Archived Postings

The deadlines have passed for the following listings, or they are notices of new issues of life writing journals. We provide this information here for points of reference for scholars interested in trends in the field.

 *

Call for Papers: Journal of Greek Media and Culture

Edited by Dr Olga Kourelou and Dr Lydia Papadimitriou Special Issue: ‘Greek Stardom and Celebrity: Histories and Methods’ Deadline for Abstracts: May 15, 2024 View the full call here>> https://www.intellectbooks.com/journal-of-greek-media-culture#call-for-papers Since the publication of Richard Dyer’s Stars (1979), which initiated the beginning of a scholarly enquiry into film stardom, star studies have been constantly evolving and expanding. While most early work on stardom focused on issues of representation and the ideological significance of film stars, or their role in the industrialisation of Hollywood cinema, the field has expanded across film, TV and media studies; adopting new areas of investigation and methodological approaches, including work on the nature of fame and celebrity (Holmes and Redmond 2007; Holmes and Negra 2011), empirical audience research (Herzog and Gaines 1991; Stacey 1994), acting and performance (Naremore 1988; Hollinger 2006; Baron 2018), as well as national and transnational stars and stardoms (Vincendeau 2000; Landy 2010; Meeuf and Raphael 2013; Yu and Austin 2017; Lawrence 2020). Meanwhile, Greek film studies have been experiencing an exponential growth in both the Greek- and English-language academe. However, while popular Greek cinema has been reclaimed as a serious object of academic study for some time now, the phenomenon of stardom in Greece has not enjoyed a similar academic reappraisal, despite its acknowledged centrality in Greek cinema and beyond. It is primarily in connection with Old Greek Cinema (Kourelou 2020; Karalis 2015; Potamitis 2013; Kartalou 2011; Kyriacos 2009), genre (Papadimitriou 2009, 2004; Eleftheriotis 1995) and, to a lesser extent, acting (Lykourgioti 2017; Dimitriadis 2008; Kourelou 2008) that Greek film criticism has recognised the role of stardom. Beyond these contexts, there has been a considerable lack of critical engagement with the diachronic manifestation and development not only of stardom but also of celebrity. This issue aims to lay the groundwork for a wide-ranging debate on the subject that will improve our understanding of stardom in Greece. The issue, however, does not seek to simply celebrate individual stars, unearth their biographies or elaborate on the types they embody. Rather, our concern is with exploring theoretical issues individual or groups of stars raise, the kinds of identities and meanings they personify, as well as the ways in which they negotiate the values and contradictions of their era. At the same time, we are not only interested in revealing the textual significance of stars in specific historical contexts, but also their political economy and discursive construction. Some of the lines of enquiry we would particularly like to pursue revolve around the following questions: how has stardom evolved historically in Greece? Does cinema still provide the ultimate confirmation of stardom, as Christine Gledhill (1991) claimed in relation to Hollywood stars more than three decades ago? How have media technologies (from TV and VHS to social media) impacted not only the way stars emerge, but also the way their fame has been conceptualised and their fans engage with them? How can we understand Greek stardom in nationally and culturally specific terms as well as through the way it intersects with other – dominant or peripheral – transnational contexts? What ideas about personhood do stars articulate, how do these change over time and how do they help audiences make sense of themselves and the (Greek) world? In order to reveal the multitude of stardoms in Greek film, TV and media, we invite (but do not limit) proposals on the following topics:
  • Histories of stardom and celebrity
  • Stars and genre
  • Stars and film style
  • Stars, gender and sexuality
  • Stars, ethnicity and race
  • Stars and the nation
  • Star labour
  • Ageing
  • Acting and performance
  • The relationship between studios and stars, auteurs and stars
  • The interconnectivity between theatrical, film and/or TV stardom
  • Non-film stardom
  • Cult stardom
  • Reception and spectatorship: stardom and film criticism, the role of the audience (and different types of audiences) and how they make use of star images
Please send a title, 300 word abstract and a short biography to Dr Olga Kourelou (kourelou.o@unic.ac.cy) and Dr Lydia Papadimitriou (L.Papadimitriou@ljmu.ac.uk) by 15 May 2024. The final articles should be around 6000-8000 words, and submitted to the editors by 1 November 2024. * CFP–Witnessing the War in Ukraine: Testimony in the Pursuit of Justice Summer Institute

August 27-30, 2024 Wroclaw, Poland Deadline for Submissions: May 15, 2024

As an urgent response to the Russian military aggression against sovereign Ukraine, several partner institutions launched the Summer Institute Witnessing the War in Ukraine in July 2022 and then hosted the Second Institute in June 2023. Over the two years, the circumstances of the war led to the rapid growth of grassroot activism and formation of new research communities both in Ukraine and beyond. As academic researchers, we consider it as our professional and ethical obligation to continue the initiative we introduced two years ago to further disseminate our academic expertise in oral history, ethnography, memory studies, interview research and research of witness literature, as well as to share this knowledge with a broad and evolving community of practitioners working in various local settings. The third Summer Institute in 2024 will focus on testimony research in the pursuit of justice, with an ambition to chart novel disciplinary approaches for oral history, memory studies and anthropology, while affording victims of the war a space of trust, empowerment and dignity. We invite the prospective WWSI 2024 participants to bring to the limelight, contextualize and interrogate injustice as it has been witnessed, observed and experienced, from a variety of conceptual and disciplinary perspectives, across diverse ethnic, religious, and cultural groups of Ukraine. Testimonies provided by eyewitnesses play a pivotal role in uncovering crimes, establishing culpability of war criminals, and securing redress for victims. The first-hand testimonies serve not only as crucial components in legal proceedings but also as a solid basis for upholding human rights and international law during armed conflicts. Moreover, such juridical work with witnesses lays the groundwork for restoring trust in the legal system and fostering peace in post-conflict societies. The concept of genocide is of special interest within the framework of WWSI 2024. Since 2014 the rhetoric of genocide has been tested to provide a juridical qualification of the crimes of the Russian Federation committed in Ukraine. We will discuss existing scholarly approaches and gauge the possibility of qualifying assaults against one’s life, one’s group identity, one’s cultural heritage and one’s natural habitat as crimes of genocide in a comparative perspective. Another focus of WWSI 2024 is proposed to be on experiences of occupation and pursuit of justice in the formerly occupied territories. Among the confirmed invited speakers are: Oksana Dovgopolova, Odessa I.I. Mechnikov National University Gabriele Rosenthal, University of Göttingen Kristina Hook, Kennesaw State University’s School of Conflict Management, Peacebuilding, and Development Dirk Moses,  City College of New York Hasan Hasanović, Srebrenica-Potočari Memorial Centre Claudia Seymour, Geneva Graduate Institute Yevheniia Podobna, Journalist & documentarian Nataliya Zubar, Maidan Monitoring Information Centre Józef Markiewicz, POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews What to expect Over the course of four days, the institute will offer a series of presentations, workshops, and mentorship opportunities examining current trends in scholarly and creative reflections on witnessing the war in Ukraine. Invited speakers and faculty will lead such discussions and invited participants will be offered opportunities to discuss their work with other members of the Institute. Testimonials to the work of the previous Summer Institute can be found here. The Summer Institute will be held in person in Wrocław, Poland. The working language of the Institute is English. The registration fee for the Summer Institute is 200 EURO. In support of accepted participants residing in Ukraine, the travel grant (covering travel, accommodation and registration fee) will be announced.

To participate in the Institute, apply here.

Your application should include a personal statement in English explaining how this Summer Institute will benefit your scholarly and/or creative work and ongoing or planned projects, a brief bio, and contact information. Important Deadlines and Dates: Application Deadline — 15 May, 2024 Notifications of Acceptance — 1 June, 2024 Summer Institute — 27-30 August, 2024 Organizers Lund University, Sweden Huculak Chair in Ukrainian Culture and Ethnography, University of Alberta, Canada Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, Canada Ukrainian Oral History Association, Ukraine Polish Oral History Association, Poland Dobra Wola Foundation, Poland Centrum Historii Zajezdnia Ukrainian-German Historical Commission Organizing Committee
  • Natalia Khanenko-Friesen — Oral historian and cultural anthropologist, Director of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies and Huculak Chair in Ukrainian Culture and Ethnography, both at University of Alberta; Co-Head of Ukrainian Oral History Association.
  • Eleonora Narvselius — Anthropologist from Lund University, currently leading the research project Ukrainians in Poland: Making Home in Times of Peace and War, in collaboration with Wrocław University.
  • Gelinada Grinchenko — Oral historian, Philipp Schwartz Fellow at the University of Wuppertal (Germany); Co-Head of Ukrainian Oral History Association.
  • Alina Doboszewska — Researcher at the Institute of Sociology of Jagiellonian University, NGO activist, founder and president of the Dobra Wola Foundation in Krakow.
https://networks.h-net.org/group/announcements/20030136/cfp-witnessing-war-ukraine-testimony-pursuit-justice-summer-institute *

CFP: Articles About Mental Illnesses in Reality Television for Book Project

deadline for submissions:  May 15, 2024 The pandemic brought a lot of changes to the structure of American society. COVID-19 was a disabling pandemic, leaving many people with severe health issues that they didn’t have pre-pandemic and which now affect their daily life. And when it comes to mental illness, the pandemic threw some of us into the realization that loneliness, depression, anxiety, etc. are more prevalent than we thought. This issue was so prominent in the minds of health officials, that the Surgeon General released a report on this new loneliness epidemic. Reality television has not typically been a place for nuanced discussions about anything, but the representation we’ve seen has improved a lot in the past decade, from a “finalist” talking about his depression on The Bachelorette to differently abled contestants on a variety of shows. And, it’s worth noting, that with the popularity and large audience of the genre, sometimes these shows can be the first time someone sees themselves represented or learns about a different type of person. I am seeking abstracts for potential articles for a book project that will be themed around representations of mental illnesses/disorders/disabilities in reality television. Some potential topics are listed below to help spur ideas! Please submit a 300 word abstract and 100 word bio by May 15, 2024 to acabral@sfsu.edu. Once abstracts have been received, a full proposal will be submitted to the interested publisher (McFarland & Company) by June 15, 2024 and if accepted, essays/papers will be due by the end of August 2024. Possible areas for discussion include:
  • How men with disabilities are depicted versus women with disabilities
  • Desirability politics in relation to dating shows and the typical uplifting of one specific body type (white, straight, skinny, able bodied).
  • Less sanitized depictions of mental illness, such a portrayals of what could probably be labeled Obsessive Compulsive Disorder on shows like My Strange Addiction
  • Shows that focus on a specific disorder, like The OCD project
  • How reality television portrayals of mental illness fit into the larger conversation about mental health, especially post-COVID and acknowledging the push by many for society to be more accepting
  • How representation of mental illnesses on reality television shows and how that may affect public perception
  • Mental illness “influencers” and/or how reality television contestants have used a newfound platform to discuss their mental health
  • How appearing on reality television can cause or worsen mental illness, such as on camera emotional breakdowns on Love Is Blind
  • How certain shows, especially marriage oriented ones like The Bachelor, force contestants to reveal their trauma (notably a contestant on Tayshia’s season of The Bachelorette told her about his suicide attempt)
Special issue editor: Angelica Cabral, Women and Gender Studies MA student at San Francisco State University. Editor Bio: Angelica Cabral is in her first year of the Women and Gender Studies Master’s program at San Francisco State University, with a focus on studying internet culture and social media as they intersect with gender and sexuality. Alongside being a student, she is the Development and Communications Manager for a youth focused nonprofit. In February she presented at the 2024 Southwest Popular/American Culture Association. Her paper was titled “Hot Girls Have IBS: An analysis of the use of meme culture to cope with an illness primarily affecting women.” Her writing has appeared in Mother Jones, Slate, The Objective, and more. * Call for Papers Women’s Autobiographical Filmmaking  Special issue of Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, Summer 2026 Deadline for Abstracts: May 15, 2024 Guest editors: Dr Felicia Chan (University of Manchester) and Dr Monika Kukolova (University of Salford) Autobiographical filmmaking refers to films created by filmmakers that tell stories about their lives, experiences and memories. These may be truthful or partially fictionalised, remembered clearly or misremembered, or a combination of these, usually in ways that also explore how film as a medium itself can do this — a form of practice-as-research, if you like. We are interested in exploring with potential contributors whether there might be a gendered nature to this mode of filmmaking / life-remembering / self-narrating? Do filmmakers who identify as women tell different stories about themselves and their lives from those who identify as men, or do they do so in a different way? How do women filmmakers navigate their simultaneous objecthood and subjecthood in the eye of the camera (Everett, 2007)? Much of the canon in film studies is constituted by works of male auteurs, all in one form or another said to be exploring their lives, their pasts and their selves on screen: think of figures like Federico Fellini, Woody Allen, François Truffaut, Shane Meadows, the list goes on. This structural domination is being continually challenged (Gledhill and Knight, 2015) and moves to rehistoricise women’s filmmaking have seen increased attention on figures from Agnès Varda through to Greta Gerwig though much more remains to be done on women filmmakers in the global majority. There has been a longer history of scholarship on women’s literary life-writing (Smith and Watson, 1998; Neuman, 2016; Brodzki and Schenck, 2019) but less so on women’s life-writing on/through film as a mode of self-narration. How have women filmmakers had to navigate the industrial structures of filmmaking with all its gatekeeping mechanisms, including access to capital? To what extent are these gatekeeping mechanisms disproportionately discriminatory towards women? We are inviting proposals to explore any area of the subject, although we are especially keen to receive proposals from scholars studying the ways women in the global majority use cinema to write themselves and their memories into post/colonial histories. We would also like to invite proposals on alternative publication formats such as the video essay, and shorter provocations, interviews or reports. Possible topics include (but are not limited to):
  • Filmmaker case studies
  • Close readings of individual films
  • Industry analysis
  • Autobiographical film as method
  • Challenges to theoretical orthodoxies, e.g. auteur theory, canon-making, etc.
  • Decolonial approaches to gender studies and women’s filmmaking
Full-length articles: 5,500-7,000 words, including notes but excluding references Video essay: Approx. 3-15 mins, plus accompanying text 500-1000 words Short reports, provocations, reviews, interviews, reflections: 1,500-2,500 words Full-length articles and video essays will be subject to full peer review. Guidelines here: https://www.alphavillejournal.com/Guidelines.html Publication Timeline 15 May 2024, abstract due 31 May 2024, notification of editors’ decision 15 January 2025, full video essay / manuscript due Publication: Summer 2026 If you are interested in contributing to this issue, please send a 300-word abstract along with a brief biography, in the same file, to Dr Monika Kukolova (M.Kukolova@salford.ac.uk) Feel free to contact us with any questions. Alphaville is a diamond open-access journal, and it requests no fee from authors or readers. Visit us at https://www.alphavillejournal.com Contact Information Dr Felicia Chan, University of Manchester, UK: Felicia.Chan@manchester.ac.uk Dr Monika Kukolova, University of Salford, UK: M.Kukolova@salford.ac.uk Contact Email Felicia.Chan@manchester.ac.uk URL https://www.alphavillejournal.com * Call-for-Papers Cultural Depictions of the Stepmother: Literature, Stage, and Screen. An Edited Collection Deadline for Abstract Submissions–30 April, 2024 This call is for abstracts for a scholarly, international edited collection entitled, Cultural Depictions of the Stepmother: Literature, Stage, and Screen. Currently I am seeking a number of academics and professionals in the field who might like to send me an abstract for consideration for inclusion in the book. Deadline for abstract submissions:  30 April, 2024 The aim of this scholarly edited collection is to reveal how, in any society, the personal expectations and actual experiences of the stepmother may differ from the societal and cultural expectations and realities of the role. The further aim is to show how the stepmother is perceived in the popular views of a particular society, as demonstrated in the literature, stage, screen, and pop culture narratives, of that society. To whatever degree, every culture in the world is different to all others. Yet, in any culture, religious and cultural beliefs are inseparable, intrinsic one to the other, and are important to the traditions, customs, practices and laws of any particular culture or society. One figure that remains consistent in almost every culture, and that attracts the attention, is the stepmother. Regardless of whether a culture is mainly monogamous or polygamous, the stepmother is one of the female figures that are central to the family, the community and hence the society and the culture. Various sources define the stepmother as: a woman who is married to one’s father after the divorce or separation of one’s parents or the death of one’s natural mother; a non-biological female parent who is married to a child’s biological male parent. An added complexity exists: statistics indicate that globally, there has been an increase of children born outside of marriage and who are raised by their cohabiting or non-cohabiting parents. Thus, a stepmother can be a woman who either marries or is the female partner of a man who has biological children resulting from a former marriage, or a previous union with some other woman.  A woman may also become a stepmother by default as in the case of, say, raising the children of a deceased (or otherwise absent) relative, or an orphan or an abandoned child as if her own offspring. Thus, given that cultural and religious, and social traditions, and laws vary widely across the globe, a woman may become the stepmother either by fact or by custom, or by religious or civil law, or by de facto relationship, or by guardianship. In most though not necessarily all cultures, and according to the religious and cultural beliefs and laws of a culture, as well as the civil laws of that country, a man who has been but is no longer married may remarry; and in some other cultures also, a man who is currently married may marry or take a second wife who may be expected to act as stepmother to his biological children by another previous marriage or union that has ended, or by agreement between the child’s/children’s biological parents. It is generally understood that whether she is welcomed by her new family or not, a man’s first wife or female partner brings with her some baggage into the life of the man she either weds or cohabits or has a relationship with, and hence into the family into which she marries or enters in some way.  Perhaps this may be more so in the case of the stepmother—a second (or further) wife or female partner of a man who already has a biological child/or children from a former relationship. Sometimes, too, a woman who becomes a stepmother will bring her own biological offspring into the union. It is well documented that parenting can be a difficult task at times. For a stepmother, the challenges, problems, and the difficulties in raising some other woman’s biological children may differ to those experienced by the biological mother. Questions arise: within any culture, what are the implications for a woman who weds or become the female partner of a widower or a divorced or separated man who is actively involved with, or is responsible for, his biological child/children from a previous union? Likewise, what are the implications for a stepmother in a) a polygamous arrangement, and b) for a stepmother in a monogamous relationship? Some suggestions for potential contributors to consider, and that could be addressed, may include but not limited to, are:
    • What are the cultural and social duties and expectations of the stepmother; and what are her personal realities and expectations, as depicted in the popular culture of a particular culture/society? Is it possible to detect differences or sameness between the fictionalized portrayals and the realities and social dictates of that culture?
    • How do class, ethnicity, culture, race, gender, and possibly history, shape depictions of the stepmother, as indicated in the popular screen, stage, and literary productions of any one particular culture?
    • What is the range of ways in which the stepmother is represented in the popular/social culture of the various societies?
    • Are there any powerful cultural or socially historical antecedents for the representations of the stepmother in popular/social culture, as screen, stage, and literary productions?
    • What are the creators’ and/or the producers’ intentions behind their portrayals of the stepmother; what are their messages for their audiences?
    • How would we establish the underlying cultural, historical, or production motivations for particular depictions of the stepmother?
How often, if at all, are these representations told from the point-of-view of the stepmother herself? Alternatively, how often, if at all, are these representations told from the point-of-view of the stepchild/stepchildren, or the husband or partner of that woman herself?
    • Is there a difference between the ways in which the stepmother is depicted in film for small and large screen, and between those mediums to the depictions in drama, and to literature? Or in these depictions, is there a reasonably broad consensus between these genres?
This collection of scholarly essays will make an intervention in the field: it will be the first of its kind to make a comprehensive study of what being a stepmother means to and for the woman, to the family, the community, the culture, and the society to which she belongs. This to investigate whether or not there are characteristic features of the stepmother between cultures that may have either some similarity, or that are totally dissimilar; explore the popular beliefs and popular culture in relation to stepmother-hood in any one or more society/ies; document and record how various eastern and western societies perceive and represent the socially and culturally important figure of the stepmother in screen, stage, and literary works, including folk tales and pop culture narratives; indicate if there is agreement or difference between the various cultures on how the figure of the stepmother is depicted in popular culture to the viewing/reading audiences; establish a new and dynamic area of theoretical research crossing family studies, women’s studies, cultural studies, social history, gender studies, social studies, and the humanities in general; point the way to possible future cross-disciplinary work through examining various peoples and societies by way of cultural depictions of the stepmother; and permit scholarly consideration of the extent to which the creators and producers of narratives about the stepmother place this figure on the perimeter of society or at its center. Submission instructions: At this initial stage, in lieu of “chapters,” this proposed work, Cultural Depictions of the Stepmother, calls for extended abstracts for consideration for inclusion in the book.
    1. The extended abstracts must be more than 1,500 words and less than 2,000 words.
Full-length chapters of not less than, say, 7,000 words, and no more than 8,500 words each (including notes but excluding references lists, title of work, and key words), will be solicited from these abstracts.
    1. Please keep in mind that your essay-chapter will be written from your extended abstract. Your abstract will carry the same title as your essay-chapter.
    1. To be considered, an abstract must be written in English, and submitted as a Word document.
    1. When writing your abstract use Times New Roman point 12, and 1.15 spacing.
    1. At the beginning of your extended abstract, immediately after the title of your work and your name, add 5 to 8 keywords that best relate to your work.
    1. Use the Chicago Manual of Style 16th Edition.
    1. Since this work is intended for Lexington Books, USA, please use American (US) spelling not English (UK) spelling, and not Australian English spelling;
    1. Use the Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary;
    1. For this project it is most important to use an impersonal academic voice when writing your abstract, and possibly your chapter later. That is, do not use the teacherly voice (“as we will see…”; “here we see…”; “as it will become clear”; …); and do not use 1st person or the personal voice (I; We will find; We find; You; Us; …)
    1. Use endnotes not footnotes, use counting numbers not Roman numerals, and keep the endnotes to a bare minimum, working the information into the text where possible;
    1. Do cite all your work in your extended abstract as you would in a full chapter:
a) In the body of the abstract, add parenthetical in-text citations (family name of author and year, and page number/s) (e.g. Smith 2019, 230); b) And fully reference all in-text citations in detail and in alphabetical order, in the References list at the end of your abstract;
    1. Please send your completed abstract as a Word document attached to an email, by the date given in this call for papers;
    1. To this same email please also attach, as separate Word documents, the following:
    • Your covering letter, giving your academic title/s, affiliation, your position, and your home and telephone numbers, your home address, and your email contact details;
    • A short bio of no more than 250 words;
    • Your C.V., including a full list of your publications and giving the publishing details and dates, and including those in press.
Editor: Dr Jo Parnell, PhD| Researcher, and Honorary Lecturer, School of Humanities and Social Science, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Australia. Papers should be forwarded to: Jo.Parnell@newcastle.edu.au  or annette.parnell@newcastle.edu.au or joandbobparnell@bigpond.com  * Call for Presentations Auto / Bio / Fictional Graphic Narratives: A Online Symposium Thursday 27 June 2024 Deadline for Submissions: April 19, 2024 Life-writing in its many forms, including autofiction and biofiction, has grown exponentially in recent decades. Comics and graphic narratives have similarly become widespread and respected literary genres that feature many biographical, autobiographical, autofictional or biofictional texts. Completing the 2023-24 Auto / Bio / Fiction series at the Goldsmiths’ Centre for Comparative Literature, this online symposium will reflect on the combination of these two forms in order to explore how auto / bio / fictional graphic narratives and comics mobilise – and may put in tension – the visual and the verbal, the individual and the collective, the historical and the fictional, the documentary and the imagined, as well as popular culture and ‘serious’ literary fiction in constructing historical lives with varying degrees of fictionality and purposes. We invite proposals for varied forms of contributions, which can include:
    • –  20-minute formal papers
    • –  10-minute flash contributions
    • –  digital posters (i.e., as in a conference poster session: the poster can be shown
through screen share, with a 5-6 minute explanation)
    • –  roundtable proposals (3-4 contributions in which each speaker presents their
position in no more than 5 minutes, followed by a discussion / conversation)
    • –  led practical exercises or workshops
    • –  presentation of work in progress by practitioners
    • –  other formats not listed above
Topics may address (but are not limited to):
    • –  the representation and development of auto/biographical and auto/biofictional
identity
    • –  the representation of self and other
    • –  constructions and explorations of gender, sexual orientation, religion, race,
ethnicity…
    • –  experiences of displacement, migration, illness, war
    • –  the relationships or tensions between the factual and the fictional, the documentary
and the imagined, the visual and the verbal in the representation of the life
    • –  the literariness of graphic life narratives
    • –  wordless narratives (e.g. George A. Walker’s The Life and Times of Conrad Black: AWordless Biography)
    • –  chronotopes of life-writing; the temporal and spatial dimensions of life narratives
    • –  the relationship between author/narrator/illustrator and the character whose life is re-told –  how forms of reading experience, in hard copy or digital formats, affect the sense of the life conveyed in the narrative
    • –  tone in graphic life narratives: the dramatic, traumatic, melodramatic; the comedic, the ironic, the satirical…
    • –  effects and function of humour, pathos, surprise…
    • –  translations of graphic life narratives
    • –  adaptation of traditional written biographies into graphic narratives
    • –  historical and geographical developments of the genre
Comparisons across languages, cultures and traditions are most welcome. Proposals are welcome from academics and practitioners at any stage of their career. Please send your proposals by 19 April 2024 to: CCL@gold.ac.uk (please include the words “Auto-Bio-Fictional Graphic Narratives” in the subject line). Proposals should include: 1) a summary of up to 250 words of the proposed contribution, and 3-5 keywords; 2) the type of contribution proposed (formal paper, digital poster, etc.: see the list above); 3) a short biography of up to 150 words. For more information visit: https://sites.gold.ac.uk/comparative-literature/auto-bio- fictional-graphic-narratives-a-symposium/. * PhD Studentship in UK – Oral History and Provenance (4/8/2024) British Library and University College London Colleagues from the Oral History Team at the British Library write: We are excited to announce the details of a collaborative AHRC-funded PhD entitled ‘Exploring the Importance of Provenance in Oral History Collections’. The project will be jointly supervised by the British Library Oral History team and the Department of Information Studies at UCL. Applications are now open and close on the 8th April 2024. Please share with your networks! More information below, full details including application instructions is available on the UCL website. Please read the application information carefully – do not use the ‘apply now’ button on the listing. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/work-at-ucl/search-ucl-jobs/details?nPostingId=9173&nPostingTargetId=21440&id=Q1KFK026203F3VBQBLO8M8M07&LG=UK&languageSelect=UK&mask=ext University College London (UCL) and the British Library are pleased to announce the availability of a fully funded Collaborative Doctoral Studentship from 1 October 2024 under the AHRC Collaborative Doctoral Partnership Scheme. This research will examine the importance of documenting provenance for archived oral history collections by exploring the value of records of provenance to archivists and oral history researchers, and how making such records available to researchers could enhance understanding of oral history interviews and the historiography of the discipline. This project will be jointly supervised by Dr Andrew Flinn (Reader in Archive Studies and Oral History) and Dr Hannah Smyth (Lecturer in Archives and Records Management) in the Department of Information Studies at UCL (UCL:DIS) and by Dr Madeline White (Curator Oral History) and Mary Stewart (Lead Curator Oral History) at the British Library. The student will spend time with both UCL and the British Library and will become part of the wider cohort of AHRC CDP funded PhD students across the UK. UCL and the British Library are keen to encourage applications from a wide range of students and particularly welcome those currently underrepresented in doctoral student cohorts. * Call for Papers Stardom & Fandom Southwest Popular / American Culture Association (SWPACA) 2024 SWPACA Summer Salon June 20-22, 2024 Virtual Conference Submissions open on March 25, 2024 Proposal submission deadline: April 15, 2024 Proposals for papers are now being accepted for the SWPACA Summer Salon. SWPACA offers nearly 70 subject areas in a variety of categories encompassing the following: Film, Television, Music, & Visual Media; Historic & Contemporary Cultures; Identities & Cultures; Language & Literature; Science Fiction & Fantasy; and Pedagogy & Popular Culture. For a full list of subject areas, area descriptions, and Area Chairs, please visit https://southwestpca.org/conference/call-for-papers/ The Area Chair for Stardom and Fandom invites paper or panel proposals on any aspect of stardom or fandom. The list of ideas below is limited, so if you have an idea that is not listed, please suggest the new topic. We are an interdisciplinary area and encourage submissions from multiple perspectives and disciplines. Topics might include:
    • Studies of individual celebrities and their fans
    • Studies focused on specific fandoms
    • The reciprocal relationship between stars and fans
    • Impact of celebrity and fame on identity construction, reconstruction and sense of self
    • Reality television, TikTok, YouTube and the changing definition of ‘stardom’
    • The impact of social media on celebrity/fan interaction
    • Celebrity/fame addiction as cultural change
    • The intersection of stars and fans in virtual and physical spaces
    • Celebrity and the construction of persona
    • Pedagogical approaches to teaching stardom and fandom
    • Anti-fans and ‘haters’
    • Fan shame, wank, purity culture and fandom policing
    • Gendered constructions of stars and fans
    • Shipping, anti-shipping and representation
    • Historical studies of fandom and fan/celebrity interaction
All proposals must be submitted through the conference’s database at https://register.southwestpca.org/southwestpca For details on using the submission database and on the application process in general, please see the Proposal Submission FAQs and Tips page at https://southwestpca.org/conference/faqs-and-tips/ Registration information for the conference will be available at https://southwestpca.org/conference/conference-registration-information/ Individual proposals for 15-minute papers must include an abstract of approximately 200-500 words. Only one proposal per person, please; no roundtables. If you have any questions about the Stardom and Fandom area, please contact its Area Chair, Dr. Lynn Zubernis, Professor, West Chester University, lzubernis@wcupa.edu. If you have general questions about the conference, please contact us at support@southwestpca.org, and a member of the executive team will get back to you. We look forward to receiving your submissions! * Call for Papers for a Special Issue (2025) Letters in/as Pedagogy Journal of Epistolary Studies Deadline for Submissions: April 15, 2024 Letters and letter writing have captivated scholars across diverse fields, including life writing, cultural studies, history, and literary studies. In the digital age, there is a renewed interest in studying letters within the ever-evolving landscape of digital communication technologies and platforms. Digital tools have revolutionized the examination of historical letters, enabling the archiving, analysis, and presentation of these artefacts. Interpersonal communication has undergone a transformation with the prevalence of email and social media. Additionally, the emergence of large language models like ChatGPT has added new dimensions to the discourse on interpersonal communication, as the chatbots promise seamless and rapid generation of personalized letters. The transformative impact of the Covid-19 pandemic has underscored the relevance of letters and letter writing in education. As teachers and students abruptly transitioned to online learning during the pandemic, some educators explored the potential of letters as a means to establish meaningful connections during a period of social distancing and isolation. Already before the pandemic letters were employed as interventions in individual classes. For instance, teachers asked students to write letters to future students of the same course, encouraging the students to share their experiences and advice (inspired by James M. Lang Small Teaching). Letters have also served as the foundation for entire courses, as exemplified by Toni Bower’s “Epistolary Fiction before 1800” course, where students were introduced to contemporary epistolary novels that use multimodality or digital communication technologies to better appreciate the form’s “long and vibrant history.” Moreover, letters have been used to communicate educational theory, as seen in Paulo Freire’s Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those who Dare Teach (2005). Letter writing can offer a unique possibility to create and explore relationships in writing where shared knowing is made possible despite geographical, temporal, cultural and other distances between the addresser and the addressee.  As the editors of We Saved the Best for You: Letters of Hope, Imagination and Wisdom for 21st Century Educators (2013) note, epistolary genre has the potential to “illuminate experiential connections and continuity across space and time” (xiv). This call for papers invites scholars to contribute their insights, research findings, and perspectives on the multifaceted relationship between letters, real-life and fictional, and pedagogy. Letters, with their malleable form, can serve a multitude of purposes. We invite contributions that explore the diverse ways in which letters may be used in and as pedagogical practices: the cultural and societal significance of letters as means of imparting knowledge and values; historical and contemporary examples of letters used for didactic purposes; and the evolution of letter writing manuals and their future in the digital age. We encourage discussions on how letters can be used to create a supportive and empathetic learning environment, connect students across geographical, temporal, and cultural boundaries, and how educators use letter writing as reflective practice. To explores these questions, we invite contributions on a range of topics, including but not limited to:
    • Didactic purpose/ potential of letters
    • Letter writing manuals: past, present, and future
    • Letter writing as pedagogy of care
    • Public pedagogy through letters
    • Letters and global education
    • Autoethnographic letter writing
    • Letters in language learning
    • Electronic correspondence
    • Multimodal epistolarity
Sindija Franzetti has proposed this special issue on “Letters in/as Pedagogy” and will serve as guest editor. If you are interested in having a peer-reviewed article published in this special issue of the Journal of Epistolary Studies, please submit an abstract of no more than 300 words, the article title, 3-5 key words, a short biographical note, and your email address to lettersinpedagogy@gmail.com no later than April 15, 2024. You will be notified by May 1, 2024, whether your proposed paper has been accepted. The final date for full article submission is pending. The aim is to publish the issue in 2025. *

CFP Translation, Transposition, and Travel in the Global Nineteenth Century

16-19 January 2025 Society for Global Nineteenth-Century Studies World Congress Global Studies Center, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Kuwait deadline for submissions: March 25, 2024 Keynote speakers: Regenia Gagnier, University of Exeter Marwan Kraidy, Northwestern University QatarArthur Asseraf, University of Cambridge Sarga Moussa, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle The period between 1750 and 1914 was marked by change, motion, and mobility. Advances in transport and the expansion of imperial powers brought together an array of peoples and facilitated contact between different cultures. These cultural encounters spurred the discovery of new information and of efforts to transmit, mask, or contain it. Translation played a seminal role in informing the public about the changing world and its interconnections. Imaginative writings and scientific concepts were subject to transposition and adaptation across languages and cultures. Indeed, global modernizing processes were due, to some extent, to travel, translation, and transposition. For its second world congress to be held in Kuwait from 16 to 19 January 2025, the Society for Global Nineteenth-Century Studies is pleased to invite proposals on the theme of “Translation, Transposition, and Travel in the Global Nineteenth Century.” We welcome proposals for papers and panels that explore transits between places, languages, cultures, and ideas. Topics may include (but are not limited to): ·       Travel and adventure ·       Initiatic journeys ·       Travel narratives and nautical fiction ·       Pilgrimage ·       Slave trade and the forced movement of peoples ·       Circulations, transfers, and migrations ·       Nomadism ·       Problems in translation (e.g., political humour, the absurd, nonsense, etc.) ·       Exile and displacement ·       Explorers and expeditions ·       Science fiction ·       Intermedial translation ·       Steamers and trains ·       Colonization ·       Translation and life writing ·       Transfer of knowledge ·       Cultural transposition ·       Adaptation across cultures ·       Transmediality and transnationalism ·       Transfer and transmission ·       Texts and their contexts ·       Transposition in music ·       Transposition and translation ·       Travel maps and cartographies of navigation ·       Books as travelling objects ·       Photography, painting, and travel ·       Tourism and visual culture ·       Nomadic narratives ·       Translation and the discovery of new cultures ·       The re/discovery of ancient civilizations/Egyptomania ·       Translation and the discovery of European modernity In addition to paper and panel proposals related to the conference theme, we also welcome proposals for prearranged special panels on topics in global nineteenth-century studies more broadly: Methodology OR Pedagogy Roundtables: Sessions focused on methodological approaches to studying and practical strategies for teaching the nineteenth century in a global context. Big Ideas: Sessions focused on a single thought-provoking topic related to the global nineteenth century. The format may vary from standard panels (three presenters and a moderator) to lightning roundtables (five to eight presenters delivering short, provocative position papers) to others that may be proposed. Proposals (extended deadline of 25 March) Individual paper proposals should consist of an abstract (200-250 words), brief biography (80- 100 words), and full contact information in a single pdf document or Word file. Panel proposals should include abstracts for 3-4 papers, a brief rationale that connects the papers (100-200 words), and biographies of each participant (80-100 words) in a single pdf or Word file. All proposals should include 3 to 5 keywords.  Successful panel proposals will include participants from more than one institution, and, ideally, represent a mix of disciplines/fields and career stages. Panel proposals should also indicate the category for evaluation: general conference program or special session; Methodology or Pedagogy Roundtable; or Big Ideas. Although the working language of the conference is English, a limited number of slots will be available for presentations in Arabic. Location and requirements The congress will be held at the Global Studies Center, Gulf University for Science and Technology, in Kuwait. Modern, prosperous, and safe, Kuwait boasts a unique cultural mix, a longstanding tradition of the theatrical arts, diverse cuisine, and some of the best beaches in the region. Presenters, panel chairs, and workshop participants must be current members of the Society for Global Nineteenth-Century Studies at the time of the World Congress. For more information on membership, visit www.global19c.com. Proposals and questions should be directed to the Program Committee: societygncs@gmail.com. Please visit the 2025 Congress website for the most up-to-date information: https://www.sgncscongress.com. *

Un-Bioed: Radically Reimagining Black Women’s Lives (3/28-29/2024)

University of Kentucky USA This 2-day conference is an opportunity to celebrate and expand the community of Black women’s life writers. Black women’s life writing has been among the fastest-growing literary subgenres in the past several years. Long before this explosion of memoirs and biographies on and by Black women, scholars such as Nell Painter, Farah Jasmine Griffin, and Barbara Ransby led the way in the 1990s and early 2000s, writing path-breaking biographies and establishing the methodologies that other scholars would build upon. And while Black women’s biography has remained a vital form of writing and research for academics at various career stages, only a few have managed to secure contracts with commercial publishers and garner wider audience reach. Join us on Thursday, March 28, 2024, from 4 – 6 pm at the William T. Young Library Auditorium for an inspiring keynote from Salamishah Tillet (Baruch College), followed by a reception at the Alumni Gallery. The next day Friday, March 29, 2024, join us at the Alumni Gallery from 9 am – 3 pm for a day of panels and workshops dedicated to community, craft, and marketing. The schedule of events with speakers can be found here. Register here for free! Please share widely—we look forward to seeing you in March! https://www.eventbrite.com/e/un-bioed-radically-reimagining-black-womens-lives-tickets-761393888617?utm-campaign=social&utm-content=attendeeshare&utm-medium=discovery&utm-term=listing&utm-source=cp&aff=ebdsshcopyurl Shanna G. Benjamin, Ph.D. Professor of African American Studies, Wake Forest she/her My book, Half in Shadow, is available for purchase! Read my interview with the AAIHS to learn more about the book and why I wrote it. Visit my Linktree for videos of past events and notice of upcoming talks. Here’s how you pronounce my name. *

2024 Conference: Call for Papers

Defining the Letter– The Epistolary Research Network (TERN) will hold its fifth conference 4-5 October 2024. Deadline for Abstracts: March 29
    1. On February 28, 1943, someone found scraps of paper in their garden, thrown from the window of a train going to Auschwitz-Birkenau. This person delivered these scribbled messages from resistance fighter Simone Alizon to her father. [Arch. Nat. 72A fonds Alizon.]
    1. James Lee Byars wrote more than 100 letters, using a variety of materials, forms, and ideas, to artist Joseph Beuys over a period of 16 years. Received but never replied to, they explore the day-to-day of his artistic practice.
Whether composed under difficult circumstances or elaborated as part of a creative experiment, these examples share one feature. They raise the question: What is or should be considered a letter? Must it be written on socially recognized media, be it papyrus sheets, potsherds, or vellum, to qualify? Must it have a date, greetings, closing, and include epistolary conventions, like asking after someone’s health? Must it have a specific addressee, or be delivered via a postal institution? TERN2024 will serve as a forum to discuss and elaborate a definition of ‘letter.’ Is one definition even possible for this form of communication that has been adapted in many ways by many people over millennia and across the globe? We are interested in bringing together examples that challenge in some way current thinking or current definitions of ‘letter.’ Topics might include:
    • epistolary communications on atypical materials (pages torn from books, fabric, handmade ink)
    • written under duress or difficult situations (war, exile, prison, refugee camps, censorship, travel)
    • examine conventions specific to one group of people (secret societies, coded letters, academic or philosophical letters)
    • letters written by those unfamiliar with letter conventions and formats (children, those with limited literacy, or those writing letters for the first time)
    • hybrid forms (poem letters, essay letters, petitions, literary letters, etc.)
​ Proposals (maximum 250 words) and a brief biography (CV) should be sent to ternetwork@hotmail.com. The deadline is 29 March 2023. The conference will be virtual and the language will be English. As always, we will try to accommodate all times zones. Publication of selected papers will be arranged following the conference. *
Deadline for Submissions, March 31, 2024
CFP: Oral History and Disability The Oral History Review is happy to announce a call for papers for a special issue dedicated to Oral History and Disability. It is currently slated for the Spring 2025 issue of the OHR. Oral historians often write and talk about inclusion, even radical inclusion. What does this mean in practice? What contributions have oral historians made – or can they make – to Disability Studies? What are the cultural representations of disability and how can oral historians add to a view of disability beyond the traditional, mostly medical, and socially constructed ones? What do the practices of oral historians with disabilities look or sound like? What can oral historians learn about communication from people with disabilities? And how do such themes as embodiment, trauma, and identity, topics oral historians often discuss, apply to disability? For this issue, we especially want to encourage multimedia submissions and to push thinking around new technologies for both interviewing and oral history project outcomes. This might include, for example, for the blind and seeing impaired, not only audio but perhaps screen reader (or text-toaudio) software. For people who are deaf or hearing impaired, the use of signed interviews with video online (ASL), closed captioning, and downloadable transcripts. Or for people with neurocognitive differences, intellectual disabilities, and other conditions, anything from assistive devices to language cues within an interview to the use of photos to aid in story capture. This special issue thus asks oral historians to explore:
    • Multimedia projects and the use of audio/video/photography
    • New technologies for both interviewing and oral history project outcomes
    • Access and accessibility
    • Visibility and its meanings
    • Stories before and after the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act
    • The second wave of the disability rights movement, also called Disability Justice (DJ)
    • The role of oral history in Disability Studies and history
    • How disability is framed today and at different times and places
    • Disability and advocacy, family, and religious belief
    • Stories from the field of narrative medicine, which seeks to bridge clinical practice and patients’ emotional health and well being
    • What oral historians can learn about communication from people with disabilities, and/or from artists with disabilities who address the labor of care in their work
    • How oral history can be used to investigate the structural ableism that people with disabilities confront daily (spatial equity)
    • Disability and poverty, gender, or race
    • COVID-19 stories
    • And other themes that oral historians often address – embodiment, trauma, community, labor, inclusion/exclusion, identity – as applied to disability
It is estimated that one in four people in the U.S. alone live with a disability. If you have questions, book and media review ideas, or would like to discuss your proposal in advance, please contact the OHR editor, Holly Werner-Thomas, at holly@hollythomasoralhistory.com by December 31, 2023. To submit your articles, use the OHR submission portal, https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ohr. The deadline for submissions is March 31, 2024. Contact Email holly@hollythomasoralhistory.com URLhttps://oralhistory.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/OHR-Spring-2025-Call-for-Papers.pdf *

The Expatriate Archive Centre (EAC) invites master’s students around the world to participate in the EAC Master’s Thesis Award and submit theses that contribute to the scholarship of expatriation studies.

Prize: €500 and promotion of the executive summary of the winning thesis by the EAC and partner organisations. Application deadline: 31 March 2024. Master thesis requirements: •             The thesis should relate to the EAC’s mission and objectives; •             The thesis is written in English; •             The thesis is from the 2019–20, 2020–21, 2021–22, or 2022–23 academic year; •             The thesis has been awarded a mark of 8/10 or more (or equivalent, e.g., 16/20 or more, or an ‘A’).

In 2019, we created this award to celebrate and reward talents who produce outstanding master’s theses that help to further understand the impact of expatriation on people’s lives. Five jurors evaluate the submissions. They use the following criteria: originality and innovation (20%); technical quality (30%); composition (10%); potential for contributing to the stimulation of scholarly (e.g. theoretical, methodological, etc.) perspectives regarding the award theme (20%); potential for contributing to the stimulation of practical engagement by policy, industry and/or civil society actors with the award theme (20%). More information about how to apply can be found here.

Partner organisations: Families in Global Transition, The International Metropolis Project, International Centre for Archival Research, TheHagueOnLine, ACCESS Netherlands and DutchNews.nl.

For more information about the EAC and this initiative, please visit our website or email welcome@xpatarchive.com.

Have a nice day, Kristine Director Expatriate Archive Centre Paramaribostraat 20 2585 GN  The Hague (the Netherlands) T. +31 (0)70 427 2014 F. +31 (0)70 427 2016 director@xpatarchive.com www.xpatarchive.com Follow us on: Facebook  Twitter  Instagram *

Close Encounters in War and Personal Narratives: Experience, Memory, and Storytelling Special issue of CEIWJ [Close Encounters in War Journal]

Deadline for Submissions: March 31, 2024

War has been the object of narration and storytelling since ancient times. Epics, myths, and legends transmitted the memory of heroes’ deeds, thus shaping and consolidating the cultural identities of local communities and ethnic enclaves and later nation-states and empires. Mythical storytelling evolved into historical narration as wars began to be recorded and accounted for systematically by early historians like Herodotus, Thucydides, or in Rome’s Annales. The public narration of war was an effective instrument of political and ideological cohesion as it displayed power and fuelled patriotic sentiments. However, the narration of war remained confined to the domain of public discourse despite armies consisting of individuals who contributed to the war directly and with personal sacrifice. The first personal account of war in the Western cultural tradition is Odysseus’s tale of the fall of Troy, which he shares with the Phaeaces. Thucydides referred to singular episodes involving specific individuals in his narration of the Peloponnesian Wars, though his discourse excludes any form of direct and personal narration. The first case of an extensive autobiographical war narrative is Julius Caesar’s De bello gallico. Despite being narrated in the third person, this work provides an individual-centred perspective about the military campaigns led by Caesar between 58 and 50 BC, culminating with the conquest of Gallia and Britannia. For the first time, the historian, the storyteller, and the protagonist of the tale coexist in the figure of the anonymous narrator/chronicler who accounts for Caesar’s deeds in the third person.

Personal narratives about war have seldom reached the public before the nineteenth century. This caused scholars to believe that anonymous soldiers, who constituted the core of all armies in any historical period, never wrote about their experiences. Writing, on the other hand, was a skill far from being achieved by everyone in the pre-modern era. Only a few combatants could account for their war experiences in writing, for example, through letters, diaries and memoirs, a small number of which has reached the public as books. Furthermore, while personal accounts of war mostly remained confined to military, political, and intelligence communication – and are therefore stored in archives and mostly accessible as historical sources – the first testimonies of war that became works of public interest did not appear in the form of autobiographies or memoirs. An author like Tobias Smollett transfigured his war experiences as a navy surgeon in his novel The Adventures of Roderick Random (1748). Something similar did Herman Melville in White Jacket (1850), an autobiographical work inspired by the author’s experience as a sailor on the frigate USS United States. In general, it can be stated that the Napoleonic wars (1800-1815) triggered an incredible proliferation of autobiographical personal accounts since the 1820s.[1] This is not surprising, if one thinks that modern autobiography – as a genre and as a philosophical form of reflection on the “self” – begins in the seventeenth century with Rousseau’s Confessions (1782),[2] whose “revolution” transformed the subject into a “unique and unrepeatable psychical interiority, which was accessible only through introspective writing.”[3]

If the nineteenth century was characterised by an increasing interest in war personal narratives, the phenomenon assumed a mass scale with the outbreak of the Great War, mainly for two reasons: the enormous mass of soldiers involved in the conflict on a global scale for over four years; and the diffusion of literacy among the mass of enlisted soldiers. Scholars claim that between 1914 and 1918, over 65 billion letters circulated between the frontlines and Italy, France, Germany, and Great Britain.[4] If personal narratives from the nineteenth-century wars amount to hundreds, above all distributed in Western countries, autobiographical accounts of the Great War amount to many thousands, spread all over the world. New groups of authors appear in this recent tradition, such as prisoners of war (POWs), women, and members of colonial troops. One striking phenomenon that characterised the response of some combatants to the Great War was the blooming of poetry in all countries, with remarkable achievements in the UK with the so-called “war poets” Wilfred Owen, Rupert Brooke, and Siegfried Sassoon, in Austria with Georg Trakl, and in Italy with the Futurists, Gabriele D’annunzio, and Giuseppe Ungaretti, only to mention a few examples. Moreover, the technological nature of the war caused all armies to create specialised corps such as pilots, tankers, submarine crews, drivers, and chemical companies, whose members published several personal narratives that enlightened the aspects of the “new” warfare. During and after the Second World War, further groups of witnesses appeared, such as the victims of political and racial persecution and deportation and the members of armed resistance (partisans) against the Nazi and the Fascist authorities in several European countries.

As wars became more and more global, during the twentieth century, so did the more and more established genre of war narratives, which eventually became a consistent section of contemporary literature (despite the debate that saw literary scholars question the literariness of personal narratives), or at least of the international book market. One can recall several personal narratives that have become classics of twentieth-century literature like Henri Barbusse’s Le feu (1916), Ernst Jünger’s In Stahlgewittern (1920), Thomas Edward Lawrence’s Seven Pillars of Wisdom (1926), Anne Frank’s Diary (1947), Primo Levi’s Se questo è un uomo (1958), Elie Wiesel’s La Nuit (1958), Elechi Amadi’s Sunset in Biafra (1973), Eugene Sledge’s, With the Old Breed (1981), Eric Lomax’ The Railway Man (1995), Isaac Fadoyebo’s A Stroke of Unbelievable Luck (1999), Keiko Tamura’s Michi’s Memoirs (2001), and many more worldwide.

As a genre, personal narratives have evolved over two centuries, passing from being almost exclusively memoirs written by high-ranking officers (mostly noble) to consisting of a much more multifaceted variety of expressive forms including letters, diaries, autobiographical sketches, poems, published or unpublished memoirs, oral histories and autobiographical fiction. After a long-lasting prejudice that banned personal narratives from the history of war and conflict, which was relegated to the disciplinary field of Military History, since the 1960s historians have begun to look at these narrations as valid and valuable sources of historical knowledge, thus giving impulse, after the so-called “cultural” and “narrative” turns after the 1970s, to the birth of sub-disciplines such as Micro-History, History of Mentality, Cultural History, Oral History and more recently the History of the Emotions. Working with personal narratives is a challenging scholarly enterprise due to the flickering and multifaceted nature of this kind of written expression, which is transversal to literary genres while including forms, styles, and registers typical of the spoken language. Personal narratives can hardly provide an overall comprehension and depiction of war, as they can inform about events that occurred on a smaller scale and the perception that human beings have of the war as a direct experience. Therefore, working with personal narratives often requires intellectual flexibility and the ability to blend different disciplinary approaches by borrowing diverse methodological, critical and analytical tools.

Issue n. 7 of the CEIWJ aims to investigate the theme of the close encounters in war in connection with the universe of personal narratives to study how people have accounted for their personal experience of war in ancient, pre-modern, modern and contemporary periods. To do so, we invite the submission of articles focused on the investigation of testimonies from a broad spectrum of theoretical and critical perspectives in the fields of Aesthetics, Anthropology, Classics, Comparative Literature, Cultural History, Ethics, Epistemology, Ethnology, Gender Studies, History of Art, History of Ideas, Linguistics, Memory Studies, Modern Languages, Oral History, Philosophy of Language, Psychology, Religion, Social Sciences, and Trauma Studies.

We invite, per the scientific purpose of the journal, contributions that focus on human dimensions and perspectives on this topic. We, therefore, seek articles that analyse the close encounters in war in diaries, letters, autobiographies, memoirs, autobiographical fiction, oral histories and other egodocuments such as juridical testimonies and memoirs, bulletins and reports (military, medical, technical, and so on), photographic albums, drawings and paintings. The following aspects (among others) may be considered:

  • Representation and perception of the “self” in the context of war;
  • Language, public and private (e.g. the use of dialect or foreign languages; encrypted writing; metaphors, symbols and allegories; alternative forms of communication);
  • Propaganda and ideology (e.g. political perspectives; racism; nationalism; religious fanaticism);
  • Ethical and moral aspects (e.g. personal development; self-understanding; the relation with the others; justification of violence; acceptance of suffering and death);
  • Censorship and self-censorship in personal narratives;
  • Literary aspects of personal narratives (e.g. use of literary models and styles; editorial re-elaboration of personal narratives for publication; the relationship between fiction and autobiographical writing; personal narrative and the literary canon);
  • Personal narratives as historical sources (e.g. methodological and deontological  issues; epistemological value of personal narratives; rhetoric and logic);
  • Anti-war attitudes (e.g. pacifism; criticism of violence; desertion and conscience objection; sabotage);
  • Feelings and emotions in personal narratives;
  • Personal narratives and trauma;
  • Identity and diversity (e.g. gender; ethnicity; cultural heritage);
  • Personal narratives in pop culture (e.g. film; TV; journalism; cultural heritage);
  • Personal narratives and the culture of memory (local and collective) (e.g. archives and repositories; Public History; sites of memory; public use of personal narratives through the Internet);

 CEIWJ encourages inter/multidisciplinary approaches and dialogue among different scientific fields to promote discussion and scholarly research. The blending of different approaches will be warmly welcomed. Contributions from established scholars, early-career researchers, doctoral students, witnesses of war (e.g. veterans, journalists, reporters, etc.) and practitioners who have dealt with or used personal narratives in the course of their activities will be considered. Case studies may include different historical periods and geographic areas.

The editors of the Close Encounters in War Journal invite the submission of abstracts of 250 words in English by 31 March 2024 to ceiwj@nutorevelli.org. The authors invited to submit their works will be required to send articles of 8,000-10,000 words (endnotes included, bibliographical references not included in word count), in English by 14 June 2024. All articles will undergo a process of double-blind peer review. We will notify the results of the review in September 2024. Final versions of revised articles will be submitted in November 2024. Please see the submission guidelines at: https://closeencountersinwar.org/instruction-for-authors-submissions/.

 [1]     See, for example, http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/browse?type=lcsubc&key=Napoleonic%20Wars%2C%201800%2D1815%20%2D%2D%20Personal%20narratives%2C%20French (Napoleonic wars 1800-1815), http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book//browse?type=lcsubc&key=Crimean%20War%2C%201853%2D1856%20%2D%2D%20Personal%20narratives (Crimean war 1853-1856), and https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/166546.First_hand_accounts_of_the_Napoleonic_Wars. See also the repository of personal narratives from the American Civil War of the University of Maryland at https://lib.guides.umd.edu/c.php?g=326774&p=2197450 (all websites last accessed on 11th January 2024).[2]     James Goodwin, in “Narcissus and Autobiography”, Genre, 12, 1 (1979): 69-92; Andrea Battistini, Lo specchio di Dedalo. Autobiografia e biografia, Bologna, il Mulino, 103-104.[3]     Gianluca Cinelli, Ermeneutica e scrittura autobiografica. Primo Levi, Nuto Revelli, Rosetta Loy, Mario Rigoni Stern, Milan, Unicopli, 2008, 12.[4]     Carlo Stiaccini, War Letters (Italy), in International Encyclopedia of the First World War (8 January 2017): 2. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/war_letters_italy.

Contact Information

Gianluca Cinelli giancin77@yahoo.it

Patrizia Piredda patrizia.piredda@oxfordalumni.org

Simona Tobia s.tobia@univ-pau.fr

Fabio Caffarena fabio.caffarena@unige.it

Contact Email

ceiwj@nutorevelli.org

URL

https://closeencountersinwar.org/2024/01/17/call-for-articles-for-issue-n-7-202…

*

Talking Back Interdisciplinary Conference

June 25, 2024 Nottingham, UK Deadline for Submissions: April 1, 2024
‘Moving from silence into speech is for the oppressed, the colonized, the exploited, and those who stand and struggle side by side, a gesture of defiance that heals, that makes new life, and new growth possible. It is that act of speech, of “talking back” that is no mere gesture of empty words, that is the expression of moving from object to subject, that is the liberated voice.’ bell hooks, “Talking Back.” Discourse (1986), p. 128. 
Talking Back interdisciplinary conference is an in-person conference that will be held in Nottingham, United Kingdom. It will bring together researchers, writers, poets, and activists in order to contribute to cross-cultural dialogue, collaborative thinking, and ongoing discussions on resistance and representation. Reflecting on speech as a radical force against the systemic silencing of marginalised voices (hooks, 1989), we would like to invite proposals from writers, academics, creatives, and activists alike who are interested in exploring critical and creative approaches to decolonial activism, reclamations of culture and identity, and the transformative power of voice. We invite contributions that explore marginalised voices, representations of dissent against western hegemony and rigid binaries, and resistance to silencing and structural oppression. We welcome critical and creative approaches to proposals from participants of all genders, racial groups, and faith groups. The conference is free to attend and will take place at Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England on Tuesday 25th June 2024. The conference will be followed by an open-mic poetry and networking event, centred on the theme of ‘talking back.’ Proposals Suggestions include and are not limited to:
    1. Solidarity in dialogue: The power of collaboration in amplifying silenced voices.
    1. Testimonial narratives of marginalisation and dissent – how can speech become an act and practice of resistance?
    1. Resisting marginalisation and challenging labels.
    1. ‘Talking back’ as a form of activism – in what ways does the idea of ‘talking back’ contribute to decolonial modes of thinking and understanding.
    1. Exposing injustice: Challenging on-going realities of colonialism
Submission Guidelines Please submit a 250-word abstract/proposal for a 20-minute paper or presentation along with a 100-word biographical statement to: talkingbackconference@gmail.com. Please title your email with the type of submission you are applying for:
    • 20-minute paper: Talking Back Conference 2024
    • 20-minute presentation: Talking Back Conference 2024
Funding The conference is free to attend. We are also able to offer 4 travel bursaries of up to £50 to support self-funded and disadvantaged students with travel costs. If you wish to apply for one of these bursaries, please express your interest at the bottom of your abstract, along with a brief summary explaining why you require the support. Key Dates
    • Deadline for all submissions: 1st April 2024
    • Conference date: 25th June 2024
Queries Email us at talkingbackconference@gmail.com if you have any questions. We look forward to receiving your submissions. This conference is made possible by generous funding and support provided by New Art Exchange, Bonington Gallery, and the NTU Postcolonial Research Group. Contact Email talkingbackconference@gmail.com URL https://talkingbackconference2024.wordpress.com * Call for Papers Voices of Resistance in and against Dutch Empire, 1600-2020s Thursday 12 and Friday 13 September 2024, at Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Deadline proposals: 1 April 2024. Throughout the long history of Dutch empire starting in the early seventeenth century and extending into the postcolonial present, various people both in imperial dependencies across the globe and the metropole have resisted the logics and realities of oppression and exploitation. While colonisers’ perspectives have received plentiful attention, this conference puts the often marginalized voices of resistance in and against Dutch empire front and centre. Drawing on recent trends in the intellectual history of anticolonialism, the conference will chart and discuss the intellectual interventions of actors who agitated against the Dutch empire and its legacies. We invite contributions on the ideas, practices and networks of anticolonial actors who navigated the Dutch empire from the seventeenth century up to today, including freedom fighters and poets, religious leaders and (formerly) enslaved rebels, artists and activists, musicians, political thinkers and intellectuals, journalists and writers. We thus interpret voices of resistance broadly, ranging from political protest to works of fiction and from artistic and literary forms of expression to philosophical tractates as well as pamphlets and other forms of ephemeral writing. We aim to take a long-term perspective from the seventeenth to the twenty-first century and combine East and West that have often been treated as separate sections of the historiography of Dutch empire. Anticolonial stories have long served as chronicles about heroic resistance such as that of the nineteenth-century Javanese Prince Diponegoro or have confirmed teleological narratives ‘from empire to nation state’. We aim to contextualize such narratives by looking into related memory practices in anticolonial and postcolonial settings and by examining the transnational and transimperial entanglements of anticolonial networks. Besides contributions focusing on better-known anticolonial agitators and their networks, we are also interested in bringing together more subtle stories of, for example, legal resistance and more local accounts of religious defiance or economic subversion. Furthermore, we are interested in exploring not only what voices of resistance were fighting against but also in analysing the constructive agendas they put forth. From histories of political thought to meaningful practices of artistic, religious, and literary resistance, the conference will examine how anticolonial actors in transimperial contexts criticized and shaped the (end of the) Dutch empire. The conference, which will be held on Thursday 12 and Friday 13 September 2024, at Utrecht University, The Netherlands, is a critical follow-up to the international conference “Visions of Empire in Dutch History”, organized in 2016 at Leiden University, and the resulting edited volume The Dutch Empire Between Ideas and Practice [Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies] (Palgrave, 2019). Call for papers We invite proposals for papers on the following range of topics: – languages, ideologies and conceptual histories of resistance – ideas articulated in the context of political protests, (labour) strikes, violent rebellions – anticolonial or decolonial scholarship, including history writing, social sciences, humanities – artistic and literary expressions of resistance, including fiction, poetry, songs, visual arts – memory and memorialization of acts of resistance – demands for symbolic and financial forms of reparations and/or restitution We furthermore encourage: – long-term and diachronic perspectives (1600-2020) – comparative and/or interconnected perspectives from East and West, including the Indian Ocean region, the Indonesian archipelago, Cape Good Hope/South Africa, the Dutch Atlantic and Dutch North America, the Caribbean, Surinam, Dutch Guyana and Brazil – transimperial perspectives of voices that operated within the Dutch empire but agitated against other empires or imperialism more broadly, and of those actors who operated in other imperial spheres, but whose efforts were aimed against the Dutch empire – paper proposals by junior researchers (at RMA or PhD level) as well as more senior scholars, from different backgrounds (also outside academia) Individual paper proposals should consist of an abstract (200-250 words), a brief biography (50-100 words), and contact information. Proposals should be directed to the organizational committee: dr. René Koekkoek, dr. Anne-Isabelle Richard, and dr. Arthur Weststeijn at a.v.weststeijn@uu.nl. https://networks.h-net.org/group/announcements/20021539/voices-resistance-and-against-dutch-empire-1600-2020s Deadline proposals: 1 April 2024. Notification of selected proposals will be given by 1 May 2024. *

The 2024 Project Narrative Summer Institute: Rhetorical and Intersectional Narratologies in Dialogue

Co-Directors: Jim Phelan and Robyn Warhol Dates: June 17-28, 2024 (on Zoom) https://projectnarrative.osu.edu/2024-project-narrative-summer-institute-rhetorical-and-intersectional-narratologies-dialogue-online PNSI is a two-week workshop that offers faculty and advanced graduate students in any discipline the opportunity for an intensive study of core concepts and issues in narrative theory. The focus for summer 2024 will be Rhetorical and Intersectional Narratologies, and the co-directors will ground their approach in the principle of dialogue.  More specifically, we will explore the grounding principles of each approach by reading foundational and cutting-edge texts from each, and we will attend to the convergences and divergences between them.  Just as important, we will add a range of primary texts to the dialogue, including Jane Austen’s Emma, Edith Wharton’s “Roman Fever,” Toni Morrison’s “Recitatif,” and Jesmyn Ward’s “On Witness and Respair.”  Sample questions:  How do rhetorical narratology’s roots in the Poetics of Aristotle and of the neo-Aristotelian Chicago Critics and intersectional narratology’s roots in structuralism and feminist theory influence the current theory and practice of each approach? How do the narrative texts prompt re-examination, revision, and/or extensions of the theories? More generally, what can rhetorical and intersectional narratologies do for each other?  We’ll take up these (and other) questions as we work through the syllabus, and in relation to the specific interests and projects of the participants.  At the end of the Institute, each participant will present and receive feedback on their individual project. Syllabus Before the Institute begins, everyone should (re)read Jane Austen’s Emma Part I: Rhetorical Narratology Monday, June 17 Poetics:  Theoretical Texts: Aristotle, Poetics; R.S. Crane, “The Concept of Plot and the Plot of Tom Jones”; Ralph W. Rader; “The Dramatic Monologue and Related Lyric Forms”; James Phelan, “The Chicago School: From Neo-Aristotelian Poetics to the Rhetorical Theory of Narrative” Narrative Texts (in addition to Emma): T.C. Boyle, “Chicxulub”; Robert Browning, “My Last Duchess”; Alfred, Lord Tennyson “Tithonus” Tuesday, June 18: The Rhetorical and Ethical Turn Wayne C. Booth, The Rhetoric of Fiction:  Excerpt about Unreliable Narration and “Control of Distance in Emma”; Booth, The Company We Keep, discussion of Emma; Peter J. Rabinowitz, “Truth in Fiction: A Re-Examination of Audiences”; Introduction to Before Reading; Nielsen, Phelan, and Walsh, “Ten Theses about Fictionality.” Narrative Texts: Emma; Edgar Allan Poe, “The Cask of Amontillado”; Toni Cade Bambara, “The Lesson”; Roddy Doyle, “Worms” Wednesday, June 19: Rhetorical Poetics Theoretical Texts: Phelan, Intro to Reading People, Reading Plots; Chapter One of Somebody Telling Somebody Else; Excerpts from Debating Rhetorical Narratology: definitions of mimetic, thematic, and synthetic; discussion of Emma; Phelan and Sarah Copland, “The Ideal Narratee and the Rhetorical Model of Audiences” Narrative Texts (in addition to Emma): Wharton, “Roman Fever”; Cisneros, “Barbie-Q”; John Donne, “The Flea,” Jamaica Kincaid, “Girl” Thursday, June 20: Applied Rhetorical Narratology: Rhetorical Narrative Medicine; Black Women’s Stories of Everyday Racism Phelan, Excerpts from Narrative Medicine, Chapter 1; “Narrative as Rhetoric and the Art of Medicine”; Chapter 11, Narrative Medicine Workshops: Understanding, Overstanding, Springboarding; Phelan, “Rhetorical Listening: Character, Progression and Fictionality in African American Women’s Stories of Everyday Racism” Narrative Texts: Jesmyn Ward, “On Witness and Respair: A Personal Tragedy Followed by Pandemic”; Joyce Carol Oates, “Hospice/Honeymoon”; Stories by Mary Bullock and Scotia Brown from Black Women’s Stories of Everyday Racism Part Two:  Intersectional Narratologies Friday, June 21: NARRATIVE DISRUPTED First, read: Toni Morrison, “Recitatif.” Plot, Genre, Ethnicity: Paula Gunn Allen, “Kochinnenako in Academe“(1986) Sexualities: Valerie Rohy, “Queer Narrative Theory” (2018) Race & Disability, Robyn Warhol & Amy Shuman, “The Unspeakable, the Unnarratable and the Repudiation of Epiphany in ‘Recitatif’” (2018); Monday, June 24: NARRATIVITY/TELLABILITY Ruth Page, “The Narrative Dimensions of Social Media Storytelling: Options for Linearity and Tellership” (2015) Susan Lanser & Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan, “Narratology at the Checkpoint” (2019) David Herman, “Zoonarratology” (2012) Julio Cortázar, “Axolotl” Tuesday, June 25:  EMPATHY/SUBJECTIVITY First, read: Judith Butler, “Giving an Account of Oneself” (2009)—available on Project Muse Katherine Young, “Narratives of Indeterminacy: Breaking the Medical Body into its Discourses: Breaking the Discursive Body out of Postmodernism” (1999) Amy Shuman, “Entitlement and Empathy in Personal Narrative” (2006) Warhol, “She Was Not Heard: Personal Narratives that Tackle Structural Racism.” Additional narratives from Black Women’s Stories of Everyday Racism Wednesday, June 26: ALTERNATE PARADIGMS Susan Lanser, “Toward (a Queerer and) More (Feminist) Narratology” (2015) Claudia Breger, “Affects in Configuration: A New Approach to Narrative Worldmaking” (2017) Karin Kukkonen, “A moving target – cognitive narratology and feminism” (2018) Thursday, June 27 and Friday, June 28: Participant Presentations To Apply: Applicants should send a current CV, a short description of the proposed project (no longer than a single-spaced page), and one letter of recommendation to Project Narrative by April 1, 2024. Applications will be reviewed promptly after the deadline. If, in order to meet funding deadlines, applicants need an earlier decision, the co-directors will consider special requests for early action. Applications can be emailed to projectnarrative@osu.edu or sent by post to the following address: 421 Denney Hall Attn: James Phelan, Project Narrative 164 Annie and John Glenn Avenue Columbus, OH 43210 Please email projectnarrative@osu.edu with any questions about applying.

Fees Tuition for the 2024 Project Narrative Summer Institute is $1900. The co-directors will gladly write in support of participants’ applications for funding from home institutions.

— Jim Phelan, Distinguished University Professor and Editor, Narrative Director, Project Narrative Department of English Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210-1370 614-292-6669 FAX 614-292-7816 phelan.1@osu.edu *

Slavery, Authorship and Literary Culture

Call for papers

April 1, 2024 Edited Collection This volume, the last in a three-volume series devoted to the comparative literary history of modern slavery, explores slavery, past and present, from the perspective of authorship, textuality and literary cultures. The editors invite abstracts for essays on all aspects of this question. Slavery is often portrayed as shrouded in silence due to the simple fact that the number of texts and accounts written by enslaved people is very limited, especially when compared to the vast amount of documentation produced by the colonial powers. As recent scholarship has shown, however, enslaved people were not silent — silence is rather an effect created by the privileging of some forms of writing and as a result certain voices and viewpoints over others. This volume aims to investigate writing about slavery in all its forms, from the written traces left by enslaved people to the archives of slaveholders and from the discourses of abolition to postcolonial narrative. While we acknowledge the problem of invisibility as a fundamental condition for the study of slavery, we also wish to highlight the ways in which discourses about slavery have found their way into print and other media as well as the ways in which these texts have circulated and been read. The volume will consider how enslaved people expressed themselves in writing, considering, among other genres, letters, legal and financial documents, as well as published texts of all kinds. We encourage contributions that explore how the formerly enslaved took up authorship as free colored people or, after emancipation, in newspapers, journals or in other contexts and venues. We will consider the literary cultures that took shape in colonies and countries in which texts on slavery were produced and disseminated. Finally, we wish to explore postcolonial writing about slavery as well as accounts of slavery in today’s world. An important question for the volume will be how and to what extent authorship corresponds to agency and political subjectivity. For vol. 3 we invite articles that address any of the many the ways in which literature relating to slavery has been written, disseminated, read and discussed. This includes, for example, the existence of libraries and literary and scientific circles in colonial settings, the ways in which colonial literature was read and discussed in Europe, international debates about abolition, the uses of literature in colonial schools and missions, and more broadly the use of text as documentation. Articles might also consider processes of translation between languages and cultures, e.g. from an African to a plantation context, when texts pass from one colonial system to another, or when accounts circulate between European audiences and readers in other parts of the world. We also invite articles that address the afterlives of colonial slavery in contemporary literatures worldwide and the recreation of lost authorship as authors engage with the memory of slavery and attempt to recover lost voices. The volume will have a broad historical and geographical scope. We encourage submissions on modern slavery from the 16th century to the present. While the focus will be on the Atlantic world, we are also interested in the related systems of African, Mediterranean and Indian Ocean slavery. Comparative angles are especially welcome. Areas of particular interest include but are not limited to:
    • Questions of agency and political subjectivity in relation to authorship. How do we situate slave narratives and their impact both at the time of their publication and since? Where do we locate the voices of enslaved and formerly enslaved in different genres and forms of textual expression?
    • Literary cultures in the colonial world, e.g. the existence of libraries, bookstores, printing presses, scientific societies and the relationship between literature and literary institutions and the practices of slavery in the colonies and Europe.
    • The relationship between literary, performative, and visual forms of expression relating to slavery in the colonies and in Europe.
    • Gender in colonial literary culture, in relation to questions of subjectivity, and in later historical and literary reflections on the gender structures of slavery and post-slavery societies.
    • The relationship between slavery and colonialism and the development of African print culture and the traces and translation of oral slavery stories in printed texts.
    • The role of abolitionist movements in the disseminations of early texts on slavery and the establishment of African-American and African-European literary traditions.
    • The relationship between economy, capitalism and literature in the colonial Atlantic and its importance for the circulation, translation and commerce of texts across the Atlantic and between colonial spheres.
    • How to recognize processes of silencing. Which strategies of reading traces and absences must be employed in order to highlight and perhaps counteract silencing?
    • Post- and decolonial responses to slavery in 20th-century art, film and literature especially in relationship to questions of voice and agency.
Please send a 300 words abstract to the volume editors Mads Anders Baggesgaard (madsbaggesgaard@cc.au.dk) and Helen Atawube Yitah (hyitah@ug.edu.gh) no later than April 1, 2024. If selected for further process, the final deadline for the article will be October 1, 2024. After that deadline there will be a peer review process. The volume will be published in the fall of 2025. This volume is the third and last in Comparative Literary Histories of Slavery, main eds. Mads Anders Baggesgaard, Madeleine Dobie and Karen-Margrethe Simonsen in the series of literary histories made by CHLEL (Coordinating Committee for Literatures in European Languages) under the ICLA (International Comparative Literature Association) Publishing House: John Benjamins Publishing. Please read the description of the book here: https://cc.au.dk/en/slaverystudies/projects/comparative-literary-history-of-modern-slavery. Kind regards from the editors Mads Anders Baggesgaard (Comparative Literature, Aarhus University) Helen Atawube Yitah (Department of English, University of Ghana) Contact Email madsbaggesgaard@cc.au.dk URLhttps://cc.au.dk/en/slaverystudies/show/artikel/call-for-papers-slavery-authorship-and-literary-culture * Podcast Launch–“Biographers in Conversation” (4/3/2024) Today I launched “Biographers in Conversation” a free weekly podcast of interviews with biographers from around the world about the choices they make while researching, writing and publishing life stories. It launches on 3 April 2024, however, here’s a sneak peek of the biographers I’ll chat with over the next few months. Please share the sneak peek far and wide within your networks to get the word out https://www.biographersinconversation.com/sneak-peek/ Warmest wishes Gabriella Gabriella Marie Kelly-Davies Doctoral candidate: Breaking through the pain barrier. The extraordinary life of Dr Michael J. Cousins  School of Literature, Arts and Media University of Sydney gkel6637@uni.sydney.edu.au 0408 256 381 * The Indigenous Nineteenth Century  4-5 June 2024, University of Kent Deadline for Submissions: March 15, 2024 Keynote: Professor Chris Andersen (Métis, University of Alberta), Professor David Stirrup (University of York) and Métis community members: ‘”On the trail of Alexander Isbister: 19th Century Métis Nationhood in Motion” The Victorian Diversities Research Network, in collaboration with the Centre for Indigenous and Settler Colonial Studies (CISCS) are pleased to announce a two-day AHRC-funded symposium: ‘The Indigenous Nineteenth Century.’ With the aim of producing new, interdisciplinary scholarship, anti-colonial research methodologies and critical interventions that re-indigenise the nineteenth-century archive and scholarly approaches to it, this two-day, hybrid symposium is accompanied by two publication opportunities: a special issue of the journal Transmotion and an edited collection to be published by Palgrave. The work of indigenising the nineteenth-century colonial archive is well under way, and this symposium aims to bring together scholars, writers, artists, curators and educators in literary studies, Indigenous studies, museum studies, library studies, and historical research areas to discuss the pleasures and problematics of (re)indigenising the colonial archive. The historical archives of imperial and colonial settlement are founded on what Mohawk scholar Audra Simpson has theorised as a foundational mis-recognition, a philosophical refusal to see Indigenous peoples’ cultures and lifeways outside of pre-conceived Eurocentric frameworks. The violence these archives do to First Nations people is ongoing. Literature and the creative arts can offer a space to interrogate the racialised-archive and its role in forming national, colonial and imperial identities. However, as Narungga woman, poet and scholar Natalie Harkin has highlighted, the wounds created by the epistemic violence of the archive still bleed. It is this problematic that this symposium proposes to investigate. The organisers therefore welcome 20 minute research papers, position papers and creative/critical interventions on the following themes: 1) Alternative archives: nineteenth-century Indigenous cultural production including treaties, petitions, letters, life writing, travel writing, novels and poetry, song culture, storytelling, material culture. 2)Colonisation and knowledge production: colonial archives and the challenges of recovering Indigenous voices from within them. Decolonial approaches to colonial archives, methodologies for addressing gaps and absences in the archive, settler-Indigenous collaborations, Indigenous language loss and revitalisation. 3)Creative-critical forms of historical writing that unsettle linear narratives and disrupt hegemonic perspectives. These can include life writing; historical novels; ‘critical fabulation’ (Hartman) and speculative history; histories of Indigenous political formations and resistance movements. 4)Contemporary literary and artistic responses by Indigenous cultural producers that seek to remix, rewrite and reconstitute colonial history and artifacts. 5)Indigenising cultural institutions: curatorial practices, representation and decolonial museology. Abstracts of 300 words and bios of 150 words for 20 minute papers or panels of 3-4 speakers should be submitted to L.E.Atkin@kent.ac.uk . Creative and critical interventions that are outside the scope of the traditional research paper are very welcome. These might include ‘in conversation’ sessions, readings, performances and other types of practice-based intervention. If you can only attend online, please say so in your submission. Online sessions will be held on June 5thAll submissions should be made by 15 March 2024. Participants will be notified by the organisers of their acceptance and the outcome of any bursary applications by 28 March 2024. In order to facilitate scholarly collaboration and cross-disciplinary conversation, we would like to invite as many people as possible to join us in Kent. To this end, we can offer six travel grants to ECR, precarious and Indigenous scholars travelling from within the UK and outside of the UK. The three UK based grants are worth up to £200 each and the three international grants are worth up to £1000 each. If you would like to be considered for one of these, please include a short expression of interest with your abstract submission. Priority will be given to those without access to institutional funding or coming from outside Europe. * Call for papers: Essay Cluster on Political Biofictions (Biographical Fictions) a/b: Auto/Biography Studies  Contact: Jenny Rademacher: vrademacher@babson.edu Deadline for Submissions: March 15, 2024 Political Biofictions By openly playing in the space between the real and the speculative, biofictions constitute thresholds between the situated realities of actual, biographical subjects and the imaginative potential of fictional creation. Thus, while deriving from real sources, biofictions liberate fiction from interacting with only invented worlds. Instead, these works invite us to experiment with our biographical lives and to use invention to evaluate and reshape real-world concerns. Amid the threats posed by delimiting political realities (e.g. dictatorship, war, sectarian conflict, populism), biofictions offer potent outlets to protest powerlessness or the inevitability of such outcomes and to speculate on alternative pasts and futures. For example, they may invite us to revise and reimagine the lives of those who contributed and who were left out of official narratives. Emma Donoghue has referred to biofiction as “voicing the nobodies.” Colum McCann has emphasized the “contested realities” and obscured truths that many writers of biofiction explore—the effort to challenge and interrogate claims to truth and what we can trust. By imaginatively making visible voices and meanings that power has so often obscured, biofictions are inherently political spaces that have the potential to challenge dominant, authoritarian modes of determining the world. In this sense, biofictions are both an outgrowth of a dispersive, uncertain reality and a mode for navigating this context, modeling alternatives for how we manage and rethink its possibilities and pitfalls. The political uncertainties we face are not only the risks of physical dangers to ourselves and our planet—although those are very real—but also to the confidence and trust we have in sources and claims to veracity. The conflicts we are confronting across so many spheres are exacerbated by misleading fictions and conspiracy theories masquerading as fact. Because biofictions employ invention in reimagining biographical lives, they might be misunderstood as undermining the importance of truth, or even fostering the legitimacy of neologisms such as post-truth, truthiness, or “alternative” facts. Yet, it is exactly the opposite. By examining critically the connection to factual realities and the distinct but equally significant responsibility to how we use fiction, biofictions offer potential antidotes against post-truth contagions. Ultimately, post-truth narratives manipulate facts to support convenient fictions, whereas biofictions, when done well, strive to use fiction to better comprehend the real. Possible topics might include (but are not limited to) biofictional works that: (*Please note! Examples of texts are simply illustrative and not intended by any means to be exhaustive. The possibilities are far too many and varied!)
    • Imaginatively recreate the biography of a political figure in ways that undermine official or popular rhetoric and the imposition of false mythologies (Mario Vargas Llosa’s The Feast of the Goat, Joyce Carol Oates’ Blonde, Antonio Muñoz Molina’s Like a Fading Shadow, Anchee Min’s Becoming Madame Mao e.g.)
    • Creatively give voice to overlooked, suppressed, silenced, or otherwise overlooked biographical figures (Colum McCann’s Transatlantic, Barbara Chase-Riboud’s Sally Hemings, J.M. Coetzee’s Foe, Maggie O’Farrell’s Hamnet and The Marriage Portrait e.g.)
    • Invite and explore metaphoric linkages between creatively re-imagined past lives and contemporary politico-historical and sociological contexts and power dynamics (Lauren Groff’s Matrix, Rosa Montero’s The Ridiculous Idea of Never Seeing You Again, Colm Tóibín’s The Magician, David Ebershoff’s The Danish Girl, Colum McCann’s Transatlantic e.g.)
    • Explore subjective, private truths that challenge the treatment of national and political myths, offering more nuanced understandings to the experiences of complicated historical moments and traumas (e.g. Colum McCann’s Apeirogon, Javier Cercas’ Soldiers of Salamis e.g.)
    • Decolonialize a dominant history of subjection, engaging with universal questions of powerlessness (Chika Unigwe’s The Black Messiah, J.M. Coetzee’s Foe, Hassan Najmi’s Gertude, Mario Vargas Llosa’s The Dream of the Celt e.g.)
    • Explore the susceptibility to invest in false and deceptive figures of power and belief (Javier Cercas’ The Imposter, Olga Tokarczuk’s The Books of Jacob, J.M. Coetzee’s The Master of Petersburg, e.g.)
    • Inventively explore how precursors of feminism speak critically to contemporary realities (Rosa Montero’s The Ridiculous Idea of Never Seeing You Again, Anna Banti’s Artemesia, Maggie O’Farrell’s The Marriage Portrait, e.g.)
    • May include anti-biopics that use fiction to engage speculatively with uncertainties around popular and political representations of public figures and others (I, Tonya, Neruda, e.g.)
    • Include more theoretical explorations regarding the contemporary boom in biofiction and the relationship to questions of truth, trust, political uncertainties and risks to our shared humanity
Submission Guidelines Please send expressions of interest and a brief proposal/abstract of @50 words by March 15, 2024. All Inquiries and essays should be sent to Jenny Rademacher at vrademacher@babson.edu. All submitted essays should have a relevant theoretical framework and participate in contemporary conversations within the field of auto/biography studies. Potential contributors may find it helpful to refer to back issues of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies prior to submitting their work for consideration. Completed essays are due July 31, 2024. Essays should be between 7,000-9,000 words in length, including notes and Works Cited. All essays should follow the a/b instructions for authors and style sheet, which can be found at:  https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?show=instructions&journalCode=raut20 About the Editor: Jenny Rademacher is Professor of Literary and Cultural Studies and Chair of the Arts and Humanities Division at Babson College. She has published widely on genre, identity, and new narrative formats, including the contemporary surge in auto- and biofiction. Her book Derivative Lives: Biofiction, Uncertainty, and Speculative Riskin Contemporary Spanish Narrative (Bloomsbury, 2022) places the biographical novel within the wider context of contemporary thought, exploring the rich field of biofiction in relation to concepts of uncertainty, speculation, and risk in a post-truth age. She received her PhD in Spanish Literature from the University of Virginia, M.A. in International Affairs and Economics from Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), and an A.B. from Harvard University. * American Women’s Mobility Narratives (proposed special session) Modern Language Association Convention, January 9-12 2025 New Orleans, USA deadline for submissions:  March 15, 2024 contact email: Nina.Bannett25@citytech.cuny.edu How is women’s mobility  exemplified through American women’s fiction, poetry, and memoir?  How do American women’s mobility narratives render women visible or invisible.  Please submit abstracts of approximately 250 words for this proposed special session of MLA 2025 in New Orleans. * CALL FOR PAPERS: LITERARY BIOGRAPHY DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS: MARCH 15, 2024 I am pleased to share this call for papers for a guaranteed session of the European Regions Forum at the 2025 MLA Convention (New Orleans, 9-12 January 2025). Please submit proposals for papers that discuss either the practice of writing literary biography or current projects in literary biography in the context of Europe. Please send a 250-word abstract & brief biography by 15 March 2024 to Julia Elsky (jelsky@luc.edu). Julia Elsky, PhD Associate Professor of French Department of Modern Languages & Literatures Loyola University Chicago URL https://mla.confex.com/mla/2025/webprogrampreliminary/Paper26029.html *
Special Issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies Lives, Selves, Media and #MeToo: Anticipating Futures, Tracing Histories and Articulating the Present Call for Papers Abstracts due 4 March 2024 This issue explores #MeToo not as an isolated media flare, but as part of a wider social, cultural and historical matrix wherein auto/biographical modes and practices collide and connect with feminist resistance—as well as negotiate and impel its backlash. #MeToo crosses media borders, inviting scholars to consider how media shape and are shaped by political movements, and how transmedia forms a part of this story. Testimony is the dominant form of engagement with the #MeToo hashtag. Millions of tweets have offered testimony and asked for the public to bear witness as people who have long been silent about their experiences of sexual violence, most of them women, speak out on social media. That a feminist phenomenon occurring in the age of the selfie has been propelled by auto/biographical statements, is extremely online, and has “Me” at its centre is possibly unsurprising and legitimately—to scholars of life narrative, at least—fascinating. Me Too began in 2006 as a Black, feminist grassroots movement founded by activist Tarana Burke. The focus was local support for Black girls and women who had survived sexual violence, and Burke used Myspace to spread her message. The Twitter hashtag exploded in 2017 in social media ecosystem different from the 2006 Myspace era. The flood of mass digital testimony drew attention from news media, inspiring books, and breaking a long-held silence by exposing perpetrators of sexual violence, chiefly in the entertainment and media industry. Likewise, #MeToo spills over historical and national borders, and is embedded within broader discourses and histories of feminist activism and sexual violence. We want to explore what has alternately been called the ‘moment’ and the ‘movement’ of #MeToo/Me Too beyond the temporal location of the hashtag and phrase. What conditions, movements, stories, and texts came before #MeToo that benefit from re-examination (or refresh) in light of #MeToo? What conditions, movements, stories, and texts are emerging after #MeToo and might productively be linked to this significant phenomenon? And where might we imagine the future leads now? Have futures been opened up or closed off by #MeToo? What have we learned from the past that would benefit future feminist activism addressing sexual violence? This issue welcomes broad interpretations of “media” to think beyond the social media context and into print media, ephemera, sound and screen media, with a view to examining the significance of mediation (and media contexts) in testimony, auto/biographical practices, and feminist activism. Our suggestions for engaging with this theme include:
    • How media forms and networks (digital, print and beyond) have played a part in feminist resistance
    • Stories, reportage, memoir, and media before and/or after #MeToo
    • The violent rhythms of ‘progress’ and backlash, and how this pattern shapes the stories we tell about gender and violence
    • Backlash politics and social media
    • Hashtag activism
    • Testimony and media(tion)
    • The embeddedness of media in social and political life, relevant to gendered violence and feminist protest
    • Forms of protest and the evolution of protest in relation to gender and violence
    • Addressing the problems of #MeToo
    • Racism, sexism and other forms of ideological violence within activist movements
    • Testimony and feminist media history/feminist activism
    • Posthuman feminist pasts, presents and futures
    • Health humanities approaches to #MeToo
    • Mediating sexual trauma in the past and present
    • Mass testimony and collective trauma
    • Digital activism, policy, and structural change
    • Parallel phenomena (what is occurring parallel to #MeToo and how would we benefit from seeing ‘across’ media and political contexts?)
    • Memoir and other narratives of childhood trauma
    • Feminist resistance, gendered violence and celebrity culture
    • Teaching #MeToo
    • #MeToo futures
    • Memoir of the movement including Tarana Burke’s Unbound: My Story of Liberation and the Birth of the Me Too Movement
We are seeking 250-300 word abstracts for articles of up to 6000 words, and shorter creative or critical contributions of up to 1000 words. Please make clear in your abstract which format your proposal pertains to. Abstracts are due on 4 March 2024, and full papers will be due on 2 September 2024. Please submit abstracts via email to: kylie.cardell@flinders.edu.au and emma.maguire@jcu.edu.au We are also planning a collaborative workshop for potential contributors in July 2024, and details will follow for those whose full papers are requested. Editors The editorial team for this special issue is led by Kylie Cardell (Flinders University) and Emma Maguire (James Cook University). Please submit abstracts via email to: kylie.cardell@flinders.edu.au and emma.maguire@jcu.edu.au Emma Maguire BA(Hons), PhD Lecturer in English and Writing BA Coordinator BA First Year Coordinator College of Arts, Society & Education James Cook University, Australia Digital Content Editor, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies journal Steering Committee Member, International Auto/Biography Association Asia-Pacific Chapter (IABA-AP) Member: International Auto/Biography Association (IABA), Australasian Association of Writing Programs (AAWP), The Life Narrative Lab, Writers SA New article in Life Writing journal:  Field Culture in Unprecedented Times: Writing the Unexpected, Narrating the Future at a Virtual Conference New article in Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly: Shame, Trauma, and the Body After #MeToo: The Year in Australia New book chapter in Career Narratives and Academic Womanhood (ed. Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle, Routledge 2023): Docile Bodies (of Work): Coaxing the Neoliberal Academic via the Online Researcher Profile * SUMMER CONFERENCE CALL FOR PAPERS: The Auto/Biography Study Group Summer Conference entitled ‘Disappointments and Dissonances’ will take place on 10th-12th July 2024 at Venue Reading, University of Reading. We are pleased to announce the call for papers/installations: https://britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/bsa-autobiography-summer-conference-2024-disappointments-and-dissonances/. The abstract submission deadline is 4th March 2024 at 5pm. We welcome papers and presentations that respond to the concept of disappointments and dissonances substantively, theoretically, methodologically and creatively. This year, as last, we also welcome ‘installation pieces’ which might include a poster, creative artefact(s), a short video or other. The keynote will be given by Dr Karin Bacon, Marino, Institute of Education, An Associated College of Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin. Karin’s paper is entitled: ‘A Family Divided by Conflict Politics – disappointments and dissonances’. We invite abstract submissions (250 words) for 30/35-minute oral presentations followed by discussion and for installation pieces (there will be space in the programme for viewing and discussion of these). We are pleased to invite papers from across the broadest range of auto/biographical work, including ‘work-in-progress’ and those testing out innovative approaches, and welcome colleagues and friends from in and outside of the academy at all career stages. Please contact gayle.letherby@plymouth.ac.uk  and/or seerya@tcd.ie for further detail about the conference. The key dates leading up to the conference are as follows: •       Abstract submission deadline: 4th March at 5pm. •       Abstract notification and conference registration opens week beginning: 23rd March. •       Presenter booking deadline: 6th May. •       Delegate booking deadline: 3rd June. •       Conference: 10th-12th July. Registration includes ensuite accommodation and full board: BSA Member Registration: £450, Auto/Biography Study Group Member Registration: £460, Non-Member Registration: £490. SEMINARS: Registration is open for the final two seminars of this academic year. The links to join each event will be sent approximately 24 hours beforehand: Thursday 7th March 2024 at 1700-1800: Life as a fat female body: A feminist narrative inquiry with Iranian women by Somayeh McKian (Independent Academic): https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/life-as-a-fat-female-body-a-feminist-narrative-inquiry-with-iranian-women-by-somayeh-mckian-independent-academic/ Wednesday 1st May 2024 at 1700-1800: Women’s spaces of knowledge: Lady Mary’s contribution to the Covid vaccine by Mich Page: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/women-s-spaces-of-knowledge-lady-mary-s-contribution-to-the-covid-vaccine/ DENNIS SMITH: Michael Erben recently received words of thanks from Dennis’ family in response to the letter expressing our condolences. They were particularly touched to know that he was held in such high regard by the group. This is a tribute page for your information: https://dennis-smith-1945-2024.muchloved.com/.. The family are collecting for Cruse Bereavement Support. AUTO/BIOGRAPHY STUDY GROUP MEMBERSHIP: In advance of the conference registration opening we thought it would be valuable to remind everyone about the benefits of joining the group. ‘Join us’ information is available here: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/join-us/. As a paid member of the Auto/Biography Study Group you will benefit from reductions on conference costs and publications, free publication in the group’s open access online journal (non-members pay £30 per submission) and a free seminar series. You will also be registered on the JISCmail list: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=BSA-AUTO-BIOGRAPHY-GROUP. The annual payment categories for the 2024 calendar year are £30 for members of the BSA and £40 for non-members. Payment may be made via PayPal by logging in or by debit/credit card and choosing to pay as a guest: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/autobiography-membership/. We are a charity and non-profit group and all proceeds from group subscriptions help to fund our publications and group events. Have a good week. Best wishes Anne Chappell and Carly Stewart Auto/Biography Study Group Convenors Email: anne.chappell@brunel.ac.uk and cstewart@bournemouth.ac.uk Find the Auto/Biography Study Group: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/ Find the Auto/Biography Study Group on X: @AutoBiographySG Join the Auto/Biography Study Group: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/join-us/ *

CFP: Historiography and Hagiography in Buddhism and Beyond

July 8-10, 2024 Cambridge University, United Kingdom Deadline for Submissions: February 23, 2024 This international conference aims to bring together scholars working on practices of record-keeping, historiography, and hagiography in the Buddhist tradition and in related cultural fields. Recent years saw a steadily-growing interest in the impact of Buddhism on historiography and hagiography, in tandem with an unprecedented increase in the availability of textual and visual primary sources. Ambitious digitization projects (especially of premodern sources) and the changing landscape of the digital realm offer new opportunities to study premodern and contemporary practices of writing and narration. In this three-days conference, we seek to foster an interdisciplinary discussion on practices of textual and visual recording, storytelling, and memory in Chinese Buddhism and beyond – past, present, and future. This conference is generously sponsored by the Tzu Chi Foundation (慈濟) and hosted by the Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Cambridge. The conference will take place at the University of Cambridge in Cambridge, United Kingdom, on 8-10 July 2024 (08/07/2024-10/07/2024). Accommodation and meals will be provided for the duration of the conference. Travel expenses to Cambridge will be covered for conference presenters (please contact organizers for further details). We welcome proposals for papers on topics relating to historiography, hagiography, and narration, including but not limited to:
    • Buddhist historiography and record-keeping
    • Historiography and record-keeping in other Chinese religious traditions
    • Narrating lives of extraordinary individuals (e.g. biographies, autobiographies, hagiographies) in textual, oral, visual, and material forms
    • The intersection of Buddhism and literature
    • Book culture and production of texts in the Buddhist tradition (e.g. in print culture, manuscript culture, publishing practices, patronage of textual production, production of temple gazetteers and mountain gazetteers etc.)
    • Uses of visual arts and the performance arts in creating or supporting Buddhist historiography and hagiography
Proposals for papers should include the following information:
    1. Name, affiliation, and title of position at the affiliated institution (independent scholars are also welcome to apply; please note “independent scholar” in your proposal if relevant)
    1. 250 word abstract
    1. Contact information: email, address, and phone number(s)

The deadline for all proposals is Friday, February 23rd, 2024 (23/02/2024). Proposals should be sent as either Word or PDF to the following email address: hist.hagio@gmail.com For general information and logistical questions, please email the organizing committee at: hist.hagio@gmail.com Regarding the conference, please contact the primary organizer, Dr Noga Ganany at ng462@cam.ac.uk. *Proposals must be submitted in English.

Contact Email hist.hagio@gmail.com * CALL FOR PAPERS Palgrave Handbook of Disability in Comics and Graphic Narratives deadline for submissions:  February 28, 2024 We invite abstracts for articles to be published in a collection showcasing scholarly research related to disability in comics and graphic narratives. This edited volume will highlight insights from both disability studies as well as comics studies. Centering a disability justice ethos, we especially welcome: submissions by disabled authors/creators; collaborative submissions; work that engages with disability life writing and/or disclosure; work that addresses accommodations and accessibility as they relate to comics pedagogy, form, and/or readership. The collection envisions a diverse selection of contributors (i.e. a mix of early, mid-, and established scholars from the humanities, comics studies, and disability studies; disability activists; comics creators; comics journalists; and so on) that represent a range of perspectives, methodologies, and communities across the globe. The contents of the collection may be likewise diverse, including essays by individual and collaborative authors, interviews, and/or creative work. Essays in all languages are welcome (to be published in translation). We encourage examinations of mainstream titles and characters, independent comics, as well as considerations of the ways disability shapes comics form in creative ways. We are especially interested in contributions that explore additional intersections of race, class, sexuality, and gender; and works that challenge ableism in comics theory and/or challenge comics’ ocularcentrism. We especially welcome essays on potential themes and keywords such as:
    • Accessibility
    • Activism
    • Archive
    • Autobiography
    • Coloniality
    • Disability Justice
    • Disability as Method
    • Genre(s)
    • Intersectionality
    • Mental Health/Illness
    • Monstrosity/grotesque
    • Multiculturalism
    • Neurodivergence
    • Pedagogy
    • Sexuality
    • Sound
    • Superheroes and supervillains
    • Touch
    • Transnationalism
    • Vision
We welcome inquiries by email. Please submit 250-300 word abstracts and 50-word bios by February 28th, 2024. After reviewing submissions, the editors will select contributors and then submit a proposal for publication by Palgrave. Final essays will be approximately 5,000-10,000 words depending on the topic. We also welcome submissions of scholarship in comics formats between 10 and 20 pages. For questions, or to submit a proposal, contact keyword.disability.comics@gmail.com * The Empire and I: Individuals in Empires and Postimperial Spaces – 3rd Annual Conference of the RTG 2571 Empires Freiberg, Germany November 28–30, 2024 Deadline for Submissions: February 29, 2024 Analysing the relations between individuals and empires has a long tradition in historiography: from the biographies of “great men” to more recent approaches such as “imperial biographies” and “imperial subjects”. And while the first has rightly been criticised in the past, the latter have shown that there is significant analytical value in studying individuals even when trying to understand macro-phenomena such as empires. As individuals can function as the smallest analytical units for exploring of broader historical developments, focusing on them can shed light on more general political, economic, and social dynamics. Retracing the activities of individuals, therefore, can be used to analyse the factors that shaped living conditions within imperial and postimperial spaces. This approach also opens up new perspectives on the agency of individuals and the strategies they could and did use to thrive and persist within or resist imperial environments. Focusing on individuals also offers possibilities to grasp their influence on empires. Individual actors impacted the way empires evolved, for instance by making use of imperial structures or policies for their own gains. Moreover, the ways individuals thought, spoke, and wrote about imperial environments illustrate how empires are perceived and conceptualised to this day. The relationships between empire and individual can therefore be approached not just through historiography but through a multitude of disciplines and for different time periods and regions. The third annual conference of the RTG 2571 “Empires” likewise aims to examine the relations between individuals and empires from different perspectives. We welcome contributions from all the humanities and social sciences as well as hybrid sciences. We especially encourage scholars in the early stages of their careers (PhD & Postdocs) to submit proposals. Interested applicants are invited to send a working title, an abstract (c. 400 words) for a presentation of 20 minutes and a short CV (no more than two pages) to the mentioned mail adress by February 29th 2024. Any further queries can be directed to the same address. Accommodation in Freiburg will be organised and covered by the RTG “Empires”. We will also reimburse presenters for their travel expenses. Contact Information Aaron Zidar Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg DFG Graduiertenkolleg 2571 „Imperien” Platz der Universität 3 79085 Freiburg im Breisgau (Germany) Contact Email conference-empires@grk2571.uni-freiburg.de URL https://www.grk2571.uni-freiburg.de/events/conferences/annual-conference-2024?s… * CALL FOR PAPERS International Conference on “Diverse Lives: Narratives of Śākyamuni Buddha in Text and Image” October 16–19, 2024 Conference Location: Royal Museum of Mariemont, Belgium Deadline for Submissions: February 29, 2024 The founding figure of Buddhism, Śākyamuni Buddha, has played an enormously important role for South and East Asian – and more recently also Western – cultures and societies. However, there is no authoritative biographic account which would be accepted by the multitude of Buddhist traditions. On the contrary, the stories concerning Śākyamuni’s life are as diverse as the doctrinal and rituals systems found in the various regions and schools of Asian Buddhism. In this context of the lack of cross-regionally and inter-sectarian accepted textual and visual sources, even key events of Buddha’s life have undergone countless interpretations in textual and visual media in the course of Buddhism’s geographical spread and doctrinal diversification. Some of the influential hagiographical accounts of Buddha’s life, such as the Sanskrit Buddhacarita and the Lalitavistara and their renderings in other languages, have attracted the attention of numerous scholars, whereas many lesser-known narratives have remained understudied. The main goal of this conference is thus to gather scholars and discuss unusual variations and interpretations of Buddha’s life stories found in textual and visual materials. The narratives concerning Buddha’s life will be approached from an interdisciplinary perspective, including religious studies, philological and literary studies, archaeology, and art history, to name a few. We invite speakers to present studies which for example focus on geographically localized adaptations of Buddha’s life – both based on visual and textual sources; variations we find in the texts and manuscripts composed in the various languages along the Silk Road and beyond; hybrid accounts of Buddha’s life which incorporate elements drawn from other traditions or cultural contexts; the way Buddha’s life is interpreted in contemporary media; as well as Western interpretations of Buddha’s life stories. There are no limitations concerning the temporal or geographical framework. The International in-person conference is scheduled for 16-19 October 2024 at the Royal Museum of Mariemont, Belgium. This event is organised, in collaboration with the Ghent Centre for Buddhist Studies of Ghent University, at the occasion of the exhibition “Buddha. Experiencing the Sensible” (September 21st, 2024 – April 20th, 2025). Interested participants should submit a 300-word proposal and a short biography (maximum 200 words) as a single Word document to Buddha2024@musee-mariemont.be by February 29th, 2024. The language of presentation will be English. Selected speakers will be notified by the end of March 2024. Transport to and from hotels nearby the conference venue will be provided by the organising institutions. Keynote speaker:  Bernard Faure, Director of the Center for Buddhism and East Asian Religions, Columbia University, Kao Professor of Japanese Religion, Columbia University, Emeritus Professor of Religious Studies, Stanford University Conference organisers: Ann Heirman, Head of the Department of Languages and Cultures, Professor of Chinese Language and Culture, Director of the Ghent Centre for Buddhist Studies, Ghent University Christoph Anderl, Professor of Chinese Language and Culture, Department of Languages and Cultures, Ghent University Lyce Jankowski, Curator of extra-European Art, Domain & Royal Museum of Mariemont Max Deeg, Professor in Buddhist Studies, Cardiff University Neil Schmid, Research Professor, Dunhuang Research Academy * Storytelling as Pedagogy: Historical Biographies in STEM and Social Studies Cain Conference, Science History Institute 7/15-16/2024 Philadelphia USA Deadline for Submissions: February 29, 2024 This Cain Conference will bring together scholars and practitioners of science education and public communication to explore how sharing stories of diverse scientists can help young girls and people of color see themselves as valuable contributors to science, historically and in the future. Organized by Cain Conference Fellow Sibrina Collins, the conference will take place at the Science History Institute in Philadelphia, PA on July 15 – July 16, 2024. Connecting with people is at the heart of storytelling. Studies have shown that sharing a compelling story about someone who has made a new contribution, tool, or discovery may inspire a student to pursue their own career in a STEM field.[i] We invite proposals for presentations or panels that focus on writing, adapting, and teaching with historical scientific biographies and narratives in the context of different formats including:
    • Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CURE)
    • Discussion and/or laboratory courses in K-12 and higher education
    • Large Lecture Courses (incl. flipped classroom formats)
    • Asynchronous online courses and multimedia production
    • Public Learning Environments (incl. churches, museums, and libraries)
We welcome proposals from educators, scholars, historians and biographers, editors and publishers, collections professionals, and others with a professional interest in the use of historical biographies in education. Interested applicants should submit an abstract of no more than 300 words and brief autobiographical sketch (50-100 words) by February 29, 2024. Questions and submissions should be sent to biographies@sciencehistory.org. For updates, please see our conference web page at https://www.sciencehistory.org/visit/events/gordon-cain-conference-2024/ [i] Collins, S.N. The importance of storytelling in chemical education. Nat. Chem. 13, 1–2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-00617-7 * Deadline for Submissions: March 1, 2024 CFP – Writers of Extreme Situations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (3/1/2024; 4/16-18/2024) 58th Comp. World Lit. Conf., California USA Venue: California State University, Long Beach. Hybrid Dates: Tuesday and Wednesday, April 16-17 (in-person presentations only with Zoom projections), Thursday, April 18, 2024 (Zoom presentations only) Plenary Speaker: Christopher Goffard, author and senior staff writer, Los Angeles Times Family crises, exilic conditions, forced migrations, excessive poverty, armed conflicts, political warfare, environmental calamities, workers’ exploitation, pandemics, and all manner of natural or man-made disasters have been rising to unprecedented levels over the last decades. How are extreme situations or situations so extraordinary as to defy imagination represented? What are the poetics underlying them? We welcome conversations about how extreme conditions and situations, (individual, collective, or global) are expressed, analyzed, and engaged from a multidisciplinary perspective, including but not limited to:  Literature, Journalism, Geography, Anthropology, Political Science, Criminology, Linguistics, Ethnic Studies, Women and Gender Studies, Disability Studies, Media Studies, Geology, Human Development, and more. This conference invites paper and panel proposals on all aspects of extreme situations. Possible topics can include but are not limited to: -Literature of extreme situations -Investigative Journalism -Trauma literature -Literatures of genocide -Holocaust memoirs -Feats of survival -Crime narratives -Narratives of addiction -Natural and man-made disasters -Innocent Project LA -Victims speak up: truth to power -The rise against femicide -Wars and exilic narratives -Refugee narratives -Pandemic narratives -Medical malpractice and botched surgeries -Ethics of survival and survivors’ guilt -The Family Secret and the wounded individual -Dementia and violence: nursing homes -Perpetrators and victims -Asylum seekers and their fate in the US -Ethical ordeals: surviving the unimaginable -Memory as a repository of horror -Collapse of ethical systems in a digital world -Institutional responses to catastrophes -Crossing the Mediterranean: the Syrian refugee crisis -Extreme geo-political conflicts -Journalism at work: covering extreme conditions -“The Banality of Evil” in urban settings. -State terrorism and extreme-isms -Millennial fatigue and extremist stances -Monuments of shame -The Kafkaesque in our daily lives -Systemic risks in the 21st Century -Extreme environments -Soft White Underbelly: Mark Laita interviews –The Trials of Frank Carson Podcast (Christopher Goffard) -Deaths in the Grand Canyon and Other National Parks. We are thrilled to announce that the plenary talk will be delivered by Christopher Goffard, Pulitzer Prize winner, journalist for the LA Times, novelist and podcaster, on Wednesday, April 17th, at 2PM (PDT). The title of his talk is: “Crossing the Impossible Bridge in a Dynamite Truck: Observations on Film, Friendship and Collaboration” In “Crossing the Impossible Bridge in a Dynamite Truck,” Goffard will reflect on his friendship and collaboration with one of cinema’s great poets of desperation and obsession, William Friedkin, and of their efforts to bring some of Goffard’s riskier stories to the screen. As a crystallization of Friedkin’s danger-courting artistry—and as a metaphor for their quest to get controversial projects made— Goffard invokes an image from the filmmaker’s 1977 masterpiece Sorcerer, in which a truck laden with nitroglycerin attempts to cross a crumbling suspension bridge in the South American jungle. Submissions for individual presentations and 90-minute sessions are welcome from all disciplines and global / historical contexts that engage with historical, personal, or social instances of extreme conditions and situations. Proposals for 15-20 minute presentations should clearly explain the relationship of the paper to the conference theme, describe the evidence to be examined, and offer tentative conclusions. Abstracts of no more than 300 words (not including optional bibliography) should be submitted by March 1, 2024. Please submit abstracts as a Word document in an email attachment to comparativeworldliterature@gmail.com NB: Please do not embed proposals in the text of the email. Make sure to indicate your mode of preference (Zoom on April 18 and in person only on April 16 and 17) for planning purposes While the conference will be hybrid, all Zoom presentations will take place only on Thursday, April 18, and in-person presentations will take place on Tuesday-Wednesday, April 16-17 (and will be Zoom-projected). We cannot accommodate pre-recorded presentations. The conference committee will review all proposals, with accepted papers receiving notification by March 15, 2024. Contact Information Dr. Kathryn Chew Contact Email comparativeworldliterature@gmail.com URL https://cla.csulb.edu/departments/complit/current-conference/ * Registration for IABA World 2024 is now open! The conference will run from 9 am 12 June to 3 pm 15 June 2024. A detailed programme will be available in due course. The fees are as follows: Early Bird (includes access to all sessions, conference materials, coffees, lunches, reception) to 1 March: 34.000 IKR (approx. 230 EUR/250 USD) Full Price after 1 March:  42.000 IKR (approx. 280 EUR/310 USD) PhD Students and PostDocs (includes access to all sessions, conference materials, coffees, lunches, reception, dinner) 27.000 IKR (approx. 180 EUR/200 USD) For more information see: https://iabaworld2024.hi.is/ Please direct all queries to iabaworld2024@gmail.com * Call for Papers—Edited Volume Mothers, Mothering and Trauma/Intergenerational Trauma Edited by Lamees Al Ethari, PhD and Maria D. Lombard, PhD Deadline for Submissions. March 1, 2024: 250–400-word abstract This edited volume on motherhood and trauma builds on Marianne Hirsch’s concept of postmemory, which states that the “generation after” [will] “grow up dominated by narratives that preceded their birth, whose own belated stories are evacuated by the stories of the previous generation shaped by traumatic events that can neither be understood nor recreated” (Hirsch 22). This volume will attempt to capture some of those very narratives and belated stories that Hirsch refers to in her rendering of the concept of postmemory, especially within the context of displaced motherhood. The chapters that this volume seeks to collect can be scholarly, creative, or visual. In the narratives chosen for this study, relational ties and generational story-telling/story-building are crucial in the construction of self-identity as they establish a sense of history and belonging for the new(er) generations. On one hand they present a personal narrative, while on the other, a communal narrative in which the experiences of a people is brought to light. While historical frameworks or references may be useful as context, the collection aims to examine experiences shaped by contemporary concepts of motherhood and disconnected/de-fragmented motherhood impacted by displacement and trauma. Areas and stories examined can be from the perspective of the mother, the mother/child relationship, the mother/society dynamic, etc. The editors are particularly interested in submissions that contextualize how Hirsch’s concept of postmemory is reflected in their work. Possible topics might look critically at (but are not limited to) generational experiences of trauma and displacement in relation to:
    •  race, culture, class, and sexuality
    • narratives about or by migrant and/ or refugee mothers
    • rhetorics of refugee/displaced motherhood
    • politics and policy on the refugee family
    • family separation, family resettlement
    • refugee children’s literature and the mother figure
    • narratives or research on adoptive mothers, reproductive health care (access to ultrasounds, pre/post-natal care, family planning, etc.)
    • activism and community action/re-action
    • communication, social media, and telling motherhood stories online
Hirsch, Marianne. Family Frames: Photography, Narrative and Postmemory. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1997. Timeline for CFP March 1, 2024: Submission of 250-400 word abstract of your chapter and a 50-word bio. April 1, 2024: Acceptance notifications will be sent to contributors. 15 August 2024: Accepted and complete chapters due (6,000 words maximum with MLA format and references) Submissions and questions should be sent to: Dr. Lamees Al Ethari lalehari@uwaterloo.ca Dr. Maria Lombard maria.lombard@northwestern.edu Editor Bios Lamees Al Ethari, PhD Lamees Al Ethari holds a PhD from the Department of English Language and Literature at the University of Waterloo, where she has been teaching creative writing and literature since 2015. She is a nonfiction editor with The New Quarterly and a co-founder for The X Page: AStorytelling Workshop for Immigrant Women. She is in the process of completing an autoethnographic monograph titled, Patterns of Telling: Women’s Autobiography in theDiaspora, which is a critical exploration of women’s narratives of displacement. She has published, From the Wounded Banks of the Tigris (2018) and Waiting for the Rain: An IraqiMemoir (2019), in which she reflects on her experiences of the 2003 American invasion of Iraq, the violent aftermath, and her migration from home. Her poems have appeared in About PlaceJournal, The New Quarterly, The Malpais Review, and the anthology Al Mutanabbi Street StartsHere. Maria D. Lombard, PhD Maria Lombard is the assistant dean for academic affairs at Northwestern University in Qatar. Her research focuses on writing studies, with interests in second-language writing pedagogy, minority and gendered voices, and travel writing. Her scholarly publications include refereed articles and proceedings, as well as book chapters, on belonging, displacement, and motherhood. Her recent edited volume, Reclaiming Migrant Motherhood: Identity, Belonging, andDisplacement in a Global Context (Lexington Books, 2022) examines the representations and lived experiences of migrant, refugee, and otherwise displaced mothers in literature, film, and original ethnographic research. *

 W. G. Sebald at 80: A (Critical) Celebration of Life and Works

Conference Date: Saturday, May 18, 2024 (ON ZOOM) Deadline for Submissions: March 1, 2024  This conference invites graduate students and beyond, including lecturers and independent scholars, to join in a critical celebration of the works of the unique Anglo-German author W. G. Sebald (1944-2001). Hailed by legendary critic Susan Sontag in a 2000 essay published in Times Literary Supplement, she asked whether “literary greatness [was] still possible” and concluded “one of the few answers available to English-language readers is the work of W. G. Sebald.” Several journal articles, book chapters, and collections have been published about this eccentric author (see the bibliography below), and yet, he remains largely unknown to Western audiences. This conference hopes to bring scholars out of the woodworks and contribute their thoughts and ideas about Sebald and any of his various works, including his essays, i.e., On the Natural History of Destruction, and literary prose, i.e., After NatureVertigoThe EmigrantsThe Rings of Saturn, and Austerlitz. There is no one guiding theme under which to produce critical evaluations of Sebald’s texts. Instead, given the eclecticism of Sebald’s subject matter, diverse approaches are encouraged, including, but not limited to: Postcoloniality Orientalism Gender and Sexuality Bio- and necropolitics Trauma Archive Gothic Ecocriticism Spatiality Temporality Narratology Genre Animal Studies Historiography Religion Rhetoric Thing Theory Photography Frankfurt School Psychoanalysis Thanatourism Translation Please submit a 200-250 word abstract, along with a brief biographical statement and your time zone in order to best approximate appropriate times for presentations, to wgsebald80conference@gmail.com. Full papers should aim to be 10-15 minutes in length. The conference will be held online over Zoom at no charge and, depending on the amount of submissions, may roll over into two days – for now, it is tentatively scheduled on what would have been the author’s 80th birthday (May 18, 1944). (Zoom link will be sent out a week before the conference). Also, select papers will be solicited to be compiled in an edited collection on the works of W. G. Sebald. Details to come. Bibliography Angier, Carole. Speak, Silence: In Search of W. G. Sebald. Bloomsbury Circus, 2021. Burns, Rob, and Wilfried van der Will. “The calamitous perspective of modernity: Sebald’s negative ontology.” Journal of European Studies, vol. 41, no. ¾, 2011, pp. 341-358. DOI: 10.1177/0047244111413700 Fischer, Gerhard, editor. W.G. Sebald: Schreiben ex patria/ Expatriate Writing. Rodopi, 2009. Groves, Jason. “Writing after Nature: A Sebaldian Ecopoetics.” German Ecocriticism in the Anthropocene, edited by Caroline Schaumann and Heather I. Sullivan, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 267-292. Johannsen, Anja K. “‘The contrarieties that are our yearnings’: Allegorical, nostalgic and transcendent spaces in the work of W. G. Sebald.” Journal of European Studies, vol. 41, no. ¾, 2011, pp. 377-393. DOI: 10.1177/0047244111413704 Long, J. J., and Anne Fuchs, editors. W. G. Sebald and the Writing of History. Königshausen & Neumann, 2007. Long, J. J., and Anne Whitehead, editors. W. G. Sebald – A Critical Companion. U of Washington P, 2004. McCulloh, Mark Richard. Understanding W. G. Sebald. University of South Carolina Press, 2003. McCulloch, Mark, and Scott Denham, editors. W. G. Sebald: History – Memory – Trauma. De Gruyter, Inc., 2006. Schwarz, Lyn Sharon, editor. the emergence of memory: Conversations with W. G. Sebald. Seven Stories Press, 2007. Silverblatt, Michael. “A Poem of an Invisible Subject.” the emergence of memory: Conversations with W. G. Sebald, edited by Lyn Sharon Schwarz, Seven Stories Press, 2007, pp. 76-86. Wolff, Lynn L. W. G. Sebald’s Hybrid Poetics: Literature as Historiography. De Gruyter, 2014. Zisselsberger, Markus, editor. The Undiscover’d Country: W. G. Sebald and the poetics of travel. Camden House, 2010. *

 “Narrating Lives” International Conference on Storytelling, (Auto)Biography and (Auto)Ethnography

Rome, Italy and Online, 5/31-6/2/2024

https://life-history.lcir.co.uk/

Deadline for Submissions: March 1, 2024 London Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Life-history approach occupies the central place in conducting and producing  (auto)biographical and (auto)ethnographic studies through the understanding of self, other, and culture. We construct and develop conceptions and practices by engaging with memory through narrative, in order to negotiate ambivalences and uncertainties of the world and to represent (often traumatic) experiences. The “Narrating Lives” conference will focus on reading and interpreting (auto)biographical texts and methods across the humanities, social sciences, and visual and performing arts. It will analyse theoretical and practical approaches to life writing and the components of (auto)biographical acts, including memory, experience, identity, embodiment, space, and agency. We will attempt to identify key concerns and considerations that led to the development of the methods and to outline the purposes and ethics of (auto)biographical and (auto)ethnographic research. We aim to explore a variety of techniques for gathering data on the self-from diaries to interviews to social media and to promote understanding of multicultural others, qualitative inquiry, and narrative writing. Conference panels will be related, but not limited, to:
    • Life Narrative in Historical Perspective
    • Qualitative Research Methods
    • Oral History, Memory and Written Tradition
    • Journalism and Literary Studies
    • Creative Writing and Performing Arts
    • (Auto)Biographical Element in Film Studies, Media and Communication
    • Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy
    • Narrative Medicine
    • Storytelling in Education
    • Ethics and Politics of Research
Submissions may be proposed in various formats, including:
    • Individually submitted papers (organised into panels by the committee)
    • Panels (3-4 individual papers)
    • Posters
Proposals should be sent to: life-history@lcir.co.uk. * BIO’s Hazel Rowley Prize for First-Time Biographers Sponsored by the Biographers International Organization (BIO), the Hazel Rowley Prize offers $5,000 for the best book proposal from a first-time biographer, plus a careful reading by an established agent. Submissions due March 1. Guidelines and entry forms are available on the BIO website: https://biographersinternational.org/award/hazel-rowley-prize/ Contact Information Michael Gately, Executive Director, BIO Contact Email execdirector@biographersinternational.org URL

rnational.org/award/hazel-rowley-prize/

* Call for Papers, Political Biofictions (2/18/2024; 1/9-12/2025) MLA New Orleans USA Alexandre Gefen (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CRNS) and Virginia Newhall Rademacher (Babson College) seek 1 to 2 additional panelists for the seminar, Political Biofictions at MLA 2025. MLA 2025 will be held January 9-12 in New Orleans, LA. Political Biofictions  Biofictions consciously reference historical subjects as their protagonists and then open those life narratives to imaginative possibility. By constituting thresholds between the situated realities of actual, biographical subjects and the imaginative potential of fictional creation, biofictions liberate fiction from interacting only with invented worlds. Instead, these works invite us to experiment with our biographical lives and to use fiction to evaluate and shape real-world concerns. The 2025 MLA Annual Convention theme of visibility is the perfect context for this session on Political Biofictions, especially in light of the crises and conflicts we face across the globe. Emma Donoghue has referred to biofiction as “voicing the nobodies.” Colum McCann has referred to the “contested realities” and obscured truths that writers of biofiction try to reveal – the effort to challenge and interrogate claims to truth and what we can trust. By imaginatively making visible voices and meanings that power has so often obscured, biofictions are inherently political spaces that defy dominant, authoritarian modes of determining the world. We invite diverse approaches, from more pointedly political critiques (Mario Vargas Llosa’s The Feast of the Goat, Joyce Carol Oates’ Blonde, Antonio Muñoz Molina’s Like a Fading Shadow, Colum McCann’s Apeirogon, Anchee Min’sBecoming Madame Mao) to morewide-ranging cultural critiques (Maggie O’Farrell’s The Marriage Portrait, Colm Toíbín’s  The Magician, Lauren Groff’s Matrix, Margaret Atwood’s Alias Grace, e.g.) as just a very few examples. If interested, please contact Professor Jenny Rademacher at vrademacher@babson.edu with a brief (one paragraph) proposal by Sunday February 18. Virginia Newhall Rademacher, PhD Professor of Literary and Cultural Studies Chair, Arts and Humanities Division Babson College Babson Park, MA 02457 vrademacher@babson.edu WebEx personal room: https://babson.webex.com/meet/vrademacher Author Page: Derivative Lives (Bloomsbury, 2022) *

4 PhD Positions “The Aggressor: Self-Perception and External Perception of an Actor Between Nations” (Heidelberg or Bochum, Germany)

Deadline for Applications: February 18, 2024 Heidelberg University (Department of History) and the Ruhr University Bochum (Faculty of History) invite applications for up to four PhD positions within the framework of the international research project “The Aggressor: Self-Perception and External Perception of an Actor Between Nations” (sponsored by the Daimler and Benz Foundation) to start in spring 2024 and to be hosted by either of the two institutions. The interdisciplinary project, headed by Prof. Dr. Thomas Maissen (Heidelberg University), investigates the identity-forming construction of national enemy images across Europe, which are shaped by aggressors from neighboring countries. The project examines the dynamics of personalization of such enemy imagery, with special attention to concrete historical figures. As ideal types or social figures, they represent hostile groups in collective memory. It comparatively researches and systematizes the perception and interpretation of concrete enemies as aggressors based on historical case studies, focusing on their discursive construction and changing significance in the politics of memory. A detailed description of the project can be found at: https://www.uni-heidelberg.de/fakultaeten/philosophie/zegk/histsem/forschung/project_aggressor_en.html Your tasks:
    • Conceptualization and execution of a doctoral project in German or English over the course of three years, pending an evaluation after the first year
    • Active participation in the further development of the broader project and in its events such as graduate seminars and workshops
Your profile:
    • Above-average degree (Master’s or equivalent) at the time of taking the position
    • Excellent doctoral project proposal
    • Good knowledge of German or English; other language skills are welcome
We offer:
    • A three-year (1+2) fixed-term contract at Heidelberg University or the Ruhr University Bochum
    • Coordinated supervision of the doctoral project by several members of the project team
    • Integration into an international interdisciplinary network of leading scholars from multiple established European research institutions
    • Highly motivating research environment in a strong academic team
    • Participation in international conferences and opportunities for publication of own research results
    • The chance to design exciting projects in the field of Public History
    • Salary based on the collective bargaining agreement of the German federal states (TV-L E13, 65%)
The doctoral project can be freely formulated within the framework of the above-mentioned description. For dissertations with a relevant topic that have already progressed, final funding with a shorter duration is conceivable. For questions regarding the content of the job profile, please contact Prof. Dr. Thomas Maissen (thomas.maissen@zegk.uni-heidelberg.de). Applications in German or English should include a cover letter, curriculum vitae, certificates, proof of language skills and professional experience (if applicable), two short academic letters of reference, and an outline of the doctoral project with details on the desired supervision and host university (max. 20,000 characters including spaces and bibliography) and should be sent as a single PDF file to:  aggressorprojekt@zegk.uni-heidelberg.de. The deadline is February 18, 2024. The interviews are expected to take place online on March 1, 2024. The participating institutions stand for equal opportunities and diversity. Qualified female candidates are especially invited to apply. Persons with severe disabilities will be given preference if they are equally qualified. Information on job advertisements and the collection of personal data is available at www.uni-heidelberg.de/en/job-market Contact Information Prof. Dr. Thomas Maissen, Department of History, Heidelberg University, Grabengasse 3-5, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany Contact Email thomas.maissen@zegk.uni-heidelberg.de URL e/fakultaeten/philosophie/zegk/histsem/forschung/pr… * Exploring Historical War Experiences through Digital Sources and Methodologies Workshop 23–24 May 2024 Tampere University, Finland Deadline for Applications: February 12, 20204 Historians have increasingly striven to understand war from the standpoint of human experience in recent decades. The emotional, psychological, and deeply traumatic experiences of people caught up in violence have become focal points of historical research, particularly concerning conflicts like the World Wars of the 20th century. This workshop discusses the study of war experiences through digital sources and methods. War experiences have been analyzed most often by closely examining the fates of individual people and their ego-documents like letters, diaries, and poems, but digitalization has opened possibilities to explore war from a broader perspective. The digitization of archives has made it easier to access millions of wartime publications, such as newspapers and parliamentary records, now only a few clicks away. Additionally, recent advancements in handwritten text recognition are making historical ego-documents, such as letters, digitally accessible. Transforming documents into data broadens the scope of research from traditional close reading to text-mining methods and creates new opportunities to present war on digital and visual platforms. What are the implications of digitalization for the study of war experiences? Are individual experiences at risk of being neglected in digital, data-driven research? Or can digitalization offer historians new ways to tell stories and convey experiences of war? It is important to emphasize that experiences should not be understood only as narratives of, or written by, individual people. Experience can also be understood more broadly as a mediating sphere between the macro and micro levels where different impulses (personal, social, cultural, and political) merge to form meanings, concepts, actions, and practices. We invite submissions of individual papers and panel discussions that present and analyze cases of historical study of war experiences through digital sources and methodologies. The topics can include, but are not limited to:
    • The concept of experience in digital history
    • Source critical reflection on ego-documents, testimonies, and narrative in the digital realm
    • The role of individual people in digital history
    • Mining war experiences and emotions
    • Silence and trauma in digital data
    • Representing war experiences through numerical data and visualizations
Submission guidelines Please send an abstract of 300 words and a short biography including your name and affiliation to ilari.taskinen@tuni.fi by Monday 12 February 2024. Notification of acceptance will be sent by 29 February 2024. The workshop takes place at Tampere University, Finland on 23–24 May 2024. The workshop is free for selected participants and provides lunch, coffee, and dinner. The organizers can help to cover travel and accommodation expenses for those without their own funding. Please indicate if you need assistance when submitting. Organizers Project: Digital History and Handwritten Sources (DIGIKÄKI) The Research Council of Finland’s Centre of Excellence in the History of Experiences (HEX) Contact Information Ilari Taskinen (Tampere University) Contact Email ilari.taskinen@tuni.fi URL https://research.tuni.fi/hex/event/call-for-papers-exploring-historical-war-exp… * Call for Papers Janet Frame at 100, special issue of The Journal of Commonwealth Literature Deadline for abstracts: 15th February 2024  The events of Janet Frame’s remarkable life – thanks in part to the success of her three-volume autobiography – have long overshadowed critical discussions and readings of her wider oeuvre, which includes a range of life narratives, novels, short stories, and poetry. On the hundredth anniversary of her birth, this special issue establishes new understandings of Frame’s work in and for the twenty-first century. Working to establish Frame as a key figure in modern Anglophone literature, this centenary issue scrutinises her experimental approach to literary forms, styles, genres, political orientations, and more. Co-edited by Andrew Dean (Deakin University, AUS), Emma Parker (University of Bristol, UK), and Nicholas Wright (University of Canterbury NZ) this issue solicits articles (7000-7500 words) which discuss Frame’s writing and themes such as:
    • Late modernist literature
    • Experimentations with literary form (metafiction; autofiction; satire; the bildungsroman)
    • Aotearoa New Zealand, postcolonial, or late colonial literatures
    • Records of violence/institutions/imperialism
    • Nationalism, both political and cultural
    • Disability and illness
    • The southern hemisphere
    • Eco-critical readings (oceanic imaginaries, environmental disasters)
    • Adaptations for the screen and stage
    • Translation and literary reception
    • Teaching: reflections on classroom experience and/or pedagogy
    • Posthumous publications and literary afterlives
Deadline for submission of abstracts, 15th February 2024, to emma.parker@bristol.ac.uk, andrew.dean@deakin.edu.au and nicholas.wright@canterbury.ac.nz Full articles due 1st August 2024 (for internal peer review) with final submissions and external peer review 1st November 2024. For full submission guidelines please see: https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/JCL *

CFP: Writers of Extreme Situations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective

deadline for submissions:  February 15, 2024 contact email:  comparativeworldliterature@gmail.com CFP: 58th Annual Comparative World Literature Conference Venue: California State University, Long Beach. Hybrid Dates: Tuesday, April 16 (Zoom presentations only), Wednesday and Thursday, April 17-18, 2024 (in person presentations only with Zoom projections) Plenary Speaker: Christopher Goffard, author and senior staff writer, Los Angeles Times Family crises, exilic conditions, forced migrations, excessive poverty, armed conflicts, political warfare, environmental calamities, workers’ exploitation, pandemics, and all manner of natural or man-made disasters have been rising to unprecedented levels over the last decades. How are extreme situations or situations so extraordinary as to defy imagination represented? What are the poetics underlying them? We welcome conversations about how extreme conditions and situations, (individual, collective, or global) are expressed, analyzed, and engaged from a multidisciplinary perspective, including but not limited to:  Literature, Journalism, Geography, Anthropology, Political Science, Criminology, Linguistics, Ethnic Studies, Women and Gender Studies, Disability Studies, Media Studies, Geology, Human Development, and more. This conference invites paper and panel proposals on all aspects of extreme situations. Possible topics can include but are not limited to: -Literature of extreme situations -Investigative Journalism -Trauma literature -Literatures of genocide -Holocaust memoirs -Feats of survival -Crime narratives -Narratives of addiction -Natural and man-made disasters -Innocent Project LA -Victims speak up: truth to power -The rise against femicide -Wars and exilic narratives -Refugee narratives -Pandemic narratives -Medical malpractice and botched surgeries -Ethics of survival and survivors’ guilt -The Family Secret and the wounded individual -Dementia and violence: nursing homes -Perpetrators and victims -Asylum seekers and their fate in the US -Ethical ordeals: surviving the unimaginable -Memory as a repository of horror -Collapse of ethical systems in a digital world -Institutional responses to catastrophes -Crossing the Mediterranean: the Syrian refugee crisis -Extreme geo-political conflicts -Journalism at work: covering extreme conditions -“The Banality of Evil” in urban settings. -State terrorism and extreme-isms -Millennial fatigue and extremist stances -Monuments of shame -The Kafkaesque in our daily lives -Systemic risks in the 21st Century -Extreme environments -Soft White Underbelly: Mark Laita interviews The Trials of Frank Carson Podcast (Christopher Goffard) -Deaths in the Grand Canyon and Other National Parks. We are thrilled to announce that the plenary talk will be delivered by Christopher Goffard, Pulitzer Prize winner, journalist for the LA Times, novelist and podcaster, on Thursday, April 19th, at 2PM (PDT). The title of his talk is: “Crossing the Impossible Bridge in a Dynamite Truck: Observations on Film, Friendship and Collaboration” In “Crossing the Impossible Bridge in a Dynamite Truck,” Goffard will reflect on his friendship and collaboration with one of cinema’s great poets of desperation and obsession, William Friedkin, and of their efforts to bring some of Goffard’s riskier stories to the screen. As a crystallization of Friedkin’s danger-courting artistry—and as a metaphor for their quest to get controversial projects made— Goffard invokes an image from the filmmaker’s 1977 masterpiece Sorcerer, in which a truck laden with nitroglycerin attempts to cross a crumbling suspension bridge in the South American jungle. Submissions for individual presentations and 90-minute sessions are welcome from all disciplines and global / historical contexts that engage with historical, personal, or social instances of extreme conditions and situations. Proposals for 15-20 minute presentations should clearly explain the relationship of the paper to the conference theme, describe the evidence to be examined, and offer tentative conclusions. Abstracts of no more than 300 words (not including optional bibliography) should be submitted by January15, 2024. Please submit abstracts as a Word document in an email attachment to comparativeworldliterature@gmail.com NB: Please do not embed proposals in the text of the email. Make sure to indicate your mode of preference (Zoom on April 16 and in person only on April 17 and 18) for planning purposes While the conference will be hybrid, all Zoom presentations will take place only on Tuesday, April 16, and in-person presentations will take place on Wednesday-Thursday, April 17-18 (and will be Zoom-projected). We cannot accommodate pre-recorded presentations. The conference committee will review all proposals, with accepted papers receiving notification by February 15, 2024. *

Call for papers – International Colloquium–Échappées belles – Correspondance of Surrealist Women

deadline for submissions: January 27, 2024 contact email:  lemieux-cloutier.eve@courrier.uqam.ca Organized by Andrea Oberhuber (Montreal University), Sylvano Santini (University of Quebec in Montreal) et Eve Lemieux-Cloutier (University of Quebec in Montreal) Montreal, October 23-25 2024 Where do we stand, almost 100 years after André Breton published the First Manifesto of Surrealism, in our understanding of what Georgiana Colvile and Kate Conley, in La femme s’entête (1998), have called “the feminine part” of the third historical avant-garde? Is it still necessary in 2023 to add a question mark, as the curators did in the case of the Surréalisme au féminin? exhibition at the Musée de Montmartre in summer 2023? Would this symbolize a doubt about the historical presence and aesthetic contribution of numerous female creators – writers and artists, often both at the same time – to the Surrealist movement? It’s true that, in the first pages of the manifesto, Breton evokes a castle in a “rustic setting, not far from Paris” where his “handsome and cordial” friends have taken up residence. He names them all, one by one, before concluding by imagining “and gorgeous women, I might add”, without bothering to specify their names. Over the past thirty years, a growing number of literary critics and art historians have put names and images to these “gorgeous women ” (Rubin Suleiman, 1990, Caws, Kuenzli and Raaberg, 1991, Conley, 1996, Rosemont, 1998, Colvile, 1999, among others). We now know that Simone Kahn and Mick Soupault were immortalized in Man Ray’s group photographs, that the young Gisèle Prassinos was the “femme-enfant” par excellence (Conley and Mahon, 2023) for quite some time, and that the group generally became more welcoming of creative women in the post-war period (Bonnet, 2006). Nor is there any need to revisit the triple role of muse-model-mistress in which young women authors and artists were mostly confined, and which for many was a means of drawing closer to Breton’s “group”, finding new ideas and values, while others have settled for a deliberately marginal position within the Surrealist nebula. Whether their relationship was one of proximity or distance, varying according to the key moments in their careers, their contribution to Surrealist aesthetics and ethics – since the two are intimately linked in the avant-garde movements of the first half of the 20th century – is no longer in doubt today. It seems to us that the centenary of the publication of the founding manifesto offers an opportunity to consider the past-present-future of Surrealism from a perspective that gives pride of place to the feminine. This bias in favor of women’s legacy, particularly in the field of correspondence, is intended to go beyond a binary vision of masculine and feminine, to breathe new life into movement studies and perpetuate creative practices to the present day. No progress, however radical, can be made without a return to the past. Surrealist women creators were witnessed to an era of upheaval that profoundly changed the conditions of art and forms of life. This was the desire of the avant-garde in general and Surrealism in particular, although it has been a long time coming. Women’s art made an original and integral contribution to the creation of these new conditions. And the reasons that explains the late realization of the will to change life are the same that might clarify the delay in the discovery of women’s work. We must avoid repeating this delay by hesitating to join their works to the forms of life that produced them. If the end of art’s autonomy is an essential contribution of the historical avant-gardes, despite their failure, as Peter Bürger (1984) demonstrated long ago, it goes beyond the question of gender. We must recognize, however, that its ultimate consequences affect women more intensely, whose subversive works have not been as decontextualized and neutralized by bourgeois recuperation and the art market as those of men. Besides, in his thesis on the historical failure of the avant-garde, Bürger never mentions the existence of women’s Surrealist works. Without wishing to deny their access to economic capital – they have the same right to it as men – their works still retain their subversive power. It’s this power that we need to bring to light, by revisiting and questioning the forms of life that gave rise to them. As part of the 100th anniversary of Surrealism in 2024, we propose to organize a colloquium on what we might be called a blind spot in surrealism studies to date, prompting us to reflect on it together: the correspondence of writers and artists whom we associate closely or remotely with the movement. They (hers) – Claude Cahun, Leonora Carrington, Lise Deharme, Leonor Fini, Simone Kahn, Nelly Kaplan, Dora Maar, Lee Miller, Suzanne Muzard, Gisèle Prassinos, Dorothea Tanning and Unica Zürn, to name but a few – knew each other from close and far-flung Surrealist circles. Although they sometimes maintained an ongoing correspondence with one of the eminent representatives of Surrealism, there are few examples of letters they addressed to each other. Examples include the correspondence between Simone Kahn and her cousin Denise Lévy, or the few letters exchanged between Claude Cahun and Adrienne Monnier. In the majority of cases, female Surrealist artists corresponded with their male counterparts: Nelly Kaplan and Leonor Fini with André Pieyre de Mandiargues, Gisèle Prassinos with Henri Parisot, Lise Deharme with Pierre Reverdy, Unica Zürn with Henri Michaux and, of course, Jacqueline Lamba with André Breton. While it is generally believed that male writers and artists pursue their work by shaping and editing their correspondence – they somehow know that it will be read – we shouldn’t think that women don’t care. We need to get rid of all gendered stereotypes about epistolary writing, such as the one suggesting that women neglect the literary value of their letters in favor of spontaneity. As Brigitte Diaz (2006) rightly points out, the various gendered stereotypes associated with correspondence should no longer have a place in epistolary studies. This will be all the more true in our colloquium, which, rather than redoing the history of Surrealism, aims to extend and refine it by questioning the modes of sociability favored by women, their desire to collaborate, their friendships and loves, their criticisms, their ambitions, their moods – in short, their aesthetic, political and social sensibilities. In short, it will explore the multiple links – from everyday life to political reflections to questions of advice on a work in progress, for example – that several generations of Surrealist creators established between writing, creation and life in an era that, in more ways than one, can still inspire our own. Proposals for papers – whether for research or research/creation – which may concern published or archival correspondence by women, or, from a broader perspective, the question of epistolary writing by women, should be around 300 words long and accompanied by a brief bio-bibliographical note. Written in French or English, they should be sent simultaneously to Andrea Oberhuber (andrea.oberhuber@umontreal.ca), Sylvano Santini (santini.sylvano@uqam.ca) and Eve Lemieux-Cloutier (lemieux-cloutier.eve@courrier.uqam.ca) no later than January 27, 2024. In the subject line of your message, please indicate “Colloque. Échappées belles”. Please note that the colloquium organizers are planning to submit a funding application to cover part of the travel and subsistence expenses of colloquium participants. Further information will be sent to candidates whose proposals have been accepted by the scientific committee. Bibliography* Bonnet, Marie-Jo, Femmes artistes dans les avant-gardes, Paris,Odile Jacob, 2006. Bürger, Peter, Theory of the Avant-Garde, trad. Michael Shaw, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1974. Caws, Mary Ann, Rudolf Kuenzli et Gwen Raaberg (dir.), Surrealism and Women, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1991. Colvile, Georgiana, et Katharine Conley (dir.), La femme s’entête. La part du féminin dans le surréalisme, Paris, Lachenal et Ritter, coll. « Pleine Marge », 1998. Colvile, Georgiana, Scandaleusement d’elles: trente-quatre femmes surréalistes, Paris, Jean Michel Place, 1999. Conley, Katharine, Automatic Woman, Nebraska, University of Nebraska Press, 1996. Conley, Kate, et Alyce Mahon, «The “Problem of Woman” in Surrealism », International Journal of Surrealism, vol. 1 n° 1, 2023, p. v-ix. Diaz, Brigitte, et Jürgen Siess (dir.), L’épistolaire au féminin : Correspondances de femmes (xviiie-xxe siècle),Caen, Presses universitaires de Caen, 2006. Oberhuber, Andrea, Faire œuvre à deux. Le livre surréaliste au féminin, Montréal, Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, coll. « Art + », 2023. Rosemont, Penelope (dir.), Surrealist Women, An International Anthology, Texas, University of Texas Press, coll. « Surrealist Revolution », 1998. Suleiman, Susan Rubin, Subversive Intent: Gender, Politics, and the Avant-Garde, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1990. * 2024 International PhD Conference “Lived Experiences”, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (hybrid format) June 6 and 7, 2024 Deadline for submissions: January 31, 2024 Call for Papers We are pleased to announce the call for papers for Lived Experiences, the international two- day PhD conference that takes place in Brussels, Belgium, on June 7th, and online on June 8th, 2024. This conference aims to create a platform for doctoral students specializing in literary studies, literary translation studies, and theatre studies to showcase their research and engage in discussions on the profound impact of personal narratives and lived experiences in shaping creative works. It provides an excellent opportunity for emerging scholars to actively participate in scholarly dialogues, share their findings, and contribute to the broader academic discourse. Theme and Scope Numerous scholars have explored how the book as a medium shapes the ways in which authors practice life writing. In “Putting Lives on the Record: The Book as Material and Symbol in Life Writing” (2017), Anna Poletti proposes an innovative approach to biography studies focusing on that centrality of “the book as both a medium and a symbol” to both “the practice and the scholarship of life writing” (Poletti, 460). However, a reading strategy, which emphasizes the relationship between a life writing practice and its medium/form, can be applied not only to book-based practices, but also to writing grounded in lived experience across various media, media combinations, and culturally defined forms of writing. Recently, life writing studies took an intermedial and transcultural turn (Rippl, 147), marked by publications such as the volume Intermediality, Life Writing, and American Studies: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Nassim Winnie Balestrini and Ina Bergmann (2018), Experiments in Life-writing: Intersections of Auto/biography and Fiction, edited by Lucia Boldrini and Julia Novak (2017), and Anna Poletti’s (2020) monograph Stories of the self: Life writing after the book. Even more recently, Claudia Jünke and Désirée Schyns published Translating Memories of Violent Pasts: Memory Studies and Translation Studies in Dialogue (2023), a collection of essays from memory studies and translation studies investigating the exploration of memories of violence through the practices of interlingual and intercultural literary translation. As Jünke and Schyns highlight in their introduction to the last-mentioned work, cultural translation already implies a form of remembering: the target text always retains its dual context. It connects the past of the source to practices of rewriting and dynamics of cultural transmission in the present. Lived Experiences seeks to further our understanding of the ways different (combinations of) media, genres, and writing practices (e.g., literary translation) can allow for different expressions and explorations of personal experience. It aims to focus on lived experiences as a catalyst for (literary) creativity, with texts using the conventions and the material, modal, formal, and symbolic affordances of media, genres, and writing practices in creative ways to express specific forms of lived experiences (such as traumatic, formative, or shared cultural experiences). By bringing together scholars of life writing and other literary practices in which lived experience plays a central role, it invites participants to reflect both on how media and genres shape creative forms of life writing and how the need or desire to represent, analyze, or simulate lived experiences can inform practices of literary creation. We encourage participants to explore diverse aspects of lived experiences within the realm of literature and other media, including but not limited to:
    1. Autobiographical narratives and memoirs: Analyzing the ways in which personal stories intersect with creative expression and exploring the relationship between fact and fiction.
    1. Representations of marginalized and underrepresented voices: Investigating how literature becomes a platform for amplifying and centering marginalized experiences and challenging dominant narratives.
    1. Trauma, resilience, and healing: Examining the depiction of lived experiences of trauma in literature and other media and exploring the transformative power of storytelling in the process of healing and resilience.
    1. Cultural heritage and identity: Exploring how creative works reflect, preserve, and redefine cultural identity and heritage.
    1. Lived experiences in translation: Investigating the role of language mediation in shaping and representing diverse lived experiences across linguistic and cultural boundaries.
Submission Guidelines We invite doctoral students to submit abstracts for a 20-minutes presentation, providing the following information:
    1. Title of the Paper
    1. Abstract (250–300 words)
    1. Brief Biography (100 words)
Please submit your abstracts via email to lived.experiences2024@gmail.com no later than January 31st, 2024. Please also indicate your affiliation and your preference for presenting your paper either in person or online. The conference will be held in English. Participation is free of charge. Important Dates
    • Submission Deadline: 31 January 2024
    • Notification of Acceptance: 21 February 2024
    • Conference Date: 7–8 June 2024
Selected papers presented at the conference may have the opportunity to be published in a special issue of the Journal for Literary and Intermedial Crossings (JLIC), based at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. For further inquiries, please contact us at lived.experiences2024 * Biography Lab 2024 (1/20/2024) Biographers International Organization (BIO). Held on ZOOM.   Biographers International Organization (BIO) is excited to announce Biography Lab 2024, which will be held via Zoom on Saturday, January 20, 2024, from 10:30 am – 5:00 pm Eastern (New York) time. BIO invites participants at all levels of interest and experience in the craft of biography to participate in three sequential 90-minute forums led by prize-winning biographers. A social hour concludes the day. The distinguished keynote speaker is Kai Bird, the author of five biographies, including the Pulitzer-Prize-winning and bestselling American Prometheus about Robert Oppenheimer. The three forum leaders are James McGrath Morris, author of multiple biographies about journalists and other writers; Janice P. Nimura, Pulitzer-Prize finalist for The Doctors Blackwell; and Ray A. Shepard, award-winning biographer of Black lives for young readers. Registration: Free to BIO members and students; $60 for nonmembers (fee includes a year’s BIO membership). Go here to register: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/biography-lab-2024-tickets-742496776847 * Call for Applications — Leon Levy Center for Biography Fellowships (1/4/2024) CUNY NY USA

FEATURED JOB: The Graduate Center, CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, Leon Levy Center for Biography – 5 $72 K Biography Fellowships

The Leon Levy Center for Biography invites applications for four 2024 – 2025 Biography Fellowships and one Leon Levy /Alfred P. Sloan Fellow in science biography. Each resident fellow receives a stipend of $72,000, research assistance, writing space and library privi- leges. They also participate in monthly seminars and the intellectual life of the Graduate Center, CUNY. Application deadline: Jan 4, 2024 Website: llcb.ws.gc.cuny.edu Contact Information Thad Ziolkowski, Deputy Director, the Leon Levy Center for Biography tziolkowski@gc.cuny.edu URL https://www.h-net.org/jobs/job_display.php?id=66559 * Call for Papers “Through Their Eyes…” – Biographical Research in the Digital Age Deadline For Submissions: January 4, 2024 PaRDeS 30 (2024) Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies in Germany / Zeitschrift der Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e.V. Editor: Dr. Björn Siegel (Institute for the History of the German Jews, Germany) Guest-Editor: Prof. Dr. Andrea Sinn (Elon University, USA) Biographical studies have always been central to the historically working humanities, however, the relevance of biographical research seems to have gained importance throughout the last years, calling for a deeper analytical study as well as a critical re-evaluation of such a newly evolving “biographical turn”. Especially in an increasingly digitalized world, including academia, life stories seem to offer new and candid, but also personal and local lenses through which to examine, understand and present historical narratives, cultural phenomena, or literal productions. Different (auto)biographical sources offer the unique opportunity to see history “through their eyes” and provide authentic and insightful perspectives on the past and the present and can therefore, when viewed critically, serve as valuable historical records. Such personal insights into the past and present not only enable researchers to reconstruct and preserve different life stories, but offer a unique opportunity to study political, cultural and social networks and spaces, but also to analyze the interwoven feelings, thoughts and beliefs of people who experienced past realities. However, these sources also raise questions about the interests and perspectives of the writer(s), the reliability and subjectivity of the individual, as well as the constructiveness of the related texts and sources. Therefore, biographical research not only represents an interesting tool and promising methodology, but also poses considerable challenges to researchers in the humanities in general, and Jewish Studies in particular. The challenges are largely connected to phenomena such as (forced) migration, the evolution of diasporas and exiles, the consequences of multilingualism and transnational networks, questions of acculturation and representation, influences of religious principles, social habits or gender relations as well as the effects of changing moral concepts, philosophies, and identities. The worldwide spread of digitization seems to have solved some of these challenges, such as the issues of availability or legibility, but it also leads to new demands and difficulties, when studying biographies. While these phenomena might be universal, they seem to be inherent in Jewish history and culture, thus, making biographical research in Jewish Studies a complex, but also promising methodology. Therefore, the journal PaRDeS is seeking contributions that explore the potential of the “biographical turn in Jewish Studies” and aims to examine its impact on the study and representation, but also preservation of Jewish history, culture, and religion in the digital age. We welcome contributions from fields including but not limited to history and literature, political and cultural studies, sociology and anthropology, as well as contributions focusing on digital studies as well as archeology, archival studies etc. Potential contributions may focus on any character, locality or time period, related to Jewish life stories. Potential papers might focus on the following (not exhaustive) topics and questions, pose examples to illustrate the changing settings and/or
    • What are the specific challenges to write Jewish biographies/life stories in the digital age?
    • How important are biographies in Jewish history, religion and/or philosophy and has itchanged to write a biography in an ever more digitized world?
    • How can one life story influence the study of Jewish history, culture, and religion anddoes the function of the individual and/or collective transform in a digital world?
    • What kind of benefits does the digital age offer/suggest for the of study of Jewishhistory, language(s), religion, and/or culture? And, how does it influence the socialconstruction of a life story?
    • Is digitization expanding the source base of biographical research and does it change theavailability, readability and/or accessibility of sources (e.g. texts and multimedia sources)?
    • How does digitization change the materiality of the sources?
    • How are Jewish biographies used today, e.g. in academia, memory culture, educationalstrategies or public debates and did the representation of Jewish life changed by newlydeveloped digital tools?
    • How do museums and archives modify their strategies to preserve “Jewish life stories” inthe digital age?
    • Do digital biographical studies offer new insights and tools to decode and analyzeemotions or thoughts, but also trauma or violence?Proposals for papers (max. 500 words) and a short CV (max. 100 words) should be submitted to the editors, Björn Siegel (bjoern.siegel@igdj-hh.de) and Andrea Sinn (asinn@elon.edu), by January 5, 2024. The candidates will be notified on January 15, 2024. The submission of the finished papers is tentatively scheduled for May 2024. The full article should be 30.000 to 35.000 characters including spaces. All submissions will undergo a blind peer-review process.PaRDeS is an interdisciplinary journal that ensures its quality through a blind peer review; all articles published in PaRDeS are indexed in Rambi: Index of Articles on Jewish Studies. PaRDeS is published online in open access and in print. Previous issues are available at this link:Contact Information
Editors: Björn Siegel (bjoern.siegel@igdj-hh.de) and Andrea Sinn (asinn@elon.edu) Contact Email bjoern.siegel@igdj-hh.de URL https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/solrsearch/index/search/searchtype/series/id/37 * Call for Papers  Acts of Witnessing on Film American University of Paris July 17, 2024 – July 18, 2024 Deadline for Submissions: January 8, 2024 The definitions, uses, policies, and norms of testimony continue to be debated, with discussions fueled by a large scientific literature; works of philosophy and aesthetics (Frosch, & Pinchewski, 2009, Goutte, 2016, El Madawi, 2020, Détue, 2022) explore the relationship between filmed oral testimonies and historical facts, the narrative processes created by this medium in the Era of the Witness, the contours of truly cinematic testimonies, and even of testimony as a new documentary form (Leimbacher, 2014, Katz, 2018). At the intersection of Trauma Studies, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, and Memory and Media Studies, scholars have conducted research into audiovisual productions about the Holocaust as well as repressions in Latin America, the Middle-East, North Africa, and Asia (cf. the selected bibliography). These works are characterized by a constructivist perspective and an interest in the role of documentary filmmakers in the writing of history. This conference reflects through a historical perspective on the act of witnessing on film. Beyond “testimonial” cinema (Garibotto, 2019), we hope to approach testimonies as a practice, shaped by the specific environments of their national cinematographic cultures. How are enunciative devices reconfigured through the technical and institutional mediations inherent to the production of knowledge? How can we address the social and political stakes of archiving at the time of creation (omissions, negotiations, political pressures…)? Which epistemological approaches can be used to analyze testimonial functions assigned after the fact (such as previous footage reassigned for other purposes and uses, witness retractions regarding propaganda)? Studies on the historicity of individual accounts in documentaries (most often Anglophone and Francophone) situate their emergence in the 1960s (Leimbacher, 2014). This conference also proposes to account for prior decades and to introduce a global and comparative perspective. We wish to shed light on sensitivities to oral expression specific to various documentary traditions (Zéau, 2020), including those that developed under authoritarian and dictatorial regimes. These elements will be put in dialogue with various approaches to conceptualizing evidence, the document, and the audio trace. In so doing, we hope to pave the way for further research into the international circulation of ideas and expertise. In order to understand the listening conditions (Comolli, 1995) of a verbal testimony centered on personal experiences of violence, it is essential to recognize to what extent the topic is both political and conflictual. It is our wish to explore this dimension of communication in these societies that are torn apart, in particular in authoritarian regimes and police states. We also seek to question the pressures coming from institutions and social groups that lie behind the emergence of testimonies in cinema by comparing examples from various national cinemas. A part of the conference will be dedicated to the dissemination of filmed-based testimonies (their geographical circulation, infrastructure, breadth, and accompanying narratives). This conference is situated at the intersection of the history of cinema and a reflection on the act of witnessing that considers the social history of mass violence and the history of the end of dictatorships. We hope that it will be multidisciplinary and will foster connections between various cultural areas of research. We welcome proposals in French or English from a diversity of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches. The conference will take place on June 17 and 18, 2024 at The American University of Paris. Submission criteria:  Please send your proposals in English or French before January 8, 2024. Please indicate the argument and issues raised by the topic of your communication and do not exceed 500 words. Submissions are to be sent to the organizing Committee (schaeffercenter@aup.edu). Authors will be responded to in February 2024. The presentation should be of 20 minutes. Organization Committee : Luba Jurgenson (Sorbonne Université), Constance Pâris de Bollardière (AUP), Brian Schiff (AUP), Irina Tcherneva (CNRS) Scientific Committee, in alphabetical order: Ruth Beckermann (filmmaker) Jennifer Cazenave (Boston University) Jochen Hellbeck (Rutgers University) Luba Jurgenson (Sorbonne) Sylvie Lindeperg (University Paris 1) Ania Szczepanska (University Paris 1) Irina Tcherneva (CNRS) Indicative bibliography 
    • Paul Bernard Nouraud and Luba Jurgenson (ed.), Témoigner par l’image, Paris, Petra, 2015.
    • Paul Bernard Nouraud, Luba Jurgenson, Irina Tcherneva (ed.), Témoigner par l’image II, Paris, Petra, forthcoming in 2023.
    • Véronique Campan, Marie Martin, Sylvie Rollet (ed.), Qu’est-ce qu’un geste politique au cinéma ? Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2019.
    • Catherine Coquio, La littérature en suspens. Écritures de la Shoah : le témoignage et les œuvres, Paris, L’Arachnéen, 2015.
    • Efren Cuevas, Filming History from Below: Microhistorical Documentaries, Columbia University Press, Wallflower Press, 2022.
    • Frédérik Détue, Témoigner au cinéma : une action dans l’histoire, Presses Universitaires de Paris Nanterre, 2022.
    • Frédérik Détue & Charlotte Lacoste, Témoigner en littérature, Europe n° 1041-1042, janvier-février 2016).
    • Stefanie El Madawi, Approaching Contemporary Cinematic I-Witnessing, PhD thesis, University of Huddersfield, 2020.
    • Paul Frosh & Amit Pinchevski, Media Witnessing. Testimony in the Age of Mass Communication, Pallgrave Macmillan, 2009.
    • Verónica Garibotto, Rethinking testimonial cinema in postdictatorship Argentina: beyond memory fatigue, Indiana University Press, 2019.
    • Martin Goutte, « Le témoignage au rythme des images et des mots : accélération et accumulation », Écrire l’histoire [online], 16 | 2016, pp. 155-163.
    • Luba Jurgenson & Alexandre Prstojevic, Des Témoins aux héritiers, Paris, Petra, 2012.
    • Aurélia Kalisky, « Pour une histoire culturelle du testimonial. De la notion de “témoignage” à celle de “création testimoniale” », PHD thesis, 2013, Paris 3 University.
    • Rebecka Katz Thor, Beyond the Witness. Holocaust Representation and The Testimony Of Images. Three Films by Yael Hersonski, Harun Farocki And Eyal Sivan, Stockholm, Art and Theory Publishing, 2018.
    • Irina Leimbacher, More than Talking Heads: Non-fiction Testimony and Cinematic Form, PHD thesis, University of Berkley, 2014.
    • Sylvie Lindeperg & Annette Wieviorka, Univers concentrationnaire et génocide : voir, savoir, comprendre, Paris, Mille et une nuits, 2008.
    • Rory O’Bryen, Literature, Testimony and Cinema in Contemporary Colombian Culture : Spectres of la Violencia, Woodbridge, Rochester, NY, Tamesis, 2008.
    • Bhaskar Sarkar & Janet Walker (ed.), Documentary Testimonies: Global Archives of Suffering, New York, Routledge, 2010.
    • Annette Wiewiorka, The Era of the Witness, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2006.
    • Caroline Zéau, Le cinéma direct : un art de la mise en scène, l’Âge d’homme, 2020.
    • Revue Images Documentaires « La Parole Filmée », 1995, n° 22.
*

Call For Papers: Rasanblaj Fanm: Stories of Haitian Womanhood, Past, Present and Future, Institute for Black Atlantic Research, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom,

10-12 July 2024 Deadline for Submissions: January 13, 2024 Haitian women are regarded as the poto mitan (central pillar) of Haitian society. As caregivers, warriors, healers, artisans, traders, cultivators, manbos, storytellers, companions and agitators, they have been vital agents in shaping the fortunes of Haiti’s revolutionary anticolonial encounters and its quest for sovereignty and legitimation as an independent state. However, this term of veneration conceals diverse forms of political, social and discursive exclusion that women in Haiti and across the dyaspora confront in the present, and the myriad forms of silence and neglect to which they have been subjected in the historical record. The little that we know of the women whose courage, ferocity, resilience and generosity paved a course for independence, postcolonial statehood and the universal and permanent abolition of slavery in 1804 is often shrouded in mythology, which, as Colin Dayan has highlighted, “not only erases these women but forestalls our turning to [their] real lives.” Moreover, these legendary “sheroes” of Haiti’s past have often been exploited for the sake of political opportunity, symbolically deployed in the service of nationalist sleights of hand which obscure the precarity, insecurity, exploitation and vulnerability of Haitian women in the present. Piecing together the scattered fragments produced by the violence and ruptures of the colonialist archive and the continuing violence, neglect and co-optation of the dominant political oligarchy necessitates a form of rasanblaj, or (re)assembly, a practice advocated by Gina Athena Ulysse which “demands that we consider and confront the limited scope of segregated frameworks to explore what remains excluded in this landscape that is scorched yet full of life, riddled with inequities and dangerous and haunting memories.” Through rasanblaj, multiple modalities and disciplinary perspectives offer pathways of intersection. This conference invites opportunities to (re)assemble narratives, theorisations, performances, mobilisations and representations of Haitian womanhood, past, present and future. It welcomes proposals for 15-20-minute presentations from scholars, artists, activists, performers, creators and organisers that grapple with these diverse assemblages of Haitian womanhood. Potential topics of discussion include (but are not limited to):
    • (Under)representations of women in histories of the Haitian Revolution
    • Literary, artistic and filmic re-imaginings of Haiti’s revolutionary “sheroes” and women of Haiti’s pre- and post-revolutionary history
    • Haitian women as creators of art, literature, film, music and dance
    • Haitian women as subjects in art, literature, film and other media
    • The history of the feminist movement in Haiti
    • Haitian girlhood and education: where it’s been, where it is, where it’s going
    • The restavek system in Haiti and its particular impact on girls and young women
    • Land-tillers and Haiti’s moun andeyo
    • Makers, artisans and Madan Sara
    • Women and culinary traditions in Haiti
    • Cultural veneration of women icons and the notion of the poto mitan
    • Haitian women in the dyaspora
    • Manbos and the primacy of women in Vodou
    • Women elders, matriarchs and oral storytellers
    • Fashion icons and beauty queens from Haiti’s past and present
    • Women’s fashion in Haiti and the dyaspora
    • Women-led social justice organisations in Haiti and across the dyaspora
    • Stateswomen and women of the judiciary in Haiti
This event marks 220 years of Haitian independence, 200 years since Marie-Louise Christophe, first and only Queen of Haiti, departed Britain, and 90 years since the end of the U.S. Occupation of Haiti (1915-1934). It also celebrates the tenth anniversary of the Institute for Black Atlantic Research, whose record of hosting international events celebrating Haitian history and culture is established. As a radically transnational, interdisciplinary, collaborative, anticolonial and feminist endeavour, we aspire to create a conference that is inclusive in its structure and its mode of dissemination, and will make provisions for presenters in English, French and (where possible) in Kreyòl. Though we hope to assemble as many delegates in one common space as possible for this ambitious project, we recognise the challenges and potential barriers to travel (especially for our Haitian contingent). For this reason, and in order to promote inclusive discussions, there will be some opportunities for remote and hybrid participation.* A selection of the accepted papers may be invited to further develop their research for inclusion in an edited volume that may be produced after the conference. Confirmed keynote speakers include the Haitian-born artist Patricia Brintle, Ayitian Ourstorian and Vodouvi Professor Bayyinah Bello and filmmaker and journalist Etant Dupain Proposals for papers, panels, film/video presentations, workshops, and roundtables are due by 13 January 2024. Please submit an abstract of up to 300 words (these should be “blinded”, with names and affiliations removed, for peer review), along with a separate document containing a short biography of no more than 200 words (to include name and institutional/organisational affiliation if applicable). Proposals for complete panels of three speakers (or up to a maximum of four, keeping in mind that sessions will run for 90 minutes) are also welcomed. For full panel submissions, a designated group representative should collate abstracts and speaker biographies. All materials should be sent to the conference organisers, Dr M. Stephanie Chancy and Dr Nicole Willson at rasanblajfanm@gmail.com by the deadline date. * Proposals should indicate language requirements and any needs for remote participation.

Conference Committee

Dr M. Stephanie Chancy, Digital Library of the Caribbean, University of Florida Dr Nathan Dize, Washington University in St. Louis Dr Rachel Douglas, University of Glasgow Dr Raphael Hoermann, Institute for Black Atlantic Research, University of Central Lancashire Isabelle Dupuy, Writer and Trustee of the London Library Dr Alyssa Goldstein Sepinwall, California State University San Marcos Dr Nicole L. Willson, Institute for Black Atlantic Research, University of Central Lancashire Contact Email rasanblajfanm@gmail.com URL https://www.fanmrebel.com/media/cfp-rasanblaj-fanm-stories-of-haitian-womanhood-past-present-and-future * (Re)Tracing Self, World, and Agency in Narratives of Transformation Université Laval’s Graduate Conference for English Literature (ULGCEL) March 15, 2024 (Hybrid) Deadline for Submissions: January 14, 2024  “Writing and performing should deepen the meaning of words, should illuminate, transfix and transform.” –bell hooks In literary studies, scholars and writers such as bell hooks have highlighted the transformative potential of words, revealing that writing and artistic performance are not merely acts of creation but journeys toward self-discovery and social change. As we navigate the complexities of our contemporary society, marked by profound shifts and challenges, the need for narratives of transformation has become more urgent. In an era that grapples with social justice, environmental crises, and cultural transformation and revitalization, we invite scholars from various fields to engage with the theme of “Narratives of Transformation.” This call for papers seeks to reflect on writing and artistic performance as vehicles for personal and collective healing and empowerment. We invite papers on all narrative forms and genres that inspire change, challenge the status quo, and bring forth stories that (re)trace and weave together individual and collective pasts, presents, and futures. Université Laval’s 2024 Graduate Conference for English Literature proposes to engage narratives of transformation to consider questions such as:
    • In what ways can narratives of transformation serve as a catalyst for personal growth, social change, or healing in our contemporary society?
    • How do authors explore the intersectionality of identities, such as race, gender, or class, in the context of narratives of transformation?
    • What are the roles of storytelling and writing in challenging the status quo and inspiring change in today’s world?
    • What ethical and social responsibilities should writers and scholars consider when engaging with narratives of transformation?
    • How can narrative (re)imagine and bridge past, present, and future, and to what effect?
    • How does literature employ narrative techniques to depict transitions and convey the aesthetics of change and transformation?
ULGCEL 2024 invites graduate student presentations that explore such questions as they relate to literature, film, graphic novels, television, video games, or wherever narrative is found. We welcome a variety of theoretical and critical approaches and encourage presentations of 15-20 minutes. Topics for consideration encompass, but are not confined to:
    • Intersectionality
    • Multiculturalism
    • Identity and Representation
    • Gender and Sexuality
    • Postcolonial Narratives
    • Environmental Narratives
    • Dystopian and Utopian Narratives
    • Transcultural Narratives
    • Narrative and Ethics
    • Narrative and Memory
The conference will be held in a hybrid format on March 15, 2024. Speakers can present in person on the UL campus or via Zoom. We invite graduate students (MA, PhD, as well as advanced undergraduates) from various disciplines (Literature, Translation Studies, Film Studies, Cultural Studies, Indigenous Studies, History, etc.) to submit proposals. Visit the website for information on post-conference publishing opportunities. Please submit an abstract of 250 words and a biography of 50 words to: aeglea@asso.ulaval.ca. Include your name, affiliation, degree program, e-mail address, equipment needs, as well as the title of your presentation, and upload the document as both PDF and Word attachments. UPDATE: The deadline for proposals is now January 14, 2024. You will be informed of our decision by January 21, 2024. Website: https://aegleaulaval.wixsite.com/home/about-9 *

(Para-)Military Violence, War Crimes in Post-Soviet Conflicts and Narratives of the Russo-Ukrainian War: New Avenues of Methodology and Research

May 21-23, 28-29, 2024 Application deadline: January 15, 2024. Potsdam and Jerusalem Leibniz-Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, in cooperation with the Pilecki Institute, the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and the University of New Europe (UNE) organize a joint international workshop that will take place in two locations: The Leibniz-Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam (ZZF) (May 21-23, 2024) and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (May 28-29, 2024). The first part of the workshop at the Leibniz-Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam will take place within the research framework KonKoop (Conflict and Cooperation in Eastern Europe: The Consequences of the Reconfiguration of Political, Economic, and Social Spaces since the End of the Cold War). It will primarily focus on the topic of (para-)military violence over a period of time starting with the collapse of the USSR till present. The Mutiny of the Wagner group in summer 2023 has highlighted the significance of armed militias for understanding conflict, violence and war in the post-Soviet space. The dissolution of the USSR was preceded by the disintegration of the Soviet Army and the rise of armed groups, local strongmen and warlords in parts of the Caucasus, in Central Asia and in Moldova. From the 1990s onwards irregular formations of armed men played a significant role in various conflicts from Chechnya to the Donbas. These men, as well as the regular armed units of Russia used violence and committed war crimes in the conflicts following the dissolution of the USSR. The workshop will assemble both those who have contributed to the ongoing discussion on methodological approaches in the study of violent groups, including ethical questions, as well as researchers who have already studied sources and collected data in the field. Presentations will include work on the conflicts of the late USSR and the 1990s as well as more recent studies about the Russian war against Ukraine (starting in 2014). The goal of the workshop is to gain a better understanding of the origins, the actors as well as the forms and consequences of irregular military violence from perestroika to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The workshop language is English. Submissions should include a one-page abstract and a short CV. Please send all materials by 15 January 2024 to alyona.bidenko@zzf-potsdam.de Applications are welcome from scholars and nonacademic research professionals such as journalists and activists. Some of the participants’ travel costs will be reimbursed upon request. In cooperation with the University of New Europe network a publication of some of the contributions is planned with a transcript in the “New Europes” book series. Organizing committee: Alyona Bidenko (ZZF/ KonKoop), Jan Claas Behrends (ZZF/ Viadrina U) Contact email: alyona.bidenko@zzf-potsdam.de For more information see. www.zzf-potsdam.de www.konkoop.de neweurope.university The Potsdam Workshop is supported by funds from the Federal Ministry of Research (BMBF) The second part of the workshop at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem will concentrate on the Russo-Ukrainian war and explore a range of topics related to how the war is narrated, constructed and interpreted by its immediate witnesses: refugees from Ukraine who left the country to various destinations, primarily to Europe and Israel. Topics that we intend to discuss include but are not limited to the following: I. History of the war seen from “within” We look forward to discussing the major narrative strands in the stories about living in Ukraine during the war (possibly, under the Russian occupation), of flight/evacuation to other countries and of current refugeehood in the country of destination. We aim here at enhancing our understanding of the social reality, micropolitics of everyday life and larger social processes as all these were altered by the war. Some of the foci in this discussion may include: 1) grass-root agency in the situation of war: where and how it is produced and sustained, how it facilitates micro-level social practices, how it shapes interaction in larger social networks and how it is inscribed in the workings of formal institutions or organizations; 2) various choices (practical, moral, political, linguistic, etc.) involved in people’s war-time experience contexts and how these choices reflect people’s individual and group-based political allegiances and humanitarian commitments; 3) individual and collective identity(ies) and their role in shaping people’s vision of the broader context of Russo-Ukrainian war, of their war-time experiences in Ukraine and later in their new host countries, as well as of the broader political agendas on the international level against which these identities are negotiated. II. Methodology We are also looking forward to discussing methodologies underlying our oral history research with particular regard to the nature of our interviews and to some extent participant observation. First, here we may focus on the ontologies of the texts produced in our work with particular regard to the following aspects: a) “translatability” of the war experience, particularly of the trauma experience, and “conditions of felicity” under which communication of this experience becomes possible; b) the role of individual and collective subjectivities invoked in people’s stories as categories of the scholarly analysis; c) critique of the nature of oral narratives produced in a multiple-stage process of immediate perception and postponed reflection of the witnesses, as well as the interpretation on the part of researchers and their resulting value for the academic discourse; d) crystallization of earlier “raw” testimonies into structured narratives with specific civil agendas, as well as various social, political and cultural factors that impact this process; e) possible theoretical framings that allow oral narratives to become part of the academic discourse. Second, we may discuss the place of our findings within the existing discourses in social sciences and humanities, such as “anthropology of emergency,” identity-and-agency theory, actor-network theory, anthropology of everyday life, genocide studies, Ukrainian studies, European studies, Israel studies, studies of colonialism and post-colonialism, diaspora and nationalism studies, aliyah studies, etc. Third, we might give thought to how ethnographic and anthropological perspectives on the one hand provide the possibility of different framings of historical events and processes as compared to official documentary sources, but on the other, how they may complement each other to expand our perspective on the object of our study. In other words, how oral history may be integrated into the larger historical canon and how this synthesis may provide a more human-oriented perspective upon the war. III. Further collaborative efforts Last but not least, we are planning to discuss our further research around the theme of the Russo-Ukrainian war, including development of joint projects, creation of cross-referenced archival depositories and establishing research networks with other academic institutions. Applications are welcome from scholars and nonacademic research professionals. We particularly welcome researchers who have been doing oral history research with war-time Ukrainian refugees, as well as scholars in social sciences more broadly. Application deadline: January 15, 2024. Accommodation costs in Israel will be covered. Organizing committee: Semion Goldin (Hebrew U of Jerusalem), semyon.goldin@mail.huji.ac.il, Anna Kushkova (Hebrew U of Jerusalem), anna.kushkova@mail.huji.ac.il Contact email: anna.kushkova@mail.huji.ac.il (Anna Kushkova) Contact Information The Leibniz-Zentrum für Zeithistorische Forschung Potsdam (ZZF): Alyona Bidenko (ZZF/ KonKoop), Jan Claas Behrends (ZZF/ Viadrina U). Contact email: alyona.bidenko@zzf-potsdam.de. Hebrew University of Jerusalem: Semion Goldin (Hebrew U of Jerusalem), semyon.goldin@mail.huji.ac.il, Anna Kushkova (Hebrew U of Jerusalem), anna.kushkova@mail.huji.ac.il. Contact email: anna.kushkova@mail.huji.ac.il (Anna Kushkova). Contact Email alyona.bidenko@zzf-potsdam.de * Deadline for proposals: January 11, 2024 CFP – Genres in Transit: The Novel of Memory as World Literature Eighth Annual Conference of the Memory Studies Association (MSA) — “Memories in Transit” Lima, Peru, 18 to 20 July 2024  https://www.memorystudiesassociation.org/call-for-papers-msa-annual-conference-2024-lima-peru/ This panel is rooted in the research done on the novel of memory in Romania, in the frame of the project The Novel of Memory in Postcommunism: Subgenres, Generations, Transnational Networks and it aims at a wider, transnational and trans-continental mapping of the genre and its local/ global embodiments and traditions. In the last four decades, the novel of memory emerged in various parts of the world, spanning spaces and experiences, most notably in postcolonial, posttotalitarian and posttraumatic situations, in such a proportion that it can be argued it now reaches the scale of a world genre. Counting among its representatives such authors as Salman Rushdie (with Midnight’s Children, 1981), Toni Morrison (with Beloved, 1987), Herta Muller (with The Hunger Angel, 2009), Mircea Cartarescu (with Blinding, 1996), Laura Alcoba (with The Rabbit House, 2007), Gilbert Gatore (with The Past Ahead, 2012) the novel of memory took on challenges of postmodern form vs. political responsibility, but mostly that of memory, often in the form of autofiction, challenging history. However this world genre is discussed, whether in terms of multidirectionality (Michael Rothberg), generationality (Astrid Erll), or postmemory (Marianne Hirsch), the debate is still open on how it came about globally, what subgenres and formulas it favored, if and how it traveled from one author or culture to another. As Wai Chee Dimock puts it in „Genre as World System: Epic and Novel on Four Continents” (2006), literary genres enter a network of interconnection, not of genealogical relations, highlighting „a remote spectrum of affinities, interesting when seen in conjunction, but not themselves organically linked”. Likeliness, Dimock emphasizes, issues “from environments roughly similar but widely dispersed”. Situated at the intersection of memory studies and literary studies, the panel invites papers on the various national embodiments of the novel of memory from Eastern Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, South Asia and the Pacific, addressing, but not limited to, the following topics:
    • how memory and literary formulas are intertwining in various political contexts
    • how multidirectionality manifests itself (or not) in the forms of this genre
    • how the different geocultural embodiments of the novel of memory deal with variation and resemblance
    • to what extent the novel of memory contributes to the decolonizing of memory being done now in multiple memory cultures and academic contexts.Wider surveys of the genre in national/ transnational frames, as well as individual case studies of authors and literary works are welcome. Scholars from literary, memory, and lifewriting studies interested in these topics may send a brief proposal (200-300 words) to andreea.mironescu@uaic.ro, if possible, no later than January 11, 2024. The deadline for panel submissions to the MSA conference is January 15, 2024.Many thanks and best wishes for 2024,Andreea Mironescu Senior Researcher, Institute of Interdisciplinary Research – Department of Social Sciences and Humanities Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andreea-Mirones
* Call for Panel Participants: Memories and Legacies of the World War II Nikkei Incarceration “Memories in Transit,” Memory Studies Association Conference July 18–20, 2024 Lima Peru https://www.memorystudiesassociation.org/call-for-papers-msa-annual-conference-2024-lima-peru/ Deadline for Submissions January 9, 2024 This proposed panel explores personal and public remembrance of the North American incarceration of persons of Japanese descent throughout the Second World War (1941–1945), particularly how memories of the event are evoked and mobilized in different historical contexts and conversations. Engaging with key concepts of memory activism (Gutman, Rigney, Wüstenberg), postmemory (Hirsch), and multidirectional memory (Rothberg), among others, we examine how several present-day social movements and political initiatives draw on memories of Nikkei wartime exclusion to challenge contemporary forms of political violence and to fight for more just, equitable, and secure futures. We address the following questions: How can memories of the past be used to combat violence and to motivate political action and solidarity in the present? How do memories of the Japanese diaspora and western exclusion move across and between multiple generations, geographies, populations, and cultures? Further, how can practices of remembrance build community between different groups and draw connections between diverse social movements and political struggles? Spanning the disciplines of history, literature, and media studies, this panel addresses these questions and others by exploring how memories and remembrance of the Nikkei wartime incarceration influences our society today—including ongoing discussions about racial repair, environmental destruction, and coloniality. Ultimately, the panel seeks to offer new and critical insights into the political, activist, environmental, and embodied legacies of the Japanese American incarceration. We invite scholars interested in participating to send a short paper abstract to Kelsey Moore (kelseymoore@ucsb.edu) and Jen Noji (jnoji@g.ucla.edu)as soon as possible, but ideally no later than January 9. NB: All panel materials will be submitted by January 15, 2024. Call for Panel Participants – MSA 2024 (Lima, Peru, July 18-20) [Announcement] * Call for Panel Participants: Memories and Legacies of the World War II Nikkei Incarceration “Memories in Transit,” Memory Studies Association Conference July 18–20, 2024 Lima Peru https://www.memorystudiesassociation.org/call-for-papers-msa-annual-conference-2024-lima-peru/ Deadline for Submissions January 9, 2024 This proposed panel explores personal and public remembrance of the North American incarceration of persons of Japanese descent throughout the Second World War (1941–1945), particularly how memories of the event are evoked and mobilized in different historical contexts and conversations. Engaging with key concepts of memory activism (Gutman, Rigney, Wüstenberg), postmemory (Hirsch), and multidirectional memory (Rothberg), among others, we examine how several present-day social movements and political initiatives draw on memories of Nikkei wartime exclusion to challenge contemporary forms of political violence and to fight for more just, equitable, and secure futures. We address the following questions: How can memories of the past be used to combat violence and to motivate political action and solidarity in the present? How do memories of the Japanese diaspora and western exclusion move across and between multiple generations, geographies, populations, and cultures? Further, how can practices of remembrance build community between different groups and draw connections between diverse social movements and political struggles? Spanning the disciplines of history, literature, and media studies, this panel addresses these questions and others by exploring how memories and remembrance of the Nikkei wartime incarceration influences our society today—including ongoing discussions about racial repair, environmental destruction, and coloniality. Ultimately, the panel seeks to offer new and critical insights into the political, activist, environmental, and embodied legacies of the Japanese American incarceration. We invite scholars interested in participating to send a short paper abstract to Kelsey Moore (kelseymoore@ucsb.edu) and Jen Noji (jnoji@g.ucla.edu)as soon as possible, but ideally no later than January 9. NB: All panel materials will be submitted by January 15, 2024. Call for Panel Participants – MSA 2024 (Lima, Peru, July 18-20) [Announcement] *

Symposium Selfing and Shelving: Zines, Zine Media, and Zintivism

deadline for submissions:  December 31, 2023 Zines are extremely versatile and shapeshift across various historical and cultural contexts. The term covers a wide range of objects with different aesthetic and material qualities as well as contexts of production and reception: Zines accommodate the collective concerns of fans and activists (zintivism) and the personal voice of the diarist and letter writer. Since the rise of digital media, zines and their aesthetics have become portable: Digitised and digital zines exist alongside blogs, social media, podcasts, and substacks, which seem to exhibit zine-y tendencies, while digital infrastructures have changed the ways that print zines are produced, distributed, and archived. At the same time, print media, including zines, have seen a revival and postdigital reinvention, not the least as a paper-based escape from screens. In this new constellation, we propose to revisit questions like: Where does the zine begin and end and how have its meanings changed for readers, collectors, and makers? How can contemporary developments of the zine (like the wave of quaranzines) change our understanding of its meaning, genealogy, and archive? And what, and where, are zines now? This symposium suggests considering these questions through the lens of –       shelving – the zine at home, on the shelves of libraries, archives, and collectors, its repurposing and disassembling, its neglect as ephemera as well as remediation through reprints and staging in exhibitions, coffee table books, etc. –       and ‘selfing’ – the zine as a tool in making identities and ‘working on the self,’ as a ‘third space’ for new subjectivities, as ‘sticky’ with affects, as the glue of communal belonging (local/transnational), as resource for ‘subcultural capital’ and distinction, and as conduit for relationships and activism. We especially welcome papers that propose theoretical approaches which attend to the materiality of zines and zine production and consider the printed zine as only one form of zine media. We are interested in new approaches to zines as well as in investigations of media and objects that borrow from, reference, mimic, disguise as, or are influenced by the zine – that are in some way zine-y and take the format, aesthetics, tone, and /or affect beyond paper. Please send an abstract (ca. 300 words) + short bio to safazli@uni-mainz.de and milos.hroch@fsv.cuni.cz by December 31, 2023 This symposium is designed as a friendly space for established and emerging scholars to share and discuss ideas. We also encourage practitioners to apply and are happy to accommodate non-academic formats of presentation. Organisers Sabina Fazli, Obama Institute, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany Miloš Hroch, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic * Call for Papers: Selbstporträts Expressionismus, Ausgabe 20/2024 Herausgegeben von Kristin Eichhorn und Johannes S. Lorenzen  Deadline for Abstracts 1/1/2024 Das Selbstporträt gehört zu den klassischen Motiven der Malerei, führt darüber hinaus aber auch zu der für die Moderne zentralen Frage nach den Wechselwirkungen zwischen Künstler*in und Werk. Es rückt den Produktionsprozess ebenso ins Zentrum wie den Menschen dahinter und erlaubt so neben der programmatischen Selbstverortung auch eine Diskussion über Art und Rolle künstlerischen Schaffens, die weit über bildende Kunst hinausgeht. In der Moderne werden deren mediale Möglichkeiten durch die Fotografie entscheidend erweitert, auch die Selbstdarstellung der kunstschaffenden Persönlichkeit verändert sich – man denke an die Akte von Egon Schiele, der sich oft selbst nackt und stilisiert malte und damit durchaus für Kontroversen sorgte. Künstlerische Selbstinszenierung durch Spiegelung der eigenen Person im eigenen Werk ist auch in der Literatur möglich und weit verbreitet. So ist es kein Zufall, dass viele Protagonisten im Werk Franz Kafkas als „K“ eingeführt werden und die frühen Romane von Johannes R. Becher autobiografische Züge aufweisen bzw. reale Lebensereignisse des Autors verarbeiten. Hintergrund dieser neuen Fokussierung auf das Selbst sind nicht zuletzt auch das Aufkommen der Psychoanalyse und dem Begriff eines ‚Ichs‘, das sich vor dem Hintergrund verdrängter Traumata und Sexualität gesellschaftlich konstituieren muss, sowie der weitgehende Wegfall religiöser und spiritueller Bedeutungsmuster, die das moderne Subjekt auf die eigene Biografie und die eigenen Lebensentscheidungen zurückwirft. Hat es das self-fashioning (Stephen Greenblatt) schon in der Renaissance gegeben, nimmt der Druck zur Selbstinszenierung vor dem Hintergrund miteinander konkurrierender und oft kurzlebiger (avantgardistischer) Strömungen zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts noch einmal deutlich zu, die nicht ohne Grund ihre Positionen durch so viele Manifeste begründen. Hinzu kommt, dass die Rolle des Künstlers zeitgenössisch stark über seine Rolle zur Gesellschaft definiert wird. Er kann als poeta vates eine quasireligiöse Seherfigur darstellen, sich entweder durch Elitarismus oder durch Provokation und Antibürgerlichkeit von der restlichen Gesellschaft absetzen und in mehr oder weniger konkreter politischer Verankerung ihre grundlegende Veränderung anstreben: In jedem Fall gehen Kunst und Leben eine enge Verbindung ein, bezeugen und beglaubigen sich gegenseitig. Künstlertum gilt es biografisch in Szene zu setzen und das Werk muss wiederum zu der Persona passen, der sich sein*e Erschaffer*in verpflichtet fühlt. So sind die Grenzen zwischen Fiktion und Realität nicht zuletzt in der Literatur des Expressionismus fließend, etwa wenn Else Lasker-Schüler als Figur in ihren Texten auftaucht, dort eine fiktive Identität als Prinz Jussuf annimmt, als der sie gleichzeitig wiederum im realen Leben auftritt. Häufig hat das Selbstporträt im Expressionismus also keine rein abbildende Funktion. Es entwickelt sich vielmehr ein komplexes Wechselspiel zwischen Original und Abbild, das die Grenzen zwischen beiden ebenso verwischt, wie es die Frage aufwirft, wo die Kunst endet und das Leben beginnt. Das geplante Heft möchte diesen und anderen Aspekten des Selbstbildnisses im Expressionismus vertieft nachgehen. Dabei sind sowohl Überlegungen zur generellen Praxis der Selbstverortung und Selbstinszenierung möglich wie auch die Auseinandersetzung mit einzelnen (bildkünstlerischen) Selbstporträts bzw. Alter Egos in narrativen Formaten (Literatur, Film). Abstracts zu diesen, aber gerne auch anderen thematisch einschlägigen Aspekten von nicht mehr als 2.000 Zeichen senden Sie bitte bis zum 1. Januar 2024 an eichhorn@neofelis-verlag.de und lorenzen@neofelis-verlag.de. Zudem werden unabhängig vom Thema des Hefts auch immer Vorschläge für Rezensionen oder Diskussionsbeiträge zu aktuellen Forschungsdebatten entgegengenommen, die Phänomene der aktuellen Expressionismus-Rezeption vorstellen und besprechen. Die fertigen Beiträge sollten einen Umfang von 20.000 Zeichen (inkl. Leerzeichen und Fußnoten) nicht überschreiten und sind bis zum 1. Juli 2024 einzureichen. Das Heft im November 2024. ENGLISH VERSION The self-portrait is one of the classical motifs of painting, but it also leads to the question of the interaction between artist and work, which is central to modernism. It focuses on the production process as well as on the person behind it and thus, in addition to the programmatic self-positioning, also allows a discussion about the nature and role of artistic creation that goes far beyond fine art. In the modern era, photography decisively expands the media possibilities of art, and the self-portrayal of the artistic personality changes as well – think of the nudes of Egon Schiele, who often painted himself naked and stylized, thus causing controversy. Artistic self-dramatization by mirroring one’s own person in one’s own work is also possible and widespread in literature. Thus it is no coincidence that many protagonists in Franz Kafka’s work are introduced as “K” and that the early novels of Johannes R. Becher have autobiographical features or process real life events of the author. The background to this new focus on the self is not least the emergence of psychoanalysis and the concept of an ‘I’ that has to constitute itself socially against the background of repressed traumas and sexuality, as well as the widespread disappearance of religious and spiritual patterns of meaning, which the modern subject could relate to his own biography and his own life decisions. If self-fashioning (Stephen Greenblatt) already existed in the Renaissance, the pressure for self-dramatization increases again significantly at the beginning of the 20th century against the background of competing and often short-lived (avant-garde) currents, which not without reason justify their positions through so many manifestos. In addition, the role of the artist is contemporary strongly defined by his role to society. As poeta vates, he can represent a quasi-religious seer figure, set himself apart from the rest of society either through elitism or through provocation and anti-bourgeoisie, and strive for its fundamental change in more or less concrete political anchoring: In each case, art and life enter into a close relationship, testifying to and authenticating each other. Artistry must be staged biographically, and the work must in turn fit the persona to which its creator is committed. Thus the boundaries between fiction and reality are fluid, not least in the literature of Expressionism, for example when Else Lasker-Schüler appears as a character in her texts, assuming there a fictitious identity as Prince Jussuf, as whom she in turn appears in real life. Please send abstracts on these, but also gladly other thematically relevant aspects of no more than 2,000 characters to eichhorn@neofelis-verlag.de and lorenzen@neofelis-verlag.de by January 1, 2024. In addition, regardless of the theme of the issue, we also always accept proposals for reviews or discussion papers on current research debates that present and discuss phenomena in the current reception of Expressionism. Final articles must be in German but translations will be accepted. Finished articles should not exceed 20,000 characters (including spaces and footnotes) and should be submitted by July 1, 2024. The issue in November 2024. Journal of Perpetrator Research Special Issue: Complicit Testimonies The Journal of Perpetrator Research is seeking submissions for a special issue on the theme of Complicit Testimonies, scheduled for publication in Spring 2025, and guest-edited by Ivan Stacy (Beijing Normal University). deadline for submissions: December 10, 2023 Introduction Shoshona Felman and Dori Laub wrote their seminal Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History (1992) as a result of their experiences with the Fortunoff Video Archive for Holocaust Testimonies at Yale. For this reason, they developed a model in which testimony is closely connected to the subject position of victimhood and the experience of trauma. This relationship has endured in academic research on testimony, with Avishai Margalit, for example, proposing the figure of the “moral witness” as one that has experienced directly the suffering produced by atrocity; it also appears in more recent contributions to The Future of Testimony: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Witnessing (edited by Jane Kilby and Anthony Rowland, 2008) and the Palgrave Handbook of Testimony and Culture, in which the editors Sara Jones and Roger Woods write in their introduction that “the urge to communicate the unique experience is the impulse behind much testimony from survivors of trauma”. Endeavours to explicate the nature of testimony as written or told by those who have lived through extreme suffering are necessary and valuable, yet the creation of testimony does not necessarily presuppose a state of victimhood or an experience of trauma. Analysis of perpetrator testimony by writers including Leigh Payne, Ute Hirsekorn and Sue Vice has productively complicated the relationship between testifier, the account they produce, and their role in historical events. However, the tendency to adjectivize testimony with a particular subject position – typically in the form of “victim testimony” or “perpetrator testimony” – presents a further problem: if, as Margalit argues, “testimony, not direct observation, is our basic source of evidence and knowledge,” to categorize that primary source of knowledge itself with the value-laden labels of “victim” or “perpetrator” imposes an a priori framework for interpreting events and experiences that are still in the process of becoming known. Moreover, as Primo Levi’s well-known elaboration on the “gray zone” in The Drowned and the Saved shows, the blurring of boundaries between victims and perpetrators was one of the central mechanisms by which the camps functioned, as a means of securing the complicity even of those whose lives they were designed to destroy. For this reason, the concept of complicity, and the uncertain moral positions that it encompasses, offers a valuable but hitherto under-theorised approach to studying testimony. The aim of this special issue of the Journal of Perpetrator Research is therefore to explore the relationship between complicity and the creation and reception of testimony from an interdisciplinary perspective. In a general sense, complicity is an increasingly important concept for understanding the negative consequences of actions in an ever-more interconnected world, and as Christopher Kutz notes, “the most important and far-reaching harms and wrongs of contemporary life are the products of collective actions, mediated by social and institutional structures.” Moreover, language itself is at once shaped by social and institutional pressures while also creating and performing complicity with those structures of power: as Thomas Docherty argues, complicity with institutions tends to operate through the “establishment of a reduced lexicon.” This special issue is intended to consider testimony in light of the particular challenges posed by the concept of complicity, and in doing so to examine the nature of narrative accounts created in a moral “gray zone.” Topics for articles in this special issue might include, but are not limited to:
    • Language and form in complicit testimonies
    • Literary and cultural representations of complicit testimonies
    • Affective responses to compromised testimony
    • Complicity and the generic boundaries of testimony
    • Distinctions between perpetration and complicity
    • Complicity and adjacent concepts (beneficiaries and implicated subjects)
    • Categories of complicity (collaborating, consorting, condoning and conniving)
We intend that the special issue will represent a range of disciplines, and we are particularly interested in articles from non-European and non-Anglophone perspectives. Deadline for submissions: Abstracts of around 300 words should be submitted to Ivan Stacy at ivanstacy@gmail.com, no later than 10 December 2023. Queries can be directed to the same email address. Full articles of 6,000-10,000 words will be due by 30 June 2024, with publication scheduled for Spring 2025. * Call for abstracts for a special issue of the International Mad Studies Journal (IMSJ), Maddening the Academy Deadline for Submissions, December 15, 2023 Guest Editors: Meaghan Krazinski (she/they), Syracuse University Jersey Cosantino (they/them), Syracuse University Jennifer Poole (she/her), Toronto Metropolitan University May Friedman (she/her), Toronto Metropolitan University Both traditional formats and non-traditional forms are welcome (and encouraged!). Deadline to submit abstracts: December 15th 2023, with publication in 2025 Call For Abstracts: The academy (noun): A place. A body. A collection of bodies, of bodyminds that bend/are bent toward who and what is considered “normal”. Never neutral, always operating in the context and coordinates of space and time including histories of in/access(ability). The academy often functions to suppress, oppress, invalidate, and erase m/Mad knowledges, ideas, thoughts, and expressions, while at the same time producing forms of madness by pathologizing ways of being that exist outside the boundaries of “normal”. The academy is a geopolitical space that reproduces itself and extends its control beyond the physical campus, while entwined in legacies of violence that reflect how education and the medical-industrial complex are always and have always been tools of white supremacy, ableism, sanism, and colonialism. Yet, while seeking to distance itself and rid itself of m/Madness, the academy encircles itself around it, quite literally, in its histories and investments in control of Mad/mad(dened) people, leaving traces of these hauntings (Gordon, 2008) and becomings in its wake. In this special issue of the International Mad Studies Journal, we seek to explore how Mad Studies, bodyminds, knowledges, meaning-making, thoughts, ideas, creativity, and imaginations, engage in an ongoing process of m/Maddening the academy and being m/Maddened by the academy. We operate from a shared understanding that the academy is rooted in the glorification of a particular colonial, white supremacist, neoliberal, Western, Global North ideological and political context and we seek to transgress this. Therefore, we invite a multitude of definitions of what the academy is, has been, and can be. We are especially grateful to scholars Juan Carlos Cea-Madrid and Tatiana Parada for their 2021 article “Maddening the Academy: Mad Studies, Critical Methodologies and Militant Research in Mental Health” from which the title of this special issue pays homage. We invite submissions from individuals with complex and multifaceted m/Mad(dening) relationships to the academy, including folks who were excluded from the academy, who rejected the academy, who found home and community within the academy, who long/ed for the promises of the academy, who helped to carve more accessible pathways through the academy, who seek to watch the academy burn once and for all…the list is endless. The ways that we, as guest editors of this special issue, practice and dream of m/Maddening the academy and hold space for the stories and felt-sense experiences of those m/Maddened by the academy are made possible because of histories of global activist and community-based resistance to psychiatrization, and the controlling, harmful practices of the psy-disciplines. Thus, a m/Maddening of the academy encompasses an infinite array of experiences and perspectives, backgrounds and identity intersections, pasts and presents, all the while perpetually seeking m/Mad(dened) futures that are liberatory for all. Abstract Submissions: We encourage abstract submissions to this special issue of the International Mad Studies Journal, “Maddening the Academy,” by December 15, 2023 via email to mkrazins@syr.edu. If alternative dates are helpful, we welcome these requests. Abstracts should:
    • be approximately 250 words that describe what will be discussed/addressed in your final article/submission and how this is connected to the theme of the special issue
    • include an approximately 100 word bio
    • include clear references to/engagement with Mad Studies scholarship/Mad movement building.
Estimated Publication Timeline (that also honors m/Mad time, Crip time, queer time, etc.):
    • August 2023: CFA is shared publicly
    • December 15, 2023: Author abstracts are submitted to guest editors
    • February 2024: Editors begin to contact authors
    • August 2024: Author final submissions due
    • Peer Review
    • Author Revisions
    • Copyediting
    • Special issue ready for publication: Winter/Spring 2025
Accessibility: Please note that we intend this special issue to also take up a process of m/Maddening academic outputs. As a result, we are open to processes which may make submission and contribution to this issue more accessible, nourishing and open to all. Please let us know what specific processes, including timelines, can best support your engagement. Final Submission Formats: In addition to traditional scholarly writing, we welcome arts-based, poetic, musical, autobiographical, photographic, and other non-normative contributions. Because the journal is entirely virtual, video, audio and other creative formats and offerings can be distributed and are warmly welcomed. We request that you include a brief written/recorded description of your arts-based contribution that highlights the submission’s connections to the special issue theme and personal significance. Contributors may choose to have their submission peer reviewed or reviewed only by editors. For more information, please feel free to reach out to us. Final Submission Word Count: There is no minimum word-count for scholarly writing  submissions of finished articles. We do ask that you please not exceed 5,000 words and to reach out to us directly if your piece will likely exceed this word count. For more information on this special issue, including possible themes and topics that we welcome you to explore, please feel free to reach out and we would be happy to share a longer, more detailed call for abstracts. Guest Editor Bios: Meaghan Krazinski: Meaghan (she/they), is a doctoral student in Special Education at Syracuse University with advanced study in women’s and gender studies. They seek to privilege neurodivergent ways of knowing as a means of resisting the pathologizing logics of the academy. Their most recent work investigates the relationships between healing, trauma, race, and disability labels. They also have a forthcoming work on the topic of Autistic understandings of gender and identity. Meaghan is white, multiply neurodivergent, and has education, class, and citizenship privileges with English as a first language. They hold a master’s in inclusive special education and a certificate of advanced study in disability studies from Syracuse University. Jersey Cosantino: Jersey Cosantino (they/them), a former K-12 educator, is a doctoral candidate in Cultural Foundations of Education at Syracuse University, completing certificates of advanced study in women’s and gender studies and disability studies. Jersey’s scholarship resides at the intersections of Mad studies and trans studies and, utilizing disability and transformative justice frameworks, their research centers the experiences and subjectivities of Mad, neurodivergent, trans, non-binary, and gender non-conforming individuals. Through oral history and autoethnography, Jersey seeks to construct Mad trans archives that create pathways and portals to Mad trans futures, imaginaries, and elsewheres. Using Mad trans methodologies that challenge sanism, ableism, and transmisia, Jersey’s research confronts medical model discourses and the pathologizing gaze of the psychiatric industrial complex. Jersey identifies as Mad, neurodivergent, queer, trans, and non-binary and is white with class, education, and citizenship privilege. They are a co-facilitator for SU’s Intergroup Dialogue Program and a co-editor of the International Mad Studies Journal. Jersey holds a master’s degree in high school English education (‘14) and a graduate certificate in mindfulness studies (‘19) from Lesley University, and a bachelor’s degree in English and studio art from Wellesley College (‘09). Jennifer (Jen) Poole (she/her) is a white, first generation settler to T’karonto (Treaty 13). Jen identifies as M/maddened and along with race, class, education, employment, citizenship,  language and other privileges, lives with disability, pain and fear.  As an Associate Professor in the School of Social Work at Toronto Metropolitan University, Jen’s work sits in the confluence of madness and grief, and while companioning learners is Jen’s professional priority, current (re) search projects focus on grief in the classroom, sanism, care, decolonizing education and knowledge. Jen is also a settler trainer for the Centre for Indigegogy at Wilfrid Laurier University, a Fellow at the Centre for Critical Qualitative Health Research at the University of Toronto and a Teaching Fellow at Toronto Metropolitan University. Additionally, Jen is a proud bonus parent, a TEDX talker and a long time community peer supporter.  Jen is happiest outside. May Friedman: May Friedman (she/her) works as a faculty member at Toronto Metropolitan University.  May’s research looks at unstable identities, including bodies that do not conform to normative tropes of race, ethnicity, ability, size, beauty and health.  Most recently much of May’s research has focused on intersectional approaches to fat studies considering the multiple and fluid experiences of both fat oppression and fat activism.  Drawing on a range of arts-based methods including digital storytelling as well as analyses of treasured garments, May has explored meaning making and representation in relation to embodiment and experience. Email questions to: mkrazins@syr.edu Please share out with all who may be interested! Live Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTlHcfa54_hj9tEbB8fh8L_237sJ__vkY4Wu4dFifV_rzvut5nSIs1CZs2wkGUjC_XTb7-B-P5k6AIs/pub ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ May Friedman (she/her) Professor School of Social Work and School of Fashion Toronto Metropolitan University 350 Victoria St. Toronto, ON M5B 2K3 Office: 208-D Eric Palin Hall 416-979-5000 x552525

may.friedman@torontomu.ca

*

Conference Announcement–Diaries in the 20th Century: Testimony, Memory, Self-Construction (12/8-9/2023) Dublin, Ireland, and Zoom

We are thrilled to announce the upcoming international conference Diaries in 20th Century: Testimony, Memory, Self-Construction, sponsored by the UCD Humanities Institute, the College of Arts and Humanities, the School of Languages, Cultures and Linguistics, and the Foundation for Italian Studies. The conference will be held at University College Dublin, Newman Building on 8 and 9 December 2023, and will be live-streamed on Zoom. Please refer to the programme to see the location of the parallel sessions. If you wish to attend the conference either in person or on Zoom, please register here. For further details, please visit UCDiaries2023, and if you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact us at ucdiaries2023@gmail.com. Best wishes, The organisers Valeria Taddei and Mara Josi Dr Valeria Taddei (she/her) IRC Government of Ireland Postdoctoral Fellow School of Languages, Cultures and Linguistics University College Dublin Dr Mara Josi (she/her), Ph.D. Cantab FWO Junior Postdoctoral Fellow, Ghent University The Research Foundation – Flanders * Journal of Perpetrator Research Special Issue: Complicit Testimonies The Journal of Perpetrator Research is seeking submissions for a special issue on the theme of Complicit Testimonies, scheduled for publication in Spring 2025, and guest-edited by Ivan Stacy (Beijing Normal University). deadline for submissions: December 10, 2023 Introduction Shoshona Felman and Dori Laub wrote their seminal Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History (1992) as a result of their experiences with the Fortunoff Video Archive for Holocaust Testimonies at Yale. For this reason, they developed a model in which testimony is closely connected to the subject position of victimhood and the experience of trauma. This relationship has endured in academic research on testimony, with Avishai Margalit, for example, proposing the figure of the “moral witness” as one that has experienced directly the suffering produced by atrocity; it also appears in more recent contributions to The Future of Testimony: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Witnessing (edited by Jane Kilby and Anthony Rowland, 2008) and the Palgrave Handbook of Testimony and Culture, in which the editors Sara Jones and Roger Woods write in their introduction that “the urge to communicate the unique experience is the impulse behind much testimony from survivors of trauma”. Endeavours to explicate the nature of testimony as written or told by those who have lived through extreme suffering are necessary and valuable, yet the creation of testimony does not necessarily presuppose a state of victimhood or an experience of trauma. Analysis of perpetrator testimony by writers including Leigh Payne, Ute Hirsekorn and Sue Vice has productively complicated the relationship between testifier, the account they produce, and their role in historical events. However, the tendency to adjectivize testimony with a particular subject position – typically in the form of “victim testimony” or “perpetrator testimony” – presents a further problem: if, as Margalit argues, “testimony, not direct observation, is our basic source of evidence and knowledge,” to categorize that primary source of knowledge itself with the value-laden labels of “victim” or “perpetrator” imposes an a priori framework for interpreting events and experiences that are still in the process of becoming known. Moreover, as Primo Levi’s well-known elaboration on the “gray zone” in The Drowned and the Saved shows, the blurring of boundaries between victims and perpetrators was one of the central mechanisms by which the camps functioned, as a means of securing the complicity even of those whose lives they were designed to destroy. For this reason, the concept of complicity, and the uncertain moral positions that it encompasses, offers a valuable but hitherto under-theorised approach to studying testimony. The aim of this special issue of the Journal of Perpetrator Research is therefore to explore the relationship between complicity and the creation and reception of testimony from an interdisciplinary perspective. In a general sense, complicity is an increasingly important concept for understanding the negative consequences of actions in an ever-more interconnected world, and as Christopher Kutz notes, “the most important and far-reaching harms and wrongs of contemporary life are the products of collective actions, mediated by social and institutional structures.” Moreover, language itself is at once shaped by social and institutional pressures while also creating and performing complicity with those structures of power: as Thomas Docherty argues, complicity with institutions tends to operate through the “establishment of a reduced lexicon.” This special issue is intended to consider testimony in light of the particular challenges posed by the concept of complicity, and in doing so to examine the nature of narrative accounts created in a moral “gray zone.” Topics for articles in this special issue might include, but are not limited to:
    • Language and form in complicit testimonies
    • Literary and cultural representations of complicit testimonies
    • Affective responses to compromised testimony
    • Complicity and the generic boundaries of testimony
    • Distinctions between perpetration and complicity
    • Complicity and adjacent concepts (beneficiaries and implicated subjects)
    • Categories of complicity (collaborating, consorting, condoning and conniving)
We intend that the special issue will represent a range of disciplines, and we are particularly interested in articles from non-European and non-Anglophone perspectives. Deadline for submissions: Abstracts of around 300 words should be submitted to Ivan Stacy at ivanstacy@gmail.com, no later than 10 December 2023. Queries can be directed to the same email address. Full articles of 6,000-10,000 words will be due by 30 June 2024, with publication scheduled for Spring 2025. * Deadline for Submissions Dec. 1, 2023

CFP: “Witnessing / Becoming” – University of Toronto, Centre for Comparative Literature, March 22-23, 2024

“‘I bear witness’—that means: ‘I affirm (rightly or wrongly, but in all good faith, sincerely) that that was or is present to me, in space and time (thus, sense-perceptible), and although you do not have access to it, not the same access, you, my addressees, you have to believe me, because I engage myself to tell you the truth, I am already engaged in it, I tell you that I am telling you the truth. Believe me. You have to believe me.’” – Jacques Derrida (“Poetics and Politics of Witnessing” 76) Witnessing is more than seeing, more than recounting testimony. A witness to an event is its participant, whether central or peripheral. In its continuity, the act of witnessing carries us past the immediate crisis of an event, into a post-event life. Processes of witnessing have manifested as fluid, ongoing testimonies, conveyed through various mediums such as novels, memoirs, autobiographies, reports, and films, among others. One could argue that at the core of these testimonies lies what Nadine Gordimer describes in “Literary Witness in A World of Terror: The Inward Testimony” (2009) as “the duality of inwardness and the outside world” (Gordimer 68), the dual exploration of one’s inner self and the external world, the quest to reconcile oneself with the uncertainties inherent in evolving events and the imperative to conceive new meanings of self-identity. We invite papers that consider how testimony has been represented not only as a form of documented eyewitness literature, but also as a process that entails transformations, and encounters that elicit new forms of becoming. By conjugating witnessing with becoming, we invite you to move past the eventuality of crisis, to understand language as irrevocably tied to the process of bearing witness, remaking itself continuously against the possible threat of erasure, “as if it were being invented at every step, and if it were burning immediately” (Jacques Derrida The Post Card 11). Differing subjectivities, selves, and life stories emerge in different environments. How might the act of bearing witness to uncodified subjective experiences and marginalized social realities challenge narratives of dominant power structures? To return to the temporal disconnect between the witnessed event and the performance of testimony, becoming can take a similar form. To become is to recognize the same temporal disconnect, to look backwards at what once was, yet no longer remains. Becoming might be a reading of the past, enacted in tandem with the witness’ attempt to reconstruct it, which remains eternally out of reach. How do these two forms interact with one another? How else might they intertwine? As an interdisciplinary conference, we encourage submissions from a variety of fields, such as literature, philosophy, history, ethnography, anthropology, media studies, disability studies, sociology, art history, religious studies, and gender studies. We welcome papers related (but not limited) to the following topics:
    • Testimonial Literature
    • Ethics of Bearing Witness
    • Living & Writing
    • Socio-political events in literature
    • Performativity
    • Transnationality & the Diaspora
    • Queerness & Alterity
    • Black Studies
    • Indigeneity & Decolonial thought
    • Planetary Subjectivity vs. Capitalist Globalism
    • Language & Translation
    • Temporality & the Self
Those who wish to participate in the conference should submit an abstract of no more than 250 words, along with a short bio. Abstracts must be sent, as attachments, to utorontocomplitconference@gmail.com before December 1, 2023. Emails should include the author’s name, institutional affiliation, and contact information. Presentations should not exceed 20 minutes. Contact Information Zichuan Gan, co-organizer PhD student Centre for Comparative Literature, University of Toronto z.gan@mail.utoronto.ca Contact Email utorontocomplitconference@gmail.com *

CFP: Biographies Area of the 2024 Popular Culture Association (PCA) Conference

March 27-30, 2024, Chicago USA Deadline for Paper Proposals: November 30, 2023 The Biographies Area of the Popular Culture Association (PCA)  is soliciting papers for the 2024 conference that examine the connections between biography and popular culture. Papers and full panel presentations regarding any aspect of popular culture and biography are encouraged. Potential topics might include: – Biography and entertainment, art, music, theater – Biography and film – Biography and criminal justice – Television programs about biography – Biography and urban legends – Biography and folklore – Biography and literature – Scholarly Biography – Controversial Biography – Psychoanalysis and Biography – Historical Biography – Political Biography – Autobiography The conference will be held March 27-30, 2024 at the Chicago Marriott Downtown Magnificent Mile. Sessions are scheduled in 1½ hour slots, typically with four papers or speakers per standard session.  Presentations should not exceed 20 minutes. Below are some recent titles of presentations in the Biographies Area panels: ·Sex, Drugs, and Rock-n-Roll: Celebrity Biography through the Lens of Autopsy ·Will Rogers: American Folk Hero or Elitist Fraud ·Manufacturing “Soupy Sales:” Biographical Insights in the Emergence of a Comic Entertainer Please see this link for details and guidelines on submitting to the conference: https://pcaaca.org/general/custom.asp?page=submissionguidelines If interested in submitting for the conference, please provide the title and abstract of your presentation. Contact Information Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries Las Vegas, NV 89154 702-895-2141 susie.skarl@unlv.edu OR susieskarl@gmail.com Contact Email susie.skarl@unlv.edu *

Haunting Lives, edited collection, call for abstracts

Deadline for Submissions November 30, 2023

Are you a creative writer who consciously plays with techniques that transgress the borders between fiction and nonfiction? What is it that attracts you to this liminal space between the two, and what new writing territory do you want to form there? Your work might be in auto/bio/fiction, the historical or nonfiction novel, speculative history or a hybrid genre. You might balk at these categories as reductive and antipathetic to this genre-defying writing. Haunting Lives is an edited collection that will illuminate this border country, help readers to navigate or succumb to its strange terrain and examine the spectres that live there. We are looking for chapters that interrogate creative practice, to investigate how you came to this border country and what you are doing with your writing there.  We want chapters that explore your transgressions and subversions of these borders. We want you to map your challenges to a rigid borderline and to illuminate the effects you create. We are looking for chapters which do this in relation to your own work and with reference to the work of other writers and conceptual frameworks. Think Gordon Burn, Ali Smith’s Seasons quartet of novels or Jay Bernard’s poetry collection, Surge. You might draw on personal/family/cultural memory in your work. You might make stories out of archival documents and objects. How do you bring your imaginative processes to bear on this material to turn it into creative writing? You might be interested in:

    • The subjective
    • The intersectional
    • Telling historical stories from new perspectives
    • Challenging the hegemony of dominant versions of history
    • Bringing hitherto invisible and silenced characters and voices to the fore
    • The creative art of braiding personal and researched stories together
    • Collage techniques
    • Formal experimentation and playfulness
We are particularly interested in the ways that such writing creates powerful haunting effects and sheds uncanny light on real events and people. Ghosts have become a significant trope in recent border writing – Alison MacLeod’s short story collection, All the Beloved Ghosts, experiments with form to tell family histories, combine an autobiographical story with that of Princess Diana and to speculate about making a citizen’s arrest on Tony Blair. Edward Parnell’s Ghostland is both an exploration of the landscape of British ghost stories and a ghost story about his own family. Dylan Trigg says, of returning to a place which holds memories, ‘I am not alone in this memory… I am followed at all times by the ghosts who continue to coinhabit my memories, despite no longer existing in the material world’ Liminal space is the privileged place where ghosts can be brought to light and the past can be brought back to haunt us. Ethan Kleinberg has begun to theorise the concept of hauntological history and the importance of creative writing to it. He foregrounds the role of the imagination in how we make meaning: ‘I use literary fiction as a privileged site that exposes the way the past haunts history’. You might make a virtue of the gorgeous unreliability, peculiarity and rich singularity of memory or you might conjure ghosts/characters from old photographs and official documents. Dan Coxon and Richard V Hirst have identified the uncanny turn in recent fiction: ‘in modern literature, the Uncanny, ‘has become one of its dominant features.’ We want to extend their discussion. Teaching on a creative nonfiction module while my students are simultaneously studying a fiction module seems increasingly nonsensical to me. I begin the module by suggesting that nonfiction is not the opposite of fiction and by the end I steer students toward the border country where they can cross between fiction and nonfiction to tell haunting stories of reality. If you teach Creative Writing, your chapter might also interrogate pedagogical issues raised by these border writings. Such writing is as old as literature itself – Plutarch’s Parallel Lives were more morality tales than they were reliable biographies. In the twentieth century Virginia Woolf turned to fantasy and magical realism to illuminate the life of Vita Sackville-West in Orlando. But in recent times the ’truth’ contract, as outlined by Philippe Lejeune (although even he rescinded it), has been a guiding premise of so much Creative Nonfiction. It has become limiting and debilitating. The litigation against James Frey and his publishers, which resulted in A Million Little Pieces having to be moved across the border and sold as fiction rather than nonfiction, might be seen as a low ebb in this rigid categorisation of creative texts, driven as much, if not more, by marketing as by creative imperatives. We want to highlight and showcase the richness, variety and complexity of writing which claims to be neither or both at the same time. The collection will be co-edited by Dr Helen Pleasance and Professor Rob Edgar, of the York Centre for Writing at York St John University. Chapters should be between 4 and 6000 words. Please send abstracts of no more than 300 words and a short biography of no more than 150 words or questions about the project to hauntinglives@outlook.com by 30 November * Call for Abstracts – Turntable Stories  An Edited Collection Deadline for Submissions–Abstracts: November 30, 2023 Turntable Stories will be a collection of stories, memories and histories. It will be an exploration of turntable culture through creative non-fiction in the form of memoir, essays, autoethnography, personal histories and reflections. We want your experiences of club culture and of bedroom mixing. We want to know about your turntable heroes and your turntable buddies. Contributions might feature memories of a life-altering rave or cider-soaked indie-disco. They might be about niche scenes and subcultures. They might be about your local pub and its funk and soul night. The focus might be broad and cultural or specific and personal. Stories can be funny, heart-breaking, weird or all of these things. Contributors can be DJs, collectors, shop owners, researchers, scholars or simply lovers of material culture. What’s important is the foregrounding of narratives that explore our relationship with our decks, what we use them for and how they shape our musical and cultural memories. The turntable is a significant material presence in our cultural and musical life. Our record players sit in dusty corners of our living rooms, take centre stage in clubs, sit sparkling in upmarket shop windows or sad and neglected in the local Cash Converter. They are coveted, mythologised and fetishized. They are functional and material objects that make our record collections spring into life. The recent celebrations of hip hop’s fiftieth birthday take DJ Kool Herc’s Bronx party in August 1973 as a starting place. The 18-year-old DJ (known to his mum as Clive Campbell) made the innovative leap to using two turntables at once. In doing so, he ‘played two copies of the same record, a technique known as the merry-go-round where one moves back and forth, from one record to the next, looping the percussion portions of each track to keep the beat alive’. 1 The DJ as artistic maverick and tastemaker was born. With him came the wheels of steel, the ones and twos, the decks. With this new way to entertain, the DJ’s understanding of music, crowds and spaces soon became a significant and ubiquitous presence in global cultures and subcultures. By the turn of the new century, turntables sat in bars, clubs, festival stages and carnival floats. To DJ was as legitimate as any other musical skill. DJs became celebrities, superstars and icons. Turntablists showed off lightening sleights of hand. Musical lexicon now included scratching, mixing, break pauses and drops. DJs travelled the world with record boxes on wheels. Grooving across polished departure lounge floors in a timeless and looping party zone. But the turntable has always been a domestic item too. It’s been a hand-me-down from sibling to sibling. It’s been saved up for and bought from brightly lit high-street electrical stores. It’s been a set of broken Technics 1200s with a mixer thrown in for 20 quid a week over a couple of years. It’s been an untouchable presence in the living room, part of a gleaming stack system used only by Dad when he’s doing the crossword with his War Movie themes LP on or by Mum when she is soundtracking her evening G&T with James Taylor.2 Decks have been set up in bedrooms, taken to teenage house parties, smuggled into pirate stations at the top of tower blocks. They’ve been direct drive and belt driven. They’ve arrived in boxes with mysterious German and Japanese names printed on them. They’ve been cased in shiny pine and in smudged plastic. They’ve made that hiss and thunk when they hit vinyl. They’ve got dusty. They’ve sat unused but never really disappeared. But then, as the new century arrived, it all stopped. We didn’t need our record players. Clubs moved on too when the CDJ made an appearance. The warning signs were there in the 80s and 90s when tapes and CDs jostled for position. ‘Much more convenient’, we were told.  Our loyalty was tested. Then the pocket-sized gadgets appeared. They held thousands of songs. Then laptops. Suddenly we could access all the music we needed through a few mouse clicks. Sometimes it cost nothing. Music lost its magic. Our tribes and genres dissolved. Record shops looked sad and empty. Record collections were ditched. They ended up in charity shops and car boot sales. They were stashed in lofts and damp garages next to that old turntable. Only a few of us stuck with it. We kept buying them. We keep cleaning them. We keep talking about them. We kept our turntables moving. Now? Turntables have returned.  They are a retro item and a new fascination. Youngsters buy them for playing their new ‘vinyls’. There is a revival. The shops have reappeared and you can buy a flat white in them now. Portable record players like your grandma owned are must-have items for your socials. There are days put aside for buying records. You can order slip mats with a photo of your dog on them. T-shirts have pictures of those old knackered 1200s on them. It all come round full circle. A full revolution. What all of this means is stories and narratives and this is where you come in. We are interested in contributions of between 3000 and 4000 words. Contributions can include memories, observations, academic articles or any combination of these forms. We welcome contributions from experienced writers and from first time writers. Please send abstracts of no more than 300 words and a short biography of no more that 150 words or questions about the project to turntablestories@outlook.com by November 30th 2023. This collection will be curated by the editors of Venue Stories3 (Equinox 2023). Turntable Stories will follow a similar format. * CFP: Biographies Area of the 2024 Popular Culture Association (PCA) Conference March 27-30, Chicago USA Deadline for Submissions: November 30, 2023 The Biographies Area of the Popular Culture Association (PCA)  is soliciting papers for the 2024 conference that examine the connections between biography and popular culture. Papers and full panel presentations regarding any aspect of popular culture and biography are encouraged. Potential topics might include: – Biography and entertainment, art, music, theater – Biography and film – Biography and criminal justice – Television programs about biography – Biography and urban legends – Biography and folklore – Biography and literature – Scholarly Biography – Controversial Biography – Psychoanalysis and Biography – Historical Biography – Political Biography – Autobiography The conference will be held March 27-30, 2024 at the Chicago Marriott Downtown Magnificent Mile. Sessions are scheduled in 1½ hour slots, typically with four papers or speakers per standard session.  Presentations should not exceed 20 minutes. Below are some recent titles of presentations in the Biographies Area panels: ·Sex, Drugs, and Rock-n-Roll: Celebrity Biography through the Lens of Autopsy ·Will Rogers: American Folk Hero or Elitist Fraud ·Manufacturing “Soupy Sales:” Biographical Insights in the Emergence of a Comic Entertainer If interested in submitting for the conference, please provide the title and abstract of your presentation. Deadline for Paper Proposals: November 30, 2023 Contact Information Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries Las Vegas, NV 89154 702-895-2141 Contact Email susie.skarl@unlv.edu

A Cultural History of Trans Lives in the Middle Ages (300-1450)

deadline for submissions:  November 20, 2023 We warmly invite submissions to contribute to A Cultural History of Trans Lives in the Middle Ages (300-1450), edited by J. D. Sargan and Micah James Goodrich. In the past several years, the emerging field of premodern trans studies has taken shape across disciplinary, geographical, and chronological lines. Our volume, A Cultural History of Trans Lives in the Middle Ages (300-1450), which spans over one thousand years of history, will serve to index these critical conversations among medievalists and anticipate new contours that our discussions may take. Please take a moment to look at the main series CFP here: https://bit.ly/CHTLvol1-6 Our volume proceeds from the assumption that there are many ways to tell the story of trans lives before the terminology “transgender” came into existence in the mid-twentieth century. While many medieval ideologies of sex and gender held that the discrete categories of “male” and “female” were spiritually innate and physically immutable, there were other currents of thought that saw the gendered body as porous, open, fluid, and textual. The boundaries of the body could stretch back in time, inhabit multiple places, be alive but not quite, and move between earthly corporeality and divinity. It is this portability of medieval gender that resonates with the prefixial trans- in “transgender,” denoting a state of motion, action, and flux, that our volume seeks to highlight. While the eight chapters in this volume spotlight a topical approach to trans lives in the Middle Ages (law, arts, medicine, etc.), we encourage contributors to think capaciously and extravagantly about how “trans lives” can be imagined. All Bloomsbury’s Cultural Histories are formed of 6 volumes, each volume covering a specific period and all the volumes in an individual History sharing the same set of broad chapter themes. This allows readers to follow a theme across history as well as study it in the context of a particular period. Authors should approach these chapters as a broad survey of the chapter topic, rather than an exposition of the author’s specific research area. That said, we do encourage authors to draw from their expertise. The Chapter titles for these volumes proceed as follows: Chapter Breakdown Chapter One: Law and Social Control [This chapter should take as its focus ‘law’ and ‘regulation’] Contributors for this chapter may consider topics and inquiries such as:
    • Formal and informal laws and legal structures (e.g. sumptuary laws)
    • Scales of law (divine, state, social)
    • Extralegal lives of social control and/or agency
    • Carcerality and embodiment
    • Law and/as violence
    • Law and/as liberation
    • Law and labor
    • Law and movement
Chapter Two: Bodies, Treatment, and Care [This chapter should take as its focus ‘science’ and ‘medicine’] Contributors for this chapter may consider topics and inquiries such as:
    • Medieval scientia and gender
    • Trivium/quadrivium and the body
    • Medieval medicine
    • Reproduction and embodiment
    • Gender-affirming medical care
    • Medical violence (anatomical texts, surgical manuals, “corrective” surgery)
    • Pastoral care
    • “Body-health” and “Soul-health”
Chapter Three: Spirituality and the Sacred [This chapter should take as its focus ‘spirituality’ and ‘the sacred’] Contributors for this chapter may consider topics and inquiries such as:
    • Religious practice across the medieval world (Judaism, paganism, Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, and beyond)
    • Theological doctrine
    • Spiritual practices
    • Cosmologies
    • Sacred ritual
    • Genres of devotion
    • Spiritual embodiments
Chapter Four: Ideas, Debates, and Polemics [This chapter should take as its focus ‘ideas’ and ‘discourse’] Contributors for this chapter may consider topics and inquiries such as:
    • Elite and vernacular cultural ideas re: gender
    • Public gender(s)
    • Speeches, sermons, debates, public discourse
    • Epistolary traditions and exchange of ideas
    • Premodern biopolitics
    • Gender and/as education, scholastic discourse
    • Authenticity, reality, and legitimacy in social discourse
    • Ideas about the self, self-knowledge
    • Philosophies of personhood, identity, embodiment
Chapter Five: Representation and the Arts [This chapter should take as its focus ‘art’ and ‘aesthetics’] Contributors for this chapter may consider topics and inquiries such as:
    • Visual registers of gender and embodiment
    • Aesthetics and/of gender
    • Architectures of gender
    • Drama, plays, performance
    • Medieval media and embodiment
    • Visual censorship and circulation
    • Visibility, invisibility
    • Symbology, typology
    • The senses in art
Chapter Six: Bodies on Display [This chapter should take as its focus ‘bodies’] Contributors for this chapter may consider topics and inquiries such as:
    • Bodies in public fora (theaters, prisons, workplaces, markets, courtrooms/records, trades, health settings, etc.)
    • Imbrication of race, capacity, disability, and gender
    • Shapes, forms, structures
    • The partitive body
    • Care and cultivation of the body
    • The body as meaning-making and world-making
Chapter Seven: Material Culture [This chapter should take as its focus ‘things’ and ‘objects’] Contributors for this chapter may consider topics and inquiries such as:
    • Material registers of gender and embodiment
    • Things, objects
    • “Artifice”
    • Prosthetics and material additions to the body
    • Archaeology
    • “Mundane” things and everyday objects
    • Material modes of signaling transness
Chapter Eight: Natural and Unnatural [This chapter should take as its focus ‘nature’] Contributors for this chapter may consider topics and inquiries such as:
    • Natural philosophy
    • Metrics of naturalness/unnaturalness
    • Human/animal/plant divide
    • Animacies
    • Taxonomies, categories
    • Supernatural (monsters, giants, fairies, etc.)
The CFP is open to anyone working in any discipline and geographical area on trans studies in the medieval period (c.300-1450). We especially encourage trans scholars to submit. Please indicate if you would be interested in collaborating with another author on a chapter. Submit a 250 word abstract outlining your vision of the chapter that you’d like to write along with a brief bio and CV to the volume editors, J.D. Sargan and Micah Goodrich by November 20th [Extended Deadline] to james.sargan@uga.edu and mjgood@bu.edu * Call for Papers–Freedom on the Move and Fugitivity in North American Slavery March 15-16, 2024 Cornell University, Ithaca, USA Deadline for Submissions; November 20, 2023 Freedom on the Move (FOTM) will hold a symposium at Cornell University on March 15-16, 2024 to gather scholars (including early career and graduate students), librarians, archivists, and teachers to discuss the future of fugitivity studies and the impact of FOTM in scholarship, pedagogy, and the digital humanities. We invite scholars to propose papers that are based on Freedom on the Move or related topics of fugitivity. Accepted papers will be pre-circulated among confirmed conference attendees. The resulting in-person discussion will, we hope, advance our collective understanding of self-liberation, racialized surveillance and policing, and marronage and fugitivity, while also helping to build a larger research community. What is Freedom on the Move? With the advent of newspapers in the American colonies, enslavers published advertisements to try to capture freedom-seekers. Jailers posted additional ads describing people they had apprehended. While created to control the movement of enslaved people, the advertisements ultimately preserved the details of individual lives – their personality, appearance, and life story. Freedom on the Move is a database that houses these advertisements. FOTM serves as a research aid, a pedagogical tool, a resource for genealogists, and a starting point for all those who want to use these historical documents in new and creative ways. Interested parties should submit a CV and one-page proposal or abstract (no more than 250 words) to FOTM@cornell.edu by November 20, 2024. Project descriptions should include a brief overview of the argument, sources, the significance of the project, and the current status of the paper (yet to be written, in progress, drafted, completed). Final papers should be between 20-30 pages double-spaced and must be submitted to FOTM@cornell.edu by February 29, 2024 to allow time for circulation to registered attendees and fellow panelists. Contributors will be notified of acceptance by December 8, 2023. An honorarium will be provided for accepted papers, and some travel assistance will be available with priority allocated to graduate students and early career scholars who are presenting papers. All questions and submissions should be sent to FOTM @ cornell.edu . For more information about Freedom on the Move, please visit https://freedomonthemove.org/ Contact Information Department of History Cornell University Contact Email FOTM@Cornell.edu URL https://freedomonthemove.org * Events updates from the Oxford Centre for Life-Writing First – we are disappointed to announce that we have made the difficult decision to cancel this Tuesday’s colloquium on Writing Jewish Women’s Lives. We hope to rearrange the date for next term, and will announce the new date in due course. Meanwhile, the Programme for Writing Jewish Women’s Lives will begin instead with our two Literary Salons, on 7th November and 21st November. And for all our other events please read on! This week we have begun our two term-time writing groups, and over the next couple of weeks we look forward to welcoming you to our first public talks of term – the first of which is online on Sunday night – as well as offering you the chance to join us for a special workshop on non-fiction publishing on 31st October. Further details on these and more below. Best wishes, Alice and the OCLW team Events in 3rd week: Tuesday 24 October, 2pm-3.30pm, Buttery Diane Watt: The Gentlewoman from Reedham: Re-encountering Margaret Paston through her letters, in the 21st century Focusing on selected letters written by Margaret across her lifetime, from the years immediately following her marriage to those leading up to her death, this talk takes the events described as the starting point for a micro-biography. Diane Watt is Professor of Medieval English Literature and Co-Director of SGS (the Sex, Gender and Sexualities Research Centre) at the University of Surrey. In person only. Book here. Tuesday 24 October, 5.30-7pm, LWA Lucas Miller: ‘Thou wast not born for death’: Keats and the Living Art of Writing Literary Lives Lucasta Miller discusses her experiences as a life-writer in the light her of her most recent book, Keats: A Brief Life in Nine Poems and One Epitaph. Free event. Book here Friday 27 October, 10.30am-12.30pm, English Faculty: Laura Marcus Life-Writing Workshops Robert Douglas-Fairhurst and Hermione Lee: Life-Writing and Illness Free event, priority given to students in the English Faculty. Book here. Events in 4th week: Tuesday 31 October, 1pm-8pm, Buttery: Publishing Non-Fiction workshop With Eli Keren and Kate Walsh from United Agents, and featuring a Q&A with Blake Morrison, concluding with a drinks reception. In the first half of the afternoon, receive general advice on crafting compelling book proposals, mastering query letters, and navigating the competitive publishing landscape. In the second half, seize the opportunity to pitch your work and receive feedback on your ideas. £90, £81 for Friends of OCLWBook for the event here. Tuesday 31 October, 5.30-7pm: Weinrebe Lecture, LWA Blake Morrison in conversation with Hermione Lee: Two Sisters and the Art of Life-Writing Blake Morrison reflects on the challenges, rewards and ethics of putting together family memoirs. Free event. Book here Coming up soon 6th week: Wednesday 15 November, 2pm-3.30pm, online only Pragya Agarwal and Rebecca Donner: Rewriting Women’s Lives Free for members of our Research Network (join here). Find out more and register for the event here. Literary Salons – Writing Jewish Women’s Lives 5th week: Tuesday 7 November, 2pm-3.30pm, Buttery: Rebecca Abrams. Free event, in person and via Zoom. Book here.    and 7th week: Tuesday 21 November, 1.30pm-3.30pm, Buttery: Rebecca Abrams in conversation with Natasha Walter. Free event, in person and via Zoom. Book here. Writing groups Interested in discussion life-writing you’ve read, or perhaps you’re working on a project of your own? We run two weekly writing groups during term time, each group costs just £15 per session, and you can join at any time. Mondays in term time, in-person and online, 11am-12.30pm Friends of OCLW Life-Writing Discussion Group, with Charlie Lee-Potter For an introduction to life-writing, well-known and lesser known authors in the field, and to try your own hand at life-writing, join our friendly weekly group. Find out more here. Thursdays in term time, online only, 3pm-4.30pm Feedback Group, with Alice Little Whether you have a work in progress or simply want to learn how to give and receive feedback, join our small-group sessions to read and discuss life-writing projects. Sign up here. *

Translation, Transposition, and Travel in the Global Nineteenth Century Society for Global Nineteenth-Century Studies World Congress 16 to 19 January 2025 Gulf University for Science and Technology, Kuwait Deadline for Submissions: November 15, 2023 (Panels); December 15, 2023 (Papers)

Keynote speakers: Marwan Kraidy, Northwestern University Qatar Regenia Gagnier, University of Exeter Arthur Asseraf, University of Cambridge Sarga Moussa, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle

The period between 1750 and 1914 was marked by change, motion, and mobility. Advances in transport and the expansion of imperial powers brought together an array of peoples and facilitated contact between different cultures. These cultural encounters spurred the discovery of new information and of efforts to transmit, mask, or contain it. Translation played a seminal role in informing the public about the changing world and its interconnections. Imaginative writings and scientific concepts were subject to transposition and adaptation across languages and cultures. Indeed, global modernizing processes were due, to some extent, to travel, translation, and transposition. For its second world congress to be held in Kuwait from 16 to 19 January 2025, the Society for Global Nineteenth-Century Studies is pleased to invite proposals on the theme of “Translation, Transposition, and Travel in the Global Nineteenth Century.” We welcome proposals for papers and panels that explore transits between places, languages, cultures, and ideas. Topics may include (but are not limited to):
    • Travel and adventure
    • Initiatic journeys
    • Travel narratives and nautical fiction
    • Pilgrimage
    • Slave trade and the forced movement of peoples
    • Circulations, transfers, and migrations
    • Nomadism
    • Problems in translation (e.g., political humour, the absurd, nonsense, etc.)
    • Exile and displacement
    • Explorers and expeditions
    • Science fiction
    • Intermedial translation
    • Steamers and trains
    • Colonization
    • Translation and life writing
    • Transfer of knowledge
    • Cultural transposition
    • Adaptation across cultures
    • Transmediality and transnationalism
    • Transfer and transmission
    • Texts and their contexts
    • Transposition in music
    • Transposition and translation
    • Travel maps and cartographies of navigation
    • Books as travelling objects
    • Photography, painting, and travel
    • Tourism and visual culture
    • Nomadic narratives
    • Translation and the discovery of new cultures
    • The re/discovery of ancient civilizations/Egyptomania
    • Translation and the discovery of European modernity
In addition to paper and panel proposals related to the conference theme, we also welcome proposals for prearranged special panels on topics in global nineteenth-century studies more broadly: Methodology OR Pedagogy Roundtables: Sessions focused on methodological approaches to studying and practical strategies for teaching the nineteenth century in a global context. Big Ideas: Sessions focused on a single thought-provoking topic related to the global nineteenth century. The format may vary from standard panels (three presenters and a moderator) to lightning roundtables (five to eight presenters delivering short, provocative position papers) to others that may be proposed. Proposals (due 15 November for panels; 15 December for individual papers) Individual paper proposals should consist of an abstract (200-250 words), brief biography (80- 100 words), and full contact information in a single pdf document or Word file. Panel proposals should include abstracts for 3-4 papers, a brief rationale that connects the papers (100-200 words), and biographies of each participant (80-100 words) in a single pdf or Word file. All proposals should include 3 to 5 keywords.  Successful panel proposals will include participants from more than one institution, and, ideally, represent a mix of disciplines/fields and career stages. Panel proposals should also indicate the category for evaluation: general conference program or special session; Methodology or Pedagogy Roundtable; or Big Ideas. Although the working language of the conference is English, a limited number of slots will be available for presentations in Arabic. Location and requirements The congress will be held at the Global Studies Center, Gulf University for Science and Technology, in Kuwait. Modern, prosperous, and safe, Kuwait boasts a unique cultural mix, a longstanding tradition of the theatrical arts, diverse cuisine, and some of the best beaches in the region. Presenters, panel chairs, and workshop participants must be current members of the Society for Global Nineteenth-Century Studies at the time of the World Congress. For more information on membership, visit www.global19c.com . Proposals and questions should be directed to the Program Committee: societygncs@gmail.com. Please visit the 2025 Congress website for the most up-to-date information: https://www.sgncscongress.com Contact Email societygncs@gmail.com URL https://www.sgncscongress.com/ *

CAMPS, CARCERAL IMAGINARIES, & CRITICAL INTERVENTIONS

May 30, 2024 – June 2, 2024 Graz, Austria Deadline for Submissions–Oct. 23, 2023 This international conference which is co-sponsored by the Center of Inter-American Studies at the University of Graz and the Department of English at the University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras, offers a forum within which graduate students, scholars, writers, practitioners, and the formerly incarcerated can come together to productively consider imprisonment, internment, and related technologies of enclosure as well as examples of resistance, protest, and struggle that have emerged in reaction to them. The history of the Americas shows that numerous groups have been confined in camps. These include detainees, inmates, prisoners, internally displaced people, asylum seekers, refugees, migrants, children, racial, ethnic, and sexual minorities, activists, and victims of political persecution, among others. It traverses events such as Cuba’s War for Independence, Japanese internment, the Viet Nam War, U.S. military operations at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, the corporatization of migrant detention, and the construction of camps at the U.S. southern border, among other events, many of which remain under-documented. In popular discourse, camps are often associated with short-term humanitarian operations related to the provision of shelter, food, and access to legal assistance. While some camps have functioned this way, scholars from numerous fields in the humanities and social sciences have signaled concerns about their proliferation and the extent to which they facilitate far-reaching cycles of punishment and abuse.  Their work demonstrates that the body politic frequently deems the people held in camps to be threatening and undeserving of “full rights” while contributing to their misrepresentation and marginalization. These and related insights prompt us to problematize how camps have been used as well as the assumption that they are necessary or effective. Building on the first conference in this series, in which five former detainees from Guantánamo discussed their lives in military prison camps and the memoirs they have written about their experiences, the conference seeks to cultivate interdisciplinary and intersectional exchanges that creatively navigate the space between “free society” and knowledge about encampment and a broad typology of camps and camp-like institutions. These include “assembly centers,” barracoons, slave depots, detention and internment camps, prisoner-of-war camps, labor camps, “black sites,” offshore detention centers, concentration and re-education camps, and prison units, among others. While proposals from all fields are welcome, the organizers anticipate ample participation from persons from the following fields: inter-American studies, literary studies, cultural studies, legal studies, critical prison studies, Caribbean studies, critical discourse analysis, sociocultural analysis, history. Graz is an opportune environment for work on camps, Guantánamo, and rights given its status as the first “Human Rights City” in Europe. The conference will include keynotes and presentations by former prisoners, academics, and prize-winning writers and poets. Planning of an array of other activities that will enrich the experience of participants is underway. These will be posted on our website as they are confirmed. Abstracts of 200-350 words for 20-minute presentations or panel proposals consisting of three to four participants should be submitted to camps2024@uni-graz.at by October 23, 2023 along with a biography of 100 words or less. Proposals for presenting poetry, art, film, and other creative work will also be considered. The languages of the conference are English and Spanish, and abstracts are welcome in both languages. Topics to be discussed include but are not limited to:
  • The past and present of Guantánamo Bay’s detention facilities
  • Education, creative writing, and literacy projects in jails and prisons
  • Language of (non)belonging and the homeland
  • Prison literature and the literature of human rights
  • The internment of people of Japanese ancestry during WWII
  • The ethics of encampment and captivity
  • Haitian detention camps in Fort Allen, Puerto Rico
  • Abolitionism, military prisons, and legal personhood
  • Camp-based protest, resistance, and solidarity (art, hunger strikes, writing, legal action, the historical record)
  • Borders, biometrics, biopolitics, security, and media representations of camps
  • The Mauritanian and other films about Guantánamo Bay, the War on Terror, and human rights
  • Prisoners of war and refugee camps, (e.g., WWI and WWII, in the Caribbean and elsewhere in the Americas)
  • Mass incarceration’s genealogical links to slavery, war, and empire
  • Immigrant experiences in literature
  • Refugee camps and understandings of “well-founded fear of persecution”
  • Testimony, activism, and human rights advocacy
  • Memoirs, essays, and poetry by former detainees, prisoners, and activists
  • Dimensions of personal identity (intersections of race, class, gender, religion, age, sexual orientation)
  • Public memory projects and archives of witness
  • Truth and reconciliation commissions in the Americas and in the global context
Contact Information camps2024@uni-graz.at *

Conference: Urban Lives: Amsterdam Diaries and Other Stories of the Self

Date: 26-28 October 2023, Amsterdam Venue: University Library, Singel 425, Doelenzaal, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Website: https://vu.nl/en/events/2023/amsterdam-diaries-and-other-stories-of-the-self-conference In October 2025, Amsterdam will celebrate its 750th anniversary. In light of this upcoming celebration, two of the city’s institutes of higher education, the University of Amsterdam and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, are organising a conference on Amsterdam diaries and other stories of the self. An exciting lineup of panels, workshops and key-note lectures given by our esteemed colleagues Julie Rak, Nina Siegal, Nadia Bouras and Diederik Oostdijk will provide each participant with a panoply of intellectually stimulating new insights on various aspects of life writing and the beautiful city of Amsterdam. The final programme for the event is available here. Registration for the conference is free of charge and open until 16 October (via the website). For more information, please consult our conference website, or contact us at: AmsterdamUrbanLivesConference@gmail.com *

CFP: Stardom and Fandom, Southwest Popular/American Culture Association Conference

February 21 — 24, 2024, Albuquerque, New Mexico deadline for submissions: October 31, 2023 contact email: lzubernis@wcupa.edu Proposals for papers and panels will be accepted starting September 1st for the 45th annual SWPACA conference. One of the nation’s largest interdisciplinary academic conferences, SWPACA offers nearly 70 subject areas, each typically featuring multiple panels. The Area Chair for Stardom and Fandom invites paper or panel proposals on any aspect of stardom or fandom. The list of ideas below is limited, so if you have an idea that is not listed, please suggest the new topic. We are an interdisciplinary area and encourage submissions from multiple perspectives and disciplines. Topics might include:
  • Studies of individual celebrities and their fans
  • Studies focused on specific fandoms
  • The reciprocal relationship between stars and fans
  • Impact of celebrity and fame on identity construction, reconstruction and sense of self
  • Reality television, TikTok, YouTube and the changing definition of ‘stardom’
  • The impact of social media on celebrity/fan interaction
  • Celebrity/fame addiction as cultural change
  • The intersection of stars and fans in virtual and physical spaces (Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, conventions)
  • Celebrity and the construction of persona
  • Pedagogical approaches to teaching stardom and fandom
  • Anti-fans and ‘haters’
  • Fan shame, wank, ‘puriteens’ and fandom policing
  • Gendered constructions of stars and fans
  • Historical studies of fandom and fan/celebrity interaction
All proposals must be submitted through the conference’s database at http://register.southwestpca.org/southwestpca SWPACA offers monetary awards for the best graduate student papers in a variety of categories. SWPACA also offers travel fellowships for undergraduate and graduate students. For more information, visit http://southwestpca.org/conference/graduate-student-awards/ For details on using the submission database and on the application process in general, please see the Proposal Submission FAQs and Tips page at http://southwestpca.org/conference/faqs-and-tips/  Individual proposals for 15-minute papers must include an abstract of approximately 200-500 words. Including a brief bio in the body of the proposal form is encouraged, but not required.  For information on how to submit a proposal for a roundtable or a multi-paper panel, please view the above FAQs and Tips page. Registration and travel information for the conference will be available at http://southwestpca.org/conference/conference-registration-information/ For 2023, we are excited to be at a new venue, the Marriott Albuquerque (2101 Louisiana Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM 87110), which boasts free parking and close proximity to dining, shopping, and other delights. We look forward to receiving your submissions! *

Call for Papers: Kings & Queens Royal Studies Network 13th Annual Conference May 27-28, 2024 American University of Paris and Châteaudun Castle, France Deadline for Submissions—October 31, 2023

The Royal Studies Network is delighted to launch a call for papers for our thirteenth annual Kings & Queens conference: Gift-giving and Communication Networks. The 2024 conference is conceived to mark the fifth centenary of the death of Queen Claude de France (1499-1524). It will be hosted at The American University of Paris for the first two days (May 27-28). Then it will move to the Châteaudun castle in the Loire Valley where, on May 29, it will hone in on Claude de France and women in Loire Valley courts. The general theme piggybacks on three former conferences: K&Q#2 (Making Connections: Alliances, Networks, Correspondence & Comparisons), K&Q#5 (Dynastic Loyalties), and K&Q#10 (Royal Patronage: Material Culture, Built Heritage & the Reach of the Crown). Presentations will be accepted in both English and French. In keeping with the spirit of the Royal Studies Network, proposals may deal with courtly gift-giving and communication networks in all times and places. We welcome submissions from professionals, postgraduate researchers, independent and early career scholars. While in-person presentations are preferred, the two days at The American University will be hybrid with online content, allowing for some degree of live streaming or recording of sessions. Please send your proposal to kchevalier@aup.edu. The deadline for submissions (250 words for an individual proposal, 500 words for a panel) is 31 October 2023. Please specify whether your presentation will be in person or online, and include a title and a short CV. You should receive a notification of acceptance no later than 15 December 2023. All queries should be directed to Kathleen Wilson-Chevalier at The American University of Paris via email to kchevalier@aup.edu. Contact Information All queries should be directed to Kathleen Wilson-Chevalier at The American University of Paris via email to kchevalier@aup.edu. More general queries on the Kings & Queens Conference series can be addressed to Elena (Ellie) Woodacre, via the Royal Studies Network (RSN). Full details of the call can be found on the link below–you can also use this weblink to contact the RSN.

* Call for papers for a Special Cluster in a/b: Autobiography Studies Spaniards across the Americas after the Spanish Civil War: “I am from the Country Called Exile” / Españoles en las Américas después de la Guerra Civil: “Soy del país del exilio”   Deadline for Submissions October 31, 2023 a/b: Auto/Biography Studies invites academic researchers to contribute to a special cluster  that seeks to recover the life writing practices by Spanish women and children who have been displaced across the Americas–North, Central and South America–since the Spanish Civil War (1936) and the almost four decades of Francisco Franco’s dictatorship in order to fill some important gaps in the historiography, literature, and social studies at both sides of the Atlantic. The soon approaching 90th anniversary of the Spanish American Exile marks the urgency of this project. Many Spanish families were exiled across the Atlantic, and yet, their history of diaspora and exile across the Americas has been largely ignored.  The lack of representation of these diasporic experiences and the artistic, literary and intellectual work of Spaniards is one the greatest impediments to the reconstruction of a collective narrative or collective memory of exile.  To that end, we aim to bring together scholars to raise awareness of the many forms of life writing produced by Spanish women and/or children who were exiled during and after the Spanish civil war, especially those reflecting on the impossibility of belonging to a distant and absent homeland as well as to an imposed new “home” in the American continent. We see this cluster as one of the first steps against the erasure of the historic memory of Spanish women’s and children’s exile, which not only contributes to the study of Spanish and American life writing practices, but also gives voice to those who have been forgotten across the Américas. Our title recovers a quote by José de la Colina—one of these exiled children—, who insists in defining his identity with the shocking statement “soy del país del exilio,” which translates to “I am from the country called Exile,” showing the identity crisis caused by the imposed exile and the impossibility of belonging. Ultimately, this special cluster aims to recover the collective memory of Spaniards and their experiences of war, exile and diaspora to reconstruct this “country called Exiled” and its many lives. As a guide, we invite participants to reflect upon the following questions:
  • How has the experience of the Spanish exile after the Civil War shaped the identity/identities of the women and/or children across the Americas and how has it been reflected in their life writing practices?  
  • How do Spanish women and/or children exiled across the Americas after the Civil War reflect on their new Spanish-American identity/identities in their life writing practices?
Estimated Timeline
  • October 30, 2023: Chapter proposals of 500 words and a 150-word bio due. Please submit to: Dr. María Gómez Martín, mgomezmartin@csusm.edu, and Dr. Ana Roncero Bellido, aroncerobellido@lewisu.edu
  • November 30, 2023: Notifications/acceptances sent
  • May 15, 2024: Complete chapters (4,500-6,000 words) due
  • September 15, 2024: Internal Reviews Due
  • December 15, 2024: Revisions Due
  • May 1, 2025: Manuscript sent to publisher
  • Special cluster to be published in the first volume of 2026, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 41.1
Please send any questions to Dr. Maria Gomez Martin (mgomezmartin@csusm.edu) and Dr. Ana Roncero-Bellido (aroncerobellido@lewisu.edu). Contributions should be original and shouldn’t be under consideration for any other publication. Submissions are accepted in English and Spanish. Spanish call for papers Convocatoria para la presentación de artículos para número monográfico: españoles en las Américas después de la Guerra Civil: “Soy del país del exilio” a/b: Auto/Biography Studies invita a investigadores académicos a contribuir en un número monográfico que tiene como objetivo recuperar las prácticas auto/biográficas de mujeres y niños españoles que han sido desplazados en las Américas (América del Norte, Central y del Sur) desde la Guerra Civil española (después de 1936) y las casi cuatro décadas de dictadura franquista, con el fin de llenar algunos vacíos importantes en la historiografía, la literatura y los estudios sociales a ambos lados del Atlántico. En este número pretendemos reunir a académicos para dar a conocer las muchas formas de escritura auto/biográfica producidas por mujeres y niños españoles que fueron exiliados durante y después de la guerra civil española, especialmente aquellos que reflexionan sobre la imposibilidad de pertenecer a una patria lejana y ausente, así como a un nuevo “hogar” impuesto en el continente americano. En última instancia, este trabajo colaborativo ayudará a recuperar la memoria colectiva de las experiencias de la guerra, el exilio y la diáspora de los españoles en las Américas para reconstruir lo que José Colina, uno de estos niños exiliados, describió como “el país llamado exilio”. A modo de orientación, invitamos a nuestros participantes a reflexionar sobre la siguiente problemática:
  • ¿Cómo ha moldeado la experiencia del exilio español después de la Guerra Civil la identidad/identidades de las mujeres y/o niños en las Américas y cómo se ha reflejado en sus ejercicios de escritura autobiográfica?
  • ¿Cómo reflexionan las mujeres y/o niños españoles exiliados en las Américas después de la Guerra Civil sobre su nueva identidad/identidades hispanoamericanas en sus ejercicios de escritura autobiográfica?
Las contribuciones que deseen participar en esta convocatoria se harán llegar a las coordinadoras del monográfico por correo electrónico (Dr. María Gómez Martín, mgomezmartin@csusm.edu y Dr. Ana Roncero Bellido, aroncerobellido@lewisu.edu). Calendario tentativo:
  • 30 octubre 2023: último día para enviar propuestas de 500 palabras y una nota biográfica de 150 palabras a Dr. María Gómez Martín, mgomezmartin@csusm.edu, y Dr. Ana Roncero Bellido, aroncerobellido@lewisu.edu
  • 30 noviembre 2023: Notificación de las contribuciones aceptadas.
  • 15 mayo 2024: Último día para enviar capítulos (4,500-6,000 words)
  • 15 septiembre 2024: Completar revisiones internas
  • 15 diciembre 2024: Último día para enviar revisiones.
  • 1 mayo 2025: Se enviará el manuscrito completo.
  • El monográfico se publicará en el primer volumen de 2026, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 41.1
Las contribuciones deben ser originales y no deben estar bajo consideración para ninguna otra publicación. Se aceptan ensayos en inglés y español. * Reckoning with the past: Soviet communism in postcolonial Australian perspective Academic workshop (and publication) 24 November 2023, 9am-5pm, The Australian National University, Canberra Abstract deadline: 1 November, 2023 Expatriate East European writers like Kapka Kassabova and Lea Ypi have portrayed their countries of birth (Bulgaria, Albania) as colonized territories. This perspective on Eastern Europe, however, is not common in Australian life writing in English. There does exist an archive of Australian life narratives in languages other than English, the languages of Eastern Europe, like Polish, Latvian, Ukrainian or Hungarian, which does share this perception of Soviet bloc countries as colonized places. But this archive is not widely known. In fact, the “Soviet story” is largely missing from public narratives and understanding of World War II and its aftermath in Australia. This is in spite of the fact that Australia is the home to many survivors of the Stalinist regime and their descendants: a great number of refugees evacuated from the USSR, from gulags in Siberia, Kazakhstan and Turkestan, were among the over 180,000 displaced persons resettled to Australia under the post-war mass migration scheme. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine brought to the attention of a broader cross-section of Australian society historic events that were previously largely ignored or unknown (such as Stalin’s Holodomor famine of the 1930s). It also brought to the fore instances of Russia’s manipulation of historical memory under Putin’s regime and the long history of Russian imperialism that underpins his war against Ukraine. It might thus be a good time to explore parallels between the (post)colonial and (post)socialist realms, and reflect on questions such as: Where does Siberia feature in an Australian imaginary? Can Australia apply familiar postcolonial paradigms to its approaches to and understandings of Eastern Europe? We acknowledge the ambiguity of the term “Eastern Europe”; here we are using it to refer to Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe – essentially, the countries of the former Soviet bloc and Yugoslavia. While a post-colonial approach to describing the condition of Eastern European countries is commonly used by academics in the region, Western scholars of postcolonialism have been reluctant to extend the paradigm to include the Soviet empire (e.g. Şandru 2012; Skórczewski 2006). In the 2011 Cambridge History of Postcolonial Literature (Quayson 2011), “not only is there no chapter dedicated to East-Central European countries, but the editor of the two volumes does not even consider the possibility of including one” (Terian, 2012). The blame for such exclusion is often placed by critics on the Marxist foundations of post-colonial theory and postcolonial scholars’ unwillingness to accuse the Soviet Union of imperial behaviours (Şandru 2013). We are looking for contributors to this academic workshop and the publication that will follow (a special issue or edited volume), who are working on various forms of life narrative (life writing, oral history, autobiographical fiction, etc.) and are interested in offering a critical reading of cultural productions, a critical response to the existing scholarship on views of Soviet communism in Australia, or a personal, creative response to the debate. Papers can address, among others, topics within broader themes including: –          Memories of Eastern Europe in Australia –          Soviet colonialism in Australian perceptions –          Translating (post)colonialisms –          Multilayered meanings of East European socialism in Australia –          Curating memory –          “Communism in the family” – remembering earlier generations Please send a 250-word abstract with a short bio by 1 November 2023 to Dr Kasia Williams (ANU Centre for European Studies) kasia.williams@anu.edu.au and Dr Mary Besemeres (ANU School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics) mary.besemeres@anu.edu.au *

Bloomsbury Cultural History of Trans Lives, Vol 4: The Eighteenth Century

deadline for submissions: November 1, 2023 Sal Nicolazzo (UC Davis), Scott Larson (University of Michigan), and Aixia Huang (SOAS), co-editors

The historical period of 1650-1800 includes massive historical transformations with particular purchase for the history of gender, yet this period has only begun to attract substantial attention from scholars of trans studies. This volume seeks to gather work that engages rigorously with trans studies methodologies while deepening the field’s engagement with historical periods and materials across regions, languages, and disciplines.

We invite chapter proposals that think broadly about “trans lives” in the long 18th century, though we do not propose one stable meaning of “trans lives” in this period or in our historical methodologies; rather, we welcome work that questions or pushes back against prioritizing what is legible as “trans” for contemporary readers/scholars and that opens a wide range of inquiry into the histories of categories, institutions, and practices that shape “trans lives” either in the past or in the present. At the same time, we acknowledge the colonial frameworks that have shaped this volume’s periodization, and we welcome work that critically interrogates the periodization of “the long 18th century.” This volume is part of the Cultural History of Trans Lives series, under contract with Bloomsbury and edited by Blake Gutt, Greta LaFleur, and Emily Skidmore. The series, which we expect will be released as open access after its first year of publication, aims for a broad readership across and beyond academia. We particularly seek proposals for chapters that can both advance scholarly conversations on trans histories of this period and speak to a broader audience of academics across fields, students, activists, community members, and anyone interested in the histories that shape trans lives now. Each volume in the series will contain eight chapters naming broad, general topics (outlined in more detail in the general series call for contributions). We welcome a wide variety of interpretations of the chapter topics from specific disciplinary, geographical, and methodological vantage points. We also understand that contributions might potentially fall under multiple possible categories, and so we welcome proposals that name multiple potential chapters of interest. We seek contributions from writers from a wide range of academic or nonacademic placements, career stages, and disciplinary locations. To propose a contribution, please send a CV and a brief chapter proposal (maximum 500 words) to chtlvol4@gmail.com. *

CFP: Archival Lives/Lives in the Archive (11/01/23; Sewanee Medieval Colloquium, April 5-6 2024)

deadline for submissions:  November 1, 2023 contact email:  ddavies@uh.edu Archival research has always been a cornerstone of medieval studies, but recent work has  reinvigorated the field by transforming our understanding of the lives of late-medieval authors  and people alike. The discovery of new evidence in the case of Cecily Chaumpaigne and  Geoffrey Chaucer, contentious debates around identifying “Chaucer’s Scribe” Adam Pinkhurst  and recovery of figures such as Eleanor Rykener and the rebels of 1381 all demonstrate how  archival research enriches our understanding of the medieval past. This thread invites  contributions that foster new understandings of lives in the archives and bring a theoretical eye to  the practice of archival research itself. Proposals might address new microhistories of medieval  figures; the need for what Saidiya Hartman names “critical fabulation” to address archival  silences and erasures; the colonial and imperialist history of institutions such as the National Archives; the archival lives of poets such as Thomas Hoccleve and John Lydgate; medieval  manuscripts as technologies of the archive; the limits of empirical history as an analytic for  literary history; and theorizations of archival “discovery” as a colonial epistemology. This thread will consist of a series of panels. You can choose to submit a paper or a pre-organized panel. Each panel will have a faculty respondent. SUBMIT A PAPER ABSTRACT (DUE NOV 1):  Proposals for papers can touch upon any aspect of the general theme, and we encourage proposals from medievalists of any discipline and any geographic area. Scholars can apply to the general call, or to specific sub-themes 12(10%) . We accept proposals from anyone with a Ph.D. or who is in the process of gaining a doctorate. Abstracts should be submitted by November 1, 2023. PROPOSE A PANEL (DUE NOV 1):  We also invite participants to submit whole panels of papers, that is, a pre-organized panel. Professional organizations often submit panels from among their membership, but individual are also invited to do the same. To submit a full panel, you need to send a description of the panel, a CV and abstract for the papers you would like to include, and suggestions for possible respondents. Panel proposals are due November 1, 2023. More information here: https://new.sewanee.edu/academics/medieval-colloquium/2024-conference-info/conference-sub-themes/archival-lives-lives-in-the-archives/ CENTER FOR BIOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH / UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA Monday, October 30 4:30-6:00pm EDT/3:30-5:00pm CDT/2:30-4:00pm MDT/1:30-3:00pm PDT/10:30am-12noon HST Online Book Launch and Celebration in honor of Cynthia G. Franklin’s Narrating Humanity: Life Writing and Movement Politics from Palestine to Mauna Kea (Fordham UP, 2023) Cynthia G. Franklin is Professor of English at the University of Hawai‘i. She coedits the journal Biography, and is author of Academic Lives: Memoir, Cultural Theory, and the University Today (2009) and Writing Women’s Communities: The Politics and Poetics of Multi-Genre Anthologies (1997). PRESENTATIONS BY: Maryam Griffin, Assistant Professor, University of Washington Fred Moten, Professor, New York University Bill V. Mullen, Professor Emeritus of American Studies, Purdue University Nadine Naber, Professor, University of Illinois; founder, Liberate Your Research Workshops With informal response by Cynthia Franklin Moderator: J. Kēhaulani Kauanui, Professor of American Studies and Anthropology, Wesleyan University TO REGISTER FOR THE EVENT GO HERE TO ORDER COPIES GO HERE *

Queen Elizabeth II: Life, Times, Legacies

17-19 April 2024 Lisbon, NOVA School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Portugal  Deadline for Submissions, October 15, 2023 The reign of the late Queen Elizabeth II (1952-2022) was the longest so far in the history of the British monarchy. Partly due, without doubt, to its exceptional duration, her seventy-year reign witnessed momentous events with far-reaching consequences, such as the end of the Empire; the decline of Britain on the international political scene; the ‘troubles’ and unrest within the British Isles and the prospect of a DisUnited Kingdom; the emergence and consolidation of popular and youth cultures and the relationship between the Crown and the media, to name but a few. The period is also of particular interest for Anglo-Portuguese Studies, as it raises issues such as the political relations between the two oldest allies during the Salazar/Caetano regime, the official visits, the impact of World War II, decolonisation, and the Revolution of the 25th April 1974, amongst others. Keynote speakers: João Carlos Espada (IEP, Universidade Católica Portuguesa) John Darwin (Nuffield College, University of Oxford) Martin Dale (University of Minho) Pedro Aires Oliveira (IHC — NOVA FCSH / IN2PAST) Philip Murphy (University of London) Steve Marsh (University of Cardiff) Teresa Pinto Coelho (IHC — NOVA FCSH / IN2PAST) >> Official website This International Conference seeks to analyse and assess Elizabeth’s life, times, and legacies across a broad range of disciplines, themes and topics, such as:
    • The British Monarchy
    • The British and Other European Monarchies
    • Monarchy and National Identity(ies)
    • Monarchy and Republic
    • British Institutions
    • Britain and the Emergence of Popular and Youth Cultures
    • Britain and the Welfare State
    • Britain in/and Europe
    • Britain and Brexit
    • Britain and Portugal: The Alliance during Elizabeth II’s Reign
    • Britain in/and the World
    • Britain and the USA: A Special Relationship?
    • The Queen and the European Monarchies
    • The Queen: Biographies and Chronicles
    • The Queen in Literature
    • The Queen in/and the Visual Arts
    • The Queen in/and the Media
    • Screening the Queen: Cinema and Television
    • Staging and Singing the Queen: Theatre and Music
    • The Queen and the (Re)Invention of Tradition(s)
    • The Queen, Memorabilia, and Merchandising
    • The Queen in/and Fashion
    • Royal Spaces and Geographies
    • The Queen in and out of doors: Sport, Animals, and Pets
    • The Queen and her Royal Residences
    • The Royal Family: Past, Present (and Future?)
    • Other
Languages: English and/or Portuguese Submissions The organisers will welcome proposals for 20-minute papers. Submissions should be sent by email to elizabeth2legacy@gmail.com including the title of the paper, an abstract (250-300 words), the author’s data (name, affiliation, contact address) and the author’s bio-note (150 words). Deadline for proposals: 15 October 2023 [NEW!] Notification of acceptance: 30 November 2023 Deadline for registration: 31 December 2023 Registration Fees: Physical (On-site) Presentation: 130€ Online Presentation: 120€ On-site (Physical) Listener: 80€ Online Listener: 70€ Students: 30€ Members of the Department of Modern Languages, Literatures and Cultures, CETAPS, IHC, IN2PAST and external supervisors to NOVA FCSH Masters in Teacher Education: Free All delegates are responsible for their own travel arrangements and accommodation. Contact Information For any inquiries, please contact the organising committee via email. Contact Email elizabeth2legacy@gmail.com * Craig Howes, List Manager Send notices for posting to craighow@hawaii.edu To browse current listings and the IABA-L archive, go to
https://manoa.hawaii.edu/cbr/iaba-listserv/
TO SUBSCRIBE https://hawaii.us14.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=4b810d876f2fee4b91c849f87&id=5ed81693cc International Auto/Biography Association Worldwide https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/iaba/home IABA Student and New Scholar Network (SNS) https://iabasns.wordpress.com on Facebook: facebook.com/IABASNS * Deadline for Submissions October 15, 2023 International Film Festival & Symposium on Celebrity: Between Fame and Infamy (10/15/2023; 2/22-3/8/2024) Texas, USA Texas State University is excited to announce its International Film Festival & Symposium on Celebrity: Between Fame and Infamyin San Marcos, Texas, February 22 – March 8, 2024. The festival will explore the topic of celebrity through a series of feature films and related artefacts (videos, edited clips, filmed performances, etc.) and conclude with a day-long symposium dedicated to the scholarly discussion of celebrity in films and filmic works from a variety of disciplinary perspectives. Historical and Theoretical Background  Going back to eighteenth-century Europe, when the notion of celebrity arose, two models come to mind. On the one hand, an unknown writer publishes a text the paradoxical argument of which creates a scandal among literati who, by publishing counterarguments and stoking the writer to continue the controversy, gather a sizable audience and designate a philosopher in the making—Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Achieving fame within a few years, the author of The Social Contractnonetheless sees his work condemned to be burnt upon its release in 1762. On the other hand, and on the opposite end of the social hierarchy, is Marie-Antoinette, Dauphine of France, facing rival image-makers who create, subvert, or degrade the future royal icon, regardless of her own disposition to personify royalty and make herself personable to the public. Fame and infamy work in a seesaw manner in the production of celebrity. In the early twentieth century, German sociologist Max Weber laid the groundwork for a modern concept of celebrity as the secularization of charismatic authority in the age of capitalism. For Weber, charisma–a notion rooted in theology that alludes to the supernatural or superhuman qualities of an individual as a gift from God–has evolved into celebrity in the “disenchanted,” secularized age of modernity. Writing at the dawn of mass media and increasing popularity of motion pictures, Weber pointed to the development of celebrity culture as a phenomenon created and sustained by moving images and their global circulation. Today, film and short videos often mediate whose histories and art we celebrate. Global celebrities like Viola Davis, Leonardo DiCaprio, Timothée Chalamet, and Zendaya, to TikTok influencers and micro-celebrities, use their platforms for social critique, whether in film, documentaries, music videos, or edited clips. Celebrity is sometimes criticized as vacuous, dictated by likes, views, and followers—often quantity over quality, and amusement over art. We make celebrities into idols and watch as they negotiate their fame and infamy. Importantly, no discussion of celebrity is complete without a discussion of political accountability and the publicists, fans and paparazzi who often enable and produce celebrities. Call for Submissions We invite proposals for papers and presentations of artists’ own film/video works that explore the concept of celebrity as a political, social, and/or cultural phenomenon. Below is a list of potential topics: • Celebrity and image-making from style to fraud; politics of authenticity versus hyper-constructed roles • From celebrity to icon to genius: how does celebrity morph into exceptional creativity? • Using celebrity for cultural change; mainstreaming subcultures; micro-celebrity and the rise of niche cultures • Celebrity, the shaping of polity, and vice versa • Celebrity, censorship, “cancel culture,” and accountability • Mapping celebrity; influencer geopolitics and the circulation of influence • Celebrity and hyper-consumerism • Celebrity and the vicarious life • Scandal as origin of the celebrity phenomenon • The aftermath of celebrity; surviving celebrity; posthumous celebrity Please send all paper/presentation proposals—including a title, a 300-400 word abstract, and a 100-200 word mini-bio—before October 15, 2023, to cm25@txstate.edu or lvalencia@txstate.edu. Sessions will be plenary, and papers will be selected for publication. Texas State is a public university in Central Texas and a Hispanic-Serving Institution with a diverse student population of 38,000+. Located 30 minutes away from Austin, where the SXSW Film & TV Festival will take place March 8-16, 2024, the University is dedicated to increasing access to the arts and internationalizing higher education in the state. Contact Information Carole Martin, Professor of French, Texas State University, cm25@txstate.edu Louie Valencia, Associate Professor of Digital History, Texas State University, lvalencia@txstate.edu Contact Email cm25@txstate.edu URL https://internationalfilmfestivalandsymposiumonce * Deadline for submissions: October 9, 2023

Call for Book Chapters: Recovering Lost Voices 19th-century British Literature

This collection aims to continue the work of diversifying the 19th-century British literary canon. Many authors who were revolutionary and popular during their time are now underrepresented in the current scholarly field. The essays in the collection will touch on underread texts and authors as well as underappreciated characters in more traditionally canonical works. We welcome essays using lenses such as disability studies, trauma theory, critical race theory, queer theory, postcolonial studies, and more. Chapter proposals can include but are not limited to:
    • Underread 19th-century British authors
    • 19th-century diaries or letters that have been critically ignored
    • Approaches to underread or unappreciated works using
        • Disability theory
        • Queer theory
        • Critical race theory
        • Postcolonial studies
        • Trauma studies
    • Examinations of minor or ignored characters in canonical works
Please submit an abstract no longer than 500 words to Michaela George ( Michaela.George@unh.edu) and Elizabeth Drummey (Elizabeth.Drummey@unh.edu), the volume editors. A * “Beyond Words: Interdisciplinary Intersections of Creative Writing and Wellbeing” bookandvolumeofthemind@gmail.comCONTACT: CALL DEADLINE: 500-word abstracts by FRIDAY 6th OCTOBER 2023 EDITORS: Dr Caty Flynn (The Genre Lab.) & Professor Ursula Hurley (University of Salford) CONTEXT The phrase “creative writing” is used in wellbeing interventions as a catch-all term for many forms of practice. Currently, there is scant research to back up claims of efficacy, and little insight in terms of what the actual benefits of specific creative writing practices are, why these benefits occur, and how we can utilise this knowledge for shaping such practices so that we can get the most out of them. We believe passionately that creative writing can, indeed, improve wellbeing. But, we want to present a collection of investigations into the mechanisms of why and, by doing so, lay blueprints for how. This important intersection between wellbeing and creative writing has yet to be addressed robustly and this collection attempts to do so. Creative writing research is inherently interdisciplinary. As Mi Csikszentmihalyi explains, “being able to braid together ideas and emotions from disparate domains is one way writers express their creativity” (263). Science and psychology recognise the broader implications of creative writing’s applicability, evidenced by a wealth of developments over the last century, including but not limited to the explicit influences apparent in everyone from Freud to Damasio to Hofstadter, to Narrative Psychology (see Sarbin, 1986) and Drama Therapy (see Jones, 1996). Theorists of all disciplines typically turn to storytelling to elucidate their points. But, what can creative writing do for these fields beyond offering metaphors or analogies (useful as that may be)? What can creative writing do in terms of application, theory, communication, and creative conceptualisation with regard to wellbeing? In this proposed collection, we seek to move beyond metaphor towards mutual enrichment. The overall purpose of the volume is to showcase innovative methodologies and new theories, highlight benefits and challenges, offer frameworks and directions for future research, and encourage new developments at the intersection of creative writing practice and wellbeing. Our enquiry considers the implications for creative practice; psychological and therapeutic practice; self-help; intersectionality, social justice and transformation; and experimental scientific research. SUGGESTED THEMES/TOPICS We aim to be inclusive in terms of discipline, approach, and background. We encourage both single-author and collaborative submissions, and chapters which incorporate practice-based research or creative or hybrid forms into process or presentation, thereby making form as well as content part of the research, as well as more traditional academic chapters. We are interested in chapters that foreground specific genres of writing or specific areas of wellbeing, and those which take a broader view. We encourage personal investigations as well as social research. Essentially, we are open to receiving any creative and robust response to the brief from any and every disciplinary perspective, to showcase the diversity of current practices and their transformative potential. Of particular interest is interdisciplinary work that can creatively raise issues, themes, and topics such as: • Creative writing as a practice through which to shift perspective, question given rules and habitual behaviours, and imagine things otherwise. • Connections between the processes and concepts of writing and those of the cognitive and social sciences. Comparative essays on concepts from psychology, mental health, neuroscience, sociology etc with concepts from creative writing i.e., stories and brain processes, rhetorical/literary devices as biological/psychological/emotional functions/tools. • How can we make creative writing concepts accessible beyond literacy, vision, or any other barrier which impedes engagement? Chapters might imagine brail or audio methods, oral storytelling, dramatic or musical performance, games, and/or inclusive social facilitations. • Re-imaginings, syntheses, or innovative extensions of traditional or existing theory from an interdisciplinary lens – i.e., creative writing and psychology. • Case-studies, evaluative reports, cameos, co-constructed content or other outputs from creative writing wellbeing intervention trials or projects. • The capacities of creative writing to constitute a free and accessible mode of self-care for a large demographic of people in ways that support intersecting social inequalities observable in accessing effective mental health, wellbeing, and self-development support. • Are all types of creative writing good for us? Are certain types of writing “better” for us or more transformational, and others “worse” for us or regressive? In terms of reading or writing, particular genres or styles or movements or periods or practices. • Specific genres & their wellbeing potential / mental health utility/resonance; specific mental health conditions explored through the lens of creative writing; specific outcomes – self-expression; reconceptualisation; control; confidence; change; perspective; reflection; etc. • Evolutionary advantages of creative writing. • Disciplinary, sectoral, and/or any other challenges, difficulties, issues, or barriers in creative writing wellbeing research, development, engagement, and evaluation, including but not limited to ethical procedure, methodology, engagement, skillset, resources, knowledge base, facilitation, publication, funding, collaboration, and interdisciplinary working. How can we transform or overcome these challenges? • Robustly researched theoretical essays regarding the “why” and “how” of wellbeing/self-development benefits which emerge from creative writing. • The potential of creative writing for social change, resisting injustice, and transforming perceptions. • Methodologies for creative writing & mental health research and innovation. • Theoretical, experimental, and creative investigations of concepts and practices such as journaling; self-expression; life-writing; self-writing; and so on. • How can we build co-construction, community involvement, and social engagement into creative writing wellbeing projects? • Everyday utility/application of creative writing concepts/practices for self-care/expression/development. • The future of writing for wellbeing – directions/next steps; predictions/hopes; necessary changes; potential problems. All chapters must constitute fully-integrated interdisciplinary work – a dialogue between fields, rather than a reading of one discipline through another in a one-way dynamic. All of these topics/ideas can be approached in whatever genre of writing feels appropriate. However, we do expect there to be rigorous interdisciplinary research, reading, and critical thinking underpinning even the most creative or experimental chapter. We interpret creative writing broadly, so do contact us if you are unsure about definitional boundaries. ___________ Format: We invite 500-word Abstracts for 5,000-10,000-word chapters (negotiable). Please include up to 5 keywords and a brief biography of the author(s) which includes an institutional affiliation and your contact email. Send your abstract to: bookandvolumeofthemind@gmail.com Deadline for Abstracts: 06/10/2023. Accepted authors will be notified 20/10/2023. Accepted chapters to be delivered no later than 19/04/2024. Editorial team: Dr Caty Flynn (The Genre Lab.) & Professor Ursula Hurley (University of Salford) REFERENCES Cozolino, L. (2010). The Neuroscience of Psychotherapy: Healing the Social Brain. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2013). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial. Damasio, A. (2000). The Feeling of what Happens. London: Vintage. Freud, S. (2008). The Interpretation of Dreams. Oxford: Oxford’s World Classics. Hofstadter, D. (2007). I am a Strange Loop. Philadelphia: Basic Books. Koestler, A. (1975). The Act of Creation. London: Picador. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. London: University of Chicago Press. Prentiss, S. and Walker, N. eds. (2020). The Science of Story: The Brain Behind Creative Nonfiction. London: Bloomsbury. Professor Ursula Hurley (she/her) Equality, Diversity and Inclusion lead School of Arts, Media & Creative Technology / Room 203 Crescent House University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT T: +44(0) 161 295 2851 u.k.hurley@salford.ac.uk  /   www.salford.ac.uk * Call for papers Fragmented Lives IABA (International Auto/Biography Association) World Conference 2024 Reykjavik, 12-15 June 2024 in collaboration with the Centre for Studies in Memory and Literature, University of Iceland deadline for submissions, Oct. 1, 2023 The IABA World Conference 2024 will be held at the University of Iceland in collaboration with the Centre for Studies in Memory and Literature 12-15 June 2024. The theme of the conference is ‘Fragmented Lives.’ We invite proposals for individual papers or panels of 3-4 papers as well as round-table suggestions on that theme. The world is fragmented in different ways in our times, due to wealth disparity, migration, and the continuing climate catastrophe. The digital revolution means that lives are now lived online as well as off – where fragmented identities and selves are played out. The recent pandemic can also be said to have fragmented our sense of time. This in turn shapes life writing and self-expression. As Eva Karpinski has argued ‘the autobiographical fragment is uniquely suited to address the discontinuities and ruptures of history, experience, and memory’ (Karpinski 2013), and that is why we turn to this theme to gain new insights into auto/biographical writing. One of the key issues at stake in auto/biographical narration is memory, and memory is usually incomplete, fragmented. Narrative is at times used to reflect this fragmentation, or it is used to paper over the cracks, to create a cohesive narrative out of a fragmented past. The biographer is also faced with fragmentary knowledge of the past when writing on another’s life, a past which is then pieced together. We are looking for papers on how lives and life writing can be addressed and examined in light of fragmentation. Themes and issues include, but are not limited to
    • fragmented narrative
    • fragmented identity
    • fragmented ecologies
    • fragments of a life
    • fragmented genres
    • digital fragmentation
    • fragmented pasts
Please send abstracts (300 words) or panel/round-table suggestions, and short bio (150 words) to IABAWorld2024@gmail.com by 1 October 2023. Further information will b e available soon on https://memory.hi.is/iaba-world-2024/ Archives in Transit: From Personal Life Histories to Public Experiences as Academics Northeast Modern Language Association March 7-10, 2024 Boston USA Submission Deadline: September 30, 2023, at: https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20713 Abstract While life in the academy often precludes acknowledging one’s own personal and familial life histories and experiences, generative and embodied scholarship in the humanities requires a thorough reckoning with our positionality and intersectionality. In this creative session, participants traverse from the personal to the professional by paying homage to the roots that lead to routes. This creative session invites all participants to express aspects of their personal identities that factor into both professional academic work and personal experiences of life in the academy. As a creative session, genre and modality are flexible. Genres can range anywhere from poetry to (non-)fiction as well as dance. Presentational modalities can include, but are not limited to, the gestural, spoken, written, visual, and audial. After panelists have performed, drawn, presented and/or read their work, there will be a collaborative discussion followed by an interactive discussion between attendees and performers. If there is ample time, an engaging discussion regarding the connections between the personal and the professional will conclude the session. We will end by jointly considering how our personal life experiences augment our abilities as instructors, writers, scholars, and life-long learners. Description The creative session will consist of 3-6 presenters who will perform, present, or draw aspects of their personal identities that factor into both professional academic work and personal experiences of life in the academy. Genre and modality are flexible. Additional Information For questions or concerns, please contact the session organizer at: andrea.dawn.bryant@gmail.com *

Ecologies of Exile: Exploring Literature Penned by Persecuted Writers during the Holocaust

Northeast Modern Language Association March 7-10, 2024 Boston USA Submission Deadline: September 30, 2023, at: https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20750 Abstract This seminar concerns the powerful and poignant canon of exile literature and focuses on works penned by authors who were forced to flee Nazi Germany. Working together, we will consider the diverse range of voices, themes, and artistic expressions that emerged from these exiled authors and artists. We will embark on a literary journey as we traverse across lines of identity to analyze works of memoir, fiction, essays, and poetry cultivated by individuals who sought safety transnationally. We will explore the interrelations between exile, stylistic and thematic choices, and conceptions of identity, belonging, and resistance. Some areas of consideration are to include, but are not limited by, the following: · The relationship between loss, displacement, and artistic imagination · Sentiments of belonging, longing for home, and cultural identity · Writing as resisting totalitarianism, persecution, and the Holocaust · The transformative power of narrating survival and resilience · Connections between emotional experiences and literary form This seminar explores identity in exile and the powerful role literature plays as an act of resistance against oppression. We invite participants to engage with a diverse array of voices and perspectives from authors who underwent displacement and persecution, thus nurturing a deeper understanding of literary contributions as they are located within the broader socio-political context of their respective situations. We additionally seek to encounter how literary expression, survival, and displacement allow a deeper understanding regarding how their contributions to a literary landscape prove to be a remaining act of resistance and fortitude. The seminar seeks to nurture the opportunity for participants to encounter the multilayered, transnational, and multilingual legacy penned by exiled writers fleeing Nazi Germany. Working together, we will honor the voices, perspectives, experiences, and work of our chosen authors and consider how their works continually contribute to understanding how human experience shapes persecution and the search for belonging. Description This seminar will consider the diverse range of voices, themes, and artistic expressions that emerged from exiled authors and artists during and following the Holocaust. Additional Information If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the session organizer at: andrea.dawn.bryant@gmail.com Contact Information Andrea Dawn Bryant Contact Email andrea.dawn.bryant@gmail.com URL https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20750 *

Avatars, Heteronyms, Phantoms: Life Writing, Literary Masks, and the Dispersion of the Self

American Comparative Literature Association Meeting March 14-17, 2024 Montreal, Canada Deadline for Submissions: September 30, 2023 As the age of online avatars as a source of anonymity is superseded by the obverse phenomenon (instead of real persons under fictitious names, algorithms using real names are increasingly part of our horizon of anxiety and expectation), it is time to look back on the complex transactions between literary avatars and life-writing. In the chapter “Playing for Real” from her book Derivative Lives (2022), Virginia Rademacher has noted the “progressive loss of the real to the simulated”, but also, as its correlative, the “dispersion of authority through the intervention of other players” (136). In this way, a biofictional or autofictional game in which the author thinks they hold behind-the-scenes control over the thresholds between imagination and the real ends up hijacked by the democratized rights of anyone’s claims to intercede in this hybrid invention. This seminar invites papers exploring the genealogy of contemporary writers’ literary avatars and/ or contextualizing these social media ephemerides as part of a broader literary tradition. If we think of Cervantes’s famous conceit of “Don Quixote” as a translation of Cide Hamete Benengeli’s writings, auctorial alter-egos can be said to be coextensive with the history of modern literature. They first start springing from the page as the made-up authors of eighteenth-century pseudo-translations (Vanacker 2018), a tradition which culminated in the nineteenth century (Toremans 2017). With the advent of periodicals, a new stage opens for invented names, often with personalities attached. From the plethora of “pseudo-persons” in Blackwoods’ Magazine in the 1820s (Esterhammer 2020, 38) to Coleridge’s alter-egos (Knox 2010, 425) or John Clare’s “Don Juan”, playing nearly tongue-in-cheek with his known delusion of being Lord Byron, the Romantics did not lack their avatars. Only Modernist authors seemed to outdo them, (re)inventing hybrid life-writing forms from “autobiografiction” (Saunders 2010) to heteronymy. Fernando Pessoa, creator of over seventy alternative selves, seems to hold a record for literary deception, but only if we do not count Romain Gary, the Lithuanian-born “French Ambassador to Hollywood”, multilingual writer, and pseudo-translator of his own “Promise at Dawn”, who pulled the impossible feat of winning the Goncourt Prize twice (under different names). In most of these cases, the “false” selves have deep auto/biographical roots, thus complicating common assumptions in biofiction and autofiction scholarship about the importance of onomastic identity between the protagonist and a historical figure. In exploring the avatar as a reincarnation of the heteronym, but also as a phantomatic return of auctorial anxieties about authenticity and the real, this seminar proposes to look at the dispersion of the self into a kaleidoscope of names and personas through the lens of life-writing. Laura Cernat, Todd Avery, and I will be co-chairing the sessions. We are interested in the literary precursors of contemporary biographical masks, avatars, and pseudonyms. We welcome proposals pertaining to a variety of cultures and historical periods and exploring the phenomenon of writing under another name or forging an entire fictive identity, in the form of made-up editors or columnists, made-up authors of pseudotranslations, or other literary conceits meant to disturb the univocal relationship between author and written work. Organizer: Laura Cernat Co-Organizer: Virginia Rademacher Contact the Seminar Organizers Virginia Newhall Rademacher, PhD Professor of Literary and Cultural Studies Chair, Arts and Humanities Division Babson College Babson Park, MA 02457 vrademacher@babson.edu WebEx personal room: https://babson.webex.com/meet/vrademacher Author Page: Derivative Lives (Bloomsbury, 2022) *

CFP–Graphic Biographical Fiction (9/31/2023) Edited Collection

Deadline for Submissions: September 30, 2023
Hello everyone,
I am happy to announce that my colleague Maria Juko and I are co-editing a volume of essays on graphic biographical fiction that explores the connections and tensions between comic studies and biofiction studies. I hope some of you will consider contributing to our volume. Here’s the call for papers! Nancy Pedri Graphic Biographical Fiction Scholars have only recently turned a critical eye towards the fictionalization of real people despite biofiction’s popularity on the literary market since the 1980s. Unlike autobiographies or biographies, rather than a truthful account of the person’s life story, biofiction centres on a creative interpretation of a real person’s life in which they become a character. Following David Lodge, who emphasized that the biographical novel “takes a real person and their real history as the subject matter for imaginative exploration” (8), Michael Lackey emphasizes that “the biographical novel is, first and foremost, fiction” (5). Further refining his definition of this literary form, Lackey explains how “the author of biofiction fictionalizes a historical person’s life in order to project into existence his or her own vision of life and the world” (Biofiction 13). Despite its growing popularity in life writing studies (Lackey, Latham, Layne), there has been a lack of research in graphic narratives that dramatize the lives of real people across words and images. In this issue, we take our cue from Paul Franssen and Ton Hoenselaars, who wished to “locate this genre in the field of literary production” (18), to locate it in the field of comics studies. As such, this special issue seeks to fill an important gap in exploring the tensions and productive relationships between biofiction and the graphic medium. Graphic biographical fiction asks us to reflect on several questions about storytelling, reading, and consumption and marketing patterns. These include, but are not limited to: – What is the relationship between graphic biographical fiction from graphic biography, historical fiction, or portraiture? – How does graphic biographical fiction impact our understanding of biographical fiction? – How does graphic biographical fiction address identity or the fact/fiction divide? – What questions about authorship does graphic biographical fiction raise? – What implications for character does graphic biographical fiction’s fictionalized treatment of a real person have? – How do graphic biographical fictions navigate the dangers of imposture, falsification, or sensationalism? – How does the visual aspect of graphic biographical fiction contribute to the dramatization of a real person and a real life? – To what extend are readers encouraged to merge the real life person with their work/ creative output? – What real life people are represented in graphic biographic fiction, and what makes them a suitable choice for authors? – Why do graphic biographical novels from European countries often focus on British or American subjects? – How is this genre promoted and why? – What readership does this genre attract and why?
Please send an abstract (200-300 words) and a short biography (100 words) to both editors, Maria Juko (mariajuko@gmail.com) and Nancy Pedri (npedri@mun.ca)
Deadline: 31 September 2023
Works Cited Franssen, P and Hoenselaars T. 1999. “Introduction: The Author as Character. Defining a Genre.” In Granssen, P and Hoenselaars, T. editors. The Author as Character Representing History Writers in Western Literature. Fairleigh Dickinson UP, pp. 11-38. Glaser, Brigitte Johanna. ‘Mediating Postcolonial Issues through Graphic Biofiction: Comics as a New Frontier in the Study of Literatures in English’. In: Michael Keneally, Rhona Richman Keneally, Wolfgang Zach (Hrsg.). editors. Literatures in English: New Frontiers of Research, Tübingen 2014. Lackey, Michael. “Locating and Defining the Bio in Biofiction!. a/b: Auto/ Biography Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, 2016. pp. 3-10. ———, Biofiction. An Introduction. Routledge, 2022. Latham, Monica. 2012. “Serv[Ing] Under Two Masters!. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, vol. 27, no. 2, 2012. pp. 354-373. Layne, Bethany, editor. Biofiction and Writers! Afterlives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020. Lodge, David. The Year of Henry James: The Story of a Novel: With other Essays on the Genesis, Composition, and Reception of Literary Fiction. Penguin, 2007. —- Nancy Pedri, Professor & Head English, Memorial University of Newfoundland https://www.mun.ca/faculty/npedri/ Memorial University’s campuses are situated in the traditional territories of diverse Indigenous groups. We acknowledge with respect the diverse histories and cultures of the Beothuk, Mi’kmaq, Innu, and Inuit. *

Touring Travel Writing III: Between Fact and Fiction International Conference

Date: November 9-10 2023 Venue: NOVA FCSH, Colégio Almada Negreiros (Campus de Campolide) deadline for submissions: September 30, 2023 touringtravelwriting@gmail.com CETAPS (Centre for English, Translation and Anglo-Portuguese Studies, Universidade Nova, Lisbon) and CELIS (Centre de Recherches sur les Littératures et la Sociopoétique, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand) once again join efforts and organise this international conference which aims to be a locus of debate on the many facets of travel writing, a research area that has emerged as a relevant topic of study in the Humanities and Social Sciences in the last few decades. Papers on the following topics are welcome: Anglophone travel writing on the Portuguese-speaking world Lusophone travel writing on the Anglophone World Travelling to write Travel writing, the novel, poetry and drama Travel writing as report Travel and visual culture Travel writing, Humanities and the Social Sciences Travel writing, gender and power Travel writing, (post)colonial discourse and decoloniality Travel writing and (forced) migration Travel writing, imagined communities and imagology Travel writing and tourist culture Travel writing and (in)tangible heritage Travel writing and exploration Travelling as gentrification Travel writing, censorship and surveillance Travel writing and (auto)biography Travel writing and Otherness Travel writing, politics and ideology Travel writing and ethics Travel writing, mobility and conviviality Maps as travel narratives Travel, Fantasy, Children’s Literature and Young Adult Fiction Sound/Food/Smell/Touch/Visual/Ecoscapes in Travel Writing Travel writing in/as translation Utopian and dystopian travel narratives Science and travel writing History of Travel Writing Travel writing: theory and criticism Intertextuality in travel writing The rhetorics of travel writing Teaching Travel Writing Travel Writing and ‘World Literature’ Keynote speakers: Carl Thompson (University of Surrey, UK) Catherine Morgan-Proux (Univ. Clermont-Auvergne, France) Susan Pickford (Univ. de Genève, Switzerland) Papers and pre-organized panels: The conference languages are English and Portuguese. Speakers should prepare for a 20-minute presentation. Please send a 300-word abstract, as well as a short biographical note (100 words), by September 30th, to: touringtravelwriting@gmail.com Proposals for papers and pre-organized panels (in this case, please also include a brief description of the panel) should include full title of the paper, name, institutional affiliation, contact details, a short bionote and AV requirements (if any). Notification of abstract acceptance or rejection will take place by October 5, 2023. Registration fees: • Full fee: 80 Euros • Students: 40 Euros (ID required) Payment must be made until October 20, 2023. After this date proposals will no longer be considered. For further queries please contact: cetaps@fcsh.unl.pt or touringtravelwriting@gmail.com or mzc@fcsh.unl.pt Delegates are responsible for their own travel arrangements and accommodation. The conference website will soon provide useful information. Payment: Payment by bank transfer: Payment by Pay Pal Reference: CETAPS CONGRESSOS – 610245 BIC: TOTAPTPL IBAN: PT50 0018 000321419114020 13 Tax identification number: 501559094 This is additional data your bank may require: Account Owner: FCSHUNL – Research Units Bank: BANCO SANTANDER TOTTA S.A. For PayPal payments, use the email: dgfc@fcsh.unl.pt Identify your payment referring to: CETAPS 610245 International Conference (Touring Travel Writing III). Please add PayPal international taxes: PT + EURO zone: 3,4% + 0,35€ Rest of the World: 4,90% + 0,35€ Full Fee: 83,07 € (PT & EURO zone) 83,92 € (Rest of the World) Student Fee: 41,71 € (PT & EURO zone) 42,31 € (Rest of the World) Please send a copy of your confirmed payment to: cetaps@fcsh.unl.pt Event website: http://www.touringtravelwriting.wordpress.com 9(14.1%) Organized by the Anglo-Portuguese Studies research area. Organizing Committee: Maria Zulmira Castanheira Rogério Miguel Puga Gabriela Gândara Terenas Miguel Alarcão João Paulo Pereira da Silva Isabel Oliveira Maria da Conceição Castel-Branco Marco Neves Administrative support: Cristina Carinhas: cetaps@fcsh.unl.pt Mariana Gonçalves: cetapsgestao@fcsh.unl.pt *

A Light in the Fog: Creative Writing about Adoption

Northeast Modern Language Association Convention, March 7-10, 2024, Boston, USA deadline for submissions:  September 30, 2023 Poets and Writers: consider submitting for a panel at the Northeast Modern Language Association Convention, March 7-10, 2024, in Boston. Panelists will read original work focused on some aspect of adoption and participate in a discussion. To submit an abstract, go to https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20738 or the NeMLA website and look for panel 20738. Submission deadline is September 30. Panel Description: A recent article in The New Yorker discusses the “emotional aftermath” America’s 7 million adoptees face. The article uses the term “coming out of the fog” to describe an adoptee’s realization, sometimes triggered by an event in adulthood, about their situation and how it influences many aspects of their lives, especially personality and interactions with others. Adoptions were once secretive affairs, often with a birth mother signing away parental rights, and infants and children housed in institutions run by religious charities or the state until claimed by a couple. Contemporary adoption has many faces: open adoption, foster to adoption, transracial and international adoptions. Of course, further complicating the landscape, inexpensive DNA testing makes it possible for adoptees to locate biological families, with a variety of results. This panel asks poets and prose writers, especially adoptees, to share their work on adoption as a way of reflecting on and discussing this complex topic. Jerry Wemple contact email:  jwemple@commonwealthu.edu  *

Women in French 11th International Colloquium “Precarious Lives/Vies Précaires”

March 28-30, 2024, The University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, deadline for submissions:  September 30, 2023 contact email:  gmstamm@ua.edu The COVID-19 pandemic, war in Ukraine threatening not only Europe but also shedding new light on other ongoing conflicts in Africa and the Middle East, series of climate change-related natural disasters, and attendant economic strain have thrown into relief what many of us were already aware of: the precarity of our own lives and that of those around us, human and nonhuman. However, as in most cases, that precarity is exacerbated by a number of systemic factors that impact us differently based on our position and identity. Women disproportionately left the workforce during the pandemic and many of the reasons driving this exodus were out of their control. Economic strain has been hardest on women of color; women, children, and minority genders make up the majority of refugees, including climate refugees. Despite being the “grande cause du quinquennat” during the first Macron term (and now renewed for the second), feminicide and domestic violence more widely continue to plague France, mirroring what has been happening in the rest of the world. For Women in French 2024 we invite you to consider the ways in which the precarity of women’s lives throughout history has been depicted in French and Francophone literature and culture. What are the factors that exacerbate that precarity? What or who else is vulnerable to these circumstances? In what ways has resilience emerged in response to these pressures? We welcome proposals of individual papers and entire panels on topics related to the overarching theme “Precarious Lives.” The conference will take place in Tuscaloosa, AL at The University of Alabama March 28-30, 2024. While the organizers envision a largely in-person event, accommodations will be made for a limited amount of colleagues who need to participate remotely. Possible topics may include but are not limited to : Migration, immigration, asylum War and genocide Environment and ecology Sexual and domestic violence Class and economic dependency/independence Race, sexual orientation, other intersectional identities Charge mentale Vulnerability studies Illness and disability studies Memory studies Women and mythology Exile Women in second-class citizen status Natural disasters and survival Precarity and science fiction Women and precarious democracies Women and world order Early emancipation movements Transatlantic studies Women and revolution Participants may present in English or in French. Please send a 250-300 word abstract and short bio to wif2024@ua.edu by September 30, 2023. Participants will be notified of acceptance by October 31, 2023. Panel proposals should include a short (about 100 word) proposal for each paper and a description of the unifying idea of the panel of the same length, as well as a brief bio of each participant. One Book, One WiF In partnership with our colleagues in WiF UK-Ireland, WIF North America is furthering the ‘One Book, One WiF’ project that began in 2017. The aim of this initiative is to help promote critical interest in less known French and Francophone women writers and thus to increase the readership of their corpus. The author for the 2024 conference is Meryem Alaoui and the text is La Vérité sort de la bouche du cheval (2018). Proposals for papers or a panel on this book or the author in general are welcomed. *

Abundant Silence: Narrative and Artistic Strategies of Resistance (Seminar)

Northeast MLA Conference, March 7-10, 2024 Boston, USA Deadline for Submissions—September 30, 2023 contact email: kaminerv@utica.edu This seminar builds on successful past seminars on the roles and limits of narrative in bearing witness to trauma and injustice. This year, we examine relationships between silence and abundance as artistic resistance strategies against colonial, racist, and exclusionary narratives. Silence is often discussed as an absence, but silences in literature and art are also abundant with meaning. On one hand, silences can refuse appropriations of voice and hegemonic interpretive frameworks. On the other hand, they can create echoes that produce new interpretations or ways of reading trauma and injustice. In this way, silences can be sites of excess, abundance, and plenitude. They can connect readers, authors, characters, and people represented in texts; they can produce spaces for love and care, for innovative relationships and ethical commitments. With this in mind, we invite participants to consider some of the following questions: What are the tensions between silence and abundance in literature and art? What can we, as readers or as scholars, learn from embracing these tensions rather than trying to resolve them? When and how might we think of silences as being full? How can silences bring something other than narrative into being? How can silences draw our attention to absences? When and how do silences echo? What stories are told by silences, absences, or things that don’t speak? In what ways are these artworks and literature more than products to be consumed? Do the ideas of surplus, abundance, and/or plenitude offer a framework for understanding the meanings of narrative silences? In what ways can silence and abundance interweave to create spaces of care or resistance? In what ways can silences reflect and contribute to thriving? Papers on all genres, media, and geographical contexts welcome. Please submit 200-word abstract and bio to the portal: https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20397 *

The Rise of Autoliterature

Northeast MLA Conference, March 7-10, 2024 Boston, USA Deadline for Submissions—September 30, 2023 contact email: calliein@buffalo.edu This panel will analyze autofiction and autotheory as contemporary literary genres still on the rise, with particular interest in putting the two in conversation with each other.
Autofiction and autotheory continue to grow in popularity as forms of contemporary life writing. Despite their differences, these two genres share a concern in representations of selfhood and subjective experience that explicitly engage and are shaped by other literary and philosophical texts. Moreover, by emphasizing the intertextuality of lived experience, they both challenge (1) the perceived conventionality of more established life writing genres, such as memoir, and (2) everyday assumptions of unmediated, individual self-expression. This panel will analyze autofiction and autotheory as contemporary literary genres still on the rise, with particular interest in putting the two in conversation with each other. Papers may engage autofiction or autotheory, or the relationship between the two, as genres, market categories, or artistic practices; look closely at specific works of autofiction and/or autotheory; or explore other forms of what we might call “autoliterature.” As the session title suggests, papers that historicize the emergence and development of autofiction and/or autotheory or that broadly analyze their ideological functions and features in a particular national or cultural context are especially welcome. Abstracts are due Sep 30, 2023, and should be submitted through NeMLA’s submission portal ( https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20337 NeMLA 2024 will take place in person at Boston, MA on March 7-10, 2024. More information about the convention can be found on the NeMLA website https://www.buffalo.edu/nemla/convention.html Please feel free to reach out with any questions to calliein@buffalo.edu. * Adapted Lives and Spectral Presences Northeast MLA Conference, March 7-10, 2024 Boston, USA Deadline for Submissions—September 30, 2023 https://networks.h-net.org/group/announcements/20004229/adapted-lives-and-spectral-presences-nemla-2024 The theme of the NeMLA 2024 Conference in Boston, MA is “Surplus.” This panel focuses on adaptations in which historical subjects, especially writers, artists, and musicians, serve as “co-authors” of the adaptation itself, challenge the conventions of historical fiction and biopics. These adaptations inscribe or stage what is surplus in the archive, as historical personages articulate previously unspoken thoughts, concealed desires, or the keys that help subsequent generations understand their political, social, or creative endeavors. Elizabeth Freeman coined the term erotohistoriography to describe an “anti-systemic method” that does not so much seek to write the past into the present as to encounter the past already in the present by “treating the present itself as a hybrid.” In these encounters, dead bodies may come back to life as spectral or corporeal figures, activating alternate temporalities that disrupt hegemonic, regulatory time. Erotohistoriography effects a “counterhistory” informing later artistic productions, particularly when the resuscitated body is used to “effect, figure, or perform” cross-generational encounters, revealing how lived experiences of marginalized groups and individuals can be erased, rewritten, or reconfigured. Closely aligned with the concept of queer temporality, erotohistoriography forges cross-generational alliances that facilitate what Jill Dolan calls “utopian performatives.” This panel invites presentations on hybridizations of past and present in adaptations in which cross-generational encounters are a foundational element of their representational apparatuses, whether these encounters are manifest in the imaginations of the subjects or authors of historical fiction, or spectral and corporeal presences in adaptations intended for film and live performance. Please submit abstracts of 250 words for consideration by September 30 through NeMLA’s submission portal at https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/User/SubmitAbstract/20803 0(0%) Contact Information David Pellegrini, Eastern Connecticut State University Contact Email pellegrinid@easternct.edu *

“You’ve Got Me in My Feelings”: Discomfort and Discourse of “Excessive” Emotions in Trauma Memoir

deadline for submissions:  September 30, 2023 Northeast Modern Language Association (NeMLA) Conference 2024 Boston, MA March 7-10, 2024 Trivialization of trauma is an increasing concern for scholars and clinicians alike, and Americans often culturally employ the language of trauma in hyperbolic or sarcastic ways, but does this humor or hyperbole also couch collective cultural unease with overwhelming emotions?  In The Body Keeps the Score, Bessel van der Kolk reminds us that “the essence of trauma is that it is overwhelming, unbelievable, and unbearable,” making bearing witness to it discomfiting and making witnesses acutely aware of their own mortality salience (197). In order to heal from traumatic experience, van der Kolk and van der Hart argue, “Traumatic memories are the unassimilated scraps of overwhelming experiences, which need to be integrated with existing mental schemes, and be transformed into narrative language,” concluding that it is necessary to “return to the memory often in order to complete it” (176). While what is traumatizing to one individual may not be for another, the vast majority of people will experience something that elicits particularly overwhelming, “negative” emotions, like grief, terror, or rage. While society tends to embrace collective shows of emotion that are viewed as “positive,” narratives that are focused on a happy ending, or storytelling that is neatly packaged to encourage consumerism or crowdfunding, too often Americans devalue, denigrate, and avoid individual experience of overpowering emotions to our individual and collective detriment.  In trauma memoir—memoir that narrates traumatic experience(s) of the author—the reading public functions as witness to these raw, private experiences of emotion, providing a necessary space for readers to learn to sit with the discomfort of intense, inconvenient emotions while also seeing how the memoirist copes and, most importantly, survives. This accepted panel invites explorations and analyses of “excessive” or inconvenient emotions in trauma memoir.  For general inquiries, please contact Danielle French, Kent State Universitydfrenc12@kent.edu.  Finally, no remote presentations are permitted per NeMLA guidelines, so please be ready to present in Boston.  For all general guidelines and 2024 NeMLA Conference information see: https://www.buffalo.edu/nemla/convention.html. Please submit your paper proposals to:  https://cfplist.com/nemla/User/SubmitAbstract/20533. *

Violences Big and Small: Personal Stories of Resilience and Revelation

deadline for submissions:  September 30, 2023 Northeast MLA Conference (NeMLA 2024, Boston) March 7–10, 2024 contact email:  mejias@strose.edu This creative panel will be dedicated to nonfiction stories of excess and loss, of fear and humiliation. Through personal accounts that unfold around moments of trauma—of violences big and small—we will explore the place of resilience and revelation amid a surplus of pain. The panel draws inspiration from chronicles of normalized racial discrimination such as Marco Avilés’ No soy tu cholo (2018), as well as from works like Lo que no tiene nombre (2013), Piedad Bonnet’s book on how schizophrenia devastated her son, and Annie Ernaux’s brutally honest account of an illegal abortion in the autobiographical novel L’événement (2000). Similar impulses can be found in contemporary English language authors of memoirs and essays such as Tara Westover (Educated, 2018), Maggie O’Farrell (I am, I am, I am, 2018), and Emilie Pine (Notes to Self, 2019). “It is essential to write about things that hurt and isolate so that we feel less alone,” O’Farrell has said. In agreement with her statement, this panel’s organizing principle is that, by writing about our moments of greatest vulnerability, we may be able to create a space of authentic communion with other human beings. Send 250-word proposals. They must include a short sample of the text that you’re proposing to read. Up to six personal stories written in Spanish will make up this panel. Given time limitations, the texts selected for reading should be between 900 and 1,000 words long. Please use this link to send your proposal: https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20746 *

Behind the Scenes: The Literary Documentary, Scene II

Northeast Modern Language Association Convention, March 7-10, 2024–Boston USA deadline for submissions:  September 30, 2023 contact email:  kblombart@verizon.net Literary documentaries have become a popular pedagogical tool in higher education. Abstracts are invited from literary, media/film, and legal studies’ professionals to share their experiences, expertise and perspectives on the processes and complexities in creating a literary documentary. Literary documentaries in the past decade have become not only popular in higher education, but they are popular among the general public.  These documentaries, an excellent medium for teaching poets and writers, offer audiences a culturally rich, fascinating aspect of a writer’s daily life (i.e., Creeley, Olson, Merwin, de Prima, Sendak, Percy; see 2014 AWP), revealing poignant, intimate scenes of his/her creative life. However, what are the pitfalls of biographical misinterpretation in a brief, 60-minute glimpse into a writer’s life? Whom to interview for a “real” portrayal (friends, family, scholars)? How to “pitch” your doc to sell your film? What are the complexities to consider, for example the plan from idea to reality, funding, marketing?  What are the legal considerations of copyright, contracts, insurance, distribution, royalties? Which documentaries are considered worthy entries in the national and international film festivals?  250-300 word abstracts. *

CFP for Roundtable “Translation, Travel Writing, and Excess”

NorthEast Modern Language Association (NeMLA) Annual Convention, March 7-10, 2024 Deadline for submissions: September 30, 2023 Chairs: Sanjukta Banerjee (York University) Elisa Leonzio (Università di Torino ,  Freie Universität Berlin) The notion of “excess” in translation and travel (writing) brings to attention the plurality of the unfamiliar often put away as “lack”. It is also connected to critical awareness of and engagement with the polysemy of others leading to inquiries that can accommodate “thick description”, “thick translation”, and point to the ambiguity and ambivalence of both the translated and the translator. How does excess figure in representations constructed and circulated by travel and translation? How is it turned into “lack” and “omission”? What processes are involved in the determination of details as “junk” (Bender and Marrinan 2005) — archived yet excluded — but not necessarily as “garbage”? What kinds of deviations from received knowledge get left out in translation ? What are the ethical dimensions of these inquiries? And how can we engage productively with the notion of excess? This roundtable seeks to explore these and other relevant questions in translation and travel (writing) as co-constitutive and distinct practices. We want to draw particular attention to the significance of ambiguity as a vital resource for exploring the limits of representation constructed and facilitated by translation and travel. We invite perspectives, especially those relevant to the global south, from theoretical and creative works and from across disciplines, including, but not limited to, translation studies, travel writing studies, cultural and media studies, and archival studies. Please submit abstracts of 200-300 words for presentations (5-7 mins) by September 30, 2023 at https://cfplist.com/nemla/User/SubmitAbstract/20794 For additional information, please contact sanjukta1@sympatico.ca  or elileo@zedat.fu-berlin.de Contact Info: For information about conference: support@nemla.org For information about roundtable: sanjukta1@sympatico.ca  OR  elileo@zedat.fu-berlin.de Contact Email: sanjukta1@sympatico.ca URL: https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20794 * Deadline for Submissions Sept. 30 2023

The Rise of Autoliterature (NeMLA 2024 panel)

This panel will analyze autofiction and autotheory as contemporary literary genres still on the rise, with particular interest in putting the two in conversation with each other.
Autofiction and autotheory continue to grow in popularity as forms of contemporary life writing. Despite their differences, these two genres share a concern in representations of selfhood and subjective experience that explicitly engage and are shaped by other literary and philosophical texts. Moreover, by emphasizing the intertextuality of lived experience, they both challenge (1) the perceived conventionality of more established life writing genres, such as memoir, and (2) everyday assumptions of unmediated, individual self-expression. This panel will analyze autofiction and autotheory as contemporary literary genres still on the rise, with particular interest in putting the two in conversation with each other. Papers may engage autofiction or autotheory, or the relationship between the two, as genres, market categories, or artistic practices; look closely at specific works of autofiction and/or autotheory; or explore other forms of what we might call “autoliterature.” As the session title suggests, papers that historicize the emergence and development of autofiction and/or autotheory or that broadly analyze their ideological functions and features in a particular national or cultural context are especially welcome. Abstracts are due Sep 30, 2023, and should be submitted through NeMLA’s submission portal (https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20337). NeMLA 2024 will take place in person at Boston, MA on March 7-10, 2024. More information about the convention can be found on the NeMLA website (https://www.buffalo.edu/nemla/convention.html). Please feel free to reach out with any questions to calliein@buffalo.edu. * Deadline for Submissions September 30, 2023

“You’ve Got Me in My Feelings”: Discomfort and Discourse of “Excessive” Emotions in Trauma Memoir

deadline for submissions: September 30, 2023 Danielle French, Kent State University dfrenc12@kent.edu Northeast Modern Language Association (NeMLA) Conference 2024 Boston, MA March 7-10, 2024 Trivialization of trauma is an increasing concern for scholars and clinicians alike, and Americans often culturally employ the language of trauma in hyperbolic or sarcastic ways, but does this humor or hyperbole also couch collective cultural unease with overwhelming emotions?  In The Body Keeps the Score, Bessel van der Kolk reminds us that “the essence of trauma is that it is overwhelming, unbelievable, and unbearable,” making bearing witness to it discomfiting and making witnesses acutely aware of their own mortality salience (197). In order to heal from traumatic experience, van der Kolk and van der Hart argue, “Traumatic memories are the unassimilated scraps of overwhelming experiences, which need to be integrated with existing mental schemes, and be transformed into narrative language,” concluding that it is necessary to “return to the memory often in order to complete it” (176). While what is traumatizing to one individual may not be for another, the vast majority of people will experience something that elicits particularly overwhelming, “negative” emotions, like grief, terror, or rage. While society tends to embrace collective shows of emotion that are viewed as “positive,” narratives that are focused on a happy ending, or storytelling that is neatly packaged to encourage consumerism or crowdfunding, too often Americans devalue, denigrate, and avoid individual experience of overpowering emotions to our individual and collective detriment.  In trauma memoir—memoir that narrates traumatic experience(s) of the author—the reading public functions as witness to these raw, private experiences of emotion, providing a necessary space for readers to learn to sit with the discomfort of intense, inconvenient emotions while also seeing how the memoirist copes and, most importantly, survives. This panel invites explorations and analyses of “excessive” or inconvenient emotions in trauma memoir.  For general inquiries, please contact dfrenc12@kent.edu.  Finally, no remote presentations are permitted per NeMLA guidelines, so please be ready to present in Boston. Please submit your paper proposals to:  https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20533.  * Deadline for Submissions October 1, 2023 Fragmented Lives Call for papers Reykjavik, 12-15 June 2024 in collaboration with the Centre for Studies in Memory and Literature, University of Iceland IABA (International Auto/Biography Association) World Conference 2024 The IABA World Conference 2024 will be held at the University of Iceland in collaboration with the Centre for Studies in Memory and Literature 12-15 June 2024. The theme of the conference is ‘Fragmented Lives.’ We invite proposals for individual papers or panels of 3-4 papers as well as round-table suggestions on that theme. The world is fragmented in different ways in our times, due to wealth disparity, migration, and the continuing climate catastrophe. The digital revolution means that lives are now lived online as well as off – where fragmented identities and selves are played out. The recent pandemic can also be said to have fragmented our sense of time. This in turn shapes life writing and self-expression. As Eva Karpinski has argued ‘the autobiographical fragment is uniquely suited to address the discontinuities and ruptures of history, experience, and memory’ (Karpinski 2013), and that is why we turn to this theme to gain new insights into auto/biographical writing. One of the key issues at stake in auto/biographical narration is memory, and memory is usually incomplete, fragmented. Narrative is at times used to reflect this fragmentation, or it is used to paper over the cracks, to create a cohesive narrative out of a fragmented past. The biographer is also faced with fragmentary knowledge of the past when writing on another’s life, a past which is then pieced together. We are looking for papers on how lives and life writing can be addressed and examined in light of fragmentation. Themes and issues include, but are not limited to
    • fragmented narrative
    • fragmented identity
    • fragmented ecologies
    • fragments of a life
    • fragmented genres
    • digital fragmentation
    • fragmented pasts
Graduate students and early career researchers are especially encouraged to apply individually and with panels. A workshop for this group is also planned and reduced conference fees will be available. Confirmed Keynote Speakers: Anna Poletti is associate professor of English at Utrecht University, the Netherlands. They research life writing in contemporary Anglophone media and culture, and specialize in archival research, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies methodologies. Anna’s research explores two primary themes: 1) the variety of roles life writing plays in contemporary societies, politics and cultures, and 2) the way people use media technologies and material culture to attach meaning to lived experience. Exploring these themes, Anna has published on topics such as Andy Warhol’s use of the cardboard box, digital storytelling, zines, selfies, graphic medicine, and youth-led climate activism. Their books include: Stories of the Self: Life Writing After the Book (New York University Press, 2020), Intimate Ephemera: Reading Young Lives in Australian Zine Culture (Melbourne University Press, 2008), and Life Narratives and Youth Culture: Representation, Agency and Participation (with Kate Douglas, Palgrave 2016). Anna co-edited the Eisner Award-nominated collection Graphic Medicine (with Erin La Cour, University of Hawai’i Press, 2021), and Identity Technologies: Constructing the Self Online (with Julie Rak, University of Wisconsin Press, 2014). Their first novel (hello, world?) explores online identity, sexuality and gender, and will be published by Semiotext(e) in 2024. With Kate Douglas and John Zuern, Anna is a Series Editor of the book series New Directions in Life Narrative for Bloomsbury. Erla Hulda Halldórsdóttir is a Professor of Women’s and Gender History at the University of Iceland. She has published works on women’s and gender history, biography, correspondence, and (women’s) historiography. Among her works in Icelandic is the monograph Nútímans konur (Women of Modernity, 2011) in which she relies heavily on correspondence when exploring women’s education and the construction of gender in late 19th century Iceland. In 2020 she co-authored the award-winning book Konur sem kjósa. Aldarsaga (A Centenary of Women Voters, 2020) in which the authors study women’s citizenship and agency in 20th-century Iceland. Among her works in English are articles in Life Writing (2010, 2015) and Women’s History Review (2018). She co-edited Biography, Gender, and History: Nordic Perspectives (2016) and wrote a chapter in The Palgrave Handbook of Auto/Biography (2020). Erla Hulda is now working on two projects related to correspondence and life writing. First, it is the publication (2023) of 50 love letters written by an Icelandic student in Copenhagen to his fiancé in Iceland, 1825-1832 – before and after he betrayed her. Second, for publication in 2024, the biography of Sigríður Pálsdóttir (1809-1871) who wrote 250 letters to her brother for half a century. For both these cases only one side of the correspondence has survived. Please send abstracts (300 words) or panel/round-table suggestions, and short bio (150 words) to IABAWorld2024@gmail.com by 1 October 2023. For more information see https://iabaworld2024.hi.is/. * ‘1974-2024: Annie Ernaux’s Years – a Global Perspective’ International Conference University of Edinburgh & University of St Andrews 3-5 October 2024 Deadline for Submissions: 29 September 2023 With Annie Ernaux’s participation (pending confirmation) Confirmed keynote speaker: Prof. Barbara Havercroft, University of Toronto Annie Ernaux’s writings have gained increasing international attention in recent years, especially since the English translation of Les Années (The Years), seen by many as her masterwork, was published in 2017 and shortlisted for the International Booker Prize in 2019. The global reach of her works culminated in the award of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Literature ‘for the courage and clinical acuity with which she uncovers the roots, estrangements and collective restraints of personal memory’. This prestigious prize, that she was the first French female writer to receive, anchored her status as a major 20th and 21st-century author and instantly brought her global fame – she was for instance the guest of honour at the New Delhi world book fair in 2023. Most of Ernaux’s writings are non-fictional and depict the life experiences of a French woman born in 1940, as much as an experience of Frenchness across genders, social classes and generations. Yet, despite being situated in a specific time, space and in personal experience, critics and readers have often commented on the universal reach of her works. Fifty years after the publication of Les Armoires vides (Cleaned Out) in 1974, her debut autobiographical novel partly based on her back-alley abortion in the 1960s, this conference aims to interrogate the universal dimension of Ernaux’s books and locate them in an international context, assessing the significance of her writings beyond the French-speaking world. As more translations of her books become available, this event will seek to broaden the scope of academic criticism on her works and shed light on her links with past and contemporary world literature, by examining her influences and legacy as a writer and public intellectual figure. Although the scholarship on Annie Ernaux emerged in the English-speaking world in the 1980s, this event will be the first international, solely English-speaking conference focusing on her work. We are particularly pleased to host this event in Scotland where Ernaux’s talks in August 2019 as part of the International Book Festival attracted a very large audience, both in French and in English, which was a testimony to the reach and relevance of her works. The conference will take place in the historic locations of Edinburgh and St Andrews across three days, with an opening evening at the French Institute in Edinburgh. Questions and themes that will be addressed in the conference include, but are not limited to:
    • the international reception and ‘universal’ dimension of Annie Ernaux’s works
    • the ‘transpersonal’ nature of her work, between the personal and the collective
    • life-writing and genre hybridity (between fiction and non-fiction, intimacy and extimacy)
    • perceptions and representations of time
    • gender, identity and bodily experiences; self and others
    • ageing, abortion and illness narratives
    • the portrayal of post-1945 socio-political and cultural changes in France and beyond (e.g. feminism, social mobility…)
    • travels and the significance of other countries and other cultures (eg. Venice; the USSR…)
    • the influence of international authors and artists on her writing; Ernaux’s legacy as a writer and her influence on contemporary authors and artists worldwide
    • questions of translation and adaptation, across languages and media (intermediality)
    • teaching Ernaux worldwide and pedagogical matters
    • national and international fame, legitimacy, and the question of ‘popularity’ and popular culture; the 2022 Nobel Prize award
    • Ernaux’s status as a leftist intellectual and committed writer; the political scope of her work in France and beyond
We invite proposals for 20-minute papers (in English) to be sent before 29 September 2023 to both conference organisers:
    • Dr Fabien Arribert-Narce (Senior Lecturer in French, School of Literatures, Languages and Cultures, University of Edinburgh), f.arribert-narce@ed.ac.uk
    • Dr Elise Hugueny-Léger (Senior Lecturer in French, School of Modern Languages, University of St Andrews), esmh@st-andrews.ac.uk
About the conference organisers: Dr Fabien Arribert-Narce is Senior Lecturer in French and Comparative Literature at the University of Edinburgh. He is the author of Photobiographies: pour une écriture de notation de la vie (Barthes, Roche, Ernaux) (Champion, 2014), and editor of L’Autobiographie entre autres (Peter Lang, 2013), The Pleasure in/of the Text (Peter Lang, 2021), and Intermedial Encounters Between Image, Music and Text (Peter Lang, 2023). His recent publications include articles on Ernaux’s ‘photojournal’ in Écrire la vie and uses of photography in Mémoire de fille. Dr Elise Hugueny-Léger is a Senior lecturer in French at the University of St Andrews. Her research focuses on contemporary life-writing and the creative writing process – she recently published Projections de soi: identités et images en mouvement dans l’autofiction (Presses Universitaires de Lyon, 2022). She is the author of Annie Ernaux, une poétique de la transgression (Peter Lang, 2009) and co-created the bilingual website www.annie-ernaux.org. In recent years, her work on Ernaux has focused on the reception of her books, including internationally, as well as on Ernaux’s creative process. Proposals for papers should include the name, affiliation and email address for all paper authors, as well as a brief (max. 250 words) abstract, paper title and biographical note (max. 50 words). Proposals from practitioners, translators and members of the publishing community are particularly welcome alongside proposals from established academics and early-career scholars and PhD students. Proposals from international speakers are particularly welcome. The provisional programme of the conference will be announced at the beginning of 2024. This project will lead to a peer-reviewed publication of selected papers.
https://www.annie-ernaux.org/conferences/2024-edinburgh-st-andrews/
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th’ ann an Oilthigh Dhùn Èideann, * Time to register for IABA Asia-Pacific The conference is online, from Tuesday, September 26 until Thursday, September 28 No registration fee, but you must be registered to attend. https://www.eventbrite.com.au/e/the-5th-iaba-asia-pacific-conference-tickets-705755302107?aff=oddtdtcreator
11(10%) The 5th IABA Asia-Pacific Conference Eventbrite – IABA Asia-Pacific Steering Committee presents The 5th IABA Asia-Pacific Conference – Tuesday, 26 September 2023 | Thursday, 28 September 2023 – Find event and ticket information. www.eventbrite.com.au
——- – on behalf of the  IABA Asia-Pacific steering committee http://iabaasiapacific.wordpress.com * 19-23 August, 2024 | Oulu, Finland 4th World Congress of Environmental History Deadline for Submissions: Sept. 18, 2023 CALL FOR PAPERS FOR A PANEL PANEL: Environmental biography as a methodological challenge https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/wceh2024/p/13626?utm_source=conference&utm_medium=sendy&utm_campaign=wceh_cfp_share David Hsiung (Juniata College) and Maarit Leskelä-Kärki (University of Turku), Convenors Short Abstract: This panel investigates the multidisciplinary field of environmental biography as a way to study the relationship between environment and humans from the perspectives of environmental humanities, history, and life writing studies. This panel investigates the multidisciplinary field of environmental biography, or like Jessica White (in “From the Miniature to the Momentous: Writing Lives through Ecobiography.” a/b: Auto/Biography Studies. Volume 35, 2020 – Issue 1: Life Writing in the Anthropocene. 2020) put it: ecobiographies. What is environmental or ecobiography? How do we understand environment, and the interaction between human and nature in biographical life-narratives? What sources can we use in writing biographies from environmental perspectives? The panel seeks for inspiring contributions discussing the possibilities and challenges of writing environmental biographies from different time periods and geographical areas. Biographical approach can concern an individual, but also couple and group biographies as well as prosopographies are possible perspectives. We encourage papers that discuss methodological and ethical challenges of doing biography from an environmental perspective particularly in the overlapping fields of environmental humanities, history, and life writing studies. Maarit Leskelä-Kärki Kulttuurihistorian yliopistonlehtori FT, Kulttuurihistorian ja elämänkerronnan dosentti (Turun yliopisto ja Lapin yliopisto) Kulttuurihistoria Arcanum, Vatselankatu 220500 Turun yliopisto 050-5344 627 (gsm) Varajohtaja / SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory Maarit Leskelä-Kärki Senior Lecturer in Cultural History PhD, Title of Docent Department of Cultural History Vice Director / SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory Arcanum, FIN-20500 University of Turku +358  50 5344627 maarit.leskela@utu.fi Vatselankatu 2 maarit.leskela@utu.fi https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/wceh2024/p/13626 * Life Narrative and the Digital: An Interdisciplinary Conference Date: 27 September 2023, 09:00-18:30 Venue: Sitzungssaal, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Dr.-Ignaz-Seipel-Platz 2, 1010 Vienna Registration Deadline: 20 September 2023 Website: https://digital-bio-2023.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/ This one-day conference explores the possibilities, uses, and challenges of digital methods and technologies for auto/biographical research and practice. We are particularly interested in the following questions:
    • In what ways can digital methods and technologies aid the study and analysis of biographical data?
    • How can the digital help us devise innovative pathways to the representation of historical individuals’ lives? (e.g. digital platforms)
    • To what extent do digital formats of life narration tie in with new trends in auto/biographical scholarship and practice? (e.g. metabiography, relational biography, persona studies, group biography, object biography, etc.)
    • How do we deal with uncertainty and the issue of data quality in the digital representation of biographical data?
The final programme for the event is available here: https://digital-bio-2023.acdh.oeaw.ac.at/data/html/program.html Registration for the conference is free of charge and open until 20 September: https://pretix.eu/digitalbio/ Please note that this is a hybrid event and that you should indicate your preference for either in-person or online participation. For more information, please consult our conference website, or contact us at amp@oeaw.ac.at. * ELN ELN Personhood, Spirit, and the Afterlife English Language Notes, Special Issue 62.2 (October 2024) Abstracts due: Sept. 1, 2023; Full length Sept. 21, 2023 SCOPE: English Language Notes invites submissions for a special issue that will explore the dynamic nature of personhood as it relates to various notions of spirit and the afterlife. This interdisciplinary issue seeks to encourage discussions on empirical functionalism and ontological personalism of a person’s individuation, and the textural and palpable expressions of individuality. The editors are interested in how the construction of personhood considers the interaction of the material and immaterial, and how it is informed by the realm outside of the material in its ability to describe itself. The issue aims to examine posthumous legacies through acts of archival and rhetorical deconstruction in all ways it may reverberate in society, culture, counter-culture, economics, politics, spirituality, and more. The editors also consider how the individual is shaped by cultural nostalgia, religious mythos, competing secular belief systems, and occult practices. As scholars of rhetoric, the editors are interested in how language plays a part in developing the intersectional contexts of race, class, gender, and citizenship around spiritual, moral, and ethical foundations as it relates to the construction of personhood in spirit and body. This issue seeks to publish a wide variety of perspectives from various points of critical inquiry including scholarly and creative work / practice that expands our notions of the academic West. The issue also aims to explore the construction of personhood as both cultural precept and narrative surveillance in popular culture, media, film, art, and global literatures. We welcome contributions that discuss how artistic practice mirrors spiritual practice in the formation of personhood in times of cultural upheaval, and how personhood functions as civic, historical, and cultural afterlife. TOPICS OF INTEREST: We invite scholarly and creative contributions from writers in all fields who engage the subject of personhood as a transdisciplinary trope through which we may consider questions such as:
    • How does the individual access the spiritual or immaterial realm for personal or creative development?
    • How does the concept of Afterlife shift in relation to the contemporary political, social, cultural, and private constructs? How do the prevailing concepts of Afterlife shape the individual?
    • How does the immaterial or spiritual inform medical or bodily care practices, and how do scientific and medical studies interact with the spiritual in generative ways?
    • How does the construction of personhood function as both cultural precept and narrative surveillance in popular culture, media, film, art, and global literatures? In what ways does artistic practice mirror spiritual practice in the formation of personhood in times of cultural upheaval? How does personhood function as civic, historical, and cultural afterlife.
    • In what capacity can humanist discourse accommodate notions of pre-life personhood and identity as antecedent to the body despite naturalist and cognitive definitions of personhood which privilege consciousness and cognition?
    • How might digital personhood, biotechnology, and the expansion of nonhuman and posthuman agency reshape both spiritual and secular understandings of longevity and afterlife?
SUBMISSION: Submissions may include essays, scholarly-adjacent critical essays, lyric essays, poetry, and genre-fluid texts that take an innovative approach to developing the creative artifacts. Interested authors should feel free to contact the guest editors: Ruth Ellen Kocher at ruthellen.kocher@colorado.edu and KP Kaszubowski at kpkaszu@gmail.com. Potential contributors may submit abstracts by September 1, 2023 or submit a completed article, essay, or creative piece by September 21, 2023. While the editors invite standard-length, single-author academic articles, we are open to other methods of critical inquiry and creative expression related to the issue’s theme: position papers, clusters, roundtable discussions, interviews, dialogues, and so on. Essays will undergo peer review. All submissions should adhere to Chicago-style citations, notes and bibliography system. Work should be uploaded to our submission portal herehttps://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/dup-eln IMPORTANT DATES: Submission Deadline: September 21, 2023 Notification: November 30, 2023 Publication Date: October 2024 ___________________________________ About English Language NotesA respected forum of criticism and scholarship in literary and cultural studies since 1962, English Language Notes (ELN) is dedicated to pushing the edge of scholarship in literature and related fields in new directions. Broadening its reach geographically and trans-historically, ELN opens new lines of inquiry and widens emerging fields. Each ELN issue advances topics of current scholarly concern, providing theoretical speculation as well as interdisciplinary recalibrations through practical usage. Offering semiannual, topically themed issues, ELN also includes “Of Note,” an ongoing section featuring related topics, review essays or roundtables of cutting-edge scholarship, and emergent concerns. ELN is a wide-ranging journal that combines theoretical rigor with innovative interdisciplinary collaboration. Contact Information Ruth Ellen Kocher (ruthellen.kocher@colorado.edu), KP Kaszubowski (kpkaszu@gmail.com), Guest Editors Contact Email eln@colorado.edu URL: https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/dup-eln * Introducing Southeast Asian Lives and Histories at UC Berkeley Deadline for Submissions, September 15, 2023 We invite applications for the first year of the annual UC Berkeley CSEAS Southeast Asian Lives and Histories small grants program. Applicants must be enrolled at or affiliated with UCB, other UCs, CSUs, or institutions located in Southeast Asia. Should you have any questions, don’t hesitate to email cseas@berkeley.edu(link sends e-mail). For applicants from UC Berkeley, other UCs, and CSUs— The UC Berkeley Center for Southeast Asia Studies is seeking participation in our Southeast Asian Lives (SEALIVES) small grants program from students and faculty with long-term and emergent research and community engagements with Southeast Asians in California or abroad. We are interested in supporting and training students and faculty in multiple approaches to life and oral history collection that include long format, annotated interviews, genealogical or other multi-generational approaches, film, and photography. We aim to support life history research on Southeast Asians of diverse class, educational, occupational, sex/gender, racial/ethnic, linguistic, and regional backgrounds. Small grants of $3,500.00 will fund all components of an interview project with one or two individuals in Southeast Asia or California. Please submit a completed application form (downloadable here(PDF file)) and the following supporting materials packaged as a single PDF:
    1. A proposal of no more than 600 words that includes:
        1. a summary of your research project and how your proposed interview(s) fit within its scope;
        1. the site where you will conduct your interviews and the expected language(s) to be used in the interviews;
        1. your reasons for selecting these potential interviewees; and
        1. the medium of the interviews (film, text, audio, multimodal).
2. A 1-page, detailed budget and justification (travel, accommodations, stipend for interviewee(s), translation and transcription (if needed), etc.). We highly encourage applications from graduate students and early career researchers, as well as scholars from non-area studies disciplines and inter-disciplinary programs for whom a country or region of Southeast Asia or a diaspora community in California is part of their research. Send applications to cseas@berkeley.edu(link sends e-mail) by Sep 15, 2023 with the subject line “SEALIVES Proposal 2023-2024_California.” Decisions will be made by mid-October 2023 and funds will be disbursed by summer 2024. Recipients of this grant will be required to participate in a fully-funded, in-person, two-day training workshop held in early 2024 with other grant recipients. They will also join a colloquium for sharing about their experiences in Fall 2024. For applicants affiliated with institutions in Southeast Asia— The UC Berkeley Center for Southeast Asia Studies is seeking participation in our Southeast Asian Lives (SEALIVES) small grants program from students and faculty with long-term and emergent research and community engagements with Southeast Asians living in various parts of the world. We are interested in supporting and training students and faculty in multiple approaches to life and oral history collection that include long format, annotated interviews, genealogical or other multi-generational approaches, film, and photography. We aim to support life history research on Southeast Asians of diverse class, educational, occupational, sex/gender, racial/ethnic, linguistic, and regional backgrounds. Small grants of $3,000.00 will fund all components of an interview project with one or two individuals in Southeast Asia undertaken by individuals affiliated with institutions in Southeast Asia (Luce guidelines delineate Southeast Asia as Brunei, Cambodia, Timor-Leste, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam). Please submit a completed application form (downloadable here(PDF file)) and the following supporting materials packaged as a single PDF:
    1. A proposal of no more than 600 words that includes:
        1. a summary of your research project and how your proposed interview(s) fit within its scope;
        1. the site where you will conduct your interviews and the expected language(s) to be used in the interviews;
        1. your reasons for selecting these potential interviewees; and
        1. the medium of the interviews (film, text, audio, multimodal).
2. A 1-page, detailed budget and justification (travel, accommodations, stipend for interviewee(s), translation and transcription (if needed), etc.). Please use your local currency and convert amounts to USD using OANDA(link is external). Include both currencies in your budget. We highly encourage applications from graduate students and early career researchers, as well as scholars from non-area studies disciplines and inter-disciplinary programs for whom a country or region of Southeast Asia or a diaspora community in California is part of their research. Send applications to cseas@berkeley.edu(link sends e-mail) by Sep 15, 2023 with the subject line “SEALIVES Proposal 2023-2024_Southeast Asia.” Decisions will be made by mid-October 2023 and funds will be disbursed by summer 2024. Recipients of this grant will be invited to virtually participate in a two-day training workshop held in early 2024 with other grant recipients. They will also virtually join a colloquium for sharing about their experiences in Fall 2024. For undergraduate applicants from UCB— The UC Berkeley Center for Southeast Asia Studies is seeking participation in our Southeast Asian Lives (SEALIVES) small grants program from UC Berkeley undergraduate students with research interests in life histories of Southeast Asians in California. We are interested in supporting and training students in multiple approaches to life and oral history collection that include long format, annotated interviews, genealogical or other multi-generational approaches, film, and photography. We aim to support life history research on Southeast Asians of diverse class, educational, occupational, sex/gender, racial/ethnic, linguistic, and regional backgrounds. Small grants of $1,500.00 will fund all components of an interview project with one individual in California. Please submit a completed application form (downloadable here(PDF file)) and the following supporting materials packaged as a single PDF:
    1. A proposal of no more than 600 words that includes:
        1. a summary of your research project and how your proposed interview(s) fit within its scope;
        1. the site where you will conduct your interviews and the expected language(s) to be used in the interviews;
        1. your reasons for selecting these potential interviewees; and
        1. the medium of the interviews (film, text, audio, multimodal).
2. A 1-page, detailed budget and justification (travel, accommodations, stipend for interviewee(s), translation and transcription (if needed), etc.). Send applications to cseas@berkeley.edu(link sends e-mail) by Sep 15, 2023 with the subject line “SEALIVES Proposal 2023-2024_Undergraduate.” Decisions will be made by mid-October 2023 and funds will be disbursed by summer 2024. Recipients of this grant will be required to participate in a fully funded, in-person, two-day training workshop held in early 2024 with other grant recipients. They will also join a colloquium for sharing about their experiences in Fall 2024. Contact Information UC Berkeley Center for Southeast Asia Studies (CSEAS) Contact Email cseas@berkeley.edu https://ieas.berkeley.edu/centers/center-southeast-asia-studies-cseas/southeast… * Memory, Melancholy and Nostalgia – 8th International Interdisciplinary Conference 7-8 December 2023 -in person (Gdansk, Poland) – online (via Zoom) Deadline for Submissions
    •  onsite presenters –  25 September 2023 
    •  online presenters – 15 October 2023
CALL FOR PAPERS: In our modern world, which some have argued to be disjointed while immersing itself ever deeper in crisis, the turning back towards “the olden days” and the ensuing nostalgia constitute a noticeable phenomenon, both individually (the memory of biography) and collectively (the memory of History). Another important – and seemingly also quite noticeable – phenomenon  is the longing for something vague, indefinite or never existent. Hence, during our interdisciplinary conference we would like to concentrate on the phenomena of nostalgia and melancholy. We are interested in all expressions of longing for the past, from the reassuring and action-propelling ones to those which paralyze us, bringing despair and utter dejection. We want to describe the experience of nostalgia and melancholy in its multifarious manifestations: psychological, social, historical, cultural, philosophical, religious, economic, political, artistic, and many others. We will also devote considerable attention to how these phenomena appear and transform in artistic practices: literature, film, theatre, and visual arts. This is why we invite researchers representing various academic disciplines: anthropology, history, psychology, psychoanalysis, sociology, politics, philosophy, economics, law, literary studies, theatre studies, film studies, memory studies, nostalgia studies, migration studies, consciousness studies, dream studies, gender studies, postcolonial studies, medical sciences, psychiatry, cognitive sciences, design, project management and others. Different forms of presentations are encouraged, including case studies, theoretical investigations, problem-oriented arguments, and comparative analyses. We will be happy to hear from both experienced scholars and young academics at the beginning of their careers, as well as students. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners, without giving a presentation. We hope that due to its interdisciplinary nature, the conference will bring many interesting observations on and discussions about the role of memory, melancholy and nostalgia in the past and in the present-day world. Our repertoire of suggested topics includes but is not restricted to: I. Memory and Affects – unwanted memory – nostalgia or melancholy? – non-melancholic nostalgia – nostalgia and longing – the healing power of nostalgia – nostalgia as an illness – nostalgia and depression – nostalgia and psychoanalysis II. Common Experiences – nostalgic epochs – nostalgic nations – nostalgic generations – nostalgia and the myth of eternal return – nostalgia, melancholy and totalitarianisms – nostalgia and war – nostalgia and melancholy of the expelled – nostalgic patriotism – nostalgia and nationalism – nostalgia and gender – nostalgia and religion – nostalgia and language – nostalgia and melancholy in the postmodern world – nostalgia and post-memory III. Individual Experiences – return to childhood – nostalgia for something indefinite – nostalgia for the future – nostalgia for a traumatic experience – nostalgia, melancholy and old age – nostalgia, melancholy and death – nostalgia, melancholy and mourning – nostalgia, melancholy and love – nostalgia, melancholy and imagination – nostalgic phantasms – nostalgic dreams IV. The Arts – nostalgia and melancholy as a theme in literature, film, and theatre – nostalgic literature – nostalgic cinema – literature and the arts as a vehicle of memory – literature, theatre and film in search of lost time – nostalgic literary genres – melancholic artists V. Society – nostalgia and political movements – nostalgia, melancholy and memory places – nostalgia, melancholy and memorials – nostalgia, melancholy and incentives – nostalgia, melancholy and community development – nostalgia, melancholy and migration – nostalgia, melancholy and meaning-making – nostalgia, melancholy and drive to change- nostalgia and travelling – nostalgia and food – nostalgia and climate changing Scientific Committee: Professor Wojciech Owczarski – University of Gdańsk, Poland Professor Polina Golovátina-Mora – NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Please submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentations, together with a short biographical note to: conferencenostalgia@gmail.com  Contact Information Conference Office Contact Email conferencenostalgia@gmail.com http://www.inmindsupport.com/nostalgia-conference * Deadline for Submissions September 11, 2023 Call for Chapter Contributors—Cambridge Companion to U.S. First Ladies Book Project We are seeking chapter contributors for an edited book titled Cambridge Companion to U.S. First Ladies. According to the series editor, the Cambridge Companion books offer “introductions/overviews to particular themes/events/figures. The books usually consist of 12-15 essays and they present the latest ideas/research/scholarship in a comprehensive and accessible manner. Students make up a portion of the readership for these books, but they are also read by general readers and individual scholars who are interested in the topic. When done correctly, the books not only provide an overview, but also make an important intervention into the study of the particular topic at hand.” Cambridge Companion to U.S. First Ladies will explore the social, cultural, and political influence of the first lady institution and the women who’ve held the position. We already have contributors covering the following subjects: first ladies as political assets/liabilities, first ladies in wartime, first ladies and slavery/civil rights, first ladies’ role in international diplomacy, first ladies as trendsetters, first ladies as Mourners-in-Chief, first ladies’ use of media, and representations of first ladies in film. But there’s still a lot of ground to cover, so we’re looking for additional authors to contribute chapters on topics such as:
    • First ladies as model of American womanhood/Impact of gender norms on first ladies
    • First ladies as social advocates
    • Legacy, memorialization, and public memory of first ladies
    • First ladies and illness
We’re also open to other chapter themes, particularly those covering first ladies and/or topics that are underrepresented in previous works. We’re looking to recruit authors from diverse research and professional perspectives including history, political communication, public address, museum studies, political science, and media studies. Final chapters will be 8,000 – 10,000 words, including endnotes, using Chicago Manual of Style, 17-th edition Notes-Bibliography formatting. The project timeline is as follows:
    • September 11: Call for contributors – letters of interest due
    • Late September: Contributors selected & begin first drafts
    • April 2024: First drafts due
    • May/June 2024: Edited chapters returned
    • July/August 2024: Revisions due
    • August/September 2024: Final edits
    • October 2024: Submission of completed manuscript to press
If you’d like to contribute to this project, please submit the following to editors Lisa Burns (Lisa.Burns@quinnipiac.edu) and Teri Finneman (finnemte@gmail.com) by noon ET on Monday, September 11-th: a short blurb explaining your interest in the project, a brief abstract/chapter sketch (150 – 300 words) on the topic you want to cover, and a short bio (about 75 words) detailing your related research experience. Authors selected to participate will be notified by September 22nd. Contact Information Lisa Burns (Quinnipiac University) and Teri Finneman (University of Kansas) Contact Email Lisa.Burns@quinnipiac.edu * Call for Papers: Dear Liz (edited by Órla Meadhbh Murray & Maria Tamboukou) Abstract deadline: 4th September 2023  Edited book proposal intended for Routledge’s Literary Studies in the Social Sciences (series editor Maria Tamboukou) Calling any scholars who use Liz Stanley’s work. This edited collection will showcase how different scholars have been inspired or influenced by Liz Stanley’s work. We are looking for chapters of around 6000 words discussing your own work in relation to an aspect of Liz’s work. This could be focused on new research, reflecting on previous work, or even pedagogical reflections and all chapters will start with a short letter entitled ‘Dear Liz’, which will be the central title of the book. Chapters can be solo- or co-authored. Please send an abstract (up to 300 words) and a short bio (up to 100 words) via email to: orla.m.murray@durham.ac.uk AND m.tamboukou@uel.ac.uk by 4th September 2023. Full chapters will be due by end of June 2024. Thanks, Órla Dr. Órla Meadhbh Murray (she/her) Lecturer in Sociology, Durham University Co-founder Institutional Ethnography Network * Literature and Life Writing Midwest Regional Meeting of the Conference on Christianity and Literature October 23-24, 2023 Wheaton College deadline for submissions:  September 7, 2023 This conference brings together scholars of Christianity and literature with contemporary writers of spiritual memoir to celebrate religious life writing and consider the forms, features, and thematic possibilities within the range of associated genres. How do literary works and forms shape portrayals of spiritual life? What might literature accomplish in the spiritual life within writer and reader? How might the literary space of religiously inflected life writing offer particular theological content? This conference will involve traditional panels, creative readings, and student panels, as well as a scholarly keynote. Attendees will also have the opportunity to attend readings and large public talks by several contemporary spiritual memoir writers, including Esau McCaulley, author of the forthcoming memoir How Far to the Promised Land? and Daniel Nayeri, award-winning author of Everything Sad is Untrue, who will be on campus that week The scholarly keynote will be given by Jeffrey W. Barbeau (Ph.D., Marquette University), professor of theology at Wheaton College, editor of The Coleridge Bulletin, and a writer on British Romanticism, religion and literature, and the history of Christian thought. He is the author or editor of numerous books, including The Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism and Religion(2021) and Religion in Romantic England: An Anthology of Primary Sources (2018). Possible topics include the following:
    • problems in genre: spiritual memoir/spiritual autobiography/spiritual life writing
    • periodization of religious life writing
    • traditions/inheritance in spiritual life writing
    • trends in contemporary spiritual life writing
    • portrayal of the divine in spiritual life writing
    • children’s literature and/as spiritual life writing
    • confession, failure, hamartiology in spiritual life writing
    • social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Substack) and spiritual life writing
    • celebrity/publicity/the public square and spiritual life writing
    • race and spiritual life writing
    • the morphology of conversion (or deconversion) in spiritual life writing
    • private writings/unpublished autobiographical material
    • fictional spiritual life writing
    • politics of religious life writing
    • religious life writing as theory/theology
    • poetic genres and spiritual life writing
    • gender within spiritual life writing
    • literary epigraphs and allusions within spiritual life writing
    • biblical form and language in religious life writing
    • emplottedness within religious life writing
    • development and decline in religious life writing
    • “deconstruction” (or deconstruction!) and spiritual life writing
    • visions, transcendence, and the miraculous within spiritual life writing
    • sentiment and emotion in spiritual life writing
    • narratives of enslavement and/as spiritual life writing
    • rhetorics of spiritual autobiography
    • ethical pitfalls within spiritual life writing
    • portraying others’ lives/portraying one’s own life in spiritual life writing
    • the individual and the church/community of faith in spiritual life writing
As always, the Midwest CCL is open to other proposals concerning the relationship of Christianity and literature, including panel proposals.  Undergraduate students must submit their entire paper for consideration; eligible undergraduate papers will be entered into the national CCL Undergraduate Writing Contest for a cash prize and publication on the CCL website. Send abstracts (200-400 words) via email to cclconference@wheaton.edu by Sept. 7 2023. Panel proposals welcome.  Accepted abstracts/panels will be notified promptly. Participants in the conference must be members of the Conference on Christianity and Literature. Questions may be sent to tiffany.kriner@wheaton.edu. * Deadline for Submissions, August 31, 2023 CFP–“Animal Subjects” (8/31/2023; 2/14-17/2024) College Art Association Conference, Chicago, USA The emergence of animal studies as a distinct field in the last twenty years has led to increased interest in treating animals as subjects. While we can never fully grasp the entirety of an animal’s experience and world, as famously argued by Thomas Nagel, animal subjectivity has been taken up in contemporary art and scholarship in part to examine consider how we can cultivate positive multispecies entanglements that respect animal agency. On the other hand, animal experiences in historical contexts like bestiaries and cabinets of curiosities, circuses and freakshows, zoos and menageries are slowly being recentered to recognize how animals regularly had to navigate the systems of colonialism, capitalism, and bio-politics. The supposedly inferior status of animals in the Enlightened hierarchy of being was used to justify the subjugation of colonial subjects, whether through visual and linguistic rhetoric or through physical proximity, while pets and exotic animals in menageries served as extensions of their human owners, reflecting the latter’s power and status. How can we talk about animals meaningfully without falling prey to the binary of human vs non? This panel invites papers that explore animal histories in relation to systems of power, both past and present. Its goal is to recenter animal subjecthood and to ask what it means to write animal narratives, whether this is a form of speaking-for or if doing so is to conduct a critical intervention into the humanist approach to art history. Field(s) of Study: Time Period: Modern (1800-present) (**will also consider abstracts for papers focusing on the 18th century**) Topics: Social History Topics: Animal Studies Topics: Environmental Art Key dates  August 31: Deadline to submit proposals. September 18: Session chair deadline to finalize sessions, inform participants via email invitation. Accepted submitters will receive an email to access their own SC after September 25. October: Conference registration opens, and full conference schedule is posted. How to submit 
    • Instructions for submission are provided here
Prior to submission, ensure the following steps are completed 
    • Create a CAA account. Membership is not mandatory at this stage. If you are not a member, you can create an account at the provided link. Skip the payment and joining process for now.
    • Prepare your presentation title and abstract, adhering to the 250-word limit.
    • Prepare a condensed CV, approximately 2 pages in length.
    • (Optional) Gather relevant images or documentation. Please limit this section to five images that support your proposal.
Contact Information Margaryta Golovchenko Ph.D. candidate (she/her/hers) History of Art and Architecture Department University of Oregon Contact Email mgolovch@uoregon.edu URL https://caa.confex.com/caa/2024/webprogrampreliminary/Session12941.html *

Makeshift Historiographies: Case Studies in HIV/AIDS Cultural Archives

College Art Association Annual Conference, February 14–17, 2024, Hilton Chicago. deadline for submissions:  August 31, 2023 For hundreds of artists who died of AIDS-related causes, only scant traces of their work—if any at all—exist in institutional archival repositories. Therefore, art-historical work revolving around the ongoing HIV/AIDS pandemic has often called for inventive archival methods that blend traditional forms of research with community work and emotional labor. Over the last fifteen years, scholars and activists have contended with the gaps and erasures in such archives as well as the geographic, racial, and gender biases that have characterized many historical projects. In so doing, many have necessarily drawn on and even created community-based repositories, personal collections, and oral history initiatives. The precarity and preciousness of such archives are central topics in recent scholarship, including Marika Cifor’s, Viral Cultures: Activist Archiving in the Age of AIDS (2022), Jarrett Earnest’s Devotion: Today’s Future Becomes Tomorrow’s Archive (2022), and Alexandra Juhasz and Theodore Kerr’s We Are Having This Conversation Now: The Times of AIDS Cultural Production (2022). Indebted to these texts, our panel calls for papers focused on case studies elaborating on archival methods related to art histories of HIV/AIDS. Seeking to acknowledge the efforts of scholars, curators, and archivists who have worked to complicate this emergent canon and reimagine the terrain of AIDS cultural production, we welcome papers that reintroduce artists or their legacies into public and scholarly discourse, detailing the journey from discovery, inquiry, analysis, and sharing. We are especially interested in papers offering methodological reflections that might be of use to individuals engaged in parallel projects. This CFP is for a panel at the College Art Association’s 112th Annual Conference, February 14–17, 2024 at the Hilton Chicago. This is an in-person panel. You are invited to submit your presentation proposals before August 31. More information about how to submit can be found here: https://caa.confex.com/caa/2024/webprogrampreliminary/meeting.html Kyle Croft and Jackson Davidow @ College Art Association contact email: kcroft@visualaids.org * Personal documents and ephemera as sources for interdisciplinary Holocaust scholarship CFP for a special issue of Holocaust Studies: A Journal of Culture and History Deadline for Submissions, August 31, 2023 Edited by Hannah Holtschneider (University of Edinburgh) and Amy Simon (Michigan State University) Since the 1970s, and proliferating in the 1980s, works of life-writing and of academic scholarship have sought to reconstruct the experience of individuals during persecution, and as refugees in different parts of the world. In the past decade micro-historical research has drawn increasingly on personal documents from the Holocaust. Branching out from works on Holocaust testimony and memoirs, literary scholars have engaged with diaries, letters and other ego-documents, and sociologists, linguists and ethnographers have shown interest in personal archives of families affected by the Holocaust. At the same time, the past two decades have seen a rise in publications of memoirs and other forms of life writing that engages specifically with such sources. Typically, such works proceed from one disciplinary perspective and rarely engage with scholarship working on similar sources but with a different scholarly method. Yet, a conversation of scholars in different disciplines working on the same documentary evidence is still lacking. Volumes such as The Diary: The Epic of Everyday Life models a different approach by bringing together literary and cultural scholars with historians in the exploration of diary writing. The proposed special issue seeks to facilitate a similar conversation and bring together scholarship on personal documents from the Holocaust. The aim is to develop and test multi- and interdisciplinary work regarding the value of different ways of approaching and interrogating these sources. We expect historians, literary scholars, linguists and translation scholars, historical anthropologists and sociologists among others to contribute to this special issue. We also encourage those working on documents from hitherto unexplored archival collections of Jewish refugees to majority-world locations, to propose contributions. To this end we are inviting proposals for research articles of 7,000-12,000 words (incl. references and bibliography), annotated translations and research notes. We expect to host two gatherings during the writing process to engage in productive conversation about the  links between topics and cross-disciplinary approaches. The finished articles should act both as stand-alone research papers and model a methodological conversation across the entire special issue suggesting new directions for research in this field. Possible themes engaging personal documents and ephemera from the Holocaust could include, but are by no means limited to:
    • Multiple approaches to the same sources to explore gains of multidisciplinary research and opportunities for interdisciplinary work
    • The role of emotions for writing about personal archives
    • The relevance of materiality
    • Space and place in personal documents
    • Gender as an analytical category
    • Connecting micro- with macro-history
    • Language, translation and genre
    • The value of engaging one collection of documents or a single diary
    • The value of working across a number of collections or different sources
    • Ethical considerations of writing about the lives of ‘private’ individuals
    • Sociological, anthropological, historical, literary theory arising from engagement with personal documents
​​​​Timeline:
    • Notification to submit full article by 30 September 2023.
    • Publication is envisaged by the end of 2025.
Contact Info: Dr Hannah Holtschneider, University of Edinburgh, UK Contact Email: h.holtschneider@ed * CFP for Palgrave Handbook on Parenthood in Popular Culture, Deadline for abstracts: 31 August 2023 Edited by Elizabeth Podnieks (Toronto Metropolitan University) and Helena Wahlström Henriksson (Centre for Gender Research at Uppsala University) As editors of the Palgrave Handbook on Parenthood in Popular Culture, which is under contract and has 15 commissioned chapters, we seek approximately 25 additional chapters (6,500-7,500 words) on topics related to parenthood in popular culture. We aim to foreground Indigenous, racialized, LGBTQ+ and non-normative experiences, in contributions that explore popular cultural representations of parental identities from intersectional perspectives, and from diverse cultural and geopolitical locations. Chapters may focus on either mothers/mothering/motherhood or fathers/fathering/fatherhood, or interrogate parents/parenting/parenthood as more comprehensive terms, across genders and in non-binary contexts. We also welcome contributions focusing on non-motherhood/non-fatherhood. By “popular culture,” we signal an expansive term that includes, but is not limited to, the following mediated texts and expressions: literature, TV, film, magazines, journalism/news, social media and technology, music, performance/theatre, advertising, sports, politics, video games and virtual reality, comics/graphics, tattoo art, fine art, public art/graffiti, exhibitions, and fashion. With this Handbook we aim to showcase contemporary representations of parents, parenting, and parenthood in twenty-first-century popular culture, critically assessing how these representations help to shape, respond to, and redefine notions of families and parents, as well as popular culture genres, in the new millennium. As described on its website, “Palgrave Handbooks are high-quality, original reference works that bring together specially-commissioned chapters, cutting-edge research, and the latest review articles in their fields. Our Handbooks provide an unparalleled overview of a specific field of research, while also setting the agenda for future directions of the discipline.” (https://www.palgrave.com/gp/palgrave-handbooks). Schedule: 31 August 2023: Abstract (approx. 250-350 words) due to both editors: lpodniek@torontomu.ca; helena.henriksson@gender.uu.se
    • 1 October Acceptance of Abstracts from Editors
    • 15 January 1st draft of chapter due
    • 15 March Revisions feedback from Editors
    • 1 May 2024: final version of chapters due
    • Fall 2024: editors submit final book manuscript to press
If you have any questions, please send queries to both editors: lpodniek@torontomu.ca; helena.henriksson@gender.uu.se * Deadline for Submissions Aug. 25, 2023 “Metafiction, Autofiction, and Other Metanarrative Forms of Storytelling” Dear members, I am leading a seminar on “Metafiction, Autofiction, and Other Metanarrative Forms of Storytelling” at the MSA conference with invited speakers Brian McHale and Josh Toth. Please consider participating. Registration has commenced and will end on August 25. If you are interested in participating, all you need to do is sign up now. You do not submit an abstract at this point. Five- to seven-page papers are due about a five weeks prior to the conference. More information about MSA seminars can be found here: https://msa.press.jhu.edu/conferences/msa2023/seminarOverview.html Modern Studies Association Conference, New York, October 26-29, 2023 Leader:
    • Lissi Athanasiou-Krikelis, Associate Professor, New York Institute of Technology
Invited Participants:
    • Josh Toth, Professor, MacEwan University,
    • Brian McHale, Emeritus, Arts and Humanities Distinguished Professor, Ohio State University
Metafiction, Autofiction, and Other Metanarrative Forms of Storytelling   With three recent publications on metafiction in the last two years—Truth and Metafiction by Josh Toth (2021), Metafiction and the Postwar Novel: Foes, Ghosts, and Faces in the Water by Andrew Dean (2021) and Metafiction by Yaël Schlick (2022)—there is a resurgence of interest in the theory and practice of this literary form, which had fallen from favor after reaching its pinnacle in the eighties. This seminar seeks to explore the various metanarrative facades of fiction, while also expanding perspectives on metanarrative commentary outside verbal storytelling from modernism to postmodernism and beyond. The seminar will attempt to address the following questions. What are the theoretical frameworks that shape metafiction, and what do recent renditions (works by Salvador Plascencia, Hernan Diaz, Susan Choi to name a few) indicate about its development? Is metafiction a self-enclosed hermeneutics, or does it also foreground issues of class, gender, sexuality, or race as seen in novels such as Mat Jason’s Pym? If metafiction is favored by male authorship–as some claim–how do women writers like Margaret Atwood, Clarice Lispector, Amanda Michalopoulou, Rachael Cusk, and others fit in? How is metafiction manifested and what purposes does it serve in specific genres: graphic novels, children’s and young adult fiction, autobiography/memoire/life-writing, poetry, film, or other forms of visual and verbal storytelling? What is the role of metanarrative commentary in popular culture in general? At a time when commercials, documentaries (Netflix: Adams Knows Everything), cartoons (Netflix: A Tale Dark & Grimm), and puppet shows (The Immortal Jellyfish Girl) employ metanarration, it is imperative that we reexamine meta-references across genres. Presenters will have the opportunity to submit their work in a companion on Metafiction, edited by Lissi Athanasiou-Krikelis and Josh Toth, currently under contract with Routledge. Regards, Lissi Athanasiou-Krikelis, Ph.D. Associate Professor of English​ Director, Interdisciplinary Studies New York Institute of Technology 16 West 61st Street, Room #608 New York, NY 10023 website: https://lissiathanasioukrikelis.com/ *

“Death in Public” /// C19 ’24 Panel Proposal (8/21/2023; 3/14-16/2024) Pasadena USA.

deadline for submissions:  August 21, 2023 Please consider submitting an abstract for the following panel proposal for The Society of Nineteenth-Century Americanists’ (C19’s) 2024 conference in Pasadena. Feel free to reach out with any questions.
Death in Public In “Sex in Public,” Berlant and Warner urged us to consider how sex—something seemingly private—is indeed “mediated by publics.” Similar to Berlant and Warner, we investigate how the concept of death, broadly defined, was determined, imagined, augmented, and regulated as a public spectacle throughout the nineteenth century. Although our contemporary image of a good death is often one of relatives and loved ones gathered around a hospital bed in hushed silence, or the calm stillness of the hospice room, the American public is simultaneously entranced by the idea of spectacular death. Years into a resurgence of the popularity of true crime, it remains the most widely listened-to podcast genre in the United States. On social media platforms such as TikTok, interest in natural burials, morbid curiosities, serial killers, and the paranormal has been used to scam viewers into buying apps, supplements, and home security devices. Offline, the COVID-19 pandemic has politicized and publicized death and sickness on a national and global scale, in a way perhaps last seen during the 1917 flu epidemic. In one age of public interest in death, we look back to another. Biological, social, and political deaths became increasingly public in the United States throughout the nineteenth century, both as a result of highly visible, recognizable violence, such as chattel slavery, the Civil War, and presidential assassinations, as well as more insidious cultural and institutional phenomena, such as the rise of Native American residential schools, tenement housing, and asylums in the second half of the century. These events inspired interests in mesmerism and esoteric death rituals at the time, such as spirit photography and séances, that permeated contemporary religious and literary imaginations. In the twenty-first century, humanities scholars continue to respond to these events, nuancing their understandings of death and dying and revealing how the increasingly public nature of these phenomena enable them to enter new contexts and adopt new meanings. This panel seeks projects that investigate death and the public imagination throughout the nineteenth century, including but not limited to those that consider:
    • Infectious diseases and epidemics (smallpox, cholera, yellow fever, measles, malaria, etc.)
    • Public displays of grief and mourning
    • Imaginations of the “good” and “bad” death
    • Eugenics
    • Social or political death, imprisonment, or institutionalization
    • Chronic illness, terminal illness, and/or disability
    • Ghosts and hauntings, mediums and mesmerism
    • “The little death”
    • Public deaths (murders, assassinations, executions, etc.)
    • Death in/and/of the Archive
    • Queer temporalities, queer deaths
If you would like to be considered for this panel, please email a 250-word abstract as well as a brief biography to Lucy Wallitsch (lucy.wallitsch@emory.edu) and Alex Anderson (ande1204@purdue.edu) by 5:00 p.m. ET on Monday, August 21.  * Thirteenth Biennial MESEA Conference, June 12-14, 2024, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu – Moving Cultures, Moving Ethnicities Open Period for Submissions: August 15, 2023 – November 15, 2023 Confirmed Keynote Speakers:
    • John McLeod (University of Leeds)
    • Anna-Leena Toivanen (University of Eastern Finland)
    • Atlantic Studies Lecture TBC
Those of us who are “world”-travelers have the distinct experience of being different in different “worlds” and of having the capacity to remember other “worlds” and ourselves in them. – Maria Lugones, “Playfulness, ‘World’-Travelling, and Loving Perception” (1987) We believe the one who has power. He is the one who gets to write the story. So when you study history, you must ask yourself, Whose story am I missing? Whose voice was suppressed so that this voice could come forth? Once you have figured that out, you must find that story too. From there you get a clearer, yet still imperfect, picture. – Yaa Gyasi, Homegoing (2016) The MESEA 2024 conference invites contributions that address the diverse layers, definitions, and ‘pathways’ of mobility, including the mobility of people from one place to another, crossings and intersections of cultures, and the formation of hybrid cultural forms. At the same time, mobility, border-crossings, and migration move people emotionally, either directly or through a wide range of cultural representations, and generate various emotional responses ranging from joy and relief to fear, loss and frustration. Affecting both those who travel, those who stay, and those encountered when journeying, such experiences are personal and collective, local and global, theoretical and empirical, and reveal the perplexing nature of mobility, whether this is voluntarily or involuntarily ventured. This conference aims to look into the pluriform contact zones that form with regard to global mobility, and to further explore the ways migration affects experience in diverse ethnic and postcolonial contexts. We seek to examine questions such as:
    • How does mobility from the perspective of affect and lived experience shed light on the variety of modes and genres of (post-)migrant experiences?
    • How are the experiences of displacement, forced migration, and other conditions of unfreedom represented in narrative?
    • How are narratives of mobility and migration formed and articulated historically?
    • To what degree do narratives of mobility contribute to the formation of transnational and translocal communities, and which narratives in various affective registers circulate within them?
    • In what ways are individual and collective memories of mobility (re)framed emotionally, for instance through expressions of melancholy, dissociation, grief, or vulnerability?
    • How is the crossing of cultural borders and transculturation articulated in world literature, film, and performance art?
    • What kind of emergent and/or alternative cultural practices are connected with mobility? How do they challenge dominant notions of identity and belonging?
The 2024 MESEA Conference seeks to explore the diversity of the phenomenon in the nexus of culture, history, borders, and geopolitics. Potential paper and panel submissions can address but are not limited to topics such as follows:
    • nostalgia and narratives of return
    • narratives of forced migration, human trafficking, deportation, and transportation
    • trauma, displacement, and emplacement
    • Gothic journeys and uncanny spaces
    • tragedy, comedy, melodrama, and other genres of migration narratives
    • mourning, melancholia, and migration
    • activism, solidarity, consciousness raising
    • autobiography and memory
    • transforming and hybridizing cultural practices and texts
    • cosmopolitanisms
    • climate migration/mobility
    • home(-making) in migration
    • border communities
    • rebordering and debordering
    • gendered perspectives on mobility
    • the ethics and economics of migration
    • migration as an opportunity
Abstracts should be submitted to our website at https://mesea.org/ between August 15 and November 15, 2023. Submitters will receive notification of acceptance by January 10, 2024. The conference will be arranged as an onsite conference at UEF Joensuu Campus. Preference will be given to complete panel proposals with an inter/transdisciplinary and/or transnational focus. Panels may not include more than 2 participants from the same institution. Presenters are expected to be members of the association in 2024. Previous MESEA Conferences have led to high quality publications (https://mesea.org/publications/). As in previous years, MESEA will award at least one Young Scholars Excellence Award. For more information please visit: http://www.mesea.org Contact Email ludmila_martan@yahoo.com URL https://mesea.org/joensuu-2024/ *

“Death in Public” /// C19 ’24 Panel Proposal (8/21/2023; 3/14-16/2024) Pasadena USA.

deadline for submissions:  August 21, 2023 Please consider submitting an abstract for the following panel proposal for The Society of Nineteenth-Century Americanists’ (C19’s) 2024 conference in Pasadena. Feel free to reach out with any questions.
Death in Public In “Sex in Public,” Berlant and Warner urged us to consider how sex—something seemingly private—is indeed “mediated by publics.” Similar to Berlant and Warner, we investigate how the concept of death, broadly defined, was determined, imagined, augmented, and regulated as a public spectacle throughout the nineteenth century. Although our contemporary image of a good death is often one of relatives and loved ones gathered around a hospital bed in hushed silence, or the calm stillness of the hospice room, the American public is simultaneously entranced by the idea of spectacular death. Years into a resurgence of the popularity of true crime, it remains the most widely listened-to podcast genre in the United States. On social media platforms such as TikTok, interest in natural burials, morbid curiosities, serial killers, and the paranormal has been used to scam viewers into buying apps, supplements, and home security devices. Offline, the COVID-19 pandemic has politicized and publicized death and sickness on a national and global scale, in a way perhaps last seen during the 1917 flu epidemic. In one age of public interest in death, we look back to another. Biological, social, and political deaths became increasingly public in the United States throughout the nineteenth century, both as a result of highly visible, recognizable violence, such as chattel slavery, the Civil War, and presidential assassinations, as well as more insidious cultural and institutional phenomena, such as the rise of Native American residential schools, tenement housing, and asylums in the second half of the century. These events inspired interests in mesmerism and esoteric death rituals at the time, such as spirit photography and séances, that permeated contemporary religious and literary imaginations. In the twenty-first century, humanities scholars continue to respond to these events, nuancing their understandings of death and dying and revealing how the increasingly public nature of these phenomena enable them to enter new contexts and adopt new meanings. This panel seeks projects that investigate death and the public imagination throughout the nineteenth century, including but not limited to those that consider:
    • Infectious diseases and epidemics (smallpox, cholera, yellow fever, measles, malaria, etc.)
    • Public displays of grief and mourning
    • Imaginations of the “good” and “bad” death
    • Eugenics
    • Social or political death, imprisonment, or institutionalization
    • Chronic illness, terminal illness, and/or disability
    • Ghosts and hauntings, mediums and mesmerism
    • “The little death”
    • Public deaths (murders, assassinations, executions, etc.)
    • Death in/and/of the Archive
    • Queer temporalities, queer deaths
If you would like to be considered for this panel, please email a 250-word abstract as well as a brief biography to Lucy Wallitsch (lucy.wallitsch@emory.edu) and Alex Anderson (ande1204@purdue.ed) by 5:00 p.m. ET on Monday, August 21. *

Call for Papers

“Wildness and Wilderness in American Travel Writing” The Society for the Study of American Travel Writing (SSATW) at the American Literature Association Fall Symposium

Oct. 26-28, 2023. Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

Deadline for Submissions: August 10, 2023 The Society for the Study of American Travel Writing (SSATW) seeks proposals for a panel on “Wildness and Wilderness in American Travel Writing” at the American Literature Association’s Fall Symposium (October 26-28, 2023, in Santa Fe, New Mexico). Scholarship on any region or era of American Travel Writing is welcome. The unfamiliar, unexplored, and unsettled places have long captivated the American literary imagination and travel writing. Whether we think of wilderness as sacred, shrinking, imagined, or simulated, how has the spectacle of wildness, in unsettled or settled spaces, impinged upon representations of the American scene by travelers? Proposals might consider how travel writers have metaphorically linked subject matter and creative practice in renditions of confronting geograpies of wilderness and wildness. They might also think about the impact that the wild or the wildernss has had on individual writers, ideas of nation, or constructions of genre. Please submit abstracts of approximately 300 words no later than August 10, 2023, to Susan Roberson (susan.roberson@retiree.tamuk.edu). Early submissions are welcome. Contact Info: Susan Roberson Contact Email: susan.roberson@retiree.tamuk.edu * Women and the Sea in the Early Modern World University of Plymouth UK, Sept. 6 and 7, 2023 Deadline for Submission August 6, 2023 In-Person Online Hybrid We invite submissions for 20-minute papers from PhD students, early career researchers and established researchers from across the world. The symposium will run in a hybrid and in-person format. Call for papers The call for papers is now open. Proposals may cover topics that includes but are not limited to the themes listed below. Please email your abstract of 200–300 words and a short biography/CV to elaine.murphy@plymouth.ac.uk. The closing date for abstracts is Sunday 6 August 2023. Themes that will be covered include
    • Experiences of women at sea
    • Women living and working in maritime communities (dockyards, port towns, fishing)
    •  Women and the Navy
    •  Women and piracy
    •  Women and migration
    •  Enslaved women and the sea
    •  Indigenous women and the sea
    •  Women and private companies (EIC, VOC etc)
    •  Material culture of women at sea
    •  Lives ashore – separation from sailor husbands/family members
    •  Gender and the sea
Organisers 
    • Dr Anna Maria Forssberg, Vasa Museum
    • Dr Deborah Hamer, New Netherlands Institute
This event is free to attend. Registration is required and will be available soon. Please contact elaine.murphy@plymouth.ac.uk with any queries. URL https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/whats-on/women-and-the-se * Call for Book Chapters: Memory Studies: An Anthology of Perspectives Chapter proposals are invited for a volume on contemporary memory and literary studies edited by Dr. D. Sudha Rani ( VNRVJIET ), Dr. Rachel Irdaya Raj ( VNRVJIET ), Dr.Shashibhusan Nayak (GP Nayagarh). Deadline for abstract submission: 30 July 2023 Abstract selection notification: 30 August 2023 Complete Paper Submission: 30 October 2023 Memory studies is an increasingly diverse, interdisciplinary, and dynamic field of knowledge that spans multiple disciplines. Sociologists, psychologists, literary critics, media, cultural studies scholars, and natural and applied scientists have been exploring the concepts and application of memory to evolve a theoretical, conceptual, and methodological framework to investigate this emerging field of study. Memory—personal, collective, cultural—is crucial to the formation, conservation, and preservation of the identity of an individual, community, society, and nation. The act of remembering involves narration, and storytelling is a form of storing. As narration moves from oral, written, and visual forms to the digital, it becomes imperative to understand the interface between and among the human and the non-human, digital and analog, and its impact on memory and its narrativization. The explosion of technology allows us to know what we need to know and preserve what we want our future generations to know. To study and document certain forms of knowledge that are crucial to defining who we are, this interdisciplinary edited collection aims to bring together researchers, academics, technologists, corporates, and students to discuss, debate, and understand the various storytelling strategies adopted by different communities, regions, and nations to record and preserve their identities and collective memories. Since technology has assumed a crucial role in this endeavor, it is necessary to assess the impact of technology on both the content and form of memory and its narration. The edited collection attempts to understand how the past, present, and future are formed, framed, mediated, and remediated through various forms of storytelling. Drawing on the theoretical and methodological approaches offered by literary, cultural, and media studies, history, sociology, psychology, as well as science and technology, this edited collection hopes to investigate the cultural representations of languages, communities, regions, and nations in oral histories, life writings, testimonies, and fictional and nonfictional narratives. The edited collection would examine issues related to memory, identity, representation, and narrativization and the impact of digital technology on memory studies and storytelling. The edited collection invites papers on the following themes but is not limited to: •          Memory studies—theories and praxis •          Modes and methods of storytelling—of languages, communities, nations, and   regions •          Impact of digital technologies on memory and memory studies •          Language, literature, and memory •          Interdisciplinarity and intersectionality of memory and memory studies. •          Memory and oral history •          Memory and life writing •          Memory and archive •          Memory and erasure •          Memory and marginality •          Memory and textuality •          Memory, cognition, and critical theory •          Memory and the Medium of fiction •          Memory and (mis)representation •          Memory and production of identities Submissions Abstracts of about 200 words, along with up to six keywords, a 50-word bio-note, institutional affiliation, and contact details, should be emailed by 30 July 2023 to shashienglish@gmail.com as a single MS Word document attachment. Chapter requirements: A chapter should be max. Eight thousand words, including footnotes and bibliography adhering to the MLA 9th edition. Important Dates: Deadline for abstract submission: 30 July 2023 Abstract selection notification: 30 August 2023 Complete Paper Submission: 30 October 2023 *

Exploring the Nexus of Healing, Stories, and Illness in the Nineteenth Century and Today

“The Nineteenth Century Today: Interdisciplinary, International, Intertemporal” IN-CSA Conference (Durham University in Durham, UK from July 10 – July 12, 2024). deadline for submissions: August 1, 2023 Call for Papers, “Exploring the Nexus of Healing, Stories, and Illness in the Nineteenth Century and Today” for “The Nineteenth Century Today: Interdisciplinary, International, Intertemporal” IN-CSA Conference (Durham University in Durham, UK from July 10 – July 12, 2024). Please submit a 250-word abstract and a 2-page CV by August 1, 2023 to Melissa Rampelli at mrampelli@holyfamily.edu The nineteenth century witnessed profound transformations in medical practices, literary expressions, and societal attitudes toward health and illness. This panel aims to shed light on the intricate relationship between healing, storytelling, and illness (broadly conceived) during this pivotal period. In light of the IN-CSA’s interdisciplinary, international, and intertemporal theme, papers exploring the legacies–either across time, disciplines, or cultures–of the dynamic between nineteenth-century narrative, illness, and healing are particularly welcome.
*

Fans, Fandoms, and Celebrity Studies – Northeast PCA Hybrid Fall Conference 2023

deadline for submissions:  August 1, 2023 The Northeast Popular/American Culture Association (NEPCA) Fans, Fandoms, and Celebrity Studies Area invites presentation submissions for NEPCA’s hybrid conference to be held October 12 – October 14, 2023 in-person at Nichols College and virtually, via the Zoom platform. This area encourages submissions that focus on interrogating the ideas and the ideals of fans and fandoms, and why we idolize celebrities. We welcome submissions from all theoretical and philosophical perspectives. We are open to submissions in any area of fan and celebrity studies including but not limited to:
    • Creation and authenticity of fandoms
    • Fandoms, diversity and inclusion
    • Celebrity marketing, advertising, and public relations
    • Social media use and celebrity status
    • Defining fandoms
    • Fandoms and politics
    • Celebrities and illness
    • Sport fandoms and celebrities
    • Issues of fame and what it means to be famous in our culture
    • Fandom comparisons between cultures
    • Trust and value of celebrity
    • An individual celebrity
The deadline for the submission of abstracts is August 1, 2023. Please use this form to submit your abstract: https://bit.ly/NEPCA23CFP If you have questions about this Area/the NEPCA Conference please see: https://nepca.blog/2023-annual-conference/ or feel free to reach out to NEPCA’S Fans, Fandoms, and Celebrity Studies Area Chair: Dr. Shelly Jones at jonesmc@delhi.edu  The Centre for Modernist Cultures at the University of Birmingham is delighted to mark the formation of the Modern Letters Editing Network (MoLE) with a virtual workshop:  Working with Modern Letters: Ford Madox Ford, Katherine Mansfield, Virginia Woolf  on Monday, 17 July, 2.00 pm to 4.00 pm  The discussion will be led by: Professor Claire Davison, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3 Professor Sara Haslam, Open University And moderated by Professor Max Saunders, University of Birmingham You are invited to a Zoom meeting. When: Jul 17, 2023 02:00 PM London Register in advance for this meeting: https://bham-ac-uk.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZMvf-6przItH9UWfNyu2pA-C_sng1zIsFf9 After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining. Max Saunders Ford Madox Ford | Reaktion Books Major new centenary exhibition of paintings and drawings by Alfred Cohen has gone online: Works – Alfred Cohen | Ben Uri Gallery and Museum with accompanying fully-illustrated book: https://www.accartbooks.com/uk/store/pv/9780900157691/alfred-cohen/max-saunders-sarah-macdougall/ Imagined Futures: Writing, Science, and Modernity in the To-Day and To-Morrow Book Series, 1923-31 https://global.oup.com/academic/product/imagined-futures-9780198829454?q=saunders&lang=en&cc=gb# * The Centre for Modernist Cultures at the University of Birmingham is delighted to mark the formation of the Modern Letters Editing Network (MoLE) with a virtual workshop:  Working with Modern Letters: Ford Madox Ford, Katherine Mansfield, Virginia Woolf  on Monday, 17 July, 2.00 pm to 4.00 pm  The discussion will be led by: Professor Claire Davison, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3 Professor Sara Haslam, Open University And moderated by Professor Max Saunders, University of Birmingham You are invited to a Zoom meeting. When: Jul 17, 2023 02:00 PM London Register in advance for this meeting: https://bham-ac-uk.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZMvf-6przItH9UWfNyu2pA-C_sng1zIsFf9 After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining. Max Saunders Ford Madox Ford | Reaktion Books Major new centenary exhibition of paintings and drawings by Alfred Cohen has gone online: Works – Alfred Cohen | Ben Uri Gallery and Museum with accompanying fully-illustrated book: https://www.accartbooks.com/uk/store/pv/9780900157691/alfred-cohen/max-saunders-sarah-macdougall/ Imagined Futures: Writing, Science, and Modernity in the To-Day and To-Morrow Book Series, 1923-31 https://global.oup.com/academic/product/imagined-futures-9780198829454?q=saunders&lang=en&cc=gb# Deadline for Submissions July 7, 2023 International Auto/Biography Association Asia-Pacific Conference 2023  26th-28th Sept 2023 (online conference) “Life Narrative in Unprecedented Times: Writing the Unexpected, Narrating the Future”.  The pandemic has functioned as a reminder of the importance of life storying and testimony as records of experience, as information sharing, or as creative engagement. This conference explores the ways momentous events shape life narration in the past, now, and for the future, for instance, the role of journalism in circulating personal stories, understanding of the impacts of mental health, and a renewed engagement in family and community histories. Each of these themes has been particularly notable during COVID-19. We invite proposals that address life narratives at unprecedented times, but also how life narrative is located by recent histories in diverse contexts and temporality. The conference welcomes critical and creative responses including, but not limited to, the themes outlined below: *narrating ‘the new normal’ *disrupted/stalled futures *national/ regional/ local life narratives *narrating isolation/ lockdown *non-human and post-human lives, particularly connections during COVID/isolation *illness narratives *stories of grief and loss *ageing and storytelling *life narrative as record-keeping *memorabilia, materials and objects *social media / the rise of TikTok *children and youth as life narrators *Reality television, trends and shifts *non-fiction podcasts *travel narratives/post-COVID *genre shifts (journalism, the essay) *narratives of work and employment Papers will be 10-15 minutes in length. Proposals of 300 words + bios of 50 words should be sent to iaba.asiapacific@flinders.edu.au by 7th July 2023. —————————-
Kate Douglas (she/her) Professor of English College of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences +61 402440223 www.flinders.edu.au/people/kate.douglas
* Call for Proposals: The 39 I.S.E.B. Conference Life Stories Across Times and Spaces Courtyard Marriott in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  (Conference site on Webpage: https://isebio.com/index.html) Conference Date: October 5-7, 2023  Submission Deadline: June 15, 2023  The International Society for Educational Biography (I.S.E.B.) invites proposals for its annual conference, to be held in partnership with The Society of Philosophy and History of Education (S.O.P.H.E.), October 5-7, 2023, at the Courtyard by Marriott Oklahoma City Downtown in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. CONFERENCE THEME: This year’s conference theme is Life Stories Across Times and Spaces.  Through the lens of time and space, we offer a robust conference space to examine the diverse forms of life writing characterizing the contemporary field. The genres of life writing include biographies such as Plato’s dialogues to St. Augustine’s Confessions, from 1-minute TikTok clips to the voluminous biographies of Winston Churchill, from Anne Frank’s diary to Princess Diana in The Crown.  We invite proposals with a special focus on the temporal and spatial dimensions of life writing and lives as they unfold as well as their writing and reception. This theme recognizes we are living in historic times that demand rigorous scrutiny and This theme recognizes we are living in historic times that demand rigorous scrutiny and discussion of the boundaries of the past and the present and between here and there. We welcome studies at any stage about biographies of all sorts, lengths, modes, and purposes, with the belief that they illuminate facets of humanity and education. Papers and presentations may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following topics: 1. Educational biographies: constructions of self, learners, educators, agents, and communities 2. Life writing in academic discourses and spaces 3. Life recordings on social media: TikTok, Podcast, and Biopics 4. From the personal to the political: diaries, biographies, autobiographies, and beyond 5. Amplifying minoritized and subaltern voices in life writing 6. Reminiscing about the past and envisioning the future: work, family, and life 7. Conceptions of memory and time: how personal time, social events, national crises, and historical epochs framing our memories 8. Theories and practices of life writing: genres, recordings, and reconstructions 9. Perspectives and genres: autoethnography, testimonio, biography, ethnography, memoir, etc. 10. Fictionalizing historical figures in books, films, science-fiction 11. Geographic and spatial tellings: the influence of space and place in life writing SUBMISSION POLICIES:
    • Participants: Submissions are welcome from ISEB members, non-members, and independent scholars both inside and outside the US.  Graduate students and international scholars are particularly welcome to submit proposals.  Please note that non-members whose proposals are accepted are expected to become members when registering for the conference, in order to be included in the program.
    • In-Person and Virtual Participation: This conference is primarily an in-person space with opportunities for virtual presentation as well. Virtual presentations can only be offered to individual papers and panel presentations. Speakers of virtual presentations should send 15-minute video clips of their presentations no later than Monday, October 2, to ensure a smooth rendition. The speakers should be available on Zoom during the panel sessions to respond to questions. The speakers should be available on Zoom during the panel sessions to respond to questions.  If the entire panel will be virtual, all presenters must designate the same participation mode.  Virtual presenters pay the same conference fee as in-person participants.  While we will do our best to make the presentation process as seamless as possible, technological glitches are always a risk.
    • Format: Submissions should fall into one of four formats—individual papers, panels, roundtable discussions, and poster sessions.  See below for more details.
    • Abstract link: Participants must submit a title and an abstract (no more than 300 words) by June 15, 2023.  Please submit your abstract here.
PRESENTATION TYPES:
    1. Individual Papers: Presentations should be 15-20 minutes long.
    1. Panels: This category is for a 90-minute session comprised of three or four presentations on a common topic.  Each panel should have an organizer responsible for submitting the panel proposal.  The proposal must include 1) a title for the panel and titles of individual presentations, and 2) an abstract (up to 500 words) for the panel.
    1. Roundtable Discussion: This category facilitates interactive discussions of issues pertinent to biographies of all types.  Each roundtable lasts for 90 minutes; the panel may have up to seven members.  The panelists should take no more than 45 minutes to present their views and leave the remaining time for interaction with the audience.  The panel organizer should also serve as the moderator.  The proposal must include 1) a title for the roundtable, and 2) a summary (up to 500 words) describing the perspectives and attitudes panelists have toward the topic.
    1. Poster Sessions: We invite submissions for this popular form of presentation posters, where the presenter displays visually a topic relevant to the conference theme and responds to audience’s questions on the spot.  Guidelines are
    1. Time: 60 minutes
    1. Location: Tables in the conference area
    1. Format: Corrugated display board—trifolds opens to roughly 36” x 48” or rollable posters of similar size
    1. Additional Media (optional): Laptops to share photos and brief videos
FURTHER INFORMATION: For more information, please email smou@depauw.edu or visit https://isebio.com/index.html Contact Info: Dr. Sherry Mou DePauw University Contact Email: smou@depauw.edu *

Representations of Ethnic Deportations from Eastern and Central Europe to the Soviet Union During and After World War I

Deadline: July 15, 2023 Call for Papers We are seeking contributors to a special issue or edited volume on representations of ethnic deportations from Eastern and Central Europe to the Soviet Union (1930-during and after WWII) favoring representations from ethnic minority groups. Articles are not limited to but can focus on:
    • first and second generation memory, postmemory (Hirsch) as expressed in life-writing, literary representations of all genres, art of all genres
    • on “portable monuments” (Rigney), narratives/stories/histories that could be re-written, appropriated, and transformed in new contexts
    • cultural memory and translation, the circulation of memory between places and languages
    • analyses of varied forms of curating memory (online exhibits, traveling exhibits, museums, monuments, installations, performance, anniversaries and commemorations, film, documentaries)
    • how, in the absence of a crystallized, hard memory, the historical documents and the representations analyzed serve as viable examples of soft memory that succeed in memorializing the forced labor camps experience in its collective and individual forms (‘Soft’ and ‘hard’ memory of deportation (Etkind) in collective and individual forms)
    • new English translations of works (poems, songs, diary entrances, letters, postcards, notes, etc.) by ethnic deportees, if they are subject of analysis or commentary and relate to the cluster and do not exceed 5 pages.
Please send up to 1,000-word proposals by July 15, 2023. Contact Info: Anca Luca Holden, aholden@amherst.edu Oana Popescu Sandu opopescusa@usi.edu Contact Email: ancaholden@yahoo.com * Deadline for Submissions July 15, 2022 Hegemony and peripherality in autobiographical writings: texts, contexts, visibility *** XXII Symposium of the Osservatorio scientifico della memoria autobiografica scritta, orale e iconografica                                                              Academia Belgica, Via Omero 8 ROMA 5, 6, 7 December 2023 Promoted and organized by: Mediapolis.Europa ass. cult. http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ and by Grupo de Investigación “Lectura, Escritura, Alfabetización” (LEA), Universidad de Alcalá Seminario Interdisciplinar de Estudios sobre Cultura Escrita (SIECE), Universidad de Alcalá Nowadays, great store is set on autobiographical – and more generally private – documentation. In the past decades, archives for the preservation of documents have multiplied, while it seems to us that studies aimed at examining their forms remain less satisfactory. However, the latter represent an essential aspect that helps us to understand not just the content of a document but the way of forging it, of forging a testimony, and how documents were made transmissible and comparable. Some questions arise in this regard: – Can the texts of authors and writers be subjected to the same methods of formal analysis? – In what way does the concept of hegemony transpire in an autobiographical text? – How can memory be safeguarded and given value? – Can contemporary society be observed through a clear distinction between social classes? What kind of terminology should be adopted to classify them? – How do the works of authors and writers interact? – To what extent has the digital revolution expanded autobiographical practice and how does it transform it? Submitting the various bodies of work to the same methodological criteria regardless of designation by content or social background appears to be a reasonable intent. The history of culture and science teaches us how the move from listing to classification in the 17th century, as illustrated by Foucault (1966: 137-176), made it possible to make scientific data comparable. What follows are some points aimed at suggesting some of the possible outlines around which a line of research can be developed. 1. Recognizing oneself within a minority culture. The issue of hegemonies was addressed by Antonio Gramsci (1975). The observation whereby those who exercise hegemony tend to give conformity to language and every form of expression, therefore making them cohesive and comparable, contrasts with the plurality of minority cultures, which are less inscribable into formal constants. There is a vast body of documentation – illustrated and discussed by Antonio Castillo Gómez (2022), among others – on the many archival initiatives that developed especially at the beginning of the 20th century to preserve these sources, and on their now widely acknowledged importance. It is precisely the spurious origins of these sources that make a formal classification of the texts more difficult, at least at first glance. Unlike authors, writers do not aim to pursue a style, as Barthes points out (1996: 153). Writers should not necessarily be understood as ordinary people. Leonardo da Vinci regarded himself as a writer and not as an author, “not a literary man,” as he defined himself writing to Ludovico il Moro in 1482. He did not know Latin very well, and for this reason he was not regarded as a man of letters. The book Kafka. Toward a Minor Literature (G. Deleuze-F. Guattari, 1975) leads to foundational reflections on this issue, which should constitute a new alphabet for the very conception of the term ‘culture’. In this text Deleuze and Guattari highlight how being without roots, being de-territorialized, leads not to an impoverishment of thought and expressions, but rather to exploring from the margins, from the borders: a distancing that makes it possible to glimpse new lexical, conceptual forms that are open to exchange. Every minority culture (which today have multiplied thanks to the many languages that are circulating, to the multiple forms of coexistence that are necessary in a world in motion) can constitute the instrument required to prevent culture from being ossified into apparatuses. Minority culture develops languages and a conception of space that is labyrinthine, de-confined, thereby suggesting new perspectives. So, who feels legitimized to write? How can experiences that do not come from a canonical style be made well-rounded, rich? In this view, the archives and the written testimonies of ordinary people should not be regarded as mere hunting grounds, but as texts in the strict sense of the term. Chasse aux archives [hunting the archives] is the expression used by Philippe Lejeune to define the voracity for texts from minority and testimonial cultures: “The idea that, within some generations, your texts are tampered with in order to gain information on any subject, without knowing what they are about […] would be disgusting. In order to avoid these misunderstandings, I would strongly emphasize that ‘Hunting is prohibited’”. (Ph. Lejeune 2005: 120-121. The translation is mine). 2. Far from where? In the case of autobiographical writing, it is possible to glimpse a feeling of being or not being part of a hegemonical entity in the position assumed by the subject as it shows itself to be or not be an integral part of a centre or of a periphery. This is not just about a marginality based on social grounds, but more cogently based on a vision of the subject’s own language and culture in their potential to be relevant within a context (Fabio Dei 2018). How does an individual conceive of his or her centrality? Where, when, and how is it possible to circumscribe the position of a writer relaying his or her own life? How does the assumption of a certain stance define an autobiographical narration, legitimise it, structure it also in view of an external glance, of a real, imagined or searched visibility? How does the narrating ‘I’ adopt a perspective of introjection or of extimité, centripetal or centrifugal? Lontano da dove is the title of a book by Claudio Magris (1989). It deals with the drama of thousands of people, their conditions at the time of the crumbling of the powerful Hapsburg Empire. It is a metaphor for the conception of centre and periphery, of hegemony and marginality, of exile as an essential condition. An idea that, starting from a political-cultural analysis, grows into a lexicon, into cultural models, it delineates individual destiny. Magris’s Lontano da dove highlights the difficulty encountered by an individual who, not being part of the hegemonic culture, is observed/observes him/herself and is positioned/positions him/herself as a marginal body. 3. The semantics of the autobiographical text The narrating ‘I’ manifests itself through expressions that testify to its sociocultural and topographical position, and that inscribe it into certain spatial-temporal categories. As George Lakoff and Mark Johnson write (2004 [1980]) in their study Metaphors we live by (see the paragraph “The Me-First Orientation”), our way of narrating is modelled on modi pensandi. A whole cultural conception governs these forms of expression, in which the individual modulates self-narration and relates to the world around him or her. Word order was studied by William Cooper & John Robert Ross (1975). Even the choice of the mother’s or the other’s language and its modelling are cues to the posture of the ‘I’, just as photographs and the ever-widespread selfies signal how self-representation is intended. In other words, in adopting a written or audio-visual register, the ‘l’ allows us to understand how and where it positions itself. Photographic and video images define its autography. Like every form of expression, language is a system composed of relations. In order to understand its meaning, a mapping is necessary, which can be delineated through contents or voids: analysing the use of languages proves to be a tool for outlining not just established but potential relations (L. Hjelmslev 2009). Iconographic expressions such as selfies and those found on the Internet (P. Sibilia 2008) follow the same pattern: showing or not showing reveals a willingness to not just self-narrate in the present but to envision what one would like to be. In the same passage, Hjelmslev argues that language forms itself into a tangle of empty places founded on a veritable difference in potential. 4. The position of the ‘I’ and the language referred to the body An example: in psychiatric patients – who are quintessentially marginal – oral, written and graphic expressions are still closely anchored to the body, to physical actions. Binswanger, a psychiatrist with long-time experience of dialogue with patients, writes: “Out of the blue”, “being in seventh heaven” are expressions of our Dasein, our being. And even though myths and poetry allow us, though a universalizing metaphorical language, to share sensations, feelings and psychic experiences, the “I nonetheless remains the original subject of what raises or falls” (L. Binswanger 2012: 42. The translation is mine). Binswanger, who had inscribed his vision into Heidegger’s philosophy for a long time, gradually distanced himself from his ontological conception to immerse it into concrete cases. An entire vocabulary places the acts of the patient’s Dasein into space: vertiginous height, ascension, altitude, infinity, etc. (L. Binswanger 1971: 237-245). It is possible to suppose that the desire to evade, to disengage, in psychiatric patients determines its lexicon. More generally, in autobiographical writings reference to the body as a vehicle of experiences that crossed it appears to be important. 5. The ‘truth”: what the ‘I’ shows or conceals. Transparency and obstruction The truth is the foundational theme of every autobiography. It can be granted by the pact that the writer makes with the reader. Philippe Lejeune’s work docet (Ph. Lejeune: 1975). The theme of truth powerfully crosses autobiographical writing. Writing about oneself and claiming that it is true implies a pact with a whole series of confirmations and complex manoeuvres. Autofictions intend to escape this criterion. Rousseau’s Confessions, a classic of autobiographical writing, is born as a form of self-externalization that makes uncertainties public in order to justify actions that, within the framework of one’s way of recounting, should be justified. Starobinski calls this attitude ‘transparency and obstruction’.  “Rousseau desired communication and transparency of the heart. But after pursuing this avenue and meeting with disappointment, he chose the opposite course, accepting – indeed provoking – obstructions, which enabled him to withdraw, certain of his innocence, into passive resignation.” (J. Starobinski 1971 : 1. The terms in italics are in the original text). Every kind of writing – and, a fortiori, autobiographical writing – exposes and conceals realities that can nonetheless be glimpsed. In sum, this is Poppea’s veil, which lets us see and not see, thereby raising, demanding more questions than certainties (J. Starobinski 1961). Resolving and understanding the distinction between truth and falsehood requires the use of many coordinates (N. Frogneux 2021); it cannot be submitted to an automatic judgement, either in the historical or in the autobiographical field (see: Carlo Ginzburg, Il filo e le tracce. Vero falso finto 2015). Even adopting a codified language (as Lotman and Bachtin note: see infra) can be a concealment, or an illusion that you can judge a book by its cover. Often, a strong determination to show that the truth is being told is also realized through reference to realia, to what is visible and concrete. In many autobiographies, writers include registry documents. With utmost precision, they mention dates and places in order to make their testimony more believable (B. Barbalato 2009). 6. How writers conceive of hegemony by adopting certain codified forms Lotman writes that a great man or a bandit must find a good reason for regarding himself as an individual who has the right to biography (J. Lotman 1985: 194). Writing life stories, both biographical and autobiographical, requires a formal choice. For this reason, Lotman asserts that a peasant’s opportunistic use of the language of the church or of bureaucracy allows him to inscribe himself into a legitimacy. Also, think of what Bachtin (103) says about unsophisticated culture, about the peasant who, living in an isolated context, believes that every language corresponds exactly to the reality that he wants to designate. The same conviction is shared by André Gide, who asserts that often unsophisticated sources formally represent a copy of the copy (A. Gide 1997 [1926-1950]: 572). Gide dispels the misunderstanding of the authenticity of the document of ordinary people. No writing is spontaneous, let alone the authenticity of those who do not practise writing. The codes to which one resorts can be regarded as a passepartout for the legitimization of one’s own narration and conception of truth, which is thus validated (see A. Castillo Gómez 2016 and V. Sierra Blas 2018). Another important observation by Bachtin concerns the diversity in conceiving and observing a life path today and in antiquity. In antiquity, public and private space was conceived of as one and the same thing. In self-representation there was no difference between an internal self and an external one. The topos was the agora (Ibid.: 279-282). This call for papers invites proposals aimed at examining writers’ and authors’ ways, forms and goals of self-expression, and it intends to investigate mutual contaminations and interferences. Besides what has already been said, particular attention is to be paid to how self-narration presents itself as opening towards the future, how it lets its expectations transpire. In writings there is a quid, a void whose contours, whose latencies are difficult to intercept but nonetheless exist. Wishes are not always openly expressed; often they can be glimpsed between the lines of a text. As Binswanger writes, writing about oneself is a way of letting the future come to oneself. (1971: 261). How can this aspect be interpreted, understood? Michail Bachtin 1979 [1975- Mosca 1955]:1975], “La parola nella poesía e la parola nel romanzo”, 83-108, “La biografía e l’autobiografia antica”, 277-293, in Id., Estetica e romanzo, transl. by Clara Strada Janovic, Torino, Einaudi. Beatrice Barbalato (2009), “L’ipersegnicità nelle testimonianze autobiografiche”, 387-400, in Silvia Bonacchi (ed.), Intr. Anna Tylusińska-Kowalska, Le récit du moi: forme, strutture, modello del racconto autobiografico, in Kwartalnik neofilologiczny, Polska Akademia Nauk, Warsaw 29-30 April 2008. editor: Franciszek Grucza. B. Barbalato-Albert Mingelgrün (eds.) 2012, Télémaque, Archiver et interpréter les témoignages autobiographiques, Louvain-la Neuve, Presses Universitaires de Louvain. Roland Barthes  1998 [“Tel Quel”, 1964], “Écrivains et écrivants”, in Essais critiques, Paris, Seuil. Ludwig Binswanger 1971 [1947], “Le sens anthropologique de la présomption”, 237-245, in Id., Introduction à l’analyse existentielle, translated from the French by Jacqueline Verdeaux and Roland Kuhn, preface by R. Kuhn and Henri Maldiney, Paris, Éd. de Minuit.Rêve et existence 2012 [1930] translation and introduction Françoise Dastur, postface by E. Basso, Paris, Vrin. Antonio Castillo Gómez 2022, “Voix subalternes. Archives et mémoire écrite des classes populaires”, 117-135, in S. Péquignot and Y. Potin (dir.), Les conflits d’archives, France, Espagne, Méditerranée, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes. Daniele Combierati 2010, Scrivere nella lingua dell’altro, Bruxelles, Peter Lang. William Cooper & John Robert Ross 1975, “World order”, 63–111, in R. E. Grossman et al. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Fabio Dei 2018, Cultura popolare in Italia da Gramsci all’Unesco, Bologna, il Mulino.

Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari 1975, Kafka. Pour une littérature mineure, Paris, Éd. De Minuit. Michel Foucault 1966, “Classer”, 137-176, in Id, Les mots et le choses, Paris, Gallimard. Nathalie Frogneux, “Une phénoménologie de la vie mensongère”, in Le Phénomène humain. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 118(4), 2021, 573-591. doi: 10.2143/RPL.118.4.3290142. André Gide 1997, Journal 1926-1950, Paris, Gallimard, vol. II. Carlo Ginzburg 2006), Il filo e le tracce. Vero falso finto, Feltrinelli, Milano. Louis Hjelmslev 1975, Résumé of a Theory of Language. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague, vol. XVI. Copenhague: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag. –        (2009), Teoria del linguaggio. Résumé, = TLR, Vicenza, Terra Ferma, Vicenza. Antonio Gramsci 1975, Quaderni del carcere, 3, Quaderni 12-29, critical edition of the Istituto Gramsci by Valentino Gerratana, Torino, Einaudi. Georges Lakoff, Mark Johnson, 2003 [1980], Metaphors We Live By, Chicago-London, The University of Chicago Press. Philippe Lejeune 1975, Le pacte autobiographique, Paris, Seuil. – “Je ne suis pas une source”, Entretien de Ph. Artières, 115-137, in Id., Signes de vie – Le pacte autobiographique 2, 2, Seuil 2005. Ronan Le Roux, « De quoi jouit l’archiviste ? Méditation certalienne sur le ‘vol d’âme’ », in Elodie Belkorchia, Georges Cuer, Françoise Hiraux (dir.), Du matériel à l’immatérielLa Gazette des archives n°262 (2021-2). Jurij M. Lotman 1985, “Il diritto alla biografia”, in Id., La semiosfera-L’asimmetria e il dialogo nelle strutture pensanti, edited and translated from the Russian by Simonetta Salvestroni, Venezia, Marsilio. Claudio Magris 1989, Lontano da Dove, Joseph Roth e la tradizione ebraico-orientale, Torino Einaudi. Paula Sibilia 2008, O show do eu: a intimidade como espetáculo, Rio de Janeiro, Nova Fronteira. Verónica Sierra Blas 2016, Cartas presas. La correspondencia carcelaria en la Guerra Civil y el Franquismo, Madrid, Marcial Pons. Jean Starobinski 1961, “Le voile de Poppée”, 7-27, in Id, L’oeil vivant, Gallimard, 1961. – Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. Trans. by Arthur Goldhammer. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988. Judging panel: Beatrice Barbalato, Mediapolis.europa ass, cult., Université catholique de Louvain Antonio Castillo Gómez, Universidad de Alcalá Nathalie Frogneux, Université catholique de Louvain Verónica Sierra Blas, Universidad de Alcalá Symposium organized by: Mediapolis.Europa (Irene Meliciani: managing director) Mnemosyne o la costruzione del senso, Presses universitaires de Louvain Grupo de Investigación “Lectura, Escritura, Alfabetización” (LEA), Universidad de Alcalá Seminario Interdisciplinar de Estudios sobre Cultura Escrita (SIECE), Universidad de Alcalá This symposium is part of the research project Vox populi. Espacios, prácticas y estrategias de visibilidad de las escrituras del margen en las épocas Moderna y Contemporánea (PID2019-107881GB-I00), financed by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Spain). Suggestions for sending proposals   The languages admitted for submission are: Italian, Spanish, French, English, Portuguese. Everyone is allowed to write in one of these languages. There will be no simultaneous translation. A passive understanding of these languages is desirable. A) Deadline for submission: 15 July 2023. The abstract will be composed of 250 words (max), with citation of two reference sources, and a brief CV (max: 100 words), with possible mention of two of one’s own publications, be they articles, books, or videos. The judging panel will read and select every proposal, which is to be sent to beatrice.barbalato@gmail.com, antonio.castillo@uah.es For information: beatrice.barbalato@gmail.com, antonio.castillo@uah.es,  irenemeliciani@gmail.com The authors of the accepted proposals will be notified by 30 July 2023. B) Regarding enrolment in the colloquium, once the proposals are accepted the fees are: Before 30 September 2023: 150.00€ From 1 to 30 October 2023:  180.00€ Enrolment fee cannot be accepted in loco For graduate students: Before 30 September 2023: 100.00€ From 1to 30 October 2023:   90.00€ Enrolment fee cannot be accepted in loco Once the programme is established, no change is allowed. For activities related to this topic at the University and cultural centers in Spain see the sites http://www.siece.es/   http://grafosfera.blogspot.com/ For information on the symposia organized in previous years by the Osservatorio della memoria autobiografica  scritta, orale e iconografica, visit the site: http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ Deadline for Submissions July 7, 2023 International Auto/Biography Association Asia-Pacific Conference 2023  26th-28th Sept 2023 (online conference) “Life Narrative in Unprecedented Times: Writing the Unexpected, Narrating the Future”.  The pandemic has functioned as a reminder of the importance of life storying and testimony as records of experience, as information sharing, or as creative engagement. This conference explores the ways momentous events shape life narration in the past, now, and for the future, for instance, the role of journalism in circulating personal stories, understanding of the impacts of mental health, and a renewed engagement in family and community histories. Each of these themes has been particularly notable during COVID-19. We invite proposals that address life narratives at unprecedented times, but also how life narrative is located by recent histories in diverse contexts and temporality. The conference welcomes critical and creative responses including, but not limited to, the themes outlined below: *narrating ‘the new normal’ *disrupted/stalled futures *national/ regional/ local life narratives *narrating isolation/ lockdown *non-human and post-human lives, particularly connections during COVID/isolation *illness narratives *stories of grief and loss *ageing and storytelling *life narrative as record-keeping *memorabilia, materials and objects *social media / the rise of TikTok *children and youth as life narrators *Reality television, trends and shifts *non-fiction podcasts *travel narratives/post-COVID *genre shifts (journalism, the essay) *narratives of work and employment Papers will be 10-15 minutes in length. Proposals of 300 words + bios of 50 words should be sent to iaba.asiapacific@flinders.edu.au by 7th July 2023. —————————-
Kate Douglas (she/her) Professor of English College of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences +61 402440223 www.flinders.edu.au/people/kate.douglas
* Call for Proposals: The 39 I.S.E.B. Conference Life Stories Across Times and Spaces Courtyard Marriott in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  (Conference site on Webpage: https://isebio.com/index.html) Conference Date: October 5-7, 2023  Submission Deadline: June 15, 2023  The International Society for Educational Biography (I.S.E.B.) invites proposals for its annual conference, to be held in partnership with The Society of Philosophy and History of Education (S.O.P.H.E.), October 5-7, 2023, at the Courtyard by Marriott Oklahoma City Downtown in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. CONFERENCE THEME: This year’s conference theme is Life Stories Across Times and Spaces.  Through the lens of time and space, we offer a robust conference space to examine the diverse forms of life writing characterizing the contemporary field. The genres of life writing include biographies such as Plato’s dialogues to St. Augustine’s Confessions, from 1-minute TikTok clips to the voluminous biographies of Winston Churchill, from Anne Frank’s diary to Princess Diana in The Crown.  We invite proposals with a special focus on the temporal and spatial dimensions of life writing and lives as they unfold as well as their writing and reception. This theme recognizes we are living in historic times that demand rigorous scrutiny and This theme recognizes we are living in historic times that demand rigorous scrutiny and discussion of the boundaries of the past and the present and between here and there. We welcome studies at any stage about biographies of all sorts, lengths, modes, and purposes, with the belief that they illuminate facets of humanity and education. Papers and presentations may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following topics: 1. Educational biographies: constructions of self, learners, educators, agents, and communities 2. Life writing in academic discourses and spaces 3. Life recordings on social media: TikTok, Podcast, and Biopics 4. From the personal to the political: diaries, biographies, autobiographies, and beyond 5. Amplifying minoritized and subaltern voices in life writing 6. Reminiscing about the past and envisioning the future: work, family, and life 7. Conceptions of memory and time: how personal time, social events, national crises, and historical epochs framing our memories 8. Theories and practices of life writing: genres, recordings, and reconstructions 9. Perspectives and genres: autoethnography, testimonio, biography, ethnography, memoir, etc. 10. Fictionalizing historical figures in books, films, science-fiction 11. Geographic and spatial tellings: the influence of space and place in life writing SUBMISSION POLICIES:
    • Participants: Submissions are welcome from ISEB members, non-members, and independent scholars both inside and outside the US.  Graduate students and international scholars are particularly welcome to submit proposals.  Please note that non-members whose proposals are accepted are expected to become members when registering for the conference, in order to be included in the program.
    • In-Person and Virtual Participation: This conference is primarily an in-person space with opportunities for virtual presentation as well. Virtual presentations can only be offered to individual papers and panel presentations. Speakers of virtual presentations should send 15-minute video clips of their presentations no later than Monday, October 2, to ensure a smooth rendition. The speakers should be available on Zoom during the panel sessions to respond to questions. The speakers should be available on Zoom during the panel sessions to respond to questions.  If the entire panel will be virtual, all presenters must designate the same participation mode.  Virtual presenters pay the same conference fee as in-person participants.  While we will do our best to make the presentation process as seamless as possible, technological glitches are always a risk.
    • Format: Submissions should fall into one of four formats—individual papers, panels, roundtable discussions, and poster sessions.  See below for more details.
    • Abstract link: Participants must submit a title and an abstract (no more than 300 words) by June 15, 2023.  Please submit your abstract here.
PRESENTATION TYPES:
    1. Individual Papers: Presentations should be 15-20 minutes long.
    1. Panels: This category is for a 90-minute session comprised of three or four presentations on a common topic.  Each panel should have an organizer responsible for submitting the panel proposal.  The proposal must include 1) a title for the panel and titles of individual presentations, and 2) an abstract (up to 500 words) for the panel.
    1. Roundtable Discussion: This category facilitates interactive discussions of issues pertinent to biographies of all types.  Each roundtable lasts for 90 minutes; the panel may have up to seven members.  The panelists should take no more than 45 minutes to present their views and leave the remaining time for interaction with the audience.  The panel organizer should also serve as the moderator.  The proposal must include 1) a title for the roundtable, and 2) a summary (up to 500 words) describing the perspectives and attitudes panelists have toward the topic.
    1. Poster Sessions: We invite submissions for this popular form of presentation posters, where the presenter displays visually a topic relevant to the conference theme and responds to audience’s questions on the spot.  Guidelines are
    1. Time: 60 minutes
    1. Location: Tables in the conference area
    1. Format: Corrugated display board—trifolds opens to roughly 36” x 48” or rollable posters of similar size
    1. Additional Media (optional): Laptops to share photos and brief videos
FURTHER INFORMATION: For more information, please email smou@depauw.edu or visit https://isebio.com/index.html Contact Info: Dr. Sherry Mou DePauw University Contact Email: smou@depauw.edu *

Representations of Ethnic Deportations from Eastern and Central Europe to the Soviet Union During and After World War I

Deadline: July 15, 2023 Call for Papers We are seeking contributors to a special issue or edited volume on representations of ethnic deportations from Eastern and Central Europe to the Soviet Union (1930-during and after WWII) favoring representations from ethnic minority groups. Articles are not limited to but can focus on:
    • first and second generation memory, postmemory (Hirsch) as expressed in life-writing, literary representations of all genres, art of all genres
    • on “portable monuments” (Rigney), narratives/stories/histories that could be re-written, appropriated, and transformed in new contexts
    • cultural memory and translation, the circulation of memory between places and languages
    • analyses of varied forms of curating memory (online exhibits, traveling exhibits, museums, monuments, installations, performance, anniversaries and commemorations, film, documentaries)
    • how, in the absence of a crystallized, hard memory, the historical documents and the representations analyzed serve as viable examples of soft memory that succeed in memorializing the forced labor camps experience in its collective and individual forms (‘Soft’ and ‘hard’ memory of deportation (Etkind) in collective and individual forms)
    • new English translations of works (poems, songs, diary entrances, letters, postcards, notes, etc.) by ethnic deportees, if they are subject of analysis or commentary and relate to the cluster and do not exceed 5 pages.
Please send up to 1,000-word proposals by July 15, 2023. Contact Info: Anca Luca Holden, aholden@amherst.edu Oana Popescu Sandu opopescusa@usi.edu Contact Email: ancaholden@yahoo.com * Deadline for Submissions July 15, 2022 Hegemony and peripherality in autobiographical writings: texts, contexts, visibility *** XXII Symposium of the Osservatorio scientifico della memoria autobiografica scritta, orale e iconografica                                                              Academia Belgica, Via Omero 8 ROMA 5, 6, 7 December 2023 Promoted and organized by: Mediapolis.Europa ass. cult. http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ and by Grupo de Investigación “Lectura, Escritura, Alfabetización” (LEA), Universidad de Alcalá Seminario Interdisciplinar de Estudios sobre Cultura Escrita (SIECE), Universidad de Alcalá Nowadays, great store is set on autobiographical – and more generally private – documentation. In the past decades, archives for the preservation of documents have multiplied, while it seems to us that studies aimed at examining their forms remain less satisfactory. However, the latter represent an essential aspect that helps us to understand not just the content of a document but the way of forging it, of forging a testimony, and how documents were made transmissible and comparable. Some questions arise in this regard: – Can the texts of authors and writers be subjected to the same methods of formal analysis? – In what way does the concept of hegemony transpire in an autobiographical text? – How can memory be safeguarded and given value? – Can contemporary society be observed through a clear distinction between social classes? What kind of terminology should be adopted to classify them? – How do the works of authors and writers interact? – To what extent has the digital revolution expanded autobiographical practice and how does it transform it? Submitting the various bodies of work to the same methodological criteria regardless of designation by content or social background appears to be a reasonable intent. The history of culture and science teaches us how the move from listing to classification in the 17th century, as illustrated by Foucault (1966: 137-176), made it possible to make scientific data comparable. What follows are some points aimed at suggesting some of the possible outlines around which a line of research can be developed. 1. Recognizing oneself within a minority culture. The issue of hegemonies was addressed by Antonio Gramsci (1975). The observation whereby those who exercise hegemony tend to give conformity to language and every form of expression, therefore making them cohesive and comparable, contrasts with the plurality of minority cultures, which are less inscribable into formal constants. There is a vast body of documentation – illustrated and discussed by Antonio Castillo Gómez (2022), among others – on the many archival initiatives that developed especially at the beginning of the 20th century to preserve these sources, and on their now widely acknowledged importance. It is precisely the spurious origins of these sources that make a formal classification of the texts more difficult, at least at first glance. Unlike authors, writers do not aim to pursue a style, as Barthes points out (1996: 153). Writers should not necessarily be understood as ordinary people. Leonardo da Vinci regarded himself as a writer and not as an author, “not a literary man,” as he defined himself writing to Ludovico il Moro in 1482. He did not know Latin very well, and for this reason he was not regarded as a man of letters. The book Kafka. Toward a Minor Literature (G. Deleuze-F. Guattari, 1975) leads to foundational reflections on this issue, which should constitute a new alphabet for the very conception of the term ‘culture’. In this text Deleuze and Guattari highlight how being without roots, being de-territorialized, leads not to an impoverishment of thought and expressions, but rather to exploring from the margins, from the borders: a distancing that makes it possible to glimpse new lexical, conceptual forms that are open to exchange. Every minority culture (which today have multiplied thanks to the many languages that are circulating, to the multiple forms of coexistence that are necessary in a world in motion) can constitute the instrument required to prevent culture from being ossified into apparatuses. Minority culture develops languages and a conception of space that is labyrinthine, de-confined, thereby suggesting new perspectives. So, who feels legitimized to write? How can experiences that do not come from a canonical style be made well-rounded, rich? In this view, the archives and the written testimonies of ordinary people should not be regarded as mere hunting grounds, but as texts in the strict sense of the term. Chasse aux archives [hunting the archives] is the expression used by Philippe Lejeune to define the voracity for texts from minority and testimonial cultures: “The idea that, within some generations, your texts are tampered with in order to gain information on any subject, without knowing what they are about […] would be disgusting. In order to avoid these misunderstandings, I would strongly emphasize that ‘Hunting is prohibited’”. (Ph. Lejeune 2005: 120-121. The translation is mine). 2. Far from where? In the case of autobiographical writing, it is possible to glimpse a feeling of being or not being part of a hegemonical entity in the position assumed by the subject as it shows itself to be or not be an integral part of a centre or of a periphery. This is not just about a marginality based on social grounds, but more cogently based on a vision of the subject’s own language and culture in their potential to be relevant within a context (Fabio Dei 2018). How does an individual conceive of his or her centrality? Where, when, and how is it possible to circumscribe the position of a writer relaying his or her own life? How does the assumption of a certain stance define an autobiographical narration, legitimise it, structure it also in view of an external glance, of a real, imagined or searched visibility? How does the narrating ‘I’ adopt a perspective of introjection or of extimité, centripetal or centrifugal? Lontano da dove is the title of a book by Claudio Magris (1989). It deals with the drama of thousands of people, their conditions at the time of the crumbling of the powerful Hapsburg Empire. It is a metaphor for the conception of centre and periphery, of hegemony and marginality, of exile as an essential condition. An idea that, starting from a political-cultural analysis, grows into a lexicon, into cultural models, it delineates individual destiny. Magris’s Lontano da dove highlights the difficulty encountered by an individual who, not being part of the hegemonic culture, is observed/observes him/herself and is positioned/positions him/herself as a marginal body. 3. The semantics of the autobiographical text The narrating ‘I’ manifests itself through expressions that testify to its sociocultural and topographical position, and that inscribe it into certain spatial-temporal categories. As George Lakoff and Mark Johnson write (2004 [1980]) in their study Metaphors we live by (see the paragraph “The Me-First Orientation”), our way of narrating is modelled on modi pensandi. A whole cultural conception governs these forms of expression, in which the individual modulates self-narration and relates to the world around him or her. Word order was studied by William Cooper & John Robert Ross (1975). Even the choice of the mother’s or the other’s language and its modelling are cues to the posture of the ‘I’, just as photographs and the ever-widespread selfies signal how self-representation is intended. In other words, in adopting a written or audio-visual register, the ‘l’ allows us to understand how and where it positions itself. Photographic and video images define its autography. Like every form of expression, language is a system composed of relations. In order to understand its meaning, a mapping is necessary, which can be delineated through contents or voids: analysing the use of languages proves to be a tool for outlining not just established but potential relations (L. Hjelmslev 2009). Iconographic expressions such as selfies and those found on the Internet (P. Sibilia 2008) follow the same pattern: showing or not showing reveals a willingness to not just self-narrate in the present but to envision what one would like to be. In the same passage, Hjelmslev argues that language forms itself into a tangle of empty places founded on a veritable difference in potential. 4. The position of the ‘I’ and the language referred to the body An example: in psychiatric patients – who are quintessentially marginal – oral, written and graphic expressions are still closely anchored to the body, to physical actions. Binswanger, a psychiatrist with long-time experience of dialogue with patients, writes: “Out of the blue”, “being in seventh heaven” are expressions of our Dasein, our being. And even though myths and poetry allow us, though a universalizing metaphorical language, to share sensations, feelings and psychic experiences, the “I nonetheless remains the original subject of what raises or falls” (L. Binswanger 2012: 42. The translation is mine). Binswanger, who had inscribed his vision into Heidegger’s philosophy for a long time, gradually distanced himself from his ontological conception to immerse it into concrete cases. An entire vocabulary places the acts of the patient’s Dasein into space: vertiginous height, ascension, altitude, infinity, etc. (L. Binswanger 1971: 237-245). It is possible to suppose that the desire to evade, to disengage, in psychiatric patients determines its lexicon. More generally, in autobiographical writings reference to the body as a vehicle of experiences that crossed it appears to be important. 5. The ‘truth”: what the ‘I’ shows or conceals. Transparency and obstruction The truth is the foundational theme of every autobiography. It can be granted by the pact that the writer makes with the reader. Philippe Lejeune’s work docet (Ph. Lejeune: 1975). The theme of truth powerfully crosses autobiographical writing. Writing about oneself and claiming that it is true implies a pact with a whole series of confirmations and complex manoeuvres. Autofictions intend to escape this criterion. Rousseau’s Confessions, a classic of autobiographical writing, is born as a form of self-externalization that makes uncertainties public in order to justify actions that, within the framework of one’s way of recounting, should be justified. Starobinski calls this attitude ‘transparency and obstruction’.  “Rousseau desired communication and transparency of the heart. But after pursuing this avenue and meeting with disappointment, he chose the opposite course, accepting – indeed provoking – obstructions, which enabled him to withdraw, certain of his innocence, into passive resignation.” (J. Starobinski 1971 : 1. The terms in italics are in the original text). Every kind of writing – and, a fortiori, autobiographical writing – exposes and conceals realities that can nonetheless be glimpsed. In sum, this is Poppea’s veil, which lets us see and not see, thereby raising, demanding more questions than certainties (J. Starobinski 1961). Resolving and understanding the distinction between truth and falsehood requires the use of many coordinates (N. Frogneux 2021); it cannot be submitted to an automatic judgement, either in the historical or in the autobiographical field (see: Carlo Ginzburg, Il filo e le tracce. Vero falso finto 2015). Even adopting a codified language (as Lotman and Bachtin note: see infra) can be a concealment, or an illusion that you can judge a book by its cover. Often, a strong determination to show that the truth is being told is also realized through reference to realia, to what is visible and concrete. In many autobiographies, writers include registry documents. With utmost precision, they mention dates and places in order to make their testimony more believable (B. Barbalato 2009). 6. How writers conceive of hegemony by adopting certain codified forms Lotman writes that a great man or a bandit must find a good reason for regarding himself as an individual who has the right to biography (J. Lotman 1985: 194). Writing life stories, both biographical and autobiographical, requires a formal choice. For this reason, Lotman asserts that a peasant’s opportunistic use of the language of the church or of bureaucracy allows him to inscribe himself into a legitimacy. Also, think of what Bachtin (103) says about unsophisticated culture, about the peasant who, living in an isolated context, believes that every language corresponds exactly to the reality that he wants to designate. The same conviction is shared by André Gide, who asserts that often unsophisticated sources formally represent a copy of the copy (A. Gide 1997 [1926-1950]: 572). Gide dispels the misunderstanding of the authenticity of the document of ordinary people. No writing is spontaneous, let alone the authenticity of those who do not practise writing. The codes to which one resorts can be regarded as a passepartout for the legitimization of one’s own narration and conception of truth, which is thus validated (see A. Castillo Gómez 2016 and V. Sierra Blas 2018). Another important observation by Bachtin concerns the diversity in conceiving and observing a life path today and in antiquity. In antiquity, public and private space was conceived of as one and the same thing. In self-representation there was no difference between an internal self and an external one. The topos was the agora (Ibid.: 279-282). This call for papers invites proposals aimed at examining writers’ and authors’ ways, forms and goals of self-expression, and it intends to investigate mutual contaminations and interferences. Besides what has already been said, particular attention is to be paid to how self-narration presents itself as opening towards the future, how it lets its expectations transpire. In writings there is a quid, a void whose contours, whose latencies are difficult to intercept but nonetheless exist. Wishes are not always openly expressed; often they can be glimpsed between the lines of a text. As Binswanger writes, writing about oneself is a way of letting the future come to oneself. (1971: 261). How can this aspect be interpreted, understood? Michail Bachtin 1979 [1975- Mosca 1955]:1975], “La parola nella poesía e la parola nel romanzo”, 83-108, “La biografía e l’autobiografia antica”, 277-293, in Id., Estetica e romanzo, transl. by Clara Strada Janovic, Torino, Einaudi. Beatrice Barbalato (2009), “L’ipersegnicità nelle testimonianze autobiografiche”, 387-400, in Silvia Bonacchi (ed.), Intr. Anna Tylusińska-Kowalska, Le récit du moi: forme, strutture, modello del racconto autobiografico, in Kwartalnik neofilologiczny, Polska Akademia Nauk, Warsaw 29-30 April 2008. editor: Franciszek Grucza. B. Barbalato-Albert Mingelgrün (eds.) 2012, Télémaque, Archiver et interpréter les témoignages autobiographiques, Louvain-la Neuve, Presses Universitaires de Louvain. Roland Barthes  1998 [“Tel Quel”, 1964], “Écrivains et écrivants”, in Essais critiques, Paris, Seuil. Ludwig Binswanger 1971 [1947], “Le sens anthropologique de la présomption”, 237-245, in Id., Introduction à l’analyse existentielle, translated from the French by Jacqueline Verdeaux and Roland Kuhn, preface by R. Kuhn and Henri Maldiney, Paris, Éd. de Minuit.Rêve et existence 2012 [1930] translation and introduction Françoise Dastur, postface by E. Basso, Paris, Vrin. Antonio Castillo Gómez 2022, “Voix subalternes. Archives et mémoire écrite des classes populaires”, 117-135, in S. Péquignot and Y. Potin (dir.), Les conflits d’archives, France, Espagne, Méditerranée, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes. Daniele Combierati 2010, Scrivere nella lingua dell’altro, Bruxelles, Peter Lang. William Cooper & John Robert Ross 1975, “World order”, 63–111, in R. E. Grossman et al. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Fabio Dei 2018, Cultura popolare in Italia da Gramsci all’Unesco, Bologna, il Mulino.

Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari 1975, Kafka. Pour une littérature mineure, Paris, Éd. De Minuit. Michel Foucault 1966, “Classer”, 137-176, in Id, Les mots et le choses, Paris, Gallimard. Nathalie Frogneux, “Une phénoménologie de la vie mensongère”, in Le Phénomène humain. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 118(4), 2021, 573-591. doi: 10.2143/RPL.118.4.3290142. André Gide 1997, Journal 1926-1950, Paris, Gallimard, vol. II. Carlo Ginzburg 2006), Il filo e le tracce. Vero falso finto, Feltrinelli, Milano. Louis Hjelmslev 1975, Résumé of a Theory of Language. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague, vol. XVI. Copenhague: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag. –        (2009), Teoria del linguaggio. Résumé, = TLR, Vicenza, Terra Ferma, Vicenza. Antonio Gramsci 1975, Quaderni del carcere, 3, Quaderni 12-29, critical edition of the Istituto Gramsci by Valentino Gerratana, Torino, Einaudi. Georges Lakoff, Mark Johnson, 2003 [1980], Metaphors We Live By, Chicago-London, The University of Chicago Press. Philippe Lejeune 1975, Le pacte autobiographique, Paris, Seuil. – “Je ne suis pas une source”, Entretien de Ph. Artières, 115-137, in Id., Signes de vie – Le pacte autobiographique 2, 2, Seuil 2005. Ronan Le Roux, « De quoi jouit l’archiviste ? Méditation certalienne sur le ‘vol d’âme’ », in Elodie Belkorchia, Georges Cuer, Françoise Hiraux (dir.), Du matériel à l’immatérielLa Gazette des archives n°262 (2021-2). Jurij M. Lotman 1985, “Il diritto alla biografia”, in Id., La semiosfera-L’asimmetria e il dialogo nelle strutture pensanti, edited and translated from the Russian by Simonetta Salvestroni, Venezia, Marsilio. Claudio Magris 1989, Lontano da Dove, Joseph Roth e la tradizione ebraico-orientale, Torino Einaudi. Paula Sibilia 2008, O show do eu: a intimidade como espetáculo, Rio de Janeiro, Nova Fronteira. Verónica Sierra Blas 2016, Cartas presas. La correspondencia carcelaria en la Guerra Civil y el Franquismo, Madrid, Marcial Pons. Jean Starobinski 1961, “Le voile de Poppée”, 7-27, in Id, L’oeil vivant, Gallimard, 1961. – Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. Trans. by Arthur Goldhammer. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988. Judging panel: Beatrice Barbalato, Mediapolis.europa ass, cult., Université catholique de Louvain Antonio Castillo Gómez, Universidad de Alcalá Nathalie Frogneux, Université catholique de Louvain Verónica Sierra Blas, Universidad de Alcalá Symposium organized by: Mediapolis.Europa (Irene Meliciani: managing director) Mnemosyne o la costruzione del senso, Presses universitaires de Louvain Grupo de Investigación “Lectura, Escritura, Alfabetización” (LEA), Universidad de Alcalá Seminario Interdisciplinar de Estudios sobre Cultura Escrita (SIECE), Universidad de Alcalá This symposium is part of the research project Vox populi. Espacios, prácticas y estrategias de visibilidad de las escrituras del margen en las épocas Moderna y Contemporánea (PID2019-107881GB-I00), financed by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Spain). Suggestions for sending proposals   The languages admitted for submission are: Italian, Spanish, French, English, Portuguese. Everyone is allowed to write in one of these languages. There will be no simultaneous translation. A passive understanding of these languages is desirable. A) Deadline for submission: 15 July 2023. The abstract will be composed of 250 words (max), with citation of two reference sources, and a brief CV (max: 100 words), with possible mention of two of one’s own publications, be they articles, books, or videos. The judging panel will read and select every proposal, which is to be sent to beatrice.barbalato@gmail.com, antonio.castillo@uah.es For information: beatrice.barbalato@gmail.com, antonio.castillo@uah.es,  irenemeliciani@gmail.com The authors of the accepted proposals will be notified by 30 July 2023. B) Regarding enrolment in the colloquium, once the proposals are accepted the fees are: Before 30 September 2023: 150.00€ From 1 to 30 October 2023:  180.00€ Enrolment fee cannot be accepted in loco For graduate students: Before 30 September 2023: 100.00€ From 1to 30 October 2023:   90.00€ Enrolment fee cannot be accepted in loco Once the programme is established, no change is allowed. For activities related to this topic at the University and cultural centers in Spain see the sites http://www.siece.es/   http://grafosfera.blogspot.com/ For information on the symposia organized in previous years by the Osservatorio della memoria autobiografica  scritta, orale e iconografica, visit the site: http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ * I am leading a seminar on “Metafiction, Autofiction, and Other Metanarrative Forms of Storytelling” at the MSA conference with invited speakers Brian McHale and Josh Toth. Please consider participating. Registration for the MSA opens soon! Additional details below: Modern Studies Association Conference, New York, October 26-29, 2023 Leader:
    • Lissi Athanasiou-Krikelis, Associate Professor, New York Institute of Technology
Invited Participants:
    • Josh Toth, Professor, MacEwan University,
    • Brian McHale, Emeritus, Arts and Humanities Distinguished Professor, Ohio State University
Metafiction, Autofiction, and Other Metanarrative Forms of Storytelling   With three recent publications on metafiction in the last two years—Truth and Metafiction by Josh Toth (2021), Metafiction and the Postwar Novel: Foes, Ghosts, and Faces in the Water by Andrew Dean (2021) and Metafiction by Yaël Schlick (2022)—there is a resurgence of interest in the theory and practice of this literary form, which had fallen from favor after reaching its pinnacle in the eighties. This seminar seeks to explore the various metanarrative facades of fiction, while also expanding perspectives on metanarrative commentary outside verbal storytelling from modernism to postmodernism and beyond. The seminar will attempt to address the following questions. What are the theoretical frameworks that shape metafiction, and what do recent renditions (works by Salvador Plascencia, Hernan Diaz, Susan Choi to name a few) indicate about its development? Is metafiction a self-enclosed hermeneutics, or does it also foreground issues of class, gender, sexuality, or race as seen in novels such as Mat Jason’s Pym? If metafiction is favored by male authorship–as some claim–how do women writers like Margaret Atwood, Clarice Lispector, Amanda Michalopoulou, Rachael Cusk, and others fit in? How is metafiction manifested and what purposes does it serve in specific genres: graphic novels, children’s and young adult fiction, autobiography/memoire/life-writing, poetry, film, or other forms of visual and verbal storytelling? What is the role of metanarrative commentary in popular culture in general? At a time when commercials, documentaries (Netflix: Adams Knows Everything), cartoons (Netflix: A Tale Dark & Grimm), and puppet shows (The Immortal Jellyfish Girl) employ metanarration, it is imperative that we reexamine meta-references across genres. Presenters will have the opportunity to submit their work in a companion on Metafiction, edited by Lissi Athanasiou-Krikelis and Josh Toth, currently under contract with Routledge. Regards, Lissi Athanasiou-Krikelis, Ph.D. Associate Professor of English? Director, Interdisciplinary Studies New York Institute of Technology 16 West 61st Street, Room #608 New York, NY 10023 website: https://lissiathanasioukrikelis.com/ *

The Visual Politics of Borders, Migration and Human Rights in Comics and Graphic Narratives

deadline for submissions:  June 30, 2023 Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association Thursday, October 26 through Sunday, October 29, 2023, Portland, Oregon USA This panel aims to explore the ways in which borders intersect with human rights in graphic narratives, whether in fiction or non-fiction. One of the theoretical frameworks for examining borders could be through the lens of border aesthetics, which considers borders as linguistic, cultural, social, political, and spatial entities that can both enable and exclude. The panel will examine how graphic narratives denaturalize and politicize the current global border regime and bordering practices that invariably reproduce the colonial binaries as well as stereotypes about migrants/refugees. The focus will also be on how graphic narratives may reinforce the exclusionary function of borders or reduce the migrants/refugees into mere abject modes of being. The panel is concerned with how these frictions and changes become manifested in graphic narratives and aims to bring together comics studies on migration and human rights. The panel invites submissions that examine any aspect of human rights violations occurring in or enabled by borders, which are understood as both positive interactions and exclusionary practices. Submissions are welcome on any of the following aspects of comics studies and human rights, as well as broader interpretations of the themes that provide a more detailed understanding of border and migration studies:
    1. Comics form and human rights
    1. Graphic representations of survival
    1. Visual-verbal medium and cultural silencing of migrants/refugees
    1. Narrative mediation and narrative violence in graphic representations
    1. Borders, experiential lives and embodied frames
    1. Gender and Child Rights
    1. Queer and Trans migrations in graphic novels
    1. War zones and the politics of violence
    1. Ethics and politics of representing human rights violations in comics and graphic narratives
    1. Comics, affect and the immigrant
    1. Displacement, disability, dystopia in graphic memoirs
    1. Border aesthetics, frames of recognition and empathy
Please submit abstracts of 250-300 words along with a brief bio (not more than 100 words) via the online submission form available on the PAMLA website. You will have to go to https://pamla.ballastacademic.com to login or create an account first. The deadline to submit abstract proposals is June 30, 2023. The web address for this session’s CFP is: https://pamla.ballastacademic.com/Home/S/18807. For any queries, please reach out to: Leenu Sugathan – leenusugathan@gwu.edu Mohit Abrol – mohitabrol463@gmail.com Important Dates: PAMLA Membership Payment Deadline: Friday, July 1 Abstract Proposal Deadline: Wednesday, June 30, 2023 Late Conference Payment Fee Period: August 21-September 15 (After September 1, those who haven’t paid their membership fees will be removed from the program; after September 15, those who haven’t paid their conference fees will be removed from the program) The Conference (at last!): Thursday, October 26 through Sunday, October 29, 2023 * Deadline for Submissions: June 30, 2023
Diaries in the 20th Century: Testimony, Memory, and Self-Construction University College Dublin, 8-9 December 2023
The diary proved an important form of writing during the 20th century, particularly for its engagement with self-definition and memory. In the early decades of the century, it enabled a new exploration of individual personality influenced by late-nineteenth-centurypsychology and philosophy. It can thus be read as an introspective prism displaying the author’s psychological, moral, and physical evolution in a different light from what would have been conceivable before. Around mid-century, it offered diarists a powerful tool to document and elaborate the trauma of the two wars, the self-threatening policies of totalitarian regimes, and the very physical threat of genocide. This kind of diary is a testimonial object of and against war. In the final decades of the century, diaries were written in an individualistic and expressivist society which increasingly blurred the boundaries between reality and fiction. They could thus become the chosen medium for postmodernist literary experimentation and invite a form of self-construction which is a precursor of (but remains very different from) the instantly public self-accounts of present-day blogs and vlogs.
This two-day conference aims to observe these and other evolutions of the twentieth-century diary, exploring their interplay with traditional assumptions about the diary as a repository of memories, an outlet for feelings, as an embodiment of the self, and a concrete means for its preservation. To this end, we invite scholars working from a wide range of disciplines on diaristic writing from different perspectives, with a particular preference for transnational and comparative approaches. Potential topics for papers include, but are not limited to:
    • Theoretical or historical perspectives on diaristic writing during the 20th century
    • Previously unknown/unpublished twentieth-century diaries
    • Diaries as documents or as literary works
    • Diary as a writing genre: real vs. fictional
    • Diary and affects
    • The body in the diary
    • Diaries as chronicles of introspection/self-talk
    • The diary between personal and collective memory
    • Self-analysis, self-questioning, self-discovery, self-awareness in diaristic writing
    • Communities and mutual influence among diary-writers
    • Comparative studies of twentieth-century diaries
    • Diaries and Cognitive Studies
    • Writing diaries during war periods
    • The diary and the Holocaust
    • The diary as gender writing
The conference will be held in person at UCD to facilitate interaction among panelists, and streamed online to allow for a wider attendance. Four travel grants will be offered for PhD, early-career, and independent researchers who cannot rely on institutional funds. Please send your title, abstract for a 20-minute paper (max 250 words), and short bio (max 100 words) to ucdiaries2023@gmail.com, valeria.taddei@ucd.ie, or m.josi1993@gmail.com, by 30 June. Let us know in your email if you would need to be considered for the travel grant. For any further information please do not hesitate to contact us! All the best, Valeria Taddei and Mara Josi Dr Valeria Taddei (she/her) IRC Government of Ireland Postdoctoral Fellow School of Languages, Cultures and Linguistics University College Dublin Belfield D04 F6X4 Ireland Dr Mara Josi (she/her), Ph.D (Cantab) Lecturer in Italian School of Languages, Arts and Cultures, University of Manchester, UK Oxford Rd. | M13 9PL * The Life Story in Oral History Practice In-person event at the British Library, London, UK Fri 30 June and Sat 1 July, 2023 Bookings are now open for the exciting International Symposium: the Life Story in Oral History Practice at the British Library on Fri 30 June and Sat 1 July. Booking link and full programme here: https://www.bl.uk/events/the-life-story-in-oral-history-practice-a-two-day-international-symposium. Attendance for the whole event is £45, with day passes available too. We promise innovative speakers from across the globe who will reflect on all aspects of life story interviewing, including Alexander Freund, Indira Chowdhury, Alistair Thomson, Doug Boyd, Wendy Rickard, Rob Perks and Don Ritchie. Our special guest on Saturday 1 July is celebrated artist and curator Lubaina Himid, to discuss her life story recording for Artists’ Lives. Join us for cutting edge debate on oral history practice, research and the impact of new technology, lively discussion and the launch of the exciting new website based on oral history: ‘Discovering Science’. The event is open to all, from newcomers to oral history to the most experienced life story practitioners, historians, writers, archivists and curators. We hope to see you there! Mary Stewart Lead Curator, Oral History Director, National Life Stories The British Library 96 Euston Road London NW1 2DB Mary.stewart@bl.uk www.bl.uk/oralhistory www.ohs.org.uk Follow us! @BL_OralHistory * Deadline for submissions: June 19, 2023

Graphic Psychiatry – Exploring Visual Narratives of Mental Health

contact email: rbodol@lsuhsc.edu Call for Papers, panel@ SAMLA 95, taking place on November 9-11, 2023, in Atlanta, GA
Graphic Psychiatry–Exploring Visual Narratives of Mental Health The “Age of Insecurity”  (samla.net/) made mental health a public health concern. From barriers to access to a provider shortage, from soaring suicide rates to supply chain issues that affect the availabilty of ADHD drugs, mental healthcare has become a pervasive topic that affects higher education as well. In this context, the special session sets out to rethink our approaches to ubiquitous visual narratives and iconographies of mental health. For this purpose, we will focus on “Graphic Psychiatry” which here describes a prolific subsection of Graphic Medicine: The term denotes the role that comics/graphic novels can play in healthcare; it is also a shorthand for this area of study and practice. Graphic “Medicine” (“as in the bottled panacea rather than the profession,” I. Williams) is meant to suggest therapeutic potential, both for creators and readers. Comics have been discussed in connection to the history of psychiatry, their graphic pathography or their demonization of psychiatrists, etc. By contrast, graphic novels offer additional types of knowledge. They are book-length narratives, often autobiographical “quest narratives” (A.W. Frank), that depict mental illness, suffering, trauma in their own right. Often, they provide critical insights into treatment, practices, systems and institutions. The first was a wordless novel, Lynd Ward’s The Madman’s Drum, published in 1930, but there has been a proliferation of graphic novels on mental health in the past decade. Examples include Marbles, Rx, Tangles, Lighter Than My Shadow, to name but a few. This special interdisciplinary session invites papers that explore “Graphic Psychiatry” and how it goes beyond “psychiatry as a spectacle” by discussing illness narratives, lived experiences, systemic criticism, as well as pathologies. Additionally, we welcome pedagogy papers on teaching visual narratives of mental health. By June 15, 2023, please submit an abstract of 500 words or less, a brief bio, and any A/V or scheduling requests to Ronja Tripp-Bodola, LSUHSC New Orleans, at rbodol@lsuhsc.edu.
Ronja R. Bodola, Ph.D., M.A. Assistant Professor – Research/Health Humanities Director of Faculty Development, Education and Scholarly Activity Department of Psychiatry School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans 2021 Perdido St Room 6218 New Orleans, LA 70112 (504) 568 2544

Travel and Tourism Studies (Mid-Atlantic Popular/American Culture Assn)

CONFERENCE TO BE HELD November 9-11, 2023 in Philadelphia, PA, USA deadline for submissions:  June 30, 2023 traveltourismmapaca@ymail.com Travel and Tourism Studies as a discipline continues to gain popularity in academia, in part because of its inter-disciplinary nature. The Travel and Tourism area seeks papers that discuss and explore any aspect of travel and/or tourism. Topics for this area include, but are not limited to, the following: – travel and gender/race/class – travel and religion – travel and war – personal travel narratives – heritage tourism – material culture and tourism ***VIRTURAL Travel and Tourism! How has lockdown affected travel around the globe?*** Please feel free to consider a wide range of materials, texts and experiences. Applicants are encouraged to consider multi-media (or other alternative format) presentations if those formats would better suit their topics, and may also propose 3- or 4-person panels and roundtables. Submit a brief (300 words) abstract at mapaca.net by June 30, ’23. Students (both undergraduate and graduate) and independent scholars are encouraged to apply. Please feel free to send questions to Jennifer Erica Sweda traveltourismmapaca@ymail.com * CALL FOR PAPERS Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics Imprisoned ‘Self’: Narratives of Loss, Guilt, Transformation Guest Editor: Ayan Chakraborty (Jawaharlal Nehru University, India) Deadline for Submissions: June 30, 2023 Prison narratives have, quite recently, emerged as an exciting genre of literary studies in academia. While the concept of imprisonment has always invited a substantial focus within sociological studies, it had marginally to do either with the deeper exploration of the ‘imprisoned self’ or the ‘narratology’ (the logic of the narrative) about the experiences recorded by the prisoner. With life in the prison succeeding in drawing interest from literary critics, different approaches have been proposed to study language and experiences (in terms of wording) to look at the representation of the self and the various expressions of pain, agony, guilt, transformation, and even liberation. Some of them consider looking at these narratives from a more political understanding of the ‘imprisoned self’ about society and power, while a few others explore how language mediates between the author’s ‘reflection’/ ‘realization’ of their self through deeply intense drives like those of melancholia, loss, and suffering or glimpses of transcendental joy that creates a deeper understanding of the ethereal and the personal. The model of the prison has changed over the centuries. While in the European continent, prisons were directly an expression of the ‘will’ of the monarch, it had much to do with the relations of sovereignty and law. However, it is interesting to note that, as Thomas S Freeman points out in his “The Rise of Prison Literature,” prisons of the middle ages and early modernity were structural edifices that symbolized an offense against the divine through a violation of the ‘law’ of the monarch itself (the monarch being a representative of divinity on earth). The prisoner was,  therefore, equivalent to the status of a heretic. Similar ideas can be found within Southern and Central Asiatic regions as well. With the rise of the liberal state, the prisoner was depicted as an ‘outlaw,’ an embodiment of violence and violation of the generic social imagination and to ‘social contract’ in particular. Michel Foucault, in his seminal The Birth of the Prison, delineates how the system of control and incarceration shifted in its objective and technique from the body and the ‘spectacle’ to the ‘mind’ and the need for ‘secrecy.’ Through a system, the prisoner’s self is inevitably a part of political interpellation, marginality, and social gaze. These ideas, though sociological, become an integral part of the prisoner’s self in their understanding of society and their relation to it. Hence, the prisoner, in all personal experiences, is a political being. As much as narratives from political prisoners, revolutionaries, and victims of racial, sexual, colonial, and economic conflicts have recorded intense moments which look at the ‘dissolution’ of the self under psychological crisis, there are instances that constructed a metaphysical idea of the ego of the prisoner that almost absorbed the world into a supernatural unity. These narratives, in their structure and intention, vary radically across symbols and semantics. This issue calls for papers that engage with language, experience, and the self (of the prisoner), study nuances of intention and expression, and explore the relation between a private subject under political scrutiny through prison narratives. To contribute to this special issue, please submit the full manuscript of your article (no less than 4,000 words) with a short author’s bio to the guest editor Ayan Chakraborty at cayan2595@gmail.com, with a copy to jclaindia@gmail.com. You are welcome to ask any questions about submission or the topic you will select. Important Dates: Submission deadline: 30 June 2023; Decision of acceptance: 31 July 2023; Publication of the issue: Autumn 2023/ Winter 2023. ABOUT THE JOURNAL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Comparative_Literature_and_Aesthetics The Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics (ISSN: 0252-8169) is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal published by Vishvanatha Kaviraja Institute of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, India, since 1977. The Institute was founded by Prof. Ananta Charan Sukla (1942-2020) on 22 August 1977, coinciding with the birth centenary of renowned philosopher, aesthetician, and historian of Indian art Ananda K. Coomaraswamy (1877-1947) to promote interdisciplinary studies and research in comparative literature, literary theory and criticism, aesthetics, philosophy, art history, criticism of the arts, and history of ideas. (Vishvanatha Kaviraja, most widely known for his masterpiece in aesthetics, Sahityadarpana, or the “Mirror of Composition,” was a prolific 14th-century Indian poet, scholar, aesthetician, and rhetorician.) The Journal is committed to comparative and cross-cultural issues in literary understanding and interpretation, aesthetic theories, and conceptual analysis of art. It publishes current research papers, review essays, and special issues of critical interest and contemporary relevance. The Journal has published the finest of essays by authors of global renown like René Wellek, Harold Osborne, John Hospers, John Fisher, Murray Krieger, Martin Bocco, Remo Ceserani, J.B. Vickery, Menachem Brinker, Milton Snoeyenbos, Mary Wiseman, Ronald Roblin, T.R. Martland, S.C. Sengupta, K.R.S. Iyengar, Charles Altieri, Martin Jay, Jonathan Culler, Richard Shusterman, Robert Kraut, Terry Diffey, T.R. Quigley, R.B. Palmer, Keith Keating, and many others. JCLA is indexed and abstracted in the MLA International Bibliography, Master List of Periodicals (USA), Ulrich’s Directory of Periodicals, ERIH PLUS, The Philosopher’s Index (Philosopher’s Information Center), EBSCO, ProQuest (Arts Premium Collection, Art, Design & Architecture Collection, Arts & Humanities Database, Literature Online – Full Text Journals, ProQuest Central, ProQuest Central Essentials), Abstracts of English Studies, WorldCat Directory, ACLA, India Database, Gale (Cengage Learning), Bibliography History of Art (BHA), ArtBibliographies Modern (ABM), Literature Online (LION), Academic Resource Index, Book Review Index Plus, OCLC, Periodicals Index Online (PIO), Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers, CNKI, PhilPapers, Google Scholar, Expanded Academic ASAP, Indian Documentation Service, Publication Forum (JuFo), Summon, J-Gate, United States Library of Congress, New York Public Library, and the British Library. The journal is also indexed in numerous university (central) libraries, state, and public libraries, and scholarly organizations/ learned societies databases. Celebrated scholars of the time like René Wellek, Harold Osborne, Mircea Eliade, Monroe Beardsley, John Hospers, John Fisher, Meyer Abrams, John Boulton, and many renowned foreign and Indian scholars were Members of its Editorial Board. Founding Editor: Ananta Charan Sukla,Vishvanatha Kaviraja Institute, India Email: jclaindia@gmail.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/jclasukla Contact Info: Viraj Shukla Publishing Assistant Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics Contact Email: jclaindia@gmail.com URL: http://jcla.in * Call for Papers ‘Dieu et mon droit (God and my right)’: representations of the British royal family in popular culture deadline for submissions:  June 30, 2023 PopCRN (the UNE Popular Culture Network) are exploring the concept of royalty with a virtual symposium focused on the representations of the British royal family in popular culture to be held online on Thursday 28th & Friday 29th September 2023. The British monarchy has played a leading role in various ways over the last millennium of world history and as such have been frequently depicted in popular culture from the plays of Shakespeare to the extensive coverage in popular magazines. We welcome papers from researchers across the academic spectrum, and encourage papers from postgraduate researchers and early career researchers. Presenters will have the opportunity to publish a refereed book chapter in a book published in 2024. Topics can include, but are not restricted to:
    • We are not amused – Royal reactions to popular events
    • In the words of one of my more sympathetic correspondents, it has turned out to be an annus horribilis – The intersections of the private and public lives of royalty
    • I do not want a husband who honours me as a queen, if he does not love me as a woman – Love and British royalty
    • I’d like to be queen of people’s hearts – The rhetorical power of royal themes
    • The king is dead, Long live the king – British royals past, present and future
    • I think the relations between the monarchy and the press is very much a two-way street. Anthony Holden – Reporting the royals
    • Spencer – Diana and the gothic
    • Diana, The peoples’ princess – Royalty and celebrity
    • The real intelligence in the royal family comes through my parents to Prince Philip and the children. (Lord Mountbatten) – Celebrity royal children
    • The Crown – Royal representations in film and television
    • Princess for a day – Royal wedding dresses and royal wedding culture
    • I myself prefer my New Zealand eggs for breakfast (Queen Elizabeth II) Royal food and wine
    • Fashioning a Queen – Royal fashion, then and now
    • Men fight wars. Women win them – The powerful Queen in the patriarchal institution
    • I know what my job was; it was to go out and meet the people and love them. (Princess Diana) – The working royal
    • The important thing is not what they think of me, but what I think of them – Royal views of the general public
    • I know I have but the body of a weak and feeble woman; but I have the heart of a king, and of a king of England, too – Representations of royal gender
    • A horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse – Shakespearian depictions of royalty
    • All my birds have flown – The ridiculed royal
    • I have as much privacy as a goldfish in a bowl. (Princess Margaret) – The public gaze and celebrity
    • Let not poor Nelly starve – Royal mistresses
    • Alvanley, who’s your fat friend? – Royalty and friends
    • Was ‘arold, with eyeful of arrow,  On ‘is ‘orse, with ‘is ‘awk in ‘is ‘and – Representations of royalty in folktales
    • You have sent me a Flanders mare ­– Royal marriages of convenience in popular culture
    • I find doing speeches nerve wrecking (Kate Middleton) – Performing royalty
    • I have found it impossible to carry the heavy burden of responsibility and to discharge my duties as king as I would wish to do without the help and support of the woman I love – The reluctant royal
    • When I am dead and opened, you shall find ‘Calais’ lying in my heart – Royal concerns of conquest and loss
    • Camelot – The American fixation with the British Royals
    • It is as Queen of Canada that I am here. Queen of Canada and all Canadians, not just one or two ancestral strains (Queen Elizabeth II) – The Royals in the colonies
    • You have to give this much to the Luftwaffe: when it knocked down our buildings it did not replace them with anything more offensive than rubble. We did that. (Prince Charles) – The Royals and war
    • For Portraits to Pop – Queen Elizabeth as a cultural icon
    • Value for money – The Royals and the British economy
    • Royal fever – The Royals and consumer culture
    • They’re changing guards at Buckingham Place – The Royals in children’s literature
    • For a time during the 1980s the Royal Family were not just the most influential family in Britain but probably in Europe and Prince Charles specifically was very much like a defacto Cabinet member and what he said actually had impact on public policy (Andrew Morton) – The Royals and No. 10
    • I should like to be a horse (Queen Elizabeth II) – British royals and animals
    • One day I’m going up in a helicopter and it’ll just blow up. M15 will do away with me. (Princess Diana). Royal conspiracies
    • The state is nothing but an instrument of oppression of one class by another – no less so in a democratic republic than in a monarchy. (Friedrich Engels) – The royals and the British class system
Please email abstracts (200 words) to popcrn@une.edu.au by 31/6/23. Please include your name, affiliation, email address, title of paper and a short biography (100 words). Registration is free. * Deadline for submissions: July 1, 2023 CFP–Global Crises Cultures: Representing Refugees in the 21st Century eds. Dr Katie Brown (Exteter) and Dr Peter Sloane (Buckingham) Although it is only since 2015 that the phenomena of mass forced displacement has warranted the term ‘crisis’, the pre-existing social, cultural, economic, and military conditions for that were exacerbated by the US led War on Terror which begin in 2001, after the attacks on the World Trade Centre. A 2020 report by Brown University’s Cost of War Project estimated ‘that at least 37 million people have fled their homes in the eight most violent wars the U.S. military has launched or participated in since 2001’ (Vine et al. 2020, 1). During the same period, rising instability in Central and South America (notably the Northern Triangle and Venezuela) has led to record numbers of internally and externally displaced persons, while ongoing conflicts in Africa have created over 30 million refugees. Encouraged by the sheer number of people (almost 1% of global population), Guy S. Goodwin-Gill argues that ‘the refugee problem cannot be considered apart from the field of human rights as a whole’ (2014, 43). Indeed, stripped of the legal protections afforded by a nation state, the refugee represents the limit case for human rights precisely because, as Hannah Arendt has it, a refugee is a person who has ‘lost all other qualities and specific relationships – except that they [are] still human’ (1979, 299). The surging volume of displaced persons and their treatment by possible host nations provokes equally vital questions about how human beings conceive of themselves as part of a common humanity, a sense of species as opposed to polity belongingness. Claude Levi-Strauss observedhalf a century ago that‘the notion of humanity, which includes without distinction of race or civilization all the forms of the human species, appeared very late and in a limited way’ (1976, 329). These limitations become starkly apparent in refugee fictions, poetry, film, literary journalism, and life writing of the 21st century, which capture not simply the predictable brutalities of despotic regimes, but the overt border violence and inhumanity of the democratic states which they imagine as places of sanctuary. During the past decade, several important anthologies have addressed the issue of refugeehood in the present. Agnes Woolley’s wonderful Contemporary Asylum Narratives: Representing Refugees in the Twenty-First Century (Palgrave, 2014), Lava Asaad’s edited collection, Literature with A White Helmet: The Textual-Corporeality of Being, Becoming, and Representing Refugees (Routledge, 2019), as well as Mike Classon Frangos and Sheila Ghose’s Refugee Genres: Essays on the Culture of Flight and Refuge (Palgrave, 2022) have drawn attention to cultures of crises in the contemporary period. Working within this context while expanding and advancing the discussions instigated in these works, Cultures of Crises will bring together both established scholars and new critical voices working across the humanities to produce a truly global study of the current period of mass migrations, with essays on movements in Ukraine, Southern and Central America, through the Middle East and Sudan, to Myanmar. While the stories themselves are of key concern, the collection will be formally wide-ranging, exploring refugee’s experiences across fiction, life writing, creative non-fiction, film, poetry, and the visual arts more broadly. Of particular interest are studies that explore multiple texts, multiple themes, and multiple locations, as opposed to single text or single author studies. Given the proliferation of prose fiction studies, preference may also be given to those essays which focus on other forms. The proposed book will be divided into three parts: Prose Fiction and Poetry; Life Writing; Visual Arts. This CFP invites abstracts of 300 words accompanied by a short biography to be submitted to culturesofcrises@gmail.com by July 1st 2023. Final essays of 6-8000 words will be due by September 30th 2024. Eds: Dr Katie Brown is Senior Lecturer in Latin American Studies at the University of Exeter. She is the author of Writing and the Revolution: Venezuelan Metafiction 2004-2012 (2019), and co-editor of Crude Words: Contemporary Writing from Venezuela (2016) and Escribir afuera: Cuentos de intemperies y querencias (2021). Dr Peter Sloane is Senior Lecturer in English at the University of Buckingham, UK. He is the author of Narrative Displacement: Refugees in 21st Century Fiction and Life Writing (Liverpool University Press, 2025), Kazuo Ishiguro’s Gestural Poetics (Bloomsbury, 2021), David Foster Wallace and the Body (Routledge, 2019), and editor of ReFocus: The Films of Claire Denis (Edinburgh University Press, 2023), and (with K. Shaw) Kazuo Ishiguro: Twenty-First-Century Perspectives (Manchester University Press, 2023).
*
Deadline for submissions: July 1, 2023 Call for Papers  VERSIONS OF THE AFTERLIFE 7th December 2023 Online Conference Between Matthew’s description of heaven as a wedding (22 1-14) – most memorably delivered by Jesus in Martin Scorsese’s The Last Temptation of Christ – and Jean Paul Sartre’s verdict that “hell is other people,” there is not only a gap of centuries but also cultures and religions.[1] Despite their disparity, however, both conceptualizations render the fundamental human anxiety related to the weighty question of “what comes next?” They point to the necessity of envisaging the unfamiliar through the familiar, thereby taming the terrifying void. Versions of the afterlife, therefore, are not only related to the need to imagine the hereafter in the sense of Heaven, Hell and Purgatory (for the Catholics), but also to the contemporary notions of “post-theory”, such as post-humanism and the ideas of postmodernism, post-feminism, post-colonialism and post-nationalism. The aim of this conference organized by the Faculty of English at Adam Mickiewicz University, in Poznan, Poland – and co-hosted with the Faculty of Philosophy, AMU, and the Poznań Chapter of the Agder Academy of Social Sciences and Letters – is to explore and discuss the literal, the literary and the metaphorical meanings of the notion of “the afterlife”. We welcome papers representing the humanities in their conceptualizations and literary reifications of the religious, medical and political “hereafters”. Literature (in English) / Art
    • Literary narratives on the hereafter across cultures and religions
    • Saints’ lives and visions
    • Theatre and the drama of/on the hereafter
    • Gothic literature and the visions of the afterlife
    • Literary visions and versions of post-apocalyptic reality
    • Artistic representations of the afterlife: Imaging the hereafter
    • The afterlives of theory: post-humanism and the ideas of postmodernism, post-feminism, etc.
    • The afterlives of ideologies, doctrines, political systems as represented in literary works (post-nationalism, post-colonialism, etc.)
    • The afterlives of literary texts and their authors: adaptations, rewritings, etc.
Medical Humanities / Social Sciences (in literary texts in English)
    • The moment of passing
    • The mystery of one’s body shutting down
    • Marketing death and the life after death
    • Out-of-body experience
    • End-of life dreams and visions versus science
Theology / Ethics (in literary texts in English)
    • Versions of the afterlife from the earliest records to contemporary times across cultures and religions
    • Ars moriendi (good endings vs bad endings)
    • Secular / atheist alternatives for life after death
300-400 word abstracts should be sent to BOTH afterlifewaconference@gmail.com and kbronkk@amu.edu.pl by 1st July 2023. Notifications of acceptance will be sent by the end of August 2023. There will be no fees for conference participation, but active and passive participants need to register in advance.

“Narratives of Displacement” International Conference

28-29 October 2023 – London/Online organised by

London Centre for Interdisciplinary Research

Deadline for Submissions 15 June 2023  The conference seeks to explore the narratives of displacement and to demonstrate the validity of a cross-disciplinary approach which brings together the historical, cultural, social and literary expertise in the handling of text. The conference will particularly focus on time and space representations and on treatment of the theme of cultural ambivalence and identity conflict. The subject of displacement will be regarded as both a migration, voluntary or forced, and a sense of being socially or culturally “out of place”. Papers are invited on topics related, but not limited, to:
    • migrations and deportations (expatriation, expulsion, exile, etc.)
    • journeys, pilgrimages, missions
    • mobility and place
    • rootlessness and taking root
    • foreignness and indigeneity
    • (re)settlement and (non)residence
    • nomadism and place attachment
    • hotels, guesthouses, shelters
    • multiculturalism, interculturalism, transculturalism
    • strangerhood and neo-cosmopolitanism
Submissions may be proposed in various formats, including:
    • Individually submitted papers (organised into panels by the committee)
    • Panels (3-4 individual papers)
    • Posters
The conference aims to bring together scholars from different fields. We invite proposals from various disciplines including history, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, culture studies, media studies, political science, law, architecture, tourism, religious studies, literature, linguistics, psychology, etc. Proposals up to 250 words should be sent by 15 June 2023 to: displacement@lcir.co.uk. Download Paper proposal form. Registration fee (online participation) – 90 GBP Registration fee (physical participation) – 150 GBP Provisional conference venue: Birkbeck College, University of London * Deadline for submissions: June 15, 2023

Imaginative kin-making. Narrating alternative forms of kinship in survival literature and fiction.

XXXI AIA Conference Rende, Cosenza, 13-16 September 2023 Associazione Italiana di Anglistica Call for proposals for panel Convenors: R. Ciocca (Università di Napoli L’Orientale) and Marta Cariello (Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli)  In Making Kin in the Chthulucene: Reproducing Multispecies Justice (2018), Donna Haraway engaged in the thorny question of survival for a planet already fast travelling towards its demographic and environmental collapse. She addressed the question from a critical post-human and post-anthropocentric stance, affirming the need to reintroduce the practice of caring for the earth at every scale, and to fight against the current mass extinction of species, from the complex perspective of both ‘the Born and the Disappeared’. She meant, by this, not to disjoint the (apparently opposed) necessities of guaranteeing reproductive justice and safety for peoples subjected to genocides, forced sterilizations, missing generations, and at the same time of finding ways to reverse the general population growth. Since the intersection between reproduction justice and environmental concerns is intimately connected to the human capacity to reverse spoliative policies of natural resources and habitats, in a pro-active sense, the feminist philosopher posed the personal and theoretical question of how to lighten our species footprint by creating innovative and enduring relationships without necessarily ‘making more babies’. Taking the cue from this need to engage scary demographic perspectives, we’d like to explore narrations in which the idea of survival is connected to new forms of ‘becoming-with’, of ‘symbiotic assemblages’, or, also, of making kin, making new families as something other/more than entities tied by genealogy or biological bonds, together with the possibilities of lateral, transversal and exogenous adoption practices. We are especially interested in inviting submissions tackling the role of these alter-families and alter-communities in coping with forced migrancy, ethnic or racial cleansing and climate change induced crises. Proposals are welcome from a number of different genre languages which include, but are not limited to, novels, poetry, drama, personal essays, memoirs, film, tv series, and other storytelling practices. Some References Rosi Braidotti and Simone Bignall ,(eds.) Posthuman Ecologies. Complexity and Process after Deleuze, New York, London, Rowman and Littlefield, 2019. Lawrence Buell, The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2005. Adele E. Clarke and Donna Haraway (eds), Making Kin Not Population, Chicago, Prickly Paradigm Press, 2018. Lidia Curti (a cura di) Femminismi futuri. Teorie/Poetiche/Fabulazioni. Roma, Iacobelli, 2019. María Puig de la Bellacasa, Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2017. Donna J. Haraway, The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness, Chicago, Prickly Paradigm, 2003. Marco Malvestio, Raccontare la fine del mondo: Fantascienza e Antropocene. Milano, Nottetempo, 2021. Rob Nixon, Slow violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 2011. Sara Upstone and Peter Ely (eds.), Community in Contemporary British Fiction. From Blair to Brexit London, Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. Deadline for proposals: 15 June 2023 Send abstracts and bio to: rcio *

Borders and Crossings: an interdisciplinary conference on travel writing

5-7 July 2023, Łódź, Poland Deadline for Submissions: May 31, 2023 Due to unforeseen circumstances outside of the organiser’s control, Borders and Crossings 2023 has additional room for presenters and the call for papers has been reopened to allow maximum participation from across the Arts and Humanities. The 2023 edition of Borders and Crossings takes place in the unique context of Łódź: a post-industrial city situated in the wider European political and economic context, and which epitomises ‘borders and crossings’ in several ways. First, Łódź was called ‘the city of four cultures’ and until WWII was inhabited by people of Polish, Jewish, German, and Russian origin, as well as minorities, with their respective languages, religions, processes of assimilation or cultural isolation, and inward and outward migrations. Second, the city’s industrial history and built environment is founded on forms of travel: migration for industrial employment; the movement of ideas, technologies, and capital within trans-European and trans-Atlantic industrial networks; and movements for social change. Third, the city’s dynamic expansion in the 19th century converged with its occupation by foreign powers, engaging discussion on imperialism, shifting borders, political change, and identity. With this in mind, we invite proposals related to the contexts mentioned above, but also, as is customary at Borders and Crossings, contributions concerning other theoretical and practical aspects of travel writing. Proposals can reflect on, but are by no means limited to, the following themes: ●    Travel writing and the industrial city ●    Representations of travel to/from/around Poland ●    Central Europe or Eastern Europe? Geographical and cultural identities in travel writing ●    East-West interactions ●    Imperialism and travel; indigenous voices ‘writing back’ and decolonisation ●    Travel writing and the self/other ●    Travel and conflict ●    Representations of space and place in travel writing ●    Travel and translation ●    Travel and class/gender/sexuality ●    Travel writing and eco-criticism/nature writing ●    Theories of travel and travel writing ●    The history of travel and/versus tourism ●    The craft and practice of travel writing ●    Travel journalism, guidebooks, digital media, social media ●    Travel writing and other media (film, photography, illustrations, etc.) ●    Non-places and spaces of transit ●    Travel rest and stopovers ●    Modes of transport and points of view ●    Travel and pandemics/disease This event is open to academics, postgraduate researchers, and practitioners (inside and outside of academia) interested in travel writing from a broad range of perspectives. The aim of this conference is to showcase the interdisciplinarity of travel writing studies and the event welcomes proposals from but not restricted to literary studies, mobility and tourism studies, history, geography, creative writing, environmental studies, translation theory and practice, among others. Proposals are not restricted to any period of time or geographical context. Further information on the Borders and Crossings conference series can be found at https://bordersandcrossings23.wordpress.com/.  Although we wish for all participants to be able to attend the conference in Łódź, the conference is hybrid so that participants unable to travel can still present their paper. The conference fee is 60 euro for regular participants and 45 euro for PhD researchers. We invite proposals for 20-minute papers and 60-minute panels of three speakers. Proposals of approximately 250 words (up to 500 words for a panel), accompanied by a short biographical note, should be sent to: bordersandcrossings23@gmail.com. Deadline for proposals: 31 May 2023 Organising committee: Joanna Kruczkowska (University of Łódź) and Ross Cameron (University of Glasgow/University of Strathclyde). Contact Email: bordersandcrossings23@gmail.com URL: https://bordersandcrossings23.wordpress.com/ * DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS JUNE 5 Dear IABA List Members, We are working on Biography’s annual annotated bibliography of critical and theoretical works on life writing, the most extensive reference of its kind, and before finalizing it, we want to make sure it is as timely, inclusive, and extensive as possible. If last year (from January to December 2022) you published, edited, or coedited a book; wrote an article for a journal or an essay for an edited collection; or completed your doctoral dissertation, we would appreciate having that information, so that we can incorporate it into the list. (We may have already included it, but this will make sure your work is noted.) We are also interested in lifewriting-focused podcasts or other media, excluding individual presentations or talks. We would request the following information: ·  Full bibliographic information for each text, formatted according to MLA 9 style ·  A one-sentence annotation per text We are especially committed to noting publications in languages other than English. If you could provide an annotation in English, however, that would be helpful. We would appreciate getting the information by Monday, June 5. Please send your information to Caroline Zuckerman (gabiog@hawaii.edu). Thanks in advance. This bibliography usually has between 1,400 and 1,500 entries, and represents the most extensive annual critical survey of the field. We want to make sure your work appears within it. — Caroline Zuckerman Editorial Assistant and Reviews Editor The Center for Biographical Research Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly 1960 East-West Road Biomed B104 Honolulu, HI 96822 Tel: (808) 956-3774 Email: gabiog@hawaii.edu * IO website. * Call for Papers for an Edited Volume (eds. Poonam Bala and Russel Viljoen) Travel Writings and Medical Encounters in the Colonial World Deadline for Abstracts–May 31, 2023 While several European naturalists, doctors travelled to tropical colonies to discover indigenous flora and fauna of medicinal value, their movement also enabled the formation of medical nexuses through various trade routes; the latter provided a cogent medium through which the collected knowledge could be re-located within the European metropoles. Placed in the context of medical humanities, these movements have opened an array of possibilities to study, analyse and recover the medical pasts of indigenous and colonial societies. The genre of travel writing preceded by the production and proliferation of travel texts by literate individuals saw the accumulation of data gathered by travellers during the 18th and 19th centuries. These writings, no doubt, revealed ideas of colonial and expansionist policies as well as imperial prowess which could vindicate colonial expansion and territorial acquisitions. Travel writings in the form of various handwritten notes, descriptions, reference to indigenous healers and sketches depicting medical encounters as written texts included reference to indigenous medical practice, cures, medicines, disease and illnesses and various interpretations of indigenous medicine, healers vis-à-vis their western counterpart. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, in particular, these explicated the rhetoric of colonialism and its expanse in the colonised communities. Travel narratives of physicians also reveal their first hand experience with slaves, slavery and the process of enslavement including encounters, resistance, medical inspections, illness, while also including medical treatment provided thereof. The  creation of a new discourse on racism and inequality also opened up issues of power over the discourse of slavery and slave narratives. The proposed volume will examine modalities of disease causation, explanation and their trajectory as a result of interaction with colonial communities in colonized settings around the world. As trained doctors, these male individuals, of European descent often engaged indigenous communities via interpreters or as observers, in order to obtain information about indigenous medical practices, treatment of disease, the relationship between disease and death, sin and sicknesses. We, therefore, seek to produce a collection that traces the “hidden” medical histories of colonized communities derived and gleaned from travel texts, which will enable an understanding of the trajectory of indigenous medical pasts and how they were shaped and re-defined as a result. Understanding the contributions of African and European doctors in the creation of a pharmaceutical industry, natural history and surgical enhancements is an important aspect of this trajectory. Chapter contributions will focus on the following themes, but not limited to these: Historiography, travel writing, medicine and disease studies Travelogues and the social (re)construction of medical pasts Travel scientists, doctors and biographies Indigenous medicine and healing practices in Travelogues Medical travel expeditions Women writers, gender and medicine Travel texts, epidemics/disease and indigenous communities Scientific institutions as sponsors of colonial expeditions Slave narratives and black travel writing Medicine and knowledge in the slave trade Interested scholars may please send an abstract of 250 words with relevant keywords, institutional affiliation and brief biography to Prof. Poonam Bala (p.bala@csuohio.edu)  and  Prof. Russel Viljoen (viljors@unisa.ac.za) by 31 May 2023. Completed draft chapter submissions of 7500 words should be submitted latest by 31 October 2023. Contact Info: Prof. Poonam Bala, Professor Extraordinarius, UNISA (South Africa) and Visiting Scholar, Clevelad State University (Ohio) * Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Austrian Centre for Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage (ACDH-CH) 26-27 September 2023 Life Narrative and the Digital: An Interdisciplinary Conference and Workshop
  • In what ways can digital methods and technologies aid the study and analysis of biographical data?
  • How can the digital help us devise innovative pathways to the representation of historical individuals’ lives? (e.g. digital platforms)
  • To what extent do digital formats of life narration tie in with new trends in auto/biographical scholarship and practice? (e.g. metabiography, relational biography, persona studies, group biography, object biography, etc.)
  • How do we deal with uncertainty and the issue of data quality in the digital representation of biographical data?
The event will feature both a workshop and a conference track. The workshop (26 September) will be dedicated to short presentations of work-in-progress, with a strong focus on tools, technologies, software, and methods, and with an emphasis on feedback and exchange. The conference (27 September) follows a conventional format, with a mix of research papers and panel discussions, and will be open to the public. Participation in both formats is free of charge. We invite proposals of max. 500 words via OpenReview (https://bit.ly/digital-bio-2023) for 15-minute (workshop) OR 20-minute (conference) contributions by 26 May 2023. For more information, please consult our conference website, or contact us at amp@oeaw.ac.at. Timo Frühwirth, Dimitra Grigoriou, Sandra Mayer * Deadline for submissions: May 31, 2023

PAMLA Veterans Studies Panel

contact email:  deborah.daley@uky.edu Veterans Studies is a growing field of research that addresses the significant impact of military personnel transitioning from active duty to civilian life with an emphasis on the veteran experience. This panel invites papers that explore various aspects of military service and/or the veteran experience, including those that reflect the conference theme of “Shifting Perspectives.” This session invites papers that explore the many facets of military life exhibited in literature, theater, film, and poetry written about or by military veterans as well as scholarly explorations of the veteran experience. Some topics of particular interest include but are not limited to: · Transition from military service · Perceptions or conceptualizations of veteran identity · Reintegration · Systems and experiences which shape veterans’ post-military experiences · Interdisciplinary approaches to veterans studies · Commemoration, memorialization, memory The conference will take place from Thursday, October 26 through Sunday, October 29, 2023 in Portland, Oregon. Potential presenters should submit abstract proposals using the online submission form (you will have to go to https://pamla.ballastacademic.com to login or create an account first). The deadline to submit presentation proposals is May 31, 2023. For more information about the PAMLA conference, please go to https://www.pamla.org/conference/. * Call for Papers for Special Focus Section (January 2025) Refugee Voices in Contemporary Literature Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature Deadline for Submissions: June 1, 2023 This special focus section of Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature highlights the ways refugee authors tell stories of displacement, while engaging with issues of representation, authenticity, voice, the politics of refuge and humanitarianism, and the paradigms of victimhood and rescue. In response to the “problem-oriented approach to refugees,” the growing interdisciplinary field of critical refugee studies (CRS) aims to highlight the resilience and creativity of refugee communities: “a humane and ethical site of inquiry that re-conceptualizes refugee lifeworlds not as a problem to be solved by global elites but as a site of social, political and historical critiques that, when carefully traced, make transparent processes of colonization, war, and displacement” (https://criticalrefugeestudies.com/). This framework and others reframe analyses of literature of displacement: to complicate traditional paradigms of victimhood and rescue (critique of humanitarianism), present nontraditional figures of refugee affect (e.g. the “ungrateful refugee,” Dina Nayeri), excavate additional knowledge of refugee experiences, and shift focal points from suffering to resilience. Considering the continued relevance of refugees as those who are both “invisible and hypervisible” (Nguyen 15), this special issue seeks to remedy the imposed “condition of voicelessness” of those who have been displaced by highlighting their narratives (Soguk 294). The contributions to this issue should engage with critical frameworks that center the creative work of refugee authors and artists, while acknowledging the complexity of what it means to be displaced in the contemporary era. The editors welcome articles that explore topics and concepts related to the opening of critical refugee studies in German Studies as well as in Francophone and Hispanic cultural production, and comparative studies. Themes for contributions may include, but are not limited to:
  • figures of displacement and placelessness
  • intertwined histories of flight, colonialism, and imperialism
  • gratitude and the “ungrateful refugee” (Dina Nayeri)
  • the “good” refugee
  • concepts of livability
  • refugee refusal
  • technology and flight
  • the place of the camp
  • statelessness, human rights and refugee rights in literature
  • forced displacement and intersections of Indigenous studies and refugee studies
Please submit an abstract of 350-500 words along with a brief biography to Kathryn Sederberg (ksederbe@kzoo.edu) and Rebekah Slodounik (ras073@bucknell.edu) by June 1, 2023. Notifications of acceptance can be expected by June 15, and complete manuscripts of 6,000-8,000 words, formatted in MLA style (see formatting guidelines), will be due by October 1, 2023. Founded in 1976, the journal Studies in 20th and 20st Century Literature became open access in 2014, and charges authors no fees. Guest Editors:  Kathryn Sederberg, Lucinda Hinsdale Stone Assistant Professor of German Studies, Kalamazoo College Rebekah Slodounik, Assistant Professor of German Studies, Bucknell University Works Cited Espiritu, Yên Lê, Lan Duong, Ma Vang, Victor Bascara, Khatharya Um, Lila Sharif, and Nigel Hatton. Departures: An Introduction to Critical Refugee Studies. Oakland: U of California P, 2022. Nayeri, Dina. The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You. New York: Catapult, 2019. Nguyen, Viet Thanh, ed. “Introduction.” The Displaced: Refugee Writers on Refugee Lives. New York: Abrams Press, 2018, pp. 11-22. Soguk, Nevgat. “Border’s Capture: Insurrectional Politics, Border-Crossing Humans, and the New Political.” In Borderscapes: Hidden Geographies and Politics at Territory’s Edge, edited by Prem Kumar Rajaram and Carl Grundy-Warr, Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2007, pp. 283-308. Contact Info: guest editors: Kathryn Sederberg (ksederbe@kzoo.edu) and Rebekah Slodounik (ras073@bucknell.edu) general inquiries about the journal: Laura Kanost, editor (lakanost@ksu.edu) Contact Email: ksederbe@kzoo.edu URL: https://newprairiepress.org/sttcl/ * Dear colleagues, Please find below the call for 4 PhD positions within the framework of the Horizon-Europe-Project “United in Narrative Diversity? Cultural (Ex-)Change and Mutual Perceptions in Eastern and Western Europe at the threshold of the digital age“ (NARDIV). Most interesting for life writing scholars is PhD position 2: Université Aix-Marseille / University of Amsterdam “East-West Perception in Life Narratives of Women in Post-Communist Europe”. Feel free to circulate this advertisement to your network of colleagues and MA students to identify potential candidates. __ University of Amsterdam Faculty of Humanities Department of History, European Studies and Religious Studies dr. M.J.M. Rensen Senior Lecturer in Modern European Literature Bushuis/Oost-Indisch Huis | kamer D2.08B (Post) PO Box 1619 | 1000 BP Amsterdam (Visit) Kloveniersburgwal 48 | 1012 CX AmsterdamT +31.20.525.2198 New publications : Edited volume AUP: Networks, Narratives and Nations: https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789463720755/networks-narratives-and-nations Redacteur Armada. Tijdschrift voor wereldliteratuur * Call for application In the framework of the Horizon-Europe-Project “United in Narrative Diversity? Cultural (Ex-)Change and Mutual Perceptions in Eastern and Western Europe at the threshold of the digital age“ (NARDIV) are four PhD-positions available NARDIV Europe experiences a relaunch of cultural and national stereotypes triggered by the migration crisis, Covid-19, democratic backslides and war against Ukraine. Four decades after the fall of the war, Eastern and Western Europe seem increasingly alienated, each having different perceptions on Europe, the EU and its principles. These trends manifest themselves in an alienation between Eastern and Western Europe, as well as in the perception of Europe in general. Intermittently they are, as we suggest, expressions of resilient post-colonial relationships within Europe. With a focus on the (clichéd binary) East-West confrontation, this project explores the future possibilities of building and managing transnational relationships in the fields of culture and heritage, one of the mainstays of customary cultural diplomacy. Taking six European countries as the basis of our exploration – France, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Slovakia and Romania – we critically examine mutual perceptions in Eastern and Western Europe through the prism of intercultural exchange. In the framework of the project, scholars, practitioners from culture-exchange institutes, artists and creative industries players join forces to scrutinise current difficulties, from diverging historical developments, emotional investments, to challenges of the digital media revolution. The objective is to develop new strategies to conceptualise and revitalise cultural encounters and exchange between East and West to discuss mutual perceptions and ideas. The findings of this collaboration aim at a) boosting the culture-diplomacy / exchange sector by strengthening their role as mediators of transnational European values; b) lay bare best and worst practices in order to develop recommendations for new approaches and (media) strategies. Thus, fostering a more inclusive concept of cultural diplomacy to counter populist, identity-based discourses and to promote the European narrative across different cultural heritages. Coordinator: Aix-Marseille Université (Nicole Colin, Catherine Teissier) Partner: Protisvalor Mediterranee SAS FR, Uniwersytet Wroclawski PL, Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg DE, Universitatea Din Bucuresti RO, Uniwersytet Szczecinski PL, Stichting Duitsland Instituut bij de Universiteit van Amsterdam NL, Romanian Cultural Institute RO, Goethe-Institut DE, Institut français de Roumanie RO, Universiteit van Amsterdam NL, EUFRAK-EuroConsults Berlin GmbH DE, GLOBESEC SK PhD position 1: HAW Hamburg / Universiteit van Amsterdam “Inclusive Cultural Policy: Social Media and Hybrid Community Building in European East-West Transfer” – Funding: 3 years – Start: 1 June 2023 (or later) – Employer: HAW Hamburg – PhD-inscription: Universiteit van Amsterdam – Application deadline: 15 May 2023 In the Work Package “Cultural Policy Dialogue in Social Media”, which is coordinated by the Hamburg University of Applied Sciences (HAW Hamburg) in cooperation with the Duitsland Institute of the Universiteit van Amsterdam and the Goethe-Institut Bucharest, new forms of cultural transfer with the help of social media and hybrid event formats as well as a participatory self-image of cultural diplomacy and educational institutions are to be developed. The focus is particularly on cultural exchange and community building in contexts that have often been neglected so far, such as work in rural regions or cooperation with young people. Based on existing research results in the field of cultural communication (e.g. for museums), innovative strategies will be developed, especially in the field of social media, but also hybrid formats for cultural events and workshops for institutions of foreign cultural policy. Your profile – Completed Master’s degree in communication, media, cultural studies or a similar discipline – Interest and initial practical experience in the field of social media and digital communication – Interest in applied research – Knowledge of qualitative and quantitative methods such as guided interviews, text and content analysis and field research – Knowledge of cultural communication, cultural transfer and cultural diplomacy – Ability to work independently and systematically and to work in a team – Good knowledge of German, English and Romanian Your tasks – Writing a scientific dissertation – Field research in Amsterdam and Bucharest (6 months each) – Development of communication strategies for social media using the example of the Goethe-Institut Bucharest and the Duitsland Instituuts Amsterdam. – Development of hybrid formats in foreign cultural policy, especially for the intensification of cultural transfer between young people. – Collaboration in the NARDIV project team – Participation in workshops, conferences and cultural events in the framework of the project NARDIV Further information and application: Prof. Dr. Hanna Klimpe (hanna.klimpe@haw-hamburg.de) PhD position 2: Université Aix-Marseille / Universiteit van Amsterdam “East-West Perception in Life Narratives of Women in Post-Communist Europe” – Funding: 3 years – Start: 1 September 2023 – Employer: Aix-Marseille Université – PhD-inscription: Joint PhD Aix-Marseille Université / Universiteit van Amsterdam – Application deadline: 15 June 2023 In the Work Package “Perceptions of East/West in women’s life narratives in post-communist Europe”, coordinated by the Université d’Aix-Marseille (AMU) in cooperation with the University of Amsterdam, the East-West perception in life narratives of women writers will be investigated within the framework of a dissertation. For this purpose, a corpus will be selected, especially from texts of the genre of life narratives, which can include, for examples, fictional texts, autofictions, autosociobiographical writings, autobiographies, memoirs, diaries as well as hybrid forms. Among other things, images, emotions, embodied experiences and affects are to be examined in the texts, which not only represent the different realities of life, weltanschauung and styles in East and West, but also actively influence mutual perceptions. The Phd project can, for example, focus on female authors from the GDR or East Germany from different generations, female authors with migration or exile experience, and female authors from German-speaking minorities in Eastern and Central Europe. Your profile – Master’s degree in German studies, (comparative) literature or cultural studies, European studies, gender studies or a similar discipline – Interest in intercultural questions, cultural transfer, literary circulation – Interest in qualitative methods of social research such as semi-structured interviews and field research in cultural contexts – Knowledge of the East-West debate in Germany and Europe – Ability to work independently and systematically and to work in a team – Very good knowledge of German, French and English Your tasks – Writing a scientific dissertation – Field research (in Germany, the Netherlands, Romania, etc.): Interviews with authors – Transcription and analysis of interviews – Support in the creation of short video films – Participation in the NARDIV project team – Participation in workshops, conferences and cultural events in the framework of the NARDIV project Further information and application: Dr. Catherine Teissier (catherine.teissier@univ-amu.fr), Dr. Marleen Rensen (m.j.m.rensen@uva.nl) PhD position 3: Université Aix-Marseille / Universitatea din București “The Impact of Cultural Diplomacy as Soft Power in Times of Crises I” – Start: 1 September 2023 – Funding: 3 years – Employer: Aix-Marseille Université – PhD-inscription: Joint PhD Aix-Marseille Université / University of Bucharest – Application deadline: 15 June 2023 As part of the Work Package “Shaping perceptions by cultural diplomacy as soft power”, coordinated by the Universitatea din București and the University of Aix-Marseille in collaboration with the Goethe-Institut Bucharest, this PhD will investigate the activities and programmes of German-speaking institutions and their influence on Romanian society and its cultural actors between 1968 and 2007. Your profile – Master’s degree in German studies, cultural studies, history, political science, cultural sociology or a similar discipline – Interest in cultural diplomacy and theories of cultural transfer – Interest in Romanian and German cultural history and the exchange between the two countries – Interest in field research in France and Romania – Ability to work independently and systematically and to work in a team – Very good knowledge of German and Romanian, good knowledge of English, knowledge of French Your tasks – Writing a scientific dissertation in German – Archival research to identify the strategies of the Goethe-Institut and other German-speaking institutions in Romania during the last two decades of communism and in the period between the fall of Ceaușescu and Romania’s accession to the European Union – Analysis of the impact of these strategies on cultural and academic actors and their networks, as well as on civil society – Field research: interviews with cultural and academic actors in Romania, Germany, Austria, etc. – Transcription and analysis of the interviews – Work in the team of the NARDIV project, in particular in cooperation with the PhD student of the Universitatea din București (PhD position 4) – Participation in research workshops, conferences and cultural events organised in the framework of the NARDIV project Further information and application: Prof. Dr. Nicole Colin (nicole.colin-umlauf@univ-amu.fr), Prof. Dr. Horatiu Decuble (horatiu.decuble@lls.unibuc.ro) PhD position 4: Universitatea din București / Université Aix-Marseille “The Impact of Cultural Diplomacy as Soft Power in Times of Crises II” – Funding: 3 years – Start: 1 September 2023 – Employer: Universitatea din București – PhD-inscription: Joint PhD Universitatea din București / Aix-Marseille Université – Applications review and selection of candidates: 1-15 September 2023, Universitatea din București As part of the Work Package “Shaping perceptions by cultural diplomacy as soft power”, coordinated by the Universitatea din București in collaboration with the University of Aix-Marseille and the Institut Français de Bucarest, this PhD will investigate the activities and programmes of the Institut Français de Roumanie and their impact on Romanian society and its cultural actors between 1968 and 2007. Your profile – Master’s degree in political science, history, Romance studies, international relations, sociology of culture or a comparable discipline – Interest in the history of cultural diplomacy and theories of cultural transfer – Knowledge of Romanian and French cultural history and the exchange relations between the two countries – Interest in field research in France and Romania – Ability to work independently and systematically and to work in a team – Very good knowledge of Romanian and French as well as good knowledge of English required; knowledge of German desirable Your tasks – Writing a scientific dissertation in French – Archival research to identify the strategies of the Institut français during the last two decades of communism and in the period between the fall of Ceaușescu and Romania’s accession to the European Union – Analysis of the impact of these strategies on cultural and academic actors and their networks, as well as on civil society – Field research: interviews with cultural, cultural policy and academic actors in Romania, France, etc. – Transcription and analysis of the interviews – Work in the team of the NARDIV project, especially with the PhD student of the Université d’Aix-Marseille (PhD position 3) – Participation in research workshops, conferences and cultural events organised in the framework of the NARDIV project Further information: Prof. Dr. Cristian Preda (cristian.preda@unibuc.ro), Prof. Dr. Nicole Colin (nicole.colin-umlauf@univ-amu.fr) How to apply? We look forward to receiving your online application with the usual application documents (letter of motivation, curriculum vitae, diplomas, recommendations) in one PDF file to the contact persons indicated. Application deadline: see the respective offer *

CfP. Decolonizing the Self: How Do We Perceive Others When We Practice Autotheory?

Special Issue (winter 2024) of The February Journal, edited by Shura Dogadaeva and Andrei Zavadski Deadline for Submissions: May 15, 2023 Andrei: So much is currently being said about decolonization. The term is being used—and, as we currently see in Eastern Europe—also abused a lot. But what does decolonization mean in practice? How does one engage in decolonizing the self? In the next special issue of The February Journal, I would like to focus on approaches to practical self-decolonization. Shura: I agree. But when I think about this, I cannot help but wonder whether I have the right to engage in a self-decolonizing practice. Shouldn’t I, a citizen of Russia and, in one way or another, a product of its imperialist culture, shut up and listen? Shouldn’t I limit my own agency in this regard? Andrei: Decolonizing the self is, in my opinion, one of those tasks that require our immediate and active attention. As somebody who was born and grew up in Belarus, I ‘belong’ to both the colonized and—in a way, especially if we consider Lukashenka’s current politics—the colonizing sides, I think we consciously have to challenge this ‘belonging.’ Ultimately, such work should result in redefining our own subjectivity and thus altering the way we perceive others. It is our primary task, I feel. Shura: But how does one deconstruct one’s ‘belonging’? It is a very abstract term. Belonging to something often means substituting my own experience with a ‘collective,’ ‘universal’ one. Unless you are a white heterosexual male, which is likely to make your personal experience close to ‘the universal one.’ But does it mean, then, that closely listening to myself might lead to a change in how I relate to others? Andrei: If we consider belonging—but also theory, knowledge, and so on—to be a construct imposed by a historical white-male-heterosexual instance and by—more-often-than-not imperialist—thinking, then it is exactly what colonizes, corrupts us, resulting in a colonizing gaze (as well as discourse and behavior) that we exercise upon others. By decolonizing the self—for instance, by dissecting our own experience—we question our belonging and other similar constructs, challenge and deconstruct them, and thus decolonize our relationship to others. Shura: Personal experience allows one to think outside the box, giving this idiomatic cliché a literal meaning. If ‘culture,’ ‘knowledge,’ et cetera are constructs, they confine us within boxed realities. Reflecting on your own experience makes you realize that this box has walls, but they are not as strong as it might seem and can in fact be brought down. Utilizing one’s personal experience for this purpose might seem like a narcissistic trap, but I don’t think it is. Rather, it is about the fact that any personal experience is always much more than ‘universal,’ ‘universalized’ experience. I think autotheory (Fournier 2022; Vaneycken 2020; Wiegman 2020) is a great method to free the self from such imposed colonizing constructs. Andrei: How do you understand autotheory? For me, it is not simply about reflecting on your personal experience and sharing it with others: this would make one part of the identity politics discourse. Moreover, a person engaging in an autotheoretical practice of self-decolonization might, as our editor Isabel Bredenbröker points out, have to resist negative identity politics, that is, outside efforts to keep this person within the confines of one prescribed identity. Shura: Definitely. You know, I love this phrase from Preciado (2021), who writes in Can the Monster Speak? that ‘[t]o be branded with an identity means simply that one does not have the power to designate one’s identity as universal.’ Authotheory isn’t about branding oneself with an identity, it is about deconstructing the ‘universal,’ of which Preciado speaks. Andrei: So, autotheory is about relating your personal experience to the one declared as ‘universal,’ but not with the aim of making the former fit in, but rather, of loosening and shattering the very structure of the universal. Once these epistemological structures are in ruins, voices and experiences that did not fit in become much more audible. By decolonizing the self we are able to listen, hear, and perceive others and their unique experiences. I think my own practice of decolonizing the self started when I realized, some time ago, that I was queer. Luckily, this realization did not make me doubt my own sanity (which sadly happens to a lot of LGBTQIA+ people), but prompted closer attention to my personal experience. Analyzing it against the ‘universal norm’ into which I was supposed to fit, I grew skeptical of ‘the universal’ rather than my own experience. Which, in line with intersectionality thinking, made me more attentive to other marginalized voices around me. Shura: My practice originates in reading groups that I conducted with young adults at a Moscow museum. We read texts on Stalinisim, genocide, World War Two, and similar topics. I soon realized that my pupils did not have the language to talk about traumatic past events. I understood this as a consequence of the (post-)Soviet education system, which saw little transformation, if at all. It made me reevaluate my own education and reexamine, among other things, historical science as a practice of colonization. I started listening to these kids very carefully, and this act of listening made them try hard to formulate their own thoughts, rather than simply reproduce school-taught narratives. Andrei: This reminds me of how Maggie Nelson’s (2015) The Argonauts opens. On the novel’s very first page, she invokes Wittgenstein’s idea that the inexpressible is contained, albeit inexpressibly, within the expressed. By listening to what your students express you are able to get a sense of what they cannot express. Shura: Yes, listening is actually an essential practice for a teacher: it allows her to challenge constructions like ‘knowledge’ or ‘belonging,’ which, in turn, challenges and transforms the types of relationships with others that are imposed by these constructions. Andrei: So, it would be interesting to learn how individuals engage in self-decolonizing autotheoretical practices and what manifestations these practices acquire in artistic, pedagogical, activist, academic, and other fields of life. Shura: Yes! And not only discursive practices: we need to consider what is beyond discourse. (Even though Judith Butler would crucify us for suggesting there is anything non-discursive.) Perhaps there are artistic, performative practices out there that work with affects, emotions, and bodies, aiming at self-decolonization. The question here is: What would this inquiry add to what we know about decolonization already? Andrei: Ana Fabíola Maurício (2023), in her chapter in the book on silence that was reviewed in The February Journal’s Issue 01–02 (Veselov 2023), critiques the discourse of postcolonialism and postcolonial theory for imposing on an individual from an oppressed group a kind of responsibility to be that group’s voice and representative. In other words, the individual’s personal experience is seen as secondary to the collective experience of the group. I believe that engaging in autotheoretical self-decolonizing practices would be a way to emphasize individual experiences and challenge established theoretical approaches. Shura: It would be great to invite authors who are developing autotheoretical self-decolonizing practices in their academic, artistic, activist, pedagogical, and other activities. It would also be great to receive submissions that use different genres and forms of presentation, as well as ones that stem from different geographical, epistemological, and other contexts. References 
    1. Fournier L (2022) Autotheory as Feminist Practice in Art, Writing, and Criticism. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    1. Maurício AF (2023) Un-silencing bodies, un-silencing lives: Artistic (self-)decoloniality and artistic (self-) empowerment. In: Santos L (ed), Cultures of Silence: The Power of Untold Narratives. London and New York, Routledge: 9–27.
    1. Nelson M (2015) The Argonauts. Minneapolis, MN, Graywolf Press.
    1. Preciado P (2021) Can the Monster Speak. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
    1. Vaneycken A (2020) Collectiveness as a form of autotheory. Parse, 12, https://parsejournal.com/article/collectiveness-as-a-form-of-autotheory/ (03/04/23).
    1. Veselov A (2023) Book review. Santos L (ed) (2023) Cultures of Silence: The Power of Untold Narratives. London and New York, Routledge. The February Journal, 01–02: 161–170.
    1. Wiegman R (2020) Introduction: Autotheory theory. Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, 1(76): 1–14.
To submit a proposal, please provide the following information in English:  • contribution type (e.g., article, visual essay, reflexive essay, data essay, etc.); • language of contribution; • title of contribution; • abstract (300 words); • keywords that indicate the focus of the contribution; • biographical information, including a short biographical statement of maximum 100 words stating research interests and relevant professional experience. Proposals for contributions are due on May 15, 2023. Send all the information requested above—as a single PDF document—to the info@thefebruaryjournal.org. The February Journal is an independent interdisciplinary journal at intersections of academic, art, and activist practices. A project of Tabor CollectiveFebruary produces special issues on strategic themes that currently include migration, displacement, statelessness, and exile in the context of war, violence, and aggression. The journal publishes empirical, theoretical, and speculative research that uses de-centering, queer, feminist, decolonial, and autotheoretical methodologies. It welcomes research in a variety of genres, celebrating innovative ways of presentation. Peer-reviewed and available in open access, The February Journal provides a sourcebook of ideas for an international audience. Contact Info: Andrei Zavadski Contact Email: info@thefebruaryjournal.org URL: https://thefebruaryjournal.org/en/announcements/call-for-submissions/25 *

13th Annual BIO Conference May 19-21, 2023 New York, NY

Along with the Leon Levy Center for Biography, Biographers International Organization (BIO) will co-host a three day conference both in person and online at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. General admission is $345 in person ($295 for members); and $99 for streaming only ($49 for members). Note that a year’s membership is just $60 for most people, $30 for students. Click here to join.

Register Here Addressing both the state of the world and the state of biography, the James Atlas Plenary on Saturday morning will feature a conversation on “Biography in Times of Conflict and War” between Blanche Wiesen Cook, the esteemed biographer of Eleanor Roosevelt, and Beverly Gage, whose recent highly acclaimed biography of J. Edgar Hoover, is on BIO’s short list for the Plutarch Award. The 2023 BIO Award winner, Kitty Kelley, will deliver the keynote address on Saturday afternoon. She is the undisputed first-name in unauthorized biography, captivating readers with her best-selling biographies of Jackie Onassis, Elizabeth Taylor, Nancy Reagan, Frank Sinatra, Oprah, the Bush family, and the British royal family. Panels on biography basics, craft, publishing, and promotion—along with sessions on issues of race, transnationalism, and other subjects—will take place on Saturday. Offerings range from “The Art of the Interview” to “Complicated Icons,” the latter featuring noted biographers Stacy Schiff (on Samuel Adams), David Maraniss (on Jim Thorpe) and Tamara Payne (on Malcolm X). There are ample opportunities for meeting fellow biographers throughout the weekend.
PhD Scholarships now available in English and Creative Writing!
Are you interested in undertaking a PhD or MPhil in English or Creative Writing? Applications for JCU Research Scholarships for 2024 are open for submissions now! Seehttps://www.jcu.edu.au/graduate-research-school/how-to-apply
I am looking to supervise projects that align with the following topics, but am also interested in discussing alternative but related projects with prospective applicants:
– Exploring the power of personal stories through a framework of feminist and/or queer theory.
– Exploring contemporary memoir, personal stories, and/or digital life narrative around sexual trauma.
– Women’s life writing in print and digital forms.
– What work can life writing texts do in relation to the social issue of sexual violence?
– Book clubs as agents of feminist change around sexual and gendered violence in Australia.
Approaches to the above topics may be either literary based or creative practice based, so you could take up and investigate any of these topics by either writing a literary research thesis, or a thesis that combines creative writing and literary scholarship.
External students are encouraged to apply (Australian residents only).
To enquire please contact Dr Emma Maguire, Primary Advisor & Lecturer in English and Writing: emma.maguire@jcu.edu.au
* Epistolary Time / Time in Letters 4th Epistolary Research Network (TERN) Online Symposium 5/5/2023; 10/6-7/2023) The clock is ticking. Schedules, delays, deadlines, queues worry our lives. Letters are often considered in terms of space and geographical distance. In 2023, TERN proposes to revisit themes surrounding temporality, be it in reference to material form or technology, delivery, calendar time or epistolary contents and conventions. Has a delayed letter ever changed a historical event? How do letter writers, consciously or unconsciously, use specific epistolary tenses to collapse or manipulate time, and for what reasons? Why are letters dated to one time period embedded in other dated media like newspapers, manuals or scrapbooks? What of the future of this form of writing? Possible topics might include, but are not limited to:
    • anachronisms
    • letters written or delivered under temporal constraints (war, illness, incarceration, difficulty finding carriers)
    • epistolary tenses, time expressions and dating conventions
    • time spent letter writing vs email, societal expectations
    • undated letters, letters removed from calendar time
    • periods when letter writing gained or lost popularity and the social context
    • open letters, letters written for later time periods or no specific time period
    • epistolary conventions concerning letter or letter archive dating
    • best time to write and reply to letters
    • mail art that addresses the concept of time
    • causes and consequences of postponements, delays and other non-delivery
    • letters used to date events in history or the lives of people
    • chronology of letter collections, gap between date letters composed and published
TERN welcomes 250-word maximum proposals for 20-minute papers concerning any geographical location, discipline or historical period. Papers should approach the topic of time in letters in innovative ways that will impact our understanding of this important written form and the societies that have produced it. Please send submissions to ternetwork@hotmail.com by midnight (BST) on 5 May 2023. The conference language is English. Publication of selected papers will be arranged following the conference. * Call for papers – International Conference – Memory gaps: Tracks and Cracks October 19-20, 2023 University of Strasbourg Deadline for Submissions: May 1, 2023 We would like to examine the way in which the arts (theatre, cinema, literature, painting, sculpture, music) draw, trace and unfold the canvases and scores of individual, familiar and collective memory, from traces, cracks, flaws, interstices, lapses, oblivion, loss of memory, repression, from “the memory of what is forgotten”, shadowy areas, crypts, confiscated images and words, prevented, manipulated or forced memory, from “wounded memory” (Ricoeur), forgetting processes, silences, denials, blind spots, scattered fragments, superimposed and/or hybridized strata, from the power of memory and the power over memory. This will also lead us to re-examine, in a comparative perspective, the forms of commitment and the culture and forms of commemoration – “orthopaedic memory, frozen in sterile commemorations”, the memory “on display”. Commitment and commemoration – two key words in the research programme of LES:TRACES (Laboratory for studies on: trauma, art, commemoration, engagement, sound). Scientific committee: Isabelle Reck, Beat Föllmi Director of CREAA: Alessandro Arbo The Centre for Research and Experimentation on the Artistic Act (CREAA) aims to develop knowledge of the artistic act in interdisciplinary matter, by comparing the knowledge and methodologies of the humanities, social sciences and exact sciences. Contact Info: The research group LES:TRACES (Laboratory for studies on: trauma, art, commemoration, engagement, sound) organises in autumn 2023 its third conference with the following topic : Memory gaps: Tracks and Cracks (in arts, theatre, cinema, literature, and music) International Conference, 19 and 20 October 2023, University of Strasbourg Each speaker has 30 minutes of presentation, followed by a 15-minute discussion. The languages of the conference are French and English. The publication of the papers is planned. Please send your proposal (title, short abstract and biography) at the latest by 1 May 2023 to: Beat Föllmi, University of Strasbourg, bfollmi@unistra.fr Contact Email: bfollmi@unistra.fr URL: * Deadline for Submissions, April 30, 2023 Translating Travel Writing in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries French/British Connections/Continuums Centre de Recherches sur les Littératures et la Sociopoétique (CELIS) Institut d’Histoire des Représentations et des Idées dans les Modernités (IHRIM) Société d’étude de da Littérature de Voyage du Monde Anglophone (SELVA 19th-20th October, 2023 Maison de Sciences de l’Homme  Clermont-Ferrand France Translators and travellers have largely been understood as similarly negotiating interstitial textual and geographic spaces and places. Tim Youngs’s conception of travellers and translators as “figures moving between cultures, not quite or wholly belonging to any one exclusively[1]”is particularly pertinent from this standpoint, as is Susan Pickford’s identification of both translation and travel writing as prime sites for “ideologically motivated textual manipulation”.[2] Thus, the study of the translation of travel texts may not be understood in what Jeff Morrison describes as “narrow, linear, national terms”.[3] In histories of translation, theoretical and transnational stances have of course received sustained attention over the years (see Michael Cronin for example). Building on perspectives which Martin and Pickford have developed in their work[4], this conference will seek to consolidate their partial focus on cross-channel, British and French theoretical and operational approaches to the translation of travel texts relating to real or fictional journeying but also to treatises/pamphlets on the necessity, act and/or nature of travel itself. How these travel text translations contributed to shaping international relations between the two countries in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and how they participated in the linkages and connections forged by cultural transfers will be the focus of this conference. The relationships established between the travellers and their translators, if any; the identities and literary, scientific or professional credentials of each; how they approach their “translatorship”; how “translation flows”[5] speak to the equilibrium of cultural relations, are just some areas of interest. Other fruitful approaches might engage with how women progressively took up translation tasks. Alison E. Martin’s 2010 study of European women who “cast themselves as intellectually enquiring, knowledgeable and authoritative figures in their translations”[6] of scientific travel writing at the end of the eighteenth century is just one extremely useful starting point for further enquiry into diverse types of travel writing, fictional, philological, exploration and/or mercantilist narrative, etc. Book and reception history perspectives are also welcome, addressing the problematics of who published these translations, of how they were made available (circulating libraries, shilling parts, subscriptions), of who read them, and of how “Belles infidèles” traditions fared in terms of circulation and reception as reactions to them became rather more guarded. Proposals from modern-day translators of eighteenth and nineteenth-century travel texts would also be very welcome. Plenary speakers: Ruth Menzies (Aix-Marseille Université) and Marius Warholm Haugen (Norwegian University of Science and Technology). Deadline for submission of 250-word proposals for 25-minute papers: April 30th, 2023. Please send your proposals as well as a short biographical notice to the two conference organisers below. Notification of acceptance: 31st May, 2023 Conference organisers Sandhya Patel (UCA, IHRIM) : sandhya.patel@uca.fr Anne Rouhette (UCA, CELIS) : anne.rouhette@uca.fr Scientific committee Gabor Gelleri, University of Aberystwyth Pierre Lurbe, Université Paris Sorbonne Susan Pickford, University of Geneva Jean Viviès, Université Aix-Marseille
[1] Tim Youngs, The Cambridge Introduction to Travel Writing, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, p.10. [2] Susan Pickford, “Travel Writing in Translation” in Barbara Schaff, Handbook of British Travel Writing, De Gruyter, 2020. [3] Alison Martin and Susan Pickford, Travel Narratives in Translation, 1750-1830: Nationalism, Ideology, Gender, Routledge, 2012, p.51. [4] See Travel Narratives in Translation, 1750-1830, op. cit.; “Translating 18th and 19th-Century European Travel Writing,” InTRAlinea, 2013. [5] See Christopher Rundle, The Routledge Handbook of Translation History, 2021. [6] Alison E. Martin, “Outward bound: women translators and scientific travel writing, 1780–1800, Annals of Science, 73, 2, 2016, p.1. Contact Info: Conference organisers Sandhya Patel  : sandhya.patel@uca.fr Anne Rouhette : anne.rouhette@uca.fr Contact Email: sandhya.patel@uca.fr

From the List Manager–please excuse the ridiculous error in the subject heading of the last announcement regarding the location of the University of Strasbourg. (Although there is some history there . . . ) My apologies. CH

*Broadcast Date, April 21, 2023 The next episode of the webinar “Let’s Talk Books at NMU (Northern Michigan University)”  hosted by Lynn Domina will be Friday, April 21 at 1:00 Eastern time.  The speaker will be Tom Taylor, speaking about his recent book, Modern Travel in World History (Routledge, 2022). The book explores all sorts of travel by all sorts of people, moving around the world in all sorts of circumstances. Tom Taylor is an Associate Professor of History at Seattle University and has traveled extensively himself. Registration is required but is free and easy, here: https://nmu.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_dnXEzUN8QMmJcIvo8AyMvw *

Deadline for Submissions, April 28, 2023

Call for Papers – Oral History Network of Ireland 2023 Conference – ‘Oral History: Power and Resistance’

Ireland {Republic} The Oral History Network of Ireland (OHNI) is pleased to announce its 2023 conference on the theme of ‘Oral History: Power and Resistance’. At every stage of the process, oral history projects may be impacted by and engage with issues of power and resistance. Oral histories offer unique insights into the operations of power and resistance in our societies in the past and present. This is not confined to issues of political power and resistance but can include everything from power dynamics within personal relationships, to understanding minority-majority group experiences. Who exercises power, how it is used and how it can be leveraged are key questions for oral historians. Similarly, what is resistance, what forms it takes and how it may or may not effect social change are questions that have been explored with the assistance of oral histories. Power and resistance are also considerations at every level in the creation of an oral history – whose stories are told, how they’re told, the power (or lack thereof) exercised by interviewees and interviewers, and the purpose of oral history itself. The conference will take place in person at Dooley’s Hotel, Waterford on Friday 16th and Saturday 17th June 2023. We are delighted to welcome Graham Smith, Professor of Oral History at Newcastle University, as the keynote speaker. His research interests include public history and environmental oral history, with a particular focus on how people remember in groups, as well as the history of family and the history of medicine. He helped to establish the Oral History Unit and Collective at Newcastle in 2017. A long-time trade union activist, Graham is the joint editor of the Historians for History blog and the editor of the four-volume collection Oral History, published by Routledge in 2017 as part of their Critical Concepts in Historical Studies series. Conference contributions are welcome in a range of formats:
    • Standard conference papers (20 minutes)
    • 10-minute presentations for our ‘Moments’ panels, focusing on outstanding or memorable individuals, experiences, and/or incidents that influenced or changed the way the presenter practices oral history. Contributions showcasing new projects on the conference theme at an early stage of development are also welcome here.
    • Posters and visual presentations
We welcome proposals on any topic related to oral history, particularly those that take an imaginative approach to the conference theme of ‘Power and Resistance’. Potential topics could include (but are not limited to):
    • Power dynamics in the interview
    • Oral history and marginalised voices
    • Elite oral histories
    • Uncovering the operation of power in organisations and institutions
    • Abuses of power
    • Resistance and adaptation
    • Power, resistance and trauma
    • History from above and below
    • Power, resistance and the archive
    • Oral history and empowerment
To propose a paper, please submit an abstract (of not more than 250 words) along with your name, the name of your group, organisation or institution, and your email address to info@oralhistorynetworkireland.ie before Friday, 28 April 2023 at 5pm. All proposals must demonstrate a clear engagement with oral history and/or personal testimony and we actively encourage the use of audio or video clips. The conference committee’s decision on successful abstracts will be communicated to potential presenters in May 2023. For further queries please contact us through info@oralhistorynetworkireland.ie. Contact Email: info@oralhistorynetworkireland.ie URL: https://oralhistorynetworkireland.ie/2023-conference * Deadline for Submissions, April 30, 2023

CFP–Travel Writing

Seeking proposals for presentations on travel writing in English from any period or country. The 2023 Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association (RMMLA) convention will be held in Denver, CO from Oct. 12-14. Please submit a 200-word abstract by April 30, 2023 Alan Blackstock alan.blackstock@usu.edu * Deadline for Submissions, April 30, 2023 Translating Travel Writing in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries French/British Connections/Continuums Centre de Recherches sur les Littératures et la Sociopoétique (CELIS) Institut d’Histoire des Représentations et des Idées dans les Modernités (IHRIM) Société d’étude de da Littérature de Voyage du Monde Anglophone (SELVA 19th-20th October, 2023 Maison de Sciences de l’Homme  Clermont-Ferrand France Translators and travellers have largely been understood as similarly negotiating interstitial textual and geographic spaces and places. Tim Youngs’s conception of travellers and translators as “figures moving between cultures, not quite or wholly belonging to any one exclusively[1]”is particularly pertinent from this standpoint, as is Susan Pickford’s identification of both translation and travel writing as prime sites for “ideologically motivated textual manipulation”.[2] Thus, the study of the translation of travel texts may not be understood in what Jeff Morrison describes as “narrow, linear, national terms”.[3] In histories of translation, theoretical and transnational stances have of course received sustained attention over the years (see Michael Cronin for example). Building on perspectives which Martin and Pickford have developed in their work[4], this conference will seek to consolidate their partial focus on cross-channel, British and French theoretical and operational approaches to the translation of travel texts relating to real or fictional journeying but also to treatises/pamphlets on the necessity, act and/or nature of travel itself. How these travel text translations contributed to shaping international relations between the two countries in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and how they participated in the linkages and connections forged by cultural transfers will be the focus of this conference. The relationships established between the travellers and their translators, if any; the identities and literary, scientific or professional credentials of each; how they approach their “translatorship”; how “translation flows”[5] speak to the equilibrium of cultural relations, are just some areas of interest. Other fruitful approaches might engage with how women progressively took up translation tasks. Alison E. Martin’s 2010 study of European women who “cast themselves as intellectually enquiring, knowledgeable and authoritative figures in their translations”[6] of scientific travel writing at the end of the eighteenth century is just one extremely useful starting point for further enquiry into diverse types of travel writing, fictional, philological, exploration and/or mercantilist narrative, etc. Book and reception history perspectives are also welcome, addressing the problematics of who published these translations, of how they were made available (circulating libraries, shilling parts, subscriptions), of who read them, and of how “Belles infidèles” traditions fared in terms of circulation and reception as reactions to them became rather more guarded. Proposals from modern-day translators of eighteenth and nineteenth-century travel texts would also be very welcome. Plenary speakers: Ruth Menzies (Aix-Marseille Université) and Marius Warholm Haugen (Norwegian University of Science and Technology). Deadline for submission of 250-word proposals for 25-minute papers: April 30th, 2023. Please send your proposals as well as a short biographical notice to the two conference organisers below. Notification of acceptance: 31st May, 2023 Conference organisers Sandhya Patel (UCA, IHRIM) : sandhya.patel@uca.fr Anne Rouhette (UCA, CELIS) : anne.rouhette@uca.fr Scientific committee Gabor Gelleri, University of Aberystwyth Pierre Lurbe, Université Paris Sorbonne Susan Pickford, University of Geneva Jean Viviès, Université Aix-Marseille
[1] Tim Youngs, The Cambridge Introduction to Travel Writing, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, p.10. [2] Susan Pickford, “Travel Writing in Translation” in Barbara Schaff, Handbook of British Travel Writing, De Gruyter, 2020. [3] Alison Martin and Susan Pickford, Travel Narratives in Translation, 1750-1830: Nationalism, Ideology, Gender, Routledge, 2012, p.51. [4] See Travel Narratives in Translation, 1750-1830, op. cit.; “Translating 18th and 19th-Century European Travel Writing,” InTRAlinea, 2013. [5] See Christopher Rundle, The Routledge Handbook of Translation History, 2021. [6] Alison E. Martin, “Outward bound: women translators and scientific travel writing, 1780–1800, Annals of Science, 73, 2, 2016, p.1. Contact Info: Conference organisers Sandhya Patel  : sandhya.patel@uca.fr Anne Rouhette : anne.rouhette@uca.fr Contact Email: sandhya.patel@uca.fr *

From the List Manager–please excuse the ridiculous error in the subject heading of the last announcement regarding the location of the University of Stasbourg. (Although there is some history there . . . ) My apologies. C

Call for papers – International Conference – Memory gaps: Tracks and Cracks

October 19-20, 2023 University of Strasbourg Deadline for Submissions: May 1, 2023 We would like to examine the way in which the arts (theatre, cinema, literature, painting, sculpture, music) draw, trace and unfold the canvases and scores of individual, familiar and collective memory, from traces, cracks, flaws, interstices, lapses, oblivion, loss of memory, repression, from “the memory of what is forgotten”, shadowy areas, crypts, confiscated images and words, prevented, manipulated or forced memory, from “wounded memory” (Ricoeur), forgetting processes, silences, denials, blind spots, scattered fragments, superimposed and/or hybridized strata, from the power of memory and the power over memory. This will also lead us to re-examine, in a comparative perspective, the forms of commitment and the culture and forms of commemoration – “orthopaedic memory, frozen in sterile commemorations”, the memory “on display”. Commitment and commemoration – two key words in the research programme of LES:TRACES (Laboratory for studies on: trauma, art, commemoration, engagement, sound). Scientific committee: Isabelle Reck, Beat Föllmi Director of CREAA: Alessandro Arbo The Centre for Research and Experimentation on the Artistic Act (CREAA) aims to develop knowledge of the artistic act in interdisciplinary matter, by comparing the knowledge and methodologies of the humanities, social sciences and exact sciences. Contact Info: The research group LES:TRACES (Laboratory for studies on: trauma, art, commemoration, engagement, sound) organises in autumn 2023 its third conference with the following topic : Memory gaps: Tracks and Cracks (in arts, theatre, cinema, literature, and music) International Conference, 19 and 20 October 2023, University of Strasbourg Each speaker has 30 minutes of presentation, followed by a 15-minute discussion. The languages of the conference are French and English. The publication of the papers is planned. Please send your proposal (title, short abstract and biography) at the latest by 1 May 2023 to: Beat Föllmi, University of Strasbourg, bfollmi@unistra.fr Contact Email: bfollmi@unistra.fr URL: * Broadcast Date, April 21, 2023 The next episode of the webinar “Let’s Talk Books at NMU (Northern Michigan University)”  hosted by Lynn Domina will be Friday, April 21 at 1:00 Eastern time.  The speaker will be Tom Taylor, speaking about his recent book, Modern Travel in World History (Routledge, 2022). The book explores all sorts of travel by all sorts of people, moving around the world in all sorts of circumstances. Tom Taylor is an Associate Professor of History at Seattle University and has traveled extensively himself. Registration is required but is free and easy, here: https://nmu.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_dnXEzUN8QMmJcIvo8AyMvw CALL FOR PAPERS: Creativecritical Writing Now A Special Issue of TEXT Journal of Writing and Writing Courses Deadline for Submissions: April 14, 2023 This Special Issue aims to explore forms of, and approaches to, creativecritical writing: writing which performs scholarly and creative functions simultaneously. Such blended approaches are no longer new—indeed, they are tracking distinct paths and uses in various contexts inside academia and beyond. As such, this Special Issue will take stock of the current nexus between the creative and the critical, as well as speculate on future conceptions of hybrid creative writing /scholarship. The creativecritical mode has a long lineage across fictocritical, autotheoretical and ethnographic writing, as well as creative nonfiction and the essay form. Recently, creativecritical writing has gained popular currency, as evidenced by the work of Rebecca Solnit, Anne Carson, and Maggie Nelson. It is also attracting critical momentum, most noticeably at doctoral level, where, as Kylie Cardell and Kate Douglas note, ‘Many postgraduates [in Life Writing] are engaging in projects where the creative and critical/exegetical are an integrated text’ (207–208). In this Special Issue of TEXT, we invite articles (of roughly 6-8,000 words) that engage with the functions, processes, poetics and ethics of creativecritical writing in its many forms (creative nonfiction, fiction, academic writing, poetry/poetics, testimony and more). These engagements should constellate, in order to ask: Where are we now, and what is next for creativecritical writing? We hope to encourage a compiling of the essayistic, the fictocritical, life writing, the seamless, and more, to assess how the exegesis—and creative writing as research more broadly—might be conceived through a creativecritical lens. Potential contributors might like to consider:
    • What creativecritical writing approaches do within research? (And, what have they done, where are we now, and where we are going?)
    • Creativecritical possibilities for the exegesis, and questions regarding what counts as scholarly output (E.g., what creative writing might do to shift the lexical possibilities of scholarly work; how it can work within institutions). Articulating the role of the exegesis, creative exegetical forms, teaching/doing exegetical writing.
    • Creativecritical approaches as indicative/supportive of new vistas in representation, such as embodied thinking or non-dualistic approaches. (What kind of work is necessary at this juncture? How do thought/body/lived experience interact with scholarly forms? How can life writing operate as scholarship?)
    • The critical power in creative work, and the inherent criticality of creative expression. (What is creative and what is critical? How can the ‘ancient quarrel’ (Brien and Webb 2012) between poetry and philosophy be re-visited? Is creative work possibly critical work?)
    • The popular turn towards the creativecritical
    • The difference,in creative writing scholarship, between explaining the work and the work being research
    • The lineage of creativecritical forms: fictocriticism, art writing, autoethnography, essay
    • The ethics of creativecritical writing
    • Potential forms and approaches to writing that makes and considers/reflects/thinks
    • Hybridity in academic writing
    • The essay and essayism in scholarly contexts; Braided writing and blended forms
How to submit your expression of interest:  Please submit a 200-word Expression of Interest by email to StefanieMarkidis and Daniel Juckes with ‘Creativecritical Writing Now’ as the subject line. In your EOI please outline how your paper or work(s) explore(s) aspects of the creativecritical mode. Please also include the following information: your full name, institutional affiliation (if any), email address, title of paper/work, brief biography (50–100 words), and 3 to 5 keywords (at least 2 of which should clearly relate to the issue’s title). Deadline for EOIs: April 14, 2023. Deadline for finished works: June 30, 2023. Enquiries: Daniel Juckes (daniel.juckes@uwa.edu.au) or Stefanie Markidis (stefanie.markidis@rmit.edu.au) Dr Daniel Juckes (he/him/his) Lecturer (Creative Writing) Associate Editor, Westerly Magazine English and Literary Studies, School of Humanities  •  M204, Perth WA 6009 Australia +61 8 6488 2066  •  E daniel.juckes@uwa.edu.au * Call for Papers Stardom & Fandom Southwest Popular / American Culture Association (SWPACA) SWPACA Summer Salon June 8 & 9, 2023 Virtual Conference http://www.southwestpca.org Submissions open on March 18, 2023 Proposal submission deadline: April 15, 2023 Proposals for papers are now being accepted for the SWPACA Summer Salon. SWPACA offers nearly 70 subject areas in a variety of categories encompassing the following: Film, Television, Music, & Visual Media; Historic & Contemporary Cultures; Identities & Cultures; Language & Literature; Science Fiction & Fantasy; and Pedagogy & Popular Culture. For a full list of subject areas, area descriptions, and Area Chairs, please visit http://southwestpca.org/conference/call-for-papers/ The Area Chair for Stardom and Fandom invites paper or panel proposals on any aspect of stardom or fandom. The list of ideas below is limited, so if you have an idea that is not listed, please suggest the new topic. We are an interdisciplinary area and encourage submissions from multiple perspectives and disciplines. Topics might include:
    • Studies of individual celebrities and their fans
    • Studies focused on specific fandoms
    • The reciprocal relationship between stars and fans
    • Impact of celebrity and fame on identity construction, reconstruction and sense of self
    • Reality television and the changing definition of ‘stardom’
    • The impact of social media on celebrity/fan interaction
    • Celebrity/fame addiction as cultural change
    • The intersection of stars and fans in virtual and physical spaces (Twitter, Tumblr, conventions)
    • Celebrity and the construction of persona
    • Pedagogical approaches to teaching stardom and fandom
    • Anti-fans and ‘haters’
    • Fan shame, wank, and fandom policing
    • Gendered constructions of stars and fans
    • Historical studies of fandom and fan/celebrity interaction
All proposals must be submitted through the conference’s database at http://register.southwestpca.org/southwestpca For details on using the submission database and on the application process in general, please see the Proposal Submission FAQs and Tips page at http://southwestpca.org/conference/faqs-and-tips/ Registration information for the conference will be available at http://southwestpca.org/conference/conference-registration-information/ Individual proposals for 15-minute papers must include an abstract of approximately 200-500 words. Including a brief bio in the body of the proposal form is encouraged, but not required. If you have any questions about the Stardom & Fandom area, please contact its Area Chair, Dr. Lynn Zubernis, at lzubernis@wcupa.edu. If you have general questions about the conference, please contact us at support@southwestpca.org, and a member of the executive team will get back to you. We look forward to receiving your submissions! Contact Info: Dr. Lynn Zubernis, Area Chair, Stardom and Fandom Contact Email: lzubernis@wcupa.edu URL: http://southwestpca.org/conference/call-for-papers/

CALL FOR PAPERS

15th International Conference of the Estonian Association of Comparative Literature Trauma and Healing: Storying Lives, Literary Engagements, Entangled Memories University of Tartu, Estonia, June 8 to 9, 2023 The deadline for individual proposals has been extended to April 10, 2023.  Acceptance notices will be sent by April 25, 2023. The conceptual framework of trauma has played an immense role in critical inquiry and memory studies for many decades. Russian full-scale military aggression against Ukraine that started on February 24, 2022 that has claimed the lives of thousands of civilians and has brought about the most extensive humanitarian crisis of the 21st century, forcibly displacing nearly half of the Ukrainian population, brings the notion of trauma into focus with particular urgency. Not only does it merit the revision of existing frameworks and approaches and weigh their applicability in the context of the massive impact of the war in Ukraine but it also calls forth the necessity of developing new frameworks and approaches of supporting coping and healing. With a focus on both individual and collective memory, large-scale historical events as well as those concerning the commonplace contexts of everyday life, involving, for instance, domestic violence, sexual abuse and social marginalization, which are closely related to and depend on social and political regulations and cultural discourses, the development of trauma studies as a field of cultural enquiry has been shaped by a close affinity to the theoretical frameworks of psychoanalysis, post-structuralism and deconstruction. The universal applicability of such theoretical framework of has been called into doubt by scholars working on global, non-Western contexts who highlight the need to consider the ways in which cultural difference impacts the manner of mediating trauma. Among the current advancements within the more inclusive paradigm of trauma, approaches geared towards contributing to the process of healing from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) play an increasingly important role. Sadly, traumatic experience continues to have devastating effect on the survivors and their family members and, in case of trauma brought about by large-scale historical events, the affected societies as a whole. The process of healing from PTSD and, in worse cases, c-PTSD (complex posttraumatic stress disorder) continues to be a long and complicated journey with high risk of trauma dominating the lives of the survivors if left unattended and passing on from generation to generation. For the conference, we welcome proposals attending to the possibilities of healing from and coping with traumatic experience with a focus on, but not limited to Therapeutic mechanisms of literature and other modes of creative self-expression Literary depictions of healing and recovery Different modes and genres of storying life experience of traumatic nature Cultural mediations of healing Discursive constellations of trauma and memory Postmemory and transgenerational trauma Unattended trauma The limits of representation and healing Alternative vocabularies and discourses A special section of the conference is dedicated to the war in Ukraine with a focus on representation of the experience of the war in literature, visual media and life writing. The main working language is English, poster presentations are welcome also in Spanish, French or German. Please send a proposal of 250-300 words and a short bio of about 100 words to evka2023korraldus@lists.ut.ee Panel proposals are also welcome. The deadline for panel proposals is March 15, 2023. NB! The deadline for individual proposals has been extended to April 10, 2023.  Acceptance notices will be sent by April 25, 2023. There is no registration fee. The participants are kindly asked to arrange and cover their travel and accommodation. If necessary, conference organizers advise and assist in finding suitable arrangements. On behalf of the organizing committee Leena Kurvet-Käosaar Associate Professor of Cultural Theory Institute of Cultural Research, University of Tartu The conference is supported by Baseline Funding Project for National Sciences nr PHVKU22922 22922 “Taking Shelter in Estonia. Stories of Ukrainians Fleeing form the War.” *
July 13-15, 2023, University of Augsburg, Germany
Call for Papers – International Workshop: Relationality and More-Than-Human Storytelling Deadline for Submissions: April 10, 2023
Over the last decade scholars in the Environmental Humanities, compelled by ever-accelerating climate crises, extreme weather events, toxic spills, and the unequal distribution of their disastrous consequences, have intensified their efforts in searching for meaningful ways to reflect the fundamental human impact on Earth’s geology and its ecosystems. Amid these debates, calls to re-think or challenge the seemingly inherent centrality of humans as a species have grown louder, as anthropocentric understandings of humans’ allegedly unique subject position have rightfully come under scrutiny. Some scholars of posthumanism have gone so far as to propose a non-hierarchical philosophy that integrates humans with living organisms as a whole, creating a flat ontology (DeLanda).
The human, in such conceptions, is to be fully decentered and agency is instead attached to phenomena that “‘emerge’” as a result of the “entangled agencies” among various agents (Barad). While such approaches lead to fascinating new perspectives, their insights obviously also trouble core aspects of storytelling: looking for the non-human/more-than-human in literature is anything but intuitive, given that the act of writing is itself ultimately a human one. Various research methodologies within the Environmental Humanities, such as New Materialism, Elemental Ecocriticism, and Object-Oriented Ontology have proliferated in recent years as scholars seek to find new ways of conceptualizing human existence in a more-than-human world. At the same time, proponents of bringing about not only ‘green’ but just transitions have good reason to caution against losing sight of inequalities among humans in these endeavors. This workship aims to embrace these tensions through the lens of relationality as a potential means to decenter the human, while bearing in mind human injustices: Especially when thinking relationality not solely in terms of human-human relations, the human can arguably be placed in a wide and intricate network of what scholars such as Jane Bennett and Bruno Latour call ʻactants.’ Building on Erin James categorization of  “narrative as a particular cognitive affordance by which humans write worlds” (2022), it is our goal to interrogate and explore various ways of how this plays out in literature and other ways of storytelling. Potential topics should focus on some form of relationality, including, but not limited to:
    • Narratological experiments that decenter the human
    • Human-animal relationships
    • Nonhuman fiction
    • Plant studies
    • Reconsiderations of human responsibilities (and place) in a more-than-human world
    • New Materialism
    • Elemental Ecocriticism
    • Object-Oriented Ontology
    • Genre in the context of more-than-human storytelling
    • Ethics of decentering the human
Please send a 300-500 word abstract and a short bio to relationality2023@philhist.uni-augsburg.de by April 10, 2023. * Deadline for Submissions April 15, 2023 Wars, Carcerality and Colonial Prisons (Hi)Story, Testimonies and Representations International Conference Third Edition 13 & 14 November 2023 Tlemcen, Algeria (In-person) This conference derives from the series of scientific events organized in 2015 on the theme of wars (1st event: Cries and Writings of Wars: When Story Gets Involved in History and 2nd event: Children of Wars: Memories, Testimonies and Representations). This year, LLC research lab is launching a third edition (November 2023) which will focus on Wars, Carcerality and Colonial Prisons. The conference will explore the memorial/testimonial experience and the representations of the penitentiary universe in the context of colonial wars and their impact on incarceration, internment, deportation, isolation and regroupment camps. This scientific event aspires to interweave reflections and research on this historical period (end of 19th and 20th centuries) in a multidisciplinary perspective: History, sociology, psychology, political sciences, law media, literature, plastic arts, etc., focusing on colonial wars and imprisonment. Wars reality and magnitude shatter all human illusions. The crimes committed against humankind, the atrocities inflicted by the wars and the internal wounds that never heal make it impossible to forget. The spectre of war never ceased to haunt the places and memories of the human beings who experienced the barbarity, fury and woes of colonial rule. Thousands of people were killed, massacred, martyred or sent to prison as a result of anti-colonial riots, conflicts, revolutions and armed struggles. Exported by the colonizer, the prison was used as an instrument for maintaining order under the colonial power, its mission being to subjugate the local populations and control the territories. Under the guise of civilizing the natives, the colonial administration used the prison to fight crime, affecting all social categories (men, women, adults, minors). Prisons were also an important source of income for the colonial economy. A real penitentiary structure was built at the time: regroupment camps, detention camps, asylums, housing centres, prison farms, barracks, psychiatric hospitals, detention centres, in addition to colonial jails (Cayenne/Guyana, Île des Pins, Nouméa/New Caledonia, Tataouine/Tunisia, Nosy Lava, la Sentinelle de fer/Madagascar, Obock/Gabon, Poulo-Condore/Indochina, etc.). Colonial prisons were not only an instrument for controlling men and spaces, but also a place of exclusion and execution for all those who had challenged colonial hegemony (resistants, nationalists, rebels, opponents and independence fighters). The aim of this conference is to examine a confused and controversial colonial past by focusing on the phenomenon of incarceration and the penitentiary universe; to give, in this case, a status to the memory, the testimonies and the representations of the surviving prisoners whose traces of internment haunt memories to this day. Indeed, war is summoned within detention, it is correlated with the phenomenon of incarceration; a colonial past jointly convened by imprisonment, isolation, exile, deprivation, confinement and deportation. In this perspective, the emphasis during the two days of the conference will be on the colonial policy of repressive reform in the colonised countries, notably the question of regroupment camps, massive deportations, imposed exile and forced migration, which are still little-known tragic phenomena of the colonial penitentiary system. The testimonial discourse and the memorial narrative of male and female prisoners of war who lived through the experience of imprisonment, torture and repression will be at the centre of this scientific event. A discourse that is able to tell and transmit the historical truth of the Algerian war of revolution, the revolutionary uprising in Indochina or Vietnam and other colonised territories that had suffered the same fate, such as South Africa, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Madagascar, Cameroon, Nigeria, Vietnam etc. When investigating the modes of representation of the war and the colonial prison, several questions arise: How can surviving prisoners testify to a carceral experience whose memory remains a gaping wound? What image will they be able to transmit of themselves and of their prison ordeal? What discursive and affective processes are employed in their testimonies?  How will these prisoners of war or survivors of colonial prisons contribute to the re-construction of a historical memory based on colonial repression? What about the supervised education of minors inside prisons and children schooling in regroupment centers and camps? What representations of the penitentiary universe are conveyed by the media, fiction, cinema, painting, drawing and photography? Can words and images heal the inner wounds or erase the horrors that the prisoners had suffered within the walls of prisons? Memory and testimony are indeed two fundamental vectors in writing History, but they are also paths that invite us to penetrate a dark universe destined for erasure and silence. We know, a priori, that carceral testimony traces the narrative course of a descent into hell in order to show how such an experience was lived before being overcome. Faced with their living conditions, prisoners testify or write about their carceral trajectory in order to denounce physical and moral abuse. This form of expression advocates the factual by resorting first and foremost to the testimonial narrative with the intention of depicting the penitentiary universe and all the traumatic scenes experienced by the prisoner of war or deportee in this space (the life of the prisoners, the functioning of the prisons and camps, the disciplinary sanctions and cell sentences  inflicted on the prisoners, the guards and the supervision of the drudgery, the operations carried out by the tormentors and their methods of execution). It takes the form of a means to denounce such inhumane practices and to fight against all the forms in which they are carried out. The prisoners’ accounts often equate the prison with a tomb where Man loses his dignity and finds himself cut off from his loved ones and the outside world. Such is the case of Algerian women who were unable to overcome an obscure carceral ordeal and were forced to keep silent about their internment since independence. Imprisoned by the French army (Aures/Algeria) and forced to undergo appalling interrogations, these women prisoners have buried the traumatic memory of their incarceration deep inside their bodies (tortures, humiliations, anguish, injuries, harassment, rape, suffering, etc). In addition to the testimonies and representations of prisoners of war, the conference will also examine the places and networks of incarceration and confinement in the colonial situation. In this context, we can cite as examples some colonial prisons and penal colonies such as Lambèse (the Aurès), Nouméa (New Caledonia), the dry Guillotine (French Guyana), Poulo-Condore (Indochina), Serkadji/Barberousse (Algiers), Fresnes (Paris), les Baumettes (Marseille), Tifelfel (women prison/Aurès), Montluc (Lyon), Tataouine (Tunisia), Douera (Bône), Nosy Lava/la Sentinelle de fer (Madagascar), Paul-Cazelles (Djelfa), Coudiat Aty (Constantine), the red prison /Ferdjioua (Mila). These places of memory recount the resistance, the descent into hell, and contribute to the restitution of little-known facts. The cartography of these penitentiary institutions or the punitive/carceral archipelago of the French army as an example (in North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, Madagascar, Indochina and overseas) with their characteristics, their specificities, the categories of prisoners who passed through them, can be considered as a reference to know more about the concentration universe under the colonial empire. Relying on facts to explain the prison reality, the witnesses feel obliged to involve scenes and facts that have been kept secret in order to bestow the value of a living memory upon the testimony. Unable to talk about their carceral experiences, these witnesses of the darkness or the surviving war prisoners often choose silence, solitude and withdrawal as a way of life. In this respect, it seems fundamental to raise questions about what means to implement in order to reconstitute the History of colonial carcerality through the testimonies and the memories of surviving prisoners. How is the double project of the witness realised by revealing historical facts that have been hidden hitherto and restoring the voice of a traumatic prison past for the prisoners of war? How to render the prison experience in the context of the colonial wars? What were the living conditions of the detained (natives or opponents) in front of the punishments and harshness of colonial prisons? How to interpret the silences and the repressed memories of the surviving prisoners in order to carry on living? Thus, this scientific meeting proposes to revisit the theme of colonial wars and their abuses by investigating the History, testimonies and literary and artistic representations of all forms of incarceration and imprisonment, including deportation and regroupment camps in the context of colonial wars and revolutions. The reflection will focus on the following themes: The cartography of the concentration universe: colonial prisons, regroupment, internment or relegation camps, and penal policies; – The carceral system in the colonies and its traces in the memorial trajectories of the prisoners of war; The penitentiary universe and the carceral economy in the prisoners’ testimonies: penal labour as an instrument of colonial economic exploitation (forced labour, drudgery, labour and production in the carceral environment); Itinerancy or the crossing of prisons, deportation, exile, transfer of prisoners, repression and forced migration between imagination and reality – Testimonies: the rewriting of the colonial past and the rehabilitation of the History of prisons; – Women fighters, women prisoners: incarceration, torture and feminine resistance – Memories of prison: the carceral journey of male and female prisoners of war (prisoners’ accounts, personal diaries, epistolary accounts, drawings, wall caricatures, photos, poetry, etc); – The contribution of surviving witnesses/prisoners to the memorial Narrative: the colonial prison between individual and collective memory; – Colonial prisons and repression in the media, documentaries and cinema; – The penitentiary question and the testimonial, literary, media or film productions of the prisoners of war: aesthetics (stylistic, narratological, discursive, iconographic processes, linguistic registers, affective processes) mobilized by the witnesses in the staging of the carceral experience; – The supervised education of minor prisoners and the schooling of children in regroupment camps; – Public/private archives, holdings, colonial legacies or the legacy of colonial prison: what is left of the carceral/colonial heritage? How to participate: The languages of the conference are French, English and Arabic. Papers proposals of about 300 words including a title and an abstract, five keywords and a short bio-bibliographical note should be sent before 15 April 2023 to the following addresses: colloqueguerre@gmail.com  // labolanguesllc@gmail.com The proposals will be examined by the scientific committee of the conference. The participants are to specify the axis in which they will place their communication project. The final programme will be decided on 30 September 2023. At the end of the conference, the scientific committee will select the papers that will be published. Participation Form: Full Name: University/Institution: Telephone: E-mail: Thesis Director (if you are a doctoral student): Title of the communication: Abstract (300 words): Keywords (5)/Axis: Bibliographic references: Bio-bibliographic record:
Important dates:
• Deadline for sending proposals: 15April 2023;
• Results of the scientific evaluation of the proposals: 15 May 2023;
• Final conference program: 30 September 2023;
• Sending of the communication: 25 October 2023;
• Date of the conference: 13-14 November 2023.
Registration fees: 5000 DA for teachers-researchers and 3000 DA for doctoral students (Algerians). 70 for teachers-researchers and 50 for doctoral students (outside Algeria). The call for papers can be accessed here: https://llc.univ-tlemcen.dz/en Conference coordinator: Prof. Latifa SARI M. LLC Research Lab:https://llc.univ-tlemcen.dz/en Abou Bakr Belkaïd University -Tlemcen: https://www.univ-tlemcen.dz/en Contact Info: University Abou Bakr Belkaïd-Tlemcen Faculty of Letters and Languages LLC Research Lab Contact Email: labolanguesllc@gmail.com URL: https://llc.univ-tlemcen.dz/en *

“Navigating Cultural Crossroads: Exploring the Experiences of Transnational Travelers in the Americas”

“Journeying (the) Americas: The Paradoxes of Travel (and) Narratives” 11th IASA World Congress 2023 (ASA) University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland, Sept. 7-10, 2023. deadline for submissions:  April 14, 2023 Travel is an intimate part of human existence that involves cultural exchange through observation and interaction. It requires us to recognize that, beyond our allegiance to our own nation, we are also bound together by our shared humanity and the global community. To truly understand our own selves, we must adopt an inclusive perspective towards life, where cultures merge and combine to form a constructive relationship. In today’s globalized world, the practice of travel, mobility, and cross-cultural contact challenges the politics of difference and the homogenizing perspectives of the world state. This ‘openness to the world’[1] enables us to appreciate the diverse cultures around us and discover our own identities in relation to others and their ethnolinguistic backgrounds. By engaging with difference, we can forge cultural connections that transcend time and space, and bring subjectivity into dialogue. International travelers have been flocking to the Americas for centuries, drawn by its diverse cultures, natural beauty, and rich history. From the ancient Incan ruins of Machu Picchu to the bustling streets of New York City, the Americas offer a wide range of experiences for travelers to explore. One of the most popular destinations for international travelers is the United States. With its vast size and cultural diversity, the US offers something for everyone, from the beaches of California to the forests of Maine. Visitors can experience the excitement of Times Square in New York City, the natural beauty of the Grand Canyon in Arizona, or the historical significance of Washington, D.C. Another popular destination for international travelers is Canada, a country that boasts some of the most stunning natural landscapes in the world, from the Rocky Mountains to the vast expanses of the Canadian Shield. Central and South America also offer a wealth of experiences for international travelers. In Central America, visitors can explore the ancient ruins of Tikal in Guatemala, relax on the beaches of Costa Rica, or experience the vibrant culture of Mexico City. South America is home to some of the world’s most iconic destinations, including the Amazon rainforest, the Galapagos Islands, and the Andes Mountains. The Americas are rich in symbolism appreciated by international travelers. Examples include the bald eagle, the Statue of Liberty, the Mayan pyramids, Niagara Falls, the Hollywood Sign, the Golden Gate Bridge, and the Rio Carnival. We invite scholars and researchers to submit papers for presentations (ca. 15 mins.) exploring the theme of transnational travel writing to (and in) the Americas. This interdisciplinary panel aims to examine the ways in which international travel writers from all parts of the world have represented and engaged with the Americas as a destination of traveling as well as a place of longing. We encourage papers that examine the diverse and complex intersections of travel writing with issues such as race, gender, class, imperialism, globalization, and transnationalism. Potential topics may include, but are not limited to: –          Travel writing as a site of cultural exchange and encounter –          Representations of the self and the other in American travel writing –          Travel writing as a form of political and social critique –          Travel writing and imperialism –          Gendered perspectives on American travel writing –          The role of technology and transportation in shaping American travel writing –          The impact of globalization on American travel writing –          The ethics of representing other cultures in American travel writing –          The role of translation and multilingualism in transnational American travel writing We welcome submissions from scholars across disciplines, including literary studies, cultural studies, history, geography, anthropology, and beyond. Please submit abstracts of 300-500 words to Stefan Brandt (stefan.brandt@uni-graz.at) and Saptarshi Mallick (saptarshieng@gmail.com) by Friday, April 14, 2023. ****************************** Prof. Dr. Stefan Brandt University of Graz Department of American Studies (Research Area for American Literary and Cultural History with a Focus on (Trans-) Nationality and Space) Heinrichstr. 18/I A-8010 Graz Dr. Saptarshi Mallick Assistant Professor in English Sukanta Mahavidyalaya, Jalpaiguri University of North Bengal *

Exile at State U: Stories from the Outer Edges of Academe

Deadline for Submissions–EXTENDED DEADLINE April 1, 2023 Seeking abstracts for an edited collection of essays about life on the tenure track, especially for those working in the humanities and social sciences at non-R1 colleges and universities. Because full-time, tenure-track jobs in the humanities and social sciences are hard to come by, we are often told to be grateful and to be quiet. And indeed, there is much to be grateful for and relatively little to shout about. But there are still important stories to be told, and relatively little nonfiction has been written about the subtle but life-changing personal and professional vicissitudes of a career spent in the academic hinterlands of branch state campuses and non-elite private colleges. Especially for those from highly rated grad programs, often in metropolitan locales, a career in a rural area or small town is an eye-opening and life-altering experience. The goal of the collection is to tell it like it is, warts and all. Essays should be autobiographical, not scholarly, and can be focused on a particular career episode (and thus relatively short) or broader in scope and longer in length. The most important thing is to be compelling, or at least interesting. Humor is more than welcome. Writers are welcome to publish under a pseudonym, or anonymously. Possible topics or areas of focus –job application process: interview and campus visit stories; first impressions; deciding whether to take the job –on the tenure track: the challenges (or lack thereof) of meeting tenure and promotion requirements; interactions with other faculty, administrators, community members; networking and conferences; deciding to stay or leave –community in exile: relationships with colleagues; relations with neighbors; location details –after tenure/the middle years: career evolution; putting down roots, professionally and personally; non-academic pursuits; changing jobs –toward retirement: taking stock; successes and regrets Please email 1-2 pp. abstracts and a short bio or CV to douglash@usca.edu by April 1, 2023. Contact Info: Douglas Higbee Department of English University of South Carolina, Aiken Contact Email: douglash@usca.edu Contact Info: Douglas Higbee Professor of English University of South Carolina, Aiken Contact Email: douglash@usca.edu * SPECIAL ISSUE Imprisoned ‘Self’: Narratives of Loss, Guilt, Transformation Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics (JCLA) Guest Editor: Ayan Chakraborty (Jawaharlal Nehru University, India) Prison narratives have, quite recently, emerged as an exciting genre of literary studies in academia. While the concept of imprisonment has always invited a substantial focus within sociological studies, it had marginally to do either with the deeper exploration of the ‘imprisoned self’ or the ‘narratology’ (the logic of the narrative) about the experiences recorded by the prisoner. With life in the prison succeeding in drawing interest from literary critics, different approaches have been proposed to study language and experiences (in terms of wording) to look at the representation of the self and the various expressions of pain, agony, guilt, transformation, and even liberation. Some of them consider looking at these narratives from a more political understanding of the ‘imprisoned self’ about society and power, while a few others explore how language mediates between the author’s ‘reflection’/ ‘realization’ of their self through deeply intense drives like those of melancholia, loss, and suffering or glimpses of transcendental joy that creates a deeper understanding of the ethereal and the personal. The model of the prison has changed over the centuries. While in the European continent, prisons were directly an expression of the ‘will’ of the monarch, it had much to do with the relations of sovereignty and law. However, it is interesting to note that, as Thomas S Freeman points out in his “The Rise of Prison Literature,” prisons of the middle ages and early modernity were structural edifices that symbolized an offense against the divine through a violation of the ‘law’ of the monarch itself (the monarch being a representative of divinity on earth). The prisoner was, therefore, equivalent to the status of a heretic. Similar ideas can be found within Southern and Central Asiatic regions as well. With the rise of the liberal state, the prisoner was depicted as an ‘outlaw,’ an embodiment of violence and violation of the generic social imagination and to ‘social contract’ in particular. Michel Foucault, in his seminal The Birth of the Prison, delineates how the system of control and incarceration shifted in its objective and technique from the body and the ‘spectacle’ to the ‘mind’ and the need for ‘secrecy.’ Through a system, the prisoner’s self is inevitably a part of political interpellation, marginality, and social gaze. These ideas, though sociological, become an integral part of the prisoner’s self in their understanding of society and their relation to it. Hence, the prisoner, in all personal experiences, is a political being. As much as narratives from political prisoners, revolutionaries, and victims of racial, sexual, colonial, and economic conflicts have recorded intense moments which look at the ‘dissolution’ of the self under psychological crisis, there are instances that constructed a metaphysical idea of the ego of the prisoner that almost absorbed the world into a supernatural unity. These narratives, in their structure and intention, vary radically across symbols and semantics. This issue calls for papers that engage with language, experience, and the self (of the prisoner), study nuances of intention and expression, and explore the relation between a private subject under political scrutiny through prison narratives. To contribute to this special issue, please submit the full manuscript of your article (no less than 4,000 words) with a short author’s bio to the guest editor Ayan Chakraborty at cayan2595@gmail.com, with a copy to jclaindia@gmail.com. You are welcome to ask any questions about submission or the topic you will select. Important Dates: Submission deadline: 31st March 2023; Decision of acceptance: 30th April 2023; Publication of the issue: Autumn 2023/ Winter 2023.
ABOUT THE JOURNAL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Comparative_Literature_and_Aest… The Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics (ISSN: 0252-8169) is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal published by Vishvanatha Kaviraja Institute of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, India, since 1977. The Institute was founded by Prof. Ananta Charan Sukla (1942-2020) on 22 August 1977, coinciding with the birth centenary of renowned philosopher, aesthetician, and historian of Indian art Ananda K. Coomaraswamy (1877-1947) to promote interdisciplinary studies and research in comparative literature, literary theory and criticism, aesthetics, philosophy, art history, criticism of the arts, and history of ideas. (Vishvanatha Kaviraja, most widely known for his masterpiece in aesthetics, Sahityadarpana, or the “Mirror of Composition,” was a prolific 14th-century Indian poet, scholar, aesthetician, and rhetorician.) The Journal is committed to comparative and cross-cultural issues in literary understanding and interpretation, aesthetic theories, and conceptual analysis of art. It publishes current research papers, review essays, and special issues of critical interest and contemporary relevance. The Journal has published the finest of essays by authors of global renown like René Wellek, Harold Osborne, John Hospers, John Fisher, Murray Krieger, Martin Bocco, Remo Ceserani, J.B. Vickery, Menachem Brinker, Milton Snoeyenbos, Mary Wiseman, Ronald Roblin, T.R. Martland, S.C. Sengupta, K.R.S. Iyengar, Charles Altieri, Martin Jay, Jonathan Culler, Richard Shusterman, Robert Kraut, Terry Diffey, T.R. Quigley, R.B. Palmer, Keith Keating, and many others. JCLA is indexed and abstracted in the MLA International Bibliography, Master List of Periodicals (USA), Ulrich’s Directory of Periodicals, ERIH PLUS, The Philosopher’s Index (Philosopher’s Information Center), EBSCO, ProQuest (Arts Premium Collection, Art, Design & Architecture Collection, Arts & Humanities Database, Literature Online – Full Text Journals, ProQuest Central, ProQuest Central Essentials), Abstracts of English Studies, WorldCat Directory, ACLA, India Database, Gale (Cengage Learning), Bibliography History of Art (BHA), ArtBibliographies Modern (ABM), Literature Online (LION), Academic Resource Index, Book Review Index Plus, OCLC, Periodicals Index Online (PIO), Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers, CNKI, PhilPapers, Google Scholar, Expanded Academic ASAP, Indian Documentation Service, Publication Forum (JuFo), Summon, J-Gate, United States Library of Congress, New York Public Library, and the British Library. The journal is also indexed in numerous university (central) libraries, state, and public libraries, and scholarly organizations/ learned societies databases. Celebrated scholars of the time like René Wellek, Harold Osborne, Mircea Eliade, Monroe Beardsley, John Hospers, John Fisher, Meyer Abrams, John Boulton, and many renowned foreign and Indian scholars were Members of its Editorial Board. Founding Editor: Ananta Charan Sukla,Vishvanatha Kaviraja Institute, India Email: jclaindia@gmail.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/jclasukla * Call for Papers Black Lives under Nazism Jacob and Yetta Gelman International Research Workshop, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Washington, D.C. June 7–16, 2023 Applications due 3/31/23 The Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum invites applications for the 2023 Jacob and Yetta Gelman International Research Workshop entitled Black Lives under Nazism. The Mandel Center will co-convene this workshop with Jacqueline Nassy Brown, Department of Anthropology, Hunter College, and Sarah Phillips Casteel, Department of English, Carleton  University. The workshop is scheduled for Wednesday, June 7 through Friday, June 16, 2023, and will take place at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. This workshop advances research on the neglected history of the African diaspora in wartime Europe and the experiences of Black people caught up in the genocidal campaign of the Nazis and their collaborators. This small yet diverse population included Black Europeans, African and Caribbean colonial subjects, African-American expatriates, and soldiers from Africa, the Caribbean, and the United States. Among the expatriates were a number of American jazz musicians, such as pianist Freddy Johnson and trumpeter Valaida Snow, who chose to stay in Europe when the war broke out rather than return to the segregated society they had sought to escape. Colonial soldiers, such as the Senegalese writer and statesman Léopold Senghor, and children of German colonial subjects, such as journalist and memoirist Theodor Wonja Michael, also found themselves in the clutches of the Nazi regime. Josef Nassy, an artist of African and Sephardic Jewish descent from the Dutch Caribbean colony of Suriname, was imprisoned as an enemy national in internment camps where he painted the most substantial known visual record of Black prisoners in the Nazi camp system. Their experiences of persecution—which ranged from social and legal ostracization, sterilization, forced labor, and imprisonment in camps to murder—are reflected in a diverse body of archival sources, testimonies, and artistic and literary work that offers us a window onto the wartime experiences of African diaspora people. The workshop will focus on these sources in order to address a variety of questions about Black experiences during this period. How did the treatment of Black people by the Nazis vary according to their citizenship, gender, and military or civilian status? What kinds of strategies did they develop to navigate Nazi rule and Nazi occupation? How did their creative work (music, visual art, literature) help them to survive the war years, both spiritually and materially? How did they understand Nazism in relation to other manifestations and systems of racial violence, particularly colonial racism in the Caribbean and Africa and the “Jim Crow” laws that codified segregation in the United States? How has postwar African diaspora writing, art, and film sought to reconstruct and draw attention to this neglected wartime history? This workshop will stimulate new research directions in the field by contributing to both the colonial turn in Holocaust studies and to the burgeoning fields of Black German and Black European studies. By bringing together Holocaust studies and Black studies—two fields not normally connected—it will challenge the compartmentalization of academic knowledge that has rendered the experiences of Black people under the Nazis largely invisible. Moreover, it will draw attention to the role of the creative arts in recovering occluded histories. Finally, the workshop will enhance our understanding of the intersectionality of histories of racial oppression by identifying complexities of identity that were flattened by Nazi racial classification and by revealing unrecognized connections between wartime Europe and global African diaspora communities. The workshop will consist of presentations and discussions led by participants along three thematic tracks: 1) comparative and relational methods and frameworks for addressing the contemporaneous histories of Nazism, colonial racism, and Jim Crow, 2) modes and strategies of survival in the face of racial persecution, and 3) artistic expression and performance as a response to the Nazi regime or conditions of internment and other forms of incarceration and persecution. Daily sessions of the workshop will be comprised of presentations and discussions led by participants, as well as discussions with Museum staff and research in the Museum’s collections. The workshop will be conducted in English. We welcome proposals that address the study of this neglected chapter of wartime history and its aftermath from a range of disciplinary perspectives. Participants will have access to both the Museum’s downtown campus and the David and Fela Shapell Family Collections, Conservation and Research Center. Museum Resources The Museum’s David M. Rubinstein National Institute for Holocaust Documentation houses an unparalleled repository of Holocaust evidence that documents the fate of victims, survivors, rescuers, liberators, and others. The Museum’s comprehensive collection contains millions of documents, artifacts, photos, films, books, and testimonies. The Museum’s Database of Holocaust Survivor and Victim Names contains records on people persecuted during World War II under the Nazi regime. In addition, the Museum possesses the holdings of the International Tracing Service (ITS), which contains more than 200 million digitized pages with information on the fates of 17.5 million people who were subject to incarceration, forced labor, and displacement as a result of World War II. Many of these records have not been examined by scholars, offering unprecedented opportunities to advance the field of Holocaust and genocide studies. The Museum’s related collections include:
    • Photos from internment camps
To search the Museum’s collections, please visit collections.ushmm.org/search. To Apply Applications are welcome from scholars affiliated with universities, research institutions, or memorial sites and in any relevant academic discipline, including anthropology, African studies, African-American/Africana studies, archeology, art history, Black studies, Caribbean studies, genocide studies, geography, history, Jewish studies, Latin American studies, law, literature, philosophy, political science, psychology, sociology, religion, Romani studies, and others. Applications will be accepted from scholars at all levels of their careers, from Ph.D. candidates to senior faculty. Scholars working at universities and research institutions in Africa and the Caribbean, as well as scholars from historically excluded backgrounds in the field, are particularly encouraged to apply. The Mandel Center will reimburse the costs of round-trip economy-class air tickets to/from the Washington, D.C. metro area, and related incidental expenses, up to a maximum reimbursable amount calculated by home institution location, which will be distributed within 6-8 weeks of the workshop’s conclusion. The Mandel Center will also provide hotel accommodation for the duration of the workshop. Participants are required to attend the full duration of the workshop. The deadline for receipt of applications is March 31, 2023. Applications must include an abstract of no more than 300 words outlining the specific project that the applicant plans to research and present in the workshop, and a short bio in English. All application materials must be submitted in English online at ushmm.org/research-workshops. Questions should be directed to Krista Hegburg, Ph.D., Senior Program Officer, International Academic Programs Division, Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies, at khegburg@ushmm.org. URL: http://www.ushmm.org/research-workshops *

Call for Papers

Urban Lives: Amsterdam Diaries and Other Stories of the Self Conference held at the University of Amsterdam, 26 – 28 October 2023 Deadline for Submissions  April 1, 2023

In October 2025, Amsterdam will celebrate its 750th anniversary. In light of this upcoming celebration, two of the city’s institutes of higher education, the University of Amsterdam and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, are inviting academics, artists, and others to share their research and knowledge on one particular topic: Amsterdam diaries and other stories of the self. We are in particular focusing on Amsterdam-based self-narratives across the centuries, told by ‘ordinary individuals’, such as diaries and memoirs. We want to examine what it was like to live in the city, to study, work and go out, engage with other people, find places where one belongs (or perhaps feels excluded), and to move through its streets. Given the city ́s long history of migration, the conference seeks to account for the life stories of people with diverse backgrounds in order to study, for example, how migrants have narrated their experiences in this city: how do they tell stories of the place of arrival, their first impressions, chances, challenges and restrictions of this new environment?

Through the theme of Amsterdam life stories, we will further explore the various ways in which the city is manifest in self-representations, whether as a socio-economic space, a cultural environment, a historical setting or otherwise. How do people engage with the city’s history and geography; with texts, imagery and discourses about Amsterdam; with its architecture; and with the life stories of citizens from the past, such as Rembrandt, Spinoza, Anne Frank, Anton de Kom? How does their street and neighborhood relate to forms of self-fashioning and identity-construction? And how do people narrate changes in the city, caused by war, crisis, or environmental conditions, that affect their everyday lives and life-trajectories? It is our goal to explore the life stories which can be found in diaries, letters, memoirs, graphics, sound recordings, or stories told to relatives and researchers. Jointly, we aim to discuss what these stories (and their interpretations) can tell us about the way individuals and groups have perceived and experienced the city of Amsterdam throughout the centuries – and which modes and forms of self-expression are practiced. In that sense, we will explore how the collection of such personal stories can construct a new and diverse ‘biography’ of the city. We further want to bring together experts from life writing studies and urban history. Both fields of study have gained prominence in the humanities and social sciences in recent decades, but their crossovers are still under-explored in scholarly research. It is our aim to stimulate dialogue and open up new avenues for studying how the city shapes the self, and how life stories and self-constructions shape the city. The conference encourages dialogues across boundaries of theory, methodology, genre, place, and time. Possible themes the speakers can focus on are: • Coming of age in Amsterdam • Feelings of (non-)belonging • Places of arrival • Intercultural encounters and connections • Experiences of particular places, such as the harbour, Central Station, parks, and markets • Cultural traditions and practices of self-narration (in for example Christian and Muslim cultures) • Collective rituals and commemorations • Visual and textual expressions of city life • The uses of self-narratives in secondary and higher education; in museums • Amsterdam-based scientists: their personal experiences in the city and in public debates • Policies and practices of making the city’s collection of diaries more inclusive and diverse? • Notions of home and home-making practices in life writing • The potential of Digital Humanities to store and map historical information about diaries and diarists in its spatial and temporal context • Theoretical approaches to the intersections of life writing and (urban) life narratives • Diaries and their (lack of) references to daily urban life • The collection of urban life narratives and issues of in- and exclusivity The conference will feature panel sessions, a round-table session, keynote presentations, and possibly performances, a city excursion, and a museum visit. The conference languages are English and Dutch. All presenters must submit a max. 300-word abstract and a 150-word bio. The abstract and bio may be written in English or Dutch. Presentations which are (almost) ready to be published shortly after the conference may be selected for a volume to appear during the festivities of October 2025. Please submit your abstract before Wednesday, 1 April 2023 using the following mail address: AmsterdamUrbanLivesConference@gmail.com Organizing committee: Babs Boter, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Barbara Henkes, Guest researcher at the University of Groningen Ernestine Hoegen, Independent researcher Marleen Rensen, University of Amsterdam Leonieke Vermeer, University of Groningen * Deadline for Submissions April 1, 2023 International Research in Children’s Literature Special issue: Children at War: From Representation to Life Narrative  Editors Maciej Wróblewski (Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland) Kate Douglas (Flinders University, Australia) The twentieth and twenty-first centuries have been characterized by war and military conflict, from the Great War, WWII, Korean War, Vietnam War, through to the War in Afghanistan, Somali Civil War, Yugoslav Wars, War in Rwanda, Iraq War, Syrian Civil War, Russia-Ukraine war. These events have resulted in an overwhelming loss of lives. According to UNICEF, children are routinely affected more seriously than adults during wartime: From widespread killing, maiming, abduction and sexual violence to recruitment into armed groups and strikes on schools and hospitals, as well as essential water facilities – children living in conflict zones around the world continue to come under attack at a shocking scale. Today, one in four children live in a country affected by conflict or disaster. . . 1 In the media, and in film and literature, the child has become a complex emblem for the futility of war and military conflict. The child is also the catalyst for intervention – for instance, as adults deploy cultural representations to draw attention to injustices affecting children. There have been many fictional representations of children’s experiences of war, particularly in film, children’s book and in YA literatures. In such instances, adult authors come to speak, feel, and dream on behalf of young people. Here, we see a literary field created for young people by adult writers. The Western tradition of children’s literature, directly linked to education and teaching systems and values, directs the patterns of children’s literatures. However, historically, children have been significant first-person witnesses during wartime. Non-fictional or life narrative genres such as diaries, letters, and more recently social media, have shown a plethora of child and youth-authored texts to show us something of young people’s experiences of war and conflict across the globe. Prominent examples include Anne Frank (and many other young diarists from World War II whose writing has been anthologized; for instance, see Zapruder, Wróblewski); child soldier memoirists of the 2000s; and most recently child activists Malala Yousafzai, writing about conflict in Pakistan, and Bana Al Abed, whose frontline Twitter narrative offers eyewitness testimony on Syrian war (Douglas; Douglas and Poletti). Our understanding of, and increased attention to, child and youth-authored texts about war reflects more general cultural shifts in the notion of childhood and the importance of children as social actors whose experiences and narratives must be heard and recorded in history (Douglas and Poletti; Gilmore and Marshall). This special issue of International Research in Children’s Literature invites papers that explore the diverse ways in which children and youth are represented, or represent their own experiences, of war and military conflict (broadly conceived). Possible topics for discussion include, but are not limited to: • Discussions or case studies representing particular young authors or texts of war/military conflict. • The life narrative forms and genres that young authors use in order to narrate their experiences of war. • The role of social or digital media in creating new spaces for young authors to witness war and military conflict. • How do children/youth negotiate or represent trauma in writing about war/military conflict? • The role of controversy and hoax in the representation of war and military conflict. • The representation of adults by young authors. • Methods for reading life narrative texts of war/military conflict authored by children and youth. • Representations of war/military conflict in children’s literatures written by adults. • Representations of war/military conflict in film and television texts about or for children. Please send a 300 word abstract to Maciej Wróblewski (matej@umk.pl), Kate Douglas (kate.douglas@flinders.edu.au), and Roxanne Harde (rharde@ ualberta.ca) by 1 April 2023. Complete manuscripts (7000 words) will be due 1 August 2023. 1. https://www.unicef.org/stories/children-under-attack-six-grave-violations-againstchildren-times-war 372 —————————-
Kate Douglas (she/her) Professor of English College of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences +61 402440223 www.flinders.edu.au/people/kate.douglas

CFP André Gide and 20th-Century Autobiography

MLA Philadelphia (1/4-7/2024) deadline for submissions:  March 17, 2023 For the centennial of Si le grain ne meurt we welcome papers on Gide’s autobiographical writings, potentially alongside works by his contemporaries (Colette, Proust…). 250-300-word proposals in French or English to curtisi@kenyon.edu by 17 March 2023. This session is organized by the Association des Amis d’André Gide at the Modern Language Association Convention (4-7 January 2024, Philadelphia) * In Her Own Hand: Media of Female Agency in the Long 18th Century Call for Papers for a special session The 91st annual Association for German Studies (AGS) in Great Britain and Ireland  Conference at Trinity College Dublin, Tue 29–Thu 31 August 2023. Deadline for Submissions: March 31, 2023 In the long eighteenth century, women found new ways to engage with a male-dominated public sphere and to express their agency in textual media. One famous example would be Sophia de La Roche’s Geschichte des Fräuleins von Sternheim (1771) or her Frauenzeitschrift Pomona (1783/84). Due to many digitisation efforts, manuscripts, letters and other paraphernalia from that time period have become available for analysis for the first time. Particularly writing in the margins, deleted parts, and drafts deemed unfit for publication can form the basis of a re-examination of the polyvalent agency of female authors such as Bettina von Arnim, Caroline von Günderrode or Caroline Pichler. This panel therefore asks how women put their hard-worn textual agency into practice: what were the media of female agency in the long 18th century and how did women writers understand their own writing? Please send your proposals of ca. 250 words and a brief bio (100 words max.) in either English or German by 31 March 2023 to Helga Müllneritsch (helga.muellneritsch@ucd.ie) and Dennis Schäfer (dennis.schaefer@princeton.edu). Contact Info: Helga Müllneritsch (helga.muellneritsch@ucd.ie) Dennis Schäfer (dennis.schaefer@princeton.edu) * Calls for Papers: Modern Language Association Life Writing Forum (for 2024 MLA Conference between Jan. 4 and 7 in Philadelphia, PA, USA—conference theme is “Joys and Sorrows”) Deadlines are listed below. One more CFP will be forthcoming from us, too. Sounding a Life: How does American popular music—specifically through an album’s sounds, lyrics and, in some cases, visuals—allow for the expression of a life with all its inevitable joys and sorrows? Submit 300-word abstracts & short bios by 3/1/23. Contact email: Kimberly Mack, kimberly.mack@utoledo.edu Dialogic Life Writing: How does auto/biography emerge through conversation, whether scholarly dialogue (e.g., bell hooks & Stuart Hall), institutional oral histories (e.g. WPA) or personal interviews (e.g., Malcolm X & Alex Haley)? 300-word abstracts, short bios by 3/1/23. Contact email: Angela Ards, ardsa@bc.edu Teaching Life Writing: A Roundtable: What are the joys and sorrows of teaching life writing in a changing world? This roundtable discussion welcomes proposals on pedagogical approaches to the challenges of the auto/biography classroom. 300-word abstracts, short bios by 3/15/2023. Contact email: Megan Brown, megan.brown@drake.edu Dr. Megan Brown Professor of English Director of Writing Associate Dean, John Dee Bright College Faculty Athletics Representative Drake University * AUTO/BIOGRAPHY STUDY GROUP SUMMER CONFERENCE 2023 ‘NEW BEGINNINGS’: July 14–16, 2023 Wolfson College, Oxford The call for papers is now open and we welcome papers and presentations that respond to the concept of ‘new beginnings’ substantively, theoretically, methodologically and creatively. This year we are also including presentations of ‘installation pieces’ which might include a poster, creative artefact(s) or a short video or other. The keynote will be given by Professor David Brown, Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University. David’s talk is entitled ‘Auto/Biography and Second Generation Practice Theory’. We invite abstract submissions (250 words) for 30-minute oral presentations followed by discussion and for installation pieces (there will be space in the programme for viewing and discussion of these). We are pleased to invite papers from across the broadest range of auto/biographical work, including ‘work-in-progress’ and those testing out innovative approaches, and welcome colleagues and friends from in and outside of the academy at all career stages. Please submit your abstract to https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/bsa-autobiography-summer-conference-2023/. The abstract submission deadline is 15th March at 5pm and abstracts received after this date will not be considered. As before, if you have any queries relating to abstract submission please email events@britsoc.org.uk. Please contact gayle.letherby@plymouth.ac.uk and/or SEERYA@tcd.ie for further detail about the conference. MARCH SEMINAR: This is a final reminder to register for our seminar on Thursday 2nd March at 1700-1800: ‘The roar at the end of years of silence: feminist voices through educating geeta’ by Geeta Ludhra (Brunel University London): https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/autobiography-study-group-seminar-online-the-roar-at-the-end-of-years-of-silence-feminist-voices-through-educating-geeta-by-geeta-ludhra-brunel-university-london-1/ The Zoom link and joining details will be sent out next Thursday morning. If you have any questions about registration please email events@britsoc.org.uk and colleagues will help you. MAY SEMINAR: Registration is also open for the seminar (online) on Thursday 4th May 2023 at 1700-1800: ‘Can children narrate memoirs? Celebrating experimental narratives’ by Amanda-Marie Kale (University of Nottingham): https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/autobiography-study-group-seminar-online-can-children-narrate-memoirs-celebrating-experimental-narratives-by-amanda-marie-kale-university-of-nottingham/ Please share the information with your colleagues and networks. Best wishes Anne Chappell and Carly Stewart Auto/Biography Study Group Convenors Email: anne.chappell@brunel.ac.uk and cstewart@bournemouth.ac.uk Find the Auto/Biography Study Group: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/ Find the Auto/Biography Study Group on Twitter: @AutoBiographySG Join the Auto/Biography Study Group: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/join-us/ Register with the Auto/Biography Study Group: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/BSA-AUTO-BIOGRAPHY-GROUP Submit to our open access online journal ‘Auto/Biography Review’: https://autobiographyreview.com/index.php/abrev *

GSA 2023 Panel: “Autobiographical and Autofictional Writing in the Works of Günter Grass”

Deadline for Paper Submissions: March 15, 2023 The 47th Annual German Studies Association (GSA) Conference, 5-8 October, 2023, Montréal, Quebec Günter Grass’s reservations towards the genre of autobiography are well documented. In a 2003 interview with Der Spiegel, Grass stated: “Wenn ich eine Möglichkeit sähe, mich gewissermaßen in Variation zu erzählen – das wäre vielleicht reizvoll. Aber eigentlich mag ich Autobiographisches in der verschlüsselten Form der Fiktion, des Romans, lieber.” (Doerry und Hage 2003, 144) Despite (or maybe because of) this skepticism, the autobiographical and autofictional are ever present in his works, not just in the so-called ‚Autobiographical Trilogy‘ (Grimms Wörter, Die Box and Beim Häuten der Zwiebel) and in Die Blechtrommel, but also in texts like Das Treffen in Telgte, Im Krebsgang, Mein Jahrhundert and others. This panel aims to engage with recent developments in autobiographical theory, particularly the discourse surrounding the concept of autofictional as a mode of writing rather than a distinct genre: in their recently published volume, Alexandra Effe und Hannie Lawlor (2022, 4) explore the concept’s widespread attraction, defining it as “a combination of real and invented elements; onomastic correspondence between author and character or narrator; and stylistic or linguistic experimentation.” How do these and similar characteristics manifest in the writing of Günter Grass? What insights into his works can be gained from the engagement with new developments in autobiographical and autofictional theory? And what, in turn, can Günter Grass’s texts contribute to better understand the complex and intriguing concept of the autofictional as well as its relation to autobiographical writing? If you are interested in participating in this panel at the 47. Annual Conference of the German Studies Association in Montréal, Canada, please send your abstract 350-500 words together with a short biographical note as well as any questions to Christian Baier (cbaier@snu.ac.kr). Submission deadline is March 15th, 2023.
https://www.thegsa.org/blog/cfp-gsa-47th-annual-conference
Contact Email: cbaier@snu.ac.kr * Deadline for Submissions Mar. 15, 2023 Call for Abstracts: War Diaries: Ecologies of Post-war Reconstructions Dr. Elisa Dainese (Georgia Tech) and Dr. Aleksandar Staničić (TU Delft) DATES AND SUBMISSION DETAILS: Submission opens: December 15, 2022. Submission deadline: March 1, 2023. Pre-selection: March 15, 2023. Tentative Workshop date: April 2023 The destruction of buildings and artifacts has shaped not only the physical attributes of the built environment but also societies, cultures, and entire civilizations across the globe—arguably, with zeal equal to their creative production. Modern-day annihilations of Aleppo and Homs, in Syria, and more recently Mariupol, Volnovakha, and many other towns, in Ukraine, illustrate the weaponization of art and architecture and connect it with a growing number of physical assaults and aggressions against entire populations, their cultural heritage, and spatial landmarks. The need to understand how cities, environments, and societies can recover efficiently and sustainably from such violence is dire. When it comes to the impact of postwar reconstructions, however, existing research focuses mostly on specific and isolated fields, such as urbicide, military urbanism, semiotics of destruction, displacement and migrations, war economies, memorial studies, etc. In the first volume of War Diaries, subtitled Design after the Destruction of Art and Architectureand published in 2022 by the University of Virginia Press (https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/5408/), we focused on the role of artistic and architectural design and the field work of designers in the context of postwar reconstruction. Discussions following the publication of the book challenged ongoing debates on post-war rebuilding. They focused on the broader ecological impact of reconstruction and the interrelation between physical, social, and economic settings during recovery and renewal. To address the gap, this call explores the rarely considered but complex ecologies and ecological entanglements emerging after violence and destruction. Ecological intricacies are understood as both richness and diversity of postwar reconstruction approaches, and include investigations on the environmental impact of human actions and the socio-spatial predicament in which different actors operate during recovery. More specifically, in the edited volume that will result from this call, we want to broaden the picture of postwar reconstruction and link the multiple settings and approaches in which rebuilding after violence operates. Future authors of War Diaries: Ecologies of Post-war Reconstructions are invited to investigate complex systems involving design recovery after the war and how they simultaneously address diverse factors, scales, milieus, and resources. The emphasis goes on the relational quality of reconstruction which connects environmental, social, and/or technological settings. Understood in its entirety, the book will consider the built environment as a canvas of various power-plays as well as the arena in which relationships combine to translate into complex postwar realities. Our long-term goal with this project is to test existing and create new urban development scenarios able to recover post-conflict contexts. Possible topics include, but are not limited to:
    • the relation between environment, territory, and community, including the complexity of landscapes of destruction and extraction, border tensions in territory formations, and the entanglement of ecologies of resistance;
    • the intricacies between social, environmental, and economic milieus, including the frictions between professional expertise and forms of (re)construction labor, the linkages between the environmental inequality of rebuilding and social tolerance, and the crisis emerging from the clash of ecological processes of renewal and (geo)political histories;
    • the connection between body and environment, the violent confrontation of embodied knowledge and damaged landscapes, the biopolitics of recovery, the emergence of ecological tensions in recovered interiors;
    • the predicament of technology and media, their limitations, potential, and broader impact in conducting, researching and designing post-war ecologies of reconstruction.
We would like to invite authors to submit extended abstracts (between 500 and 1000 words). Proposals should be submitted no later than March 1, 2023, via the following email addresses: elisa.dainese@design.gatech.edu and A.Stanicic@tudelft.nl . By March 15, 2023, the co-editors will inform the authors if their proposal is selected. After abstracts are selected, authors will be invited to participate in an extended conversation on the book project which will set the base for a publication on ecologies of postwar reconstruction. This will be the third event that the authors have organized to promote the topic: the first event was in The Netherlands, at Delft Institute of Technology (June 20, 2022), the second event took place in Atlanta (USA), at the Georgia Institute of Technology (September 23, 2022). Authors will be asked to prepare a 5 to 10-minute presentation on the main ideas of their proposal. Presentations will be followed by a group brainstorming session in which we will define more precisely the outline of the book. During the workshop, we will actively engage our authors in a conversation on the book project. We will also discuss a timeframe for publication of the entire manuscript. The modality of the meeting will be hybrid (virtual on zoom and in person; location tbd). Authors will work on the final papers for publication after the event and according to the feedback received. Contact Info: Dr. Elisa Dainese (Georgia Tech, elisa.dainese@design.gatech.edu) and Dr. Aleksandar Staničić (TU Delft, A.Stanicic@tudelft.nl) Contact Email: elisa.dainese@design.gatech.edu *
CALL FOR PAPERS
Trauma and Healing: Storying Lives, Literary Engagements, Entangled Memories University of Tartu, Estonia, June 8 to 9, 2023 15th International Conference of the Estonian Association of Comparative Literature Deadline for Submissions March 15, 2023  
The conceptual framework of trauma has played an immense role in critical inquiry and memory studies for many decades. Russian full-scale military aggression against Ukraine that started on February 24, 2022 that has claimed the lives of thousands of civilians and has brought about the most extensive humanitarian crisis of the 21st century, forcibly displacing nearly half of the Ukrainian population, brings the notion of trauma into focus with particular urgency. Not only does it merit the revision of existing frameworks and approaches and weigh their applicability in the context of the massive impact of the war in Ukraine but it also calls forth the necessity of developing new frameworks and approaches of supporting coping and healing.
With a focus on both individual and collective memory, large-scale historical events as well as those concerning the commonplace contexts of everyday life, involving, for instance, domestic violence, sexual abuse and social marginalization, which are closely related to and depend on social and political regulations and cultural discourses, the development of trauma studies as a field of cultural enquiry has been shaped by a close affinity to the theoretical frameworks of psychoanalysis, post-structuralism and deconstruction. The universal applicability of such theoretical framework of has been called into doubt by scholars working on global, non-Western contexts who highlight the need to consider the ways in which cultural difference impacts the manner of mediating trauma. Among the current advancements within the more inclusive paradigm of trauma, approaches geared towards contributing to the process of healing from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) play an increasingly important role. Sadly, traumatic experience continues to have devastating effect on the survivors and their family members and, in case of trauma brought about by large-scale historical events, the affected societies as a whole. The process of healing from PTSD and, in worse cases, c-PTSD (complex posttraumatic stress disorder) continues to be a long and complicated journey with high risk of trauma dominating the lives of the survivors if left unattended and passing on from generation to generation. For the conference, we welcome proposals attending to the possibilities of healing from and coping with traumatic experience with a focus on, but not limited to Therapeutic mechanisms of literature and other modes of creative self-expression Literary depictions of healing and recovery Different modes and genres of storying life experience of traumatic nature Cultural mediations of healing Discursive constellations of trauma and memory Postmemory and transgenerational trauma Unattended trauma The limits of representation and healing Alternative vocabularies and discourses A special section of the conference is dedicated to the war in Ukraine with a focus on representation of the experience of the war in literature, visual media and life writing. The main working language is English, poster presentations are welcome also in Spanish, French or German. Please send a proposal of 250-300 words and a short bio of about 100 words to evka2023korraldus@lists.ut.ee Panel proposals are also welcome. The deadline for panel proposals is March 15, 2023 and individual proposals March 25, 2023.  Acceptance notices will be sent by April 10, 2023. There is no registration fee. The participants are kindly asked to arrange and cover their travel and accommodation. If necessary, conference organizers advise and assist in finding suitable arrangements. On behalf of the organizing committee Leena Kurvet-Käosaar Associate Professor of Cultural Theory Institute of Cultural Research, University of Tartu The conference is supported by Baseline Funding Project for National Sciences nr PHVKU22922 22922 “Taking Shelter in Estonia. Stories of Ukrainians Fleeing form the War.” *

Autotheory and Its Others

deadline for submissions:  March 15, 2023 Edited Collection Autotheory, an emergent discourse with historic precedents, lacks a stable definition. Recently, Lauren Fournier defined the term as “a self-conscious way of engaging with theory—as a discourse, frame, or mode of thinking and practice—alongside lived experience and subjective embodiment . . .” (Autotheory as Feminist Practice in Art, Writing, and Criticism). Yet there are as many approaches to autotheory as there are autotheorists. From a recognizable aesthetic in artistic practices to a more scholarly methodology, autotheory remains a shapeshifter. Autotheory can be understood as a methodology rather than as a final result or a specific aesthetic. It is first and foremost an opportunity for a maker (i.e., a writer, a researcher, or an artist) to make sense of reality through a profound, embodied, and possibly speculative processing of theory and art in order to better open up past, present, and future worlds. An acknowledgement of those fields implies an acceptance of others, their realities, and their sense-making attempts. Thus, autotheory is not the act of pinning a loose reference to theory on one’s chest like an honorary medal. Instead, it needs the tangible, sizable presence of the other/s to confront, expand, and contextualize the auto-, and vice versa. We can also approach autotheory as a scholarly genre itself, mixing one’s lived experience with a thoroughgoing engagement with and reflection on theory and art in all its iterations. Although autotheory is an example of what Michel Foucault called “technologies of the self”—a discursive practice, an exercise in shaping one’s life, and a form of pedagogy in the same way that Roland Barthes understood his lecture courses at the Collège de France as a form of paideia, “an introduction to living, a guide to life” (The Neutral)—it is best understood as a practice in which theory and art are not used as a reassuring mirror, a form of self-fashioning, but rather as a catalyst in a project of unlearning and undoing, of becoming other. Such a practice can be found not only in current manifestations of autotheory but also in its predecessors, i.e., in traditions such as romanticism, decadent aestheticism, existentialism, psychoanalysis, and surrealism: currents that tried to understand and galvanize everyday experiences by exploring other ways of doing, feeling, and thinking. The preceding offers a framework for a multi-author collection tentatively entitled Autotheory and Its Others. Punctum Books has expressed early interest in the proposed collection. With editors working from both sides of the Atlantic—Eric Daffron and Becky McLaughlin from the U.S. and Maria Gil Ulldemolins and Kris Pint from Europe—this collection will serve as a testing ground for those definitions while providing space for work that expands and even challenges them. We invite practicing autotheorists to plot its different manifestations and roots. Different realities will require different encounters. What do the latter entail? Who is invited? How does the very definition of the self change depending on context? How does the understanding of the other/s change in different contexts? How do the less academic forms of knowledge, the more local, vernacular, and folkloric branches of culture, appear in autotheoretical practices? What can we learn from these engagements? We seek texts of all sorts—scholarly, creative, theoretical, and pedagogical—that pose and/or reflect on these questions in order to widen the understanding of not only what autotheory is but also what it can do. And, considering the rich legacy of autotheory’s predecessors, biographical, historical, and critical studies of figures whose artistic, pedagogical, and theoretical practices might now be retroactively regarded as autotheory are also welcome. Possible topics include but are not limited to the following: Autotheory and its others: Autotheory in the classroom Autotheory and collaboration Autotheory and its predecessors Autotheory and the self as an/other Autotheory and self-experimentation/transformation Autotheory and its discontents: Autotheory and confession Autotheory and alienation Autotheory and authenticity Autotheory and solipsism Autotheory and ego discourse Autotheory and its genres and modes: Autotheory and life-writing Autotheory and autofiction Autotheory and the lyric essay Autotheory and performance Autotheory and visual art Autotheory and its preoccupations: Autotheory and sexuality Autotheory and race Autotheory and trauma Autotheory and human rights Autotheory and climate crisis Autotheory and its practitioners: Autotheory and Roland Barthes Autotheory and Hélène Cixous Autotheory and Michel Foucault Autotheory and Gloria Anzaldúa Autotheory and bell hooks Please send proposals of 500 words and a brief CV to Becky McLaughlin at the University of South Alabama (bmclaugh@southalabama.edu) with “Autotheory” as the subject line. Deadline for receipt of proposals is March 15, 2023. Accepted papers will typically run between 6,000 and 8,000 words, but the editors will entertain somewhat shorter pieces on a case-by-case basis. We especially invite persons from underrepresented groups to contribute to this collection. * Call for Contributions: [Auto]biographical Writing, Fan Fiction and Education Edited Collection Abstracts Due March 1, 2023 German philosopher Wilhelm Dilthey noted the educational value of [auto]biographical writing as a means of understanding life, bound up in hermeneutic knowing:  an intuitive route to understanding based on our situated human-ness, rather than on knowledge based on certainty or probability (Friesen, 2020). Certainly, Dilthey was not the first to note this enduring pedagogical quality of the autobiography as, in the 18th century, Benjamin Franklin had already offered his autobiography as a model of a life “fit to be imitated” (cited in Jacobson, 2018). Although mimetic modelling and hermeneutic knowing cannot be easily reconciled, it is clear that both rely on a degree of introspection and introjection. Fan fiction, on the other hand, is a fictional novum, which is closely linked to the genre of [auto]biographical writing. Amateur writers feel strongly linked to already established characters, placing them into new situations and, via their own understanding of the world, they write about the characters’ lives, loves and experiences in a speculative way. There is introspection here, in terms of the hermeneutic endeavour of interpreting the character via one’s own context and experience; and there is introjection as the writers seek to model the persona of the fictional character in their own writing. In this proposed publication, we are seeking chapters which address the relationship between [auto]biographical writing and fan fiction, and both of these in relation to education. Suggestions for contributions include (but are not limited to):
    • Pedagogical uses of autobiography/fan fiction
    • Autobiography/fan fiction as pedagogical reduction
    • Self-reflection in autobiographical writing/fan fiction
    • Representation of identities/intersectional identities
    • Hermeneutic knowing and writing in autobiography/fan fiction
Although this work will consider autobiographical and fan fiction from an educational slant, contributions are not limited to scholarship in the field of education. Ideas from across disciplines are encouraged. Papers can be theoretical or empirical in scope. If you are interested in contributing a chapter, please submit a 500 word abstract by March 1st 2023 to: Nicola Robertson n.robertson@strath.ac.uk Yueling Chen yueling.chen.2018@strath.ac.uk * CALL FOR PAPERS Conference: Women’s narratives and European integration history University of Luxembourg/C2DH 20-21 April 2023 Deadline for abstracts: 1 March 2023 The question of women’s role in international relations has given rise to a growing body of research since the mid-1970s. Topics have included pacifist activism during World War Two (Gottlieb & Johnson, 2022; Goedde, 2019; Bell 2015), the feminist movement, human rights issues (Briatte, 2020; Kaplan, 2014; Offen, 2000) and gender issues in international relations theory, as well as other subjects within the fields of gender studies and intersectionality studies (Carver & Lyddon, 2022; Hancock, 2016; Steans, 2013). Female leadership in international relations and post-war diplomacy has also been explored (Müller & Tömmel, 2022; Owens & Rietzler, 2021; Aggestam & Towns, 2018; Sluga & James, 2016). At European level, too, there has been increasing interest in this area. In policy terms, however, although the Treaty of Rome introduced a European gender equality policy in 1957, it was only from 1975 that a common policy on women’s economic and social rights began to be developed. Research has ranged from parity issues (Bereni & Reveillard, 2007; Deshormes, 1991) to women’s participation in the exercise of political power (Woodward, 2004; Union interparlementaire, 1995), the concept of gender mainstreaming as a cross-sector approach (Abels & Mushaben, 2012; Lascoumes & Le Gales, 2004) and female networks and gender issues in European integration (Hertner, 2021; Briatte, Gubin & Thébaud, 2019). But notwithstanding these efforts, in general the presence and influence of women, whether formal or informal, in power relations (Gaspard 2009), institutions (Carbonell, 2019; Dénéchère, 2016), international relations and diplomacy (Badel, 2021; Doré-Audibert, 2002; Seidel, 2023) has received scant attention. The history of European integration and Europeanisation has developed into a varied field that has moved on from an initial focus on the vision and achievements of the founding fathers. However, even though women played a vital part in the European project launched after the Second World War (intellectuals, experts and technocrats, those with menial but essential jobs, parliamentarians, trade unionists, diplomats, activists for the European cause, etc.), their role has yet to be fully explored. Women tended to remain in the background until they began to be more readily accepted as political leaders, particularly following the first European elections by direct universal suffrage in 1979 and the appointment of the first female European Commissioner in 1989. Against this backdrop, “adding a gender perspective to European memory” and history (Milosevic, 2018) seems essential. This conference, which focuses on the period after World War Two, aims to spark discussion on topics that can inform the following issues:
    • From a “his-storical” to a “her-storical” narrative: is there a female narrative in the European integration process? Specific historiographical traditions, theories, methodologies and approaches related to the history of women in Europe in the 20th and 21st centuries;
    • Biographical perspectives: individual women in the development and implementation of the European project;
    • The “female lobby”: how different organisations, groups of thinkers, activists and networks organised themselves to develop their influence, political presence and visibility in Europe (at trans-European/international level, within the EU and in individual Member States)
    • Women in East-West dialogue and the EU’s enlargement
    • Anti-europeanism: women and Euroscepticism
    • Gendered perspectives and issues related to European democracy, rights, policies, institutions and actors
    • Digital storytelling in developing new knowledge of the past: norms and practices in gathering, preserving, sharing and disseminating the memory of women who have played an active role on the European stage (oral history, text mining, network analysis, etc.)
These are intended to serve as broad categories; the conference will be open to a variety of approaches. The conference will take place on 20-21 April 2023 at the University of Luxembourg/Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History (C2DH) in connection with the project “The role of women in European and international relations in Luxembourg (after the Second World War)”, developed by the University of Luxembourg, C2DH and Europe Direct at the University of Luxembourg. Eligibility and how to apply: PhD students, early career researchers and experienced researchers are invited to submit proposals. Applicants should submit an abstract of no more than 500 words outlining their proposal and a short CV by 1 March in writing to François Klein (francois.klein@uni.lu) with the subject heading “Women’s narrative conference application”. Selected applicants will be informed by 10 March 2023. Scientific committee: Dr Elena Danescu (University of Luxembourg/C2DH), Dr Katja Seidel (University of Westminster, School of Humanities), Dr Dieter Schlenker (Historical Archives of the European Union); Prof. Sonja Kmec (University of Luxembourg, Institute for History), François Klein (University of Luxembourg/C2DH). Contact Info: Dr Francois Klein Dr Elena Danescu Contact Email: k.seidel@westminster.ac.uk URL: https://www.c2dh.uni.l * direct your questions to Dr. Yuan Shu (yuan.shu@ttu.edu). The deadline for submission is February 18, 2023. You may choose either on-site or on-line format (cannot be switched). Personal Writing and Textual Practices in the British Empire, C19th-20th One-day conference, University of Leicester Generously supported by the Leicester Institute for Advanced Studies (LIAS) CFP In person, 14 April 2023, 10am-5pm GMT Deadline for Proposals: February 17, 2023 Social drinks to follow Co-convenors: Dr Ipshita Nath (Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Saskatchewan) Ellen Smith (AHRC Midlands4Cities PhD Researcher, School of History, Politics & International Relations) We invite submissions of abstracts for individual papers (20 minutes) or whole panels (x3 individual 20-minute papers) for the LIAS-funded one-day conference on Personal Writing and Textual Practices in the British Empire, during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The conference will explore the experiences of individuals as constructed and represented through various forms of writing, specifically personal in nature. We are interested in generating new insights and methodologies to study epistolary writing and textual cultures of the empire. The scope is decidedly broad to allow for the widest possible engagement with our key enquiry, which will examine the relationship between personal writing and the ways British imperialism was conceived and has since been remembered to the present day. We are interested in proposals that address genres in personal writings, including private correspondence, journals, memoirs, diaries, scrapbooks, ethnographical accounts, etc.  We aim to create discussions around aspects of the colonial and postcolonial experience that these forms recorded, such as relationships, ­­­domestic subjectivities, travel, colonial service or labour, warfare, everyday life, political action, personal reflection and expressions of identity. Proposals for papers or panels that are interdisciplinary in scope are particularly encouraged. We envisage productive links to be made with methodological approaches to writing from disciplines and fields such as history, literary studies, art history, sociology and psychology, and media and communication studies, for instance. Proposals might wish to address the following topics, but not limited to:
    • Letter writing and communication in colonial and global contexts; formal or official communication networks.
    • Diary writing, journal reporting and documenting the ‘Self’.
    • Subaltern life writing and modes of resistance.
    • Life writing, memoirs and remembrance or memory studies of empire.
    • Writing in familial, personal and domestic spheres.
    • Travel writing, migration, emigration, and writing on the move.
    • The ‘female gaze’ on the empire.
    • Adventure and exploration tales.
    • Missionary writing.
    • Processes, techniques and genres of writing; the material aspects and culture of writing.
    • Artistic representations of writing, or writing supplemented with visual and textual practices, such as interactions of text and photographs/sketching/art/watercolours.
    • Erasure and silencing; editing and destruction.
    • Broader archival practices and the material traces or remnants of writing and text.
    • Private/personal writing as modes of historiography.
    • Problems of authenticity e.g., biases, prejudices, and ideological motivations.
    • Ephemera and textual assemblages e.g., scrapbooks and albums.
    • Literature and fictional responses to empire in personal contexts.
    • Writing and everyday life.
Instructions: For individual papers, please send 250-word abstracts, paper titles, and short biographies to ecss3@leicester.ac.uk (primary conference contact). For panels, please include abstracts and bios for each speaker, as well as a title/short summary of the panel theme and purpose. We ask that proposals and all elements of these are sent in a single word or pdf file. PowerPoint presentations and visual aids are encouraged and the venue will facilitate this. Deadline for proposals: 17 February 2023. All submissions will receive confirmation of entry and decisions will be communicated no later than 22 February 2023. Additional details: the conference is free to attend but registration will be essential as spaces are limited. Lunch and tea and coffee will be provided throughout the day. Registration links and updates will be announced via @LeicsIAS and the LIAS blog: https://www.leicias.le.ac.uk/ *We plan to publish the findings from the conference as an edited collection and speakers will be invited to submit their papers for inclusion in the volume by the end of May. Contact Info: Ellen Smith: ecss3@leicester.ac.uk Contact Email: ecss3@leicester.ac.uk * Deadline for Submissions, February 14, 2023 “The ‘Portfolio’ from Every Angle. Archiving and Preserving Working Documents (1680s-1820s)” Call for Proposals for the International Conference organised at the University Côte d’Azur, CMMC-MSH Sud-Est, on 21-22 March 2024 by Simon Dolet The storage of digital data has been at the heart of our concerns for the past 60 years. Technologies come and go – floppy disk, CD-Rom, USB stick, external hard drive, cloud computing – with greater storage capacity to meet the exponential growth in digital data production. The new ‘digital industry’ also has to respond to the growing fear of data loss as old storage formats become obsolete. However, the issue is older and deserves to be put into a longer perspective. In particular, there seems to have been an inflection in the 18th century, when the quantity of documents preserved and therefore available, compared to previous centuries, recorded an unprecedented growth. The “portefeuille” (or “porte-feuille”) is an example of this concern for the conservation of documents. Used since the 16th century according to the French Academy, in 1718 this term still referred to a “cardboard box folded in two, covered with skin or some other material, & used to carry papers”. While its use in the French language expanded over the course of the century, the term did not enter foreign dictionaries until the beginning of the 19th century, with literal translations of “porte-feuille”: brieftasche (German), portfolio (English), portafolio (Spanish) or portafoglio (Italian). It is in the European space and its worldwide extensions that the portfolio will be considered here as a support for storing and filing personal documents, documents known or not by its contemporaries, published or not. With the rise of the concept of literacy, the ‘writing life’ (Bertrand, 2015) has animated recent historical studies. The portfolio could add to this historiographical renewal a tool used in all sectors of society – the portfolios of a minister, a merchant, an artist, a craftsman, a man of letters, a scholar, etc. – which contains documents that allow us to identify the life of a person. This is a collection of documents that allow us to get closer to the daily life of the actors. Drafts (Ferrand, 2012), notebooks (Blair, 2010), letters (Chapron, Boutier, 2013), printed matter and so on are ‘living writings’ (Bertrand, 2015) offering the possibility of writing a material, cultural, social and political history. Three main axes have been selected for this scientific meeting in order to consider the role taken by portfolios in society as well as the inflection of uses and practices between the 1680s and the 1820s. The focus will be on case studies, not only of portfolios of famous figures but also of more modest and lesser-known actors. 1. The formation of portfolios If a material approach connects the historian with the archives, it is necessary to understand the uses and sensitivity of the actors to their portfolio(s): purchase, creation, insertion of papers, momentary or definitive extraction, filing, loss, destruction. 2. Within and outside portfolios This section will focus on the documents contained in the portfolios, which are associated with both the successes and failures of their owners. 3. Governing and existing through portfolios The focus here will be on portfolios in relation to the organs of power, without forgetting the power granted to the individual outside of institutions. For an extended version and/or in French : https://www.fabula.org/actualites/112339/le-portefeuille-sous-toutes-ses-coutures-archiver-et-conserver-ses.html Submission Proposals in French or English, the languages of this international conference, should be between 1 and 3,000 characters in length and accompanied by a bio-biographical presentation. They should be sent before 30 September 2023 by email to dolet.simon@gmail.com. This international conference will be published. Scientific commitee Pierre-Yves Beaurepaire-Hernandez (Université Côte d’Azur) Jean Boutier (EHESS) Liliane Hilaire-Pérez (EHESS, Université Paris Cité) Isabelle Laboulais (Université de Strasbourg) Pietro Daniel Omodeo (Università Ca’ Foscari) Contact Info: Simon Dolet Centre de la Méditerranée Moderne et Contemporaine Côte d’Azur University, Nice, France PhD Candidate simon.dolet@univ-cotedazur.fr Contact Email: simon.dolet@univ-cotedazur.fr *

Saints and Mystics in Legend and Tradition

September 2, 2023 to September 3, 2023 Surrey, UK Where is the spring that rose where St. Alban’s blood fell? Who cares for Cuddy Ducks? Can we see Enoch and Elijah? When the Virgin fell in labour, was Romani St. Sarah at her side? How did St. Sebastian become a gay icon? Who were the Twin Saints, the Three Pure Ones, the Four Friends and the Five Major Prophets? What goes into a Dumb Cake for St. Agnes’ Eve? Does a wet St. Swithun’s day really foretell forty days of rain? Do girls still appeal to St. Andrew of the fishermen for a good catch in marriage? Can we still hear Old Clem at the hammer and the thunders of St. Barbara? Whether you weave a cross of reeds for Lá Féile Bríde, wear a daff for Dewi Sant, or bear a rose for St. George, come and join our day or we may have to call on St. Jude, patron saint of lost causes. A two-day conference on Saints and Mystics in Legend and Tradition will be held on Saturday 2nd (St. Justus of Lyons) and Sunday 3rd (St. Gregory the Great) September 2023 at the Chapter House, St. Albans Cathedral. Anyone can join us – scholars, storytellers, hermits and hagiographers. We invite proposals about any saint, mystic, martyr or prophet. Presentations, which should be 20 minutes long, can take the form of talks, performances, or film. For more information, see https://folklore-society.com/events. The conference fee is £35 for speakers, £70 for others attending. Contact Info: Jeremy Harte, Bourne Hall, Spring Street, Ewell, Surrey KT17 1UF. Telephone: 020 8394 1734 Contact Email: jrmharte@gmail.com URL:
https://folklore-society.com/events/

*

The 2023 TTU Symposium on “Pandemic, Environment, and Life Writing”

April 21-22, 2023 deadline for submissions:  February 18, 2023 The Comparative Literature Program at Texas Tech University will host the 2023 symposium on “Pandemic, Environment, and Life Writing” on campus on April 21-22, 2023. Keynote Speakers: Dr. Jennifer Ho, Eaton Professor of Ethnic Studies and Director of the Center for Humanities & the Arts, University of Colorado at Boulder Dr. Laura Hyun Yi Kang, Professor of Gender and Sexuality Studies, University of California at Irvine Dr. Muhsin al-Musawi, Professor of Classic and Modern Arabic Literature and of Comparative and Cultural Studies, Columbia University Dr. Aretha Phiri, Associate Professor of English, University of Rhodes, South Africa Dr. Jacqueline Kolosov, Professor of Creative Writing, Texas Tech University Since the Covid-19 pandemic started in spring 2020, millions of people around the globe have perished, suffered from loss of health and loved ones, and struggled for survival on a day-to-day basis. As humanity exposes vulnerability before unpredictable natural and built environments, hate crime and anti-Asian racism have been on a dramatic rise. The situation has been exacerbated by the emergence of right-wing extremist groups around the globe from dictators in totalitarian regimes to elected nationalist leaders of Western democracies. Moreover, with the escalation of the tech war between the US and China into Cold War 2.0 and the on-going war between Russia and Ukraine, we are facing a possible apocalyptic scenario of nuclear devastation and World War III. In front of these multifarious threats and divisions, what is our common humanity? What role has life writing played in articulating and negotiating our humanity at different moments of crises across time and space? What kind of healing power can life writing generate? Why and how are telling and sharing of personal life narratives critical to our human survival and planetary future? This symposium not only looks for papers that explore life narratives in different aesthetic forms and representational modes from autobiography to autoethnography, from auto-graphics to biopic, but it also encourages presentations that critically historicize and investigate life writing in relation to geopolitics, ethics of science, trauma theories, racial formation analyses, gender performance discourses, and environmental and ecocritical studies. We also welcome readings in creative writing. Please send your 250-word abstract and 2-page C.V. and

The Joys and Challenges of Teaching Biographies

Deadline for Submissions: February 15 Dates of Conference: January 4, 2024 to January 7, 2024 We are seeking two additional panelists to join us for a roundtable session at the 2024 American Historical Association conference in San Francisco, entitled, “The Joys and Challenges of Teaching Biographies.”  The deadline for submissions is February 15, 2023. History and biography are inextricably linked and yet many instructors of introductory undergraduate and advanced high school courses resist including them in their reading lists and overall course pedagogy.  The session will examine the ways in which biographies are and are not used in classrooms at both the college and high school levels.  We will focus on the benefits and limitations of the genre with an eye for including a variety of perspectives.  We seek to address questions such as, “Why do biographies appeal to students?” “Why don’t more classes utilize them?” “How can instructors compensate for periods with limited source materials?” “How can we manage the bias of hagiography?” We (Dr. Nancy S. Kollmann of Stanford University, Dr. M.A. Claussen of the University of San Francisco and Derek Dwight Anderson of Marin Academy) are especially interested in the ideas and expereinces of historians teaching at all levels.  Those interested in participating as a panelist should contact Derek soon. Contact Info: Derek Dwight Anderson, Marin Academy Contact Email: danderson@ma.org * Deadline for Submissions, February 14, 2023 “The ‘Portfolio’ from Every Angle. Archiving and Preserving Working Documents (1680s-1820s)” Call for Proposals for the International Conference organised at the University Côte d’Azur, CMMC-MSH Sud-Est, on 21-22 March 2024 by Simon Dolet The storage of digital data has been at the heart of our concerns for the past 60 years. Technologies come and go – floppy disk, CD-Rom, USB stick, external hard drive, cloud computing – with greater storage capacity to meet the exponential growth in digital data production. The new ‘digital industry’ also has to respond to the growing fear of data loss as old storage formats become obsolete. However, the issue is older and deserves to be put into a longer perspective. In particular, there seems to have been an inflection in the 18th century, when the quantity of documents preserved and therefore available, compared to previous centuries, recorded an unprecedented growth. The “portefeuille” (or “porte-feuille”) is an example of this concern for the conservation of documents. Used since the 16th century according to the French Academy, in 1718 this term still referred to a “cardboard box folded in two, covered with skin or some other material, & used to carry papers”. While its use in the French language expanded over the course of the century, the term did not enter foreign dictionaries until the beginning of the 19th century, with literal translations of “porte-feuille”: brieftasche (German), portfolio (English), portafolio (Spanish) or portafoglio (Italian). It is in the European space and its worldwide extensions that the portfolio will be considered here as a support for storing and filing personal documents, documents known or not by its contemporaries, published or not. With the rise of the concept of literacy, the ‘writing life’ (Bertrand, 2015) has animated recent historical studies. The portfolio could add to this historiographical renewal a tool used in all sectors of society – the portfolios of a minister, a merchant, an artist, a craftsman, a man of letters, a scholar, etc. – which contains documents that allow us to identify the life of a person. This is a collection of documents that allow us to get closer to the daily life of the actors. Drafts (Ferrand, 2012), notebooks (Blair, 2010), letters (Chapron, Boutier, 2013), printed matter and so on are ‘living writings’ (Bertrand, 2015) offering the possibility of writing a material, cultural, social and political history. Three main axes have been selected for this scientific meeting in order to consider the role taken by portfolios in society as well as the inflection of uses and practices between the 1680s and the 1820s. The focus will be on case studies, not only of portfolios of famous figures but also of more modest and lesser-known actors. 1. The formation of portfolios If a material approach connects the historian with the archives, it is necessary to understand the uses and sensitivity of the actors to their portfolio(s): purchase, creation, insertion of papers, momentary or definitive extraction, filing, loss, destruction. 2. Within and outside portfolios This section will focus on the documents contained in the portfolios, which are associated with both the successes and failures of their owners. 3. Governing and existing through portfolios The focus here will be on portfolios in relation to the organs of power, without forgetting the power granted to the individual outside of institutions. For an extended version and/or in French : https://www.fabula.org/actualites/112339/le-portefeuille-sous-toutes-ses-coutures-archiver-et-conserver-ses.html Submission Proposals in French or English, the languages of this international conference, should be between 1 and 3,000 characters in length and accompanied by a bio-biographical presentation. They should be sent before 30 September 2023 by email to dolet.simon@gmail.com. This international conference will be published. Scientific commitee Pierre-Yves Beaurepaire-Hernandez (Université Côte d’Azur) Jean Boutier (EHESS) Liliane Hilaire-Pérez (EHESS, Université Paris Cité) Isabelle Laboulais (Université de Strasbourg) Pietro Daniel Omodeo (Università Ca’ Foscari) Contact Info: Simon Dolet Centre de la Méditerranée Moderne et Contemporaine Côte d’Azur University, Nice, France PhD Candidate simon.dolet@univ-cotedazur.fr Contact Email: simon.dolet@univ-cotedazur.fr *

CFP

From Wine Moms to QAnon: The Violence at the Heart of White Women’s Lifestyle Culture Deadline for Abstracts–February 15, 2023 Co-editors Anna Mae Duane, University of Connecticut & Elizabeth Marshall, Simon Fraser University This proposed edited collection historicizes the harms leveled by the white middle class’s appropriation of Audre Lorde’s investment in self-care. More specifically, we consider how the aspirational empowerment and self-improvement industry has emerged as a force that obscures the violence embedded in individualism, neglects collective trauma, and negates the possibility of collective solutions. Inspired by Kyla Schuller’s observation that white women’s culture often “presents capitalism as the deliverer of equality” and thus obscures how how “capitalism is actually a chief engine of social harm,” we seek essays that explore how the white self- care/wellness industry—broadly defined from the eighteenth century to the present day—exerts a discipline that narrows the radical possibilities of what carework could mean, either for oneself, one’s family, or for one’s community. Questions that guide the collection include: ·      What historical lineages does white women’s wellness culture draw upon? How do these histories contextualize current iterations of white women’s wellness culture? ·      Through what cultural apparatuses are the links between and among white women, wellness and violence produced? ·      How is white, privileged motherhood deployed within a capitalist framework to reassert domesticity/martyrdom? ·      How does the category of white, privileged motherhood enable the cultural work of white supremacy? ·      In what ways does the individualized work of wellness hide the violence of capitalism and resultant harms between and among women?
It is our goal to send a complete manuscript to a publisher in the fall of 2023.
Please send abstracts of between 250-500 words by Feb. 15th, 2023 to Elizabeth_marshall@sfu.ca & anna.duane@uconn.edu. A full draft (approximately 6,000 words) would be due by July 15th 2023. *
Call for Papers: Teaching the American Essay
Deadline for Proposals: February 15, 2023 This call for papers invites proposals for a volume in the MLA Options for Teaching series entitled Teaching the American Essay, edited by Stephanie Redekop. Teaching the American Essay seeks to provide undergraduate literature instructors with a range of classroom approaches, exercises, and assignments for teaching American essays as literary texts. It will complement existing volumes on using essays as compositional models in the writing classroom by collating strategies for teaching essays in American literature survey courses and special-topics seminars or in literature courses on nonfiction. Essays today are hard to ignore: Rebecca Solnit has called ours an “essayistic age”; Christy Wampole has argued in the New York Times for the “essayification of everything”; Kara Wittman and Evan Kindley suggest that the essay is currently “experiencing something of a renaissance.” Indeed, interest in the essay genre is building among literary scholars, as illustrated by several important new volumes, including The Cambridge Companion to the Essay (2022), The Edinburgh Companion to the Essay (2022), On Essays (2020), and the forthcoming Cambridge History of the American Essay. What does it mean to read essays as literary texts, using methods of literary theory, history, or criticism? How do essays relate to or participate in broader trends in American literature, culture, and history? Alongside the wide range of dynamic approaches to these questions in literary scholarship, this volume will demonstrate ways that they can be framed and addressed in the literature classroom. Essays have long been valuable teaching texts, with essayists like Gloria Anzaldúa, James Baldwin, Rachel Carson, Joan Didion, Frederick Douglass, W. E. B. Du Bois, Jonathan Edwards, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Benjamin Franklin, Margaret Fuller, Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Zora Neale Hurston, Barry Lopez, Audre Lorde, Claudia Rankine, Leslie Marmon Silko, Susan Sontag, Henry David Thoreau, and David Walker frequently appearing on American literature syllabi. This volume will offer strategies that help support the use of essays as literary teaching texts, while also seeking to expand and diversify what Lynn Z. Bloom has identified as the classroom “essay canon.” Suggested topics include: Formal and Generic Approaches to the Essay
    • Teaching subgenres such as the personal essay, nature essay, protest essay, travel essay, literary journalism, etc.
    • Using essays to explore definitions of fact, fiction, and creative nonfiction, or the boundaries of “the literary”
    • Reading “secondary sources” as literature; examining the genre of literary-critical or theoretical essays in the classroom
Teaching Essays and Essayists in Context
    • Essays’ relation to historical, literary, or theoretical trends in American literature; strategies for incorporating essays into courses, units, or lessons on specific historic moments or literary movements in the United States
    • Historicized or contextualized framings of specific essays or essayists
    • Studies of American essays’ cultural work for specific periods or publics
Classroom Methods and Assignments
    • Book history or media studies approaches to teaching essays in their print or publication contexts (e.g., in periodicals, anthologies, or online)
    • Assignments that allow students to consider how studying essays as a literary genre can shape their own writing; “essays on the essay”
Abstract proposals (300–500 words) and a short bio or CV should be e-mailed to Stephanie Redekop (stephanie.redekop@mail.utoronto.ca) by 15 February 2023. Authors will be notified of initial acceptance by 30 April 2023. Pending peer review of the prospectus, completed essays of approximately 4,000 words will be due by 1 November 2023. * The next episode of the webinar “Let’s Talk Books at NMU (Northern Michigan University)”  hosted by Lynn Dominawill be Friday, Feb. 17 at 1:00 Eastern time.  The speaker will be Shelley Puhak discussing her recent book, The Dark Queens: The Bloody Rivalry That Forged the Medieval World. Shelley Puhak is a critically acclaimed poet and writer whose work has appeared in the AtlanticSmithsonianTimeLapham’s QuarterlyVirginia Quarterly Review, and other publications. She is the author of three books of poetry, including the Anthony Hecht Prize-winning Guinevere in Baltimore and Harbinger, a National Poetry Series selection. The Dark Queens is her nonfiction debut. She lives in Maryland. Registration is required but is free and easy, here: https://nmu.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_dnXEzUN8QMmJcIvo8AyMvw *

Oxford project aims to preserve WW2 memories and objects

A project led by the Faculty of English at the University of Oxford is looking for contributions to a free online archive of family stories, anecdotes, memories and digitized objects relating to people’s experiences of the Second World War. Their Finest Hour, funded by the National Lottery Heritage Fund, aims to digitally collect stories and materials related to Britain’s and the Commonwealth’s role in the Second World War in order to preserve them and make them freely available to the public. Led by Dr Stuart Lee of the Faculty of English, the project team will:
    • Run a series of ‘Digital Collection Days’ at major museums, libraries and heritage centres across the UK and encourage people to bring war-related stories and materials – letters, photos, diaries, memorabilia, or just stories handed down from family members – for digitization
    • Capture people’s thoughts and reactions to the way the war is remembered today
    • Preserve all the collected stories and objects in a free-to-use online archive that will be launched on 6 June 2024, the 80th anniversary of D-Day
Dr Stuart Lee said, “We’re delighted to be able to create this archive with memories of the Second World War. We know from previous projects that people have so many wonderful objects, photos, and anecdotes which have been passed down from family members which are at risk of getting lost or being forgotten. Our aim is to empower local communities to digitally preserve these stories and objects before they are lost to posterity.” If you have stories or objects that you would like to contribute to the Their Finest Hour archive, you can upload them now. There will be a series of collection events taking place throughout the UK in 2023; keep an eye on the website for dates and details. You can also follow the project’s progress on FacebookInstagram and Twitter. Dr Matthew Kidd, Project Manager Contact Email: theirfinesthour@ell.ox.ac.uk URL: http://theirfinesthour.english.ox.ac.uk
* Dear Friends Happy New Year! We hope you have enjoyed the festive period and had a good start to 2023. JANUARY SEMINAR: A reminder to register for our first 2023 online Seminar on 12th January at 1700-1800 (free to members – see below). We are looking forward to ‘The Magic of Social Life: A Self-Other Study of Conjuring’ by Brian Rappert (University of Exeter). Please register on the BSA website: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/autobiography-study-group-seminar-online-the-magic-of-social-life-a-self-other-study-of-conjuring-by-brian-rappert-university-of-exeter/. The Zoom link and joining details will be sent approximately 24 hours before the event. If you have any difficulties or questions about registering please email events@britsoc.org.uk and colleagues will be able to help. OTHER DIARY DATES 2023: The programme of events for 2023 is below. Seminars are free to Auto/Biography Group and BSA members: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/events/. There is a £10 charge for non-members. Seminar (online) on 2nd February 2023 at 1700-1800: ‘Celebration of Longevity’ by Terry Martin (University of Southampton): https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/autobiography-study-group-seminar-online-celebration-of-longevity-by-terry-martin-university-of-southampton/ Seminar (online) on 2nd March 2023 at 1700-1800: ‘The roar at the end of years of silence: feminist voices through educating geeta’ by Geeta Ludhra (Brunel University London): https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/autobiography-study-group-seminar-online-the-roar-at-the-end-of-years-of-silence-feminist-voices-through-educating-geeta-by-geeta-ludhra-brunel-university-london-1/ Seminar (online) on 4th May 2023 at 1700-1800: ‘Can children narrate memoirs? Celebrating experimental narratives’ by Amanda-Marie Kale (University of Nottingham): https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/autobiography-study-group-seminar-online-can-children-narrate-memoirs-celebrating-experimental-narratives-by-amanda-marie-kale-university-of-nottingham/ Auto/Biography Study Group Summer Conference 2023 ‘New Beginnings’ on Wednesday 12th July-Friday 14th July at Wolfson College, Oxford. Keynote: Professor David Brown (Cardiff Metropolitan University). The call for papers will be sent out early in 2023 and further details and registration information will follow. Seminar (online) on 5th October 2023 at 1700-1800: ‘Celebration of student research and creativity activity: An autobiographical journey’ by Amanda Norman (University of Winchester):  https://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/key-bsa-events/autobiography-study-group-seminar-online-celebration-of-student-research-and-creativity-activity-an-autobiographical-journey-by-amanda-norman-university-of-winchester/ Seminar (online) November at 1700-1800: date, details and registration to follow. Auto/Biography Study Group Christmas Conference 2023 on 8th December at Friends House, Euston. Theme, details and registration to follow. MEMBERSHIP: ‘Join us’ information is available here: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/join-us/. As a paid member of the Auto/Biography Study Group you will benefit from a free seminar series (see below and https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/events/), reductions on conference costs and publications, free publication in the group’s open access online journal (non-members pay £30 per submission). You will also be registered on the JISCmail list: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=BSA-AUTO-BIOGRAPHY-GROUP. The annual payment categories for the 2023 calendar year are £30 for members of the BSA £30 and £40 for non-members. Payment may be made via PayPal by logging in or by debit/credit card and choosing to pay as a guest: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/autobiography-membership/. We are a charity and non-profit group and all proceeds from group subscriptions help to fund our publications and group events. AUTO/BIOGRAPHY REVIEW: For more information about our open access journal and the call for papers see Auto/Biography Review information (https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/autobiography-review/) and the journal (website (https://autobiographyreview.com/index.php/abrev) . Please share the information with your networks, including doctoral researchers – we continue to be fully committed to supporting early career researchers. Anne Chappell and Carly Stewart Auto/Biography Study Group Convenors Email: anne.chappell@brunel.ac.uk and cstewart@bournemouth.ac.uk Find the Auto/Biography Study Group: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/ Find the Auto/Biography Study Group on Twitter: @AutoBiographySG Join the Auto/Biography Study Group: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/groups/study-groups/autobiography-study-group/join-us/ Register with the Auto/Biography Study Group: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/BSA-AUTO-BIOGRAPHY-GROUP Submit to our open access online journal ‘Auto/Biography Review’: https://autobiographyreview.com/index.php/abrev
* *

Call for Papers: Autobiography

deadline for submissions:  February 1, 2023 Nesir: Journal of Literary Studies Guest Editors: Yalçın Armağan (Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul) Zeynep Zengin (Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul) Nesir: Journal of Literary Studies’ fourth issue is dedicated to the exploration of “autobiography,” a literary genre that stands between fiction and reality, subjectivity and objectivity, individualism and collectivism, and narrative and history. Having gained a central stage in the literary theories that emerged after the 1960s, autobiography is often informed by genre, text and cross-genre breedings, as it concerns itself with the experience, temporality, memory, remembrance and testimony. The issue aims to highlight all these concepts, which are explored by various theoretical schools and disciplines, in relation to autobiographical writing. Against this background, the issue accepts submissions of articles, research notes, critical essays and book reviews written in English or Turkish until February 1st, 2023. The issue also welcomes translated articles (from Turkish into English and vice versa). All submissions should be done through the electronic submission page on the website https://nesirdergisi.com/ Potential topics include but are not limited to:
    • Autobiography as a literary genre
    • The question of cross-genre influences in autobiographies
    • The limits of I/life-narratives
    • Theories on autobiography
    • “Fictional selves” in autobiographical texts
    • Fiction in autobiography, autobiography in fiction
    • Representations of memory in autobiography
    • Experience, remembrance and testimony in autobiography
    • The literature of autobiography in Turkey
    • Autobiographic items in Ottoman literature (mecmuas, tezkires etc.)
    • Autobiograhy in modern Turkish literature
    • Comparative autobiography studies in world literature
    • Women’s experiences in autobiographies
    • Autobiography as a reading/textual contract
    • The crisis of subjectivity vs. objectivity in autobiographies
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES  All submissions should be done through the electronic submission page on the website https://nesirdergisi.com/ Format/ Font: MS Word in Times New Roman 12 point (Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition). All the papers must be original, unpublished and written within 3,000-7,500 words. An abstract in 75-150 words and 5-8 keywords should be embedded within the paper. Each paper should include a cover letter suggesting the name of the author, along with a brief bio, not exceeding 50 words. The name of the author and co-author (if any) must not be written or suggested anywhere except the cover letter. The paper should be original and must have a proper bibliography and work cited section. An acknowledgement shall be sent upon receipt. Any suggested revisions by the editor and peer reviewers must be returned in two weeks without delay. Simultaneous submissions are not allowed. For more information: https://nesirdergisi.com Contact Info: editor@nesirdergisi.com Contact Email: editor@nesirdergisi.com URL: http://nesirdergisi.com * CALL FOR PAPERS: ‘Ethics and Expressions of Third-Generation Holocaust Storytelling’. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics Presently, the Holocaust dwindles on the edge of living memory. As the last Holocaust witnesses pass away, there is a sense of urgency and gravity for the third generation – that is, grandchildren of witnesses or people who are otherwise at a three-generation remove – who seek to preserve and share these stories, and who are the new custodians of this representative responsibility. Jilovsky defines the third generation as ‘the bridging generation … connecting lived memories of the past with people of the future, born after the last eyewitness has passed away’ (2015, p. 94). The ethical complexity surrounding the representation of Holocaust stories, the building of this figurative bridge between past and future, cannot be overstated. The new millennium has seen a surge in literature by grandchildren of survivors, who are grappling with the residual lines of trauma, history and memory in their own lives and consciousness. Aarons writes that ‘This is a generation approaching the Holocaust from a position that is precariously balanced between proximity and distance, a position that characterizes this generation, this literature, the discourse about this literature, and the disposition of our time’ (2016, p. xvii). With each passing year the Holocaust recedes further into history, its memory and preservation increasingly vulnerable to denialism, mythology, and forgetfulness. As a response to this climate of ethical precarity, misrepresentation and shaky ground we find ourselves in, this special issue of Ethical Space seeks to interrogate the ‘Ethics and expressions of third-generation Holocaust storytelling.’ Possible topics include but are by no means limited to:
    • Identifiable themes, techniques, or trends in third-generation texts
    • The Holocaust in contemporary culture and memory
    • The ethics of writing or engaging with survivor trauma
    • Artefacts and places as sites of third-generation understanding
    • Expressions of the Holocaust in life writing, poetry and/or fiction
    • Experiments in Holocaust writing
    • The role of postmemory and imagination in third-generation texts
    • The ethics of representing the dead
    • Technology and innovation in Holocaust story preservation
    • Reflections on third-generation identity and purpose
We welcome abstracts of 250 words for scholarly articles and essays that explore the ethics and intentions of third-generation Holocaust storytelling, as crucial contributions to the global debate around preservation of traumatic histories. Submit abstracts by 1 February 2023 Full papers submitted by 1 September 2023. Papers should be 6000-7000 words in length. Please send abstracts and any queries to tess.scholfield-peters@uts.edu.au. We look forward to reading all submissions! Tess Scholfield-Peters University of Technology Sydney Contact Info: tess.scholfield-peters@uts.edu.au Contact Email: tess.scholfield-peters@uts.edu.au URL: http://www.abramis.co.uk/ethical-space/ *

POSTMEMORY AND THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD – 4th International Interdisciplinary Conference (Online)

deadline for submissions: February 5, 2023 conferencememory@gmail.com Conference online (via Zoom): 23-24 February 2023 Scientific Committee: Professor Wojciech Owczarski – University of Gdańsk, Poland Professor Polina Golovátina-Mora – NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology CFP: ​Coined by Marianne Hirsch in the 1990s, the term postmemory by now entered various disciplines who search to understand how memory form our identity and how we position, articulate or just make sense of our place in the society and our relations with it. The term postmemory problematizes the concept of memory by bringing attention to the memories that are not exactly personal but that keep on shaping one’s life and one’s  way of seeing the world. During our conference we would like to concentrate on the phenomenon of postmemory and how it keeps on shaping the contemporary world. We are interested in all aspects of postmemory: in its individual and collective dimensions, in the past and in the present-day world, and in its potential to direct the future. Whose memory is postmemory: that of generations, communities, nations or families? How is it maintained and passed on? What is the role of imagination in its creation? What is remembered and what is forgotten? Is it always the memory of traumatic experience? How can it be taught and studied? These are some of the questions that inspired the idea of the conference. We would like to explore the phenomenon of postmemory in its multifarious manifestations: psychological, social, historical, cultural, philosophical, religious, economic, political, and many others. As usual, we also want to devote considerable attention to how these phenomena appears in artistic practices: literature, film, theatre or visual arts. That is why we invite researchers representing various academic disciplines: anthropology, history, psychiatry, psychology, psychoanalysis, sociology, politics, philosophy, economics, law, literary studies, theatre studies, film studies, memory studies, migration studies, consciousness studies, dream studies, gender studies, postcolonial studies, medical sciences, cognitive sciences, and urban studies, to name a few. Different forms of presentations are encouraged, including case studies, theoretical inquiries, problem-oriented arguments or comparative analyses. We will be happy to hear from both experienced scholars and young academics at the start of their careers, as well as doctoral and graduate students. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners, without giving a presentation. Our repertoire of suggested topics includes but is not restricted to: I.  Individual experiences:
    • Postmemory and trauma
    • Postmemory and recovery
    • Postmemory and imagination
    • Postmemory and artefacts
    • Postmemory and personal memories
II.  Collective experiences
    • Postmemory and its sources
    • Postmemory and mythology
    • Generational postmemory
    • Postmemory and social non-acceptance
    • Postmemory and solidarity
    • Postmemory and territory
III.  Remembering and Forgetting
    • Postmemory and forced forgetting
    • Postmemory and forced remembering
    • Teaching postmemory
    • Negotiating postmemory
    • Studying postmemory
    • Forgetting/remembering for recovery
    • Postmemory and its purpose
    • Postmemory and allegiances
IV.  Representations
    • Testimonies and memories
    • Genres of Postmemory
    • Postmemory in literature
    • Postmemory in film
    • Postmemory in theatre
    • Postmemory in visual arts
    • Creating as experience
    • Postmemory and urban planning
    • Postmemory and urban art
    • Rural Postmemory
    • Postmemory in the nature
    • Materialism of postmemory
    • Nonhuman postmemory
V.  Feelings and Practices
    • Sadness of postmemory
    • Fear of postmemory
    • Postmemory and nostalgia
    • Postmemory and grief
    • Postmemory and loneliness
    • Postmemory and change
    • Living postmemory
    • Rituals of postmemory
VI.  Institutionalization
    • Postmemory and nation-state
    • Postmemory and identity politics
    • Postmemory and ideology
    • Postmemory and religion
    • Postmemory and punishment systems
    • Postmemory and army
    • Postmemory and school
    • Postmemory and museums
    • Monuments of postmemory
    • Sites and cities of postmemory
    • Economy of postmemory
    • Language of postmemory
VII.  The Contemporary World
    • Postmemory and postcomunism
    • Postcolonialism, decolonization and postmemory
    • Neoliberalism and postmemory
    • Postmemory and migration
    • Postmemory and globalization
    • Postmemory and nationalism
    • Postmemory and new media
    • Postmemory and political correctness
    • Postmemory and natural disasters
Please submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentations, together with a short biographical note, by 5 February 2023 to: conferencememory@gmail.com For all details please visit our website: https://www.inmindsupport.com/postmemory-conference * Call for Papers: “Disembodied Communications: Vulnerable Identities and Caring Connections in Literary Texts” York EGSA Conference 2023 – May 12th, 2023 Deadline: February 3rd, 2023, 11:59 pm EST Disembodiment is widespread in literature. In literary texts around the world, identities may lack physical forms, formerly embodied beings may abandon their bodies, body parts may be lost, disease or technology may invade the body, and organic property may transcend to a nonmaterial world. While being embodied may imply tangibility, visibility, familiarity and security, being disembodied can aptly imply other sides to these discussions: incorporeality, covertness, and vulnerability. More than this, (dis)embodied beings may lose grasp of or be made to feel like strangers in their own bodies, without autonomy or agency. Such feelings may result from oppression due to gender notions, racism, speciesism, ageism, classism, ableism, and various cultures of violence. The “dis” in “disembodiment” hints at the ways in which disparate physical forms and frames of mind can exist simultaneously. Concerns regarding feelings of (dis)embodiment can also call into question vulnerable identities. This conference seeks presentations that explore this interrelation between (dis)embodied communications and vulnerable identities, and what a presence or lack of care can suggest about these connections.  Nel Noddings argues that caring connections would be “interested in maintaining and enhancing caring relations—attending to those we encounter, listening to their expressed needs, and responding positively if possible” (13). When considering how exposure to such physical/mental disembodiments affect one’s sense of self and one’s voice, a humane response would evaluate how we can form caring connections with the vulnerable. Some questions that this conference aims to address are as follows: How do practices in disembodied communications contribute to feelings of vulnerability? How can we consider feelings of and treatment towards autonomy, agency, and subjectivity of vulnerable, (dis)embodied beings? How are such feelings addressed in literary texts? How do literary texts demonstrate care toward the vulnerable? How does a lack of care elicit feelings of compassion, action, and solidarity? Various disciplines and practices have inscribed disembodiment and literary texts with particular interpretations, such as mind-body dualism; when each perspective is considered in isolation, such interpretations can be limited and imbalanced. Disembodied communications are manifested and easily interpreted in many fields of inquiry. Acknowledging these multiple interactions between (dis)embodiment and narrative,  this conference invites papers in any genre, period, or geographical space. Furthermore, (dis)embodiment presents itself in a diverse range of mediums. As such, a literary text, for the purpose of this conference, takes shape in many different forms: novels, graphic novels, short stories, poetry, film/television, nonfiction, theoretical works, memoirs and life writing, journalism, digital narratives, and other multimedia works. Topics in literary texts that may be addressed include, but are not limited to, the following: Discussions of human/nonhuman language in relation to (dis)embodiment Discussions of race, gender, age, sexuality, disability, class, and/or species and how they create meaning regarding disembodiment and vulnerability Virtual/digital communications, spaces, and realities Prioritization of body language and other nonverbal communications Posthuman/transhuman bodies Transgenics, bodily modifications, and de-extinction Narratives of absence, and how such marginalization can lead to (dis)embodiment Ghost stories/narratives of hauntings Communications within sonic communities Dystopian control, apocalyptic oppression, and survivalism Object-oriented approaches to disembodiment Environmental narratives and rhizomatic communities Representations of reproduction and children Representations of cyborg/AI communications Representations and discourses of monstrosity Representations of pandemic-era narratives Representations of “out-of-body” experiences Representations of gaslighting and abuse in relation to feelings of (dis)embodiment Representations of sensory and aesthetic (dis)embodiment Details: This conference is presented by the York University English Graduate Student Association. It will be in person, with a social event planned to take place following the conference, circumstances permitting. There is a possibility, however, that we will be able to accommodate remote presenters and encourage anyone who is interested to apply. If you can only present remotely, we please ask that you specify this with your submission. This conference welcomes submissions not only from graduate students/early-career researchers in English Literature but other related disciplines. Accordingly, our conference emphasizes inclusivity and respectful dialogue. Abstracts between 200 – 350 words should be sent to yorkegsacolloquium2023@gmail.com by 11:59 pm EST on Friday, February 3rd, 2023. Please include a 50 – 100 word biographical note. Visit http://twitter.com/EGSAconference to stay up to date with details of the conference. *

Call for Papers: Autobiography

deadline for submissions:  February 1, 2023 Nesir: Journal of Literary Studies Guest Editors: Yalçın Armağan (Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul) Zeynep Zengin (Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul) Nesir: Journal of Literary Studies’ fourth issue is dedicated to the exploration of “autobiography,” a literary genre that stands between fiction and reality, subjectivity and objectivity, individualism and collectivism, and narrative and history. Having gained a central stage in the literary theories that emerged after the 1960s, autobiography is often informed by genre, text and cross-genre breedings, as it concerns itself with the experience, temporality, memory, remembrance and testimony. The issue aims to highlight all these concepts, which are explored by various theoretical schools and disciplines, in relation to autobiographical writing. Against this background, the issue accepts submissions of articles, research notes, critical essays and book reviews written in English or Turkish until February 1st, 2023. The issue also welcomes translated articles (from Turkish into English and vice versa). All submissions should be done through the electronic submission page on the website https://nesirdergisi.com/ Potential topics include but are not limited to:
    • Autobiography as a literary genre
    • The question of cross-genre influences in autobiographies
    • The limits of I/life-narratives
    • Theories on autobiography
    • “Fictional selves” in autobiographical texts
    • Fiction in autobiography, autobiography in fiction
    • Representations of memory in autobiography
    • Experience, remembrance and testimony in autobiography
    • The literature of autobiography in Turkey
    • Autobiographic items in Ottoman literature (mecmuas, tezkires etc.)
    • Autobiograhy in modern Turkish literature
    • Comparative autobiography studies in world literature
    • Women’s experiences in autobiographies
    • Autobiography as a reading/textual contract
    • The crisis of subjectivity vs. objectivity in autobiographies
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES  All submissions should be done through the electronic submission page on the website https://nesirdergisi.com/ Format/ Font: MS Word in Times New Roman 12 point (Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition). All the papers must be original, unpublished and written within 3,000-7,500 words. An abstract in 75-150 words and 5-8 keywords should be embedded within the paper. Each paper should include a cover letter suggesting the name of the author, along with a brief bio, not exceeding 50 words. The name of the author and co-author (if any) must not be written or suggested anywhere except the cover letter. The paper should be original and must have a proper bibliography and work cited section. An acknowledgement shall be sent upon receipt. Any suggested revisions by the editor and peer reviewers must be returned in two weeks without delay. Simultaneous submissions are not allowed. For more information: https://nesirdergisi.com Contact Info: editor@nesirdergisi.com Contact Email: editor@nesirdergisi.com URL: http://nesirdergisi.com * CALL FOR PAPERS: ‘Ethics and Expressions of Third-Generation Holocaust Storytelling’. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics Presently, the Holocaust dwindles on the edge of living memory. As the last Holocaust witnesses pass away, there is a sense of urgency and gravity for the third generation – that is, grandchildren of witnesses or people who are otherwise at a three-generation remove – who seek to preserve and share these stories, and who are the new custodians of this representative responsibility. Jilovsky defines the third generation as ‘the bridging generation … connecting lived memories of the past with people of the future, born after the last eyewitness has passed away’ (2015, p. 94). The ethical complexity surrounding the representation of Holocaust stories, the building of this figurative bridge between past and future, cannot be overstated. The new millennium has seen a surge in literature by grandchildren of survivors, who are grappling with the residual lines of trauma, history and memory in their own lives and consciousness. Aarons writes that ‘This is a generation approaching the Holocaust from a position that is precariously balanced between proximity and distance, a position that characterizes this generation, this literature, the discourse about this literature, and the disposition of our time’ (2016, p. xvii). With each passing year the Holocaust recedes further into history, its memory and preservation increasingly vulnerable to denialism, mythology, and forgetfulness. As a response to this climate of ethical precarity, misrepresentation and shaky ground we find ourselves in, this special issue of Ethical Space seeks to interrogate the ‘Ethics and expressions of third-generation Holocaust storytelling.’ Possible topics include but are by no means limited to:
    • Identifiable themes, techniques, or trends in third-generation texts
    • The Holocaust in contemporary culture and memory
    • The ethics of writing or engaging with survivor trauma
    • Artefacts and places as sites of third-generation understanding
    • Expressions of the Holocaust in life writing, poetry and/or fiction
    • Experiments in Holocaust writing
    • The role of postmemory and imagination in third-generation texts
    • The ethics of representing the dead
    • Technology and innovation in Holocaust story preservation
    • Reflections on third-generation identity and purpose
We welcome abstracts of 250 words for scholarly articles and essays that explore the ethics and intentions of third-generation Holocaust storytelling, as crucial contributions to the global debate around preservation of traumatic histories. Submit abstracts by 1 February 2023 Full papers submitted by 1 September 2023. Papers should be 6000-7000 words in length. Please send abstracts and any queries to tess.scholfield-peters@uts.edu.au. We look forward to reading all submissions! Tess Scholfield-Peters University of Technology Sydney Contact Info: tess.scholfield-peters@uts.edu.au Contact Email: tess.scholfield-peters@uts.edu.au URL: http://www.abramis.co.uk/ethical-space/ * *
Exploring Conflict and Political Violence through the Woman’s Lens
Abstract Deadline–January 31, 2023 The peer-reviewed academic journal Acta Universitatis Carolinea – Studia Territorialia invites authors to submit articles for a special issue titled “Exploring Conflict and Political Violence through the Woman’s Lens: Victims, Mediators, and Resisters.” Although both past and current armed conflicts have had deleterious consequences for women, this topic is still under-explored in academia. As Rehn and Johnson Sirleaf pointed out in 2002, “The situation of women in armed conflict has been systematically neglected.” This lacuna persists even though the experience of women during and after conflict is widespread. Russia’s war on Ukraine and the latest women-led uprising in Iran reinforce the urgency of engaging with women’s experiences during conflicts and post-conflict. The painful past of women affected by armed conflict and political violence is frequently overlooked in official memory and in the history of states for a variety of reasons. Often, women’s voices and the memory of their ordeals during conflicts and in oppressive regimes are subsumed in a grand narrative of the suffering of the “whole nation,” which stifles the voices, testimonies, and claims of women victims, resisters, survivors, care givers, fighters, and mediators. Though men inarguably suffer greatly from the violence of political repression and armed conflict, women and girls are much more affected by sexual and psychological violence because they are regarded as repositories of ethnic and cultural identity. Moreover, women are exposed to manifold, intersecting forms of exclusion. Thus, women’s “aftermath” of conflict, as well as the burden of displacement, are experienced considerably differently than that of men. Although women are exposed to double or even triple jeopardy during and after conflicts and mass violence, their experiences nevertheless should not be exclusively viewed through a lens of victimhood. In that vein, we are looking for contributions that address all the dimensions of women’s victimhood but also their resistance to conflict and mass violence. Topics may include, but are not limited to: – Women soldiers – Women heroes and resisters – Women as caregivers during and after conflicts – Women, anti-war protests, and peace movements – Women as victims of political repression – Wars, armed conflicts, and gender-based violence – Gender-based violence as an occasion for solidarity across space and time – Women perpetrators and collaborators in mass violence – Women’s role in conflict mediation and post-conflict societies – Womanism, feminism, and quiet diplomacy in post-conflict situations – Gendered memories of refugees – Feminism and societal body politics – Feminism and international relations – Feminist geopolitics of war – Feminism in peace and conflict studies Submitted articles should be in English and should ideally be 6,000 to 9,000 words long (excluding footnotes and abstract). Submissions should be sent to the journal’s editorial team at stuter@fsv.cuni.cz or uploaded via the Studia Territorialia journal management system. Authors should consult the submission guidelines on the journal’s website for further instructions and preferred style. All contributions will be subject to double-blind peer review. Abstract submission deadline: January 31, 2023. Notification of status and next steps: February 10, 2023. Article submission deadline: April 15, 2023. Acta Universitatis Carolinea – Studia Territorialia is a leading Czech peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on area studies. It covers the history and the social, political, and cultural affairs of the nations of North America, Europe, and post-Soviet Eurasia in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. The journal is published by the Institute of International Studies of Charles University, Prague. It is indexed in the SCOPUS, ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and CEEOL databases and others. Please feel free to direct all inquiries to the editors. Contact Info: Lucie Filipova, Studia Territorialia executive editor Contact Email: stuter@fsv.cuni.cz URL: * Call For Papers: Envisioning Queer Black and Indigenous Self-Representations within the Digital Literary Sphere AMLit – American Literatures: Special Issue October 2023 Deadline for Submissions: January 30, 2023 Guest Editors: Oluwadunni Talabi & Corina Wieser-Cox In their book on Queer Indigenous Studies (2011), Qwo-Li Driskill, Chris Finely, Brian Joseph Gilley and Scott Lauria Morgensen ask: “What does a queer decolonization of our homelands, bodies and psyches look like?” (219). Their question is critical when understanding the complex realities of Indigenous and Black queer individuals in the settler-colonial states of both Canada and the US, as well as in the central and southern states of “Latin” America. The queer Indigenous and Black body – especially when it is trans* or gender nonconforming – is often the site of violence and misrepresentation, yet it is also a site of destabilization and decolonization when reimagined and reified in digital media and literary forms. Through online self-representations facilitated by digital infrastructure, the queer Black and Indigenous heterogenous consciousness is made accessible. Queer Black and Indigenous creators and writers, given to existing at the most periphery of inter and intra discourse and imposed upon by the limits of Western gendered vocabulary in Queer discourse, are at the forefront of rethinking queerness. Returning to the past, pulling references that point to liberation and juxtaposing it in the context of the future, they are producing alternate realities and showing a relationship between times, while staying rooted in African and Indigenous world consciousness, inadvertently pushing for queer imaginings beyond Eurocentric epistemological limits. The intersectional shifts and visual aesthetics that arise from the everyday digital sphere of literary and cultural media goes beyond the liberational idea of, ‘if you can imagine it, you can create it’ to the idea of, ‘that it is not your norm does not mean it does not/did not previously exist.’ The digital sphere and its ability to provide an avenue for self-representation, has already been explored by Shola Adenekan in his recently published book African Literature in the Digital Age (2021) in which he showcases how digitalization has enabled African writers to transcend the power relations of traditional publishing and scholarship. In order to discover an unlimited range of non- heteronormative representation and complexity, one must turn to the digital sphere, where queer Black and Indigenous artists from the Americas are leading conversations on the repercussions of colonial modern epistemes and are using an amalgam of their lived reality, historical narratives and fiction to create new epistemes of encompassing futures. Two main questions arise concerning the digital sphere and queer Black and Indigenous selfrepresentations: First, how do digital literary/cultural forms produced by queer Black and Indigenous creatives engender a monumental paradigm shift in queer self-representation and selffashioning? Second, how do the literatures and cultures produced in the digital sphere mediate how the queer body is constructed, viewed, represented, and delineated within a diasporic and settlercolonial context of the Americas? This special issue of AmLit invites papers that analyze queer literary works within the digital sphere, specifically pertaining to queer Indigenous and Black peoples residing in the Americas, i.e., Turtle Island, Mesoamerica, Abya Yala, etc, that might include some of the following topics: • the digitization and archiving of zines: e.g., the People of Color Zine Project (POCZP) and the Queer Zine Archive Project (QZAP) • Audience engagements with texts/counterpublics • Disruption of the “heteronormativity of settler colonialism” (Smith) through digitization • Visual and literary aesthetics of the “sovereign erotic” (Rifkin) • Two-Spirit epistemologies & digital literatures • Black/Afrofuturist queer futures • The aesthetics of survivance • The aesthetics of metaphysics • New vs. old forms of aesthetics within digital literary media • Digital violence and counterdiscourses • Racism and homophobia online • Misogynoir and reimagining the world through digital resistance • Communal and relational aspects of the digital sphere • Discourses of resistance and survivance • Imaginations created from cultural archives Submission Information Full essays should be between 5,000 and 10,000 words (including notes and bibliography) and be submitted by January 16th, 2023. The deadline has been extended to January 30th, 2023! Notification of acceptance for the articles will follow shortly after the deadline in January. The first round of edits is planned for March 2023 and publication is set to be October 2023. The article should be preceded by a short abstract (180 – 200 words). Bibliographical references and general presentation should follow the current MLA style sheet. If you have any questions before submission, feel free to email the guest editors at digitalselfrepresentations@gmail.com Please send completed articles to the email (digitalselfrepresentations@gmail.com), along with any questions you might have concerning the publication. Guest Editors: Corina Wieser-Cox – University of Bremen Oluwadunni Talabi – University of Bremen Works Cited Adenekan, Shola. African Literature in the Digital Age: Class and Sexual Politics in New Writing from Nigeria and Kenya. Boydell & Brewer, 2021. Driskill, Qwo-Li, et al., editors. Queer Indigenous Studies: Critical Interventions in Theory, Politics, and Literature. University of Arizona Press, 2011. Contact Info: martin.holtz@uni-graz.at Contact Email: martin.holtz@uni-graz.at URL: http://amlit.eu * Deadline for Submissions January 30, 2023

CfP: Imperial Lives Conference

Date: 30.-31.3.2023 Place: Online/Rautenstrauch-Joest-Museum Cologne (RJM). For reasons of greater accessibility and sustainability, the conference will be held completely online. After years of struggle, deflection, and hesitation, ethnographic museums are increasingly accepting the need for decolonization. Often, this is framed in terms of diversity and empowerment and with a special focus on creator communities and their diaspora. We agree: the victims of imperial violence and their descendants need to be at the centre of any fruitful decolonization process. However, this leaves a momentous gap: what about the creators of the museum, the collectors who often violently amassed the collections, as well as those who are implicated in their legacy today? Whose acts of perpetration, violence, transgression, betrayal, superiority, exploitation, and misunderstanding lie at the foundation of the museum? When it comes to the actors in question and their agency, what prevails is often absence or a retreat into abstraction, both in academia and the museum. The “Imperial Lives” conference wants to widen this perspective and offer a complementary approach: it aims at exploring ways of overcoming this colonial aphasia by focussing on the concrete, often messy biographies behind the institution “ethnographic museum”. We propose that the encounter with the personified past of empire – the biographies of imperial collectors – creates a space of unsettlement in which the personal implication of all members of a post-imperial democratic society can be explored and collective memory transformed. Ethnographic museums, as one of the most visible sites of imperial continuity, offer an exemplary field for the exploration of imperial perpetration and implication that goes beyond the bounds of anthropology – especially when it comes to the interaction with broader audiences. This is why the conference will focus on both research and narration, inviting transdisciplinary perspectives from history, cultural, and literary studies as well as artistic, journalistic and activist practices. We call for contributions addressing issues of biographic knowledge generation and representation, including questions such as:
    • How can biographic approaches to the legacy of empire contribute to the decolonisation of ethnographic museums?
    • What may be the archival foundation for biographic approaches to the imperial past? How can imperial personas be portrayed if the only archival material available was produced by themselves? What is the role of ethnographic collections as archives?
    • What kind of biographies are suited for such decolonial biographic research?
    • Who should be doing this research? How does the personal situatedness of the researcher affect the outcome?
    • What forms of representation, what narrative strategies should be used to depict imperial biographies?
    • With museums as the sites of a society’s collective memory: Which narrative approaches are fruitful contributions to the “work of remembrance”?
    • What is the relationship between historical factuality and biographic fiction, especially concerning the archival inequalities of empire?
    • In how far can artistic research and practice enrich modes of biographic display?
Conference language: English There will be a recording of all papers, keynotes, and panels. We are inviting scholars from the fields of: ethnography, anthropology, literary studies, historical science, cultural studies, museology, art history, arts (e.g. fine arts, film, literature etc.), provenance research, journalism. CfP: Please hand in your abstract of max. 500 words (in English, + short bio) until 2023/01/30 via: https://tinyurl.com/abstract-imperiallives2023 For any questions, feel free to get in touch via mail@imperiallives.com Research project “Wilhelm Joest and the Intimacies of Colonial Collecting” (Fritz Thyssen Stiftung, 2019-2023): www.museenkoeln.de/rautenstrauch-joest-museum/Wer-ist-Joest Cooperation: Department of Cultural and Social Anthropology, University of Köln; trandisciplinary platform Contemporary& *

TRAVELLING, TRANSMISSION AND TRANSGRESSION – 3rd International Interdisciplinary Conference

February 16, 2023 to February 17, 2023

Poland Deadliine for Submissions: January 31, 2023 Conference Online (via Zoom platform) Scientific Committee: Professor Wojciech Owczarski – University of Gdańsk, Poland Professor Polina Golovátina-Mora – NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology ABOUT CONFERENCE: Experiencing one’s life as a perpetual change rather than something constant has become more and more frequent in the contemporary world. Travelling has gained new dimensions – it is no longer associated merely with tourism, but it often turns out to be a way of life or even a figure of human condition. The homo viator of our times intentionally moves from country to country, rents apartments and does not posses one, changes his or her occupations and work places, meets still new people and is generally well trained in being flexible, mobile, and open to metamorphoses. Travelling, in its both literal and metaphorical meaning, has much to do with transmission and transgression as it enables crossing the geographical, physical, cultural, social, and psychological borders. During our conference, we would like to discuss all these – and many other – aspects of travelling and transgressive experiences.​ We want to describe those phenomena in their multifarious aspects: psychological, social, historical, cultural, philosophical, religious, political, and many others. We also want to devote considerable attention to how they appear in artistic practices: literature, film, theatre, or visual arts. That is why we invite researchers representing various academic disciplines, such as anthropology, history, psychology, psychoanalysis, sociology, politics, philosophy, literary studies, theatre studies, film studies, memory studies, gender studies, and postcolonial studies.​ Different forms of presentations are encouraged, including case studies, theoretical investigations, problem-oriented arguments, and comparative analyses.​ We will be happy to hear from both experienced scholars and young academics at the beginning of their careers as well as doctoral and graduate students. We also invite all persons interested in participating in the conference as listeners, without giving a presentation. We hope that due to its interdisciplinary nature, the conference will bring many interesting observations on and discussions about the role of travelling, transmission, and transgression in the past and in the present-day world. Our repertoire of suggested topics includes but is not restricted to: I. Individual experiences
    • Travelling as a distraction
    • Travelling and tourism
    • Travelling as a way of life
    • Living in between
    • Liminal spaces
    • Limit situations
    • Transgressive experiences
    • Borderline personality
    • Travelling and cognition
    • Travelling and education
    • Travelling and spiritual growth
    • Solo travelling
    • Travelling and family life
II. Collective experiences
    • Travelling and multiculturalism
    • Transmission of cultural values
    • Travelling and tolerance
    • Travelling and xenophobia
    • Transgressive identity of societies
    • Travelling and migration
    • Forced travelling
    • Travelling and economy
    • Travelling and job market
III. Pandemic experiences
    • Travelling in the time of COVID-19
    • Isolation
    • Social distance
    • Motionlessness
    • Transmission of the virus
IV. Past experiences
    • History of travelling and tourism
    • Known travellers
    • Travelling and geographical discoveries
    • Travelling and colonialism
    • Travelling and time
V. Artistic experiences
    • Travel diaries
    • Travel as a literary motif
    • Travelling in Bildungsroman
    • Road movies
    • Travelling in the media
    • Travelling artists
    • Touring theatres
    • Touring exhibitions
    • Travel guidebooks
Please submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words) of your proposed 20-minute presentations, together with a short biographical note, by 31 January 2023 to: travellingconference@gmail.com Contact Info: Conference Office Contact Email: travellingconference@gmail.com URL:
https://www.inmindsupport.com/travelling-conference
Exploring Conflict and Political Violence through the Woman’s Lens
Abstract Deadline–January 31, 2023 The peer-reviewed academic journal Acta Universitatis Carolinea – Studia Territorialia invites authors to submit articles for a special issue titled “Exploring Conflict and Political Violence through the Woman’s Lens: Victims, Mediators, and Resisters.” Although both past and current armed conflicts have had deleterious consequences for women, this topic is still under-explored in academia. As Rehn and Johnson Sirleaf pointed out in 2002, “The situation of women in armed conflict has been systematically neglected.” This lacuna persists even though the experience of women during and after conflict is widespread. Russia’s war on Ukraine and the latest women-led uprising in Iran reinforce the urgency of engaging with women’s experiences during conflicts and post-conflict. The painful past of women affected by armed conflict and political violence is frequently overlooked in official memory and in the history of states for a variety of reasons. Often, women’s voices and the memory of their ordeals during conflicts and in oppressive regimes are subsumed in a grand narrative of the suffering of the “whole nation,” which stifles the voices, testimonies, and claims of women victims, resisters, survivors, care givers, fighters, and mediators. Though men inarguably suffer greatly from the violence of political repression and armed conflict, women and girls are much more affected by sexual and psychological violence because they are regarded as repositories of ethnic and cultural identity. Moreover, women are exposed to manifold, intersecting forms of exclusion. Thus, women’s “aftermath” of conflict, as well as the burden of displacement, are experienced considerably differently than that of men. Although women are exposed to double or even triple jeopardy during and after conflicts and mass violence, their experiences nevertheless should not be exclusively viewed through a lens of victimhood. In that vein, we are looking for contributions that address all the dimensions of women’s victimhood but also their resistance to conflict and mass violence. Topics may include, but are not limited to: – Women soldiers – Women heroes and resisters – Women as caregivers during and after conflicts – Women, anti-war protests, and peace movements – Women as victims of political repression – Wars, armed conflicts, and gender-based violence – Gender-based violence as an occasion for solidarity across space and time – Women perpetrators and collaborators in mass violence – Women’s role in conflict mediation and post-conflict societies – Womanism, feminism, and quiet diplomacy in post-conflict situations – Gendered memories of refugees – Feminism and societal body politics – Feminism and international relations – Feminist geopolitics of war – Feminism in peace and conflict studies Submitted articles should be in English and should ideally be 6,000 to 9,000 words long (excluding footnotes and abstract). Submissions should be sent to the journal’s editorial team at stuter@fsv.cuni.cz or uploaded via the Studia Territorialia journal management system. Authors should consult the submission guidelines on the journal’s website for further instructions and preferred style. All contributions will be subject to double-blind peer review. Abstract submission deadline: January 31, 2023. Notification of status and next steps: February 10, 2023. Article submission deadline: April 15, 2023. Acta Universitatis Carolinea – Studia Territorialia is a leading Czech peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on area studies. It covers the history and the social, political, and cultural affairs of the nations of North America, Europe, and post-Soviet Eurasia in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. The journal is published by the Institute of International Studies of Charles University, Prague. It is indexed in the SCOPUS, ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and CEEOL databases and others. Please feel free to direct all inquiries to the editors. Contact Info: Lucie Filipova, Studia Territorialia executive editor Contact Email: stuter@fsv.cuni.cz URL:  * Biography Lab 2023: An Online Forum on Craft BIO is excited to announce Biography Lab, which will be held via Zoom on January 21, 2023, from 10:30 am – 5 pm New York time. BIO invites participants at all levels of interest and experience in the craft of biography to participate in three sequential 90-minute forums led by prize-winning biographers. A social hour concludes the day. The distinguished plenary speaker will be Hermione Lee, who will give a talk entitled “Biographical Choices.”  The three widely celebrated forum leaders are Caroline Fraser, Pulitzer-Prize winner for Prairie Fires: The American Dreams of Laura Ingalls Wilder; T.J. Stiles, a double Pulitzer-Prize winner, most recently for Custer’s Trial: A Life on the Frontiers of a New America; and Eric K. Washington, winner of the Herbert H. Lehman Prize for New York history for his recent Boss of the Grips: The Life of James H. Williams and the Red Caps of Grand Central Terminal. Registration: Free to BIO members and students; $60 for nonmembers (fee includes a year’s BIO membership). Register here. What to Expect: Forum leaders will present on a specific issue of craft followed by questions and discussion with participants.  Forums will not be recorded to protect the privacy of participants about their own works-in-progress. For more information about Biography Lab 2023, click here. To register, click here. Linda Leavell President, Biographers International Organization president@biographersinternational.org biographersinternational.org
      Linda Leavell President, Biographers International Organization president@biographersinternational.org biographersinternational.org
*

CFA: 2023 American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) Archives Fellowship Program

Deadline for Applications: January 23, 2023 by Isabelle Rohr The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) Archives is pleased to announce that it is accepting applications for its 2023 fellowship program. In 2023, three to six fellowships will be awarded to senior scholars, postdoctoral researchers, graduate students, and independent researchers to conduct research in the JDC Archives, either in New York or in Jerusalem. The fellowship program is open to scholars pursuing biographical research. Topics in the fields of twentieth century Jewish history, modern history, social welfare, migration, and humanitarian assistance will be considered, as well as other areas of academic research covered in the JDC archival collections. Our finding aids can be consulted to identify relevant areas. The fellowship awards are $2,500 and the deadline for submission is January 23, 2023. Fellows are expected to make a remote public presentation on their research upon conclusion of their fellowships. The areas of research and lectures of previously awarded recipients can be viewed here.
he GRACEH (Graduate Conference in European History) series was launched in Budapest in 2007 and is co-organized since 2010 by Central European University, the European University Institute, University of Vienna, and the University of Oxford. The conference is hosted annually by one of these institutions, and in 2023 its 17th edition will be hosted by Central European University in Vienna. The theme of GRACEH 2023 is:
“Voices Heard and Unheard: Authority, Truth, and Silence in Historical Perspective,” 17-19 April 2023, Central European University The past—mediated through written, visual, or material sources—is filled with empty spaces. Incomplete versions of what happened have been taken at face value, passed through time as representing the “real,” and validating particular kinds of the historical understanding devoid of (un)documented actors, practices, and processes. Over the past few decades, scholars have been increasingly interested in voices from “underneath”, lending their ear to, for example, oral histories, messages between the lines, hints, clues, symbols, humor, satires, gestures, or objects to unearth that which has been doomed to non-existence or silence. This approach to historical sources could be labeled as relying on “weak evidence,” for even though it breaks the silence, it escapes clear-cut explanations. How can we retrieve voices from the past? When is “weak evidence” evidence enough to challenge or even replace dominant and established historical interpretations and narratives? To what kind of evidence do we grant higher authority over the other and why? How is authority attached to a piece of evidence? What is the purpose of establishing authority? Is it to state that something actually happened? Or to create an authentic world that looks as veridic as possible? How can a source be used to represent or construct truth? We invite graduate students working on any topic or period in European history and/or Europe in global perspective to delve into these questions and consider the multiple layers conveyed by the notion of historical authority and its implicit elements in historical perspective. We welcome submissions dealing with oral history, popular history, history of science, material history, intellectual history, history of ideas, book history, literary history, art history, social history, political history, legal history, historical anthropology, history in public sphere, archeology, museum studies, media history, and gender history. Topics may include but are not limited to:
    • Voices and truth from below: voices of minorities, marginalized, oppressed/suppressed groups (on the basis of race, class, gender, religion and many more);
    • Establishing and identifying authority and truth in written, visual, material sources: expressing agency, creating authenticity, authorial practices and authorship, self-fashioning;
    • Whose authority? Whose truth?: Practices, regimes and actors of authority, crafting official scientific and historical discourses, forms of erasure, violence, (un)truth, and (in)justice;
    • Mediality and materiality: displaying authority, emblems/signifiers of authority, objects as tokens of authority and truth, “making history” through objects, fakes, distortions, and reproductions;
    • Historical truth in/and literary evidence: the status of historical fiction, the power of myths, propaganda, literature as a historical source, reimagining history across genres (fiction, non-fiction, sci-fi, fantasy, drama, poetry, folktale, and so on);
    • What happened? What is said to have happened?: Layers of authority, “meta” methodological approaches to history writing, critically engaging with historical narratives and historiography, the issue of objective past, “making history” and institutions (institutes, archives, museums, and so forth).
Keynote speakers are: Clio Doyle (Queen Mary University of London) James Kapaló (University College Cork) This conference is open to all graduate students. We particularly encourage submissions from those who have not presented their work at conferences before or are from underrepresented regions and/or institutions. We hope to be able to support travel and/or accommodation for a limited number of presenters without access to institutional funding. Please send abstracts up to 300 words and a brief biography (max 100 words) to graceh2023@ceu.edu by 17 January 2023. Participants will receive a notification of acceptance by 17 February 2023. Final papers (up to 2000 words) should be submitted by 17 March 2023 for pre-circulation. More information can be found at https://graceh2023.wordpress.com/ Contact Info: On behalf of the GRACEH 2023 Organizing Committee: Olga Petrova petrova_olga@phd.ceu.edu Contact Email: graceh2023@ceu.edu URL:
*
*
British Women Writers Conference: Liberties
May 25–28 2023 University of Virginia deadline for submissions:  January 15, 2023 contact email:  bwwc2023@gmail.com The organizers of the 2023 BWWC invite papers and panel proposals interpreting the theme of ‘Liberties’ in global and transatlantic British women’s writing from the long eighteenth century to the present. We ask participants to consider ‘liberties’ not only as a political abstraction but also as part of material and experiential subjectivity. Interpreted broadly, liberties include (but are not limited to) legal rights and freedoms, liberty of the person and bodily autonomy, liberties of creative and artistic expression, liberty of profession and vocation, freedom of movement both physical and social, and self-determination in the private and public spheres. How far did these liberties extend to women at different historical moments? Were liberties granted by the state and other institutions or taken despite them? How were they imagined and realized differently by women across categories of race, class, ethnicity, nationality, sexuality, age, ability? We invite presenters to contextualize ‘liberties’ in terms of both its capacities and practices as well as its limits and exclusions. British history of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries poses conflicting and contradictory narratives of liberty. The abolition of the slave trade did not end indentured labor in the colonies. The expansion of the franchise through legislation did not extend the vote to women and the poor. Free trade and market liberalism increased Britain’s wealth but also aggravated socioeconomic inequalities. The rhetorics of emancipation at home contrasted with the realities of imperial rule abroad. How can we make sense of these partial and conditional liberties using literary history? Whose liberty is centered in literary, historical, and political narratives? How is liberty represented in women’s writing — as aspiration, transgression, fantasy, lack? We welcome scholarship that puts the construct of liberty under critical scrutiny and interrogates its relationship to ongoing and incomplete struggles for liberation. We also welcome presentations and panel proposals on pedagogy. How can we draw connections in our teaching between literary history and the liberationist movements of the present? Short talks on pedagogical methodology, classroom practices, use of digital and other media tools, or collective and community-facing projects are highly encouraged. Possible topics for papers and panels include: Political liberties Women and nationhood, women’s civic participation, women and human rights, anti-slavery and abolition, empire and anti-colonialism, suffrage and women’s liberation Social liberties Women’s education, women’s work and the professions, women travelers and migration, women’s associations and societies, liberty and domesticity Liberties of the body Reproductive liberties, sex and sexuality, desire and consent, queer bodies, women’s physical cultures, women and disability Liberties of expression Gender and performance, women’s self-fashioning, women’s art and aesthetics, women and publicity, women and print culture, women’s intellectual histories Please visit the conference website for more details and to submit your abstracts: http://bwwc23.com/ REMINDER IABA Europe 2023 Life-Writing in Times of Crisis 5–8 July 2023 University of Warsaw, Poland We are pleased to announce that the next IABA Europe Conference will be held in Warsaw, Poland, from July 5th to July 8th 2023. The conference will be held on-site only. The theme of the conference, Life-Writing in Times of Crisis, relates to the challenges we have had to face in Europe and all around the world in recent years. A lot has changed since the 2019 IABA Europe conference in Madrid. The accelerating climate crisis, the COVID–19 pandemic, and then the war in Ukraine have significantly influenced not only our perception of the world, but also the ways in which we record autobiographical experiences (the practice of writing about one’s own life). A crucial component of the difficult situation in Europe and other parts of the world is the refugee crisis. In recent years, inhabitants of countries affected by wars and terrible conflicts – Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan or African states – have been seeking peace among European communities. Today, millions of Ukrainians are in the same situation. Contemporary crises may take place on a collective scale and concern events such as war, extermination, the pandemic or economic troubles (rising inflation, unemployment, difficult housing markets), but they can also happen on an individual (personal) scale: illness, the passing of loved ones, imprisonment, forced confinement, hunger, houselessness, unemployment, or changing one’s place of residence… Circumstances of unwanted change, sudden rupture, and discontinuity, which could be described as a sense of living in a previously unknown, utterly changed world, often mark the experience of crisis. In all of these situations, different practices of life-writing emerge – and all of them will interest us. How do dynamic sociopolitical processes shape the stories we tell about our everyday lives? What is the relation between the fragmentation or consolidation of entire social systems and the experimental modes of autobiographical narratives put forward by individuals? Since our conference will be organised in Warsaw, we would like to refer to historical and academic experiences that are specific to Polish and Central European contexts, such as the surprisingly rich tradition of memoir competitions organised in Poland since the 1920s (a total of about 1,500 different competitions were held, with millions of memoirs and diaries collected). Another example would be the tradition of collecting autobiographical documents during the war and the Holocaust, which resulted in the creation of the monumental Ringelblum Archive, among others. Overall, we aim to examine the relationship between crisis situations and writing one’s life. How and why does autobiographical writing happen during crises, when the established order of the world suddenly collapses and everyday life becomes strange, unpredictable, and threatening? How do we talk about our lives, how and why do we record our experiences in difficult conditions? We invite proposals focused on archival records or material records in general (diaries, letters, autobiographies, memoirs), as well as various electronic, virtual life-writing practices that may be performed or kept on-line, on various websites or social media platforms. The theme of the conference may also be analysed from the perspective of life-writing in visual forms (photography, drawings, comics, films and video recordings, among others). Finally, participants may discuss records/reports about the experience of crisis created at the request of journalists or researchers, reporters, sociologists, psychologists, and historians (audiovisual, spoken, written accounts, important oral history tradition). All of the above-mentioned ways of “recording” life in a crisis situation are of great interest to us. During the IABA Warsaw Conference we will celebrate the 10th anniversary of the European Journal of Life Writing. Submissions: We welcome 20-minute individual presentations and 90-minute panel sessions (preferably interdisciplinary and international). The conference will be held in English. Abstracts should not be longer than 300 words; bios should not be longer than 150 words. Practicalities and schedule: Conference website: https://iabawarsaw2023.eu Conference e-mail: iabawarsaw2023@uw.edu.pl Online submissions will open on October 15, 2022 Deadline for proposals: December 31, 2022 Notifications of acceptance will be sent out by January 31, 2023 Registration and conference fees: February 1–March 31, 2023 Preliminary programme: May 1, 2023 Detailed programme: June 1, 2023 Conference Fees: Participants 220 EUR (includes conference lunches and a dinner) The participation of 5 researchers from Ukraine, free of charge *

Family Archives and their Afterlives, 1400-present

June 27, 2023 to June 28, 2023 Deadline for Submissions–Dec. 31, 2022 United Kingdom From the muniments rooms of country estates to scrapbooks, photo albums, and boxes of papers and ephemera stored under the bed: our homes are sites of intergenerational collection and curation. We act as archivists, deciding which materials to keep, both for ourselves and for future generations who will, in time, face the same question. In the early modern period, anxieties over the loss of precious family paperwork were widespread. The sixteenth-century yeoman Robert Furse implored his son to ‘keep sure your wrytynges’, and the resolution of many an eighteenth-century novel – including Charlotte Smith’s The Old Manor House (1793) and a whole host of gothic fiction – turned on the adequate preservation (or otherwise) of family papers and the secrets contained therein. Documents were kept in special vessels (initialled chests, boxes tied up with a loved one’s hair), they were bequeathed in wills, and, as public repositories became more widespread, some collectors attempted to imitate the practices of institutional archives in their own homes – or fought to get their materials included in (or excluded from) these collections. Today, we have the capacity to store an almost infinite quantity of material online – but many of us continue to prize the physical artefact, and books and readymade albums that purport to help us create and store our family archives are widely available. Though in recent years the ‘archival turn’ has led to a renewed interest in the collections compiled by states and institutions, we know rather less about the materials accumulated by families and households. In the absence of the apparent hallmarks of modern archival practice – catalogues, indexes, and, perhaps most pertinently, professional authentication of their historical value – family papers are rarely approached as ‘archives’ – but, when they are transferred into local and national record offices, these same collections go on to form a significant part of our archival heritage. This conference seeks to bring together academics, archivists, and family historians to explore the family archive, in all its forms, from the medieval to the modern period. Topics may include, but are by no means limited to:
    • Approaches to the family archive: definitions, challenges, opportunities
    • The contents and curation of specific family collections
    • Access, circulation, and the ‘social life’ of archives
    • Muniments and legal papers
    • Exclusion and absence in the archive
    • Archives and emotions
    • The matriarchive and women as archivists
    • Arrangement and organisation: cataloguing, inventories, storage, furniture
    • Objects in/and the archive
    • Visual and literary representations of family collections
    • The relationship between family and institutional archives, including bequests, loans, and donations to local and national collections
    • Destruction and dispersal
Please send a title, short bio, and abstract (c. 200-300 words) to: familyarchivesconference@gmail.com. The deadline for submissions is 30 December 2022. We would be grateful if you could also let us know if you have any access requirements (e.g. online/hybrid attendance). All papers will be considered for inclusion in an edited collection, estimated date of submission for chapters December 2023. Please make it clear on your submission if you do not wish your paper to be considered. This conference is part of the ‘Family Archives in Early Modern England’ project, supported by the Leverhulme Trust. Visit us at www.family-archives.co.uk. Contact Info: Please send a title, short bio, and abstract (c. 200-300 words) to: familyarchivesconference@gmail.com. Contact Email: familyarchivesconference@gmail.com * READING WOMEN’S LIFE WRITING: A Critical Appraisal In her book Writing a Woman’s Life (1988), the late Carolyn Heilbrun expressed the need for original scripts for women to live by; stories that press beyond the convention and closure of the marriage plot. Men have always had narrative stories, such as the quest motif and the warrior exemplar, on which to base their lives and within which to tell their life stories. But, Heilbrun argues, such stories of action and accomplishment have been denied to women; the behavior praised by these stories has always been branded “unwomanly”. What we need to do is to move outside that male-centered, binary logic altogether. We need to ask not how Woman is different from Man. We need to know how women have come to be who they are through history, which is the history of their oppression by men and male-designed institutions. Only through an analysis of the power relationships between men and women, and practices based on that analysis, will we put an end to our oppression-and only then will we discover what women are or can be. Only in the last third of the twentieth century have women broken through to a realization of the narratives that have been controlling their lives. Women poets of one generation—those born between 1923 and 1932—can now be seen to have transformed the autobiographies of women’s lives, to have expressed, and suffered for expressing, what women had not earlier been allowed to say. Please send your papers at drsunitasinha@gmail.com.The deadline is 30th December, 2022. The Wordlimit is between 3500 to 5000 words. The book shall be published by Atlantic Publishers and Distributors New Delhi. Prof.Sunita Sinha Email: drsunitasinha@gmail.com Website: www.sunitasinha.com

*

Deadline for Submissions December 31, 2022 University of Warsaw, Poland 5–8 July 2023 Life-Writing in Times of Crisis IABA Europe 2023 We are pleased to announce that the next IABA Europe Conference will be held in Warsaw, Poland, from July 5th to July 8th 2023. The conference will be held on-site only. The theme of the conference, Life-Writing in Times of Crisis, relates to the challenges we have had to face in Europe and all around the world in recent years. A lot has changed since the 2019 IABA Europe conference in Madrid. The accelerating climate crisis, the COVID–19 pandemic, and then the war in Ukrainehave significantly influenced not only our perception of the world, but also the ways in which we record autobiographical experiences (the practice of writing about one’s own life). A crucial component of the difficult situation in Europe and other parts of the world is the refugee crisis. In recent years, inhabitants of countries affected by wars and terrible conflicts – Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan or African states – have been seeking peace among European communities. Today, millions of Ukrainians are in the same situation. Contemporary crises may take place on a collective scale and concern events such as war, extermination, the pandemic or economic troubles (rising inflation, unemployment, difficult housing markets), but they can also happen on an individual (personal) scale: illness, the passing of loved ones, imprisonment, forced confinement, hunger, houselessness, unemployment, or changing one’s place ofresidence. Circumstances of unwanted change, sudden rupture, and discontinuity, which could be described as a sense of living in a previously unknown, utterly changed world, often mark the experience of crisis. In all of these situations, different practices of life-writing emerge – and all of them will interest us. How do dynamic sociopolitical processes shape the stories we tell about our everyday lives? What is the relation between the fragmentation or consolidation of entire social systems and the experimental modes of autobiographical narratives putforward by individuals? Since our conference will be organised in Warsaw, we would like to refer to historical and academic experiences that are specific to Polish and Central European contexts, such as the surprisingly rich tradition of memoir competitions organised in Poland since the 1920s (a total of about 1,500 different competitions were held, with millions of memoirs and diaries collected). Another example would be the tradition of collecting autobiographical documents during the war and the Holocaust, which resulted in the creation of the monumental Ringelblum Archive, among others. Overall, we aim to examine the relationship between crisis situations and writing one’s life. How and why does autobiographical writing happen during crises, when the established order of the world suddenly collapses and everyday life becomes strange, unpredictable, and threatening? How do we talk about our lives, how and why do we record our experiences in difficult conditions? We invite proposals focused on archival records or material records in general (diaries, letters, autobiographies, memoirs), as well as various electronic, virtual life-writing practices that may be performed or kept on-line, on various websites or social media platforms. The theme of the conference may also be analysed from the perspective of life-writing in visual forms (photography, drawings, comics, films and video recordings, among others). Finally, participants may discuss records/reports about the experience of crisis created at the request of journalists or researchers, reporters, sociologists, psychologists, and historians (audiovisual, spoken, written accounts, important oral history tradition). All of the above-mentioned ways of “recording” life in a crisis situation are of great interest to us. During the IABA Warsaw Conference we will celebrate the 10th anniversary of the European Journal of Life Writing. Submissions: We welcome 20-minute individual presentations and 90-minute panel sessions (preferably interdisciplinary and international). The conference will be held in English. Abstracts should not be longer than 300 words; bios should not be longer than 150 words. Practicalities and schedule: Conference website: https://iabawarsaw2023.eu Conference e-mail: iabawarsaw2023@uw.edu.pl Online submissions will open on October 15, 2022 Deadline for proposals: December 31, 2022 Notifications of acceptance will be sent out by January 31, 2023 Registration and conference fees: February 1–March 31, 2023 Preliminary programme: May 1, 2023 Detailed programme: June 1, 2023 Conference Fees: Participants 220 EUR (includes conference lunches and a dinner) The participation of 5 researchers from Ukraine, free of charge PhD student participants 170 EUR (includes conference lunches and a dinner) The participation of 5 PhD students from Ukraine, free of charge IABA Warsaw 2023 Organising Committee Teresa Bruś Marcin Gołąb Joanna Jeziorska-Haładyj Artur Hellich Maciej Libich Lucyna Marzec Joanna Piechura Paweł Rodak Agnieszka Sobolewska Honorata Sroka *

Exile at State U: Stories from the Outer Edges of Academe

deadline for submissions: December 31, 2022 Douglas Higbee/University of South Carolina, Aiken contact email: douglash@usca.edu Seeking abstracts for an edited collection of essays about life on the tenure track, especially for those working in the humanities and social sciences at non-R1 colleges and universities. Because full-time, tenure-track jobs in the humanities and social sciences are hard to come by, we are often told to be grateful and to be quiet. And indeed, there is much to be grateful for and relatively little to shout about. But there are still important stories to be told, and relatively little nonfiction has been written about the subtle but life-changing personal and professional vicissitudes of a career spent in the academic hinterlands of branch state campuses and non-elite private colleges. Especially for those from highly rated grad programs, often in metropolitan locales, a career in a rural area or small town is an eye-opening and life-altering experience. The goal of the collection is to tell it like it is, warts and all. Essays should be autobiographical, not scholarly, and can be focused on a particular career episode (and thus relatively short) or broader in scope and longer in length. The most important thing is to be compelling, or at least interesting. Humor is more than welcome. Writers are welcome to publish under a pseudonym, or anonymously. Possible topics or areas of focus –job application process: interview and campus visit stories; first impressions; deciding whether to take the job –on the tenure track: the challenges (or lack thereof) of meeting tenure and promotion requirements; interactions with other faculty, administrators, community members; networking and conferences; deciding to stay or leave –community in exile: relationships with colleagues; relations with neighbors; location details –after tenure/the middle years: career evolution; putting down roots, professionally and personally; non-academic pursuits; changing jobs –toward retirement: taking stock; successes and regrets Please email 1-2 pp. abstracts and a short bio or CV to douglash@usca.edu by Dec. 31, 2022. Douglas Higbee University of South Carolina, Aiken Deadline for Submissions December 15, 2022

Colonial Letters and the Contact of Knowledges: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Colonial Correspondences

April 11, 2023 to April 14, 2023 University of Bayreuth, Germany Written correspondence (e.g. letters, diaries, telegrams, etc.) were one of the major means of communication during the 19th – 20th Century British colonialism of Africa. Through them, the instructions, intensions, decisions, complaints, justifications and agenda of resident British colonial officers, local colonial administrators and collaborators, colonial officials in Britain and colonised subjects (individuals, villages) were transmitted across time and space. These letters offer extraordinary access to the mindset and overall agenda of the entities producing them. The ways of life of these entities, their patterns of social order, repertoires and constellations of knowledges, linguistic voices, world views and cosmologies are projected, both directly and indirectly, in these letters. In themselves, these letters embody the contact zone of colonial-precolonial structures, coloniser-colonised entities, indigenous-foreign knowledges, cultural and linguistic practices, etc. Letters written during British colonialism of Southern Cameroons were the object of study of the research project “Colonial Letters and the Contact of Knowledges” funded by the Africa Multiple Cluster of Excellence at the University of Bayreuth, Germany (https://www.africamultiple.uni-bayreuth.de/en/Projects/Knowledges/Knowledges_Colonial-letters/index.php). The aim of the conference is to present the major findings of the project. We also invite perspectives on British (and other) colonial correspondences in other territories and periods. Call for papers We invite submissions that describe, from multidisciplinary perspectives (within the humanities and social sciences, especially linguistics, history, literature, communication studies, anthropology and sociology), the instantiations of colonial contacts, conflicts, contestations and eventual coalescence, co-habitations and or hybridisations of ‘knowledges’ during colonialism that are embodied in, and transmitted through, letters written during British colonisation of Southern Cameroons (1916-1961) and beyond. Other colonisations, especially in Africa, form part of the focus of the conference. Several lines of investigation fall within the scope of the conference including, but not limited to:
    • Colonial correspondences and the construction of multiple identities
    • Colonial correspondences and the discursive enactment of (social, religious, political, hereditary) power
    • Colonial correspondences and the coalescence, cohabitation and hybridisation of colonial and precolonial social norms (interaction, hierarchy, respect forms, kinship affiliation)
    • Colonial correspondences and the contact of languages
    • Colonial correspondences and patterns of language stratification: official, native, local, dialect, etc. languages
    • Colonial correspondences and the production, consolidation and contestation of ‘knowledges’
    • Colonial correspondences and the role of letter writing agencies
    • Colonial correspondences and the concealment of, and access to, knowledge, information and rights
    • Colonial correspondences and colonial social and power structures of stratification
    • etc.
What patterns of knowledge production are adopted in colonial correspondences? How are these different in letters written by colonial administrators and those written by colonised subjects? What repertoires of knowledges drive their production, rejection and perhaps co-construction? To answer these questions, we invite submissions that adopt multidisciplinary, trans-disciplinary or inter-disciplinary approaches. NB: Selected papers from the conference will be published in the series Africa Multiple: Studies of Africa and its Diasporas (Brill Academic Publishers). Submission Guidelines
    • Deadline for receipt of abstracts: 15 December 2022
    • Feedback on abstracts: 31 December 2022
    • Maximum abstract length: 500 words
Partial scholarships We offer per diems of up to 300€ (i.e., 100€ per day) for participants whose abstracts are accepted. More info  at: https://colonial-letters.de/# Contact Info: Conference organisers Eric A. Anchimbe (University of Bayreuth) Glory Essien Otung (University of Bayreuth) Contact Email: colonial.letters@uni-bayreuth.de URL: https://www.africamultiple.uni-bayreuth.de/
Narrative Matters Conference 2023 Instrumental Narratives: Narrative Studies and the Storytelling Boom Tampere University, Finland, 15–17 June 2023 https://events.tuni.fi/narrativematters2023/ CALL FOR PAPERS
NB! Deadline for proposals extended until the end of November 2022!
Welcome to the 11th Narrative Matters conference at Tampere! The conference positions narrative scholars in the midst of the storytelling boom. Everyone is urged to share their story today, from consumers to multinational corporations, from private citizens to nation states. Storytelling consultants are thriving in today’s storytelling economy, but where are narrative scholars? Do the professional analyzers and theorizers of narrative have a say in the current storytelling boom? How to engage in a societal dialogue and debate as a narrative scholar? Featured topics: *   storytelling boom and its social relevance *   novel ways of storytelling today *   emergent methods, ideas, and issues in narrative studies The social events include a lake cruise to Viikinsaari island – dinner, sauna & swim! TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION –  2 hour train ride from the Helsinki airport –  direct flights to Tampere via 11 hubs –  strong hotel capacity in the campus area Conference webpage / CFP and submission link: https://events.tuni.fi/narrativematters2023/call-for-papers/ CFP OPEN UNTIL NOVEMBER 30, 2022! Conference fee EUR 220 (faculty) / EUR 120 (student) Pre-conference workshops, hosted by Jens Brockmeier, Alexandra Georgakopoulou, Stefan Iversen & Ann Phoenix, will take place on Wednesday, June 14th. NB! Narrative Matters 2023 is an on-site conference with no hybrid sessions and no recording of presentations. We will however include two online sessions in the programme, one early in the morning and another late in the evening (Helsinki time). The conference fee for online participants, who will only have access to these two online sessions, will pay a reduced conference fee of EUR 150 / 100 (students). Main organizers: Maria Mäkelä, Matti Hyvärinen & Mari Hatavara (Tampere University, Narrare) Hanna Meretoja (University of Turku, SELMA) Merja Polvinen (University of Helsinki) The Academy of Finland Consortium Project Instrumental Narratives https://instrumentalnarratives.wordpress.com Full CFP: The eleventh Narrative Matters conference is hosted by Tampere University (Finland) and co-organized by the Instrumental Narratives consortium project, SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory, and Narrare: Centre for Interdisciplinary Narrative Studies. The conference positions narrative scholars in the midst of the storytelling boom. Everyone is urged to share their story today, from consumers to multinational corporations, from private citizens to nation states. Storytelling consultants are thriving in today’s storytelling economy, but where are narrative scholars? Do the professional analyzers and theorizers of narrative have a say in the current storytelling boom? How to engage in a societal dialogue and debate as a narrative scholar? The conference will provide a platform for scholars to both seek new applications that might appeal to diverse audiences and to critically reflect on the instrumentalization of narrative studies. Most narrative scholars agree on the rich affordances of storytelling: narrative is a compact and intuitive form for sharing detailed, personal experiences as well as collective, community-forming ideas and outlooks. Thus narrative studies approaches lend generous support to the instrumentalization and commercialization of narrative form in business, politics, media, and personal development. Yet narrative may just as well be put to uses that are dubious if not dangerous. The widespread, uncritical use of narratives of personal experience in journalism and social media may have unintended and unanticipated consequences. Experientiality may come at the cost of informativeness. Furthermore, while narratives are ideally suited to conveying the complexity of human experience, the complexity of large social interactions or material processes, such as climate change, easily exceeds the capacity of storytelling. Now that the benefits of storytelling have caught the public imagination and are recognized in various professional practices, narrative scholarship is in a good position to disseminate critical practices for the analysis of the forms and contexts of storytelling as well. We should also look into future narrative possibilities. The 21st century will no doubt be the era of social media and shared personal narratives, and therefore we should look for productive ways of connecting the personal with the political. How, for example, to bridge the gap between individual particularity and supra-individual concerns at the limits of narrative, such as the climate crisis and global inequality? How to conceptualize and control the afterlife of narratives determined by digital forms of narrative agency? Will new forms of narrative speculation direct our actions as citizens, consumers, and collectives? Which roles will be allotted to specific artistic, digital, and quotidian genres of storytelling? Are these new narrative genres and practices changing the ways people share their experience and use stories in the everyday? Are new affordances for narrative meaning making evolving? We invite narrative scholars across disciplines to address the following (and related) issues: *   storytelling boom and its social relevance *   novel ways of storytelling today *   emergent methods, ideas, and issues in narrative studies *   sociological analysis of curated storytelling *   the study of storytelling rights and privileges; re-thinking of empathy *   narrative and post-truth *   narrative consultancy business; storytelling self-help and manuals *   story-critical reading in narrative studies; story-critical tools for audiences *   popularizing narrative theory and practices *   social life of narratives vs. analysis of individual texts *   narrative and action: political narratives, positioning and counter-narratives *   professional narratives and narratives of professions refigured *   the limits and affordances of narrative in making sense of illness and health *   the limits and affordances of narrative in addressing the environmental crisis *   uses and risks of viral storytelling and social media sharing *   discourse on well-being and cognitive benefits of literature *   the potential of fiction in analysing and resisting the narrative boom Please send your paper and panel proposals by November 30, 2022! The abstract for an individual paper should be 250-300 words. A panel proposal (in the case of a traditional research panel, 3-4 speakers) should be approx. 600 words, including a brief general description + short abstracts of each paper. In addition to the proposal text, please include a 100 word biographical statement for every speaker. If you only wish to present in either of the online sessions, please indicate this in your proposal. Here is the link to the submission form. Narrative Matters 2023 is an on-site conference with no hybrid sessions and no recording of presentations. We will however include two online sessions in the programme, one early in the morning and another late in the evening (Helsinki time). The conference fee for online participants, who will only have access to these two online sessions, will pay a reduced conference fee of EUR 150 / 100 (students). Dr. Maria Mäkelä Senior Lecturer in Comparative Literature Tampere University, Finland +358 40 8325635 https://www.tuni.fi/en/maria-makela *

The Ecocritical First Person

American Society for the Study of Literature This CFP is for a guaranteed panel sponsored by the Thoreau Society 2023 ASLE + AESS Conference: “Reclaiming the Commons” July 9-12, 2023 in Portland, Oregon deadline for submissions:  December 1, 2022 What is the role of the personal voice in contemporary ecocritical scholarship? As Dipesh Chakrabarty has argued, conceptualizing climate change demands an awareness of both personal and planetary scales of transformation, yet traditional academic discourse has tended to discourage the use of personal history, anecdote, and the first-person voice. Our roundtable asks what’s at stake in the personal turn and a more intimate mode of literary-critical address. For this roundtable, we seek both excerpts from ecocritical writing in the personal voice and reflective/critical proposals that might trace the historical genealogy of the personal; consider the politics of voice vis-à-vis race and ethnicity, class, gender, and region; discuss marginalized efforts to bear witness; or offer reflexive meditations on our ties to the university and what more informal scholarship has to offer “lay” audiences. This panel has a guaranteed slot on the conference program. Proposals (maximum 200 words) for either/both creative or critical presentations and short CVs due by December 1st to Deanna Kreisel at deekaykay@icloud.com. Travel and Wonder, 1450-1750 Conference 27-28 April 2023 to be held at the University of York deadline for submissions:  November 20, 2022 Call for Papers We invite proposals for conference papers on wonder in early-modern travel writing. Papers are welcome to discuss any geographical area. They may explore (but are not restricted to) the following questions: how did early-modern travellers express wonder? What is the role of the senses in descriptions of wonder? Did travellers doubt their own senses? How did they address the problem of credibility and readers’ doubts when describing wondrous phenomena in their writing? How does wonder in early-modern travel writing relate to scholarly themes such as race, gender, colonialism, material culture, religion, knowledge or scientific discourse? Keynote speakers are Joan-Pau Rubiés (Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona) and Lauren Working (University of York). While preferring in-person presentations, we welcome a limited number of online papers. Please indicate in your proposal whether you plan to present in-person or online. Please submit a brief CV and proposal of 250-300 words for 20 minute papers to Dr Jaska Kainulainen, Docent of history at the University of Helsinki and a research associate at the Centre for Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (CREMS) at the University of York, at jaska.kainulainen@helsinki.fi by 20 November 2022. The conference is generously supported by the KONE FOUNDATION in association with CREMS, University of York. *
Biography, Autobiography, Memoir, and Personal Narrative
Southwest Popular and American Culture Association February 22-25, 2023, Albuquerque, New Mexico deadline for submissions:  November 14, 2022 Melinda McBee / mcbee58@verizon.net Paper proposals on any aspect of biography, autobiography, memoir, and personal narrative are welcome. Literary papers as well as creative works will be accepted.  Send a 500 word abstract by November 14, 2022, to to conference’s database at http://www.southwestpca.org Directions: Once you have accessed the above web site, you will have to create an account.  After creating you account, on the web site choose Conference, then from the drop-down menu click Call for Papers/Submit Proposal.  Scroll down to the Language and Literature section to Biography, Autobiography, Memoir, and Personal Narrative.  Click the + sign under the Biography area, then choose Submit Proposal. SUBMIT PROPOSAL * As some of you know, I host a monthly webinar series,  “Let’s Talk Books at NMU” (Northern Michigan University).  On November’s episode, I’ll be talking with Etta M. Madden about her book, Engaging Italy: American Women’s Utopian Visions and Transnational Networks. The webinar will occur on Friday, Nov. 18, at 1:00 Eastern time. Registration is required but easy, and can be found here: https://nmu.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_dnXEzUN8QMmJcIvo8AyMvw Please join us if you’re free, and also feel free to forward this announcement widely. Thanks, Lynn Domina Deadline for Submissions November 1, 2022 The College English Association, a gathering of scholar-teachers in English studies, welcomes proposals for presentations on Travel and Literature for our 52nd annual conference, March 30-April 1, 2023, in San Antonio, Texas. Submit your 250-500 word abstract at https://www.conftool.pro/cea2023. The Travel and Literature area at CEA is seeking submissions on any aspect of travel and literature, including but not limited to travelogues; travel and ecocriticism; regionalism; travel and identity; intercultural perspectives; etc. Theoretical and interdisciplinary approaches are welcome, as are papers concerning various genres and historical periods of literature. Of particular interest will be presentations that actualize the conference theme, Confluence, as it applies to travelers across America, around the world, and through time and space. How do writers explore, engage, and articulate Confluence within the places, spaces, experiences, texts, and selves of their travels? Conference Theme: CONFLUENCE CEA welcomes proposals for presentations that move to the general conference theme: ConfluenceThe conference will be held in San Antonio, a city that itself is a kind of confluence: it has been the home of multiple cultures; it has seen the rise and fall of famous missions and military presidios; and it honors in its daily life today its Hispanic heritage and cowboy culture alike. It is no wonder, then, that it is recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. General Call for Papers CEA also welcomes proposals for presentations in any of the areas English departments typically encompass, including literature criticism and scholarship, creative writing, rhetoric, composition, technical communication, linguistics, and film. We also welcome papers on areas that influence our work as academics, including student demographics, student/instructor accountability and assessment, student advising, academic leadership in departments and programs, and the place of the English department in the university. Panels and Roundtable Sessions are also welcome. If submitting a pre-formed panel, please create a user ID for each participant, and identify the panel in the submission. Roundtables will feature presentations and discussion of 500-word essays, an opportunity to engage with other scholars, discover other resources, or begin imagining the next steps towards developing ideas into longer, more typical conference papers or articles. Abstract Submissions Accepted until November 1, 2022 For more information on how to submit, please see the full CFP at www.cea-web.org. Format Presentations must be made in person at the conference venue. Neither proxy nor “virtual” (Skyping, etc.) presentations are permitted. Presentations will be limited to 15 minutes. Membership All presenters at the 2023 CEA conference must become members of CEA by January 1, 2023. To join CEA, please go to www.cea-web.org. Other questions? Please email cea.english@gmail.com. Sincerely, Katrina J. Quinn, Ph.D. Special Topics Chair, Travel and Literature (724) 738-2430 | katrina.quinn@sru.edu * Deadline for Submissions November 1, 2022

Call for Proposals – Oxford Handbook of Henry David Thoreau

The editors of the proposed Oxford Handbook of Henry David Thoreau seek proposals for essays on any aspect of Thoreau’s works, life, or reception that significantly reframe an aspect of his scholarly, political, or popular legacy. For more than a century, the dominant image of Thoreau was that of a solitary figure who happily turned his back on social ties and political matters to head off into the woods. In both public and scholarly writing, Thoreau was held up as an exemplar of a certain type of white, able-bodied masculinity: one where wilderness was preferable to domestic and social spaces, and where independence and communion with the self in nature superseded other forms of relationality, community, and solidarity. In recent years, scholarly work on Thoreau, including a major biography and several bicentennial volumes, has challenged these long-held critical perceptions with consideration of his work in relation to gender and sexuality, abolition, indigeneity, race, environmental justice, and other issues. We aim to collect and expand these new directions in Thoreau studies in a comprehensive volume designed to inform the next generation of Thoreau scholarship. We seek contributions from disciplines, traditions, and perspectives that have been previously excluded from or that have been marginalized within Thoreau studies. We are particularly interested in writings that engage with a range of traditions, including anti-racist work and prison abolition; disability justice, LGBTQ+ activism; climate justice; radical politics; as well as experimental or innovative approaches to Thoreau’s life, writings, and legacies. Please send abstracts of 300 words or fewer to kristen.case@maine.edu and james.finley@tamusa.edu by November 1, 2022. In addition, we welcome queries and would be happy to discuss ideas prior to the deadline. Contact Info: Kristen Case, Professor of English, University of Maine Farmington, kristen.case@maine.edu James Finley, Associate Professor of English, Texas A&M University – San Antonio, james.finley@tamusa.edu Contact Email: james.finley@tamusa.edu * Deadline for Submissions November 1, 2022 Call for Papers Out of the USSR: Travelling Women, Travelling Memories 2–3.2.2023 University of Turku, Finland Travelling has always been connected with fundamental social and political changes taking place in societies. Throughout history, one of the countries that people have chosen to leave, move away or have been expelled from, but also a country which they have been going back to, is Russia/the Soviet Union. There is an obvious link between the large transformations that have taken place in Russia since the time of perestroika in the 1990s until the ongoing war in Ukraine and the restrictions of civil rights such as freedom of speech, and the increased mobility out of Russia. The conference takes these transformations as starting points in examining how individuals reflect on and recall the Soviet/Russian home country in literary presentations, addressing the history of mobility, emigration, family, gender, ethnic or religious background in face of their collective memory in their new place of residence. The meeting points for the proposals are the concepts of travelling/mobility/exile and (post-, trans-/cross-cultural) memory. The focus is on women’s fictional texts and memories from the 1980s until today that allow the presentations to address and to acknowledge [e]migrating women writers as mediators of ideas and memories in trans-/cross-cultural contexts. The aim of the conference is to focus on gender in the process of the transformation of cultures through ideas that travel, and to pay special attention to women’s contribution to the cultural transfer and mobility of ideas and memories which have not been sufficiently studied and documented. We expect presentations addressing published fictional texts by women who have moved from the Soviet and Russian territories into new areas, and by writing they have created and processed memories of moving and of resettling in a new country/location of residence. We are especially interested in memories of women emigrants and travellers to the Nordic countries, Germany, Great Britain, the US, France and Israel. The organizers plan to publish an edited collection of papers presented at the conference. We invite researchers to a two-day conference that provides a platform to reflect upon the themes that address the following issues and more: ● What is recalled, and how the history of leaving/migration is experienced, recalled and narrated? ● Ideas, ideologies and memories (e.g. national myths) which women carry along to their new country/location of residence, and how they change in regard to the home country vis-à-vis thenew country? ● The creation and production of post-memorial recollection of family history ● Motives for leaving and emigration ● The constitution of matrilinear narratives and transformation of individual, family- and collective memory through travelling ● Carriers, media, contents, practices and forms of travelling memory ● Recollection of Soviet terror (e.g. Stalinist genocide and Holodomor) in the face of the prevalence of Holocaust memory in the new site of residence ● The understanding of one’s “own” culture, its possible changes, and the kind of presentation / narrative forms the change of location / culture /context produces ● Narratives of lived experiences in the new location ● The form that the social and cultural background (age, profession, gender identity, family background, etc.) takes in the texts ● Cultural memories (family, generation, gendered, etc.) that are carried along and created in the new country of residence, and what is their relation to the new location of residence? ● Narration of the journey, departure and arrival at the new location of residence ● Sites of memory in transition Keynote speakers are: Eva Hausbacher, Professor of Slavic Literature und Culture at the University of Salzburg, Department of Slavic Studies. “Close distances: Narratives of the Soviet Past in Russian-German Women’s Writings” Simona Mitroiu, PhD, Senior Researcher at Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Department of Interdisciplinary Research in Social-Human Sciences “Generations of Memory in Women’s Narratives: Literary (re)workings of Transnational Disruptions, Intersections, and Transformations” Please submit your abstract (title, ca. 250 words, names and affiliations of the presenters) by 1. November 2022 to Viola Parente-Čapková (viocap@utu.fi) and Arja Rosenholm (arja.rosenholm@tuni.fi). Acceptance letters and the final programme will be sent by the end of November 2022. The conference has its background in the research project Texts on the Move https://tekstitliikkeessa.com/, examining how Russian women’s texts and ideas have been travelling and moving across the border to Finland in 1840–2020. Organizer: Texts on the Move: Reception of Women’s Writing in Finland and Russia 1840–2020 (Emil Aaltonen Foundation), and University of Turku, and Tampere University * Deadline for Submissions November 1, 2022 Women Writing Women’s Lives Kathy Chamberlain Research Awards Women Writing Women’s Lives (WWWL), a women’s group dedicated to the writing of women’s lives, is pleased to offer five research awards to women who are furthering the group’s mission. The awards are funded by a generous gift from Edith Penty, a veteran activist in the civil rights and women’s movement, who wished to express her gratitude for the work of WWWL and to honor Kathy Chamberlain. A long-time WWWL member and author of Jane Welsh Carlyle and Her Victorian World, Kathy Chamberlain served as WWWL steering committee chair for ten years. Each recipient will be awarded five hundred dollars ($500) to help defray expenses incurred while working on a memoir or biography of a woman, in print or other media, such as film, podcast, bibliography, database, or website. Awardees will also receive a one-year membership in WWWL (including dues). Awards must be used between February 1, 2023 and February 1, 2024. Awards may be used to fund: ● Travel to archives or relevant research locations ● Copying or digitizing materials ● Purchase of books for research ● Computers, software, or other technology needed for the project Eligibility: We welcome submissions from women who are current masters and doctoral students; adjunct and/or unaffiliated scholars who received their PhD in the last six years; assistant professors working towards tenure; and independent researchers. WWWL members are not eligible. How to Apply: Send an email to ChamberlainAward@gmail.com with the subject line “Chamberlain Award Application.” Attach the application, which consists of one PDF document. The document must include the four items below: Name the document with your last name, first name [LAST NAME, FIRST NAME]. 1. Contact Information: Your name, telephone number, permanent address and e-mail, current employer or academic affiliation, and title of project. 2. Proposal: A 500-word proposal describing the project and how it advances the WWWL mission (see below). 3. Budget: List how the funds will be used. 4. Curriculum Vitae: Provide a 1-page Curriculum Vitae. Due Date: Applications will be accepted from September 6 to November 1, 2022 by 11:59 pm. Email the application, which should consist of one PDF attachment to: ChamberlainAward@gmail.com. Please do not include the application in the body of the email. It must be just one attachment. Award recipients will be notified by February 1, 2023. Email or call Allysha A. Leonard, Chamberlain Award Administrative Assistant, if you need assistance: ChamberlainAward@gmail.com  (831) 345-9849. Women Writing Women’s Lives Mission Statement The places, cultures, and communities in which women live their lives change, as do women’s roles, status, interests, and opportunities. Our purpose as a group is to identify these changes, understand their impact, and explain and portray the complex realities of women’s lives. In biographies and memoirs of women, created in writing or other media, we hope to call attention to the reciprocal dynamics between our subjects and society, to find new ways of looking at and presenting women’s stories, and ultimately to influence the way women’s stories are perceived and written.
https://womenwritingwomenslives.org/kathy-chamberlain-award/
* Seminar Title: Reimagining 21st Century Realisms American Comparative Literature Association’s Annual Meeting in Chicago (March 16-19, 2023) Organizer: Jenny Rademacher, Professor, Babson College (vrademacher@babson.edu) Paper proposals can be submitted at this link from Oct. 1 to Oct. 31, 2022 at this link: https://www.acla.org/reimagining-21st-century-realisms How are we rethinking genres that grapple with the increasingly ambivalent boundaries among truth, fact, and invention?  The past three decades have produced myriad efforts to name the wide range of forms that aim for greater veracity and anchoring to documented realities, while simultaneously equivocating—metamodernism, post-irony, new sincerity, auto/biofictions, and the awkwardly phrased post-post modernism, to name only a few. While the field is still very much in play, there is a common shift away from purely ironic approaches toward the connectedness of language, humans, and reality, and a newly dominant engagement with the capacity of literature and other forms of creative expression to reshape how we live and create. If postmodernism’s perception of language as a self-referential game has played itself to exhaustion, neither are we witnessing a return to literature that naively observes and strives to mimetically represent external reality. Rather than a mirror, contemporary realisms extend beyond materiality to expose the complex and often vexing realness of emotions, perceptions, and ethical obligations to one another and the world we inhabit. In so doing, such speculative realisms experiment with derivative identities and claims to truth, incorporating uncertainty while still trying to speak meaningfully to the realness of human experience.  With attention to their contradictions and confluences, this seminar explores the patterns of reimagined realisms in contemporary narrative— what forms they may be taking, how they are reconfiguring what we may understand as realism, and why. Considering the interaction among these diverse modes and how their growing popularity speaks to the experience of contemporary life, possible topics include (but are not limited to):
    • What is the nature and function of new realisms in shaping what comes after postmodernism?
    • How can fiction be used to experiment with the real and to create alternative ways of seeing and being in the world?
    • If realism has become more speculative, how does it challenge post-truth? How might these forms reveal a common thread for fostering an ethical relationship with truth?
    • How do auto/biofictions explore uncertainties among biographical, fictional, and authorial subjectivities that we navigate in real life and not only in these texts?
    • What do fictions that tread the borders between situated realities and invention provide us that neither non-fiction nor fiction alone might?
    • How do changing concepts of technology impact technique and form, providing thresholds for re-examining what we think we know?
    • Why have these new realisms become so popular with writers and readers?
    • How can a specific writer’s work illuminate important features of contemporary realisms?
    • In what ways do the varied forms of new realisms share a common zeitgeist that extends across multiple geographies (or how do they differ)?
Virginia Newhall Rademacher, PhD Professor, Hispanic Literature and Cultural Studies Babson College Babson Park, MA 02457 vrademacher@babson.edu WebEx personal room: https://babson.webex.com/meet/vrademacher Author Page: Derivative Lives (Bloomsbury, 2022) * American Comparative Literature Association’s Annual Meeting in Chicago (March 16-19, 2023) Seminar Title: Literary Biography Co-organizers: Sara Kippur (Trinity College, CT) and Julia Elsky (Loyola University Chicago, jelsky@luc.edu) Paper proposals can be submitted at this link from Oct. 1 to Oct. 31, 2022: https://www.acla.org/literary-biography This panel seeks to explore the topic of literary biography as both theory and practice. Literary studies since the New Critics have long registered a suspicion of biographical approaches to criticism, yet our contemporary moment–in which scholars and students seem to agree that there are ethical and political stakes to recognizing an author’s lived experiences and actions–pushes us to revisit the terms and stakes of biography in scholarship and in the classroom. To what extent should biography be centered in literary studies and in the comparative literature classroom? How has the form and practice of literary biography evolved? How might we, as practitioners, responsibly take on the task of writing literary biographies? These are some of the questions that motivate our panel and that we hope to address from a range of perspectives. Recent publications suggest the expansiveness of literary biography as a genre: it encompasses, of course, the biography of a person; the biography of a novel, such as Alice Kaplan’s Looking for The Stranger about Camus’s text or Michael Gorra’s Portrait of a Novel about Henry James’s novel; and dual biographies that feature multiple figures, such as Charlotte Gordon’s Romantic Outlaws about Mary Wollstonecraft and Mary Shelley. This seminar seeks participants who will discuss the form of literary biography in a theoretical framework as well as those who will present the frameworks of the literary biographies they are in the process of writing. The seminar will also be a forum for discussion of how biographers write for general and academic audiences. How do approaches and forms change when looking to publish with an academic press, including those that aim at a broader readership, or a trade publisher? The wide range of approaches, as well as the interest in publishing biographies of women, are evinced by recent publications such as Ann Jefferson’s biography of Natalie Sarraute (Princeton, 2000), Caroline Weber’s Proust’s Duchess (Penguin, 2018), and Ruth Franklin’s biography of Shirley Jackson (Norton, 2016), among others. We would welcome scholars and critics who have or are currently considering writing for a more general audience. We also plan to invite an editor who straddles academic and trade audiences and who could discuss norms in their area of publishing. Julia Elsky, PhD Associate Professor of French Department of Modern Languages and Literatures Loyola University Chicago jelsky@luc.edu * Call for Papers STARDOM AND FANDOM Southwest Popular / American Culture Association (SWPACA) 44th Annual Conference, February 22-25, 2023 Marriott Albuquerque Albuquerque, New Mexico http://www.southwestpca.org Submissions open on August 15, 2022 Proposal submission deadline: October 31, 2022 Proposals for papers and panels are now being accepted for the 44th annual SWPACA conference. One of the nation’s largest interdisciplinary academic conferences, SWPACA offers nearly 70 subject areas, each typically featuring multiple panels.  For a full list of subject areas, area descriptions, and Area Chairs, please visit http://southwestpca.org/conference/call-for-papers/ The Area Chair for Stardom and Fandom invites paper or panel proposals on any aspect of stardom or fandom. The list of ideas below is limited, so if you have an idea that is not listed, please suggest the new topic. We are an interdisciplinary area and encourage submissions from multiple perspectives and disciplines. Topics might include: Studies of individual celebrities and their fans, both current and historical Studies focused on specific fandoms – films, television programs, books, bands, etc. Fandom and loss – how fans cope when beloved things come to an end The reciprocal relationship between stars and fans Impact of celebrity and fame on identity construction, reconstruction and sense of self Reality television, YouTube celebrities, Influencers and the changing definition of ‘stardom’ The impact of social media and various platforms on celebrity/fan interaction Celebrity/fame addiction as cultural change The intersection of stars and fans in virtual and physical spaces (Twitter, Tumblr, TikTok, conventions) Celebrity and the construction of persona Pedagogical approaches to teaching stardom and fandom Fans, Stans, Antis and ‘haters’ Fan shame, wank, fandom policing, and purity culture in fandom spaces Gendered constructions of stars and fans Historical studies of fandom and fan/celebrity interaction All proposals must be submitted through the conference’s database at http://register.southwestpca.org/southwestpca For details on using the submission database and on the application process in general, please see the Proposal Submission FAQs and Tips page at http://southwestpca.org/conference/faqs-and-tips/ Individual proposals for 15-minute papers must include an abstract of approximately 200-500 words. Including a brief bio in the body of the proposal form is encouraged, but not required. For information on how to submit a proposal for a roundtable or a multi-paper panel, please view the above FAQs and Tips page. The deadline for submissions is October 31, 2022.   SWPACA offers monetary awards for the best graduate student papers in a variety of categories. Submissions of accepted, full papers are due January 1, 2023.  SWPACA also offers travel fellowships for undergraduate and graduate students. For more information, visit http://southwestpca.org/conference/graduate-student-awards/ Registration and travel information for the conference will be available at http://southwestpca.org/conference/conference-registration-information/. For 2023, we are excited to be at a new venue, the Marriott Albuquerque (2101 Louisiana Blvd NE, Albuquerque NM 87110), which boasts free parking and close proximity to dining, shopping and other delights. In addition, please check out the organization’s peer-reviewed, scholarly journal, Dialogue: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Popular Culture and Pedagogy, at http://journaldialogue.org/ If you have any questions about the Stardom and Fandom area, please contact its Area Chair, Dr. Lynn Zubernis, Professor, West Chester University, at lzubernis@wcupa.edu. If you have general questions about the conference, please contact us at support@southwestpca.org, and a member of the executive team will get back to you. We look forward to receiving your submissions! Contact Info: Lynn Zubernis, PhD Professor, West Chester University 1160 McDermott Drive, Ste 102 West Chester PA 19380 Contact Email: lzubernis@wcupa.edu URL: http://www.southwestpca.org * Deadline for Submissions October 31, 2022
International Conference
“Virginia Woolf: For a Poetics & Politics of Intimacy”
Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France Organised by ECLLA (Études du Contemporain en Littératures, Langues, Arts) with the support of the French Society of Woolfian Studies and of CORPUS (UR-UPJV 4295) Thursday, 11th of May 2023 and Friday, 12th of May 2023 Confirmed keynote speakers: Elsa Högberg, Uppsala University and Christine Reynier, Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3 University “They’ve just sent the second batch of proofs [of Passenger to Teheran] which I have swallowed at a gulp. […] I kept saying ‘How I should like to know that woman’ and then thinking ‘But I do’, and then ‘No, I don’t– not altogether the woman who writes this.’ I didn’t know the extent of your subtleties […]. Indeed it is odd that now, having read this, I have picked up a good many things I had missed in private life. What are they, I wonder, the very intimate things, one says in print? There’s a whole family of them. Its [sic] the proof to me, of being a writer, that one expresses them in print only […].” (The Letters of Virginia Woolf, vol. 3, 290-291) This excerpt from a letter written to Vita Sackville-West on the 15th of September 1926, while Virginia Woolf was proof-reading her intimate friend’s account of journeying through Persia prior to its publication by the Hogarth Press, is a telling illustration of the rich entanglement between intimacy and writing opening onto the numerous ways in which Woolf explores this question. She expresses here the fundamental difficulty of knowing the other (even when the other is an intimate friend), which is also at the core of her reflection upon characterization, and the necessity of turning to the written word both to express one’s own mind and to grasp the subtleties of the human mind. The paradoxical necessity of going public in order to express one’s private thoughts explains Woolf’s reticence to commit herself to autobiography: “Also I’m uneasy at taking this role in the public eye – afraid of autobiography.” (The Diary of Virginia Woolf, vol. 5, 141). Yet at the same time, intimacy is defined as being beyond words; intimacy is “knowledge” says Lily Briscoe as she conjures up the figure of Mrs Ramsay while resting her head on the woman’s lap, “but nothing that could be written in any language known to men.” (To the Lighthouse, 305). Yet again, that type of knowledge proves to be equally fallacious: “Who knows what we are, what we feel? Who knows even at the moment of intimacy? This is knowledge?” (To the Lighthouse, 390). Expressing life, the mind (her own and the others’) is indissociable from Woolf’s modernist project to reshape the novel and injunction to both the reader of modernist fiction and the writers of her own spiritual generation to “look within.” In her effort to define “the proper stuff of fiction” she claims that the spirit of life should be conveyed with “as little mixture of the alien and external as possible,” (“Modern Fiction” Essays 4, 160) enjoining her contemporaries to stress the inward life of their characters, in keeping with the etymology of the adjective “intimate” (which stems from the Latin “interior” and from the superlative “intimus”, the most interior or the inmost.) It is precisely with this injunction in mind that we propose to analyse intimacy and its political and ethical ramifications in Woolf’s oeuvre. For intimacy is as central to Woolf’s essays as it is to her fiction, and particularly her feminist essays. Both genres work through the political fabric of the intimate and in this respect might be seen to produce an original form of materialist feminism. Woolf’s radical endeavours flourished when she also had to navigate the atmosphere of “fear and suspicion” (VW in Marshik 3) that prevailed until the late 1920s, when censors and moralists still held a strong power over authors, printers and publishers as well as the general public (see Pease, Potter, Marshik & Pease). The literary strategies Woolf developed to circumvent censorship affect her representation of an embodied intimacy, turning the expression of the personal into an inevitably political gesture. In A Room of One’s Own she voices women’s experiences and concerns by adopting the guise of a persona, a certain Mary Beton, giving her a woman’s body in direct contact with the issues she seeks to theorise. It is also obvious that the privacy of the room of one’s own is in fact spurious as the outside world keeps impinging upon it, just as the letter written in answer to a middle-aged educated man in Three Guineas is in fact a very public kind of address. The frontier between inside and outside, confidentiality and publicity is very porous indeed, and Woolf’s political commitment is deeply rooted in her own personal experience as an educated man’s daughter. The question of intimacy has been central to Woolf studies and to modernist studies since the late 20th century (Bagguley and Seymour, Berlant, Frost, Illouz, Minow-Pinkney among others), but it seems to have gained momentum in recent years with the emergence of the field of affect studies, with publications ranging from Jessica Berman’s 2004 article, to Elsa Högberg’s 2020 Virginia Woolf and the Ethics of Intimacy, to Jane Goldman’s 2021 chapter in Högberg’s Modernist Intimacies. Focusing primarily on four of Woolf’s modernist novels, Högberg’s 2020 study compellingly shows that the writing of intimacy and interiority is “configured as an aesthetic, but also ethical process.” In the wake of this thinking, arguing that Woolf “places intimacy at the centre of public and political as well as private relations”, we propose to examine how Woolf’s conception of intimacy, of human relations and of the self informs not only her fiction, but also her essays, auto/ biographies, diaries and correspondence. Woolf’s texts convey an ethical and a political stance which is inseparable from her poetics foregrounding introspection in a complex nexus of tensions and paradoxes which may be expressed in terms of the Woolfian concept of “vacillation” between within and without, secrecy and revelation, concealment and disclosure, the private and the public, the personal and the impersonal, the self and the other. These questions might equally be extended to consider the reception of Woolf’s work in France and the nature of the imprint of the intimate in the French response to Woolf, as it meets contemporary feminist thinking anachronistically (see Favre, Gérard, Jones, Lasserre, Meyer) This conference intends to bring together Woolf scholars ready to engage with the subject of intimacy from diverse theoretical standpoints. We therefore invite papers on the literary, aesthetic, ethical, political, philosophical and more broadly cultural aspects of Woolf’s œuvre, its origins, conception and reception both then and now. Topics of interest may include, but are not limited to: *Following the first definition one finds in the OED of the word “intimacy” as “the state of being personally intimate, intimate friendship or acquaintance, familiar intercourse, close familiarity”: relationship between Virginia Woolf and Bloomsbury; an ethics of intimacy. Influence of George Moore’s Principia Ethica, the “Memoir Club contributions”, the Bloomsbury group founded on the idea of friendship and truth telling. Thursday evenings as a catalyst for the group’s politics of style. In connection with the new domesticity invented by Bloomsbury, one could also look at real or imaginary places of intimacy, Hyde Park Gate, Monk’s House, Charleston, etc. Virginia Woolf and friends/family: emulation and influence of Leslie Stephen, Lytton Strachey, Vanessa and Clive Bell, Roger Fry, etc. Role played by Leonard Woolf in her literary career, in furthering her fame even posthumously (the way he shaped her diaries in A Writer’s Diary, how he represented her in his own lengthy autobiography). The Hogarth Press and its impact on Woolf’s work. *Life-writing and autobiography: how to represent the other’s/one’s own intimacy. How Woolf’s conception of intimacy led her to revolutionize biography: the New Biography and her poetics of the individual. Diary writing vs letter writing: confessional aspect of these laboratories of the self and of her fiction. Role played by the editors of her correspondence/diaries, by her biographers, in shaping an “intimate” Woolf. The way her papers were published (trimmed and censored or published in their entirety), the way we are given access to Woolf’s innermost thoughts and what different literary critical periods have made of them, what these editorial processes say about Woolf, but also about our own reception of her texts/images and about our own era. *The fascination exerted by Woolf’s intimacy in recent works “recycling” her: her madness, her same-sex friendships are presented as a filter through which we are invited to read her fiction and essays. The way novelists have used her life as an inspiration; the modernist icon revisited (cf. The White Garden, a Novel of Virginia Woolf by Stephanie Barron, The Hours by Peter Cunningham or the recent movie Vita and Virginia, which, although they give a fictional, warped, partial and possibly erroneous version of Woolf, nevertheless add a complementary touch to the way Woolf is seen as part of the canon). *Woolf’s photographic practice and conception of photography: Reticence towards self-portrayal and intimacy but photography as a necessary means to record private daily life. Visual apprehension of the self/of the other, role of her albums in her creation of a family romance. Link with Julia Margaret Cameron, role of her father’s Mausoleum Book in creating a visual genealogy redefining familiarity. *Woolf’s aesthetic experiments and post-impressionism: towards an embodied formalism. *Corporeality, body and mind, the question of “incarnation”: how intimacy, love, the body are represented, or transcended, negated or circumvented but always fundamental in her oeuvre as sensory experience is seen as necessary to artistic creation. The imprint of the intimate in contemporary readings of Woolf and feminist responses to Woolf. *Woolf’s feminism as deriving from her ethics of intimacy, link between political space and private space. A Room of One’s Own and Three Guineas: the narrator is embodied, telling her story rather than his story, the personal is political: gender and sex, the androgynous mind as the naturally creative mind. Giving voice to women’s private experiences. *Literature and psychoanalysis: relationship with Freudian psychoanalysis, simultaneous development of modern psychology, psychiatry, psychoanalysis and literary modernism. Resonances with Lacan’s concept of “extimité.” Woolf’s fiction as exploration of the unconscious (cf. “Modern Fiction” in which she claims that her generation should explore “the dark places of psychology.” (Essays 4, 162). Links with Kristeva’s definition of intimacy as a “continuous copresence between the sensible and the intelligible – a true continuity, beyond division.” (Intimate Revolt, 47) *Intimacy also means “closeness of observation, knowledge or the like” (cf. OED definition 1c) which may trigger reflections upon the intimacy between reader and writer: the reader’s affective investment in the novel’s content, link with the theory of reception. Intersection between the reader’s quest for meaning and the narrator’s quest for character. How reading and writing as intimate acts are possibly conducive to politically subversive acts of revolt. Woolf’s own practice as a reader, reviewer, and its effects on her writing. *Modernizing characterization: “Life and the Novelist” or how to express the character’s interiority, how to cope with the unknowability of the other in a creative way. Woolf’s “tunnelling process” and her “digging out beautiful caves.” (Diary 2, 272, 263). *Intimacy and modernism: looking within, expressing the modernist inward strand. The stylistic revolution of the stream of consciousness in promoting interiority, introspection and free indirect speech as a mode of intimate story-telling and in the twenties circumventing censorship. We welcome proposals for papers preferably in English on the above-mentioned topics or any other topic which you may find relevant to the theme of the conference. Please send abstracts of about 300 words together with a short biographical notice to woolfintimacy@gmail.com by 31st October 2022. Notifications of acceptance will be sent by 15th December 2022. Contact : Floriane Reviron-Piégay floriane.reviron.piegay@univ-st-etienne.fr Anne-Marie Smith-Di Biasio annemarie.dibiasio@gmail.com Scientific committee: Elizabeth Abel (University of California, Berkeley) Anne Béchart-Léauté (Jean Monnet, St Etienne) Catherine Bernard (Paris-Cité) Anne Besnault (Rouen) Rachel Bowlby (University College London) Adèle Cassigneul (Toulouse) Rémi Digonnet (Jean Monnet, St Etienne) Claire Davison (Sorbonne Nouvelle) Chantal Delourme (Paris-Nanterre) Nadia Fusini (La Sapienza, Rome) Maggie Humm (East London) Mark Hussey (Pace University-New York) Catherine Lanone (Sorbonne Nouvelle) Marie Laniel (Picardie, Jules Verne) Frédéric Regard (Paris-Sorbonne) Floriane Reviron-Piégay (Jean Monnet, St Etienne) Anne-Marie Smith-Di Biasio (Institut Catholique de Paris)
* Deadline for Submissions Oct. 31, 2022
Call for Papers Narrative Matters Conference 2023 Instrumental Narratives: Narrative Studies and the Storytelling Boom Tampere University, Finland, 15–17 June 2023 https://events.tuni.fi/narrativematters2023/
Welcome to the 11th Narrative Matters conference at Tampere! The eleventh Narrative Matters conference is hosted by Tampere University (Finland) and co-organized by the Instrumental Narratives consortium project, SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory, and Narrare: Centre for Interdisciplinary Narrative Studies. The conference positions narrative scholars in the midst of the storytelling boom. Everyone is urged to share their story today, from consumers to multinational corporations, from private citizens to nation states. Storytelling consultants are thriving in today’s storytelling economy, but where are narrative scholars? Do the professional analyzers and theorizers of narrative have a say in the current storytelling boom? How to engage in a societal dialogue and debate as a narrative scholar? The conference will provide a platform for scholars to both seek new applications that might appeal to diverse audiences and to critically reflect on the instrumentalization of narrative studies. Most narrative scholars agree on the rich affordances of storytelling: narrative is a compact and intuitive form for sharing detailed, personal experiences as well as collective, community-forming ideas and outlooks. Thus narrative studies approaches lend generous support to the instrumentalization and commercialization of narrative form in business, politics, media, and personal development. Yet narrative may just as well be put to uses that are dubious if not dangerous. The widespread, uncritical use of narratives of personal experience in journalism and social media may have unintended and unanticipated consequences. Experientiality may come at the cost of informativeness. Furthermore, while narratives are ideally suited to conveying the complexity of human experience, the complexity of large social interactions or material processes, such as climate change, easily exceeds the capacity of storytelling. Now that the benefits of storytelling have caught the public imagination and are recognized in various professional practices, narrative scholarship is in a good position to disseminate critical practices for the analysis of the forms and contexts of storytelling as well. We should also look into future narrative possibilities. The 21st century will no doubt be the era of social media and shared personal narratives, and therefore we should look for productive ways of connecting the personal with the political. How, for example, to bridge the gap between individual particularity and supra-individual concerns at the limits of narrative, such as the climate crisis and global inequality? How to conceptualize and control the afterlife of narratives determined by digital forms of narrative agency? Will new forms of narrative speculation direct our actions as citizens, consumers, and collectives? Which roles will be allotted to specific artistic, digital, and quotidian genres of storytelling? Are these new narrative genres and practices changing the ways people share their experience and use stories in the everyday? Are new affordances for narrative meaning making evolving? We invite narrative scholars across disciplines to address the following (and related) issues: *   storytelling boom and its social relevance *   novel ways of storytelling today *   emergent methods, ideas, and issues in narrative studies *   sociological analysis of curated storytelling *   the study of storytelling rights and privileges; re-thinking of empathy *   narrative and post-truth *   narrative consultancy business; storytelling self-help and manuals *   story-critical reading in narrative studies; story-critical tools for audiences *   popularizing narrative theory and practices *   social life of narratives vs. analysis of individual texts *   narrative and action: political narratives, positioning and counter-narratives *   professional narratives and narratives of professions refigured *   the limits and affordances of narrative in making sense of illness and health *   the limits and affordances of narrative in addressing the environmental crisis *   uses and risks of viral storytelling and social media sharing *   discourse on well-being and cognitive benefits of literature *   the potential of fiction in analysing and resisting the narrative boom The social events include a lake cruise to Viikinsaari island – dinner, sauna & swim! TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION –  2 hour train ride from the Helsinki airport –  direct flights to Tampere via 11 hubs –  strong hotel capacity in the campus area Conference webpage / CFP and submission link: https://events.tuni.fi/narrativematters2023/call-for-papers/ CFP OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 31, 2022! Conference fee EUR 220 (faculty) / EUR 120 (student) Pre-conference workshops, hosted by Jens Brockmeier, Alexandra Georgakopoulou, Stefan Iversen & Ann Phoenix, will take place on Wednesday, June 14th. More information on registration and participation will be available by the end of September 2022! Main organizers: Maria Mäkelä, Matti Hyvärinen & Mari Hatavara (Tampere University, Narrare) Hanna Meretoja (University of Turku, SELMA) Merja Polvinen (University of Helsinki) The Academy of Finland Consortium Project Instrumental Narratives https://instrumentalnarratives.wordpress.com/ Please send your paper and panel proposals by October 31, 2022! Here is the link to the submission form<https://www.lyyti.in/narrativematters2023cfp> On behalf of the organizing team, Hanna Meretoja ———————- Hanna Meretoja Professor of Comparative Literature, Director of SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory, University of Turku, Finland MAE (Member of Academia Europaea) Tel. +358 50 329 1783 https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-ethics-of-storytelling-9780190649364?lang=en&cc=us Call for Papers: “Am I Invisible?” Voices Society Silences   deadlines for submissions:  October 15, 2022 (Pre-Submission Ideas, Proposals, and Abstracts Deadline) November 15, 2022 (Deadline for Drafts)  contact email:  SurviveAndThriveHealing@gmail.com  In this special issue of _Survive and Thrive: A Journal for Medical Humanities and Narrative Medicine_ (Vol. 8, slated for publication 2023; full schedule below), we ask students, educators, caregivers, victims/survivors, advocates, first responders, and all others who feel they are invisible to bring light to their experiences for others to see. In an era of “me first” and social media filters that make snapshots seem like a perfect life–it is easy for people to feel and question if they are invisible in their pain. It is easy for people to feel the weight of society silencing your cries for help, and the increasing burden making the air too heavy to breathe. We seek to provide a microphone for those who wish to lighten their weight by acknowledging their experiences, to help others feel validated in knowing they are not alone, and to help folks know they are not invisible. In this project, we are inspired by the work of the What They Don’t Tell You About Being a Survivor podcast (available at https://menaspeacemakers.podbean.com/), whose mission is to empower survivors/victims, and help people know they are not alone in what they are going through. The types of traumas discussed on the podcast are not limited to any specific type of trauma. Contributors might explore these questions and other questions of their own:
    • What would I say if the world would listen?
    • What would I share if I didn’t fear the shame of ____?
    • What would I say to those who are starting the journey, I am healing from?
    • What is my story from trauma to healing?
    • How might my journey have gone if people would have helped me when I needed it?
    • What makes me feel invisible while in plain sight?
    • What lies beneath the mask I feel obliged to wear?
    • What is it society silences me from saying about___?
    • How can I help others who are enduring what I have?
    • How can we help others from experiencing the trauma I am?
    • What has healing been like for me?
    • How does my trauma weigh me down still?
    • What they don’t tell you about being a survivor?
We especially would like to hear from people who have/are experiencing trauma (please note: authors can use a pseudonym). The truth is that the majority of us have or will experience trauma; the unfortunate truth is also that people tell us our trauma is not actually trauma. Trauma is trauma, and we want to help folks know they are not invisible, that we see you and you are not alone. We also want to give hope to others through sharing the journey of healing. Providing validation for those who might be hearing “It’s in the past move on.” or something else that minimizes their experience(s). Not asking folks to reopen wounds, but rather name them and share how the trauma has impacted your life. We encourage folks to share the ups and downs of their personal story on surviving and thriving. SUBMISSION DEADLINE -October 15, 2022:  Deadline for Ideas, Proposals, and Abstracts.  Authors who submit by October 15 will receive early feedback to help them grow, expand and develop ideas. Submit to: SurviveAndThriveHealing@gmail.com and to dbeard@d.umn.edu -November 15th, 2022:  Deadline for Completed Work.  You do not need to have submitted an abstract to submit work on this deadline. Submit to: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/survive_thrive/ Summer 2023:  Projected Publication SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS “Submissions” may include text (poetry, essay, creative nonfiction, scholarly argument) video, audio, or image files that express the aims and scope of the journal. Submissions cannot have been previously published. A FEW SUGGESTED READINGS, in alphabetical order:
ABOUT SURVIVE AND THRIVE: A JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL HUMANITIES AND NARRATIVE AS MEDICINE Survive & Thrive: A Journal for Medical Humanities and Narrative as Medicine aims to provide opportunities for sharing research, artistic work, pedagogical dialogue, and the practices of medical humanities and narrative as medicine. The journal serves a mission in education and the practice of humanities as they relate to illness, injury, and trauma. One of the primary aims of the journal is to bring medical humanities and narrative medicine to patients, survivors, and caregivers. Its emphasis, therefore, is on patients and survivors and their needs, and while aware of and supporting professional medical education, the journal is most concerned with an audience broader than an academic audience. We encourage physicians and others in the medical profession to practice Narrative as Medicine by submitting their work, especially when it encourages them to be artists – visual, performance, and literary. Project co-edited by: Laura Anderson, SurviveAndThriveHealing@gmail.com David Beard, DBeard@d.umn.edu * Deadline for Submissions October 15, 2022 I am thrilled to announce that my fabulous colleague Tripthi Pillai and I are co-editing a new Routledge Companion to Global Women’s Writing (to be published in summer 2024). Please see the cfp below, consider sending us an abstract, and/or share widely with your networks! Routledge Companion to Global Women’s Writing  Editors: Tripthi Pillai and Ina Seethaler We invite abstracts for chapters of previously unpublished and original work to be included in the new Routledge Companion to Global Women’s Writing, which is under contract to be published in July 2024 as part of the Routledge Literature Companions series. Covering both established and emerging topics and methodologies, The Routledge Companion to Global Women’s Writing equips readers with interdisciplinary and intersectional approaches to women’s writing in the global context. Movements and experiences shaping the twenty-first century assert the urgent need for expanding and re-envisioning existing academic and social definitions as well as cultural perceptions of gender, location, and creative expression. In response to this growing need felt by diverse communities across the world, the collection forges new directions in and conceptualizations of identity, experience, and practice. Specifically, we welcome contributions that engage the three principle aspects informing the collection—“global,” “women,” and “writing”—in inclusive ways that not only broaden readers’ understanding of these key identities and concepts but also enable them to explore the underappreciated connections among them. Towards this end, the editors seek a multiplicity of voices from a variety of disciplines and geocultural landscapes. Similarly, we welcome with enthusiasm diverse perspectives, positionalities, and approaches, ranging from commentary on dominant/key debates to exploratory work on budding and innovative practices of global women’s writing. Each section of the handbook offers a broad range of topics that are globally applicable and provide critical and creative access to the nexus of women’s writing. Possible sections and topics include but are not limited to:
    1. Bodies: 
        1. Disability and women’s self-expression
        1. Global perspectives on healthcare
        1. Spirituality, religion, and ritual
        1. Transgender poetics and politics
    1. Locations: 
        1. Language, borders, and migration
        1. Domesticity and negotiations of home
        1. Ecologies and environments
        1. Carceral experiences
    1. Media Landscapes: 
        1. Body art as authorship and activism
        1. Graphic writings
        1. Women in gaming
        1. Social media and global communication
    1. Disruptive Canvases:  
        1. Textiles as texts
        1. Storytelling through graffiti/murals/poster art
        1. Global foodways
        1. Artifacts and experiences of war
    1. Movements of Resistance: 
        1. Global writing and #metoo
        1. Grassroots activism and movements
        1. Education and liberatory/oppressive practices
        1. Law, justice, and policy
We are especially interested in contributions from authors at various stages of their careers who embrace interdisciplinary approaches and/or adopt practices of citational justice. Please send an abstract of up to 350 words as well as a 200-word biography to tpillai@coastal.edu and iseethale@coastal.edu by October 15, 2022. Contributors will be notified by 15 November 2022 of their abstracts’ acceptance. Completed chapters of up to 6000 words will be expected by May 15, 2023. Some flexibility exists regarding word count, especially in the case of contributions that discuss non-dominant identities, geographies, and/or writing practices. Feel free to reach out to the editors with any queries. Ina C. Seethaler, Ph.D. (she, her, hers) Associate Professor/Director of Women’s and Gender Studies HTC Honors College Coastal Carolina University Kearns 104B PO Box 261954, Conway, SC 29528 iseethale@coastal.edu 843-349-6919 The land on which Coastal Carolina University stands is part of the traditional territory of the Waccamaw Indian People. We honor them and express our gratitude to the ancestors who lived here in the past, the Waccamaw Indian People today, and the generations to come *
Disobedient Lives, Disorderly Archives: Social Justice Agency in Archival Spaces and Arts
ROUND TABLE at the 54th Annual NEMLA (Northeast Modern Language Association) Convention, to be held March 23rd-26th in Niagara Falls, NY, US. deadline for submissions:  September 30, 2022 contact email:  jlmason1@buffalo.edu Abstract: This roundtable will bring together scholars interested in developing and studying archives that push the boundaries of what we consider the archive. At the roundtable, through our work, we will consider questions that arise within archival practices and arts, such as: what constitutes or counts as an archive, what kinds of archival delineations should be drawn, pushed back against, or ruptured, and, perhaps most importantly, what is or should be the role of the archive in combating systemic injustice and advancing social justice? The roundtable seeks to bring together scholars across disciplines and community activists and archivists who are interested in the relationship between social justice activism and the archive, those who are building archives or deconstructing archives or imagining new and different archives with the goal of helping communities and those whose lives have been hidden or suppressed or ignored completely within archives.Archivist-activists and scholars interested in the political and social role of the archive, especially those whose projects are geared toward utilizing the archive as mechanism or space for social justice activism are invited to submit proposals that demonstrate the connection between their social justice concerns and their archival work and interests. The roundtable will be geared toward scholars and activists engaging the archive, in both material, corporeal and immaterial, conceptual senses. It will allow archivists and scholar-activists alike to come together to share and make wisdom concerning the use of the archive as a space for shaping and advancing social change, and for changing the social and material conditions of communities that have been marginalized, historically. LINK to CFP/to submit: https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/1979 Contact: jlmason1@buffalo.edu Organizers/Co-Chairs: Nicole Crevar and Jessica Lowell Mason *

The Art of Non/Resilience for People with Disabilities

Northeast Modern Language Association Conference March 23-26, 2023. Niagara Falls, NY deadline for submissions:  September 30, 2022 contact email: mariaguarino07@gmail.com Submit abstract here: https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/20018 What is resilience for people with disabilities? What is recovery? Narratives of illness, trauma and disability are often framed to emphasize recovery. Reflecting on resiliency, constructed ideas of normalcy, and “crip time,” Ellen Samuels writes: “Disability and illness have the power to extract us from linear, progressive time with its normative life stages and cast us into a wormhole of backward and forward acceleration, jerky stops and starts, tedious intervals and abrupt endings” (2017). In working with disabled performers, disability scholar and artist Petra Kuppers notes the connection between the material oppression experienced by people with disabilities and the performance space. She writes: “Many of the performers’ physical experiences mirrored their silencing in, and exclusion from, representation. Some had no space for themselves, their bodies, their movements in the social and physical environment. They are excluded from life alone, from getting an apartment; conformed to a timetable of contact with medical practitioners, or the even more rigorous timetable of pills and injection. Their bodies can be invaded, as the law allows them to be drugged against their will and involuntarily hospitalized. Their physical and mental privacy is often under threat” (2005). Kuppers suggests there may be an added level of invisibility for people with disabilities because of the likely invasion of privacy through the process of disclosure. In offering up this context, Kuppers raises many questions about the production and spectacle of arts by people with disabilities. How do we see disability? How can we understand the tension of disclosure and hypervisibility? How do we build safer and more comfortable spaces for people with disabilities to present their art? How do relationships change after disclosure, and/or how do we recognize the need to pivot in states of crisis and illness? How do we recognize the work of disability artists? In his poem, “I am too pretty for some Ugly Laws,” Lateef McLeod speaks to these experiences of both invisibility, hypervisibility, and historical oppression. He says: “My mere presence//of erratic moving limbs//and drooling smile//used to be scrubbed off the public pavement” (2018). Through writing, poetry, acting, and many other mediums, we have the opportunity to convert the disabled bodymind from being solely what disabled performer Catherine Cole calls a “performer in a script [they] did not write” (2003). We can engage further and sit, stand, walk, seize, lay, etc in these spaces of disability, and ask what resilience and recovery means. We can also ask not only how disabled bodyminds are resilient, but how they are not. This is a call for creative submissions that explore representations of disability, resilience, and recovery. Submissions can include, but are not limited to: poetry, art, film etc. What is resilience? What is recovery? *
Deadline for Submissions Sept. 30, 2022
Call for Chapter Contributions Diaspora/Diasporas: Cross-cultural Ibero-Caribbean Texts and Context Editors: Irene M. F. Blayer (PhD), Brock University; Jo-Anne Ferreira (PhD), UWI Trinidad and Tobago; Dulce M. S. Scott (PhD), Anderson University We envision this edited collection to be interdisciplinary and multidimensional, thus incorporating a set of diasporic areas of research within the Ibero-Caribbean context. Chapters are double-blind peer refereed. An invitation to submit a paper in no way guarantees that the paper will be published; this is dependent on the review process. Unpublished and original papers, in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French are welcome. Proposals that treat other topics not included below but that are of thematic relevance are welcome.
    • Storying the Ibero-Caribbean diaspora
    • Cultural histories in the context of diasporas and globalization
    • Place, history and collective memories /
    • Textualized identity
    • Testimonies, diaries, chronicles, letters, autobiographies
    • Migration and identity: the role of geographical place
    • The diasporic imaginary: Self in the textual narrative
    • Interfacing literary dialogues
    • Circulation and reception of diaspora literature
    • Bilingualism and multilingualism
    • Language and cultural identity
    • Translation and the trials of identity
    • Tradition and social change
    • Material and non-material culture
    • Sociology and psychology of the migrant experience
    • Oral vs. written narratives
    • Cross-generational narratives/ diaries, chronicles, letters
    • The economics of language policy in immigration
    • Language, dislocation, and exile
    • Cross-generational narratives
    • Ethnography of language
    • Re-imagining Ibero-American Insular spaces/worlds
Submissions The deadline for the receipt of abstracts (450-500 words) and a biographical note (300-350 words) is September 30, 2022.  Those invited to submit full chapters will be notified by December 30th, 2022. Complete chapter drafts should be approximately 4,500-6,500 words including endnotes and bibliography. Chapters must follow the MLA style rules, and will be due June 30, 2023. Prospective contributors should email all inquiries and submissions to: ibero.caribbean.diaspora@gmail.com * Studies in Travel Writing is seeking an Editor-in-Chief. Routledge–Taylor and Francis Applications must be submitted by 30 September. Think this could be you? Read more and apply today. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/WhctKKXgmLchNXmqgZMSGRFJPZqmWpvbPVpVcLKRxRGWrwzxBjlbpxKgchKwHRXFTCwHGwL * Deadline for Submissions September 30, 2022 Call for Chapter Contributions Diaspora/Diasporas: Cross-cultural Ibero-Caribbean Texts and Context Editors: Irene M. F. Blayer (PhD), Brock University; Jo-Anne Ferreira (PhD), UWI Trinidad and Tobago; Dulce M. S. Scott (PhD), Anderson University We envision this edited collection to be interdisciplinary and multidimensional, thus incorporating a set of diasporic areas of research within the Ibero-Caribbean context. Chapters are double-blind peer refereed. An invitation to submit a paper in no way guarantees that the paper will be published; this is dependent on the review process. Unpublished and original papers, in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French are welcome. Proposals that treat other topics not included below but that are of thematic relevance are welcome.
    • Storying the Ibero-Caribbean diaspora
    • Cultural histories in the context of diasporas and globalization
    • Place, history and collective memories /
    • Textualized identity
    • Testimonies, diaries, chronicles, letters, autobiographies
    • Migration and identity: the role of geographical place
    • The diasporic imaginary: Self in the textual narrative
    • Interfacing literary dialogues
    • Circulation and reception of diaspora literature
    • Bilingualism and multilingualism
    • Language and cultural identity
    • Translation and the trials of identity
    • Tradition and social change
    • Material and non-material culture
    • Sociology and psychology of the migrant experience
    • Oral vs. written narratives
    • Cross-generational narratives/ diaries, chronicles, letters
    • The economics of language policy in immigration
    • Language, dislocation, and exile
    • Cross-generational narratives
    • Ethnography of language
    • Re-imagining Ibero-American Insular spaces/worlds
Submissions The deadline for the receipt of abstracts (450-500 words) and a biographical note (300-350 words) is September 30, 2022.  Those invited to submit full chapters will be notified by December 30th, 2022. Complete chapter drafts should be approximately 4,500-6,500 words including endnotes and bibliography. Chapters must follow the MLA style rules, and will be due June 30, 2023. Prospective contributors should email all inquiries and submissions to: ibero.caribbean.diaspora@gmail.com *

Resilient Bodies: Beyond the Margins of Life Writing

deadline for submissions: September 30, 2022 Northeast Modern Language Association contact email: kasia.peric@gmail.com Recent discussions in autobiography studies have increasingly shifted their focus to non-conventional forms of self-expression. In broader terms, life writing, which aims to reveal the self in all of its complexity, has inevitably evolved from a highly conventional genre to an open and ever-expanding practice that connects writing with other modes of representation. Discussions on autobiography have progressively become inclusive of non-literary forms of expression, such as performance, body and endurance art. The works of artists such as Marina Abramovic, Abel Azcona, Cindy Sherman, and Sophie Calle, just to name a few, experiment with various conventions of visual and live art to push self-expression beyond the margins of writing and into the public domain. Many of these artists, such as Marina Abramovic and Abel Azcona – in particular through their “endurance art” installations – deal with themes of physical and emotional resilience to address the question of personal identity. Similarly, the performance art installations of Cindy Sherman and Sophie Calle question the stereotypes of self-representation and test the limits of autobiography by experimenting with different identities in different social contexts. This session encourages the study of French and Francophone performance artists who work in the autobiography field which is an area that has been explored very little to date. Its purpose is to stimulate an interdisciplinary research and exchange between scholars from different fields and to promote French and Francophone art and culture. This session welcomes interdisciplinary research that examines various forms of self-expression from different fields of inquiry such as literature, the visual and fine arts. Proposals should be submitted in 250 words max. * Deadline for Submissions Sept. 30, 2022 Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France Thursday, 11 of May 2023th and Friday, 12th of May 2023 “Virginia Woolf: For a Poetics & Politics of Intimacy” International Conference – Société d’Études Woolfiennes Call for Papers Organised by ECLLA (Études du Contemporain en Littératures, Langues, Arts) with the support of the SEW and of CORPUS (UR-UPJV 4295) Confirmed keynote speakers: Elsa Högberg, Uppsala University and Christine Reynier, Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3 University “They’ve just sent the second batch of proofs [of Passenger to Teheran] which I have swallowed at a gulp. […] I kept saying ‘How I should like to know that woman’ and then thinking ‘But I do’, and then ‘No, I don’t– not altogether the woman who writes this.’ I didn’t know the extent of your subtleties […]. Indeed it is odd that now, having read this, I have picked up a good many things I had missed in private life. What are they, I wonder, the very intimate things, one says in print? There’s a whole family of them. Its [sic] the proof to me, of being a writer, that one expresses them in print only […].” (The Letters of Virginia Woolf, vol. 3, 290-291) This excerpt from a letter written to Vita Sackville-West on the 15th of September 1926, while Virginia Woolf was proof-reading her intimate friend’s account of journeying through Persia prior to its publication by the Hogarth Press, is a telling illustration of the rich entanglement between intimacy and writing opening onto the numerous ways in which Woolf explores this question. She expresses here the fundamental difficulty of knowing the other (even when the other is an intimate friend), which is also at the core of her reflection upon characterization, and the necessity of turning to the written word both to express one’s own mind and to grasp the subtleties of the human mind. The paradoxical necessity of going public in order to express one’s private thoughts explains Woolf’s reticence to commit herself to autobiography: “Also I’m uneasy at taking this role in the public eye – afraid of autobiography.” (TheDiary of Virginia Woolf, vol. 5, 141). Yet at the same time, intimacy is defined as being beyond words; intimacy is “knowledge” says Lily Briscoe as she conjures up the figure of Mrs Ramsay while resting her head on the woman’s lap, “but nothing that could be written in any language known to men.” (To the Lighthouse, 305). Yet again, that type of knowledge proves to be equally fallacious: “Who knows what we are, what we feel? Who knows even at the moment of intimacy? This is knowledge?” (To the Lighthouse, 390). Expressing life, the mind (her own and the others’) is indissociable from Woolf’s modernist project to reshape the novel and injunction to both the reader of modernist fiction and the writers of her own spiritual generation to “look within.” In her effort to define “the proper stuff of fiction” she claims that the spirit of life should be conveyed with “as little mixture of the alien and external as possible,” (“Modern Fiction” Essays 4, 160) enjoining her contemporaries to stress the inward life of their characters, in keeping with the etymology of the adjective “intimate” (which stems from the Latin “interior” and from the superlative “intimus”, the most interior or the inmost.) It is precisely with this injunction in mind that we propose to analyse intimacy and its political and ethical ramifications in Woolf’s oeuvre. For intimacy is as central to Woolf’s essays as it is to her fiction, and particularly her feminist essays. Both genres work through the political fabric of the intimate and in this respect might be seen to produce an original form of materialist feminism. Woolf’s radical endeavours flourished when she also had to navigate the atmosphere of “fear and suspicion” (VW in Marshik 3) that prevailed until the late 1920s, when censors and moralists still held a strong power over authors, printers and publishers as well as the general public (see Pease, Potter, Marshik & Pease). The literary strategies Woolf developed to circumvent censorship affect her representation of an embodied intimacy, turning the expression of the personal into an inevitably political gesture. In A Room of One’s Own she voices women’s experiences and concerns by adopting the guise of a persona, a certain Mary Beton, giving her a woman’s body in direct contact with the issues she seeks to theorise. It is also obvious that the privacy of the room of one’s own is in fact spurious as the outside world keeps impinging upon it, just as the letter written in answer to a middle-aged educated man in Three Guineas is in fact a very public kind of address. The frontier between inside and outside, confidentiality and publicity is very porous indeed, and Woolf’s political commitment is deeply rooted in her own personal experience as an educated man’s daughter. The question of intimacy has been central to Woolf studies and to modernist studies since the late 20th century (Bagguley and Seymour, Berlant, Frost, Illouz, Minow-Pinkney among others), but it seems to have gained momentum in recent years with the emergence of the field of affect studies, with publications ranging from Jessica Berman’s 2004 article, to Elsa Högberg’s 2020 Virginia Woolf and the Ethics of Intimacy, to Jane Goldman’s 2021 chapter in Högberg’s Modernist Intimacies. Focusing primarily on four of Woolf’s modernist novels, Högberg’s 2020 study compellingly shows that the writing of intimacy and interiority is “configured as an aesthetic, but also ethical process.” In the wake of this thinking, arguing that Woolf “places intimacy at the centre of public and political as well as private relations”, we propose to examine how Woolf’s conception of intimacy, of human relations and of the self informs not only her fiction, but also her essays, auto/ biographies, diaries and correspondence. Woolf’s texts convey an ethical and a political stance which is inseparable from her poetics foregrounding introspection in a complex nexus of tensions and paradoxes which may be expressed in terms of the Woolfian concept of “vacillation” between within and without, secrecy and revelation, concealment and disclosure, the private and the public, the personal and the impersonal, the self and the other. These questions might equally be extended to consider the reception of Woolf’s work in France and the nature of the imprint of the intimate in the French response to Woolf, as it meets contemporary feminist thinking anachronistically (see Favre, Gérard, Jones, Lasserre, Meyer) This conference intends to bring together Woolf scholars ready to engage with the subject of intimacy from diverse theoretical standpoints. We therefore invite papers on the literary, aesthetic, ethical, political, philosophical and more broadly cultural aspects of Woolf’s œuvre, its origins, conception and reception both then and now. Topics of interest may include, but are not limited to: *Following the first definition one finds in the OED of the word “intimacy” as “the state of being personally intimate, intimate friendship or acquaintance, familiar intercourse, close familiarity”: relationship between Virginia Woolf and Bloomsbury; an ethics of intimacy. Influence of George Moore’s Principia Ethica, the “Memoir Club contributions”, the Bloomsbury group founded on the idea of friendship and truth telling. Thursday evenings as a catalyst for the group’s politics of style. In connection with the new domesticity invented by Bloomsbury, one could also look at real or imaginary places of intimacy, Hyde Park Gate, Monk’s House, Charleston, etc. Virginia Woolf and friends/family: emulation and influence of Leslie Stephen, Lytton Strachey, Vanessa and Clive Bell, Roger Fry, etc. Role played by Leonard Woolf in her literary career, in furthering her fame even posthumously (the way he shaped her diaries in A Writer’s Diary, how he represented her in his own lengthy autobiography). The Hogarth Press and its impact on Woolf’s work. *Life-writing and autobiography: how to represent the other’s/one’s own intimacy. How Woolf’s conception of intimacy led her to revolutionize biography: the New Biography and her poetics of the individual. Diary writing vs letter writing: confessional aspect of these laboratories of the self and of her fiction. Role played by the editors of her correspondence/diaries, by her biographers, in shaping an “intimate” Woolf. The way her papers were published (trimmed and censored or published in their entirety), the way we are given access to Woolf’s innermost thoughts and what different literary critical periods have made of them, what these editorial processes say about Woolf, but also about our own reception of her texts/images and about our own era. *The fascination exerted by Woolf’s intimacy in recent works “recycling” her: her madness, her same-sex friendships are presented as a filter through which we are invited to read her fiction and essays. The way novelists have used her life as an inspiration; the modernist icon revisited (cf. The White Garden, a Novel of Virginia Woolf by Stephanie Barron, The Hours by Peter Cunningham or the recent movie Vita and Virginia, which, although they give a fictional, warped, partial and possibly erroneous version of Woolf, nevertheless add a complementary touch to the way Woolf is seen as part of the canon). *Woolf’s photographic practice and conception of photography: Reticence towards self-portrayal and intimacy but photography as a necessary means to record private daily life. Visual apprehension of the self/of the other, role of her albums in her creation of a family romance. Link with Julia Margaret Cameron, role of her father’s Mausoleum Book in creating a visual genealogy redefining familiarity. *Woolf’s aesthetic experiments and post-impressionism: towards an embodied formalism. *Corporeality, body and mind, the question of “incarnation”: how intimacy, love, the body are represented, or transcended, negated or circumvented but always fundamental in her oeuvre as sensory experience is seen as necessary to artistic creation. The imprint of the intimate in contemporary readings of Woolf and feminist responses to Woolf. *Woolf’s feminism as deriving from her ethics of intimacy, link between political space and private space. A Room of One’s Own and Three Guineas: the narrator is embodied, telling her story rather than his story, the personal is political: gender and sex, the androgynous mind as the naturally creative mind. Giving voice to women’s private experiences. *Literature and psychoanalysis: relationship with Freudian psychoanalysis, simultaneous development of modern psychology, psychiatry, psychoanalysis and literary modernism. Resonances with Lacan’s concept of “extimité.” Woolf’s fiction as exploration of the unconscious (cf. “Modern Fiction” in which she claims that her generation should explore “the dark places of psychology.” (Essays 4, 162). Links with Kristeva’s definition of intimacy as a “continuous copresence between the sensible and the intelligible – a true continuity, beyond division.” (Intimate Revolt, 47) *Intimacy also means “closeness of observation, knowledge or the like” (cf. OED definition 1c) which may trigger reflections upon the intimacy between reader and writer: the reader’s affective investment in the novel’s content, link with the theory of reception. Intersection between the reader’s quest for meaning and the narrator’s quest for character. How reading and writing as intimate acts are possibly conducive to politically subversive acts of revolt. Woolf’s own practice as a reader, reviewer, and its effects on her writing. *Modernizing characterization: “Life and the Novelist” or how to express the character’s interiority, how to cope with the unknowability of the other in a creative way. Woolf’s “tunnelling process” and her “digging out beautiful caves.” (Diary 2, 272, 263). *Intimacy and modernism: looking within, expressing the modernist inward strand. The stylistic revolution of the stream of consciousness in promoting interiority, introspection and free indirect speech as a mode of intimate story-telling and in the twenties circumventing censorship. We welcome proposals for papers preferably in English on the above-mentioned topics or any other topic which you may find relevant to the theme of the conference. Please send abstracts of about 300 words together with a short biographical notice to woolfintimacy@gmail.com by 30th September 2022. Notifications of acceptance will be sent by 15th  November 2022. Contact : Floriane Reviron-Piégay floriane.reviron.piegay@univ-st-etienne.fr Anne-Marie Smith-Di Biasio annemarie.dibiasio@gmail.com Scientific committee: Elizabeth Abel (University of California, Berkeley) Catherine Bernard (Paris-Cité) Anne Besnault (Rouen) Rachel Bowlby (University College London) Adèle Cassigneul (Toulouse) Claire Davison (Sorbonne Nouvelle) Chantal Delourme (Paris-Nanterre) Nadia Fusini (La Sapienza, Rome) Maggie Humm (East London) Mark Hussey (Pace University-New York) Catherine Lanone (Sorbonne Nouvelle) Marie Laniel (Picardie, Jules Verne) Frédéric Regard (Paris-Sorbonne) Floriane Reviron-Piégay (Jean Monnet, St Etienne) Anne-Marie Smith-Di Biasio (Institut Catholique de Paris) Works of reference: BERLANT, Lauren. Intimacy. Chicago: U of Chicago Press, 2000. BERMAN, Jessica. “Ethical Folds: Ethics; Aesthetics, Woolf,” MFS: Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 50, n°. 1, Spring 2004, pp. 151-72. BERSANI, Leo & PHILLIPS, Adam. Intimacies. Chicago: U of Chicago Press, 2008. DELOURME, Chantal. Et une phrase… Virginia Woolf, écrire dans l’entre-deux-guerres. Paris : ENS Éditions, 2021. FAVRE, Valérie. Virginia Woolf et ses “petites sœurs” : Relire A Room of One’s Own au prisme de sa postérité littéraire, critique et féministe dans l’espace atlantique anglophone des années soixante à nos jours, PhD Dissertation, Lyon 2, 2021. GÉRARD, Valérie. Les Formes du chaos : sur l’art politique de V. Woolf. MF Éditions, 2022. GOLDMAN, Jane. “Burning Feminism: Virginia Woolf’s Laboratory of Intimacy” in HÖGBERG, Elsa, ed., Modernist Intimacies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2021, pp. 52-73. HÖGBERG, Elsa. Virginia Woolf and the Ethics of Intimacy. London: Bloomsbury, 2020. —, ed. Modernist Intimacies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2021. HUMM, Maggie. Talland House: A Novel. Berkeley, CA: She Writes Press, 2020. ILLOUZ, Eva. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. London: Polity Press, 2007. JONES, Clara. Virginia Woolf: Ambivalent Activist. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2017. KRISTEVA, Julia. Intimate Revolt. The Powers and Limits of Psychoanalysis, 1997. Trans. HERMAN, Jeanine. New York: Columbia UP, 2002. LASSERRE, Audrey. Histoire d’une littérature en mouvement : textes, écrivaines et collectifs éditoriaux du Mouvement de libération des femmes en France (1970-1981), PhD Dissertation, Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris 3, 2014. LIGHT, Alison. Mrs. Woolf and the Servants: An Intimate History of Domestic Life in Bloomsbury. London: Penguin Books, 2007. MARSHIK, Celia.  British Modernism and Censorship. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. MARSHIK, C. & PEASE, A. Modernism, Sex, and Gender. London: Bloomsbury, 2019. MEYER, Suzel. Écrire l’histoire au féminin : autour de The Years de Virginia Woolf et des Années d’Annie Ernaux, PhD Dissertation, Strasbourg, 2020. MINOW-PINKNEY, Makiko. Virginia Woolf and the Problem of the Subject: Feminine Writing in the Major Novels. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers UP, 1987. PEASE, Allison. Modernism, Mass Culture, and the Aesthetics of Obscenity. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. POTTER, Rachel. Obscene Modernism. Literary Censorship & Experiment 1900-1940. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013. REYNIER, Christine. Virginia Woolf’s “Good Housekeeping” Essays. New York and London: Routledge, 2019. SANGER, Tam & TAYLOR, Yvette, eds. Mapping Intimacies: Relations, Exchanges, Affects. London: Palgrave Macmillan 2013. SEYMOUR, Julie & BAGGULEY, Paul, eds. Relating Intimacies: Power and Resistance. London: Macmillan, 1999. WOLFE, Jesse. Bloomsbury, Modernism and the Reinvention of Intimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011. (FWF-Project “Co-Producing and Using Identity Documents. Habsburg Monarchy/Austria ca. 1850-1938”) The workshop deals with the co-production and use of identity documents from a historical and interdisciplinary perspective. Establishing the identity of persons was (and still is) fundamental for a variety of tasks and operations of the state. In the course of the last centuries, various forms of identification and registration became subject to ever more precise state regulations and were adapted or fully taken over by state authorities. Yet, at the same time, practices of identification, registration and categorization of individuals were never exclusively a matter of statehood and citizenship, subject to governmentality, bureaucracy, surveillance and migration control. Identity papers were not exclusively produced and used by or vis á vis state authorities. Historically, various parties could be (and remained) involved in practices of identification and registration, ranging from religious organizations, trade or occupational associations, employers, unions, political organisations, landlords, welfare organizations, companies, creditors, or recreation clubs. Such parties provided information, produced data, checked documents, or even issued their own papers. They fulfilled tasks assigned to them, while following or adopting regulations issued by authorities with (greater or lesser) enthusiasm or accuracy. At the same time, the parties involved in such tasks often pursued their own agendas, producing and using papers for their own purposes. Individuals – who in most cases are seen as wholly subjected to identification, surveillance, or control – contributed to the production of their official identities in a variety of ways: by complying with official directives and cooperating with authorities; by initiating administrative processes themselves, (co-)producing information, forging documents or dealing with missing or incoherent documents; and by avoiding or boycotting identification. It is not always apparent or conclusively established where in such entanglements state bureaucracy started or ended. In order to investigate why certain forms of identification functioned historically as successful or failed, or were altered, or varied in an international context, the workshop will reflect on the diversity of contexts and constellations in which documents were produced and used and in which the parties involved interacted in consensus or conflict. The workshop will take place from 22.9.to 23.9. 2022 at the University of Vienna (Main building, Universitätsring 1, 1010 Vienna, TP, seminar room 1 and 4 in a hybrid format. Participation is free of charge, but registration is required. To register, please send an email to sigrid.wadauer@univie.ac.at before 12.9.2022. Program
22.9.2022 SR 1
9:00–9:20 Sigrid Wadauer (University of Vienna): Welcome and Introduction
Documents – Local Authorities – Migration
Chair: Sigrid Wadauer (University of Vienna)
9:20–10:00 Beate Althammer (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin): Registering Migrants in Prussian Cities (ca. 1880 to 1914)
10:00–10:40 Anne Winter (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) / Hilde Greefs (University of Antwerp / Zoom): Identity Documents of Foreign Migrants Arriving in Antwerp (1850–1910)
10:40–11:10 Coffee Break
Documents – Citizenship – Interactions
11:10–11:50 Lida–Maria Dodou (University of Vienna / Austrian Archaeological Institute Athens): The Spectrum of Belonging: Austrian “de jure subjects”, “de facto subjects” and “protégés” in Fin–de–siècle Salonica
11:50–13:30 Lunch Break
  Chair: Jessica Richter (Institute of Rural History, St. Pölten)
13:30–14:10 Darren Wan (Cornell University): Brokering Citizenship: Illiteracy and Illegibility in the Production of Malayan Identity Documents, 1957–1963
14:10–14:50 Juanita Cox (University of London): Identification Documents: Practices and Perspectives from the Black British Caribbean Community
14:50–15:10 Coffee Break
Documents and Categorization
15:10–15:50 Michal Turski (Center for Historical Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Berlin): Meanders of Ethnic Registration and Categorization of Polish Germans in the Lodz Region during World War II.
15:50–16:30 Christiane Weber (Arolsen Archives/Germany):  Who Decides Who is a DP? Post–World War II Identification Documents of Displaced Persons in the Arolsen Archives
16:30–16:50 Coffee Break
16:50–17:30 András László Pap (Centre for Social Sciences Institute for Legal Studies/Budapest / Zoom): Ethno-racial Identity in Documents: from Registration to Construction
    23.9.2022 SR 4
Documents – Work, Control and Coercion
Chair: Beate Althammer (Humboldt University zu Berlin)
9:00–9:40 Paolo Raspadori (University of Perugia): Demographic and Social Control Tool. Staff Papers of Industrial Companies as Identity Documents of Italian Workers (First Half of the Twentieth Century)
9:40–10:20 Bernard Kusena (University of Zimbabwe): Forced Labour Recruitment and the Political Economy of Identity Documents: Clandestine Migration and Other Everyday Forms of Resistance in Southern Rhodesia, 1890–1980
10:20–10:40 Coffee Break
10:40–11:20 Chris Holdridge (North–West University, Potchefstroom/South Africa): Convict Mobility and Emergent Regimes of Paperwork and Interpersonal Status in Port Cities of the Anglo World
Illicit Uses and Forged Documents
Chair: Johanna Wassholm (Åbo Akademi, Finland)
11:20–12:00 Cristina Diac (National Institute for the Study of Totalitarianism of the Romanian Academy): Navigating Multiple Identities. Romanian Communists and their Travels Abroad
12:00–13:30 Lunch Break
13:30–14:10 Burak Sayım (New York University Abu Dhabi / Zoom): Crossing the Frontier: The Comintern, Forged Passports, and the Making of Interwar Border Regimes
14:10–14:30 Conclusions
With the kind support of: FWF – Der Wissenschaftsfonds Stadt Wien, MA 7 – Kultur, Wissenschafts- und Forschungsförderung University of Vienna (FSP Global History, Department of Economic and Social History) Contact Info: PD Dr. Sigrid Wadauer Department of Economic and Social History University of Vienna Universitätsring 1 1010 Vienna Austria https://www.sigridwadauer.com/ Contact Email: * Deadline for Submissions Sept. 10, 2022 Uppity Medieval Women Across the Globe   International Congress on Medieval Studies (Michigan USA hybrid), and other potential conferences (9/10/2022; 5/11-13/2023) In 1998, Vicki Leon published Uppity Women of Medieval Times, providing brief vignettes of primarily European medieval women fitting the description. As the field of Medieval Studies has been taking a global turn, this proposal seeks to put European uppity women into a deeper and more substantial conversation with their global sisters, such as the Japanese Lady Murasaki Shikibu, the Indian Nur Jahan, the Nigerian Queen Amina, and the Arabic Walladabint al-Mustakfi, to name a few. Uppity medieval women transgress their patriarchally assigned positions of immanence, often with the pen, the sword, and through sex. In an attempt to break new ground, we seek contributions that explore uppity medieval women––both historical and fictional–– from global perspectives. Comparative perspectives that trace similar experiences are highly encouraged. Reading the Middle Ages from a broader vantage point that illustrates how women worldwide were facing comparable experiences and challenges helps us understand the Middle Ages and feminism through a new lens. Please email your 200-word abstract and a 100-word biography to Anita Obermeier (aobermei@unm.edu) and to Doaa Omran (Domran@unm.edu) by the 10th of September 2022. We are having online and face-to-face sessions at the International Congress on Medieval Studies (ICMS). Our two panels are titled “Assertive Medieval Women Across the Globe I” and “Assertive Medieval Women Across the Globe II (A Virtual Roundtable).” The deadline for abstract submission on the congress website is the 15th of September 2022. Here is the submission link: https://icms.confex.com/icms/2023/cfp.cgi We are also considering organising panels at Leeds International Medieval Congress (IMC) https://www.imc.leeds.ac.uk/imc-2023/ and the Medieval Association of the Pacific (MAP) https://www.medievalpacific.org/annual-conference/ . Since we are trying to get a critical manuscript for an edited volume, we are proposing this session for several conferences, although in different formats. *
Deadline for Submissions, Sept. 1, 2022
The Amsterdam School of Regional, Transnational and European Studies (ARTES) currently has a vacant Postdoc researcher position as part of the broader field Cultural Heritage and Identity. Postdoctoral researcher Amsterdam Diaries: Self-representation, Cultural Diversity, and Migration https://vacatures.uva.nl/UvA/job/Postdoctoral-researcher-Amsterdam-Diaries-Self-representation%2C-Cultural-Diversity%2C-and-Migration/751074902/ Faculty/Services:  Faculty of Humanities Educational level:  Promoted Function type:  Academic Staff Closing date:  1 September 2022 Vacancy number:  9819 The Amsterdam School of Regional, Transnational and European Studies (ARTES) currently has a vacant Postdoc researcher position as part of the broader field Cultural Heritage and Identity. Within this field the focus is on material and immaterial heritage, including digital Humanities and on Cultural Heritage and societal changes. ARTES is one of the five Research Schools within the Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research. What are you going to do You will be part of an interdisciplinary research team that collects and analyzes diaries of ordinary people of the 19th and 20th centuries who wrote about their daily lives in Amsterdam. In the light of Amsterdam’s 750th anniversary in 2025, the team investigates what diaries can tell us about lived and narrated experiences of Amsterdam as a multicultural city. We will use a flexible conception of ‘diary’ in order to include other forms of self-representation, such as drawings or self-recorded stories on cassette tape. First, you will help organize a diary donating campaign in cooperation with the Dutch Diary Archive and the Amsterdam Museum in order to collect new diaries. We will focus on migrant ego-documents because these are underrepresented in archives and scholarly research. The task is to involve local communities and gain support to help build a more inclusive and diverse diary-collection. Knowledge of the history of migrants, as well as relevant languages, will be an asset. Second, you will study representations of self and the city in a selection of diaries from the newly gained materials as well as from archives such as the Dutch Diary Archive, Stadsarchief, Joods historisch Museum, Atria, Niod, Black Archives, IHLIA, and xpatarchive. The aim is to understand how individuals with diverse socio-cultural backgrounds express feelings of (non-)belonging, and in what ways they narrate their experiences of (intercultural) spaces, encounters and connections and their sense of what is familiar and foreign. Third, you will help developing tools from Digital Humanities to store and map historical information about diaries and diarists in their spatial and temporal contexts. You will contribute to creating a digital resource, similar to (or as part of) the Amsterdam Time Machine, which will enable users to ‘travel back in time and navigate the city on the levels of neighborhoods, streets, houses and rooms’ (https://www.amsterdamtimemachine.nl/). Ideally, this will connect stories from multiple perspectives to particular places such as streets, parks, bars and buildings. Your tasks and responsibilities:
    • conducting research, presenting intermediate research results at workshops and conferences and publishing two single-authored, peer reviewed articles;
    • participating in meetings of the project research group and developing a shared database;
    • co-organising knowledge dissemination activities.
What do you have to offer Your experience and profile:
    • a PhD in the Humanities;
    • excellent research skills demonstrated by a track record of publishing in high-ranking journals and/or with leading presses or a demonstrable capacity to develop such a record;
    • a strong cooperative attitude and willingness to engage in collaborative research;
    • enthusiasm for communicating academic research to non-academic audiences;
    • excellent command English.
What can we offer you The Postdoc researcher will be appointed at the Department of History, European Studies and Religious Studies of the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Amsterdam and will conduct the research in ARTES. The employment contract will be for one year. Contingent on a positive performance evaluation the contract will be extended with one year. The employment contract is for 30,4-38 hours a week. Preferred starting date is 01 October 2022. The gross monthly salary, based on 38 hours per week and relevant experience, ranges between € 3,974,00 to € 5,439,00. This sum does not include the 8% holiday allowance and the 8,3% year-end allowance. A favourable tax agreement, the ‘30% ruling’, may apply to non-Dutch applicants. The Collective Labour Agreement of Dutch Universities is applicable. What else do we offer
    • excellent possibilities for further professional development and education, including participation in a dedicated Research Training group;
    • an enthusiastic, inspiring and professional academic team;
    • the opportunity to collaborate with leading researchers at research institutes that – partly as a result of their interdisciplinary approach – are world renowned.
About us The University of Amsterdam is the Netherlands’ largest university, offering the widest range of academic programmes. At the UvA, 30,000 students, 6,000 staff members and 3,000 PhD candidates study and work in a diverse range of fields, connected by a culture of curiosity. The Faculty of Humanities provides education and conducts research with a strong international profile in a large number of disciplines in de field of language and culture. Located in the heart of Amsterdam, the faculty maintains close ties with many cultural institutes in the capital city. Research and teaching staff focus on interdisciplinary collaboration and are active in several teaching programmes. Want to know more about our organisation? Read more about working at the University of Amsterdam. Questions Do you have any questions or do you require additional information? Please contact:
Job application If you feel the profile fits you, and you are interested in the job, we look forward to receiving your application. You can apply online via the link below. The deadline for applying for this vacancy is 01 September 2022. Applications should include the following information (submitted in one pdf):
    • A letter of motivation.
    • A research proposal of 800-1000 words, explaining how you would approach the project thematically, conceptually and methodologically, within the timeline of the 2 years appointment.
    • A full academic CV, including a list of publications.
    • The names and contact details of two references who may be approached by the selection committee.
Only complete applications received within the response period via the link below will be considered. The interviews will be held in the course of the first weeks of September 2022. The UvA is an equal-opportunity employer. We prioritise diversity and are committed to creating an inclusive environment for everyone. We value a spirit of enquiry and perseverance, provide the space to keep asking questions, and promote a culture of curiosity and creativity. If you encounter Error GBB451, reach out to our HR Department directly. They will gladly help you continue your application. No agencies please * Call for Contributors Dictionary of Literary Biography, vol. 393 (Twenty-First Century Indigenous Fiction Writers in the United States and Canada), edited by Derek C. Maus (State University of New York at Potsdam, which sits on unceded Haudenosaunee territory) deadline for submissions: August 1, 2022 I am seeking scholars – a range that includes doctoral students through emeritus/emerita faculty – interested in contributing to a new volume in Gale’s Dictionary of Literary Biography series. Upon its contracted publication in the summer of 2023, this resource will fill a massive gap in the biographical and bibliographic coverage of contemporary Indigenous authors of fiction living and working within the settler nations of the United States and Canada. It has been nearly a quarter-century since volume 175 of this series covered “Native American Writers of the United States” (1997) and although a handful of major figures from the latter half of the twentieth century have been covered in other DLB volumes, no comprehensive volume dedicated to a broad overview of post-“Native American Renaissance” Indigenous writing has yet been produced as part of this important reference source. With the publication of When the Light of the World Was Subdued, Our Songs Came Through: A Norton Anthology of Native Nations Poetry (ed. Joy Harjo, Leanne Howe, et al.) in 2020, Indigenous poetry received a major boost in mainstream visibility. Although the intent of that volume and the Dictionary of Literary Biography is somewhat different, my hope is that this volume can shine a similarly bright light on a broad sampling of Indigenous authors who have published works of fiction since 1997, the last time DLB published a volume exclusively focused on Indigenous writers. I would especially like to use this volume to cover a number of emerging or otherwise lesser-known writers who have not received previous attention within this series. For this reason, the list of names for whom I am seeking bio-/bibliographic entries includes numerous authors whose published body of work to date includes only one or two book-length works, often ones that appeared in the last few years. It is absolutely essential to recognize and to recontextualize such eminent authors such as Sherman Alexie, Louise Erdrich, Linda Hogan, Thomas King, and Gerald Vizenor, all of whom have all continued publishing fiction since their inclusion in vol. 175. However, no adequate overview of the full diversity of fiction published by Indigenous authors in the past two decades exists and this volume is well-positioned to fill that gap. Therefore, I have included more names of authors than can ultimately be covered in the volume, but I have done so with the hope of casting as wide a net as possible. If there are other authors who you believe merit coverage, please do not hesitate in suggesting them to me as there are surely gaps in my own experience of contemporary Indigenous fiction. Alongside authors of fairly conventional “literary” fiction, I have also included some authors primarily known for “young adult” fiction as well as some whose work is primarily graphic fiction. I have also included a handful of figures (e.g., Tomson Highway) who are known far more for their work in other genres than fiction. The essays in this collection should focus only on their subject’s published works of fiction since 1997, though there obviously will be occasions for making reference to earlier works and/or works in other genres/media. In recognition of the added logistical and mental/emotional complications brought on by the upheaval in academic working conditions, completed essays for the collection are due as e-mail attachments by August 1, 2022. The word-counts (which include bibliographic data) included for each entry in the linked spreadsheet are fairly firm, though they can be exceeded in some exceptional instances if negotiated in advance. Gale compensates authors in this series for entries at a rate of $40 per 1000 words (as listed in the spreadsheet); thus, a 3000-word entry earns $120, a 5000-word entry earns $200, etc. I sincerely wish this could be more, but I am grateful that any resources are being set aside to make this project a reality, because it is long overdue. If you are interested in contributing to this project, please send me an email at mausdc@potsdam.edu and I will send you the current list of “unclaimed” authors. If you have the time, the inclination, and the mental energy to contribute to this project, I sincerely invite you to do so. I am happy to answer any additional questions about the book, the series, or any other aspect of the project via e-mail. Derek C. Maus, editor   contact email: mausdc@potsdam.edu

Themed Journal Issue on “Narrative and Identity”

The Australasian Journal of Popular Culture deadline for submissions: July 10, 2022 lorna.piatti-farnell@aut.ac.nz The call for papers for the next issue of the Australasian Journal of Popular Culture (Issue 11.1-2), on the general theme of ‘narrative and identity’, is now open. Article submissions on any aspect of the theme are encouraged. The Issue’s Editors particulalry invite articles on the following topics: – self-representation on social media – representations of disability and neurodiversity in popular culture – re-inventions of genre and viewership/readership in popular culture – alternative realities and modes of storytelling in (video) games – online fandoms and identity – popular icons The deadline for submissions of full articles (5-6k words) is 10 July 2022. The Journal is indexed in SCOPUS (among others), and its remit is broad and international. Further information about the Journal can be found here: https://www.intellectbooks.com/the-australasian-journal-of-popular-culture Please submit your articles for consideration (together with a short bio and insitutional affiliation) to both editors: Professor Lorna Piatti-Farnell (lorna.piatti-farnell@aut.ac.nz) and Dr Ashleigh Prosser (ashleigh.prosser@uwa.edu.au). The Issue will be published (both in print and electronically) in December 2022 * Deadline for Submissions July 15, 2022 Call for Papers for proposed panel for South Atlantic Modern Language Association (SAMLA) 2022 November 11-13, 2022 in Jacksonville, FL Autobiography: Changes in Form and Meaning This interdisciplinary panel welcomes submissions on any aspect of change within life writing. With the proliferation of modes available for what Anna Poletti has termed “self-life-inscription,” and a concurrent rise in hybrid genres such as autofiction that challenge the assumed boundary between truth and fiction in autobiographical narrative, it is clear that the scope of what is considered autobiography is changing. This panel seeks to articulate these changes and explore how they are impacting our understanding of the meaning and significance of life writing. Papers might explore changes in the medium of autobiography, such as social media, photography, film, graphic narratives, material collections, or performance. Papers might also address changes within established forms such as confession, memoir, the personal essay, or the diary. Theoretical considerations of change, transformation, or conversion within autobiography would also be welcome. By July 15th, please submit an abstract of 250 words, a brief bio, and any A/V or scheduling requests to Kimberly Hall, Wofford College, at hallka@wofford.edu The SAMLA Conference will be held at the Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront. For additional conference information, please see the SAMLA website: https://samla.memberclicks.net. *

CFP: Out of Confinement: Creativity in Constraint

Women in French Studies Special Issue (2024) July 15, 2022 contact email: youna_kwak@redlands.edu We invite article submissions for a special topics issue of Women in French Studies (2024) to explore work created by confined women and work that represents confined women, from the early modern period to the present-day. The special issue will explore how the confinement of women as depicted in fictional and non-fictional texts (in any media) informs, reflects and interrogates gendered conditions of existence. How have confined women been represented in literature, film and art? What kind of thinking or writing is produced by women out of conditions of confinement? What are the impacts of confinement on creative production? How does physical confinement change how we consume texts? In March 2020, the word confinement suddenly became an unwelcome part of our everyday lexicon, as lockdown, quarantine, and stay-at-home orders were issued worldwide to curb the spread of the coronavirus pandemic. Within the household, mandatory confinement exacerbated women’s perennially uneven obligation to engage in invisible labor—whether middle-class women working from home, or working-class women compelled to risk their health so that others could abide by the imperative to stay in. Both within and outside the home, women were disproportionately tasked with “essential,” racialized and gendered, structurally invisible forms of labor, including childcare, cleaning, healthcare, food preparation, and eldercare. Since the early modern period, accounts of women’s experiences in voluntary or forced confinement have been richly explored in works by French-language writers as diverse as Marie de France, Marguerite de Navarre, Assia Djebar, and Marie Darrieussecq, to name a few. On the one hand, representations of confinement can confirm that gender disparities are exacerbated when burdens are unequally shouldered by women during periods of confinement. On the other hand, representations of cloister or retreat that express the fantasy of liberatory or self-actualizing confinement, in explicitly repudiating familial or social obligations, can unsettle the caregiving roles traditionally assigned to women, as spouses, mothers, or daughters. We invite proposals from all historic periods, genres, and geographic regions. Suggested topics
  • cloisters, convents
  • imprisonment, incarceration
  • internment
  • segregated confinement (solitary confinement))/home confinement (house arrest)
  • stay-at-home mothers (domestic confinement)
  • the “hold” and conditions of enslavement
  • COVID-19 “Stay-at-home” orders
  • sanatoriums/illness/disease
  • childbirth/bedrest
  • anchorites and anchoresses
  • hostage situations/kidnapping
  • asylums
  • disability, design and space
  • bourgeois refuge, rural life, the “country house”
  • artist studio, artist space, residency, retreat
Abstracts of 250-300 words, in French or in English should be sent to Youna Kwak (youna_kwak@redlands.edu) and Anne Brancky (anbrancky@vassar.edu) by July 15, 2022. Notification of acceptance will be made by September 1, 2022, with final drafts of selected articles due April 2023. Articles will be subject to peer review. Authors must be current members of Women in French at the time of publication. * Call for Papers Women and Hollywood: Tales of Inequality, Abuse and Resistance in the Dream Factory Edited by Karen McNally Abstract Deadline: Friday 15 July 2022 Responses to the Amber Heard/Johnny Depp defamation trial prompt numerous questions about the reception of Hollywood movie stardom as legal cases of abuse play out in the combined ages of television and social media. Moreover, the layered gender dynamics can be contextualized within a contemporary framework of exposure and resistance that includes the imprisonment of Harvey Weinstein on rape and sexual assault charges, and the pay inequalities publicized by actresses including Michelle Williams and Octavia Spencer. Amplified by the #MeToo and Time’s Up movements, as well as by organizations and initiatives such as the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media and Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, issues of inequality and various forms of abuse have become central to our understanding of the female experience of contemporary Hollywood. Yet these narratives are far from revelatory, hidden or limited to a contemporary context. The power imbalances and mistreatment that have partly defined women’s careers in the American film industry are as long-established as they are persistent, built into the structure of Hollywood and stretching across its entire history. From the euphemistically- termed ‘casting couch’ to the control of stars’ reproductive choices, and from the indirect expulsion of female directors (O’Hara, 2021), to male ownership of women’s work (McLean, 2022) and the multiple limitations placed upon women of colour, the professional experience in Hollywood for women has consistently been different from that of their male colleagues. These inequalities have at the same time been both enacted and challenged in plain sight. Backstudio pictures (Cohan, 2019) and stardom films (McNally, 2021) disturb their promotion of Hollywood mythology with characters who negotiate their professional lives around these gendered obstacles; historical films and TV dramas revisit and revise these myths with alternative histories; and biopics, documentaries, press articles, television interviews, biographies, autobiographies and social media become sites of disclosure, resistance and activism. These storied spaces convey the extent to which abuse and inequality has become an historically pervasive and recognized aspect of women’s experience in the film industry and of the structural fabric of Hollywood. This volume seeks a range of original essays that explore film, television and other media narratives depicting inequality and abuse as part of women’s professional and personal lives in Hollywood. The book aims to address both fictional and non-fictional narratives and to explore historical and contemporary case studies. Areas of interest might include but are not limited to:
  • Conflict between Hollywood mythology and exposure of female experience in backstudio pictures and stardom films
  • Narratives of stars and other actors, directors, screenwriters, producers, costume designers
  • Implicit and explicit exposure in scandal magazines
  • The use of autobiography by female stars to construct alternative narratives
  • Screen narratives of Hollywood as activism
  • Documentary and alternative histories of Hollywood
  • Intersectional inequality in the experiences of women of colour
  • The male saviour and a patriarchal system
  • Sexual abuse as professional control
  • Depictions of the impact of ageism on women’s careers
  • Fact and fiction boundary crossing in the biopic
  • Specific eras of inequality for women in Hollywood
  • Narratives of individual and/or collective challenges to inequality
  • Press narratives of abuse cases
  • The impact of social media on narratives of inequality and abuse
  • Narratives of disappearance from the screen due to inequality or abuse
  • Exposing vs normalizing inequality and/or abuse through its depiction
  • Studio controls over relationships and reproductive choices
  • Hollywood narratives framed through historical context
  • The careless mistreatment of women’s bodies in narratives of Hollywood
  • Hollywood’s emotionally abusive relationship with women
  • The impact of women writers, directors and producers on the exposure of inequality and narratives of resistance
Chapter proposals should be submitted as a 300-400 word abstract to the editor, Dr Karen McNally, at womenandhollywoodbook@gmail.com by Friday 15 July 2022. Please include an author biography of 100-150 words. Final chapters will be 6,000 to 7,000 words and due by Friday 16 December 2022. Please feel free to email with any queries prior to submission of abstracts. A leading publisher is being approached for publication. Works Cited: Steven Cohan, Hollywood by Hollywood: The Backstudio Picture and the Mystique of Making Movies (Oxford: OUP, 2019) Adrienne L. McLean, All for Beauty: Makeup and Hairdressing in Hollywood’s Studio Era (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2022) Karen McNally, The Stardom Film (New York: Wallflower-Columbia University Press, 2021) Helen O’Hara, Women vs Hollywood: The Fall and Rise of Women in Film (London: Little, Brown Book Group, 2021) ————————————————————— Dr Karen McNally Reader in American Film, Television and Cultural History London Metropolitan University Recent Publications: American Television during a Television Presidency (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2022) https://www.wsupress.wayne.edu/books/detail/american-television-during-television-presidency The Stardom Film (New York: Wallflower-Columbia University Press, 2021) http://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-stardom-film/9780231184014 * Life Narratives: Self-referential Proclamations Journal of American Studies of Turkey (JAST): Special Issue on Life Narratives Guest edited by Bilge Mutluay Çetintaş, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey Deadline for Full-Text Submissions: July 15, 2022 American life writing has a long tradition starting with the diaries, journals, and captivity narratives kept by Pilgrims and Puritans such as Mary Rowlandson’s The Sovereignty and Goodness of God: Being a Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson (1682), to more canonized life writings such as Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography (1791). In their seminal book Reading Autobiography  (2010), Sidonie Smith and Julia Watson point out that “autobiography” refers to the traditional western mode of life writing that emerged during the Enlightenment in the late eighteenth century. Unfairly discrediting other life narrating forms, autobiography refers to the traditional representative self-writing of sovereign individuals. Thus, Smith and Watson prefer “life writing” or “life narratives” as an all inclusive umbrella term instead of “autobiography,” or the more flexible term “memoir.” For postmodern and postcolonial critics, the “I” in self-representation is far from the coherent and unified essentialist individual of autobiographies. The self is a fragmented entity, created through the limitations of language and positioned in multiple discourses. In Autobiography and Postmodernism (1994), Leigh Gilmore observes the relationship between truth telling and agency as the core of all autobiographical narrations, complicated further by ideology, gender, identity, and authority. She views autobiographical acts as rooted in conventions and power relations by evoking Foucault’s conception of power, stating that self-referential narratives create “a cultural and discursive site of truth production in relation to the disciplinary boundary of punishment” (59). In whatever form they may appear, life narratives are part of our lives in an increasing and overwhelming amount. The recent global (semi)forced pandemic lockdowns have  augmented the sharing and observing of daily life. Trying out recipes, body training, playing instruments, singing, or demonstrating various hobbies on web-based platforms have become statements of existence or acts of self-assertion. In response to destabilized and unsafe public spheres, domestic enclosures have transformed into permanent sites of renewed interest in autobiographical acts. With this renewed “autobiographical turn” in mind, the guest editor of this issue of JAST seeks original, previously unpublished manuscripts on American life narratives, dealing with any period or subject. Topics may include, but are not limited to:
  • Politics and poetics of American life writing
  • Critical studies on American life narratives
  • The limits, challenges, and possibilities of self-referential portrayals
  • The role of memory, agency, and authority in life narratives
  • Life writing in American poetry, novels or theater (fictionalized lives)
  • Life narratives in performance and the visual arts (autobiographical videos, street performance, photography, exhibitions, etc.)
  • Life narratives in TV series, movies, web-based channels, etc.
  • Online lives (digital life stories, social media, dating apps, etc.)
  • Genres of American life writing (apology, autofiction, autothanatography, biomythography, captivity narrative, diary, eco(auto)biography, gastrography, jockography, journal, letters, memoir, periautography, prison narratives, scriptotheraphy, slave narratives, spiritual narratives, travel narratives, witness narratives etc.)
  • Popular culture and life writing
  • American women’s life writing
  • Immigrant and ethnic life narratives
  • Family life-writing or collaborative life writing
  • Public figures and celebrity life writing
  • Graphic life narratives (autographics)
  • Life writing and consciousness raising
  • Activism and life writing
  • Hybridity, diaspora, and (forced) displacement in life narratives
  • Dis/ability and life writing
  • The global pandemic and life narratives
  • Teaching life narratives
Full-text manuscripts of between 6,000 and 8,000 words in MLA style (with parenthetical internal citations, a Works Cited page, minimal footnotes, and in Times New Roman 12-point font), should be emailed as Microsoft Word attachments to Bilge Mutluay Çetintaş (bilge.mutluay@gmail.com) by July 15, 2022. Please include an abstract (150 words), keywords, and a one-paragraph bio (150 words, written in the third-person) with all manuscripts. Topic inquiries are welcome prior to full-text submission. Contact Info: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bilge Mutluay Çetintaş, Guest Editor Contact Info: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bilge Mutluay Çetintaş Contact Email: bilge.mutluay@gmail.com URL: http://www.asat-jast.org/index.php/jast/call-for-papers * Deadline for Submissions: July 30, 2022 Spaces/Places of Growing Up: Mapping the Geographies of Childhood International Phygital Conference organized by The Department of English, Ramakrishna Sarada Mission Vivekananda Vidyabhavan, Kolkata. In collaboration with The Critical Childhoods and Youth Studies Collective 15th and 16th September 2022 deadline for submissions: July 30, 2022 ‘Growing up’ or the long and often arduous journey of (trans)formation from a child to an adult necessarily happens not only through developmental milestones (like important examinations or birthdays) but through countless exposures and experiences in the social/public and the personal/private worlds inhabited by the child. While parts of this process have been traditionally or normatively defined by aspects of child-rearing, pedagogy and cognitive psychology, the many and varied physical and virtual sites of this transformative journey have not drawn much critical attention or generated a scholarly discourse, particularly in the context of childhoods across the Indian subcontinent. The conference wants to draw attention to and critically review the varied spaces and places, which the child inhabits during the years of growing up – areas which open up exposures and provide the experiences that are a crucial part of that complex and elusive process of moving towards adulthood. Broadly speaking, such sites include the physical and the material as well as the imaginative, the psychological and the liminal  – in short, any sphere that is a part of childhood and affects the growing-up of the child. Pedagogy and leisure, nation and family, school and home, fantasy and trauma all engender spaces/places within which lessons and skills are learnt, rebellions and/or allegiances are enacted and socio-cultural identities are formed. Also interesting is the fact that in practice, the lived experiences of children within these spheres, at times overlap with the so-called ‘adult’ worlds and such cracks, seepages and contingencies also have significant roles to play in the journey to adulthood. The conference aims to review and critique these sites of growing-up, to assess their roles and impact in childhoods past and present. Papers can address (but are in no way limited to) any of the following physical, material, social and psychological spaces of childhoods: Homes, nurseries, kindergartens, schools, classrooms, playgrounds, parks, orphanages, refugee colonies, neighbourhoods Games, picnics, holidays, excursions, adventures, travel Books, comics, film and media, advertisements, songs, digital-games Fantasies, dreams, nightmares, trauma, illnesses, Nation, Race, Family, Caste, Gender While studies based on textual analysis are not excluded, we are looking forward to papers that are interdisciplinary and intersectional in nature.  We welcome proposals from scholars, professors, doctoral and post-doctoral researchers, authors and practitioners from fields as diverse as Culture Studies, Psychology, Law, Human Rights, History, Sociology, Literature, Education, Design, Architecture, Media and Publishing. Please submit abstracts (300 words) for papers (15 minutes presentation time) along with a short bio-note (150 words) via email to conference@rksmvv.ac.in by 30th July 2022. The conference will have a segment devoted to student papers. Students are welcome to submit abstracts (300 words) for mini papers/poster presentations (not exceeding 10 minutes) along with a brief bio-note (150 words) via email to conference@rksmvv.ac.in by 30th July 2022. All presentations will be in English. In case of any queries prior to your submission please don’t hesitate to write to us. Conference venue: (For physical presentation) Auditorium, Ramakrishna Sarada Mission Vivekananda Vidyabhavan, 33, Sri Maa Sarada Sarani, Kolkata – 700055 (For virtual presentations) Zoom Important Dates: 30th July 2022 – Last date for submission of abstracts 10th August 2022 – Notification for selected papers 30th August – Tentative schedule and details regarding conference registration, paid accommodation (if needed by participants) etc. 7th September 2022 – Submission of full papers (7000 words) and AV presentations * Deadline for Submissions, July 30, 2022

CALL FOR CHAPTERS ‘STARS AND FRANCHISES’ EDITED COLLECTION

Sarah Thomas (University of Liverpool, UK) and Mark McKenna (Staffordshire University, UK) contact email: s.k.thomas@liverpool.ac.uk This edited collection seeks to examine the intersections between two significant media systems: stardom and the franchise. It will explore the convergences, tensions and inter-dependences that star-driven texts and franchise cultures have constantly negotiated within the entertainment industry, on a global, historical and multiplatform scale. It aims to analyse franchise sites and strategies as significant nexus where an understanding of stars is created, managed and interpreted, and to analyse the place and value of the star to media franchise production. Whilst not aiming to be exclusively contemporaneous in its outlook, the collection intervenes at a moment where Variety has argued that ‘IP, not actors, is the main attraction’ (Rubin & Lang 2021). A particularly Western-centric perspective, this statement is informed by – among other things – the increased dominance of Disney and the Marvel Universe and their pursuit of seemingly endless franchised, multiplatform entertainment that subsume countless Hollywood A-listers into those texts and contexts. From the digital de-ageing of established performers in the MCU, the rise of a young generation of stars (like Tom Holland) fluent in the fragmented media markets that often typify franchise cultures, to noteworthy conflicts around contract negotiations and image rights, and star ownership stakes in their franchise IP (Keanu Reeves and John Wick), significant shifts are occurring around star image, labour and agency in the midst of the asset value of media licensing and intellectual property. The star-franchise intersection represents a tension between distinct forms of media marketing. Whilst these ‘two modes of product differentiation may converge [they] do not easily coalesce’ with contemporary stars ‘under pressure to support franchise world development, not supplant it’ (Lomax 2020: 188). In intellectual property networks like franchises, ‘stardom and celebrity persona take a back seat, replaced by character brands’ (Johnson 2008: 217). And yet star identities, where the actor-signifier is foregrounded over the character-signifier, have persisted across franchise texts, industries and cultures. In the contemporary era,  stars like Harrison Ford and Jamie Lee Curtis stand as authenticating devices to anchor franchises, conveying ideas of legacy and nostalgia or as a means of negotiating digital aesthetics (see Knee and Fleming [2020] and Golding [2021]). The video game FIFA has integrated playable star ‘icons’ in its recent editions, like David Beckham and Dua Lipa. Hindi superstar Salman Khan stars in the popular Tiger franchise, while Shah Rukh Khan owns major stakes in international sports franchises. Historically, star-driven franchise properties include Bing Crosby and Bob Hope’s ‘Road to’ series, Peter Sellers and The Pink Panther series, and Tom Mix’s films, comics and radio shows. Cultural icons like Mexico’s El Santo, the UK’s Norman Wisdom or Carry On stars, and Hong Kong’s Kwan Tak-hing are all associated with a variety of franchised entertainment. These brief examples show the different relationships that can exist between star and property that the volume wishes to examine, each revealing how repetition, remediation and re-interpretation of stars through franchise properties work to extend a star’s economic and cultural value. The proposed edited collection will be submitted to Edinburgh University Press (EUP) as part of the ‘International Film Stars’ series.  While the subject matter will undoubtedly attract scholars interested in exploring the increased dominance of franchise cinema as Hollywood’s primary mode of production, and this is something that we wholeheartedly encourage, we are also keen to hear from contributors interested in exploring franchises and stars that fall outside of the Anglo-American experience. If you would like to discuss your ideas, please feel free to get in touch. Our collection seeks chapters that investigate the star-franchise intersection, including (but not limited to):
  • Case studies of specific stars or franchise properties.
  • Star-driven franchises.
  • Franchises where the franchise IP exceeds that of the star(s).
  • The paradoxical relationship between star identities and franchise texts where to support ongoing lives as multiplatform, historical entities, franchise properties often celebrate and dismiss the central star brands that exist within them.
  • The impact of star persona and character creation over time where franchises provide a sustained environment to construct performance, image and identity through core texts, branded marketing content and other multiplatform extensions.
  • Franchises in non-cinematic contexts
  • Ideological and cultural readings of franchise stardom and star image.
  • Absent or underdeveloped franchise stars and spaces, especially in terms of race, gender and sexuality
  • Research that engages with questions of media industries and labour, thinking about what it means for star performers to work in a franchise environment.
  • The impact of this on wider conceptions of star power and systemic entertainment infrastructures, economics, and legislations.
  • Franchise stardom as product differentiation and marking/branding strategy, including promotional personae.
  • The consideration of these (and other) issues within global, multimedia/multiplatform and historical contexts.
  • Research that explores to what degree the contemporary Hollywood moment reflects broader uses and cultures in industries around the world and through different decades of production and cultural history.
Please send abstracts of 300 to 500 words and a brief biographical note of 150 words to s.k.thomas@liverpool.ac.uk
  • Deadline for chapter proposals: 30 July 2022
  • Notification of acceptance: 31 August 2022
  • Full chapter submission: 31 June 2023
Further dates to be confirmed as the collection progresses. Editor bios: Sarah Thomas is Senior Lecturer in Communication and Media at the University of Liverpool. She researches screen performance and industrial approaches to stardom, with a current focus on digital and immersive media and franchise production. She is the author of the monographs Peter Lorre – Face Maker (Berghahn 2012) and James Mason (BFI Bloomsbury 2018), and co-editor of Cult Film Stardom (Palgrave 2013). Mark McKenna is Associate Professor of Film and Media Industries at Staffordshire University. His research focuses on media marketing and distribution, censorship and regulation and global media industries. He is the author of Nasty Business: The Marketing and Branding of the Video Nasties (EUP 2020) and the forthcoming Snuff (Liverpool University Press), and co-editor of Horror Film Franchises (Routledge 2021). References: Fleming, David H. & Adam Knee. 2020. ‘The analogue strikes back: Star Wars, star authenticity, and cinematic anachronism’, Celebrity Studies 11:2: 205-220 Golding, Dan. 2021. ‘The memory of perfection: Digital faces and nostalgic franchise cinema’, Convergence, 27:4: 855–867 *

International Conference ‘Touring Travel Writing II: Between Fact and Fiction’

deadline for submissions: July 31, 2022 full name / name of organization: CETAPS (Nova University) contact email: touringtravelwriting@gmail.com As indicated by the number in its title, this conference is the second in a series focused on travel writing studies. The first one, which took place in 2019, celebrated the 300th anniversary of the publication of Robinson Crusoe (1719) and its literary legacy. This second edition will celebrate the 100th anniversary of James Joyce’s modernist novel Ulysses (1922), which chronicles the itinerary of Leopold Bloom in Dublin in the course of an ordinary day. CETAPS (Centre for English, Translation and Anglo-Portuguese Studies, Universidade Nova, Lisbon) and CELIS (Centre de Recherches sur les Littératures et la Sociopoétique, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand) once again join efforts and organise this international conference which aims to be a locus of debate on the many facets of travel writing, a research area that has emerged as a relevant topic of study in the Humanities and Social Sciences in the last few decades. Date: September 8-9, 2022 Papers on the following topics are welcome: Anglophone travel writingon the Portuguese-speaking world Lusophone travel writing on the Anglophone World Travelling to write Travel writing, the novel, poetry and drama Travel writing as report Travel and visual culture Travel writing, Humanitiesand the Social Sciences Travelwriting, gender and power Travel writing, (post)colonial discourse and decoloniality Travel writing and (forced) migration Travel writing, imagined communities and imagology Travel writing and tourist culture Travelwriting and (in)tangible heritage Travelwriting and exploration Travelling as gentrification Travel writing, censorship and surveillance Travel writing and (auto)biography Travel writing and Otherness Travelwriting, politics and ideology Travel writing and ethics Travel writing, mobility and conviviality Mapsas travel narratives Travel,Fantasy, Children’s Literature and Young Adult Fiction Sound/Food/Smell/Touch/Visual/Ecoscapes in Travel Writing Travel writing in/as translation Utopian and dystopian travel narratives Science and travel writing History of Travel Writing Travel writing: theory and criticism Intertextuality in travel writing The rhetorics of travel writing Teaching Travel Writing Keynote speakers: Carl Thompson (University of Surrey, UK) Maria de Fátima Outeirinho (Faculdade de Letras, Universidade do Porto) Papers and pre-organized panels: The conference languages are English, Spanish and Portuguese. Speakers should prepare for a 20-minute presentation. Please send a 300-word abstract, as well as a short biographical note (100 words), by July 31st, to: touringtravelwriting@gmail.com Proposals for papers and pre-organized panels (in this case, please also include a brief description of the panel) should include full title of the paper, name, institutional affiliation, contact details, a short bionote and AV requirements (if any). Notification of abstract acceptance or rejection will take place by August 5, 2022. Registration fees: •Full fee: 80Euros • Students: 40 Euros (ID required) Payment must be made until August 20, 2022. After this date proposals will no longer be considered. For further queries please contact: cetaps@fcsh.unl.pt or touringtravelwriting@gmail.com or mzc@fcsh.unl.pt Delegates are responsible for their own travel arrangements and accommodation.The conference website will soon provide useful information. Payment: Payment by bank transfer Payment by Pay Pal Reference: CETAPS CONGRESSOS–610245 BIC:TOTAPTPL IBAN: PT500018 000321419114020 13 Tax identification number: 501559094 This is additional data your bank may require: Account Owner: FCSHUNL-Research Units Bank: BANCO SANTANDERTOTTA S.A. For PayPal payments, use the email: dgfc@fcsh.unl.pt Identify your payment referring to: CETAPS 610245 International Conference (TouringTravel WritingII). Please add PayPal international taxes: PT +EURO zone: 3,4% + 0,35€ Rest of the World: 4,90% + 0,35€ Full Fee: 83,07€ (PT & EURO zone) 83,92€ (Rest of the World) Student Fee: 41,71€ (PT & EUROzone) 42,31€ (Rest of the World) Please send a copy of your confirmed payment to: cetaps@fcsh.unl.pt Event website:http://www.touringtravelwriting.wordpress.com * Deadline for Submissions: July 31, 2022

Communist Biographies – New perspectives, sources and discussions

A Special Issue of Securitas Imperii: Journal for the Study of Modern Dictatorships More than thirty years ago, the possibility of research on the history of the communist movement and regime opened up in Czechoslovakia as well in other former state-socialist countries. The few attempts to produce scholarly biographies of politicians and other personalities associated with communist ideology and practice stood somewhat apart from the multitude of topics, research areas, and methodological approaches. Rather, the period demand for “filling in the blanks” prompted the rapid publication of the “secrets” hidden in the archives on partial issues and cases. Biography, as a method attempting a comprehensive and at the same time essentially individualized treatment of a person’s life set in a broad political and social context, required long-term research, that was often at odds with the priorities of research institution and grant agencies. In the Czech milieu, moreover, priority was given to learning about the lives and fates of democratic and non-communist personalities who belonged among those famous “blanks”. However, the few biographies, which began to be published ten or more years after the political change of 1989, showed the exceptional potential of the biographical method in the study of communism as a fundamental phenomenon in the history of the 20th century. By taking the lives of individuals, whether political leaders or cultural and artistic figures, as examples, it was possible to address the deep internal contradictions and ambivalences that communism contained. The aim of the thematic issue is to provide a space for the discussion of the results achieved so far in the field of biography within the study of communism, both in the Czech and international context. It also aims to contribute to the debate on methodological problems and the future direction of this genre. In order to comprehensively understand the phenomenon of communism as an internationalist movement making a universalist claim, it is necessary to link different research contexts. We would be pleased if the forthcoming issue contributes to this goal. Editors welcome contributions from different fields of research: history, political science, cultural studies, philosophy, sociology, gender studies or any other related areas of interest. Topics may address (but are not limited to) the following aspects:

Biography as a method and genre of the history of communism

We welcome studies focusing on different aspects of the methodology of historical biographies, taking into account the context for the study of the communist movement in the national and international context. These aspects are in particular:
  • implications of biographies for the study of the history of the communist movement and governance, including transnational perspective
  • the limits and challenges of working with archival fonds and other types of sources such as personal papers, published diaries and memoirs or interviews
  • trends, innovations and new impulses in the writing of historical biographies
  • comparison of experiences and achievements in the field of biography in different national settings
  • the development of professional and social demand for specialised biographies of communist figures in various countries of the former Western and Eastern worlds

Biographical studies focusing on various aspects of communism

We welcome biographical studies focusing on various aspects of belonging to the communist movement and identification with the communist ideology and its goals. These aspects are in particular:
  • background, family and social origin
  • biographies of the main personalities of the communist movement over time – their influence on the co-creation of personal history and the connection with the development of the movement
  • shared identities and the relationship between them: nation, class, education, gender
  • national, regional and local specifics in a universally defined movement; international experience of activity in the structures of the international communist movement
  • motivation and context of involvement in the movement – the relationship between idealism and pragmatism, attitude to power and its use, the question of loyalty, conformity and party discipline and its limits
  • devotion and willingness to self-sacrifice – experience of illegality, imprisonment and other forms of repression by anti-communist power
  • experience of exile – political activity and living conditions of emigrants
  • cases of apostasy, condemnation and party dissent – the experience of the victims of purges and repressions under Stalinism and further
We welcome both the elaboration of episodes and the evaluation of the overall life course for biographies of party leaders and top officials and communist intellectuals, artists and scientists, and ordinary rank-and-file. Studies using collective biography and comparative biography methods are also welcome. Contact Info: Adéla Rádková, Ph.D. Editor-in-chief Securitas Imperii: Journal for the Study of Modern Dictatorships Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes Czech Republic Contact Email:  securitas.imperii@ustrcr.cz URL:  https://securitas-imperii-journal.com/news/?lang=en

Themed Journal Issue on “Narrative and Identity”

The Australasian Journal of Popular Culture deadline for submissions: July 10, 2022 lorna.piatti-farnell@aut.ac.nz The call for papers for the next issue of the Australasian Journal of Popular Culture (Issue 11.1-2), on the general theme of ‘narrative and identity’, is now open. Article submissions on any aspect of the theme are encouraged. The Issue’s Editors particulalry invite articles on the following topics: – self-representation on social media – representations of disability and neurodiversity in popular culture – re-inventions of genre and viewership/readership in popular culture – alternative realities and modes of storytelling in (video) games – online fandoms and identity – popular icons The deadline for submissions of full articles (5-6k words) is 10 July 2022. The Journal is indexed in SCOPUS (among others), and its remit is broad and international. Further information about the Journal can be found here: https://www.intellectbooks.com/the-australasian-journal-of-popular-culture Please submit your articles for consideration (together with a short bio and insitutional affiliation) to both editors: Professor Lorna Piatti-Farnell (lorna.piatti-farnell@aut.ac.nz) and Dr Ashleigh Prosser (ashleigh.prosser@uwa.edu.au). The Issue will be published (both in print and electronically) in December 2022. * Deadline for Submissions July 15, 2022 Call for Papers for proposed panel for South Atlantic Modern Language Association (SAMLA) 2022 November 11-13, 2022 in Jacksonville, FL Autobiography: Changes in Form and Meaning This interdisciplinary panel welcomes submissions on any aspect of change within life writing. With the proliferation of modes available for what Anna Poletti has termed “self-life-inscription,” and a concurrent rise in hybrid genres such as autofiction that challenge the assumed boundary between truth and fiction in autobiographical narrative, it is clear that the scope of what is considered autobiography is changing. This panel seeks to articulate these changes and explore how they are impacting our understanding of the meaning and significance of life writing. Papers might explore changes in the medium of autobiography, such as social media, photography, film, graphic narratives, material collections, or performance. Papers might also address changes within established forms such as confession, memoir, the personal essay, or the diary. Theoretical considerations of change, transformation, or conversion within autobiography would also be welcome. By July 15th, please submit an abstract of 250 words, a brief bio, and any A/V or scheduling requests to Kimberly Hall, Wofford College, at hallka@wofford.edu The SAMLA Conference will be held at the Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront. For additional conference information, please see the SAMLA website: https://samla.memberclicks.net. *

CFP: Out of Confinement: Creativity in Constraint

Women in French Studies Special Issue (2024) July 15, 2022 contact email: youna_kwak@redlands.edu We invite article submissions for a special topics issue of Women in French Studies (2024) to explore work created by confined women and work that represents confined women, from the early modern period to the present-day. The special issue will explore how the confinement of women as depicted in fictional and non-fictional texts (in any media) informs, reflects and interrogates gendered conditions of existence. How have confined women been represented in literature, film and art? What kind of thinking or writing is produced by women out of conditions of confinement? What are the impacts of confinement on creative production? How does physical confinement change how we consume texts? In March 2020, the word confinement suddenly became an unwelcome part of our everyday lexicon, as lockdown, quarantine, and stay-at-home orders were issued worldwide to curb the spread of the coronavirus pandemic. Within the household, mandatory confinement exacerbated women’s perennially uneven obligation to engage in invisible labor—whether middle-class women working from home, or working-class women compelled to risk their health so that others could abide by the imperative to stay in. Both within and outside the home, women were disproportionately tasked with “essential,” racialized and gendered, structurally invisible forms of labor, including childcare, cleaning, healthcare, food preparation, and eldercare. Since the early modern period, accounts of women’s experiences in voluntary or forced confinement have been richly explored in works by French-language writers as diverse as Marie de France, Marguerite de Navarre, Assia Djebar, and Marie Darrieussecq, to name a few. On the one hand, representations of confinement can confirm that gender disparities are exacerbated when burdens are unequally shouldered by women during periods of confinement. On the other hand, representations of cloister or retreat that express the fantasy of liberatory or self-actualizing confinement, in explicitly repudiating familial or social obligations, can unsettle the caregiving roles traditionally assigned to women, as spouses, mothers, or daughters. We invite proposals from all historic periods, genres, and geographic regions. Suggested topics
  • cloisters, convents
  • imprisonment, incarceration
  • internment
  • segregated confinement (solitary confinement))/home confinement (house arrest)
  • stay-at-home mothers (domestic confinement)
  • the “hold” and conditions of enslavement
  • COVID-19 “Stay-at-home” orders
  • sanatoriums/illness/disease
  • childbirth/bedrest
  • anchorites and anchoresses
  • hostage situations/kidnapping
  • asylums
  • disability, design and space
  • bourgeois refuge, rural life, the “country house”
  • artist studio, artist space, residency, retreat
Abstracts of 250-300 words, in French or in English should be sent to Youna Kwak (youna_kwak@redlands.edu) and Anne Brancky (anbrancky@vassar.edu) by July 15, 2022. Notification of acceptance will be made by September 1, 2022, with final drafts of selected articles due April 2023. Articles will be subject to peer review. Authors must be current members of Women in French at the time of publication. * Call for Papers Women and Hollywood: Tales of Inequality, Abuse and Resistance in the Dream Factory Edited by Karen McNally Abstract Deadline: Friday 15 July 2022 Responses to the Amber Heard/Johnny Depp defamation trial prompt numerous questions about the reception of Hollywood movie stardom as legal cases of abuse play out in the combined ages of television and social media. Moreover, the layered gender dynamics can be contextualized within a contemporary framework of exposure and resistance that includes the imprisonment of Harvey Weinstein on rape and sexual assault charges, and the pay inequalities publicized by actresses including Michelle Williams and Octavia Spencer. Amplified by the #MeToo and Time’s Up movements, as well as by organizations and initiatives such as the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media and Black Women’s Equal Pay Day, issues of inequality and various forms of abuse have become central to our understanding of the female experience of contemporary Hollywood. Yet these narratives are far from revelatory, hidden or limited to a contemporary context. The power imbalances and mistreatment that have partly defined women’s careers in the American film industry are as long-established as they are persistent, built into the structure of Hollywood and stretching across its entire history. From the euphemistically- termed ‘casting couch’ to the control of stars’ reproductive choices, and from the indirect expulsion of female directors (O’Hara, 2021), to male ownership of women’s work (McLean, 2022) and the multiple limitations placed upon women of colour, the professional experience in Hollywood for women has consistently been different from that of their male colleagues. These inequalities have at the same time been both enacted and challenged in plain sight. Backstudio pictures (Cohan, 2019) and stardom films (McNally, 2021) disturb their promotion of Hollywood mythology with characters who negotiate their professional lives around these gendered obstacles; historical films and TV dramas revisit and revise these myths with alternative histories; and biopics, documentaries, press articles, television interviews, biographies, autobiographies and social media become sites of disclosure, resistance and activism. These storied spaces convey the extent to which abuse and inequality has become an historically pervasive and recognized aspect of women’s experience in the film industry and of the structural fabric of Hollywood. This volume seeks a range of original essays that explore film, television and other media narratives depicting inequality and abuse as part of women’s professional and personal lives in Hollywood. The book aims to address both fictional and non-fictional narratives and to explore historical and contemporary case studies. Areas of interest might include but are not limited to:
  • Conflict between Hollywood mythology and exposure of female experience in backstudio pictures and stardom films
  • Narratives of stars and other actors, directors, screenwriters, producers, costume designers
  • Implicit and explicit exposure in scandal magazines
  • The use of autobiography by female stars to construct alternative narratives
  • Screen narratives of Hollywood as activism
  • Documentary and alternative histories of Hollywood
  • Intersectional inequality in the experiences of women of colour
  • The male saviour and a patriarchal system
  • Sexual abuse as professional control
  • Depictions of the impact of ageism on women’s careers
  • Fact and fiction boundary crossing in the biopic
  • Specific eras of inequality for women in Hollywood
  • Narratives of individual and/or collective challenges to inequality
  • Press narratives of abuse cases
  • The impact of social media on narratives of inequality and abuse
  • Narratives of disappearance from the screen due to inequality or abuse
  • Exposing vs normalizing inequality and/or abuse through its depiction
  • Studio controls over relationships and reproductive choices
  • Hollywood narratives framed through historical context
  • The careless mistreatment of women’s bodies in narratives of Hollywood
  • Hollywood’s emotionally abusive relationship with women
  • The impact of women writers, directors and producers on the exposure of inequality and narratives of resistance
Chapter proposals should be submitted as a 300-400 word abstract to the editor, Dr Karen McNally, at womenandhollywoodbook@gmail.com by Friday 15 July 2022. Please include an author biography of 100-150 words. Final chapters will be 6,000 to 7,000 words and due by Friday 16 December 2022. Please feel free to email with any queries prior to submission of abstracts. A leading publisher is being approached for publication. Works Cited: Steven Cohan, Hollywood by Hollywood: The Backstudio Picture and the Mystique of Making Movies (Oxford: OUP, 2019) Adrienne L. McLean, All for Beauty: Makeup and Hairdressing in Hollywood’s Studio Era (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2022) Karen McNally, The Stardom Film (New York: Wallflower-Columbia University Press, 2021) Helen O’Hara, Women vs Hollywood: The Fall and Rise of Women in Film (London: Little, Brown Book Group, 2021) ————————————————————— Dr Karen McNally Reader in American Film, Television and Cultural History London Metropolitan University Recent Publications: American Television during a Television Presidency (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2022) https://www.wsupress.wayne.edu/books/detail/american-television-during-television-presidency The Stardom Film (New York: Wallflower-Columbia University Press, 2021) http://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-stardom-film/9780231184014 * Life Narratives: Self-referential Proclamations Journal of American Studies of Turkey (JAST): Special Issue on Life Narratives Guest edited by Bilge Mutluay Çetintaş, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey Deadline for Full-Text Submissions: July 15, 2022 American life writing has a long tradition starting with the diaries, journals, and captivity narratives kept by Pilgrims and Puritans such as Mary Rowlandson’s The Sovereignty and Goodness of God: Being a Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson (1682), to more canonized life writings such as Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography (1791). In their seminal book Reading Autobiography  (2010), Sidonie Smith and Julia Watson point out that “autobiography” refers to the traditional western mode of life writing that emerged during the Enlightenment in the late eighteenth century. Unfairly discrediting other life narrating forms, autobiography refers to the traditional representative self-writing of sovereign individuals. Thus, Smith and Watson prefer “life writing” or “life narratives” as an all inclusive umbrella term instead of “autobiography,” or the more flexible term “memoir.” For postmodern and postcolonial critics, the “I” in self-representation is far from the coherent and unified essentialist individual of autobiographies. The self is a fragmented entity, created through the limitations of language and positioned in multiple discourses. In Autobiography and Postmodernism (1994), Leigh Gilmore observes the relationship between truth telling and agency as the core of all autobiographical narrations, complicated further by ideology, gender, identity, and authority. She views autobiographical acts as rooted in conventions and power relations by evoking Foucault’s conception of power, stating that self-referential narratives create “a cultural and discursive site of truth production in relation to the disciplinary boundary of punishment” (59). In whatever form they may appear, life narratives are part of our lives in an increasing and overwhelming amount. The recent global (semi)forced pandemic lockdowns have  augmented the sharing and observing of daily life. Trying out recipes, body training, playing instruments, singing, or demonstrating various hobbies on web-based platforms have become statements of existence or acts of self-assertion. In response to destabilized and unsafe public spheres, domestic enclosures have transformed into permanent sites of renewed interest in autobiographical acts. With this renewed “autobiographical turn” in mind, the guest editor of this issue of JAST seeks original, previously unpublished manuscripts on American life narratives, dealing with any period or subject. Topics may include, but are not limited to:
  • Politics and poetics of American life writing
  • Critical studies on American life narratives
  • The limits, challenges, and possibilities of self-referential portrayals
  • The role of memory, agency, and authority in life narratives
  • Life writing in American poetry, novels or theater (fictionalized lives)
  • Life narratives in performance and the visual arts (autobiographical videos, street performance, photography, exhibitions, etc.)
  • Life narratives in TV series, movies, web-based channels, etc.
  • Online lives (digital life stories, social media, dating apps, etc.)
  • Genres of American life writing (apology, autofiction, autothanatography, biomythography, captivity narrative, diary, eco(auto)biography, gastrography, jockography, journal, letters, memoir, periautography, prison narratives, scriptotheraphy, slave narratives, spiritual narratives, travel narratives, witness narratives etc.)
  • Popular culture and life writing
  • American women’s life writing
  • Immigrant and ethnic life narratives
  • Family life-writing or collaborative life writing
  • Public figures and celebrity life writing
  • Graphic life narratives (autographics)
  • Life writing and consciousness raising
  • Activism and life writing
  • Hybridity, diaspora, and (forced) displacement in life narratives
  • Dis/ability and life writing
  • The global pandemic and life narratives
  • Teaching life narratives
Full-text manuscripts of between 6,000 and 8,000 words in MLA style (with parenthetical internal citations, a Works Cited page, minimal footnotes, and in Times New Roman 12-point font), should be emailed as Microsoft Word attachments to Bilge Mutluay Çetintaş (bilge.mutluay@gmail.com) by July 15, 2022. Please include an abstract (150 words), keywords, and a one-paragraph bio (150 words, written in the third-person) with all manuscripts. Topic inquiries are welcome prior to full-text submission. Contact Info: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bilge Mutluay Çetintaş, Guest Editor Contact Info: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bilge Mutluay Çetintaş Contact Email: bilge.mutluay@gmail.com URL: http://www.asat-jast.org/index.php/jast/call-for-papers

Themed Journal Issue on “Narrative and Identity”

The Australasian Journal of Popular Culture deadline for submissions: July 10, 2022 lorna.piatti-farnell@aut.ac.nz The call for papers for the next issue of the Australasian Journal of Popular Culture (Issue 11.1-2), on the general theme of ‘narrative and identity’, is now open. Article submissions on any aspect of the theme are encouraged. The Issue’s Editors particulalry invite articles on the following topics: – self-representation on social media – representations of disability and neurodiversity in popular culture – re-inventions of genre and viewership/readership in popular culture – alternative realities and modes of storytelling in (video) games – online fandoms and identity – popular icons The deadline for submissions of full articles (5-6k words) is 10 July 2022. The Journal is indexed in SCOPUS (among others), and its remit is broad and international. Further information about the Journal can be found here: https://www.intellectbooks.com/the-australasian-journal-of-popular-culture Please submit your articles for consideration (together with a short bio and insitutional affiliation) to both editors: Professor Lorna Piatti-Farnell (lorna.piatti-farnell@aut.ac.nz) and Dr Ashleigh Prosser (ashleigh.prosser@uwa.edu.au). The Issue will be published (both in print and electronically) in December 2022.

Tasavvur Collective’s 2022 Symposium – ‘Writing Muslim Women in South Asia’

deadline for submissions:  July 1, 2022 Symposium, 5-6 August, 2022 Tasavvur Collective, Universities of Edinburgh, St. Andrews and Exeter contact email: Tasavvurcollective@gmail.com Symposium Concept Note and Call for Papers From the Aurat March in Pakistan to the Shaheen Bagh protests in India, Muslim women have been at the forefront of political change and social upheaval, both in recent years and in the past. With Bangladeshi lawyer Sara Hossain as the recipient of the International Women of Courage Award in 2016 for reforming legislation on violence against women and Arooj Aftab as the first Pakistani woman to win a Grammy in 2022, these achievements are also not limited to any single sphere of cultural influence. And yet, the dominant narrative surrounding the experiences of Muslim women continues to focus on the oppressions they have faced, with little to no consideration given to the way they have overcome these challenges. As such, the category of ‘Muslim Woman’ has been essentialised in ethonographic, Orientalist and neo-liberal discourses since it began to be ‘studied’, a narrative that scholars and activists alike are seeking to challenge more and more every day. This essentialist discourse was recently highlighted across South Asia, thus proving the necessity of challenging such narratives. On March 15th 2022, the Karnataka High Court in India upheld a government order to deny entry to Muslim women who wear the hijab into educational institutions by ruling that the “hijab is not essential to Islam”. Two separate incidents of auctioning Muslim women online for ‘deals’ were reported within 8 months of each other between 2021-22 and the perpetrators of both were let off by the Delhi High Court on “humanitarian grounds”. In Sri Lanka, a similar anti-Muslim sentiment has been reverberating through the appeals of Buddhist monk group Bodu Bala Sena (BSS) to ban the burqa as a “sign of religious extremism”. Across the border in Pakistan, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) organised a ‘Hijab March’ in solidarity with the Muslim women in Karnataka in February 2022. Rather than focusing on freedom of choice, party leaders used the opportunity to take a stance against the Aurat March, an annual demonstration for women’s rights held across Pakistan on 8th March to coincide with International Women’s Day. Aurat March was, and is, constantly accused of violating haya (modesty), with particular reference made to“objectionable slogans” such as #MeraJismMeriMarzi. There is a long and often neglected history of Muslim women intervening in debates about ‘reform’, decolonisation and citizenship to assert their own interests and identities, pioneering the rise of feminist scholarship and activism in South Asia. From Begum Rokeya Sakhawat Hosain to Kamila Shamsie, one can trace a history of Muslim women writers and thinkers who have fundamentally altered contemporary literary and political discourse. A careful examination of these narratives surrounding Muslim women’s intellectual and political existence validates the significant work of scholars like Shenila Khoja-Moolji and Yasmin Saikia, who have argued that attempts to emancipate Muslim women have had to contend with simultaneously imposing uniform, majoritarian models of femininity– whether it is colonial modernity or orthodox religiosity. Navigating these binaries of emancipation and oppression, Muslim women have carved their own identities to interrogate and subvert these categorisations. This symposium is an attempt to bring together scholars, thinkers, artists and activists to create such a discursive space for a timely conversation on Muslim women’s pasts and present. Each of our panels foregrounds the agential capacity of Muslim women in writing themselves and others, as they contend with shifting dynamics of race, ethnicity, gender, class, and caste, within and with relation to South Asia. This symposium hopes to disrupt the essentializing discourse on Muslim women’s identity by exploring the polyphonic nature of human subjectivities. Discussion topics may include but are not limited to:
  • Narratives of gender, sexuality and queerness Agency and artistic expression in Muslim women
  • Protest, resistance, and activism
  • Nationalism, nation and gender; Partition(s) Space, place and temporality
  • Purdah, privacy and public discourse
  • Marriage, family, and domesticity
  • Technology; social media; cybercrime
  • Sair: narratives of travel, cosmopolitanism and mobility
  • ‘Modern’ Muslim women; self-fashioning in the age of empire
  • Sharif Ladki: reform, education and girlhood
  • Zaat: intersections of caste and gender in South Asian Islam
  • Begumati Zubaan: gender and multilingualism
We invite established academics and early-career/PhD scholars within the fields of humanities and social sciences, and outside of these realms, as well as non-academic voices working on and representing Muslim women’s perspectives with reference to South Asia to present 20-minute papers, mixed-media presentations or any other forms of discussion on or around the above themes. Please send 300 word abstracts/presentation outlines including a short biography of not more than 100 words to tasavvurcollective@gmail.com. The deadline for submission of abstracts is 1st July 2022, and selected participants will be contacted with the final schedule by 15th July 2022. The symposium will be held online via Zoom on 5th-6th August 2022. Symposium organisers: Fatima Z. Naveed (University of Exeter), Sheelalipi Sahana (University of Edinburgh) and Zehra Kazmi (University of St. Andrews) of the Tasavvur Collective. Follow us on Twitter: @tasavvurcollect for updates. *

On (Re)Shaping Identity: Self-Portraiture and the Quotidian

PAMLA 2022 – Los Angeles, CA (November 11-13, 2022 – entirely in-person deadline for submissions:  July 1, 2022 Please contact presiding officer for this session, Ariana Lyriotakis, with any questions: lyriotaa@tcd.ie Special Session – CFP Persona and confessional poetry of the Postmodern period enact an undeniable relationship with the quotidian. But how do these poems explore a visual depiction and an expression of self-identity in ordinary life? This panel will explore the methods by which poets manipulate and reject aesthetic production in their poetry, while calling into question subjectivity and truthful composition. This special session will explore poetic self-portraiture and the shaping of identity within the bounds of the quotidian. John Ashbery’s “Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror” is perhaps one of the more notable examples from this era; as a poetry firmly situated within the intermediality of poetic textual images and art, he addresses “the enchant of self with self” through personal depiction and aesthetic production. But what is revealed to the reader in these moments of vulnerability and self-appraisal? How can the poet be both subject and object, while constructing a poetic likeness amongst the commonplace? This panel seeks poetry of self-encounter, whether banal or familiar, to interrogate an inward/outward representation of the self within these constructs. Contributions are invited relating to any of the following aspects, as well as broader interpretations of the theme which may illuminate and elucidate in greater detail. Please be in touch if you have any questions or require further clarification.
  • Depictions of the domestic and the visual
  • Intermediality of poetic textual images and art
  • Interrogations of the actual and the self
  • Orality and performance in poetry
  • Visuality of text and experimentation
  • Mimesis and the composition of ordinary spaces
  • Interdeterminacy and temporality
Abstracts must be submitted through the PAMLA website only. The web address for this session’s CFP is: https://pamla.ballastacademic.com/Home/S/18564 All panel participants/presenters must join PAMLA by July 1, 2022. https://pamla.ballastacademic.com CALL FOR PAPERS:  LIFE WRITING AS WORLD LITERATURE (book) Deadline for abstracts: July 1, 2022 Deadline for final essays: January 1, 2023 The series Literatures as World Literature by Bloomsbury Publishing aims to “take a novel approach to world literature by analyzing specific constellations — according to language, nation, form, or theme — of literary texts and authors in their own world-literary dimensions.” https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/series/literatures-as-world-literature/ The proposed volume will be dedicated to life writing. We use “life writing” as a broad term encompassing a wide variety of personal narratives. We also recognize the capaciousness of the term “world literature” and the accompanying challenges. By putting life writing and world literature into dialogue, we seek to explore their rich shared history, as well as new areas of research. Authors are encouraged to explore, among others the intersecting histories of the two fields debates in world literature concerning auto/biographical genres autobiographical texts outside the Western canons (East Asia, Latin America, Northern Africa, Middle East) autobiographical works as they move in translation through global contexts autobiographical works as they move across time and media (remediation, intermediality, etc.) the role of materiality in life writing visual narratives, new media, affective networks, and the role of life writing in participatory democracy autobiographical texts in “world literature” courses and in cultural diplomacy the role of autobiographical texts in eco or medical humanities the homogenizing effects of autobiographical technology and data bias Please submit abstracts of 350 words, along with a short bio, to the Editors: Helga Lenart-Cheng (hl4@stmarys-ca.edu) and Ioana Luca (ioana.luca@ntnu.edu.tw) by July 1, 2022. Helga Lenart-Cheng Associate Professor World Languages and Cultures Honors Program, Director Saint Mary’s College of California Book office hours here Forthcoming in 2022: Story Revolutions: Collective Narratives from the Enlightenment to the Digital Age *

Tasavvur Collective’s 2022 Symposium – ‘Writing Muslim Women in South Asia’

deadline for submissions:  July 1, 2022 Tasavvur Collective, Universities of Edinburgh, St. Andrews and Exeter contact email: Tasavvurcollective@gmail.com Symposium Concept Note and Call for Papers From the Aurat March in Pakistan to the Shaheen Bagh protests in India, Muslim women have been at the forefront of political change and social upheaval, both in recent years and in the past. With Bangladeshi lawyer Sara Hossain as the recipient of the International Women of Courage Award in 2016 for reforming legislation on violence against women and Arooj Aftab as the first Pakistani woman to win a Grammy in 2022, these achievements are also not limited to any single sphere of cultural influence. And yet, the dominant narrative surrounding the experiences of Muslim women continues to focus on the oppressions they have faced, with little to no consideration given to the way they have overcome these challenges. As such, the category of ‘Muslim Woman’ has been essentialised in ethonographic, Orientalist and neo-liberal discourses since it began to be ‘studied’, a narrative that scholars and activists alike are seeking to challenge more and more every day. This essentialist discourse was recently highlighted across South Asia, thus proving the necessity of challenging such narratives. On March 15th 2022, the Karnataka High Court in India upheld a government order to deny entry to Muslim women who wear the hijab into educational institutions by ruling that the “hijab is not essential to Islam”. Two separate incidents of auctioning Muslim women online for ‘deals’ were reported within 8 months of each other between 2021-22 and the perpetrators of both were let off by the Delhi High Court on “humanitarian grounds”. In Sri Lanka, a similar anti-Muslim sentiment has been reverberating through the appeals of Buddhist monk group Bodu Bala Sena (BSS) to ban the burqa as a “sign of religious extremism”. Across the border in Pakistan, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) organised a ‘Hijab March’ in solidarity with the Muslim women in Karnataka in February 2022. Rather than focusing on freedom of choice, party leaders used the opportunity to take a stance against the Aurat March, an annual demonstration for women’s rights held across Pakistan on 8th March to coincide with International Women’s Day. Aurat March was, and is, constantly accused of violating haya (modesty), with particular reference made to“objectionable slogans” such as #MeraJismMeriMarzi. There is a long and often neglected history of Muslim women intervening in debates about ‘reform’, decolonisation and citizenship to assert their own interests and identities, pioneering the rise of feminist scholarship and activism in South Asia. From Begum Rokeya Sakhawat Hosain to Kamila Shamsie, one can trace a history of Muslim women writers and thinkers who have fundamentally altered contemporary literary and political discourse. A careful examination of these narratives surrounding Muslim women’s intellectual and political existence validates the significant work of scholars like Shenila Khoja-Moolji and Yasmin Saikia, who have argued that attempts to emancipate Muslim women have had to contend with simultaneously imposing uniform, majoritarian models of femininity– whether it is colonial modernity or orthodox religiosity. Navigating these binaries of emancipation and oppression, Muslim women have carved their own identities to interrogate and subvert these categorisations. This symposium is an attempt to bring together scholars, thinkers, artists and activists to create such a discursive space for a timely conversation on Muslim women’s pasts and present. Each of our panels foregrounds the agential capacity of Muslim women in writing themselves and others, as they contend with shifting dynamics of race, ethnicity, gender, class, and caste, within and with relation to South Asia. This symposium hopes to disrupt the essentializing discourse on Muslim women’s identity by exploring the polyphonic nature of human subjectivities. Discussion topics may include but are not limited to:
  • Narratives of gender, sexuality and queerness Agency and artistic expression in Muslim women
  • Protest, resistance, and activism
  • Nationalism, nation and gender; Partition(s) Space, place and temporality
  • Purdah, privacy and public discourse
  • Marriage, family, and domesticity
  • Technology; social media; cybercrime
  • Sair: narratives of travel, cosmopolitanism and mobility
  • ‘Modern’ Muslim women; self-fashioning in the age of empire
  • Sharif Ladki: reform, education and girlhood
  • Zaat: intersections of caste and gender in South Asian Islam
  • Begumati Zubaan: gender and multilingualism
We invite established academics and early-career/PhD scholars within the fields of humanities and social sciences, and outside of these realms, as well as non-academic voices working on and representing Muslim women’s perspectives with reference to South Asia to present 20-minute papers, mixed-media presentations or any other forms of discussion on or around the above themes. Please send 300 word abstracts/presentation outlines including a short biography of not more than 100 words to tasavvurcollective@gmail.com. The deadline for submission of abstracts is 1st July 2022, and selected participants will be contacted with the final schedule by 15th July 2022. The symposium will be held online via Zoom on 5th-6th August 2022. Symposium organisers: Fatima Z. Naveed (University of Exeter), Sheelalipi Sahana (University of Edinburgh) and Zehra Kazmi (University of St. Andrews) of the Tasavvur Collective. Follow us on Twitter: @tasavvurcollect for updates.

 *

Deadline for Submissions: July 1, 2022

Reimagining #MeToo in South Asia And the Diaspora (Edited Collection of Essays)

Dr. Nidhi Shrivastava contact email: shrivastavan@sacredheart.edu This edited volume seeks to examine how sexual violence and feminist interventions in South Asia and the Diaspora have been articulated in the context of but, more importantly, in opposition to the #MeToo Movement. We seek to understand how the feminist movement has radically diverged from the assimilationist discourse of the #MeToo Movement and, consequently, the Global North. The #MeToo movement has not made an impact at the grassroots level because it is hinged on the victim-survivor to speak up. In an era where the Global North has been a model for influencing change in the Global South, there has been an inconspicuous absence of recognition and impact of the #MeToo Movement. In addition, survivors’ testimonies lie at the center of the #MeToo movement, which demystifies victim-shaming and victim-blaming, legitimizing the survivor’s testimony as the unquestionable truth. Since 2017, the #MeToo movement has been successful in the conviction of Harvey Weinstein, who was at the center of the landmark trial. The #MeToo has had a significant impact worldwide on how we understand sexual harassment, rape, and gendered violence, especially in the US. However, this global women’s movement has had little reach in South Asia, where access to virtual platforms is limited, and hashtags are still unknown. The #MeToo Movement in South Asia and the Diaspora was taken up briefly by the media and entertainment industry but has failed to make a concrete impact in many ways. This can be attributed to multiple reasons – there are several regionally specific movements, such as the 2009 Pink Chaddi Campaign and 2011 #WhyLoiter campaign, that have been radically popular within the sub-continent. In the South Asian context, such testimonies are still taboo, which leads to survivors refusing to share and relive their experiences/narratives even if they have the means and access. Therefore, our edited volume seeks to problematize the #MeToo movement in order to reimagine and contextualize it in South Asia and the South Asian diaspora as a much-needed intervention to examine the implications of a transnational feminist movement. We wish to explore questions such as: how the #MeToo movement can move away from Hollywood/Bollywood/workplace and elitist exclusivity. How can it be more inclusive of non-white and marginalized voices? In light of the ongoing and increasing gender-based violence occurring in South Asia and the diaspora, our edited volume will reflect on these questions as we seek to understand new ways of formulating complex and nuanced gendered subjectivities vis-à-vis the lens of post-colonial feminism and intersectionality. Our focus shifts away from the traditional approaches of victimization to generate dialogue and hopefully create a new platform to break the silence and encourage discomforting narratives to normalize conversations surrounding this pivotal issue. Themes include but are not limited to the following:
  • Pedagogy and Transformative Learning via #MeToo in the Classroom
  • Queer/LGBTQI+ Spaces within #MeToo
  • New Masculinities
  • Contemporary Gender Movements and Resistances
  • Caste, Gender, Class, and Social Spaces
  • Problematization of #MeToo and ‘Speaking Up’
  • New Modalities of Testimonies
  • Resistance and Digital Feminist Interventions
  • New Feminist Mediations
  • Militarized Feminist Modernities
  • Ageism
  • Viral Videos
  • Censorship, Cultural Production, and Minority Literature
  • Mythologies, Legends, and Sexuality
We welcome informal queries, and potential contributors may submit a 500-750 word abstract and 2 page CV by July 1, 2022. Please direct queries to Dr Nidhi Shrivastava (Sacred Heart University), shrivastavan@sacredheart.edu, Dr Ruma Sinha (Syracuse University), rumas1@gmail.com, and Dr Billie T. Guarino (Jamia Milia Islamia), thoidingjam@gmail.com. Acceptance of the final articles is subject to double-blind peer review. The final deadline for submitting 5,000- 6,000-word articles will be November 15, 2022. * Deadline for Submissions June 30, 2022 Representations of Border Crossings in Media, Literature, and the Arts International Academic Conference:15-16 December 2022 MIDEX Centre, University of Central Lancashire (Research Strand: Representations of Migration, Diaspora and Exile in Media, Literature, and Art) CALL FOR PAPERS Border crossings delineate movement from a place, nation, and culture, inter alia, to another. Border crossers, Jane Jackson (2014) writes, can move temporarily or permanently, and crossings can be forced or voluntary, successful or unsuccessful, contemporary or historical. They can lead to multicultural identity formations, or to experiences and feelings of exclusion and isolation (Martin and Nakayama 2008). Because they are embodied experiences, they are determined by race, ethnicity, citizenship status, religion and gender, as well as by biopolitical and necropolitical practices, particularly, when deemed ‘irregular.’ Representations of border crossings play a key role in media, literature, visual, as well as performance arts. Historical and contemporary border crossings form a core segment of literary and artistic production as shown by the publication of literary and graphic migration narratives, museum exhibitions, installations in galleries and open public spaces, and via dance, music and theatre performances (Viljoen 2013). At the same time, representations of contemporary ‘irregular’ border crossings foreground the injurious implications of border control practices, as well as media responsibilities of a ‘crisis’ (Chouliaraki and Stolic 2017). For this conference, we invite papers that explore representations of border crossings in media, literature, and the arts. We seek to examine the kinds of narratives that can be told through media, artistic and literary attempts to speak about border-crossing subjects. We hope to determine the extent to which such representations cross borders themselves by being exposed to culturally different audiences (Friedman 2005). We further mean to investigate how border-crossing ‘selves’ and ‘others’, collective, or individual, become displayed in such representations and whether hegemonic, (neo-)colonial hierarchies become undone or reproduced through them. How can a person in the position of the ‘host,’ for instance, ‘imagine another without doing violence to [their] object of description’ (Black 2010: 1)? How can representations of liminal, border-crossing subjects disrupt narratives of modernity/coloniality (Schimanski and Wolfe 2013; Mignolo 2011)? Can such representations show ‘how changing perceptions of borders relate to shifting aesthetic practices’ (Wolfe 2014: 1; Schimanski and Wolfe 2007)? How do they illustrate that ‘as the border crosser crosses the border, new […] borders are created and crossed in the crosser’s own story, and in the story of the border itself’ (Schimanski 2006: 47)? What are the strategies that would enable nuanced interpretations of such representations (see Schimanski and Wolfe 2017)? We call for researchers and practitioners to submit proposals of up to 250 words for 20-minute presentations exploring border-crossings in literature, media and the arts. We also invite creative practitioners to submit performances, readings, (video) installations, and exhibitions, inter alia. The themes that can be explored include, but are not limited to: • Exilic, diasporic, migrant, refugee, and asylum-seeking border crossers • Border-crossing, gender, and sexuality • Decolonial and postcolonial border-crossings • Border-crossing traumas • Border-crossing memories • Affective border-crossings • Border-crossing as an opportunity • Metaphorical, cultural, and linguistic border crossings Please submit your proposals to bordercrossing@uclan.ac.uk by 30th of June, 2022. References: Black, S. (2010), Fiction Across Borders: Imagining the Lives of Others in Late-Twentieth Century Fiction, New York : Columbia University Press. Chouliaraki, L. and T. Stolic (2017), ‘Rethinking Media Responsibility in the Refugee “Crisis:” A Visual Typology of European News’, Media, Culture & Society, 39(8):1162-77. Friedman, S. S. (2005), ‘Spatial Poetics and Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things’, in J. Phelan and P. J. Rabinowitz (eds), A Companion to Narrative Theory, 192-205, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Jackson, J. (2014), Introducing Language and Intercultural Communication, London: Routledge. Martin, J.N. and Nakayama, T.K. (2008), Experiencing Intercultural Communication: An Introduction, New York: McGraw-Hill. Mignolo, D. W. (2011), The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options, New York: Duke University Press. Schimanski, J. (2006), ‘Crossing and Reading: Notes towards a Theory and Method’, Nordlit, 19: 41-63. Schimanski, J. and S. Wolfe (2007), ‘Entry Points: An Introduction’ in J. Schimanski and S. Wolfe (eds), Border Poetics De-Limited, 9-26, Hannover: Wehrhahn Verlag. ____. (2013), ‘The Aesthetics of Borders’, in K. Aukrust (ed), Assigning Cultural Values, 235-250, Frankfurt: Peter Lang. ____. eds. (2017), Border Aesthetics: Concepts and Intersections, New York: Berghahn. Viljoen, H., ed. (2013), Crossing Borders, Dissolving Boundaries, Amsterdam: Rodopi. Wolfe, S. (2014), ‘Border Aesthetics/Border Works’, Nordlit, 31:1-5. * “’My strength, my comfort, my intense delight’: Women, Art and Lifewriting in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.” Universities Art Association of Canada annual conference Oct 27-29, University of Toronto. Deadline for abstracts: June 30. Like her contemporary Eugène Delacroix, British watercolourist Elizabeth Murray left the “West” in the early 1800s for the “Orient,” recording her adventures in extensive writings and images. However, while Delacroix’s journals and notebooks became widely celebrated, Murray’s account slid into obscurity—even though Delacroix’s journey lasted only six months and generated two articles, while Murray’s time in the region prompted her two-volume autobiography Sixteen Years of an Artist’s Life in Morocco, Spain, and the Canary Islands. Moreover, accounts by other women from that century—Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun; Elizabeth Butler—similarly languished, creating the sense that this era’s female artists neither left home nor published autobiographies. This panel aims to explode this misapprehension by convening discussions of lifewriting by women artists of the 1800s and earlier. We welcome proposals regarding all lifewriting forms (e.g. diaries, letters), with particular interest in accounts originating outside normative “Western” narratives, and/or regarding now-obscure autobiographies. Per standard practice, you need to join UAAC if your paper is accepted – but you don’t need to join to submit a proposal. Questions? creeve@ocadu.ca Application process and full conference CFP here. Charles Reeve OCAD University Chair, Liberal Studies Faculty of Arts & Science * CALL FOR PAPERS North-American Novelists’ Autobiographical Acts: Nonfictional Disruptions Aix-Marseilles University, 6/7 July 2023 Organizers: Sophie Vallas (Aix-Marseilles University, LERMA), Arnaud Schmitt (University of Bordeaux, CLIMAS) Deadline for Submissions June 30, 2022 Addressing the topic of autobiographical texts or memoirs published by novelists, what she calls “the literary writer’s autobiography,” Laura Marcus underlines that the reader’s awareness of the name and reputation of the author immediately confers a certain literary status on the autobiographical text: “Not all autobiographers are writers by profession, though there is a widespread assumption that the literary writer’s autobiography best defines the genre.” Far from the host of confessional memoirs, either by celebrities or unknown authors, a publishing phenomenon identified by Rockwell Gray as a “memoir boom” in his 1982 article “Autobiography Now,” and far from so-called autobiographical novels or autofictions which, according to Maurice Couturier, allowed many writers to “smuggle their own autobiographies,” this conference will focus on autobiographical texts—paratextually and unequivocally identified as such—published by American novelists, on “the literary writer’s autobiography” in other words, and on their influence on the perception of the overall work of their author. We will wonder how autobiographical acts happen, when they happen, in a career dominated by fiction, what their links with the fictional part of the work are or why they are often perceived as minor texts among a fictional body of major ones. Also, do they conjure up specific writing techniques, a separate creative space? The disruption caused by autobiographical texts in a literary work mostly devoted to the writing of fiction raises several questions concerning the artistic logic underlying them, the way they are embedded in the complete oeuvre of the author and the editorial and paratextual choices made for their publication. It often seems logical that authors should turn to life writing at the end of their career, an introspective act embracing their whole life, revisiting their own work. Mark Twain, who published a few chapters of his autobiography in the years prior to his death, decided nevertheless that its publication would be a posthumous act, a hundred years after his death more precisely (The Autobiography of Mark Twain, 2010). Other texts, also published late in their authors’ life, focus on the death of a relative or a friend while offering authors the opportunity to reflect on their own life, inexorably drawing to a close: Joan Didion’s autobiographical diptych, The Year of the Magical Thinking in 2005 (simultaneously mourning the death and celebrating the life of her husband, John Dunne) and Blue Nights in 2011 (doing the same for Didion’s adopted daughter, Quintana, who died in 2005), belongs to this crepuscular tradition in which writing almost amounts to issuing legal, performative acts standing for marriage, adoption, death. Such is also the case for Philip Roth’s Patrimony (1991). Conversely, some autobiographical texts herald the birth of an author: Paul Auster’s The Invention of Solitude (1982) delivered, in prose, the new voice of a poet and essayist who, from then on, would dedicate his career as a novelist to developing and fictionalizing many topics already present in this seminal memoir. Auster has gone on regularly publishing autobiographical narratives, each time revisiting his life from a different angle and adding new acts to the play of his life (The Red Notebook, 1995; Hand to Mouth, 1997; Winter Journal, 2012; Report from the Interior, 2013). For other autobiographical texts, what is at stake is less the moment when they get written, either at the beginning or at the end of a career, than their capacity of exploring the very art of their authors. In that case, they tend to exist as so many comments on the fictional works which they occasionally revisit. Joyce Carol Oates, for instance, has kept on analyzing the act of writing throughout the years ((Woman) Writer: Occasions and Opportunities, 1974; The Faith of a Writer: Life, Craft, Art, 2003; A Widow’s Story. A Memoir, 2011; The Lost Landscape. A Writer’s Coming of Age, 2015). At the very opposite of Oates’ regular autobiographical practice, James Salter’s Burning the Days (1997) stands as a unique autobiographical text in a body of work otherwise entirely devoted to fiction, almost like a faulty act, even if the volume sounds like Salter’s powerful novels in terms of structure and voice, much to the delight of his readers. On the other hand, certain autobiographical texts, just like Richard Wright’s Black Boy (1945) for instance, can be seen as irreversible acts which eclipse the author’s fictional production. Philippe Lejeune once regretted that “the dirty habit of publishing diaries has resulted into most people writing their privacy while decked out in their very best attire.” Is a novelist, and even more so an established one, not tempted, indeed, to write their autobiography in their best array, drifting away from spontaneous, supposedly authentic autobiographical acts which tend to be nowadays published on social networks? Autobiography indeed involves an element of risk and exposure since it may, whether purposefully or not, allow the reader to get a behind-the-scenes look at the making of fiction, and thus disrupt the construction of the figure of the author. Proposals may address, among other issues, the following: – The origin of the autobiographical act in a novelist’s career – The minor works/major works dialectics. – Stylistic specificities of autobiographical narratives versus fictional texts – The balance in an author’s oeuvre, and more specifically the place occupied by the autobiographical texts in the overall work – The reception of the autobiographical texts, often isolated or unknown – The dialogue between fictional and non-fictional texts within a work (Laura Marcus: “The literary writer’s autobiography also bears on, and frequently comments upon, his or her other works”) – The tools needed for analysis (similar, different?) to study the autobiographical texts – The persistence of a distance between the narrator and the author, even in an autobiographical text, similar to that embodied by the concept of implied narrator whose presence Jim Phelan, for example, detects even in referential texts such as Joan Didion’s The Year of MagicalThinking.

Tasavvur Collective’s 2022 Symposium – ‘Writing Muslim Women in South Asia’

deadline for submissions:  July 1, 2022 Symposium, 5-6 August, 2022 Tasavvur Collective, Universities of Edinburgh, St. Andrews and Exeter contact email: Tasavvurcollective@gmail.com Symposium Concept Note and Call for Papers From the Aurat March in Pakistan to the Shaheen Bagh protests in India, Muslim women have been at the forefront of political change and social upheaval, both in recent years and in the past. With Bangladeshi lawyer Sara Hossain as the recipient of the International Women of Courage Award in 2016 for reforming legislation on violence against women and Arooj Aftab as the first Pakistani woman to win a Grammy in 2022, these achievements are also not limited to any single sphere of cultural influence. And yet, the dominant narrative surrounding the experiences of Muslim women continues to focus on the oppressions they have faced, with little to no consideration given to the way they have overcome these challenges. As such, the category of ‘Muslim Woman’ has been essentialised in ethonographic, Orientalist and neo-liberal discourses since it began to be ‘studied’, a narrative that scholars and activists alike are seeking to challenge more and more every day. This essentialist discourse was recently highlighted across South Asia, thus proving the necessity of challenging such narratives. On March 15th 2022, the Karnataka High Court in India upheld a government order to deny entry to Muslim women who wear the hijab into educational institutions by ruling that the “hijab is not essential to Islam”. Two separate incidents of auctioning Muslim women online for ‘deals’ were reported within 8 months of each other between 2021-22 and the perpetrators of both were let off by the Delhi High Court on “humanitarian grounds”. In Sri Lanka, a similar anti-Muslim sentiment has been reverberating through the appeals of Buddhist monk group Bodu Bala Sena (BSS) to ban the burqa as a “sign of religious extremism”. Across the border in Pakistan, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) organised a ‘Hijab March’ in solidarity with the Muslim women in Karnataka in February 2022. Rather than focusing on freedom of choice, party leaders used the opportunity to take a stance against the Aurat March, an annual demonstration for women’s rights held across Pakistan on 8th March to coincide with International Women’s Day. Aurat March was, and is, constantly accused of violating haya (modesty), with particular reference made to“objectionable slogans” such as #MeraJismMeriMarzi. There is a long and often neglected history of Muslim women intervening in debates about ‘reform’, decolonisation and citizenship to assert their own interests and identities, pioneering the rise of feminist scholarship and activism in South Asia. From Begum Rokeya Sakhawat Hosain to Kamila Shamsie, one can trace a history of Muslim women writers and thinkers who have fundamentally altered contemporary literary and political discourse. A careful examination of these narratives surrounding Muslim women’s intellectual and political existence validates the significant work of scholars like Shenila Khoja-Moolji and Yasmin Saikia, who have argued that attempts to emancipate Muslim women have had to contend with simultaneously imposing uniform, majoritarian models of femininity– whether it is colonial modernity or orthodox religiosity. Navigating these binaries of emancipation and oppression, Muslim women have carved their own identities to interrogate and subvert these categorisations. This symposium is an attempt to bring together scholars, thinkers, artists and activists to create such a discursive space for a timely conversation on Muslim women’s pasts and present. Each of our panels foregrounds the agential capacity of Muslim women in writing themselves and others, as they contend with shifting dynamics of race, ethnicity, gender, class, and caste, within and with relation to South Asia. This symposium hopes to disrupt the essentializing discourse on Muslim women’s identity by exploring the polyphonic nature of human subjectivities. Discussion topics may include but are not limited to:
  • Narratives of gender, sexuality and queerness Agency and artistic expression in Muslim women
  • Protest, resistance, and activism
  • Nationalism, nation and gender; Partition(s) Space, place and temporality
  • Purdah, privacy and public discourse
  • Marriage, family, and domesticity
  • Technology; social media; cybercrime
  • Sair: narratives of travel, cosmopolitanism and mobility
  • ‘Modern’ Muslim women; self-fashioning in the age of empire
  • Sharif Ladki: reform, education and girlhood
  • Zaat: intersections of caste and gender in South Asian Islam
  • Begumati Zubaan: gender and multilingualism
We invite established academics and early-career/PhD scholars within the fields of humanities and social sciences, and outside of these realms, as well as non-academic voices working on and representing Muslim women’s perspectives with reference to South Asia to present 20-minute papers, mixed-media presentations or any other forms of discussion on or around the above themes. Please send 300 word abstracts/presentation outlines including a short biography of not more than 100 words to tasavvurcollective@gmail.com. The deadline for submission of abstracts is 1st July 2022, and selected participants will be contacted with the final schedule by 15th July 2022. The symposium will be held online via Zoom on 5th-6th August 2022. Symposium organisers: Fatima Z. Naveed (University of Exeter), Sheelalipi Sahana (University of Edinburgh) and Zehra Kazmi (University of St. Andrews) of the Tasavvur Collective. Follow us on Twitter: @tasavvurcollect for updates. *

On (Re)Shaping Identity: Self-Portraiture and the Quotidian

PAMLA 2022 – Los Angeles, CA (November 11-13, 2022 – entirely in-person deadline for submissions:  July 1, 2022 Please contact presiding officer for this session, Ariana Lyriotakis, with any questions: lyriotaa@tcd.ie Special Session – CFP Persona and confessional poetry of the Postmodern period enact an undeniable relationship with the quotidian. But how do these poems explore a visual depiction and an expression of self-identity in ordinary life? This panel will explore the methods by which poets manipulate and reject aesthetic production in their poetry, while calling into question subjectivity and truthful composition. This special session will explore poetic self-portraiture and the shaping of identity within the bounds of the quotidian. John Ashbery’s “Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror” is perhaps one of the more notable examples from this era; as a poetry firmly situated within the intermediality of poetic textual images and art, he addresses “the enchant of self with self” through personal depiction and aesthetic production. But what is revealed to the reader in these moments of vulnerability and self-appraisal? How can the poet be both subject and object, while constructing a poetic likeness amongst the commonplace? This panel seeks poetry of self-encounter, whether banal or familiar, to interrogate an inward/outward representation of the self within these constructs. Contributions are invited relating to any of the following aspects, as well as broader interpretations of the theme which may illuminate and elucidate in greater detail. Please be in touch if you have any questions or require further clarification.
  • Depictions of the domestic and the visual
  • Intermediality of poetic textual images and art
  • Interrogations of the actual and the self
  • Orality and performance in poetry
  • Visuality of text and experimentation
  • Mimesis and the composition of ordinary spaces
  • Interdeterminacy and temporality
Abstracts must be submitted through the PAMLA website only. The web address for this session’s CFP is: https://pamla.ballastacademic.com/Home/S/18564 All panel participants/presenters must join PAMLA by July 1, 2022. https://pamla.ballastacademic.com CALL FOR PAPERS:  LIFE WRITING AS WORLD LITERATURE (book) Deadline for abstracts: July 1, 2022 Deadline for final essays: January 1, 2023 The series Literatures as World Literature by Bloomsbury Publishing aims to “take a novel approach to world literature by analyzing specific constellations — according to language, nation, form, or theme — of literary texts and authors in their own world-literary dimensions.” https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/series/literatures-as-world-literature/ The proposed volume will be dedicated to life writing. We use “life writing” as a broad term encompassing a wide variety of personal narratives. We also recognize the capaciousness of the term “world literature” and the accompanying challenges. By putting life writing and world literature into dialogue, we seek to explore their rich shared history, as well as new areas of research. Authors are encouraged to explore, among others the intersecting histories of the two fields debates in world literature concerning auto/biographical genres autobiographical texts outside the Western canons (East Asia, Latin America, Northern Africa, Middle East) autobiographical works as they move in translation through global contexts autobiographical works as they move across time and media (remediation, intermediality, etc.) the role of materiality in life writing visual narratives, new media, affective networks, and the role of life writing in participatory democracy autobiographical texts in “world literature” courses and in cultural diplomacy the role of autobiographical texts in eco or medical humanities the homogenizing effects of autobiographical technology and data bias Please submit abstracts of 350 words, along with a short bio, to the Editors: Helga Lenart-Cheng (hl4@stmarys-ca.edu) and Ioana Luca (ioana.luca@ntnu.edu.tw) by July 1, 2022. Helga Lenart-Cheng Associate Professor World Languages and Cultures Honors Program, Director Saint Mary’s College of California Book office hours here Forthcoming in 2022: Story Revolutions: Collective Narratives from the Enlightenment to the Digital Age *

Tasavvur Collective’s 2022 Symposium – ‘Writing Muslim Women in South Asia’

deadline for submissions:  July 1, 2022 Tasavvur Collective, Universities of Edinburgh, St. Andrews and Exeter contact email: Tasavvurcollective@gmail.com Symposium Concept Note and Call for Papers From the Aurat March in Pakistan to the Shaheen Bagh protests in India, Muslim women have been at the forefront of political change and social upheaval, both in recent years and in the past. With Bangladeshi lawyer Sara Hossain as the recipient of the International Women of Courage Award in 2016 for reforming legislation on violence against women and Arooj Aftab as the first Pakistani woman to win a Grammy in 2022, these achievements are also not limited to any single sphere of cultural influence. And yet, the dominant narrative surrounding the experiences of Muslim women continues to focus on the oppressions they have faced, with little to no consideration given to the way they have overcome these challenges. As such, the category of ‘Muslim Woman’ has been essentialised in ethonographic, Orientalist and neo-liberal discourses since it began to be ‘studied’, a narrative that scholars and activists alike are seeking to challenge more and more every day. This essentialist discourse was recently highlighted across South Asia, thus proving the necessity of challenging such narratives. On March 15th 2022, the Karnataka High Court in India upheld a government order to deny entry to Muslim women who wear the hijab into educational institutions by ruling that the “hijab is not essential to Islam”. Two separate incidents of auctioning Muslim women online for ‘deals’ were reported within 8 months of each other between 2021-22 and the perpetrators of both were let off by the Delhi High Court on “humanitarian grounds”. In Sri Lanka, a similar anti-Muslim sentiment has been reverberating through the appeals of Buddhist monk group Bodu Bala Sena (BSS) to ban the burqa as a “sign of religious extremism”. Across the border in Pakistan, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) organised a ‘Hijab March’ in solidarity with the Muslim women in Karnataka in February 2022. Rather than focusing on freedom of choice, party leaders used the opportunity to take a stance against the Aurat March, an annual demonstration for women’s rights held across Pakistan on 8th March to coincide with International Women’s Day. Aurat March was, and is, constantly accused of violating haya (modesty), with particular reference made to“objectionable slogans” such as #MeraJismMeriMarzi. There is a long and often neglected history of Muslim women intervening in debates about ‘reform’, decolonisation and citizenship to assert their own interests and identities, pioneering the rise of feminist scholarship and activism in South Asia. From Begum Rokeya Sakhawat Hosain to Kamila Shamsie, one can trace a history of Muslim women writers and thinkers who have fundamentally altered contemporary literary and political discourse. A careful examination of these narratives surrounding Muslim women’s intellectual and political existence validates the significant work of scholars like Shenila Khoja-Moolji and Yasmin Saikia, who have argued that attempts to emancipate Muslim women have had to contend with simultaneously imposing uniform, majoritarian models of femininity– whether it is colonial modernity or orthodox religiosity. Navigating these binaries of emancipation and oppression, Muslim women have carved their own identities to interrogate and subvert these categorisations. This symposium is an attempt to bring together scholars, thinkers, artists and activists to create such a discursive space for a timely conversation on Muslim women’s pasts and present. Each of our panels foregrounds the agential capacity of Muslim women in writing themselves and others, as they contend with shifting dynamics of race, ethnicity, gender, class, and caste, within and with relation to South Asia. This symposium hopes to disrupt the essentializing discourse on Muslim women’s identity by exploring the polyphonic nature of human subjectivities. Discussion topics may include but are not limited to:
  • Narratives of gender, sexuality and queerness Agency and artistic expression in Muslim women
  • Protest, resistance, and activism
  • Nationalism, nation and gender; Partition(s) Space, place and temporality
  • Purdah, privacy and public discourse
  • Marriage, family, and domesticity
  • Technology; social media; cybercrime
  • Sair: narratives of travel, cosmopolitanism and mobility
  • ‘Modern’ Muslim women; self-fashioning in the age of empire
  • Sharif Ladki: reform, education and girlhood
  • Zaat: intersections of caste and gender in South Asian Islam
  • Begumati Zubaan: gender and multilingualism
We invite established academics and early-career/PhD scholars within the fields of humanities and social sciences, and outside of these realms, as well as non-academic voices working on and representing Muslim women’s perspectives with reference to South Asia to present 20-minute papers, mixed-media presentations or any other forms of discussion on or around the above themes. Please send 300 word abstracts/presentation outlines including a short biography of not more than 100 words to tasavvurcollective@gmail.com. The deadline for submission of abstracts is 1st July 2022, and selected participants will be contacted with the final schedule by 15th July 2022. The symposium will be held online via Zoom on 5th-6th August 2022. Symposium organisers: Fatima Z. Naveed (University of Exeter), Sheelalipi Sahana (University of Edinburgh) and Zehra Kazmi (University of St. Andrews) of the Tasavvur Collective. Follow us on Twitter: @tasavvurcollect for updates.

 *

Deadline for Submissions: July 1, 2022

Reimagining #MeToo in South Asia And the Diaspora (Edited Collection of Essays)

Dr. Nidhi Shrivastava contact email: shrivastavan@sacredheart.edu This edited volume seeks to examine how sexual violence and feminist interventions in South Asia and the Diaspora have been articulated in the context of but, more importantly, in opposition to the #MeToo Movement. We seek to understand how the feminist movement has radically diverged from the assimilationist discourse of the #MeToo Movement and, consequently, the Global North. The #MeToo movement has not made an impact at the grassroots level because it is hinged on the victim-survivor to speak up. In an era where the Global North has been a model for influencing change in the Global South, there has been an inconspicuous absence of recognition and impact of the #MeToo Movement. In addition, survivors’ testimonies lie at the center of the #MeToo movement, which demystifies victim-shaming and victim-blaming, legitimizing the survivor’s testimony as the unquestionable truth. Since 2017, the #MeToo movement has been successful in the conviction of Harvey Weinstein, who was at the center of the landmark trial. The #MeToo has had a significant impact worldwide on how we understand sexual harassment, rape, and gendered violence, especially in the US. However, this global women’s movement has had little reach in South Asia, where access to virtual platforms is limited, and hashtags are still unknown. The #MeToo Movement in South Asia and the Diaspora was taken up briefly by the media and entertainment industry but has failed to make a concrete impact in many ways. This can be attributed to multiple reasons – there are several regionally specific movements, such as the 2009 Pink Chaddi Campaign and 2011 #WhyLoiter campaign, that have been radically popular within the sub-continent. In the South Asian context, such testimonies are still taboo, which leads to survivors refusing to share and relive their experiences/narratives even if they have the means and access. Therefore, our edited volume seeks to problematize the #MeToo movement in order to reimagine and contextualize it in South Asia and the South Asian diaspora as a much-needed intervention to examine the implications of a transnational feminist movement. We wish to explore questions such as: how the #MeToo movement can move away from Hollywood/Bollywood/workplace and elitist exclusivity. How can it be more inclusive of non-white and marginalized voices? In light of the ongoing and increasing gender-based violence occurring in South Asia and the diaspora, our edited volume will reflect on these questions as we seek to understand new ways of formulating complex and nuanced gendered subjectivities vis-à-vis the lens of post-colonial feminism and intersectionality. Our focus shifts away from the traditional approaches of victimization to generate dialogue and hopefully create a new platform to break the silence and encourage discomforting narratives to normalize conversations surrounding this pivotal issue. Themes include but are not limited to the following:
  • Pedagogy and Transformative Learning via #MeToo in the Classroom
  • Queer/LGBTQI+ Spaces within #MeToo
  • New Masculinities
  • Contemporary Gender Movements and Resistances
  • Caste, Gender, Class, and Social Spaces
  • Problematization of #MeToo and ‘Speaking Up’
  • New Modalities of Testimonies
  • Resistance and Digital Feminist Interventions
  • New Feminist Mediations
  • Militarized Feminist Modernities
  • Ageism
  • Viral Videos
  • Censorship, Cultural Production, and Minority Literature
  • Mythologies, Legends, and Sexuality
We welcome informal queries, and potential contributors may submit a 500-750 word abstract and 2 page CV by July 1, 2022. Please direct queries to Dr Nidhi Shrivastava (Sacred Heart University), shrivastavan@sacredheart.edu, Dr Ruma Sinha (Syracuse University), rumas1@gmail.com, and Dr Billie T. Guarino (Jamia Milia Islamia), thoidingjam@gmail.com. Acceptance of the final articles is subject to double-blind peer review. The final deadline for submitting 5,000- 6,000-word articles will be November 15, 2022. Deadline for Submissions June 30, 2022 Representations of Border Crossings in Media, Literature, and the Arts International Academic Conference:15-16 December 2022 MIDEX Centre, University of Central Lancashire (Research Strand: Representations of Migration, Diaspora and Exile in Media, Literature, and Art) CALL FOR PAPERS Border crossings delineate movement from a place, nation, and culture, inter alia, to another. Border crossers, Jane Jackson (2014) writes, can move temporarily or permanently, and crossings can be forced or voluntary, successful or unsuccessful, contemporary or historical. They can lead to multicultural identity formations, or to experiences and feelings of exclusion and isolation (Martin and Nakayama 2008). Because they are embodied experiences, they are determined by race, ethnicity, citizenship status, religion and gender, as well as by biopolitical and necropolitical practices, particularly, when deemed ‘irregular.’ Representations of border crossings play a key role in media, literature, visual, as well as performance arts. Historical and contemporary border crossings form a core segment of literary and artistic production as shown by the publication of literary and graphic migration narratives, museum exhibitions, installations in galleries and open public spaces, and via dance, music and theatre performances (Viljoen 2013). At the same time, representations of contemporary ‘irregular’ border crossings foreground the injurious implications of border control practices, as well as media responsibilities of a ‘crisis’ (Chouliaraki and Stolic 2017). For this conference, we invite papers that explore representations of border crossings in media, literature, and the arts. We seek to examine the kinds of narratives that can be told through media, artistic and literary attempts to speak about border-crossing subjects. We hope to determine the extent to which such representations cross borders themselves by being exposed to culturally different audiences (Friedman 2005). We further mean to investigate how border-crossing ‘selves’ and ‘others’, collective, or individual, become displayed in such representations and whether hegemonic, (neo-)colonial hierarchies become undone or reproduced through them. How can a person in the position of the ‘host,’ for instance, ‘imagine another without doing violence to [their] object of description’ (Black 2010: 1)? How can representations of liminal, border-crossing subjects disrupt narratives of modernity/coloniality (Schimanski and Wolfe 2013; Mignolo 2011)? Can such representations show ‘how changing perceptions of borders relate to shifting aesthetic practices’ (Wolfe 2014: 1; Schimanski and Wolfe 2007)? How do they illustrate that ‘as the border crosser crosses the border, new […] borders are created and crossed in the crosser’s own story, and in the story of the border itself’ (Schimanski 2006: 47)? What are the strategies that would enable nuanced interpretations of such representations (see Schimanski and Wolfe 2017)? We call for researchers and practitioners to submit proposals of up to 250 words for 20-minute presentations exploring border-crossings in literature, media and the arts. We also invite creative practitioners to submit performances, readings, (video) installations, and exhibitions, inter alia. The themes that can be explored include, but are not limited to: • Exilic, diasporic, migrant, refugee, and asylum-seeking border crossers • Border-crossing, gender, and sexuality • Decolonial and postcolonial border-crossings • Border-crossing traumas • Border-crossing memories • Affective border-crossings • Border-crossing as an opportunity • Metaphorical, cultural, and linguistic border crossings Please submit your proposals to bordercrossing@uclan.ac.uk by 30th of June, 2022. References: Black, S. (2010), Fiction Across Borders: Imagining the Lives of Others in Late-Twentieth Century Fiction, New York : Columbia University Press. Chouliaraki, L. and T. Stolic (2017), ‘Rethinking Media Responsibility in the Refugee “Crisis:” A Visual Typology of European News’, Media, Culture & Society, 39(8):1162-77. Friedman, S. S. (2005), ‘Spatial Poetics and Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things’, in J. Phelan and P. J. Rabinowitz (eds), A Companion to Narrative Theory, 192-205, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Jackson, J. (2014), Introducing Language and Intercultural Communication, London: Routledge. Martin, J.N. and Nakayama, T.K. (2008), Experiencing Intercultural Communication: An Introduction, New York: McGraw-Hill. Mignolo, D. W. (2011), The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options, New York: Duke University Press. Schimanski, J. (2006), ‘Crossing and Reading: Notes towards a Theory and Method’, Nordlit, 19: 41-63. Schimanski, J. and S. Wolfe (2007), ‘Entry Points: An Introduction’ in J. Schimanski and S. Wolfe (eds), Border Poetics De-Limited, 9-26, Hannover: Wehrhahn Verlag. ____. (2013), ‘The Aesthetics of Borders’, in K. Aukrust (ed), Assigning Cultural Values, 235-250, Frankfurt: Peter Lang. ____. eds. (2017), Border Aesthetics: Concepts and Intersections, New York: Berghahn. Viljoen, H., ed. (2013), Crossing Borders, Dissolving Boundaries, Amsterdam: Rodopi. Wolfe, S. (2014), ‘Border Aesthetics/Border Works’, Nordlit, 31:1-5. * “’My strength, my comfort, my intense delight’: Women, Art and Lifewriting in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries.” Universities Art Association of Canada annual conference Oct 27-29, University of Toronto. Deadline for abstracts: June 30. Like her contemporary Eugène Delacroix, British watercolourist Elizabeth Murray left the “West” in the early 1800s for the “Orient,” recording her adventures in extensive writings and images. However, while Delacroix’s journals and notebooks became widely celebrated, Murray’s account slid into obscurity—even though Delacroix’s journey lasted only six months and generated two articles, while Murray’s time in the region prompted her two-volume autobiography Sixteen Years of an Artist’s Life in Morocco, Spain, and the Canary Islands. Moreover, accounts by other women from that century—Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun; Elizabeth Butler—similarly languished, creating the sense that this era’s female artists neither left home nor published autobiographies. This panel aims to explode this misapprehension by convening discussions of lifewriting by women artists of the 1800s and earlier. We welcome proposals regarding all lifewriting forms (e.g. diaries, letters), with particular interest in accounts originating outside normative “Western” narratives, and/or regarding now-obscure autobiographies. Per standard practice, you need to join UAAC if your paper is accepted – but you don’t need to join to submit a proposal. Questions? creeve@ocadu.ca Application process and full conference CFP here. Charles Reeve OCAD University Chair, Liberal Studies Faculty of Arts & Science * CALL FOR PAPERS North-American Novelists’ Autobiographical Acts: Nonfictional Disruptions Aix-Marseilles University, 6/7 July 2023 Organizers: Sophie Vallas (Aix-Marseilles University, LERMA), Arnaud Schmitt (University of Bordeaux, CLIMAS) Deadline for Submissions June 30, 2022 Addressing the topic of autobiographical texts or memoirs published by novelists, what she calls “the literary writer’s autobiography,” Laura Marcus underlines that the reader’s awareness of the name and reputation of the author immediately confers a certain literary status on the autobiographical text: “Not all autobiographers are writers by profession, though there is a widespread assumption that the literary writer’s autobiography best defines the genre.” Far from the host of confessional memoirs, either by celebrities or unknown authors, a publishing phenomenon identified by Rockwell Gray as a “memoir boom” in his 1982 article “Autobiography Now,” and far from so-called autobiographical novels or autofictions which, according to Maurice Couturier, allowed many writers to “smuggle their own autobiographies,” this conference will focus on autobiographical texts—paratextually and unequivocally identified as such—published by American novelists, on “the literary writer’s autobiography” in other words, and on their influence on the perception of the overall work of their author. We will wonder how autobiographical acts happen, when they happen, in a career dominated by fiction, what their links with the fictional part of the work are or why they are often perceived as minor texts among a fictional body of major ones. Also, do they conjure up specific writing techniques, a separate creative space? The disruption caused by autobiographical texts in a literary work mostly devoted to the writing of fiction raises several questions concerning the artistic logic underlying them, the way they are embedded in the complete oeuvre of the author and the editorial and paratextual choices made for their publication. It often seems logical that authors should turn to life writing at the end of their career, an introspective act embracing their whole life, revisiting their own work. Mark Twain, who published a few chapters of his autobiography in the years prior to his death, decided nevertheless that its publication would be a posthumous act, a hundred years after his death more precisely (The Autobiography of Mark Twain, 2010). Other texts, also published late in their authors’ life, focus on the death of a relative or a friend while offering authors the opportunity to reflect on their own life, inexorably drawing to a close: Joan Didion’s autobiographical diptych, The Year of the Magical Thinking in 2005 (simultaneously mourning the death and celebrating the life of her husband, John Dunne) and Blue Nights in 2011 (doing the same for Didion’s adopted daughter, Quintana, who died in 2005), belongs to this crepuscular tradition in which writing almost amounts to issuing legal, performative acts standing for marriage, adoption, death. Such is also the case for Philip Roth’s Patrimony (1991). Conversely, some autobiographical texts herald the birth of an author: Paul Auster’s The Invention of Solitude (1982) delivered, in prose, the new voice of a poet and essayist who, from then on, would dedicate his career as a novelist to developing and fictionalizing many topics already present in this seminal memoir. Auster has gone on regularly publishing autobiographical narratives, each time revisiting his life from a different angle and adding new acts to the play of his life (The Red Notebook, 1995; Hand to Mouth, 1997; Winter Journal, 2012; Report from the Interior, 2013). For other autobiographical texts, what is at stake is less the moment when they get written, either at the beginning or at the end of a career, than their capacity of exploring the very art of their authors. In that case, they tend to exist as so many comments on the fictional works which they occasionally revisit. Joyce Carol Oates, for instance, has kept on analyzing the act of writing throughout the years ((Woman) Writer: Occasions and Opportunities, 1974; The Faith of a Writer: Life, Craft, Art, 2003; A Widow’s Story. A Memoir, 2011; The Lost Landscape. A Writer’s Coming of Age, 2015). At the very opposite of Oates’ regular autobiographical practice, James Salter’s Burning the Days (1997) stands as a unique autobiographical text in a body of work otherwise entirely devoted to fiction, almost like a faulty act, even if the volume sounds like Salter’s powerful novels in terms of structure and voice, much to the delight of his readers. On the other hand, certain autobiographical texts, just like Richard Wright’s Black Boy (1945) for instance, can be seen as irreversible acts which eclipse the author’s fictional production. Philippe Lejeune once regretted that “the dirty habit of publishing diaries has resulted into most people writing their privacy while decked out in their very best attire.” Is a novelist, and even more so an established one, not tempted, indeed, to write their autobiography in their best array, drifting away from spontaneous, supposedly authentic autobiographical acts which tend to be nowadays published on social networks? Autobiography indeed involves an element of risk and exposure since it may, whether purposefully or not, allow the reader to get a behind-the-scenes look at the making of fiction, and thus disrupt the construction of the figure of the author. Proposals may address, among other issues, the following: – The origin of the autobiographical act in a novelist’s career – The minor works/major works dialectics. – Stylistic specificities of autobiographical narratives versus fictional texts – The balance in an author’s oeuvre, and more specifically the place occupied by the autobiographical texts in the overall work – The reception of the autobiographical texts, often isolated or unknown – The dialogue between fictional and non-fictional texts within a work (Laura Marcus: “The literary writer’s autobiography also bears on, and frequently comments upon, his or her other works”) – The tools needed for analysis (similar, different?) to study the autobiographical texts – The persistence of a distance between the narrator and the author, even in an autobiographical text, similar to that embodied by the concept of implied narrator whose presence Jim Phelan, for example, detects even in referential texts such as Joan Didion’s The Year of MagicalThinking. *

Tasavvur Collective’s 2022 Symposium – ‘Writing Muslim Women in South Asia’

deadline for submissions:  July 1, 2022 Symposium, 5-6 August, 2022 Tasavvur Collective, Universities of Edinburgh, St. Andrews and Exeter contact email: Tasavvurcollective@gmail.com Symposium Concept Note and Call for Papers From the Aurat March in Pakistan to the Shaheen Bagh protests in India, Muslim women have been at the forefront of political change and social upheaval, both in recent years and in the past. With Bangladeshi lawyer Sara Hossain as the recipient of the International Women of Courage Award in 2016 for reforming legislation on violence against women and Arooj Aftab as the first Pakistani woman to win a Grammy in 2022, these achievements are also not limited to any single sphere of cultural influence. And yet, the dominant narrative surrounding the experiences of Muslim women continues to focus on the oppressions they have faced, with little to no consideration given to the way they have overcome these challenges. As such, the category of ‘Muslim Woman’ has been essentialised in ethonographic, Orientalist and neo-liberal discourses since it began to be ‘studied’, a narrative that scholars and activists alike are seeking to challenge more and more every day. This essentialist discourse was recently highlighted across South Asia, thus proving the necessity of challenging such narratives. On March 15th 2022, the Karnataka High Court in India upheld a government order to deny entry to Muslim women who wear the hijab into educational institutions by ruling that the “hijab is not essential to Islam”. Two separate incidents of auctioning Muslim women online for ‘deals’ were reported within 8 months of each other between 2021-22 and the perpetrators of both were let off by the Delhi High Court on “humanitarian grounds”. In Sri Lanka, a similar anti-Muslim sentiment has been reverberating through the appeals of Buddhist monk group Bodu Bala Sena (BSS) to ban the burqa as a “sign of religious extremism”. Across the border in Pakistan, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) organised a ‘Hijab March’ in solidarity with the Muslim women in Karnataka in February 2022. Rather than focusing on freedom of choice, party leaders used the opportunity to take a stance against the Aurat March, an annual demonstration for women’s rights held across Pakistan on 8th March to coincide with International Women’s Day. Aurat March was, and is, constantly accused of violating haya (modesty), with particular reference made to“objectionable slogans” such as #MeraJismMeriMarzi. There is a long and often neglected history of Muslim women intervening in debates about ‘reform’, decolonisation and citizenship to assert their own interests and identities, pioneering the rise of feminist scholarship and activism in South Asia. From Begum Rokeya Sakhawat Hosain to Kamila Shamsie, one can trace a history of Muslim women writers and thinkers who have fundamentally altered contemporary literary and political discourse. A careful examination of these narratives surrounding Muslim women’s intellectual and political existence validates the significant work of scholars like Shenila Khoja-Moolji and Yasmin Saikia, who have argued that attempts to emancipate Muslim women have had to contend with simultaneously imposing uniform, majoritarian models of femininity– whether it is colonial modernity or orthodox religiosity. Navigating these binaries of emancipation and oppression, Muslim women have carved their own identities to interrogate and subvert these categorisations. This symposium is an attempt to bring together scholars, thinkers, artists and activists to create such a discursive space for a timely conversation on Muslim women’s pasts and present. Each of our panels foregrounds the agential capacity of Muslim women in writing themselves and others, as they contend with shifting dynamics of race, ethnicity, gender, class, and caste, within and with relation to South Asia. This symposium hopes to disrupt the essentializing discourse on Muslim women’s identity by exploring the polyphonic nature of human subjectivities. Discussion topics may include but are not limited to:
  • Narratives of gender, sexuality and queerness Agency and artistic expression in Muslim women
  • Protest, resistance, and activism
  • Nationalism, nation and gender; Partition(s) Space, place and temporality
  • Purdah, privacy and public discourse
  • Marriage, family, and domesticity
  • Technology; social media; cybercrime
  • Sair: narratives of travel, cosmopolitanism and mobility
  • ‘Modern’ Muslim women; self-fashioning in the age of empire
  • Sharif Ladki: reform, education and girlhood
  • Zaat: intersections of caste and gender in South Asian Islam
  • Begumati Zubaan: gender and multilingualism
We invite established academics and early-career/PhD scholars within the fields of humanities and social sciences, and outside of these realms, as well as non-academic voices working on and representing Muslim women’s perspectives with reference to South Asia to present 20-minute papers, mixed-media presentations or any other forms of discussion on or around the above themes. Please send 300 word abstracts/presentation outlines including a short biography of not more than 100 words to tasavvurcollective@gmail.com. The deadline for submission of abstracts is 1st July 2022, and selected participants will be contacted with the final schedule by 15th July 2022. The symposium will be held online via Zoom on 5th-6th August 2022. Symposium organisers: Fatima Z. Naveed (University of Exeter), Sheelalipi Sahana (University of Edinburgh) and Zehra Kazmi (University of St. Andrews) of the Tasavvur Collective. Follow us on Twitter: @tasavvurcollect for updates. *

On (Re)Shaping Identity: Self-Portraiture and the Quotidian

PAMLA 2022 – Los Angeles, CA (November 11-13, 2022 – entirely in-person deadline for submissions:  July 1, 2022 Please contact presiding officer for this session, Ariana Lyriotakis, with any questions: lyriotaa@tcd.ie Special Session – CFP Persona and confessional poetry of the Postmodern period enact an undeniable relationship with the quotidian. But how do these poems explore a visual depiction and an expression of self-identity in ordinary life? This panel will explore the methods by which poets manipulate and reject aesthetic production in their poetry, while calling into question subjectivity and truthful composition. This special session will explore poetic self-portraiture and the shaping of identity within the bounds of the quotidian. John Ashbery’s “Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror” is perhaps one of the more notable examples from this era; as a poetry firmly situated within the intermediality of poetic textual images and art, he addresses “the enchant of self with self” through personal depiction and aesthetic production. But what is revealed to the reader in these moments of vulnerability and self-appraisal? How can the poet be both subject and object, while constructing a poetic likeness amongst the commonplace? This panel seeks poetry of self-encounter, whether banal or familiar, to interrogate an inward/outward representation of the self within these constructs. Contributions are invited relating to any of the following aspects, as well as broader interpretations of the theme which may illuminate and elucidate in greater detail. Please be in touch if you have any questions or require further clarification.
  • Depictions of the domestic and the visual
  • Intermediality of poetic textual images and art
  • Interrogations of the actual and the self
  • Orality and performance in poetry
  • Visuality of text and experimentation
  • Mimesis and the composition of ordinary spaces
  • Interdeterminacy and temporality
Abstracts must be submitted through the PAMLA website only. The web address for this session’s CFP is: https://pamla.ballastacademic.com/Home/S/18564 All panel participants/presenters must join PAMLA by July 1, 2022. https://pamla.ballastacademic.com CALL FOR PAPERS:  LIFE WRITING AS WORLD LITERATURE (book) Deadline for abstracts: July 1, 2022 Deadline for final essays: January 1, 2023 The series Literatures as World Literature by Bloomsbury Publishing aims to “take a novel approach to world literature by analyzing specific constellations — according to language, nation, form, or theme — of literary texts and authors in their own world-literary dimensions.” https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/series/literatures-as-world-literature/ The proposed volume will be dedicated to life writing. We use “life writing” as a broad term encompassing a wide variety of personal narratives. We also recognize the capaciousness of the term “world literature” and the accompanying challenges. By putting life writing and world literature into dialogue, we seek to explore their rich shared history, as well as new areas of research. Authors are encouraged to explore, among others the intersecting histories of the two fields debates in world literature concerning auto/biographical genres autobiographical texts outside the Western canons (East Asia, Latin America, Northern Africa, Middle East) autobiographical works as they move in translation through global contexts autobiographical works as they move across time and media (remediation, intermediality, etc.) the role of materiality in life writing visual narratives, new media, affective networks, and the role of life writing in participatory democracy autobiographical texts in “world literature” courses and in cultural diplomacy the role of autobiographical texts in eco or medical humanities the homogenizing effects of autobiographical technology and data bias Please submit abstracts of 350 words, along with a short bio, to the Editors: Helga Lenart-Cheng (hl4@stmarys-ca.edu) and Ioana Luca (ioana.luca@ntnu.edu.tw) by July 1, 2022. Helga Lenart-Cheng Associate Professor World Languages and Cultures Honors Program, Director Saint Mary’s College of California Book office hours here Forthcoming in 2022: Story Revolutions: Collective Narratives from the Enlightenment to the Digital Age *

Tasavvur Collective’s 2022 Symposium – ‘Writing Muslim Women in South Asia’

deadline for submissions:  July 1, 2022 Tasavvur Collective, Universities of Edinburgh, St. Andrews and Exeter contact email: Tasavvurcollective@gmail.com Symposium Concept Note and Call for Papers From the Aurat March in Pakistan to the Shaheen Bagh protests in India, Muslim women have been at the forefront of political change and social upheaval, both in recent years and in the past. With Bangladeshi lawyer Sara Hossain as the recipient of the International Women of Courage Award in 2016 for reforming legislation on violence against women and Arooj Aftab as the first Pakistani woman to win a Grammy in 2022, these achievements are also not limited to any single sphere of cultural influence. And yet, the dominant narrative surrounding the experiences of Muslim women continues to focus on the oppressions they have faced, with little to no consideration given to the way they have overcome these challenges. As such, the category of ‘Muslim Woman’ has been essentialised in ethonographic, Orientalist and neo-liberal discourses since it began to be ‘studied’, a narrative that scholars and activists alike are seeking to challenge more and more every day. This essentialist discourse was recently highlighted across South Asia, thus proving the necessity of challenging such narratives. On March 15th 2022, the Karnataka High Court in India upheld a government order to deny entry to Muslim women who wear the hijab into educational institutions by ruling that the “hijab is not essential to Islam”. Two separate incidents of auctioning Muslim women online for ‘deals’ were reported within 8 months of each other between 2021-22 and the perpetrators of both were let off by the Delhi High Court on “humanitarian grounds”. In Sri Lanka, a similar anti-Muslim sentiment has been reverberating through the appeals of Buddhist monk group Bodu Bala Sena (BSS) to ban the burqa as a “sign of religious extremism”. Across the border in Pakistan, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) organised a ‘Hijab March’ in solidarity with the Muslim women in Karnataka in February 2022. Rather than focusing on freedom of choice, party leaders used the opportunity to take a stance against the Aurat March, an annual demonstration for women’s rights held across Pakistan on 8th March to coincide with International Women’s Day. Aurat March was, and is, constantly accused of violating haya (modesty), with particular reference made to“objectionable slogans” such as #MeraJismMeriMarzi. There is a long and often neglected history of Muslim women intervening in debates about ‘reform’, decolonisation and citizenship to assert their own interests and identities, pioneering the rise of feminist scholarship and activism in South Asia. From Begum Rokeya Sakhawat Hosain to Kamila Shamsie, one can trace a history of Muslim women writers and thinkers who have fundamentally altered contemporary literary and political discourse. A careful examination of these narratives surrounding Muslim women’s intellectual and political existence validates the significant work of scholars like Shenila Khoja-Moolji and Yasmin Saikia, who have argued that attempts to emancipate Muslim women have had to contend with simultaneously imposing uniform, majoritarian models of femininity– whether it is colonial modernity or orthodox religiosity. Navigating these binaries of emancipation and oppression, Muslim women have carved their own identities to interrogate and subvert these categorisations. This symposium is an attempt to bring together scholars, thinkers, artists and activists to create such a discursive space for a timely conversation on Muslim women’s pasts and present. Each of our panels foregrounds the agential capacity of Muslim women in writing themselves and others, as they contend with shifting dynamics of race, ethnicity, gender, class, and caste, within and with relation to South Asia. This symposium hopes to disrupt the essentializing discourse on Muslim women’s identity by exploring the polyphonic nature of human subjectivities. Discussion topics may include but are not limited to:
  • Narratives of gender, sexuality and queerness Agency and artistic expression in Muslim women
  • Protest, resistance, and activism
  • Nationalism, nation and gender; Partition(s) Space, place and temporality
  • Purdah, privacy and public discourse
  • Marriage, family, and domesticity
  • Technology; social media; cybercrime
  • Sair: narratives of travel, cosmopolitanism and mobility
  • ‘Modern’ Muslim women; self-fashioning in the age of empire
  • Sharif Ladki: reform, education and girlhood
  • Zaat: intersections of caste and gender in South Asian Islam
  • Begumati Zubaan: gender and multilingualism
We invite established academics and early-career/PhD scholars within the fields of humanities and social sciences, and outside of these realms, as well as non-academic voices working on and representing Muslim women’s perspectives with reference to South Asia to present 20-minute papers, mixed-media presentations or any other forms of discussion on or around the above themes. Please send 300 word abstracts/presentation outlines including a short biography of not more than 100 words to tasavvurcollective@gmail.com. The deadline for submission of abstracts is 1st July 2022, and selected participants will be contacted with the final schedule by 15th July 2022. The symposium will be held online via Zoom on 5th-6th August 2022. Symposium organisers: Fatima Z. Naveed (University of Exeter), Sheelalipi Sahana (University of Edinburgh) and Zehra Kazmi (University of St. Andrews) of the Tasavvur Collective. Follow us on Twitter: @tasavvurcollect for updates.

 *

Deadline for Submissions: July 1, 2022

Reimagining #MeToo in South Asia And the Diaspora (Edited Collection of Essays)

Dr. Nidhi Shrivastava contact email: shrivastavan@sacredheart.edu This edited volume seeks to examine how sexual violence and feminist interventions in South Asia and the Diaspora have been articulated in the context of but, more importantly, in opposition to the #MeToo Movement. We seek to understand how the feminist movement has radically diverged from the assimilationist discourse of the #MeToo Movement and, consequently, the Global North. The #MeToo movement has not made an impact at the grassroots level because it is hinged on the victim-survivor to speak up. In an era where the Global North has been a model for influencing change in the Global South, there has been an inconspicuous absence of recognition and impact of the #MeToo Movement. In addition, survivors’ testimonies lie at the center of the #MeToo movement, which demystifies victim-shaming and victim-blaming, legitimizing the survivor’s testimony as the unquestionable truth. Since 2017, the #MeToo movement has been successful in the conviction of Harvey Weinstein, who was at the center of the landmark trial. The #MeToo has had a significant impact worldwide on how we understand sexual harassment, rape, and gendered violence, especially in the US. However, this global women’s movement has had little reach in South Asia, where access to virtual platforms is limited, and hashtags are still unknown. The #MeToo Movement in South Asia and the Diaspora was taken up briefly by the media and entertainment industry but has failed to make a concrete impact in many ways. This can be attributed to multiple reasons – there are several regionally specific movements, such as the 2009 Pink Chaddi Campaign and 2011 #WhyLoiter campaign, that have been radically popular within the sub-continent. In the South Asian context, such testimonies are still taboo, which leads to survivors refusing to share and relive their experiences/narratives even if they have the means and access. Therefore, our edited volume seeks to problematize the #MeToo movement in order to reimagine and contextualize it in South Asia and the South Asian diaspora as a much-needed intervention to examine the implications of a transnational feminist movement. We wish to explore questions such as: how the #MeToo movement can move away from Hollywood/Bollywood/workplace and elitist exclusivity. How can it be more inclusive of non-white and marginalized voices? In light of the ongoing and increasing gender-based violence occurring in South Asia and the diaspora, our edited volume will reflect on these questions as we seek to understand new ways of formulating complex and nuanced gendered subjectivities vis-à-vis the lens of post-colonial feminism and intersectionality. Our focus shifts away from the traditional approaches of victimization to generate dialogue and hopefully create a new platform to break the silence and encourage discomforting narratives to normalize conversations surrounding this pivotal issue. Themes include but are not limited to the following:
  • Pedagogy and Transformative Learning via #MeToo in the Classroom
  • Queer/LGBTQI+ Spaces within #MeToo
  • New Masculinities
  • Contemporary Gender Movements and Resistances
  • Caste, Gender, Class, and Social Spaces
  • Problematization of #MeToo and ‘Speaking Up’
  • New Modalities of Testimonies
  • Resistance and Digital Feminist Interventions
  • New Feminist Mediations
  • Militarized Feminist Modernities
  • Ageism
  • Viral Videos
  • Censorship, Cultural Production, and Minority Literature
  • Mythologies, Legends, and Sexuality
We welcome informal queries, and potential contributors may submit a 500-750 word abstract and 2 page CV by July 1, 2022. Please direct queries to Dr Nidhi Shrivastava (Sacred Heart University), shrivastavan@sacredheart.edu, Dr Ruma Sinha (Syracuse University), rumas1@gmail.com, and Dr Billie T. Guarino (Jamia Milia Islamia), thoidingjam@gmail.com. Acceptance of the final articles is subject to double-blind peer review. The final deadline for submitting 5,000- 6,000-word articles will be November 15, 2022 Deadline for Proposals June 20, 2022 Autobiography: a matter of geometry?XXI International Symposium of the Scientific Observatoryfor Written, Oral and Iconographic Autobiographical Memory, organized by: Mediapolis.Europa, cultural association http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ and Mnemosyne, o la costruzione del senso, Presses universitaires de Louvain https://pul.uclouvain.be/review/Rome (Italy), 2, 3, 4 November 2022 This call for papers aims to invite proposals that examine the relationship between a subject who narrates him/herself and the spatial dimension. This is not about seeing oneself in space, or casting a glance on space, but presenting oneself through a mental space. The subject can choose an omniscient or a partial vision, can interpose obstacles by asking questions on his/her identity, can find a way of observing him/herself from the outside. This call for papers intends to consider not fictional works but rather autobiographical ones. Under the register of fiction, the category of space has in fact many points of reference that can be inscribed into defined pathways: think of the themes of wandering, nomadic thought, utopia (u-topos: non-place), Foucault’s discourse on heterotopia, Kafka’s vision, and much more. The autobiographical pact, which remains a fixed point, obliges one to take existential responsibility as a single focal point. (Ph. Lejeune, 1975). In archaic Latin, the word existence means exsistere, ex + sistere. According to the Enciclopedia Treccani, in the language of philosophy, it is the state of every reality as it is, or, specifically, the state of a reality that can be the object of a sensory experience. In our case, this means that the subject that recounts his/her own existence chooses a place in which to situate, envision, project, pro-ject him/herself. For those who engage in their own autobiography, the complexity lies in being able to avail of an external eye. In Life of Hernri Brulard, Stendhal writes: “… what eye can see itself?” At the beginning of the 20th century, the expression biography of self underscores the distancing taken by the writer from him/herself. Dostoevsky talks about self-accounting regarding his novel The Double (1846). In the past fifty years, many video artists have focused their research on the use of video as an external eye. They have intended to contrast the vision that, beginning from the Renaissance, had wanted to objectivise space; according to Christine Van Assche, the point of view of the spectator [N.B.: stimulated by some work of video art] is no longer the single and unperturbed point of view of the observer of Brunelleschi’s ‘tablet’; it is already perturbed, unstable, moving, but inevitably, physically, psychologically, and intellectually active. Van Assche refers to Rosalind Krauss’ essay The Aesthetics of Narcissism (1976). On this matter, see also issue n. 48 (1988) of Communication. The theme of defining the subject’s mental space is at the heart of a significant part of contemporary art and particularly video art.   The longitude and latitude of the self ‘Super-ego, subconscious, to emerge, to remove’ are words that highlight the subject’s vertical position in space. Psychoanalysis has given prominence to this geometry of the psyche. Freud compares memory to the stratification of Roman excavations, an archaeology of memory (Civilization and Its Discontents [1930]). The subject’s relationship to space is one of the dominant themes, the very focal point, of existentialism, which, beginning with Kierkegaard, crosses our contemporaneity. In the chapter “The subjective truth, inwardness; truth is subjectivity” in Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs (2009 [1846]), Kierkegaard places inwardness at the centre, which is a choice, a path, a posture, a centripetal movement. Even supposing an objective reality, to give a meaning to our cosmos, to our cosmoi, everything then returns to subjectivity: “for as Hamlet says, existence and non-existence have only subjective significance.” (2009 [1846], p. 163). The I = I (which comes from Fichte), is a constant in Kierkegaard’s thinking, which connects the subject’s identity to a permanent inward movement.  The Swiss psychiatrist Binswanger (1881-1966), defines Kierkegaard’s conception as ‘passion of inwardness’, meaning that one can assume oneself only beginning from within oneself. As already said, Kierkegaard insists upon the term ‘existence’ by underscoring how the self and only the self is in its isolation, in its being acontextual, it can determine itself by leaving external interferences at the margins. Little by little, Binswanger, a staunch follower of Kirkegaard, will come to Heidegger. Observing patients’ language and behaviour, he examines the “basic forms and perception of human Dasein” (1942), noting the importance of space in the vision that patients have of themselves. Binswanger observes that, in order to describe themselves, patients closely connect bodily sensitivity and affectivity to space. Thus Binswanger orients himself towards a method that he calls Daseinsanalysis, a term that clearly refers to Heiddeger’s Dasein. Heidegger writes: “Space is not in the subject, nor is the world in space. Space is rather ‘in’ the world in so far as space has been disclosed by that Being-in-the-world which is constitutive of Dasein. Space is not to be found in the subject, nor does the subject observe the world ‘as if’ that world were in a space; but the ‘subject’ (Dasein), if well understood ontologically, is spatial.” (Being and Time, 1972 [1927], p.145, Paragraph 24, “Space and Dasein’s Spatiality”). This way of thinking about space will represent a change compared to all previous philosophy, and it will be only the beginning of a series of reflections on the subject-space relationship. Sartre, Merleu-Ponty, Camus will undertake to develop aspects that go beyond Heidegger’s ontological discourse.   The space of the subject in language  In childhood and in pathological psychic states, it is through awareness of space that one manifests oneself. In The Psychology of Intelligence, Jean Piaget explains that space is a primary category of consciousness in children’s thinking (1967). “To bring back to earth” or “to be over the moon” are expressions of our Dasein, our existence. And even though myths and poetry allow us – through a universalizing metaphorical language – sensations, feelings, psychic experiences, the self nonetheless remains the original subject of what climbs or falls. (L. Binswanger 2012, p. 42). Binswanger, who starts from Heidegger, moves away from the latter’s ontological conception, which is his own, to immerse it in concrete cases. A whole vocabulary situates in space the acts of the patient’s dasein: vertiginous height, climbing, aerial altitude, the infinite, etc. (L. Binswanger 1971, pp. 237-245).   Some linguistic expressions reveal how the self situates itself in the space that it constantly places in relation to his/her own persona. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson (2003 [1980]), in Metaphors We Live By (see paragraph “The ME-FIRST Orientation”], show how our way of recounting is modelled on a way of thinking in which the concept of up wins over that of down, front always precedes back, and here precedes there (Ibid., pp. 132-133). A whole cultural conception governs these forms of expression, in which the individual regards him/herself as at the epicentre in relation to the surrounding world that he/she modulates. The order of words was studied by William E. Cooper and John Robert Ross, 1975, World Order.   The subject’s framing of the world  Man frames the world and frames himself in the world. A metalanguage interprets the subject’s framing of the world, as Lotman writes. In particular, he talks about this in two essays on, respectively, the problem of artistic space in Gogol’s prose and the semiotics of cultural space, 1975 [1968]. The writing on Gogol constitutes an important methodological reference. The extremization of a longitudinal contextualization of existence is described by Borges in a paradoxical manner: “So complex is reality, and so fragmentary and simplified is history, that an omniscient observer could write an indefinite, almost infinite, number of biographies of a man, each emphasizing different facts; we would have to read many of them before we realized that the protagonist was the same”. (1974 [1943]. Borges highlights how, by longitudinally crossing a life, each time choosing only one aspect and ignoring the others, we would find ourself before many parallel lives of a single person. This reflection could be transposed as it is to autobiographical writing. Borges shows how fragile a linear description of existence is. In Lines–A brief history (2007), Tim Ingold calls ‘ghostly lines’ those that derive from abstractions and constitute points of reference in various cultures, especially the Western one. These lines have neither consistency nor colour (as a furrow in agriculture could be, for example). It is especially beginning from Euclid that the idea of the straight line dominates visual perception, from which geometric perspective will derive, which insists on presenting reality in a unidirectional manner. (2007, p. 159). Tim Ingold says that when we look at a starry sky, for example, we define the constellations of the stars by connecting them through abstract lines until we imagine structured figures. (Ibid., p. 49). This is completely normal in our Western vision. Moreover, the conviction that history is evolutionary has generated genealogical trees in which past generations, instead of being brought back to the roots, are placed on the branches. Instead of a lineage as it was in the representation of ancestors in ancient Rome, our Western civilization has created an upward progression, towards the future. (Ibid., pp. 104-109).   Lotman observes how, in the military field, front line is a watchword, an anticipatory geometry. And yet, those who experience war realize the difficulties in finding this vision, this geometry, in concrete experience. In the short autobiography Non-Memoirs (2001 [1994]) on the war years spent on different Soviet fronts, Lotman writes that it is difficult to write about war because only those who have never been to war know what it is. He argues that is like describing a huge space with no precise boundaries and no internal unity, pointing out that there is one war in winter and another in spring; one during retreat and another during defence and offence; one in the day and one at night; one in the infantry, another in the artillery, and a third one in the aviation; one for the soldier and another for the journalist arriving at the front. (Ibid., p. 50-51). In other words, the meaning that the individual and the community attribute to space is the result of processes of mutual semantization.   Marginalia and opacity  Authors and writers can choose particular habitats to avoid situating themselves and being seen in spaces that are, so to speak, conventional. We consider only two examples: Edgar Allan Poe’s Marginalia and Rousseau’s Confessions as seen by Starobinski in his book La transparence et l’obstacle. At the beginning of Marginalia (1844), Edgar Allan Poe writes: “In getting my books, I have always been solicitous of an ample margin; this not so much through any love of the thing in itself, however agreeable, as for the facility it affords me of pencilling suggested thoughts, agreements and differences of opinion, or brief critical comments in general.” And further on: “In the marginalia, too, we talk only to ourselves; we therefore talk freshly – boldly – originally – with abandonment – without conceit”. [Bold is ours]. To put events into perspective also means to omit, to put aside spaces and aspects of one’s own life. Just as Starobinski highlights regarding Rousseau’s Confessions. It is possible to play with transparency (to see everything) and the obstacle. Starobinski calls this strategy Poppaea’s veil. Tacitus writes about Poppaea: “Her conversation was charming and her wit anything but dull. She professed virtue, while she practised laxity. Seldom did she appear in public, and it was always with her face partly veiled, either to disappoint men’s gaze or to set off her beauty.” Annals XIII, 45. Poppaea did not want to conceal herself, she wanted to be glimpsed. A painting by an unknown artist from the School of Fontainebleau (1550-1560), in the MAH Musée d’art et d’histoire, Geneva, 1839, shows Sabina Poppaea wrapped in gauze, in a falsely modest pose. Starobinski wrote a long introduction to L’oeil vivant (1961), “Le voile de Poppée”, in which he argues that it is possible to intentionally interpose obstacles to the space of communication with the other, pointing out that that which is hidden is the other face of a presence. He asserts that Poppaea’s veil, which is both an obstacle and an interposed sign, generates an alienated perfection that, through her own escape, demands to be retrieved through our desire. By virtue of the interdiction posed by the obstacle, he continues, there appears a whole depth that passes as essential. He goes on to argue that fascination emanates from a real presence that forces us to prefer what she dissimulates, the remoteness that she prevents us from understanding, at the very moment in which she offers herself. (Ibid., p. 10). Starobinski’s subtle analysis takes into account our mental spaces, how they are constructed. Another important aspect concerns the influence on the construction of mental space due to circumstances less strictly subjective, so to speak: Foucault’s analysis of heterotopia (see Conference, 14 May 1967, Paris); the writings of Deleuze and Guattari on the concept of deterritorialization (1975) – ideas that allows us to understand the incidence of culture on the way of individually conceiving space. In conclusion: if for Kierkegaard, come what may, introspection will never be a matter of geography, yet we know that conceiving oneself in space is certainly different for an American Indian, or an Eskimo, or a New Yorker. As Henri Lefèvre’s studies indicate, mental space does not correspond to either knowledge in space, or on space; that is, mental space is not external to the subject (1968). And yet, this individuality of mental space, as Lefèvre illustrates, is the long-term result of our interaction with the world and exposure to the universe, to the semiosphere, in which we find ourself living.   Bibliographic references  -Beatrice Barbalato, 2018, “Le ‘FRONT’ sémantique de Non-memorie de Lotman”, 61-77. in (ed.) Cathérine Gravet, and al., with Serge Deruette, Pierre Gillis, Katherine Rondou, Cahiers Internationaux de Symbolisme, n. 149-150-151. -Raymond Bellour, Anne Marie Duguet, (dir.), 1988, Vidéo, Communication n. 48. -Ludwig Binswanger, 1942, Grundformen und Erkenntnis menschliche Daseins, Zurich, Niehans. – Introduction à l’analyse existentielle, 1971, translated from the German by J. Verdeaux and Roland Kuhn, preface by R. Kuhn and Henri Maldiney. – Rêve et existence, 2012 [1930], translation and introduction by Françoise Dastur, afterword by E. Basso, Paris, Vrin. -Caterina Borelli, 2018, «The House He Built : autobiografia in una casa», in B. Barbalato (dir.), Auto/biographie, polyphonie, plurivocalité, Mnemosyne n. 11, PuL, Presses universitaires de Louvain. https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/Mnemosyne/article/view/14123 -Jorge Luis Borges, “On William Beckford’s Vathek” [1943] https://www.gwern.net/docs/borges/1943-borges-onwilliambeckfordsvathek.pdf -William Cooper and John Robert Ross, 1975, “World order”, pp. 63–111, R. E. Grossman and al. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism, Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society. -Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari 1975, Capitalisme et schizophrénie-L’AntiOedipe, v. I, Parigi, Éditions du Minuit. -Michel Foucault 2004 [1967], Des espaces autres, 12-19, Érès “Empan” 2004/2, n. 54. -Sigmund Freud, first published in 1930, Civilization and Its Discontents, translation by James Strachey, https://www.stephenhicks.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/FreudS-CIVILIZATION-AND-ITS-DISCONTENTS-text-final.pdf -Martin Heidegger, 1972 [1927], Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd. -Tim Ingold 2007, Lines – A brief history, London-New York, Routledge. https://taskscape.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/lines-a-brief-history.pdf -Søren Kierkegaard, 2009 [1847], “The subjective truth, inwardness; truth is subjectivity,” p. 163, in Conclusive Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Crumbs, edited and translated by Alistair Hannay, Cambridge University Press. -Rosalind Krauss 1976, The Aesthetics of Narcissism, Cambridge. -Georges Lakoff, Mark Johnson, 2003 [1980], Metaphors We Live By, Chicago-London, The University of Chicago Press. -Henri Lefèvre, 1974, La production de l’espace, Paris, Anthropos. -Philippe Lejeune, Le pacte autobiographique, Paris, Seuil, 1975. -Yuri M. Lotman, 1975 [1968], “Semiotica dello spazio culturale”, 143-248, “Il problema dello spazio artistico in Gogol”, 193-248, translated by Sergio Molinari, in J. M. Lotman and Boris A. Uspenskij, Tipologia della cultura, edited by Remo Faccani and Marzio Marzaduri, translated from the Russian into Italian by Manila Barbato Faccani, Remo Faccani, Marzio Marzaduri, Sergio Molinari, Milano, Bompiani. -, 2001 [1994], Non-Memorie, Silvia Burini and Alessandro Niero (edited and translated), introduction by Maria Corti, Novara, Interlinea. Original Russian text “Ne-memuary”, 1994, in Lotmanovskij sbornik, I-C-Garant, Moscow. -Jean Piaget, “L’élaboration de la pensée”, pp. 129-165, in Ibid., La psychologie de l’intelligence, Paris, Colin, 1967. -Edgar Allan Poe, «Marginalia part I», 1844-1849, United States Magazine and Democratic Review, November 1844. http://pinkmonkey.com/dl/library1/marg.pdf -Tacitus, Annals, from Tacitus, Complete Works of Tacitus, Alfred John Church, William Jackson Brodribb, Sara Bryant, edited for Perseus, New York. Random House, Inc., reprinted 1942. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0078%3Abook%3D13%3Achapter%3D45 -Christine Van Assche 1992, Une histoire de vidéo, introduction to the catalogue of Musée d’Art moderne du Centre Pompidou, Vidéo et après, Paris, Éditions Carré.   Scientific Committee Beatrice BARBALATO, Mediapolis.Europa  May CHEHAB, Université de Chypre Fabio CISMONDI, Euro Fusion Antonio CASTILLO GÓMEZ, Univ. d’Alcalà de Henares Françoise HIRAUX, Univ. cath. de Louvain Giulia PELILLO-HESTERMEYER, Universität Heidelberg Anna TYLUSIŃSKA-KOWALSKA, Uniwersytet Warszawski Organization Irene MELICIANI, managing director Mediapolis.Europa   Symposium – Rome 2, 3, 4 November 2022Autobiography: a matter of geometry?Enrolments LANGUAGES ADMITTED FOR THE INTERVENTIONS: English, French, Italian, Spanish. Every speaker will speak in their chosen language; there will be no simultaneous translation. A rough passive understanding would be desirable. A) The deadline for the submission of papers is 20 June 2022. Candidates are asked to present an abstract of up to 250 words, with citation of two reference texts, and a brief curriculum vitae of up to 100 words, with possible mention of two publications, be they articles or books. These must be submitted online on the conference registration page of the http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ Website. The scientific committee will read and select every proposal that will be sent to the conference registration page of the http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ Website. For information, please contact the following: beatrice.barbalato@gmail.com, irenemeliciani@gmail.com. Notification of the accepted proposals will be given on 30 June 2022.   B) In regard to enrolment in the colloquium, once the proposal is accepted the fees are the following: Before 30 July 2022: 110,00€ From 1 to 30 August 2022: 130,00€ Enrolment cannot be accepted in loco. Ph.D. students: Before 30 July 2022: 75,00€ From 1 to 30 August 2022: 90,00€ Enrolment cannot be accepted in loco. Participation only 30,00 €   Virtual: All conference activities will be available through our webinar format. You will receive the conference link through the email address you provide in your registration. A) For information on registration fees, past symposia, the association’s activities, and the organising and scientific teams, please refer to our website:  http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ The association Mediapolis.Europa contributes to the publication of the journal Mnemosyne, o la costruzione del senso, Presses universitaires de Louvain, www.i6doc.com. Indexed as a scientific journal in: https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/erihplus/periodical/info?id=488665 Deadline for Application June 15, 2022

Vacancy for PhD researcher: “Broadcast Biographies. Innovations in Genre and Medium (1945-2020)”

by Birgit Van Puymbroeck The Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Faculty of Languages and Humanities, Department of Linguistics and Literary Studies, is looking for a four-year full-time PhD researcher in the field of literary studies as part of the FWO funded research project “Broadcast Biographies. Innovations in Genre and Medium (1945-2020)”. 1. Project This project is situated at the intersection of life writing, literary radio studies and cultural memory studies. It examines the literary radio biography in Britain and (West-)Germany in the period 1945-2020 along three complementary lines: its production and reception history, its genre and media conventions and its cultural memory function. Despite the rich history of biographical writing on and for radio, little research exists on the radio biography as genre, let alone on its role as a potential catalyst for genre and media innovation. Neither the vast scholarship on life writing nor the field of radio studies have paid systematic attention to biographies created specifically for radio. Still, as this project aims to show, the radio biography gives us a unique insight in the ongoing mediation of life narratives and the history of radio itself. By writing lives for the radio, literary authors such as Alfred Andersch, Martin Esslin, Gerhard Rühm, Angela Carter and Tom Stoppard also chronicle the life of radio itself, reflecting on the possibilities and limits of both genre and medium. In this project, we mainly focus on productions by (post)modernist and neo-avant-garde authors. We aim to study the genre and function of the broadcast biography, including its role in the transnational exchange between the two central national broadcasting cultures in this project. 2. Position We offer a four-year full-time PhD position (subject to annual positive evaluation). The successful candidate will carry out the project as a doctoral researcher in close collaboration with the two supervisors at the Centre for Literary and Intermedial Crossing (CLIC) at VUB (https://clic.research.vub.be/en/home). The candidate will write a doctoral dissertation on the subject of the radio biography, carry out archival work on selected authors and productions (in the UK and Germany), (co-)publish the results of the research in academic articles and books, present at national and international conferences and co-host scientific meetings. The candidate will complete the doctoral training programme of the Faculty of Arts and Humanities at VUB (https://student.vub.be/en/phd/doctoral-training#doctoral-schools) and is expected to defend their doctoral dissertation in 2026. Please be aware that the position requires you to be present in the department on a regular basis (3 days per week). 3. Profile
  • You hold a master’s degree in (literature in) English, (literature in) German, comparative literature (or a comparable degree) or you will have obtained this by the start date of this position.
  • You demonstrate excellent study results. Previous academic experience (publications, conference presentations, etc.) will be considered an asset.
  • You have a demonstrable interest in twentieth-century and/or contemporary literature, life writing, biography studies, literary radio studies, sound studies, media history or cultural memory studies. Previous experience with archival research will be considered an asset.
  • You are an enthusiastic researcher, capable of conducting research both independently and in team.
  • You are willing to conduct research stays abroad in function of archival research and knowledge exchange.
  • You act in accordance with the rules regarding scientific integrity, as described in the VUB charter for researchers: https://www.vub.be/en/violations-of-scientific-integrityinbreuken-op-wetenschappelijke-integriteit#information-in-english`
  • You have excellent academic English-language skills (oral and written). A good command of the German language is highly desirable.
4. Offer
  • We offer a four-year full-time doctoral position (requiring enrolment as a doctoral student at VUB), subject to an annual positive evaluation.
  • The planned starting date is 1 September 2022, or as soon as possible thereafter.
  • You will receive a salary in one of the grades defined by the Belgian government. Depending on previous professional experience, the monthly tax-free salary varies from approx. € 2541 to max. € 2704 (EU staff) / approx. € 2318 to max. € 2466 (non-EU staff). In addition, you are provided with a shared office space and work laptop, library access, social and health benefits, and free access to Belgian public transport for your commute to campus.
  • As an employee of VUB, you will work in a dynamic, diverse, and multilingual environment. For this function, VUB’s Brussels Humanities, Sciences & Engineering Campus (Etterbeek) will serve as your home base. Our campus is a green oasis in the capital city of Flanders, Belgium, and Europe, and has an excellent restaurant and extensive sport facilities. It is within easy reach (twenty minutes by public transport) of the city centre of Brussels and has a direct train connection to Brussels National Airport. Childcare facilities are to be found within walking distance.
  • For more information on what it is like to work at VUB, go to www.vub.ac.be/en/jobs.
5. Application procedure Applications should include (in one PDF file): (1) a cover/motivation letter; (2) your academic CV with details about your bachelor and master qualifications (including grades) and your previous academic experience (if applicable); (3) a short text on how you envisage your contribution to the project, especially the doctoral dissertation that you would be working on (max. 1000 words). Please mention your approach, research question and potential cases; (4) the names of two referees. Also include (in a separate PDF file) a writing sample (e.g. your MA thesis, a research paper or academic article). Clearly mention your name on your writing sample. Please send your application by e-mail to both supervisors, Prof. dr. Inge Arteel (Inge.Arteel@vub.be) and Prof. dr. Birgit Van Puymbroeck (birgit.van.puymbroeck@vub.be). The deadline is 15 June 2022 (midnight, CET). Shortlisted candidates will be interviewed in the week of 4 July 2022 on the Humanities Campus of Vrije Universiteit Brussel or online. If you have any questions, please contact Inge.Arteel@vub.be or birgit.van.puymbroeck@vub.be. Deadline for Submissions June 15, 2022

Call for Book Chapters: “Narrative medicine: trauma and ethics”

Deadline: June 15, 2022 Vernon Press invites book chapter proposals to be included in a forthcoming scholarly volume on “Narrative medicine: trauma and ethics” edited by associate professor Anders Juhl Rasmussen and professor, MD, Morten Sodemann, University of Southern Denmark. Narrative medicine is a scholarly discipline based on narrative theory, close reading, phenomenological inquiry, and creative writing that fortifies clinical practices of all health disciplines with ways to honor the stories of people who seek and give care. Narrative medicine was created at Columbia University in 2000, and through partnerships the field has giving rise to narrative medicine courses worldwide that give students and clinicians the opportunity to read, write, and reflect on clinical experiences. In recent years, new art-based intervention studies with patients have evolved under the same heading as “system narrative medicine”. Narrative ethics was introduced in the 1990’s, and shared decision making in ethical dilemmas will always have a crucial role in narrative medicine. This book seeks to ask broad questions about how traumas are narrated and known, how they are conceived in society trough art and treated in the health care system by methods of narrative medicine. These kinds of trauma could be adverse childhood events, sexual abuse, natural disasters, or trauma related to armed conflict, terrorism, persecution, etc. We welcome proposals that are interdisciplinary in nature and can come from disciplines that include literary studies, cultural studies, media studies, anthropology, psychology, psychoanalysis, history, philosophy, sociology, etc. We seek book chapters that range from approximately 5000-6000 words in length to include in this edited collection. We invite chapter proposals that explore a wide variety of topics such as: – to what extend can traumatic events be narrated, known, and measured? – how does narratives in art shape commonly held beliefs in society about e.g. rape trauma? – how may clinicians learn to ethically encounter trauma patients through literature? – could an adoption of Trauma Informed Care practices supplement narrative medicine? – how can art-based intervention studies address shared decision making with trauma patients, e.g. in ethical dilemmas? – in which way can creative/expressive writing and close/shared reading help patients heal or repair from trauma? Please send a 300-word abstract, project title, and a brief bio in English to Anders Juhl Rasmussen and Morten Sodemann (Volume Editors) at: ajr@sdu.dk and msodemann@health.du.dk  by June 15, 2022. Contact Info: Anders Juhl Rasmussen and Morten Sodemann (Volume Editors) at ajr@sdu.dk and msodemann@health.du.dk Contact Email: ajr@sdu.dk Deadline for Submissions–between March 1 and June 1, 2022 Dear colleagues,   We are pleased to announce the call for papers to the dossier The auto/biographical space in university culture and extension, of the Revista UFG. Revista UFG is an international refereed journal based on the Federal University of Goiás, in Brazil, aimed at diffusion studies on different areas of knowledge applied to social practices, focusing on culture and extension at universities. Revista UFG welcomes article manuscripts, reviews, and visual essays submissions from all fields, including works from multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas.   The present call for papers departs from a critical-reflective movement that permeated many university practices since the pandemics, raising questions about individuals, groups, and institutions’ roles in teaching, research, and culture connected to communities beyond the academy. Creating spaces for active listening and sharing stories at the university has become essential in searching for innovative solutions and transformative narratives that may contribute to social justice and change beyond the university’s walls. This dossier welcomes reflections and expressions that stimulate the imagination about possible futures for post-pandemic university practices. We encourage texts departing from what we have learned so far, considering subjectivities, perceptions, and life stories that may point out other ways of doing and being in/with the world.   >> Submissions: from 1st March to 1st June 2022 >> Modalities: Articles, Essays, Reviews, Visual Essays >> Guidelines for submissions: https://www.revistas.ufg.br/revistaufg/about/submissions (please, on the website, click on the options on the right-side column for accessing translated content in English, Spanish or Portuguese).   If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. We look forward to receiving your submissions. Best, Manoela dos Anjos Afonso Rodrigues – UFG (manoelaafonso@ufg.br) Cláudia Mariza Mattos Brandão – UFPel (claummattos@gmail.com) * ReStorying Ageing: Older Women and Life Writing May 24th, 2-6pm (Irish time; GMT+1), via Zoom (Booking link below) This webinar brings together researchers, writers and the public as part of the Bealtaine Festival 2022. Through presentations, discussions and readings, the online event will explore the empowering potential of women’s creativity and life writing, and the importance of recognising the diversity of women’s experiences as they grow older, experiences which are so often stereotyped in literature and culture. Speakers: Ashton Applewhite, Prof. Molly Andrews, Dr Mary McGill, Éilís Ní Dhuibhne, Dr Áine Ní Léime, Helen O’Rahilly, & participants from a life writing workshop for women aged 50 and older. Organisers: Dr Michaela Schrage-Frueh (School of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, NUI Galway), Dr Maggie O’Neill (Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, NUI Galway) and Karen Hanrahan (University of Brighton / Moore Institute), in partnership with Age & Opportunity and with funding from the Irish Research Council. Attendance is free but booking is essential: https://www.eventbrite.ie/e/restorying-ageing-older-women-and-life-writing-tickets-311983570257 *

In the Spaces Provided: Career Narratives and Academic Womanhood

Advance Contract: Routledge Press, Series in Auto/biography Studies Deadline for abstract: June 1st, 2022 Contact: ortiz@tcnj.edu In her introduction to Essays in Life Writing, Marlene Kadar suggests that self-expressive life writing can invite readers into the overwhelming “too muchness” of the subject’s life.[i] Career construction specialist, Larry Cochrane finds that the more functional career narrative minimizes the life story that individuals “may want and need to tell” in favor of articulating and promoting an academic brand. As Cochran quips, scholars must leave out “all that would captivate us in a good autobiography.”[ii] Ultimately, these two forms of self-representation are made to face opposite directions and academics are socialized to believe that these genres cannot trust one another. This thinking is more harmful than helpful for women academics who stand to benefit from inserting themselves into their work as a means to transform the historically male-defined terms upon which their disciplines and the profession at large have been built. As Alison Black rightly asserts of career narratives, “There is a richness to [women’s] individual experiences and stories that must not be reduced. From these can emerge a collective vision that speaks to our individual, emotional and embodied lives – lives which the neoliberal university too oft deems insignificant”[iii] In the Spaces Provided is an edited collection of auto-theoretical essays by women life writing scholars who explore their early-career, mid-career, late-career, and “alt-career” experiences with the documents that shape their professional careers: the institutional auto/biography of employment letters, curriculum vitae, tenure portfolios, promotion dossiers, professional bios, academic website profiles, and other self-authored narratives required by institutions to self-promote for opportunities and resources. I am seeking a diverse range of expert considerations of how life writing theory and practice enable our thinking about access to the highly regulated spaces of self-construction in academic career documentation. Contributors are invited to turn the lenses of life writing theory and methodology inward as self-aware subjects negotiating frameworks for writing and reviewing self-authored academic career documents. I encourage contributions that model a range of theoretical moves for exposing and subverting the traps of self-representation the repressive norms of professional review in which explorations of personhood – including experiences of gender, ability, sexuality, age, nationhood, race, and class – are inhibited. I invite contributions attuned to engagements with:
[i] Kadar, Marlene. Essays on Life Writing: From Genre to Critical Practice. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1992, 4. [ii] Cochran, Larry R. “Narrative as a Paradigm for Career Research.” Methodological Approaches to the Study of Career, Richard A. Young and William Borgen, eds., New York: Praeger. 1990, 71-86. [iii] Black, Alison, “Women Activating Agency in Academia: Metaphors, Manifestos and Memoir, Alison L. Black and Susanne Garvis, eds., New York: Routledge, 25. Dr. Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle [Pronouns: she/her/hers] Professor of English, The College of New Jersey Fulbright Research Chair in Society and Culture, Univ of Alberta, 2021-22 * Call for Papers Reading old age, the ageing body and memory in British and American literature and texts of culture Special Issue, The Polish Journal of English Studies Deadline for Submissions, June 1, 2022 Age studies point to all life stages as culturally and historically idiosyncratic, and complicated even more by various intersectional perspectives. Within this age(s)-focused field of analysis, humanistic and critical gerontologists as well as historians of old age issued an ardent call to redefine old age as equally ephemeral and multi-layered as any other life stage. Addressing the existing studies of the formative and foundational quality of youth and adulthood, gerontologists of various subdisciplines objected to seeing old age as simply the end of life, and to defining it as a precise point in time rather than a nebulous period with no exact opening temporal bracket. Thane (2000) in particular stressed the difficulty in defining old age in term of chronology only, proposing to view it as a functional and cultural category as well. More precisely, scholars noted, one is sooner made (to feel) old by culture and society than one perceives oneself as being such. Consequently, even if it is an essentially intimate and embodied lived experience, old age must be seen as an experience with a set of socio-cultural prescriptive and proscriptive rules of conduct and decorum as well as social sanctions and rewards. Addressing all of said emerging conceptual recalibrations, Gullette claimed that indeed age “could be the next analytic and hermeneutic concept to make cutting-edge difference” (2004: 106) in humanist research. . Having specifically worked on middle and old age in her research, she further noted that, just like with other necessary intersectionalities, to talk about ageing is to keep unravelling and disentangling “the din of representations, unseen internalizations, [and] unthinking practices” (Gullette 2004: 27). Old age can then be seen as simultaneously ”the culmination or the dreary denouement of life’s drama” (Cole 2006: xx), written as somatic and mental narratives of decline (Gullette 1997) as well as the most meaningful moment of human existence, “a time for recapitulating, connecting part to part, re-membering” (Carson 1987: xii), leading to wisdom only allowed to the members of this in-group. From such a dialectic other questions are engendered: Do we with age become the embodied repositories of knowledge and guardians of traditions? Do we need to properly perform old age as the various gerontideologies socialize us to do (Mangan 2013)? Are we our ageing bodies? How do our auto/self-narratives change with age? Can we “read the beginning in the end and the end in the beginning” (Baars 2016: 82)? This themed volume aims to critically address and further identify the meaning(s) behind and potentialities of old age and ageing. As growing and/or being old are not only subjective and embodied experiences but also socio-cultural phenomena, the points of departure in this collection are the three fundamentals in gerontological research: 1) old age, 2) the (ageing) body and 3) memory, the latter understood not only as recollecting one’s spatio-temporal past but, in particular, re-membering one’s somatic “past-ness”. Such intertwining of old age with memory inevitably invites studies of nostalgia, seen as both positive and negative approaches to and perceptions of one’s embodied past. We thus welcome papers that engage in age and gerontological readings within British and American literature and paraliterary texts of culture (i.e. ego-documents, conduct texts, philosophical tracts, etc.) across all historical periods. Book reviews within the field of literary age  studies or literary gerontology are welcome as well. Please send a 150-200-word abstract (titled Surname_PJES_Old age) together with a short biographical note to  Dr Katarzyna Bronk-Bacon at kbronkk@amu.edu.pl The deadline for submission of abstracts is 1st June 2022. Notifications about proposal acceptance will be sent by 20th June 2022. The deadline for submission of completed papers is 1st November 2022. Planned publication: 2023. Bibliography Baars, Jan. 2016. “Concepts of age and aging”, in Geoffrey Scarre (ed.), The Palgrave handbook of the philosophy of aging (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 69-86. Carson, Ronald A. 1987. ‘Foreword’, in Thomas R. Cole and Sally Gadow (eds.), What does it mean to grow old? Reflections from the humanities. Durham: Duke UP, xi–xiv. Cole, Thomas R. 2006. The journey of life: A cultural history of aging in America. Cambridge: CUP. Gullette, Margaret M. Declining to decline: Cultural combat and the politics of the midlife. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1997. Gullette, Margaret M. 2004. Aged by culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cole, Thomas R., and Sally Gadow, eds. What does it mean to grown old? Reflections from the humanities. Durham: Duke UP, 1987. Mangan, Michael. Staging ageing: Theatre, performance, and the narrative of decline. Bristol: Intellect, 2013. Contact Info: dr Katarzyna Bronk-Bacon Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland Contact Email: kbronkk@amu.edu.pl URL: http://pjes.edu.pl/issues/9-2-2023/ *

Call for Proposals: The Routledge Companion to Latinx Life Writing

Extended Deadline for Submissions June 3, 2022 Contributions are invited for consideration to be published in a collection of critical essays introducing readers to studies of Latinx life writing, a prominent and essential pan-genre within Latinx literature since Latinx literature began to be conceived as such. Life writing is a broad umbrella term that encompasses a number of genres in which authors take life and lived experience as their core subject. Within Latinx life writing, these genres include memoir, autobiography, and testimonio most centrally. The proposed handbook provides literary criticism of Latinx life writing focusing on its history, key themes and questions, and genres. The handbook will feature chapters on the trends and concerns of Latinx life writers across different historical periods, providing insight into various thematic and generic concerns as they evolve throughout Latinx cultural production.  Although this book is scholarly in nature, the tone will be broadly accessible in order to make the book suitable for a wide audience including graduate students, undergraduate students in community colleges and four-year universities, and classroom instructors. THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO LATINX LIFE WRITING is under contract with Routledge and is scheduled to be published in 2024. Please note that we are seeking essays of literary criticism; we are not seeking creative works of Latinx life writing at this time. We are seeking proposals specifically in the following areas:
  • 19th century and U.S. occupation narratives (oral histories-narratives, correspondence, memories, diaries)
  • Crónica, relatos, testimonios
  • Fictionalized autobiographies/life writing in fiction/plays
  • Corridos, folklore, oral forms
  • Correspondence (in wartime or Latino veterans or because of family separation, etc.)
  • Poetry of protest
  • Coming of age autobiographical narratives
  • Experimental autobiographical works
  • Education testimonios
  • Chicana and Latina “Third World” women of color feminist mixed genre writing
  • Autobiographical narratives of exile
  • LGBTQ+/Queer articulations
  • Testimonios and new media (Digital Humanities, digital storytelling)
  • Grief, trauma narratives
  • Graphic narratives
  • Undocumented narrative
We are seeking only original, never before published work at this time. Please submit a no more than two page abstract (approximately 500 words) of a chapter that you wish to be considered for this handbook by June 3, 2022 (the deadline has been extended), as well as a 2 page abbreviated curriculum vitae. Contact Info: For more information, contact co-editors Dr. Maria Joaquina Villaseñor, mvillasenor@csumb.edu or Dr. Christine Fernandez, chrfernandez@csumb.edu Contact Email: mvillasenor@csumb.edu * Dear IABA List Members,
 
We would like to let you know that the deadline for the call for entries into Biography’s annual annotated bibliography has been extended to Monday, May 15. Please see below for information on submission guidelines.
 
Biography’s annual annotated bibliography of critical and theoretical works on life writing is the most extensive reference of its kind, and before finalizing it, we want to make sure it is as timely, inclusive, and extensive as possible.
 
So if last year (from January to December 2021) you published, edited, or co-edited a book, wrote an article for a journal or an essay for an edited collection, or completed your doctoral dissertation, we would appreciate having that information, so that we can incorporate it into the list. (There is of course a very good chance that we have already included it, but this will make sure your work is noted.)
 
We would request the following information:
 
·      Full bibliographic information for each text, formatted according to MLA 9 style
·      A one-sentence annotation per text
 
We are especially committed to noting publications in languages other than English. If you could provide an annotation in English, however, that would be helpful.
 
We would appreciate getting the information by Monday, May 15. Please send your information to Zoë Sprott (gabiog@hawaii.edu).
 
Thanks in advance. This bibliography usually has between 1,400 and 1,500 entries, and represents the most extensive annual critical survey of the field. We want to make sure your work appears within it.
 
Zoë E. Sprott (she/her/hers)
Editorial Assistant and Reviews Editor
The Center for Biographical Research
Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly
1960 East-West Road
Biomed B104
Honolulu, HI 96822
Tel: (808) 956-3774
Email: gabiog@aikoy *

Autobiography Panel, 119th Annual PAMLA Conference

119th Annual Pacific Ancient and Modern Languages Association Conference Friday, November 11, 2022 to Sunday, November 13, 2022 UCLA Luskin Conference Center and Hotel in Los Angeles, California Hosted by the University of California, Los Angeles Deadline for Submissions, May 15, 2022 PAMLA’s Autobiography panel is currently accepting submissions for in-person sessions! “Autobiography creates a self as the right instrument to seek meaning.” -Patricia Hampl We are open to a wide range of papers which explore auto/biographical constructions of the self across genres, geographies, and modes. We are especially interested in papers attuned to the conference theme, “Geographies of the Fantastic and the Quotidian,” and welcome proposals which regard auto/biographical expression as a mode for mapping geographies within and around the self. In what ways do fantastic and quotidian places and spaces inform identity? How are place and space represented in auto/biographical texts? How might auto/biographical texts shape audience understandings of and orientations to particular places? How might auto/biographical representations of those places impact their physical geographies in material ways? We encourage presenters to explore auto/biography through interdisciplinary approaches, such as affect studies and cognitive science, theories of the archive and archival sciences, area studies, critical race theory, digital humanities, feminist and theories of gender, genre studies, materialism, media studies, queer theory, phenomenology, post- and decolonial studies, psychology, translation and adaptation studies, and more. Possible genres and topics could include but are not limited to: autofiction and biofiction, autotheory, collective autobiography, conquest and encounter narratives, diaries, documentary film, glitch feminism, intersectional subjectivity, lyric essays, maps, memoir, pedagogical applications for life writing, photography, social media, and other techniques of self-narration and self-fashioning. Submit an abstract directly through the Autobiography panel submission page, or search the PAMLA comprehensive Call for Papers. Contact Emily Travis (etravis@ucsc.edu) with any questions. About PAMLA and this year’s theme: The Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association is a scholarly association designed for those teaching or conducting research in a diverse range of literary, linguistic, and cultural interests, both ancient and modern, in the United States and abroad. PAMLA members include faculty and students in language and literature departments in colleges and universities, as well as interdisciplinary scholars from other disciplines and independent scholars. This year’s theme, “Geographies of the Fantastic and the Quotidian,” invites scholars to consider the overdetermined landscapes both of the imagination and of everyday experience. Particularly fascinating might be explorations of the extraordinary, the exemplary, the “out of this world” sorts of places, real and figurative: the spaces of the fantastic and the bizarre. Conversely, the lived and experienced environments of the banal might spark equally fertile archaeologies of the everyday. For that is the allure of the often inscrutable or illegible cities of the imagination: they open up new territories
Contact Info:
Emily Travis, UC Santa Cruz
Contact Email:
*
Call for Contributions

Edited Collection:

In the Spaces Provided: Career Narratives and Academic Womanhood

Advance Contract: Routledge Press, Series in Auto/biography Studies Deadline for abstract: May 15th, 2022 Contact: ortiz@tcnj.edu In her introduction to Essays in Life Writing, Marlene Kadar suggests that self-expressive life writing can invite readers into the overwhelming “too muchness” of the subject’s life.[i] Career construction specialist, Larry Cochrane finds that the more functional career narrative minimizes the life story that individuals “may want and need to tell” in favor of articulating and promoting an academic brand. As Cochran quips, scholars must leave out “all that would captivate us in a good autobiography.”[ii] Ultimately, these two forms of self-representation are made to face opposite directions and academics are socialized to believe that these genres cannot trust one another. This thinking is more harmful than helpful for women academics who stand to benefit from inserting themselves into their work as a means to transform the historically male-defined terms upon which their disciplines and the profession at large have been built. As Alison Black rightly asserts of career narratives, “There is a richness to [women’s] individual experiences and stories that must not be reduced. From these can emerge a collective vision that speaks to our individual, emotional and embodied lives – lives which the neoliberal university too oft deems insignificant”[iii] In the Spaces Provided is an edited collection of auto-theoretical essays by women life writing scholars who explore their early-career, mid-career, late-career, and “alt-career” experiences with the documents that shape their professional careers: the institutional auto/biography of employment letters, curriculum vitae, tenure portfolios, promotion dossiers, professional bios, academic website profiles, and other self-authored narratives required by institutions to self-promote for opportunities and resources. I am seeking a diverse range of expert considerations of how life writing theory and practice enable our thinking about access to the highly regulated spaces of self-construction in academic career documentation. Contributors are invited to turn the lenses of life writing theory and methodology inward as self-aware subjects negotiating frameworks for writing and reviewing self-authored academic career documents. I encourage contributions that model a range of theoretical moves for exposing and subverting the traps of self-representation the repressive norms of professional review in which explorations of personhood – including experiences of gender, ability, sexuality, age, nationhood, race, and class – are inhibited. I invite contributions attuned to engagements with:
* Social justice approaches to hiring, tenure, and promotion * Tools, practices, and policies of career self-documentation * Paradoxes of privacy and disclosure * Parenthood and career expectations * Decolonizing, anti-racist, and anti-sexist career affiliations * Ableist expectations of academic success * Mentoring and career narratives * Visibility, intelligibility, and embodiment * Approaches to racial, indigenous, and cultural identity * Social networking and “new media * Digital modalities for academic career review * Retirement and late-career perspectives on career construction * Alt-academic transitions * Contingent and transient academic posts * Career mobility and representations of movement * Academic career coaching * Comparative experiences in transnational contexts * Revealing and concealing LGBTQ personhood * Self-promotion and Self-advocacy in academic institutions * Straddling teaching, administration, service, and scholarshipPlease send a brief abstract (300 words) and a brief biographical statement (100 words) to Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle (ortiz@tcnj.edu) by May 15th, 2022.  Those invited to submit full essays will be notified by June 1st, 2022. Completed contributions (6,500-8,000 words including notes and bibliography) will be due October 1st, 2022.About the editor: Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle is Professor of English at The College of New Jersey. She is author of Américanas, Autocracy, and Autobiographical Innovation Overwriting the Dictator (Routledge, 2020). Other work appears in Biography: An Interdsciplinary QuarterlyEuropean Journal of Life Writinga/b: Auto/Biography Studies, and Life Writing. She serves as book review editor for a/b: Auto/Biography Studies and is a 2021-22 Fulbright Research Chair in Arts and Humanities at the University of Alberta in E

[i] Kadar, Marlene. Essays on Life Writing: From Genre to Critical Practice. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1992, 4.
[ii] Cochran, Larry R. “Narrative as a Paradigm for Career Research.” Methodological Approaches to the Study of Career, Richard A. Young and William Borgen, eds., New York: Praeger. 1990, 71-86.
[iii] Black, Alison, “Women Activating Agency in Academia: Metaphors, Manifestos and Memoir, Alison L. Black and Susanne Garvis, eds., New York: Routledge, 25.
Dr. Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle
[Pronouns: she/her/hers]
Professor of English, The College of New Jersey
Fulbright Research Chair in Society and Culture, Univ of Alberta, 2021-22
Genre Studies Delegate, Modern Language Association Book Reviews Editor, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies Author,Américanas, Autocracy, and Autobiographical Innovation
*
Colleagues,
We hope you are doing well.
KaaVonia and I have a new call for papers we are sharing with you.
We have included an abstract below.
We welcome your questions, submissions, and collaborations.
Much peace,
Lucy and Kaa
Biographical and Documentary Research Special Interest Group, AERA

Educational Embodiments: 

Life Writing the Body 

 

A volume in the Research in Life Writing and Education Series (Information Age Publishing) 

 

Call For Papers: 

Abstracts Due May 15, 2022 

 

(Peer-Reviewed Edited Collection) 

 

Edited by: 

Lucy E. Bailey, Oklahoma State University, & KaaVonia Hinton, Old Dominion University 

 

This book focuses on life writing that centers body politics and embodiment in educational spaces. The aim of the book is to consider, examine, and voice the lived, fleshy, textured body as a site of politics, a site of embodied educative experiences, and a site of learning and teaching. We welcome varied genres of life writing that engage with diverse theories, epistemologies and ontologies to explore experiences and politics of educative and learning body-minds (Clare, 2017) in varied educational environments and locales, whether virtual spaces, homes, hospitals, workshops, or classrooms. Researchers and educators alike have long championed the disembodied researcher and teacher as the ideal collectors and vehicles for knowledge production and emphasized the intellect over the full body in pedagogies, analyses, and fieldwork. Drew Leder (1990), in fact, reminded us decades ago that our bodies often disappear from our consciousness, emerging only in moments in which we are injured, in pain, or suffering. Writers have long recognized the need to narrate experiences with wounding and healing to explore and reclaim the self (e.g., Couser, 1997, 2007; Frank, 1995; Leder, 1990). Further, we are always enfleshed in diverse ways in various locales, always changing, moving, becoming, aging, singing, aching, growing, becoming marred, and scarred, and stronger and bigger, and smaller again. We are embodied with others, interacting with other body-mind-souls that awaken interrelational proxemics and kinesthetic experiences. We learn from moving, in moving, or, become an “I” or a “we” through and within that movement (Brown, 2013; Thompson, 2017; Young, 2005). All of these embodied engagements have educative potential.  Tentative Submission and Publishing Timeline  Proposals Due May 15, 2022  
  • Notification of Proposal Acceptance: June 15, 2022  
  • Full versions of selected papers are due to the editors: by September 15, 2022 
  • Suggestions and revisions on submissions sent to authors from the editors: November 1, 2022 
  • Final, revised essay for peer-review due to editors: January 15, 2023 
  • Anticipated Date for Publication: Late Spring, Summer, 2023  Please submit 300-500 word abstract to Lucy.bailey@okstate.edu and khintonj@odu.edu, using the subject line, “life writing the body”.  
  1. A single Word file using American Psychological Association, 7th Edition; 
  • An abstract of 300-500 words, with a working title, proposed components of the chapter; methodological/inquiry approach; possible theoretical allegiances for the chapter; potential significance for scholarship on the field of education, teaching, or life writing; a statement concerning which of the three themes you are pursuing; a working bibliography of 5–10 sources; and 
  • Brief biographical note or 1 page CV from author(s). 
Peace, LB
Lucy E. Bailey, Ph.D.
Social Foundations and Qualitative Inquiry
Director of Gender, Women’s, and Sexuality Studies
Member, Digital Humanities Initiative Oklahoma State University
She/Her/Hers 215 Willard Hall Stillwater, OK 74074 lucy.bailey@okstate.edu
Co-Editor, Research in Life Writing in Education Book Series
*

2022 PAMLA | On (Re)Shaping Identity: Self-Portraiture and the Quotidian

November 11, 2022 to November 13, 2022Deadline for Submissions, May 15, 2022
Please contact the presiding officer for this session, Ariana Lyriotakis, with any questions: lyriotaa@tcd.ie CFP submissions must be submitted through PAMLA’s portal, as listed below. 119th session of PAMLA 2022 – Los Angeles, CA (November 11-13, 2022 – entirely in-person) Special Session – CFP “On (Re)Shaping Identity: Self-Portraiture and the Quotidian Persona and confessional poetry of the Postmodern period enact an undeniable relationship with the quotidian. But how do these poems explore a visual depiction and an expression of self-identity in ordinary life? This panel will explore the methods by which poets manipulate and reject aesthetic production in their poetry, while calling into question subjectivity and truthful composition. This special session will explore poetic self-portraiture and the shaping of identity within the bounds of the quotidian. John Ashbery’s “Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror” is perhaps one of the more notable examples from this era; as a poetry firmly situated within the intermediality of poetic textual images and art, he addresses “the enchant of self with self” through personal depiction and aesthetic production. But what is revealed to the reader in these moments of vulnerability and self-appraisal? How can the poet be both subject and object, while constructing a poetic likeness amongst the commonplace? This panel seeks poetry of self-encounter, whether banal or familiar, to interrogate an inward/outward representation of the self within these constructs. Contributions are invited relating to any of the following aspects, as well as broader interpretations of the theme which may illuminate and elucidate in greater detail.
  • Depictions of the domestic and the visual
  • Intermediality of poetic textual images and art
  • Interrogations of the actual and the self
  • Orality and performance in poetry
  • Visuality of text and experimentation
  • Mimesis and the composition of ordinary spaces
  • Interdeterminacy and temporality
Deadline: May 15, 2022. Abstracts must be submitted through the PAMLA website only . The web address for this session’s CFP is: https://pamla.ballastacademic.com/Home/S/18564 All panel participants/presenters must join PAMLA by July 1, 2022. https://pamla.ballastacademic.com
Contact Info:
Presiding Officer for this Special Session at PAMLA: Ariana Lyriotakis, Trinity College Dublin lyriotaa@tcd.ie *

Memoir 101: Writing Your Life Story.

Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association (PAMLA) Conference, November 11-13, 2022. Los Angeles, California
deadline for submissions:
May 15, 2022
contact email:
The conference theme, “Geographies of the Fantastic and Quotidian,” can easily apply to personal narratives of Memoir and creative non-fiction. Let’s explore how the writers of these genres navigate memories, fantasies, and realities of life to create stories rich in lessons and meaning. This session will serve as a gathering place for memoir authors, editors, and readers. At first glance, writing our life stories seems easy, but anyone who’s ever braved the task will tell you otherwise. What makes writing memoirs and creative non-fiction so tricky? The answer lies in recognizing the elements of our stories most appealing to our readers. In this workshop, we’ll set off to dispel the myths about one of today’s most popular genres. We’ll also explore the main elements of memoir, and learn techniques a writer can use to create a dynamic personal narrative.

* 2022 BIO Conference Friday through Sunday, May 13–15, 2022 Online Biographers International Organization (BIO) welcomes biographers, editors, agents, publishers, and publicity professionals from across the nation and around the world to the 12th annual BIO Conference, being held virtually. BIO is honored again to partner with the Leon Levy Center for Biography to host this event. Registration for the 2022 BIO Conference is now available through Eventbrite. The 2022 BIO conference will take place online Friday through Sunday, May 13–15, 2022. Panels, social hours, and roundtables are live and take place in real time. Other events are prerecorded and may be watched at your convenience. The panels will also be recorded and available to conference participants a week or two after the conference itself. The cost of registration is $49 for BIO members, $99 for nonmembers. Those in need of financial assistance may apply for a Chip Bishop Fellowship here. The conference will begin with the James Atlas Plenary, in which two experimental biographers address the theme of the conference: “Disrupting the Conventions of Biography.” Plenary speakers will be Craig Brown, author of 99 Glimpses of Princess Margaret and 150 Glimpses of the Beatles; and George Packer, author of Our Man: Richard Holbrooke and the End of the America Century. On Saturday the 2022 BIO Award winner, Megan Marshall, will deliver the keynote address. A long-time advocate for biography and biographers, Marshall is the author of The Peabody Sisters: Three Women Who Ignited American RomanticismMargaret Fuller: A New American Life; and Elizabeth Bishop: A Miracle for Breakfast. Her books have received multiple awards, including the Pulitzer Prize for Margaret Fuller. Panels on the basics of biography, its craft, its business aspects, and its recent disruptions are offered on all three days. Sixteen live Zoom panels will include Biography in the Age of #metoo; Biography in Different Forms; Biography in the Worst of Times; Biographies of Families and Family Members; Black Women’s Biography; and Bertelsmann and the Future of Publishing. Also offered will be round tables on various subjects, short readings of new books by members, announcements of the Biblio award and fellowship winners, and the announcement of the Plutarch Award for the best biography of 2021, as judged by biographers. New this year will be two virtual social hours, one on Friday afternoon and the other on Sunday evening. Additional information is available on the BIO website. Linda Leavell President, Biographers International Organization president@biographersinternational.org biographersinternational.org
* New Perspectives on the “Confessing Animal” Conference: Berlin (& online), 22-23 July 2022 See also: https://disclosureconference.wordpress.com/ +++ DEADLINE FOR PROPOSALS: 10 MAY 2022 +++ Never has Foucault’s diagnosis of “confessing animal[s]” (or “beast[s] of confession,” which would be a far better translation of the French bête d’aveu) been more relevant than it is today. The first two decades of the twenty-first century have seen an exponential growth of confessing, primarily, though not exclusively, in the vast digital archive of social media. Whereas twentieth-century confessional phenomena have received considerable attention from literary and cultural critics, the more recent manifestations of confessional culture remain largely unexplored. On the other hand (though not unrelatedly), social media has also been linked to a new kind of social justice activism that takes place primarily online, as well as having been accused of the rise of identity politics more broadly. While there is good reason to remain skeptical about the media-driven publicizing and commodification of the most intimate details of people’s lives, especially this latter development demonstrates the urgent need we currently have for holding individuals (and other legal entities, such as governments or corporations) accountable for their actions. Confession, before the Romantic cult of subjectivity reduced it to “mere” self-expression, provided exactly this: a mechanism whereby people can not only be held accountable for their actions but also faced with the consequences of those actions, and, eventually, be released from the burden of their pasts. These tensions are explored by DISCLOSURE, an interdisciplinary research group founded by a Ph.D. candidate, Sonja Pyykkö (Freie Universität Berlin), with master’s students from various departments represented within the Berlin University Alliance. We are inviting participants for a two-day symposium over a summer weekend in Berlin (remote online participation possible), set to explore the current state and future directions of the “confessing animal,” as Michel Foucault’s famous diagnosis from The History of Sexuality (1976/78) goes. Foucault was notably suspicious of what he saw as a ritual of voluntary self-subjugation, both in its ancient Christian and contemporary Freudian manifestations. After decades of Foucault-inspired suspicious criticism, DISCLOSURE seeks to rethink confession in light of the crises of accountability that are becoming the hallmark of twenty-first century social justice projects. Like Foucault, we think that confession is indeed integral to secular modernity, but unlike Foucault, we do not think that this is an altogether bad thing: Rather than a dated and coercive ritual of self-policing, we take confession be a secular means of moral self-inquiry and an aesthetic of self-fashioning focused on character, defined by a set of moral values and principles—ethos. For our first symposium, we invite scholars working on adjacent topics to join us in developing new critical approaches to the study of confession. We especially welcome comparative and interdisciplinary approaches and perspectives broadening our understanding of what constitutes “confession” in different 21st century contexts. Proposals for papers, to be presented either in workshop or panel discussion format, may wish to address the following areas:
  • Confession in literature: contemporary poetry, essay, memoir, autofiction and autotheory, narrative nonfiction
  • Confession in performance and media: true crime, podcasts, vlogs and blogs, video games, social media, stand-up comedy, spoken word, performance art
  • Confession in society: social justice movements (e.g., Me Too, Black Lives Matter), identity politics (e.g., LGBTQI+), institutional and incumbent confession (e.g., churches, governments, corporations)
Junior researchers, including master’s students, are likewise encouraged to submit an abstract. Join us in asking what it means to confess in the twenty-first century! +++ Deadline for Abstracts: 10 May 2022 +++ Abstracts (max. 300 words) must be sent to both Sonja Pyykkö (pyykko@gsnas.fu-berlin.de) and Elizabeth Neumann (claraelin95@zedat.fu-berlin.de). For enquiries, please contact Elizabeth Neumann, claraelin95@zedat.fu-berlin.de. Organizing committee: Sonja Pyykkö (Graduate School of North American Studies, Freie Universität Berlin), Elizabeth Neumann, Felix Fischer, Konstantin Helm, Hannah Maier-Katkin, Dilayda Tülübaş, Metin Turgut. This project is funded by the Berlin University Alliance.
Contact Info:
For enquiries, please contact Elizabeth Neumann (she/her), claraelin95@zedat.fu-berlin.de.
*

The Epistolary Research Network (TERN)

The Epistolary Research Network (TERN) is pleased to announce its third conference, to be held 30 September – 1 October 2022. This online symposium seeks papers from scholars everywhere who have an interest in letters and correspondence throughout history. For thousands of years, in every region of the globe, letters brought people together when physical distance separated them. They derive from many parts of society. From princes to prisoners, letters transported greetings and farewells, news from distant friends, consolation in times of anxiety, triumph against rivals, submission to fate. We usually know who wrote them, but who read them? TERN is especially interested in letters that address a theme which emerged from last year’s conference, “The Other Reader(s).” From the ancient world to the post-modern, epistolary efforts have often been undertaken with at least one eye toward future unknown readers. For instance, Pliny the Younger used his private correspondence, reworked into books, to give himself and his uncle, Pliny the Elder, distinct identities that continue to impact how we understand these men today. And it was not always the case that letters were destined for the general public or even a specific person. Sometimes epistolary writings ended up in unexpected hands with unintended consequences for those who composed them. Possible topics might include, but are not limited to: a) letters used to create public identities, distinct from private ones; the benefits or limits to using letters to understand the lives of others b) the various ways letters were copied, shared or read aloud, and why this was done; how accidental readers create alternative interpretations c) the role of editors, or anyone involved in turning individual letters into a collection; how their decisions influenced later perceptions of the letter sender, familial relations or our knowledge of history more generally d) letters that never reached their addressee, including perhaps those of soldiers, immigrants, adventurers, POWs, and the role played by dead letter offices, historians, museums and archives (digital or paper) Proposals (maximum 250 words) and a brief biography should be sent to ternetwork@hotmail.com. Deadline is May 2, 2022. The conference language will be English. Publication of selected papers will be arranged following the conference. *

***CALL FOR PAPERS***

THEME: Domesticity and Persona (Volume 8, Issue 2)

ISSUE EDITORS: Dr Kim Barbour (University of Adelaide) and Dr Michael Humphrey (Colorado State University)

* Abstracts due – 29 April 2022

Revolutions political, social, personal, technological, and beyond have changed the way many people relate to the word “domestic.” At the same time, the feeling of home is still very familiar to many. This became readily evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, as homes became the scene for a far more expansive set of life activities. For some, rather than crossing beyond a private domain to the shared world, the shared world peered into a slice of millions of private lives, prepared neatly for the eye of a webcam, or interrupted by passing pets, partners, and children. For others, the external gaze was resisted, views carefully obstructed to preserve the sanctity of the domestic sphere. For still others, the domestic space became (or continued to be) a place of surveillance, isolation, imprisonment, and repression.

In the midst of these changes, both new and old, we are calling for theoretical, critical, empirical, and/or creative responses that investigate the persona in domesticity. Which personas flourish in domestic light and which shrink? Who expands or constricts the boundaries of domesticity? What freedoms and/or restrictions await, and for whom? How do we understand domesticity and personas in a time of collapsed contexts and multipurpose spaces?

THEMES AND ISSUES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:  

* Parenting, homemaking, life-hacks, pets, home spaces

* Work/Life (im)balance

* Authenticity and the domestic sphere

* Shared domestic spaces and labour

* Queering domesticity

* Protest and counter-narratives of domesticity

* Taboo and domestic personas

* Power, control, violence and victimisation in domestic persona performance

* Domestic personas through history

* Labour and the domestic persona

* Personas in paid domestic work

* Gender, race, and/or class and domestic personas

* Visualising domestic personas

* Visibilising domestic spaces and personas through lockdown and WfH

* Theorising domesticity through persona

* Persona curation and ‘work from home’ / ‘learn from home’ spaces

* Theorising persona through domesticity

* Celebrity and domesticity

* Platformed domesticity and personas

* Domesticity and education

* Domesticating devices and persona building 

To register your interest:

Please submit a 250-300 word abstract to personastudies@gmail.com, including the proposed article/creative response title, and a short author bio (50-100 words) for each contributor, no later than 29 April 2022. Ensure the abstract clearly connects to the theme of the issue – a short statement in the email to explain the fit with the issue is welcome but not necessary. Please see the Key Dates below for the timeline for the issue, noting that deadlines should be read in your own time zone.

Key Dates:

* Abstracts due – 29 April 2022

* Invitation for full papers – 06 May 2022

* Full papers due for peer review – 15 August 2022

* Peer review results returned – 12 September 2022

* Revised papers due – 14 October 2022

* Issue release date – November 2022

Michael Humphrey, Ph.D. Asst. Professor, Journalism and Media Communication
Clark C 205
Campus Delivery 1785 Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523 o: 970-480-7583
*

“Narrating Lives”: International Conference on Storytelling, (Auto)Biography and (Auto)Ethnography 27-28 August 2022 – London/Online organised online by London Centre for Interdisciplinary Research

Life-history approach occupies the central place in conducting and producing  (auto)biographical and (auto)ethnographic studies through the understanding of self, other, and culture. We construct and develop conceptions and practices by engaging with memory through narrative, in order to negotiate ambivalences and uncertainties of the world and to represent (often traumatic) experiences. The “Narrating Lives” conference will focus on reading and interpreting (auto)biographical texts and methods across the humanities, social sciences, and visual and performing arts. It will analyse theoretical and practical approaches to life writing and the components of (auto)biographical acts, including memory, experience, identity, embodiment, space, and agency. We will attempt to identify key concerns and considerations that led to the development of the methods and to outline the purposes and ethics of (auto)biographical and (auto)ethnographic research. We aim to explore a variety of techniques for gathering data on the self-from diaries to interviews to social media and to promote understanding of multicultural others, qualitative inquiry, and narrative writing. Conference panels will be related, but not limited, to:
  • Life Narrative in Historical Perspective
  • Qualitative Research Methods
  • Oral History, Memory and Written Tradition
  • Journalism and Literary Studies
  • Creative Writing and Performing Arts
  • (Auto)Biographical Element in Film Studies, Media and Communication
  • Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy
  • Storytelling in Education
  • Ethics and Politics of Research
Submissions may be proposed in various formats, including:
  • Individually submitted papers (organised into panels by the committee)
  • Panels (3-4 individual papers)
  • Posters
Proposals should be sent by 30 April 2022 to: life-history@lcir.co.uk. To download the paper proposal form and find out more about the latest deadline, please visit our website: https://life-history.lcir.co.uk/. Please download Paper proposal form. Registration fee (online participation) – 90 GBP  Registration fee (physical participation) – TBC Selected papers will be published in a post-conference volume with ISBN. *

Unending Translation: Creative Critical Experiments in Translation and Life Writing

Deadline for abstract proposals: April 15th, 2022

Publisher: UCL Press (tbc)

The aim of this collected edition is to explore different approaches to translation criticism through the medium of life writing. Traditionally assigned to the paratextual, the translator’s point of view rarely occupies the narrative centre of creative writing and essays. In recent years, however, contemporary translators have taken on a more prominent role in translation criticism, exploring their practice through the medium of memoirs and experimental essays allowing for fragmentation, doubt and openness to be expressed in subjective modes of writing. The translational turn to life writing and the essay can be interpreted as a challenge to the separation between practice and theory which traditionally exists in translation studies. On the one hand, the meeting between translation and life writing can be seen as an attempt to rethink autobiographical forms, reinventing the terms within which we create, shape and think the category of the subject through literature. On the other, creative-critical experiments in essay writing and translation have allowed for a more embodied and situated critical engagement with translation, an opportunity to explore translation as a practice-led thinking of texts and writing in their own right. The meeting between translation and life writing thus shifts our literary focus from thinking about the essence of individual works to thinking about translation as a space of subjective and material entanglement, a practice capable of re-imagining relations not only between cultures but between the traditionally opposed practices of reading and writing, thinking and doing. In this collected monograph, we ask and call for translators, writers, teachers and critics to approach translation practice from such an embodied, situated position. What happens when translation meets life writing? But also, what happens when translation shapes the essay as a form, and when the essay in its turn continues translation? What happens, in other words, when translation practice becomes the subject rather than the object of literary introspection? How can life writing accounts of translation make us rethink our understanding of the relationship between translation and politics, translation and life? We welcome experimental essays and life writing experiments, for example:  – Stories of a translator’s personal experience that narrate the interpretive experience as a writerly one. – Experimental approaches to translation that rewrite a text through the translator’s engagement with it, or perhaps weave together different types of text, playing with form. – Reflections on the subject position and voice of the translator, both as a lived experience but also as a politically situated one that is enjoined to tackle on the one hand the appropriative gesture of translation and on the other, the marginalised, secondary position that translation takes in traditional binaries of original/translation. – Writings that play on the form of the translator’s commentary, responding to the traditional forms of translator prefaces, footnotes etc. – Essays that multiply translational variants through a collection of hybrid approaches. – Translations where the figure of the author is translated into the figure of the translator – Stories of translation that give unique openings onto texts, for example through the interweaving of translation and commentary in the translation of genetic material (manuscripts, authorial marginalia, intertexts etc.) – Writings that explore translation as fiction, in the sense given by Kate Briggs as an invitation to suspend one’s disbelief, to enter the foreign as though it is familiar, but also that tell a story of the time and place of the translating figure. – Writings that visibilise the translator’s voice but their process and technique, challenging the injunction to produce a unitary, sole text as a finished product to be sellable. – Translator writings that reflect upon political and identity dynamics such as feminist translation or decolonial practices. Reflections on the specificity of translating minority, regional, non-standardized or non-national languages are also welcome here. – Heterolingual experiences that mix languages, texts, translations and originals and deterritorialize the attachment of languages to nation states. Bibliography C. Bergvall (2016) Drift. Brooklyn, Nightboat. K. Briggs (2018) This Little Art. London, Fitzcarraldo Editions. B. Brown (2011) The Poems of Gaius Valerius Catullus. San Francisco, CA, Krupskaya. – (2012) Flowering Mall. Berkeley, Roof. J. Butler. (2019) ‘Gender in Translation: Beyond Monolingualism’, Philosophia. Albany, N.Y. Vol.9 (1), pp.1-25. A. Carson (2009) Nox. NYC, New Directions. S. Collins (2016) Currently & Emotion.Londres, Test Centre. M. Gansel (2017) Translation as Transhumance, trans. by Ros Schwartz. London, Les Fugitives D. Grass (2021) ‘Translating the Archives: An Autotheoretical Experiment’, in Thinking Through Relation: Encounters in Creative Critical Writing. ed. by Florian Mussgnug, Mathelinda Nabugodi and Thea Petrou. London, Peter Lang. T. Hermans (1996) ‘The Translator’s Voice in Translated Narrative’, in Target. International Journal of Translation Studies. Vol.8 (1), pp. 23-48. C. Gepner (2019) Traduire ou perdre pied. Paris, Contre-allée. N. Grunwald (2021) Sur les bouts de la langue: traduire en féministe/s. Paris: Contre-allée. S. Kadiu (2019) Reflexive Translation Studies: Translation as Critical Reflection. London, UCL Press. ​​J. Lahiri (2016) In Other Words. New York, Knopf. S. De Lotbinière-Harwood (1991) Re-belle et infidèle, la traduction comme réecriture au féminin; the Body Bilingual, translation as rewriting in the feminine. Québec, Les Editions du remue-ménage/Women’s Press. E. Mouré (2004) Sheep’s Vigil by a Fervent Person: A transelation of Alberto Caeiro/Fernando Pessoa’s Oguardador de rebanhos. Toronto,House of Anansi Press. – (2014) Secession with Incession. Montréal, Book Thug. J. Osman & J. Spahr (eds.) (2003) Chain 10: Translucinación. Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press. N. Ramayya (2019) States of the Body Produced by Love, Ignota Books. L. Robert-Foley (2013) m. Luxembourg, Corrupt Press. C. Rossi (2018) ‘Translation as a Creative Force’, The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Culture, ed. by Sue Ann Harding. London, Routledge. M. de la Torre (2020) Repetition Nineteen. New York, Nightboat Books. C. Wright (2013) Yoko Tawada’s Portrait of a Tongue. Ottawa, University of Ottawa Press. Timeline: Deadline for abstract proposals: April 15th, 2022 Response to proposals: May 15th, 2022 Completed articles due: October 15th
Delphine Grass/Lancaster University, Lily Robert-Foley / Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3
*
CALL FOR PAPERS Telling Life Stories: Ethos, Positionality, and Structures of Narrative The reading and analysing of life stories offer multiple perspectives in understanding the self-reflexivity of authorial consciousness, the rhetorical/stylistic fashioning of ethos, and the fabulation/fictionality of narrative. Lived experiences, of the author as well as the reader, allow perception of meaning against the sedimented social, political, and cultural paradigms of the “master” or “grand narrative,” as Jean-François Lyotard puts in his seminal work, The Postmodern Condition (1979). The dialectic of human action and social reality within such narratives serves to map the interrelated progression of individuals and cultures throughout history. As a challenge to the uniform idea of art as a politicized structure, the heterogeneity introduced by popular culture introduces new questions surrounding emotional engagement and intellectual stimulation within the domain of production and reception of life writing; these questions are reflected in recent experiments with structure, style, and theme. Featuring the agential role of an individual in the larger social-political scheme, autobiographical writing represents a common structure of narrative experience. Even as authors seek to share lifeworlds, readers bring their own positionality and narrative experience to bear in response. The result is an intertexual dialogue, in which authorial expression allows independent enquiries to come to force. By engaging with life narratives and their readerly interpretation, we gather up resources to reexamine the role of narrative as an epistemology or ‘way of knowing,’ as well as to raise questions pertaining to the subjectivity of the author, the positionality of the reader, and the re-evaluation of factors affecting textual production. The narrative ethos of the writer writing, as reflected in the emotive engagement of the reader reading, highlights the shared experience of such discourse. Interpretation creates narrative models which reflect psychological underpinnings, as influenced by culturally available forms and content. Within this ethical/ethotic textual frame, the identity of the reader is projected along with the constructed identity of the author/protagonist/narrator. Within the current global pandemic, the existential premise of breathing, face-to-face contact/communication is, for the moment, withheld: we speak through masks–literally. Meeting online, we speak and listen, type and read through screen images and avatars, our living presences subsumed within the technologies of digital representation. This loss of intimacy leads us to revisit a question as old as Western classical rhetoric, though relevant today. It’s a question of ethos: that is, of constructing/representing/positioning the speaking/writing self within the textual space of language. Ethos unfolds within the structures of narrative, positioning the speaker/writer culturally and historically. Further, this unfolding is performed before (and on behalf of) the hearer/reader, who is invited into the textual space as (caring) witness and (critical) respondent. Such is a twofold premise of this issue. For this issue, we seek submissions that consider, challenge, or generate discussion about life narratives. Serious explorations/applications of emergent fields such as narrative therapy and trauma and memory studies are welcome. We are most interested in those that come from underrepresented perspectives, cultures, or positions that provide an additional view on our collective humanity. Please engage with the topics below or feel free to go beyond:
  • Biopics and the fashioning of the self/persona
  • Visual arts and autoethnography
  • Travel journalism and indigenous cultures
  • Everyday narratives in popular culture
  • Documentaries and docufiction
  • Folklife and community narratives
  • Online personas and the plural selves/subjectivity
  • Intersubjective and intertextual space of narrative
  • Sovereignty of expression amidst media control
  • Narrative politics in popular domain
  • Revisioning exclusion in age of digitization
  • Memoirs from the margins (LGBTQ+)
  • Aborignal life narratives
  • War diaries and journals
  • Mass culture and the consumption of life narratives
  • Reappraisal of historical figures in the times of hypernationalism
Submissions: Only complete papers will be considered for publication. The papers need to be submitted according to the guidelines of the MLA 8th edition. You are welcome to submit full length papers (3,500–10,000 words) along with a 150 words abstract and list of keywords. Please read the submission guidelines before making the submission – http://ellids.com/author-guidelines/submission-guidelines/. Please feel free to email any queries to – editors@ellids.com. Please make all submissions via the form: https://forms.gle/ButBog95zvvFbyrS8 Submission deadline: 15th April, 2022 Website: http://ellids.com/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/journal.llids/
Contact Email:

Life’s Not Personal: A Creative – Critical Conference on Experimental Life Writing

deadline for submissions:
April 15, 2022
Midlands4Cities AHRC
There has always been a need to adapt and disrupt conventions to tell one’s story and now there are almost as many forms of life writing as there are different lives. The boundaries of representation are continually being pushed. ‘Life’s Not Personal: A Creative-Critical Conference on Experimental Life Writing’ seeks to explore these narratives from both theoretical and practice-based perspectives. We are looking for papers that engage with novel modes of life writing, hybridity, marginal perspectives, and the ever-changing parameters of genre and privacy. Genres of interest include but are not limited to: autotheory, autofiction, lyric essays, graphic narratives, online representations of the self and hybrid forms. Papers can be based on any time period using exemplary works that attend to the conference themes. We’re also looking for creative work that experiments with the ‘I’, plays with the form of life writing or offers a marginalised perspective on writing a life. Submitted papers will culminate in a creative-critical conference taking place online on Tuesday 26th July 2022. The day will feature an exciting mix of talks and performances, alongside inspiring keynotes, an interactive workshop and opportunities to connect and network. The conference is aimed at researchers and practitioners of all levels working within life-writing. It is being organised in collaboration with Midlands4Cities Doctoral Training Partnership and Arts and Humanities Research Council. To participate, please send a 250-word abstract outlining your paper or creative piece and a 100-word biography to lifesnotpersonalconference@gmail.com by Friday 15th April 2022. Direct any queries you have to: lifesnotpersonalconference@gmail.com For more information, visit the conference website at: https://lifesnotpersonalconference.wordpress.com/ 
*

“The Circle of Life” – Birth, Dying, and the Liminality of Life since the Nineteenth Century

September 1, 2022 to September 2, 2022Deadline for Submissions: April 15, 2022
Poland
Birth and dying are the only life events that everyone experiences – without anyone being able to tell about them. As existential transitions in human life they have a profound significance for every society. Surprisingly, in historical research they are usually considered in isolation. Anthropologists and ethnologists, on the other hand, have been interpreting them as entangled practices for a long time, as envisioned in the concept of liminality and rites of passage by Arnold van Gennep and Victor Turner. In observing that cultures have different approaches to these phenomena, they observed that their functions depended on the specifics of a given society and its cultural beliefs and performances. However, rites of passage and liminal stages do not only have a cultural dimension. Rather, they are connected with historical change. This can be seen in modern societies where processes such as secularisation, modernisation, scientification, and rationalisation had a major impact on (religious) systems of beliefs as well as everyday life. Therefore, these processes also influenced the meaning of liminality and rites of passage that are subjects to public discourses, political decisions, and legal requirements. To give but two examples: So-called ‘pro-life’ groups try to alter the definition of the beginning of life, in order to prepone the moment the state is obligated to protect this life. The Heartbeat Law in Texas or the decision of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal from October 2020, but also historical discourses like the pre-referendum debates in the Republic of Ireland in the early 1980s show how impactful these discussions about the liminal stage of conception could be in modern societies. In a similar vein, debates on euthanasia have triggered a broad international controversy on when life ends – and on how people can die “with dignity” in the light of medical opportunities to prolong the life of terminal patients further and further. While the ethical and legal legitimacy of mercy killings is still disputed in most countries, passive forms of euthanasia are generally accepted, even in Catholic societies. Because they are subjects to individual and intimate aspects of human life as well as because of their relevance for societies, the thinking and arguing about liminality and rites of passage tend to be discussed in a controversial manner. The stages of conception, birth(-giving), and dying show exemplarily the general ambivalence liminality and rites of passage can create in political discussions as well as their complex legal implications. We invite interested scholars to join our conference where we would like to analyse and investigate concepts of liminality and rites of passage in a historical perspective, with a particular focus on social changes in modern industrialised societies. Thus, we are interested, among others, in the following questions:
  • how do modern, especially pluralist, societies deal with the above mentioned liminal stages at the beginning and end of human life;
  • which factors and processes have influence on changes in understanding and interpreting these stages;
  • how do modern societies and their diverse subgroups react to social change, shifts in values, and scientific innovation with regard to the liminal stages of conception, birth(-giving), and dying;
  • which notions, ideas, and (legal) traditions influence the legislative regulation of these stages?
The workshop will be held at the German Historical Institute in Warsaw on 1 and 2 September 2022 with financial support of the German Research Foundation. In case of travel restrictions due to the pandemic, the workshop will be held in a hybrid or online format. The workshop language will be English. Travel expenses of invited speakers will be reimbursed, accommodation will be provided by the German Historical Institute Warsaw. Proposals for 20-minutes presentations should include a short abstract (approx. 300 words), a title, a short bio (half a page), institutional affiliation, email address, and should be sent to the workshop organisers Michael Zok (zok@dhi.waw.pl) and Florian Greiner (florian.greiner@ebert-gedenkstaette.de) by 15 April 2022.
Contact Info:Dr. Michael ZokGerman Historical Institute WarsawPałac KarnickichAleje Ujazdowskie 39PL-00-540 Warszawazok@dhi.waw.plMichael Zok (@doc__zok) / Twitter
Contact Email:
*
“Writing Tasmanian Lives” Winter Symposium 22–24 June 2022 University of Tasmania   CALL FOR PAPERS About us  Writing Lives is a new research program based in the School of Humanities at the University of Tasmania, harnessing existing expertise and building capacity in critical studies of life writing, biography, oral history, microhistory, history of ideas, memoir, and personal writing such as letters and diaries. Our program is working to foster dialogue about life writing as a form and genre that crosses disciplinary boundaries and embraces possibilities offered by texts, objects, and nonhuman as well as human lives. We are also working to engage community and cultural sector partners both within lutruwita/Tasmania and nationally in this exciting research area. The symposium To showcase the many possibilities offered by this field of research, we are delighted to announce the call for papers for our first symposium, to be held online over the afternoons of Wednesday 22, Thursday 23 and Friday 24 June 2022. In this symposium we turn our focus to the local as we examine the challenges presented by the discipline and practice of biography and life-writing in and about Tasmania and Tasmanians. The symposium program will encourage discussion about what is at stake – critically, creatively, historically, and ethically – in writing the life stories of Tasmanians, whether historically well-known or hitherto uncelebrated. We are especially interested in exploring the following questions:
  • What does it mean to write biography in lutruwita/Tasmania, about its residents (living or dead) or about the lives that have influenced our state’s history?
  • How can we make personal histories and biographies in lutruwita/Tasmania visible to the broader community?
  • How do we connect local life stories to national and international histories and communities?
  • How does lutruwita/Tasmania feature in both human and more-than-human life stories throughout history?
  • What role do collectors and archivists play in documenting and understanding Tasmanian lives?
Papers on the theme of Writing Tasmanian Lives, interpreted in its widest sense, drawing on scholarship and experience from the humanities, creative arts, social sciences, education, and natural science, and from other diverse fields such as library, museum, archives, and cultural studies, are encouraged. We also welcome papers that engage with broader questions about life writing and biography that go beyond the local context, such as:
  • What is life writing and what forms should it take?
  • Whose lives should we examine?
  • How does the form of life-writing change with the needs of the subject?
  • How can we celebrate diversity through life writing, amplifying the voices of people who have been pushed into the margins of history and literature?
  • How can we decolonise biography?
  • Where lives have not been thoroughly documented, how can we make imaginative use of archival material?
Plenary events include a keynote address by Dr Jessica White (UniSA), about her work writing an ecobiography of Georgiana Molloy, and a panel conversation on writing Indigenous lives. More information about keynote speakers and events will be circulated closer to the date.  Proposal submissions and registration Please email abstracts and proposals (200 words approx.) for a 20-minute presentation by Thursday, 14 April 2022 to: writing.lives@utas.edu.au Submissions should also include your name, institutional affiliation where relevant, e-mail address, the title of your proposed paper, and a short bio (50 words approx.). We will advise if your proposal has been accepted for inclusion in the program and provide further details of the registration process. Event delivery and registration At time of writing, this will be an online event with panel sessions delivered via Zoom. If possible, some of the keynote plenary sessions and workshops will also take place in person in nipaluna/Hobart. Whether we proceed with any live components will be dependent on the COVID-19 situation and any restrictions that are in place, which will be considered nearer the time. For further information, do not hesitate to get in touch at writing.lives@utas.edu.au We look forward to receiving your submission.
Contact Info:
Naomi Milthorpe, University of Tasmania
Contact Email:
*
The Center for Biographical Research presents:
Sweat and Salt Water: Generating a Testament to the Legacy of Teresia Kieuea Teaiwa”Thursday, March 31 at 12PM to 1:15PM (HST) on Zoom Zoom Meeting ID: 964 6893 6495 Password: 765773 Meeting link: https://hawaii.zoom.us/j/95496570215
Dr. April K. Henderson, Director of Va’aomanū Pasifika—Programmes in Pacific Studies and Samoan Studies, Te Herenga Waka/Victoria University of WellingtonTerence Wesley-Smith, Professor (retired), Center for Pacific Islands Studies, UHMKaterina Teaiwa, Professor of Pacific Studies and Deputy Director – Higher Degree Research Training in the School of Culture, History and Language, and a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, Australian National UniversityCosponsored by Hamilton Library, the Spark M. Matsunaga Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution, Hui ʻĀina Pilipili: Native Hawaiian Initiative, the Hawaiʻinuiākea School of Hawaiian Knowledge, and the Departments of Ethnic Studies, Political Science, and Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies*
On 21 March 2017, Associate Professor Teresia Kieuea Teaiwa passed away at the age of forty-eight, precipitating an extraordinary outpouring of grief. Mourners referenced Teaiwa’s nurturing interactions, her innovative program-building, her feminist and political activism, her poetry, her Banaban/I-Kiribati/Fiji Islander and African American heritage, and her extraordinary ability to connect with people of all backgrounds.This talk will focus on Sweat and Salt Water, a collection of Teaiwa’s scholarly and creative contributions over a professional career cut short. Together, the editors will discuss how it honors her legacy in various scholarly fields, including Pacific studies, Indigenous studies, literary studies, security studies, and gender studies.
Katerina Teaiwa is an interdisciplinary scholar and artist of Banaban, I-Kiribati and African American heritage born and raised in Fiji. She is professor and deputy director Higher Degree Research in the School of Culture, History, and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, at the Australian National University. She was recently named the 2021 Australian University Teacher of the Year for her visionary approach to Pacific studies.April K. Henderson is senior lecturer and director of Va‘aomanū Pasifika—Programme in Pacific Studies and Samoan Studies at Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington. Her research focuses on the circulation of music and performing and visual art forms between the US, the Pacific Islands, and Aotearoa New Zealand. She serves on the editorial boards of Perfect Beat and Popular Communication, and co-edits the University of Hawai’i Press book series Indigenous Pacifics, with Professor Noelani Goodyear-Ka‘ōpua. University of Hawai’i Press book series Indigenous Pacifics, co-edited with Professor Noelani Goodyear-Ka‘ōpua.
Terence Wesley-Smith recently retired from the University of Hawai’i after more than three decades with the Center for Pacific Islands Studies. He is a former director of the center, and former editor of The Contemporary Pacific. Professor Wesley-Smith has written extensively about Pacific Islands studies as an interdisciplinary project.
* Stories of Women Who Lost Their Beloved Ones
  The University of Hawai`i is conducting a study:
 
If you identify as a woman, 18 years old or older, and who have lost a beloved one (e.g., significant other, child, parent, siblings) and were one of their caregivers, please share your stories
 
Dr. L. Ayu Saraswati would like to invite you to participate in a research study.
 
The purpose of this study is to learn more about how women cope with the diagnosis and death of their beloved ones. 
 
Study volunteers will receive $ 10 Starbucks or equivalent gift certificate
 
To learn more about the study,
please email Dr. L. Ayu Saraswati at luhp@hawaii.edu  
http://drsaraswati.com

Books:
Saraswati, L. Ayu. Pain Generation: Social Media, Feminist Activism, and the Neoliberal Selfie (New York University Press, 2021) 
     Click here for the Instructor’s Guide
Saraswati, L.A. and Barbara Shaw, eds. Feminist and Queer Theory: An Intersectional and Transnational Reader (Oxford University Press, 2020)
Saraswati, L.A., Barbara Shaw, and Heather Rellihan, eds. Introduction to Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Second Edition. (Oxford University Press, 2020) 
Saraswati, L.A. Seeing Beauty, Sensing Race in Transnational Indonesia (University of Hawaii Press, 2013) * The Stories We Tell Ourselves About Nice Things
 
Are you of Asian descent and are over 18 years old? 
Do you like to buy nice, luxurious, expensive items?
If the answer is YES

The University of Hawai`i is conducting a study:

Dr. L. Ayu Saraswati would like to invite you to participate in a research study.
 
The purpose of this study is to learn more about why we buy nice, luxurious, expensive items, and whether gender, racial and class backgrounds shape our consumption pattern. 
 
Study volunteers will receive $ 10 Starbucks or equivalent gift certificate
 
To learn more about the study,
please email Dr. L. Ayu Saraswati at luhp@hawaii.edu
 
http://drsaraswati.com
 
Books:
Saraswati, L. Ayu. Pain Generation: Social Media, Feminist Activism, and the Neoliberal Selfie (New York University Press, 2021) 
     Click here for the Instructor’s Guide
Saraswati, L.A. and Barbara Shaw, eds. Feminist and Queer Theory: An Intersectional and Transnational Reader (Oxford University Press, 2020)
Saraswati, L.A., Barbara Shaw, and Heather Rellihan, eds. Introduction to Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Second Edition. (Oxford University Press, 2020) 
Saraswati, L.A. Seeing Beauty, Sensing Race in Transnational Indonesia (University of Hawaii Press, 2013) *

Edited volume: Narratives of Gendered Abuse in Academia

deadline for submissions: 
April 1, 2022
Mary K Holland, SUNY New Paltz and Carrie Rohman, Lafayette College
contact email: 
While the #MeToo movement as a cultural, feminist, and antiracist force has been slowly and steadily uncovering and altering landscapes of gendered harassment and abuse across our society, academia itself as an abusive culture has remained fairly immune to these critiques. Recent events at Harvard, where senior scholars immediately lined up in support of a colleague accused of habitually harassing students, only to withdraw that support later, are sadly typical of the kneejerk defense of institutions and disregard for victims that characterize such cases. Scholars such as Sarah Ahmed have forcefully critiqued academic culture, helping us begin to theorize its endemic harassment and abuse. It is perhaps all too telling that Ahmed herself resigned from academia years ago, in protest over university failures around sexual harassment and assault. Ahmed’s crucial recent study Complaint! documents and explains the structures and mechanisms that enable institutions to reproduce misogyny and intersectional abuses of power rather than protecting individuials. This volume aims to use personal narratives to document what gendered harassment and violence in academia look and feel like, doing for them what Roxane Gay’s Not That Bad has done for rape and rape culture. In her 1938 Three Guineas, Virginia Woolf repeatedly asks us to consider what it will mean for women to follow their educated brothers into the professions: “It is true that for the past twenty years we have been admitted to the Civil Service and to the Bar; but our position there is still very precarious and our authority of the slightest” (12). Nearly one hundred years later, this sentiment still resonates. Woolf was more than prescient in warning women about what they would face as they joined the ranks of patriarchal institutions. Our contemporary failures to confront the institutional violences that continue to be reproduced within our profession— that we could argue continue to be central to our profession— exacerbate her prophecies all the more. The 2015 book Women Who Make a Fuss: The Unfaithful Daughters of Virginia Woolf, written by Isabelle Stengers and Vinciane Despret and a collective of academic women, takes up Woolf’s injunction, “think we must,” in order to ask if women in academia have changed the form of thought in their respective fields. While the primary authors make it clear that experiences of gendered “discrimination” are not precisely the centerpiece of their project, the disillusioning realities of being a female academic inevitably seep into their powerful volume. Stengers and Despret highlight the entrapments of academic life, explaining, “we are among those women who have been where Woolf said we must not go, or in any case, not stay, for staying there, seeking to make a career in the university, is to be captured by it (for both young men and women)” (52). As their incorporation of multiple female voices reveals, “once you are inside, they will look for ways to devitalize you” (Sironi qtd. in Stengers and Despret 103). This edited collection will document narratives of gendered abuse and disadvantage in academia, in order to bear witness to the ways that women, and all whose gender expression falls outside heteronormative masculinity, are devitalized in higher education. We are interested in the power of memoir becoming “anonymous,” in the circulating of anecdote as feminist documentation, and in the idea that the personal is political, theoretical, and professional. The collection will also ask after the ways that academic institutions replicate the kinds of gendered abuses that individuals experience in other forms of relationship, such as partner abuse, abuse in marriage, and abuse in family structures, alongside the failures of various therapeutic models in these analogous scenarios. The co-editors aim to reimagine the academic editorial process along feminist lines for this project, which will likely involve more communal forms of writing and re-writing than what is standard practice. For instance, we may orchestrate occasional virtual meetings among contributors, as we hope the project will function in the spirit of scholarly, activist, and advocacy frameworks. Thus, we seek first-person accounts of all varieties of gendered abuse, harassment, and/or discrimination as experienced by women and LGBTQ individuals in academia. We welcome narratives
  • from all academic disciplines;
  • from any size or type of academic institution;
  • from academics at all career stages, from graduate students to senior scholars;
  • about all kinds of gendered abuse, including but not limited to sexual;
  • about events that occurred across multiple years of individuals’ careers, or singular potent events;
  • that focus entirely on personal narrative, and/or that incorporate relevant studies or theory;
  • from writers who want to attach their names to their pieces and those who wish to remain anonymous.
Please submit your 500-750 word abstract, brief c.v., and contact information to both volume editors (hollandm@newpaltz.edu and rohmanc@lafayette.edu) by April 1, 2022. And spread the word to friends and colleagues who might have their own stories to tell. Mary K. Holland specializes in contemporary literature, theory, and women’s writing at SUNY New Paltz. Her most recent book is #MeToo and Literary Studies: Reading, Writing, and Teaching about Sexual Violence and Rape Culture (co-edited with Heather Hewett; Bloomsbury 2021). She is also the author of two monographs on contemporary lit (Bloomsbury, 2013 and 2020) and co-editor of an MLA volume in the Approaches to Teaching World Literature series (2019). Carrie Rohman works in animal studies, critical theory, modernism, and performance studies at Lafayette College. Her plenary address at the 2021 Annual International Conference on Virginia Woolf examined gendered abuse in academia. Rohman contributed to the “#MeToo and Modernism” cluster in Modernism/modernity (2020) and is Associate Editor at Contemporary Women’s Writing. Her most recent book is Choreographies of the Living: Bioaesthetics in Literature, Art, and Performance (Oxford 2018).
*
International Conference Childhood at War and Genocide: Children’s experiences of conflict in the 20th and 21st century – Agency, Survival, Memory and Representation Date: 24-26.10.2022 Location: Center for Holocaust Studies at the Leibniz Institute for Contemporary History (IfZ), Munich, Germany Children are the primary victims of wars, armed conflicts, and genocides. They perish first and in disproportionately large numbers.  Wars and genocides also destroy the family and family bonds, and that is so strikingly visible in the case of child survivors who are impacted for life with painful memories of the loss of parents, childhood, and community, and of displacement. Thanks to the last two decades of historical, sociological, anthropological, literary, and ethnographic research, scholars now know much more about the world of thinking, being, and feeling of Jewish and non-Jewish European children and youth, alongside their daily experiences, both during and in the aftermath of the Second World War. The mass of scholarly works on Jewish and non-Jewish child survivors and youth of the Nazi era, and the studies of the ways young survivors were treated by relatives, adoptive parents, social workers, medical staff, and respective states in the aftermath of the Second World War, is constantly growing. However, large research gaps remain, especially concerning the German war in the East. Similarly, specific histories of child survivors of other genocides in the twenty century and beyond are lacking. But thanks to the recent endorsement of child-centered historical methods and interdisciplinary approaches, the experiences and memories of child survivors of the post-1945 wars and genocides have also begun to be investigated. This offers us a new and vital opportunity for systematic and focused comparative studies of timely topics such as the role of a child’s gender and agency as well as different social groups and resources that enabled the children to survive; family status, gender, and adoption of orphaned children in the aftermath of war and genocide; and the child survivors’ official state status, rehabilitation, education, and displacement, among others. One of the main goals of the two-and-a-half-day international conference is to shed light on those topics and others, through comparative and transnational lenses. Our aim is not only to seek similarities and differences among cases but also to use one set of phenomena to understand the other. The conference organisers are interested in innovative contributions which tackle various historical and contemporary case studies of children and war and genocide. The organisers have three objectives. First, while the initial focus is on the Holocaust and the occupied European territories during the Second World War, we are also interested in taking a more global outlook at the experiences and representations of children who experienced, witnessed, and survived war and genocide during the twentieth and twenty-first century. Second, to explore similarities and differences in the experiences and life stories of displaced, orphaned, and also physically and mentally disabled young survivors of the Holocaust, and the genocides in Armenian, Rwandan, Cambodian, and Bosnian, among others. And third to examine the effect of war and genocide on children and childhood: on children’s emotions, needs and social identities; children’s social relations within family and friendship and long-life ties; and their role in the reconstruction of family in the aftermath of war and genocide. The spectrum of possible topics is deliberately broad to allow room for newer approaches and new questions. We especially welcome papers that relate to the following four thematic blocks: 1. The spaces of experience, agency, and survival of children and adolescents in wars and genocides. 2. The ideological wars against children: genocidal policies and practices and other forms of persecution of children by various political governments and state agents. 3. Similarities and differences in dealing with retrospective experiences of war and genocide. To what extent was it possible to inscribe and process what had been suffered in one’s own biography? To what extent were people sensitive to traumatic experiences of their children, and if so, which ones? What other ways and means of processing (film, literature, associations) exist? To what extent do states legally punish crimes committed against children? And which crimes and charges were in the center of attention? Finally, what consequences does the treatment of childhood in wars and genocides have for today’s culture of remembrance in the respective states? 4. Sources and testimonies: Children hardly leave any sources behind. The aim is to explore which sources and methods can be used to grasp and tell the story of childhood in war. We welcome ideas about hitherto little-known and unused sources. Limitations and methodological weaknesses can and should also be discussed. To Apply: We are seeking proposals for 15-20 minutes presentations in English. Applicants should send the title and abstract of their presentation (max. 350 words), a short biography (max. 200 words) including contact information, institutional affiliation, and a reference to 2-3 selected publications to zfhs@ifz-muenchen.de by 31 March 2022. Invited participants will be notified of their acceptance in the first half of May 2022. Further information: Travel and accommodation costs for invited participants will be paid for by the Center for Holocaust Studies. The organisers hope that the conference will take place at the Leibniz Institute for Contemporary History, Munich, Germany. Given the uncertainty of the Covid-19 pandemic, we may also consider a hybrid or online format, or the potential postponement of the conference. A decision about this will be made in due time. Organisers: Joanna Michlic, UCL Centre for Collective Violence, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, IAS (UCL-ISA) Yuliya von Saal, Leibniz Institute for Contemporary History (IfZ) Anna Ullrich, Center for Holocaust Studies, Leibniz Institute for Contemporary History (IfZ) Tobias Freimüller, Fritz Bauer Institute (FBI) The conference is hosted by the Center for Holocaust Studies at the Leibniz Institute of Contemporary History in cooperation with the Fritz Bauer Institute and the Institute of Advanced Studies at University College London.
Contact Info:
Contact Email:
*
Online June 17-18, 2022 Border Crossings and Human Rights in Graphic Narratives International Workshop: Call for Papers
Organisers: Olga Michael (University of Cyprus), Laurike in ’t Veld (Erasmus University Rotterdam)This workshop aims to explore intersections between border crossings and human rights in fiction and non-fiction graphic narratives. According to Özgün E. Topak, ‘borderzones are spaces where human rights are suspended in favour of sovereign practices, and migrants are left to die’ (2014, 816). Border aesthetics, a theoretical lens through which borders can be examined, conceptualizes them as linguistic, cultural, social, political and spatial entities. Borders are also understood as enabling ‘b/ordering’ practices as well as the formation of ‘narratives or tropes [,] which can […] interrogate their including/excluding function’ (Wolfe and Schimanski 2017, 149). ‘B/ordering’ practices include, inter alia, stereotypical understandings of racially or religiously ‘othered’ male migrants as ‘monstrous’ terrorists, and, correspondingly, of female migrants as silent, passive victims within patriarchal, oppressive contexts from the micro-level of the family to the macro-level of the nation (see Griffiths 2015; Ticktin 2017). This workshop will focus on graphic narratives that explore borders as sites of exclusion, while also navigating and/or commenting upon practices of ‘b/ordering.’ In addition, it will examine to what extent graphic narratives depicting human rights violations that occur during migratory experiences can indeed challenge, or if they reproduce the ‘including/excluding function’ of the border. In exploring human rights violations emerging during regular or irregular migration journeys, this workshop aims at unpacking the ways in which a human-rights perspective on the border can complicate its conceptualization. As such, it is concerned with the ‘friction and change [that appear] when borders and aesthetics rub against each other and change each other accordingly’ (Rosello and Wolfe 2017: 6), and the ways in which these frictions and changes become manifested in graphic narratives depicting human rights violations at the border. Migration and detention comics have increasingly drawn academic attention (see Naghibi, Rifkind and Ty 2020; Rifkind 2020; Serrano 2021) and, likewise, representations of human rights violations in contexts of war, conflict, and genocide in comics and graphic novels have also triggered the publication of a significant body of scholarship (Earle 2017; In ’t Veld 2019; Nayar 2021). In an attempt to bring comics studies in migration and human rights together, we invite papers examining any aspect of human rights violations occurring in or enabled by borders, which are here understood as linguistic, cultural, social, political and/or spatial entities, and as enabling both positive interactions and ‘b/ordering’ practices. The questions on human rights and the border as a physical space and a conceptual and framing device that are to be explored during this workshop include the following: ·       To what extent does the comics form, itself based on borders that frame narrative fragments, enable nuanced representations of human rights as intersecting with border crossings? ·       How do the positions of the perpetrator, the victim and the bystander become negotiated in such cases? ·       How does Western humanitarianism become staged in and through borders? ·       What is the educational use and impact of graphic narratives displaying human rights violations occurring at and through the border in higher and/or secondary education? ·       What is the role of such graphic narratives in social justice? Suggested topics include (but are not limited to): ·       Border aesthetics, human rights and graphic life narratives ·       Online graphic narratives, human rights and migration ·       Perpetrators at the border ·       Gender and perpetration ·       Victims at the border ·       Gender and human rights at the border ·       Space and human rights ·       Children’s rights ·       Western humanitarianism at the border Please send your proposals of 250-300 words for presentations of no more than twenty minutes and a short bio note of 100-150 words to bordercrossingcomics@gmail.com by March 17th, 2022. Notifications of acceptance will be sent out by April 17th, 2022. The papers selected for the workshop will be published in a special issue of a peer-reviewed journal.References: Earle, H. 2017. Comics, Trauma, and the New Art of War. Jackson: U of Mississippi P. Griffiths, M. 2015. ‘“Here Man is Nothing!:” Gender and Policy in an Asylum Context,’ Men and Masculinities 18(4): 468-88. In ‘t Veld, L. 2019. The Representation of Genocide in Graphic Novels: Considering the Role of Kitsch. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Naghibi, N., C. Rifkind and E. Ty, eds. 2020. ‘Introduction: Migration, Exile and Diaspora in Graphic Life Narratives,’ a/b: Auto/biography Studies 35(2): 295-304. Nayar, P. 2021. The Human Rights Graphic Novel: Drawing it Just Right. London: Routledge. Rifkind, C. 2020. ‘Migrant Detention Comics and the Aesthetic Technologies of Compassion,’ in Documenting Trauma in Comics: Traumatic Pasts, Embodied Histories, and Graphic Reportage, D. Davies and C. Rifkind, eds. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Rosello, M. and S. F. Wolfe. 2017. ‘Introduction,’ in J. Schimanski and S. F. Wolfe (eds.), Border Aesthetics: Concepts and Intersections. New York: Berghahn, pp. 1-24. Schimanski, J. and S. F. Wolfe, eds. 2017. ‘Intersections: A Conclusion in the Form of a Glossary,’ in Border Aesthetics: Concepts and Intersections. New York: Berghahn, pp. 147-70. Serrano, L. N., ed. 2021. Immigrants and Comics: Graphic Spaces of Remembrance, Transaction, and Mimesis. New York: Routledge. Ticktin, M. 2017. ‘A World Without Innocence,’ American Ethnologist: Journal of the American Ethnological Society 44(4): 577-90. Topak, E. Ö. 2014. ‘The Biopolitical Border in Practice: Surveillance and Death at the Greece–Turkey Borderzones,’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32(5): 815-33.
*
Colleagues, The next of my monthly webinars, Let’s Talk Books at NMU, will feature Melissa Homestead discussing her recent book, The Only Wonderful Things: The Creative Partnership of Willa Cather and Edith Lewis.  The webinar will be Friday, March 18 at 1:00 Eastern time. I’d love it if you could join us. The registration link is below. Lynn Domina You are invited to a Zoom webinar. When: Mar 18, 2022 01:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Topic: Let’s Talk Books at NMU – Melissa Homestead Please register: https://nmu.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Rp0DfO6vR6GLA8u22e4cYg After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. * College Language Association and Black Auto/Biography Modern Language Association Convention, January 5-8, 2023, San Francisco, USA Deadline for Submissions: Tuesday, 15 March 2022
Black life writing takes many forms—print, performative, visual, archival. How do different methodologies and modes constitute the work of “writing” black lives? Collaboration with College Language Association Forum. Please submit 300-word abstracts and bios to Joycelyn Moody.
*
New Perspectives on the “Confessing Animal” Berlin, 22-23 July 2022 Deadline for Submissions: 15 March, 2022 Few critics have questioned Foucault’s diagnosis of “confessing animal[s]” (or “beast[s] of confession,” which would be a far better translation of the French bête d’aveu). The more provocative of Foucault’s claims has likewise gone largely unchallenged: Namely, Foucault did not only argue that we have been conditioned into spilling our guts in public and in private, in speech and in writing—he also claimed that we have been tricked into believing that this constant and supposedly voluntary self-disclosure constitutes a rebellious liberation from taboos and censorship. “One has to be completely taken in by this internal ruse of confession,” Foucault writes, to believe that disclosing the most intimate aspects of one’s life to public scrutiny is proof of “freedom” from oppression. Never has Foucault’s diagnosis been more relevant than it is today. The first two decades of the twenty-first century have seen an exponential growth of confessing, primarily, though not exclusively, in the vast digital archive of social media. Whereas twentieth-century confessional phenomena have received considerable attention from literary and cultural critics, the more recent manifestations of confessional culture remain largely unexplored. On the other hand (though not unrelatedly), social media has also been linked to a new kind of social justice activism that takes place primarily online, as well as having been accused of the rise of identity politics more broadly. While there is good reason to remain skeptical about the media-driven publicizing and commodification of the most intimate details of people’s lives, especially this latter development demonstrates the urgent need we currently have for holding individuals (and other legal entities, such as governments or corporations) accountable for their actions. Confession, before the Romantic cult of subjectivity reduced it to “mere” self-expression, provided exactly this: a mechanism whereby people can not only be held accountable for their actions but also faced with the consequences of those actions, and, eventually, be released from the burden of their pasts. These tensions are explored by DISCLOSURE, an interdisciplinary research group founded by a Ph.D. candidate, Sonja Pyykkö (Freie Universität Berlin), with master’s students from various departments represented within the Berlin University Alliance. Drawing on the group leader’s doctoral research project, which examines confession in the combined perspective of literary theory, history, and philosophy, members of DISCLOSURE have been investigating confessions across media since the spring of 2021. We are inviting participants for a two-day symposium over a summer weekend in Berlin, set to explore the current state and future directions of the “confessing animal,” as Michel Foucault’s famous diagnosis from The History of Sexuality (1976/78) goes. Foucault was notably suspicious of what he saw as a ritual of voluntary self-subjugation, both in its ancient Christian and contemporary Freudian manifestations. After decades of Foucault-inspired suspicious criticism, DISCLOSURE seeks to rethink confession in light of the crises of accountability that are becoming the hallmark of twenty-first century social justice projects. Like Foucault, we think that confession is indeed integral to secular modernity, but unlike Foucault, we do not think that this is an altogether bad thing: Rather than a dated and coercive ritual of self-policing, we take confession be a secular means of moral self-inquiry and an aesthetic of self-fashioning focused on character, defined by a set of moral values and principles—ethos. For our first symposium, we invite scholars working on adjacent topics to join us in developing new critical approaches to the study of confession. We especially welcome comparative and interdisciplinary approaches and perspectives broadening our understanding of what constitutes “confession” in different 21st century contexts. Proposals for papers, to be presented either in workshop or panel discussion format, may wish to address the following areas:
  • Confession in literature: contemporary poetry, essay, memoir, autofiction and autotheory, narrative nonfiction
  • Confession in performance and media: true crime, podcasts, vlogs and blogs, video games, social media, stand-up comedy, spoken word, performance art
  • Confession in society: social justice movements (e.g., Me Too, Black Lives Matter), identity politics (e.g., LGBTQI+), institutional and incumbent confession (e.g., churches, governments, corporations)
Junior researchers, including master’s students, are likewise encouraged to submit an abstract. Join us in asking what it means to confess in the twenty-first century! Deadline for abstracts: 15 March 2022 This project is funded by the Berlin University Alliance.
Contact Info:
Abstracts for papers (max. 300 words) must be sent to Sonja Pyykkö (pyykko@gsnas.fu-berlin.de) and Elizabeth Neumann (claraelin95@zedat.fu-berlin.de) by March 15, 2022. For enquiries, please contact Elizabeth Neumann, claraelin95@zedat.fu-berlin.de. Organizing committee: Sonja Pyykkö (Graduate School of North American Studies, Freie Universität Berlin), Elizabeth Neumann, Felix Fischer, Konstantin Helm, Hannah Maier-Katkin, Dilayda Tülübaş, Metin Turgut.
*
Three MLA 2022 Panels from the Life Writing Forum
January 5–8, 2023 San Francisco, California Deadlines listed below
Joan Didion as Memoirist:
Known for her journalism and novels, Didion also wrote revelatory memoirs. What do they tell us about the work of grieving and parenting; of self-fashioning; of style? 300-word abstracts by 3/5/2022. Contact email: Angela Ards, ardsa@bc.edu
Planetary Lives: 
The 2019 memorial for Iceland’s Okjökull glacier suggests a question: how and why might life writing represent nonhuman, nonanimal existence to testify to climate crisis? 250-word abstracts and short bios by 3/1/2022. Contact email: Megan Brown, megan.brown@drake.edu
Auto/biographies of/as Work:
How do forms of auto/biography capture, create, and/or critique experiences and conditions of work and labour? How do authors view the work of auto/biography itself? Submit 300-word proposals & short bios by 3/7/2022. Contact email: Laurie McNeill, laurie.mcneill@ubc.ca

*

Looking Backward, Working Forward: Contemporary Life Writing and the Queer/Trans Past

deadline for submissions: 
March 1, 2022
Megan Paslawski / MLA 2023
contact email:
What strategies are contemporary life writers using to approach queer/trans pasts that remain unrecognized or unrecognizable? Possible topics may include archival silences, biofiction, LGBTQ childhoods and queer temporality, intergenerational mentorship, HIV/AIDS’ legacy, and more. This call for papers is for a special session at the Modern Language Association 2023 conference, which means that it is a non-guaranteed panel. Please submit 250-word abstracts and CVs to Megan Paslawski (Queens College, CUNY) to be considered for the panel proposal.
*
CFP: Domestic Goods: Silence speaks in our interiors, objects, clothing, and keepsakes. (Italian-Canadian perspectives) CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF ITALIAN STUDIES June 2- 5, 2022 Annual Conference https://canadianassociationforitalianstudies.org/ What items do we cherish? Which items do we pass on? Typically, an inheritance item may be attached to a monetary value. What if the object’s value is more in the form of palpable memory? Can the mundane domestic goods of a pot or colander speak of a mother, or the alarm clock speak of a father? What resonates in the prosaic realm? This session will draw on autotopography (Gonzalez), the archive (Derrida), vibrant matter (Bennett), atmospheric attunements (Stewart) and thing theory (Brown). What domestic goods speak to the heirs of Italian immigrants? How can we speak of intersectional identities in Italian immigrants’ children, grandchildren, and great children? The session will call upon the first (1900-1918), second (1950-1970) and third (1980-onwards) waves of Italian immigrants to Canada. The goals of this session are to:
  1. Welcome papers addressing themes surrounding domesticity, domestic goods, and the archive,
  2. Create a network of scholars and community members interested in intersectional identity, memory, interiors, objects, clothing and keepsakes and to,
  3. Produce a visually creative anthology of domestic goods and narratives and to,
  4. To support a Call for Papers, for a possible publication in a special issue of the journal Italian Canadiana, University of Toronto.
If you are interested in participating, please send a 350- word abstract and short bio before February 28, 2022: Lorella Di Cintio, PhD Ryerson University (renaming in progress) Toronto, Ontario, CANADA Email: ldicintio@ryerson.ca
*
Transdisciplinary Trauma Studies: Trauma Through Contemporary and Historical Perspectives https://summeruniversity.ceu.edu/courses/transdisciplinary-trauma-studies-trauma-through-contemporary-and-historical-perspectivesCentral European University, Summer University Course Budapest, July 11–16, 2022 Application deadline: 28 February 2022The course will show how trauma is present in various areas of social and cultural life; how trauma-informed approaches help understand processes of othering and traumatization, and how they can help in building resilience. We aim to make our students familiar with innovative approaches in studying trauma in different academic fields, and provide them with capacities necessary for developing greater empathy: we would like our students to acquire knowledge and also to develop an awareness of the complexity of how trauma is interwoven into enduring forms of conflict or oppression, and how the long-term impact of trauma is present in our own time.Director: Anna Menyhért Faculty: Gillian Eagle, Thomas Fetzer, Gina Donoso, Mykola Makhortykh, Annie St. John-StarkCo-funded by the Open Society University Network (OSUN)
——————————————–
Prof. Dr. Anna Menyhért
Professor of Trauma Studies, The University of Jewish Studies, Budapest, HU
Summer University Course Director, Central European University, Vienna, AT–Budapest, HU

*

Intimate Politics in Anglophone Women’s Writing

(University of Paris-Nanterre, 23-24 September 2022)

An international conference organized by FAAAM (CREA, EA 370)

In nineteenth-century romantic literature, especially poetry and personal writings, the notion of intimacy was understood as springing from the depths of an individual, untainted by cultural forces (hence closer to nature). Yet, as a number of studies have shown—most notably Foucault—intimate relationships are the product of social power structures deriving from a patriarchal gender hierarchy and reinforced by class and ethnic divides. The second-wave feminist slogan, “the personal is political,” coined by Carol Hanisch in 1969, drew our attention to the fact that aspects of women’s lives—housework, sex, familial relationships, etc. —were shaped by broader forces. We therefore invite scholars to examine “the personal is political” in all forms of women’s writings in English. In Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism (2007), Eva Illouz argues that the gender divisions that replicate the public and private spheres as well as divisions of labor are also based on emotions, without which men and women would not reproduce their roles and identities. An intense emotional culture participated in the development of capitalism. Twentieth-century America in particular witnessed the invasion of the public sphere by (Freudian) therapeutic discourse while, on the other hand, the private sphere was invaded by economic discourse. Thus, the private sphere of emotions was subjected to intense rationalization. Furthermore, the multiplicity of sexual and gender expressions in the twenty-first century challenges normative assumptions of intimacy that privilege heterosexual relationships and the biological family unit, consider binary cisgender identities as given, and view sexual or romantic desire as the only ground for developing intimate relationships. We invite participants to submit proposals treating the following themes: 1) The disclosure of intimacy as a double-edged sword for women in patriarchal cultures: empowerment, emancipation, but also increased vulnerability/exposure, backlash, commodification of intimacy. The #Metoo movement has considerably amplified the risks and benefits of disclosure. Women’s personal writings are especially subjected to this double bind. What definitions of intimacy do women’s writings offer? How are the paradoxes of intimacy interwoven in women’s writings, negotiated within the constraints of gender, ethnicity and class? How can women writers represent the experience of intimacy (between resistance to disclosure and the need/desire to recount)? What innovative narratives of intimacy do queer identities give birth to? 2) Intimate spaces: one of the ways in which we experience and conceptualize intimacy is through space (public and private spheres, and so on). Intimate relationships involve ideas of proximity and distance. Moreover, intimacy creates space. Historically, the birth of a private, intimate culture in the eighteenth century correlates with the transformation of the private abode: beds began to be relocated to more private rooms, and separate spaces for hygiene were created, to name but a few changes. Just as social spaces are ideologically constructed so that they reproduce gender divisions and roles, so too are intimate spaces. Thus, home has been considered as the female domain because of the representation of women as carers/nurturers. This representation conceals power relationships, and the fact that intimate spaces, like any other space, are heterogeneous and precarious (Rose 1993). Investing women with the role of carer/nurturer grew out of their capacity to reproduce, the uterine space being a site of much conflict and contention. Perceived as the presumed source of hysteria, of women’s assumed propensity for the domestic (Erikson’s inner space) and of the promise/threat of maternity, also described as the cave of the lost Sibyl in Mary Shelley’s introduction to The Last Man (1826), the uterus is often used as a metaphor for literary gestation. The body, and particularly the female body, with its convex and concave forms, its recesses and enclosed spaces, is often associated with the private and the intimate. As Gilbert and Gubar have pointed out, spatial imagery of enclosure and escape has characterized much writing by women (Madwoman 1979: 83, 85). From Charlotte Perkins Gilman (Yellow Wallpaper, 1892) to Margaret Atwood (The Handmaid’s Tale, 1985), heroines have been restricted to rooms and roles. For female artists, the presence or absence of intimate spaces has affected their creative output, as Virginia Woolf powerfully demonstrated in A Room of One’s Own. Because of the elusive nature of spatial intimacy, women writers have sometimes imagined utopian/dystopian worlds to represent it. In Rokeya Sakhawat Hossain’s feminist utopia, Sultana’s Dream, women rule the world as society lives peacefully and prospers through their inventions of solar ovens, flying cars, and cloud condensers, which offer abundant, clean water to the population of “Ladyland.” And the men, who are deemed “fit for nothing,” are shut inside their homes. Participants may also question the role of virtual spaces in favoring/impeding intimacy. 3) Narrative intimacy: According to Lauren Berlant, the concept of intimacy rests upon the development of a story and a narrative. As the reader is not passive in the construction of meaning, reading can be viewed as an intimate experience. Creating and entering a relationship with a reader is sometimes a very strong motivation behind the act of writing—Ruth Ozeki has spoken of writing “embodied prose in order to elicit the same kinds of strong, physical, emotional responses, from the reader” (“Literature is a Kind of Mirror,” 2016). On the poetic side, in milk and honey (2014) and the sun and her flowers (2017), the “instapoet” rupi kaur devised a poetic space combining text and image to recreate personal experiences of – occasionally traumatic – intimacy, which readers have shared and responded to. What kinds of “engagement” (Rita Felski 2008) can occur and develop throughout the reading process and beyond it? To what extent is intimacy created by narrative techniques? What issues of power are at play between (female) author and reader/public? What narrative voices shape intimacy? Participants may also examine experimental, genre-defying works that women have used to turn intimacy and emotion into political concerns.   Genres to consider: theatre, poetry, personal writings (diaries, letters, memoirs), first person novels, autofiction, science fiction, epistolary novels, experimental, genre-defying works, prison narratives…. Please send a 300-400-word abstract (for a 20-minute presentation followed by 10 minutes of question/discussion) with a short bio-bibliography to: faaam.nanterre@gmail.com  FAAAM (Femmes Auteurs Anglo-AMéricaines) is a research seminar whose members share an interest in women’s writing and gender. We have published, in the wake of our two previous conferences, Women’s Life Writing and the Practice of Reading (Palgrave Macmillan 2018) https://link.springer.com/book/9783319752464 Text and Image in Women’s Life Writing: Picturing the Female Self (Palgrave Macmillan, 2021) https://link.springer.com/book/9783030848743 Deadline for submissions: February 28th, 2022 Notification of acceptance: March 31st, 2022 Language of the conference: English Organizing and Scientific Committee: Claire Bazin (Université Paris-Nanterre), Nicoleta Alexoae-Zagni (Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis), Valérie Baisnée (Université Paris-Saclay), Corinne Bigot (Université Toulouse – Jean-Jaurès), Stephanie Genty (Université d’Évry-Paris/Saclay), Nathalie Saudo-Welby (Université de Picardie Jules Verne) Select bibliography:   Berlant, Lauren, Ed. Intimacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Boling, Patricia. Privacy and the Politics of Intimate Life. Cornell UP 1996. Cooke, Jennifer, Ed. Scenes of Intimacy: Reading, Writing and Theorizing Contemporary Literature. London, New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.   Dimen, Muriel. Sexuality, Intimacy, Power. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, 2003. Felski, Rita. Uses of Literature. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2008. Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, tr. Robert Hurley (Histoire de la sexualité, vol. 1, 1976; New York: Random House, 1978). Illouz, Eva. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2007. Miguel, Christina. Personal Relationships and Intimacy in the Age of Social Media. Palgrave, 2018. Rose, Gillian. Feminism & Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
*
Récit de vie féminin dans l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est/ Women’s Life Writing in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe/ Literatură auto/biografică feminină în Europa de Est şi de Sud-Est Call for Papers In the form of memoirs, autobiographies, diaries or correspondence, or given a literary spin as autofiction and biofiction, the experiences of East and South-East European women during wartimes and under the oppressive regimes of the twentieth century (a period laden with contrasts, which in the West was hailed as “a century of women”, Rowbotham 1997, but also framed as an “age of testimony”, Felman and Laub 1992) have been surfacing in the past two decades. The transmission of these narratives followed sinuous paths, taking both verbal and non-verbal forms, relying on both “filial” and “affiliative” networks (Hirsch 2012), and coming from both female victims and female perpetrators (Schwab 2010). If deciphering most of what came to light requires the careful eye of a literary or cultural studies scholar, the broad perspective of a historian, or the attentive ear of a psychoanalyst, some phenomena of resurfacing bring back not only traumatic legacies, but also extremist ones, pushing towards repeating a history of perpetrations (Pető 2020), a concerning tendency which calls for a political scientist’s perspective. The persistence of women’s psychic wounds, passed on through “postmemory” (Hirsch 1997 & 2012) has generated  “haunting legacies” (Schwab 2010) as it shaped the next generation’s unconscious reflexes, and has found a forceful outlet in works of life writing coming either from second-generation witnesses or from the publication of previously censored works by victims of totalitarian regimes. The transmission of these narratives happened against the backdrop of an uneven social progress, which created gender gaps and accentuated women’s vulnerabilities, despite the presence of emancipation movements, which received official support from some political regimes. This issue will look at how traumatic memories (lived, inherited, or transmitted) are transformed through the aesthetic agency of literature (sometimes with additional support from photography or visual art), thus building a safe space where the revisiting of the past allows room for both reflection and learning. The volume focuses on a triad of aspects of life writing: witnessing (following distinctions made by Derrida and Agamben, and recently refined by van der Heiden 2019, between the Latin testis, superstes, martyr – derived from the Greek martus – and auctor), enduring (which brings together suffering and duration or survival), and recovering (connoting healing in the intransitive form, but also rescuing or preserving in the transitive). We also want to take into account the influence of censorship and self-censorship on the process of witnessing and the way “missing memory” (Schwartz, Weller, and Winkel, 2021) finds a compensation in fictional forms of life-writing. Contributions should cover the large life writing spectrum (biographical and autobiographical narratives, memoirs, diaries, letters, biofiction, or autofiction), including posthumously published or retrospectively written accounts. The memory of past trauma or past guilt seeped in through gestures, images, whispers, storytelling, silences. Life writing (broadly conceived to include photography, correspondence, and archival material) has offered the main  instrument to access, reassemble, and give meaning to these traces of history. Deciphering the “communicative legacies of trauma and resilience” (Hannah Klieger, in Mitroiu 2018), the relationship between memory and history (Radstone and Hodgkin 2003), but also between witnessing and literature (Felman and Laub 1992, van der Heiden 2019), are some of our main goals for this special issue. The impact of local context on form (Mrozik & Tippner 2021) has modelled the categories of life writing in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, providing a vantage point for formulating new theories on the development of genre. We too are very interested in highlighting the local and regional background and the specificity of these political, social and cultural environments, with their impact on women’s life-writing. We invite submissions on topics including, but not limited to:
  • The value of testimony, persistence, and survival in women’s life writing and of life-based literary narratives (biofictions and autofictions) as related to historical traumas;
  • The role of literature, but also hybrid genres (life writing accounts including photography and visual art) in recovering Eastern and South-Eastern European female experiences of the twentieth century and in recording the postmemory of these experiences in contemporary times;
  • Politics, women’s emancipation movements and their backlashes: 19th century origins, Marxism and the Cold War.
  • The involvement of women from Eastern and South-Eastern Europe in political movements (leftist or rightist adherence, even extremist groups) and, if the case, the resulting traumatic repression as it is portrayed in various media.
  • The impact of the World Wars and the Cold War as well as communist/fascist repression and censorship on the evolution of women’s life writing and memory preservation;
  • The body as site of trauma, recovery, and witnessing in women’s life writing that reflects the historical atrocities of the twentieth century;
  • The transition from suffering witness (martus) to storytelling witness (auctor) in women’s life writing;
  • Establishing transnational connections and routes of memory within Eastern and South-Eastern European women’s life writing;
  • The conflicted identities of descendants and / or close friends of victims but also of perpetrators of historical trauma.
Please submit your proposals to the editors as follows: Proposals on Romanian life-writing, Cold War and totalitarian contexts: Dr. Andrada Fătu-Tutoveanu, Lecturer, andrada.pintilescu@fspac.ro Proposals on Biofiction and Autofiction, Postmemory: Laura Cernat, PhD candidate, cernat.laura@kuleuven.be Proposals on South-East European and Eastern European literature:  Dr. Bavjola Shatro, Associate Professor- shatro.uamd.edu@gmail.com Deadlines for submissions: ABSTRACTS  (around 300 words): February 10, 2022. FULL PAPERS (around 8000-9000 words): June 30, 2022. Bibliography: Felman, Shoshana, and Laub, Dori. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York & London: Routledge, 1992. Hirsch, Marianne. Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press, 1997. Hirsch, Marianne. The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012. Mitroiu, Simona (ed.). Women’s Narratives and the Postmemory of Displacement in Central and Eastern Europe. Cham: Palgrave, 2018. Mrozik, Agnieszka, and Tippner, Anja. “Remembering Late Socialism in Autobiographical Novels and Autofictions from Central and Eastern Europe: Introduction”. European Journal of Life Writing. Vol 10, 2021, pp. 1-14. Pető, Andrea. The Women of the Arrow Cross Party: Invisible Hungarian Perpetrators in the Second World War. Cham: Palgrave, 2020. Radstone, Susannah, and Hodgkin, Katharine. Regimes of Memory. London & New York: Routledge, 2003. Rowbotham, Sheila. A Century of Women: The History of Women in Britain and the United States. London: Viking, 1997. Schwab, Gabrielle. Haunting Legacies: Violent Histories and Transgenerational Trauma. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. Schwartz, Matthias, Weller, Nina, and Winkel, Heike. After Memory: World War II in Contemporary Eastern European Literatures. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter, 2021. Van der Heiden, Gert-Jan. The Voice of Misery: A Continental Philosophy of Testimony. New York: SUNY Press, 2019. Récit de vie féminin dans l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est/ Women’s Life Writing in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe/ Literatură auto/biografică feminină în Europa de Est şi de Sud-Est Appel à contributions Soit sous la forme de mémoires, d’autobiographies, de journaux ou de volumes de correspondance, soit recevant une tournure littéraire en tant qu’autofiction et biofiction, les expériences des femmes de l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est en temps de guerre ou pendant les régimes oppressifs du vingtième siècle (période pleine de contrastes, ayant été célébrée comme « un siècle des femmes » dans l’Occident – Rowbotham 1997, mais aussi présentée comme un « âge du témoignage » – Felman and Laub 1992) n’ont cessé d’émerger durant les deux dernières décennies. La transmission de ces récits a suivi des voies sinueuses, prenant des formes parfois verbales et parfois non-verbales, soutenue autant par des réseaux « filiaux » que par des réseaux « affiliatifs » (Hirsch 2012) et provenant tant du côté des femmes victimisées que de celui des femmes coupables d’atrocités (Schwab 2010). Si l’interprétation des documents qui sont parus récemment dans ce domaine serait une tâche pour l’œil soigneux du spécialiste en littérature ou de l’expert en études culturelles, entrainant également la perspective vaste de l’historien ou peut-être l’oreille attentive du psychanalyste, il existe également des phénomènes de réémergence qui réaniment non seulement la mémoire culturelle traumatique, mais également un héritage extrémiste, engendrant la tendance de répéter des violences historiques (Pető 2020), une évolution inquiétante dont l’analyse réclame une expertise en sciences politiques. La rémanence des blessures psychiques que les femmes ont transmises à leurs proches à travers la « post-mémoire » (Hirsch 1997 & 2012) a généré des « héritages obsédants » (« haunting legacies », Schwab 2010), structurant les réflexes inconscients de la génération suivante. De telles expériences traumatisantes, soit héritées soit vécues, ont trouvé un exutoire puissant dans l’écriture de témoignage pratiquée par la génération des enfants des victimes ou dans la publication des ouvrages autobiographiques ou biographiques émanant directement des victimes des régimes totalitaires et à l’époque censurés. La transmission de ces récits s’est passée dans le contexte d’un progrès social inégalement réparti, qui a créé des disparités de genre et a accentué la vulnérabilité des femmes, malgré l’existence de mouvements d’émancipation, qui ont, pour certains d’entre eux, bénéficié du soutien officiel des régimes politiques. Ce numéro thématique se penchera sur la manière dont les souvenirs traumatisants (soient-ils vécus, hérités, ou transmis) sont transformés par l’agencement esthétique propre à la littérature (parfois aidée par la photographie ou l’art visuel), afin de construire une zone neutre où la reconsidération du passé donne lieu à la réflexion et, par la même occasion, à l’apprentissage. Le volume se concentre sur une triade d’aspects de l’écriture de vie : témoigner (suivant les distinctions, théorisées par Derrida et Agamben, et récemment affinées par van der Heiden 2019, entre les termes latins testis, superstes, martyr (dérivé du grecque martus), et auctor), survivre (survivre à une expérience traumatisante, donc souffrir, mais aussi résister, durer), et rétablir (connotant une guérison dans sa forme réflexive, mais aussi l’effort de récupérer ou de préserver la vérité du passé, dans sa forme transitive). Nous voudrions tenir compte également de l’influence de la censure et de l’autocensure dans le processus de témoignage et de la manière dont la « mémoire manquante » (« missing memory », Schwartz, Weller et Winkel 2021) trouve une compensation dans les modalités fictionnelles de l’écriture de vie. Les contributeurs sont encouragés à couvrir l’ensemble de formes de l’écriture de vie (des récits biographiques et autobiographiques, mémoires, journaux, correspondance, biofiction ou autofiction), y compris des récits publiés à titre posthume ou écrits en rétrospective. Le souvenir des expériences traumatisantes passées ou d’une culpabilité traumatisante s’infiltre à travers des gestes, des images, des murmures, des histoires, des silences. Les récits de vie (conçus plus généralement comme l’ensemble de techniques de sauvegarde de la mémoire, dont font partie la photographie, la correspondance, les matériaux d’archive) ont fourni l’outil principal pour accéder à ces traces de l’histoire, les rassembler et leur donner du sens. Déchiffrer les « héritages communicationnels du traumatisme et de la résilience » (« communicative legacies of trauma and resilience », Hannah Klieger, dans Mitroiu 2018), ainsi que la relation entre la mémoire et l’histoire (Radstone et Hodgkin 2003), mais également entre le témoignage et la littérature (Felman et Laub 1992, van der Heiden 2019), figurent parmi les objectifs principaux de ce numéro thématique. L’impact du contexte local sur l’aspect formel de l’écriture (Mrozik & Tippner 2012) a modelé les catégories du récit de vie en l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est, offrant un nouvel angle pour formuler des théories innovatrices sur le développement du genre. Nous cherchons également des articles qui mettent l’accent sur le contexte local et régional et sur la spécificité de ces milieux politiques, sociaux, et culturels, dans la mesure où ils influencent le récit de vie féminin. Nous invitons des contributions sur des thèmes liés au récit de vie féminin dans l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est, parmi lesquels nous recommandons :
  • La valeur du témoignage, de la persévérance et de la survie dans les récits de vie écrits par des femmes ou dans la littérature féminine inspirée par la vie réelle (biofiction ou autofiction) dans leur rapport avec les expériences historiques traumatisantes ;
  • Le rôle que la littérature, mais aussi les genres hybrides (les récits de vie dans leur ensemble, y compris sous la forme de la photographie ou de l’art visuel), jouent dans le rétablissement / la récupération des expériences féminines du vingtième siècle dans l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est et l’impact de ces pratiques sur l’inscription de la post-mémoire de ces expériences dans l’archive contemporaine ;
  • La scène politique, les mouvements d’émancipation et leurs contrecoups : les origines de ces tendances dans le dix-neuvième siècle, notamment les discussions sur l’héritage du marxisme pendant la Guerre Froide ;
  • L’implication des femmes de l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est dans des mouvements politiques (de gauche ou de droite, y compris les adhésions à des groupes extrémistes) et, selon le cas, la répression traumatisante qui s’en est suivie, telle qu’elle est dépeinte dans les différents médias.
  • L’impact des Guerres Mondiales, de la Guerre Froide, de la répression ainsi que de la censure communiste ou fasciste sur l’évolution des récits de vie féminins et sur la conservation de la mémoire collective féminine ;
  • Le corps comme lieu de l’expérience traumatisantes, du rétablissement et du témoignage dans le récit de vie féminin qui relate les atrocités historiques du vingtième siècle ;
  • Le passage du rôle du témoin souffrant (martus) à celui du témoin racontant (auctor) dans le récit de vie féminin ;
  • Les connections transnationales et les routes de la mémoire à travers le récit de vie féminin dans l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est ;
  • Les identités conflictuelles des descendants et/ou des proches des victimes, mais également des descendants et des proches des femmes coupables d’atrocités historiques.
Veuillez remettre vos propositions aux éditeurs selon les catégories suivantes : Les propositions concernant le récit de vie en Roumanie, l’expérience de la Guerre Froide, et les contextes totalitaires : Dr. Andrada Fătu-Tutoveanu, chargée de cours, andrada.pintilescu@fspac.ro Les propositions sur la biofiction, l’autofiction, et la post-mémoire: Laura Cernat, doctorante, cernat.laura@kuleuven.be Les propositions concernant la littérature de l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est: Dr. Bavjola Shatro, conférencière – shatro.uamd.edu@gmail.com Date limite pour remettre les propositions (environ 300 mots): 10 février 2022. Date limite pour la remise des contributions (environ 8000-9000 mots): 30 juin 2022. Bibliographie: Felman, Shoshana, and Laub, Dori. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York & London: Routledge, 1992. Hirsch, Marianne. Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press, 1997. Hirsch, Marianne. The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012. Mitroiu, Simona (ed.). Women’s Narratives and the Postmemory of Displacement in Central and Eastern Europe. Cham: Palgrave, 2018. Mrozik, Agnieszka, and Tippner, Anja. “Remembering Late Socialism in Autobiographical Novels and Autofictions from Central and Eastern Europe: Introduction”. European Journal of Life Writing. Vol 10, 2021, pp. 1-14. Pető, Andrea. The Women of the Arrow Cross Party: Invisible Hungarian Perpetrators in the Second World War. Cham: Palgrave, 2020. Radstone, Susannah, and Hodgkin, Katharine. Regimes of Memory. London & New York: Routledge, 2003. Rowbotham, Sheila. A Century of Women: The History of Women in Britain and the United States. London: Viking, 1997. Schwab, Gabrielle. Haunting Legacies: Violent Histories and Transgenerational Trauma. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. Schwartz, Matthias, Weller, Nina, and Winkel, Heike. After Memory: World War II in Contemporary Eastern European Literatures. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter, 2021. Van der Heiden, Gert-Jan. The Voice of Misery: A Continental Philosophy of Testimony. New York: SUNY Press, 2019. Literatură auto/biografică feminină în Europa de Est şi de Sud-Est Women’s Life Writing in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe/ Récit de vie féminin dans l’Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est/ Apel la contribuţii Fie că a luat forma memoriilor, autobiografiilor, jurnalelor sau coresponţei ori a îmbrăcat forme ficţionalizate (autoficţiune ori bioficţiune), experienţa feminină din perioada războaielor mondiale şi a regimurilor opresive din secolul XX în spaţiul est şi sud-est european a ieşit la suprafaţă şi s-a impus în peisajul editorial al ultimelor două decenii. O perioadă a contrastelor pe planul emancipării, secolul XX a fost celebrat în Occident ca un „secol feminin” („a century of women”, Rowbotham 1997), dar în acelaşi timp a fost considerat o „eră a mărturiilor” („age of testimony”, Felman & Laub 1992). Transmiterea istoriilor personale din această epocă a urmat trasee sinuoase, în forme orale sau scrise, bazându-se pe reţele „filiale”şi „afiliative” (Hirsch 2012), venind atât de la victimele feminine ale diferitelor regimuri opresive cât şi de la alte figuri (în special feminine) care au dus mai departe mărturia victimelor directe (Schwab 2010).  În cursul descifrării acestor istorii personale publicate în ultimele decenii (şi prezentând interes pentru multiple discipline, de la studiile literare şi cele culturale la istorie sau psihanaliză) iese la lumină nu doar memoria culturală traumatică, ci şi, în egală măsură, o conservare şi reemergenţă a extremismului. În unele contexte, aceasta din urmă a putut da naştere unei tendinţe de a repeta violenţe istorice (Pető 2020), o direcţie îngrijorătoare care solicită o perspectivă politologică specializată. Persistenţa unor traume, transmise apropiaţilor acestor figuri feminine prin ceea ce se numeşte „post-memorie” (Hirsch 1997 & 2012) a generat  „reminiscenţe obsedante” („haunting legacies” (Schwab 2010), transmiţând reflexe inconştiente noii generaţii. Aceste experienţe traumatice, trăite sau moştenite, s-au manifestat cu forţă în scriitura de tip memorialistic sau auto/biografic a generației care a preluat amintirile traumatizante, precum și în scriitura confesivă a victimelor însele, anterior cenzurată de regimurile totalitare. Transmiterea memoriei reprimate s-a produs în contextul unui progres social inegal, care a creat disparităţi de gen şi a accentuat vulnerabilităţile feminine, în ciuda existenţei unor mişcări de emancipare care au primit sprijin oficial din partea unora dintre aceste regimuri. Acest număr tematic are în vedere felul în care memoria traumatică (a experienţelor trăite, moştenite sau transmise) este transformată prin influenţa estetică a literaturii (uneori şi prin mijlocirea unor elemente vizuale, fotografie sau arte plastice), construind un spaţiu securizant în care revizitarea trecutului e un prilej de reflecţie şi învăţare. Volumul se concentrează pe o triadă care caracterizează scriitura auto/biografică: mărturia (urmând distincţiile făcute de Derrida şi Agamben şi nuanţate mai recent de van der Heiden, 2019, între testis, superstes, martyr, derivat la rândul său din grecescul martus –  şi auctor), rezistenţa (care concentrează suferinţa, durata, dar şi supravieţuirea) şi recuperarea (având conotaţii terapeutice în formă reflexivă, dar şi de salvare sau conservare în formă tranzitivă). Dorim să luăm în considerare influenţa cenzurii şi auto-cenzurii asupra procesului prin care această mărturie se transmite şi asupra modului în care „memoria absentă” (missing memory, Schwartz, Weller, & Winkel, 2021) e compensată de formele ficţionale ale scriiturii memorialistice (conţinute de termenul-umbrelă de life-writing). Contribuţiile autorilor interesaţi de acest număr pot acoperi un spectru larg de genuri şi subgenuri (biografii şi autobiografii, memorii, jurnale, scrisori, bioficţiune sau autoficţiune), incluzând texte publicate postum sau scrise retrospectiv. Rememorarea traumelor  sau a vinovăţiei se manifestă în gesturi, imagini, naraţiune sau chiar în ceea ce rămâne nespus. Literatura auto/biografică (life-writing, unde includem şi materiale de arhivă, fotografice şi corespondenţă) a oferit un instrument major de acces, reansamblare şi conferire de sens acestor istorii în spaţiul Istoriei.  Numărul e interesat de descifrarea „reminiscenţelor comunicative ale traumei şi rezistenţei” (communicative legacies of trauma and resilience, Hannah Klieger, în Mitroiu 2018), relaţia dintre memorie şi istorie (Radstone & Hodgkin 2003), dar şi dintre mărturie şi literatură (Felman & Laub 1992, van der Heiden 2019). Impactul contextului local asupra formei (Mrozik & Tippner 2021) a modelat categoriile subsumate life-writing-ului, oferind un nou unghi pentru formularea teoriilor inovatoare asupra dezvoltării genului. Ne interesează articole care să pună accentul pe contextul local şi regional dar şi pe specificul mediului politic, social şi cultural care au influenţat literatura auto/biografică feminină. Vă invităm să trimiteţi articole legate de următoarele teme şi nu numai:
  • Valoarea mărturiei, rezistenţei şi supravieţuirii înliteratura auto/biografică feminină, bioficţiune şi autoficţiune în relaţie cu traume istorice.
  • Rolul literaturii, dar şi al genurilor hibride (relatări auto/biografice incluzând fotografia şi artele vizuale), în recuperarea experienţelor feminine est şi sud-est europene în secolul XX, dar şi în practici de post-memorie în documentele contemporane.
  • Politică, mişcări de emancipare şi retrograde: origini în cadrul secolului al XIX-lea. Marxismul şi Războiul Rece.
  • Implicarea femeilor din estul şi sud-estul Europei în mişcările politice (de dreapta sau stânga, incluzând aderenţa la grupările extremiste) şi, unde a fost cazul, reprimarea şi trauma care au rezultat din acestea, aşa cum apar prezentate în diverse medii artistice.
  • Impactul celor Două Războaie Mondiale şi al Războiului Rece precum şi al represiunii şi cenzurii comuniste şi fasciste asupra evoluţiei genului auto/biografic şi chestiunii memoriei.
  • Corpul ca spaţiu de manifestare al traumei, recuperării şi mărturiei în scriitura auto/biografică, reflectând atrocităţile secolului XX.
  • Tranziţia de la martor afectat de evenimente (martus) la martor ca autor al relatării (auctor) în scriitura auto/biografică.
  • Stabilirea de conexiuni şi trasee transnaţionale ale memoriei în scriitura auto/biografică feminină est şi sud-est europeană.
  • Identităţi conflictuale ale descendenţilor şi apropiaţilor victimelor, dar şi ale celor care au perpetuat trauma istorică
Contribuţiile pot fi trimise pe adresele editorilor acestui număr tematic după cum urmează: Termene-limită:
  • Rezumate (aprox. 300 de cuvinte): 10 februarie 2022.
  • Lucrări acceptate (8000-9000 cuvinte): 30 iunie 2022.
Bibliografie: Felman, Shoshana, and Laub, Dori. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York & London: Routledge, 1992. Hirsch, Marianne. Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press, 1997. Hirsch, Marianne. The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012. Mitroiu, Simona (ed.). Women’s Narratives and the Postmemory of Displacement in Central and Eastern Europe. Cham: Palgrave, 2018. Mrozik, Agnieszka, and Tippner, Anja. “Remembering Late Socialism in Autobiographical Novels and Autofictions from Central and Eastern Europe: Introduction”. European Journal of Life Writing. Vol 10, 2021, pp. 1-14. Pető, Andrea. The Women of the Arrow Cross Party: Invisible Hungarian Perpetrators in the Second World War. Cham: Palgrave, 2020. Radstone, Susannah, and Hodgkin, Katharine. Regimes of Memory. London & New York: Routledge, 2003. Rowbotham, Sheila. A Century of Women: The History of Women in Britain and the United States. London: Viking, 1997. Schwab, Gabrielle. Haunting Legacies: Violent Histories and Transgenerational Trauma. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010. Schwartz, Matthias, Weller, Nina, and Winkel, Heike. After Memory: World War II in Contemporary Eastern European Literatures. Berlin/ Boston: De Gruyter, 2021. Van der Heiden, Gert-Jan. The Voice of Misery: A Continental Philosophy of Testimony. New York: SUNY Press, 2019.
* Date of Event, February 18, 2022 Colleagues, I’ve begun a new webinar series focused on scholars discussing their new books. The next episode will occur this Friday, Feb. 18, at 1:00 Eastern time. My guest will be Gail Okawa, discussing her book, Remembering Our Grandfathers’ Exile: US Imprisonment of Hawai’i’s Japanese in World War II.  I’d love for you to join us if you’re free. Registration information is below. Feel free to share this widely. Thanks, Lynn Domina ldomina@nmu.edu You are invited to a Zoom webinar. When: Feb 18, 2022 01:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Topic: Let’s Talk Books at NMU Please register for the date and time that works best for you: https://nmu.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_bznT6dkhTp-HPDFngGdLSQ After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. * Telling (Jewish) Lives: BiographersReports / (Jüdische) Leben erzählen: Biographische Werkstattberichte All lectures in German German version see below Digital lecture series, winter term 2021/2022 Tuesdays, 6:15pm – 7:45pm (CEST/CET), online Prior registration requested: events-js@uni-potsdam.de Organized by Prof. Dr. Grażyna Jurewicz University of Potsdam, Institute of Jewish and Religious Studies Selma Stern Center for Jewish Studies Berlin-Brandenburg On the topic For some time now, there has been talk of a “biographical turn” in the historically working humanities. In Jewish Studies, too, the relevance of biographical research practice is continuously increasing. Based on this finding, the interdisciplinary lecture series held in German (Jüdische) Leben erzählen: Biographische Werkstattberichte [Telling (Jewish) Lives: Biographers’ Reports] offers insights into the historiographical and literary aspects of working on Jewish life stories. Jewish lives often embody subject positions whose biographical accessing and analysis pose considerable challenges to researchers. These are rooted in phenomena such as exile, diaspora, transculturality, multilingualism, and intersectionality, which seem to be inherent in Jewish history and which result in potentially discontinuous or fragmented worlds of experience. The consequence is an often markedly complex constellation of sources, which on the one hand complicate biographical investigations, but on the other hand can prove particularly revealing for the methodology of biography. In the context of retrospective reflection on the processes of their life history studies, the speakers describe such challenges and possible ways of dealing with them, using concrete examples. In doing so, they touch upon a number of general methodological questions and practical research problems of biographical writing, such as: the choice of protagonists of biographical narratives; the presence of biographers in their representations of other lives and their possible identification with their own “objects”; the handling of gaps in knowledge or the abundance of knowledge; literary aspects of biographical work as well as its ethical dimensions; the representability of the connections between the life to be biographed and the specific form of creativity that was practiced in this life. Along these and other case-specific aspects of life writing, the lecture series will discuss the conditions of the possibility of transforming traces of past lives as conveyed by various media into written narratives in order to gain methodological yields for biographical research practice within and outside Jewish Studies. Program 10/26/2021 Grażyna Jurewicz (Potsdam/Berlin): Prologue 11/2/2021 Beatrix Borchard (Hamburg/Berlin): Storytelling or Marking Gaps? Reflecting on the Handling of Biographical Source Material 11/9/2021 Ernst Piper (Potsdam): Between Intersectionality and Internationalism. Approaching Rosa Luxemburg 11/16/2021 Reiner Stach (Berlin): Kafka’s Life. A Research 11/30/2021 Verena Dohrn (Hannover): Family Biography as Literary Procedure. The Saga of the Oil Entrepreneurs Kahan from Baku 12/07/2021 Dominique Bourel (Paris/Kassel): Moses Mendelssohn and Martin Buber: Biography without Autobiography? 12/14/2021 Stefanie Mahrer (Bern/Basel): Salman Schocken. Topographies of a Life 01/11/2022 Katharina Prager (Vienna): “I can only understand it Hasidically…” – Jewishness in the Lives of Berthold and Salka Viertel 01/18/2022 Claudia Willms (Frankfurt am Main): Historiography from below? Franz Oppenheimer and Biographical Research from a Cultural Anthropology Perspective 01/25/2022 Efrat Gal-Ed (Düsseldorf/Augsburg): Nobody’s language. Itzik Manger – a European Poet. On the Biographical Textual Process 02/01/2022 Jacques Picard (Basel/Zurich): The Clock That Is Still Ticking. On Subjects and Objects in Biographical Research 02/08/2022 Philipp Lenhard (Munich): The Pitfalls of the Archive: On the Biography of Friedrich Pollock 02/15/2022 Christina Pareigis (Hamburg): Shamanistic Voyages. Review of the Making of an Intellectual Biography of Susan Taubes 02/22/2022 Stephan Braese (Aachen): To Biographize Hildesheimer: Workshop – Expedition – Laboratory 03/01/2022 Alfred Gall (Mainz): “I don’t belong anywhere, because I am from somewhere else”: Constellations of Biography and Science Fiction in Stanisław Lem’s Work *** German Version Digitale Ringvorlesung, Wintersemester 2021/2022 (Jüdische) Leben erzählen: Biographische Werkstattberichte dienstags, 18:15–19:45 Uhr (MESZ/MEZ), online Anmeldung: events-js@uni-potsdam.de Veranstaltet von Prof. Dr. Grażyna Jurewicz Universität Potsdam, Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft Selma Stern Zentrum für Jüdische Studien Berlin-Brandenburg Zum Thema Seit geraumer Zeit ist in den historisch arbeitenden Geisteswissenschaften von einem „biographical turn“ die Rede. Auch in den Jüdischen Studien nimmt die Relevanz der biographischen Forschungspraxis kontinuierlich zu. Von diesem Befund ausgehend bietet die interdisziplinäre Ringvorlesung „(Jüdische) Leben erzählen: Biographische Werkstattberichte“ Einblicke in die historiographischen und literarischen Aspekte der Arbeit an jüdischen Lebensgeschichten. Jüdische Lebensläufe verkörpern häufig Subjektpositionen, deren biographische Erschließung Forscher:innen vor erhebliche Herausforderungen stellt. Diese gründen in Phänomenen wie Exil, Diaspora, Transkulturalität, Mehrsprachigkeit und Intersektionalität, die der jüdischen Geschichte scheinbar inhärent sind und aus denen potenziell diskontinuierliche bzw. fragmentierte Erfahrungswelten resultieren. Das Ergebnis sind oft ausgesprochen komplexe Quellenkonstellationen, die biographische Untersuchungen einerseits erschweren, sich aber andererseits für die Methodologie der Biographie als besonders aufschlussreich erweisen können. Im Rahmen retrospektiver Reflexion über die Entstehungsprozesse ihrer lebensgeschichtlichen Studien schildern die Referent:innen an konkreten Beispielen solche Herausforderungen und den möglichen Umgang mit ihnen. Dabei berühren sie eine Reihe allgemeiner methodologischer Fragen und forschungspraktischer Probleme biographischen Schreibens, etwa: die Wahl von Protagonist:innen biographischer Narrative; die Anwesenheit der Biograph:innen in ihren Darstellungen fremder Leben und ihre eventuelle Identifikation mit den eigenen „Objekten“; den Umgang mit Wissenslücken bzw. der Wissensfülle; literarische Aspekte biographischer Arbeit sowie deren ethische Dimensionen; die Darstellbarkeit der Zusammenhänge zwischen dem zu biographierenden Leben und der je spezifischen Form der Kreativität, die in diesem Leben wirksam wurde. Entlang dieser und weiterer fallspezifischer Aspekte lebensgeschichtlichen Schreibens werden in der Ringvorlesung die Bedingungen der Möglichkeit diskutiert, medial vermittelte Spuren vergangener Leben in schriftliche Erzählungen zu transformieren, um damit methodologische Erträge für die biographische Forschungspraxis inner- und außerhalb des Faches Jüdische Studien zu gewinnen. Termine 26.10.2021 Grażyna Jurewicz (Potsdam/Berlin): Prolog 02.11.2021 Beatrix Borchard (Hamburg/Berlin): Storytelling oder Lücken markieren? Nachdenken über den Umgang mit biographischem Quellenmaterial 09.11.2021 Ernst Piper (Potsdam): Zwischen Intersektionalität und Internationalismus. Annäherung an Rosa Luxemburg 16.11.2021 Reiner Stach (Berlin): Kafkas Lebenswelt. Eine Recherche 30.11.2021 Verena Dohrn (Hannover): Familienbiographie als literarisches Verfahren. Die Saga der Ölunternehmer Kahan aus Baku 07.12.2021 Dominique Bourel (Paris/Kassel): Moses Mendelssohn und Martin Buber: Biographie ohne Autobiographie? 14.12.2021 Stefanie Mahrer (Bern/Basel): Salman Schocken. Topographien eines Lebens 11.01.2022 Katharina Prager (Wien): „Ich kann es nur chassidisch begreifen…“ – Jüdischsein in den Leben von Berthold und Salka Viertel 18.01.2022 Claudia Willms (Frankfurt am Main): Geschichtsschreibung von unten? Franz Oppenheimer und die kulturanthropologische Biographieforschung 25.01.2022 Efrat Gal-Ed (Düsseldorf/Augsburg): Niemandssprache. Itzik Manger – ein europäischer Dichter. Zum biographischen Textverfahren 01.02.2022 Jacques Picard (Basel/Zürich): Die Uhr, die noch tickt. Von Subjekten und Objekten in der Biographieforschung 08.02.2022 Philipp Lenhard (München): Die Tücken des Archivs: Zur Biographie Friedrich Pollocks 15.02.2022 Christina Pareigis (Hamburg): Shamanistic Voyages. Rückblick auf die Entstehung einer intellektuellen Biographie über Susan Taubes 22.02.2022 Stephan Braese (Aachen): Hildesheimer „biographieren“: Werkstatt – Expedition – Labor 01.03.2022 Alfred Gall (Mainz): „Ich gehöre nirgendwo hin, denn ich bin anderswoher“: Konstellationen von Biographie und Science-Fiction bei Stanisław Lem — Prof. Dr. Grażyna Jurewicz Universität Potsdam Institut für Jüdische Studien und Religionswissenschaft Am Neuen Palais 10 | 14469 Potsdam | Raum 1.11.0.04 Telefon: +49 (0) 331 977-1284 E-Mail: grazyna.zuzanna.jurewicz@uni-potsdam.de *
Call for Papers: Autotheory: Thinking through Self, Body, Practice (Hybrid Conference)
Deadline for Submissions: 1st February 2022 Date: Week of 24th October 2022 Venue: University of Glasgow and online In 2015, the term ‘autotheory’ rose to prominence with the publication of Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts, eliciting a flurry of critical and academic attention. Yet the practice of blending self-representation with philosophical and theoretical engagements has a long history and rhizomatic roots. Notably, the practice has been mobilised and advanced through the work of Women of Colour and LGBTQ+ feminist writers and thinkers, for example Audre Lord, bell hooks, Cherríe Moraga, Christina Sharpe, Gloria Anzaldúa, and Theresa Hak Kyung Cha. Comparable practices have arisen across time and place, across traditions of memoir and autobiographic writing, personal essay, creative nonfiction, criticism, autoethnography, activism, philosophy and critical theory, as well as in performance, visual art and film. While the practice has been most closely associated with literature, we are interested in exploring its possibilities beyond. Artists like Adrian Piper and Félix González-Torres push the boundaries of the term beyond the literary sphere and we especially encourage submissions that do the same. We use ‘autotheory’ not to limit the possibilities of engagement, but rather to pay homage to the thinkers who have thought alongside it over the years; thinkers like Gloria Anzaldúa, who’s  ‘autohistoria’ and ‘autohistoria-teoría’ are foundational blocks for autotheory as it is understood today. Anzaldua used ‘autohistoria’ to describe art that ‘depicts both the soul of the artist and the soul of the pueblo… [which] goes beyond the traditional self-portrait or autobiography; in telling the writer/artist’s personal story, it also includes the artist’s cultural history.’ In 2009, she coined ‘autohistoria-teoría’ to describe a ‘personal essay that theorizes’. The cognate ‘autotheory’ was coined by Stacey Young in 1997 to describe feminist ‘autotheoretical texts’ such as This Bridge Called My Back (ed. Gloria Anzaldúa and Cherríe Moraga) as ‘counter-discourses’ and ‘the embodiment of a discursive type of political action, which de-centers the hegemonic subject of feminism’. Later, Mieke Bal described the practice as a ‘ongoing, spiralling form of analysis-theory dialectic’ and more recently still, Lauren Fournier has referred to autotheory as a means of using autobiography, first person and other self-imaging processes to perform, enact, iterate, subvert and instantiate the hegemonic discourse of theory and philosophy. The term, then, is nebulous and porous, open to multiple iterations and possibilities. We want to explore them. Autotheory: Thinking through Self, Body, Practice will be held over two days at the University of Glasgow and online and will explore autotheory across practices, mediums, disciplines, places and times. We seek contributions from activists, artists, critics, curators, filmmakers, musicians, performers, scholars, writers, and anyone whose work engages with autotheory or with the self and theory/philosophy, working in any medium. We are interested in papers, performances, workshops,  and cross-modal events which explore the history and/or future of autotheory; autotheory as decolonial and feminist practice; the assumptions and implications underlying the mode; practices of autotheory; autotheoretical works and works which might be autotheory; and anything else that touches on the personal as theoretical. Autotheoretical approaches are encouraged. Please also send us your autotheoretical poems, songs, artworks, fragments and uncategorizable miscellanea–we hope to provide space for autotheoretical works themselves. If you have any queries, please email us at: autotheoryconference@gmail.com To submit, please complete this google form: https://forms.gle/a4qN1evzivVRxiUNA Submissions should include an approximately 300 word proposal and a little bit about yourself. Please also consider if you would like to contribute in person or online and let us know any specific requirements your submission might entail. *
Call for Papers: Biographies of Numbers
July 7, 2022 to July 9, 2022, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, GermanyDeadline for Submissions: January 31, 2022
Throughout the twentieth century, Chinese intellectuals, politicians, and scientists were obsessed with the population number of their country. From the late nineteenth century to the foundation of the People’s Republic (PRC) in 1949, without being able to rely on entirely accurate census surveys, they alleged that China had 400 million inhabitants (Bréard 2019). Consequently, the narrative goes, this made the world’s most populous country hard to govern, but also one of the most important countries in the world which eventually deserved a leading role in international politics. Governing and controlling the population arguably has been and is one of the most fundamental concerns of the government of the PRC, spawning numerous social engineering projects such as the one-child policy or the social credit system. Biographies of Numbers will explore the life of numerically framed knowledge, such as the population of China, from a global historical perspective on quantification, regarded as one of the most pervasive practices of the modern world. This conference is based on the assumption that numbers have their own biographies: they come into being, lead a life of their own, travel in time and space, have a career, and eventually fall into oblivion. That numbers are not simply the objective reflection of reality but socially, politically, culturally, and historically constructed knowledge has been shown extensively for the case of statistics in the Western world (Desrosières 1993, Porter 2020). At the same time, numbers are powerful agents which represent, transform, and recreate individual lives, social worlds, political spheres, nature, or other entities that are taken for granted. Statistical and other numbers, invoking mathematical reason and scientific truth, often claim universal validity and thus circulate easily from one site to another. By following the global trajectory of a single number from its production and global dissemination to the divergent narratives surrounding its numerical value, we can analyze the stabilizing and destabilizing impact of numbers on individual and collective practices and imaginaries. The aim of the conference is to trace the biographies of specific numbers. Although we will limit ourselves to “scientific numbers”, i.e. those that are grounded on quantitative knowledge and method, our notion of “number” is to be understood more broadly, including indicators, formulas, and statistics as well. By focusing on the historical emergence and circulation of numbers and on patterns of argumentation and narration with these numbers, this conference also aims to contribute to historical epistemology and the global history of science. Rather than pursuing a realist approach that focuses on the alleged scientific “discovery” of numbers or claiming that they are mere “inventions” in the constructivist sense, we see to follow the argument that numbers as (scientific) objects can be “simultaneously real and historical” (Daston 2000:3). Possible questions to be addressed might include: How do certain numbers or indicators become objects of scientific inquiry or scientific entities themselves? What debates are they surrounded by, how and when do they become entrenched in scientific practices, and how do they disappear from the consciousness of the public or scientific experts? What powers and agency do we attribute to numbers? What are the sources of their power? How do numbers interact with other forms of authority, for example law, to create trust? How have instruments of quantification altered the modalities of governing and forms of personhood and subjectivity? Who writes the biography of a number? Although some of these questions have been examined partially in a Western European or North American context, they have been largely ignored regarding other regions. We welcome contributions that deal with the historical and cultural role of numbers, particularly in China but also more generally in other East Asian countries. While papers may be situated in a local context, they are welcome to chart developments that occurred in many areas and over longer time periods. Contributions might address the following topics:
  • biomedical numbers and indicators as ideals or thresholds (such as the 7-day incidence in the context of COVID)
  • the cross-cultural dissemination and adaptation of an indicator
  • governing individuals and populations by body measurements and biometrical data
  • the political life of social numbers and their effect on categories such as family, gender balance, etc. (e.g. China’s “One-Child”)
  • the role of ideology in the construction and application of quantitative knowledge
  • numbers as authoritative entity justifying policies
  • numbers as cultural, social or political icons
  • delegation processes that contribute to the fame and persistence of a numerical entity
  • the dichotomy between the absolute (universal, eternal) value of a number and its narratives or degrees of realism (variable, manipulable, etc.).
Practicalities and timeframe: The Conference is organized with the generous support of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation within the framework of the sin-aps project at the Chair for Sinology with a focus on the Intellectual and Cultural History of China, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg. It will take place July 7-9, 2022, in the city of Erlangen. Please send an abstract of no longer than one page and a short, one-paragraph biographical statement to Prof. Andrea Bréard andrea.breard@fau.de and Dr. Nicolas Schillinger nicolas.schillinger@fau.de by January 31, 2022. Selected participants are expected to send in an unpublished paper draft by the end of May 2022, since we will have discussion and reading groups based on participants’ submissions and envision a publication after the conference. References Bréard, Andrea. “400 Millionen – Globale Wirkungen einer mächtigen Zahl.” in N. Bilo, S. Haas and M. C. Schneider, eds., Kulturgeschichte der Statistik, Steiner Verlag (2019), 215–232. Daston, Lorraine, ed. Biographies of Scientific Objects. University of Chicago Press, 2000. Desrosières, Alain. La politique des grands nombres : une histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: La Découverte, 1993. Porter, Ted. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press, 2020 (2nd ed.).
Contact Info:
Alexander-von-Humboldt Research Group Sin-Aps Hartmannstr. 14, D3 91052 Erlangen, Germany
*
Deadline for Submissions January 31, 2022

CFP: Remembering Contentious Lives
May 11-13th 2022 at Utrecht University
Organised as part of the ERC research project
Remembering Activism: The Cultural Memory of Protest in Europe (PI
Ann Rigney)
Contact: Clara Vlessing, Duygu Erbil, react@uu.nl.

What can studying life stories tell us about the relationship between memory and activism? Auto/biography studies has long been interested in the ways in which written lives construct subjectivities. Life writing itself has under certain conditions been theorised as a dissenting practice (Perkins 2000; Powell 2021): functioning as testimony in human rights activism (Schaffer and Smith 2004; Whitlock 2007), exemplifying textual forms with which to voice resistance (Harlow 1987; Harlow 1996) or constructing a repertoire of activist identities. Building on these discussions of the socio-political potential of representing lived experience, this conference looks specifically at the storying of contentious lives. How do we remember lived experiences of dissent? And how does life writing, as an act of cultural remembrance, play into the construction of collective identities? Can remembering past activist lives affect contemporary activism?

Bringing together social movement, cultural memory and auto/biography studies, this conference will consider the role of life stories in the memory-activism nexus (Rigney 2018). Auto/biography has a part to play in memory activism (Gutman 2017), in the mobilisation of memory in activism and in mediating the memory of activism: storying contemporary or recent lives saves a particular set of images or version of events for posterity; while the storying of past lives affects the changing memory of protest and protestors, and has the potential to mobilise activists in the present. Focusing on memories of change and the desire to change, it aims to bridge the gap between accounts of remembering selves and remembering collectives in social movements.

Possible lines of enquiry include:

●  What can life writing help us understand about the role of cultural memory in social
movements?
●  How can an individual’s storied life stand for a collective? What are the available subject
positions or models for contentious subjectivities?
●  What are the media and genres for remembering contentious lives? What literary devices are
at work and how do they structure political emotions and affect?
●  Which institutions prompt or affect the stories of contentious lives? How does this change
over time?
●  What forms of witnessing are important to the memory of social movements? Is there an
inherent relationship between witnessing and injustice?
●  How does the memory of movements relate to the memory of individual lives, which go on
longer than particular protest cycles? What role does intergenerational storytelling have in the transmission of contentious memories?

If you are interested in participating, please send a 350-word abstract and short bio to react@uu.nl before January 31st 2022. This is an in-person conference with the possibility of online presentation. A limited number of travel grants will be made available. We intend for this conference to lead to an edited publication in a peer-reviewed venue. Participants will be invited to contribute.

*
CALL FOR PAPERS
Poetics of Travelling Self: Discursive Formations and Purposiveness of Travel Special Issue of Language, Literature, and Interdisciplinary Studies The heterogenous character of protean form of travel writing—letters, journals, logbooks, diaries, memoir, journalistic pieces, guidebooks, confessional narratives, accounts of seafaring voyages, literary picaresque narratives, scientific explorations, artists’ escapades, ventures of urban flâneurs, self-exiled wanderers, and fictionresists easy demarcation. Its heterogeneity lies in the revisionary stance brought about in each narrative through the distinguishing figure of the traveller, mode of narration, means of mapping, or redefining of the landscape. Right from antiquity to medieval, modern to postmodern times, travel narratives have showcased relevance despite premature announcements or off-the-mark assessments of their ‘death.’ Witnessing a renaissance in the late twentieth century, travel writings continue to be written in ever increasing numbers in the twenty-first century and engage critical attention across disciplines. Travel writing fosters self-fashioning through the curation of a persona with experiential outlook who presents the world to her readers. This mode of subjective perception and a detached analytical voice threading along in the narrative melds facts with the imaginary to create literary composition with varied manifestations. A genre that quintessentially encounters the other also gives rise to the discursive formations of the other perceived through the gaze of traveler. The embeddedness of gaze, individual and/or collective, in a certain cultural ideology not only helps in evaluating one’s own context but also works to construct epistemological narratives of what is perceived as foreign, resulting in the intertwining of micro with macro history. Crosscurrents of representing actual or fictional travel narratives, while creating space for cross-cultural fertilization, often involve involuntary expeditions into the unknown. Slave narratives, refugee narratives, exile narratives among others reveal a complex motif of travel caused by forces external to the subject. In these accounts of journey beyond, home is the seminal anchor that provides a threshold for theoretical underpinnings relevant to diaspora, migration, and displacement. The poetics of the travelling self is a subject of curiosity since the beginning of Homo sapiens’ story right from the time when they dispersed out of Africa. The motifs of journey, be it inner or outer, along with their motivation and purpose have certainly been diverse: exploratory, survival, religious, commercial, exploitative, scientific, or professional. Documented through time and space, these motifs corroborate the descriptive with the affective to profoundly shape the history of the world as we know it. If, at one level, they raise extensive questions related to privileged mobility, dynamics of geopolitical boundaries, and economic structures then at another level, they probe explicit issues of neo-imperialism, along with the perpetuation, reinforcement, and reproduction of prevailing ideologies of Empire. The inviting simplicity and intrinsic complexity of travel literature allows for scrutiny on multiple scales—insightfully teasing out political and historical hegemonies enmeshed with racial, class, gender, and power dynamics. In recent years, disability studies too have made major inroads into this genre. Moreover, in conjunction with new digital media, characterized as mobility turn in Arts as well as Humanities and more generally in Social Sciences, enquiry into travel literature takes precedence and acts as a crucial optic to make sense of new configurations of power, subjectivity, relationality, and the globalized world alike. Critical engagement with travel writing yields a fruitful site for the analysis of social, historical, economic, political, and cultural issues underpinning contemporary state of affairs. In the context of Covid-19 pandemic here, ‘vaccine passport’ emerges as an interesting phenomenon to study vis-à-vis travel writing. Critical engagement with travel writing yields a fruitful site to study issues in the contemporary scenario by way of interdisciplinary analysis involving philosophy, sociology, history, anthropology, literary studies, economics, political science, rhetoric, media and cultural studies, and linguistics among others. Scholars are invited to explore how travel writings make and remake us and our world through and beyond following themes:
  • Travel writing as Life Writing
  • Wanderlust and economy of desire
  • Dynamics of exclusion
  • Democratization of travel and mass tourism
  • Travel writing as means of worldmaking
  • Travel writing and thanatourism
  • Memory Studies and travel writing
  • Tradition of travel writing in non-western world
  • Food and travel
  • Pedagogical approaches to travel writing
  • Motif of travel in Bildungsroman genre
  • Travel as a theme in Science Fiction and popular fiction
  • Formation/crisis of identity
  • Autobiographical travel narratives: phenomenology of experience
  • Travel writing in Cultural Studies
  • Travel writing and Medical Humanities
  • Theories of affect in relation to travel writing
  • Travel blogs, vlogs, and visual culture
  • Philosophical travelogues
  • Significance of religion in travel writing
  • Travel journalism
  • Travel writing and imagined geography/cartography
  • Ecocritical approaches to travel writing
  • Travel writing and cosmopolitanism
Submissions: Only complete papers will be considered for publication. The papers need to be submitted according to the guidelines of the MLA 8th edition. You are welcome to submit full length papers (3,500–10,000 words) along with a 150 words abstract and list of keywords. Please read the submission guidelines before making the submission – http://ellids.com/author-guidelines/ submission-guidelines/. Please feel free to email any queries to – editors@ellids.com. Please make all submissions via the form: https://forms.gle/c4tN4M1JdJCKXLgr7 Submission deadline: 31st January, 2022 Website – http://ellids.com/ Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/journal.llids/
Contact Email:
*
CALL FOR PAPERS 3rd EUI CONFERENCE IN VISUAL AND MATERIAL CULTURE STUDIES Souvenirs, keepsakes and tokens: material and visual expressions of personal memories (12th-21st centuries) 16th May 2022 European University Institute, Florence Submissions Due–31st January 2022 Organizing committee: Elisa Chazal, Isabelle Riepe, Ana Struillou People use objects as a memento for fragments of their lives, be they ordinary memories of childhood, or extraordinary memories of travel, wonder, belief, rupture or oppression. From the inception of pilgrimage, travellers collected and carried tokens of the places they transited through that were later displayed back home. Similarly, souvenirs are also meaningful objects in sedentary lives,materialisingdomestic and intimate momentsand tensions within the home. Yet, souvenirs were not crafted, distributed, sold and acquired solely by European men and women. Instead,from medieval pilgrimages to present-day immigration, sedentary and mobile individuals are engaged in a form of emotional attachment to objects, as reminders of their past. We define souvenirs as mementoes of places and times, tied to individuals and communities who ascribed to them changing meanings and functions throughout their existence. These ever-evolving objects acquired new values and symbolic status. Taking this broad definition of souvenirs, this conference seeks to ascertain how individuals, families and communities memorialise their past through the visual and material world. We welcome proposals discussing the trajectory of souvenirs from their creation, distribution and their eventual musealisation or destruction, from the twelfth to the twenty-first century. Papers are expected to use visual and material evidence. We aim for this conference to reach beyond the boundaries of historical scholarship and therefore warmly welcome papers from other fields including art history, historical anthropology, and archaeology. The researcher-led Visual and Material History Working Group of the European University Institute in Florence invites you to a one-day conference on the material and visual expressions of individual memories. By encouraging exchanges between different disciplines and scholars researching on the medieval, early modern and modern periods, we hope that this event will foster new questions and perspectives on the fields of historical anthropology, history and art history. Proposals may include, but are not limited to:
  • Religion and pilgrimage
  • Ruptures: armed conflicts, revolution, end of regime, wars
  • Forms of oppression, slavery, prosecution and forceful confinement
  • Gender and sexualities
  • Health and pandemics
  • Family and life trajectories
  • Diasporas and migrations
  • Grand tour and modern tourism (e.g., mass-produced souvenirs)
  • Collecting practices, displays and performances
  • Categorization and administration of objects
To submit a paper, send an abstract (no more than 300 words) and a short biography to visual.materialeui@gmail.com by 31st January 2022. Early-career researchers are particularly encouraged to submit. We hope this event to take place on site, or at least in a hybrid format. Partial covering of travelling and accommodation expenses is possible for the speakers willing to travel to Florence. Please indicate in your submission if you would be willing to come to Florence, should the situation allow it, or would prefer to attend via ZOOM.
Contact Email:
*
Re: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS – Freelance Story Writer for Hispanic Access Introduction Hispanic Access Foundation is a national 501(c)(3) organization that connects Latinos with partners and opportunities to improve lives and create an equitable society. Our vision is that all Hispanics throughout the U.S. enjoy good physical health, a healthy natural environment, a quality education, economic success and civic engagement in their communities with the sum of improving the future of America. In the spirit of our mission and vision, Hispanic Access wants to highlight 52 stories from our various networks. We work nationwide with faith leaders, conservation focused individuals, Black, Indigenous, Latinos, and other people of color, and other community leaders. With these stories, we want to amplify the voices of those that we work with through our social media and website. The Stories Hispanic Access Foundation will provide its freelance writer with the story ideas, corresponding network members and their contact information. The writer will then take this information to conduct interviews in order to produce a total of 52 (400 – 700 word) stories. The breakdown of stories/networks provided will be similar to this: o Conservation (11 total Stories) ▪ Por La Creación Faith-Based Alliance ▪ Latino Conservation Week ▪ Our Heritage, Our Planet Film Week o Hispanic Leadership Network (11 total Stories) ▪ HLN Retreat 2022 ▪ HLN Cohort Members o MANO Project (11 total Stories) ▪ US Fish and Wildlife Service ▪ National Park Service ▪ US Forest Service ▪ MANO Alumni o Organization (11 total Stories) ▪ Latino Advocacy Week ▪ Board Members ▪ Staff o Our Dreams Scholarship (4 total Stories) o COVID Vaccine Initiative (4 total Stories) What We Expect Here are our guidelines for these stories: ● 400-700 words ● 3-5 high quality photos from the individual to attach to the story. (We will provide guidance on what is needed for the feature photo and the quality of other images. Writer will not need to take the images, simply instruct the contact on what’s needed and coordinate their reception.) ● Written in the third-person perspective ● Bilingual (English and Spanish) — it is likely that some of our members prefer to be interviewed in Spanish. Budget We will pay $100 for each story written, budgeted up to $5,200 for 52 stories. ● Funds can be distributed after every 5-10 stories submitted or as a lump sum at the end of thecontract, depending on writer preference. Timeline Our preferred timeline is outlined below, however, it is open to modifications based on schedule and availability. Additionally, we would look to have a monthly 1 hour check-in beginning on February 1st. ● January 21 – Proposals Due ● January 25 – Contract Awarded ● February 11 – First 3-5 Stories Due ● March 11 –8 Stories Due ● June 1 – 8 Stories Due ● August 1 – 8 Stories Due ● October 1 – 8-10 Stories Due ● December 1 – Final 8 Stories Due Submission Requirements We’re not looking for a lengthy proposal.Your proposal should include the following items, which will inform the selection process: ● Writing Samples: provide PDFs or links to 3 examples that demonstrate your writing abilities when it comes to writing features/profiles.. ● Budget: provide a budget proposal that includes your fees, as well as any additional costs that should be considered. ● Timeline: We outlined the tentative timeline above, please outline the timeline from your perspective. ● Spanish Language Proficiency: Please highlight your Spanish language capacity (native/bilingual, conversational, professional). Point-of-Contact For questions about the scope of work, please contact: ● Evelyn Ramirez, Digital Communications Associate, evelyn@hispanicaccess.org Deadline for Submission Proposals should be received no later than Monday, January 21, 2021. Submissions should beemailed to Evelyn Ramirez at evelyn@hispanicaccess.org. Proposal Reviews/Calls/Selection Proposals will be reviewed by staff. Calls may be scheduled by Hispanic Access Foundation if necessary. *

CfP: Modern Travel, Modern Landscapes: Connections and Exchanges in Europe c. 1850-1950

(1/28/2022; 7/6-7/2022)
This conference is intended as the first in a series of events to discuss travel writing in modern history and literature. It is organised by Jana Hunter (University of Oxford) and Christian Drury (Durham University) – please see a call for papers below. Christian Drury Department of History Durham University christian.j.drury@durham.ac.uk Modern Travel, Modern Landscapes Connections and Exchanges in Europe c. 1850-1950 6th and 7th July 2022 University of Durham Travel was central to shaping identity in Europe between the mid-nineteenth and mid-twentieth century. Representations of place, as well as personal, cultural and institutional connections, informed and structured travel at this time. Travellers within Europe and from outside shaped an understanding of what Europe was and is in a global, imperial context. As Kate Hill has put it, “under the influence of technological and colonial change, spaces, narratives themselves, and cultural encounters all took on a greater measure of flux as the nineteenth century progressed. The provisional nature of the modern categories of home and away were forged in the nineteenth century”. This conference calls for papers on travel in this period, especially travel writing which considers landscape and modernity as key themes. Considering travel narratives, both published and private, as well as other texts, images and sources, allows us to consider these historical connections in greater detail, while taking travel as a practice, together with the structuring themes of landscape and modernity, will enrich our understanding of European history in the period. Modern Travel, Modern Landscapes looks to engage with a rich diversity of subjects including but not limited to: history and history of science, geography and natural sciences, art history and visual culture (photography and film), as well as architecture and urban studies. We are particularly interested in understanding how travel and landscape can be perceived and experienced  by an individual. As such, we encourage submissions which explore not only physical travel, but also ‘armchair travel’ through the consumption of the representations of place. We will consider broadly four main themes: Identities Identities are formed by travel and travel is influenced by identities. In modern Europe, the identity of the traveller, as well as those they travel with, are crucial for thinking about who can travel and where. We welcome submissions that consider these identities of travel, as well as the forms their depictions of travel take and how connections are – or are not – made.
  • How does a traveller identify with a place and with travelling?
  • Who can travel and where? Who can choose their travel?
  • Who claims authority to speak about the place travelled to and through?
  • How is Europe represented by travellers from the rest of the world?
  • How does the travellee respond? How can hidden or marginalised actors be included?
Infrastructure Travellers need ways of getting to places and their forms of travel affect their representations of place. However, infrastructure is more than transport and we encourage submissions which take a broad approach to discussing the way in which travel was structured and communicated.
  • How do different types of travel affect travel narratives?
  • Who is a tourist and does it matter? How can we diversify the idea of infrastructure?
  • How are travellers influenced by existing discourses?
  • What is the relationship between infrastructure and landscape?
Time and temporalities Time may not be at the heart of travel writing, but it does present itself in a number of different ways. There are a number of ways to read time and temporality in travel writing, encapsulating notions of history, encountered in the environment, or even in terms of progression. We welcome submissions that explore how travellers experienced, perceived, and considered temporalities and in turn, informed their audiences back at home.
  • How has time been represented, coded and understood by travellers?
  • How do travellers and/or travellees apply meaning to time and temporality?
  • To what extent can we consider temporality to be a dimension of travel experience?
  • How did encroaching modernity shape ideas of time?
  • How was time experienced in different spaces and environments?
Borders and frontiers A number of different borders and frontiers were crossed by travellers, which not only played into the travellers’ cultural identity and perception of the self, but also fed into the wider understanding of the society and cultures they were encountering. We welcome discussions that explore physical boundaries and frontiers, for example geopolitical and military, but also encourage submissions discussing racial, gender, and sexual frontiers or that focus on how economic, linguistic, national and aesthetic borders were negotiated.
  • What different frontiers exist?
  • How did frontiers influence identities?
  • When, where, and how were frontiers challenged, faced, and crossed?
  • Did they create new tensions or categories?
  • Are frontiers in opposition to one another?
Please send an abstract of up to 300 words and a short biography of no more than 100 words to Jana Hunter and Christian Drury (mtml2022@gmail.com) by Friday 28th January 2022.
Contact Info:
Christian Drury and Jana Hunter Durham University/University of Oxford
Contact Email:
*

Call for Proposals: The Routledge Companion to Latinx Life Writing

Abstracts Due–January 28, 2022
Contributions are invited for consideration to be published in a collection of essays introducing readers to Latinx Life Writing, a prominent and essential pan-genre within Latinx literature since Latinx literature began to be conceived as such. Life writing is a broad umbrella term that encompasses a number of genres in which authors take life and lived experience as their core subject. Within Latinx life writing, these genres include memoir, autobiography, and testimonio most centrally. The proposed handbook provides a broad overview of the Latinx life writing in terms of its history, key themes and questions, and genres. The handbook will feature chapters on the trends and concerns of Latinx life writers across different historical periods, providing insight into various thematic and generic concerns as they evolve throughout Latinx cultural production.  Although this book is scholarly in nature, the tone will be broadly accessible in order to make the book suitable for a wide audience including graduate students, undergraduate students in community colleges and four-year universities, and classroom instructors. THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO LATINX LIFE WRITING is under contract and scheduled to be published in 2024. We are seeking proposals specifically in the following areas:
  • 19th century and U.S. occupation narratives (oral histories-narratives, correspondence, memories, diaries)
  • Crónica, relatos, testimonios
  • Fictionalized autobiographies/life writing in fiction/plays
  • Corridos, folklore, oral forms
  • Correspondence (in wartime or Latino veterans or because of family separation, etc.)
  • Poetry of protest
  • Coming of age autobiographical narratives
  • Experimental autobiographical works
  • Education testimonios
  • Chicana and Latina “Third World” women of color feminist mixed genre writing
  • Autobiographical narratives of exile
  • LGBTQ+/Queer articulations
  • Testimonios and new media (Digital Humanities, digital storytelling)
  • Grief, trauma narratives
  • Graphic narratives
  • Undocumented narratives
We are seeking only original, never before published work at this time. Please submit a no more than two page abstract (approximately 500 words) of a chapter that you wish to be considered for this handbook by as well as a 2 page abbreviated curriculum vitae. Please send any questions and your abstract for the chapter you wish to be considered to the volume editors,  Dr. Christine Fernandez (chrfernandez@csumb.edu) and Dr. Maria Joaquina Villaseñor (mvillasenor@csumb.edu).
Contact Info:
Professor Maria Villaseñor, California State University, Monterey Bay; Professor Christine Fernandez, California State University, Monterey Bay
Contact Email:
* The 2022 AFEA Annual Conference : “Legitimacy, Authority, Canons 31 May- 3 June 2022, Bordeaux Montaigne University (France)
deadline for submissions: 
January 17, 2022
POPULAR CULTURE WORKSHOP Historical destinies as the foundation of legitimacy: the biographical genre in the United States pop cultures Between 2000 and 2021, out of the twenty-one winners of the Oscar for Best Actor, eleven were rewarded for playing the part of a historical figure. Seven of the movies they appeared in were clearly identified as biographical pictures. Over the same period, thirty-three out of the one hundred and fifty Oscar for Best Picture nominees – and four of the movies that were awarded the prized statuette – were biopics. Since 2017, the Netflix biographical series The Crown has been nominated four times for both the Golden Globe and the Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series, and it has brought home four of these awards. The biographical genre has place of pride in Hollywood and in US popular culture in general, understandably so: it brings together the pseudo-legitimacy of the period film and the widespread appetite for tales of remarkable destinies. Biographies can be found in films and series of course, and in traditional or graphic novels (too many to name), but also in music (Bob Dylan’s songs “Hurricane” and “Joey”, or Elton John’s “Candle in the Wind” for example), stage musicals (such as Evita, Beautiful: The Carole King Musical, or more recently, Hamilton), and even video games (Ryan Green’s That Dragon, Cancer, and Nina Freeman’s games Cibele, How Do You Do It and We Met in May, explore universal themes even though they are based on the lives of their programmers). Rewriting and romanticizing are cornerstones of the genre. They are a way for biographical fictions to turn historical facts into narratives that will be both accessible to the general public and bankable. It has the same popularizing tone as historical fiction, but because it focuses on a single character, it fosters the process of identification, and makes it possible for the audience to get emotionally involved in the story that it unfolds. This raises the question: who is pictured and, to some extent, mythologized, in biographical fiction? The major – or sometimes a bit obscure – historical figures that the genre sheds light on come from a variety of backgrounds (politicians, artists, scientists…), and are transformed into heroic figures through the narrative. Biographical fiction explores and (re)shapes past events in order to explain how and why these people became so well-known and/or important. And in doing so, they sometimes explore the dark side of American society, telling tales of serial killers for example (Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy, Aileen Wuornos…), or of other famous criminals – through increasingly popular (and numerous) “true crime” novels, television shows and podcasts, a genre that finds its more celebrated examples in Netflix series such as Narcos or Mindhunter. How can we make sense of a genre that thrives in the representation of both somber individuals who threaten the very fabric of society, and role-models who often feed into the myth of the American self-made-(wo)man? Conversely, why are there so few biopics that revolve around big scientific figures, and why are so many of these people represented as mad or lonely scientists? The issue of the lack of representation also comes to mind: are there any categories of people whose biographies are not fictionalized, or have only become an object of fiction recently? Are women, for instance, represented as often and in the same way as men (an issue tackled by Raphaëlle Moine in Vies héroïques : biopics masculins, biopics féminins)? What about other minorities? In the past few years, there has been a surge of representations of black women in Hollywood biopics with movies such as Hidden Figures, Nina or Harriet, which focus specifically on women who fought, in some way, against racist discriminations. Although they offer better representation to a part of the American society that is rarely pictured in leading roles, it would seem justified to wonder whether these movies are merely a way for Hollywood to push aside the criticisms of the #OscarsSoWhite movement, while limiting this representation to safe, widely recognized figures. This question could be broadened to the representation of African-American figures, indeed most of the biographical fictions about them focus on figures of athletes or musicians whom the general public already knows and loves. The limited representation of other minorities, such as Asian-Americans or LGBTQI+ people, could be similarly questioned. Finally, the strong link between literature and the moving picture is made particularly clear in biographical fiction: biographical narratives are often adapted from the page onto the screen, or focus on major literary figures, usually trying to shed light on the way in which their personal lives inspired their most famous works (an idea that Hilda Shachar worked on in Screening the Author: The Literary Biopic). Most such adaptations are biographical novels turned into biopics, but the source can also be a graphic novel or a comic (American Splendor, My Friend Dahmer). The literary roots of the genre could be a way for it to claim its own legitimacy, to base itself on foundations that seem solid and more worthy of respect than other media, and which could grant an appearance of “seriousness” to the narrative. But in that case, what is the canon that biographical fiction follows? How does the genre set aside historical truth in order to conform to the codes of the different media it appears in? Are some aspects of history systematically erased when the biographical narrative is being constructed, and why? Is the modification of facts as big a deal as Time Out film critic Dave Calhoun seemed to believe when he wrote that Bohemian Rhapsody was “an act of brazen myth-making. Facts and chronology are tossed aside in favor of a messianic storyline…”, thus highlighting the complex relationship between biographical fiction and its own codes? Papers can deal with, but are not limited to: – The forms of biographical fictions, and the ways in which it adapts to the codes of various media. – The idea of authoritative figures: are the heroes of biographical fiction already leading figures in their field, or does the genre create new objects of fame by enabling the audience to identify to them through popular fiction? – The relationship between biographical fiction and historical facts, as a potential way for popular culture to claim its own legitimacy. The issue of time and the chronological reorganization, or even rewriting, of facts in order to turn biographies into myths. – Conversely, the question of the evolution of biographical fiction through time, and the changes in its form, but also in the figures it chooses to focus on. Are there any “forgotten” biopics, which focus on figures now considered to be dangerous for the American society? – The connection between the biography of an artist and artistic creation itself, a topic that seems particularly relevant in the case of jukebox musicals such as Beautiful: A Carol King Musical or Rocketman. – The compatibility between biographical fiction and video games: why are there so few biographical video games, and why are so many of them autobiographies? To what extent can the gameplay allow players to be fully involved in a narrative that entirely belongs to someone else? – More generally, the integration of biographical fiction into other forms of games (RPGs, LARPDs…). – The representation of minorities in biographical fictions: are they a way to make scarcely visible social groups more widely represented, or a means, specifically for Hollywood studios, to pretend to be inclusive while carefully selecting safe, consensual figures? – What about fictional biographies, fictions that revolve around a figure who has only existed in fictional worlds? In a transdisciplinary perspective, the workshop is open to all approaches which may further the exploration of these questions. Papers have to deal with the USA Paper proposals (300-500 words approximately) may put forward different fields of study and theoretical frameworks and approaches. They are to be sent, along with a short biography, to Jeanne Ferrier (ferrierjeanne@gmail.com) and Danièle André (daniele.andre.univ.larochelle@gmail.com) by January 17th, 2022. Please note that to present a paper, it is necessary to be a member of the AFEA (The French Association of American Studies, for which the membership fees are about 60 euros) and to register for the symposium (the register fees are about 60 euros as well). *
Call for submissionsPlacing Disability: Personal Stories of Embodied GeographyEdited by Susannah B. Mintz, Professor, Skidmore College, smintz@skidmore.edu and Gregory Fraser, Professor, University of West Georgia, gfraser@wga.edu**Soliciting 350-word abstracts for original 10-15 page essays on the subject of disability and location, according to the geographical regions listed below. Complete description of the project follows. Please send questions about the project to both editors. Abstracts due Jan. 15, 2022.We will be seeking completed auto-critical essays for a collection under review at Palgrave-Macmillan. Titled Placing Disability: Personal Stories of Embodied Geography, the collection will present original work that addresses the experience of disability in particular geographical locations. We are interested in essays that directly engage the question of what it is like to be disabled in a specific place, for a collection that will be organized according to geographical type. Placing Disability will expand on current work focused on disability and eco-criticism or disability and spatial theory by situating authors’ reflections on the meaning of embodiment in distinct physical places and by grounding (quite literally) the discourse of disability awareness and activism in personal experience. We imagine a collection that will be as useful in the creative writing workshop as in a Disability Studies seminar or a class on environmental literature, as appealing to general readers of memoir as to scholars of contemporary body theory or the Anthropocene.The book will be organized in terms of topographies and vistas rather than being bound by the map. This will encourage dialogue between writers within certain kinds of landscapes (the beaches of Florida compared to Colombia, the cities of North America compared to South Asia) as well as between regions themselves (urban spaces compared to prairies or mountains). Some regions are quite unique—the Pacific Northwest, as one example—but most types of location have specific “instances.” Organized according to these conceptual places (listed below), the collection will stimulate writers’ and readers’ understanding not just of disability experience generally but also of the meaning of physical place and how identities are constructed, experienced, and represented in relation to geography.The writers collected in Placing Disability will propose that disability identity cannot be divorced from location. The book will thus offer its readers what we call a series of geocripistemologies, as authors explore issues of movement, work and play, community and activism, cultural and artistic production, love and sex, access and social services, family, memory, and maturity—informed by the places they inhabit. Like Nancy Mairs, who throughout her collection Waist-High in the World asks readers to rethink the most mundane of life’s tasks no less than the most philosophical conundrums of existence from her position in a wheelchair, “the height of an erect adult’s waist,” or Eli Clare, who writes in Brilliant Imperfection that it is his “shaky balance” that grants him a certain “intimacy with the mountain[s]” of Vermont, Placing Disability’s authors will show us where disability happens as a fresh and exciting way of conceiving of what disability means to our collective grasp of the human condition.Our collection adds the important element of location to an increasingly sophisticated cultural and critical conversation about disability. Essays in Placing Disability will resist the pressure to draw conclusions or declare priorities; our goal is not to determine that it is “better” to be disabled here rather than there, but instead to seek out a multitude of geo-embodied realities. We envision a collection of high literary and philosophical quality that will represent what is possible in terms of imagining regional disabilities in the fullest possible sense. We ask that writers straddle the creative/scholarly threshold—in the manner of Clare and Mairs—braiding theoretically inflected examinations of place with personal, perhaps lyrically told, tales.

About the Editors

Susannah B. Mintz is a professor of English at Skidmore College. She has published extensively as a writer of creative nonfiction, with essays in American Literary Review, The Writer’s Chronicle, Epiphany, Ninth Letter, Michigan Quarterly Review, and elsewhere. She was the winner of the 2014 South Loop National Essay Prize and a finalist for both the 2010 William Allen nonfiction prize and the Epiphany chapbook contest in 2015. Her work has received special mention from Best American Essays 2010 and the Pushcart Prize Anthology 2018. A short memoir titled “Match Dot Comedy” appeared as a Kindle Single in 2013. A specialist in disability studies and scholar of autobiography, she is also the author of four monographs, including Unruly Bodies: Life Writing by Women with Disabilities (2007), Hurt and Pain: Literature and the Suffering Body (2014), and The Disabled Detective: Sleuthing Disability in Contemporary Crime Fiction (2019), and co-editor of three volumes: a critical anthology on the essayist Nancy Mairs, the Long Eighteenth Century volume of Bloomsbury’s forthcoming Cultural History of Disability, and the two-volume Gale-Cengage reference work Disability Experiences. A memoir called Love Affair in the Garden of Milton: Poetry, Loss, and the Meaning of Unbelief is just out from LSU Press. www.susannahbmintz.com Gregory Fraser is Professor of English at the University of West Georgia University, outside Atlanta. He is the author of four poetry collections: Strange Pietà (Texas Tech University Press, 2003), Answering the Ruins (2009), Designed for Flight (2014), and Little Armageddon (2021), all from Northwestern University Press. He is also the co-author of the workshop textbook Writing Poetry (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2008) and the critical writing textbook Analyze Anything (Bloomsbury, 2012). Fraser’s poetry, which often addresses themes of disability, illness, and place, has appeared in journals including The New Yorker, The Paris Review, The Southern Review, Ploughshares, and The Gettysburg Review. He is the recipient of numerous awards for his writing, including grants from the National Endowment for the Arts and the Guggenheim Foundation. Conceptual regions: Coastlines The far North and the far South The Desert The Northwest The Country The Heartland The City The Burbs
*

Memories of War in Other Worlds: Approaches to War Literature and Memories from the Global South

Conference June 15-18, 2022 Virtual
American Comparative Literature AssociationDeadline for Submissions: January 15, 2022
contact email:
Memories of military conflicts from both combatants and non-combatants alike have been a key tool in analyzing the unique traumas and socio-cultural affects of modern warfare. Scholars such as Samuel Hynes and Paul Fussell have done seminal work in articulating theoretical approaches to understanding the memories of bearing witness to modern war. Yet, mainstream war literature largely recounts the white voices from the West. Building further on the works of scholars such as Santanu Das, David Omissi, Franziska Roy and others this seminar seeks to capture the voices of the Global South and their perceptions of modern wars, from the mass global conflicts of the World Wars, to other wars that have continued to be waged in the postcolonial world without being afforded a significant space in Western consciousness. In analyzing primary sources such as letters, memoirs, biographies and including the fictional representations of modern conflicts created by authors from the Global South this seminar seeks to include the authorial voices which have historically been denied a space in the mainstream memorializations of major conflicts. The scope of the seminar includes non-Western perspectives on global wars as well as their approaches to localized regional conflicts and how the experiences of combat and wartime rupture have shaped discourses of culture, literature and collective memory. This seminar seeks to ask what theoretical approaches can be conceptualized through postcolonial theory and other strategies of reading to approach conflict narratives not located in the Western metropole. Locating questions of race, colonial legacies, generational and cultural traumas of the non-Western world and decolonization within the understanding of war narratives would be a prime focus and in scope the discussions aim to incorporate non-white voices from conflicts across Latin America, Africa and Asia to attempt a more holistic and inclusive understanding of legacies of modern conflicts that continue to shape our world. What are the reformulations to received Western perspectives to postcolonial regional geopolitics that can be achieved by a comparative literary and analytical approach to texts recounting the violent ruptures and eruptions of these regions? How do we alter our approach to war literature by including the voices previously marginalized in canonical literary discourse? For further information regarding the conference please visit the FAQ page for the American Comparative Literature Association: https://www.acla.org/annual-meeting-2022 To submit paper abstracts please access the submission form on the ACLA conference website: https://www.acla.org/node/add/paper Please search for the relevant seminar titled ‘Memories of War in Other Worlds: Approaches to War Literature and Memories from the Global South’, from the drop-down menu at the end of the submission form to ensure that your abstract gets submitted to the right seminar. (Note: Prospective presenters have to create a login account on the ACLA website prior to the submission of their paper abstract) *
CfP for Special Issue of Life Writing (Routledge) ‘The Translation Memoir’
deadline for submissions:  January 14, 2022
The translation memoir can be defined as a reflexive writing practice on the personal and political intersection between writing and translation.Translation memoirs use writing to explore the practice of translation and continue translation’s creative and critical work in different forms. Recent years have seen a boom in the publications of translation memoirs and essays, with authors in the genre encompassing translators such as Kate Briggs (2017), Mireille Gansel (2012), Corinna Gepner (2019), Gregory Rabassa (2005) and Jennifer Croft (2019).  These have engaged creative-critical reflections on the affective, political and transcultural work of translating literary texts, questioning the literary conventions which separate reading and writing, writing and translation. The translation memoir has also participated in a wider postmodern philosophical shift in the rethinking of identity and autobiography [Karpinsky 2012], engaging a form of authorial self-retrieval from within the dominant identity discourses of authorship, nationality, gender and the self. By highlighting the fluidity of national and cultural identities [Jhumpa Lahiri 2016], translation memoirs investigate otherness from the perspective of translation, interrogating the limits of national and gender narratives through the practice of rewriting the text and the self in other languages. Outside of the translation memoir as defined above, explorations of the relationship between translation and autobiographical memory, translation and the archive can also be found in works such as Anne Carson’s Nox for example, or in the creative-critical practice of Clive Scott. These engage in a wider reflection on the relationship between translation and memory, translation and the survival of the text. Participants are invited to send proposals for articles which explore any aspect of the translation memoir as a creative and philosophical investigation of translation through life writing. As well as analysing the translation memoir as a form of self-authorization of the translator as writer, participants are invited to reflect more widely on the impact of the translation memoir on the fields of translation and translator studies, philosophy, history and life writing. Does the translation memoir invite us to expand the definitions of what we consider a translation?  What new forms of writing can emerge from rethinking the self in relation to translation? How does the translation memoir bring to the fore and narrate the cultural differences and power differentials with which the work of translation must often contend? What sets the translation memoir apart from other memoirs? What sets the translation memoir apart from translator autobiographies? What translation theories, what forms of literary criticism have paved the way for the boom in translation-memoir writing we are witnessing today? Please email your abstracts to Dr. Delphine Grass d.grass@lancaster.ac.uk and Dr. Lily Robert-Foley lily.robert-foley@univ-montp3.fr with ‘Translation Memoir Abstract’ as subject heading. Deadline for Abstracts: January 14th, 2022. Deadline for completed manuscripts: April 15th, 2022. *
Register for the 2022 International Symposium on Autoethnography and Narrative
Registration for the 2022 International Symposium on Autoethnography and Narrative is now live! The conference will occur via Zoom on January 3-5, 2022. Eastern Standard Time (EST) will be used for all conference activities.On January 4-5, there will be dozens of sessions featuring more than 150 individual submissions. Kitrina Douglas and David Carless will give the keynote address, and there will be spotlight sessions with Renata Ferdinand, Art Bochner, Sandra Faulkner, Norman Denzin, Carolyn Ellis, Robin Boylorn, Mark Freeman, Dan Harris, Ken Gergen, Mary Weems, Fetaui Iosefo, Elyse Pineau, Bryant Keith Alexander, Craig Gingrich-Philbrook, Alec Grant, Stacy Holman Jones, Ragan Fox, Keith Berry, David Purnell, Susan Krieger, Phiona Stanley, and Chris Poulos.On January 3, there will also be four workshops led by Kakali Bhattacharya, Jonathan Wyatt, Marquese McFerguson, and Amy Arellano and Christina IveyRegistration for the general conference [January 4-5] is $25 (USD). Only those who have registered for the conference will have access to the keynote and primary conference sessions. To participate in the workshops [January 3], there will be an additional $25 registration fee.The times for the workshops, keynote, individual submissions, and spotlight sessions are still being finalized; the times and the conference program will be available on December 1, 2021.For more information about the conference, including how to register, visit www.iaani.org.

*

Cleopatra and the Celebrity of Infinite Vareity (edited collection)

deadline for submissions:
December 31, 2021
Dr. Courtney A. Druzak (DigiPen Institute of Technology) and Margaret J. Yankovich, M.I. (Independent Scholar), editors

According to Stacy Schiff in her acclaimed 2010 biography of Cleopatra VII, Egypt’s last queen was “A goddess as a child, a queen at eighteen, [and] a celebrity soon thereafter.” That is to say, Cleopatra has lived on in the imaginations of scholars, artists, and storytellers to the effect that her multifaceted legacy– as, per Schiff, “an asteroid, a video game, a cliche, a cigarette, a slot machine, a strip club, a synonym for Elizabeth Taylor”–has long overshadowed her brief life as a mortal, and catapulted her into the stratosphere of celebrity. In the almost 2,000 years of history that have unfolded since her death in 30 BCE, her life and her person have been consistently appropriated and reappropriated, her celebrity and larger-than-life legacy performed in countless artistic imitations and interpretations. That Cleopatra has defeated the obsolescence of death and the passing of time to become one of greatest celebrity figures of both the Western and Eastern worlds is a subject that begs for further scholarly interrogation.

It is with this framework in mind that we invite scholars of diverse academic disciplines–literature, art, cultural studies, history, and more–to submit papers for inclusion in Cleopatra and the Celebrity of Infinite Variety, an edited collection of works on Cleopatra and legacy/performance of her celebrity in the popular imagination. We have strong interest from a publisher for this project.

Some topics for this interdisciplinary edited collection include, but are not limited to:

-Cleopatra as agentic subject

-Objectified Cleopatra / Cleopatra reproduced as object

-Intersections of race and sexuality in her portrayals in art and literature

-Cleopatra in children’s literature

-Western vs. Eastern perceptions of Cleopatra, particularly through a historical lens

-Readings of recent biographical works on Cleopatra (such as Schiff’s biography as well as Alberto Angelo’s 2021 biography)

-Commodifications of Cleopatra and her legacy

-Representations of Cleopatra in artistic/visual media (painting, sculpture, print, design, film, theater, video games)

-Cleopatra in fashion / fashion inspired by Cleopatra

Interested scholars should submit abstracts of approximately 300 words, along with brief author bios, to cleopatraandcelebrity@gmail.com by December 31, 2021 for review. Emerging and experienced scholars are both encouraged to apply. A decision regarding all submitted abstracts will be made no later than mid-January, with notifications sent by January 31, 2022. If an abstract is accepted for inclusion in the collection, the first draft of the proposed work will be due October 1, 2022. Works should be between 5,000-7,000 words, and citations should be in Chicago Notes-Bibliography style. A total of no more than five images can be used per essay, and contributors are responsible for attaining all rights and paying all fees for images used in their essays.

——————————-

Courtney A. Druzak holds a PhD in English from Duquesne University. She currently works as an Assistant Professor of English at DigiPen Institute of Technology in Redmond, WA, where she teaches writing and literature. Her work is focused on the early modern period and ecofeminism, although she also holds a special interest in Cleopatra as both historical figue and celebrity. She can be reached at courtney.druzak@digipen.edu.

Margaret J. Yankovich is a graduate of Rutgers University School of Communication and Information where she received a M. I. in Library Science. A public librarian, she is employed as the Head of Information at the Dorchester County Public Library in Cambridge, Maryland. Margaret also publishes and presents as an independent scholar of horror media.

*

“Voicing ‘Woman’ across Media, 1500-1800”

University of California, Santa Barbara

Conference Date: February 24-25, 2022

Abstracts Due: December 31, 2021

The Early Modern Center at the University of California, Santa Barbara is excited to announce this year’s winter conference, “Voicing ‘Woman’ across Media, 1500-1800,” part of the Center’s theme for the year, ‘Woman,’ 1500-1800. The conference is open globally to faculty, graduate students, and independent scholars, and will feature a special panel of distinguished undergraduate students. It will be held virtually (via Zoom) on Thursday, February 24th and Friday, February 25th, 2022. We are also thrilled to announce our two keynote speakers, Dr. Simone Chess (Wayne State University) and Dr. James McNamara (UCSB). “Voicing ‘Woman’ across Media, 1500-1800” invites presentations that query the early modern concept of ‘woman’ as it is variously constructed or performed by members of all genders in literature, (auto)biography, drama/the stage, music, art, religious texts, film and television, and other media. Instead of focusing broadly on gender, which we recognize has been a key issue of late, we instead want to focus specifically on ‘woman.’ What is ‘woman’? Who is privileged with voicing and defining ‘her’? How have adaptations (both within the early modern period and after the eighteenth century) appropriated and/or interrogated these early modern constructions? Possible topics include, but are not limited to:
  • writing by and/or about women
  • ‘woman’ as dramatic character or caricature
  • women’s voices as depicted by male writers
  • digitizing ‘woman’ / ‘woman’ in the archive
  • the idea of ‘woman’ in relation(s) to race, sexuality, and/or nationality
  • transfemininity and transmisogyny in depictions of women
  • querying gender in terms of queering ‘woman’ (and vice versa)
  • ‘woman’ within and outside the European context
  • women as travelers and/or women depicted in travel narrative
  • ‘woman’ as icon/iconic
  • representations of women in pamphlet gender debates of the early 17th c.
  • women as unruly and/or resistant
  • ‘warrior’ women
  • women and disability
  • women in religion
  • women’s spaces/the space of (and for) women
  • technology and women
  • print history and women
  • feminist and/or female-centered adaptations of early modern drama
We invite and envision both panel presentations and ten-minute roundtable presentations. Please submit abstracts of 150 to 200 words and a one-page CV to emcfellow@gmail.com by December 31, 2021.
Registration is now open for the Southern Lives Workshop, which runs from Monday 6 – Tuesday 7 December. This is a hybrid event: attendees can choose to register for either online or in-person attendance. Click here to register: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/southernlivesworkshop-tickets-194992727497Location: Wolfson College, with sessions on 6 Dec at the Pitt Rivers Museum and TORCH.Co-organised by Elleke Boehmer and Katherine Collins, this event brings together writers and scholars in the oceanic humanities, postcolonial and Global South studies and polar studies, to explore how the high southern latitudes are imagined through life-writing. With kind thanks to the British Academy Small Grants fund and the Leverhulme Trust for their support.Please see the Workshop Schedule, which is included below, for more information.All the best,The OCLW Team

Schedule: Southern Lives Workshop

MONDAY 6 December 202113:30-14:30: Group visit to the Pitt Rivers Museum.15:00-16:15: Welcome to the workshop & Southern Lives book proposal discussion.16:15-16:30: Short break16:30-17:30: First paper session: Knowing and unknowing the South (Elleke Boehmer, Katherine Collins, Bernhard Schirg)TUESDAY 7 December 202109:30-10:30: Professor Boaventura de Sousa Santos (Coimbra): Responses, On Southern Lives, followed by Q and A.10:30-11:00: Tea/Coffee11:00-12:15: Second paper session: ‘Far southern resonances and images’ (Elizabeth Leane, Carolyn Philpott, Joanna Price, Joe Shaughnessy, Priyanka Shivadas)12:30-13:15: Lunch13:15-14:30: Third paper session: ‘Perspectives on time, change, the environment’ (Confidence Joseph, Charne Lavery, Isaac Ndlovu, Emma Parker)14:30-15:00: Coffee/tea15:00-16:15: Fourth paper session: Imagining southern spaces (Sarah Comyn, Archie Davies, Porscha Fermanis, Cristóbal Pérez Barra, Pablo Wainschenker)16:15-16:30: Short break16:30-17:15: Feedback17:15-18:00: Light buffet dinner 18:00-19:30: Final session: Creative-critical crossovers in the South (Elizabeth Lewis Williams, Khutso Mabokela, Louis Rogers) Close Oxford Centre for Life-Writing Wolfson College Linton Road Oxford OX2 6UD https://www.oclw.web.ox.ac.uk

*

CFP: Popular Culture Association Annual Conference-Biographies Area (Virtual Conference–April 13-16, 2022)–Submission Deadline Extension: 12/5/21

The Popular Culture Association will be holding its annual conference virtually  April 13-16, 2022. The Biographies Area is soliciting papers that examine the connections between biography and popular culture. Papers and full panel presentations regarding any aspect of popular culture and biography are encouraged. Potential topics might include: – Biography and entertainment, art, music, theater – Biography and film – Biography and criminal justice – Television programs about biography – Biography and urban legends – Biography and folklore – Biography and literature – Scholarly Biography – Controversial Biography – Psychoanalysis and Biography – Historical Biography – Political Biography – Autobiography Sessions are scheduled in 1½ hour slots, typically with four papers or speakers per standard session.  Presentations should not exceed 20 minutes. On your submission, please include title of paper, abstract, and contact information. Submission Deadline Extension: 12/5/21 Please go to this link to submit your paper:  https://pcaaca.org/conference/submitting-paper-proposal-pca-conference  Please direct any queries to the Biographies Area chair: Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries Las Vegas, NV 89154 susie.skarl@unlv.edu OR susieskarl@gmail.com
Contact Info:
Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries Las Vegas, NV 89154
Contact Email:
* Moving Biography Summer School
International summer school in Beirut, 1-8 June 2022 Deadline for Applications: 30 November 2021 The Orient-Institut Beirut (OIB) in collaboration with the American University of Beirut (AUB) and the Global (De)Centre (GDC) invites doctoral and postdoctoral researchers to apply for an international Summer School, entitled Moving Biography, that will take place in Beirut/Lebanon from 1 to 8 June 2022. Our Summer School will explore the various etymologies and connotations that the term “biography” carries in different languages and their various complexities. The English term “biography” comes from the Greek words “bios” (life) and “graphia” (writing). As such, the word expresses a tension between conceptions of life as a narrative (everyone has a biography), and the actual practice of writing about particular lives. The genre of biography socializes us into expectations for our own lives. In contrast, the Arabic term “sīra” conceives of biography as a journey. Deriving from the verb “sāra” (to travel), it has been used, in particular, to refer to “al-sīra al-nabawiyya” (the prophetic biography), the life journey of the Prophet Muhammad. Al-sīra al-nabawiyya constitutes a key source of Islamic studies, next to the Qur’ān and the “ḥadīth” (tradition). Whose stories get written and what they include profoundly shapes how we understand the world and whose lives matter within it. Biographies tend to conform to notions of nation, ethnicity, religion, or class, despite the opportunity, articulated in the Arabic “sīra”, for following lives across boundaries. Probing the sometimes messy contradictions between real-life stories and conceptions of self, between personal and communal identities, Moving Biography brings together different perspectives from a range of disciplines (anthropology, art history, cultural studies, gender studies, literary studies, history, political studies, and sociology) to question disciplinary assumptions and decenter the genre. Moving Biography will focus on three main themes: (1) questions of data (2) the act of creation, and (3) the importance of the social and historical context of biographies.
  1. We will use the topic of biography as a broad, generative umbrella under which to explore cultural and intellectual inequality. The destinations towards which lives move and their means of travel reveal not only the unequalness of infrastructures of circulation but also the radical inequalities characterizing the landscapes within which lives get lived. How do fiction and non-fiction merge in the writing of lives? How do biographies deal with uncertainties and gaps in the life stories/journeys that are recorded? These questions are all the more urgent when archival research is restricted, be it by war, other social and political conditions, or the very form of the archive itself. Biography forces us to rethink what counts as relevant data. Does an author’s fiction count as data? How do we conceive of autobiographical writing in works of fiction? Would records of quaint past-time activities or other ephemera count for a politician or a prophet? Observing the compliance of biography with certain scholarly boxes encourages new methodologies including considerations of ownership, archival management, and social infrastructure.
  2. Biography can shed an important light on creation. Two models dominate: creation as an isolated, personal act, or a connected, interactive, ongoing one that may or may not involve others. These lead, in turn, to two tactics: to embed the individual in the cultural/historical context in which he or she lived, or to tell the story of an intellectual, literary, or artistic movement or genre. Our interdisciplinary, comparative perspective suggests that creation is never purely individual. Methodologically, we explore how the circulation of ideas affected important thinkers, and wonder at how such networks have not been studied systematically for individuals who live(d) at the social margins. We also include the things an individual makes—the transient, ephemeral acts of imagination—as part of the biography of a person or community, even if no single stylistic motive or outcome unifies them.
  3. We will use the topic of biography to rethink disciplines and social institutions. How are biographies conceived in different spatial and temporal settings and in different academic disciplines? Biography offers a method for rethinking personhood/social being. What constitutes “a life” cross-culturally in and through time? How are sets of biographies related to “generational” contingencies and concerns? As C. Wright Mills argued, one cannot separate a biography from history and context. What notions of history and time does biography foreground? How do past, present, and future converge in real-life stories? In what ways are social persons or the idea of biographical founders essential to the endurance and effervescence of academic disciplines? An in-depth discussion about these questions will prompt greater reflexivity in each of our disciplines.
In order to explore the above, we invite the participation of 20 PhD students and postdoctoral researchers in the humanities and social sciences engaged in research relating to biography/sīra in the Middle East and in other regions, in particular in the global south, to join us in Beirut for a one-week Summer School in June 2022. The school will be preceded by a preparatory phase kicked off by a series of keynote lectures and the launch of an online platform, in which the selected participants can upload summaries of their ongoing projects, expand on their research questions, share literature and start an informal exchange in the run up to the Summer School. The one-week school will convene an interdisciplinary group of students and faculty who will each bring their own disciplinary background and assumptions to the conversation. It will be organized around a combination of plenary talks by invited scholars, working sessions by the Summer School organizers about the theoretical issues at stake, and workshops where participants will present their ongoing research in small groups to get feedback and critique. Three field visits to institutions and initiatives in Lebanon that are implicated in the forming of biographies and one plenary discussion with practitioners from the field will form an integral part of the Summer School. We believe it is especially important to hold the Summer School in Beirut, to highlight the importance of international scholarly exchange at a time of crisis and to understand the challenges one faces when thinking about biography and the fragility of data. Confirmed speakers include Marilyn Booth (University of Oxford), Kirsten Buick (University of New Mexico), Wilhelm Hemecker (University of Vienna), Tarif Khalidi (American University of Beirut), Jean Said Makdisi (writer and scholar), Lina Saneh Majdalani (independent artist), Sherene Seikaly (University of California, Santa Barbara), Daniel Schönpflug (Institute for Advanced Study Berlin) and Salim Tamari (Birzeit University). Travel to/from Beirut and accommodation will be covered. The program is aimed at researchers in the humanities and social sciences from the region and abroad who will present their ongoing projects in relation to the topic of biography. The researchers’ work should be clearly relevant to the themes of the Summer School and use original source material. The working language will be English. The application should be in English and consist of
  •  a CV
  • a 3 to 5-page outline of the project the applicant is currently working on
  • the names and contact details of two potential referees (no letters of recommendation required)
to be sent by Email in one PDF document no later than 30 November 2021 to movingbiography@orient-institut.org The Summer School is funded by the Volkswagen Foundation and organised by Peggy Levitt, Wellesley College/Harvard University Nadia von Maltzahn, Orient-Institut Beirut (OIB) Sonja Mejcher-Atassi, American University of Beirut (AUB) Kirsten Scheid, American University of Beirut (AUB). It is a partnership between the Orient-Institut Beirut (OIB), the American University in Beirut (AUB) and the Global (De)Centre (GDC). The Orient-Institut Beirut (OIB) The Orient-Institut Beirut (OIB) is an academically independent German research institute and part of the Max Weber Foundation. It is mainly funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. It conducts interdisciplinary research on the Arab world and the region of West Asia and North Africa at large. Its research community comprises long-term research associates from Germany and short-term visiting fellows from all over the world, who represent the major disciplines of the humanities and social sciences, including Islamic and Arab studies, history and anthropology of the Middle East, as well as sociology and political sciences. The OIB aims to foster academic relations across the MENA region and increasingly conducts its research in transregional perspectives. See https://www.orient-institut.org/about/ The American University in Beirut (AUB) Founded in 1866, the American University of Beirut bases its educational philosophy, standards, and practices on the American liberal arts model of higher education. A teaching-centered research university, AUB has around 800 instructional faculty and a student body of around 8,000 students. The University encourages freedom of thought and expression and seeks to graduate men and women committed to creative and critical thinking, life-long learning, personal integrity, civic responsibility, and leadership. See https://www.aub.edu.lb/AboutUs/Pages/default.aspx The Global (De)Centre (GDC) The Global (De)Centre (GDC) is a platform bringing together a growing network of interdisciplinary scholars, creative practitioners and managers, and activists from across the world who are committed to challenging intellectual and cultural inequality. The GDC seeks to deconstruct and reconstruct by looking closely at how the methods and categories we have traditionally used to create knowledge bring to light certain “truths” while obscuring others. We are also committed to charting a constructive way forward—to create new ways of producing and disseminating knowledge and new social interventions—that unsettle longstanding cultural and intellectual hierarchies and bring a wider range of actors and epistemologies into conversation with one another (reconstruction). All four Summer School organizers are members of the GDC. See http://globaldecentre.world/gdc/about-gdc
Related date:
November 30, 2021
*
Call for Papers
International and Interdisciplinary Conference
Hybridity in Life Writing: How Text and Images Work Together to Tell a Life Organizers: Clare Brant (King’s College London), Arnaud Schmitt (Bordeaux University & LARCA, Université de Paris) Venue: Université de Paris, Paris, 7–8 July, 2022 Keynote Speaker: Pr. Teresa Bruś (Wrocław University)
  • Please submit an abstract of approx. 250 words and a short bionote to
clare.brant@kcl.ac.uk and arnaud.schmitt@u-bordeaux.fr by 30 November, 2021 at the latest.
It might seem that, to some extent, almost all visual content in autobiographical texts is visual aid. But what is it in aid of? Of the text, somehow. Victor Burgin notes that “we rarely see a photograph in use which does not have a caption or a title, it is more usual to encounter photographs attached to long texts, or with copy superimposed over them. Even a photograph which has no actual writing on or around it is traversed by language when it is ‘read’ by a viewer.” As powerful as images can be, and they frequently outshine the text that precedes or follows them, their narrative potential is nevertheless tethered to the text that introduces them or comments them a posteriori. In other words, the text has the first or last word, it frames the picture and, in a way, ‘tames’ its impact: a picture is at the text’s service. And yet, it can also be argued that images contradict texts in the same Derridean way as texts and more particularly words contradict each other, or at least unsettle themselves. In Picture Theory, W. J. T. Mitchell states that he wants “to concentrate, however, on the kinds of photographic essays which contain strong textual elements, where the text is most definitely an ‘invasive’ and even domineering element.” Thus, even if and when they are supposed to work together, words and images in a memoir establish a balance of power, one that requires investigation as the autobiographical narrative of a hybrid memoir depends on this very balance. From a historical point of view, this balance of power may also result from the evolution of each medium’s status, as an art form or cultural artefact. For instance, it can be argued that the first memoir written by a photographer is Talbot’s The Pencil of Nature. Teresa Bruś claims that “The Pencil of Nature, presented to the public in 1844, is the first autobiographical book of a photographer. […] aligning the ‘art’ of photography with a rhetorical, if not a literary, project.” But in Photography and Literature, François Brunet points out that, contrary to what might have been expected, Talbot’s effort had little effect on the publishing world, and this “estrangement of photography from literature,” with the odd exception, lasted until the end of the 19th century. According to him, nothing much happened before the beginning of the 20th century and “the growing recognition of photography as a distinct art form.” It makes sense that photography’s relation with literature very much depended on its evolving status.[1] On a more positive note, hybridity may also be seen to operate beyond this semantic and cultural balance of power and to aim at an additional meaning created thanks to intermediality at a level where, despite their intrinsic cognitive features and differences, text and images are able to produce content that they would not have been able to produce had they been kept separate. In a way, it hinges on how a book balances text and images, how it ‘monitors’ intermediality. But Gilles Mora writes that “photography has rarely generated autobiographical works able to exist without the support of language” (“la photographie a rarement produit des œuvres autobiographiques qui puissent se passer de l’appui du langage”). Maybe because one of the main (if not the only) functions of photographs in life writing is to authenticate. Roland Barthes is mostly responsible for the widespread belief that photography is better at accessing the past than words, principally through two assertions he made in Camera Lucida: “it [photography] does not invent; it is authentication incarnate. […] Every photograph certifies a presence” (“elle [la photographie] n’invente rien ; elle est l’authentification même. […] Toute photographie est un certificat de presence”) and “It seems that Photography always carries its referent with it […]” (“On dirait que la Photographie emporte toujours son référent avec elle […]”). The role of non-photographic images in hybrid memoirs or autobiographical works is thus more complex as paintings for instance do not have this ability to authenticate and similarly to words do not “carry their referent with them.” However, in a post-PhotoShop age, the way photographs have the ability to tamper with or even falsify “their referent” can be seen as highly problematic in an autobiographical context. The same can be said about graphic memoirs, a booming field, as drawings are also very low on the ‘authentication scale’. Nevertheless, Narratologist Robyn Warhol made the following remark regarding them: “The juxtaposition of cartooning with verbal memoir offers methods of representing subjectivity that are unprecedented in traditional autobiography. Indeed, as Versaci asserts ‘while many prose memoirists address the complex nature of identity and the self, comic book memoirists are able to represent such complexity in ways that cannot be captured in words alone’.” But is this “subjectivity” represented separately or jointly? And in the latter case, how? Also not as authenticating as photographs, paintings remain nevertheless a potential narrative resource for any autobiographer. In The Privileged Eye, Max Kozloff reminds us that “a main distinction between a painting and a photograph is that the painting alludes to its content, whereas the photograph summons it, from wherever and whenever, to us.” It might only be “alluding to a content,” but a painting in a memoir simply is another form of hybridity and a way for an author to diversify the work’s content. Stanley Cavell wrote that we might say that “a painting is a world” and that “a photograph is of the world” but a painting in many ways continue to allude to the world, and more precisely to the autobiographer’s world. Finally, beyond the intermedial question, there is the issue of autobiography, and more specifically autobiography at the beginning of the 21st century, a different type from previous centuries, one more informed of the limits of referential writing and more than ever aware of its importance; one also that has often outgrown its usual vessel—even though the latter remains its most prestigious one in terms of official recognition­—and has branched out into social and often more visual media (just one example among so many: the renowned American photographer Stephen Shore’s Instagram account on which he posts one picture everyday). Sidonie Smith and Julia Watson have identified and explored “the visual-verbal-virtual contexts of life narrative” which have multiplied through for example performance and visual arts, autobiographical films and videos, and variously curated online lives. Véronique Montémont rightfully points out that Philippe Lejeune, one of the most prominent life writing theorists, “does not mention photography because for him autobiography involves enunciation, a narrator in other terms.” And yet photography has entered the field of autobiography in a multitude of ways. In Picturing Ourselves: Photography & Autobiography, Linda Haverty Rugg sums up her study’s main objectives thus: “This book explores the intersection of these two debates—the point at which photographs enter the autobiographical act. What (or how) do photographs mean in the context of an autobiography?” The aim of this symposium is to explore the point at which an image, any image, whether fixed or moving (in vlogs for instance), enters the autobiographical act and confronts the verbal form. Keynote Speaker: Pr. Teresa Bruś (Wrocław University), author of the forthcoming Face Forms in Photography and Life Writing of the 1920s and 1930s
CFP – Gender and the Sea: Women and Men in Maritime History Guest editor: dr. Djoeke van Netten For centuries sailors thought that the presence of women on board would mean bad luck: rough weather, big waves, and other disasters were sure to follow. Through notions like these, women were supposedly excluded from the maritime domain. Therefore, the ship and the sea have predominantly been perceived as a space for men. Yet, the presence of women at sea has increased in the last century. This volume of the Yearbook for Women’s History therefore asks: to what extent was the sea ever a masculine space? This volume examines if and how women were part of seafaring communities, maritime undertakings, and maritime culture. In the field of maritime history, the role of women and gender have long been understudied. To enlighten our understanding of the influence and presence of women in the maritime past, this volume of the Yearbook for Women’s History will bring together recent research to provide more insight into the contribution of women to the maritime world, including (but not limited to) maritime industries, seafaring communities, naval warfare, (cruise) tourism, art and literature, and imaginary worlds concerning the sea from antiquity to the twenty-first century. Besides the role of women, this volume also wants to focus on the broader workings of gender and the role of femininity and masculinity in the maritime world. By doing so, this volume touches on different intersections of gender with other political, socio-economic and cultural phenomena in relation to people’s use, fear, and admiration of the sea. We welcome contributions that employ different scales of analysis from all over the world. We are looking for articles that vary in length (3000-6000 words) and are written in Dutch or English. Possible topics include: – Masculinity and femininity at sea and/or in the maritime world – The sea as a territory for men and/or women – Gender and maritime metaphors and myths – The sea, gender religion and/or superstition – Women and/or men in flags and ship decoration, e.g. figureheads – Paintings and portraits – Women (and children) who travelled by ships, e.g. in a colonial context – Women who worked in maritime industries (ashore) – Sailor’s wives – Female authors and publishers of poems and books regarding the sea – Women who worked on board in a broad range of professions – Women in the navy – Female pirates – Women on board dressed or disguised as men – Sea monsters, mermaids and mermen – Sex and sexuality on board – Forced migration of women and men, e.g. slave trade We invite authors from academia, museums and cultural and heritage institutions to submit an abstract. Abstracts (200-300 words) written in English or Dutch are to be submitted by 25 November 2021 to jaarboekvrouwengeschiedenis@gmail.com. Important dates 25 November 2021 Deadline for abstracts Early December 2021 Information concerning acceptance sent to the writers 1 April 2022 Submission deadline for articles to be submitted to editorial and peer review End of August Submission deadline for final versions
* Upcoming Events from the Leon Levy Center for Biography, Oct.-Dec. 2021 Tuesday, October 19, 6 pm Ruth Franklin on Scandalous Biographers & Their Publishers in conversation with Laura Marsh, Tim Duggan, Katha Pollitt & Ian Buruma To register, please click here: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZ0lde6trTkuGdDE_mQm9OKMaCxM4tx… When Philip Roth authorized Blake Bailey to write his biography, he told Bailey, “I don’t want you to rehabilitate me. Just make me interesting.” Last spring, when the biography was published, critics’ responses suggested Bailey had succeeded: while some questioned whether his portrayals of Roth’s relationships with women were fair-minded, most lauded the book’s comprehensiveness and verve. All that changed within days when allegations surfaced in the media that Bailey had engaged in sexual misconduct. Amid the resulting scandal, Bailey’s publisher, W.W. Norton, announced it would stop selling the book. This and other recent literary scandals raise difficult questions for authors, publishers, and readers. Do we have an obligation to consider a writer’s personal conduct when making decisions about whether to publish or buy a book—or do we have an obligation not to? (“Read the book, not the author,” an Amazon reviewer pleads on Bailey’s behalf.) What is the appropriate response to allegations such as the ones raised against Bailey? Has the politicization of our cultural climate gone too far—or not far enough? Former Leon Levy Fellow Ruth Franklin is a book critic and former editor at The New Republic. Her first biography, Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life (Liveright/W.W. Norton, 2016) won the National Book Critics Circle Award for Biography and was named a New York Times Notable Book of 2016, a Time magazine top nonfiction book of 2016, and a “best book of 2016” by The Boston Globe, the San Francisco Chronicle, NPR, and others. She is the recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship in biography, a Cullman Fellowship at the New York Public Library, and the Roger Shattuck Prize for Criticism. She lives in Brooklyn, New York. Laura Marsh is the literary editor of the New Republic, and co-host of the Politics of Everything podcast. Tim Duggan is an executive editor at Henry Holt & Company, a division of Macmillan. The authors he has edited include Timothy Snyder, David Wallace-Wells, Michiko Kakutani, Karan Mahajan, Daniel Mendelsohn, William Boyd, Annie Dillard, and Uzodinma Iweala. The books he has edited include winners of the Pulitzer Prize, the National Book Critics Circle Award, the Women’s Prize for Fiction, and many finalists for the National Book Award. Katha Pollitt is a poet, essayist and columnist for The Nation. She has written for many magazines and published numerous books, most recently Pro: Reclaiming Abortion Rights and The Mind-Body Problem (poems). Ian Buruma, a regular contributor to and former editor of the New York Review of Books, is the author of, among other works: Behind the Mask, God’s Dust, Playing the Game and Murder in Amsterdam: The Death of Theo van Gogh and the Limits of Tolerance. Buruma has won several prizes for his books, including the Los Angeles Times Book Prize and the PEN/Diamonstein-Spielvogel Award for the Art of the Essay for Theater of Cruelty: Art, Film and the Shadows of War. Friday, October 15, 2:30 pm: Molly Peacock on Mary Hiester Reid to register for this event, please click here: https://www.92y.org/event/flower-diary.aspx In her new book, Flower Diary, Former Leon Levy Fellow Molly Peacock weaves together elements of biography, memoir and art history to reveal the world of Mary Hiester Reid, a fascinating, complex woman who insisted on her right to live as a married artist, not as a tragic heroine. A foremother of Georgia O’Keefe, who lived in a subtle menage with her painter husband and a talented younger painter at both the Onteora Artists’ Colony in the Catskills and in Toronto, Heister Reid produced over 300 passionate paintings in which the figures of flowers and trees become like a diary of her life. Monday, October 18, 4 pm Victoria Phillips on Eleanor Lansing Dulles Presented by the Center for the Study of Women and Society and Women Writing Women’s Lives, cosponsored by The Leon Levy Center to register for this event, please click here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/women-power-and-intrigue-in-cold-war-berlin…​ Victoria Phillips is the author of Martha Graham’s Cold War: The Dance of American Diplomacy (Oxford University Press, 2020), which uncovers the political life of Martha Graham and her particular brand of dance modernism as pro-American propaganda during the global Cold War. A Visiting Fellow in the Department of International History at the London School of Economics, Dr. Phillips is also the director of the Cold War Archival Research Project, History OnLine, and co-founder of the Global Biography Working Group.​ Tuesday, November 2, 6 pm Debby Applegate on Madam: Polly Adler, Icon of the J​azz Age in conversation with Gerald Howard To register for this event, please click here: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZItc-ioqDIjEtGfQK1VqdjsWceVj1e… The compulsively readable and sometimes jaw-dropping story of the life of a notorious madam who played hostess to every gangster, politician, writer, sports star and Cafe Society swell worth knowing, and who as much as any single figure helped make the twenties roar—from the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Most Famous Man in America. Simply put: Everybody came to Polly’s. Pearl “Polly” Adler (1900-1962) was a diminutive dynamo whose Manhattan brothels in the Roaring Twenties became places not just for men to have the company of women but were key gathering places where the culturati and celebrity elite mingled with high society and with violent figures of the underworld—and had a good time doing it. As a Jewish immigrant from eastern Europe, Polly Adler’s life is a classic American story of success and assimilation that starts like a novel by Henry Roth and then turns into a glittering real-life tale straight out of F. Scott Fitzgerald. She declared her ambition to be “the best goddam madam in all America” and succeeded wildly. Debby Applegate uses Polly’s story as the key to unpacking just what made the 1920s the appallingly corrupt yet glamorous and transformational era that it was and how the collision between high and low is the unique ingredient that fuels American culture. Debby Applegate won the Pulitzer Prize for Biography for her first book, The Most Famous Man in America: The Biography of Henry Ward Beecher, and is the author of Madam: The Biography of Polly Adler, Icon of the Jazz Age. She holds a Ph.D. in American Studies from Yale University and lives in New Haven, Connecticut. Gerald Howard recently retired from Doubleday, where he edited two books by Debby Applegate: Madam and The Most Famous Man in America, her biography of Henry Ward Beecher. His essays and reviews have appeared in a variety of publications. He is currently at work on a biographical study of the editor and critic Malcolm Cowley. Tuesday, November 9, 6 pm Jason L. Riley on Thomas Sowell in conversation with Robert A. George To register for this event, please click here: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZMpfuqtqjosGdXAhWuXlbiZWpOCYvW… Thomas Sowell is one of the great social theorists of our age. In a career spanning more than a half century, he has written over 30 books, covering topics from economic history and social inequality to political theory, race, and culture. His bold and unsentimental assaults on liberal orthodoxy have endeared him to many admirers but have also enraged fellow intellectuals, the civil-rights establishment, and much of the mainstream media. The result has been a lack of acknowledgment of his scholarship among critics who prioritize political correctness. In the first-ever biography of Sowell, Jason L. Riley gives this iconic thinker his due and responds to the detractors. Maverick showcases Sowell’s most significant writings and traces the life events that shaped his ideas and resulted in a Black orphan from the Jim Crow South becoming one of our foremost public intellectuals. Jason L. Riley is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a columnist for the Wall Street Journal, where he has written about politics, economics, education, immigration and social inequality for more than 25 years. He’s also a frequent public speaker and provides commentary for television and radio news outlets. After joining the Journal in 1994, Mr. Riley was named a senior editorial page writer in 2000 and a member of the Editorial Board in 2005. He joined the Manhattan Institute, a public policy think tank focused on urban affairs, in 2015. Mr. Riley is the author of four books: Let Them In: The Case for Open Borders (2008); Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed (2014); False Black Power? (2017); and Maverick: A Biography of Thomas Sowell (2021). Born in Buffalo, N.Y., Mr. Riley earned a bachelor’s degree in English from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He lives in suburban New York City. Robert A. George is a member of the Bloomberg Opinion Editorial Board and columnist. Previously a member of the New York Post and Daily News editorial boards, he has been writing about New York and national issues for more than two decades. He was born in Trinidad and lived in the United Kingdom before moving to the United States. A 1985 graduate of St. John’s College in Annapolis, Maryland, George worked for the Republican National Committee and, following the 1994 midterm elections, Speaker of the House of Representatives Newt Gingrich. George also has been a guest on MSNBC, CNN, and Fox and regularly appears on other political affairs programs. George has written for the conservative National Review, the libertarian Reason and the progressive Huffington Post. He is a cofounder of the Electoral Dysfunction podcast. In addition, George moonlights as a stand-up comic and improviser. Wednesday, November 10, 5 pm (NB) Claire Tomalin on HG Wells in conversation with Edward Mendelson To register, please click here:​​ https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZcrdu2vqT4qHtLdKVoNn8_KT85eKGT… Here for the first time, Claire Tomalin brings to life the early years of H. G. Wells, and traces his formation as a writer of extraordinary originality and ambition. Born in 1866, the son of a gardener and a housekeeper, Wells faced poverty and ill health from a young age. At 12, he was taken out of school, torment for a child with intellectual aspirations. Determined, Wells won scholarships and worked towards science degrees. Though he failed his final exams, he was soon writing text books, involving himself in politics, and contributing to newspapers. Still suffering from serious illness, as well as multiple physical breakdowns, Wells understood early on the impulse to escape – through books, art, and his imagination – and he began to make his name by writing short stories. But it wasn’t until the publication of his first novel, The Time Machine, in 1895, that Wells attained the great success he had so longed for. His book, which transformed the way readers saw the world, was hailed as an extraordinary accomplishment. Until the period leading up to the first world war, Wells wrote books at an almost unprecedented speed – about science, mysteries, and prophecies; aliens, planets, and space travel; mermaids, the bottom of the sea, and distant islands. He chronicled social change, and forecasted the future of technology and politics; formed friendships with Winston Churchill, Henry James, and Bernard Shaw, and shaped the minds of the young and old. His most famous works have never been out of print, and his influence is still felt today. In this unforgettable portrait of this complicated man, Tomalin makes clear his early period was crucial in making him into the great writer he became, and that by concentrating on the young Wells, we get the best of his life, and of his work. Claire Tomalin was born Claire Delavenay in 1933 in London. She was educated at Cambridge University and worked in publishing and journalism. Her first book, a life of Mary Wollstonecraft, came out in 1974, the year in which her husband, the journalist Nicholas Tomalin, was killed, leaving her with four children. She has written biographies of Katherine Mansfield, Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, Thomas Hardy, Samuel Pepys and the actress Mrs Jordan, and most recently a memoir of her own life. She is married to the playwright and novelist Michael Frayn. Edward Mendelson is the Lionel Trilling Professor in the Humanities at Columbia University. He is the literary executor of the Estate of W. H. Auden and the author or editor of several books about Auden’s work, including Early Auden and Later Auden. He is also the author of The Things That Matter: What Seven Classic Novels Have to Say About the Stages of Life about nineteenth- and twentieth-century novels, and Moral Agents: Eight Twentieth-Century American Writers. His work on Thomas Pynchon includes Pynchon: A Collection of Critical Essays. He is the editor of annotated editions of novels by Thomas Hardy, George Meredith, Arnold Bennett, H. G. Wells, and Anthony Trollope. With Michael Seidel he co-edited Homer to Brecht: The European Epic and Dramatic Traditions. Thursday, November 11, 6 pm Julia Sweig on Lady Bird Johnson in conversation with Debby Applegate To register, please click here:​​ https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZcudeyhqTorGtSnjx4K9jzwW3tbaew… Perhaps the most underestimated First Lady of the twentieth century, Lady Bird Johnson was also one of the most accomplished and often her husband’s secret weapon. Managing the White House in years of national upheaval, through the civil rights movement and the escalation of the Vietnam War, Lady Bird projected a sense of calm and, following the glamorous and modern Jackie Kennedy, an old-fashioned image of a First Lady. In truth, she was anything but. As the first First Lady to run the East Wing like a professional office, she took on her own policy initiatives, including the most ambitious national environmental effort since Teddy Roosevelt. Occupying the White House during the beginning of the women’s liberation movement, she hosted professional women from all walks of life in the White House, including urban planning and environmental pioneers like Jane Jacobs and Barbara Ward, encouraging women everywhere to pursue their own careers, even if her own style of leadership and official role was to lead by supporting others. Where no presidential biographer has understood the full impact of Lady Bird Johnson’s work in the White House, Julia Sweig is the first to draw substantially on Lady Bird’s own voice in her White House diaries to place Claudia Alta “Lady Bird” Johnson center stage and to reveal a woman ahead of her time—and an accomplished politician in her own right. Dr. Julia Sweig is a scholar and author whose extensive short- and long-form work covers Cold War American foreign policy and diplomatic history in the Americas, especially Cuba. As a policy practitioner, she led the Latin American program at the Council on Foreign Relations for 15 years. Her new book, Lady Bird Johnson: Hiding in Plain Sight, a New York Times bestseller, shifts Julia’s focus to American history and politics. Moving into broadcast media, her ABC News podcast, In Plain Sight: Lady Bird Johnson, is an eight-episode, immersive audio documentary. Debby Applegate won the Pulitzer Prize for Biography for her first book, The Most Famous Man in America: The Biography of Henry Ward Beecher, and is the author of Madam: The Biography of Polly Adler, Icon of the Jazz Age. She holds a Ph.D. in American Studies from Yale University and lives in New Haven, Connecticut.​ Wednesday, December 8, 6 pm Kati Marton on Angela Merkel in conversation with Eliza Griswold To register, please click here:​​ https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZUtdeqprD0sGdfUSbj-g3f9LmPxZzu… Acclaimed biographer Kati Marton set out to pierce the mystery of how Angela Merkel achieved all this. And she found the answer in Merkel’s political genius: in her willingness to talk with adversaries rather than over them, her skill at negotiating without ever compromising on what’s most important to her, her canniness in appointing political rivals to her cabinet and exacting their policies so they have no platform to run against her, the humility to allow others to take credit for things done in tandem, the wisdom to stay out of the papers and off Twitter, and the vision to take advantage of crises to enact bold change. Famously private, the Angela Merkel who emerges in The Chancellor is a role model for anyone interested in gaining and keeping power while holding onto one’s moral convictions—and for anyone looking to understand how to successfully bridge huge divisions within society. No modern leader has so ably confronted Russian aggression, provided homes to over a million refugees, and calmly unified Europe at a time when other countries are becoming more divided. But Marton also describes Merkel’s many challenges, such as her complicated relationship with President Obama, who she at one point refused to speak to. Kati Marton is the author of True Believer: Stalin’s Last American Spy; Enemies of the People: My Family’s Journey to America, a National Book Critics Circle Award finalist; The Great Escape: Nine Jews Who Fled Hitler and Changed the World; Hidden Power: Presidential Marriages That Shaped Our History; Wallenberg; The Polk Conspiracy; and A Death in Jerusalem. She is an award-winning former NPR and ABC News correspondent. She was born in Hungary and lives in New York City.​ Eliza Griswold is the author, most recently, of Amity and Prosperity: One Family and the Fracturing of America, a 2018 Times Notable Book and a Times Critics’ Pick, for which she won the Pulitzer Prize for general nonfiction, in 2019. Griswold has been awarded various prizes, including the J. Anthony Lukas Prize, a PEN Translation Prize, and the Rome Prize for her poetry. Her second book of poems, If Men, Then, was published in 2020. She is currently a Distinguished Writer-in-Residence at New York University.​
Deadline for Submissions Nov. 30, 2021

Call for Papers

The conference is rescheduled to 14-17 June 2022 and opens the call for papers for NEW submissions. PLEASE NOTE: If you already have an accepted abstract in the IABA conference, please follow these steps:
  1. sign in to your Oxford Abstracts account, open your submission and click on “Amend” on the top of the abstract window
  2. reply on the added question (choose if you wish to modify your abstract, leave it as it is or withdraw it). If you wish to modify your abstract, you can make the modifcations immediately or come back and modify later, until 30 November 2021
  3. click “submit” at the bottom of submission form to submit your reply.
Oxford Abstracts: https://app.oxfordabstracts.com/stages/1230/submitter PLEASE ALSO NOTE: The conference team is aiming to have the conference as a live event in which participants attend the conference in person. The team is aware of the possible challenges of travel in June 2022 and is willing to discuss remote participation in cases where the travelling is hindered. Unfortunately, we are unable to offer the whole conference as an online event / in a hybrid format. Call for papers (new submissions) IABA World Turku 2022 Life-Writing: Imagining the Past, Present and Future 14-17 June 2022 Turku, Finland SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory warmly welcomes proposals to the 12th IABA World Conference, which will be held at the University of Turku (Finland), June 14-17, 2022. Through the theme of Life-Writing: Imagining the Past, Present and Future, IABA World 2022 will explore the multiple temporalities shaping the dimensions of life storying and life writing research. Temporality impacts the writing and shaping of life narratives, as well as the ways in which we analyze life narrative documents. The temporal is at the core of how we understand the centuries-long histories of how the self is written about and the genealogy of life writing research. Temporality, however, does not mean only gazing to the past, but also understanding how the present moment and orientation to the future are visible in life writing and/or how history makes its presence known in different moments and spaces. The temporal approach also invites us to explore how the future is imagined in life narratives and to discuss our visions for the future of life writing studies. This interdisciplinary conference encourages dialogues across boundaries of theory, methodology, genre, place, and time. The Conference invites not only traditional conference papers and panels, but also unconventional presentation formats, creative sessions, as well as artistic performances. We encourage cross-disciplinary and transnational contributions. Proposed works may consider life storying through themes including for example:
  • Narrating and imagining life courses (for example childhood, youth, and aging in life writing)
  • Ethics of storytelling
  • Cultural memory and societal change
  • Non-human life storying / Life writing in posthumanism
  • Autobiography, diary, letters, and life writing in historical research
  • The histories and futures of different genres of life writing
  • Digital history and the future of biographical and prosopographical research
  • Sensory and/or Emotive narratives
  • Life storying in popular culture (music, film, theatre, games)
  • Visual life narratives (photography, graphics, visual arts etc.)
  • Hidden/forgotten lives vs. Public/celebrated lives
  • Interrelations: Family and life writing
  • Life storying migrations, displacements, and belongings
  • Life writing illness and wellness / disability and ability
  • Imagining futures in life narratives
  • Life writing and artistic research
  • The histories and futures of life writing studies across disciplinary boundaries
  • Methods, genres, and definitions in life-writing/autobiographical/life story/ego-document research
Submissions: We invite both 20 minute individual presentations and 90 minute full panel, roundtable, or workshop sessions. We encourage proposed full sessions to be interdisciplinary and international. Creative sessions and performances can also be proposed and if you are uncertain about how to submit these, please contact the organizers: iabaturku2020@utu.fi The conference language is English. All presenters must submit a max. 300 word abstract and a 150 word bio. Please note: when you propose a full session all the presenters must submit their own abstract to the system and mention that it is part of XXX session. Abstract submission guidelines:
  • Register to Oxford Abstracts to submit
  • You may amend your submission until the final submission deadline. Please note that uncompleted abstracts will not be reviewed.
  • Remember to complete the abstract and answer all the required questions before the deadline.
  • If you have any questions regarding the submission process, please contact info@aboaservices.fi
  • Oxford Abstracts: https://app.oxfordabstracts.com/stages/1230/submitter
Practicalities and schedule: Deadline for new proposals 30 November 2021 Notification of acceptance: by 22 December 2021 Deadline for confirming and modifying the submissions that are already in the OA system 30 Nov 2021 Registration (re)opens: 20 December 2021 Early bird fee until: 15 March 2022 Final registration by:  30 April 2022 – abstract presenters 15 May 2022 – regular participants The Conference Fees: Participant type Early bird fees Late fees Participant 270 EUR 320 EUR Participant (reduced fee, dinner not included) 220 EUR 270 EUR Student participant 220 EUR 270 EUR Student participant (reduced fee, dinner not included) 170 EUR 220 EUR Information about publication plans: The conference team will publish a special issue of Biography in conjunction with the 2022 IABA Turku. More information on this during the conference. Conference organizer: SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory, University of Turku Conference co-organizers:  Åbo Akademi University, the City of Turku, International Institute for Popular Culture, and the Finnish Literature Society FAQ: Individual proposal + panel: traditional academic session with 3–4 participants, 20 min presentation + 10 minutes discussion. In full panel, we propose that the chair is one of the presenters. Roundtable: 4–6 participants, with short presentations and then questions from the round-table organizers, dialogue between participants and then open discussion from the floor
*
What’s New? Topical Work in Transnational Life Writing 
Sixth Annual Symposium organized by Unhinging the National Framework: Platform for the Study of Transnational Life Writing 
 
Friday, 3 December 2021, 9.30 – 17.00
Campus Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Atrium, Medical Faculty
Van der Boechorststraat 7 (first floor)
 
Free of charge, but please register before Tuesday, 30 November 2021: b.boter@vu.nl
 
 
Speakers
Conny Braam, former Dutch anti-apartheid activist; writer of biographies, historical novels, travelogues, short stories. Interview about her recent work on Hendrik Witbooi (2016) and Jakob Witbooi (2020).
Interviewer: Dr. Barbara Henkes, Groningen University
 
Hermine Haman, PhD-candidate Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam: “Reconstructing the life and work of Eddy Bruma, Surinamese lawyer, author, politician”
Response: Dr. Lonneke Geerlings, independent researcher
 
Dr. Margriet van der Heijden, physicist, journalist and author of Denken is verrukkelijk: Het leven van Tatiana Afanassjewa en Paul Ehrenfest (2021): “A vibrant household and cosmopolitan oasis in ‘rainy’ Leiden”
Response: Dr. Abel Streefland, Delft University of Technology
 
Prof. dr. Kees Ribbens, NIOD, Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide Studies: “Selling the Dutch WWII narrative abroad. Mapping the transnational republication of war stories”
Response: Dr. Marijke Huisman, Utrecht University
 
Prof. dr. Ugur Üngör, NIOD, Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide Studies: “The Syria Oral History Project: A Transnational Perspective”
Response: Dr. Ernestine Hoegen, independent researcher
 
Dr. Suze Zijlstra, independent researcher, author of De Voormoeders: Een verborgen Nederlands-Indische Familiegeschiedenis (2021): “Raising Eurasian children under Dutch rule in eighteenth-century Makassar”
Response: Dr. Eveline Buchheim, NIOD, Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide Studies
 
 
Research pitch
Four Dutch queens in a time of nation building (1774-1934)
 
Dr. Alpita de Jong, independent researcher, biographer of Wilhelmina van Pruisen (1774-1837)
Dr. Petra van Langen, independent researcher, biographer of Anna Paulowna (1795-1865)
Dr. Leonieke Vermeer, Groningen University, biographer of Sophie van Wurtemberg (1818-1877)
Dr. Monica Soeting, independent researcher, biographer of Emma van Waldeck-Pyrmont (1858-1934)
 
 
Bookstand
Utrecht-based bookshop Savannah Bay *
The Hazel Rowley Literary Fellowship, valued at $20,000, supports Australian writers working on biography projects.Deadline for Applications, Nov. 16, 2021
The Fellowship is open to Australian citizens and permanent residents. Up to $20,000 is awarded for travel and research to further a writing proposal or work in progress. It may not be used to pay for a research assistant or to subsidise a publication. The focus is on biography, but extends to an aspect of cultural or social history compatible with Hazel’s interest areas. Preference is given to projects that are about ‘risk-taking’ and expanding horizons, promote discussion of ideas, and make a significant contribution to public intellectual life. Applications open each year on 1 October and close on 16 November, the shortlist is announced in the following January and the Fellowship is awarded in March. For more information and to make an application, visit Writers Victoria. Previous applicants are eligible to apply again. If submitting a second application for the same project, any progress should be reflected in the proposal. The judges will take into account any progress that has been made. Click here for the Fellowship Terms and Conditions.

COVID-19 changes

The Hazel Rowley Fellowship recognises the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on writers’ ability to undertake travel and research. Accordingly, we have extended the time frames for the 2022 Fellowship to 18 months and priority will be given to those projects that do not involve international travel.
The Fellowship was established by the family and friends of Hazel Rowley, one of the world’s leading biographers, to commemorate her life and writing legacy following her death in 2011. Hazel left behind a legacy of great writing, a passion for words and for exploring the lives of exceptional men and women.
Following her award-winning biography of the Australian novelist Christina Stead in 1993 Hazel went on to establish an international career with a biography of the African-American novelist Richard Wright (2001), an examination of the relationship of the French philosophers Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre, Tête-à-Tête (2005) and her last book, an insight into the marriage of the Roosevelts, Franklin and Eleanor: An Extraordinary Marriage (2010).
Although most recognised for these four outstanding biographies, Hazel also wrote and published many essays, articles and book reviews. She was well known as a lively and engaging public speaker, appearing at numerous book festivals and literary events around the world.
*
  • CFP: Popular Culture Association Annual Conference-Biographies Area (11/15/2021; 4/13-16/2022) Seattle, USA
Biography, Film and Film History, Journalism and Media Studies, Music and Music History, Popular Culture Studies
The Popular Culture Association will be holding its annual conference in Seattle, Washington, April 13-16, 2022. The Biographies Area is soliciting papers that examine the connections between biography and popular culture. Papers and full panel presentations regarding any aspect of popular culture and biography are encouraged. Potential topics might include: – Biography and entertainment, art, music, theater – Biography and film – Biography and criminal justice – Television programs about biography – Biography and urban legends – Biography and folklore – Biography and literature – Scholarly Biography – Controversial Biography – Psychoanalysis and Biography – Historical Biography – Political Biography – Autobiography Sessions are scheduled in 1½ hour slots, typically with four papers or speakers per standard session.  Presentations should not exceed 20 minutes. On your submission, please include title of paper, abstract, and contact information. Submission Deadline: 11/15/21 Please go to this link to submit your paper:  https://pcaaca.org/conference/submitting-paper-proposal-pca-conference 
Contact Info:
Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries 4505 S. Maryland Pkway Las Vegas, NV 89154
Contact Email:
FULL PAPERS: 15 February 2022 ABSTRACTS: 15 November 2021
*
Special Issue: Life Writing & Persona 2022 Vol. 8 Issue 1 Persona Studies Call For Papers:
Persona Studies is seeking papers and creative projects that investigate the ways in which personas are produced, managed, used, and disseminated in the contexts of life writing. We take “life writing” here in the very broadest of senses to include written texts (published and unpublished; written, print and online) but also other forms and genres of representation/self-(re)presentation including film, art, theatre, publicity, social media and more. In this issue we are interested in life writing as a site of persona production, persona performance, and persona dissemination. Whether vlogs and Facebook posts or celebrity memoirs, profiles or biopics, life writing texts are doing persona work – often quite intentionally and strategically in the cases of public figures and public texts. Indeed, life writing seems both an obvious and natural home for studying persona and there are productive sites of overlap in how these fields theorize performativity, authenticity, strategy, agency, and reputation. But the study of life writing as a site of persona work also has the opportunity to stretch both fields in new directions: private life writing texts, for example, offer a challenge to the supposition in Persona Studies that personas are mechanisms for being public. Persona Studies in turn complicates distinctions between public and private mechanisms of self-(re)presentation that have historically structured Life Writing Studies. Theoretically, both fields have much to offer each other: how might theoretical work on the slash in auto/biography, truth-telling, and auto/biographical pacts be brought to bear on persona performances? How might life writing benefit from thinking about playability, mediatization, and role-playing? This special issue on life writing and persona welcomes abstracts and papers related to these and many other issues including (but certainly not limited to): ·       Social media and other forms of presentational media as sites of persona work and life writing ·       Persona and biographical representational media forms: films, profiles, biographies, etc. ·       Self-presentation in representational media forms ·       Persona in public and private life writing texts ·       Referentiality and truth-telling in persona work ·       Issues of agency, performativity, and reputation in life writing ·       Strategic productions of persona in life writing ·       Personas in the publicity and marketing of life writing textsAbstracts and Expressions of Interest (300-500 words) should be submitted by 15 November 2021 to katja.lee@wa.edu.au with the subject heading “Life Writing and Persona.” Full papers may also be submitted at this time. Notification of acceptance will follow by 1 December 2021. Please note that final acceptance of the full paper and project is contingent upon the peer review process. Full papers (6,000-8,000 words) and creative projects will be due 15 February 2022.*Call for Papers EXPERIMENTAL LIFEWRITING  22-23 April 2022, Wrocław, Poland University of Wrocław and École Normale Supérieure de Lyon Conference website: http://vanessaguignery.fr/The capacious category of lifewriting accommodates conventional biography and autobiography – with their insistence on linearity, coherence and a stable sense of the self – as well as auto/biographical works that embrace digital media, mix genres and break down neat life narratives into fragments. In order to give a name to the disruptive strand of the auto/biographical tradition, Irene Kacandes has proposed the term “experimental lifewriting,” which encompasses texts employing an unconventional formal device “for the purposes of fact or of enhancing, reinforcing or drawing attention to the referential level.” They are driven by the desire “to convey some aspect of the ‘realness’ of certain life experiences that could not be conveyed as well without pushing at the form itself.” Kacandes distinguishes between experiments regarding time, medium, the relation between the author, subject and reader, and the work’s focus. Julia Novak goes on to define “experiments in lifewriting” as works that “push at the boundaries of existing forms to mould them into something that better suits the writer’s efforts of representation.” In her co-edited volume (with Lucia Boldrini) Experiments in LifeWriting (2017), she suggests an alternative classification, based on experimentation with the auto/biographical subject, generic composites, style, structure, intertextuality and metalepsis, names and pronouns, and media. 1975 – the year of the publication of Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes and Joe Brainard’s I Remember – can be viewed as the onset of that overtly experimental streak in auto/biographical writing, which has recently yielded such diverse works as David Clark’s 88 Constellations for Wittgenstein (2008), Joan Wickersham’s The Suicide Index (2008), Anne Carson’s NOX (2010), Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts (2015), Una’s Becoming Unbecoming (2015) and Carmen Maria Machado’s In the Dream House (2019). However, as Max Saunders has argued, that tradition can be traced back to the Modernist practice of autobiografiction and claim such literary classics as Virginia Woolf’s Orlando (1928) and Gertrude Stein’s The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas (1933).Our conference aims to theorize, historicize, and exemplify the still very fresh critical notion of experimental lifewriting. We have a particular interest in contemporary Anglophone writing and welcome comparative papers about works in English and other languages. Possible issues and forms to explore in conference papers include (but are not limited to):
  • fragmentary lifewriting,
  • genre-defying graphic memoirs,
  • multimodal, multimedia and collage-like lifewriting,
  • digital/online biography,
  • conceptual (life-)writing,
  • postmodern lifewriting and avant-garde autobiography,
  • anti-biography,
  • fake auto/biography,
  • the self as archive/database,
  • digital identities and the quantified self,
  • auto/biography and social media,
  • formal experimentation in the context of trauma, grief and/or radical vulnerability,
  • queer lifewriting,
  • autobiography in the second or third person,
  • generic hybridity in lifewriting,
  • unconventional relations between the author, narrator, subject and reader,
  • playing with frames/framing,
  • pedagogical implications of experimental lifewriting.
Proposals (ca. 300 words), together with a biographical note, should be sent to Vanessa Guignery (vanessa.guignery@ens-lyon.fr) and Wojciech Drąg (moontauk@gmail.com) by 15 November 2021. Keynote speakers: Irene Kacandes, Teresa Bruś and David Clark.
*
Call for Papers Disability at the Intersection of History, Culture, Religion, Gender, and Health Date: March 3-4, 2022 Place: Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI  Submissions Due Oct. 31, 2021 Disability is a living human experience. It is not merely a medical or biological phenomenon, and it is not only the subject of sciences. Perspectives on disability have evolved historically, theologically, and medically. Academics and disability activists have increasingly come to view disability as more than an individual medical diagnosis, often highlighting it as an issue of social justice and equity. As such, there is a need for further collaboration between the sciences and the humanities to deepen our understanding of disability in all of its complexities. Using interdisciplinary approaches to examine disability as fluid and dynamic condition can help us understand it as an identity and as social construct. This conference aims to encourage open discussion and better understanding as well as to breakdown stigma associated with disabilities. To accomplish that, the conference aims to generate inclusive dialogues and interdisciplinary interactions between academia, community organizers, social and legal activists, health care service/providers, and religious leaders. The conference will serve as a platform to foster collaboration between various groups engaged in understanding and improving disability conditions. We invite papers that offer critical analysis of how disabilities have been viewed in historical terms as medical conditions, social/cultural constructs, and as the norms that produce and reproduce perceptions of normalcy or normative bodies. We particularly welcome papers dealing with normalcy narratives, discourse, and issues of stigmas evolving around disabilities in marginalized communities with an emphasis on the intersection of disability (as an identity and minority) with gender, culture, and religion. Key Topics: Core conference themes include, but are not limited to: Disability and identity Social and cultural construction of disabilities Religious and cultural perspectives on disability Bodies and construction of normalcy Gendered disabilities and feminist approaches to disability Language terminology and conceptualization of impairment and disability in literary, cultural, and artistic production Disabilities as social and legal rights issue Community activism, policy making, and service Lived experiences, life-writing and narratives of people with disability This hybrid conference will host both in-person and virtual sessions. We invite proposals of individual papers, panels, workshops, roundtables, and thematic conversation. Graduate student submissions are encouraged. Panels will be composed of 3- 4 presenters (time must be divided equally among panel presenters allowing 10-15 minutes for questions). Roundtable and thematic conversation may consist of more than three participants. The time for all panel types is one hour. Keynote Speaker: Lennard Davis, Distinguished Professor, Disability and Human Development, The University of Illinois Chicago Key Dates: Abstracts up to 300 words in Word format must be submitted through the electronic system by October 31, 2021. You will be notified of the decision by December 15, 2021. Publication Conference proceedings and selected papers will be published in a special issue of the Journal of Gender, Ethnic, and Cross-Cultural Studies. Preliminary organizing committee members: Enaya Othman Tara Baillargeon Behnam Ghasemzadeh Michelle Medeiros Giordana Poggioli-Kaftan Dana Fritz Gülnur Demirci Stefan Reutter Submit your abstract at https://epublications.marquette.edu/icdi/2022/ For any inquiries, please contact Dr. Enaya Othman at enaya.othman@marquette.edu Gülnur Demirci at ggulnurdemirci@gmail.com
*
Announcement: Call-for-Papers: This call has been slightly revised. This call is for abstract submissions for an international edited collection now entitled Taking Control: the use of critical and creative digital tools in the now and beyond, in  screen, literature, graphic texts, and visual culture narratives. Currently I am seeking a number of academics and professionals in the field who might like to send me an abstract for consideration for inclusion in the book. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the deadline date for abstracts has been extended: Abstracts now due: 19  October 2021. The aim of Taking Control is to highlight the human-AI blend in creativity as a vibrant multidisciplinary thematic area where we urgently need better understanding and clear parameters to judge success and failure. Taking Control seeks to examine the current uses, and the potential for expansion and extension, and possible future uses of AI in relation to screen and literature, including e-books and electronic literature genres and graphic texts, and visual culture narratives; as well as the little explored angle of cultural criticism and cultural meaning in those human-AI assisted productions. Suggestions for potential contributions to consider, but not limited to, are, how the use of AI in these productions may:
  • connect to the viewer’s/reader’s world to foster a new reality and encourage learning;
  • sharpen, and ask for answers to, big questions that intersect with our society and environment and worlds;
  • encourage further research that opens new possibilities as well as an open-mindedness in the quest for a deeper understanding;
  • create platforms that cross cultures and borders, to become inter- and multi- disciplinary;
  • provide immediate access to resources that we can trust to provide accurate information, and that is enriching and productive;
  • bring to the table a common “language” that can create a shared experience, with the potential to cross borders into other disciplines, and sustain our cultural heritage;
  • discuss how the human-AI blend can be used to highlight or determine the use of cultural criticism and/or cultural meaning in the relevant productions;
  • discuss the potential of the human-AI blend for extension and expansion, and possible future uses in the stated genres.
Technology can be misused, yet in the human-AI blend humans have the power to intervene. In these interactions, there is the potential to take things to a different level. The power of the human, the ability to think differently, and critically and creatively, together with the technical abilities of the immediate computer for holding, sorting, and providing masses of big data, hold out the possibility of expanded human creativity. When you choose and use information fairly, it makes the outcome compelling and accurate. AI affects what people look for; what they enter, and how they respond, and what that reveals and changes about the people, can affect our societies and cultures. Wherever you add questions about our environment, for instance, AI it sharpens it so we can relate to it.  Thus, how it relates to the human experience, to our world, and human society, much depends on how we manage it, where we take it and what we do with it. Questions remain: In what ways can human-AI assisted screen, literature, graphic texts  and visual culture narratives expand, grow, and bring deeper understanding of ourselves, our worlds, our environment, our culture and society, and bring about change?  How do these works address cultural criticism, and social and cultural meanings, and add to our understanding of our cultures and society? What is the potential for exploring human experience and that connect to our world, and the possible import of these productions for the future? Admittedly, there are differing views and opinions on the future of AI. Some think an Artificial General Intelligence  can exist and others think not. What does all this mean for our future society and culture? At this initial stage, in lieu of “chapters,” this proposed work, Taking Control, calls for extended abstracts for consideration for inclusion in the book. Submission instructions:
  1. The extended abstracts must be more than 1,000 and less than 1,500 words.
(Full-length chapters of 6,000 – 7,000words each (including notes but excluding references lists, title of work, and key words) will be solicited from these abstracts.)
  1. Please keep in mind that your essay-chapter will be written from your extended abstract. Your abstract will carry the same title as your essay-chapter.
  2. To be considered, abstracts must be written in English, and submitted as a Word document.
  3. When writing your abstract use Times New Roman point 12,and 1.15 spacing.
  4. At the beginning of your extended abstract, immediately after the title of your work and your name, add 5 to 8 keywords that best relate to your work.
  5. Use the Chicago Manual of Style 16th Edition.
  6. Use English spelling not American English spelling.
  7. Use endnotes, not footnotes, use counting numbers not Roman numerals, and keep the endnotes to a bare minimum, working the information into the text where possible.
  8. Do cite all your work in your extended abstract as you would in a full chapter.
a) in the body of the abstract, add parenthetical in-text citations (family name of author and year, and page number/s) (e.g. Smith 2019, 230); b) fully reference all in-text citations in alphabetical order, in the References list at the end of your abstract. 10. Please send your abstract and your documents as attachments to an email. At the same time as submitting your extended abstract, in separate documents please send the following:
  • Your covering letter, giving your academic title/s, affiliation, your position, and your home and telephone, and email contact details;
  • A short bio of no more than 200 words;
  • Your C.V., giving your publications to date, and the publishing details and dates.
Papers should be forwarded to: Jo Parnell Jo.Parnell@newcastle.edu.au  alternatively annette.parnell@newcastle.edu.au  or joandbobparnell@bigpond.com Dr Jo Parnell. | Honorary Associate Lecturer School of Humanities and Social Science College of Human and Social Futures M: +61 (0)421 993 253 E: Jo.Parnell@newcastle.edu.au W: newcastle.edu.au/profile/Jo-Parnell International author and editor Latest books: Representation of the Mother-in-Law in literature, film, drama, and television (Lexington Books USA, 2018). New and Experimental Approaches to Writing Lives (Macmillan International Higher Education, Red Globe Press, 2019). The Bride in the Cultural Imagination: Screen, Stage, and Literary Productions (Lexington Books USA, 2020). Taking Control: the critical and creative uses of digital tools in the now, the foreseeable future, and beyond, in screen, literature, and the visual arts. culture (Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming 2021/22). Writing Australian History on Screen: cultural, sociological, and historical depths in television and film period dramas “down under,” with Julie Anne Taddeo (Lexington Books, USA, forthcoming 2021/22). Cultural Representations of the Second Wife: Literature, Stage, and Screen (Lexington Books, USA, forthcoming 2021/22). The University of Newcastle University Drive, Callaghan NSW 2308 Australia
*

Journal Articles for Special Issue: “Teaching Girlhood Studies

deadline for submissions:
October 15, 2021
Girlhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Girlhood Studies, as an academic discipline, is still growing. Since some educational institutions do include girls’ studies as part of a special curriculum, an academic program, a certificate course, a minor, or as part of Women’s Studies or Gender Studies, Girlhood Studies does have a presence in academia although at this stage rarely in an autonomous department. This interest in the pedagogies and practices of teaching Girlhood Studies is an important aspect of its growth as a field of study at university level, at school, and outside of formal academic settings. Depending on these formal and informal educational contexts, the discussion of approaches to teaching girlhood can range from theoretical ones to outlining hands-on projects that invite and promote the discussion of girlhood so, for this special issue, we invite articles that address the teaching of Girlhood Studies in various contexts. The key questions that inform this special issue build on those that informed the creation of this journal: “What is girlhood studies”? How do we do girlhood studies? What is the relationship between women’s studies and girlhood studies? What is the relationship between girlhood studies and boyhood and masculinity studies?” (Mitchell et al. 2008: ix). Contributors might like to explore the following questions: • Why teach Girlhood Studies? • Are there girlhood pedagogies? • Are girlhood pedagogies also feminist pedagogies? • Are we working with girls as equal participants in teaching and learning Girlhood Studies? • What is the status of teaching Girlhood Studies and in which new directions should it go? • How has the landscape of teaching Girlhood Studies changed? • Who teaches Girlhood Studies? • Who are students in Girlhood Studies courses? Whose voices are highlighted or whose are silenced? Articles may address teaching girlhood studies from various perspectives and academic disciplines including historical studies, literature, cultural studies, media studies, the study of juvenilia art, material and virtual culture (for example toys and games), girls and science, geographies of girlhood, education, and girl methodologies and methods, among others. Articles may present case studies or empirical research, may include or focus on artistic representations, or may be about theoretical or conceptual frameworks related to girlhood pedagogies. Teacher perspectives as well those of students are welcome. In addition to conventional articles, we will also consider creative contributions and material produced by (former or current) students of Girlhood Studies courses. We are especially interested in contributions on teaching Girlhood Studies by and about Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC). Abstracts are due by 15 October 2021 and should be sent to teachinggirlhoodstudies@gmail.com Full manuscripts are due by 15 March 2022. Authors should provide a cover page giving brief biographical details (up to 100 words), institutional affiliation(s) and full contact information, including an email address. For more information, please see https://journals.berghahnbooks.com/_uploads/ghs/GHS_cfp_TeachingGirlhood…
*
“Ecce mulier”: Female celebrity culture and the visual arts around 1900 Call for papers Image and Narrative 24.2 (2023) Guest edited by Carlijn Cober, dr. Floris Meens and dr. Tom Sintobin, this issue will focus on representations and self-representations of female key figures during the fin de siècle of the 19th century. By combining visual, narrative and historiographical analyses, we aim to gain insight into how female artists, authors, actors, musicians, salonnières, scholars and muses both functioned within the cultural field and have been ‘imagined’ or imagined themselves during their lifetime and beyond. Research questions can concern either literal or figurative interpretations of terms relating to both ‘image’ and ‘narrative’. In the case of literal visual imaginations, possible questions would be: How are female figures depicted in visual media, such as photographs, films, paintings, sketches, or cartoons? Against which background, in what posture, in whose company? Does that depiction follow, establish or transgress norms? How – through what media and in which circles – were these images established, distributed or consumed, both synchronically and diachronically? What was the relationship between various forms of representations and the women’s fame? Who was responsible for these depictions: did women have agency and to what extent can they be seen as a coproduction? In the case of figural forms of imagination, questions could be: How did famous or influential women construct or fashion their own image? How are they visible in literary texts, poetry, diary entries, biographies, letter exchanges, plays, operas, operettas and songs? What role did they play within the cultural imagination? How have they been imagined, within which framework, in what role or position, in relation to whom? How have either their image or narrative evolved over time, during their life or ours? How can we render them visible or highlight different perspectives of them? We are looking for articles with an average length of 5000 words (including notes and bibliography) that together address a wide range of methods and approaches related to this topic, and original interpretations of both ‘image’ and ‘narrative’. Those interested to contribute can submit an abstract of maximum 250 words and a cv to eccemulier.cfp@gmail.com by October 1st, 2021. The deadline for the first drafts will be March 1st, 2022 the final deadline July 1st, 2022.
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Submissions 9/30/2021
2022 Magarey Medal for Biography Applications Open
The Magarey Medal for Biography is awarded biennially to the female person who has published the work judged to be the best biographical writing on an Australian subject. The 2022 Medal will be awarded for a book published in 2020 or 2021. For the 2022 round, the Magarey Medal will be administered by the Association for the Study of Australian Literature (ASAL). Intentions to submit an application are due 30 September 2021 and applications close 31 January 2022. Details here: https://theaha.org.au/awards-and-prizes/magarey-medal-for-biography/
*

New Developments in 20th- and 21st-century Life Writing

(9/30/2021; 3/10-13/2022) Baltimore, USA
contact email:
New Developments in 20th- and 21st-century Life Writing (Panel for NEMLA conference, March 10-13, 2022, Baltimore MD) Forms and approaches to self-representation continue to diversify as the landscape of possible media, tools, subjects, and cultural accounts is growing. Historically, life writing genres such as biography, autobiography, memoir, correspondence and ancestral documentation have been used as archival, political and sociological resources. However, the value and use of life writing extends far beyond these textual forms and practical uses. In an increasingly mobile and interconnected world, issues of subjectivity, identity, belonging, self-constitution and dialog become more pressing, particularly in response to social and cultural upheaval. Examples include Walter Kempowski’s so-called collective diary Echolot or Katja Petrowskaja’s autofictional family history Vielleicht Esther. The panel looks at voices and perspectives that have gained new traction in recent decades. In particular, we invite papers that consider genre developments within Life Writing with an eye towards methods, forms and interpretations that broaden the range of voices and subject positions we explore. While significant research regarding Life Writing has been undertaken within the field of German Studies in recent years, we also welcome proposals from other disciplines and fields. Please submit a 250-300 word proposal through the NeMLA submission portal by September 30, 2021: https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/19545 If you have any questions regarding the panel, please contact the organizers: Friederike Eigler (eiglerf@georgetown.edu) and Samantha Grayck (scg86@georgetown.edu). *

Ethics of Witnessing

NeMLA (9/30/2021 3/10-13/2022 Baltimore USA
contact email:
In the aftermath of mass atrocities, where the humanity is both the subject and object of a destructive process, the historical truth is almost impossible to access. On the one hand, perpetrators have tendency to deny their responsibility in committing atrocities, and on the other hand, victims’ experience remains unspeakable due to the impact of trauma. After the Holocaust, researchers from different disciplines focused on the possibility of transmission of the traumatic events related to the atrocities, as well as the obstacles that are faced during this process. One of the interesting areas of research in this regard is the victim-perpetrator encounter and the dynamics of witnessing in relation to the historical truth. This panel investigates the dynamics of witnessing and its representations through the artistic production. Deadline for submissions–9/30/2021. *

Rock Music Icons

deadline for submissions:
September 30, 2021
full name / name of organization:
For the Record
Well-developed essays on major rock music artists are sought for publication in the For the Record book series. These essays should extend beyond biography into some aspects of the artist’s creative work. Of particular interest are essays on rock performers who have made an impact since 1980 and essays that discuss the artist’s music, iconic status, and cultural significance. Of course, essays on Elton John, David Bowie, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, and other major figures who made their mark before 1980 are also welcome. Proposals of about 200-300 words may be sent from July through September 30, 2021 and should indicate the direction of your essay. Essay proposals and inquiries may be sent to Dr. Robert Mc Parland at bmcparland@bobmcparland.com or mcparlandr@felician.edu Complete essays of 5,000-6,500 words will be due by the end of 2021.
*
Legacies of Trauma: The Tragedy of Before and After deadline for submissions: September 30, 2021 Language, Literature, and Interdisciplinary Studies contact email: llids.journal@gmail.com CALL FOR PAPERS For a Special issue Of Language, Literature, and Interdisciplinary Studies Legacies of Trauma: The Tragedy of Before and After In the last couple of decades, life-writing has come to be seen as a singular site of reclaiming unclaimed experiences of trauma. Despite the apparent crisis of representation, a wide array of strategies and innovations are employed in life-writings towards the cause of conveying trauma. Life-writing in its various avatars dealing with trauma foreground the insight that trauma is not only a “drama of past event, but also, even primarily, a drama of survival” (Rubin). For the autobiographical subject, modalities of articulation and testimony present grounds for recovery of selfhood, leading to a possibility of re-engagement with the lifeworld. In putting together the fragments of memory, life-writing potentially counters trauma through the enactment of witnessing one’s own trauma in telling and its transmissibility to the reader, through whom the questions of secondary victimhood come to be seen as another determinant in the complex signification towards the experience of trauma. However, language miserably gives way to its own splintering before the overwhelming traumatic experience and fails to remain a witness thereof. Nevertheless, across different genres of expression, including digital and hybrid ones, dilatation of conventional idiom of expression with a view to register creatively what resists or slips away is crucial. Subjects living as survivors of life-threatening events take to different means of expression. The complexity of textualizing trauma is such that the narrative oftentimes betrays a great deal about how the subject re-constitutes itself to come to terms with the experience, thereby underlining themes of truth telling and reconciliation in the face of trauma. However, one of the complex threads of survivor’s narrative is the interpellation of memory in the act of composing a narrative. It also brings to fore an aporia inherent in the very enterprise of representing trauma that is typically taken as unrepresentable. Delayed response to trauma, fragmented memory, complexity of experience, denial, and fear of persecution dislocate the subject from its history, culture, and context. This call for paper stems out of the realization that there is much to be reckoned with in the experience and imprint of traumatic experiences in life, which seem to be hinged to the tenor of (our) times. Representations of trauma abound in photography, cinema, paintings, memoirs, testimonials, etc., giving a spectrum of positions to engage and tease interdisciplinary lines of inquiry. Scholars are invited to explore the area by engaging and going beyond the following thematics:
  • Partition Literature/Literature of Crisis and Trauma
  • Restorative Function of Art
  • Tropes/Metaphors and Articulation of Trauma
  • Modernity and Trauma
  • Memory Studies and Trauma
  • Disability Studies and Trauma
  • Trauma in Pre-modern Life-writing
  • Life-writing and Childhood Trauma
  • Construction of the Childhood/Figure of Child in the Survivor’s Narrative
  • Intergenerational/Transgenerational Trauma
  • Historical Trauma and Methods of Recuperation
  • Testimonial Projects and Legal Framework
  • Limits of Representation in Autobiography
  • PTSD in Non-Western Narratives
  • Construction of Trauma and Politics of Trauma
  • Pathography and Limits of Autobiography
  • Trauma and Scriptotherapy
  • Trauma and Public Memory
  • Pandemic and Trauma
  • Exile and Trauma
  • Refugee Crisis and Trauma
  • Representation of Trauma through Photographs
Submissions: Only complete papers will be considered for publication. The papers need to be submitted according to the guidelines of the MLA 8th edition. You are welcome to submit full length papers (3,500–10,000 words) along with a 150 words abstract and list of keywords. Please read the submission guidelines before making the submission – https://ellids.com/author-guidelines/submission-guidelines/. Please feel free to email any queries to – editors@ellids.com. Submission deadline: 30th September, 2021 Website – https://ellids.com/ Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/journal.llids/
*
NEMLA 2022: Family Inheritance in Original Creative Work (9/30/2021; 3/10-13/2022) Baltimore, USA
Writers inherit much from their families: stories, material wealth, trauma, discipline, genetic traits, knowledge, and other legacies. What do we do with this heritage and how do we make it our own in our original creative productions? Will the legacy become a heirloom seed that produces exquisite blooms or a hereditary disorder that wilts inspiration on the vine? Bestselling memoirists Mary Karr, Sherman Alexie, Ocean Vuong, and many others have famously shaped family trauma into achingly poignant works of art, begging us to ask if such pain is a necessary ingredient of their success. On the other hand, poets such as Robert Hayden and Ruth Stone have eulogized family members through art, thereby immortalizing the positive aspects loved ones have left behind. This panel will explore these positive and negative inheritances through readings of creative works followed by a panel discussion. Writers are invited to interpret the theme of inheritance broadly, to read a 10 to 15-minute excerpt of the poetry fiction, or creative non-fiction (including memoir) that showcases their inheritance, and participate in a discussion of how writers make use of what their families leave them. Please submit a 200-250-word abstract of your presentation, including how it applies to the theme of inheritance, and a two-page excerpt of the creative work you will read.  Submit to https://www.cfplist.com/ by September 30, 2021. Contact Info:
Dr. Betina Entzminger English Department Bloomsburg University bentzmin@bloomu.edu
Contact Email:

*

#MeToo and Contemporary Literary Studies (NeMLA panel)

deadline for submissions:
September 30, 2021
Mary K. Holland and Heather Hewett, SUNY New Paltz
contact email:
#MeToo and Contemporary Literary Studies: panel accepted for the 2022 NeMLA conference (March 10-13, 2022; Baltimore, MD) While feminist literary scholars have been examining the relationship between literature and rape for decades, the #MeToo movement has reenergized this work. Building on recent scholarship (Serisier 2018; Field 2020; Holland and Hewett 2021), and along with forthcoming work (Gilmore; Hobbs), this panel considers the range of critical frameworks with which literary critics are addressing gender, identity, violence, and power. Reassessing these aspects of experience and representation in light of this movement calls for a rethinking of the critical practices we use to produce scholarship and theory about literature and culture, and requires rereadings of literature and authors whose participation in or critique of rape culture has yet to be made visible, or whose work can be revisited to shed light on the current moment. The panel is particularly interested in transnational, transcultural, and intersectional approaches that attend to genre and genre-blurring; publication and reception; rape culture outside and inside academia; the interconnections between written literature and social media; narratives about sexual violence, racism, and colonialism authored by BIPOC authors; queer violence and survivorship; and the recent outpouring of published literature, particularly memoir and lifewriting, about sexual violence, testimony, trauma, and healing. Most broadly, this panel will ask how current theoretical and critical approaches are positioned in the long history of literary activism against sexual violence, and what role literature and literary studies can play in the project of ending sexual violence and rape culture. More specific topics include (but are not limited to) the following:
  • Rethinking critical practices in light of #MeToo.
    • Ways in which intersectional analyses of #MeToo narratives might provide another context for interpreting creative work, particularly texts that explore bodily violence, trauma, and survivorship;
    • How #MeToo, and social media more broadly, interacts with traditionally published life narratives and changes the possibilities of creating, sharing, and using personal narratives;
    • Ways in which sexual politics in the university or publishing world inhibit critical work that unmasks misogyny and sexual abuse;
    • Ways in which critics might silence themselves when writing about misogynistic texts or texts that support rape culture;
    • Implications of authorial accusations of sexual abuse for critical readings of authors’ work (eg, Junot Diaz, Sherman Alexie).
    • Reconsiderations of canonical authors whose sexual politics have so far escaped scrutiny (eg, Coetzee, Updike; this list may include female authors);
    • Readings of lesser known texts that critique rape culture in effective ways;
    • How young adult literature treats sexual assault and rape culture (Erik Cleveland and Sybil Durand published on this topic in 2014);
    • How sexual assault is normalized even in otherwise female-empowering literature, film, or TV;
    • How depictions of sexual assault and rape culture in contemporary texts differ from those in earlier texts, because of changes in the law, cultural changes, political movements, etc;
    • Texts that draw parallels with the current political and social climate of backlash against women’s rights.Feminist rereadings of authors or specific texts whose misogyny, rape culture, and/or scenes of sexual harassment, abuse, or rape have yet to be identified and critiqued by critics.
Please submit your abstract using the NeMLA conference portal: https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/19291

NeMLA 2022 – Representing Care and Being Together in Refugee Writing (9/30/2021; 3/10-13/2022) NEMLA, Baltimore USA

Please consider submitting an abstract for the following panel at the 2022 Northeast Modern Language Association Conference to be held from March 10-13, 2022, in Baltimore, MD. Abstracts are accepted from June 15 to September 30, 2021. Submit abstracts at the NeMLA portal: https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/Home/login This panel invites papers that attend to new perspectives on the representation of refugee histories and experiences in literature. The figure of the refugee has been the subject of much political and philosophical debate, ranging from discussions about the “bare life” of the refugee (Agamben 1995) to their being subjects of humanitarian violence (Nyers 2006). More recent investigations in literary studies have focused on the misrepresentation or absence of refugee histories in post/colonialism, diaspora studies and modernity such as with David Farrier’s Postcolonial Asylum: Seeking Sanctuary Before the Law, Lyndsey Stoneridge’s Placeless People: Writing, Refugees and Rights and Daniel Coleman’s et al. Countering DisplacementThe Creativity and Resilience of Indigenous and Refugee-ed Peoples. More can be said, however, about the representation of refugee experiences and histories of care, desire, and aspiration in literature. What experiences other than violence and trauma remain to be elucidated in refugee writing? How is refugee writing envisioning alternative ways of caring and being together? Paper topics include but are not limited to:
  • Representations of refugees in graphic novels and memoirs
  • Refugee memoirs and testimonials
  • Refugees in film and television
  • Collaborative writing projects
  • Experiences and histories of refuge or asylum in opera and musical theatre
If you have any questions, please contact Jonathan Nash (Universisty of Victoria) at jnash33@uvic.ca
*
CFP: Biographies as “Probes” of Transformation? ‘Agency’ of Nazi Perpetrators after 1945 in the Federal Republic, the GDR and Austria
Workshop at the University of Vienna, 03-04 March 2022 The workshop focuses on political biographies of perpetrators of National Socialism after 1945, with a regional emphasis on West Germany, the GDR and Austria. Research on Nazi perpetrators published in recent years has increasingly concentrated on the definition of the concept of perpetration, on the identity and agency of Nazi perpetrators, and on the conditions for their participation in the crimes. In doing so, however, the “prehistory” during the German Empire, World War I, the Weimar Republic, and the First Republic was incorporated into the political biographies of the perpetrators. Further activities of the perpetrators after the end of the “Third Reich” are only mentioned as the aftermath of National Socialism, in the “politics of the past”, and are rarely interpreted as the prehistory of post-National Socialist societies. Moreover, transformation processes around the macro-historical caesura of 1945 are primarily analyzed from a structuralist perspective. Studies on this topic tend to focus on the examination of (federal) ministries, using the year 1945 as a marker of collapse and new beginning (which is also constituted in the biographies), and thus, contribute to the construction of a dichotomy of continuity and breaks. The individual perspectives of the biographical subjects, however, hardly become visible. Adopting Thomas Etzemüller’s approach of viewing biographies as instruments or “probes” (“Sonden”), into an integrated social history “in order to understand the functioning of society”, we will consider and examine – on the basis the biographies of female and male perpetrators in National socialism – society and the individual not as separate entities, but as constituents involved in a reciprocal relationship. In this context, we will discuss and question in the workshop the dichotomy of macro- and micro-perspectives as well as the concepts of “structure” and “agency”. Workshop papers may address, but are not limited to the following questions: – Perpetration: How did individual perpetrators deal with their participation in Nazi crimes? How is their participation integrated into the narrative of their own biography? Did they hide, legitimise, or deny their participation? What strategies did they use? – Careers and networks: How did perpetrators react to system collapses and changes? Who succeeded in integrating into new systems and who did not? Which agents were able to use their qualifications and “expertise” acquired under National Socialism and how? How did system changes influence private and professional networks and functional elites? – Integration: How did former Nazi perpetrators integrate into new systems? How did integration possibilities differ for perpetrators, especially with regard to elites? Where did integration succeed, where did it fail? – Structure: The conditions and norms of post-National Socialist societies influenced and confronted the perpetrators first in the occupation zones, later in Austria, the GDR and FRG. How did the developing societal structures, constitutional systems, and norms influence the perpetrators’ decisions to act? – Legality and illegality: Who fled? Who maintained their legal existence and who entered illegality? What can be determined about the relationship between actual and feared prosecution and how did this influence the actions of the perpetrators? How did (feared) prosecution affect (dis)integration processes? Application: We particularly encourage doctoral students in history and related disciplines to apply. Proposals should include an abstract describing the topic, relevance, empirical basis, and methodological approach of your paper, as well as a short CV of the applicant. Please send your proposal, which must not exceed two pages, as one PDF file to taeterbiografien.ifz@univie.ac.at by 30 September 2021. Conference languages are German and English. Travel and accommodation costs can be reimbursed to a limited extent.
Contact Info:
taeterbiografien.ifz@univie.ac.at Oliver Gaida / Kathrin Janzen / Stefan Jehne / Yves Müller
* Deadline for Submissions 9/15/2021 Announcement: Call-for-Papers This slightly revised call is for abstracts for a scholarly, international edited collection entitled, Cultural Representations of the Second Wife: Literature, Stage, and Screen. Currently I am seeking a number of academics and professionals in the field who might like to send me an abstract for consideration for inclusion in the book. Due to effects of the covid-19 pandemic 2020-21, and the strain this has placed on people and businesses (including academics and universities world-wide), the deadline for abstracts for this project has been extended. New deadline for abstract submissions: 15 September 2021 The aim of this scholarly edited collection is to reveal how the personal expectations and actual experiences of the second wife may differ from the social and cultural expectations and realities of the role of the second wife; and how the second wife may be perceived in the popular and social culture of various cultures, in screen, stage, and literary productions and pop culture narratives. In any culture, religious and cultural beliefs are inseparable, and intrinsic one to the other, and are important to the marriage  customs and laws of that particular culture or society. Regardless of whether a culture is mainly monogamous or polygamous, one female figure that attracts attention is the second wife. A woman may become the “second wife” either by fact or by custom, or by religious law, or by de facto relationship, or by concubinage. In most though not necessarily all cultures, and according to the religious and cultural beliefs and laws of a culture, as well as the civil laws of that country, a man who has been but is no longer married may remarry; and in some cultures also, a man who is currently married may marry or take a second wife who may or may not have been formerly married to some different man. In some other cultures, cultural customs, or religious dictates, or accepted practices, or inheritance factors, forbid men who are divorcees or widowers to remarry. Similarly, and perhaps more so than with men, some cultures forbid widows or divorced or abandoned women from remarrying. It is generally understood that whether she is welcomed by her new in-law family, or not, the first wife as a new wife, brings with her some baggage into the new relationship, into the life of the man she weds, and hence into the family into which she marries, and ultimately into that society; but perhaps this is more so in the case of the second wife.  From antiquity to the present, like the first wife, the second wife features in stories, anecdotes, and jokes, and in both high and low culture, but in a way that is vastly different to how the first wife is depicted. The concept of the second wife is an important part of social and cultural history and ritual in most societies, world-wide, yet it would seem that to date, there are no published scholarly edited collections, no academic books, on representations of the second wife from the angle suggested in this cfp. In can be said that in any culture, the role of the second wife may differ to that of a first wife. The act of becoming and the experience of being a second wife may also be somewhat different to that of being a man’s first wife. Questions arise: within any culture, regardless of her status as a woman, what are the implications for a woman who marries a widower or divorced man? Likewise, what are the implications for a second wife in a polygamous relationship? Some suggestions for potential contributors to consider, and that could be addressed, may include but are not limited to are:
  • What are the cultural and social duties of the second wife; what are the cultural expectations of her; and what are her personal realities and expectations, as represented in the popular culture of a particular culture/society? Is it possible to detect differences or sameness between the fictionalized portrayals and the realities and social dictates of that culture?
  • How do class, ethnicity, culture, race, gender, and possibly history, shape representations of the second wife, as indicated in the popular screen, stage, and literary productions of any one particular culture?
  • What is the range of ways in which the second wifeis represented in the popular/social culture of the various societies?
  • Are there any powerful cultural or socially historical antecedents for the representation of the second wife in popular/social culture, as screen, stage, and literary productions?
  • What are the creators and/or the producers intentions behindtheir portrayals of the second wife; what are the messages or lessons they intend for their audiences through these depictions?
  • How would we establish the underlying cultural, historical, or production motivations for particular depictions of the second wife?
How often, if at all, are these representations told from the point-of-view of the second wife herself?
  • Is there a difference between the ways in which the second wife is represented in cinematic film to that in small screen, and between those mediums to representations in drama, and to literature? Or in these representations, is there a reasonably broad consensus between these genres?
This collection of scholarly essays will make an intervention in the field: it will be the first of its kind to make a comprehensive study of what being a second wife means to and for the woman, the family, the community, the culture, and the society to which she belongs; to explore whether or not there are characteristic features of the second wife between cultures that may have either some similarity, or that are totally dissimilar, in popular belief and popular culture; to document and record how various eastern and western societies perceive and represent the socially and culturally important figure of the second wife in screen, stage, and literary works and pop culture narratives; to indicate if there is agreement or difference between the various cultures on how the figure of the second wife is represented in popular culture to the viewing/reading audiences; to establish a new and dynamic area of theoretical research crossing family studies, women’s studies, cultural studies, social history, gender studies, social studies, and the humanities in general; to point the way to possible future cross-disciplinary work through examining various peoples and societies by way of cultural representations of the second wife; and to permit scholarly consideration of the extent to which the creators and producers of narratives about the second wife place this figure on the perimeter of society or at its center. Submission instructions: At this initial stage, in lieu of “chapters,” this proposed work, Cultural Representations of the Second Wife, calls for extended abstracts for consideration for inclusion in the book.
  1. The extended abstracts must be more than 1,000 and less than 1,500 words.
Full-length chapters of 6,000 – 7,000words each (including notes but excluding references lists, title of work, and key words) will be solicited from these abstracts.
  1. Please keep in mind that your essay-chapter will be written from your extended abstract. Your abstract will carry the same title as your essay-chapter.
  2. To be considered, an abstract must be written in English, and submitted as a Word document.
  3. When writing your abstract use Times New Roman point 12,and 1.15 spacing.
  4. At the beginning of your extended abstract, immediately after the title of your work and your name, add 5 to 8 keywords that best relate to your work.
  5. Use the Chicago Manual of Style 16th Edition.
  6. Since this work is intended for Lexington Books, USA, please use American (US) spelling not English (UK) spelling, and not Australian English spelling;
  7. Use the Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary;
  8. Use endnotes and not footnotes, use counting numbers not Roman numerals, and keep the endnotes to a bare minimum, working the information into the text where possible;
  9. Do cite all your work in your extended abstract as you would in a full chapter:
a) in the body of the abstract, add parenthetical in-text citations (family name of author and year, and page number/s) (e.g. Smith 2019, 230); b) fully reference all in-text citations in detail and in alphabetical order, in the References list at the end of your abstract;
  1. Please send your abstract as a Word document attached to an email;
  2. To this same email please also attach, as separate Word documents, the following:
  • Your covering letter, giving your academic title/s, affiliation, your position, and your home and telephone numbers, your home address, and your email contact details;
  • A short bio of no more than 250 words;
  • Your C.V., including a full list of your publications and giving the publishing details and dates, and including those in press, and published.
Editor: Dr Jo Parnell, PhD, Researcher and Honorary Associate Lecturer, School of Humanities and Social Science, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Australia. Papers should be forwarded to: Jo Parnell at: Jo.Parnell@newcastle.edu.au  or annette.parnell@newcastle.edu.au or joandbobparnell@bigpond.com Dr Jo Parnell. | Honorary Associate Lecturer School of Humanities and Social Science College of Human and Social Futures M: +61 (0)421 993 253 E: Jo.Parnell@newcastle.edu.au W: newcastle.edu.au/profile/Jo-Parnell International author and editor Latest books: Representation of the Mother-in-Law in literature, film, drama, and television (Lexington Books USA, 2018). New and Experimental Approaches to Writing Lives (Macmillan International Higher Education, Red Globe Press, 2019). The Bride in the Cultural Imagination: Screen, Stage, and Literary Productions (Lexington Books USA, 2020). Taking Control: the critical and creative uses of digital tools in the now, the foreseeable future, and beyond, in screen, literature, and the visual arts. culture (Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming 2021/22). Writing Australian History on Screen: cultural, sociological, and historical depths in television and film period dramas “down under,” with Julie Anne Taddeo (Lexington Books, USA, forthcoming 2021/22). Cultural Representations of the Second Wife: Literature, Stage, and Screen (Lexington Books, USA, forthcoming 2021/22). The University of Newcastle University Drive, Callaghan NSW 2308 Australia

Life Narrative Futures: 

An International Auto/Biography Association (IABA) networking event for graduate students and early-career researchers

Sponsored by the IABA SNS, and the IABA regional chapters

Friday 29th October, 2021 (Australian CST)

Call for Expressions of Interest

Dear colleagues,

On behalf of the IABA Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe chapter convenors, I am pleased to announce this on-line networking event aimed at linking graduate students and Early-Career-Researchers (ECRs) across the globe who are working on life narrative projects. 

In their special issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies “What’s Next? The Futures of Auto/Biography Studies” (2017) Ricia Anne Chansky and Emily Hipchen aimed to give “established and emerging scholars from multiple disciplines the time and space to enter into lively discourse on our possible futures.” The result was an incredibly timely multivocal, interdisciplinary conversation about where we are heading as a discipline. 

Such conversations seem even more important now. 2020/2021 have been especially challenging periods for graduate students and ECRs. Travel restrictions have affected networking opportunities, and IABA would like to acknowledge this by organising this event aimed at supporting and celebrating emerging scholars.

Format: Via Zoom conferencing, graduate students/ECRs will be placed in small groups and will make short, informal presentations about their projects. Each group will also contain an established IABA scholar who will act as a mentor in offering feedback on the projects in their small group.

The event will be held virtually in an ‘around the world’ format with the aim of accommodating different time zones in an inclusive way.

To participate in this event, please make a submission of approximately one page as a Word doc including the following information:

  • Your name;

  • University, Department/Faculty affiliation;
  • 50-word bio;

  • Thesis or current project title;

  • Short abstract for your project;

  • Two-three challenges emerging from your research project/topic;

  • Questions /issues you would like to discuss with your fellow graduate students/ECRs.

The extended deadline for submissions in September 10, 2021. Please make your submission to: iaba.asiapacific@flinders.edu.au

Any questions, or for more information, please contact the organizers: 

iaba.asiapacific@flinders.edu.au

Kind Regards, Kate Douglas (Flinders University, Australia), on behalf of the IABA regional chapters and IABA SNS.

International Auto/Biography Association Worldwide

https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/iaba/home

IABA Student and New Scholar Network (SNS)

https://iabasns.wordpress.com; on Facebook: facebook.com/IABASNS

*
Call for Digital Submissions Proposals – Ongoing
a/b: Auto/Biography Studies is building a YouTube channel dedicated to highlighting and extending the journal’s content, upcoming book releases, and projects and conversations related to life narrative and identity studies more broadly.
We’re hoping that you’ll help us expand our online content and/or contribute to building a digital archive by submitting proposals for contributions to our new YouTube channel. We can support content in any language and are able to provide translation, transcription, and closed captioning services.
Possible Topic Ideas include:
· Trailers promoting upcoming book releases, special issues of journals, conferences, CFPs, and other happenings;
· Interviews between scholars at any stage in their careers or between scholars and life narrators, especially as pertinent to publications, conferences, and other activities;
· Oral histories of the field;
· Image-driven or other multimodal research relevant to life narrative; and
· Issues that intersect with life narrative, especially those that relate to social justice and human rights.
Have an idea? We’d love to hear it! Submit your proposals—300-500-words—in .pdf format to Jessica Lauer and Orly Lael Netzer at [abstudiesdigital@gmail.com]. Be sure to include your name, affiliation, email address, and a short bio with your proposal.
Don’t have an idea, but would still like to participate? No worries! While we’re glad to consider all submissions, we also have a wish list of projects that we’d like to undertake. If you’re willing to take on a topic from our wish list related to journal content or a publication in the Routledge Auto/Biography Studies book series, we’d be delighted to work with you.
Queries may be directed to the Digital Content Editors, Jessica Lauer and Orly Lael Netzer at [abstudiesdigital@gmail.com].
Thank you for being a part of our digital future!
*

International Symposium | Digital Expressions of the Self

National Institute of Technology Silchar / University of Hyderabad / Goldsmiths University of London
Concept Note This symposium engages with the digital forms of expressions of the self. It explores the ways in which, for instance, digital techniques now allow the construction of selves that often rely more on algorithms than any ‘original’ referent. Consider, for example, how algorithms simulate images, voices etc. and have become the basis for facial-biometric recognition, and similar datafication concerning the self. This shift is indicative of what we might term posthuman condition. Along these lines, we are interested in papers that engage with how expressions enhanced by algorithms produce multiple, fractured selves. Following Deleuze, we invite papers that engage with how the in-dividual has become ‘dividual’ in societies of post-control vis-a-vis the introduction of digital technologies. Finally we are interested in how people experiment with creative expressions of the self. ​Constructing the self in the digital sphere may involve processes of experimentation that in turn allow one to experience the self in multiple ways. This is mediated of course by the apparatus of the digital-codes and algorithms. Digital self-expression occurs both consciously and explicitly, and subconsciously and indirectly. Taking this as a point of departure, this symposium examines the broad range of digital expressions of the self. Panel 1: Affect, Fandom and Liveness in Popular Culture, 8 Sep, 2:40–3:45 P.M. (Indian Time) 1)Live Performance and the Media: A Methodological Reflection on Analysing Stand-up Comedy in India — Madhavi Shivaprasad, Advanced Centre for Women’s Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India 2) Yo Yo Matlab Aapka Apna : Locating Affect and Gender in Online Fandom of Yo Yo Honey Singh — Prashastika Sharma, Ambedkar University, Delhi,  India 3) Digital Expression from the Shadow States: The in-betweeners in the Late-capitalist Era — Sagorika Singha, The Sarai Programme, Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, Delhi, India Panel 2: The Self and/as Subject, 8 Sep, 4:45–6:00 P.M. (Indian Time) 1) Defining Our Google Self: Our Self Perception Meets The Platform Society — Oshri Bar-Gil, The Program for Hermeneutics and Cultural Studies, Bar-Ilan University, Tel Aviv,  Israel 2) A New Normal: Social Media, Vanishing Cultural Values and the Digitalisation of Pregnancy among Nigerian  Women — Henrietta Eshalomi, Institute of African Studies, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria 3) The Reality of the Internet and Its Effect on the Individual — Simran Tapaswi, Student, IIT Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India Panel 3: Being Seen, Being Social, 9 Sep, 2:40–3:45 P.M. (Indian Time) 1) “Why do Indians Cry Passionately on Insta?”: Grief Performativity and Ecologies of Commerce of ‘Crying Videos’ — Soma Basu, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland 2) Instagram and Ambiguities of Female Sexual Imagery — Cheshta Arora, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru, India 3) (Re)Imagining the Khasi tribe on social media — Rajani K Chhetri, Department of Mass Communication, Assam Don Bosco University, Guwahati, Assam, India Panel 4: The Performative and the Political, 9 Sep, 4:45–6:00 P.M. (Indian Time) 1) No Politics on My Island: Animal Crossing and Politics of Digital Self-expression in China — Lin Song Department of Communication, University of Macau 2) “Revolution Will Not Happen on Facebook… but Propaganda can”: Political Practices, Strategies and Communities in Web 2.0 — Akansha Tyagi [1] & Abhishek Kumar [2] [1] Department of Sociology, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, India; [2] Department of Humanities and Social Science, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India 3) “Azadi’s Political until You’re Pressing Play”: Digital Platforms and Hip-hop in India — Debarun Sarkar Department of Sociology, University of Mumbai, India Closing panel: Exploring identity and selfhood in digital spaces Keynote 1) Prof Ayona Datta, University College London (4:00 – 4:30 P.M. IST, 8th Septemper, 2021) 2) Dr Nimmi Rangaswamy, IIIT-Hyderabad (4:00 – 4:30 P.M. IST, 9th Septemper, 2021 Register using this link: https://tinyurl.com/DigitalExpressions You can find the Book of Abstracts here: https://tinyurl.com/DEBookofAbstracts
*

Dear colleagues and friends, 

You are invited to the Emotional Culture and Society seminar “New Forms of Self-Narration one year on: A conversation on young women’s life narratives” on Wednesday 8 September from 9:30 to 11:00 CET. If you are in Pamplona, you are welcome to join us in room M05 in Edificio Amigos

You can also join us online via Zoom: https://unav.zoom.us/j/96186125471?pwd=RHYyY1B6a1l6SUQ3YkdObndOd0dUQT09

Author Ana Belén Martínez García will be discussing her book along with Dr. Kate Douglas from Flinders University. Roundtable chaired by Dr. Rosalía Baena.

About the book: 

This book is a timely study of young women’s life writing as a form of human rights activism. It focuses on six young women who suffered human rights violations when they were girls and have gone on to become activists through life writing: Malala Yousafzai, Hyeonseo Lee, Yeonmi Park, Bana Alabed, Nujeen Mustafa, and Nadia Murad. Their ongoing life-writing projects diverge to some extent, but all share several notable features: they claim a testimonial collective voice, they deploy rights discourse, they excite humanitarian emotions, they link up their context-bound plight with bigger social justice causes, and they use English as their vehicle of self-expression and self-construction. This strategic use of English is of vital importance, as it has brought them together as icons in the public sphere. New Forms of Self-Narration is the first ever attempt to explore all these activists’ life-writing texts side by side, encompassing both the written and the audiovisual material, online and offline, and taking all texts as belonging to a unique, single, though multifaceted, project.
We hope you can join us.
All the best,
Ana
Ana Belén Martínez García
Associate Professor of English
ISSA School of Applied Management
Amigos Building, Office 5090
31009 Pamplona – Spain
Tel. +34 948425600 (802814)
New Forms of Self-Narration
*
Deadline for Submissions September 6, 2021

Finding Meaning: Oral History, Power and Emotions

21-22 April 2022, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, Pau – France The history of emotions is one of the most notable progressions in the field of history in the last few decades, and in recent years an astonishing number of articles and books has focused specifically on emotions in history. With this “emotional turn” (Boddice, 2018: 72), historians have determined that emotions change over time, and are thus a subject deserving of historical inquiry. Perhaps more importantly, emotions are at the center of human experience and therefore at the center of our history: “human emotions are neither timeless nor universal, but rather shaped by historical and cultural circumstances” (Thomson, 2019: 1). Emotions are both the effect and active cause of historical events. In addition, as argued by Boddice, focusing on emotions enables “to rehabilitate the unsaid – the gestural, affective and experiential – of traditional historical narratives” (Boddice, 2019: 10). He even proposes to refer to various labels – such as “feelings” and “affective experiences” – so as to open possibilities for the expression and interpretation of emotions (14). Feelings have also been the focus of oral historians for many decades before this historical turn towards emotions. The key findings of oral historians are not so much the events that narrators recall, but the “meanings and feelings” relating to those events, in line with Alessandro Portelli’s argument that it is the subjectivity of oral history interviews that constitutes an invaluable contribution to the field, as it allows the researcher to analyze how the interviewee gives meaning to personal experience; this, in turn, is indicative of the collective construction of meaning (Portelli, 1981: 96-107). Accordingly, the primary aim of this conference is to explore the relevance and possibilities of finding meaning in oral history interviews. The conference organizers wish to explore oral history’s potential to record, interpret and make sense of emotions in historical experiences in the Americas, the United Kingdom and Ireland, but also across global geographical and cultural areas. The narrative element becomes key to the understanding of these meanings, which cannot be revealed by any other type of source. The plot, the way narrators choose to organize their story, and shifts in the pace of the narration, as, for example, when only a few words are devoted to talking about experiences which lasted a long time, or the exact opposite, can unveil the subjectivity of human experience. Paying careful attention to language, particularly language used to express feelings and emotions can also help researchers to go beyond the constraints of internalized cultural boundaries, which shape memory (Anderson and Jack, 1991: 11-26). Feelings and emotions can give meaning to activities and events, as for example when certain emotions are silenced because they do not sit nicely with the prevailing collective narrative of a certain event. The purpose of this conference is to re-center the role of oral history in the history of emotions on the one hand, as well as the role of emotions in history and oral history on the other. Indeed, oral history offers the unique possibility to study the way in which experiences are remembered as well as the relationship between individual and collective memory. “Individual remembering is affected by cultural narratives about the past” (Thomson, 2019: 2) and emotions are essential in this process because they are “impacted by social relations and cultural expectations” (Thomson, 2019: 2). Joanna Bourke focused on fear and anxiety in an article published in 2003 (Bourke, 2003: 111-133), in which she argued that humans narrate their emotions by conforming to certain narrative structures. Bourke shed light on the dialogical nature of the link between the personal emotion and the collective emotional environment of a society. This paves the way for further studies on the shifts in the way people narrate certain emotions and the subsequent ways in which these shifts may also alter their subjective experience. The other facet of the study of emotions that the conference organizers wish to explore is its relationship with power which, despite its complexity, has yet to be fully problematized. Bourke writes: “emotions such as fear do not only belong to individuals or social groups: they mediate between the individual and the social. They are about power relations” (Bourke, 2003: 124). Fear – and emotions more generally – are the product of a society and of given “power relations”, but they may also contribute to reforming them, as shown by the history of the evolving status of women or minorities in society. More precisely, are emotions experienced differently because of one’s gender and/or one’s identity, as suggested by Boddice (2018: 100-122)? It may also be argued that emotions can be empowering: in the context of war and conflict for example, oral testimonies indicate strong interrelations between affective experiences and agency. The organizers of the conference also wish to assess the extent to which oral history as a methodology is empowering when it gives agency to participants who have traditionally been excluded from more classic approaches to historical research. Paradoxically, emotions may also be indicative of situations of domination and subordination, and of a person’s powerlessness. From a methodological perspective, how could historical analysis enhance the narratives which include expressions of feelings and emotions? Alistair Thomson offers some insight into this in his most recent work on emotions in oral history (Thomson, 2019: 1-11). The sound of personal testimony can further our understanding of the emotions and their historical and cultural meanings. Speakers can add emphasis by increasing volume, or adding well-timed pauses; excitement and emotion can be shown by a change in the speed of the speech, whereas slowing down might express difficult moments. Silences are widely studied by oral historians, as they often mean painful moments, a struggle with the narrator’s own memory, or even embarrassment or shame. Thomson writes: “the voice can suggest warmth and pleasure, anger and disappointment, sarcasm or disapproval” (4), and how would one interpret the meanings of laughter, sobs or tears? Furthermore, the organizers propose to include both the interviewing process and analysis carried out by the same researcher as well as the so-called “secondary analysis”, or the analysis of pre-recorded interviews which have been (or are about to be) deposited in sound archives around the world by someone else. This practice of reusing past interviews is somewhat controversial and frowned upon on the basis that an oral history interview is not a “data-bank”, offering empirically neutral material that anyone at any moment in time can draw upon. This attitude has been referred to as the “naive realism” of the researcher, with the argument that interview data are “socially constructed”, and are not “simply facts that are free of theoretical presuppositions” (Bornat, 2010: 43-52). Yet, following Joanna Bornat’s argument in favor of the practice of revisiting past interviews, the organizers of the conference would also like to explore the possibilities for historical research offered by the exploitation of the many hundreds of hours of recorded interviews held in sound archives, some of which are even available on line. The underlying ambition will be to identify a scientific framework in which such a research method could become an interesting (re)source and could eventually open up new research prospects. The themes to be investigated include (but are not limited to) the following:
  • The relations between emotions, history and oral history
Emotions as cultural, social, political and/or historical constructs The role of emotions in the construction of memory; “memory composure” The meanings and feelings of human experience Emotions and historical experience
  • Historicizing emotions
  • Emotions and causation
  • Emotions, empowerment and activism; emotions and power relations (domination, subordination)
  • Emotions in the context of war and conflict
  • Emotions and gender
  • Emotions, racial and ethnic issues
Proposals seeking to explore methodological issues will be welcome, such as:
  • The advantages and drawbacks of reusing past interviews / interviews conducted by someone else; Methodological approaches to secondary analysis
  • Methods for finding and interpreting emotions; Interpreting silence / what is not said
The organizers will welcome proposals from specialists in History, Oral History, Geography, Civilisation Studies, Social Sciences, Political Sciences, Law and Transitional Justice. The geographical scope will include – but will not be limited to – the Americas, the United Kingdom and Ireland, and proposals taking a comparative and interdisciplinary approach will be particularly welcome. The proposals should preferably focus on the 20th and 21st centuries. This international, cross-disciplinary conference will be held in English and French. Please send a 300-word abstract in English or in French to Joana Etchart and Simona Tobia : joana.etchart@univ-pau.fr and stobia@univ-pau.fr bSeptember 6th 2021 The acceptance or rejection of proposals will be announced in October 2021
Contact Info:
Simona Tobia – s.tobia@univ-pau.fr Joana Etchart – joana.etchart@univ-pau.fr
Contact Email:
*
Deadline for Submissions September 1, 2021

Request from the editor of Markers: Annual Journal of the Association for Gravestone Studies

We are currently seeking article submissions for the 2022 issue of Markers, the scholarly journal of the Association for Gravestone Studies. The subject matter of Markers is defined as the analytical study of gravemarkers, monuments, tombs, and cemeteries of all types and encompassing all historical periods and geographical regions. Markers is of interest to scholars in anthropology, historical archaeology, art and architectural history, ethnic studies, material culture studies, American studies, folklore and popular culture studies, linguistics, literature, rhetoric, local and regional history, cultural geography, sociology, and related fields. Articles submitted for publication in Markers should be scholarly, analytical, and interpretive, not merely descriptive or entertaining, and should be written in a style appropriate to both a wide academic audience and an audience of interested non-academics. Authors are encouraged to send a query email outlining a project before sending a manuscript. Queries and submissions to Markers should be sent to Editor Elisabeth Roark, Professor of Art History and Museum Studies at Chatham University, at roark@chatham.edu, before September 1, 2021.
Contact Info:
Elisabeth L. Roark Professor of Art History and Museum Studies Chatham University Pittsburgh, PA 15232
Contact Email:
*

Teaching Women Travellers of the Eighteenth Century

deadline for submissions:
September 1, 2021
full name / name of organization:
ABO: Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts, 1640-1830
contact email:
ABO’s pedagogy series, Concise Collections on Teaching Eighteenth-Century Women,seeks submissions for an article grouping on Teaching Women Travellers in the Eighteenth Century. This Collection: This collection focuses on the teaching of literary and historical texts, as well as other forms of artistic production, created by and about female travellers in the long eighteenth century. Articles should provide ideas on how a specific text or aspect of the artist/discourse/writer can be taught most effectively and to best impact in different university and college contexts, and thus increase the profile of women travellers in eighteenth-century studies classrooms. Submissions should focus on a strategy for teaching a single text or group of short texts, or will locate an approach or module within the context of a commonly-taught course or framing (in the context of a survey, for example, or course on the novel or theatre, on the sister arts, on gender and sexualities, on travel literatures, on transatlantic/continental dialogues, on studies of empire and colonialism). The Series: ABO’s Concise Collections pedagogy series seeksto promote the teaching of eighteenth-century women writers and artists who remain underrepresented in university classrooms, beyond a small collection of now-canonical authors. Each issue will have a curated collection of 4-6 articles on teaching the work of a specific woman or group of female creatives, mixing essays focused around teaching individual works with pieces suggesting ways to bring these women into common course topics and syllabi. “Teaching Charlotte Lennox” will appear in Spring 2022; “Teaching Women Travelers” in Fall 2022; and “Teaching Mary Prince” in Spring 2023. We also welcome submissions on open topics in teaching 18C women, for inclusion in our regular Pedagogies section of the journal. Submit proposals by September 1 2021 to pedagogy editor tiffany.potter[at]ubc.ca, or complete articles by 15 March 2022 to the ABO platform: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/submit.cgi?context=abo ABO is peer reviewed and indexed in the MLA Bibliography
*
Prose Studies Special Issue Call for Papers: “Struggle & Hustle: Queer Nonfiction Prose” (8/13/2021)
Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism invites submissions for a special issue devoted to exploring trans and queer mutual aid, support, and networks in all genres and periods of nonfiction prose. This issue seeks to delve into the ways in which trans and queer writers have mobilized nonfiction prose to make visible marginalized identities, disseminate underground knowledge, and fashion networks of care and family. From Victorian pamphlets on “female husbands” to contemporary web-based grassroots medical guides like Trans Bodies, Trans Selves, trans and queer people have long both been written about and written popular nonfiction prose. Such writing has both served to create fraught narratives of pathology and, often simultaneously, enabled LGBTQIA+ people of diverse lived experiences to reflect their realities and write themselves and their communities into being. Likewise, in memoirs like Janet Mock’s Redefining Realness and Jacob Tobia’s Sissy, nonfiction prose’s sense of immediacy and materiality works to insist on the self-defined reality of people who challenge conventional notions of the gender, sexuality, gender expression, race, disability, class, geography, size, immigration status, sex work, and to imagine what a thriving self and community can look like. Moreover, in this context, LGBTQIA+ nonfiction prose must be considered in terms of the material conditions of its production, including queer and trans presses and editors. Topics of interest might include, but are not limited to:
  • Social and medical advice manuals by, for, and/or about LGBTQIA+ people
  • LGBTQIA+ organizations and their publications
  • Colonial/post-colonial trans and queer identities
  • Writing the self in queer and trans memoir
  • Queer and trans networks in magazines, newspapers, pamphlets, and zines
  • Digital representations and networks of LGBTQIA+ identities
  • Historic and contemporary tensions between “queer” and “trans”
  • Queering and transing prose archives
  • Charting LGBTQIA+ genealogies through nonfiction prose
  • Legal and medical nonfiction prose and LGBTQIA+ people
  • LGBTQIA+ visual culture and nonfiction prose
  • Protest and activist ephemera from ACT UP to Black Lives Matter
  • Pandemic LGBTQIA+ isolation and/or networks of care

About the Journal: Prose Studies (https://bit.ly/prosestudiesaims) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the study of nonfiction prose in all historical and contemporary contexts. The journal is committed to publishing rigorously argued scholarship from diverse theoretical and interpretive approaches.

To Submit: Please send article proposal abstracts of 500 words to Lisa Hager (hagerl@uwm.edu) by the extended deadline of August 13, 2021. Early submission is welcome as are queries or letters of interest. Completed manuscripts of 8,000–9,000 words will be due February 1, 2022.
Contact Info:
Lisa Hager Associate Professor of English & Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Director, LGBTQIA Resource Center Co-Editor, Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism Pronounsthey, them, theirs University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee at Waukesha 1500 North University Dr. Waukesha, WI 53188-2720 Office: 129 Westview hagerl@uwm.edu || http://www.lisahager.net/ || @lmhager
Contact Email:
*

Illness Writing in Lebanon: Converging Pathologies and Lived Narratives Since August 4, 2020

This is a call for creative critical personal texts, what Life Writing defines as essays, addressing the cultural ills in the Lebanese context. The solicited essays, unlike conventional academic works, allow for a more creative and self-reflexive approach, and are first-person, lived narratives. The macro narrative of illness in Lebanon arguably consists of two synergistic categories of illness: first, the deep-seated disease of patriarchy and partisanship and its visceral consequences on economy and environment, which, second, are transposed into a spectrum of somatic and psychological diseases, including cancer, mental ailments, and most recently the widespread traumas of the August 4, 2020 blast. The combined narrative of both types of illness, their converging causes and effects, suggests that the people’s revolution that started in 2019 – later stymied by the pandemic, coeval with the apocalyptic Beirut Port explosion – was the route through which people’s efforts to voice their grievances and seek radical reforms were conjoined. Knowing that illness writing ties inextricably to its culture of origin, an emerging corpus of Lebanese life writing concomitant with the revolution, pandemic, and Port explosion highlights the causal intersection between the physical and cultural ills that frame these narratives. Illness writing may therefore serve as a means of expressing and drawing attention to, if not also processing, the different facets of illness that currently shape the Lebanese predicament. As illness’s sundry roots (here, patriarchy) and the routes it fosters (here, revolution) are interrogated and celebrated, respectively, such lived stories gain pressing significance. Taking this mode of life writing as its focus, this special issue seeks to explore how writers in the Lebanese context engage with experiences of illness in its various permutations. Contributors are invited to consider, but are not restricted to, the following themes:
  • The August 4, 2020 explosion and its aftermath
  • Writing the pandemic
  • Negotiating selves, challenging authority
  • Activist texts
  • Queerness and revolution
  • Gender and otherness
  • Bullying
  • (De)stigmatizing illness
  • Coming-of-age
  • Nonviolent micro-aggressions, non-normative behaviors
  • The Syrian refugee crisis
  • Ecological concerns and auto/biography
  • Migrant lives
  • Vicarious trauma and the Lebanese expatriate
  • The elision of sexual minorities from COVID-19 emergency workflows

Submission Instructions

Life Writing publishes both “essays” and “articles.” This special issue will focus upon essays and we particularly invite such submissions. These would be critically informed, creative personal essays, which differ from academic articles in that a high level of analysis and referencing is less important, but the reflexive ‘I’ should filter the subject matter. On the continuum from discursive/analytical to creative, these essays will fall somewhere in the middle. For an example of how this approach might be expressed, see Linus Hagström’s “Becoming a Traitor” (LW 18.1, 2021). Production Timeline: Deadline for abstracts (150-250 words): August 20, 2021 Notification of abstract acceptance: September 20, 2021 Essay submissions (3,500-5,500 words, not including notes and references): March 20, 2022 Essay acceptance (pending peer review): June 20, 2022 Revisions and resubmissions: July 20, 2022 Publication: Online first after acceptance, and later in a forthcoming issue of Life Writing. If you are unsure if the particular form of creative writing that you have in mind would suit this special issue of Life Writing, please contact the guest editor, Dr. Sleiman El Hajj. Queries, as well as abstract and essay submissions (as WORD documents), should be sent to the following address: sleiman.elhajj@lau.edu.lb. Submissions need to include a brief author bio and e-mail address. https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/illness-writing-lebanon/?utm_source=TFO&utm_medium=cms&utm_campaign=JPG15743
Sleiman El Hajj, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Creative and Journalistic Writing Departments of English and Communication Arts Beirut Campus/Lebanese American University 01-786 456 Ext. 1238
+
Extended deadline: new deadline for submissions: 31 July 2021  Life Writing: Transnationalism, Translingualism, Transculturalism November 20-23, 2021, The University of Adelaide, in collaboration with the University of South Australia and Flinders University. *please note: this conference can be attended online or in-person. Website: https://arts.adelaide.edu.au/french-narratives/conference Confirmed Keynote Speakers: Prof. Ricia Chansky, University of Puerto Rico, Prof. Anne Pender, University of Adelaide Prof. Liu Jialin, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Transnationalism is an increasingly popular phenomenon, reflecting and responding to the heightened interconnectivity between people and the receding economic and social significance of boundaries among nation states. The current global pandemic has brought issues of interconnectivity sharply into question. In this context, this conference will explore life narratives across a broad variety of contexts. By discussing life narratives, including in a variety of languages, this conference aims to expand the boundaries of literary studies and its relationships with other media and nations. Papers may consider themes such as:
  • Narrating and imagining the migrant experience
  • Refugee and asylum seeker narratives
  • Life writing in languages other than English
  • Life writing and translation
  • Translingual and multilingual narratives
  • Coming of Age narratives (especially across nations and media)
  • Childhood life writing
  • Ethics of storytelling
  • Activist narratives
  • Cultural memory across nations, languages and media.
  • Autobiographies, letters and diaries
  • Life narratives in popular culture (music, film, theatre, games)
  • Visual life narratives (photography, graphics, social and digital media, visual arts etc.)
  • The histories and futures of life writing studies across disciplinary boundaries
  • Methods, genres, and definitions in life-writing/autobiographical/life story/ego-document research
Submissions: The conference will be held in two modes, incorporating face to face and zoom sessions. We invite both 20 minute individual presentations and 90 minute full panel, roundtable, or workshop sessions. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions that foster dialogues across theory, methodology, genre, place, and time. We invite not only traditional conference papers and panels, but also innovative presentation formats and creative sessions. Please submit a max. 300-word abstract and a 150-word bio to Dr. Christopher Hogarth at iabaadelaide2021@gmail.com by 31 July. Organising Committee: Professor Natalie Edwards natalie.edwards@adelaide.edu.au, Dr. Christopher Hogarth christopher.hogarth@unisa.edu.au, Dr. Kylie Cardell kylie.cardell@flinders.edu.au, Professor Kate Douglas kate.douglas@flinders.edu.au IABA Asia-Pacific emerges from the central disciplinary association for auto/biography scholars—The International Auto/Biography Association (IABA). IABA was founded in 1999 as a multidisciplinary network that aims to deepen the cross-cultural understanding of self, identity and experience, and to carry on global dialogues about life writing/narrative. IABA Asia-Pacific aims to foster new region-specific conversations and to encourage regional participation in the global IABA conference. Our goal is to develop scholarly networks between life narrative scholars and practitioners in the Asia-Pacific region that support the circulation and publication of high-quality life narrative theory, practice, and pedagogy. This conference forms part of an Australian Research Council funded Discovery Project on Transnational Narratives of Migration to Australia (Natalie Edwards and Christopher Hogarth, DP190102863). *
CALLING ALL LIFE WRITERS!Do you engage in, produce, teach, or write about any of the following?
  • Ethnography or duoethnography
  • Autoethnography or autotheory
  • Biography or educational biography
  • Autobiography or memoir
  • Life history or life narrative
  • Oral history or family history
  • Testimonio
  • Collective biography or prosopography
If so, we warmly invite you to submit a proposal for the 37th Annual Conference of the International Society for Educational Biography (ISEB) being held in partnership with The Society of Philosophy and History of Education (SOPHE) Annual Conference September 30 – October 2, 2021 at the Clayton Plaza Hotel, St. Louis, MissouriSUBMISSION INFORMATION: We welcome all those who work with life writing—teachers, graduate students, academics, social workers, and independent scholars—to submit a proposal.  The Conference Program Committee invites presentations in the following formats:
  1. Paper or presentation (individual or co-authored) on completed or in-progress research or methodological approach.
  2. Panel consisting of at least three panel members with related papers or presentations.
  3. Roundtable discussion on an open pedagogical, methodological or research issue.
  4. Structured Posters
To be considered, please complete the Proposal Form and include an abstract of up to 300 words to describe your proposal. The Conference Program Committee will review your proposal and notify you promptly.  Those interested in previous conference information can find it at the ISEB Archive.CONFERENCE INFORMATION: Conference Dates:  September 30-October 2, 2021 Location: Clayton Plaza Hotel, St. Louis, MO: http://www.cpclayton.com/ Booking a Room:  When you contact the hotel, please register in the SOPHE room block. Deadline for Proposals:  July 31, 2021.  Proposals received after this date will only be evaluated if there is room in the program. Presenter deadline for ISEB registration: September 15th, 2021, after which time you will not appear in the program.COVID-19 UPDATE: While we recognize our members are extremely busy in these times, we remind you we welcome paper, panel, round table abstracts, and more.  We fully anticipate that the conference will take place as planned; at the same time, we are monitoring the plans and procedures recommended by the CDC for organizations staging large events and gatherings. The executive team is considering all possible options that will keep our membership safe, including the possibility of virtual sessions.CONFERENCE REGISTRATION/DATES: Advanced Registration: August 15, 2021. Registration Deadline: Only presenters who are current in ISEB membership dues and have paid the conference registration fee will be listed in the Conference Program. Conference Registration: Members of both organizations will be responsible for paying separate conference registration and organizational membership fees.  Registration will include admission to both ISEB and SOPHE paper presentations, poster sessions, and workshops. ISEB Membership: In addition to the conference registration fee, presenters must be members of ISEB.  Membership includes a one-year subscription to the ISEB journal Vitae ScholasticaePlease note:  If a presenter wishes to present as part of/at both ISEB and SOPHE, they will need to pay one conference fee, but both membership fees. Registration Costs:
Registration Advance Late/On Site
Conference Registration + Full ISEB Membership $245 $280
Student Conference Registration + Student ISEB Membership (no journal) $50 $50
Conference Registration + Full ISEB + SOPHE Membership $295 $320
Student Conference Registration + Student ISEB + SOPHE Membership (no journal) $80 $80
Registration link: To register for the conference, please CLICK HERE.ABOUT THE ORGANIZATIONS: ISEB is an organization dedicated to the exploration of biography in writing, teaching, research, and other professional endeavors.SOPHE is an organization dedicated to promote research and teaching in the historical, philosophical, ethical, and social foundations of education.Please note:  When considering submitting your proposal, SOPHE and ISEB are small but historic organizations that maintain an important space for foundational and biographical scholarship. As the financial pressures and demands in higher education continue to shift, we are working to preserve these important spaces of community and scholarship. Acceptance to our conference means that we are reserving a space for you on the program and organizing the program accordingly. No-shows can have devastating effects for us and for other participants who might have attended in the space we have reserved for you. We ask for you to send early registration if possible and, if accepted, please prioritize your attendance to aid us in our mission of providing a venue for the important work of our members past, present, and future.JOURNAL: Participants have the opportunity to submit their papers for consideration for publication in our journal that we have been publishing for near 40 years, Vitae Scholasticae: The Journal of Educational Biography. We welcome all forms of work on life writing scholarship, teaching, and methodology.QUESTIONS? For questions or concerns, please contact Dr. Edward Janak, Program Committee Chair, at Edward.Janak@utoledo.edu.  Please reference “ISEB” in the subject line of your email.
*

Fans, Fandoms, and Celebrity Studies for NEPCA 2021

deadline for submissions:
August 1, 2021
full name / name of organization:
Northeast Popular Culture Association (NEPCA)
contact email:
The Fan, Fandoms, and Celebrity Studies area encourages submissions that focus on interrogating the ideas and the ideals of fans and fandoms, and why we idolize celebrities. We welcome submissions from all theoretical and philosophical perspectives. We are open to submissions in any area of fan and celebrity studies including but not limited to:
  • Creation and authenticity of fandoms
  • Fandoms, diversity and inclusion
  • Celebrity marketing, advertising, and public relations
  • Social media use and celebrity status
  • Defining fandoms
  • Fandoms and politics
  • Celebrities and illness
  • Sport fandoms and celebrities
  • Issues of fame and what it means to be famous in our culture
  • Fandom comparisons between cultures
  • Trust and value of celebrity
  • An individual celebrity
2021 Northeast Popular Culture Association (NEPCA) will be a virtual conference held between Thursday, October 21-Saturday, October 23, 2021. Please note that proposals are due by August 1, 2021. Presentations will be limited to 15 or 20 minutes in length depending on the final panel size. Singular presentations or full panels can be submitted for consideration.  Proposals can be submitted on the NEPCA Conference page or by going directly to the submission form here. Please select “Fan, Fandoms, and Celebrity Studies” as your designated area. Please address any questions about submissions to the area chair, Shelly Jones, at jonesmc@delhi.edu
*
CALL FOR PAPERS Life Narratives: Prismatic World of the Author and Beyond, Special Issue of Language, Literature, and Interdisciplinary Studies (7/15/2021) India The interconnectedness between life and writing, explored in life narratives, subscribes to the axiom of endorsing a transparency regarding the nature of the self who is writing—not only to the readers, but to the author itself who may find a moment of oneness between life and writing. This generates multiple possibilities of interpretation embedded in the questions of truth, memory, and agency of the writing subject. While establishing the subject as the prism of narration, these narratives of subjectivity are punctuated with impulses to understand one’s own life, memorialize one’s experiences, record one’s encounters with the animate and the inanimate, or even a will to preserve the unity of one’s own identity. At the center of life narratives then are located the self-projections of the artist, either underscoring or playing with the apparent unity of author, narrator, and protagonist. But despite this focus on the artist-subject, life narratives keep engaging with epistemological enquiries that often go beyond what the author intends to promote—the act of personal recollection offering unintended consequences despite the concerns being focused upon individuality, subjectivity, interiority, or authenticity associated with the specular figure of the author. Though overtly committed to personal memory, life narratives also uncover performativity inscribed in the very form, seen as the element of deliberate stylization, that draws attention to the limits of self-expression when structural and creative considerations come into play. Representation of subject, style of writing, or the pattern of self-disclosure gets reflected in plurality of forms that are both sedimented and fluid in structure. These innovative narrative structures are evolved to offer something which is an exception to the normative identification through overlapping of various genres: fiction, non-fiction, autofiction, poetry, memoir, autobiography, digital testimony, etc. Extending well beyond any coherent theoretical coordinates to streamline its disparate forms, life narratives are as much constructed by an individual artist-subject as they are the product of his intersecting textures of historical, social, political, economic, and cultural contexts. Concerning the Issue 5.1 with the exploration of life narratives in different shapes and formats, LLIDS invites scholars to deliberate upon forms of articulation and presentation of life narratives by either focusing on the themes given below or branching beyond:
  • Forms of Expression and Configuring Autobiographical Subject
  • Ancient, Modern, and Postmodern Life Narratives
  • Narrativizing Memory in Life Narratives
  • Self-Portraits as Life Narratives
  • Life Narratives and Post Truth
  • Life Narratives as Metanarratives
  • Biomythographies
  • Thanatographies
  • Temporality in Life Narratives
  • Gendered Perspective in Self-Representation
  • Confession and Life Narratives
  • Figuring Reader in Life Narratives
  • Experiments with Language in Life Narratives
  • Formation of Identity through Life Narratives
  • Paratextual Elements in Life Narratives
  • Life Narratives in Translation
Submissions: Only complete papers will be considered for publication. The papers need to be submitted according to the guidelines of the MLA 8th edition. You are welcome to submit full length papers (3,500–10,000 words) along with a 150 words abstract and list of keywords. Please read the submission guidelines before making the submission – http://ellids.com/author-guidelines/ submission-guidelines/. Please feel free to email any queries to – editors@ellids.com. Please make all submissions via the form: https://forms.gle/RpiCuga6g4igf2BW7 Submission deadline: 15th July, 2021 Website – http://ellids.com/ Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/journal.llids/
Contact Email:
* REMINDER — Call for Contributions Autobiography, Ethics, and Relations Proposal deadline: July 15, 2021 Editor: Orly Lael Netzer (PhD), University of Alberta Publisher: Wilfrid Laurier University Press  The first two decades of the twenty-first century have seen a growing interest in personal stories across media and markets, from photo-journalism, to letters, social media posts, memoirs, documentaries, and performance or installation art. True accounts of experience have been used to protest sexual violence, institutional racism, and neo-colonial practices of occupation; personal stories have been situated as transformative acts of resiliency, healing, survivance, and resurgence; and autobiographical acts have been mobilized to call for humanitarian response to crises of forced displacement and migration. While these interventions are not unprecedented, they highlight two key aspects of auto/biographical acts and their use in contemporary cultures across the globe — namely, the pivotal roles of relationality and ethics. Contending with auto/biographical ethics means interrogating the relationships and power dynamics that shape individuals’ and communities’ experiences, alongside the relationships embedded in the representation, mediation, and reception of these experiences. In other words, it means accounting for the intrinsic relations between ethics and politics, exploring what truths autobiographical texts speak to while also asking whose lives are represented, how, by whom, for whom, and for whose profit. Autobiography, Ethics, and Relations — a peer-reviewed edited collection under advance contract with Wilfrid Laurier University Press — will interrogate the ethical challenges, risks, responsibilities, and potentialities embedded in local and global practices of auto/biography. To explore these issues, I invite contributions attuned to questions of agency, responsibility, and accountability to true stories and to the individuals and communities whose lives have been represented in auto/biographical works across mediums, periods, and locations. The collection as a whole will not offer firm conclusions, nor will it readily solve ethical challenges or dilemmas. Instead, I encourage contributions that speak to wider issues and relationalities (rather than offer an analysis of a single work), offering provocations while carefully situating them in specific cultural, historical and material contexts. The collection will be organized around three interlinked categories —production, circulation, and reception — and potential discussion topics may address (but are not limited to) one or more of the following: Production
  • The ethics of telling, discovering, recording, or collaborating to represent lived experience 
  • The power dynamics and ethical concerns embedded in collaborative production of life stories
  • Responsible practices of working with auto/biographical subjects, documents, and communities
  • Producing life stories in/for community settings (e.g. community-based workshops or projects)
  • Reproducing auto/biographical accounts in translation, restoration, or revised editions
  • Considerations of harm, exploitation, access, implication, consent, benefit, and agency of auto/biographical subjects and their communities
Circulation:
  • The ethics of archiving, curating, anthologizing, and promoting true stories
  • The circulation and use of life stories for/ as social justice activism Life stories vis-à-vis human-rights discourse
  • Approaches to life stories in history, ethnography, sociology, archeology, etc.
Reception:
  • The use of life stories in discourses of state/ international recognition and redress
  • The ethics of remembrance, memorializing lives, or commemorating trauma
  • Ethical approaches to reading life writing (privately and publicly)
  • Auto/biographical ethics in discourses of testimony and witnessing
  • Audiences’ responsibilities to true stories and the communities whose experiences are shared
I welcome contributions from emerging or established scholars, artists, writers, curators, or activists, as well as educators, librarians, editors, publishers, and journalists, or archivists. Please send a short abstract (~300 words) and a brief biography (100 words) to Dr. Orly Lael Netzer (laelnetz@ualberta.ca) by July 15, 2021. Those invited to submit full chapters will be notified by August 15, 2021. Please note the manuscript will undergo a full peer-review process. Complete chapter drafts should be approximately 7,500-9,000 words including endnotes and bibliography and will be due Jan. 30th, 2022. Citations will follow the Chicago 17th Manual of Style (Author/Date style). If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out via email. I look forward to reading your submissions, Orly

Call for Papers: Unknown stories of intermediaries in women’s migration: men, women and non-binary people (7/10/2021) Edited collection

Editors: Alexandra Yingst (University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland) Stellamarina Donato (LUMSA University, Rome, Italy) Call for Papers: Recent scholarship has promoted gender equality in the field of female migration. Although generally seeking to record stories on the experiences of migrant women, scholars are also working to uncover the lesser-known stories of men, women, and non-binary people who played a part in the migration of women. This collection of essays aims to record the forgotten stories of people who positively or negatively impacted female migration. Stories can be about social network formers/maintainers, migrant smugglers, human traffickers, and more. We propose an edited collection of stories that show how everyone, no matter what gender they identify as, plays a role and is involved in female migration. Stories may be about people both past and present. Following Donna Gabaccia’s work on gender in migration studies, we want to stress the importance of including literature on gender studies in this volume. This volume will present a strong theoretical focus with innovative research methods from multiple disciplines across the humanities, social, and political sciences. An example of such literature would be the work of social theorists like Butler, Fraser, and historians like Scott, who focused on gender as a subjective process and not a determinant natural factor. Gender identification is a crucial point to consider when addressing unknown stories of migrant women because it challenges the vulnerability paradigm that has populated the debate for decades (Reysoo & Verschuur, 2004; Grotti et al., 2018) and therefore goes beyond the complementarity between men and women as the status quo (Andaya, 2007; Grami, 2018) and limited male-female comparisons (Donato et al., 2006; Erdal & Pawlak, 2018). In this regard, this collection considers women’s migration and gender equality (O’Neil et al., 2016) as two issues that should always coexist and aims at stressing their ties throughout the essays. Objectives: In this edited volume, we will show how all genders (not only women) have importantly been involved in female migration. By studying their social networks and resources that assisted the migration process, we also aim to challenge the widespread belief that migrant women are always vulnerable. Finally, we will challenge the effect of gender constructs found in migration studies (i.e., how migrant issues are often dichotomized). We also plan to bring together researchers from different disciplines who have a story to tell about the intermediaries, men, women and non-binary identifying people, who directly impacted the personal experiences of migrant women. Each chapter should also refer to those specific themes that are often related to women’s migration, such as stigma, vulnerability, determinism, double standard. Therefore, we would like to collect contributions that have the following elements: a)  Present a lesser-known story of an intermediary who assisted in the migration of women. b)  Briefly introduce the background of this person. c)  Describe how this person positively or negatively changed the position of female migrants. d)  Clearly specify how the unknown story of the intermediary provides new insights to women’s migration studies. e)  Follow a bottom-up approach to storytelling, from the specific story to the theory. We envisage this edited volume to present the lesser-known stories of people involved in women’s migration through a sectional division by the typology of migration (labor migrants and highly skilled and business migrants; irregular, illegal, or undocumented migrants; refugees, asylum seekers; constrained migration; family migration, etc.). List of Potential Sections (3 chapters in each section): Labor migrants, highly skilled and business migrants; Irregular, illegal, or undocumented migrants; Forced migration, refugees and asylum seekers; Family migration Submission Procedure: Contributors are invited to send by July 10, 2021 an abstract proposal of approximately 350 words clearly explaining the relevance of their contribution to the edited volume, as well as a short biography of themselves. Abstracts should be sent to both Alexandra Yingst (aly3@hi.is) and Stellamarina Donato (s.donato@lumsa.it). Authors will be notified by August 30, 2021 about the acceptance of their proposal. Full chapters (ca. 6000 – 8000 words, including bibliography) are expected to be submitted by February 30, 2022. Publisher: The edited volume’s manuscript will be proposed for publication to Women on the Move’s book series at Manchester University Press or Palgrave Macmillan. It is expected to be published by mid-2023.
Contact Info:
Alexandra Yingst (University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland) and Stellamarina Donato (LUMSA University, Rome, Italy)
Contact Email:
*
Announcement: Call-for-Abstracts Deadline for submission: 1st July 2021 SPECIAL ISSUE OF LIFE WRITING: CALL FOR ABSTRACTS MERITOCRACY AND LIFE WRITING

Editor:  Professor D. L. LeMahieu

Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, Illinois, 60045, USA

lemahieu@mx.lakeforest.edu

Michael Young’s satire The Rise of the Meritocracy (1957) popularized a new term that gained wide currency in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.  Both the social democratic Left and the neo-liberal Right endorsed the notion that intelligence plus effort equaled merit.  Intended to displace an elitism based on birth or social privilege, meritocracy promised upward mobility to those with the talent and work ethic to earn success.  Yet, as meritocracy congealed into a self-sustaining elitism, the concept has attracted intense criticism from meritocrats themselves as well as nativists and populists excluded from positions of power.  The life writing of meritocrats discloses the complex subjectivities of upward mobility during a period of accelerating social change and raises the question of what constitutes merit. Abstracts are invited addressing any of the topics below. Abstracts should be between 300 and 500 words and include the author’s institutional affiliation if any. Include 5 or 6 keywords for your approach to the topic. Due date for abstracts: Thursday 1st July, 2021. Abstracts should be emailed to the journal’s guest editor at lemahieu@mx.lakeforest.edu Authors will be notified as to whether the complete paper would be welcome for submission by 16th August, 2021. Final due date for completed papers if abstract is accepted: 1st December 2021. Completed papers should be 6,000-8,000 words long, and must follow the Instructions for Authors on the journal’s website for referencing, endnotes, UK spelling, etc. Papers will be submitted for blind peer review. This may take about 2 months. Papers that are recommended for publication following peer review will be published online in Life Writing during 2022, with print publication in a special issue to follow. Topics: – Meritocratic life writing before the term was coined (Roman “new men”; beneficiaries of the Chinese examination system; Victorian self-help discourse) – Education, scholarships, and social class in meritocratic narratives – Gender and meritocracy – Race and meritocratic life writing – Structure and personal agency in meritocratic life writing – Meritocratic virtue: the personal qualities it takes to succeed – Marxism and meritocratic life writing – Meritocratic medical doctors, lawyers and jurists – Politicians and their advisors – Business women and business men – Childhood and the origins of personal ambition – Meritocrats and personal trauma, including terminal illness narratives – Typologies of meritocratic life writing – Meritocratic academics and the transformation of higher education – Meritocratic life writing and identity politics – How meritocrats process, critique, or ignore their own privileges – Meritocratic dissenters, including populists and nativists – Meritocratic theologians and the challenges of secularism – Ghost writing the lives of famous meritocrats including entertainers – Neoliberal life writing – Mentors in meritocratic life writing

*

Being Out of Place: Deconstructing Travel Narratives in Postcolonial Arab Literature(via Zoom)

July 1, 2021
contact email:
Conference Director Dr. Soumaya Bouacida, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Conférence Date:: 20 th Decembre, 2021 Keynote Speakers -Dr. Robert Clarke is a senior lecturer in English studies, and Head of Discipline, English, in the school of Humanities at the University of Tasmania. He is the editor of several books and issues such as Celebrity Colonialism: Fame, Power and Representation in Colonial and Postcolonial Cultures(2009), “Travel and Celebrity Culture”(special issue in Postcolonial Studies), and The Cambridge Companion to Postcolonial Travel Writing (2018) –Dr.Nouri Gana is professor of Comparative Literature & Near Eastern Languages and Cultures at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). He is the author of Signifying Loss: Toward a Poetics of Narrative Mourning, and the editor of The Making of the Tunisian Revolution: Contexts, Architects, Prospects and of The Edinburgh Companion to the Arab Novel in English. The Head of the Conference Organizing Committee Mr. Toufik Laachouri, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Members of the Conference Organizing Committee Dr.Soumaya Bouacida, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Dr.Zeyneb Benhenda, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Dr. Roumeissa Silini, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Dr. Naima Harbi, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Dr. Bochra Bouteraa, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Ms .Assia Nekakaa, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Ms. Fouzia Krim University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Mr. Malek Benkhalaf Dr. Mounir Karek Dr. Djihed Messikh University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Ms. Imen Bouchagour, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Ms.Fatima Zohra Laidi, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Ms. Fatima Bouglouf, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Ms.Imen Chraita, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Ms. Imen Achouri ,University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Ms. Selwa Hadibi, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Msr. Nabila Dendani, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Ms. Nour Elhouda Boudrouma, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Mr. Zin El-din, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria The Head of Conference Reading Committee Dr. Zeyneb Benhenda, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Members of the Conference Reading Committee -Dr.Soumaya Bouacida, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria -Dr. Roumeissa Silini, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria Dr. Hayette Harbi, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria -Dr. Hichem Souhali, University of Batna 02, Batna, Algeria -Dr. Moufida Zaidi, University of Mentouri, Costantine, Algeria – Prof. Nadir Kaouli, University of Batna 02, Batna, Algeria -Dr. Leila Djaafri, University of Batna 02, Batna, Algeria -Dr. Farida Lebbal, University of Batna 02, Batna, Algeria -Dr. Mohamed Seghir Halimi, Ourgla University, Ouargla, Algeria -Dr. Ahmed Bashar, Biskra University, Biskra, Algeria -Dr. Nadir Idri, Bejaia University -Dr. Youcef Awad, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan -Dr. Tahrir Hamdi, Open Arab University, Amman, Jordan -Dr.Lina Saleh, Al Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan -Dr.Samira Al-Khawaldeh, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan -Dr. Aba-Carina Parlog, West University of Timisoara, Roumania -Dr. Mariam F. Alkazemi, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA – Dr. Mounir Karek, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria -Dr.Salim Sista, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria -Dr. Camilia Bechiri, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria -Mr. Abdelmalek Ben khalef, University of 20th August 1955, Skikda, Algeria                                                                                                                            Call for Papers  I occasionally experience myself as a cluster of flowing currents. I prefer this to the idea of a solid self, the identity to which so many attach so much significance. These currents, like the themes of one’s life, flow during the waking hours, and at their best they require no reconciling, no harmonizing. They are “off” and may be out of place, but at least they are always in motion, in time, in place, in the form of all kinds of strange combinations moving about, not necessarily forward, sometimes against each other, contrapuntally yet without one central theme. Edward Said In this passage that is taken from Out of Place(1999), a text that dovetails memoir with the travel narrative, Edward Said reads himself as an embodied form of diversity and as a celeberation of a heterogeneous identity since he is ‘a cluster flowing currents’: he is Arab and Christian, Palestinian and American, the Anglophone “Edward” and the Arabic “Said”. Such complex identification comes as a result of his geographical mobility and continuous travel between Cairo and New York, Beirut and London, Jerusalem and Boston, Dhour and Paris. More pointedly, travel is a vehicle through which one can explore how his relationship to a place can shape his own experiences and, thus, his own identity. Travel is not only limited to human beings, but also diseases can travel the globe. Travelling diseases become embricated with the history of different cultures and play a central role in travel writing. In the ongoing wake of COVID-19, the normative modes of travel have witnessed some interruptions, which leads to the mounting of paranoia among people who have been displaced from their homes like migrants, refugees and asylum seekers. Regulations on travel have left this category of people stranded; they face intense deprivations in their right to economic welfare, limited access to school, poor health care, and threats to their safety and protection. Travel narratives were vital for Said’s Orientalist project because they include accounts of ‘other’ places and peoples that construct distinctions between “the Orient” and “the Occident” and that depict the “ East” as inferior and uncivilized. The description produced by the imperial eye is considered as a justification for colonial projects and imperial expansionism. However, for postcolonial writers and mainly Arab ones, travel texts can convey accounts that defy colonial discourses by deconstructing the binary oppositions of the colonial travel writings, decentering the Western eye and reconceptualizing the relationship between centre and periphery through creating contact zones .This conference, therefore, attempts to examine these debates by exploring the major scholarly works on travel writing by postcolonial Arab writers. This conference fosters a creative dialogue between leading academic researchers and scholars who are willing to exchange and share their experiences and results on all aspects of travel in postcolonial Arab writings and in case of serious situations such as the spread of pandemics (Corona virus is a case in point) . It also provides a premier interdisciplinary platform for researchers to discuss the most recent trends and concerns in the field of travel writing. We would like to take stock of the scholarship concerning travel in Postcolonial Arab literature and we kindly invite prospective authors to contribute to the conference through the submissions of their original research abstracts, papers and e-posters. The topics that could be explored in the conference include but are not limited to: -Travel and constructions of race, class, and gender -Constitutions of ‘self’ ad ‘other’ in travel writing -Travel and diaspora -Travel and transculturation -Travel and displacement -Travel and politics of exile -Travel and gastronomic culture -Travel and Topophilia -Nostalgia/ Solastalgia ,Memory and Trauma in travel writing -Travel and language -Contact zones and the relationship between travelers and travelees -Travel and Pandemics Paper proposals of up to 250 words in English and a brief biographical note should be sent by 1st July 2021 to travelconference2021@gmail.com. The contributors will be asked to send their full papers by  Novembre, 15 th in order to submit them as a special issue in Quraterly Arab journal after going through a reviewing process..No fees are recommended for this conférence.
*
The Institute for the Study of Canadian Slavery, at the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design (NSCAD University), proudly announces a Call for Applications for:
Please note, the first cohort of Institute fellows in 2021-2022 will be virtual, and each fellowship is worth $10,000.00 Canadian Dollars. See further details in the links for each fellowship. For more information contact: theinstitute@nscad.ca

*

The Transformative Experience of the Journey via Recollection and Reflection

deadline for submissions:
June 30, 2021

Pacific Modern and Ancient Language Association Nov. 11-14, 2021 Las Vegas, USA
contact email:
The travel memoir offers an opportunity to examine a number of issues in terms of creative non-fiction. Travel stories focus on individuals who become strangers to themselves when they exile themselves from the environmental and cultural factors that have defined them thus far in service of self-discovery. They link up with the grand Odysseus-like impulse of traditional and modern literature that can profoundly alter identity when they travel and write about their experiences. Topics to consider include the issue of fact vs. fiction in creative non-fiction texts, the idea of the diary as an essential aspect of the transformative experience, and the collaborative relationship between readers and writers in this highly popular genre in terms of identity development.

*

Deadline for Submissions June 20, 2021
“Narrating Lives”: International Conference on Storytelling, (Auto)Biography and (Auto)Ethnography
August 28, 2021 to August 29, 2021
Location:
United Kingdom
Life-history approach occupies the central place in conducting and producing  (auto)biographical and (auto)ethnographic studies through the understanding of self, other, and culture. We construct and develop conceptions and practices by engaging with memory through narrative, in order to negotiate ambivalences and uncertainties of the world and to represent (often traumatic) experiences.
The “Narrating Lives” conference will focus on reading and interpreting (auto)biographical texts and methods across the humanities, social sciences, and visual and performing arts. It will analyse theoretical and practical approaches to life writing and the components of (auto)biographical acts, including memory, experience, identity, embodiment, space, and agency. We will attempt to identify key concerns and considerations that led to the development of the methods and to outline the purposes and ethics of (auto)biographical and (auto)ethnographic research. We aim to explore a variety of techniques for gathering data on the self-from diaries to interviews to social media and to promote understanding of multicultural others, qualitative inquiry, and narrative writing. Conference panels will be related, but not limited, to:
  • Life Narrative in Historical Perspective
  • Qualitative Research Methods
  • Oral History, Memory and Written Tradition
  • Journalism and Literary Studies
  • Creative Writing and Performing Arts
  • (Auto)Biographical Element in Film Studies, Media and Communication
  • Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy
  • Storytelling in Education
  • Ethics and Politics of Research
Submissions may be proposed in various formats, including:
  • Individually submitted papers (organised into panels by the committee)
  • Panels (3-4 individual papers)
  • Posters
Proposals should be sent by 20 June 2021 to: life-history@lcir.co.uk. Please download Paper proposal form. Registration fee – 90 GBP    
Contact Info:
London Centre for Interdisciplinary Research www.lcir.co.uk info@lcir.co.uk
Contact Email:
*

Stories of Home, the Road, and the Host Country: Women Narrating Migration in Morocco

June 11, 2021
Centre for the Study of Contemporary Women’s Writing (CCWW) INSTITUTE OF MODERN LANGUAGES RESEARCH School of Advanced Study • University of London Stories of Home, the Road, and the Host Country: Women Narrating Migration in Morocco https://modernlanguages.sas.ac.uk/events/event/24070 11 June 2021 10.00am – 4.00pm BST Online Symposium Organiser: Keltouma Guerch (Mohamed I University, Oujda Morocco) Judging by the late 20th and early 21st centuries movement realities, migration is no longer a choice nor is it an option among other options. It’s rather an economic, social, and political necessity. For millions of individuals and families around the world, migration is the ultimate survival decision and action. As a matter of fact, movement through unknown lands involves stories of home and the road. Stories are our daily bread to communicate with others, express joys and sorrows, and survive trials and tribulations. Migrants’ stories help them share their experiences of the terrible journey and how they “survive” in the transit and/or destination countries. The geographic location of Morocco imposed a specific identity on the country as both a transit and destination land, hence, its notoriety as a place where migration plans and human trafficking are massively negotiated. Given the dramatic conditions in which movement from the southern to the northern coasts of the Mediterranean are carried out, migration tales are obviously not romantic ones. In this symposium participants share their scholarly work and research in the field of migration, particularly gendered migration, from different perspectives. Programme Panel One, 10.00 – 12.00 BST   (Chair: Keltouma Guerch) Abdellah El Boubekri (Mohamed I University, Oujda Morocco); “Unconsummated belonging in Laila Lalami’s The Other Americans (2019) and Conditional Citizens (2020).” Wissam Bitari (Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh Morocco); “The Intersection of Diaspora and Postmodern realities in Laila Lalami’s The Other Americans.Tayeb Ghourdou (Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fes Morocco); “Identity Construction between Home and Exile: A Comparative Analysis of Laila Lalami’s The Other Americans and Murja Kahf’s The Girl in the Tangerine Scarf.” Brahim Elaouni (Mohamed I University, Oujda Morocco); “Space and Women Consciousness in the Writings of Lalami the Novelist and Lalami the Essayist.” Lunch Break: 12.00 – 14.00 BST Panel Two, 14.00 – 16.00 BST   (Chair: Abdellah El Boubekri) Mimoune Daoudi (Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fes Morocco);  “Self-narration in Moroccan Women Diasporic Literature: Najat Elhachemi’s The Last Patriarch, as a case study.” Zineb  Rabouj (Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fes Morocco); “Escaping to/from America: Roots and Routes in Anissa Bouziane’s Dune Song.” Keltouma Guerch (Mohamed I University, Oujda Morocco); “Mothers and Daughters: Home, the Road, and the Host Country in the Narratives of Sub-Saharan Women Migrants Living in North-East Morocco.” Fatima-Zohra Alaoui Mehrez (Mohamed I University, Oujda Morocco); “Narrating Sub-Saharan African Female Migrants’ Stories in Morocco.” All are welcome to attend this free event at 10.00am BST on 11 June. You will need to register in advance to receive the online event joining link. To register go to: https://modernlanguages.sas.ac.uk/events/event/24070

This symposium is organised as part of the CCWW Seminar Series 2021/22: ‘Precarious Homes – Narratives and Practices of Home-Making in Turbulent Times’ which takes its cue from the CCWW Conference  “‘Where are you from?’ to ‘Where shall we go together?’ Re-imagining Home and Belonging in 21st-Century Women’s Writing“, hosted at the IMLR in September 2020. Dedicated to further exploration of literary and theoretical conceptualisations of home-making, the series considers women’s writing in context, using various formats –  reading groups, a symposium, and an author/translator conversation.
Contact Info:
Cathy Collins Institute of Modern Languages Research School of Advanced Study | University of London Room 239 | Senate House | Malet Street | London WC1E 7HU | UK
Contact Email:

*

Event Held–June 3, 2021

Lives: Biography and Autobiography in New Writing on American Art

6/3/2021, 4:00-8:15pm. CEST
The John F. Kennedy Institute of American Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, and the Terra Foundation for American Art are pleased to invite you to this year’s Berlin Terra symposium, Lives: Biography and Autobiography in New Writing on American Art which will be delivered online via Webex on June 3, 2021, 4.00 pm – 8.15 pm (Central European Summer Time). (USA start times: 7:00 am PDT/8:00 am MDT/9:00 am CDT/10:00 am EDT.) The origins of art history privileged the artist’s biography in the explanation and interpretation of artworks, but such narratives came to be rejected for their heroic and exclusionary narratives of the exceptionalism and isolated genius. In their place, questions of historical, social, and intellectual context took precedence, and the writing of an artist’s life came to seem conservative and unconnected to larger social, political, and aesthetic concerns. However, recent art historical scholarship has found a renewed interest in the details of the lives of artists as embedded in their social and artistic worlds, and these new approaches aim to create a more equitable and diverse narrative of art’s many histories. Biography and autobiography have come to be newly relevant as art history struggles with its legacies of exclusion based on race, gender, sexuality, class, and ability. This symposium will showcase some new biographical and autobiographical approaches to writing American art’s histories, with a view toward the ways in which the life experiences of artists and writers afford opportunities for counternarratives and new ways of understanding the diverse histories of American art. Lives: Biography and Autobiography in New Writing on American Art brings together scholars and curators who discuss the intertwinement and intersectionality of artists’ life experiences with the work they produced from them. Speakers include C. Ondine Chavoya, Joan Kee, Cyle Metzger, and Helen Molesworth. It is convened by David J. Getsy, 2020-2021 Terra Foundation Professor of American Art. Please visit the event website for a detailed schedule and log-in details: https://www.jfki.fu-berlin.de/faculty/culture/terra/Conferences/Getsy_2021/index.html The symposium is free and open to the public. No registration required. Event language is English.
Contact Info:
Amalie Boye Terra Student Assistant, John F. Kennedy Institute for North American Studies, Freie Universität Berlin
Contact Email:
*
Deadline for Submissions June 1, 2021
CFP for SAMLA 93, taking place on November 4-6, 2021, in Atlanta, GA.
LIFE WRITING
The production of identities and subjectivities across narrative spheres and histories‚ from genres like captivity narratives, slave narratives, autobiographies, biographies, and commonplace books, to contemporary iterations in memoir, blogs, social media, and reality television‚ challenge expectations for how lives can be documented and shared. Life writing crucially expands the bounds of what lives and literatures can look like, demanding that readers attend to histories, lives, languages, and experiences that are often unfamiliar or different from their own. This panel welcomes presentations on any aspect of life writing, and those projects that are related to the conference theme, “Social Networks, Social Distances,” are especially welcome. By June 1, please submit an abstract of 250 words, along with presenter’s academic affiliation, contact information, and A/V requirements, to Nicole Stamant, Agnes Scott College, at nstamant@agnesscott.edu.
Nicole Stamant, PhD Associate Professor and Chair | Department of English
SUMMIT Faculty Coordinator for Digital in the Curriculum Pronouns: she/her/hers 404.471.6062 (phone)
nicolestamant.agnesscott.org Agnes Scott College | 141 E. College Ave. | Decatur, Georgia 30030

*

CALL FOR PAPERS  The Multiple Lives of Memories: Materializing Experiences of Soviet Terror (5/15/2021) Edited by Samira Saramo (Migration Institute of Finland) & Ulla Savolainen (University of Helsinki) Keywords: memory; life stories; experiences; materiality; emotion; mobility; violence; repression; Soviet Union This peer-reviewed international collection of articles focuses on the expansive reach of Soviet Terror through an analysis of the materialization of memories from multi-sited perspectives. The book examines the concrete mobility of life stories, letters, memoirs, objects, and bodies reflecting Soviet repression and violence across borders of geographical locations, historical periods, political regimes, and generations, while simultaneously paying attention to more abstract processes of textual circulation and (re)mediation. The collection asks: what happens to life stories, testimonies, and experiences when they travel in time and space and are (re)interpreted and (re)formulated through these transfers? What types of spaces for remembering, telling, and feeling are created, negotiated, and contested in these contexts? What are the boundaries and intersections of intimate, familial, and community memories? The book explores these travels as processes of becoming, which reflect productive entanglements of the material, social, and discursive qualities in people’s experiences and memories with Soviet repression and violence. By engaging with current discussions on mediation (e.g. Erll & Rigney 2009; De Cesari & Rigney 2014), reception (e.g. Sindbæk Andersen & Törnquist-Plewa 2017; Etkind 2013), life writing and life storying (Gilmore 2001; Adler 2002; Merridale 2000; Šukys 2017), and materiality (Hirsch 2012; Miller 2011) in (cultural) memory studies and beyond, the collection of articles aims to open new perspectives on the multiple lives of memories, and who and what gets to remember and be remembered. Through this focus, this collection contributes fresh methodological perspectives to the study of Soviet Terror. We invite article proposals (approx. 500 words) addressing the theme of the book to be sent to the editors (samira.saramo@migrationinstitute.fiulla.savolainen@helsinki.fi) by May 15th, 2021. The proposals should describe the case study, research materials, and methodological framework of the planned article, along with a short biographical statement.Prospective contributors will be informed of decisions by June 1st, 2021. The deadline for the first version of article manuscripts is December 1st, 2021. The book proposal will be sent with abstracts to an international academic publisher in September 2021 and the collection of articles will be sent for peer review in Spring 2022. References Adler, N. 2004. The Gulag Survivor: Beyond the Soviet System. London: Routledge. De Cesari, C. and A. Rigney, eds. 2014. Transnational Memory: Circulation, Articulation, Scales. Berlin: De Gruyter. Erll, A. and A. Rigney, eds. 2009. Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin: De Gruyter. Etkind, A. 2013. Warped Mourning: Stories of the Undead in the Land of the Unburied. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Gilmore, L. 2001. The Limits of Autobiography: Trauma and Testimony. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Hirsch, M. 2012. The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press. Merridale, C. 2000. Night of Stone: Death and Memory in Russia. London, Granta. Miller, N.K. 2012. What They Saved: Pieces of a Jewish Past. Sindbæk Andersen, T. and B. Törnquist-Plewa, eds. 2017. The Twentieth Century in European Memory: Transcultural Mediation and Reception. Leiden: Brill. Šukys, J. 2018. Siberian Exile: Blood, War, and a Granddaughter’s Reckoning. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Call for Chapters: Exploring Student Lives Through Photography, Oral History and Context-based Art Editors Lorenzo J. Torres Hortelano, Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC, Madrid), Spain. Maida Gruden, Students’ City Cultural Center (SCCC, Belgrade), Serbia. Andrija Stojanović, Students’ City Cultural Center (SCCC, Belgrade), Serbia. Proposals Submission Deadline: May 15th, 2021 Full Chapters Submission Due: September 15th, 2021 Submission guidelines [link] Submit your proposal (400-800 words) to lorenzojavier.torres.hortelano@urjc.es and book@theylive.eu Introduction This will be an open access book to be published by an international reference indexed publishing company (which will be announced later in 2021). It is aimed to analyze the most relevant aspects of the Creative Europe Project ‘They: Live’Student lives revealed through context-based art practices (2020-2023), through three distinct parts that correspond to its different milestones. This call is limited to the first part of the book which seeks to involve reflections from various disciplines (history, sociology, anthropology, visual anthropology, political sciences, cultural and curatorial studies, oral history studies, history of photography, aesthetics of digital art and databases….) on the lives of students (University level) from Second World War to the present day. Within the project, photographs from private albums, archives, and oral history testimonies by current and former students will be collected, documented, and showed on Topothek open online platform. Researchers are welcomed to use it, where other works as photographs, audio, texts databases and research are hosted. They: Live project focuses on the following topics: the everyday student life, campus-related life, cultural habits and free time, interpersonal relations, gender relations, socio-political engagement of students, from the end of the Second World War until contemporary days on the European level. The field of research can be expanded beyond assigned topics of the project and from different angles and disciplines on student’s lives. The second part of the book will encompass case studies about Artist in Residences programs on students’ campuses with essay contributions by selected artists and curators involved in the project. And the third part, written by members of the project consortium, will be a step-by-step manual with recommendations for implementation of the organizational methodology of this type of residential stay in student campuses and exhibits. So, it will be an edited book, a mix of essay, case study and methodology book emerging from the research results of the European project They Live. Objective The objective of this book is to address a relevant issue that involves a multidisciplinary approach, that is, the relationships between students’ lives in the campuses, documentary vernacular photography, oral history, contemporary art, and students’ intangible heritage. It is aimed to offer a valuable contribution regarding the challenges and possibilities faced by contemporary art practices and the archiving of the everyday memory of student communities. Student lives and their activities represent a live reservoir of innovative ideas and relationships, a source through which an evolutionary development of intellectual heritage can be followed, and a completely new view of the European culture and its future development can be established. This is a relevant and current topic that makes the book suitable for scholars and professionals working in the areas of social sciences (history, sociology, anthropology, visual anthropology, political sciences, cultural and curatorial studies, oral history studies, history of photography, aesthetics of digital art, digital humanities etc). One of the strongest features of the book is the multi-national, trans-generational as well as multidisciplinary approach to the topic. Therefore, papers need to address both the scientific and practical implications of the research. Recommended Topics (but not limited) Cultural studies on student lives – History of student culture, – Student lives from the perspective of sociology: everyday life in campuses, interpersonal and gender relationships –  Political engagement of students – Gender studies related to students’ life – Anthropology of students’ life- Students lives through photography  – Oral history related to students live – Genres of photography coming from students live – Art context-based practices and student lives – Digital archives related to student live photos – Art inspired by student lives – Aesthetics of the archive – Art from archives – Multimedia Art – Comparative view on students’ lives in different countries from the end of WWII until now This is a list of related papers and books: [link] Publisher We are in discussions with international European academic high indexed publishers. This publication is anticipated to be released in Q1 2023. Inquiries Lorenzo J. Torres Hortelano Senior Lecturer professor (tenure) Rey Juan Carlos University lorenzojavier.torres.hortelano@urjc.es and book@theylive.eu http://theylive.eu/kategorija.php?menu_id=15 Thanks and Best regards, Lorenzo J. Torres Hortelano  Vicedecano de Extensión Universitaria y Relaciones Internacionales Vice-Dean of University Extension and International Relations Profesor Titular/Professor Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación Departamento de Ciencias de la Comunicación y Sociología Edificio de Gestión – Decanato Camino del Molino s/n, 28943 Fuenlabrada +34 91 488 73 11 lorenzojavier.torres.hortelano@urjc.es gestion2.urjc.es/pdi/ver/lorenzojavier.torres.hortelano researchgate.net/profile/Lorenzo_Torres Lorenzo Torres Academia.edu IP proyecto Europa Creativa http://theylive.eu/
Contact Info:
Lorenzo J. Torres Hortelano  Vicedecano de Extensión Universitaria y Relaciones Internacionales Vice-Dean of University Extension and International Relations Profesor Titular/Professor Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación Departamento de Ciencias de la Comunicación y Sociología Edificio de Gestión – Decanato Camino del Molino s/n, 28943 Fuenlabrada +34 91 488 73 11 lorenzojavier.torres.hortelano@urjc.es gestion2.urjc.es/pdi/ver/lorenzojavier.torres.hortelano researchgate.net/profile/Lorenzo_Torres Lorenzo Torres Academia.edu IP proyecto Europa Creativa http://theylive.eu/
*

Call for Papers: FRAME 34.2, “Writing the Mind”

FRAME. Journal of Literary Studies contact email: info@frameliteraryjournal.com In Ellen Forney’s autobiographical comic Marbles: Mania, Depression, Michelangelo and Me (2012), the author narrates her journey following her bipolar disorder diagnosis, a journey that sets off an exploration into how her art is connected to that of the “crazy artists” of the past. Just like Vincent van Gogh and Sylvia Plath, whose work has been connected to their mental health status, Forney explores how her condition possibly influenced her art. Through her struggle with identity, medication, and periods of mania and depression, Marbles depicts how Forney arrives at the conclusion that her art is not dependent on her “bipolar brain”: “I’d say my ‘creative thought process’ is there whether I’m manic or stable… It’s just how my brain works” (217).¹ The ways our brains work inform the way we see, understand, and narrate the world we live in, as well as ourselves and others. The next issue of FRAME will focus on the topic of “Writing the Mind”. We invite scholars of literature and related fields to consider the connections between mental health, writing, and literary studies. How does mental health shape our understandings of literary practices? How does literature shape our understandings of mental health in different contexts? How has this artistic discipline informed the imagery about the way the mind works? And what can literature and literary studies offer to this field of medicine? Themes and topics related to these questions might include (but are not limited to):
  • Literary (mis)representations of mental illness and the usage of stereotypes
  • Literature and mental health stigma
  • The history of gender and sexuality as mental illness
  • The relation between the mental and physical
  • (Life) writing as therapy
  • Disability studies perspectives on the mind
  • The role of literature in the training of medical professionals of the mind
  • Current approaches to mental health in the (medical) humanities
  • Intersections between mental health and other identity categories (e.g. gender, sexuality, race, nationality, religion, etc.)
The questions and concerns presented are only a few of the many themes that could be included in the upcoming issue. If you are interested in writing for FRAME, please submit a brief proposal of 250 words max. before May 21. The deadline for the submission of the full article is August 17. An article for the journal has a word limit of 5400 words, including bibliography and footnotes. For our Masterclass section, graduate students and Ph.D. students are invited to write up to a maximum of 3500 words. Please feel free to contact us at info@frameliteraryjournal.com, should you have any questions. More info can be found on our website: www.frameliteraryjournal.com. Check our submissions guidelines here. Please subscribe to our newsletter to stay updated with more news. ¹Forney, Ellen. Marbles: Mania, Depression, Michelangelo and Me. Gotham Books (2012).
* Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics (JCLA) Vol. 44, No. 4, Winter 2021 SPECIAL ISSUE – Telling Lives, Signifying Selves: Life Writing, Representation, and Identity Guest Editor: Mukul Chaturvedi Associate Professor of English, Zakir Husain Delhi College, University of Delhi, India CONCEPT NOTE Stories have an irresistible charm, and they continue to fascinate us. In fact, stories or narratives are the only way we understand ourselves and our world. If, as Seyla Benhabib (1996) says, “we are who we are, or the ‘I’ that we are, by means of a narrative”, then the narrative of a life or writing about one’s own life may be a crucial way in which the writer can inscribe or access subjectivity. Life writing fundamentally embodies a crises of representation as it struggles to represent a life by ordering it in a narrative form and foregrounds ways of being in the world. As a discourse on the self, life writing traverses’ various disciplinary terrains like history, literature, journalism, ethnography, and pushes the limits of writing the self. Extending the traditional generic boundaries of autobiography and biography, life writing encompasses a vast array of self-induced narrative forms that have spawned in recent years. Other than life writing texts like memoirs, diaries, and testimonies there is also an upsurge in graphic memoirs and digital storytelling that have brought a new dimension to practices of narrating the self. In the field of cinema, biopics have spawned in recent years and there is a keen interest in adapting real-life stories. Dismantling the notion of a coherent self and positing it as provisional and contingent, life writing acknowledges the complex nature of autobiographical acts and their performative nature in which ‘selves’ are constantly configured through experience, memory, location, identity, and ability. Also, life writing has emerged as a more inclusive genre which allows for collaborations, non-hierarchical connections to emerge as it gives voice to oral and marginalized subjectivities. Interestingly, one key aspect of life writing is how it circulates across languages, cultures, borders through translation and its various trajectories in transnational contexts. While translation of life writing texts as forms of testimonial acts or role of personal narratives in human rights (Gilmore 2017 Smith and Schaffer 2004) has been empowering as narrators find voice and reclaim agency, critics have cautioned towards the pitfalls and appropriation of these texts as they circulate beyond the locus of their origin. (Whitlock 2007) Addressing the epistemological, ethical, methodological and translational issues in life writing scholarship across varying narrative forms and media, this special issue of JCLA envisages itself as an interface between life writing researchers/academicians, life writing practitioners, life writing translators and calls upon the contributors to examine the sub-themes mentioned below. These themes are only suggestive and in no way restrictive. Contributors are welcome to go beyond them and offer creative and critical insights from a range of life writing forms.
  • Pushing the Boundaries: the limits of life writing
  • Autobiography and Truth Claims
  • Life writing and Memory
  • Life Writing as Testimony
  • Life in Translation: Challenges and Responsibilities
  • Life Writing and Gender
  • Ethics of Authorship: Collaborative life writing
  • Life writing and Censorship
  • Queer & Trans Lives
  • Disability life writing
  • Life on Celluloid: Biopics
  • Digital Storytelling
  • Graphic lives/memoirs
  • Autoethnography
Please submit abstracts of 300 words with a brief bio note. Last date for the submission of abstract: 15th May 2021 Intimation of selection of abstracts: 30th May 2021 Full Paper (5,000-6,000 words) submission: 15th September 2021 Please email your abstracts to jclaindia@gmail.com with a copy to drmukulchaturvedi0709@gmail.com
*
REMINDER–DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS MAY 15, 2021
Stories of Change, Stories for Change

The International Auto/Biography Association, Chapter of the Americas 5th Biennial Conference: October 1, 2021

VIRTUAL

Co-conveners: Laura Beard, Ricia Chansky, Eva Karpinski, and Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle

Abstracts are invited for the 2021 International Auto/Biography Association Chapter of the Americas 5th biennial conference, “Stories of Change, Stories for Change.” This virtual conference is hosted by the University of Alberta and co-sponsored by the University of Alberta Faculty of Arts’ Signature Area on Stories of Change. 

How do we use narrative to act for change on both personal and communal levels? As we navigate these early years of the twenty-first century what are some of the ways in which we parse through our lives by structuring them as stories? How have we historically crafted stories that enact/ed change? In what ways do our stories chronicle change or even act as change? And how does the circulation of our life stories enact change on local and global levels?  

The co-conveners invite lightning papers (5 minutes) on any aspects of the power of stories in our lives. We understand stories broadly, thinking of the larger stories of our cultures and the individual stories of our daily lives. What is your story of change? What is your story for change? 

Potential subjects include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • Storytelling in/as social activism and social justice

  • Storytelling and sharing as community building and acts of belonging 

  • Memory (and its fallibility) in stories of/for change, including collective memory, testimony, testimonio

  • Erasure and silencing in stories and storytelling as undermining erasure and silencing

  • Embodied stories of/for change

  • Stories of migration, diaspora, refugees, resettlement, and citizenship

  • Decolonizing lives through storytelling 

  • Bearing witness through storytelling

  • Telling stories of illness, mortality, disaster, and crisis

  • Storytelling in/through archives, genealogy, and genetics

  • Narrative facilitators — who collect, translate, edit, anthologize, curate and otherwise facilitate the circulation of stories of/for change

  • Stories as objects of collecting and objects that tell stories 

  • How are stories moving through modality, medium, and genre and for what purpose 

Please submit a 150 word abstract for a 5 minute paper and a brief biographical statement by May 15th, 2021. Abstracts must be submitted through the conference website: www.iabaa2021.ca. We expect to notify applicants by June 15, 2021. Inquiries are welcome at iabaa2021@gmail.com

We ask that abstracts be submitted in English or in English and a second language; however, we will assist with arranging translation for scholars who would like to present their papers in Spanish, Portuguese, or French. Please indicate in your abstract submission whether you will need assistance with translation of your paper.

The conference organizers gratefully acknowledge the support of the Kule Institute of Advanced Study, the Arts Resource Centre, the Department of Modern Languages & Cultural Studies at the University of Alberta, and a/b: Auto/Biography Studies.

At the University of Alberta, we acknowledge that we are located on Treaty 6 and Métis territory. These lands are and have been a traditional gathering place for many Indigenous peoples including the Cree, Blackfoot, Métis, Nakota Sioux, Iroquois, Dene, Ojibway/ Saulteaux/Anishinaabe, Inuit, and many others whose histories, languages, and cultures continue to influence our vibrant community.

Laura J. Beard
she/her/hers
Professor, Modern Languages & Cultural Studies, Faculty of Arts
Co-Lead, Arts Signature Area, Stories of Change
Associate Vice President (Research)
Office of the Vice President (Research and Innovation)
2-51 South Academic Building (SAB)
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta Canada T6G 2G7
780-492-5320
The University of Alberta is located in ᐊᒥᐢᑿᒌᐚᐢᑲᐦᐃᑲᐣ / Amiskwacîwâskahikan on Treaty 6 territory, the territory of the Papaschase, and the homeland of the Métis Nation. 
* Biographers International Organization (BIO) and the Leon Levy Center for Biography

announce the 11th BIO Conference, May 14-16, 2021

Highlights of the conference include the keynote address on Saturday afternoon by the BIO Award winner David Levering Lewis and, on Saturday morning, the James Atlas Plenary with David W. Blight and Annette Gordon-Reed in conversation about “Overlooked Lives.” Registration is $99 ($49 for members).   On both Saturday and Sunday you can participate in up to six of twelve panel discussions on subjects ranging from how to choose a subject and conduct interviews to obituary writing and organizing your narrative kaleidoscopically. Registration will provide links to watch pre-recorded plenary events at your convenience and to participate in real-time panels and roundtables with Zoom. At a later date, your registration ticket will provide access to recordings of all twelve panels.   Friday includes the presentation of BIO’s various awards and fellowships plus short readings from new work by BIO members. Sunday will include roundtable discussions and the presentation of the Plutarch Award for the best biography of 2020. 
For a complete conference schedule, go here: https://biographersinternational.org/conference/2021-bio-conference/

To register for the conference, go here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2021-bio-conference-tickets-139035164921    To join BIO, go here: https://biographersinternational.org/member/signup Dear colleagues, You are warmly invited to this exciting online event on Friday 7 May, 14.00 – 15.30 (CEST / GMT+2) that brings together two acclaimed women in conversation – Zimbabwean writer Petina Gappah and South African writer and critic Elleke Boehmer – discussing Literature and the Politics of the Past in Southern Africa. Award-winning author Petina Gappah recently published Out of Darkness, Shining Light (2019), a novel which writes back to the tradition of David Livingstone biographies by imagining the recollections of two of his bearers. Elleke Boehmer is not only a central postcolonial and life writing scholar, but also an acclaimed author in her own right, most recently of To the Volcano (2019). In this event, the authors will read from their recent works and discuss the role of literature in negotiations over the past in the Southern African region. Register for free here. You can also visit the event’s Facebook page here. The event is convened by the project Literatures of Change: Culture and Politics in Southern Africa funded by the Nordic research councils and organised by Astrid Rasch, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Amanda Hammar, University of Copenhagen; Minna Johanna Niemi, The Arctic University of Norway; Lena Englund, University of Eastern Finland; and Nicklas Hållén, Karlstad University. * Presentation April 28, 2021 Save the Date! Orient-Institut Istanbul Spring Lecture Series: Life Narratives and Gender: Voices of Women in the Near East and Eastern Mediterranean Leigh Gilmore (Ohio State University) Autobiographics: Gender, Life Narrative, and Self-Representation April 28, 2021. 9pm Turkish time (2pm EST) Please click here to view the full program: https://www.oiist.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/LIFE_NARRATIVES_BOOKLET_SPREAD.pdf To attend this virtual lecture series, prior registration is necessary. Please send an email specifying your name and academic affiliation to info@ mappinggenderneareast.org by April 27, 2021 (Tuesday) at the latest. Dr. Richard Wittmann Kommissarischer Direktor Orient-Institut Istanbul Susam Sokak 16-18, D. 8 TR-34433 Cihangir – Istanbul Türkei Tel: +90-212-293 6067 Fax: +90-212-249 6359 E-mail: wittmann@oiist.org wittmann@post.harvard.edu Editor – Memoria. Fontes Minores ad Historiam Imperii Ottomanici Pertinentes http://www.perspectivia.net/publikationen/memoria http://menadoc.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/menalib/nav/classification/2322084 Co-Editor – Life Narratives of the Ottoman Realm: Individual and Empire in the Near East (Routledge) https://www.routledge.com/Life-Narratives-of-the-Ottoman-Realm-Individual-and-Empire-in-the-Near-East/book-series/LNOR http://www.ferikoycemetery.org/ https://www.mappinggenderneareast.org/ * Deadline for Submissions, May 1, 2021

The Epistolary Research Network Second Conference (5/1/2021; 10/1-2/2021) Virtual

The Epistolary Research Network (TERN) is pleased to announce its second conference, to be held October 1-2, 2021. This virtual conference seeks papers from scholars everywhere who have an interest in letters and correspondence throughout history. For thousands of years, in every region of the globe, letters brought people together when physical distance separated them. From princes to prisoners, letters could offer reports across time and distance – greetings and farewells, news from distant friends, consolation in times of anxiety, triumph against rivals, submission to fate. TERN is holding a virtual meeting to explore this aspect of letters and letter-writing in the broadest possible sense, across a range of disciplines and times. Who wrote letters? To whom, and for what reason? What did they discuss? What light do they shed on the human condition, and how are they different from simple conversation? We seek papers to be read (approximate length, 20 minutes) and discussed at an online conference. We welcome proposals from anyone with an interest in letters and letter-writing, from graduate students to emeritus professors. Possible topics might include, but are not limited to: – immigrants and emigrants keeping in touch with family – the significance of correspondence in different historical periods – forms of composition and their evolution – email, Twitter, and Facebook in literary perspective – letters meant for publication vs. private missives Proposals (maximum 250 words) and a one-page c.v. should be sent to ternetwork@hotmail.com. Deadline is May 1, 2021. The conference language will be English. Publication of selected papers will be arranged following the conference. https://journals.tdl.org/jes/index.php/jes/announcement/view/4 And for the Journal of Epistolary Studies website https://journals.tdl.org/jes/index.php/jes/index * CALL FOR PAPERS International Workshop: Narrated Lives, Remembered Selves –Emerging Research in Life Writing Studies 13 and 14 May 2021, online via Zoom Conference Organizers: Verena Baier (Regensburg), Tamara Heger (Regensburg) Confirmed Keynote Speakers and Discussants: Prof. Dr. Mita Banerjee (Mainz), Prof. Dr. Sidonie Smith (Michigan), and Prof. Dr. Julia Watson (Ohio State) “If life writing was a “rumpled bed” in 2000, it is now a messy multi-sensorium, teeming with the potential—and the pitfalls—of vibrant self-presentations across media, geographies, and worlds.” (Smith/Watson, Life Writing in the Long Run (2017), xlvii) We invite early career scholars currently working on projects in the field of Life Writing Studies to meet and contribute to dialogues about the significance, potential and pitfalls of studying diverse forms of self-representation today. In the past decades, Life Writing as a concept has proven a fruitful expansion opening up new perspectives to identify acts, forms, and media of self-thematization that allows to analyze the well-known forms such as autobiography, letters, and diaries, but has also included emerging new arenas of self-presentation and autobiographical discourse, also on the non-textual level. Following Sidonie Smith and Julia Watson’s approach, Life Writing Studies challenge the ideas of a unified story and a coherent self. Rather, they acknowledge the complexities of autobiographical acts and subjectivities and their performative nature, in which “selves” are constantly produced and remade through memory, experience, identity, spatial location, embodiment and agency. Thus, the study of Life Writing can be as complex as its materials, which is why in this workshop we want to discuss a number of ongoing international research projects in the field. As we want to explore new trends and tendencies in Life Writing Studies and engage in open-minded discussions, we deliberately do not choose a thematic focus for this workshop, but will let emerging projects in the field of Life Writing determine the scale of our workshop. Thus, we invite contributions from all areas and disciplines of Life Writing Studies. We are especially addressing early career scholars, i.e. PhD students and postdocs working on pertinent projects with life writing materials. We are inviting proposals for short presentations of ten minutes that sketch the main research interests and the core materials, and also address problems and questions that propel and guide a stimulating and fruitful discussion of around twenty minutes. Please send an abstract of 300 words and a short CV (no more than one page) to both Verena Baier (verena.baier@ur.de) and Tamara Heger (tamara.heger@ur.de), by Monday, 16 April 2021. * Dear All, you may remember that I contacted you last year about a biofiction conference in Leuven. The conference has been postponed to Sept 2021. While the organisers are planning for an actual physical conference in Leuven, they do realise that some scholars may be unable to travel and there will be “alternatives for participating online” if that is the case. So here we go: Call for papers As part of the conference Biofiction as World Literature Conference (Leuven, Belgium 15-18 September, 2021), I will convene a panel on “Gendering Biofiction as World Literature”, for which I am seeking contributions. Biofiction is a genre that focuses on individual historical figures but often projects and negotiates larger social or political issues through the individual life. This panel, in keeping with the conference theme, proposes to examine the capacity of biofiction to reflect and, perhaps, to shift perceptions of gender. It asks how particular biofictions can be related to large-scale movements and systems of thought, such as second or third-wave feminism, intersectionality, gender performativity, or more traditional conceptions of gender that operate(d) across national boundaries. Transnational or transcultural biofictions (where the author takes on a subject from another culture or where the subject’s life crossed national boundaries or is thought to have transnational significance) will be of particular interest in this context. Papers will be 20 minutes long. The full call for papers for the conference can be found at https://www.arts.kuleuven.be/biofiction-as-world-literature/call-for-papers Please send an abstract of 250-300 words for a 20 minute paper, and a brief bio note (150w) to Julia.Novak@univie.ac.at, by 18 April 2021. With kind regards, Julia Lajta-Novak — Dr. Julia Lajta-Novak Department of English and American Studies University of Vienna Campus Altes AKH Hof 8.3, Spitalgasse 2 1090 Vienna, Austria +43(0)699 81761689 www.julianovak.at * Life Writing as Political Voice deadline for submissions:  April 22, 2021 Nov. 11-14, 2021 PAMLA, Las Vegas USA City dwellers have a unique opportunity to see and engage in group political activities that those in more rural areas do not. Their everyday lives can be impacted by political demonstrations whether they are actively participating or not. The perspectives that we usually get are from the government, press, or political leaders. These accounts miss how people actually experience and understand the protests they see and/or participate in. As such, examining the life writing of those who participated or observed city protests can be intriguing and add a personal element to group politics. This panel will focus on the experiences of those who planned, participated, and/or observed protests in various cities. Ideas to be examined include personal vs. public perception, the individual vs. government, and political activities as community building among others. For example, reading the personal accounts of British suffragists during the Black Friday protest highlights the very real danger the women encountered and the gendered opposition they faced through both physical and sexual assault. Entries can be historical or contemporary and involve any large metropolitan area. While memoirs could be useful in this discussion, pieces can come from online publications, articles as well as diaries and less public life writing. contact email: sarah.n.macdonald@gmail.com * Open positions at EuroStorie: 3 PhD students and 3 post-docs Deadline 4/23/2021 Dear all, We are happy to open 3 PhD student positions and 3 post-doctoral positions at the Centre of Excellence in Law, Identity and the European Narratives (www.EuroStorie.org). We are considering applicants from a range of backgrounds (but not limited to): legal history, history, Roman law, politics, philosophy, political science, political theory, political history, intellectual history, law, theology, anthropology, sociology, and human geography. The positions are both at the Faculty of Social Sciences and the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki. The deadline for all is April 23rd. For details and how to apply, please see the open calls: https://www2.helsinki.fi/en/researchgroups/law-identity-and-the-european-narratives/open-positions Please feel free to forward this message to anyone you think might be interested! Best wishes, Heta Björklund — Heta Björklund Projektikoordinaattori / Project coordinator heta.bjorklund@helsinki.fi +358504482563 Eurooppalaisen oikeuden, identiteetin ja historian tutkimuksen huippuyksikkö / The Centre of Excellence in Law, Identity and the European Narratives (www.eurostorie.org) Law, Governance and Space: Questioning the Foundations of the Republican Tradition (www.spacelaw.fi) Siltavuorenpenger 1 A, huone / room 323 PL / P.O. Box 9, 00014 Helsingin yliopisto / University of Helsinki *

Autobiography Panel, 118th Annual PAMLA Conference (4/15/2021; 11/11-14/2021)

118th Annual Pacific Ancient and Modern Languages Association Conference

Thursday, November 11, 2021 to Sunday, November 14, 2021

Virtual and In-Person Panels, Sahara Las Vegas Hotel

Hosted by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas

PAMLA’s Autobiography panel is currently accepting submissions!

We are open to a wide range of paper topics dealing with subjectivity, authorship, auto-fiction, and identity, but are particularly interested in papers that take new interdisciplinary approaches to Autobiography. As such, papers that draw on cognitive science, psychology, phenomenology, critical race theory, gender theory, or intersectionality in their analyses of Autobiography are particularly welcome. Possible topics could include, but are not limited to: collective autobiography; techniques of self-narration; self-fashioning; neuroaesthetics; intersectional subjectivity; philosophy of race. We are also interested in papers attuned to some facet of the conference theme, “City of God, City of Destruction.”

Deadline for submissions: April 15, 2021

Submit an abstract directly through the Autobiography panel submission page, or search the PAMLA comprehensive Call for Papers. Contact Emily Travis (etravis@ucsc.edu) with any questions.

About PAMLA and this year’s theme:

The Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association is a scholarly association designed for those teaching or conducting research in a diverse range of literary, linguistic, and cultural interests, both ancient and modern, in the United States and abroad. PAMLA members include faculty and students in language and literature departments in colleges and universities, as well as interdisciplinary scholars from other disciplines and independent scholars.

This year’s theme, “City of God, City of Destruction,” seeks to take the “form analysis” of Las Vegas in a religious direction, considering this shimmering city in the desert as both celestial emblem and den of sin. More broadly, the 2021 PAMLA conference, while welcoming paper proposals on a wide variety of topics, invites meditation on the connections between ideas of the city and the forms of fiction, and the way both may be informed by a religious poetics.

*
Jan Schroeder / Carleton University

Ordinary Oralities: Everyday Voices in History

Edited by Josephine Hoegaerts and Jan Schroeder

Histories of voice are often written as accounts of greatness: great statesmen, notable rebels, grands discours, and famous exceptional speakers and singers populate our shelves. This focus on the great and exceptional has not only led to disproportionate attention to a small subset of historical actors (powerful, white, western men and the occasional token woman), but also obscures the broad range of vocal practices that have informed, co-created and given meaning to human lives and interactions in the past. For most historical actors, life did not consist of grand public speeches, but of private conversations, intimate whispers, hot gossip or interminable quarrels. It also did not exclusively take place in the chambers of political power, or splashed across the columns of national newspapers. Most voices in history, as Arlette Farge notes in Essay pour une histoire des voix,[1] left their traces only unwillingly, or not at all. The longstanding project of “recovering” the voices of the silenced or marginalized has tended to privilege voice as a metaphor for (stolen) human agency, at the expense of a thorough understanding of the practical materialities of ordinary uses of the voice. In order to meaningfully include voices and vocal practices in our understanding of history, we suggest an extended practice of eavesdropping instead. Rather than listening out for exceptional voices, this volume calls for contributions that listen in on the more mundane aspects of vocality, including speech and song, but also less formalized shouts, hisses, noises and silences. Moving away from a narrative that centers the public voice, and its use as a political tool and metaphor, we aim to edge towards a history of voice as a history of encounter. Insisting on the intersubjective nature of voice, and its often uncanny ability to ‘travel’ across different personal, social and cultural divides, we aim toward an expansive history of everyday vocality, accounting for the multiplicity and materiality of historical voices. Along with Ana María Ochoa Gautier, we call for an “acoustically tuned exploration” of the archives,[2] on the understanding that ordinary voices in history are not neatly proffered up by single documents, but are often fleeting and muted, and dispersed across textual sites with different stated purposes. The volume therefore also aims toward geographical and chronological breadth, from any region of the globe, from roughly the seventeenth to the twentieth century. Contributors to this volume seek out spaces and moments that have been documented idiosyncratically or with difficulty, and where the voice and its sounds can be of particular salience. Although the voice, as Jonathan Rée has pointed out, can never be stored and preserved as it is,[3] it does leave traces – and stubbornly following those can lead us away from the conventional grain of the archives[4] and their (institutionalized) logic. Including methods and documents that defy the disciplinary constraints of the modern archives and its historiography[5] will also, we hope, help to make space for an exploration of the mundane encounters that took place throughout history across boundaries that historiography has both uncovered and amplified. Listening in on talks, shouts, and whispers between mistress and servant, adult and child, human and more-than-human, between speakers of different languages and inhabitants of different worlds – or hearing some voices failing to be heard by others  – the volume centers concrete practices of speech and sound. Rather than exploring what exceptional or symbolic voices have accomplished in the public sphere or for the historical record, our attention is geared towards vocal materiality: the sounding qualities of concrete human voices, as they were projected by concrete, tangible bodies in both public and private spaces: the home, the street, the schoolroom, the market, the prison, the chapel, the workplace. That also implies an interest in the visible and material characteristic of those bodies, and their changing cultural meaning over time: voices were produced not only in particular places and for particular ‘period ears’, but also at the intersection of culturally fluid corporeal practices of gender, age, ability, race and class. A focus on ‘who’ speaks has, in work historicizing ‘great speeches’ in the context of biography often served to obscure those characteristics, insisting on universalistic notions of authority instead. This volume, too, argues for a heightened attention to who speaks, and whose voices resound in history, but refuses to take the modern equation between speech and presence/representation for granted. Proposals for chapters are welcome by early career scholars and established researchers alike. We invite abstracts of approximately 500 words, with final submissions of approximately 6000 words. Please send abstracts by April 15 to the editors.  De Gruyter has expressed interest in publishing this collection in both paper and e-book formats. [1] A. Farge, Essay pour une histoire des voix, 2009. [2] A.M. Ochoa Gautier, Aurality, 2014, p. 3. [3] J. Rée, I See a Voice, 1999. [4] A.L. Stoler, Along the Archival Grain, 2008. [5] C. Steedman, Dust, 2002. Proposal Deadline: 15 April 2021 Deadline for completed chapters: 15 October 2021
* Deadline for Submissions April 15, 2021 Announcement: Call-for-Papers This call is for abstracts for a scholarly, international edited collection entitled, Writing Australian History on Screen: cultural, sociological, and historical depths in television and film period dramas “down under”. Due to effects of the covid-19 pandemic 2020-21, and the strain this has placed on people and businesses (including academics and universities world-wide), the deadline for abstracts for this project has been extended. New deadline for abstract submissions: 15 April 2021. It could be said that Australia’s unique history has shaped the diversity of its peoples, and the Australian life-styles of today. Australia is both a very ancient and a very young nation. The diverse Australian Indigenous peoples were and still are the First Australians, and the true owners of the land. Despite the British Empire’s 1770 claim on the land as one of its colonies, and white Australia’s announcement of Australia as a nation with the birth of Federation in 1901, “Australia” was in fact a nation long before that; and so long before the British deportation of convicts to Australia and the subsequent arrival of the Anglo-Celtic-European settlers; and the supposed much earlier arrival of Chinese traders; and the much later arrival of the many different nationalities during the Gold Rushes. In more modern times, there is also the extensive immigration from many different nationalities and cultures, and Australia’s intakes of refugees. All these peoples, whether born in Australia or naturalized, are Australians though some hold dual citizenship. The Australian nation’s history is closely tied to the national and cultural identity. In many countries, but perhaps more so in Australia, there is no single or fixed national identity. In actuality, an  Australian national identity does not exist rather there is a process of something that is unfurling or “becoming” some semblance of a sort of truth; there is no one history rather many diverse histories that overlay or color each the other; there is no one heritage or culture rather divers heritages and cultures; there is no one religion rather many; all of which sit together, side-by-side, and despite the common myths, not always so well or easily. Numerous writers note that in the Australian society there is a “visible” fracture, and also a disconnectedness between what many Australians have imagined themselves to be a part of in the past. The Australian histories, what came before and what has happened since, and how this has been incorporated or interpreted, together with the Australian environment and the geography of the land, and with Australia’s unique type of multiculturalism, has helped to shape what is variously described as the Australian character, and the society. Australian television and film period dramas are involved in conversations about who the Australian peoples were, and who they are now in the current time. These types of productions work, or rework, the numerous factors involved in “telling” the Australian story, and in so doing explicitly and implicitly bring to light the many various issues that are as relevant to the Australian society today as they were in the period portrayed on screen. In exploring the deeper issues, these sorts of filmic dramas capture and convey something of the atmosphere/s of a particular time. Admittedly, these same issues may have been viewed differently and drawn different responses in the past to what happens now. Of course, with period dramas, the angle from which the issues are approached, the way in which past times are depicted, and the questions that arise from these discussions,  also depend to some degree or another, on the writer/s and the producer/s own points-of-view and particular agendas and artistic skills, as well as the message/s intended for, or inadvertently conveyed to, the viewer. It can be said that Australian television and film  period dramas raise big questions for the Australian society of today to ponder. Staying specifically with those produced in Australia, examples of these types of period dramas are: the hugely popular television series, The Sullivans (aired 1976-1983); Against the Wind (released in 1978); Redfern Now (aired 2012-2013); A Place to Call Home (premiered in 2013); and the much-loved films, The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith (first screened in 1978); Rabbit Proof Fence (released in 2002); The Dressmaker (released in 2015); Ladies in Black (premiered in 2018). Some suggestions for potential contributors and questions that could be addressed may include but are not limited to:
  • What are some of the cultural and/or social aspects and issues raised in a particular Australian television/ or film period drama?
  • What are, and how do these types of productions convey, the differences or sameness between the fictionalized portrayals and the realities of the times, and social dictates of the Australian culture then in relation to those of today?
  • In Australian television and filmic period dramas, how might class, ethnicity, culture, race, gender, and history, shape these representations for the viewers?
  • Are there cultural or historical antecedents for consideration of portrayals of the Australian outlook in small and-or large screen period dramas?
  • How are the Australian viewpoints expressed in any one or two or more Australian period screen dramas conveyed to the viewer, and what might be the producers motivations in each case?
  • What makes Australian period drama TV/films distinct from (maybe even bolder than), say, their British counterparts? What happens when British dramas present Australia on film (for example, “Banished” (first released 2015) )?Is Australian history sometimes just a different backdrop or central to interrogating specific issues/themes?
  • How do these Australian dramas restore marginalized histories and voices?
  • Chapters about late 20th-c dramas as well as recently popular ones are encouraged, and could include APTCH, Miss Fisher’s Murder Mysteries, Ms. Fisher’s Modern Murder Mysteries, Love Child, The Doctor Blake Mysteries, Australia, My Brilliant Career, Gallipoli, Anzac Girls, Emma’s War, and more.
Submission instructions: At this initial stage, in lieu of “chapters,” this proposed work, Writing Australian History on Screen, calls for extended abstracts for consideration for inclusion in the book.
  • The extended abstracts must be more than 1,000 and less than 1,500 words.
(Full-length chapters of 6,000 – 7,000words each (including notes but excluding references lists, title of work, and key words) will be solicited from these abstracts.)
  • Please keep in mind that your essay-chapter will be written from your extended abstract. Your abstract will carry the same title as your essay-chapter.
  • To be considered, an abstract must be written in English, and submitted as a Word document.
  • When writing your abstract use Times New Roman point 12,and 1.15 spacing.
  • At the beginning of your extended abstract, immediately after the title of your work and your name, add 5 to 8 keywords that best relate to your work.
  • Use the Chicago Manual of Style 16th Edition.
  • Since this work is intended for Lexington Books, USA, please use American (US) spelling not English (UK) spelling, and not Australian English spelling;
  • Use the Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary;
  • Use endnotes and not footnotes, use counting numbers not Roman numerals, and keep the endnotes to a bare minimum, working the information into the text where possible;
  • Do cite all your work in your extended abstract as you would in a full chapter.
  1. a) in the body of the abstract, add parenthetical in-text citations (family name of author and year, and page number/s) (e.g. Smith 2019, 230); b) fully reference all in-text citations in alphabetical order, in the References list at the end of your abstract;
  • Please send your abstract as a Word document attached to an email;
  • To this same email please also attach, as separate Word documents, the following:
  • Your covering letter, giving your academic title/s, affiliation, your position, and your home and telephone, your home address, and your email contact details;
  • A short bio of no more than 200 words;
  • Your C.V., giving your publications to date, and the publishing details and dates.
Editors: Professor Julie Anne Taddeo, Research Professor of History, University of Maryland, USA, and Dr Jo Parnell, Conjoint Research Fellow, School of Humanities and Social Science, College of Human and Social Experience, University of Newcastle, Australia. Papers should be forwarded to both editors: Julie Anne Taddeo taddeo@umd.com Jo Parnell Jo.Parnell@newcastle.edu.au  alternatively annette.parnell@newcastle.edu.au  or joandbobparnell@bigpond.com

*

“Digital Expressions of the Self” (Special Issue of Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies)

Deadline for abstracts: 16 April 2021 / Expected date of publication: June 2022 Guest editors: Avishek Ray (National Institute of Technology Silchar), Gabriel Dattatreyan (Goldsmiths), Usha Raman (University of Hyderabad), Martin Webb (Goldsmiths) This issue of “Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies“ engages with the digital forms of expressions of the self. We invite papers that explore the ways in which, for instance, digital techniques now allow the construction of selves that often rely more onalgorithms than any ‘original’ referent. Consider, for example, how algorithms simulate images, voices etc. and have become the basis for facial recognition, biometrics and similar datafication concerning the self. This shift is indicative of what we might term posthuman condition. Along these lines, we areinterested in papers that engage with how expressions enhanced by algorithms produce multiple, fractured selves. Following Deleuze, we invite papers that engage with how the in-dividual has become ‘dividual’ in societies of post-control vis-a-vis the introduction of digital technologies. Finally we are interested in how people experiment with creative expressions of the self. Constructing the self in the digital sphere may involve processes of experimentation that in turn allow one to experience the self in multiple ways. This is mediated of course by the apparatus of the digital-codes and algorithms. Digital self-expression occurs both consciously and explicitly, and subconsciously and indirectly. Taking this as a point of departure, this special issue examines the broad range of digital expressions of the self. The issue will pivot around, but not be limited to, these concerns:  What, in the digital context, defines the self and its boundaries? How is the self articulated in digital culture and cultures of everyday life especially in relation to Web 2.0? When articulated digitally, where do we locate its forms and ontology?  How is the digital expression of the self different from its analogue counterpart? What affordances of the digital, if at all, reconfigure the self? Consider, certain digital expressions can be evidential (eg: the selfie), viral, emotive or even tactile. How do the materialities of the specific platforms (eg: Instagram, MySpace.com, TikTok videos, Soundcloud, Tinder etc.) then impact the digital self or its expression?  These platforms have become not only media of self-expression but also experimentation. How do users, especially youngsters, leverage these platforms to experiment with their gender, bodies, sexualities and identities, creating self-representations that often challenge normativity?  How (im)proximate, in terms of referentiality, is the digital self to the so-called ‘real’ self? What does the digital expression entail epistemologically? How does it speak to the question of referentiality? In other words, to what extent, if at all, can these expressions be perceived as simulacrum? What is the nature of the human-algorithm interaction involved here?  How does the notion of the (in)dividual play out while articulating one’s self in the context of digitality, when the (post)human can be prosthetically ‘engineered’, Artificial Intelligence can govern societies, and robots can acquire personhood (or even citizenship)? Please send a 300-word abstract and a 100-word bio-note to the guest editors: avishekray@hum.nits.ac.in, g.dattatreyan@gold.ac.uk, usharaman@uohyd.ac.in, m.webb@gold.ac.uk by 16 April 2021. Decisions on acceptance will be communicated by 30 April 2021. Full papers will be due by 30 July 2021.
Contact Info:
Dr. Avishek Ray Assiatant Professor Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Submissions, April 3, 2021 Announcement: Call-for-Papers This call is for abstracts for a scholarly, international edited collection entitled, Cultural Representations of the Second Wife: Literature, Stage, and Screen. Currently I am seeking a number of academics and professionals in the field who might like to send me an abstract for consideration for inclusion in the book. Deadline for abstracts: 3 April 2021. In any culture, religious and cultural beliefs are inseparable, and intrinsic one to the other, and are important to the marriage  customs and laws. Regardless of whether a culture is mainly monogamous or polygamous, one female figure that attracts attention is the second wife. A woman may become the “second wife” either by fact or by custom, or by religious law, or by de facto relationship, or by concubinage. In most though not necessarily all cultures, and according to the religious and cultural beliefs and laws of a culture, as well as the civil laws of that country, a man who has been but is no longer married may remarry; and in some cultures also, a man who is currently married may marry or take a second wife who may or may not have been formerly married to some different man. In some other cultures, cultural customs, or religious dictates, or accepted practices, or inheritance factors, forbid men who are divorcees or widowers to remarry. Similarly, and perhaps more so than with men, some cultures forbid widows or divorced or abandoned women from remarrying. It is generally understood that whether she is welcomed by her new in-law family, or not, the first wife as a new wife, brings with her some baggage into the new relationship, into the life of the man she weds, and hence into the family into which she marries, and ultimately into that society; but perhaps this is more so in the case of the second wife.  From antiquity to the present, like the first wife, the second wife features in stories, anecdotes, and jokes, and in both high and low culture, but in a way that is vastly different to how the first wife is depicted. The concept of the second wife is an important part of social and cultural history and ritual in most societies, world-wide, yet it would seem that to date, there are no published scholarly edited collections, no academic books, on representations of the second wife from the angle suggested in this cfp. In can be said that in any culture, the role of the second wife may differ to that of a first wife. The act of becoming and the experience of being a second wife may also be somewhat different to that of being a man’s first wife. Questions arise: within any culture, regardless of her status as a woman, what are the implications for a woman who marries a widower or divorced man? Likewise, what are the implications for a second wife in a polygamous relationship? This scholarly edited collection will reveal how the personal expectations and actual experiences of the second wife may differ from the social and cultural expectations and realities of the role of the second wife; and how the second wife may be perceived in the popular and social culture of various cultures, in screen, stage, and literary productions and pop culture narratives. Some suggestions for potential contributors to consider, and that could be addressed, may include but are not limited to are:
  • What are the cultural and social duties of the second wife; what are the cultural expectations of her; and what are her personal realities and expectations, as represented in the popular culture of a particular culture/society? Is it possible to detect differences or sameness between the fictionalized portrayals and the realities and social dictates of that culture?
  • What are the distinctions between how the second wife has been typically represented in jokes and anecdotes, to that in popular and social culture as literature, film, drama, and television?
  • How do class, ethnicity, culture, race, gender, and possibly history, shape representations of the second wife?
  • Are there any powerful cultural or socially historical antecedents for the representation of the second wife in popular/social culture, as screen, stage, and literary productions?
  • What are the creators and/or the producers intentions behindtheir portrayals of the second wife; what are the messages or lessons they intend for their audiences through these depictions?
  • How would we establish the underlying cultural, historical, or production motivations for particular depictions of the second wife?
  • How often, if at all, are these representations told from the point-of-view of the second wife herself?
  • What is the range of ways in which the second wifeis represented in the popular/social culture of the various societies?
  • Is it possible to identify contemporary writers of popular culture in literature, film, and drama, who center their work on representations of the second wife? Do any of these writers illuminate individual representations of the second wife figure in a new and innovative way?
  • Is there a difference between the ways in which the second wife is represented in cinematic film to that in small screen, and between those mediums to representations in drama, and to literature? Or in these representations, is there a reasonably broad consensus between these genres?
This collection of scholarly essays will make an intervention in the field: it will be the first of its kind to make a comprehensive study of what being a second wife means to and for the woman, the family, the community, the culture, and the society to which she belongs; to explore whether or not there are characteristic features of the second wife between cultures that may have either some similarity, or that are totally dissimilar, in popular belief and popular culture; to document and record how various eastern and western societies perceive and represent the socially and culturally important figure of the second wife in screen, stage, and literary works and pop culture narratives; to indicate if there is agreement or difference between the various cultures on how the figure of the second wife is represented in popular culture to the viewing/reading audiences; to establish a new and dynamic area of theoretical research crossing family studies, women’s studies, cultural studies, social history, gender studies, social studies, and the humanities in general; to point the way to possible future cross-disciplinary work through examining various peoples and societies by way of cultural representations of the second wife; and to permit scholarly consideration of the extent to which the creators and producers of narratives about the second wife place this figure on the perimeter of society or at its center. Full-length chapters of 6,000 – 7,000words each (including notes but excluding references lists, title of work, and key words) will be solicited from these abstracts. The extended abstracts must be more than 1,000 and less than 1,500 words.
  • Please keep in mind that your essay-chapter will be written from your extended abstract. Your abstract will carry the same title as your essay-chapter.
  • To be considered, an abstract must be written in English, and submitted as a Word document.
  • When writing your abstract use Times New Roman point 12,and 1.15 spacing.
  • At the beginning of your extended abstract, immediately after the title of your work and your name, add 5 to 8 keywords that best relate to your work.
  • Use the Chicago Manual of Style 16th Edition.
  • Since this work is intended for Lexington Books, USA, please use American (US) spelling not English (UK) spelling, and not Australian English spelling;
  • Use the Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary;
  • Use endnotes and not footnotes, use counting numbers not Roman numerals, and keep the endnotes to a bare minimum, working the information into the text where possible;
  • Do cite all your work in your extended abstract as you would in a full chapter:Submission instructions: At this initial stage, in lieu of “chapters,” this proposed work, Cultural Representations of the Second Wife, calls for extended abstracts for consideration for inclusion in the book.
  1. a) in the body of the abstract, add parenthetical in-text citations (family name of author and year, and page number/s) (e.g. Smith 2019, 230); b) fully reference all in-text citations in detail and in alphabetical order, in the References list at the end of your abstract;
Please send your abstract as a Word document attached to an email;
  • To this same email please also attach, as separate Word documents, the following:
  • Your covering letter, giving your academic title/s, affiliation, your position, and your home and telephone numbers, your home address, and your email contact details;
  • A short bio of no more than 250 words;
  • Your C.V., including a full list of your publications and giving the publishing details and dates, and including those in press, and published.
Editor: Dr Jo Parnell, Conjoint Research Fellow, School of Humanities and Social Science, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Newcastle, Australia. Papers should be forwarded to: Jo Parnell at: Jo.Parnell@newcastle.edu.au  or annette.parnell@newcastle.edu.au or joandbobparnell@bigpond.com Deadline for Submissions, March 31, 2021
*Diversifying Persona Studies: Online International Conference and Special Issue*
-What is persona studies? What should persona studies be?
-How can the field be as inclusive and diverse as possible?
-What are possible futures for persona studies research and scholarship?
In 2021 we wish to ask hard questions about the assumptions and the scope of study that have hitherto grounded the field. We see this as a crucial opportunity to destabilise and to interrogate what we do and why we do it, to make space for new voices and areas of study, and to actively facilitate inclusive scholarship.

*Participation in the online conference is in two parts.
Accepted presenters pre-record a 10 minute research presentation and submit with an extended abstract of 800-1000 words. These will be collated into themed playlists, equivalent to a conference session. These playlists, extended abstracts and author bios will be circulated in a program to registered presenters and other participants for viewing throughout July and August.
Presenters will then be invited to participate in a webinar with others from their playlist or theme. The webinar will be broadcast live and be equivalent to a panel and Q&A discussion. Those watching the livestream will be able to ask questions, through the webinar chair, both before and during the panel. The webinars will be crucial opportunities to discuss, develop, and grow our work.
All presentation proposals can also be considered for inclusion in the special double issue of Persona Studies. This issue will be, as always, online and open-access, with no APCs.
All topics relate to Persona Studies will be considered but we particularly encourage and welcome submissions that address:

-understudied theories of persona
-challenging persona studies
-queering personas
-activism and persona
-indigeneity and persona
-race and persona
-disability and persona
-age and persona
-gender and persona
-exceptional personas
-contested personas
-personas and the banal
-persona and migration/diaspora
-other considerations of difference, diversity, and justice with a persona studies framework

*Call for Papers:*
Abstracts: In the first instance, submit a 300-500 word abstract outlining the proposed presentation and its connection to the theme of diversifying persona studies. Please include title, brief author biography, and indicate whether you’d like to be considered for the 2021 special issue.
Send abstracts to personastudies@gmail.com with the subject heading “Diversifying Persona Studies” by 31 March 2021.

Special Issue: Building on the pre-recorded presentations and the webinar discussions, Persona Studies will be issuing a special issue on the theme of Diversifying Persona Studies in late 2021. Invitations to submit full length (6000 words) papers will be based on abstracts submitted to conference. Full papers will be due 16 August 2021.

Key dates:
-Abstracts due: 31 March 2021
-Notification of acceptance to present, invitation to submit full paper; Registration opens: 15 April 2021
-Pre-recorded presentation and extended abstract due: 14 June 2021
-Registration closes: 5 July 2021
-Curated playlists and programs released: 5 July 2021
-Discussions with authors, livestreamed and recorded (dates indicative only): 16 July 2021, 23 July 2021, 30 July 2021, 6 August 2021
-Full papers due for peer review: 16 August 2021
-Special issue released: October 2021
Costs: This conference and webinar series is being run on a volunteer basis. We are asking a nominal registration fee for participants of AU$50 to offset the costs of administrative support. Contingent, unwaged, and student presenters can apply to have this cost waived upon notification of acceptance. Your capacity to pay will not impact your ability to participate. * Deadline for Submissions, March 22, 2021 CFP: Roundtable on Race, Religion, and Archives (3/22/2021; 1/6-9/2022) Modern Language Association: Washington, D.C. We invite topics that explore the relationships between race, religion, and archives for an approved session of the Religion and Literature Forum of the MLA. We welcome interdisciplinary work at the intersections of critical race theory, religious studies, cultural geography, health humanities, women and gender studies, and more. Proposals could include but are not limited to the following broad themes: Archival theory and praxis Politics of recovery Digital projects Reparative histories Problems of genre New archival research Potential and limitations of archives Decolonization Silences and resistance Memory Orality Presentations are expected to be brief. The exact time limit depends on the final number of panelists. The goal is to have plenty of time for robust discussion. Please send 250 abstract and cv to kdb13@psu.edu by March 22. * Deadline for Submissions, March 25, 2021 Autobiography: excess, self-expenditure   19th International Meeting of the Scientific Observatory of Autobiographical Memory in Written, Oral and Iconographic Form 30 June 2021, 1-2 July Academia Belgica, Via Omero 8 00196 Roma Deadline for Submissions: March 25, 2021 organised by the cultural association Mediapolis.Europa http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ in collaboration with Mnemosyne, Magazine scintifique – Presses universitaires de Louvain https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/Mnemosyne and l’Academia Belgica Via Omero 8- 00196 Roma http://www.academiabelgica.it/ Preamble: In the current global situation due to Covid-19, the themes of excess, moderation, exaggeration, of ‘too much’, seem to be taking a particularly important place as we are forced to change our lifestyle. The limits imposed upon us may appear extreme to us, and yet even the old customs to which we compulsively adhered can be seen in a different light. Proposals on this topic will be read with much interest. The excess “Although an entire intellectual tradition sees the flight of the soul out of its material bonds to be a positive good, another learned tradition that also goes back to ancient sources appeals to a different sense of the word ‘excess’ to designate that which goes beyond the correct proportions in the material order itself.” (Starobinski J. 2008, p. 75). Breaking boundaries and excess constitute the prime movers of different narrations in the first person. How are these behaviours delineated in self-narration? In what way do they construct a person’s identity? With which arguments and in which relationship with the idea of Power? With this call for papers we intend to invite proposals that consider self-expenditure and excess in autobiographical writings. That is, autobiographies by both ordinary people and recognised individuals, which are not supported, legitimated, by ideological plaudit, be it political, religious, etc. Every culture sets ethical boundaries with which every individual confronts oneself. Crossing  boundaries is allowed in certain liberating situations such as bacchanals or carnivals, but these are circumscribed in terms of time and space. The unlimited and the infinite correspond to conceptions with different nuances: it is possible to go beyond recognised forms or to act in an infinite motus while denying the existence of boundaries. Current parlance translates the idea of boundary using a vocabulary borrowed from geometry: measure, the right way, to be square, to be conclusive (that is, to remain within a circumscribed topic or area of action), etc. In medio stat virtus situates virtue in space. It is a locution of medieval scholastic philosophy that appropriated Aristotle’s conception. Nicomachean Ethics, a posthumous publication by Aristotle (who lived from 384 or 383 to 322 BC), places at the centre of its reasoning endoxa, the common opinions of both ordinary and learned people. These endoxa are the boundaries that derive from society’s orientation. Aristotle does not necessarily share current opinions but appropriates them as the basis of social bonding. They appear as a behavioural diktat and have a pragmatic value. In Book II of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle writes that virtue develops pragmatically: one learns how to build by building, how to play cithara by playing it, etc. How is ethics conceived of? “this is concerned with emotions and actions, in which one can have excess or deficiency or a due mean. […] Virtue, therefore is a mean state in the sense that it is able to hit the mean. […] so this is another reason why excess and deficiency are a mark of vice, and observance of the mean a mark of virtue (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, II, 6). Different autobiographies embody a willingness to go beyond the recognised and shared boundaries. It is possible to establish a certain distinction between the behaviour whereby a boundary is recognised and overcome, and the practice of excess as complete rejection of the boundary, such as a way of acting ad infinitum. As Jean Starobinski reminds us (Starobinski J., 2008, p. 76), the term ‘excess’ in the Bible refers to the exit of life, excessus vitae. An excess that does not recognise boundaries is a serious threat to the social system. “The myth of Dom Juan came about at a moment in European history when the subject of the inconstancy of the human heart and the related subject of its various drives—feeling, knowing, dominating (libido sentienti, libido sciendi, libido dominandi)—were intensely debated by the moralists of the day” (Ibidem). The two great myths of modernity, Faust and Don Giovanni, are condemned due to two excesses: libido sciendi and libido sentiendi. Already the Middle Ages deplored sapiens mundi. Ulysses in Dante’s Inferno is an example of this. In fact, excess practised ad libitum aims at laying claim to an eternalisation of one’s own behaviour, a transcendentality, replacing another power. The exhibition held at the Musée d’Orsay, Paris, on the occasion of the 200 th anniversary of de Sade’s death (2014), which was organised on the basis of de Sade’s various epistolary evidence, was entitled Attaquer le soleil: that is, aspiring to deprive the universe of the vital star, using it to burn the universe itself. (Le Brun A., 2014, p. 19). Many autobiographical narrations in Romanticism (relating to dandyism, satanism, alcoholism, and others) would make excess the centre of their own existential narration. In “Être comme excès”, Rocco Ronchi writes: “what opens to me the immensity in which I lose myself is the being as excess, a being deprived of material reality, throbbing, rhythmical – a being which has in itself an integral transcendence, a being that is uncontainable in the shape of identity and exceeds the space that reveals apophantic judgement. This being is not immobile, its manner of being – its essence in the verbal sense – rightly resides in the fact of transcending, of rotating outside of itself (I am borrowing this sentence from Marc Bloch), of getting lost and challenging oneself” (Ronchi R., 2000, p. 8). The term ‘self-expenditure,’ therefore, has a particular role and different significant values. In sport, self-expenditure can be identified with what is at stake, the challenge, the individual risk outside of the great apparatuses. “The Notion of Expenditure” by Georges Bataille (1933) examines how society imposes productivity in its entire spectrum. Society recognises the right to acquire, conserve or consume rationally, but it excludes the principle of unproductive expenditure (Bataille G., 1985, p.137). It is the principle of loss, that is, of unconditioned expenditure (Ibid., p.169). Societies in general, and the Western one due to their economic structure, do not want to squander the essence of their own assets and regard the person as an asset, a capital. Acting in itself must not be in the service of any return or recompense. These are arguments to which Bataille returns in various writings (e.g. On Nietzsche, 1945). Concepts such as useful/useless, gratuitous/interested, arbitrary/imposed, are involved. Is this a form of revolt? According to Camus, revolt embodies the very identity of the individual, his cogito (Camus A., 1951). The rebel does not recognise impositions: he is not a revolutionary and does not conceive of systems (revolution meaning strategic and preconceived acting aimed at achieving an ideal that overturns the status quo). The rebel fights against any ideological barrier and cage. Camus evokes the figures of Cain, de Sade, Saint-Just, Lautréamont, Rimbaud, Bakunin, Nietzsche. The idea of anti-utilitarianism is ennobling. Self-expenditure without concatenations is in many respects a chimera. A grade-zero behaviour, without residues, cannot exist. Nevertheless, taking shelter in the necessity of being productive (in every sense) may in turn constitute a form of power. Being losers may mean annihilating the power that the Other exerts on ourselves (Lippi 2008, p. 62). Years ago, in an article published in Il Tempo (Pasolini P. P., 1973), Pasolini reviewed the autobiography of a Russian pilgrim, associating him with Lazarillo de Tormes. The pilgrim about whom Pasolini writes (who we understand from the text was 33 years of age in 1859) wanders with the prayer book Philokalia (love of the beautiful) and recounts his wanderings to a spiritual father. Pasolini writes that the pilgrim and Lazarillo remain invincible in their resigned nature that annihilates the very idea of power due to excess of passivity: “There is nothing that proves power wrong so much as Resignation, which is actually a refusal of power in any form (that is, it makes it what it actually is, namely an illusion)”. The implications of self-expenditure and the practice of excess are manifold, as you can see. With this call for papers we intend to investigate the relationship between autobiographical narration as an expression of going beyond, as a pursuit of the extreme in relation to the concept of boundary, or as a practice of excess, understanding how, stated or implied, these components constitute the framework of the argument of the writing examined. Some biographical references ANONYMOUS, The Way of a Pilgrim: Candid Tales of a Wanderer to His Spiritual Father, translated by Anna Zaranko with an introduction by Andrew Louth, Penguin Books, 2017. ARISTOTLE, Nicomachean Ethics, translated by H. Rackham, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd., 1934. [Fourth century BC]. Georges BATAILLE, “The Notion of Expenditure” in Visions of Excess: selected writings, 1927–1939, edited by Allan Stoekl, translated by Allan Stoekl with Carl R. Lovitt and Donald M. Leslie, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 1985 (Originally published in La part Maudite, Paris, Points, 1933). http://itech.fgcu.edu/faculty/bhobbs/Bataille-the-Notion-of-Expenditure.pdf Julien BEAUFILS, Solenne CAROF, Anne SEITZ et Philipp SIEGERT, « Excès et sobriété. Construire, pratiquer et représenter la mesure et la démesure. Introduction », Trajectoires [En ligne], 10 | 2016, mis en ligne le 01 décembre 2016, consulté le 18 octobre 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/trajectoires/2172 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/trajectoires.2172 Albert CAMUS, The Rebel, translated by Anthony Bower, London, Penguin Books, 2000. Benvenuto CELLINI, Vita di Benvenuto Cellini, edited by Orazio Bacci, Firenze, Sansoni, 1901. (Written between 1558 and November1562). https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1118599/f4.image CASANOVA, Histoire de ma vie, Paris, Livre de Poche, 2004. Mémoires de J. Casanova de Seingalt, écrits par lui-même, written in French, between 1789 and 1798, published posthumously in1825. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k314854/f1.image vv. I- Thomas DE QUINCEY, Confessions of an English Opium-Eater, 1821. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2040/2040-h/2040-h.htm Annie LE BRUN, SADE-Attaquer le soleil, Paris, Musée d’Orsay-Gallimard, 2014. Silvia LIPPI, “De la dépense improductive à la jouissance « bavarde»”, in Transgressions. Bataille, Lacan, edited by S. LIPPI, Toulouse, ERES, “Point Hors Ligne”, 2008, pp. 62-71. URL: https://www.cairn.info/transgressions–9782749209753-page-62.htm Marie José MONDZAIN, De l’excès, Théatre/Public 178. P. P. PASOLINI, “‘Come pregare?’ ‘Come mangiare?’ Esperienze di un Prete e di un Letterato”, in Il Tempo, 11 February 1973. Rocco RONCHI, “Une ontologie de l’excès”, Lignes, 2000/1 (n° 1), pp. 107-124. DOI : 10.3917/lignes1.001.0107. URL: https://www.cairn.info/revue-lignes1-2000-1-page-107.htm9 Jean STAROBINSKI, “Registers of Excess,” in Enchantment: The Seductress in Opera, translated by C. Jon Delogu, New York, Columbia University Press, 2008. (Originally published as Les enchantresses, Paris, Seuil, 2005). Lionel TERRAY, Les conquérants de l’inutile: des Alpes à l’Annapurna, Paris, Gallimard, 1961. Autobiography: excess, self-expenditure 30 June – 1, 2 July 2021 – Rome LANGUAGES ADMITTED FOR THE INTERVENTIONS: English, French, Italian, Spanish. Every speaker will speak in their chosen language; there will be no simultaneous translation. A rough passive understanding would be desirable. A) The deadline for the submission of papers is 25 March 2021. Candidates are asked to present an abstract of up to 250 words, with citation of two reference texts, and a brief curriculum vitae of up to 100 words, with possible mention of two publications, be they articles or books. These must be submitted online on the conference registration page of the http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ Website. The scientific committee will read and select every proposal that will be sent to the conference registration page of the http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ Website. For any information, please contact the following: beatrice.barbalato@gmail.com, irenemeliciani@gmail.com, Notification of the accepted proposals will be given by 30 March 2021. B) In regard to enrolment in the colloquium, once the proposal is accepted the fees are the following: Before 10 April 2021: 110,00€ From 11 April to 10 May 2021: 130,00€ Enrolment cannot be accepted in loco. Ph.D. students: Before 10 April 2021: 75,00€ From 11 April to 10 Mai 2021: 90,00€ Enrolment cannot be accepted in loco. C) For information on registration fees, past symposia, the association’s activities, and the organising and scientific teams, please refer to our Website: http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ The association Mediapolis.Europa contributes to the publication of the journal Mnemosyne, o la costruzionedel senso, Presses universitaires de Louvain, www.i6doc.com, Indexed a scientific journal in: https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/erihplus/periodical/info?id=488665 Scientific Committee Beatrice BARBALATO, Mediapolis.Europa May CHEHAB, Université de Chypre Fabio CISMONDI, Euro Fusion Antonio CASTILLO GÓMEZ, univ. Alcala de Henares (Madrid) Giulia PELILLO-HESTERMEYER, Universitat Heidelberg Anna TYLUSIŃSKA-KOWALSKA, Uniwersytet Warszawski Management Irene MELICIANI, managing director Mediapolis.Europa
Deadline for Submissions, March 5, 2021
Players and Pawns: Political Childhoods, Political Children Children’s Literature Division, MLA Special Session, MLA (Modern Language Association) 2022 Location/Dates: Washington DC, 6-9th January, 2022 Deadline for submissions: March 5, 2021 “Think of the children,” we say, again and again using the child as the object of political discourse. Policies and laws governing everything from education and public health to minimum wage and sexual relations are enacted with the intent of protecting children and improving their lives. So often, however, children are denied the ability to be perceived and accepted as political agents themselves. In fact, when children and teens, such as Malala Yousafzai, Greta Thunberg, Mari Copeny (Little Miss Flint), and David Hogg, among many others, become involved in politics, adults often criticize their efforts, arguing that children possess neither the experiences nor the knowledge to be involved in political discussions or to advocate for policy changes. As children’s and YA literature affirms, children and teens both are used for the political gain of others and are themselves interested in politics. Drawing on children’s and YA literature, as well as films and other forms of youth media, this panel considers what it means to be a political child and/or how children are used by politicians. In other words, in what ways are children players in the game of politics, and in what ways are they pawns? Papers might consider the following questions: What are the politics of the child? How is the political child constructed by adults? By children? What kinds of childhood are instrumentalized by people in positions of power, and to what end? What does it mean to “fight for the children?” How does the desire to protect children affect political children? What is the child’s role in politics? In what ways do children and teens resist political power? How does the political child embody agency? How might children politicize themselves? Which possibilities or which limitations of children’s agency are inherent in political discourse? Who is included and excluded from being a political child? How does the political child collaborate with the political adult? What is the politics of childhood without the guise of futurity? What is the connection between anti-fascism and children’s and youth media. Please submit 300-word abstracts and a brief biography to Miranda Green-Barteet (mgreenb6@uwo.ca) by March 5, 2021.
*
Deadline for Submissions, March 4, 2021
CFP–Four Life Writing Forum Panels, Modern Language Association (3/5/2021; 1/6-9/2022) Washington DC, USA Documenting Isolation How do life writers make meaning of selves and experiences in/of isolation in or through their texts? Papers examining historical and/or contemporary life narratives of isolation invited. Submit 300-word abstract and bio. Deadline for submissions: Friday, 5 March 2021 Megan Brown, Drake U (megan.brown@drake.edu ) Laurie McNeill, U of British Columbia (laurie.mcneill@ubc.ca ) Transnational Black Auto/biography Papers on Black life writing engaging African diasporic transnationalism, self-representation, Black liberation, political activism, and/or intellectual analysis, from precolonial petitions to BLM auto/biographies and beyond. 300-word abstract and bio. Deadline for submissions: Friday, 5 March 2021 Joycelyn K. Moody, Joycelyn Moody (joycelyn.moody@utsa.edu ) Angela Ards, Boston C (ardsa@bc.edu ) Memoir as Politics How do life stories in various forms reflect and comment on political and social issues? Papers may address (but are not limited to) memoirs by politicians and other public figures. 300-word abstract and brief bio. Deadline for submissions: Friday, 5 March 2021 Angela Ards, Boston C (ardsa@bc.edu ) John David Zuern, U of Hawai‘i, Mānoa (zuern@hawaii.edu ) Stories of Destierro How to craft contemporary life stories of destierro: expulsion, banishment, and deportation? Who’s telling these stories, and in what forms? 300-word proposals focused on Greater Mexico and beyond. Deadline for submissions: Friday, 5 March 2021 Sergio Delgado Moya, Emory U (sdelga4@emory.edu ) John David Zuern, U of Hawai‘i, Mānoa (zuern@hawaii.edu )

Deadline for Submissions March 1, 2021

Call for contributions to a Journal of Scandinavian Cinema In Focus section highlighting Musical Biopics and Musical Documentaries from the Scandinavian countries This is a call for short subject contributions (2000-3000 words) focusing on how Scandinavian film and television have presented musicians, singers, bands and orchestras in biopics and documentaries. We welcome submissions that – after a quick theoretical introduction and concise contextual background – offer discussions of topics such as: – the film’s role within cultural memory – usually restricted to a single national market and often catering to a certain age group’s intragenerational memories – the handling of generic conventions; from narration and characterization to the selection of music, casting choices and staging of performances – the function of music in specific films and film genres – marketing and authentification discourses, including media coverage of stars and their work with particular roles and performances, as well as screenwriters’ and directors’ use of biographies, interviews, original footage and recordings – national and international reception of such films Please send contributions to Anders Marklund (anders.marklund@litt.lu.se) and Ewa Mazierska (EHMazierska@uclan.ac.uk) by 1 March 2021. Make sure that you follow the most recent Notes for contributors, available at Intellect’s journal pages: https://www.intellectbooks.com/journal-of-scandinavian-cinema. The publication of the In Focus section will coincide with the eighth Lübeck Film Studies Colloquium discussion of the topic and with screenings of select musical biopics and documentaries at Lübeck’s Nordic Film Days festival. These events are arranged in October/November 2021 – with more information available (in due course) online at https://www.nordische-filmtage.de/en/index.html.

Deadline for Submissions March 1, 2021

2021 Oral History Association Annual Meeting CFP: “Moving Stories” (3/1/2021; 10/17-21/2021)

The OHA’s Call for Proposals for the 2021 Annual Meeting is now open! Find the portal here: https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/oha/oha21. Find additional tips and guidelines for submitting here: https://www.oralhistory.org/submission-guidelines/. Keep an eye out for additional information about the Annual Meeting here: https://www.oralhistory.org/annual-meeting/. The deadline for submission is March 1.  Proposal Queries may be directed to: Nikki Yeboah, 2021 Program Co-chair (San Jose State University, nikki.yeboah@sjsu.edu) Sara Sinclair, 2021 Program Co-chair (Columbia University, ses2235@columbia.edu) Amy Starecheski, OHA Vice President (Columbia Oral History MA Program, aas39@columbia.edu) For submission inquiries or more information, contact: Faith Bagley, Program Associate, 615-898-2544, oha@oralhistory.org Contact Info: Oral History Association Box 193/Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro, TN. 37132 Contact Email: oha@oralhistory.org URL: http://oralhistory.org

Deadline for Submissions March 1, 2021

Biographers International Organization (BIO) is accepting applications for The Hazel Rowley Prize $2000 for an Exceptional Book Proposal from a First-time Biographer This prize is given to the author of an exceptional book proposal for a full-length biography. In addition to the $2,000 award, the winner will have their proposal evaluated by an established literary agent. They will also receive a year’s membership in BIO, along with registration for the annual BIO conference, and publicity for the author and project through the BIO website, The Biographer’s Craft newsletter, and social media. The prize advances BIO’s mission to reach talented new writers in the genre. The deadline for applications is March 1, 2021. For further information and application instructions, see https://biographersinternational.org/award/hazel-rowley-prize/#apply
* Deadline for Submissions February 28, 2021 “Literary [Non-]Fiction in Times of Crisis”, 13th May to the 15th May 2021 (Submission Deadline 2/28/2021) CRISIS: “a time of great danger, difficulty, or confusion when problems must be solved or important decisions must be made” (OED) The fall of the Berlin Wall; refugee movements across Europe; Brexit; political populism; divided societies in Europe and USA; or the pandemic of Covid-19 – it is almost unlikely to formulate a complete list of crises that have emerged in recent times. The notion of crisis, however, is by no means confined to the socio-political realm and its grand narratives/grand challenges. Personal, religious and identity crises seem idiosyncratic in essence, but are in reality experiences shared collectively by different cultures and generations. The idea that crises are not only destructive or arresting, but rather necessary for progress and/or self-development is communicated not only by means of historical accounts or political analyses, but also via personal life reviews as well as fictional, literary works. Literary [non-]fiction is, after all, the most multi-faceted medium of communication. Many times the individual’s need for literary (self-)expression is driven by the need to make sense of the surrounding reality [also by highlighting different versions of reality] and contextualize one’s personal, socio-political or environmental crisis. Facing a political/cultural/social/religious predicament, authors are often driven by an imperative to voice their disagreement over transgressions/half-truths/ lies/manipulations, which eventually makes one unable to turn away from the presumed obligation to right a wrong. This is why Nadine Gordimer once said that writing about ‘public policies’ [sensu largo], particularly if their impact on the social fabric is negative, corresponds to writing about morality. Department of English Literature and Literary Linguistics is pleased to announce its conference, “Literary [Non-]Fiction in Times of Crisis”, to be held online at Adam Mickiewicz University from the 13th May to the 15th May 2021. The conference’s objective is to explore both writerly and non-writerly involvement, analyses and suggestions regarding descriptions of and possible solutions to the ills of a given society/community/individual and collective mindsets. Our intention is to set up an interdisciplinary dialogic space for academics interested in restoring the strength of referentiality in [non-]fiction writing, with the overall aim to make textual reality relevant again. Our invitation is addressed to researchers from various fields of scholarly investigation, including literary studies, culture studies, film studies, identity studies and other interdisciplinary studies. Suggested topics include but are not restricted to: SECTION I Socio-Political crisis in texts Session Chairs: prof. dr hab. Liliana Sikorska [sliliana@amu.edu.pl] and prof. UAM dr hab. Ryszard Bartnik [rbartnik@amu.edu.pl] * Black Lives Matter * Wars [culture wars/terrorist extremism] * Arab Spring [and other ‘revolutions’] * Minority and human rights * Brexit * Political transitions of divided societies SECTION II Psychological crisis in texts Session Chairs: dr Katarzyna Bronk-Bacon [kbronkk@amu.edu.pl] and prof. UAM dr hab. Dominika Buchowska-Greaves [drusz@amu.edu.pl] * Narration and representation of personal or collective trauma * Crisis of identity and belonging * Rites of passage in human life [motherhood/fatherhood; middle age/old age, crisis of faith] * Sexual/gender assault/abuse/asymmetry SECTION III Environmental crisis in texts [Ecocriticism] Session Chairs: dr Jeremy Pomeroy [jerpom@amu.edu.pl] and dr Jacek Olesiejko [olesiejk@amu.edu.pl] * The crisis of Anthropocene * Climate change * Pan- and epidemics SECTION IV ‘Institutional’ crisis in texts Session Chairs: dr Marta Frątczak-Dąbrowska [mfratczak@amu.edu.pl] and dr Joanna Jarząb-Napierała [joanna.jarzab@amu.edu.pl] * Crisis of democracy * Crisis of neoliberalism * The [re]birth of populism * Crisis of the state [Truth/Trust/Rule of law] Authors are encouraged to prepare 20 minute presentations in English. Abstracts of around 300-500 words should be submitted to crisisandliterature2021@amu.edu.pl by the 28th February 2021 [in the event of any technical problems use the alternative email address crisisrb@amu.edu.pl]. In addition, we would like to inform about that the Department of English Literature and Literary Linguistics is planning to launch, presumably in 2022, a postconference publication, in cooperation with Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. The full-length papers to be considered for this volume shall be peer-reviewed and must not be under consideration by any other journal or publication. * Deadline for abstracts: 27 February 2021 Announcement: Call-for-Papers This call is for abstracts for a scholarly, international edited collection entitled, Writing Australian History on Screen: cultural, sociological, and historical depths in television and film period dramas “down under”. Deadline for abstracts: 27 February 2021. It could be said that Australia’s unique history has shaped the diversity of its peoples, and the Australian life-styles of today. Australia is both a very ancient and a very young nation. The diverse Australian Indigenous peoples were and still are the First Australians, and the true owners of the land. Despite the British Empire’s 1770 claim on the land as one of its colonies, and white Australia’s announcement of Australia as a nation with the birth of Federation in 1901, “Australia” was in fact a nation long before that; and so long before the British deportation of convicts to Australia and the subsequent arrival of the Anglo-Celtic-European settlers; and the supposed much earlier arrival of Chinese traders; and the much later arrival of the many different nationalities during the Gold Rushes. In more modern times, there is also the extensive immigration from many different nationalities and cultures, and Australia’s intakes of refugees. All these peoples, whether born in Australia or naturalized, are Australians though some hold dual citizenship. The Australian nation’s history is closely tied to the national and cultural identity. In many countries, but perhaps more so in Australia, there is no single or fixed national identity. In actuality, an  Australian national identity does not exist rather there is a process of something that is unfurling or “becoming” some semblance of a sort of truth; there is no one history rather many diverse histories that overlay or color each the other; there is no one heritage or culture rather divers heritages and cultures; there is no one religion rather many; all of which sit together, side-by-side, and despite the common myths, not always so well or easily. Numerous writers note that in the Australian society there is a “visible” fracture, and also a disconnectedness between what many Australians have imagined themselves to be a part of in the past. The Australian histories, what came before and what has happened since, and how this has been incorporated or interpreted, together with the Australian environment and the geography of the land, and with Australia’s unique type of multiculturalism, has helped to shape what is variously described as the Australian character, and the society. Australian television and film period dramas are involved in conversations about who the Australian peoples were, and who they are now in the current time. These types of productions work, or rework, the numerous factors involved in “telling” the Australian story, and in so doing explicitly and implicitly bring to light the many various issues that are as relevant to the Australian society today as they were in the period portrayed on screen. In exploring the deeper issues, these sorts of filmic dramas capture and convey something of the atmosphere/s of a particular time. Admittedly, these same issues may have been viewed differently and drawn different responses in the past to what happens now. Of course, with period dramas, the angle from which the issues are approached, the way in which past times are depicted, and the questions that arise from these discussions,  also depend to some degree or another, on the writer/s and the producer/s own points-of-view and particular agendas and artistic skills, as well as the message/s intended for, or inadvertently conveyed to, the viewer. It can be said that Australian television and film  period dramas raise big questions for the Australian society of today to ponder. Staying specifically with those produced in Australia, examples of these types of period dramas are: the hugely popular television series, The Sullivans (aired 1976-1983); Against the Wind (released in 1978); Redfern Now (aired 2012-2013); A Place to Call Home (premiered in 2013); and the much-loved films, The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith (first screened in 1978); Rabbit Proof Fence (released in 2002); The Dressmaker (released in 2015); Ladies in Black (premiered in 2018). Some suggestions for potential contributors and questions that could be addressed may include but are not limited to: ·  What are some of the cultural and/or social aspects and issues raised in a particular Australian television/ or film period drama? ·  What are, and how do these types of productions convey, the differences or sameness between the fictionalized portrayals and the realities of the times, and social dictates of the Australian culture then in relation to those of today? ·  In Australian television and filmic period dramas, how might class, ethnicity, culture, race, gender, and history, shape these representations for the viewers? ·  Are there cultural or historical antecedents for consideration of portrayals of the Australian outlook in small and-or large screen period dramas? ·  How are the Australian viewpoints expressed in any one or two or more Australian period screen dramas conveyed to the viewer, and what might be the producers motivations in each case? ·  What makes Australian period drama TV/films distinct from (maybe even bolder than), say, their British counterparts? What happens when British dramas present Australia on film (for example, “Banished” (first released 2015) )?Is Australian history sometimes just a different backdrop or central to interrogating specific issues/themes? ·  How do these Australian dramas restore marginalized histories and voices? ·  Chapters about late 20th-c dramas as well as recently popular ones are encouraged, and could include APTCH, Miss Fisher’s Murder Mysteries, Ms. Fisher’s Modern Murder Mysteries, Love Child, The Doctor Blake Mysteries, Australia, My Brilliant Career, Gallipoli, Anzac Girls, Emma’s War, and more. This collection of scholarly essays will make an intervention in the field: it will be the first of its kind to make a comprehensive study of Australian screen period dramas, to explore whether or not there are characteristic features of the Australian history/histories, culture, and psyche; to establish a new and dynamic area of theoretical research in history, social history, gender studies, cultural and social studies, and the humanities in general; to point the way to possible future work in an ever-expanding field of cross-disciplinary fields through examining various portrayals of Australian histories and the peoples; and to permit scholarly consideration of the extent to which the producers of Australian history narratives for screen, establish popular representations of periods that are an intrinsic part of the Australian society and culture as a whole. Submission instructions: At this initial stage, in lieu of “chapters,” this proposed work, Writing Australian History on Screen, calls for extended abstracts for consideration for inclusion in the book.
  1. The extended abstracts must be more than 1,000 and less than 1,500 words.
  2. (Full-length chapters of 6,000 – 7,000words each (including notes but excluding references lists, title of work, and key words) will be solicited from these abstracts.)
· Please keep in mind that your essay-chapter will be written from your extended abstract. Your abstract will carry the same title as your essay-chapter. ·  To be considered, an abstract must be written in English, and submitted as a Word document. ·  When writing your abstract use Times New Roman point 12,and 1.15 spacing. ·  At the beginning of your extended abstract, immediately after the title of your work and your name, add 5 to 8 keywords that best relate to your work. ·  Use the Chicago Manual of Style 16th Edition. ·  Since this work is intended for Lexington Books, USA, please use American (US) spelling not English (UK) spelling, and not Australian English spelling; ·  Use the Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary; ·  Use endnotes and not footnotes, use counting numbers not Roman numerals, and keep the endnotes to a bare minimum, working the information into the text where possible; ·  Do cite all your work in your extended abstract as you would in a full chapter. a) in the body of the abstract, add parenthetical in-text citations (family name of author and year, and page number/s) (e.g. Smith 2019, 230); b) fully reference all in-text citations in alphabetical order, in the References list at the end of your abstract; ·  Please send your abstract as a Word document attached to an email; ·  To this same email please also attach, as separate Word documents, the following: ·  Your covering letter, giving your academic title/s, affiliation, your position, and your home and telephone, your home address, and your email contact details; ·  A short bio of no more than 200 words; ·  Your C.V., giving your publications to date, and the publishing details and dates. Editors: Professor Julie Anne Taddeo, Research Professor of History, University of Maryland, USA, and Dr Jo Parnell, Conjoint Research Fellow, School of Humanities and Social Science, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Newcastle, Australia. Papers should be forwarded to both editors: Julie Anne Taddeo taddeo@umd.com Jo Parnell Jo.Parnell@newcastle.edu.au  alternatively annette.parnell@newcastle.edu.au  or joandbobparnell@bigpond.com Deadline for Submissions February 23, 2021 Women in the Nineteenth Century—Traveling, Writing, Speaking Margaret Fuller Society American Literature Association Conference Boston, July 7–11, 2021 The writings of such women as Margaret Fuller, Catharine Sedgwick, Rebecca Cox Jackson, Betsey Stockton, Caroline Kirkland, Frances E. W. Harper, Eliza Potter, Susan B. Anthony, Ida B. Wells, and Anna Julia Cooper, to name only a few, show the wide range of women’s reasons for and responses to travel. This panel proposes to question ways of thinking about traveling, including theorizing as well as representations (or silencings) of travel in the writings of Fuller and other women travelers, especially women of color. Whether focused on genres traditionally thought of as travel writing or on other modes in which women wrote and spoke, we would like to interrogate how motivations, encounters, itineraries, geographical locations, traveling equipment, and audiences have shaped literary, cultural, and political expressions in Fuller’s works and in that of women of her century. We are especially interested in ways that race and class, as well as gender, might have impeded or influenced modes of traveling and modes of writing about it. By including writing by Fuller and 19th-century women travelers, this panel aims to explore how these writers conceptualize travel, how they approach it as a topic, and how they respond to travel’s capacity to register physical and imaginative experiences, or to highlight or circumvent obstacles and impossibilities. We welcome papers from scholars at any career stage. Paper proposals of 250-500 words and a short vita should be sent to Sonia Di Loreto (sonia.diloreto@unito.it) and Jana Argersinger (argerj@gmail.com) by February 23, 2021. Please note if you will require A/V for your presentation. * Deadline for Submissions, February 15, 2021 The Legacies of Exchange by 19th-Century Black Women Society for the Study of American Women Writers Triennial Conference November 4-7 2021, Baltimore, Maryland We propose a panel for the SSAWW Triennial Conference “American Women Writers: Ecologies, Survival, Change” in Baltimore, Maryland, November 4-7, 2021: This panel highlights forms of representation and exchange by black women that look beyond narratives of enslavement. We welcome papers that explore how nineteenth-century black women built networks of kinship and support through forms of correspondence (letters, periodicals, allusions) and materials that illustrate artistic intimacies (albums, scrapbooks, autograph books, marginalia, ephemera). Building on the work of scholars like Nazera Sadiq Wright and Jasmine Nichole Cobb, we ask: what ecologies and networks are illuminated when we look at these items? We are especially interested in discussions of archival resources, recovery work, sentimentality, citizenship, and writing as care-taking. By February 15th, please send your abstract (250-300 words), institutional affiliation, contact information, and a brief bio (no more than 50-60 words) to Victoria Baugh at vlb57@cornell.edu or Charline Jao (cj422@cornell.edu). * Call for Papers:  Fragmented, Evolving, Precious: Scholarly Writing across Life Contexts  500-word proposals with 50-word bios due 15 February 2021 Scholarly writing can be a scattered process, with research and composing time eked out in fits and starts as teaching, administrative, and familial responsibilities can overwhelm even the most dedicated scholars’ best intentions for scheduled writing time. Writing and research processes also change over time as circumstances change–as graduate student life morphs into tenure-track or adjunct life; as single life morphs into partnered life, or vice versa; as faculty have children who require different intensities of attention at different stages; as bodies are or become differently dis/abled; and/or as administrative roles replace writing time with back-to-back meetings. This collection seeks to examine, explain, and even exult in how writing processes change over time by exhibiting what is both lost and gained through successive rounds of transformation and adaptation. How do writers, in their own words, respond to significant disruptions of their established processes? How do they develop “writing workflows” (Lockridge and Van Ittersum) to meet new demands, or that are capable of responding to unstable conditions? How do they understand the variables that prompt changes and what resources do they draw on to meet that change? This kairotic moment finds many scholars newly challenged to develop different writing processes as they wrestle with new ways to teach, administrate, parent, and navigate the world. As various researchers (Boice, Tulley) have demonstrated, scholars successfully produce scholarship even when their focus and time are fragmented. Boice recommends that faculty writers ensure their writing success in part by arranging “external situations to ensure regular writing productivity.” Boice’s advice articulates well with the “environmental-selecting and structuring practices (ESSPs)” Paul Prior and Jody Shipka describe in their study of scholarly writers’ processes. What this collection takes up in part is the current context in which many scholars are, due to pandemic restrictions such as school and library closures, unable now to “arrange external situations to ensure regular writing productivity” as they have in the past. These same pressures also call scholars to respond to the neoliberal demands of limitlessly increasing personal productivity. Drawing inspiration from Jessica Restaino’s pledge to “determine anew [her] use value” as a scholar (137) after a devastating personal loss, this collection seeks to determine anew the use value of scholarly writing and the processes that produce it, both within and beyond the context of losses, constraints, and adaptations associated with Covid. We want to explore how scholars have navigated various workflow changes throughout various phases of their lives and careers. The pandemic context provides an opportunity to examine how writing processes can be adapted. When the most reasonable “normal” writing advice may be impossible to follow and writing is necessarily slowed and further fragmented, might writing activity be also deepened and made more precious? We seek both personal and scholarly contributions that examine the advantages and possibilities as well as the frustrations concomitant with evolving scholarly writing processes. We invite proposals for chapters that take up, challenge, or augment questions such as these:
  • How have you reinvented your writing process(es) at one or more stages of your scholarly career or for different types of projects?
  • What resources or tools have you adopted for that reinvention? What was your affective experience before, during, and after?
  • How does your personal engagement with writing processes shape your engagement with process scholarship or writing studies writ large, or vice versa?
  • How does your teaching of writing shape your own writing processes?
  • How does your scholarly writing occur within your home, work, and community context?
  • How is your scholarly writing process affected by gendered, raced, and/or classed work-life expectations?
  • What are the possibilities and challenges associated with your scholarly writing process?
  • How could past examples of ideal and/or problematic scholarly writing processes speak to the present? How do you relate to your past processes?
  • What do you see as the challenges of creating or sticking to a productive process, and/or how do you push back against a culture that over-values speed and “productivity”?
Submit 500-word proposals and 50-word bios no later than 15 February 2021. Notifications of acceptance will be sent by 15 March 2021. Full chapter drafts (6000-8000 words including Works Cited) will be due 1 July 2021. Requested revisions will be due 1 October 2021. Please send queries and proposals to: fragmented.writing@gmail.com. Kim Hensley Owens Derek Van Ittersum * Deadline for Submissions, 15 February, 2021 Contemporary South Slavic Victimhood Narratives and Performances in Arts and Cultures Founding myths of South Slavic nation-states have been centred around victimhood narratives since the emancipatory struggles within several occupying empires. Rarely have those narratives been stand-alone founding myths – they were interwoven with narratives of the heroic and the oppressed. Notions of being ‘a historic victim’ (or a victim of history) can be found among all South Slavs, not only in the post-Yugoslav region. The political function of such founding myths in in the construction of collective identities has been a research focus of South Slavic and South Eastern European Studies for quite some time already. The instrumentalization of victimhood narratives in the process of South Slavic nation-state formations, also in the context of Yugoslavia’s breakup and the Yugoslav Wars, has been explored, yet less attention has been given to victimhood narratives and performances in the very current South Slavic regions and contexts. We are interested in narratives and performances of South Slavic victimhood in arts (literature, theatre, performance, film, music and art), in media and in places and performances of remembrance (memorial days, memory in public space, museums and memorials). Therefore, we are inviting scholars from different fields (South Slavic Studies, Film and Media Studies, Theatre and Performance Studies, Art History, Cultural and Memory Studies and other closely related disciplines) to contribute to the edited volume “Contemporary South Slavic Victimhood Narratives and Performances”. Proposals for research articles will be peer reviewed for an edited book to be published by a reputed publisher in 2022. Original and unpublished texts are invited (but not restricted to) the following areas and research questions:
  • How have already established victimhood narratives changed after the end of the Yugoslav Wars?
  • What new victimhood narratives have emerged in the 2000s until today?
  • How are South Slavic victimhood narratives intertwined and are they mutually dependent?
  • Are new narratives and performances of victimhood changing former constructions of collective identities?
  • Who are perpetrators and victims in new victimhood narratives in arts and culture and what is the role of the spectator (bystander)?
  • What are the aesthetic strategies in various art forms to de-construct and question those narratives?
  • What are the roles of South Slavic victimhood discourses in the diaspora?
Proposals consist of a short abstract (250-300 words, including 3-4 keywords) and a short bio note of the author. Last date of submission of abstracts to the editors is February 15th 2021, to be sent to: senad.halilbasic@univie.ac.at and miranda.jakisa@univie.ac.at The authors will be notified within 4 weeks The first draft of selected contributions is due in August 2021 (length: 5.000-7.000 words) Contact Email:  senad.halilbasic@univie.ac.at URL:  https://suedslawistik.univie.ac.at/ *

CFP: Promising Journeys, Perilous Roads: Women’s Journey Narratives in Neoliberal India (Edited Collection)

Deadline for Submissions: February 10, 2021
Call for chapter proposals (With a strong publishing interest from Lexington Books, USA) Traditionally, men have had more access than woman to Indian public spaces, especially the cities, roads, and streets. Not surprisingly, then, the presence of women in patriarchal public spaces such as roads poses a threat to traditional spatial associations of the home and the woman that in turn are significant in the construction of Indian femininity. More important, women on Indian roads have felt threatened and experienced numerous and unbelievable instances of violence, some of which in the recent past have been globally and vocally condemned. Curiously, if narratives of traveling, self-sufficient women and their outdoor experiences remain scarce, what is rarer are theoretical and critical discourses surrounding and analyzing women’s predicaments on the road. Stressing this, academicians such as Manish Madan and Mahesh K. Nalla in their study tilted “Sexual Harassment in Public Spaces: Examining Gender Differences in Perceived Seriousness and Victimization” (2016) note that while a considerable amount of research has been done on  domestic violence in India, which mostly occurs indoors in private spaces, “the treatment of women in the public sphere, particularly with regard to sexual harassment (one of the most pervasive forms of violence against women)” (1) has only received public attention post the notorious Nirbhaya rape case (2012) due to media coverage and international outcry. Likewise, keeping mainly the Nirbhaya rape case and the gang rape of a young photo-journalist in Mumbai (2013) as a contextual backdrop, Shilpa Phadke in her article “Unfriendly Bodies, Hostile Cities Reflections on Loitering and Gendered Public Space” argues that the “overarching narrative appears to be that [Indian] cities are violent spaces that women are better off not accessing at all” (50). Arguably, while empirical and data driven research has to some extent taken into account the issue of women’s travel experiences, theoretical research dealing with fictionalized representations of women’s road journeys in millennial India is palpably missing. The present edited collection attempts to bridge this unfortunate gap in scholarship. Where international research is concerned, the issue of women’s safety within public spaces such as the road has been a central problematic for space theorists and feminist geographers such as Linda McDowell, Gillian Rose, and Doreen Massey who declare that spaces are governed by patriarchal power relations which exclude women. Doreen Massey, for instance, in Space, Place, and Gender (1994) claims that “spatial control, whether enforced through the power of convention or symbolism, or through the straightforward threat of violence, can be a fundamental element in the constitution of gender” (180). According to feminist geographers therefore public spaces such as roads are inherently gendered and exclude women with the threat of sexual violence. In a deeply patriarchal society such as India, spatial politics along with explicit and implicit threats of violence plague millions of women who try to accesses public spaces, beginning with the roads. In neoliberal India, especially after Nirbhaya rape case, one encounters a growing engagement with women’s travel narratives most significantly on several OTT (over-the-top) digital platforms including Netflix and Amazon Prime Videos. Many fictionalized series telecast on these platforms have presented the problem of female vulnerability within public spaces to expose physical, mental, sexual, and epistemic violence that traveling women face. Here Richie Mehta’s Delhi Crime proves to be a powerful case in point. Likewise, mainstream Hindi films such as Chhapaak (2020) in the recent past have also exposed how women are extremely vulnerable to the male gaze and to patriarchal violence, especially on the roads. Literature, too, has responded to this vexed issue and writers such as Janhavi Acharekar and Namita Gokhale have attempted to reveal how structural violence mars the outdoorsy experiences of many Indian women. Other fictionalized narratives that underscore women’s promising albeit perilous road journeys include films such as Nagesh Kukunoor’s Dor (2006), Leena Yadav’s Parched (2015), Aniruddha Roy Chowdhury’s Pink (2016), Ashtar Sayed’s Maatr (2017), Ravi Udyawar’s Mom (2017), and Gopi Puthran’s Mardaani 2 (2019). In addition, there are also well-received web series such as The Good Girl Show (2017) and She (2020) which unravel the regressive rape myths, stigma, victim-blaming, and misogyny that are entrenched in Indian society and channeled against women exploring the world outside their homes. The present volume entitled Promising Journeys, Perilous Roads: Women’s Journey Narratives in Neoliberal India hopes to inaugurate a much-needed scholarly discussion on women and their experiences on the road in the present times. By focusing on the complex negotiations that women make with the challenges posed by the gendered space of the road, this edited collection hopes to bring together critical and scholarly voices that together address a deep rooted and pressing problem fettering Indian women’s mobility today. It invites essays that attempt critically informed analyses of literature, graphic novels, films, web series, and other popular cultural representations of Indian women’s experiences on the road, and ultimately initiate localized feminist interventions against gendered violence. Themes addressed may include, but are not limited to: •    Literary representations of Indian women’s vulnerability on the road •    Graphic narratives of female road journeys •    Films, web series, television, popular culture vis-à-vis violence and spatial politics •    Sororities and female bonding in the face of violent road journeys •    Wandering mothers: women, violence, and caregiving on the road •    Women’s aging, destitution, and violence of the road •    Rape myths, stigma, and sexual offences •    Intrusive male gaze and objectified female bodies •    Class, caste, female oppression, and violent roads •    Female fortitude, resistance, and survival on gendered roads Lexington Books, USA has expressed a strong interest in publishing this edited collection. Please submit an abstract of 750 words and a short CV by February 10, 2021 to Swathi Krishna S. swathi@iitrpr.ac.in and Srirupa Chatterjee srirupa@la.iith.ac.in The final articles will be 6000-7000 words in the latest MLA Handbook format and will be due by August 31, 2021.
* Deadline for Submissions–Feb. 5, 2021

The Register & Visitors’ Book in Historical Scholarship: A Virtual Colloquium, June 1, 2021

The value of the institutional guest book/register as a source has become evident in recent historical scholarship. Studies have engaged registers from a broad range of approaches and interests, including the histories of travel and tourism, book history, historical geography, literary tourism, and legal history. The form, legal status, and uses of these books varied markedly by site and jurisdiction: in some, their completion was required by law. In others, the ‘visitors’ book’ was a site of whimsical inscription, filled with prose, verse, and illustration. The material affordances of the books, and the regimes of surveillance enacted over them, also varied widely. In many cases, institutions maintained both the legally compulsory register and a voluntary book for guests’ inscriptions. As scholars have unearthed these books in local, regional, and national archives, explored the legal, economic, social, and cultural contexts in which they were used—as tools of surveillance, as business records, as tableaux for leisure travellers—and used them extensively as sources in historical scholarship, they have developed fruitful intellectual exchanges. Beyond places of accommodation, research has encompassed books that were at other institutions and sites—stately homes, museums, universities, and places associated with the lives of famous authors, for instance—in the early modern and modern periods. On Tuesday 1 June 2021 a workshop will bring together scholars using these books as evidence in diverse historical research programmes. We invite participation (through pre-circulated papers to be discussed in the virtual event) from scholars working on a range of projects that employ these sources in historical research, including (but not limited to):
  • Hotel guest books and registers as legal and social instruments
  • Guest books and registers as sources for the study of mobility and tourism markets
  • Institutional visitors’ books and practices of inscription and reading
  • Cultures of travel illuminated by guest books
  • Practices of travel illustration as revealed in guest books and related sources
  • Transnational vs national dimensions of guest book use
  • Early modern forms of the institutional guest book
Please submit a title and 250-word proposal, as well as a one-page résumé, by Friday 5 February 2021 to Kevin James at kjames@uoguelph.ca, to whom any enquiries may also be directed.
Contact Info:
Professor Kevin James Scottish Studies Foundation Chair and Professor of History University of Guelph Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada
Contact Email:
*
General Call for Papers
Interdisciplinary Studies in Diasporas Irene Maria F. Blayer and Dulce Maria Scott ISSN: 2378-0975 www.peterlang.com/view/serial/ISD Interdisciplinary Studies in Diasporas opens a discursive space in diaspora scholarship in all fields of the humanities and social sciences. The volumes published in this series comprise studies that explore and contribute to an understanding of diasporas from a broad spectrum of cultural, literary, linguistic, anthropological, historical, political, and socioeconomic perspectives, as well as theoretical and methodological approaches. The series welcomes original submissions from individually and collaboratively authored books and monographs as well as edited collections of essays. All proposals and manuscripts are peer reviewed. For more information, or if you’d like to discuss a proposal, please contact: : Dr Irene Blayer, Series Editor, iblayer@brocku.c Dr Dulce Scott, Series Editor, dmscott@anderson.edu Dr Philip Dunshea, Acquisitions Editor , p.dunshea@peterlang.com. * Deadline for Submissions, February 1, 2021 Biographers International Organization (BIO) is pleased to announce the inauguration of the Frances “Frank” Rollin Fellowship $2000 for an Exceptional Biography-in-Progress about an African American Subject Named for the first African American biographer, the Frances “Frank” Rollin Fellowship awards $2,000 to an author working on a biographical work about an African American figure or figures whose story provides a significant contribution to our understanding of the Black experience. This fellowship also provides the recipient with a year’s membership in BIO, registration to the annual BIO conference, and publicity through BIO’s marketing channels. The Rollin Fellowship aims to remediate the disproportionate scarcity and even suppression of Black lives and voices in the broad catalog of published biography. This fellowship reflects not only BIO’s commitment to supporting working biographers but to encouraging diversity in the field. Deadline for applications: February 1, 2021. To apply, go to https://biographersinternational.org/award/the-frances-frank-rollin-fellowship/#apply *
*
Deadline for Submissions, Feb. 1, 2021
Female Narratives of Protest: Literary and Cultural Representations from South Asia deadline for submissions: February 1, 2021 full name / name of organization: Nabanita Sengupta contact email: nabanita.sengupta@gmail.com Contemporary regimes of protest in South Asia are informed and injuncted by its ever shifting geopolitical modalities. With the rise of globalisation, neoliberalism and multiculturalism, South Asian geopolitics comprise a quest for redefinition of biopower and subjectivity formations. As hegemonies of Western  dominance are toppled, South Asian geopolitics are evolving as a complex assemblage of biopolitics, citizenship ethics and human rights concerns. In this evolving engagement with global politics, South Asia is fast emerging as a contending power itself with competent human and capital resources. An important consequence of this is the appearance of newer axes of fault lines in terms of polity, economy, religion, culture, art, and gender. This has transpired into multiple geopolitical fissures, one glaring example of which is the CAA, a politically manipulated definition of citizenship and the politics of belonging in the Indian subcontinent. South Asian non-unitary subjectivities dwell within the vectors of diverse vocabularies of protest that are social and political in nature. In the light of this, protest narratives originate in a space of power conflict as a means to combat the exploitation of the weak by the strong –  as a means of survival for the unempowered and unprivileged. Therefore a longing for empowerment, a desire to topple the authoritarian and a quest towards a just society is embedded within any protest narrative. The journey of struggle gets recorded in such narratives and irrespective of the outcome, the cultural productions of the movements become important. Archiving of protest narratives is a significant task because such narratives dare to break away from the dominant cultural representations and present the voices of the marginalised. It critically enquires the heteronormative world of binaries bringing into limelight the fault lines in the dominant normative exclusivist discourses. An interesting hermeneutics of protest literature is its very fluid nature and multiple connotations. An important aspect is the moral and ethical relationship between aesthetics and political message informing the content of protest narratives. Protest as an agentive politics on one hand is hinged upon the philosophical question of individuality and the dynamics of social structure, while on the other, gains impetus from political issues. These political issues might be embedded within one’s location and therefore protest narratives are also deeply shaped by one’s embeddedness in specific geospatialities Historically, gender has been identified as one such location of the genesis of protest narratives. Female voices have always been marginalised in a patriarchal social system. Patriarchal politics of sexuality and gender identities have been conventionally partial to the heteronormative male voice. Females, both as a sexual identity as well as a gender construct have been involved in a long and tedious battle which still continues. Within the South Asian region too females have a long history of struggle, the trajectory of which can be traced to the emergence of the female Bhakti poets in the 16th century in the Indian subcontinent. While any form of protest poetry invites penalty in some form from the authority, when it comes to the female voices, discourses invading the body and sexuality further problematises the issue. In the South Asian context, these struggle narratives are various and multi-layered. They have different rationales of origin, varied historiographies andsocio-political consequences, depending on their geopolitical locations but they all together can be brought under the umbrella of intersectional feminist discourses. Whether it be the landais from Afghanistan, miya women writing from Assam, Dalit women’s narratives or narratives of queer women across the region, the modes of protest are against the dominant, monolithic, universalist ideology. The culminating point would be the ethical and humanitarian cartographies of protest narratives leading to formation of closely knit female communities of shared sufferings and solidarities resulting in a positive biopolitical production premised on affective frameworks of care, cooperation and collective political actions. Within such a theoretical framework, the proposed anthology is interested in exploring the reconfiguration of female voices of protest in contemporary literature and popular culture and invites abstracts on but not limited to the following topics Exploring various genres of narratives by women, focus may also be on mixed genre interpretations Need for such narratives Socio-political consequences Feminism and protest/ resistance narratives Feminist postcolonialist perspectives Protest, gender and the era of post truth Queer narratives of protest Protest shaped by the politics of location Protest and the politics of belonging Protest and Biopolitics Protest and Necropolitics Protest Memory Protest and Citizenship Rights Protest and Life-writings Protest and Illness narratives/narrative medicine Protest and Disability Studies Protest in the age of electronic media Cultural Representations of Protest (In films) Submit your abstract of not more than 350 words to protestnarratives@gmail.com by 1st February 2021. The edited anthology will be published by a reputed international publisher. Editors Dr. Nabanita Sengupta Assistant Professor of English Sarsuna College (Affiliated to University of Calcutta) Kolkata West Bengal India Samrita Sengupta Sinha Assistant Professor Department of English Sophia College for Women (Autonomous) Mumbai Maharashtra India
*
Deadline for Submissions, Feb. 1, 2021
Call for Papers
Comic Lives A special issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 37.2 Spring 2022 www.tandfonline.com/raut Deadline for Submissions–Feb. 1, 2021 Guest Editors: Laurie McNeill and John David Zuern Stand-up comics, comedians, and humor writers routinely draw material from their personal lives and play it for laughs. For this special issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, we invite contributors to explore the personal, cultural, political, and ethical ramifications of this practice. We seek essays examining all forms of comedic self-representation, from live stand-up performances to essay collections and memoirs, and we also encourage authors to reflect on the theoretical and methodological challenges auto/biographical comedy presents to scholars in life writing studies. We aim for a broad international scope and welcome projects that take a comparative approach to comic lives in different cultural contexts, and we particularly invite submissions that take up issues of diversity and inclusion in comedy. Studies of the work of specific comics are also welcome. Essays should focus on the intersection of the comedic and the auto/biographic in these texts—in other words, on the role of comedians’ personal experiences in their performances and/or writing, and they should situate this work in the particular contexts in which audiences receive it. In many countries, comedians have come to play influential roles as cultural and political commentators, positioning themselves within national debates and taking sides in partisan politics. In doing so, how are they deploying comedy to reinforce or challenge their audiences’ opinions on key issues, and how are they constructing their own personas as models of informed and engaged citizenship? We hope this special issue will also provide an opportunity for some authors to reflect on the public role of comedy in the Covid-19 pandemic, which has radically altered the conventional formats for live performances. In the United States, for example, social distancing has compelled comedians with popular television programs such as Samantha Bee, Stephen Colbert, and Trevor Noah to broadcast from home, which in turn has compelled them to incorporate aspects of their everyday private lives into their comedy. What are the implications of this fusion of comic performance and life in lockdown for their audiences’ own experience of social distancing and their sense of responsibility for protecting the health of others? Other topics might include the following: Comedy and identity: How do identity categories such as race, gender, sexuality, disability, nationality, and citizenship status figure in comedians’ work? How do they use their own alignment with or resistance to these categories to critique prejudice and advocate for inclusivity? Comedy and trauma: How do comedians use their performances to represent and work through traumatic experiences? How does humor factor into recovery? How does comedy serve as a form of witness and testimony? Comedy as labor: How do comedians represent the economic dimension of their work? Can comedy be understood as a form of affective labor? The comic Künstlerroman: How do comedians who have produced memoirs describe the discovery and development of their comedic talent? How do they recount how being funny became an aspect of their self-conceptions? Career comics: How do older comedians reflect on the course of their professional lives? How do they incorporate the aging process into their material? How have they negotiated their celebrity over time? How have they rebranded themselves in response to criticism and/or shifting social mores? Comedy and truth: Do the same criteria for truth-telling in other forms of life writing apply to auto/biographical comedy? How (and why) might we identify and assess fiction, faction, fictiveness, and falsification when life stories are played for laughs? Comedy, relationality, and ethics: How do comedians use their personal relationships with family members, friends, and fellow comedians as material? What are the ethical implications of this practice? Genres of auto/biographical comedy: How do the affordances of particular modes and media such as live stand-up routines, comedy specials, television programs, YouTube and other social media, graphic memoirs, and books shape comedic self-representation? How do comedians working in various formats inhabit or depart from narrative? What challenges to genre theory does comedy present? Please submit complete essays up to 7000 words in length—including notes and Works Cited, in Chicago Manual of Style 17 —by February 1, 2021 to both editors: laurie.mcneill@ubc.ca and zuern@hawaii.edu. Please also submit a brief abstract, keywords, and biographical statement with your submission. Essays submitted for the special issue, but not selected, may be considered general submissions and may be selected for publication. In order to ensure a confidential peer review, remove any identifying information from the essay, including citations that refer to you as the author in the first person. We welcome the inclusion of images and there are no charges to reprint in color. All images should be submitted as 300dpi tifs. Please submit images both pasted in the body of the essay with captions and submitted as separate files labeled with author last name and figure number. It is the responsibility of the author to procure all image reprint rights prior to publication. We are also able to link to accompanying digital materials from our website and encourage inclusion of these ancillary materials when appropriate. Please note that acceptance of an essay by the guest editors does not guarantee publication. All submissions will undergo double blind peer review once completed articles are submitted. About the editors: Dr. Laurie McNeill is a Professor of Teaching in the Department of English Language and Literatures at the University of British Columbia, studies the production and reception of life narratives in digital and archival spaces. Her recent publications include Online Lives 2.0, a special issue of the journal Biography, co-edited with John David Zuern (2015),  Teaching Lives: Contemporary Pedagogies of Life Narratives, co-edited with Kate Douglas (Routledge, 2017), “Assumed Identity: Writing and Reading Testimony through and as Anne Frank” (Inscribed Identities: Life Writing as Self-Realization, Routledge, 2019), and “Reading Digital Lives Generously,” co-authored with John David Zuern, in Research Methods for Auto/Biography Studies (Routledge, 2019). John David Zuern is a Professor in the Department of English at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, where he teaches courses in fiction, life writing, and research methods in literary studies. He is a co-editor of Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly and coordinates the journal’s annual “International Year in Review” feature. His recent publications include Online Lives 2.0, a special issue of the journal Biography, co-edited with Laurie McNeill (2015), “Remedial Materialism: What Can Comparative Literature and Electronic Literature Learn from Each Other?” in Comparative Literature (September 2018), and “Reading Digital Lives Generously,” in Research Methods for Auto/Biography Studies (Routledge 2019), co-authored with Laurie McNeill.
John David Zuern Professor, Department of English
1733 Donaghho Road
University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI 96822 808-551-7627 fax: 808-956-3083
Pronouns: he, him, his
Deadline for Submissions, January 31, 2021
contact email:
22, 23 & 24 June 2021 (Le Mans University, France) WAR MEMORIES (2020/21) – Sharing War Memories – From the Military to the Civilian International Conference initiated by Professor Renée Dickason (Université Rennes 2), Professor  Stéphanie Bélanger (Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario) and Professor Delphine Letort (Le Mans Université) “War Memories 2020/21” is delighted to welcome Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Professor Doctor Denis Mukwege as a Guest of Honour. https://warmem2020.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/CFP_warmem_2020_EN.pdf War narratives are subject to emphases, orientations and points of view that give a particular flavour to wars fought by populations (anonymously, individually and/or hidden in an organisation, secret or not)  and by the military (from high command to the ‘unknown soldier’). Such accounts evolve with the benefit of hindsight, the writing of history textbooks and the constant (re)interpretations of archives (new or not) and the official version a country wishes to put forward according to its political agendas and visions of patriotism, citizenship and human rights, or its diplomatic or international policy objectives. The narratives of wars vary with the context and the need for men and women to express their inner feelings when faced with the torments and human atrocities of war; they also reflect the place of individuals within a group and the implications of group cohesion within the larger community. Civilians’ knowledge of the war effort and the involvement of the military is informed by two types of documents: primary sources (letters, emails, photographs, videos, testimonies, trench gazettes, blogs, etc.) provide direct information about the war experienced at an individual level, whereas secondary sources mediate these artefacts by incorporating them into another narrative. The artefacts of war become the original materials which museums and memorials turn into places of memory, while feature films provide a less direct approach as they often (re)mediate the original accounts of first-hand witnesses through documentary, ethno-fiction, docudrama or more generally through fiction. These documents show a possible encounter between the military and civilian spheres, especially when the two are separated either in time or space. Civilians learn about past and distant wars through the narratives built on them and through the images produced either by the military themselves, by news reporters embedded with them or following in their footsteps, or by historians. Journalistic records often frame the understanding of war by shining light on events hidden from the public gaze, by illuminating the conflicts or the complicity between civilian witnesses and members of the military. Whether intended to win the ‘hearts and minds’ of the indigenous populations or to denigrate the enemy by reductive stereotyping, military strategies condition how armed forces regard the ‘Other’. Humanitarian groups approach war with a different goal in mind; their representations of war emphasize the dangers for civilian populations trapped by an ongoing conflict and reintroduce human concerns where war technology erases them. The case of civilian hostages is of particular relevance in this context. This conference aims to explore zones of contact between the military and the civilian worlds – be they real or virtual. Zones of contact extend beyond the battlefields to civilian areas, where the enemy is sometimes conflated with undeclared combatants (especially in the age of terrorism). Soldiers may also find respite in the civilian life that wars disrupt but cannot completely annihilate. The contacts between the military and the civilians are often channeled by professional relationships. Doctors, nurses, drivers, journalists, artists… provide a link between two worlds that outsourcing has brought closer together in the contemporary era. Both volunteers and conscripts undergo a change of status when they join the armed forces. The transition from the civilian to the military world may be a life-changing event, but it may also become part and parcel of one’s daily rhythm as war can increasingly be pursued without even leaving the home country (for example, with the development of drone technology). How do the military manage to attract civilians into donning the uniform? How do the veterans reintegrate into civilian life and overcome the trauma of waging war, especially when serious injury makes them unfit for further service. The study of the relationships between the civilian and the military implies research into the artefacts of war, conveying the perception of combat by the military themselves or by the civilians observing them. This relationship is founded on a variety of objects aiming at boosting admiration for war heroes or condemnation of war criminals. Reality turns into fiction as it becomes a political or romanticized narrative in film and on television, in literature and in the arts – and this transformation illuminates the civilians’ perception of war as well as soldiers’ perception of themselves. In 2021, to mark the tenth year anniversary of the active and fruitful collaboration on the theme of war memories, our research groups – ACE (Rennes), the Royal Military College of Canada (Kingston, Ontario) and 3L.AM (Le Mans) – would like to offer researchers and members of civil society the opportunity to participate in workshop discussions on the subject of sexual violence and abuse perpetuated as a weapon of war, and on the fate of children in wartime, in addition to the themes in the non-exhaustive list given below. Other possible workshops: –  Remembering, transmitting war (commemorations, textbooks (paper or e-learning), museums…) and narrating war (children’s literature, graphic novels, essays, short stories, drama, poetry…) – Drawing, photographing or filming war (documentaries, docu-fictions, ethno-fiction) – Medialization of war (news bulletins, news reports, blogs, social media, websites…) – War and the human dimension: testimonies of trauma and the management of emotions (from military to civilian points of view) –  Childhood in wartime: mobilization of children in armed conflicts; staging children characters in, fictional and non-fictional, war narratives; writing or representing war for a young public – Women civilians and the military in war; women as war weapons and victims With keynote speeches by: Jonathan Bignell (Professor of Television and Film, Reading University, United Kingdom) Keynote provisional  title: Television and Ephemerality: Remembering and Forgetting War Daniel Palmieri (Historian, International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland) Keynote provisional title: “Now, the World without me”. Humanitarians and Sexual Violence in Time of War Stéphanie Bélanger (Professor, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario) Keynote provisional title: Voice or Loyalty? Dealing with Memories in the Armed Forces Terence McSWEENEY (Southampton/London, UK) Keynote provisional title: Film as Cultural Battleground: War, Conflict and Human Rights in Contemporary Global Cinema

SUBMISSION DEADLINE : 30 JANUARY 2021

All submissions will be considered after the deadline of 30 January 2021. Please send your abstract (350 words) and biography (200 words) directly to the conference website. You will need to create an account in the Submission section before filling up the fields required and uploading your document (see information on the conference website). We will not be able to give you any news concerning the acceptance of your work before 30 January 2021.
*
Deadline for Submissions, Jan. 30, 2021

Making a Murderer: True Crime in Contemporary American Popular Culture

Crime Fiction Studies
“Everybody’s fascinated with the notion that there is a cause and effect,” claims notorious serial killer Ted Bundy, quoted in the Netflix original, Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (2019) – that we can “put our finger on it,” and reassuringly rationalise the genesis of the uniquely modern phenomenon of the American serial killer. But when there is “absolutely nothing” in the background of a serial murderer that would lead one to believe they were “capable of committing murder,” how do we begin to acclimatise ourselves to this violent defect of contemporary history? More challengingly, how do we bring depth to our collective portrait of what constitutes a murderer, so that we may then self-exempt our compulsion to look more closely at these perversely familiar figures? Over the last 50 years, a plethora of books, magazines, film and television adaptations on the subject of true crime has captured – and held – the public imagination in a vice-like grip, ultimately achieving cult status in postwar-American society while furthermore granting the white male serial killer the kind of cultural capital usually awarded only to celebrities. With the enormous popularity of such series as Making a Murderer (2015) and Mindhunter (2017), however, it seems like now, more than ever, the uneasy question of why we continue to glorify killers by inserting them into mainstream media – and what exactly the appeal of this enduring genre and its mythologization of ultraviolent masculinities tells us about ‘who we are’ and the nature of American society itself – has acquired a new level of urgency, which, in turn, requires new depths of understanding. Likewise, with the growing Netflixisation of true crime, and the narrativization of true crime more broadly, now is the time to establish a study that evaluates the politics of the ever-increasing fine line between actual crime documentaries versus fictional shows that reference true crime. Following the University of Edinburgh’s popular ‘True Crime’ workshop series, organised by Harriet Stilley and Victoria Madden and funded by the British Association for American Studies, we are delighted to announce the call for papers for ‘Making a Murderer: True Crime in Contemporary American Popular Culture.’ This special issue of the Edinburgh University Press Crime Fiction Studies journal capitalises on a recent swell of public interest in true crime narratives, offering informed analyses of the styles of violence, intimacy, sociality, and belief that constitute the abnormal normality of the world of true crime in the American cultural imagination. Specifically, this collection of essays will explore and evaluate the multiple, contested social and/or psychological significances of murderous crime in a range of discourses from the early twenty-first century, including – but not restricted to – film and television. In doing so, we seek to address a host of difficult moral, ethical, and social questions surrounding the study of true crime – questions that force us to confront both the cultural machinery of the genre as well as our role as consumers within this framework and yet, paradoxically, are often too easily ignored. We are thus asking for abstracts for this special issue that consider the correlations between recent true crime narratives and the broader culture within which they have become gravely significant in order to shed some more light on this important but often neglected area of study. Possible topics for this special issue may include, but are in no way limited to:
  • True Crime and Neflix (the narrativisation of true crime more broadly)
  • True Crime as Contemporary Gothic Horror
  • The Legacy of the White Male Serial Killer
  • True Crime and Celebrity Culture
  • Hypermasculine Violence and Female ‘Victimhood’
  • The Female ‘Monster’ versus the Male ‘Icon’ (and the gender implications of this more broadly)
  • Abnormality versus Normality (and conceptions of the American family)
  • True Crime and Representations of Race
Abstracts of 400 words are due by 31st January 2021 and finished articles of 6500 words will be due in July 2021. This issue will be published in March 2022. Please send abstracts and a biographical statement of 150 words to the editors Harriet Stilley and Victoria Madden at makingamurderercfs@gmail.com. We welcome all questions and inquiries.
*
Wednesday 20 January 7:00 pm GMT  Zoom Registration page link: Webinar Registration – Zoom
 This Spring Term, the Royal Drawing School’s Online Lecture Series hosts Creative Conversations; dialogues between artists, curators and writers, live on Wednesday evenings. The series is curated by Dr Claudia Tobin, lectures are held at 7pm live on Zoom.
Artist and activist Bobby Baker will be in-conversation with artist and writer Dr Sarah Lightman about a life of drawing. They will talk about how we have claimed time and space to make work, as women and mothers.
Bobby Baker studied painting at Saint Martins School of Art (now Central Saint Martins) between 1968-72, but felt disillusioned by the elitist and chauvinist culture of the art world, where she saw very few visible women artists. “Then I had this sudden and exciting idea – to make art out of cake. It was so funny, so rebellious, so interesting in its newness. And so liberating to discover my own language to make work about what it was to be a young woman in the modern world. In those days it was so normal to be patronised and underestimated as a woman that I found the only way to deal with it was by using humour and subversion in my work.”She became a performance artist but retained her huge love of the visual arts, and drawing in particular. She has made drawings in many places and on many surfaces throughout her career: on walls as part of installations, story boards for films, sketch books, and has made many diaries of drawings about her daily life – drawing wherever she is – at home, on holiday, in waiting rooms and on tour. Last year COVID propelled her into borrowing money to build a studio in her garden to finally have the space to focus on drawing, entirely. Baker’s feminist practice champions intersectionality and expressly aims to focus on the undervalued and stigmatised aspects of women’s daily lives. In a career spanning four decades, Baker has been widely commissioned, including by WOW – Women of the World Festival; LIFT; and the London 2012 Cultural Olympiad. Her highly acclaimed exhibition, Diary Drawings: Mental Illness and Me, premiered at the Wellcome Collection, London, in 2009 and continues to tours globally. The accompanying book of the same name won the MIND Book of the Year 2011. Baker’s most recent projects include the major commission Great & Tiny War for the 14-18 NOW arts programme for the First World War centenary. This site-specific work took over an entire house in Newcastle at the end of 2018, and in 2019, won Best Event Tyneside at the Journal Culture Awards. In 2019, La Casa Encendida in Madrid held a retrospective of Baker’s work, Tarros de Chutney. As part of this, Baker launched her new and on-going project: EPIC DOMESTIC – a Domestic Revolutionary Party fit for the Twenty First Century.
Baker’s most recent projects include the major commission Great & Tiny War for the 14-18 NOW arts programme for the First World War centenary. This site-specific work took over an entire house in Newcastle at the end of 2018, and in 2019, won Best Event Tyneside at the Journal Culture Awards. In 2019, La Casa Encendida in Madrid held a retrospective of Baker’s work, Tarros de Chutney. As part of this, Baker launched her new and on-going project: EPIC DOMESTIC – a Domestic Revolutionary Party fit for the Twenty First Century.
Dr. Sarah Lightman (b.1975) is a London-based artist and writer, and Honorary Research Fellow at Birkbeck, University of London. For the last 20 years her research and artwork has focussed on women’s visual memoirs. She studied at Central St Martin’s, The Slade School of Fine Art and the University of Glasgow. Her publications include Graphic Details: Jewish Women’s Confessional Comics in Essays and Interviews (McFarland 2014), and her autobiographical graphic novel, The Book of Sarah (Myriad Editions and Penn State University Press 2019). Over the last 12 years, she has published her writings on Bobby Baker’s work in books and journals, and in 2019 she was commissioned by The Wellcome Trust and Daily Life Ltd. to write the catalogue essay Great & Tiny War. She teaches Graphic Narratives at the Royal Drawing School.
*
Deadline for Submissions, January 16, 2020

The Howard University Graduate English Student Association’s 5th Annual Conference

Forging Identities: Agency, Voice, and Representation in African American Literature and Beyond

Deadline for Submissions: January 16, 2021 Conference Date: March 26, 2021 Conference Location: Zoom Keynote Speaker: Dr. Keith D. Leonard, Author of Fettered Genius In her 1993 Nobel Lecture, the late Toni Morrison said, “Language alone protects us from the scariness of things with no names. Language alone is meditation.” Throughout the history of the African diaspora, Black people have demonstrated the power of language and cultural narratives to (re)envision, (re)imagine, and (re)articulate notions of identity. To interrogate and investigate the complex relationship between narratives of artistic production and identity formation, The Graduate English Student Association invites presentations, panels, and roundtables for its fifth annual conference on the theme Forging Identities: Agency, Voice, and Representation in African American Literature and Beyond. We ask participants to consider how art and language both mediate the imposition of identity and continually birth new forms of identifying. How do literature and cultural creations aid in the crafting of multilayered, complex identities that represent Blackness beyond binaries and monoliths? How do Black artists both confront their oppression and envision their liberation? This conference, then, invites interrogation of cultural production from the Black Diaspora (e.g., music, drama, visual art, literature, and so on) as it conveys discourse on notions of identity (e.g., race, class, gender, sexuality, and so on). Papers from a variety of disciplines and interdisciplinary approaches will be considered. Possible fields of study include literature, including African, African Amerian, and Caribbean literatures; history, performance studies, women and gender studies, and so forth. Possible topics include but are not limited to the following: identity formation in a transnational context; expressions of intersectionality within artistic practice; rhetorics of identity, including digital rhetoric; performing identity in virtual spaces; interrogating diversity, identity, and color blindness in “post”-racial America; identifying through speech acts, articulations, and spoken word; controlling images and misrepresentation; social media and autobiographical writing; navigating the intersections: race, gender, and sexuality; diversity and education, including literacy. Send a 250-word abstract and a short bio to gesasecretary@gmail.com by the January 16, 2021.
Deadline for Submissions, January 15, 2020

Women of the Harlem Renaissance

Society for the Study of American Women Writers

Triennial Conference, Baltimore, Nov. 4-7, 2021

This panel will explore the multiple ways women participated in the Harlem Renaissance, a period during which women writers were particularly prominent. Paper proposals are welcome on women writing in any genre—novels, stories, poetry, journalism, drama, memoir, letters—as well as across genres. Possible topics include:
  • women’s networks during the Harlem Renaissance
  • the urban and the rural
  • Harlem and the nation
  • ecocritical perspectives on the Harlem Renaissance
  • women’s visibility and invisibility
  • lesser known women of the Harlem Renaissance
  • the Harlem Renaissance in the archives
  • teaching texts from the Harlem Renaissance
  • literature and other arts
  • abilities and disabilities in the Harlem Renaissance
Please send proposals to Lynn Domina at ldomina@nmu.edu. Deadline: Jan. 15, 2021 *
Deadline for Submissions, January 15, 2021

What do we talk about when we talk about queer death? Call for short contributions (Whatever Journal, issue 4))

Whatever. A Transdisciplinary Journal of Queer Theories and Studies (https://whatever.cirque.unipi.it/) is inviting submissions for short contributions (500-2000 words) to be collected in a multi-authored article entitled “What do we talk about when we talk about queer death?”. The article will introduce the themed section Queer thanatologies (edited by A.C. Corradino, C. Dell’Aversano, R. Langhi and M. Petricola) that will appear in Whatever’s next issue in summer 2021. Queer death studies has recently emerged as a transdisciplinary field of inquiry investigating the cultural performances related to death, dying, grief, and disposal from the perspective of queer theory, defined as a hermeneutical stance whose premises could be summed up as follows: «queer states that any construction of identity (including LGBT ones) is a performance constituting a subject which does not “exist” prior to it, and encourages to bring into being (both as objects of desire, of fantasy and of theoretical reflection and as concrete existential and political possibilities) alternative modes of performance» (Dell’Aversano 2010: 74-75). Driven by the will to «reconceptualis[e] death, dying and mourning in relentlessly norm-critical ways» (Radomska, Mehrabi, and Lykke 2020: 82), the field of queer death studies is developing and expanding in a number of directions. Some center on an «overall attention to necropolitics and necropowers» (ibidem: 85); some focus on peripheral, non-normative, and anti-normative identities, among which are those falling within the LGBT+ spectrum; some devote to non-humans as both subjects and objects of grief; some explore the construction of corpses as objects of desire in literature and the arts, as well as their position in spiritual and other kinds of political activism; some are grounded in category theory and the social sciences and aimed at the theoretical deconstruction of the life/death polarity itself, considered as one of the most fundamental constructs for the development of every human culture; some critically-affirmatively take a posthuman and/or decolonial point of departure in life/death, considered as a spiritual-material continuum, encouraging an ecophilosophical focus on the vibrancies of all non/living matter beyond the dualisms (mind-soul/body, culture/nature, human/non-human), cherished by Western modernity. We encourage scholars, activists, thanatologists, and other queer death friends working in any field to contribute to the ongoing development of queer death studies by answering the question “what do we talk about when we talk about queer death?” in a bite-sized format. Your theoretical reflections, case studies, notes, and thoughts are invaluable for mapping this ever-expanding field. Short contributions should be sent to Mattia Petricola (mattia.petricola@gmail.com) by January 15, 2021. For any question or information, for expressing your interest in this publication or discussing your contribution, do not hesitate to get in touch. References Dell’Aversano, Carmen. 2010. ‘The Love Whose Name Cannot Be Spoken: Queering the Human-Animal Bond’. Journal for Critical Animal Studies VIII (1/2): 73–125. http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/JCAS-Vol-VIII-Issue-I-and-II-2010-Full-Issue1.pdf. Radomska, Marietta, Tara Mehrabi, and Nina Lykke. 2020. ‘Queer Death Studies: Death, Dying and Mourning from a Queerfeminist Perspective’. Australian Feminist Studies 35 (104): 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2020.1811952.
* Deadline for Submissions: January 15, 2021
Call for Papers: Virtual Conference HIDDEN HISTORIES: WOMEN AND SCIENCE IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY Organizers: Dr Amelia Bonea (University of Heidelberg) & Dr Irina Nastasă-Matei (University of Bucharest) 7-8 May 2021 Submission deadline: 15 January 2021 The twentieth century has often been hailed as a period when women became important in science, but their participation in scientific inquiry and practice often remains buried, quite literally, in the footnotes of specialist publications and studies of the history of science. Even today, national statistics about women in science are not always easily available. The data that does exist suggests there is significant regional and cultural variation in how women engage with science globally. Recent UNESCO surveys, for example, point to a contrast between the former Soviet republics of Central Asia, where almost half of the researchers employed in science are female, and East, South and West Asia, where that proportion drops significantly to 23 percent or less. Similarly, in Eastern European countries female researchers tend to be better represented in science fields than their Western European counterparts. Perhaps ironically, that relationship is reversed when we turn our attention to studies of the history of science in the twentieth century: the scientific pursuits of women in Western contexts have consistently enjoyed more visibility than those in regions like Africa, Asia or Eastern Europe. The Biographical Dictionary of Women in Science (2000) is emblematic of these trends, listing as it does a mere 17 scientists from India, China and Japan, as opposed to more than 500 from Great Britain, and featuring entries up to the 1950s, a period that roughly overlaps with decolonization in Asia. This two-day virtual conference, accompanied by a roundtable discussion, brings together scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds to address two main, interrelated questions:
  • How did women contribute to the making and communication of scientific knowledge in the twentieth century?
  • How do we study the history of women in science during this period?
We begin from the premise that encounters with science happened in a multitude of settings and that statistical data, while essential, provides only a superficial insight into the myriad experiences of women in science and, indeed, what science itself meant in different regional and cultural contexts. Our aim is to move beyond the popular ‘heroine’ model to investigate the many hidden figures who worked not only as professional scientists, but also at the periphery and even outside of scientific communities as lab technicians, amateur scientists, school teachers, librarians, journalists or science writers. In so doing, we hope to raise new questions and formulate new methods for writing the history of women in science. What, for example, do textbooks, forgotten footnotes in scientific papers, conversations about female colleagues in male scientists’ correspondence or photographs of Indian women toiling at archaeological sites teach us about the history of women in science? Possible topics include:
  • Gender and the historiography of science: theories, methods and archives
  • Pedagogy of science: government policies around science and education, women in tertiary education, science clubs, science in the home, science education in religious institutions
  • Cultures of scientific practice: laboratories, fieldwork, secondary school teaching, scientific instruments, relationship between professional and amateur science
  • Scientific communication: scientific periodicals, mass media and science journalism, museum work, popular science writing, photography, the arts
  • Representations of women and gender in science
  • Women and scientific networks: personal and professional networks, associational culture
Keynote speakers: Prof Mariko Ogawa (Mie University) & Prof Andrea Pető (CEU) We welcome contributions from both experienced and early career scholars. We encourage especially scholars working in/on countries and regions that are less represented to apply, in order to promote a global dialogue on this matter. Please send your proposals for 20-minute papers (abstracts of max. 300 words), along with a brief biographical note, to womeninscience2021@gmail.com by the deadline of 15 January 2021. Successful applicants will be notified by 15 February 2021. The conference will be held virtually via Zoom or heiCONF and participants will have the option of presenting their papers live or in pre-recorded format. For queries please do not hesitate to contact the organizers at the above email address.
Contact Info:
Dr Amelia Bonea (University of Heidelberg) & Dr Irina Nastasă-Matei (University of Bucharest) womeninscience2021@gmail.com
* Deadline for Submissions January 10, 2021

Call for Papers

Samyukta: A Journal of Gender and Culture (ISSN: 2393-8013)

January, 2021 issue (online)

Special number on Life Writing

Life Writing in its conceptual, creative or hands-on versions articulates very intriguing reconfigurations. Writing about one’s own life/lives, writing about the lives of others- real or imagined, the living vs the not so much alive or the non-living has been loaded with the complexities of agency, perspective and cultural currency. The politics of non-human narratives in the age of the Anthropocene has evolved into an entire discipline. One has also to be mindful about the word writing and what sort of rhetoric and knowledge it entails and presupposes respectively. Lives ‘written’ through art, music, sometimes through graffiti or word of mouth has repopulated the significations of textuality. Whose are these lives that are being presented? Why? By whom? And what facets of these lives swim to the surface? These questions have never been satisfactorily answered. And neither should they be. Because Life and the many meanings it has acquired does not allow one to settle for answers. Rather, the questions present interesting possibilities regarding the matrices and impulses that govern the world over time. The need to chronicle, to confess, profess, clarify, edify or to preserve for posterity, the possibilities, motives, methods are limitless, leading Life Writing to draw from diverse disciplines and speaks many dialects of knowledge. This edition of Samyukta: A Journal of Gender and Culture looks at the possibilities that Life Writing presents- as an elastic genre, as an ongoing conversation between the agencies governing human interaction, as power, as knowledge and other associated slants and angles. We are interested in critical examinations of how Life Writing evolved over time from being read as a clutch of diaries to the intense revelation of cultural and historic connects between philosophies, religions, languages and selves. Exclusionary politics and the subtle art of self- censorship are concerns that draw greater attention to glaring absences. These concerns also establish delicate bridges with the many positions that truths occupy -personally, philosophically, ethically and theologically. Intersections between the global, the local and the Anglophone and the issues of economic viability, visibility and contemporary geopolitics govern who gets written and read. The agency presented by social media to narrate lives and the issues of digital divide add yet another angle to the discourse. The way that Life Writing places people, the politics of gender and power, the stories of movements, nationhood and social systems through the accounts of the self and the times throws the spotlight on the many modernities that we experience and live through today. Possible topics could include but are not limited to: The archeology of Life Writing The teleological, narrative and spatial politics of Life Writing The many Subjectivities of Life Writing The nuances of Text and Writing in Life Writing Decoding ‘Life’ in Life Writing Gender and Life Writing Writing Lives, Writing History Reading Social Movements through Life Writing Reading Ideologies through Life Writing Writing Life through Art: Performing Lives. Survivor narratives Writing the non-human Life Writing and Social Media Translating Vernacular Lives: Who gets Translated and Why? Biopics as Life Writing An abstract of 200 words should be sent to samyuktainfo@gmail.com by 10 January 2021 Selected abstracts will be intimated by 15 January 2021. The full paper must be sent to samyuktainfo@gmail.com by 25 January 2021. The paper must be between 3000-5000 words, in Times New Roman size 12 and must comply with the stipulations of the MLA Handbook (8th edition). Guest Editor for the issue is Kukku Xavier, Assistant Professor, Department of English, All Saints’ College, Thiruvananthapuram. Samyukta: A Journal of Gender & Culture is a bi-annual, peer-reviewed, academic journal published from Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, since January 2001. Through incisive questioning of entrenched stances and deep biases, the journal has by now emerged as a leading publication from India in the field of Gender and Cultural Studies. Acknowledging the fact that our thinking, language and actions are defined by culture, papers published in Samyukta have consistently examined the cultural dimensions that impact gender roles. More recently the journal has foregrounded  the ethics of sexual difference in its papers as a matter of policy. A galaxy of scholars from India and abroad, Margot Badran, Uma Chakravarti, Imrana Qadeer, Sneja Gunew, Ritu Menon, Ilina Sen to name a few, have acted as Guest Editors for the journal.
*
Deadline for Submissions, Jan. 8, 2021
The Art of Forgetting: Memory, Loss, and Revision Department of English, Fourteenth Graduate Student Conference, University of Ottawa, March 5-7, 2021 (1/8/2021; 3/5-7/2021)
The loss of memory can extend from the deeply personal to broader social and collective experiences. The art of ‘forgetting,’ or ars oblivionalis, allows us to reflect on how we memorialize this loss through both private and public monuments to our memories and shared pasts. Umberto Eco believed an ars oblivionalis was impossible: he maintained that deliberate forgetting couldn’t be achieved and that any framework erected to understand such an art would, paradoxically, forestall the natural processes of oblivion. For Nietzsche, ‘active’ forgetting could only be practiced as selective remembering. Nevertheless, many writers and theorists have examined forgetting in diverse and productive ways. In Forgetful Remembrance (2018), Guy Beiner has argued that forgetting is feasible, but Eco was not entirely wrong: forgetting exercises do not result in total obliteration of memory, but in its diminution. Forgetting therefore gives expression to the ethical responsibility memorializing confers on us in the present. Forgetting exerts a considerable influence on storytelling. Writing about the holocaust, Paul Ricoeur has cautioned that forgetting will “kill the victims twice,” but remembering can “prevent life stories from becoming banal” (Figuring The Sacred 290). M. NourbeSe Philip sees significance in the “residue of memory” which remains after we forget, and draws an essential analogy between loss, what is left, and “the attempted erasure of the memories of the Africans brought as slaves to the New World”  (“A Long-Memoried Woman” 146-147). Dionne Brand, by contrast, narrates the conflict arising from deliberately forgetting trauma in her novel In Another Place, Not Here (1996). Forgetting in Yoko Ogawa’s novel The Memory Police (1994) creates possibilities for exploring the power of memory and the trauma of loss. These areas of inquiry prompt us to ask what further possibilities the art of forgetting generates. For this year’s conference we hope to consider the ethical responsibility for remembrance and to probe the relationship between memory and forgetting generally. Broadly, we ask what is the textual relationship between cultural memory and forgetting? Do approaches to understanding ‘forgetting’ change when we examine collective remembrance rather than individual memory? Why do different groups of people interpret the same events differently—even when the facts are not disputed? What is the utility in exploring trauma and violence when we risk the activation of painful memories? What remembrance do we owe people we have lost and how is that reflected in the monuments we create to commemorate them? How does forgetting shape history, our stories, and narrative? Potential topics can include, but are not limited to:
  • “Forgetting” as an aspect of memory
  • Collective Memory and Social Forgetting
  • Loss of Identity, Culture, and Geographical or Historical space, e.g. diaspora studies
  • Nationalism and Propaganda
  • Monuments, Commemoration, and Remembrance
  • Holocaust / Shoah
  • “Fake news” and Rumour
  • Narratology and the unreliable narrator
  • Vernacular/Alternative Historiography
  • Performance and Oral Histories
  • Uncovering untold histories (queer & BIPOC narratives, etc.)
  • Erasure
  • Archival studies
  • “Forgotten” stories, “Lost” narratives and experiences, e.g. disability studies
  • Memoir Studies
  • Trauma Theory, Psychoanalysis
  • Dementia and mental health narratives
  • Episodic memory/Misremembering
  • Sites of Oblivion
  • Literature of Memory / Mnemotechnic literature
  • Active Forgetting
  • Testimony Literature
  • Time & temporality
The EGSA invites proposals from graduate students and emerging and established academics working in any discipline, period, and geographical region to consider the art of forgetting in its various formulations. Please send 250-word abstracts and a short bio by 8 January 2021 to uottawa.conference@gmail.com. * Deadline for Submissions, January 6, 2021

CFP: 2021 Popular Culture Association Annual (PCA) Conference–Biographies Area: Boston, MA, June 2-5, 2021: Submission Deadline Extension (1/6/21)

The Biographies Area is soliciting papers that examine the connections between biography and popular culture. Papers and full panel presentations regarding any aspect of popular culture and biography are encouraged. Potential topics might include: – Biography and entertainment, art, music, theater – Biography and film – Biography and criminal justice – Television programs about biography – Biography and urban legends – Biography and folklore – Biography and literature – Scholarly Biography – Controversial Biography – Psychoanalysis and Biography – Historical Biography – Political Biography – Autobiography Sessions are scheduled in 1½ hour slots, typically with four papers or speakers per standard session.  Presentations should not exceed 20 minutes. The deadline for submissions has been extended to January 6, 2021. The Popular Culture Association is committed to holding the conference in June 2021. Given recent events, there will likely be a hybrid/virtual component. To submit an abstract, please visit: https://pcaaca.org/conference/submitting-paper-proposal-pca-conference Submissions will only be accepted through the PCA website. Individuals must be current, paid members to submit to the conference. Please direct any queries to the Biographies Area Chair: Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries Las Vegas, NV 89154 susie.skarl@unlv.edu OR susieskarl@gmail.com
Contact Info:
Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries 4505 S. Maryland Pkway. MS 7014 Las Vegas, NV 89154
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Submissions, December 30, 2020

Dissident self-narratives: radical and queer life writing

A Special Issue of Synthesis Journal   (12/30/2020) Life writing is often considered to endorse a universalist liberal humanist ethics that encompasses a broad spectrum that goes from a neoliberal emphasis on self-sufficiency to theories of care that highlight our common vulnerability and interdependence. This universalist humanist ethics, even in its most progressive forms, may blunt life writing’s radical edge and even participate in the silencing and oppression of subaltern beings that fall outside its scope. Thus, diseased, displaced, dissenting, dis-integrated autobiographical voices and life-writing’s dissident potential and radical, queer promises need to be reassessed and reclaimed.
This special issue aims to examine critical and anti-normative explorations of the self as they become manifest in contemporary but also older forms of life writing that have challenged hegemonic discourses shaping human subjectivity, the sexual order and the political status quo. For instance, Marguerite Yourcenar’s ecological decentering of the human race and deconstruction of heteronormativity might outweigh the more traditional elements in her autobiographical triptych. In order to yield its full radical and oppositional possibilities, life writing often embraces public and private chaos and shuns the poise of hindsight. For instance, Louis MacNeice or Klaus Mann write their autobiographies during the Second World War, to foreground, rather than resolve, trauma, madness and the death-drive. Marginality, diseased bodies and ubiquitous death are pervading themes in the autobiographical works of Hervé Guibert, Derek Jarman, David B. Feinberg and Guillaume Dustan, whose writings stand on the threshold between testimony and political activism. As they try to survive AIDS, while also facing the social stigma associated with queer sexualities, they take to task liberal, compassionate readers, and construct a subaltern counter-public of queer alter egos.  Earlier, Claude Cahun’s fragmented Disavowals or René Crevel’s “inner panoramas” have wreaked havoc in “the old logical-realistic attic” and challenged not only the confessional tradition but also the binary structure of rational discourse. Another form of critical and anti-normative exploration of the self can be found in the way Roland Barthes keeps at bay psychological narratives of healing and mourning. More recently, in his account of his F to M transition through rogue self-medication, Paul B. Preciado bypasses psychology in order to foreground the biopolitical dimension of subjects shaped and invented by media images and pharmaceutical molecules, but also to map out possibilities of micro-resistance. In the different context of North-American structural racism, John Wideman’s “black rage” and multi-layered writing eschew a personal linear narrative of self-made success and integration. While foregrounding certain writers standing at the margins of the current academic literary canon, this special issue also draws attention to the more highly profiled writers who can also be read as voices of dissent that oppose the tenets of liberal humanism. We invite submissions that examine life writing that disrupts canonical autobiographical paradigms that are informed by the nineteenth-century Bildungsroman, which has often centered on a socially integrated narrator who looks back with retrospective wisdom, pride, regret or nostalgia, consolidating thereby an identity grounded in dominant conceptions of what a life, a self and a reading public should be like. We welcome contributions that discuss the ways by which life writing challenges hegemonic paradigms of self-knowledge, subjectivity and reader reception, by radically questioning gender, racial and class norms. –Abstracts of 300 words should be submitted to Aude Haffen at marie-aude.haffen@univ-montp3.fr andsynthesisjournal2008@gmail.com by 20 December 2020. –Notification of acceptance will be delivered by 11 January 2021. –Accepted articles are to be submitted by 30 June 2021. –Final articles should be 6,000-9,000 words long and include an abstract of no more than 300 words.
Contact Info:
All enquiries regarding this issue should be sent to the guest editor, Aude Haffen, at marie-aude.haffen@univ-montp3.fr.
* Deadline for Submissions: 15 December 2020. World Literature and the Minor: Figuration, Circulation, Translation” (12/15/2020; 5/6-7/2021) University of Leuven, Belgium (Online) Conference website https://www.arts.kuleuven.be/world-literature-and-the-minor-figuration-circulation-translation Call for papers (abridged version) The conference “World Literature and the Minor: Figuration, Circulation, Translation” will explore the multifaceted meanings of the minor from different disciplinary perspectives—as it is represented in literary texts (figuration), as it inflects patterns of mobility and reception (circulation), and as it marks processes of linguistic and cultural transfer (translation). The conference will work towards a critical, more inclusive understanding of the minor, both conceptually and methodologically. Deadline for abstract submission: 15 December 2020. Please send your proposal to minorliterature@kuleuven.be Keynote speakers Michael Cronin (Trinity College Dublin) B. Venkat Mani (UW-Madison) Francesca Orsini (SOAS) Lyndsey Stonebridge (Birmingham) Online format In order to stimulate as much interaction as possible, the conference panels will consist of small working groups based on pre-circulated papers. The participants will have 5 minutes to summarize their paper. The presentations will be followed by a short response and a general discussion. We plan to publish a selection of the papers in a thematic special journal issue and a book. The aim of the discussions is to establish common threads between the different topics and to work towards expanded versions of the papers suitable for publication. Important dates 15 December 2020: deadline for abstract submission 15 January 2021: notification of acceptance 1 March 2021: deadline for online registration 20 April 2021: deadline for paper submission 6-7 May 2021: conference Contact email: nuria.codina@kuleuven.be * Deadline for Submissions: 15 December 2020

Narrative Knowing in Heritage and Travel Online Conference

December 15, 2020 / May 27, 2021Plymouth
Subject Fields:
Architecture and Architectural History, French History / Studies, Geography, German History / Studies, Literature
Writers such as W G Sebald and Sven Lindqvist employed literary travel writing to emotionally and psychologically translate their fieldwork experiences into their writings about place, while Walter Benjamin combined ideas of narrative knowing with practices that offer public engagement and impact for his ideas. This conference explores how methods of contemporary literary travel writing can be brought into the work of academic researchers, writers and professionals in the fields of cultural heritage interpretation. Proposals for papers are invited from researchers and from heritage and tourism practitioners that explore narrative non-fiction as a literary form or as professional practice for writing about place. Established academics and postgraduate or doctoral researchers are encouraged to submit their proposals. Further, pedagogic approaches to teaching interpretative and writing practices for these fields are also encouraged. We are delighted to announce our Keynote speaker, literary travel writer and pyschogeographer Gareth E Rees, author of Unofficial Britain: Journeys through Unexpected Places (2020), Carpark Life (2019) and the Marshland: Dreams and Nightmares on the edge of London (2013). We expect to publish an edited collection of presented papers. Deadline for Proposals is midnight UTC on December 15, 2020.
Proposals must include the title of the paper, author’s name, email and affiliation. Please include a description of the paper in up to 300 words plus two or three indicative bibliographic references. Please email proposals to: Dr Charlie Mansfield, Co-Director, Cornerstone Heritage Research Centre, University of Plymouth. Email charlie.mansfield@plymouth.ac.uk In addition, the conference plans to display posters digitally, in A0-size, single-slide landscape format in PowerPoint, for delegates to download and view offline. Please propose these by email in a Word document with the title of the poster, name, email and affiliation and brief description of the work plus two indicative bibliographic references. Conference language: English. Zoom will be used.

*

Announcement: Call-for-Papers

Deadline: December 15, 2020 This call is for submissions for an international edited collection entitled Taking Control: the critical and creative uses of digital tools in the now, the foreseeable future, and beyond, in screen, literature, and the visual arts. Taking Control seeks to examine the current uses, and the potential for expansion and extension, and possible future uses of AI in relation to screen and literature and visual culture texts and narratives; as well as the little explored angle of cultural criticism and cultural meaning in those human-AI assisted productions. Suggestions for potential contributions to Taking Control are: how the use of AI in these productions may sharpen, and ask for answers to, big questions that intersect with our society and environment and worlds; encourage further research that opens new possibilities as well as an open-mindedness in the quest for a deeper understanding; create platforms that cross cultures and borders, to become inter- and multidisciplinary; provide immediate access to resources that we can trust to provide accurate information, and that is enriching and productive; and bring to the table a common “language” that can create a shared experience, with the potential to cross borders into other disciplines, and sustain our cultural heritage. The aim of Taking Control is to highlight the human-AI blend in creativity as a vibrant multidisciplinary thematic area where we urgently need better understanding and clear parameters to judge success and failure. Technology can be misused, yet in the human-AI blend humans have the power to intervene. In these interactions, there is the potential to take things to a different level. The power of the human, the ability to think differently, and critically and creatively, together with the technical abilities of the immediate computer for holding, sorting, and providing masses of big data, hold out the possibility of expanded human creativity. When you choose and use information fairly, it makes the outcome compelling and accurate. AI affects what people look for; what they enter, and how they respond, and what that reveals and changes about the people, can affect our societies and cultures. Wherever you add questions about our environment, for instance, AI it sharpens it so we can relate to it.  Thus, how it relates to the human experience, to our world, and human society, much depends on how we manage it, where we take it and what we do with it. Questions remain: In what ways can human-AI assisted screen, literature and visual culture texts and narratives expand, grow, and bring deeper understanding of ourselves, our worlds, our environment, our culture and society, and bring about change?  How do these works address cultural criticism, and social and cultural meanings, and add to our understanding of our cultures and society? What is the potential for exploring human experience and that connect to our world, and the possible import of these productions for the future? Admittedly, there are differing views and opinions on the future of AI. Some think an Artificial General Intelligence  can exist and others think not. What does all this mean for our future society and culture? At this initial stage, in lieu of “chapters,” this proposed work, Taking Control, calls for extended abstracts for consideration for inclusion in the book. Submission instructions:
  1. The extended abstracts must be more than 1,000 and less than 1,500 words.
(Full-length chapters of 6,000 – 7,000words each (including notes but excluding references lists, title of work, and key words) will be solicited from these abstracts.)
  1. Please keep in mind that your essay-chapter will be written from your extended abstract. Your abstract will carry the same title as your essay-chapter.
  2. To be considered, abstracts must be written in English, and submitted as a Word document.
  3. When writing your abstract use Times New Roman point 12,and 1.15 spacing.
  4. At the beginning of your extended abstract, immediately after the title of your work and your name, add 5 to 8 keywords that best relate to your work.
  5. Use the Chicago Manual of Style 16th Edition.
  6. Since this work is for Palgrave Macmillan UK, please use English spelling not American English spelling.
  7. Use endnotes not footnotes, use counting numbers not Roman numerals, and keep the endnotes to a bare minimum, working the information into the text where possible.
  8. Do cite all your work in your extended abstract as you would in a full chapter.
a) in the body of the abstract, add parenthetical in-text citations (family name of author and year, and page number/s) (e.g. Smith 2019, 230); b) fully reference all in-text citations in alphabetical order, in the References list at the end of your abstract.
  1. Please send your abstract and your documents as attachments to an email. At the same time as submitting your extended abstract, in separate documents please send the following:
  • Your covering letter, giving your academic title/s, affiliation, your position, and your home and telephone, and email contact details;
  • A short bio of no more than 200 words;
  • Your C.V., giving your publications to date, and the publishing details and dates.
Papers should be forwarded to: Jo Parnell Jo.Parnell@newcastle.edu.au  alternatively annette.parnell@newcastle.edu.au  or joandbobparnell@bigpond.com Deadline for abstracts: 15 December 2020. Editor: Dr Jo Parnell, Conjoint Research Fellow, Faculty of Education and Arts, School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Newcastle, Australia. *
Deadline for Registration, Dec. 1, 2020 Unhinging the National Framework: Platform for the Study of Transnational Life Writing Fifth Annual Symposium Friday 4 December 2020 9.00 – 17.00 Location: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Main Building 5A00 + online via Zoom Webinar Free of charge, but please register before 1 December. How to register: https://clue.vu.nl/en/news-agenda/news-archive/2020/okt-dec/201204-unhinging.aspx Program Keynote speakers: Prof. dr. Halleh Ghorashi, Professor of Diversity and Integration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Dr. Anna Poletti, Associate Professor Comparative Literature, Utrecht University Prof. dr. Gloria Wekker, Professor Emerita, Gender and Ethnicity, Utrecht University Speakers: Dr. Vera Alexander, Senior Lecturer in European Cultures and Literatures, Groningen University Prof. dr. Susan Legêne, Professor of Political History, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Dr. Vilan van de Loo, independent writer and researcher. Prof. dr. Giles Scott-Smith, Professor of Diplomatic History, Leiden University Speakers and abstracts (in order of appearance) Anna Poletti, Associate Professor Comparative Literature, Utrecht University Autobiography, mediation and transnationalism: Behrouz Boochani’s No Friend But the Mountains Behrouz Boochani’s award-winning No Friend But the Mountains: Writing from Manus Prison is a hybrid work of life writing, composed on illicit mobile phones and secretly transmitted to a team of translators and supporters via WhatsApp. Documenting and theorizing the violence of Australia’s indefinite mandatory detention in camps on remote Pacific nations of people seeking asylum, No Friend But the Mountains is a uniquely transnational intellectual and aesthetic project. Its composition was enabled by digitally networked technologies that were able to evade the blanket of censorship imposed on Australia’s offshore detention centres by Government policies that limited access to the prisons by journalists, human rights organizations, and international monitors. The book’s title—a Kurdish saying that refers to the powerful connection between the Kurdish people and the mountains of their homelands—signals that the writing and thinking of the book is imbedded in and enabled by Boochani’s identity as a Kurdish journalist forced to flee Iran. At the same time, No Friend But the Mountains is a work of theory and life writing that is profoundly transnational; it responds to and seeks to understand the logics of the nation state, citizenship and border policing as techniques of power that produce new forms of violence which transcend national boundaries and jurisdictions, creating complex networks of implication, responsibility, and hierarchies. Drawing on my arguments about autobiography and mediation in my recent book (Stories of the Self (NYU Press, 2020)), a forthcoming collection of essays I commissioned on No Friend But the Mountains for Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, and my experience teaching the book in an international classroom in the Netherlands, I will examine No Friend But the Mountains as a work that exemplifies the role of media technologies in the act of living—and the emergence of—transnational life. Vera Alexander, Senior Lecturer in European Cultures and Literatures, Groningen University Figures of Mobility and the Crisis of Connection In this presentation I locate life stories of mobility in an ongoing crisis of connection and connectivity. I read figures of mobility such as the visitor, the tourist and the refugee as ambivalent signifiers of place and belonging that problematise any simple dichotomy of Self versus Other and Here versus There. Making reference to contemporary  poetic travel writings by Warsan Shire and Kapka Kassabova as well as photography and other media, I argue that the relational nature of life narratives needs to be considered not only in binary terms of social connections between human beings, but as a triad that embraces the precarious relationship that connects human beings to place as well as notions of time and duration. Place relations are subject to utopian idealisation and polarised affective projections as they are constitutive of identity construction. Since these are subject to constant change and reconfiguration, the notion of mobility and its obverse, stagnation, need to be reconceptualised as fundamental dynamic aspects of belonging. Giles Scott-Smith, Professor of Diplomatic History, Leiden University Between Colonial and Post-Colonial? Ivan Kats and the Perils of Cultural Diplomacy in Cold War Indonesia Is it possible to overcome colonial legacies if you promote post-independence cultural autonomy? Ivan Kats was a Flemish/American cultural entrepreneur who developed a profound interest in Indonesia and the development of its national cultural identity. From the 1960s to the 1990s he pursued a book publishing project through his Obor Foundation, that looked to bridge the ethical gap between the resources of Western cultural imperialism and the poverty of the post-colonial culture industry. This presentation places Kats as a ‘double personage’ (Bourdieu) between different worlds, to explore both his projects and motivations. Gloria Wekker, Professor Emerita, Gender and Ethnicity, Utrecht University Families navigating Empire In my presentation I will present excerpts from recent, autobiographical work, which emphatically is work – in – progress. These excerpts will eventually become part of a mixed genre work, based on historical and anthropological knowledge, on non- fiction and fiction. This type of work is currently understood under several different headings, among which “critical fabulation” is prominent. It is a term used by Saidiya Hartman, signifying a writing methodology that combines historical and archival research with critical theory and fictional narrative. Central in my presentation will be different migrations within my multi-ethnic Surinamese family, which encompasses enslaved people, Jewish plantation owners, Native Surinamese. I will talk about transnational, geographical migrations but also about migrations of the heart, where individuals overstepped ethnic boundaries which had long been understood as foundational to empire, to plural societies, which needed to be governed as if the boundaries around different ethnic groups were “natural”. Concretely I will read prose and poetry and reflect on the nature of “critical fabulation”. Dr. Vilan van de Loo, independent writer and researcher Exploring the New Political Correct: Colonial Violence in Aceh Central in my presentation is the possibility of creating a transnational understanding of heroism. To answer this question I will focus on the military Aceh expedition of 1904. Nowadays the Dutch East Indies seems to be reduced to a narrative of military violence during the process of decolonisation, although there is an awareness of the tradition of colonial violence as well, especially in Aceh. The framing of both histories of violence is the same: the officers of the KNIL were more or less war criminals, and the Acehnese were helpless victims. This leads to a postcolonial self-image of superiority among the Dutch: ‘look how good we are to be able to see how bad we have been’. With the exploration of contemporary sources and with the use of a specific military view, the original framing is now fading. My presentation will focus on a new way of looking at the history of the military Aceh expedition of 1904, commanded by Frits van Daalen (1863-1930). I will place this new approach in the context of the early twentieth century’s national need for colonial heroes—from which the Acehnese were excluded. I will also discuss how this related to the making of a civil servant (Van Daalen became governor of Aceh) and take a look at the vulnerable position of Van Daalen. As the highest-ranking Indo-European officer he stood out. What do we see, if we look at the expedition through his eyes, and what does that mean in the way the colonial past is judged? Would it be possible to create a transnational understanding of heroism during this expedition? Halleh Ghorashi, Professor of Diversity and Integration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam BLM: A transnational movement that changed the Dutch landscape In this lecture I will discuss how Black Lives Matter, as a transnational movement, has changed the Dutch landscape regarding the existence of institutional racism and cross-racial solidarities. In the last 25 years, I have been engaging with the life experiences of refugee and migrant women (through various forms of narratives methodology). In these studies these women narrate a strong presence of exclusionary mechanisms (both blatant and subtle) within the Dutch context.  Yet, until recently, the existing implicit and growing explicit forms of racism in the Dutch public space had not led to a public recognition of the existence of structural forms of racism in the Netherlands. In an earlier work, I showed the historical and societal reasons behind the denial of racism in the Dutch context despite the fact that racist acts and statements in the public space had gained a strong presence. I argued that this was partly based on the historically rooted idea of the superiority of Dutch culture in the Dutch migration discourse (which Wekker conceptualized as cultural archive) and its link to the categorical framing of migrants as ‘a problem’ in Dutch society. This history together with a positive self-image of the Dutch as progressive had made it almost impossible for people to accept the notion that racism was part of the Dutch self-image. But something shifted with the arrival of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement in the Netherlands. I argue that Dutch society can take advantage of this momentum to transform its non-reflective progressive image into critical self-reflection and actions aimed at the inclusion of diverse groups by addressing institutional racism beyond “good intentions”. Deadline for Submission: December 1st, 2020. 
Austrian Travel Writing (12/1/2020; 6/17-19/2021) Maynooth University, Ireland Organisers: Florian Krobb, School of Modern Languages, Literatures and Cultures, Maynooth University Caitriona Leahy, Department of German, Trinity College Dublin On 24 February 1879, Empress Elizabeth of Austria (‘Sisi’), participating in a stag hunt out of Summerhill House, residence of the Viscounts of Langfort in Kilcock, County Meath, breached the walls of neighbouring St. Patrick’s College Maynooth. She was greeted by Acting President, Dr William Walsh, a future Archbishop of Dublin. On returning to Ireland one year later, she presented the College with a statue of St George, somewhat unfortunately the patron saint of England. Sisi’s visit – after all the visit of a Catholic monarch from a ‘dual’ monarchy – was otherwise welcomed by Irish nationalists as a potent statement of solidarity. The empress, perhaps contritely, later endowed the College with a set of vestments of gold cloth, decorated with gold and green shamrocks and the coats of arms of Austria, Hungary and Bavaria. The less welcome statue was promptly stolen. Sisi’s visit to Maynooth highlights some of the aspects that make travel such a rewarding subject of academic investigation: the purpose, perception, political implications, symbolism and discourse that attend the actual activity of travelling form a potent, intriguing, often contradictory blend, sometimes in their own time, sometimes later. The aim of the conference is to explore Austrian travel writing in the broadest sense, incorporating all German writing originating from Austria and the Habsburg lands from the Middle Ages to the present day. Travel writing is understood as any text, in fiction or non-fiction, that deals explicitly and substantively with journeys (understood as physical movement through space, not primarily in a figurative or metaphorical sense) and uses an itinerary as a prominent structuring device. As regards purpose, length or destination of the journey, however, engagement with all varieties of travel writing are welcome – internal and external travel, tourism and exploration, ‘discovery’ of the more remote parts of the Habsburg Empire and the core regions of the truncated Austrian republics, as well as regions further afield. We welcome a plurality of methodological and theoretical approaches. We welcome engagement with a variety of genres from pilgrims’ or journeymen’s narratives, accounts of diplomatic or military travel, reports of ‘scientific’ travel (Novara expedition, Payer/Weyprecht Arctic expedition of 1872-74) and accounts of Afrikareisende such as Oscar Baumann, to genres such as travel journalism / reportage and travel poetry. Journeys undertaken in search of refuge and other kinds of migrations might also have found expression in forms of travel writing. We welcome engagement with noteworthy individuals such as Ida Pfeiffer, travel writing on specific destinations with specific agendas (e.g. Felix Salten’s evaluation of Jewish settlement in Palestine 20 years after Herzl’s Altneuland), fresh studies of classics and modern classics by (e.g.) Roth, Bachmann, Handke, Ransmayr, and of more recent postcolonial treatments of historical journeys in the works of (e.g.) Thomas Stangl and Franzobel. We wonder if contemporary attention to the anthropocene across the humanities is also making its mark on the writing of travel literature and on our ways of reading it…? The Coronavirus experience, too, might have opened up new perspectives on travel writing and travel discourse. Conference languages are English and German. A selection of the English papers will be published as vol. 31 (2023) of the MHRA yearbook Austrian Studies. The publication of a selection of the German papers is also envisaged. Both publications will be fully peer-reviewed. Please send an abstract of no more than 250 words and a short bio-blurb (both in the same document) in your chosen language to florian.krobb@mu.ie and cleahy@tcd.ie by 1 December 2020. Attempts will be made to secure some support for early career scholars / non-tenured colleagues, but no promises can be made with regard to funding. However, there will be no conference fee. If public health considerations prevent us from going ahead on the dates indicated above, we will reschedule rather than cancel. In the meantime, we would encourage interested colleagues to submit proposals inevitable uncertainties notwithstanding.
Contact Info:
Prof. Florian Krobb, School of Modern Languages, Literatures and Cultures, Maynooth University / National University of Ireland Maynooth Maynooth, County Kildare, Republic of Ireland
Contact Email:
Deadline for Submission: December 1st, 2020. 
CFP: Special Issue on Life Writing – Ilha do Desterro
Ilha do Desterro, one of the longest-running Brazilian journals devoted to English studies, is currently accepting submissions for a special issue on Life Writing to be published in May 2021. Even though the first recorded uses of “life writing” in English are found in the 17th century as rather straightforward translations of “bios” and “graphein”, we owe much of our current understanding of life writing to Virginia Woolf and her use of the concept in “A Sketch of the Past”. Differently from this earlier use, which simply meant “biography,” after not only Woolf and Lytton Strachey in Britain, but also in American literature with Gertrude Stein and Vladimir Nabokov, as well as Edmund Gosse and W.B. Yeats in Ireland, to name a few, life writing in English has come to encompass an array of genres and forms, across many media, that seek to represent a single life or multiple lives. According to Margaretta Jolly, the concept has gained “wide academic acceptance since the 1980s” because of “its openness and inclusiveness across genre, and because it encompasses the writing of one’s own or another’s life” (ix).In this special issue of Ilha do Desterro, we intend to take a broad and inclusive approach to the concept of life writing and consider articles that cover a range of broadly conceived texts: auto/biographies, letters, memoirs, journals, and diaries all make relevant corpora for study. We are also interested in texts that may not have been published contemporaneously or circulated widely, as this opens “the way for the study, in particular, of a range of women’s writings from earlier periods and for a recognition of the significance of ‘personal’ or ‘private’ writing, including family memoirs, diaries, and journals” (Marcus, 2019, p. 2). This trans- and multidisciplinary issue of Ilha thus invites articles dealing with literary, intermedia, and intermodal genres and forms of life writing, in English speaking contexts or from comparative approaches, including:• Life writing and ethics: truth-telling, mediation, pact-making• Collaborative projects in life writing• Life writing in diasporic movements, migration, and dislocation• “Lives of the obscure,” no more: representation and intersectionality in disability studies, critical race studies, queer studies, and the writing of women’s lives• Writing nonhuman lives: nature, animal, land, objects and life writing• Wandering subjects in life and travel writing• Historical, theoretical, and comparative approaches to life writing• The aesthetics and rhetoric of life writing• The role of the archive in life writing• New platforms for life writing in the 21st, including social mediaReviews are also considered for books published in 2019-2021, under the scope of this literature issue. The journal’s scope is literatures in English—the geopolitical study of works and authors of Anglophone literatures in the light of contemporary critical theories; theoretical and cultural intersections, with a focus on the study of literatures, other arts and media, as well as their interrelations and/or theoretical and cultural specificities.Deadline for Submission: December 1st, 2020.More information: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/announcement/view/1599
* Newsletter Biography Institute November 2020 New series Biography Studies started successfully In the new series Biography Studies (Brill) two first volumes have been published. Hans Renders and David Veltman edited the volume Different Lives. Global Perspectives on Biography in Public Cultures and Societies, whereas Maarten Zwiers and Jelte Olthof were responsible for the publication of Profiles in Power. Personality, Persona, and the U.S. President. On Biografieportaal.nl and in The Biographer’s Craft reviews were published in praise of Different Lives. Both parts are now available in the bookshops. From the cover of Different Lives Internationally acclaimed biographies are almost always written by British or American biographers. But what is the state of the art of biography in other parts of the world? Introduced by Richard Holmes, the volume Different Lives offers a global perspective: seventeen scholars vividly describe the biographical tradition in their countries of interest. They show how biography functions as a public genre, featuring specific societal issues and opinion-making. Indeed, the volume aims to answer the question: how can biography contribute to a better understanding of differences between societies and cultures? Special attention is given to the US, China and the Netherlands. Other contributions are on Australia, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Iceland, Iran, Italy, New Zealand, Spain, and South Africa. Hubert van den Berg hosts workshop at Biography Institute Professor Hubert van den Berg (Palacky university, Czech Republic) will provide a workshop at the Biography Institute on Thursday 19 November, 13-16 hrs. via Zoom. During this workshop, he will discuss ways to avoid trodden paths in archival research. Van den Berg wrote extensively on the historical avant-garde in the Netherlands, Eastern Europe and Scandinavia. In 2017, his book Dada, een geschiedenis appeared at Vantilt publishers. People that are interested to attend the workshop online, can send a mail to the Biography Institute. David Veltman publishes article on Les Plats Pays.com The francophone website Les Plats Pays.com now features an article by David Veltman, PhD student at the Biography Institute, on the friendship between the Flemish painter, Felix de Boeck and the Walloon poet Maurice Carême. More information can be found on the website www.biografieinstituut.nl. For subscribing to and unsubscribing from this newsletter, please email biografie.instituut@rug.nl
*
Subject: Teaching Life Writing Conference Dec 10-11: Registration is Open Dear Colleagues, Registration for the December 10-11 Teaching Life Writing (virtual) Conference is now open! Register Here: https://subline.ualberta.ca/Registration/Create/57?eventItemDef=476 If your paper or round-table presentation has been accepted, please register now. The cost is $5 CD. Do you just want to attend the conference? You can! Register, pay the fee and you will have access to the whole conference. The program is almost ready. When we release it, we will give you instructions about attending the conference in the Round the World format. Promote the conference in your networks! Like us on our Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/lwconf), follow us on Twitter (@lifewritingconf) and check the main conference page (https://subline.ualberta.ca/portals/57) for updates about the conference. We are looking forward to welcoming you soon! The Teaching Life Writing Conference Team (Orly Lael Netzer, Julie Rak, Amanda Spallacci) email: lwconf@ualberta.ca
*
Dear IABA List Members, We are working on Biography’s annual annotated bibliography of critical and theoretical works on life writing, the most extensive reference of its kind, and before finalizing it, we want to make sure it is as timely, inclusive, and extensive as possible. So if during the last year (from December 2019 to December 2020) you have published, edited, or co-edited a book, written an article for a journal or an essay for an edited collection, or completed your doctoral dissertation, we would appreciate having that information, so that we can incorporate it into the list. (There is of course a very good chance that we have already included it—we work on this all year!—but this will make sure your work is noted.) We would request the following information: ·      Full bibliographic information for each text, formatted as per MLA 8 style ·      A one-sentence annotation per text We are especially committed to noting publications in languages other than English. If you could provide an annotation in English, however, that would be helpful. We would appreciate getting the information by Friday, December 4. Please send your information to Zoë Sprott (gabiog@hawaii.edu). Thanks in advance. This bibliography usually has between 1,400 and 1,500 entries, and represents the most extensive annual critical survey of the field. We want to make sure your work appears within it. —
Paige Rasmussen
Managing Editor
The Center for Biographical Research
Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly
1960 East-West Road Biomed B104
Honolulu, HI 96822
Tel: (808) 956-3774
Find us on Facebook and Twitter!
* Dear IABA-L Members The Center for Biographical Research at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa has been holding a weekly seminar series since 1987–this week’s talk will be session number 761. COVID-19 has forced us online, but the upside is that the seminars can now be attended virtually from virtually anywhere, so we thought that especially for those in somewhat congenial time zones, and with an interest in the Pacific–though the topics range beyond that–it would make sense to tell when the seminars are, and also that they will be posted on the Center’s YouTube channel in a permanent archive. Hope to “see” you, if something catches your interest. Craig Howes, Director, Center for Biographical Research * BROWN BAG BIOGRAPHY Center for Biographical Research, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa THURSDAYS, 12:00 NOON–1:15 PM Hawaiian Standard Time • ONLINE VIA ZOOM DISCUSSIONS OF LIFE WRITING BY & FOR TOWN & GOWN All are welcome to attend. For more information about the weekly events, please visit the Center for Biographical Research’s website http://manoa.hawaii.edu/cbr/ FALL 2020 SCHEDULE October 22: “Roots and Routes along Keaukaha’s Seashore: Tidalectic Repertoires of Place” Halena Kapuni-Reynolds, Doctoral Candidate, Department of American Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Cosponsored by the Departments of History, Political Science, and Anthropology, the Museum Studies Program, and Hamilton Library Meeting ID: 954 2305 5123 Password: EDV55r October 29: “A Biography of Haunting: Crafting Historical Fiction Set in Post-Annexation Hawai`i” Kristiana Kahakauwila, Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Cosponsored by Hamilton Library Meeting ID: 914 7320 9610 Password: 3KRqBF November 5: “‘The Depth of Darkness’: Genealogies of Race and Sovereignty in Nineteenth-Century Hawaiian Literature” Joyce Pualani Warren, Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Cosponsored by Hamilton Library Meeting ID: 939 8234 2880 Password: 001PS8 November 12: “James Macrae and the Voyage of HMS Blonde” Brian Richardson, Hamilton Library, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Cosponsored by the Departments of History and Political Science, and Hamilton Library Meeting ID: 920 6909 2145 Password: VYh10D November 19: “​Materializing Queer Genealogies at Horace Walpole’s Strawberry Hill” Dr. Emily West, Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Cosponsored by the Department of History and Hamilton Library Meeting ID: 954 9489 9581 Password:  kZYY3y November 24 (TUESDAY):​ “​Nationalism and the Transformation of Land into Sovereign Territory” Nandita Sharma, ​Professor of Sociology and Co-Director of the International Cultural Studies Program, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Cosponsored by the Departments of History, Political Science, and Anthropology, the Center for South Asian Studies, and Hamilton Library Meeting ID: ​945 6312 3936 Password: 385314 December 3: “George Birdwood Before He Was ‘Sir George Birdwood’: The Bombay Years, 1854–1868” Peter H. Hoffenberg, Associate Professor of History, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Cosponsored by the Department of History, the Center for South Asian Studies, and Hamilton Library Meeting ID: 965 3776 2074 Password: 354W83 *
XII IABA TURKU: postponement & updates Dear IABA-World Conference Participants, We would like to update you on plans for the IABA World conference, postponed from June 2020. As you know, we had hoped to welcome you to Turku in June 2021, but as the global pandemic is still effecting every corner of the world and there is so much uncertainty, we have discussed the situation both with our Turku team and the international IABA group. We have made the extremely difficult decision to reschedule the World-conference to June 2022. As travelling will still be difficult next Spring and changing the conference to an entirely virtual form would require many changes in the programme and other practical difficulties, we think this is the only solution at the moment. However, the IABA-group is planning to offer platforms for area chapters to organise smaller scale virtual events next year – and you will be hearing about them soon. We are planning to have the CFP open again next summer, and, at that time, you can confirm or update your abstract, propose a new paper, or withdraw your participation. Please wait for this follow-up information, as we cannot answer all individual emails right now. We will update the website https://iabaturku2021.net/, and remember to follow us in Facebook and Twitter as well! Regarding the registration and payment practicalities, our congress services Aboa (info@aboaservices.fi) will be in contact with you by the end of October.
Warm wishes, Maarit and the whole IABA team from SELMA @iabaturku2021 #iaba2021
* Deadline for Proposals, November 29, 2020

From Combat to Commemoration. Veteran Politics and Memory: A Global Perspective (11/29/2020; 4/16-17/2021) United Kingdom

Department of History, University of Warwick 16th and 17th April 2021 From the fields of Gettysburg to the beaches of Normandy, the participation and presence of former soldiers has been an integral part of the memorial culture of many conflicts. As survivors of war, veterans are often portrayed a group imbued with a unique knowledge whose experiences should not be forgotten. Yet while public commemorations have sought to establish consensus about the meaning of the past, veterans’ memories have also been a source of conflict and contestation, engaged in struggles over rights, recognition, and the authority to remember the past and speak for the future. In a recent article in War & History,Grace Huxford et al. note that the historically unprecedented number of veterans across the world during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries has ensured not just that veterans ‘occupy a significant place in modern history but that they are also a vital lens through which to analyse the changing relationship between war and society’. Veterans, however, are from being a modern phenomenon –estimates suggest that a larger proportion of the English population fought in the Civil Wars of the mid-seventeenth century than in World War One. Moreover, though veteran studies has become a rich field of interdisciplinary enquiry, studies tend to be embedded in their own geographic and historical contexts: the transtemporal and transnational study of veterans remains in its infancy. This conference seeks to bring together scholars from across time and space to explore the experience of veterans, and particularly the politics of veteran memory and commemoration, from a global, comparative perspective. We hope to publish the resulting papers in an edited collection that will approach veteran memory from a range of different disciplinary, temporal, and geographic perspectives. Proposals are invited for 20-minute papers that discuss any aspect of veteran politics and memory, from the ancient world to the present. Complete panel proposals are also very welcome (panels/papers which seek to explore different conflicts/countries/periods are especially encouraged). Possible themes include, but are by no means limited to:
  • Commemoration and memory
  • Veteran social movements and associations
  • Veteran cultural contributions (documentary evidence, art, etc.)
  • Political power of veterans
  • Veteran trauma, health and emotions
  • Veteran protest and dissent
  • (Inter)national veteran networks
  • Family and intergenerational memory
  • Monuments, statues, and re-enactments
  • Travel and battlefield tourism
  • Museums and heritage
Please submit paper abstracts (max. 300 words) and brief bio(s) to both imogen.peck@warwick.ac.uk and timo.schrader@warwick.ac.uk by 29th November 2020. Participants will be notified of decisions by the end of December 2020. *
* Deadline for Submissions, November 16, 2020

VIRTUAL IDENTITIES AND SELF-PROMOTING

Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association National Conference June 2-5, 2021 Boston Marriott Copley Place 110 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02116, US Virtual Identities and Self Promotion seeks to examine, explore and critically engage with the issues surrounding creating a sense of self in online environments.   Undoubtedly, our experience of the web is changing and has changed our identity both on and offline. Many people have used online environments to explore the fluidity of self-expression as an “identity laboratory.” Almost everyone in today’s age has experienced some kind of online identity play, whether through playing an online game, participating in social networking sites, writing a blog, creating a website, commenting on an article, or contributing to updates on twitter. Many users present an idealized “me,” specifically shaped for various audiences. These new technologies have changed the way we think and how we have constructed our identities and consequently have informed our relationships and interactions within both online and offline arenas. We invite submissions investigating and exploring virtual identity creation and self-promotion, including but not limited to the ways in which users:
  • Use social media to create identity professionally, personally, socially, academically
  • Socially construct (gender, race, sex, etc…) their identity in online environments including social media, and other online communities
  • Use online technology in order to study language, communication, and identity construction
  • Construct and reconstruct themselves in arenas promoting user-generated content, such as YouTube
  • Create digital artifacts as a way of self-discovery and identity construction
  • Negotiate online identity with physical identity socially,  professionally, and academically
  • Use online interactions for validation of self, emotionally and/or intellectually
Submission Information: Please Submit:
  • the Title of Individual Paper
  • an Abstract of 250 words which describes the main concepts to be addressed by presentation
  • Please include, name, institutional affiliation, e-mail, and telephone
  • For guidelines on proposing a panel please contact the Chair of the session or visit the PCA/ACA website.
Abstracts Due:  November 16, 2020 Submission Portal:  https://pcaaca.org/ Submissions will only be accepted through the PCA website. Individuals must be current, paid members to submit to the conference. All presenters must be current, paid members of the PCA and fully registered for the conference.
Contact Info:
Monica S. Gallamore, Ph.D.
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Proposals, November 16, 2020
CFP: Popular Culture Association Annual (PCA) Conference–Biographies Area: June (11/16/2020; 6/2-5/2021) Boston, MA, The Biographies Area is soliciting papers that examine the connections between biography and popular culture. Papers and full panel presentations regarding any aspect of popular culture and biography are encouraged. Potential topics might include: – Biography and entertainment, art, music, theater – Biography and film – Biography and criminal justice – Television programs about biography – Biography and urban legends – Biography and folklore – Biography and literature – Scholarly Biography – Controversial Biography – Psychoanalysis and Biography – Historical Biography – Political Biography – Autobiography Sessions are scheduled in 1½ hour slots, typically with four papers or speakers per standard session.  Presentations should not exceed 20 minutes. The deadline is November 16, 2020. To submit an abstract, please visit: https://pcaaca.org/conference/submitting-paper-proposal-pca-conference Submissions will only be accepted through the PCA website. Individuals must be current, paid members to submit to the conference. Please direct any queries to the Biographies Area Chair: Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries Las Vegas, NV 89154 susie.skarl@unlv.edu OR susieskarl@gmail.com
Contact Info:
Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries Las Vegas, NV 89154 susie.skarl@unlv.edu OR susieskarl@gmail.com
Contact Email:
*
*
Family and Conflict in Graphic Narratives Special Issue for Studies in Comics Call for Articles, Interviews, and Comics Deadline–Nov. 15, 2020 (Final Notice) Even though family relationships are at the heart of many graphic narratives, particularly relationships between parents and children (one can think of examples like Alison Bechdel’s Fun Home and Art Spiegelman’s Maus), few studies have examined how the family is used as a trope in graphic narratives. Considering the role of family is important, as Anne McClintock reminds us, since the trope of the family ‘offers a “natural” figure for sanctioning social hierarchy within a putative organic unity of interests’ (63, original emphasis). In a similar vein, Sarah Harwood has argued the family has become ‘a primary way of organising and understanding [material] reality across all cultural forms’ (3). Moreover, in discussing how popular literature depicts conflict, specifically the conflict in Israel/Palestine, Toine van Teeffelen has suggested that popular literature ‘tends to metaphorically understand political and social life through the experiences of persons and small groups’ (390). This special issue asks how the trope of the family is used to understand and organise conflict, including how it functions as a way to illustrate material realities and ideologies. Articles might address, but are not limited to, the following questions:
  • How is the family used as an allegory for the nation?
  • How is the trope of the family used to reflect wider concerns in relation to conflict, including the possibility of a resolution of the conflict?
  • How does the family work to make conflict accessible to outsiders?
  • To what extent are different family members used to illustrate contrasting (political) positions?
  • How is an emphasis on family used to counteract fears about change and fragmentation that are heightened during conflict?
Please submit
  • Either: an article of 4,000 – 8,000 words (including all quotes, footnotes, references and bibliography)
  • Or: an interview of 2,000- 3,000 words (including all quotes, footnotes, references and bibliography)
  • Or: 4 pages of comics (colour or black and white) 300dpi.
  1. The landscape-oriented format is 20x15cm (landscape) . It is not necessary to completely fill the white space if the images don’t perfectly correspond to those dimensions.
  2. The portrait-oriented images either presented alone or alongside one another – they will only be printed at a maximum of 15cm tall.
  • AND a separate document with the following metadata (labelled as ‘Title of your article’ metadata)
  1. Article title
  2. Author’s name
  3. Author’s postal and email address (the postal address is needed for your contributor’s copy)
  4. Author’s biography and affiliation (50-100 words)
  5. Abstract (200-300 words)
  6. Keywords (listed one per line, in lower case where applicable)
  7. Wordcount  (not necessary for comics contributions)
by 15th November 2020 to the special issue editors – Please send your submission to the appropriate editor: Articles Dr Isabelle Hesse, isabelle.hesse@sydney.edu.au Lecturer, Department of English, The University of Sydney The Politics of Jewishness in Contemporary World Literature: The Holocaust, Zionism, and Colonialism (Bloomsbury Academic, 2016) Comics Dr Sarah Lightman, sarahlightman@yahoo.com Honorary Research Fellow, Birkbeck, University of London The Book of Sarah (Myriad Editions, Penn State University Press 2019) The editors will provide initial feedback by 15th January 2021. Revised articles and comics will be due by 1 May 2021 and will then be sent out for double blind peer-review by Studies in Comics.
*
Deadline for Submissions, Nov. 13, 2020

CFP: Stardom and Fandom: Southwest Popular/American Culture Association Conference (11/13/20; 2/22–27/2021) USA

For the 2021 Conference, SWPACA is going virtual! Due to concerns regarding COVID-19, we will be holding our annual conference completely online this year. We hope you will join us for exciting papers, discussions, and the experience you’ve come to expect from Southwest. Proposals for papers and panels are now being accepted for the 42nd annual SWPACA conference. One of the nation’s largest interdisciplinary academic conferences, SWPACA offers nearly 70 subject areas, each typically featuring multiple panels. For a full list of subject areas, area descriptions, and Area Chairs, please visit http://southwestpca.org/conference/call-for-papers/ The Area Chair for Stardom and Fandom invites paper or panel proposals on any aspect of stardom or fandom. The list of ideas below is limited, so if you have an idea that is not listed, please suggest the new topic. We are an interdisciplinary area and encourage submissions from multiple perspectives and disciplines. Topics might include: Studies of individual celebrities and their fans, both current and historical Studies focused on specific fandoms – films, television programs, books, bands, etc. Fandom and loss – how fans cope when beloved things come to an end The reciprocal relationship between stars and fans Impact of celebrity and fame on identity construction, reconstruction and sense of self Reality television, YouTube celebrities, Influencers and the changing definition of ‘stardom’ The impact of social media on celebrity/fan interaction Celebrity/fame addiction as cultural change The intersection of stars and fans in virtual and physical spaces (Twitter, Tumblr, conventions) Celebrity and the construction of persona Pedagogical approaches to teaching stardom and fandom Fans, Stans, Antis and ‘haters’ Fan shame, wank, and fandom policing Gendered constructions of stars and fans Historical studies of fandom and fan/celebrity interaction All proposals must be submitted through the conference’s database at http://register.southwestpca.org/southwestpca For details on using the submission database and on the application process in general, please see the Proposal Submission FAQs and Tips page at http://southwestpca.org/conference/faqs-and-tips/ Individual proposals for 15-minute papers must include an abstract of approximately 200-500 words. For information on how to submit a proposal for a roundtable or a multi-paper panel, please view the above FAQs and Tips page. SWPACA will offer registration reimbursement awards for the best graduate student papers in a variety of categories. Submissions of accepted, full papers are due January 1, 2021. SWPACA will also offer registration reimbursement awards for select undergraduate and graduate students in place of our traditional travel awards. For more information, visit http://southwestpca.org/conference/graduate-student-awards/. Registration for the conference will be open and available in late fall. Watch your email for details! In addition, please check out the organization’s peer-reviewed, scholarly journal, Dialogue: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Popular Culture and Pedagogy, at http://journaldialogue.org/ If you have any questions about the Stardom and Fandom area, please contact its Area Chair, Dr. Lynn Zubernis, Professor, West Chester University, at lzubernis@wcupa.edu. We look forward to receiving your submissions!
Contact Info:
Lynn Zubernis PhD Professor, West Chester University Area Chair, Stardom and Fandom
Contact Email:
*
Dear IABA List Members
We have a new research initiative on Life Writing launching at University College Cork next week and I’d be delighted if members of the IABA list could be alerted to it. A silver lining of the pandemic is the ease with which research events are accessible wherever we are in the world, so I’m hoping some IABA members might think of attending.
With all best wishes
Caitríona Ní Dhúill
Launch of new research cluster on Life Writing Centre for Advanced Studies in Languages and Cultures (CASiLaC), University College Cork Thursday 5 November 2020, 4-6 pm Virtual launch on MS Teams: email d.fitzgibbon@ucc.ie for access The Centre for Advanced Studies in Languages and Cultures at University College Cork is delighted to announce the launch of a new Life Writing research cluster, dedicated to exploring life writing in all its forms. The Life Writing cluster focuses on the inscription of ‘selves’ and ‘others’ and the recording of memories and experiences in auto/biography, autofiction and memoir, diaries, letters, new media and the visual arts. The launch will feature papers by Rebecca Braun (Lancaster University) and Helen Finch (University of Leeds), followed by a roundtable discussion. Researchers from all disciplines and career stages with an interest in Life Writing are warmly invited to attend. Paper 1: The Past, Present and Future of Life Writing Rebecca Braun, Lancaster University This talk explores the different ways in which societies construct attitudes towards authors and authors construct attitudes towards society, both in literary texts and in the many interpersonal relationships beyond them. Drawing on the case-study of post-war Germany (particularly in the 1960s and 1970s), I outline four dominant modes of authorship that underpin these constructions on both sides: celebratory, commemorative, satirical and utopian. I then consider how the foundation of the modern European novel is driven by articulating ways of orienting ourselves in the world that make us better actors, individually and collectively, in the present and with a clear view to the future – authors of our own stories, as it were. This idea is explored through discussion of the genesis of Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote (1605/1615). Analysing life, writing, chronology and resilience alongside one another like this allows us to trace shared core values and ethical blind spots that go well beyond an individual’s biography or a particular literary text and into the very fabric of society. Paper 2: Life writing in the aftermath of the Shoah: an undisciplined genre? Helen Finch, University of Leeds What is a ‘life’ in the aftermath of severe trauma? What form might the writing of this life take? What uncomfortable links might life writing make between a time of extreme violence and the time of writing? This paper investigates the works of German-speaking survivors of the Shoah Fred Wander, Edgar Hilsenrath and Ruth Klüger to argue that life writing after the Shoah intertwines transgressive political criticism of the postwar world with the shadow of trauma. The world that the three Jewish survivors bear witness to after 1945 is structured by disturbing parallels, in their accounts, to the one they saw slip into catastrophe in the 1930s. At the same time, the survivors are constantly negotiating a shattering of selfhood in the wake of extreme violence. The person of the survivor-author is a haunted, elusive figure, and the survivors’ writing struggles to find a coherent standpoint from which to narrate a ‘life’. Contact r.magshamhrain@ucc.ie for further information and d.fitzgibbon@ucc.ie to register for the launch.
Professor Caitríona Ní Dhúill
Department of German
School of Languages, Literatures and Cultures
O’Rahilly Building
University College Cork
Ireland
+353 21 490 2077
*
Submission Deadline Nov. 1, 2020
Call for Papers Domestic Politics: Women’s Private Lives and Public Writing in the Mid-Century. Co-Editors: Melissa Dinsman, Megan Faragher, and Ravenel Richardson.Deadline for Proposals, November 1The mid-twentieth century saw seismic shifts for British women, including those living under British rule in the colonies, in the public and private spheres. These years are often imagined as a wave of expansion and constriction, with the swelling of economic and political freedoms for women in the 1930s, the cresting of women in the public sphere during the Second World War, and the resulting break as employment and political opportunities for women dwindled in the 1950s when men returned home from the Front. But this narrative needs  reexamining. This book aims to revivify studies of the female writers living or working in Britain, or under British rule, during the mid-century while also complicating extant narratives about the divisions between domesticity and politics.
We are looking for essays that explore how women represented the transformation of the quotidian, including the home, employment, family life, religious participation, etc. Specifically, we seek contributions that examine how women writers addressed political and wartime upheaval in the 1930s and 1940s along with the substantial shifts that occurred as war-torn countries attempted to adjust to a fraught peacetime in the 1950s, which also saw domesticity reconceptualized as a form of public duty.
We seek contributions to this volume that engage with a variety of fields including (but not limited to) journalism, photojournalism, fiction, archival discoveries, life writing, poetry, and film. We welcome abstracts that focus on single author or comparative, transnational approaches on the following topics:
  • How politics shaped, limited, and/or expanded women’s domestic experiences in the mid-century
  • The interactions between women and the public sphere, including industry, medicine, education, and politics
  • Transnational writing: travel writing, journalism, ex-patriate accounts
  • The intersectional politics of race, class, and gender in the domestic and public spheres
  • Reconceptualizing the public/private divide in the mid-century
  • Colonial and Commonwealth perspectives
If interested, please send a short bio and an abstract of 300 words to Melissa Dinsman (mdinsman@york.cuny.edu), Megan Faragher (megan.faragher@wright.edu), and Ravenel Richardson (mrr82@case.edu) by November 1, 2020. Final chapters of 6000-7500 words will be requested by August 15, 2021.
*
Submission Deadline Nov. 1, 2020 Angelaki Special Issue on Witnessing After the Human Volume 27, Issue 2 (2022) Deadline for indications of interest–Nov. 1, 2020. Guest Editors
  1. Michael Richardson
Michael.Richardson@unsw.edu.au Senior Research Fellow (ARC DECRA) University of New South Wales
  1. Magdalena Zolkos
Zolkos@em.uni-frankfurt.de Humboldt Research Fellow Goethe University Frankfurt Special Issue Description Until recently, scholarship on testimonial practice in literature, media and culture has assumed that witnessing applies primarily to a human subject. This is evident in the evolution of the meaning of the word ‘witness’ in public discourses and scholarly literature alike: from representative of a persecuted minority who addresses a community of nations to testify to their plight, to the survivor of atrocity, to the figure of an empathetic humanitarian activist or social media user, who is proximate to mass violence, though not its direct target. In politics, law, religion and science, it has been taken for granted that bearing witness is a human capacity, often imagined as a verbal act of narrativization of violence. For some, that act included production of evidence and demonstration of truth; for others, it implied a proximity to catastrophic events, and had ethical implications of making demands on the listeners. Recently, witnessing has been extended to non-human subjects, such as plants, animals and artificial intelligences; re-imagined through diverse scientific and technological vistas; as well as applied to inanimate entities, such as cultural productions, geological items, or, as in the ‘forensic aesthetics’ approach, to human remains. This extension of the status of the witness and practices of witnessing to the nonhuman has profound implications for witnessing theory. With this Special Issue of Angelakiwe seek to create a platform for articulating and exploring the meanings of witnessing ‘after the human’ from diverse disciplinary perspectives. We ask about the epistemological, aesthetic, political and ethical effects of extending the practice of witnessing from the human subject to diverse categories of non-human beings, such as animals, plants, cyborgs, machines, and inanimate objects, as endowed with a capacity akin to ‘testimonial affordance’ and as potential producers of testimonial knowledge. We explore the possibilities within contemporary theorizing of testimony to reveal and to work beyond the limits of the humanist imaginary of the witness as a historical agent, often in tandem with thinking from feminist, queer, Indigenous, disability, critical race and whiteness studies that has done so much to expose the limitations and violences inherent to ‘the human’ as a framework for subjectivity.  Finally, we seek to uncouple the association between witnessing and speech, or verbal articulation, through attention to the role of senses, silence, affect, gesture, code, materiality and other communicative modes in testimonial practice. From the perspective of witnessing ‘after the human’, testimony appears as a prosthetic practice, both because of the importance of technological and machinic mediations of testimony today, and, more generally, as an example of prosthetikos:the process of adding onto the body. Possible Topics For Submissions  We invite cross-disciplinary contributions, focusing on the practices, processes and subjects of witnessing from the angle of (broadly defined) post-humanities. We are interested in philosophic, literary, cultural, sociological, political, ethnographic, and other, engagements with the question of witnessing ‘after the human’. The topics for submissions include, but are not limited to:
  1. Animals and witnessing;
  2. Plants and witnessing;
  3. Inanimate witnessing, including ‘memory objects’ and ‘trauma objects’;
  4. Machines and witnessing; cyborg testimony;
  5. Environmental witnessing; climate change testimony, including ‘planetary grief’ and solastalgic perspectives on witnessing;
  6. Critical epistemology of witnessing; testimonial credibility and truth;
  7. The time of witnessing; non-/post-human testimonial temporalities;
  8. Testimonial aesthetics and poetics of the post-human;
  9. ‘Decolonizing witnessing’; critical race perspectives on testimony;
  10. Queering testimony;
  11. Sensorial perspectives on witnessing; non-occulocentric witnessing, testimony and listening, testimony and touch;
  12. Silence and witnessing; gestural witnessing;
  13. Imaginal testimony;
  14. Neuroscience and witnessing;
  15. Technology and witnessing;
  16. Science and witnessing; algorithmic witnessing; witnessing through data;
  17. Social media technologies and witnessing.
Time-line for Submissions
  • Indications of interest are invited by November 01, 2020. The indications of interest should include a title and ca. 500-words-long abstract.
  • The editors will communicate to the authors whether the abstracts have been accepted by December 01, 2020.
  • The authors are requested to submit their articles by June 01, 2021.
  • The editorial and blind peer-review process will take place after June 01, with final manuscripts to be completed by October 01, 20201.
Contact Info:
Magdalena Zolkos
* Deadline for Proposals, October 31, 2020

We are excited to announce a new call for papers on life writing and race.

See details below!

IAP 

CALL FOR CHAPTERS 

Racial Dimensions of Life Writing Research

Edited by:

Lucy E. Bailey, Oklahoma State University and KaaVonia Hinton, Old Dominion University

A volume in the Research in Life Writing and Education Series

Overview  This call for chapters focuses on the racial dimensions of life writing in education, writ large. We welcome chapters that bring racial analysis and theorizing to bear on life writing research in all its forms (biography, oral history, narrative inquiries, testimonios, portraiture, auto/ethnographies, family inquiries, creative life histories) and in varied teaching and learning spaces (e.g. schools, homeschooling, playgrounds, digital environments, prisons, bookstores, museums, anti-racist protests). Just as racialized laws, practices, and discourses have profoundly shaped educational institutions and the lives of people who move within them (e.g. Haney-Lopez, 2006), race can also profoundly shape research dynamics (e.g. Sefa Dei & Singh Johal, 2005; Winddance-Twine & Warren, 2000). Whether researchers are conducting an inquiry on an anti-racist activist teacher historically or engaging in a collaborative autoethnography on learning outside of traditional school spaces, those contributing to this collection should bring racial analysis or theorizing to bear on how they conceptualized, carried out, interpreted, and/or represented their life writing project. Both innovative and traditional approaches are welcome as we seek to capture the complexity of the methodological terrain of contemporary life writing. Possible Themes and Approaches  We are soliciting chapters (5000–7000 words, including references) that puzzle through racial dynamics, concepts, theorizing, insights, and experiences in carrying out life writing research. Chapters might focus on: Educational Lives
  • Analyses of the racial contours and methodological dimensions of life-writing projects focused on educators, activists, and leaders;
  • Exploring complexities and creativity of life-writing research focused on lives with racial lessons to “teach,” whether leaders, elders, students, or community activists.
Methodological/Inquiry Innovations and Dynamics
  • Analyzing how race and its intersections shape the life-writing inquiry process, whether through research focus, researcher-participant relations, and/or contextual dynamics;
  • Innovative methodological approaches to engaging with projects concerning race and its intersections;
  • The contours and triumphs of carrying out research on under-represented educational actors historically in diverse contexts;
Theoretical Engagements
  • Racial theorizing or analysis of lives and life writing using (but not limited to) such theories as intersectionality (Crenshaw; Hill Collins; Nash) women of color theorizing (Keating, 2012), critical race theories, indigenous and decolonizing methodologies, LatinX theories, critical whiteness studies, or postcoloniality.
Writing and Representation
  • Diverse approaches and decision making processes in writing up (Wolcott) and (re)presenting life writing research.
Proposals Due: October 31, 2020  Tentative Submission and Publishing Timeline 
  • Notification of Proposal Acceptance: November 15, 2020
  • Submission of Chapter Drafts: (by) January 31, 2021
  • Peer-Review Feedback to Authors: February 28, 2021
  • Submission of Revised Chapters: April 15, 2021
  • Anticipated Date for Publication: Late Summer, Fall 2021.
Please submit abstract to Lucy.bailey@okstate.edu and khintonj@odu.edu, using the subject line, “racial dimensions of life writing” in the email.
  • A single Word file using American Psychological Association, 7th Edition;
  • An abstract of approximately 500 words, with a working title, proposed components of the chapter, methodological approach, racial dimensions of the research, potential significance, a working bibliography of 5–10 sources; and a
  • Brief biographical note or 1 page CV from author(s).
Lucy E. Bailey, Ph.D.
Social Foundations and Qualitative Inquiry
Director of Gender and Women’s Studies Oklahoma State University 215 Willard Hall Stillwater, OK 74074 lucy.bailey@okstate.edu
* Deadline for Proposals, October 31, 2020

Call for Book Chapters for edited volume: Mountains and Memoir

deadline for submissions:
October 31, 2020
full name / name of organization:
Jenny Hall and Martin Hall
Mountaineering and Climbing have become extraordinarily popular lifestyle sports. More generally, mountain-going has been one of the fastest growing leisure activities of the past thirty years where an estimated, ‘10 million Americans go mountaineering annually’ (Macfarlane, 2004: 17) and In the United Kingdom 2.48 million people participate in recreational rock climbing and mountaineering (Mintel, 2018). The American Alpine Club, in their annual State of Climbing Report noted that in 2018 there were ‘7.7 million’ American climbers (2019: 6), ‘2,500 licenced USA climbing athletes’ (2019: 10) and that in 2017, ‘climbing as a whole contributed $12,450,000,000 to the economy’ (2019: 13), where in the UK, the British Mountaineering Council (BMC) membership currently stands at 76,000 individuals and 320 clubs. Dr Jenny Hall and Dr Martin Hall are editing a volume exploring the relationships between mountains and mountaineering, literature, media, film and popular culture. At current, the edited volume which is being proposed focusses on mountains and memory in popular culture, particularly looking at the literary memoir and its closeness and association with film and other media forms. The mountaineering memoir has a long and rich tradition. Extreme adventure memoirs are the stuff of legend and Hollywood movies. In Memoir: A History, Ben Yagoda makes the salient point that, ‘Memoir has become the central form of the culture’ and it this centrality and significance which drives the call for this book. Yet there is a paucity of scholarship that explores the mountaineering memoir as a powerful social influence these texts have had on our understanding of how mountains are constructed, reproduced and performed. Dianne Chisolm described the distinguished Lynn Hill’s 2002 book, Climbing Free as ‘the first history of free climbing and one of the first climbing histories ever to be presented from a woman’s perspective’ and mountaineers such as the eminently well-known Chris Bonington speak of a ‘boost in income from newspaper rights and the sudden rush of lectures’ (2017: 98) when as a result of his climbs, ‘every national newspaper ran a banner headline’ (2017: 97). Two central themes are covered, firstly, this book intends to interrogate is the relationship between these feats and the attention given them throughout the media and in the documented accounts by the climbers themselves. Secondly, we ask, to what extent do mountaineering texts create, rather than mirror reality, and how sustainable is this genre? Climbing and mountaineering texts from memoirs to documentaries are direct influencers for the ecological consciousness of athletes, authors, filmmakers and crucially their audiences. If more of these texts were as successful as Alex Honould’s Academy and BAFTA awarding winning film, Free Solo, the ramifications of influence could be enormous. Sustainability is a central theme of this book and concerns the body in the context of mountain spaces and places and as such considers the histographic influences of the sublime, and how and why this is embodied in living memory and performance through texts and films. The aim is to proliferate the powerful message that these books and films expound and problematize the neoliberal commercialisation of these highly sensitive mountain spaces and places through textual sources. Given that the UN Climate Change Summit is due to take place in Glasgow, United Kingdom in November 2020 this book will challenge the dominant narrative of consumption in these leisure and tourism spaces and how we engage with sensitive mountain environments and the communities. Through a broadly interdisciplinary approach which calls for scholarship across philosophy, geography, social psychology, sport, literature, film studies and wider scope, the editors are looking for chapters which interrogate and elucidate upon the representation and prominence of mountaineering, in its widest meaning, in the memoir and its associated paratexts through film and television. Concepts may include but are not limited to:
  • Gender
  • Sexuality
  • Race
  • Disability
  • Sustainability/Environment
  • Education
  • Fitness
  • Wellbeing/Mental Health
  • Widening Participation
  • Travel/Borders/Transnationalism
  • Genre
  • Reality/Truth/Authenticity
  • Reification of the mountaineering hero
  • Deviant leisure
  • Globalism/localism/Covid-ism
  • Spirituality/Sublime
  • Haptics/Sensuality
  • Emotion
  • Politics/Governance
  • Subversion
  • Elitism/Exclusivity
  • Femininity/Masculinity
  • Death/Risk/Exposure
Please submit a 300-word extract and a 200-word bio to mountainmemoirproject@gmail.com by October 31st

*

Deadline for Proposals, October 30, 2020

Life Writing as World Literature, ACLA April 8-11, 2021 (Virtual)

deadline for submissions: October 30, 2020.

 This panel brings the fields of world literature and life writing together to explore social, economic and ideological contexts informing the circulation, translation and reading of auto/biographical texts. Redefinitions of world literature highlight the “effective life” of works “within a literary system beyond that of its original culture” (Damrosch 2003) or underscore that literature now “is unmistakably a planetary system” (Moretti 2000).

Similarly, scholars in life writing emphasize the role of narrated lives for “contemporary imaginaries” (Smith 2011), challenge the national and monolingual categorization of autobiographical texts, reveal the pitfalls of worldwide circulation (Whitlock 2007), the imbrications between autobiographical practices and markets (Rak 2013), the role of personal narratives in human rights (Smith & Schaffer 2004, Jolly 2014), and the relevance of life narratives as forms of testimonial acts (Gilmore 2017).

Participants are encouraged to explore: autobiographical works as they move in translation between national and global contexts and as they travel across media; forms of “minor transnationalism” that life writing enables; new perspectives gained from texts outside the Western and European canons; new understandings revealed through postcolonial and decolonial readings; life writing in the curriculum, its pedagogical role in transnational contexts; life writing and digital humanities, and large-scale paradigms of distant reading.

ACLA’s annual meeting will take place virtually between April 08 – 11, 2021. Please submit your paper proposal (350 words) and short bio (150 words) via ACLA’s online portal by October 30, 2020.

https://acla.secure-platform.com/a/

For queries, please contact the organizers Helga Lenart-Cheng hl4@stmarys-ca.edu and Ioana Luca ioana.luca@ntnu.edu.tw*
Deadline for Proposals, October 18, 2020
Call for Proposals: “Biographies and Politics. The Involvement of Jews and People of Jewish Origin in the Leftist Movements in the 19th and 20th Century Poland” a special issue of Jewish History Quarterly (10/18/2020) Guest editor: Michał Trębacz (POLIN: Museum of the History of Polish Jews, Center for Jewish Studies Univeristy of Łódź) Editor in Chief: Jan Doktór (Jewish Historical Institute) This special issue seeks to evaluate to outline the actual involvement of Jews and activists of Jewish origin in the leftist movements of the 19th and 20th centuries from the perspective of individual motivations, ideological choices and personal biographies. To explore the different paths which led Jewish individuals to engage in leftist parties and organizations, we suggest approaching the topic from a biographical perspective. We thus invite scholars to present their findings on the formation of Jewish political identities based on biographical sources, especially ego-documents like diaries, personal letters, memoirs or oral testimonies. Possible questions to be addressed might be:
  • Was being Jewish an important factor in choosing a specific political path?
  • Which other factors led Jews and people of Jewish origin to affiliate with a particular political group?
  • How did their leftist involvement influence their attitude towards imperial settings, occupying powers, internationalist movements, as well as Poland and Polish identity?
  • How did they assess their leftist engagement later in their lives?
Please send a 250-word abstract of your proposed paper to mtrebacz@polin.pl by October 18, 2020. Decisions will be made in October 2020. If accepted, papers will be due in for peer review. All email correspondence should be sent to mtrebacz@polin.pl
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Proposals, October 15, 2020
CALL FOR PAPERS FOR AN EDITED COLLECTION:Writing HerStories: Women’s Rock Memoirs (Provisional title)Editors: Cristina Garrigós (National University of Distance Education, UNED, Spain) and Marika Ahonen (University of Turku, Finland).The last ten years have seen a significant rise in the number of published memoirs by female rock musicians. Patti Smith’s Just Kids (2010) came out in the same year that Kristin Hersch’s Rat Girl (2010) appeared, and others soon followed: Alice Bag’s Violence Girl: East L.A. Rage to Hollywood Stage. A Chicana Punk Story (2011), Kim Gordon’s Girl in a Band (2015), Carrie Brownstein’s Hunger Made Me a Modern Girl (2016), Chrissie Hynde’s Reckless (2016), Michelle Cruz Gonzales’s The Spitboy Rule. Tales of a Xicana in a Female Punk Band (2016), Cosey Fanni Tutti’s Art, Sex, Music (2017), and Viv Albertine’s Clothes, Clothes, Clothes. Music, Music, Music. Boys, Boys, Boys (2016). More recently, there are Debbie Harry’s Face It (2019), Liz Phair’s Horror Stories. A Memoir (2019), and Kathy Valentine’s All I Ever Wanted (2020). These examples – all from the U.S. and the U.K. – suggest that there is a growing interest in, and room for, women’s rock memoirs.The commercial success of these memoirs attests to the rise of a new genre in which women’s voices have acquired a new significance. Aware that their public persona had previously been structured mostly through not only their music, but perhaps mainly through interviews and images, now they take up their pens – or computer keyboards – to deliver first-person narratives of their vision of themselves. In this volume, we ask how female rock musicians, or female-identified rock musicians, narrate and remember their experiences in memoir, and what type of knowledge these books offer.Academic attention to musical memoirs has been growing of late, as the publication of Music, Memory, and Memoir (Bloomsbury, 2019) demonstrates. However, no attention has been paid specifically to the writing of women in rock music. The rise of studies of popular culture, autobiography studies, and cultural history, together with a gender perspective, are therefore fertile academic soil for works such as the one we are presenting here. As musical memoirs are fragmented and interdisciplinary, in this volume we specifically focus on female-identified rock musicians by emphasizing an intersectional understanding of the topic. Gender apart, we also want to consider how other factors, including ethnicity and socioeconomics, shape the authors’/musicians’ experiences and influence the remembrance and narration of their lives in memoirs. The tension between the public persona and the private, remembering and forgetting, telling and not telling, thus structures many of these works and deserves further exploration.Possible subjects to be addressed include, but are not restricted to:•       Memory and Forgetting. •       Creation: reflections on musical and literary production. •       Narrative strategies of life-writing in a memoir. •       Being a woman in the music world. •       Aging: the perspective of a mature woman looking back and considering the present. •       Role models and cultural influences. •       Maternity: wanted and unwanted maternity. Abortion. Children. Adoption… •       Sex: Narrating sexual experiences and verbalizing sexual abuse. •       Mental issues: eating disorders, depression, anxiety, etc. •       Affect theory and the female musical autobiography. •       Defense of or resistance to feminist ideas. •       Punk/Rock aesthetics and politics. •       Re-writing their stories: challenges of previous representations (reports, interviews, videoclips, pictures, …) •       Life writing as performance. •       The female memoir as a genre: topoi, tropes, traditions… •       Ethics of storytelling in a memoir •       The limitations and the politics of remembering •       The therapeutics of writing a memoirWe are seeking English-language contributions that address female rock memoirs published in the past decade. We encourage contributors to think about the topic broadly, in the frames of the somewhat vaguely-defined “rock genre”. Although the examples mentioned above are all U.S. and U.K.-based, works written outside these frames are warmly welcome.Please submit proposals (300 words) and a brief bio (100 words) by 15 October 2020 to Cristina Garrigós cgarrigos@flog.uned.es or Marika Ahonen mjahon@utu.fi For accepted proposals, final essays between 5,000-7,000 words (inclusive of notes and bibliography) will be due 30 September 2021.
*
Deadline for Submissions, October 2, 2020
The (Im)Possibilities of Bearing Witness: The Intrinsic Value and Healing Power of Autobiographic Narratives (10/2/2020; 7/5-9/2021) Warsaw, Poland The Witnessing Working Group of the Memory Studies Association (MSA) is organizing a roundtable during the forthcoming MSA annual conference in Warsaw, Poland, July 5-9, 2021. Due to Covid-19, virtual participation will be possible. This roundtable will discuss the role of the researcher and the ways in which his/her testimony with traumatic experiences influences the course of research, but also the way in which the individual traumatic experiences of the researcher affect his/her trauma research methodology and narratives produced. Besides that, we would like to explore ways through which witness testimonies can influence researchers and ordinary readers and if (and to what extent) such testimonies may help post-trauma healing and recovery. According to the psychiatrist Dori Laub, a victim needs the presence of  a witness (an empathetic listener or reader), to confront the darkness of painful memories and to organize and process traumatic experiences. “‘Arousers’ of memories” helped Holocaust survivor Primo Levi (1990) describe the horrors of Auschwitz and discover meaning in writing and literature. For him, the true witness is the one who does not survive. Hence the survivor bears the responsibility to speak for those who cannot speak, or to serve as a “moral witness,” to testify with a “moral purpose” (Margalit, 2002, 149). Often researchers are put in the position of the (moral) witness while investigating the impact of traumatic events. How does such implied moral purpose influence the scholarly endeavors? And how does the arousal of the scholar’s own memories in the process of witnessing shape the course of the research conducted? Can a researcher turn into “a witness to himself”/herself (Laub, 1991, 58), potentially working through his/her own traumatic past while witnessing the trauma of others? And how can such self-reflections and self-explorations—of the survivor and/or researcher—be productively integrated into scholarly writings, possibly exploring paths of healing, which reach a wider audience than the ivory tower of academia? This roundtable is meant as a forum for researchers from various academic fields (including but not limited to anthropology, history, psychology as well as literary, film and media studies). We seek papers of 10 minutes length allowing for an extended discussion. Please submit a paper proposal (not exceeding 250 words) in addition to a short bio (no longer than 200 words including pertinent publications) via e-mail to Alma Jeftic (alma.jeftic@gmail.com) and Stefanie Hofer (hofer@vt.edu) by October 2, 2020. Please note that we aim to submit panels to the organising committee of the Memory Studies Association by October 15, 2020 and the final decision will depend on this committee. As in previous years, all presenters have to be members of MSA. For more information please consult MSA webpage: https://www.memorystudiesassociation.org/warsaw-conference-2021-cfp/ Proposals not limited to the following topics are invited:
  • How can traumatic narratives in scholarship be represented to adequately reflect the suffering of the victim?
  • (Im)possibilities of bearing witness and how to be addressed in qualitative research?
  • Witnessing and the dangers of appropriation
  • The overwhelming nature of autobiographical narratives
  • The healing power of trauma narratives
  • Cultural representations of trauma and recovery as catharses
  • (Moral) witnessing and activism
  • Postcolonial witnessing and non-Western healing paradigms
References: Laub, D. (1992). Bearing Witness, or the Vicissitudes of Listening. In S. Felman and D. Laub, Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History (pp. 57-74). New York: Routledge. Levi, P. (1990). The Sixth Day and Other Tales. London: Simon & Schuster. Margalit, A. (2002). The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Contact Info:
Alma Jeftic (alma.jeftic@gmail.com), Research Fellow, Peace Research Institute – International Christian University, Japan Stefanie Hofer (hofer@vt.edu), Associate Professor, Virginia Tech, USA
*
Sessions held on October 1, 2020 The International Society for Educational Biography (ISEB) presents Professional Development Webinars– Life Writing Methodologies in 2020: Writing and Sharing our Lived Experiences The International Society for Educational Biography (ISEB) invites members new and current to its methodological, blended-format webinar.  Those who engage in life writing in all its forms (biography, auto/biography or memoir, ethnography or duoethnography, autoethnography or autotheory, life history or life narrative, oral history or family history, testimonio, collective biography or prosopography) are warmly welcomed to participate. CONFERENCE INFORMATION: Theme:  The year 2020 has proven to be incredibly tumultuous: we live in times which will be written about in historical accounts, archival and biographical.  Those who engage in life writing in all its forms are attentive to the impact of current events on all domains of human lives. The International Society of Educational Biography seeks to create a space for those who engage in life writing in all its forms to come together and begin to process the present. Dates:  Methodological papers/presentations will be available for asynchronous review prior to the conference.  Two highly interactive synchronous sessions will take place Thursday, October 1 with a virtual social event held after.  Please note: attendees may choose to attend any or all of the three sessions as their schedules permit. Schedule of Synchronous Sessions: 3:30-3:40: Welcome/introduction from ISEB President 3:45-5:15: Session I: Methodological Approaches to Life Writing in the Present:  Authors of methodological pieces will be available for synchronous conversation(s) regarding their work. 5:15 – 5:30: Break 5:30 – 7:00: Session II: Life Writing in 2020:  Attendees will come together in a moderated conversation regarding methodological issues during this time.  Attendees will be asked to prepare any brief statements or questions to be shared with the group at large and, when possible shared/posted in advance. 7:15 – ?: Optional Session:  Virtual Social Hour/Meetup:  Attendees are welcome to attend a virtual happy hour co-hosted by the ISEB President and President-Elect. Cost:  Attendance is free to all members of ISEB.  All attendees must be members of the society by the time of the synchronous session to participate in these.  Annual membership is $95 and includes a one-year subscription to the ISEB journal Vitae Scholasticae. Registration:  To register for the conference, click to please join or renew your membership.  You can also visit http://isebio.com/our/membership.html Information:  For further questions or concerns please contact Dr. Edward Janak, Edward.janak@utoledo.edu Technology/host:  The webinar will be hosted by the Department of Educational Studies, Judith Herb College of Education, University of Toledo. * Deadline for Submissions, Sept. 30, 2020

Writing Our Wombs (9/30/2020; 3/11-14/2021) NEMLA, Philadelphia, USA

full name / name of organization:
Rachelann Lopp Copland/Northeastern Modern Language Association
Abstract:  Our literal and figurative wombs have been targeted, misunderstood, misrepresented, and used against us. The Oxford denotation itself seems to pin our bodies to one use–reproduction: “the organ in the lower body of a woman or female mammal where offspring are conceived and in which they gestate before birth; the uterus.” Here, language fails us; society’s synecdoche makes us walking uteruses. This session calls for submissions that reclaim womb with individual uniqueness, yet lend themselves to a collective voice of the womb. This session calls for women and members of the LGBTQ community to submit work related to the function of their wombs and how the womb creates/destroys/changes identity. Ironically, the rhetoric we often use for the art of writing overlaps with the discourse associated with the womb. By creatively exploring our histories of meaning associated with womb, this creative session aims to contribute to NeMLA’s 2021 convention theme, “Tradition and Innovation: Changing Worlds Through the Humanities,” by sharing unique writing experiences that challenge the traditional meanings associated with wombs and present new ways of looking at the literal and figurative womb. Shortened Description: This session calls for women and members of the LGBTQ community to submit work related to the function of their wombs and how the womb creates/destroys/changes identity. By creatively exploring our histories of meaning associated with womb, this creative session aims to contribute to NeMLA’s 2021 convention theme, “Tradition and Innovation: Changing Worlds Through the Humanities,” by sharing unique writing experiences that challenge the traditional meanings associated with wombs and present new ways of looking at the literal and figurative womb. * Deadline for Submissions, Sept. 30, 2020

Call for Chapters: The Lived Religious Lives of Women in 21st Century Britain. (9/30/2020)

 
Little is written about the lived religious lives of women in 21st century Britain. I am describing the term, lived religion, as the ways in which people practice religion in their everyday lives. This may or may not include worship in a religious setting and can be formal or informal. Vernon Press invites chapter proposals that look at this topic across religions and religious denominations. This may include subjects such as:
  • Food
  • Clothing
  • Prayer
  • Female Ordination
  • Navigating the patriarchy in conservative religious denominations
  • Ritual
  • Women only religious spaces
  • Solidarity and support through religion
  • Family worship and religious observation
Please submit an abstract no longer than 500 words. The proposal should also include a short biographical note. Complete chapter lengths should be between 6000-8000 words. All submissions to Yvonne Bennett at yhb64a@gmail.com by September 30th, 2020
Contact Info:
Yvonne Bennett: yhb64a@gmail.com William Whitehead: william.whitehead@vernonpress.com
Contact Email:
*
Deadline for Submissions, Sept. 30, 2020

In Their Own Words: Voices of Kashmir (9/30/2020; 3/11-4/2021) NEMLA, Philadelphia, USA

deadline for submissions:
September 30, 2020
full name / name of organization:
Zachary Bordas/ Northeast Modern Language Association (NeMLA) 2021
contact email:
This heuristic panel seeks to examine the lived reality and creative representation of the political and ecological crisis in Kashmir. Spotlighting the voices of Kashmiri writers will continue the long and delicate process of shedding light on the current human rights crisis happening in Kashmir, as well as its global significance. This panel, therefore, solicits academic research that brings the persecuted voices of Kashmiri writers out of isolation (respecting anonymity on an individual basis) and into humanist discussions. The purpose of this panel involves both understanding the description of the Kashmiri lived reality, as well as providing space for hearing the specific tenants of their calls for change. As a scholarly body who believes in the praxis of the Humanities, I invite research that empirically focuses on the current situation in Kashmir as delineated in non-fiction prose; resources might include newspaper articles, pamphlets, blog postings, interviews, municipal and census records, and similar. Equivalently, I call for papers concentrated on creative works published by Kashmiri authors that might include novels, graphic arts, poetry, film, and alike. The objective of this panel centers on connecting the threads between demonstratable facts and their artistic representation, which as humanist scholars may better inform our understanding, reaction, and pedagogical practices on how we teach our students about the gaps and absences of the marginalized Kashmiri voice. With the revoke of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir on 8 August 2019, most communication from inside their borders has become increasingly difficult to access thus leaving many speculations and concerns about the daily reality of those living inside the lockdown. Grassroots projects such as Video Volunteers provides a space where marginalized voices may “tell their stories and create change campaigns,” which as one of the organization’s volunteers states, “When no voice is too small or unimportant to be heard, only then, can we be a democracy in the true sense of the word.” Therefore, this session leans toward opening a rhetorical space to discuss the writings coming from Kashmir; specifically focusing on the appeals for social justice and global underrepresentation. This panel first and foremost concentrates on listening to the words of Kashmiri writers so as to let them speak in their own terms. This panel, therefore, welcomes papers from researchers around the world and writers living within Kashmir who, perhaps unable to obtain a passport or travel visa, may submit their paper (or short creative piece) that will be read by a stand-in on their behalf––maintaining anonymity per request. This panel focuses on the crisis in Kashmir as understood empirically and represented creatively. How might empirical data inform our reading of creative texts coming from Kashmir, and vice-versa? What innovative practices are Kashmiri writers employing in making the voices of the marginalized heard? What are the dangers of assigning an author the burden of representation, how might multiple narratives intertwine so as to offer a borderer representation of the Kashmiri crisis, and most of all, how might we best let Kashmiri writers speak for themselves? Direct link to this panel: https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/18685 Please submit abstracts online via the NeMLA portal: https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/User/SubmitAbstract/18685
Deadline for Submissions, September 30, 2020
Dear Colleagues,Our planning team at the University of Alberta is happy to announce that the abstract submission portal for the Teaching Life Writing Conference is open! Please consider submitting an abstract to our virtual conference.Access the portal, and detailed information about the conference, here: https://subline.ualberta.ca/portals/57The abstract and bio submission deadline is September 30, 2020 at 12:00 noon Mountain Standard Time.Registration will open mid-October.Questions? Please write to lwconf@ualberta.ca . We are looking forward to reading your abstracts!Regards,Orly Lael-Netzer, Julie Rak, Amanda Spallacci Planning Team, Teaching Life Writing Conference (virtual) –Julie Rak Professor and Henry Marshall Tory Chair Department of English and Film Studies University of Alberta Humanities Centre 3-5 Edmonton, AB T6G 2E6, Canada ᐊᒥᐢᑿᒌᐚᐢᑲᐦᐃᑲᐣ (Amiskwacîwâskahikan), Treaty 6/Region 4 Métis NationWebsite: https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/julie-rak/home
Deadline for Submissions, September 30, 2020

Addressing ‘The Memoir Problem’ (Creative Panel)

NeMLA 2021  March 11-14, Buffalo N.Y.
contact email:
Addressing ‘The Memoir Problem’: Blocked Memories, Documentary Traces, and Hybrid Forms (Creative Panel) As memoir continues to be a wildly popular genre in our world today, there are many challenges to writing memory and many stakes to publishing a memoir. In many ways, writing a memoir may be a kind of mythical beast for emerging voices. How does one finish a memoir and what marks its timeliness and closure? This forum seeks to interrogate the expectation of a memoir to follow a traditional narrative arc, to expand genre definitions and to highlight cross-genre work. If memory is object-oriented, why do we expect memoir to be plot-driven? How may object or image centric work take a different approach to scene and narrative-telling? Contemporary innovations in creative nonfiction craft, comics, short forms and documentary poetics may reveal how cross-genre work offers a fruitful place to challenge readers’ expectations and incorporate other disciplines in writing. Many established and emerging voices, leading this work and creating new platforms for writers, are reclaiming their stories through traumas and against injustices and discriminations. As a space for writers to read their work and share in Q&A, a diversity of voices & styles are sought. Submissions of auto-fiction & auto-theory, somehow “memoir-esque,” are also encouraged. Creative genres may include but are not limited to:
  • Memoir, Memoir-esque, Memoir Plus
  • Creative Nonfiction, Including Creative Nonfiction Comics & Diary Comics
  • Autobiography & Life-Writing
  • Poetry & Experimental/Hybrid Forms
  • Personal Essay
  • Auto-Theory
  • Auto-Fiction
Please submit an abstract of 200 to 250 words describing your proposed creative reading by September 30th, 2020, to the submission page: https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/18874

*

Deadline for Submissions, September 30, 2020

The Writer as Sociopath (9/30/2020; 3/11-4/2021) NEMLA, Philadelphia, USA

full name / name of organization:
Northeast Modern Language Association (NeMLA)
contact email:
This panel will consider the cases of writers who have used their platforms to create fictions of self—to misrepresent, self-justify, even blatantly lie about their own lives and realities. The panel is open to considering any act of writing sociopathy, from memoir (e.g., M.E. Thomas’s 2013 Confessions of a Sociopath or Donald Trump’s The Art of the Deal) to fictional works that inhabit the minds of sociopaths (e.g., A Clockwork Orange, Gone Girl) to literary fakers (e.g., James Frey, Danny Santiago, JT LeRoy, Caroline Calloway). Is writing in itself an act of misrepresentation bordering on psychopathy? This panel is asked to investigate such issues as literary hoaxes, memoir and identity, and question of whether writing is inherently a form of the “long con.”
*
Deadline for Submissions, September 30, 2020

Call for Chapters: The Lived Religious Lives of Women in 21st Century Britain. (9/30/2020)

 
Little is written about the lived religious lives of women in 21st century Britain. I am describing the term, lived religion, as the ways in which people practice religion in their everyday lives. This may or may not include worship in a religious setting and can be formal or informal. Vernon Press invites chapter proposals that look at this topic across religions and religious denominations. This may include subjects such as:
  • Food
  • Clothing
  • Prayer
  • Female Ordination
  • Navigating the patriarchy in conservative religious denominations
  • Ritual
  • Women only religious spaces
  • Solidarity and support through religion
  • Family worship and religious observation
Please submit an abstract no longer than 500 words. The proposal should also include a short biographical note. Complete chapter lengths should be between 6000-8000 words. All submissions to Yvonne Bennett at yhb64a@gmail.com by September 30th, 2020
Contact Info:
Yvonne Bennett: yhb64a@gmail.com William Whitehead: william.whitehead@vernonpress.com
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Submissions, September 30, 2020

Becoming the Obamas: Critical Approaches to Barack & Michelle Obama’s Memoirs

deadline for submissions:
September 30, 2020
Northeast Modern Language Association (NeMLA) Convention in Buffalo, New York, Mar. 11–14, 2021
contact email:
This year marks the 25th anniversary of Barack Obama’s memoir Dreams from My Father (1995). Praised by Toni Morrison and Philip Roth, Obama’s memoir explores his life up to his admission to Harvard Law School in 1988. More recently, 2018 saw the publication of Michelle Obama’s best-selling memoir Becoming, which is the story of her life up through the end of her tenure as first lady. This panel seeks papers that critically explore the major prose works by Barack and Michelle Obama: Becoming, Dreams From My Father, and The Audacity of Hope. Questions to consider include, but are not limited to: How do the Obamas tell their story? What literary devices and/or rhetorical strategies do they employ in their respective works? How are their memoirs rooted in the African American literary tradition? Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man clearly influenced Barack Obama’s Dreams, yet who else did Obama invoke in telling his story? Who, if any, are Michelle Obama’s literary influences in Becoming? How do the Obamas extend or complicate the specific category of Black Autobiography? How do their texts compare/contrast with other memoirs – either contemporary or canonical texts? How does Becoming compare/contrast with Barack Obama’s Dreams of My Father? How do the Obamas depict race/racism and/or intersectionality in their texts? How can we teach Becoming, Dreams From My Father, and/or The Audacity of Hope to our twenty-first century students? All submissions that explore the life writings of Barack and/or Michelle Obama will be considered. They do not need to be comparative in scope, though they can be. To submit to this panel, please upload your 250 word abstract to NEMLA’s submission portal at https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/Home/Login.

*

Deadline for Submissions, September 30, 2020
Dear Colleagues, On behalf of the conference team, I am VERY pleased to announce the Call for Papers for the Teaching Life Writing conference. The CFP is pasted below and attached as a pdf. The conference is virtual in a Round the World format and organized around many opportunities for sharing and discussion. You can sign up to observe or you can participate. Presenters from the IABA World conference which would have been in Finland are particularly welcome to repurpose their papers for this conference. We are excited to give you the opportunity to present your work, hear our amazing keynotes and talk together. The submission/registration portal opens in about two weeks, but we thought you’d like to start thinking about the conference now.  If you havequestions or need more information, please email lwconf@ualberta.ca . Weare looking forward to hosting you! Regards, the Teaching Life Writing Conference Team Julie Rak, Orly Lael-Netzer, Amanda Spallacci University of Alberta, Canada Teaching Life Writing: a conference on nonfiction and pedagogy *Organizers: *Julie Rak, Orly Lael Netzer, Amanda Spallacci (University of Alberta, Canada) *Dates:*December 10-11, 2020 *Keynotes* ** Maarit Leskelä-Kärki University of Turku Joycelyn Moodie University of Texas at San Antonio Anna Poletti University of Utrecht ** *Fee: $5 CD for all participants* *Description* Recently, life writing researchers in Canada, the United Kingdom, Europe, the United States and Australia have been publishing handbooks, collections and special issues of journals on the teaching of life writing, including the collections Kate Douglas and Laurie McNeill’s /Teaching Lives /(2018), Desiree Henderson’s /How to Read a Diary/ (2019), and Dennis Kersten and Anne-Marie Mreijen’s essay cluster for the /European Journal of Life Writing /called “Teaching Life Writing Texts in Europe” (2015).Pedagogical issues in life writing studies have been important at least since Miriam Fuchs’ and Craig Howes’ landmark collection /Teaching Life Writing Texts /(2008). Sidonie Smith and Julia Watson’s /Reading Autobiography /(2010) has an emphasis on pedagogical strategies. In fields beyond life writing, nonfiction and other forms of personal narrative have begun to attract interest as part of teaching, including in education, reading studies, history, and social work. But there has yet to be a conference devoted specifically to thinking about life writing and the work of teaching. It is high time that life writing scholars and those in associated fields come together to think about the developments in the teaching of nonfiction, both from theoretical perspectives and from the practical experiences in the classroom. This conference is an opportunity to do precisely that — to ask what does life writing pedagogy look like now? In a year of dramatic global events — from the COVID 19 pandemic and the many changes it has brought to our teaching and learning lives, to social and politicalupheavals taking place around the world — it is imperative that life writing scholars come together to think about teaching and pedagogy in a variety of registers. /Teaching Life Writing/ aims to provide that opportunity in an online “Round the World” conference format that will allow learning, reflection and thinking together across many time zones, over two days. *Abstract/Bio Submission Date* September 30, 2020 *Submission Format* /Two formats/: regular panels with 8 minute papers, loosely keyed to one of the four themes below (you can refer to the subtopics or make your own) OR you can sign up for a roundtable discussion based on one of the four themes (3 minute presentations and then a conversation). You cannot present in both formats. /Submission: /100 word abstract and 50 word bio for the 8 minute paper option; 50 word abstract and 50 word bio for the roundtable option. Indicate the theme you wish to be part of in your abstract. /Submission and Registration Portal: /The portal will open August 31, 2020 for registration and submission. *Conference Themes:* 1.Methodology: teaching life writing strategies in the 21st century ●Archives, translation, documentary,interviews, data, life history, autoethnography ●Online or remote teaching environments: challenges ●Teaching diaries, letters and oral history ●Teaching biography ●Neurodiverse teaching and pedagogy for disabled students ●New and classic life writing methods 2.Theory (connected to teaching) ●narrative and structure ●politics ●ethics ●pedagogy ●state of the field past/present ●witnessing ●genre ●ephemera ●medium ●new developments 3.Fields of Knowledge ●Life writing in history, sociology, Indigenous studies, political science ●Creative writing: teaching students how to create an autobiography, biography, or a diary ●New media: teaching digital topics ●Teaching graphic medicine and life writing in the medical humanities ●Graphic medicine 4.Life writing, teaching, social change ●Teaching trauma in life writing ●Life writing and marginalized communities ●Social justice, activism and personal narrative ●Teaching about COVID 19 *Round the World Format* The conference will be online-only, but keyed to different time zones. You can participate in the conference in your chosen time zone, or just go to as much as you like. There will be gathering opportunities throughout the conference, so that you can meet each other and discuss ideas. *Contact the Organizers* If you need more information, please contact *lwconf@ualberta.ca* <mailto:lwconf@ualberta.ca> ** *Sponsors* HM Tory Chair program, University of Alberta Faculty of Arts, University of Alberta Kule Institute for Advanced Studies (KIAS) Julie Rak Henry Marshall Tory Chair Department of English and Film Studies University of Alberta Humanities Centre 3-5 Edmonton, AB T6G 2E6, Canada ᐊᒥᐢᑿᒌᐚᐢᑲᐦᐃᑲᐣ (Amiskwacîwâskahikan), Treaty 6/Region 4 Métis Nation Website: https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/julie-rak/home Board Member, Critical Gambling Studies: https://www.criticalgamblingstudies.com/index.php/cgs

*

Deadline for Submissions, September 30, 2020

The Routledge Handbook of Refugee Narratives

deadline for submissions: 
September 30, 2020
The Routledge Handbook of Refugee Narratives, currently under contract with Routledge, presents a transnational and interdisciplinary study of refugee narratives. In response to the oversaturation of sociological, governmental, and journalistic narratives about refugees, this anthology features academic essays that examine the narratives refugees tell to, for, and about themselves. Engaging a rich variety of genres—fiction, autobiography, prose, poetry, graphic novels, film, photography, performance, social media—the chapters will analyze how conditions of forced displacement and encounters with different asylum regimes shape, but do not circumscribe, the form and content of refugee cultural productions. Chapters will tentatively be organized around three key forms—storytelling, testimony, (auto)ethnography—and four key themes—memory (and forgetting), human rights (and its limitations), border-crossing (and nation-states), and cartographies (of displacement and diaspora). This handbook aims to provide a comprehensive introduction to the range and overarching concerns of refugee narratives. We are seeking chapters that speak to wider issues and problematics, as opposed to an analysis of a single work. We envision chapters that discuss multiple texts, drawing out the themes that thread through or may resonate with different historical, national, and social contexts. This anthology will be of interest to researchers, teachers, students, and practitioners. As such, we encourage contributors to also touch on pedagogical issues that surround the teaching and reception of these narratives. This handbook conceives of narrative broadly and encompasses a range of critical approaches, methodologies, and genres. We are particularly interested in chapters that address one or more of the following:
  • ●  Narratives that trouble the category or definition of “refugee,” including its intersections with migrancy, Indigeneity, exile, and citizenship
  • ●  Intersections between refugee flight and Black fugitivity
  • ●  Feminist and queer theory analyses of gender and sexuality
  • ●  Engagements with ecocriticism, posthumanism, food studies, and/or critical theory
  • ●  Questions of health, disability, and embodiment as they pertain to refugee migration
  • ●  Struggles with, and organizing against, detention, deportation, forced repatriation, andrefoulement
  • ●  The role of religion in refugee narratives
  • ●  The role of memory and forgetting in refugee narratives
  • ●  Histories of empire, colonialism, postcolonialism, settler colonialism, and/or slavery
  • ●  Refugee migrations within the Global South, including South-South trajectories
  • ●  Narrative representations of boat refugees, particularly in and around the Mediterraneanregion
  • ●  Historical and contemporary refugee migrations from and through East and South Asia,including but not limited to Tibetian, Rohingya, Kashmiri, and Pakistani refugees
  • ●  Historical and contemporary refugee migrations from and through the Middle East North Africa (MENA) region, including but not limited to Syrian, Iranian, Kurdish, Palestinian, Yemeni, and Afghani refugees
  • ●  Historical and contemporary refugee migrations from and through the African continent, including but not limited to Sudanese, Somali, and Eritrean refugees
  • ●  Jewish refugees and the Holocaust
  • ●  Refugee narratives on social media and in new media, such as video games, virtualreality, podcasts, selfies, TikTok and YouTube videos
  • ●  Refugee art, including music or visual art, such as paintings, sculptures, and installations
  • ●  Refugee life narratives, including memoirs, oral histories, and ethnographies
  • ●  Refugee performances, both theatrical/dramatic and experimental/activist
  • ●  Refugee literature, including novels, short stories, poetry, graphic novels, and comics
Final chapters will be approximately 7,500 words including endnotes and bibliography. Citations will follow the Chicago Manual of Style. If interested, please send a short abstract (250 words) to Dr. Vinh Nguyen (vinh.nguyen@uwaterloo.ca) and Dr. Evyn Lê Espiritu Gandhi (elegandhi@ucla.edu) by September 30, 2020. We look forward to reading your submissions!
*
Deadline for Submissions, September 30, 2020

British Travels to the Americas During the Long 19th Century (9/30/2020; 3/11-14/2021) Philadelphia–NEMLA

This panel seeks to investigate cross-cultural and intercultural exchanges in British literature produced by men and women who traveled to and from the Americas (North, Central, and South) during the long 19th century (1750-1900). It provides a critical examination of the ideological underpinnings and socio-political reasoning for the production of British travel narratives as well as the effects they had on the construction of identity, race, and gender in American and British territories during this period. In doing so, we hope to challenge established academic disciplinary boundaries and provide new insights into the intricate relationships between transatlantic literature, identity, and politics. Proposed essays may focus but are not limited to the following topics: the construction of the “I” and the “Other(s); gendered bodies and empires; British and US-American conflicts and expansions; representations of Amerindian, Afro-American, and mixed culture(s); interactions and negotiations between indigenous peoples and imperial powers; the economy and politics of slavery; and demonstrations of acceptance and resistance by newly-independent and/or formed nations. We are particularly interested in papers that are interdisciplinary in nature, and that employ theoretical modes such as critical race studies, gender studies, transatlantic studies, and theories of empire-building. Direct link to this panel: https://cfplist.com/nemla/Home/S/18950 Please submit abstracts online via the NeMLA portal by September 30, 2020: https://www.cfplist.com/nemla/Home/CFP If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to contact Dr. Jose Lara, Chair of this panel, at j1lara@bridgew.edu
Contact Info:
José I. Lara, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Bridgewater State University
Department of Global Languages & Literatures
Bridgewater MA 02325
Contact Email:
*
*
The editors of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies are absolutely delighted to welcome Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle to our editorial team. She will be serving as our new Book Reviews Editor. Lisa is a longtime member of the auto/biography studies communities with interests in Latinx and Latin American life narratives. She is currently working on projects in autoethnographic research and academic narratives.
Lisa welcomes information regarding new theoretical texts on auto/biography, life narrative, and identity studies in any language. Please feel free to reach out to her at ortiz@tcnj.edu. Review copies may be sent to her institutional address: Professor Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle, Department of English, The College of New Jersey, 2000 Pennington Road, Ewing, New Jersey 08628, USA.
Congratulations, Lisa, and welcome aboard!
We would also like to express our sincere gratitude to our outgoing Book Reviews Editor, Tanya Kam. Thank you for your organization, enthusiasm, and many kindnesses, Tanya! We’ll miss you!
Professor Ricia Anne Chansky, Ph.D.
University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez
Research Affiliate, York University CERLAC Fulbright Specialist in US Studies – Literature
* 2021 PhD Scholarships Available in English and Creative Writing at James Cook University, Australia Interesting in undertaking a PhD or MPhil in English or Creative Writing? Applications for JCU Research Scholarships for 2021 are open for submissions now! See https://www.jcu.edu.au/graduate-research-school/how-to-apply We’ve listed some potential topics below, but we are interested in discussing a range of projects with prospective applicants. Students who want to study externally are encouraged to apply.
  • Fairy tale and gothic narrative, especially Beauty and the Beast and related tales; retellings and adaptations of fairy tale in film, literature  and new media (talk with A/Prof Allison Craven allison.craven@jcu.ecu.au)
  • Australian Gothic film and literature – landscapes and monsters, colonial and contemporary (talk with A/Prof Allison Craven allison.craven@jcu.ecu.au)
  • Australian cinema, its histories and regional connections in the Asia-Pacific (talk with A/Prof Allison Craven allison.craven@jcu.ecu.au)
  • Teaching and/or performing Shakespeare in Australia (talk with Dr Claire Hansen claire.hansen3@jcu.edu.au)
  • Exploring the power of place in literature/drama through a framework of ecocriticism and the blue humanities (talk with Dr Claire Hansen claire.hansen3@jcu.edu.au)
  • How literature improves our wellbeing – linking the health humanities and literary studies (talk with Dr Claire Hansen claire.hansen3@jcu.edu.au)
  • Exploring zines and archives through a lens of self-representation (talk with Dr Emma Maguire emma.maguire@jcu.edu.au)
  • Digital life narratives of girls and women (talk with Dr Emma Maguire emma.maguire@jcu.edu.au)
  • Writing fiction, creative nonfiction, auto/biography or memoir (talk with Dr Emma Maguire emma.maguire@jcu.edu.au)
  • Exploring the relationships between authorship, editing, publishing, and reading of novels and short stories – Australian, British, American literature (talk with Dr Roger Osborne roger.osborne@jcu.edu.au)
  • Representation of cultural heritage texts in print and digital media – Australian, British, American literature (talk with Dr Roger Osborne roger.osborne@jcu.edu.au)
  • Grief or trauma literature and memoir (talk with Dr Victoria Kuttainen  victoria.kuttainen@jcu.edu.au)
  • Postcolonial approaches to literature (talk with Dr Victoria Kuttainen victoria.kuttainen@jcu.edu.au)
  • Early twentieth century 1914-1950 literature and/ or new media (magazines, photography, cinema) (talk with Dr Victoria Kuttainen  victoria.kuttainen@jcu.edu.au)
Information on PhD entry requirements, application procedures and scholarships is available from the JCU Graduate Research School website: https://www.jcu.edu.au/graduate-research-school For general enquiries please contact Professor Sean Ulm, (Associate Dean of Research Education) at sean.ulm@jcu.edu.au
*
* Deadline for Submissions, September 15, 2020
Beyond Biofiction: Writers and Writing in Neo-Victorian Fiction
Guest Editors: Armelle Parey and Charlotte Wadoux 2021/22 Special Issue of Neo-Victorian Studies (http://neovictorianstudies.com) Despite the death of the author famously announced by Roland Barthes in 1967, real-life writers as characters, sometimes intermingling with their own creations, feature prominently in neo-Victorian fiction and other media. Besides reprising historical writers’ careers and exposing their secret, sometimes disreputable lives, these neo-Victorian biofictions also engage, self-consciously or implicitly, with changes in writing modes, genres, and narrative conventions over time and with the theorisation of both creative practice and life-writing. The same holds true of depictions of wholly imaginary, professional or aspiring literary scribes without specific historical antecedents. Simultaneously, neo-Victorian portrayals of writers highlight dubious inequalities between celebrity and marginalised literary figures, implicated in perpetuating biased canons as well as selective forms of cultural commemoration, often privileging the same, predominantly white male writers (Charles Dickens, Henry James, Alfred Lord Tennyson) as the most suitable subjects for rewrites, with even the Brontë sisters suffering from tokenism in comparison and writers of other races going almost entirely unrepresented. This special issue aims to explore neo-Victorian representations of writers and writing in biofiction and beyond from new and innovative angles. We are particularly interested in contributions that pursue the following enquiries: Which actual nineteenth-century writers and their works are reimagined, which are not, and what accounts for such policies of differential remembrance and forgetting? How are writers deliberately misrepresented, and what present-day agendas does such misremembering serve? What accounts for the persistent fascination with the writer figure, real or imagined, in an increasingly digital age, where the book almost seems destined to relegation to the museum and the realm of virtual objects? How do neo-Victorian concerns with writing engage metafictionally with neo-Victorianism’s own processes of writing – and reading – the Victorians today? What new approaches to and techniques of intertextuality can be discerned in neo-Victorian depictions of authorship? Possible topics may include, but need not be limited to, the following:
  • rethinking and reworking the ‘cultural capital’ of nineteenth-century writers
  • innovations in neo-Victorian biofictions of writers: new orientations
  • the differential canonisation and depreciation of author figures (in terms of race, ethnicity, class, (trans)gender, sexual orientation, able-bodiedness, etc.)
  • neo-Victorian metafictional engagements with processes of writerly production, reception, and consumption
  • immersive neo-Victorian encounters with author figures: writing, empathy and affect
  • engagements with theory and its contestation in neo-Victorian writer fictions
We especially invite contributions on neo-Victorian fictions and biofictions featuring Victorian writers that have not yet attracted significant critical attention, as well as on texts featuring period scenes of non-Western writers and writing. Please address enquiries and expressions of interest to the guest editors Armelle Parey (armelle.parey@unicaen.fr) and Charlotte Wadoux (cwadoux@gmail.com). Abstracts/proposals of 250-300 words, with accompanying brief bio note, will be due by 15 September 2020. Completed articles will be due by 1 March 2021. Abstracts and articles in Word document format should be sent via email to both guest editors, with a copy to neovictorianstudies@swansea.ac.uk. Please consult the NVS website (‘Submission Guidelines’) for further guidance. *
Deadline for Submissions, September 15, 2020
CALL FOR ABSTRACTS ILLNESS, NARRATED ON_CULTURE: THE OPEN JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF CULTURE ISSUE 11 (SUMMER 2021) In response to debates considering the relationship between illness and narrative, and the extent to which these concepts can be seen as mutually constitutive, this issue of On_Culture seeks to gather new approaches and critical perspectives to the intricate relationship between narrative and illness. We welcome (inter)disciplinary contributions addressing the concepts’ entanglement on an individual, societal, and global level. Already in 1963, Michel Foucault linked (illness) narration to its discursive conditions in The Birth of the Clinic. Moving away from the politicized view on what narrative does, medical humanities today stresses the importance, and even healing aspect of telling an illness story. In this positive view on the redeeming aspects of illness narration, identity and narrative are understood as inextricably linked. Rita Charon asserts that narrative is a central instance of good medical practice, since “without narrative acts, the patient cannot himself or herself grasp what the events of illness mean” (Charon 2006, Narrative Medicine, 13). In this broad formulation, ‘narrative’ uncritically refers to the act of self-expression as such, without taking into account the conditions that set the parameters for it. The scope of narrative has been a central concern of critical approaches to the medical humanities. Scholars like Angela Woods, in taking up Galen Strawson (2004, “Against Narrativity”), criticize the emphasis on narrative in the medical humanities, stating that “it has never been innocent” (Woods 2011, “The Limits of Narrative”, 75). Woods warns against understanding “a person’s narrative or story […] to be coextensive with their subjective experience, their psychological health and indeed their very humanity” (73). According to Brian Schiff, the focus on narrative reifies a Western, “arguably middle and upper class concept as a universal mode of shaping and articulating experience” (Schiff 2006, “The Promise”, 21). Moreover, historians of colonial and global history showed how those narratives were challenged and contradicted, leading to other conceptions of medical knowledge (e.g. Arnold 1993, Colonizing the Body). Other approaches broaden the concept of narrative, show how stories of illness might “reject the comforts of narrative” (McKechnie 2014, “Anxieties of Communication”, 121), yet still demand to be met with narrative engagement. Beyond the immediate focus on narrative as illness mediation, the turn to affect in critical theory can prove productive in addressing the autonomy of the body. For the (critical) medical humanities, this opens up space with which to think of the bodily experience beyond narrative and to ask if this is even possible. Furthermore, expanding the scope of narrative beyond literary texts, internet culture, online media, and the increasing use of digital and technological innovations in healthcare can be seen to mediate both health and illness in different ways. In response to these ongoing debates, we welcome innovative and interdisciplinary approaches in the (critical) medical humanities, narrative medicine, history of medicine, disability studies, narratology, literary studies, historiography, empirical social science, media, television and film studies, and other related disciplines that address how narrative is interlinked with illness experience and medical practice. We welcome submissions including, but not restricted to, the following topics:
  • Illness/Narrative and self-expression
  • Narrative as mediation of bodily experience
  • Differences in discussing physical and mental illness
  • Narrating about vs. narrating with illness
  • Disease classification/taxonomy/nosology
  • Illness as metaphor
  • Subversive illness narration (e.g. chaos narratives)
  • Illness narratives in gender, queer and trans studies
  • Non-Western conceptualizations and narratives of illness
  • Illness narratives in different media (literature, newspapers, magazines, advertising, television (series), film, games, etc.)
  • Online support groups, blogging, confession stories, memes, fora (e.g. Spoonies and Spoon Theory)
  • Interfaces of the digital and medical realm (algorithms, digital data, and self-tracking apps)
If you are interest in having a peer reviewed academic article featured in this issue of On_Culture, please submit an abstract of 300 words with the article title, 5-6 keywords, and a short biographical note to content@on-culture.org (subject line “Abstract Submission Issue 11”) no later than September 15, 2020. You will be notified by September 30, 2020 whether your paper proposal has been accepted. The final date for full papaper submissions is January 15, 2021. Please note: On_Culture also features a section devoted to shorter, creative pieces pertaining to each issue topic. These can be interviews, essays, opinion pieces, reviews of exhibitions, analyses of cultural artifacts and events, photo galleries, videos, works of art … and more! These contributions are uploaded on a rolling basis, also to previous issues. Interested in contributing? Send your idea to content@on-culture.org View CfA online https://www.on-culture.org/submission/cfa-issue-11/

*

Deadline for Submissions, September 15, 2020

CFP for Comparative Cinema: Biopic vs biopic: Cinematographic life as a place for comparison

deadline for submissions:
September 15, 2020
full name / name of organization:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
contact email:
Over the last ten years, the biopic has been carried out by many relevant filmmakers —within and beyond the mainstream— and it has become a key genre in contemporary cinema. This fact is attested by titles like ‘Carlos’ (Olivier Assayas, 2010), ‘J. Edgar’ (Clint Eastwood, 2011), ‘Hannah Arendt’ (Margarethe von Trotta, 2012), ‘Camille Claudel 1915’ (Bruno Dumont, 2013), ‘Saint Laurent’ (Bertrand Bonello, 2014), ‘Steve Jobs’ (Danny Boyle, 2015), ‘Neruda’ (Pablo Larraín, 2016), ‘Snowden’ (Oliver Stone, 2016), ‘First Man’ (Damien Chazelle, 2018), ‘Loro: International Cut’ (Paolo Sorrentino, 2018), ‘At Eternity’s Gate’ (Julian Schnabel, 2018), ‘Bohemian Rapsody’ (Brian Synger, 2018), ‘The Traitor’ (Marco Bellocchio, 2019), ‘Judy’ (Rupert Goold, 2019), ‘Rocketman’ (Dexter Fletcher, 2019) and ‘A Hidden Life’ (Terrence Malick, 2019). At the same time, documentary biopics have increased, as in the case of ‘George Harrison: Living in the Material World’ (Martin Scorsese, 2011), ‘The Salt of the Earth’ (Wim Wenders and Juliano Ribeiro Salgado, 2014), ‘Amy’ (Asif Kapadia, 2015), ‘Diego Maradona’ (Asif Kapadia, 2019) and ‘Pavarotti’ (Ron Howard, 2019). The diversity among these titles is proof of Belén Vidal’s statement in the prologue to the volume ‘The Biopic in Contemporary Film Culture’ (Belén Vidal and Tom Brown, eds., 2014): the term biopic —usually undervalued as a synonym of narrative restrictions and aesthetic conservatism— is also used to name a space that is open to formal experiments. That is the reason why, in the past decade, this genre has also received renewed attention in the academic world, with volumes like ‘Whose Lives Are They Anyway? The Biopic as Contemporary Film Genre’ (Dennis Bingham, 2010), ‘Biopic: de la réalité à la fiction’ (Rémi Fontanel, ed., 2011) and ‘Invented Lives, Invented Communities: The Biopic and American National Identity’ (William H. Epstein and R. Barton Palmer, eds., 2016). In this issue of ‘Comparative Cinema’, we want to approach the biopic from the specific perspective of comparative cinema. How much does the story of a lifetime allow to compare aesthetic and narrative differences between two separate works? Which biopic elements are especially relevant for a comparison? Rather than discovering what the comparison between two biopics reveals us, we are interested in how such comparison can be articulated and in finding out which of its elements can be the most fruitful. Some lines of work are suggested: Biopic and life: biopics privilege certain moments of a trajectory. Which of the life chapters are the most revealing of narrative and aesthetic differences? Between the personal and the professional life, which one of them has a greater impact on the comparison between different biopics? Biopic and film time: by its very definition, the biopic is developed throughout a long, well delimited period. How can the length of the portrayed period, the length of the film and the time dedicated to each event be compared between different works? Biopic and star studies: biopics entail professional challenges for performers because they can strengthen or renew their star persona. How can a biopic be compared to other performances by the same actor? How can the real character and the previous roles of the performer be compared through specific gestures? Biopic and authorship: some filmmakers have transformed the biopic into a sign of identity. Is it possible to find common elements between different biopics directed by the same author? How much do the author’s other films —not biopics— influence these biopics? Biopic and documentary film: many characters have been biographed both in documentaries and fiction films. Moreover, the fiction biopic can sometimes include real images. How can comparison between a documentary biopic and a fiction biopic be articulated? How much does the biopic allow to approach methodologies about documentary film? Priority shall be given to papers focused on cinema from the 2000-2020 period (or papers containing, at least, one film from this period in their comparison). Papers must be between 5000 and 6000 words long, including footnotes. The texts (in a Word format) and the images accompanying them must be sent through the RACO platform, available on the website of the journal. This special issue is also open for publishing interviews that have been previously agreed with the editors. Suggestions can be sent to comparativecinema@upf.edu. The time limit for receiving papers is the 15th of September 2020. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Comparativecinema/announcement/view/79

*

Deadline for Submissions, August  30, 2020

Prose Studies is Seeking an Editor

About the Role
Prose Studies provides a forum for discussion of the history, theory and criticism of non-fictional prose of all periods. As the study of non-fiction prose transforms, Routledge are seeking to appoint a new Editor, or pair of Co-Editors, with suitable academic background as well as the passion to drive the journal forward. The journal and Routledge are dedicated to diversity, inclusion and fair process, and we therefore welcome scholars from all backgrounds and creeds to apply. The successful candidate(s) will be responsible for editorial oversight and decision-making on submissions, using the Prose Studies Editorial Manager site. They will have authority to accept articles following peer review and will ensure that reviewers, authors and Editorial Board members adhere to the journal’s Code of Publishing Ethics. The new Editor(s) would initially work with the current Editor, Clare Simmons (Ohio State University) through an agreed handover period to ensure seamless transition. The new Editor(s) would be free to choose a team to support them and update the journal’s policies as relevant. Routledge will provide training on systems and processes used as well as remuneration for the role to cover any journal-related expenses. Routledge will also be able to supply annual reports reflecting on the performance of the journal to support ongoing development. Becoming the Editor of a journal is a rewarding and fulfilling experience where you will build your own networks, promote the research that you are passionate about, and be recognised as a leading figure within the research community.

Submitting your Application

Interested in applying? Here are the skills and attributes we would be looking for in a successful applicant:
  • Active within a relevant research community (including but not limited to literature, languages, rhetoric, media studies, communication and journalism);
  • Experience of/in academic publishing (special issues, peer review, edited collections, etc.);
  • Confidence to engage with authors and researchers to attract the highest quality submissions;
  • Strong organisational skills to ensure that submissions are handled in a timely manner;
  • Excellent communication skills and the ability to foster positive working relationships with colleagues such as reviewers, Editorial Board members, authors and Routledge contacts;
  • Time to devote to the journal’s development and act as an ambassador for the journal.

Submitting your Expression of Interest

If you are interested in the role, please send your CV(s) and a short vision statement to Becky Guest, Routledge, (rebecca.guest@tandf.co.uk) by 31st August 2020. Potential co-editors should express their interest jointly. Your vision statement should be no longer than 600 words and should cover:
  • Where you believe the study of non-fiction prose is going, and the journal’s place within it;
  • What opportunities for development you see, and ideas for how you would enact these;
  • How you would maintain and increase the quality and diversity of submissions in a virtual environment.
Following receipt, suitable candidates will be selected to discuss the role in more detail. Formal appointment and a transition timeline will then be mutually agreed with Routledge and the outgoing Editor. If you have any questions about the role or application process, please contact the current Editor simmons.9@osu.edu and rebecca.guest@tandf.co.uk. For more information https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/fprs-callforeditor/
*

CFP Autobiography Before Autobiography (1400-1700) (8/15/2020; 11/13-14/2020) Berlin, Germany

International Online Workshop at the Freie Universität, Berlin Oranizer: Nicolae Virastau, PhD (Columbia University), Postdoctoral Fellow of the Dahlem Humanities Center, Freie Universität, Berlin 13 November and 14 November 2020 Jacob Burckhardt famously placed the birth of autobiography during the Renaissance in the context of the discovery of the individual, and the awakening of the self. Few scholars today would fully embrace this master narrative. Medievalists posit the existence of a sense of individual selfhood much earlier, in the High Middle Ages, while many literary theorists of autobiography employ a narrow definition of autobiography focusing on personal development and reflexive subjectivity. Thus, literary theory effectively excludes from the history of autobiography most of what was written before the eighteenth century. Conversely, more recent cultural historians and historians of private life have sought to recover neglected forms of self-writing that do not fit modern definitions of the literary genre of autobiography: account books, semiliterate diaries, or astrological almanacs. They proposed neologisms such as life-writing, egodocuments, and self-testimonies to avoid the teleological implications of the Burckhardtian grand narrative, and to include texts that have been neglected by the traditional literary history of autobiography. The goal of this workshop is to bring together historians and literary scholars working on a wide range of late-medieval and early-modern self-writing forms that challenge the more common, postromantic ideas about autobiography, such as: family books, books of reason, almanacs, artisan autobiographies, but also prefaces and marginalia. Papers that can address the relation of these types of self-writing to the better-known genres of the vitae, commentarii, memoirs, confessions, essays, poetic autobiographies, etc. are especially welcome. Papers should be given in English or French, and should not exceed 30 minutes. Please send an abstract (300 words max.) and a brief CV (2 pages max.) at NAV2110@COLUMBIA.EDU. Due to the Covid-19 outbreak, the conference will take place online. The submission deadline has been extended to August 15, 2020.
Contact Info:
* Deadline for Submissions August 15, 2020
CALL FOR PAPERS Heroines of the Holocaust: Frameworks of Resistance Wagner College Holocaust Center June 2-3, 2021 “Nobody taught us how to fight or to perform our duties. We learned by ourselves not only how to clean and use a gun, but how to conduct ourselves in combat and battle, how to blow up a bridge or a train, how to cut communication lines and how to stand on guard.” —Sara Ginaite, partisan, March 8, 1944 (International Woman’s Day) The activities of women during the Holocaust have often been forgotten, erased, misunderstood, or intentionally distorted. Jewish women and those of all faiths fought with dignity, compassion and courage to save others from the murderous Nazi regime in over 30 nations. Often overlooked, women as well as men played critical roles in uprisings against the Nazis in over 50 ghettos, 18 forced labor camps and 5 concentration camps, including Auschwitz. Women were critical to the Jewish underground and other resistance networks both as armed fighters and as strategists and couriers of intelligence and false papers. Women played essential roles operating educational, cultural and humanitarian initiatives. In other genocides, women also faced horrendous atrocities, yet distinguished themselves with resilience and acts of moral courage. This symposium hopes to create a new narrative around agency in the Shoah and other genocides, which may inspire transformative activism today. From the groundbreaking 1983 conference on “Women and the Holocaust” at Stern College to the 2018 symposium on “Women, the Holocaust and Genocide” at Seton Hill University, research on gender issues has grown exponentially. Innumerable books, conferences, panels, films, journal special issues, and groups such as Remember the Women Institute, now document the inspiring lives of female participants. Yet, there remain many untold stories of women fighting back against the Nazis with pistol or pen. The leadership strategies, networks of defiance and testimony of better-known activists, such as Vitka Kempner-Kovner, Zivia Lubetkin, Vladka Meed, Sara Fortis, Gisi Fleishman, Marie-Madeleine Fourcade, Nadezhda Popova, Haviva Reik, Edith Bruck, Friedl Dicker-Brandeis and Roza Robota, among others, still merit far more attention; their lives, too, should become part of the canon of Holocaust study. How is our understanding of the Shoah– and the central question of how it happened– impacted and re-conceptualized by knowing about the activities of female resisters and rescuers?  This symposium will bring together international scholars working on this topic to share new approaches, projects and information on well-known women, as well as those whose stories remain shrouded in obscurity. We seek papers exploring women as rescuers and resisters of the Holocaust and genocide. Topics include, but are not limited to: Leadership Lessons of Women in Resistance Networks Women and Resistance in the Concentration Camps Women Rescuers and Resisters in the Ghettos Female Partisans in World War II The Psychology of Rescue and Resistance Women Doctors, Nurses and Social Workers Female Artists as Resisters The Power of a Photo of Women Resisters The Role of Women in Zionist and other youth groups Women as Resisters and Rescuers in Genocide Resilient Bonds: Mother/Sister/Aunt/Daughter/Grandmother Beyond Anne Frank: Women’s Journals, Memoirs and Archives Films and Music of Women and Human Rights Limits and Possibilities of Collection of Women’s Oral Testimony and Archives Post-Holocaust Life of Female Resisters and Rescuers Historiography of Jewish and non-Jewish Resisters and Rescuers Illiberal Memory Politics and Selective Forgetting of Women Teaching about Women, Resistance and Rescue Please submit abstracts of 300 to 500 words outlining the focus and approach of your paper. Abstracts must include full name and title, institutional affiliation and email address. Please also attach a copy of your CV. Subject line should be: LAST NAME Abstract Heroines Submit to both Conference Organizers: Laura Morowitz, Professor of Art History, Wagner College lmorowit@wagner.edu And Lori Weintrob, Professor of History and Director, Wagner College Holocaust Center holocaust.center@wagner.edu. Important Dates: August 15, 2020: Deadline for submission of Abstracts October 1, 2020: Notification of Acceptance The two-day symposium on the campus of Wagner College, in Staten Island, New York, is sponsored by the Wagner College Holocaust Center. The Museum of Jewish Heritage in Manhattan will host a private visit for participants. Details on accommodations and travel will be sent following acceptance of paper. We will open up the conference on the second day to NY/NJ teachers and a general audience ensuring an even greater circulation of these ideas.
Contact Info:
Professor Laura Morowitz, Wagner College Professor Lori Weintrob, Wagner College
Contact Email:

*

Deadline for Submissions August 15, 2020 CALL FOR PAPERS Heroines of the Holocaust: Frameworks of Resistance Wagner College Holocaust Center June 2-3, 2021 Deadline for Submissions, August 15, 2020 “Nobody taught us how to fight or to perform our duties. We learned by ourselves not only how to clean and use a gun, but how to conduct ourselves in combat and battle, how to blow up a bridge or a train, how to cut communication lines and how to stand on guard.” —Sara Ginaite, partisan, March 8, 1944 (International Woman’s Day) The activities of women during the Holocaust have often been forgotten, erased, misunderstood, or intentionally distorted. Jewish women and those of all faiths fought with dignity, compassion and courage to save others from the murderous Nazi regime in over 30 nations. Often overlooked, women as well as men played critical roles in uprisings against the Nazis in over 50 ghettos, 18 forced labor camps and 5 concentration camps, including Auschwitz. Women were critical to the Jewish underground and other resistance networks both as armed fighters and as strategists and couriers of intelligence and false papers. Women played essential roles operating educational, cultural and humanitarian initiatives. In other genocides, women also faced horrendous atrocities, yet distinguished themselves with resilience and acts of moral courage. This symposium hopes to create a new narrative around agency in the Shoah and other genocides, which may inspire transformative activism today. From the groundbreaking 1983 conference on “Women and the Holocaust” at Stern College to the 2018 symposium on “Women, the Holocaust and Genocide” at Seton Hill University, research on gender issues has grown exponentially. Innumerable books, conferences, panels, films, journal special issues, and groups such as Remember the Women Institute, now document the inspiring lives of female participants. Yet, there remain many untold stories of women fighting back against the Nazis with pistol or pen. The leadership strategies, networks of defiance and testimony of better-known activists, such as Vitka Kempner-Kovner, Zivia Lubetkin, Vladka Meed, Sara Fortis, Gisi Fleishman, Marie-Madeleine Fourcade, Nadezhda Popova, Haviva Reik, Edith Bruck, Friedl Dicker-Brandeis and Roza Robota, among others, still merit far more attention; their lives, too, should become part of the canon of Holocaust study. How is our understanding of the Shoah– and the central question of how it happened– impacted and re-conceptualized by knowing about the activities of female resisters and rescuers?  This symposium will bring together international scholars working on this topic to share new approaches, projects and information on well-known women, as well as those whose stories remain shrouded in obscurity. We seek papers exploring women as rescuers and resisters of the Holocaust and genocide. Topics include, but are not limited to: Leadership Lessons of Women in Resistance Networks Women and Resistance in the Concentration Camps Women Rescuers and Resisters in the Ghettos Female Partisans in World War II The Psychology of Rescue and Resistance Women Doctors, Nurses and Social Workers Female Artists as Resisters The Power of a Photo of Women Resisters The Role of Women in Zionist and other youth groups Women as Resisters and Rescuers in Genocide Resilient Bonds: Mother/Sister/Aunt/Daughter/Grandmother Beyond Anne Frank: Women’s Journals, Memoirs and Archives Films and Music of Women and Human Rights Limits and Possibilities of Collection of Women’s Oral Testimony and Archives Post-Holocaust Life of Female Resisters and Rescuers Historiography of Jewish and non-Jewish Resisters and Rescuers Illiberal Memory Politics and Selective Forgetting of Women Teaching about Women, Resistance and Rescue Please submit abstracts of 300 to 500 words outlining the focus and approach of your paper. Abstracts must include full name and title, institutional affiliation and email address. Please also attach a copy of your CV. Subject line should be: LAST NAME Abstract Heroines Submit to both Conference Organizers: Laura Morowitz, Professor of Art History, Wagner College lmorowit@wagner.edu And Lori Weintrob, Professor of History and Director, Wagner College Holocaust Center holocaust.center@wagner.edu. Important Dates: August 15, 2020: Deadline for submission of Abstracts October 1, 2020: Notification of Acceptance The two-day symposium on the campus of Wagner College, in Staten Island, New York, is sponsored by the Wagner College Holocaust Center. The Museum of Jewish Heritage in Manhattan will host a private visit for participants. Details on accommodations and travel will be sent following acceptance of paper. We will open up the conference on the second day to NY/NJ teachers and a general audience ensuring an even greater circulation of these ideas.
Contact Info:
Professor Laura Morowitz, Wagner College Professor Lori Weintrob, Wagner College
Contact Email:

*

Deadline for Submissions August 15, 2020

CFP for Special Issue about African American Biofiction

for the journal African American Review

                Biofiction is literature that names its protagonist after an actual historical figure, and it has become a dominant aesthetic form since the late 1980s, resulting in stellar works from global luminaries as varied like Gabriel García Márquez, J.M. Coetzee, Margaret Atwood, Michael Cunningham, Joyce Carol Oates, Mario Vargas Llosa, Peter Carey, Olga Tokarczuk, and Hilary Mantel, just to mention a notable few. Studies about biofiction have surged over the last ten years, but what scholars have not yet noted is the African American contribution to the evolution, rise, and legitimization of biofiction. There were some important biofictions published in the nineteenth century, such as Herman Melville’s Israel Potter: His Fifty Years of Exile (1855), Gustave Flaubert’s The Temptation of St. Anthony (1874) and “Herodias” (1877), Friedrich Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883-85), and Oscar Wilde’s “The Portrait of Mr. W.H.” (1889). But the first real boom occurred in the 1930s, with influential publications from authors like Thomas Mann, Heinrich Mann, Irving Stone, and Robert Graves. Worth noting is that Arna Bontemps (Black Thunder) and Zora Neale Hurston (Moses, Man of the Mountain) published two of the more impressive biofictions from the decade. But it would be two novels about African Americans in the second half of the twentieth century that would contribute significantly to the most important boom in biofiction, which is still underway. In 1967, William Styron published the hugely controversial novel The Confessions of Nat Turner, which won the Pulitzer Prize in Fiction, while in 1979, Barbara Chase-Riboud published Sally Hemings, a work that sold more than a million copies and led, in part, Eugene A. Foster to carry out DNA testing, which confirmed that Hemings’s descendants are related to Jefferson. African Americans, either as authors or protagonists, are of crucial importance in some of the most impactful biofictions, including Chase-Riboud’s The President’s Daughter (Jefferson’s daughter Harriet Hemings) and Hottentot Venus (Sarah Baartman), Charles Johnson’s Dreamer (Martin Luther King, Jr.), Louis Edwards’s Oscar Wilde Discovers America, Caryl Phillips’s Dancing in the Dark (Bert Williams), Chika Unigwe’s De Zwarte Messias (Olaudah Equiano), and Colum McCann’s TransAtlantic (Frederick Douglass), just to name a few. It is for this reason that the African American Review is soliciting essays for a special issue about African American biofiction, by which is meant either biofiction by or about African Americans. We welcome essays about the history of the aesthetic form in relation to African American literature and culture, African American innovations within the form, the role of African Americans within biofiction, studies about individual texts, and the recovery of lost historical figures through biofiction. More speculative essays are also welcome. For instance, we know that Toni Morrison encouraged Chase-Riboud to write Sally Hemings. Given the huge success of that 1979 novel, why did Morrison change the name of her protagonist in Beloved? How would Beloved signify differently had Morrison written it as a biographical novel? How would Sally Hemings function and signify differently had Chase-Riboud changed the protagonist’s name? Such contrastive and comparative studies could illuminate individual novels as well as African American biofiction more generally. Essays will be due on August 15th, 2021. For information about this special issue, contact Michael Lackey (lacke010@morris.umn.edu) —
Michael Lackey
Distinguished McKnight University Professor
University of Minnesota, Morris
104 Humanities Building
600 East 4th Street
Morris, MN 56267-2132 320-589-6263
*

Date for Submissions August 14, 2020

Women in Higher Education: A Compilation of Feminist Historiographies – CALL FOR BOOK CHAPTERS – Book proposal (8/14/2020) We are pleased to invite chapters for an upcoming book proposal entitled, Women in Higher Education: A Compilation of Feminist Historiographies. The focus of the book will be on women who have significantly influenced higher education in the United States during the mid-19th to mid-20th centuries. Nineteenth century women academics faced numerous tensions in their pursuit of higher education. Their persistence was scoffed at by contemporaries. Women of this time period influenced gender equity, however their contributions to the field of higher education have remained largely unrecognized. Their journeys and leadership strategies may be relevant to women seeking and securing educational roles. The absence of women leaders in higher education has been noted by various scholars. An analysis of their leadership skills is needed within the current academic landscape. As female graduate students continue to enter into the field of higher education in increasing numbers, there is an urgency to revisit the experiences and contributions of female academics to avoid continuation of the grand narrative. Their lived experiences and educational contributions provide foundations and principles which can influence future women leaders in higher education. By bringing these women to the forefront, there is a possibility of diversifying and advancing the field of leadership in higher education. Examining women’s contributions to the field of higher education is ethical and responsible and works toward affirming how past female leaders and the strategies they employed can inform current practices of leaders in higher education. We recognize that there remain countless untold stories of their work that have remained unnoticed or disregarded. We welcome feminist historiographies highlighting women from a wide range of national, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds to share the legacies of these female educational pioneers. If accepted, the final book chapters must document the subject’s relevant biography, her contribution to higher education and demonstrate an in-depth intersectionality of narratives between author and historical female figure. This work is being advanced by doctoral students in a class on Women in Higher Education at the University of Hartford. We particularly invite graduate students to participate in this project. We have written feminist historiographies on five women who had a positive impact on the field of higher education prior to the 1950s. The five women are: Annie Howes Barus, Harriette J. Cooke, Alice Hamilton, Frances Willard and Sara Josephine Baker. Submission Details: Please send a two-page PDF summary of your proposed book chapter of a feminist historiography that includes the details outlined above. Please also denote a chapter title and include the affiliation(s) and degree(s) of the author(s). After notification of acceptance of summaries, final book chapter submissions should be approximately 10 pages (double-spaced). Final book chapters must adhere to the guidelines within the 7th edition of the APA Publication Manual. The timeline is as follows: Submission deadline for summaries: August 14, 2020 Notification of acceptance of summaries: September 30, 2020 Submission deadline for full book chapters: January 8, 2020 Final submission of revised book chapters: March 1, 2021 Proposed Publication Date: Fall 2022 Proposals and submissions should be emailed to the Main Editor: Karen Case at kcase@hartford.edu Contact Info: Karen Case, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Administration and Supervision University of Hartford, Department of Education 200 Bloomfield Avenue, Auerbach 223C West Hartford, CT 06117 Phone: (860) 508-4397 Email: kcase@hartford.edu Contact Email: kcase@hartford.edu
Contact Info:
Karen Case, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Administration and Supervision University of Hartford, Department of Education 200 Bloomfield Avenue, Auerbach 223C West Hartford, CT 06117 Phone: (860) 508-4397
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Submissions, August 7, 2020
CFP: Celebrity Studies Special Edition, “CHILDREN AND CELEBRITIES.” Deadline: August 7, 2020. The entertainment industries create the most widely circulated popular images of children and childhood, and yet the role of children in celebrity studies warrants further study. As John Mercer and Jane O’Connor (2017) point out, the intersection between Childhood Studies and Celebrity Studies has been gaining traction in recent years, highlighting a tension between the dominant discourses of innocence surrounding children, and the highly competitive commercial imperatives of celebrity culture. New participatory entertainment ecologies have created new opportunities for child performers, leading to the rise of new kinds of child celebrities and surrounding reception cultures. For instance, on YouTube, the world’s most popular user-generated video streaming service, some of the most successful celebrities are children: eight year old Ryan Kaji – a North American child who reviews toys for the channel ‘Ryan’s World’ (formerly ‘Ryan ToysReview’) – was the highest-earning YouTube personality of the year in both 2018 (Statista, 2019) and 2019 (Berg, 2019). The child on screen, the child viewer, and the child star continue to be influenced by concepts of childhood that first emerged in the 19th century, eliciting discourses of harm and protection and attracting waves of moral panic in different eras. These public debates most often reveal more about adult sensibilities around often nostalgic notions of childhood than they do about children themselves. As Karen Lury puts it, “the essential understanding of the child here is the child as being rather than becoming”(2005: 314), a subject lacking agency, which leads Hugh Cunningham to caution “we need to distinguish between children as human beings and childhood as a shifting set of ideas” (2005: 1). In the current cultural moment and in prior eras, the categories of child and adult are mutually reinforcing ideals that are articulated and reflected in a range of distinctive ways through celebrity culture. For example, since the world went into lockdown, the family home has taken centre stage for live broadcasts and social media feeds, and as a result viewers have been inundated with images of celebrities in isolation with their children. There is more cultural evidence around childhood as a cultural concept than the lived experiences of children, a distinction which becomes key when considering children as fans of child and adult celebrities. In the field of Fandom Studies, Kyra Hunting notes the tendency to examine adolescent and teen media fans at the expense of children. She suggests this is partly due to practical, methodological reasons around collecting data, but argues it also reveals a resistance to framing children’s participatory media engagement as a form of fandom. This is despite the fact that “the playing child” functions as a “model for fandom” studies (Hills, 2002: 9). As such, we need to be mindful of how the child audience is addressed by star vehicles and paratexts, compared with what children actually do as fans, even (or particularly) if this does not accord with teen and adult models of fandom, and what intergenerational modes might be in play. We seek original essays of 6-8000 words that address children and celebrities through an interdisciplinary approach, across a range of media forms and eras, for a special issue of Celebrity Studies (prospective publication 2023, pending the journal’s review of abstracts). We will be looking for internationalisation, a range of scholarly experiences, gender balance, and that each of the abstracts tackles their topic or research question through broad and dynamic celebrity intersections. Topics that the articles may address include, but are not limited to:
  • Examination of specific child stars or celebrities
  • Fandom around child stars, among children and/or adults
  • Child fans of adult stars
  • On and off-screen dynamics between child stars and their co-stars
  • Child celebrities and their online persona
  • ‘Fur babies’: celebrity companion animals as ‘children’
  • Intersectional explorations of gender, race, and/or sexuality around child stars, fromtheir youth through to adulthood
  • Nostalgia around child stars of the past
  • Intergenerational spectatorship and child celebrities
  • Public discourses around child star breakdowns
  • Acting and screen performance
  • Ageing child stars
  • Children on reality TV
  • The child actor industry
  • Child actors in adult film and television
  • Celebrity families in music, film, television and social media cultures
  • Child labour and consent
  • Child stars and stalkers
  • Children of celebrities
  • Children, celebrity culture, and moral panic
  • Child stars and merchandising
  • Children, celebrities and genre
  • Adult stars who feature in children’s film and televisionPlease send proposals of 300 words and a 50 word author bio to Djoymi Baker djoymi.baker@rmit.edu.au, Jessica Balanzategui jbalanzategui@swin.edu.au, or Diana Sandars sandars@unimelb.edu.au by 7 August 2020.Djoymi Baker is a Lecturer in Media and Cinema Studies at RMIT University, Australia. She is a prize-winning writer on topics such as genre studies, fandom and myth in popular culture. Djoymi is the author of To Boldly Go: Marketing the Myth of Star Trek (I. B. Tauris, 2018) and the co-author of The Encyclopedia of Epic Films (Rowman & Littlefield, 2014). Her current research examines children’s film and television history.Jessica Balanzategui is a Lecturer in Cinema and Screen Studies at Swinburne University of Technology and a Chief Investigator at the Centre for Transformative Media Technologies. Her research examines screen genres across film, television and digital media for and about children, and the impact of technological and industrial change on entertainment cultures. Jessica is the author of The Uncanny Child in Transnational Cinema (Amsterdam University Press, 2018), and the founding editor of Amsterdam University Press’s book series, Horror and Gothic Media Cultures. Jessica is also an editor of Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media.Diana Sandars is a Lecturer in the School of Culture and Communication at the University of Melbourne, Australia, where she teaches courses in Screen, Gender, Digital Cultures, Social Justice and Cultural Studies. Diana has a research focus on the child in, and subject of,
screen media. Diana is the author of What A Feeling: The Hollywood Musical After MTV (Intellect, forthcoming). References Berg, M, 2019, “The highest paid YouTube stars of 2019.” Forbes 18 December. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/maddieberg/2019/12/18/the-highest-paid-yout… stars-of-2019-the-kids-are-killing-it/#446f8a3338cd (accessed 19 December 2019). Cunningham, Hugh, 2005, Children and childhood in western society since 1500, New York: Routledge. Hills, Matt, 2002, Fan Cultures, London: Routledge. Hunting, Kyra, 2019, “Finding the child fan: A case for studying children in fandom studies,” Journal of Fandom Studies, Vol.7, No. 2, pp. 93-111. Lury, Karen, 2005, “The Child in Film and Television,” Screen, Vol. 46, No. 3, Autumn, pp. 307-314. Mercer, John, and Jane O’Connor, 2017, Childhood and Celebrity, London: Routledge. Statista, 2019, “Most popular YouTube channels as of September 2019, ranked by number of subscribers (in millions).” Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/277758/most-popular-youtube-channels… by-subscribers/ (accessed 01 December 2019).

*

Deadline for Submissions August 1, 2020

“Living with loss: bereavement, grief, loneliness, and resilience”–call for papers for the special issue for the British Journal of Guidance & Counselling (8/1/2020) The contemporary poet David Whyte invites his audiences to wonder with him why humans are almost solely focused on achievement and success and are frequently shocked by any ending to a relationship, job, or loved-one’s life. He proposes we would do well to “apprentice ourselves to loss” as much as we do to gain. This begs questions like: what do we already know about well-being and resilience, what essential questions do we need to ask to facilitate our learning in this area, and what new research is being done or should be done to improve guidance and counselling practice in this context? This special issue invites perspectives on the range of reactions people have when faced with loss and change, and the potential for more healthful responses. It is also aimed at articulating ways in which we might serve those we support when they confront specific human challenges related to bereavement, grief, and loneliness. Bereavement Bereavement refers to the loss of a loved one and the sadness, struggle, and adjustment this profound change requires. In counselling and guidance theory and practice, we maintain that humans are innately relational: when someone we love dies (or we are faced with the bereavement of those we serve), we are reminded that our attachments provide security, safety, consistency, and even shape our identity. With the secularisation of society, many rituals for coping well with bereavement and providing comfort have disappeared and the onus is frequently on the individual to make meaning. This may be done through psychological, creative or spiritual approaches, and social support remains an essential element of being well when faced with the death of those closest to us. The Covid-19 epidemic poses additional issues for the bereaved; not only because of the complications of burials and the impossibility of visiting those who are seriously ill, but also the disturbance of cultural rituals that appease the living and ‘do right by the dead’ as part of meaning-oriented practices. We are interested in learning more about innovations, theories, new research, and perspectives on bereavement within the context of guidance and counselling. Grief “Grieving represents a form of psychosocial and perhaps spiritual transition from the initial onset of a life-altering loss through a period of frequently tumultuous adjustment to a point of relative stability beyond the period of acute bereavement” (Neimeyer & Cacciatore, 2016, p. 3). We will all face grief, we will see our clients and students face grief, and we will see loss in all areas of human life, not just as it relates to the death of loved ones. We will likely all be confronted with one or more of the following losses: job loss, loss of relationships or connection, even loss of our freedom (e.g. through illness; the current pandemic; lack of autonomy at work). Facing grief demands of us that we adapt, make meaning, and respond to the changes that challenge our sense of safety and identity. Loneliness Loneliness is said to have the same “impact on mortality as smoking 15 cigarettes a day, making it even more dangerous than obesity,” writes researcher Douglas Nemecek (Tate, 2018). He and his colleagues found in their 2018 national survey in USA, that loneliness is correlated with social anxiety and self-reported overuse of social media. Findings in their study indicate that in order to reduce loneliness, guidance and counselling professionals should focus on, “improving social support, decreasing social anxiety, and promoting healthy daily behaviors” among their clients (Bruce, Lustig, Russell, & Nemecek, 2018). This is, of course, complicated by consistent findings that “lonelier people are more likely to have poor social skills, have difficulty in forming relationships, and hold negative or hostile opinions of other people” (Bevinn, 2011). In the current pandemic, which involves self-isolating and social distancing, there are additional causes of loneliness. We are interested in finding out more about loneliness in the context of bereavement and the range of other non-death losses, including Covid-19 related losses. Resilience In the context of bereavement, a surprising 68% of people show resilience; however, a minority does suffer from prolonged and complicated grief (Bonanno, 2009). Resilience is generally perceived as the ability to respond quickly and adaptively to difficult change. Most scholars agree that it is a combination of aptitude, attitude, and social connection. We are resilient to the degree to which we can ask for and receive the support of others, are able to honour our emotions and let them do their adaptive work, and have (or can develop) the ability to reorder our lives. We may even learn and transform through painful change through a phenomenon called benefit finding (Hall, 2014). Researchers have come to understand that our response to change in life is dependent on biological, personal, dyadic, and cultural forces (for a full overview see Neimeyer, Klass & Dennis, 2014). For this special issue of the British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, we are looking for scholarly articles on the following topics:
  • Innovative perspectives and theories on bereavement, grief, loneliness, and resilience
  • Loneliness research, policy and practice
  • Theoretical and practical perspectives on resilience
  • Interdisciplinary research in relation to the theme(s) of this special issue
  • Psychology of bereavement/grief, loneliness and/or resilience
  • Cultural factors in bereavement/grief, loneliness and/or resilience
  • Loss, trauma, and counselling and beneficial approaches
  • Community factors in resilience
  • Creative methods in response to grief and loneliness (e.g. narrative therapies, life writing and creative writing, counselling, poetry therapy, embodied methods for learning through difficulty)
  • Bereavement, grief, loneliness, and resilience in the time of COVID-19
Submission Instructions
  • Proposals of no more than 500 words and list of authors, including contact details for the corresponding author can be submitted to the Special Issue Editor(s) Dr. Robert Neimeyer, Portland Institute for Loss and Transition neimeyer@portlandinstitute.org and Dr. Katrin Den Elzen, Curtin University, Perth, Australia katrin.denelzen@curtin.edu.au for feedback by August 1, 2020.
  • Full papers can (also) be submitted into the system without a proposal.
  • When submitting, please choose “Living with Loss” from drop-down tab when asked if you are submitting for a special or symposium issue
  • Please see general BJGC guidelines on word counts and referencing styles before submitting
*
Deadline for Submissions August 1, 2020

Call for papers

7th international symposium of the Finnish Oral History Network FOHN 

Power, Authority, and Voice: Critical Reflections in/on Oral History

26–27 November 2020 Helsinki, Finland

The notions of power, authority, and voice have been at the center of oral history research and practice from its inception. Oral history research is emblematically distinguished by its preoccupation with the voices from ‘the below’, having dedicated itself to the recording, collection, and analysis of memories, personal narratives, and histories of individuals and groups that would not have been heard otherwise. The concept of voice has implicitly referred to the nature of oral histories as recorded interviews, but more importantly, to issues of subjectivity, representation, and authority. In addition to recorded interviews, there has been increasing interest in various forms of life writings, as well as other forms of vernacular mnemonic practices online and offline. Even though the dialogic nature of data and knowledge production has been emphasized, analyzed, and celebrated, we still need to ask who holds the power to decide which pasts and perspectives are recognized, and whose voices – and what kind of voices – are listened to and analyzed, how and why? Moreover, we need to critically reflect on the structures of power and authority that practices and methods of oral history research foster.  The seventh international symposium of the Finnish Oral History Network FOHN will focus on the notions of power, authority, and voice in the context of oral history from critical contemporary perspective. The keynote speakers are Urvashi Butalia (Delhi, India), Erin Jessee (University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK), Jonna Katto (Ghent University, Belgium), and Riikka Taavetti (University of Helsinki, Finland). We wish to invite contributions focusing on methodological and ethical questions as well as on case studies. Proposals may be submitted for individual papers or panels and they can address but are not limited to the following themes and issues:
  • Critical reflections on voices and silences
  • Authorities of knowledge production in oral history
  • Culturally dependent aesthetics of oral history and life writing
  • Ideologies and politics of oral history and life writing
  • Issues related to the nature of oral history as a social movement, form of activism, and academic practice
  • Materiality and medium of the ‘voice’ (i.e. sound, writing, image)
  • Dominance of the ‘tragic’, ‘traumatic’, and ‘devastating’ experiences
  • Oral history and other disciplines
  • Critical reflections on the geographies of oral history
Submissions of individual papers require a title and a maximum of 250-word abstract. Panel proposals should include a maximum of 250-word description of the panel and max 250-word abstracts of each individual papers. The conference language will be English.  Please e-mail your proposal to fohn-symposium@helsinki.fi. The deadline for the proposals has been extended to 1 August 2020. The acceptance or rejection of proposals will be announced by 15 August 2020 and the registration will be opened in September 2020. The conference fee will be 70 euros (standard) / 35 euros (concession: students, unwaged).
The Finnish Oral History Network FOHN is still very much hoping that the symposium will be organised as originally planned, but participants will be kept posted on any possible changes.
Enquiries: fohn-symposium@helsinki.fi Ulla Savolainen Chair, FOHN UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI                                            Further information on the symposium:https://www.helsinki.fi/en/conferences/7th-international-symposium-of-the-finnish-oral-history-network-fohn FOHN’s webpage: http://www.finlit.fi/fi/fohn-en Facebook: Finnish Oral History Network
— Ulla Savolainen, PhD, title of docent Academy of Finland postdoctoral researcher Department of Cultures Topelia, Room C214, P.O. Box 59, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland

The editors of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies are delighted to announce that Margaretta Jolly is the recipient of The 2019 Hogan Prize for her essay “Survival Writing: Autobiography versus Primatology in the Conservation Diaries of Alison Jolly,” which was published in the special issue, “Engaging Donna Haraway: Lives in the Nature-Culture Web” (34.3, Autumn 2019). Congratulations to Margaretta, and thank you to our guest judge, Gillian Whitlock! Please find the full judge’s statement below.The 2019 Hogan Prize AnnouncementThe editors of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies are very pleased to award the fifth annual Hogan Prize. This award is presented annually to a scholar in recognition of an outstanding essay published in the journal. Essays selected for this prize are carefully chosen by an independent judge. The 2019 judge is Gillian Whitlock, Emeritus Professor in the School of Communication and Arts at The University of Queensland. The prize includes publication in the journal and an award of $750. This award is generously supported by Routledge Journals.The prize was named in honor of two of the journal’s founding editors, Rebecca and Joseph Hogan, who worked tirelessly and creatively to expand the field of auto/biography studies. This award, therefore, recognizes ingenuity in scholarly research and supports critical work that advances the field.2019 Judge’s Statement by Gillian WhitlockThis year contenders for the Hogan Prize share a common theme: Donna Haraway’s scholarship. To read them as a collection is to be reminded again of the extraordinary impact of Haraway’s writing on life narrative. The essays draw on diverse locations, conversations and concepts to capture Haraway’s constant return to relationality, to sympoetic action and thinking. These essays are to be read together, for they nurture each other, collectively, including Margaretta Jolly’s ‘Survival Writing: Autobiography versus Primatology in the Conservation Diaries of Alison Jolly’. This is an arresting essay right from the start, as we move from ‘Haraway’ and ‘Jolly’ to the intimacy of ‘Donna previously wrote about Mum…..’.  Alison Jolly, who features in Haraway’s Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science, was one of a generation of female primatologists that transformed this science, and the pre-eminent researcher of the lemurs of Madagascar. This essay is matriography: a tribute to Alison Jolly as a scientist and mother by the daughter who inherited her diaries following her death in 2014, later published as Thank You, Madagascar: The Conservation Diaries of Alison Jolly.  Grief and loss remain palpable on the page as Jolly ‘tangles’ with her mother’s legacy, as her daughter and literary executor, and her academic successor. Here, matriography enables private mourning to engage with issues which are now more than ever of critical importance: species survival, environmental politics, and what life narrative can bring to our thinking on these issues. It also enables Margaretta Jolly, as literary executor and literary critic, to engage with the ethics and cultural politics of publishing diaries now, in a life-narrative market where the preference for ‘first contact’ story endures. By returning to topics and texts that inspired thinking on posthuman lives a decade ago ‘Survival Writing’ suggests how far this project has travelled now, in the ‘late writing’ of both Donna Haraway’s Staying with the Trouble  and Alison Jolly’s Thank You, Madagascar.  Anthropomorphism, for example the ‘first contact’ of primatologist to primate trope, is displaced ‘by relishing many contacts, hands and gazes’ in the diaries (478).  Here, Margaretta Jolly argues, her mother becomes part of a movement of life narrators who respond to environmental crisis by recognising the worlds of other species, without simply extending human modes of personhood. In this ‘late writing’ Jolly finds consolation, a possibility of ‘more respons-able living and dying …in times yet to come (482).  As with other memorable essays in life narrative scholarship, we pause to admire the craft of both critical and creative writing here: layers of historical, cultural and intellectual interpretation, the memory and emotion that animates it, and its final powerful turn to the solace of Haraway’s vision of multispecies survival in the Chthulucene.
*

Deadline for Submissions July 31, 2020

Call for Participation – Fourth version of “YoVeo” (“I see”), The Festival Of Word And Image In First Person (7/31/2020; 8/28/2020) Colombia

Dear colleagues, I hope this message finds both you and your loved ones in good health. I bring good news to you: this year, with the support of the Edumedia-3 Research Group and Seedbed, we will celebrate the fourth version of  “YoVeo (“I see”), The Festival Of Word And Image In First Person.” This is an event in which we pay tribute to the different ways of representing and relating the Self, as an exercise and practice of freedom of expression with the purpose of generating a space for reflective exchange in relation to subjectivity, singularity and individualism. The festival began in 2010 in Pereira (Colombia), a city in which we have gotten to fill four exhibition rooms of the Colombian-American Center, the Colombian-French Alliance, the University Foundation of the Andean Area and Comfamiliar Risaralda (the local family compensation office) with the support of Pereira’s Institute of Culture and Promotion of Tourism (today Secretary-of-Culture’s Office). In this ten-year-long trajectory and in the three previous versions, artists, cartoonists, videographers, journalists, researchers, students, teachers and citizens in general from El Salvador, Guatemala City, Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro have taken part. This year we have already opened the reception of works and with them we will make the exhibition, online this time, from August 28. We would like to have your participation in one or several activities that we describe below. The way to do this may be either one of the ones listed below or in anuy other way that you consider pertinent. So, if you feel encouraged to join us, do let us know about your intention by responding to this email. Participation: – In a virtual chat on Facebook Live before August 28 on our page @LaFiestaYoVeo with a duration of between 30 and 60 minutes. – With a video of a conference that you have already produced or that you would like to produce related to the ways of representing and relating the Self, to be published before August 28. – With a short article (500 words approx.) about the Self to be published on the website www.edumedia3.co – As a jury in charge of selecting among the preselected works the three best by category: Images of the Self, Words of the Self, Scenes of the Self, Objects of the Self and Other forms of the Self. – With a work or paper on the Self: portrait, self-portrait, biography, autobiography, personal memory or life story in one of the four categories whose examples are given below. – With the promotion of this call among your contacts from your personal, work and research networks of, as one of the peers joining us or through the organization or institution that you represent and that we will be involving through the logo and the media we have access to. “Images Of the Self” Category: it can be any of these: selfie, photography, painting, drawing, caricature, plasticine, video, cinema. “Words of the Self” Category: poetry, chronicle, newspaper, memory, song, testimony, interview. “Scenes of the Self” Category: monologue, performance, choreography. “Objects Of the Self” Category: photo album, exlibris, t-shirt. “Other forms of the Self” Category: blog, body map, tattoo … The organization will certify your participation, publish the preselected works digitally and on our media: website, YouTube channel and other social networks giving participants the due credits, as well as in media at the local, national and international levels. We hope to be able to count on your valuable contribution and are already looking forward to your kind response. If you decide to help us forward this call, please attach this information for those who wish to participate: Prior to registration we must know something about the work or paper that will be evaluated by the selection committee and then by the jury of the event, for which we request the sending of a photograph or video (1 minute is enough) if you will participate in Images Of The Self, Scenes of the Self, Objects of the Self or Other Forms of the Self, or an audio (1 minute is enough), if you will participate in Words of the Self. You must send the image, video or audio to fiestayoveo@gmail.com before July 31, 2020. We will reply as soon as possible with the instructions and conditions for participation in case you are pre-selected. Thank you very much for your help and have a good day, Best regards,
Diego Leandro Marín Ossa
Docente Titular e Investigador Asociado
Área de medios y educación
Escuela de español y comunicación audiovisual
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación
Director del grupo y semillero de investigación
Ext: 7234 / Edificio Nº 7A (primer piso)

El contenido de este mensaje y sus anexos son únicamente para el uso del destinatario y pueden contener información  clasificada o reservada. Si usted no es el destinatario intencional, absténgase de cualquier uso, difusión, distribución o copia de esta comunicación.

Deadline for Submissions, July 15, 2020

118th Annual Pacific Ancient and Modern Languages Association Conference, Las Vegas, NV Thursday, November 12, 2020 to Sunday, November 15, 2020 Sahara Las Vegas Hotel Hosted by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas *** Given concerns about the COVID-19 virus, organizers will be monitoring the situation as we continue planning for our conference in November. Deadline for Submissions, July 15, 2020 PAMLA’s Autobiography panel is currently accepting submissions! We are open to a wide range of paper topics dealing with subjectivity, authorship, auto-fiction, and identity, but are particularly interested in papers that take new interdisciplinary approaches to Autobiography. As such, papers that draw on cognitive science, psychology, phenomenology, critical race theory, gender theory, or intersectionality in their analyses of Autobiography are particularly welcome. Possible topics could include, but are not limited to: collective autobiography; techniques of self-narration; self-fashioning; neuroaesthetics; intersectional subjectivity; philosophy of race. We are also interested in papers attuned to some facet of the conference theme, “City of God, City of Destruction.” Submit an abstract directly through the Autobiography panel submission page, or search the PAMLA comprehensive Call for Papers. Contact Emily Travis (etravis@ucsc.edu) with any questions. About PAMLA and this year’s theme: The Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association is a scholarly association designed for those teaching or conducting research in a diverse range of literary, linguistic, and cultural interests, both ancient and modern, in the United States and abroad. PAMLA members include faculty and students in language and literature departments in colleges and universities, as well as interdisciplinary scholars from other disciplines and independent scholars. This year’s theme, “City of God, City of Destruction,” seeks to take the “form analysis” of Las Vegas in a religious direction, considering this shimmering city in the desert as both celestial emblem and den of sin. More broadly, the 2020 PAMLA conference, while welcoming paper proposals on a wide variety of topics, invites meditation on the connections between ideas of the city and the forms of fiction, and the way both may be informed by a religious poetics. Contact Info:
Emily Travis
Contact Email:
*
Deadline for Submissions, July 15, 2020
Women, Life Writing, and Scandals of Self-Revelation
Women in French Panel at SAMLA Conference (7/15/2020; 11/13-15/2020) Jacksonville, Florida, USA This panel is one of five Women in French sessions at the 2020 South Atlantic Modern Language Association annual conference, taking place this year in Jacksonville, Florida from November 13-15. Presenters must be current members of Women in French and the South Atlantic Modern Language Association. As life writing exposes purported truths about personal experience and identity, self-revelations in these accounts position these texts as potential objects of controversy as authors test the limits of telling all. Many authors have turned to life-writing practices to speak about intimate loss, family secrets, stolen childhoods, and physical, psychological, or historical trauma. In this way, autobiography, autofiction, and memoir, remain potentially perilous terrains especially regarding the implications of others on which such self-accounts unavoidably depend. This panel seeks to explore the scandals behind or beyond such self-revelation. How has scandal served as impetus for textual creation? In what ways has the publication of “scandalous” texts implicated others whether in accusation, in solidarity, or by engaging in broader controversies or social discontent? How have such texts responded to scandal? What role do legal proceedings play in (self)censoring self-accounts? Proposals on examples of women engaged with or implicated in scandalous self-revelations in literature, film, theatre, and other modes of representation from all time periods and all areas of Francophone literature are welcome. Please send 250-word proposals in English or French along with presenter’s name, academic affiliation, and email to Adrienne Angelo (ama0002@auburn.edu) by July 15, 2020. Chair: Adrienne Angelo, Auburn University, <ama0002@auburn.edu>
Deadline for Submissions July 1, 2020
Self/Culture/Writing: Autoethnography in the 21st Century – Special Issue of Life Writing Deadline: July 1st, 2020 contact: Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle, The College of New Jersey – ortiz@tcnj.edu This special edition seeks to offer 21st century perspectives on the intersections of autobiographical and anthropological writing around the globe at this historical moment. It aims to examine autoethnography as both process and product of evocative, interpretive, analytic, interactive, performative, experiential, and embodied forms of writing self/culture. Proposals are invited for critical essays and autoethnographic prose of between 7-8,000 words of original, previously unpublished work related (but not limited) to the following topics: ·       Creative nonfiction and fictionalized insider ethnography ·       Poetics of Autoethnography ·       Autoethnographic memoir ·       Connections between travel literature and autoethnography .       Writing immigrant transnational, and diasporic lives ·       Embodied autoethnography ·       Duo-ethnographic and collaborative ethnographies of self ·       Indigenous representations of self/other and self as other ·       Digital humanities and autoethnographic modalities ·       Visual media and autoethnography ·       Autoethnography of queer and trans cultures ·       Oral storytelling traditions ·       Intersections of autobiographical and ethnographic memory ·       Ethics and Politics of autoethnographic method ·       Literary, performance, and journalistic ethnographies of self ·       Autoethnographic narrative in historical perspective ·       Autoethnographies of academia ·       Autoethnography as social-justice genre for vulnerable lives ·       Writing gendered self/culture ·       Racial identity and autoethnography ·       Autoethnography as a de/colonizing method Special interest in meta-narrative approaches that push boundaries and rethink paradigms. Procedure for Submission – Proposals of up to 500 words should be sent to ortiz@tcnj.edu by 1 July, 2020. Please include a brief biographical note of 50 words or less, institutional affiliation and 4-5 keywords. Full-length papers will be solicited from these proposals by 15 July, 2020 with final essays due 1 November, 2020. Final revisions due, 1 March, 2021. —
Dr. Lisa Ortiz-Vilarelle
Professor
Department of English
The College of New Jersey (609) 771-3231
Fax (609) 637-5112
PO Box 7718

Ewing, NJ 08628-0718

Deadline for Submissions, June 30, 2020
Scandal in Autobiography (6/30/2020; 11/13-15/2020) SAMLA Virtual Conference
Autobiographies establish the author’s own individual voice and the ability of that voice to display a social scandal or provoke a scandal. In so doing, authors aim to understand the social space around them, and in particular, their personal experience to provoke others within their narrative from the 19th to the 21st centuries. How do we use autobiographical texts to examine the crossroads of public and private spaces? Phillippe Lejeune outlines a pact between writers and their readers, testified by the use of the author’s name as both protagonist and narrator. Autobiography has in this way been for centuries one of the most widespread prolific expressions and can be related to the larger tradition of the genre in terms of self-depiction in literary history. This panel therefore explores the impact of scandal in autobiographies of the nineteenth-twenty-first centuries.  Scandal as a social phenomenon examines speech acts. At times, scandal comes from the outside, in which a writer reflects upon an experience; scandal can also take the form of provocation. We encourage papers from a broad range of disciplines, and possible topics might include:
  • Scandal in Popular Culture
  • Autobiography in the Romantic Era
  • Politics and Scandal
  • Love, Heartbreak, and Sensual Writing
  • Scandal and Communication Studies
  • Global Female Testimonies
Please send abstracts of 250 words to Dr. Petra M. Schweitzer (pschweit@su.edu) and to Dr. Casey Eriksen (ceriksen@su.edu) by June 30, 2020.
Contact Info:
Dr. Petra M. Schweitzer, pschweit@su.edu Dr. Casey R. Eriksen, ceriksen@su.edu
*
Deadline for Submissions, June 30, 2020

Comparative American Studies: An International Journal Special Issue: Elizabeth Wurtzel (6/30/2020)

contact email:
Elizabeth Wurtzel (1967-2020) is most famous for her controversial bestselling autobiographies, Prozac Nation (1994) and More, Now, Again (2001). These works are often cited as seminal in the ‘memoir boom’ of the late 1990s and early 2000s and established Wurtzel as a cult classic and an icon of her generation. Her writing spans across almost 40 years and includes journalism, personal essays (most notably Bitch: In Praise of Difficult Women (1998)), and other non-fiction. In the aftermath of Wurtzel’s passing in January 2020, a reappraisal of her literary career seems both timely and a mark of tribute. We welcome articles exploring the following aspects: – Reassessments of the impact of Wurtzel’s writing in the context of American literature and culture in the late 1990s-early 2000s – Analyses of Wurtzel’s influence on contemporary confessional/autobiographical writing, especially by women – Analyses of gender, sexuality, mental health and illness in Wurtzel’s work – Situating Wurtzel as a Jewish woman writer, or a Generation X writer – Wurtzel’s non-fiction, such as her music and online journalism – Wurtzel’s literary influences – Analyses of the systemic critiques of late 20th/ early 21st century America in Wurtzel’s writing – Wurtzel and the cult of the individual Articles which take a comparative focus (comparing Wurtzel to other writers and cultures, for example) are especially encouraged.
*
Deadline for proposals 20 June 2020
AUTOFICTION AND HUMOUR Special Issue of Life Writing (Autumn 2021) Deadline for proposals 20 June 2020 One of the main features of autofictional literature is its so-called ability to “sit on the fence” (Lejeune) and be simultaneously fictional and referential. Throughout the theoretical discussions on autofiction this has overshadowed some of its other features. This special issue explores one of them, namely the as-of-yet rarely addressed humorous dimension of autofictional writing, including the aesthetic, narrative and social function(s) of humour in autofictional literature. In 1996, Marie Darrieussecq, a French scholar who almost overnight became a literary celebrity with the publication of Pig Tales (Truismes), published an article entitled “Autofiction, a non-serious Genre” (“L’Autofiction, un genre pas sérieux”) in which she ironically lauded autobiography only to better support autofiction’s creativity and its noncommittal attitude toward reality. Even if Darrieussecq meant “non-serious” to denote a less respected, frowned-upon subcategory of autobiographical discourse, now almost 50 years after Doubrovsky first coined the term, it’s worth considering if indeed autofiction is a non-serious mode of writing, although along a different understanding of the non-serious than Darrieusecq’s. Freud defined humour as a defence mechanism, a way of keeping reality at bay while still focusing on it. This could also describe the way autofiction relates to autobiographical practices and their attempt to describe somebody’s reality. Judging for example by the grandiloquent buffoonery of Bret Easton Ellis’s Lunar Park, the wry self-deprecating tone of Ben Lerner’s 10:04, and by how J.M. Coetzee pokes fun at his alter-ego in Scenes from Provincial Life, at times verging on self-parody, it seems high time to consider autofiction’s humorous dimension. One of the comic features of autofiction lies in its capacity to mock the seriousness of the genre it seemingly belongs to and, taking Darrieussecq’s rhetorical twist as a perfect example, seems to sneer at autobiography’s desperate dependence on facts and memory knowing that both have been shown to be fluctuating and labile (see for instance Mark Rowlands’s Memory and the Self: Phenomenology, Science and Autobiography, 2017). Even if a writer such as Mary Karr scathingly pointed out in The Art of Memoir (2015) that this aspect has often been regarded as carte blanche by some memoirists to publish blatant lies, she also rightfully reminded us that this inherent fallibility of our memory doesn’t call into question the validity of autobiography as long as it’s aware of this flaw. Another comic feature stems from an amused, sometimes ironic outlook on life and on those who try to put it on paper. In other words, autofiction often generates “ironic signals with regard to the reality of reported facts” (“signaux ironiques quant à la réalité des faits rapportés,” Colonna). Of course, this doesn’t imply that autofictional literature foregoes all claims to narrate any form of reality, but it frequently does so through tongue-in-cheek humour. As noted by Yves Baudelle, even in more serious autofictions such as Chloé Delaume’s or Camille Laurens’s, often conjuring up ghosts and the general theme of Thanatos, this “phantasmagoria is only tolerated in a humorous mode, which bestows upon it both its specificity and its function” (“cette fantasmagorie n’est tolérée que sur le mode humoristique, ce qui lui confère à la fois sa spécificité et sa fonction”). Thus, autofiction’s very referential logic could be described as “apotropaic.” In Ariadne’s Thread, J. Hillis Miller, focusing on realistic fiction’s essential flaw, wonders why “this dissolution of its own fundamental fiction [is] as constant a feature of realistic fiction as the creation of the fiction of character in the first place,” suggesting that “the function is apotropaic. It is a throwing away of what is already thrown away in order to save it.” Is autofiction trying to save autobiography and simultaneously make a joke out of it? This might be the very core of its ironical nature. We encourage cross-disciplinary and comparative approaches and papers discussing primary texts in any language. Proposed articles may consider the humorous dimension(s) of autofictional literature through themes like, but not limited to, those listed above. Practicalities and schedule: Deadline for proposals (300 words): 20 June 2020 Authors will be notified if their proposal can be accepted for peer review by the end of July. Deadline for sending in first drafts of papers: 1 November 2020 Peer-review process and corrections: January-March 2021 Final publication: Autumn 2021 All submissions need to be sent with a brief bio, which includes title, institutional affiliation and e-mail address. Below is the link to the journal’s instructions for authors: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?show=instructions&journalCode=rlwr20 Please submit to: Alexandra Effe (alexandra.effe@wolfson.ox.ac.uk), Marie Lindskov Hansen (marie.lindskov.hansen@fu-berlin.de), Arnaud Schmitt (arnaud.schmitt@u-bordeaux.fr)
*
Deadline for Submissions June 15, 2020

Call for Articles: Travel Narratives and Real-Life Fiction, The Lincoln Humanities Journal (6/15/2020)

The Lincoln Humanities Journal (ISSN 2474-7726) is requesting article submissions for its 8th special issue, to be published in December 2020, on the topic of Travel Narratives and Real-Life Fiction. Contributors are invited to examine specifically (a) the evolving forms of life-writings (biographies, autobiographies, memoirs, diaries, blogs, etc.) as they pertain to travel; (b) the intersection of fictional and factual travel narratives, and (c) the emotional, economic, socio-political, environmental, physiological, and literary aspects of travel (in reality and in fiction; by land, sea and air; on earth and in outer space). We welcome approaches across a broad range of disciplines such as literature, history, political science, anthropology, religion, popular culture, philosophy, visual arts, and social media. Topics may include but are not limited to:
  • The concept of travel: historical and philosophical perspectives
  • Travel writing, Life-writing as genre
  • Biofiction, biography, autobiography
  • Travel journalism
  • Travel in film, theater, literature, and television
  • The Internet of places: Pictures and videos of other places, cultures, etc.
  • Modern tourism
  • Adventure  and exploration
  • Travel for business, pleasure, family reunion, aid work
  • Travel for education (study abroad, etc.)
  • Pilgrimage & religious travel
  • Modes of transportation
  • Environmental  impact of travel
  • Travel to the moon and beyond; The sci-fi connection and influence
  • Tourism in international relations (migration, spying, etc.)
  • Temporary living and/or working abroad (mission, etc.)
Important Dates & Deadlines
  • Deadline for Full Article Submissions:    June 15, 2020
  • Acceptance Notification:                       60 days after submission
  • Projected Date of Publication:               December 2020
Submission Guidelines
  1. Include an abstract of 200-400 words (in MS Word)
  2. Include a biographical note of 50-250 words (in MS Word)
  3. The article should be 4000-6000 words, including the abstract, the footnotes and the works cited
  4. Include the following statement in the cover e-mail: “I solemnly confirm that the attached manuscript has never been published elsewhere, under this, or another title.”
  5. Include name, professional affiliation, phone number, and email address in the cover e-mail.
Formatting Guidelines
  1. Manuscripts should conform to MLA-style guidelines as detailed in recent editions of MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing. For an MLA Style Works Cited format overview, please check the following web resource: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formattin…
  2. Use font Georgia # 12. The entire article, including the abstract and the indented quotations, should be double-spaced, and in MS Word.
  3. The final submission must comply with other formatting guidelines, to be communicated upon notification of acceptance.
Submission & Review Process
  1. Manuscripts should be sent to the editor, Abbes Maazaoui (maazaoui@lincoln.edu)
  2. Articles undergo a double blind review and their publication depends on the peer-review process.
*
Deadline for Submissions June 20, 2020

Representations of Refugee, Migrant, and Displaced Motherhood in a Global Context (6/20/2020)

Seeking abstracts or unpublished chapters looking at literary accounts of Latina and/or Indigenous motherhood experiences in the context of migration and displacement to fill a gap in scholarly edited collection.  Please submit a 250-400 word abstract of your chapter and a 50-word bio by June 20, 2020. Accepted and complete chapters due 15 August 2020 (6,000 words maximum with MLA format and references) Contributions are invited for a scholarly edited collection that aims to explore literary accounts of migrant, refugee, and displaced motherhood in a global context. The collection will look primarily at contemporary writings about migrant motherhood. In a world marked by forced migrations, climate change, and wars, the collection aims to examine writings about the displacement of mothers at the American borders, in the Syrian conflict, and beyond. This book seeks to examine writings by and about the displaced mother in both fiction and non-fiction.  Refugees and migrants are often unseen, or worse seen as an inconvenience or imposition.  Migrant mothers in particular are often overlooked, with their experiences, their needs, and their lives nearly erased. Vu Tran says that “for those who can never quite accept her, a refugee is like a ghost” (p. 154).  This collection is particularly interested in analysis of first-hand accounts of migrant motherhood, while also recognizing that the migrant mother is often silent. Therefore, analysis of both fictional and non-fiction accounts may be of importance as the collection pieces together the fragmented lives of migrant mothers. Dina Nayeri has examined the refugee experience in both her fictional and non-fiction works, Refuge and The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You. In the latter, her non-fiction account, Nayeri talks about how her own mother made the brave decision to take her small children and leave home to ultimately settle in America.  Nayeri says of the refugee, “A tortured mind, terror of a wasted future, is what enables you to abandon home; it’s a prerequisite for stepping into a dingy, for braving militarized mountains” (p. 8). The journey of the migrant woman is made evermore complex by her status as a mother, a child-bearer, and a woman at-risk. The borders of motherhood to be examined in this collection can be linguistic, political, and geographical, along with the complex physicality of moving through liminal and transitory spaces. Chapters may explore a range of topics from the mother figure in refugee children’s literature to ethnographic studies of migrant mothers in detention facilities. I am in talks with several highly reputable academic publishers that are interested in the collection. Possible topics might look critically at (but not limited to):
  • Narratives about or by migrant or refugee mothers
  • Fictionalized accounts of migrant motherhood
  • Reproduction and migration
  • Rhetoric of migrant motherhood
  • Family separation
  • Family resettlement
  • Research and qualitative studies on women’s experiences as migrant or refugee mothers
  • Refugee children’s literature and the mother figure
References Tran, Vu. “A Refugee Again” In The Displaced: Refugee Writers on Refugee Lives, Edited by Viet Thanh Nguyen, Abrams, NY, NY, 2018 Nayeri, Dina. The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You. Catapult, NY, 2019. Refuge, Riverhead, NY, 2017. Timeline 1 December 2020: Deadline for submitting 250-400 word abstract of your chapter and a 50-word bio. 1 April 2020: Accepted and complete chapters due (6,000 words maximum with MLA format and references) Submissions and questions should be sent to maria.lombard@northwestern.edu
*

Deadline for Submissions June 5, 2020
Speculating Identities and Defying Stereotypes: South Asian Women Writers and Idealistic Mobilities (6/5/2020) Special Issue, Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics
deadline for submissions:
June 5, 2020
full name / name of organization:
Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics (JCLA)
contact email:
The issue intends to bring to the fore the writings of women from colonial and postcolonial era of South Asia, particularly exploring how these women writers addresses the issues of violence, speculating identity and belongingness while defying stereotypes in primarily male literary traditions as a focal point. Moreover, the proposed issue considers how different literary genres ranging from novels, poetry, novellas, short stories, memoirs to autobiographies by South Asian women writers present an exclusive and inimitable insight into varied understandings of pre-constructed gender roles and relations in the context of south Asian society and culture. Their works bear testimony to their personal as well as socio-political experiences struggling with the boundaries of centre and periphery, negotiating their identities and ideologies across different spatial and temporal domains. This special issue, therefore, attempts to look into the literary tradition of South Asian Women writers and how it has developed into an alternative literary canon significantly upholding the (Her)stories, previously unacknowledged by the male writers. The issue is focused on identifying the narrative politics of the literary texts composed by the South Asian women writers, and how over the years their works have collectively shown a steady development of an emerging category of female writers struggling with the issues of identity, class, caste, gender, economic disparity and so on within an oppressive heteronormative social frame. The issue intends to focus on the following sub-themes, but authors are also encouraged to explore other wide-ranging relevant and related critical writings. The sub themes are: 1. Constructing nation through gender 2. South Asian Women’s narratives across continents 3. Interplay of tradition and modernity in South Asian Women’s narratives 4. Understanding class and caste in South Asian Women’s writing 5. Gender plurality in South Asian Women’s texts Guest Editors: Raeesa Usmani and Ritushree Sengupta Submission Guidelines: 1. Original scholarly and unpublished research papers of 5000-6000 words are invited. 2. A short author(s) bio-note (100 words) mentioning address of institution, email id, phone number and email address must be submitted along. 3. An abstract of 250-300 words will have to be submitted on or before 5th June, 2020 to email id: papers.jcla@gmail.com. 4. Once the author is notified about the selection of the abstracts, the full paper must be submitted by 1st October, 2020 to papers.jcla@gmail.com. Authors are requested to strictly abide by the deadlines and submission guidelines. 5. Authors must follow referencing style MLA 8th edition. Font: Times New Roman, Font Size: 12, Line Spacing: 1.5, Margin: 1 inch all sides, Page: A4 6. All papers will go through rigorous editing process and plagiarism scanning through Turnitin. Only 10% similarity will be accepted. 7. Should you have any query or confusion, please feel free to reach out to us on papers.jcla@gmail.com ABOUT THE JOURNAL The Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics (ISSN: 0252-8169) is a half-yearly journal published by the Vishvanatha Kaviraja Institute of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, India since 1977. The Institute was founded on August 22, 1977 coinciding with the birth centenary of legendary philosopher, aesthetician, and historian of Indian art, Ananda K. Coomaraswamy (1877-1947). The Journal is committed to interdisciplinary and cross-cultural issues in literary understanding and interpretation, aesthetic theories, conceptual analysis of art, literature, philosophy, religion, mythology, history of ideas, literary theory, history, and criticism. The Journal has already published legends like Rene Wellek, Harold Osborne, John Hospers, John Fisher, Murray Krieger, Martin Bocco, Remo Ceserani, J.B. Vickery, Menachem Brinker, Milton Snoeyenbos, Mary Wiseman, Ronald Roblin, T.R. Martland, S.C. Sengupta, K.R.S. Iyengar, V.K. Chari, Charles Altieri, Martin Jay, Jonathan Culler, Richard Shusterman, Robert Kraut, T.J. Diffey, T.R. Quigley, R.B. Palmer, Keith Keating, and many renowned scholars. JCLA is indexed and abstracted in the MLA International Bibliography, Master List of Periodicals (USA), Ulrich’s Directory of Periodicals, Philosopher’s Index, EBSCO, ProQuest, and Gale. Celebrated scholars of the time like Rene Wellek, Harold Osborne, Mircea Eliade, Monroe Beardsley, John Hospers, John Fisher, Meyer Abrams, John Boulton, and many renowned foreign and Indian scholars were Members of its Editorial Board.
Deadline for Submissions June 1, 2020
Call for Book Chapters: The Other #MeToos
Chapter proposal submission deadline: 01 June 2020 Since the inception of #MeToo, conversations have largely centered on the movement’s development in the United States. This edited collection focuses on the reception, translation, and adaptation of #MeToo in non-Western, indigenous, and/or postcolonial contexts; it aims to explore how #MeToo, a popularly Western-centric feminist movement, translates to politically, culturally, religiously, geographically, and academically Othered places and Othered genders and sexes. This edited collection aims to explore the following ideas: (i) #MeToo has become a transnational feminist movement (ii) #MeToo works effectively through revisions rather than replication (iii) #MeToo assumes a different face in non-Western, non-White, postcolonial, transnational, and indigenous feminisms (iv) These other #MeToos require different theoretical approaches that need to be closely connected with feminist praxis and (v) #MeToo works in alliance with local progressive political forces. We look for chapter contributions that, via eclectic, intersectional, and interdisciplinary approaches, bring together personal and academic experiences of and responses to #MeToo in diverse sociopolitical cultures and academic locations. Please submit a 250 word chapter proposal, 50-150 word long bio, and a CV at TheOtherMeToos@gmail.com by 01 June 2020. Editor: Iqra Shagufta Cheema | University of North Texas Contact information: TheOtherMeToos@gmail.com Submission: Chapter title + chapter abstract (250 words) + bio (100 words) + CV Submission Deadline: 01 June 2020 Acceptance Notification: 10 June 2020 Complete Chapters Due: 01 October 2020 Should you have any questions, please feel free to email me at the address given above.

Deadline for Submissions June 1, 2020

SAMLA 92: THE GENRES OF CELEBRITY SCANDAL (6/1/2020; 11/13-15/2020) Florida, USA, SAMLA

Given the evident command of the celebrity in 20th- and 21st-century media cultures and following modern trends toward trans-medial and inter-generic production, this traditional session calls for papers that explore the relationships between celebrity and generic scandals. How have filmmakers, television writers, tabloid/entertainment journalists, novelists, essayists, biographers, memoirists, and other cultural creators depicted celebrity scandal while pushing the limits of their given genre or medium? While the 20th and 21st centuries are the focus of this call, media and literary scholars of all periods are welcomed to apply. History-bending is happily encouraged alongside genre-bending. Scandals could involve:
  • Addiction/alcoholism
  • Mental illness and “nervous breakdowns”
  • Sexual controversy: sex tapes, infidelity, coming out, consent, rape, assault, doxing, incest, public sex, etc.
  • Censorship and privacy
  • Body image (fatness, thinness)
  • Crime (shoplifting, violence, DUIs)
  • Health spectacles: disease, cancer, HIV/AIDS, etc.
  • Slander
  • Cults
Potential topics/methods could include:
  • Documentary films or TV series that record a star’s scandal, or fictions that recreate such scandals
  • The biography of celebrity scandals, or autobiographies or memoirs written by scandalous celebrities
  • The relationships between identity and celebrity and/or identity and genre: age, religion, class, language, ability, race, sex, gender, nationality, geography, and intersectional approaches
  • The influence of contemporary “factual entertainment” (e.g. reality TV, talk shows) on genres of celebrity (A-list, D-list, elitist, populist, etc.)
  • Paparazzi and tabloid cultures
  • Historical approaches to “celebrity genres”
  • Celebrity scandal explored through genres of confession, witness, testimony, evidence, etc.
  • Political celebrity and election media
  • Celebrity affects, generic affects
Please send a 300-word abstract, brief bio, and A/V requirements to Blake Beaver at blake.beaver@duke.edu by June 1, 2020. CFP Link: https://samla.memberclicks.net/calls-for-papers#filmstudies
* Deadline for Submissions June 1, 2020

The Transformative Experience of the Journey via Recollection and Reflection (6/1/2020; 11/12-15/2020) Las Vegas, USA–PAMLA

contact email:
The travel memoir offers an opportunity to examine a number of issues in terms of creative non-fiction. Travel stories focus on individuals who become strangers to themselves when they exile themselves from the environmental and cultural factors that have defined them thus far in service of self-discovery. They link up with the grand Odysseus-like impulse of traditional and modern literature that can profoundly alter identity when they travel and write about their experiences. Topics to consider would include a discussion of three particular aspects of this kind of storytelling. First, we must discuss the idea of fiction vs. fact and try to decide how much of each is essential in terms of crafting biographical material. Sometimes fiction can reveal truths more clearly than facts and so it could be said that truth lies in the interplay between these two critical aspects of storytelling. Further the idea of the diary as self-revealing and as an essential part of the transformative process journeying is meant to promote is a critical discussion as well. Experience is not fully integrated by writers and certainly not experienced by readers until it is written down and shared. This then leads to an analysis of the powerful draw travelogues’ mythological aspects have to audiences that, by in large, never travel but are rabidly addicted to this kind of story because these travel tales are vehicles for self-evaluation via contact with what we can call “others” (other cultures, other uncomfortable places, and travelers vs. nontravelers).
*
Deadline for Submissions May 31, 2020

Written on the Body: Narrative (Re)constructions of Violence(s) (5/31/2020; 7/26-8/2/2020– UPDATED AND ADJUSTED FORMAT

Call for Traces
July 26–August 2, 2020 Location: World Wide Web/Local initiatives The Nordic Summer University 2020 will take place in an adjusted format because of the Covid-19 pandemic. Invitation and Theme: ‘Written on the Body: Narrative (Re)constructions of Violence(s)’ was meant to be a week-long symposium organised by the study circle ‘Narrative and Violence’. Following the discussions on how to make sense of violence in the digital age, which took place last February at the University of Gdańsk, this was to be the second symposium of our Study Circle’s. However, due to the pandemic of Covid-19, the Nordic Summer University Summer Session 2020 will not be able to take place as a physical gathering, but will instead take place in distant and dispersed formats of encounter, sharing and connection. The participants are invited to create a trace (please see below for a more detailed description). Taking the advantage of the current environment, rather than collapsing under its restrictions, NSU is thus opening a space for traditional and unconventional collaborations, experiments, unusual meet-ups, creative interventions and other innovative approaches. In all this, documentation, accessibility and shareability aspects are crucial. We therefore invite scholars, students, practitioners and activists from all disciplines to submit proposals for traces that will address how bodies becomes subjects and objects of violence and how, by simply ‘being’, they narrate their traumatic experience. But how do bodies narrate violence(s)? Our understanding of a body is purposefully broad and includes the human and nonhuman, the organic and inorganic, and their diverse material or corporeal forms. We are therefore engaging with bodies that are human, animal, vegetal, natural and technological; that are both singular and collective (i.e. the social body); that are situated in both the physical and virtual space; and that express naturecultural entanglements (Haraway 2003). To consider the materiality of violence implies attending to its trans-corporeal intersections and therefore addressing its inseparability from the ‘environment’—a network of relations (human and nonhuman), phenomena and space (e.g. the home, the neighbourhood, the city) that foster, produce, perform, and ultimately bear witness to violence. Hence, inspired by Catriona Sandilands (2019), we envisage the entangled forms of violence done to human and nonhuman bodies as metonymic and intersectional. Our ambition is to engage with the imaginative (re)constructions of (human/nonhuman/social/natural/technological) bodies that perform or experience violence; with how they reproduce the intertwining of gender, power, agency and heteropatriarchal capitalism; and with their contribution to ethics, aesthetics, and politics. Finally, in addressing how bodies narrate violence we wish to reflect on the implications and effects of such (embodied) practices—whether positive or negative—and on the possible strategies to counter-act or counter-story them. We invite contributions exploring various practices of storying violence on bodies, and attending to ‘the wounds of the world’. Suggested themes relate to narratives addressing human and nonhuman bodies, within non-digital and digital realities, fictional or factual, and their multiple intersections. They include but are not limited to:
  • Self-inflicted violence (e.g. self-harm, eating disorders, suicide, etc.)
  • Other-directed violence (abuse, harassment, murder, genocide, etc.)
  • Technological representations/forms of bodily violence (e.g. social media, videogames, drones, etc.)
  • Aesthetic representations of bodily violence (e.g. art, literature, film, etc.)
  • (Neo)colonial labour and slavery
  • Appropriation of indigenous knowledge
  • Environmental violence and its effects on communities (e.g. natural catastrophes and their aftermaths, exploitation of indigenous/ancestral lands, etc.)
  • Entanglements of misogynist and anti-ecological violence
  • Micro- and macro-political violences
  • Governmental policing and rationalization of (public) spaces
  • Reconstructions of war-crimes (e.g. forensic architecture)
  • The effects of field-work violence: researchers, practitioners, activists, NGOs workers
The framework of the Study Circle is intersectional and open to multiple approaches and methodologies in humanities, social sciences and from the practicing field. The overarching intention of our three-year Study Circle is to contribute in particular to the fields of digital and environmental violence. What is a trace? A trace is defined as the outcome of our Study Circle’s activities in the Summer Session 2020. A trace is documented and can be archived or presented as a form of evidence. A trace can have a variety of formats: it can be an article written or co-written by you or a discussion held among our Circle’s members; it can be a virtual meet-up or a localised interdisciplinary micro meet-up between members of different circles in a form that is permitted; an online podcast or interviews. The format is not restricted in any way. As the Cricle’s coordinators we will evaluate the potential outcome, creative and academic contribution, quality and shareability of the proposed traces. The Board of NSU has defined the following guidelines for the shortlisting of the proposed Traces:
  • produced by a single individual or group of participants;
  • sharable and open to all during the Summer Session time frame;
  • fitting to NSU’s overall goals, aims and vision;
  • related to the Circle’s theme;
  • created in its main language English or a Scandinavian or Baltic language;
  • those who make a trace must be members of NSU (pay membership fee) & participate in the democratic forum of NSU (may become a delegate for the General Assembly meeting);
  • the team or the individual creating a trace needs to provide some promotion material considered as an INVITATION to the trace, before the Summer Session with an image & description of 200-500 words;
  • those who make a trace need to provide a brief report of the trace to their coordinator (form to be provided by NSU, including number of participants, goals, etc.) after the trace has been produced.
As always, NSU is particularly interested in supporting people who are at the outskirts of the Nordic region – the Baltic and West-Nordic communities as well as those with special needs. So please inform us if your application for a Trace grant falls under the regional support or if the pandemic has had particular financial consequences to you. Please send proposals for traces (200-500 words and an image, if appropriate) with a title and a short biographical statement (100 words) to narrativeandviolence@gmail.com by 31st May 2020. This is also the deadline for the application for grants of up to 7000.00 DKK per trace. Authors of accepted traces will be contacted after 15th June 2020. More information about NSU can be found by following this link: http://nordic.university.
Contact Info:
Marta-Laura Cenedese
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Submissions May 31, 2020

Travel Writing/Writing Travel Session  (5/31/2020; 11/3-5/2020) Midwest Modern Language Association Convention, Milwaukee USA

Travel is a vehicle for which to explore the condition of living, how our relationships to place shape us and our experiences, how our identities and political histories inform place, how power structures inform how we migrate (or don’t) and how that affects the places we pass through. –Bani Amor, “Getting Real About Decolonizing Travel Culture” (2017) In this spirit of this year’s theme, “Cultures of Collectivity,” the Travel Writing/Writing Travel permanent session invites essays that interrogate the relationship between culture, community, and narratives of travel. This session seeks to explore the multiple ways in which travel, broadly conceived, has a profound impact on place, society, and the formation of global networks of exchange and communication. Critical and creative submissions will be considered. Papers that explore a broad spectrum of genres, disciplines, time periods, and geographic regions in relation to the conference theme are welcome. Potential topics and themes may include (but are not limited to):
  • Travel and travel writing as a collaborative act
  • The politics of travel and travel writing
  • Travel and literary genre
  • The impact of tourism on local communities
  • Travel and the promotion of solidarity between communities
  • Contact zones and the relationship between travelers and travelees
  • Histories of travel/Decolonizing travel
  • Transnational and global forms of cultural exchange
  • Travelling locally
  • Constitutions of “self” and “other” in travel writing
  • Travel and constructions of race, class, and/or gender
Please send abstracts of approximately 200-300 words and a brief bio to Shannon Derby at MMLATravelWriting@gmail.com by May 31st.
Deadline for Submissions May 30, 2020

Designing the Self

deadline for submissions: 
May 30, 2020
full name / name of organization: 
Humanities Graduate Student Association, York University
contact email:
Humans navigate personal and social relationships in the world through self-definition. Human nature is a capacious concept; one that has been challenged by diverse cultural revolutions in history. Today, as we stand at the crossroads of the human and the digital, technologies force us to reflect on how we view, create, and alter our selves through multiple media. As we enter the age of new media, and algorithms, the interpretations, perceptions, and representations of the self are continuously altered, while our identities become more fragile multiple and fluid. Identities may be founded on varied cultural, biological, and physiological markers, but are also a source and product of social engagement, shared ideas, ideologies, and biases. Identities are both personal and social and are in the eternal process of construction. Our gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, class, disability, religion, nation, and age consistently intersect and interrupt our process of identity construction in media including print, broadcast, and social media. How does the forging of multi-layered, complex identities materialize in traditional and new media? How does the cultural production of the self occur in literature, television, music, blogs, or digital technologies? How does the self break out of its essential boundaries through various practices of writing, and how does it come to be represented? How does it traverse the binaries of gender construction using technology? How does it penetrate barriers towards an intersectional identity building? How are bodies constructed differently in different media? How do masculinity and femininity as concepts of gender identity manifest on platforms? How does individual and collective identity building occur, and how does identity construction enable the use of various media for community development and social activism for communities? Humanities as a discipline is always deeply reflective of the changing world order and is consistently tasked with redefining the notions of the self. We are keen to address this humanities framework in relation to identity politics, representation, and embodiment of the self on various media. To interrogate and investigate the complex relationships between narratives of self-production, and identity formation in media, The Department of Humanities invites abstract submissions for its annual conference on the theme Designing the Self. We invite proposals for papers from a variety of fields and perspectives that engage with issues including, but not limited to:
  • How does cultural production of the self occur in various forms of media?
  • How does (dis)embodiment occur on social media?
  • How do representations of gender, masculinity, or femininity occur in media?
  • How is intersectional identity constructed, and how does gender intersect with class, race, disability, religion, nation, and age as other factors if identity building?
  • How can we rethink diversity, intersectionality, and identity politics in the age of technology?
  • How does identity construction vary in different cultures and historical traditions?
Our two-day conference will address these and related topics. It will be held virtually due to the COVID-19 situation. We welcome proposals for 15-minute paper presentations. Those interested are invited to submit an abstract of 250 words to  hugsaconf2020@gmail.com by 30 May 2020. Submissions must include the title of the paper, the author’s name, affiliation, and contact information. Applications must be accompanied by a short biography of 150 words. For questions and inquiries, contact Nanditha Narayanamoorthy at nanditha@yorku.ca. * Deadline for Submissions May 30, 2020

CFP for Oct 2021 symposium on Constructing Presidential Legacies: Critical Perspectives on American Presidential Libraries and Museums (5/30/2020; 10/8-9/2020)

We invite a wide range of scholars interested in any aspects of US Presidential Libraries and Museum’s to submit ~500-word abstracts by May 30, 2020, for a symposium to be held October 8-9, 2021, followed by an edited publication in early 2022. Presidential Libraries and Museums’ function as “memorials to individuals” and “memorials of their times” and over time have given rise to many questions across a variety of fields. Beyond the buildings, the exhibitions and narratives also contribute to the shaping, presentation and reinterpretation of presidential legacies.  Any critique of the thirteen existing libraries from Hoover to George W. Bush and future libraries (Obama and Trump) are welcomed. We also encourage potential participants to contact us prior to submitting to discuss possible subjects in order to achieve a wide range of paper topics and approaches. Marie-Alice L’Heureux, Professor, Arc/D, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS malheur@ku.edu Kapila Silva, Associate Professor, Arc/D, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS kapilads@ku.edu December 2019: Call for abstracts May 30, 2020: Abstracts due June 30, 2020: Notifications of acceptance January 25, 2021: First drafts of papers due and revisions circulated May 31, 2021: Presentation drafts due October 8-9, 2021: Conference and discussion. January 31, 2022: Final revised papers due for publication.
Contact Info:
Marie-Alice L’Heureux
Contact Email:
A question from a list member
Greetings
I would like know if IABA members are aware of memoirs/biographies written in more than one voice. Two examples are Doris Brett’s Eating the Underworld: A Memoir in Three Voices, and Brian Matthews Louisa, a biography of Louisa Lawson.
I would be extremely grateful for this; please send personal responses to r.luckie@bigpond.com
Kind regards
(Dr) Rae Luckie *
NEW SERIES TITLE: Palgrave Studies in Mediating Kinship, Representation, and Difference SERIES EDITOR/S: May Friedman, Ryerson University (Canada); Silvia Schultermandl, University of Graz (Austria) This book series brings together analyses of familial and kin relationships with emerging and new technologies which allow for the creation, maintenance and expansion of family. We use the term “family” as a working truth with a wide range of meanings in an attempt to address the feelings of family belonging across all aspects of social location: ability, age, race, ethnicity, nationality, sexuality, gender identity, body size, social class and beyond. This book series aims to explore phenomena located at the intersection of technologies including those which allow for family creation, migration, communication, reunion and the family as a site of difference. The individual volumes in this series will offer insightful analyses of the representations of these phenomena in media, social media, literature, popular culture and corporeal settings. Possible book topics include: • the use of technology and migration and family composition and disjunction; the ways that technologies may both push and pull kin together/apart • the range of technology use across literal and figurative space including intersections of geography, age, poverty, gender and beyond • the impact of technological absence: the ways that technologies may be taken for granted in particular environments (privileged nations; privileged subject positions) and may be denied or inaccessible in other spaces or places • technologies of family creation and maintenance: the use of alternate reproductive technologies; the use of communication technologies to share information; • queer family creation and representation through technology; making queer family visible through traditional, popular and social media; alternate family connections including nonnormative parenting arrangements (more than two parents, multiple different shades of parenting); “new” family through donor sibling relationships; • technologies of class mobility, including the impact of smartphone technology on mediating/curtailing aspects of the digital divide; shifting family relationships through generational moves in class status; • fat family: the ways that narratives of obesity have had impacts on the creation and representation of family (for example: obese women who are denied reproductive technologies or access to international adoption); the ways these rhetorics have shifted differently in different jurisdictions; representation of fat family; intersection of fat and working class identities in popular culture; • trans families: both in terms of gender identity but also in terms of other families that “confound”—families that do not “match” one another, or that otherwise transgress normative models; • technologies of disability: the use of technology to enhance or bolster independence, the ways that disabled people are seen as incapable of parenting; on the other hand, the technologies which come into play around parenting children with disability, both prenatally and once children are born; representation of disability and family (fetishization and the perceived martyrdom of parents) Please send inquiries to may.friedman@ryerson.ca AND silvia.schultermandl@uni-graz.at
*
Deadline for Submissions May 29. 2020
CFVP Virtual Video Symposium – Poetic Justice: Narrating Personhood, Solidarity, and Citizenship (5/29/2020) Utrecht, Netherlands
deadline for submissions:
May 29, 2020
full name / name of organization:
Anne Kustritz / Utrecht University
contact email:
Poetic Justice: Narrating Personhood, Solidarity, and Citizenship This one-day digital symposium brings together international colleagues for an interdisciplinary conversation on the use of narratives to make claims about (or foreclose the possibility of) social justice in both formal and informal political situations, for example in art, memoir, social media, protest movements, and legal documents.  As such, the event unpacks the vital role of storytelling within contemporary political struggles, including, for example, in films about restorative justice, in newspaper representations of the Dutch farmers’ strike, and ethnography regarding labor organization in the digital media industry.  Only by better understanding how stories shape who is included and excluded from social institutions may we thoughtfully narrate a more open and inclusive society, since policy and politics begin with an act of imagination.  Please feel free to interpret the theme liberally. Talks can be between 5 and 30 minutes and must be submitted in digital video form.  The format is flexible and may consist of a recorded live reading, slides with an audio track, audio only, or something more creative or conceptual like montage or remix.  The symposium takes place on the 19th, meaning participants are encouraged to comment on each other’s presentations that day, and the event will end with a closing zoom call.  In these complicated times, we hope to offer a sense of connection between colleagues and an opportunity to remotely support each other’s research.  To present RSVP with your intent to Anne Kustritz at a.m.kustritz@uu.nl by 29 May.  The deadline to submit a video is the 16th of June.  To participate as a viewer and commenter RSVP by 18 June (a.m.kustritz@uu.nl). *
*
Deadline for Submissions, May 22, 2020

International Symposium

on

Digital Expressions of the Self

Organized by the Department of Humanities & Social Sciences

National Institute of Technology Silchar

7-8 December 2020

Pre-Symposium Workshop: 5-6 December 2020

This symposium engages with the digital forms of expressions of the self. We invite papers that explore the ways in which, for instance, digital techniques now allow the construction of selves that often rely more on algorithms than any ‘original’ referent. Consider, for example, how algorithms simulate images, voices etc. and have become the basis for facial recognition, biometrics and similar datafication concerning the self. This shift is indicative of what we might term posthuman condition. Along these lines,  we are interested in papers that engage with how expressions enhanced by algorithms produce multiple, fractured selves. Following Deleuze, we invite papers that engage with how the  in-dividual has become ‘dividual’ in societies of post-control vis-a-vis the introduction of digital technologies. Finally we are interested in how people experiment with creative expressions of the self. Constructing the self in the digital sphere may involve processes of experimentation that in turn allow one to experience the self in multiple ways. This is mediated of course by the apparatus of the digital-codes and algorithms. Digital self-expression occurs both consciously and explicitly, and subconsciously and indirectly. Taking this as a point of departure, this symposium examines the broad range of digital expressions of the self. The symposium will pivot around, but not be limited to, these concerns:
  • What, in the digital context, defines the self and its boundaries? How is the self articulated in digital culture and cultures of everyday life especially in relation to Web 2.0? When articulated digitally, where do we locate its forms and ontology?
  • How is the digital expression of the self different from its analogue counterpart? What affordances of the digital, if at all, reconfigure the self? Consider, certain digital expressions can be evidential (eg: the selfie), viral, emotive or even tactile. How do the materialities of the specific platforms (eg: Instagram, MySpace.com, TikTok videos, Soundcloud, Tinder etc.) then impact the digital self or its expression?
  • These platforms have become not only media of self-expression but also experimentation. How do users, especially youngsters, leverage these platforms to experiment with their gender, bodies, sexualities and identities, creating self-representations that often challenge normativity?
  • How (im)proximate, in terms of referentiality, is the digital self to the so-called ‘real’ self? What does the digital expression entail epistemologically? How does it speak to the question of referentiality? In other words, to what extent, if at all, can these expressions be perceived as simulacrum? What is the nature of the human-algorithm interaction involved here?
  • How does the notion of the (in)dividual play out while articulating one’s self in the context of digitality, when the (post)human can be prosthetically ‘engineered’, Artificial Intelligence can govern societies, and robots can acquire personhood (or even citizenship)?
Abstract Submission To apply to present at the symposium, please submit an abstract of about 400 words and a bio-note (150 words) using this link <https://forms.gle/UwQkdJdkxxuE4jFM7>. Abstracts will be considered on a rolling basis until May 22, 2020. For those accepted, unpublished draft papers (~4,000 words) have to be submitted by August 15, 2020. Final decisions on acceptance, based on the draft papers, will be communicated by August 28, 2020. Those who would require to travel from relatively far are requested to submit their abstracts earlier than the deadline for the organizers to be able to get back within a shorter turnaround time. This way, you will have a greater window to arrange your travel logistics. Pre-Symposium Workshop The symposium will be preceded by a workshop scheduled during December 5-6, 2020. This is targeted mainly at postgrad students and research scholars, whose projects bear resonance with the symposium theme and, broadly speaking, concern Digital Humanities. Participants will be selected from the pool of symposium participants. During the workshop, experts will reflect on the state-of-the-art affairs in the field and advise informally on the students’ projects. If you wish to participate in the workshop — either as a scholar or as an expert, please express your intent during the abstract submission. Financial Support Limited subsidy to offset travel costs may be made available for a small number of participants. This is typically meant for postgraduate students, early-career and un(der)employed academics. Details about the travel bursaries will be communicated upon receipt of the draft papers. Miscellaneous Participants from outside the conventional Humanities & Social Sciences disciplines — for example, scientists who work on AI, image processing, biometrics etc., gamers, game-designers, coders — are encouraged to apply. Attendance at the symposium and the workshop will also be open to a limited number of non-presenters. There is no registration fee for participating or attending. This event is a part of a SPARC (Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration) project funded by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), with additional support from the UK-India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI). The pre-symposium workshop is sponsored by the Northeast India Company (Silchar). This event overlaps with the famous Hornbill Festival in Nagaland, relatively close to Silchar. Nagaland and Silchar are connected by rail route, but might require a transit at Lumding. Contact Us For questions and clarifications, write to <selfie2021@gmail.com>.
*
Deadline for Submissions May 20, 2020
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF GLOBAL CRISES: STATE SURVEILLANCE, SOLIDARITY AND EVERYDAY LIFE May 20, 2020 at The American University of Paris, is a virtual conference and free of charge. You can participate from wherever you are. Full details below: https://www.aup.edu/psychology-global-crises The current global Covid-19 crisis is unprecedented in many ways. Yet, crisis” as a phenomenon is everything but new. In the past years, we have been in the middle of the so-called “refugee crisis” the European sovereign debt crisis, the subprime mortgage crisis and the 2007-2008 global financial crisis. Some attest to a more general crisis of liberal democracy, an eventual crisis of capitalism, or a “population change crisis.” Climate change is typically identified as a central factor in the emergence of future global crises. Beyond economically driven crises, we experience crises on the social and cultural levels: the Occupy movement, #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, Cambridge Analytica, the global surveillance disclosures, etc. On a smaller scale, we witness crises of various academic disciplines, famous among them perhaps the replication crisis in psychology. Some go further and argue that the social sciences are in a state of perpetual crisis at least since the beginnings of the 20th century. Last not least, psychologists identify and treat crises on an individual level: loss of workplace, loneliness, depression. Every crisis phenomenon maps its territory and calls for its experts and expert discourses, measures and publicly communicated courses of action. Sparked by current developments, the theme of this conference is “crisis” in all its varieties. Who is speaking to the current crisis and with what advice? Which voices are heard? What can the social sciences contribute to understand crises, the current global situation and expectations for the future? How can we critically examine the concept of “crisis.” Who defines a situation as a crisis? Who benefits from and who is negatively affected by crises? How do crises change local communities? How do they affect the individual agency and the relationship of citizens to one another? In times of crisis, let us come together in the virtual world and discuss the phenomena at hand. The conference organizers hope you will be able to participate and help spread the word too. With best wishes, Ana http://www.unav.es/ Ana Belén Martínez García PhD Assistant Professor ISSA School of Management Assistants Edificio Amigos. Despacho 5090 Tel.: 948 425600 (802814)
Deadline for Submissions May 17, 2020

Life Writing as Political Voice

PAMLA Pacific, Asian, and Modern Language Association Los Vegas 11/12-15, 2020
contact email:
City dwellers have a unique opportunity to see and engage in group political activities that those in more rural areas do not. Their everyday lives can be impacted by political demonstrations whether they are actively participating or not. The perspectives that we usually get are from the government, press, or political leaders. These accounts miss how people actually experience and understand the protests they see and/or participate in. As such, examining the life writing of those who participated or observed city protests can be intriguing and add a personal element to group politics. This panel will focus on the experiences of those who planned, participated, and/or observed protests in various cities. Ideas to be examined include personal vs. public perception, the individual vs. government, and political activities as community building among others. For example, reading the personal accounts of British suffragists during the Black Friday protest highlights the very real danger the women encountered and the gendered opposition they faced through both physical and sexual assault. Entries can be historical or contemporary and involve any large metropolitan area. While memoirs could be useful in this discussion, pieces can come from online publications, articles as well as diaries and less public life writing.
*
Family and Conflict in Graphic Narratives – a Special Issue for Studies in Comics (5/15/2020)
Even though family relationships are at the heart of many graphic narratives, particularly relationships between parents and children (one can think of examples like Alison Bechdel’s Fun Home and Art Spiegelman’s Maus), few studies have examined how the family is used as a trope in graphic narratives.
Considering the role of family is important, as Anne McClintock reminds us, since the trope of the family ‘offers a “natural” figure for sanctioning social hierarchy within a putative organic unity of interests’ (63, original emphasis). In a similar vein, Sarah Harwood has argued the family has become ‘a primary way of organising and understanding [material] reality across all cultural forms’ (3).
Moreover, in discussing how popular literature depicts conflict, specifically the conflict in Israel/Palestine, Toine van Teeffelen has suggested that popular literature ‘tends to metaphorically understand political and social life through the experiences of persons and small groups’ (390).
This special issue asks how the trope of the family is used to understand and organise conflict, including how it functions as a way to illustrate material realities and ideologies.
Articles might address, but are not limited to, the following questions:
• How is the family used as an allegory for the nation?
• How is the trope of the family used to reflect wider concerns in relation to conflict, including the possibility of a resolution of the
        conflict?
• How does the family work to make conflict accessible to outsiders?
• To what extent are different family members used to illustrate contrasting (political) positions?
• How is an emphasis on family used to counteract fears about change and fragmentation that are heightened during conflict?
Please send submissions by 15th November 2020  to the appropriate editor.
The editors will provide initial feedback by 15th January 2021.
Revised articles and comics will be due by 1 May 2021 and will then be sent out for double blind peer-review by Studies in Comics.
Please see attached CFP for more details about submissions.
Articles
Dr Isabelle Hesse, isabelle.hesse@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer, Department of English, The University of Sydney
The Politics of Jewishness in Contemporary World Literature: The Holocaust, Zionism, and Colonialism (Bloomsbury Academic, 2016)
Comics
Dr Sarah Lightman, sarahlightman@yahoo.com
Honorary Research Fellow, Birkbeck, University of London
The Book of Sarah (Myriad Editions, Penn State University Press 2019)
*
Deadline for Submissions May 15, 2020
Call for papers

7th international symposium of the Finnish Oral History Network FOHN

Power, Authority, and Voice: Critical Reflections in/on Oral History

26–27 November 2020 Helsinki, Finland

The notions of power, authority, and voice have been at the center of oral history research and practice from its inception. Oral history research is emblematically distinguished by its preoccupation with the voices from ‘the below’, having dedicated itself to the recording, collection, and analysis of memories, personal narratives, and histories of individuals and groups that would not have been heard otherwise. The concept of voice has implicitly referred to the nature of oral histories as recorded interviews, but more importantly, to issues of subjectivity, representation, and authority. In addition to recorded interviews, there has been increasing interest in various forms of life writings, as well as other forms of vernacular mnemonic practices online and offline. Even though the dialogic nature of data and knowledge production has been emphasized, analyzed, and celebrated, we still need to ask who holds the power to decide which pasts and perspectives are recognized, and whose voices – and what kind of voices – are listened to and analyzed, how and why? Moreover, we need to critically reflect on the structures of power and authority that practices and methods of oral history research foster. The seventh international symposium of the Finnish Oral History Network FOHN will focus on the notions of power, authority, and voice in the context of oral history from critical contemporary perspective. The keynote speakers are Urvashi Butalia (Delhi, India), Erin Jessee (University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK), Jonna Katto (Ghent University, Belgium), and Riikka Taavetti (University of Helsinki, Finland). We wish to invite contributions focusing on methodological and ethical questions as well as on case studies. Proposals may be submitted for individual papers or panels and they can address but are not limited to the following themes and issues:
  • Critical reflections on voices and silences
  • Authorities of knowledge production in oral history
  • Culturally dependent aesthetics of oral history and life writing
  • Ideologies and politics of oral history and life writing
  • Issues related to the nature of oral history as a social movement, form of activism, and academic practice
  • Materiality and medium of the ‘voice’ (i.e. sound, writing, image)
  • Dominance of the ‘tragic’, ‘traumatic’, and ‘devastating’ experiences
  • Oral history and other disciplines
  • Critical reflections on the geographies of oral history Submissions of individual papers require a title and a maximum of 250-word abstract. Panel proposals should include a maximum of 250-word description of the panel and max 250-word abstracts of each individual papers. The conference language will be English. Please e-mail your proposal to fohn-symposium@helsinki.fi. The deadline for the proposal is 15 May 2020. The acceptance or rejection of proposals will be announced in mid-June 2020. The conference fee will be 70 euros (standard) / 35 euros (concession: students, unwaged).Enquiries: fohn-symposium@helsinki.fi
Ulla Savolainen Chair, FOHN UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI                                           Further information on the symposium: https://www.helsinki.fi/en/conferences/7th-international-symposium-of-the-finnish-oral-history-network-fohn FOHN’s webpage: http://www.finlit.fi/fi/fohn-en Facebook: Finnish Oral History Network
— Ulla Savolainen, PhD, title of docent Academy of Finland postdoctoral researcher Department of Cultures Topelia, Room C214, P.O. Box 59, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/persons/ulla-savolainen
*
Deadline for Submissions May 10, 2020

“Narrating Lives”–International Conference on Storytelling, (Auto)Biography and (Auto)Ethnography (5/10/2020; 8/28-29) Malta

organised by London Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Life-history approach occupies the central place in conducting and producing  (auto)biographical and (auto)ethnographic studies through the understanding of self, other, and culture. We construct and develop conceptions and practices by engaging with memory through narrative, in order to negotiate ambivalences and uncertainties of the world and to represent (often traumatic) experiences. The “Narrating Lives” conference will focus on reading and interpreting (auto)biographical texts and methods across the humanities, social sciences, and visual and performing arts. It will analyse theoretical and practical approaches to life writing and the components of (auto)biographical acts, including memory, experience, identity, embodiment, space, and agency. We will attempt to identify key concerns and considerations that led to the development of the methods and to outline the purposes and ethics of (auto)biographical and (auto)ethnographic research. We aim to explore a variety of techniques for gathering data on the self-from diaries to interviews to social media and to promote understanding of multicultural others, qualitative inquiry, and narrative writing. Conference panels will be related, but not limited, to:
  • Life Narrative in Historical Perspective
  • Qualitative Research Methods
  • Oral History, Memory and Written Tradition
  • Journalism and Literary Studies
  • Creative Writing and Performing Arts
  • (Auto)Biographical Element in Film Studies, Media and Communication
  • Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy
  • Storytelling in Education
  • Ethics and Politics of Research
Submissions may be proposed in various formats, including:
  • Individually submitted papers (organised into panels by the committee)
  • Panels (3-4 individual papers)
  • Posters
Proposals should be sent by 10 May 2020 to: life-history@lcir.co.uk. Please download Paper proposal form. Standard registration fee – 160 GBP Student registration fee – 140 GBP Conference venue: University of Malta, Valletta Campus, St Paul Street, Valletta VLT1216, Malta
Deadline for Submissions May 1, 2020
The Miroslav Krleža Institute of Lexicography is organising the INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENCYCLOPEDISTICS 2020 – ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES On the occasion of its 70th founding anniversary, the Miroslav Krleža Institute of Lexicography is organising the international conference Encyclopedistics 2020 – Achievements and Challenges, which will be held from 15 to 17 October in Zagreb. The 70th anniversary of the Miroslav Krleža Institute of Lexicography, founded in 1950 on the centuries-old tradition of Croatian encyclopedistics and lexicography, has prompted us to consider the achievements, current state, and (un)predictable future of encyclopedistics in Croatia, Europe, and the world. Bringing together experts, not only in encyclopedistics and lexicography, but also in other academic fields, we wish to discuss topics that we have divided into three broad groups, regarding the state and possibilities of digital encyclopedistics, individual fields and terminology, and the encyclopedistic treatment of biographies (these topics are guidelines rather than fixed categories). The topics of the conference are as follows:
  1. a)  Digital encyclopedias and knowledge networking: • Online encyclopedias and other reference works • Thematic portals • Digitisation and linking digital sources • Multimedia and interactive content• The role of digital reference works in science and education • Organisation, networking, and dissemination of knowledge • Encyclopedias in the age of greater accessibility of information • Digital lexicography and digital humanities
  2. b)  Fields and terminology in encyclopedistics and lexicography • Theoretical fundamentals (methods, approaches, specificities) • Concepts and production of professional encyclopedias • Treatment of specific fields in general/national encyclopedias • Selected topics from specific fields• Mircropedic and macropedic approach • Terminology between description and prescription • Terminology between internationalism and purism • Terminology in a diachronic perspective
enciklopedika 2020 – dosezi i izazovi encyclopedistics 2020 – achievements and challenges c) Biography in encyclopedias
LEKSIKOGRAFSKI ZAVOD MIROSLAV KRLEŽA Frankopanska 26 Zagreb Hrvatska
• Conceptions of biographic encyclopedias and lexicons • Biographies in professional, national, and general encyclopedias • Biographies in regard to specific fields • Problems regarding biographic research and presentation • Bibliography The abstract (1000 to 1500 characters), in Croatian and English (the organiser shall secure translation into Croatian for foreign applicants), together with a short biography (400 to 600 characters) should be sent to the secretary of the Organising Committee, Iva Klobučar Srbić (iva.klobucar@lzmk.hr; enciklopedika2020@lzmk.hr). The application deadline is 1 May 2020. The applicants will be informed whether their abstracts have been accepted by 1 June 2020, and the accepted abstracts will be published in a separate booklet. Presentations should be in Croatian or English and up to 15 minutes long. Papers based on these presentations that are submitted by 1 March 2021 will be published, following the peer review process, in a thematic issue of the lexicography and encyclopedistics journal Studia lexicographica (http://studialexicographica.lzmk.hr/sl). There is no participation fee, but applicants are expected to cover their own travel and accommodation expenses. All information and notifications about the conference can be found on the webpage: http://www.lzmk.hr/ enciklopedika-2020. Organising Committee: Ivana Crljenko, Vlatka Dugački, Filip Hameršak, Zdenko Jecić, Nataša Jermen, Iva Klobučar Srbić, Bruno Kragić Programme Committee: Petra Bago, Vlaho Bogišić, Damir Boras, Irina Deretić, Peter Jordan, Stipe Kutleša, Janko Lozar, Nives Mikelić Preradović, Željko Pavić, Slaven Ravlić, Krešimir Regan, Hrvoje Stančić, Goran Sunajko, Domagoj Vidović, Antun Vujić Contact: enciklopedika2020@lzmk.hr; iva.klobucar@lzmk.hr * Deadline for Submissions May 1, 2020

“Autotheory”– Special Issue of ASAP/Journal (5/1/2020)

ASAP/Journal seeks critical and creative contributions for a guest-edited special issue on “autotheory.” Fusing self-representation with philosophy and critical theory, autotheory moves between the worlds of “theory” and “practice,” often exceeding disciplinary boundaries, genres, and forms. This special issue embarks on a rigorous investigation of the autotheoretical impulse as it moves across medial, disciplinary, and national borders from the 1960s to the present. In dialogue with scholars, artists, and activists, this issue will broach the central question: What are autotheory’s conditions of possibility, and what are the political, aesthetic, and cultural effects of this theoretical turn in contemporary cultural production? What are the underlying assumptions and implications of understanding autotheory as a genre, framework, performance, or practice? What kinds of reading might it invite or preclude? This issue is especially concerned with BIPOC, feminist, queer, trans and gender non-conforming, and anti-colonial and de-colonial approaches to autotheory, and the politics and ethics therein. From social media technologies and the publishing industry to the academic industrial complex and its varied, often ambivalent alternatives, autotheory’s escalating ubiquity serves as a critical provocation: why “autotheory” and why now? Considering the rapid rise of popular and scholarly interest in works like Paul B. Preciado’s Testo Yonqui (Testo Junkie) (2008), Claudia Rankine’s Citizen (2014), Moyra Davey’s Les Goddesses (2011), and Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts (2015), and renewed interest in Clarice Lispector’s Água Viva (1973), Gloria E. Anzaldúa’s Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza (1987), and Chris Kraus’s I Love Dick (1997), autotheory’s recent popularization suggests a pressing need for analogous critical discourse. Some have considered autotheory from transmedial perspectives, from Mieke Bal’s work on documentary filmmaking to Lauren Fournier’s work on conceptualism and video art. This special issue seeks to bring together leading articles that approach autotheory transmedially and transnationally, reflecting on its evolution and circulation as a way of bringing theory to life and life to theory. We seek contributions from artists, curators, filmmakers, writers, critics, scholars, activists, performers, composers, and other culture workers relating to the global contemporary arts in any medium. Autotheoretical approaches to writing are encouraged. Rather than entrench a single definition or approach, we aim to facilitate dialogue that parses autotheory from diverse critical perspectives and geographical contexts. ASAP/Journal invites 6,000-8,000 word articles exploring autotheory in ways that may include but are not limited to: •Alternative modes of historicizing “autotheory” •Alternative approaches to defining “autotheory” •Indigenous autotheory and decolonial possibilities •Autotheory in non-Western practices and contexts •Trans, queer, feminist, and BIPOC autotheory •Autotheory, ideology, and neoliberalisms •Autotheory, accessibility, and questions of access •Autotheory, canons, and anti-canonization •Autotheory and pedagogy •Autotheory and translation •Autotheory and disciplinary boundaries and genres •Autotheory’s theoretical legacies •Autotheory and adaptation •Autotheory and autofiction •Autotheory and art criticism •The ethical issues of autotheory •The politics and aesthetics of narcissism •Autotheory and identity politics •Ideas of anti-memoir Completed essays due by May 1, 2020. Please send queries or abstracts via email to the ASAP/Journal editor, Jonathan P. Eburne, at editors_asap@press.jhu.edu Completed articles should be submitted to the journal’s online submission site at http://journals.psu.edu/asap/index.php/testJournal/announcement  Full-length essay submissions of 6000-8000 words (including notes but excluding translations, which should accompany foreign-language quotations) in Microsoft Word should be prepared in accordance with the Chicago Manual of Style. All content in the journal is anonymously peer reviewed by at least two referees. If the contribution includes any materials (e.g., quotations that exceed fair use, illustrations, charts, other graphics) that have been taken from another source, the author must obtain written permission to reproduce them in print and electronic formats and assume all reprinting costs.Manuscripts in languages other than English (including Cree, French, Spanish, Portuguese) are accepted for review but must be accompanied by a detailed summary in English (generally of 1,000–1,500 words) and must be translated into English if they are recommended for publication. Essays in experimental or unusual formats are encouraged. Authors’ names should not appear on manuscripts; when submitting manuscripts, authors should remove identifying information by clicking on “File”/“Properties” in Microsoft Word and removing identifying tags for the piece. Authors should not refer to themselves in the first person in the submitted text or notes if such references would identify them. For additional submission guidelines, please see: https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/asap_journal/guidelines.html. Lauren Fournier is a writer, curator, filmmaker, and SSHRC Postdoctoral Fellow in Visual Studies at the University of Toronto. She is currently writing a monograph on autotheory as an artist’s practice, historicizing the autotheoretical impulse in relation to post-1960s feminist art, performance, and criticism. www.laurenfournier.net  Alex Brostoff is a writer, teacher, and Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Comparative Literature at the University of California, Berkeley. Her dissertation investigates how relations between human and textual bodies are autotheorized across the Americas, both within and against the contemporary identity studies from which they emerge. *
Deadline for Submissions April 30, 2020
Call for Papers, Abstracts, and Panel Proposals: Celebrity & Stardom Area Chair: Scott Owen Chappuis (scott.chappuis@cuaa.edu) Midwest Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association Annual Conference Friday-Sunday, October 2-4, 2020 Minneapolis, Minnesota Dear Celebrity and Stardom Scholars: You are invited to submit to the Midwest Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association annual meetings being held in Minneapolis, Minnesota, at the Westin Minneapolis, from Friday-Sunday, October 2-4, 2020. More details about the conference, membership, travel matters, and the conference hotel and its rates can be found at the MPCA/ACA website http://www.mpcaaca.org/. Everything is explained here: https://mpcaaca.org/minn-2020/2020-cfp/ The Area Chair for the Celebrity and Stardom Area invites paper or panel proposals on any aspect of celebrity and stardom. A list of ideas below is limited, so if you have an idea that is not listed, go for it! We are an interdisciplinary area and encourage submissions from multiple perspectives and disciplines. Topics might include: Impact of celebrity and fame on identity construction, reconstruction and sense of self Reality television YouTube celebrities Influencers and the changing definition of ‘stardom’ The impact of social media on celebrity/fan interaction Celebrity/fame addiction as cultural change The intersection of stars and fans in virtual and physical spaces (Twitter, Tumblr, conventions) Celebrity and the construction of persona Pedagogical approaches to teaching stardom Gendered constructions of stars and fans Historical studies of fandom and fan/celebrity interaction The deadline for submissions is April 30, 2020 – no exceptions, no bending of the deadline. Submissions are to be uploaded at http://submissions.mpcaaca.org/. This is the ONLY way to submit to the conference. Accepted panelists will be notified by me within two weeks of the submission deadline. We look forward to seeing you in Minneapolis in October!
Contact Email:
*
Deadline for Submissions, April 15, 2020

Biofiction as World Literature/ La biofiction comme littérature mondiale (4/15/2020; 10/29-31/2020)  – Leuven, Belgium

Biofiction (literature that takes a real biography as its point of departure) is powered by what Colm Tóibín has recently called “the anchored imagination”, which grants the fictional narrative a certain ambiguous (almost duplicitous) credibility. But what do biographical novels mean as world-making vehicles? Is the recent boom in stories that rely on the real past, yet project contemporary visions upon it, only a sign that we are trying to build a coherent world-image of centuries past, or is it also an attempt to bring into being a new way of seeing and/or being in the present? Furthermore, does it foster new visions and teach new lessons for the future?
In the light of theories of World Literature proposed by David Damrosch, Theo D’haen, and others, and using T. O. Beebee’s method of starting from particular areas (in this case, a genre) in our exploration of transnational dynamics, we propose several complementary angles for conceptualizing Biofiction as World Literature: biofiction’s capacity of cross-cultural representation (manifested in novels likeHassan Najmi’s Gertrude, where a writer portrays a famous figure from another cultural area), its world-shaping imagery (detectable in biofictions of explorers, translators, and other cosmopolitan figures), its strong link with cultural memory (which can be traced back to the interwar versions of the roman à clef, to Woolf’s and Schwob’s experiments, and even further back into the mid-nineteenth century), its protean adaptability (seen in its mixture of modernist and postmodernist elements), its appeal to large audiences (sometimes in the form of biopics), its power to address social and political issues (in the works of Javier Cercas, Peter Carey, J. M. Coetzee, Mario Vargas Llosa, and many others) or shifting gender norms (in fictions by Anna Banti, Margaret Atwood, Annabel Abbs, Janice Galloway, etc.), its parallel developments across wide spaces and far beyond the West (with the work of Anchee Min, Amin Maalouf, Bensalem Himmich, etc.), and its ability to fuel international theoretical debates. These are just some of the aspects that recommend this genre as a lens for analyzing world-spanning literary developments.
If you are interested in more details about our approach and/or you would like to contribute to the dialogue, please consult our website for the full-length version of the Call for Papers: https://www.arts.kuleuven.be/biofiction-as-world-literature/call-for-papers
You can send 300-word proposals for 20-minute papers or proposals for 90-minute panels (including a 300-word cover statement and three 300-word abstracts) to the following email address: biofiction@kuleuven.be. Please include a brief bio note for each speaker (around 150 words).
The deadline for submissions is April 15, 2020.
***
Si elle relève en première instance de la littérature, la biofiction prend pour point de départ une biographie réelle. Elle est sous-tendue par ce que Colm Tóibín a récemment appelé « l’imagination ancrée », qui confère au récit fictionnel une crédibilité ambiguë touchant parfois à la duplicité. Mais que signifie ce genre en tant que vecteur de fabrication de mondes ? Ce boom des récits qui rejouent un passé réel, projetant sur lui un regard contemporain, est-il seulement un signe que nous cherchons à élaborer une image cohérente du monde des siècles passés ou s’agit-il plutôt d’une tentative de donner forme à une nouvelle manière de voir et/ou de se situer dans le présent ? Davantage, favorise-t-il de nouvelles conceptions et enseigne-t-il de nouvelles leçons pour l’avenir ?
A la lumière des théories relatives à la littérature mondiale développées par David Damrosch, Theo D’haen et d’autres, et utilisant la méthode de T. O. Beebee consistant dans une exploration de dynamiques transnationales à partir d’un domaine déterminé (en l’occurrence, un genre), nous proposons plusieurs perspectives complémentaires dans l’examen de la Biofiction comme Littérature mondiale : sa capacité de représentation trans-culturelle (manifeste dans des romans commeGertrude de Hassan Najmi, dans lequel l’auteur portraiture une figure célèbre d’une autre aire culturelle), ses liens forts avec la mémoire culturelle (qui apparaît dans les romans à clefs de l’entre-deux-guerres, dans les expérimentations de Woolf et Schwob et plus loin encore au XIXe siècle), son adaptabilité protéenne (dont témoigne son mélange d’éléments modernistes et post-modernistes), son attrait pour le grand public (parfois sous la forme de biopics), sa faculté à toucher des enjeux sociaux et politiques (dans les oeuvres de Javier Cercas, Peter Carey, J. M. Coetzee, Mario Vargas Llosa, et de nombreux autres) ou à affecter les normes touchant au genre (dans les fictions de Anna Banti, Margaret Atwood, Annabel Abbs, Janice Galloway, etc.), ses développements dans des espaces étrangers à l’Occident (avec les œuvres de Anchee Min, Amin Maalouf, Bensalem Himmich, etc.), et sa capacité à nourrir les débats internationaux. Il s’agit là de quelques-uns des traits par lesquels ce genre témoigne des évolutions littéraires à l’échelle mondiale. 
Pour découvrir plus de détails sur notre approche et/ ou pour participer au dialogue, veuillez consulter notre site web pour la version complète de l’argumentaire :
Nous accueillons des propositions de communications de 20 minutes (300 mots), ainsi que des propositions de sessions de 90 minutes (300 mots pour le descriptif général, tout comme pour chacun des trois exposés inclus).
Les résumés, accompagnés d’une note biographique d’environ 150 mots pour chaque participant, seront à envoyer à biofiction@kuleuven.be.
La date limite pour la remise des propositions est le 15 avril 2020.
*
Deadline for Submissions, April 7, 2020

Cinematic Representations of Women in Modern Celebrity Culture (1900-1950) (edited collection) (4/7/2020)

We invite proposals for contributions to an edited collection on cinematic representations of women in works of art, poetry, fiction, theater and criticism of the avant-garde. The popularization of film stars such as Blanche Sweet, Mae Marsh, Mary Pickford, Greta Garbo and Brigitte Helm shaped the cultural imaginary of modernity to such an extent that they influenced the creative activity of artists and writers in the years 1900-1950. Questions centering on feminine stardom will set the background of this collection of essays examining the intersections of vanguardism with popular culture, publicity and performance. How are images of femininity circulated and consumed by the spectators of the cinematic medium? What position do the so-called high and low art forms take with regards to the presence of women in cinema celebrity culture? To what extent do stereotypical conceptions of feminine beauty reflect male ways of seeing, interpreting and writing?  We are interested in expanding the conversation to aesthetic, political, historical and cultural analyses from a perspective that integrates the written word and the animated image into constructions of femininity. Potential topics include but are not limited to: Filmic types and stereotypes of femininity Critical approaches to the male gaze Fetishism and idolatry of women in cinema culture Fashion, modernity and the commodification of feminine cinematography The muse versus the male artist Gender performativity, mass media and promotional value Women stars in Hollywood and the independent film industry Ekphrasis, iconology and iconography of feminine acting Intersections of verbal and cinematic images of power, gender identity and race Feminist theory and aesthetics of motion pictures Abstracts of 300-500 words along with a 150-word bio should be emailed to María Cristina C. Mabrey (Professor Emerita, University of South Carolina) at rriopar@gmail.com and Leticia Pérez Alonso (Assistant Professor, Jackson State University) at leticia.p.alonso@jsums.edu no later than April 7th, 2020. We will notify authors of the acceptance by April 13th, 2020. Chapters (approximately 6,000-7,000 words, including notes and bibliography) will be due by September 18th, 2020.
*
Deadline for Proposals April 5, 2020
Propose a 2021 Special issue of Ennen ja nyt: Historian tietosanomat (Before and Now: History Journal) (April 5, 2020) Finland Propose a theme issue for 2021! Ennen ja nyt: Historian tietosanomat (translated as Before and Now: History journal) was founded in 2001 as a non-profit history journal that publishes papers of high scholarly merit in three categories: research papers, reflections and essays, and reviews. The official languages of the publication are Finnish and English, but other languages are taken into consideration as well. The publication follows new and emerging research themes in the field of history and neighboring fields. Publishing in the journal and reading it is completely free of charge, and there is no embargo in place. The journal is currently looking for theme issues to be published in 2021. Any history-related theme will be considered. These are just some of the previously published issues: Multidimensional Europe Historical cinema The study of digital history History of France in Finland at the beginning of 2000 A theme issue consists of at least six articles of which some are refereed. These also include reflections and essays as well as book reviews. A theme issue can be proposed in two ways: A writer (who will later act as a visiting editor in chief of the theme issue) drafts a theme for an issue and invites other writers to contribute to the issue. A theme can be proposed to editor in chief Lauri Keskinen after which a Call for papers will be released in order to find writers interested in the theme. In both cases: Draft an idea paper (maximum length: 1 page) of the theme and mention if there are already writers who have expressed interest in writing to the issue. Send the idea paper to editor in chief Lauri Keskinen (lokesk@utu.fi) at the latest on 5.4.2020. Issues released before 2020 can be found at www.ennenjanyt.net Best, Anna-Leena Perämäki Cultural History University of Turku Finland
Deadline for Submissions,  April 3, 2020
Call for papers for proposed panel on The World of the Visual Artist in Biofiction”  (4/3/2020; 10/29-31/2020) Leuven, Belgium Venue:  Biofiction as World Literature Conference (Leuven, Belgium 29-31 October, 2020) Website: https://www.arts.kuleuven.be/biofiction-as-world-literature/call-for-papers Proposed Panel Topic:  Historical visual artists have been popular protagonists of biographical fiction dating back to Irving Stone’s 1934 novel Lust for Life (on Vincent Van Gogh), and Anna Banti’s 1947 Artemisia (on Artemisia Gentileschi). Recent decades have seen a virtual explosion of biographical novels about artists as varied as Michelangelo, Camille Claudel, Georgia O’Keefe, Caravaggio, Sofonisba Anguissola, Frida Kahlo, Gustav Klimt, Egon Schiele, May Alcott Nieriker, Pablo Picasso, and so many more. This proposed panel, in keeping with the conference theme, seeks papers that consider biofiction about visual artists from an internationalizing perspective. For example: ·         How have particular artists been characterized in biofiction as international/intercultural explorers, agents, and/or witnesses? ·         What artists seem to be particularly adaptable to biofiction published across languages, and why? ·         How do biofiction authors treat issues of transnational identities? ·         How do biofiction authors treat cultural “otherness,” whether in terms of description, language, characterization, etc.? ·         What broader international publishing trends can be detected in relation to biofiction about visual artists, and what might be prompting them? Please send:  300 word (max) abstract for a 20 minute paper, and 150 word brief bio by April 3, 2020 to  Julia Dabbs (dabbsj@morris.umn.edu). Graduate students, as well as scholars at other stages in their careers, are encouraged to apply. This CFP is part of a broader effort to identify scholars working on the topic of biofiction and visual artists, with the eventual goal of publishing a collection of essays. Thank you for considering this, and/or for passing it along to others! Julia Dabbs
Julia K. Dabbs, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Art History | http://www.morris.umn.edu/academics/arthistory/
Division of Humanities, 600 East 4th Street, Morris, MN  56267 University of Minnesota, Morris | morris.umn.edu dabbsj@morris.umn.edu | 320-589-6232
*
Deadline for Submissions April 1, 2020
Narrative, Medicine and Disability PNSI The 2020 Project Narrative Summer Institute: (4/1/2020; 6/22-7/2/2020)
Institute Co-Directors: James Phelan, University Distinguished Professor of English, and Amy Shuman, Professor of English The 2020 Project Narrative Summer Institute: Narrative, Medicine and Disability PNSI is a two-week workshop on the campus of Ohio State University that offers faculty and advanced graduate students in any discipline the opportunity for an intensive study of core concepts and issues in narrative theory. The focus for summer 2020 will be Narrative, Medicine and Disability, and the co-directors will ground their approach in the principle of dialogue.  More specifically, we will explore the connections and tensions among a range of objects of study—the three objects named in the Institute’s subtitle– and of discourses about them:  narrative theory, narrative medicine, and disability studies. Sample dialogues: What can narrative theory and narratives about illness do for each other? What can narrative medicine and narratives of disability do for each other? What can narrative theory, narrative medicine, and disability studies do for each other? What are the limitations of efforts to find synergies among these objects of study and discourses about them? We’ll take up these questions in relation to the readings listed below, and in relation to the specific interests and projects of the participants. PNSI 2020 Description and Syllabus To Apply: Applicants should send a current CV, a short description of the proposed project (no longer than a single-spaced page), and one letter of recommendation to Project Narrative by April 1, 2020. Applications will be reviewed promptly after the deadline. If, in order to meet funding deadlines, applicants need an earlier decision, the co-directors will consider special requests for early action. Applications can be emailed to projectnarrative@osu.edu or sent by post to the following address: 421 Denney Hall Attn: Project Narrative 164 Annie and John Glenn Avenue Columbus, OH 43210 Please email projectnarrative@osu.edu with any questions about applying. Fees and Housing: Tuition for the 2020 Project Narrative Summer Institute is $1,800. This does not include housing, but the Project Narrative staff will assist participants in finding affordable housing options according to individual needs. Project Narrative cannot provide financial aid, but the co-directors will gladly write in support of participants’ applications for funding from home institutions. *
Deadline for Submissions, April 1, 2020 CALL FOR PAPERS: AN IABA ASIA PACIFIC AFFILIATED CONFERENCE Transnationalism, Life Writing and Migration in Australia and the Asia Pacific September 20-23, 2020 Confirmed Keynote Speaker: Ricia Chansky, University of Puerto Rico The University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia in collaboration with the University of Adelaide and Flinders University This conference forms part of an Australian Research Council funded Discovery Project on Transnational Narratives of Migration to Australia (Natalie Edwards and Christopher Hogarth, DP190102863). It will explore the literature of migration and otherness in the wide contexts of Australia and the Asia Pacific region. Transnationalism is an increasingly popular scholarly phenomenon, reflecting and responding to the heightened interconnectivity between people and the receding economic and social significance of boundaries among nation states. In “Australian Literature-International Contexts,” Robert Dixon calls “a transnational practice of Australian literary criticism” (Dixon 2007, 19). Dixon encourages biographical research into transnational Australian writers and research into the influence of multicultural backgrounds on literature. He finds that it is now time to move beyond cultural nationalism to “explore and elaborate the many ways in which the national literature has always been connected to the world” (20). Two years later, Michael Jacklin, discerning a “transnational turn” in Australian literary studies, commented “I wonder why, in this transnational turn, multicultural literatures have not been accorded more significance” (Jacklin 2009, 1). As scholars have responded to this line of enquiry, new approaches to examining Australian literature have appeared, including studies of literature written in Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, Vietnamese and Italian, for example (Jacklin, Huang and Omundsen; Yuanfang; Gatt-Rutter). This conference aims to build upon this scholarship by rethinking transnational writing in the context of Australia and the Asia Pacific region. We seek papers that explore how these themes are represented specifically in life narratives. By discussing writers’ visions of the surrounding Asia Pacific region, including in a variety of languages, it aims to expand the boundaries of Australasian literary studies. Proposed papers may consider themes such as:
  • Narrating and imagining the migrant experience in Australia and/or the Asia Pacific region,
  • Refugee and asylum seeker narratives
  • Narratives in languages other than English
  • Translation and translingual narratives
  • Coming of Age narratives in Australia and/or the Asia Pacific region
  • Childhood life writing
  • Ethics of storytelling
  • Activist narratives
  • Cultural memory of this region
  • Autobiographies, letters and diaries of the Australia and/or the Asia Pacific experience
  • Life narratives in popular culture (music, film, theatre, games)
  • Visual life narratives (photography, graphics, social and digital media, visual arts etc.)
  • The histories and futures of life writing studies across disciplinary boundaries
  • Methods, genres, and definitions in life-writing/autobiographical/life story/ego-document research
Submissions: We invite both 20 minute individual presentations and 90 minute full panel, roundtable, or workshop sessions. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions that foster dialogues across theory, methodology, genre, place, and time. We invite not only traditional conference papers and panels, but also innovative presentation formats and creative sessions. All presenters must submit a max. 300 word abstract and a 150 word bio to Dr. Christopher Hogarth at iabaadelaide2020@gmail.com by 1 April. Organising Committee: Associate Professor Natalie Edwards, Dr. Christopher Hogarth, Dr. Kylie Cardell, Professor Kate Douglas Dr. Christopher Hogarth, Lecturer of Comparative Literary Studies/French,
School of Creative Industries
Co-Chief Investigator: “Transnational Selves: French Narratives of Migration to Australia” (ARC DP190102863)
Vice-President, Australian Society for French Studies  https://australiansocietyforfrenchstudies.com/
University of South Australia,Magill Campus Office: B1-12 ex 24354 Recently published: Chapter in Volume on Post-Migratory Cultures in Postcolonial France https://liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/products/108138 Chapter in Volume on Rethinking the French Classroom https://www.routledge.com/Rethinking-the-French-Classroom-New-Approaches-to-Teaching-Contemporary/Meyer-Johnston/p/book/9781138369931
*
Deadline for Submissions, March 31, 2020

Narratology Panel

deadline for submissions:
Tuesday, March 31, 2020
Conference. Rocky Mountain MLA, October 10-12 2019, Hotel Paso del Norte, El Paso, Texas Narratology. Marshall Johnson, English Dept./0098, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557; marshalljohnson@unr.edu.
Description: This session invites proposals on narrative theory as it relates to pedagogy and writing/composition studies or literary studies, particularly those including, but not limited to, multimodal learning, WPA curricula, the quest narrative, student efficacy, research writing, new and interesting approaches to canonical texts, comparative and contemporary literature, the graphic novel, genre studies, and memoir studies.
Narratology. Marshall Johnson, English Dept./0098, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557; marshalljohnson@unr.edu.
* Deadline for Submissions, March 31, 2020
CFP: Fandom and Controversy Special issue of American Behavioral Scientist edited by Rebecca Williams and Lucy Bennett In 2005, American Behavioral Scientist published a special issue on Fandom, which contained articles that continue to resonate and influence the field today. This proposed special issue seeks to offer a follow-up to that foundational issue, offering new perspectives on fan cultures which respond to the changes that have happened in the fifteen years since its publication and acknowledging the complex cultural, social and political landscape that we currently occupy. The issue seeks to showcase voices from both established and emerging scholars, offering work that addresses these key concerns from a range of perspectives. Its focus is on the relationship between fandom and moments of fissure or controversy, including how this intersects with the current political and cultural moment. Although fandom can very often involve admiration and pleasure towards a person or text, there are also moments where disappointment, shame, and displeasure occur (Jones 2018). In the past decade accusations of sexual harassment and assault surrounding celebrities such as Michael Jackson, R, Kelly, and the spread of the #metoo hashtag, have caused some fans to re-evaluate their attachments to famous figures and celebrities, challenging how we conceive of concepts such as ‘anti-fandom’ (Gray 2003), so-called ‘cancel culture’, or the spread of forms  of ‘toxic fandom’ (Proctor and Kies 2018) or ‘reactionary fandom’ (Stanfill 2019). However, other fans have sought to maintain their fandom for these celebrities, offering justifications and solidarity to their object of fandom in the face of these controversial moments. Indeed, the wider current social and political landscape offers a set of unique challenges that has a clear impact on how we understand the discourses and practices of fandom. As the United Kingdom deals with the consequences of Brexit and leaving the European Union, as Europe itself negotiates its future, and as the United States faces a series of new challenges under the Trump Presidency, the political and the personal intersect like never before. Meanwhile protests in Hong Kong have captured the world’s attention as fannish modes of communication including memes are appropriated for political and cultural purposes (Teixeira 2019). The issue thus encourages scholars from a range of national perspectives, especially those from non-Western countries and those outside of the Global North. The emerging overlaps between fandom, controversy and the political moment can be seen in the use of fannish language to describe key politicians such as those who support the UK Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn as Corbynistas (see Hills 2017, Sandvoss 2017, Dean 2017), fans of the previous Leader Ed Miliband which led to the so-called Milifandom (see Hills 2015, Wahl-Jorgensen 2019, Sandvoss 2015), or the emergence of young female fans of former UK Prime Minister Theresa May, referred to as Mayllenialls (Smith 2017). The approaches of Fan Studies have been employed to understand loyal supporters of President Donald Trump (Wahl-Jorgensen 2019), whilst the tools of online fandoms such as forums, social media, memes and hashtags have been employed by a range of groups with varying political viewpoints and agendas (Sandvoss 2013, Booth et al 2018, Wilson 2018). The increasing celebrification of politics has perhaps reached its nadir in the star status of Barack Obama (Sandvoss 2012) and the election of Donald Trump to the office of President (see Negra 2016) but the blurring of boundaries between the political and the famous continues as rumours swirl about the intentions of famous figures as diverse as Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and Disney CEO Bob Iger to run for office. Meanwhile, existing fandoms continue to mobilise both political and activist efforts (Jenkins 2012, Hinck 2019) to combat human rights violations and respond to natural disasters (e.g. the efforts of the Supernatural fandom in raising money for relief for victims of Hurricane Harvey in Texas). Other fan groups often find themselves thrown into unforeseen controversial political moments, as in the juncture of singer Ariana Grande fans with narratives around international terrorism after the bombing of her concert in Manchester, or the co-option of Taylor Swift by members of the alt-right. Given these intertwining threads, this issue focuses on the confluence of fandom and controversy. Seeking contributions from a range of disciplines including media and cultural studies, fan studies, politics, celebrity studies and beyond, contributors are invited to submit proposals on any of the above examples, the following topics, or any other aspect of the linkages between fandom, controversy and politics (in all its forms):
  • Celebrity/fan connections
  • Discourses of “superfandom”
  • Disappointment and shame within fandom
  • Links between fandom, controversy and the public sphere (e.g. fandom of certain figures or political parties, fannish resistance to political readings of texts)
  • Fandom as citizenship/fans as citizens
  • Forms of anti-fandom or non-fandom
  • The intersections between celebrity, fandom and political culture
  • Fan activism
  • The use of social media and its language (e.g. memes, hashtags, GIFs)
  • Affect and emotion
  • The importance of places and spaces, both physical and virtual
  • The creation of transformative works (e.g. fanfiction, fan videos) that address these issues
  • Material cultures
  • The ethics of studying these forms of participatory culture and fandom
  • Stan culture
  • Fandom and cancel culture
  • Toxic fandom
Please send abstracts of no more than 300 words in length, plus a short author biography to Dr Rebecca Williams at Rebecca.williams@southwales.ac.uk and Dr Lucy Bennett at BennettL@cardiff.ac.uk by 31st March 2020. Notifications of acceptance will be sent out by 30th April 2020. Please note than acceptance of an abstract does not guarantee publication. All submissions will undergo double blind peer review once completed articles are submitted. References Booth, Paul, Amber Davisson, Aaron Hess and Ashley Hinck (2018) Poaching Politics: Online Communication During the 2016 US Presidential Election, Peter Lang. Dean, Jonathan (2017) ‘Politicising Fandom’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19 (2) 408–424. Gray, Jonathan (2003) ‘New audiences, new textualities: anti-fans and non-fans’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6 (1): 64-81. Hills, Matt (2015) ‘The ‘most unlikely’ or ‘most deserved cult’: citizen-fans and the authenticity of Milifandom’, Election Analysis 2015, http://www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2015/section-7-popular-culture/the-most-unlikely-or-most-deserved-cult-citizen-fans-and-the-authenticity-of-milifandom/ Hills, Matt (2017) ‘It’s the stans wot (nearly) won it’, Election Analysis, http://www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2017/section-8-personality-politics-and-popular-culture/its-the-stans-wot-nearly-won-it/ Hinck, Ashley (2019) Politics For the Love of Fandom: Fan-Based Citizenship in a Digital World, LSU Press. Jenkins H (2012) ‘Cultural acupuncture’: Fan activism and the Harry Potter Alliance. Transformative Works and Cultures 10. Available at: http://journal.transformativeworks.org/index.php/twc/article/view/305/259 Jones, Bethan (2018) ‘Navigating Grief and Disgust in Lostprophet’s Fandom’. In: Williams, R. ed. Everybody Hurts: Transitions, Endings, and Resurrections in Fan Cultures. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, pp. 43-60. Negra, Diane (2016) ‘The Reality Celebrity of Donald Trump’, Television and New Media, 17 (7).Show all authorsDiane Negra Sandvoss, Cornel (2012) ‘Enthusiasm, Trust, and its Erosion in Mediated Politics: On Fans of Obama and the Liberal Democrats’. European Journal of Communication, 27(1): 68-81. Sandvoss C (2013) Toward an understanding of political enthusiasm as media fandom: Blogging, fan productivity and affect in American politics. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 10(1):252–296. Sandvoss, Cornel (2015) ‘It’s the neutrosemy, stupid!: fans, texts and partisanship in the 2015 General Election’, Election Analysis, http://www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2015/section-7-popular-culture/its-the-neutrosemy-stupid-fans-texts-and-partisanship-in-the-2015-general-election/ Sandvoss, Cornel (2017) ‘Corbyn and his fans: post-truth, myth and Labour’s hollow defeat’’, Election Analysis, http://www.electionanalysis.uk/uk-election-analysis-2017/section-8-personality-politics-and-popular-culture/corbyn-and-his-fans-post-truth-myth-and-labours-hollow-defeat/ Smith, Patrick (2017) ‘The “Mayllennials” Are Young Women Who Love Theresa May And It’s The Most Unlikely Fandom Of 2017’, Buzzfeed News, 10 May 2017  https://www.buzzfeed.com/patricksmith/the-maylennials-are-young-women-who-love-theresa-may-and Stanfill, Mel (2019) ‘Introduction: The Reactionary in the Fan and the Fan in the Reactionary’, Television & New Media, Online First, pp. 1 – 12. DOI: 10.1177/1527476419879912 Teixeira, Lauren (2019) ‘China Is Sending Keyboard Warriors Over the Firewall’, Foreign Policy, 26 August 2019, https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/08/26/china-is-sending-keyboard-warriors-over-the-firewall/ Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin (2019) Emotions, Media & Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press. * Deadline for Expressions of Interest 3/29/2020
Games and Persona – Persona Studies Journal Theme Issue Editors: Christopher Moore and Katja Lee (3/29/2020) Games have provided players with many opportunities to experiment with identity in ways that have fundamentally shaped social media platforms. As Apperley and Clemens (2017) have argued, networked digital media have embraced the avatar as the predominant form for the presentation of the public self online. Games also have a vibrant role in the performance of the self that is affectively charged. Because of this, games and persona interconnect beyond the virtual self of the avatar, through esports, cosplay, wikis, criticism and review and many other mediated forms of expression. The interaction between games and persona represent agency in the negotiation of complex personal, public and intimate selves which collapse the remnant distinctions between the online and off. Game developers, for example, from mainstream legends to ‘indie’ heroes and aspiring innovators, like most workers in the creative industries, must maintain online personas as part of their professional lives. The demand for such personas results in complex interactions and micro-publics between peers, colleagues, fans and consumers that are now routine to the firmament of participatory culture, with serious potential for success and controversy. We are inviting authors and scholars to contribute to this themed issue of Persona Studies on games and persona. The issue is seeking interdisciplinary papers that consider the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of games and persona and the broader phenomenological experiences and ontological implications of games and play for persona studies. The following list is a general, and non-definitive guide to topics that we consider would be a valuable addition to exploring the relations between games and persona:
  • Avatars and identity
  • Developer and designer persona
  • Participatory persona
  • Player performances: live streaming, criticism and review, esports, cosplay and beyond
  • Player communities and micro-publics
  • Game platforms and personas: Steam, Itch.io and others
  • Persona as celebrity/micro-celebrity
  • The persona of game franchises
  • Persona in the advertising and marketing of games
  • Emerging technologies in games and the performance of the self
  • Object/subject relations: virtual and physical personas
  • Memorabilia, merchandise, collections – presentation of a passionate persona
  • Affect and agency
Apperley, Thomas and Clemens, Justin. 2017. ‘Flipping out: avatars and identity’. Boundaries of self and reality online: implications of digitally constructed realities. Jayne Gackenbach and Johnathan Bown eds. Elsevier, London. pp.41-56, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804157-4.00003-7. Key Dates EOI: March 29 ABSTRACTS AND/PAPERS: June 15 FULL PAPERS: September 1 PUBLICATION: November 30 Please send expressions of interest and abstracts of 150-200 words to: katja.lee@uwa.edu.au or chrism@uow.edu.au
*
Deadline for Submissions, March 27, 2020
Call for papers Extended Deadline to March 27, 2020 As part of the conference Biofiction as World Literature Conference (Leuven, Belgium 29-31 October, 2020), I will convene a panel on “Gendering Biofiction as World Literature”, for which I am seeking contributions. Biofiction is a genre that focuses on individual historical figures but often projects and negotiates larger social or political issues through the individual life. This panel, in keeping with the conference theme, proposes to examine the capacity of biofiction to reflect and, perhaps, to shift perceptions of gender. It asks how particular biofictions can be related to large-scale movements and systems of thought, such as second or third-wave feminism, intersectionality, gender performativity, or more traditional conceptions of gender that operate(d) across national boundaries. Transnational or transcultural biofictions (where the author takes on a subject from another culture or where the subject’s life crossed national boundaries or is thought to have transnational significance) will be of particular interest in this context. Papers will be 20 minutes long. The full call for papers for the conference can be found at https://www.arts.kuleuven.be/biofiction-as-world-literature/call-for-papers Please send an abstract of 250-300 words for a 20 minute paper, and a brief bio note (150w) to Julia.Novak@univie.ac.at, by 27 March 2020.
*
Deadline for Submissions, March 10 or 15, depending on panel
The MLA Genre Studies Forum in Life Writing welcomes abstracts for the following sessions at the MLA Convention in Toronto (January 7-10, 2021). 
Assembled Lives
How are auto/biographical texts materially and/or socially “assembled”? How do archives, social media platforms, databases, social movements, and other collections offer resources for life stories? How do we theorize assembled lives? 300-word abstract and bio by March 10, 2020, to John David Zuern (zuern@hawaii.edu).
#resistance
How do life narratives chart or embody resistance, in their choice of stories, subjects, or forms, and to what effects? Which stories of resistance will circulate, with what reception? 300-word abstract and bio by March 10, 2020, to Laurie McNeill (laurie.mcneill@ubc.ca).
Lives In/Between Language
How does the persistence, loss, or recovery of a language inflect life narratives emerging from diasporic and/or indigenous communities? 300-word abstract and bio by March 15,2020,  to Rebecca Dingo (rebecca.dingo@gmail.com) and John David Zuern (zuern@hawaii.edu).
#community
Communities encompass physical spaces and the people who inhabit them. How do we memorialize lives in/as community, cultivating real and imagined geographies to resist displacement and envision alternate futures? 250-word abstracts by March 15 to Ricia Anne Chansky (ricia.chansky@upr.edu) and Angela Ards (ardsa@bc.edu).
*
Deadline for Proposals: March 15, 2020
Dear colleagues,
We invite you to submit article proposals for a special issue in Poetics Today, titled “Engaging Narrative Theory: Critical Approaches to the Storytelling Boom”, please see the CFP below, and the same here: https://instrumentalnarratives.wordpress.com/cfps/
The deadline for proposals is March 15.
Call for PapersSpecial issue of Poetics Today 2022Guest Editors: Maria Mäkelä & Hanna Meretoja Engaging Narrative Theory: Critical Approaches to the Storytelling Boom “Narratives are everywhere” was once the triumphant slogan of narrative scholars, but now we are starting to realize that this might in fact be a problem. In contemporary social media induced narrative environments, stories of personal change and disruptive experience often end up dominating over systematic data or scientific knowledge. As argued by researcher of social politics Sujatha Fernandes (2017), the contemporary storytelling boom is, in essence, inseparable from the neoliberal doctrine highlighting the upward mobility of an individual, while downplaying supra-individual societal structures and processes. Moreover, compelling stories are extremely difficult to challenge and falsify, regardless of their purpose and consequences. Narrative has, indeed, a unique capacity to capture and convey human experience – what it feels like to be this particular person living through these particular events. This doctrine is now being widely popularized across spheres of life; storytelling consultancy thrives, economists talk about “narrative economics” (Shiller 2019), and practices ranging from personal branding (see Salmon 2010) to socio-political activism (see Polletta 2006, Fernandes 2017) increasingly draw from a narrative repertoire. An insufficiently researched area are all the possible downsides of these engaging narratives that everyone should allegedly be crafting in today’s story economy. While Western literary and philosophical traditions have their own strong story-critical currents, contemporary practices of storytelling are permeated by a strong story-positivity that ought to be challenged by narratologists as well as philosophically, sociologically, and psychologically oriented narrative scholars. Many contemporary researchers in literary studies, psychology and philosophy like to claim that engaging with narratives enhances our mind-reading ability, or cognitive empathy, which plays a crucial role in social interaction and moral development. It is no wonder, then, that narrative is being touted as the miracle cure for a wide variety of individual and social ills. Many narrative studies approaches lend generous support to the instrumentalization of narrative form, and storytelling consultants and manuals are eagerly repeating more or less streamlined versions of recent studies on narrative and empathy. Yet narrative may just as well be put to uses that are dubious if not dangerous. The widespread, uncritical use of narratives of personal experience in journalism and social media may have large-scale consequences that were neither intended nor anticipated. Experientiality may come at the cost of informativeness, while the narrative form as such tends to complicate the distinction between fact and fiction. Self-fashioning through cultural narratives adopted from self-help literature is not without its risks either. Furthermore, while narratives are ideally suited to conveying human experiences, they may simplify and misrepresent – or simply fail to depict – complex social interactions or material processes, such as climate change. Consequently, one pertinent task for contemporary narrative scholars is to highlight not only the affordances but also the epistemic, cognitive, and ethical limitations of narrative forms and easily shareable masterplots (Mäkelä 2018, Mäkelä forthcoming). Both academic and popular discourse on the moral and cognitive benefits of literature can be seen as closely related to the general storytelling boom. Today, narrative fiction is instrumentalized and even medicalized in the service of wellbeing and self-help industry; overly simplifying popularizations of, for example, empirical research on reading produce simplistic advice (see e.g. “For Better Social Skills, Scientists Recommend a Little Chekhov”, Belluck 2013, The New York Times). In critical discussion of the storytelling boom, however, it is worth looking at how fiction itself has critically engaged with narrative. Particularly since the crisis of storytelling in modernism and postmodernism Western fiction has problematized narrative as a form of representation – questioning it from ontological, epistemological and ethical perspectives and thematizing the risks and potential of narrative in nuanced ways that manifest metanarrativity, self-aware reflection on the role of cultural narratives in our lives (Meretoja 2014). Drawing on the complexity with which narrative fiction has explored this issue, narrative scholars have recently sought to provide nuanced models for evaluating the risks and benefits of different kinds of narrative practices (Schiff et al. [ed.] 2017; Meretoja 2018). The Poetics Today special issue Engaging Narrative Theory: Critical Approaches to the Storytelling Boom seeks to redefine the role of narrative theorists and analysts in the contemporary storytelling boom. If research on the benefits of storytelling has caught on in the public imagination and various professional practices, we should be in a position to disseminate critical practices for the analysis of the forms and contexts of storytelling as well. We invite narrative scholars across disciplines to critically address the following (and related) issues:
  • discourse on well-being and cognitive benefits of literature, “literature makes us better people”, empathy·           
  • sociological criticism of curated storytelling (Fernandes 2017) and the critique of empathy (Shuman 2005)
  • narrative and post-truth
  • storytelling boom and its relation to late capitalism, “narrative economics” (Shiller 2018, Beckert 2016)
  • the story-critical potential of fiction
  • literary industry affected by the storytelling boom
  • narrative consultancy business; storytelling self-help and manuals
  • story-critical reading in narrative studies? story-critical tools for audiences?
  • “narrative” as a slogan and poor instrumental use of terms like “narrative” and “storytelling” across disciplines and spheres of life
  • popularizing narrative theory
  • social life of narratives vs. analysis of individual texts
  • uses and risks of viral storytellingPlease send a proposal of max. 300 words and a short biographical statement to Maria Mäkelä (maria.makela@tuni.fi) and Hanna Meretoja (hanna.meretoja@utu.fi) by March 15, 2020. References
Beckert, Jens 2016. Imagined Futures. Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fernandes, Sujatha 2017. Curated Stories: The Uses and Misuses of Storytelling. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mäkelä, Maria 2018. “Lessons from the Dangers of Narrative Project: Toward a Story-Critical Narratology.” Tekstualia 2018:4, 175–186. Open access. Mäkelä, Maria forthcoming 2020. “Through the Cracks in the Safety Net: Narratives of Personal Experience in Social Media and Human Interest Journalism.” In Marianne Wolff Lundholt & Klarissa Lueg (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Counter-Narratives. New York & London: Routledge. Meretoja, Hanna 2014. The Narrative Turn in Fiction and Theory: The Crisis and Return of Storytelling from Robbe-Grillet to Tournier. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Meretoja, Hanna 2018. The Ethics of Storytelling: Narrative Hermeneutics, History and the Possible. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Polletta, Francesca 2006. It Was Like a Fever. Storytelling in Protest and Politics. London: University of Chicago Press. Salmon, Christian 2010. Storytelling: Bewitching the Modern Mind, transl. by David Macey. London and New York: Verso. Schiff, Brian; A. Elizabeth McKim & Sylvie Patron (eds.) 2017. Life and Narrative: The Risks and Responsibilities of Storying Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shiller, Robert J. 2019. Narrative Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shuman, Amy 2005. Other People’s Stories: Entitlement Claims and the Critique of Empathy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. ———————- Hanna Meretoja
Professor of Comparative Literature, Director of SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory, University of Turku, Finland
Visiting Fellow, Exeter College and Oxford Centre for Life-Writing (Wolfson College), University of Oxford
Tel. +358 50 329 1783
Co-organizers Melba Cuddy-Keane (University of Toronto) and Brian Richardson (University of Maryland) invite paper proposals for the guaranteed ISSN panel at MLA 2021 in Toronto, Canada, from January 7th – 10th. 
*
Deadline for Proposals: March 15, 2020

Narrative beyond Stories: Telling Life Differently A guaranteed panel for the International Society for the Study of Narrative session at MLA 2021

Despite the continuing hold on the critical imagination of Peter Brooks’s “reading for the plot,” a significant strand of narrative rejects, as its primary driver, the forward progressive impulsion of linear events. Modernist novelists in particular wrote against the Victorian plot, citing its disconnection from lived experience, the falsity of its Bildungsroman construction of achievement as stable identity, its masculinist assumptions about outward markers of success. Writers, in the early 20th century, experienced life differently. The modernist over-riding of monologic linear plot has been well plumbed, as has its later postmodernist manifestations (Brian Richardson 2006; 2015); the present panel seeks to understand the more recent resistance, in contemporary fiction and film, to telling life through “stories.”  Has non-linearity seeped from modernist and postmodernist texts into mainstream 21st-century consciousness, and what new forms of meaning emerge in such “updating”? Has a feeling of being betrayed by action plots with their inscriptions of human agency occasioned a new determinism as when, in Joon-Ho Bong’s film Parasite (2019), Ki-taek says to his son, “You know what kind of plan never fails? No plan. . . . Because life cannot be planned,” adding that once the chaotic chain of events takes over and there’s nothing you can do to stop it, you are not responsible. Or do we find instead what Brian Ott and Greg Dickinson identify as “rhetoric’s materiality,” focusing on sensations of “presence” rather than linguistic constructions of “meaning,” and shifting agency from the humanist subject to the physical world in ecological and post-humanist ways (“Redefining Rhetoric: Why Matter Matters,” 2019, and Claire-Louise Bennett’s Pond (2015)? Or is skepticism about progressive plots shifting narrative from action to listening and conversation, adjusting our expectations of, and attitudes toward, human relationships (Alfonso Cuarón’s film Roma (2018)?  Alternatively, what underlies mammoth efforts to “fit everything in,” as in in Olga Neuwirth’s trans-gender, trans-genre, “Mxd” media opera Orlando (2019)?  But can we truly escape the dialectic between storied and non-storied minds, encapsulated in Rachel Cusk’s Outline trilogy (2014; 2017; 2018) when the narrator’s interlocutor states, “I discovered that a life with no story was not, in the end, a life that I could live,” and the narrator responds, “I said that, on the contrary, I had come to believe more and more in the virtues of passivity, and of living a life as unmarked by self-will as possible.” Papers are invited addressing any of the above questions, from any theoretical position, and analyzing narrative in any media. While we are interested in new forms such as weak narrativity (McHale 2001), we invoke the Proteus Principle (Sternberg 1982) that the same form can have different meanings in different contexts and times and so seek discussions relating form to such contemporary issues as: ·      Escalating challenges (economic and environmental) to a belief in possible futures ·      Refocusing of the human-centered to the ecologically informed ·      Feminist disillusionments with the popular “you can turn your life around” plot ·      Increasing complexity in digital platforms, global interactions, cognitive structures We hope to stimulate audience discussion of the question: given the emphasis today on the value of constructing positive progressive narratives in everything from therapy to governing to marketing, why might we still have a need to tell life differently?
Please send 300-word abstracts plus short bio by Sunday, March 15, 2020, to Professors Cuddy-Keane and Richardson at m.cuddy.keane@utoronto.ca and richb@umd.edu
All best,
Melba and Brian
Melba Cuddy-Keane Emerita Professor Department of English Jackman Humanities Bldg. University of Toronto 170 St. George St., 6th floor Toronto, ON M5R 2M8

*

MLA Roundtable Special Session: What’s Next? Naming Post-Immigrant Diaspora Literature (3/15/2020; 1/7-10/2021) Toronto

On December 30, 2019, Cesar Miguel (@cesarmvm) tweeted “Diaspora is almost becoming as useless a term as immigrant.” The thread continued by distinguishing between the experiences of refugees and those who gained easier access to documentation and residence because it “benefited American/European geopolitical interests; those who make six figures in highly trained fields and those who earn way below the poverty line.” Min Hyoung Song echoed Cesar Miguel’s thoughts but with relation to terms further associated with migration, noting that we need to reconceptualize the language of migration, and Viet Thanh Nguyen chimed in to note that – as per Paul Gilroy – most terms inevitably require clarification and adjectival distinction. They key emphases of these claims – the heterogeneous experiences of diasporic people who migrate to the US and the need for new terms to describe new circumstances – constitute the focus of this roundtable. Participants will investigate the ways in which we name, talk about, and categorize US literature by migrants, (im)migrants, refugees and/or that which we have called transnational literature, literature of the diaspora, and multiethnic literature. When and why are these terms less effective than they used to be? What use value does their historicity still offer – if any? What forms do/might these alternately named literatures take? What other terms can we propose? Topics of particular interest include: labor and migration; climate change and migration; considerations of shifting ethno-racial constructions; explorations of different genres and forms (i.e., novel vs. poetry vs. memoir); comparative perspectives (i.e., between sending and receiving countries); generative proposals for new terminology Please submit abstracts of 250 words to Diana Filar, dfilar@brandeis.edu by March 15, 2020.
*
Deadline for Submissions March 15, 2020
British Travels to Germany
deadline for submissions: 
March 15, 2020
NB–notice did not give dates for conference–please contact the organizers.
For centuries, the close ties between Britain and Germany have found expression not least on the level of personal travel. Travellers came from Britain to Germany for a host of occasions and with the most diverse aims, expectations, and preconceptions. This conference explores the reports produced about their experiences in German lands by travellers from England, Scotland, and Ireland since the Middle Ages. Travel accounts of this sort are not merely ‘about’ travel and its circumstances, but they construct images of Germany and ‘the’ Germans. Whether – and to what extent – Germany even existed as an entity and object of observation is a matter of specific historical circumstance, of course. However, travel writing is a particularly salient medium for communicating observed geographical, political or cultural units. The mere fact that a ‘German’ space should be perceived – whether as destination, transit space, or neighbouring borderland – offers productive insight into a period’s British image of Germany. Travellers make first-hand experiences that will often precipitate the revision of stereotypical preconceptions or prejudices. Travel accounts will enter into a dialogue with such images of the other, (re-)producing or transforming them. Thus, travel writing must be seen as an agent within the network of cultural relations between Britain and Germany. It can be fruitfully studied for its representation of Germany and Germans encountered by British travellers – including social, political, cultural and ethnographic aspects as much as representations and constructions of ‘natural’ sites and spaces. Next to specific occasions and contexts for travel, the intended readership of travel accounts needs to be taken into account. Similarly, the form of individual accounts rewards attention. Travel writing is inevitably suspended between fact and fiction. Surely, a diplomat’s code message serves a different function than the unreliable narrator of Ford Madox Ford’s The Good Soldier (1915), or a BBC programme on a royal visit to Germany. Even when an account is clearly marked as fiction (such as that of Victor Frankenstein’s Rhine valley sojourn), its representation of Germany may create discursively powerful ‘facts’. Contributions might inquire into the formal – i.e., generic, textual, (tele-)visual, musical, or intermedial – nature of travel accounts and how they employ historically contingent ‘form-knowledge’ in order to bestow authority on the knowledge about Germany and Germans they communicate. The conference aims to examine the history of this inter- and, potentially, transnational phenomenon from an interdisciplinary perspective. We invite proposals for twenty-minute papers from the fields of history, literary and cultural studies, art history, the history of science, and related fields on British, English, Scottish, and Irish travellers to Germany from the Middle Ages to the present day. Possible topics include, but are not limited to: –       reasons for, and aims of, travels to Germany –       conditions of travel (e.g., economic, cultural, logistical) –       forms and genres of travel writing –       political systems and their representation –       economic, technological, and scientific exchange –       the experience of conflict, war and reconciliation –       the negotiation of regional, national and transnational identities Abstracts of around 300 words, along with a brief biographical note, should be submitted by March 15 to Dr Florian Klaeger, Universität Bayreuth (klaeger [at] uni-bayreuth.de). As host, the Prinz-Albert-Gesellschaft will cover travel expenses for contributors. The conference proceedings will be published in the Prinz-Albert-Studien / Prince Albert Studies (PAS) series (with Duncker & Humblot, under the general editorship of Frank-Lothar Kroll).

Deadline for Submissions March 15, 2020
Age and Aging in Texts by Goethe and His Contemporaries (5/15/2020; 1/7-10/2021) Modern Language Association, Toronto, Canada
Panel sponsored by the Goethe Society of North America Annual Conference of the Modern Language Association January 7-10, 2021, Toronto, ON Organizers: Christine Lehleiter and Elisa Leonzio Goethe was one of the relatively few of his generation who enjoyed an extended life span and it comes as no surprise that reflections on age and the aging process are frequent in his work. Goethe’s Wilhelm Meister undoubtedly had significant impact on the establishment of an ideological context in which the young bourgeois individual was expected to leave the parents’ house in order to become an autonomous being and, at the same time, a productive member of society (cf. Franco Moretti, Andrea Charise). Considering this framework, the elderly person that might suffer diminished economic productivity and lose autonomy when returning to the family or other support networks might seem a failure. However, while the Meister novel follows a young hero, in Goethe’s Elective Affinities the narrator takes a more critical position vis-a-vis Eduard’s enthusiasm for everything that is young and new while older individuals like the gardener highlight the values of maturity and duration. In other texts by Goethe, old age offers alternative perspectives from which modernity can be challenged. At the end of Faust II, Philemon and Baucis in their old age are strong reminders of the victims of the colonizing project driven by an ideology of progress. Even in those places where aging is depicted explicitly as a burden and obstacle (The Man of Fifty Years) new happiness is found once age is accepted and endorsed. Against the backdrop of recent scholarship in historical and literary studies on old age in Western Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries (cf. Andrea Charise, Karen Chase, Susannah Ottaway), this panel seeks to explore presentations and conceptualizations of age and aging in texts by Goethe and his contemporaries. We welcome proposals from a wide range of texts and we are particularly interested in contributions that explore the topic at the intersection of literature and medicine. Beyond our overarching question of how age and aging were experienced, represented, and conceptualized in texts by Goethe and his contemporaries, topics may include (but are not limited to): What kind of values are associated with old age? How do these values inform social (in particular intergenerational) interactions (respect, stigmatization, care)? How are the categories of age, class, and gender connected (the widow, the alms receiver, the old sage)? What kind of strategies are employed in order to deal with old age or to postpone its onset (cosmetics, diet, exercise)? Is there an aesthetics of old age? What ideal of health, and what “welfare system,” emerges from the texts, and what kind of power and power discourses are implied? How do the authors deal with the pain and deterioration usually associated with aging? What are the connections between medical and literary texts regarding the conceptualization of old age? This panel is sponsored by the Goethe Society of North America. Please send an abstract of no more than 350 words to Christine Lehleiter (christine.lehleiter@utoronto.ca) and Elisa Leonzio (elisa.leonzio@unito.it) by March 15th, 2020.
*
Deadline for Submissions March 15, 2020 Call for Book Chapters: The Other #MeToos Chapter proposal submission deadline: 15 March 2020 Since the inception of #MeToo, conversations have largely centered on the movement’s development in the United States. This edited collection focuses on the reception, translation, and adaptation of #MeToo in non-Western, indigenous, and/or postcolonial contexts; it aims to explore how #MeToo, a popularly Western-centric feminist movement, translates to politically, culturally, religiously, geographically, and academically Othered places and Othered genders. This edited collection aims to explore the following ideas: (i) #MeToo has become a transnational feminist movement (ii) #MeToo works effectively through revisions rather than replication (iii) #MeToo assumes a different face in non-Western, non-White, postcolonial, transnational, and indigenous feminisms (iv) These other #MeToos require different theoretical approaches that need to be closely connected with feminist praxis and (v) #MeToo works in alliance with local progressive political forces. We look for chapter contributions that, via eclectic, intersectional, and interdisciplinary approaches, bring together personal and academic experiences of and responses to #MeToo in diverse sociopolitical cultures and academic locations. Please submit a 250-word chapter proposal, 50-150 word long bio, and a CV at TheOtherMeToos@gmail.com by 15 March 2020. Contact information: TheOtherMeToos@gmail.com Submission: Chapter title + chapter abstract (250 words) + bio (100 words) + CV Submission Deadline: 15 March 2020 Acceptance Notification: 20 April 2020 Should you have any questions, please feel free to email me at the address given above. Deadline for Submissions March 15, 2020
Autobiography: excess, self-expenditure 19th International Meeting of the Scientific Observatory of Autobiographical Memory in Written, Oral and Iconographic Form 23-24-25 June 2020 organised by the cultural association Mediapolis.Europa http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ in collaboration with L’Istituto Centrale per i Beni Sonori ed Audiovisivi [Central Institute for Audio and Audio-visual Assets] and la Biblioteca di Storia Moderna e Contemporanea [Modern and Contemporary History Library] Palazzo Mattei di Giove Via Michelangelo Caetani 32 – 00186 Rome “Although an entire intellectual tradition sees the flight of the soul out of its material bonds to be a positive good, another learned tradition that also goes back to ancient sources appeals to a different sense of the word ‘excess’ to designate that which goes beyond the correct proportions in the material order itself.” (Starobinski J. 2008, p. 75). Breaking boundaries and excess constitute the prime movers of different narrations in the first person. How are these behaviours delineated in self-narration? In what way do they construct a person’s identity? With which arguments and in which relationship with the idea of Power? With this call for papers we intend to invite proposals that consider self-expenditure and excess in autobiographical writings. That is, autobiographies by both ordinary people and recognised individuals, which are not supported, legitimated, by ideological plaudit, be it political, religious, etc. Every culture sets ethical boundaries with which every individual confronts oneself. Crossing boundaries is allowed in certain liberating situations such as bacchanals or carnivals, but these are circumscribed in terms of time and space. The unlimited and the infinite correspond to conceptions with different nuances: it is possible to go beyond recognised forms or to act in an infinite motus while denying the existence of boundaries. Current parlance translates the idea of boundary using a vocabulary borrowed from geometry: measure, the right way, to be square, to be conclusive (that is, to remain within a circumscribed topic or area of action), etc. Nicomachean Ethics, a posthumous publication by Aristotle (who lived from 384 or 383 to 322 BC), places at the centre of its reasoning endoxa, the common opinions of both ordinary and learned people. These endoxa are the boundaries that derive from society’s orientation. Aristotle does not necessarily share current opinions but appropriates them as the basis of social bonding. They appear as a behavioural diktat and have a pragmatic value. In Book II of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle writes that virtue develops pragmatically: one learns how to build by building, how to play cithara by playing it, etc. How is ethics conceived of? “this is concerned with emotions and actions, in which one can have excess or deficiency or a due mean. […] Virtue, therefore is a mean state in the sense that it is able
In medio stat virtus situates virtue in space. It is a locution of medieval scholastic philosophy that appropriated Aristotle’s conception.
to hit the mean. […] so this is another reason why excess and deficiency are a mark of vice, and observance of the mean a mark of virtue (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, II, 6). As Jean Starobinski reminds us (Starobinski J., 2008, p. 76), the term ‘excess’ in the Bible refers to the exit of life, excessus vitae. An excess that does not recognise boundaries is a serious threat to the social system. “The myth of Dom Juan came about at a moment in European history when the subject of the inconstancy of the human heart and the related subject of its various drives—feeling, knowing, dominating (libido sentienti, libido sciendi, libido dominandi)—were intensely debated by the moralists of the day” (Ibidem). The two great myths of modernity, Faust and Don Giovanni, are condemned due to two excesses: libido sciendi and libido sentiendi. Already the Middle Ages deplored sapiens mundi. Ulysses in Dante’s Inferno is an example of this. In fact, excess practised ad libitum aims at laying claim to an eternalisation of one’s own behaviour, a transcendentality, replacing another power. The exhibition held at the Musée d’Orsay, Paris, on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of de Sade’s death (2014), which was organised on the basis of de Sade’s various epistolary evidence, was entitled Attaquer le soleil: that is, aspiring to deprive the universe of the vital star, using it to burn the universe itself. (Le Brun A., 2014, p. 19). Many autobiographical narrations in Romanticism (relating to dandyism, satanism, alcoholism, and others) would make excess the centre of their own existential narration. In “Être comme excès”, Rocco Ronchi writes: “what opens to me the immensity in which I lose myself is the being as excess, a being deprived of material reality, throbbing, rhythmical – a being which has in itself an integral transcendence, a being that is uncontainable in the shape of identity and exceeds the space that reveals apophantic judgement. This being is not immobile, its manner of being – its essence in the verbal sense – rightly resides in the fact of transcending, of rotating outside of itself (I am borrowing this sentence from Marc Bloch), of getting lost and challenging oneself” (Ronchi R., 2000, p. 8). The term ‘self-expenditure,’ therefore, has a particular role and different significant values. In sport, self-expenditure can be identified with what is at stake, the challenge, the individual risk outside of the great apparatuses. “The Notion of Expenditure” by Georges Bataille . It is the principle of loss, that is, of unconditioned expenditure (Ibid., p.169). Societies in general, and the Western one due to their economic structure, do not want to squander the essence of their own assets and regard the person as an asset, a capital. Acting in itself must not be in the service of any return or recompense. These are arguments to which Bataille returns in various writings (e.g. On Nietzsche, 1945). Concepts such as useful/useless, gratuitous/interested, arbitrary/imposed, are involved. Is this a form of revolt? According to Camus, revolt embodies the very identity of the individual, his cogito (Camus A., 1951). The rebel does not recognise impositions: he is not a revolutionary and does not conceive of systems (revolution meaning strategic and preconceived acting aimed at achieving an ideal that overturns the status quo). The rebel fights against any ideological barrier and cage. Camus evokes the figures of Cain, de Sade, Saint-Just, Lautréamont, Rimbaud, Bakunin, Nietzsche.
Different autobiographies embody a willingness to go beyond the recognised and shared
boundaries.
It is possible to establish a certain distinction between the behaviour whereby a boundary is recognised and overcome, and the practice of excess as complete rejection of the boundary, such as a way of acting ad infinitum.
(1933) examines how society imposes
productivity in its entire spectrum. Society recognises the right to acquire, conserve or consume
rationally, but it excludes the principle of unproductive expenditure (Bataille G., 1985, p.137)
The idea of anti-utilitarianism is ennobling. Self-expenditure without concatenations is in many
respects a chimera. A grade-zero behaviour, without residues, cannot exist.
Nevertheless, taking shelter in the necessity of being productive (in every sense) may in turn constitute a form of power. Being losers may mean annihilating the power that the Other exerts on ourselves (Lippi 2008, p. 62).
Years ago, in an article published in Il Tempo (Pasolini P. P., 1973), Pasolini reviewed the autobiography of a Russian pilgrim, associating him with Lazarillo de Tormes. The pilgrim about whom Pasolini writes (who we understand from the text was 33 years of age in 1859) wanders with the prayer book Philokalia (love of the beautiful) and recounts his wanderings to a spiritual father. Pasolini writes that the pilgrim and Lazarillo remain invincible in their resigned nature that annihilates the very idea of power due to excess of passivity: “There is nothing that proves power wrong so much as Resignation, which is actually a refusal of power in any form (that is, it makes it what it actually is, namely an illusion)”. With this call for papers we intend to investigate the relationship between autobiographical narration as an expression of going beyond, as a pursuit of the extreme in relation to the concept of boundary, or as a practice of excess, understanding how, stated or implied, these components constitute the framework of the argument of the writing examined. Some biographical references ANONYMOUS, T ARISTOTLE, Nicomachean Ethics, translated by H. Rackham, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd., 1934. [Fourth century BC]. Georges BATAILLE, “The Notion of Expenditure” in Visions of Excess: selected writings, 19271939, edited by Allan Stoekl, translated by Allan Stoekl with Carl R. Lovitt and Donald M. Leslie, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 1985 (Originally published in La part Maudite, Paris, Points, 1933). http://itech.fgcu.edu/faculty/bhobbs/Bataille-the-Notion-of-Expenditure.pdf Albert CAMUS, The Rebel, translated by Anthony Bower, London, Penguin Books, 2000. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1118599/f4.image https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k314854/f1.image vv. I- Thomas DE QUINCEY, Confessions of an English Opium-Eater, 1821. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2040/2040-h/2040-h.htm Annie LE BRUN, SADE-Attaquer le soleil, Paris, Musée d’Orsay-Gallimard, 2014.
The implications of self-expenditure and the practice of excess are manifold, as you can see.
he Way of a Pilgrim: Candid Tales of a Wanderer to His Spiritual Father, translated
by Anna Zaranko with an introduction by Andrew Louth, Penguin Books, 2017.
Benvenuto CELLINI, Vita di Benvenuto Cellini, edited by Orazio Bacci, Firenze, Sansoni, 1901.
(Written between 1558 and November1562).
CASANOVA, Histoire de ma vie, Paris, Livre de Poche, 2004.
Mémoires de J. Casanova de Seingalt, écrits par lui-même, written in French, between 1789 and
1798, published posthumously in1825.
Silvia LIPPI, “De la dépense improductive à la jouissance « bavarde»”, in Transgressions. Bataille,
Lacan, edited by S. LIPPI , Toulouse, ERES, “Point Hors Ligne”, 2008, pp. 62-71.
URL: https://www.cairn.info/transgressions–9782749209753-page-62.htm Marie José MONDZAIN, De l’excès, Théatre/Public 178. P. P. PASOLINI, “‘Come pregare?’ ‘Come mangiare?’ Esperienze di un Prete e di un Letterato”, in Il Tempo, 11 February1973. Jean STAROBINSKI, “Registers of Excess,” in Enchantment: The Seductress in Opera, translated by C. Jon Delogu, New York, Columbia University Press, 2008. (Originally published as Les enchantresses, Paris, Seuil, 2005). Lionel TERRAY, Les conquérants de l’inutile: des Alpes à l’Annapurna, Paris, Gallimard, 1961. Autobiography: excess, self-expenditure 23-24-25 June 2020 – Roma, Palazzo Mattei di Giove LANGUAGES ADMITTED FOR THE INTERVENTIONS: English, French, Italian, Spanish. Every speaker will speak in their chosen language; there will be no simultaneous translation. A rough passive understanding would be desirable. A) The deadline for the submission of papers is 15 March 2020. Candidates are asked to present an abstract of up to 250 words, with citation of two reference texts, and a brief curriculum vitae of up to 100 words, with possible mention of two publications, be they articles or books. These must be submitted online on the conference registration page of the http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ Website. The scientific committee will read and select every proposal that will be sent to the conference registration page of the http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ Website. For any information, please contact the following: beatrice.barbalato@gmail.com, irenemeliciani@gmail.com, Notification of the accepted proposals will be given by 30 March 2020. B) In regard to enrolment in the colloquium, once the proposal is accepted the fees are the following: Before 10 April 2020: 110,00 From 11 April to 10 May 2020: 130,00 Enrolment cannot be accepted in loco. Ph.D. students: Before 10 April 2020: 75,00 From 11 April to 10 Mai 2020: 90,00Enrolment cannot be accepted in loco. C) For information on registration fees, past symposia, the association’s activities, and the organising and scientific teams, please refer to our Website: http://mediapoliseuropa.com/ The association Mediapolis.Europa contributes to the publication of the journal Mnemosyne, o la costruzionedel senso, Presses universitaires de Louvain, www.i6doc.com, Indexed a scientific journal in:
Rocco RONCHI, “Une ontologie de l’excès”,Lignes, 2000/1 (n° 1), pp. 107-124. DOI :
Scientific Committee Beatrice BARBALATO, Mediapolis.Europa May CHEHAB, Université de Chypre Fabio CISMONDI, Euro Fusion Antonio CASTILLO GÓMEZ, univ. Alcala de Henares (Madrid) Albert MINGELGRÜN, Universite Libre de Bruxelles Giulia PELILLO-HESTERMEYER, Universitat Heidelberg Anna TYLUSIŃSKA-KOWALSKA, Uniwersytet Warszawski Management Irene MELICIANI, managing director Mediapolis.Europa
*
Deadline for Submissions March 10, 2020
Living with Disabilities in New England, 1600-1900 (3/10/2020; 6/19/21/2020) Deerfield, USA
The Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife (founded 1976) is pleased to announce the subject of this year’s conference, Living with Disabilities in New England, 1600–1900, to be held in Deerfield, Massachusetts, in June 2020. The purpose of the Dublin Seminar is to serve as a meeting place where scholars, students, and committed avocational researchers who share an interest in a specific subject can pool their knowledge and exchange ideas and methods. The Dublin Seminar is now accepting proposals for papers and presentations that address the history of people living with disabilities in New England and adjacent areas of New York and Canada from 1600 to 1900. The principal topic examined by this conference is how children and adults with disabilities experienced disability in everyday life. Proposals might address the following questions:
  • How was disability defined during this period?
  • How did gender, race, and class intersect with the experience and meaning of disability?
  • What was the relationship between the law and disability?
  • How did people with disabilities interact with institutions ranging from religious organizations to state-sponsored hospitals to schools?
  • What is the history of disability within the context of military or industrial settings?
  • How did people with disabilities interact with material culture and technology, including but not limited to assistive technologies such as artificial limbs and hearing aids; clothing; landscapes and buildings; and service animals?
  • What is the relationship between medical history and disability history?
The Seminar encourages papers that reflect interdisciplinary approaches and original research, especially those based on material culture, archaeological artifacts, letters and diaries, vital records, federal and state censuses, as well as newspapers, visual culture, business records, recollections, autobiographies, and public history practice or advocacy at museums, archives, and elsewhere. Living with Disabilities in New England, 1600–1900, will be held in Deerfield, Massachusetts, on the weekend of June 19-21, 2020, and will consist of approximately seventeen lectures of twenty minutes each. Professional development points will be available for public school teachers. Selected papers will appear as the 2020 Annual Proceedings of the Dublin Seminar to be published about eighteen months after the conference. The Dublin Seminar will be held in the Deerfield Community Center (DCC), Historic Deerfield’s public lecture facility. The DCC is wheelchair accessible via a ramp and has an accessible restroom. For information or questions regarding accessibility and/or the program or requests concerning other forms of accommodation, call Julie Orvis, Special Events Coordinator, (413) 775-7179 or email jorvis@historic-deerfield.org. To submit a paper proposal for this conference, please submit (as a single email attachment, in Word or as a pdf) a one-page prospectus that describes the paper and its sources and a one-page vita or biography by March 10, 2020.
*
Deadline for Submissions March 8, 2020

Storytelling and Identity through Digital Media–Special Issue of Storytelling, Self, Society Journal (3/8/2020)

Digital media has drastically altered the way ordinary folk and professional users develop, tell, and share stories of culture. It challenges notions of authenticity and truth and the ethics of who has the privilege to tell a story. This special issue of Storytelling, Self, Society will investigate the way digital media has specifically altered practices such as narrative, character/identity, culture, story creation, and dissemination. Research questions might include: How do public and private users develop cultural media? What are the effects of insider and outside digital storytelling practices on identity formation? What constitutes authenticity and truthfulness in digital storytelling practices? Who has the right to tell a story online and from which perspectives? How can digital storytelling practices reframe identity and culture narratives for ordinary folk? How do people work within the limits of the media to tell narratives of identity and culture? What is the futurity of cultural digital media narrative artifacts? What is the impact of cultural digital narratives on travel and tourism? Are there differences between digital narratives and those told in person? What creative digital media projects are currently being employed to discuss narratives of identity and culture? What dissemination practices reach audiences most effectively? How do diverse audiences respond to or reflect the impact of digital stories of identity and narrative? List of potential topics: ● Authenticity and truthfulness ● Ethics of identity shaping ● Social media ● Augmented/Virtual Reality ● Video games ● Video storytelling and Vlogs ● Character creation ● Gamer identity ● Identity groups (ex. LGBTQ+, Latinx) ● Avatars ● Public vs. personal identities ● Public History Please submit articles of approx. 6000-9000 words/25-30 pages (Times New Roman 12pt. double-spaced) to Amanda Hill, Ph.D. at ahill5@stmarytx.edu.
Deadline for Submissions March 7, 2020
Call for papers As part of the conference Biofiction as World Literature Conference (Leuven, Belgium 29-31 October, 2020), I will convene a panel on “Gendering Biofiction as World Literature” for which I am seeking contributions. Biofiction is a genre that focuses on individual historical figures but often projects and negotiates larger social or political issues through the individual life. This panel, in keeping with the conference theme, proposes to examine the capacity of biofiction to reflect and, perhaps, to shift perceptions of gender. It asks how particular biofictions can be related to large-scale movements and systems of thought, such as second or third-wave feminism, intersectionality, gender performativity, or more traditional conceptions of gender that operate(d) across national boundaries. Transnational or transcultural biofictions (where the author takes on a subject from another culture or where the subject’s life crossed national boundaries or is thought to have transnational significance) will be of particular interest in this context. Papers will be 20 minutes long. The full call for papers for the conference can be found at https://www.arts.kuleuven.be/biofiction-as-world-literature/call-for-papers Please send an abstract of 250-300 words for a 20 minute paper, and a brief bio note (150w) to Julia.Novak@univie.ac.at, by 7 March 2020.
Deadline for Submissions March 1, 2020
Trauma, Narratives, Institutions: Transdisciplinary Dialogues
A Special Issue of the Journal of Trauma & Dissociation Deadline for Submissions March 1 2020 Special Issue Guest Editors: Michael Salter, PhD & Iro Filippaki, PhD SPECIAL ISSUE: CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS AND PEER-REVIEWERS This special issue of the Journal of Trauma and Dissociation aims at bringing together socio-historical, anthropological, psychological, and cultural theorizations of institutional roles and narratives and the ways that they impact the lives of traumatized individuals. Narratives and Institutions: Virtually all institutions are sustained through production of narratives (Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory). These narratives reflect the power relations and ideologies of institutions and reveal the politics of the larger structures that govern them. In light of ongoing global forced migrations, socio-political negotiations of gender and trauma, and persistent urban inequalities worldwide, institutional presence is ubiquitous but insidious in its workings. While it is well recognized that institutional betrayal can revictimize trauma survivors through shaming or victim-blaming narratives (Smith and Freyd 2014), neither the narratives on which institutions rely nor the narratives that they produce are systematically explored within trauma studies. Unanswered Questions:  How are institutions positioned to manage psychic and bodily trauma and how does trauma manifest and develop under institutional narratives of power? How can the narrative representation of trauma through literature, history, and art shed light on current institutional practices, and conversely, what kinds of representations are produced under institutional influence? What are the experiences of trauma caused, for example, by living under racist rhetoric and structures? How is the experience of trauma changed when it is enacted by social institutions, and when it has institutional power behind it? And, importantly, what kind of a narrative is trauma itself, and how does it shape the content and methodology of different disciplines? The co-editors will consider theoretical and conceptual manuscripts, position papers, clinical conceptualizations, and comprehensive literature reviews. Topics to be explored include but are not limited to military sexual trauma, medicine, race, and gender, literature and institutional representations, urban conflict, total war, and PTSD, institutional secondary traumatic stress disorder, institutional memory and discourse, artistic representations of institutional trauma, individual identity and institutional narratives, forced migration and institutional practices, institutional betrayal, systemic trauma and history. Please email submissions directly to the co-editors: trauma.narratives.institutions@gmail.com Deadline for full manuscript or abstract with a proposed date of submission: March 1, 2020 All submitted manuscripts that meet the requirements for this special issue will undergo peer review. Final selection of manuscripts will be based on relevance and potential impact, methodological rigor, scientific and/or clinical value, implications for application, and available space. Final acceptance will be based on approval by the special issue guest editors and the editor-in-chief of the Journal of Trauma and Dissociation. See the Journal of Trauma and Dissociation website for more information about the submission requirements:https://dynamic.uoregon.edu/jjf/jtd/ Manuscripts should be 1500-5500 words. For more instructions, see Submission Instructions for Authors at https://dynamic.uoregon.edu/jjf/jtd/instructions.html Authors are welcome (but not required) to submit abstracts for feedback regarding appropriateness for this issue to trauma.narratives.institutions@gmail.com Interested in peer reviewing for this special issue? Email us at trauma.narratives.institutions@gmail.com For more information about the Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, see: https://dynamic.uoregon.edu/jjf/jtd/. Link to cfp: https://dynamic.uoregon.edu/jjf/jtd/trauma.narratives.html
*
Deadline for Submissions March 1, 2020
Hazel Rowley Prize for First-Time Biographers
Biographers International Organization (BIO) is now accepting applications for its Hazel Rowley Prize for First-Time Biographers. The Rowley prize offers $2,000 for the best book proposal from a first-time biographer, plus a careful reading by an established agent. Submissions due March 1. Guidelines and entry forms are available on the BIO website: http://biographersinternational.org/rowley-prize
*
Deadline for Submissions March 1, 2020
death | text | resonance Simone Weil and Writing To(wards) Death July 1st – July 4th, 2020 Max-Weber-Kolleg Erfurt diffrakt | zentrum für theoretische peripherie Berlin Confronted with situations of imminent extinction, prominent and philosophers and readers, ranging from Maurice Blanchot, Samuel Beckett, Martin Heidegger, Joan Didion, Virginia Woolf, Alejandra Pizarnik and many others, have articulated death in manifold ways: as the other night, the impossibility of ending, being-toward-death, experience of loss and grieving, existential premise of modernist melancholia, and poetics of silence and nothingness. In this context, Simone Weil (1909‒1943) has become particularly significant. Through her philosophical writing and political activism, Weil radicalized the instant of death as a focal point through which the vulnerable beauty of human existence asks to be considered in a new light. Weil’s handwritten notebooks document literary practices between excess and deprivation, producing visual assemblages of decreation, anorexia, and various forms of textual kenosis. In discussing the possible ways to articulate the ungraspable from different disciplinary backgrounds and theoretical traditions, our workshop will discuss literary, philosophical and theological forms of writing to(wards) death. Together with Simone Kotva (University of Cambridge) and Hartmut Rosa (University of Jena/Max-Weber-Kolleg), we will trace the movements of textual experiments that search for and attempt to approach that which we cannot understand but sometimes experience, that is, the infinite, the numinous, and the ineffable. Simone Weil’s texts will provide our workshop with a constant reference point, amid participants’ differing approaches of writing (to)wards death, darkness and existential uncertainty. Join us in our efforts to forge ahead on this errand on the edge. Against this backdrop, we will confront and challenge contemporary questions raised by scholars in philosophy, sociology, economics and psychology about the nature of the proverbial “good life.” We will do this by entering into a transdisciplinary dialogue with Hartmut Rosa’s ‘Sociology of Our Relationship to the World,’ which raises questions about how far it is possible to ‘resonate’ with death and what particular functions literary practices assume in this context. In addition, we will attend to the role of the attention and will in such endeavors, aided by Simone Kotva’s work on ‘Effort and Grace.’ We invite submissions from all fields of study, including, but not limited to, literary studies, theology, philosophy, critical theory, religious studies and political science. Papers may address one or more of the following topics:
  •  Reading and writing mystical experiences
  •  Decreation and self-annihilation
  •  Performativity and ritualization
  •  Asceticism, anorexia, disciplining
  •  Unspeakability, withdrawal, unavailability
  •  Fetish, trauma, desire
  •  Melancholia and jouissance
  •  Resonance and questions of the good life
  •  End of the world, eschatology and apocalypticism
The submission deadline is on March 1st, 2020. Please send abstract proposals of up to 300 words to Thomas Sojer (thomas.sojer@uni-graz.at). The working language is English, and notification of submission results will be communicated by April 1st, 2020. Each participant is asked to submit selected passages by Simone Weil and/or other writers (15 pages maximum) prior to June 1st, 2020. These passages will be collected and distributed among participants two weeks in advance. At the workshop we will ask you to provide a short introduction to your text selection (10-15 minutes). We don’t expect finished presentations, though we prefer participants to arrive with a tentative thesis to aid our common discussion and reading. death | earth [Wednesday | July 1st, 2020]: The first evening is dedicated to an artistic open-air reading and the collective experience of textual performativity. death | text [Thursday | July 2nd, 2020]: The second day focuses on the presenters’ close readings of the selected passages and subsequent in-depth discussions within the group: after a brief contextualization, the presenters will guide the group through their reading of the text [along the question of writing to(wards) death] followed by a group discussion. death | resonance [Friday | July 3rd, 2020]: The first half of the day focuses on resonance, death, and the capacity of attention in a dialogue between Simone Kotva and Hartmut Rosa followed by a plenary discussion. The second half of the day is filled by the common transfer to Berlin and completed by a joint evening in Germany’s capital. trans | disziplin [Saturday | July 4th, 2020]: The fourth day aims at linking the thought of Simone Weil with other thinkers and is, by its nature, experimental: the choice of location – diffrakt | zentrum für theoretische peripherie [The Centre of Theoretical Periphery] in Berlin – resonates with the denʞkollektiv’s central commitment to open dialogue and pushing existing boundaries. This final day invites all participants to a reflection on the basic ideas of the denʞkollektiv and envisions its future collaborations and projects. The conference will cover lodging expenses in Erfurt for the conference presenters, who are encouraged to seek coverage of transportation costs from their home institutions or other sources. | organization: trans | diziplin Simone Weil denʞkollektiv [Martina Bengert, Thomas Sojer, Max Walther] | partners: Max-Weber-Centre for Advanced Cultural and Social Studies diffrakt | zentrum für theoretische peripherie
Contact Info:
trans | diziplin Simone Weil denʞkollektiv [Martina Bengert, Thomas Sojer, Max Walther]
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Submissions February 29, 2020

Travel Literature and Transatlantic Encounters: “The Iberian Peninsula as seen from North America (1850-1950)” (2/29/2020)

contact email:
This conference is part of the research project “Exotic Spain: American Travel Literature about Spain (1900-1950)” (ATLAS) funded by the Research and Knowledge Transfer Office of Alicante University (GRE18-14 A). The project focuses on the study of a corpus of American authors who traveled to Spain in the first half of the twentieth century, especially on those texts that look beyond the vision of Spain related to the experience of the Spanish Civil War. ATLAS addresses, from an interdisciplinary perspective, a variety of literary texts and analyzes how the vision of Spain has been constructedand how the uses and customs of the chroniclers—as opposed to local uses— influenced their writing and their representation of the territory. Following Mieke Bal, who in Travelling Concepts in the Humanities (2002) invites us “to explore the intellectual excitement of interdisciplinary cultural analysis”, ATLAS plays with the boundaries between literature, linguistics, history, geography, visual arts and philosophy to explore the perception of Spain within a particular historical context, which deserves further critical attention. The project also traces the routes drawn in the different travelogues to construct the authors’ literary cartographies with an informative and pedagogical purpose in mind. This conference aims to be not only a discussion forum on the project itself, but also an opportunity to further explore both the physical and intellectual journey that these traveling experiences involved. For this purpose, we welcome paper and round-table proposals that deal with the presence of writers, intellectuals and American travelers in the Iberian Peninsula between 1850 and 1950 including, but not restricted to, the following topics:
  • Literary creations—fictional and non-fictional—based on traveling.
  • Testimonial and autobiographical writing, literary chronicles, travel writing.
  • Contrastive studies on travel writing.
  • Traveling and chronicles in times of war and postwar.
  • Travel experiences and their correlation with visual arts.
  • Philosophical approaches towards travel experiences.
  • The “Self” and the “Other” in travel experiences.
  • Traveling and travel experiences from a gender-based perspective.
  • Spatial criticism, representations of rural and urban spaces.
  • Artistic and architectural tourism.
  • Studies on corpus linguistics and travel literature.
  • Traveling and travel experiences from an ecocritical perspective.
  • Traveling and geography: geocriticism and geolocalization; literature and cartography and study of the territory.
  • Approaches towards travel experiences within a historical framework.
  • Sociological, anthropological, ethnographic approaches towards travel experiences.
  • Travel literature and digital humanities.
The following plenary speakers have been confirmed: Dr. Pere Gifra Adoher (Pompeu Fabra University) Dr. Eulalia Piñero Gil (Autonomous University of Madrid) Please, submit your proposals in English or Spanish (250-300 words and 3-5 keywords) to alicante.atlas@ua.es by February 29, 2020.
*
Deadline for Submissions February 25, 2021
Prison Voices: Literature from Inside the Walls (2/25/2020; 1/7-10/2021) MLA Toronto This panel will examine modern literary production emerging from US prisons since the post-Attica prison-building boom and the growth of mass incarceration.  It will center incarcerated voices, their ideologies, and pedagogical possibilities for college and university teachers.  There is special interest in discussion of censorship and conditions of production.  Scope includes single or multiple authors, ex-prisoners and currently incarcerated, and all genres – poetry, fiction, non-fiction prose, autobiography, drama, erotica, and more.  Send 250-300 word abstracts and a short bio to Joe.Lockard@asu.edu before February 25, 2020.
*
Deadline for Contributions February 20, 2020

Call for Contributors for Women Who Changed the World

We are seeking contributors to Women Who Changed the World, to be published by ABC-CLIO. This ambitious, 4-volume reference work will contain essays on approximately 250 women from world history, from ancient times to the twenty-first century, from Bella Abzug to Empress Zauditu. The collection will feature essays that not only provide biographical profiles of women from all parts of the world, but also will address the contexts in which they encountered challenges and persevered to change the worlds into which they were born. We welcome proposed contributions from scholars from all world regions and across all career stages, including early career historians and advanced graduate students. This world history project will explore the variety of gendered experiences and constructed identities on every continent, as well as the impact and influence of individual (and some groups of) women, both positive and negative. The essays will include the significance of individual life experiences (how they “changed” their worlds) and the specific historical and cultural contexts in which each woman lived and struggled. The common format of the entries is meant to be a rough guide, given the global scope of the project, by keeping the contributions open to historical and comparative critical thinking. The writing style should be accessible to the general reader, since the volumes will be marketed to libraries and schools, as well as colleges and universities. Contributors will receive access to the completed work, in addition to the standard byline as the author. Essays will be peer-reviewed. Submissions should be 4000-6000 words. Deadlines are somewhat negotiable, with the preferred due date prior to February 20, 2020. For a full list of entries available for assignment or any further questions, we invite you to contact the General Editor:  Dr. Candice Goucher, cgoucher@wsu.edu. Please include WWCW in the subject line and provide your areas of expertise and a brief cv with your inquiry.
Contact Info:
Contact Info:  Dr. Candice Goucher, Washington State University Contact Email:  cgoucher@wsu.edu
Contact Email:
* Hello Everyone, Danielle Fuller, a professor at the University of Alberta and a specialist in reading studies (as well as a presenter at the upcoming IABA World in Finland), has a request for you about a research project about reading practices that she is doing with Dr. DeNel Rehberg-Sedo of Mount St Vincent University.  They want to hear from as many people as possible about reading, and they want to hear about genre issues too. Thanks for viewing and responding to this request. Circulate widely! Regards, Julie Rak University of Alberta * Dear Colleagues We are writing to invite you to participate in our latest research project on reading practices. This time around we are looking to get a snapshot of what you are reading, how much you’re reading, how you find out about books to read, and about where you share what you’re reading. Please help us. The survey will take no longer than 10 minutes to complete, and you’d be helping out a great deal. As a token of our appreciation, you can put your name into a draw for a bookseller gift certificate. Here is a link to the survey: https://redcap.ualberta.ca/surveys/?s=DEDMAJJETM Your responses are completely anonymous. At the end of the survey, there’ll be a link to put your name into a draw for a CD$100 (CDN) bookseller gift certificate, but your email address and your survey responses are completely separate from one another. Thank you very much for taking our survey. Please forward this to your friends and family. Sincerely, Danielle and DeNel — Danielle Fuller Professor, Department of English and Film Studies University of Alberta Humanities Centre 3-5 Edmonton, AB T6G 2E6, Canada ᐊᒥᐢᑿᒌᐚᐢᑲᐦᐃᑲᐣ (Amiskwacîwâskahikan), Treaty 6/Métis Territory Twitter: @DrDFuller Julie Rak Henry Marshall Tory Chair Department of English and Film Studies University of Alberta Humanities Centre 3-5 Edmonton, AB T6G 2E6, Canada ᐊᒥᐢᑿᒌᐚᐢᑲᐦᐃᑲᐣ (Amiskwacîwâskahikan), Treaty 6/Region 4 Métis Nation Website: https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/julie-rak/home
Deadline for Submissions February 7, 2020
Cinematic Representations of Women in Modern Celebrity Culture (1900-1950) (edited collection) We invite proposals for contributions to an edited collection on cinematic representations of women in works of art, poetry, fiction, theater and criticism of the avant-garde. The popularization of film stars such as Blanche Sweet, Mae Marsh, Mary Pickford, Greta Garbo and Brigitte Helm shaped the cultural imaginary of modernity to such an extent that they influenced the creative activity of artists and writers in the years 1900-1950. Questions centering on feminine stardom will set the background of this collection of essays examining the intersections of vanguardism with popular culture, publicity and performance. How are images of femininity circulated and consumed by the spectators of the cinematic medium? What position do the so-called high and low art forms take with regards to the presence of women in cinema celebrity culture? To what extent do stereotypical conceptions of feminine beauty reflect male ways of seeing, interpreting and writing?  We are interested in expanding the conversation to aesthetic, political, historical and cultural analyses from a perspective that integrates the written word and the animated image into constructions of femininity. Potential topics include but are not limited to: Filmic types and stereotypes of femininity Critical approaches to the male gaze Fetishism and idolatry of women in cinema culture Fashion, modernity and the commodification of feminine cinematography The muse versus the male artist Gender performativity, mass media and promotional value Women stars in Hollywood and the independent film industry Ekphrasis, iconology and iconography of feminine acting Intersections of verbal and cinematic images of power, gender identity and race Feminist theory and aesthetics of motion pictures Abstracts of 300-500 words along with a 150-word bio should be emailed to María Cristina C. Mabrey (University of South Carolina) at rriopar@gmail.com and Leticia Pérez Alonso (Jackson State University) at leticia.p.alonso@jsums.edu no later than February 7th, 2020. We will notify authors of the acceptance by February 13th, 2020. Chapters (approximately 6,000-7,000 words, including notes and bibliography) will be due by August 7th, 2020.
Contact Info:
María Cristina C. Mabrey, University of South Carolina (rriopar@gmail.com) Leticia Pérez Alonso, Jackson State University (leticia.p.alonso@jsums.edu)
*
Deadline for Submissions February 1, 2020

MEDIA HISTORY STUDY DAY 2020: MEDIA LIVES (2/1/2020; 3/18/2020) UK

Call for Papers

Media History Study Day 2020 is an opportunity for postgraduate students (PGRs) and early career researchers (ECRs) working on any aspect of media studies to share and discuss their work in a collegial, multidisciplinary environment. ECRs/PGRs working on media from any time period, social/cultural context, or perspective are invited to participate, including, but not limited to, those examining book history, broadcast media, electronic media, ephemera, film, journalism, media theory, newspapers, periodicals, or print culture.

MEDIA HISTORY STUDY DAY 2020: MEDIA LIVES

DATE: Wednesday, March 18, 2020       TIME: TBD–19:30

LOCATION: Birkbeck, University of London, 43 Gordon Square, London

KEYNOTE: Dr. Rebecca Roach, University of Birmingham, 18:00–19:30

The Study Day’s theme, “MEDIA LIVES,”broadly considers the concept of life in the media, embracing everything from interviews, influencers, and self-representation to the lives and lifecycles of old and new media. Topics may include, but are not limited to:
  • Agency
  • AI and the Lives of Machines
  • Autobiography/Biography/Diaries/Media Identities/Self-Representation/Life-writing/Subjectivity
  • Blogging/Microblogging/Bots
  • Celebrity
  • Collaboration
  • Data-driven Subjects/Dividuals/Black-boxing
  • Dis/ability
  • Gaming lives
  • Influencers
  • Interfaces
  • Interviews
  • Invisible labour or participants
  • Lifespans of media and technologies
  • Lives in the media archive
  • Long Runs/Short Runs of newspapers, periodicals, serials, or series
While PGRs/ECRs are encouraged to share work that resonates with the theme, submissions on all media-related subjects are welcome. Participants will give 10-minute presentations on their works-in-progress followed by a 5-minute discussion of a question/problem related to their research. Research posters or presentations in alternative formats will also be considered. The Study Day is free. It will include a workshop on the ethical implications of conducting research in digital environments/on digital topics facilitated by Dr. Rebecca Roach from the University of Birmingham. Coffee, tea, and lunch will be provided by the Study Day’s sponsors. Participants are responsible for their own travel costs.

_______________

ABSTRACT DEADLINE: Early career researchers and postgraduate students interested in participating in Media History Study Day 2020 should submit a 100-word abstract and 40-word bio to Media.History.Study.Day@gmail.com before midnight on February 1, 2020. If you would like to share a poster or use an alternative presentation format, please include details along with your abstract. For more information, please visit https://mediahistoryseminar.wordpress.com or contact Ann M. Hale, Media.History.Study.Day@gmail.com.

_______________

Media History Study Day 2020 is sponsored by Media History, an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on media and society from the fifteenth century to the present; the Media History Seminar, a London-based interdisciplinary group working on a range of media including print, radio, film, and digital communications technologies from various time periods; Queen Mary University of London; the Birkbeck Centre for Nineteenth-Century Studies; the Institute of English Studies; and the Institute of Historical Research.
Deadline for Submissions February 1, 2020
Call for Papers: “Un/Bound” Special Issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 36.3 Autumn 2021 www.tandfonline.com/rautSubmissions Deadline: February 1, 2020Memoirs and other auto/biographical genres that describe selfhoods at, on, or over borders have long been a subject of scholarly interest but have recently acquired greater urgency. Border crossings and unbindings—the movements of bodies in space inside and across boundaries of all kinds—are at the center not just of the news but also of current discussions in life writing studies.Since 2016, every volume of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies has included essays or clusters dedicated to lives written in spaces between bounded ground or that exist in crossings between such places. Biography’s recent issue includes Marc Lamont Hill’s “From Ferguson to Palestine: Reimagining Transnational Solidarity Through Difference” as well as Gillian Maris Jones’ “Black Lives Abroad: Encounters of Diasporic Solidarity in Brazil.” Books on the subject, such as Routledge’s After American Studies: Rethinking the Legacies of Transnational Exceptionalism (Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera, 2019) and UNC-Chapel Hill’s Migrant Longing: Letter Writing Across the US-Mexico Borderlands (Miroslava Chávez-García, 2018) have proliferated, as have short-form treatments across more than 100 journals in disciplines as disparate as those represented by the Journal of Literacy Research, African and Black Diaspora, and Culture, Medicine, and Psychology.Textual lives in/of migration are clearly the focus of intensive critical attention currently. As the necessity of migration and its divisive politics intensifies, life writing about lives bound and unbound by movement in and between spaces becomes more valuable in fighting stereotypical projections and in complicating and deepening our understanding of the link between place, movement, and identity.The guest editors of this special issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies seek essays investigating how borders and boundaries function in the telling of life narratives—the sense in which lines and liminality may bind people in place, in which crossing boundaries is definitional in life writing as a genre, and in which crossed boundaries become meaningful in their own creation and in the creation of a life-as-text. This issue seeks to address such life writing from a global perspective, asking us to think about what binds or frees human beings, what constitutes a border or a margin on which a self might be or escape its definition.Proposed essays may address, but certainly should not be limited to, the following topics:
  • Border crossing and border enforcement, immigration, and refugee experiences in life narratives
  • Life in the borderlands, life in immigrant communities/families
  • Depictions and/or constructions of transnational or postcolonial identity, hybridity, international interaction
  • Issues of language and dialect
  • Effects of changing, shifting, or disputed borders and government policies on individuals and communities
  • Concepts of, and responses to, border (in)security
  • Narrative forms used to represent borders and borderlands
  • Mapping and cultural geographies in borderlands narratives
  • Methodologies used to support border research
  • Pedagogical approaches to border narratives
  • Genre and narrating lives on the move
Send original articles of 6,000-7,000 words (including works cited and notes), including keywords, an abstract, and a brief biographical statement to Helga Lénárt-Cheng (hl4@stmarys-ca.edu) and Megan Brown (megan.brown@drake.edu). The guest editors welcome essays that include images and are able to print in color without author fees. a/b also publishes ancillary digital and multimedia texts on the journal’s Routledge website. Inquiries welcome. All essays must follow the format of Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition). Essays submitted for the special issue, but not selected, may be considered general submissions and may be selected for publication. In order to ensure a confidential peer review, remove any identifying information, including citations that refer to you as the author in the first person. Cite previous publications, etc. with your last name to preserve your anonymity in the reading process. Include your name, address, email, the title of your essay, and your affiliation in a cover letter or cover sheet for your essay. It is the author’s responsibility to secure any necessary copyright permissions and essays may not progress into the publication stage without written proof of right to reprint. Images with captions must be submitted in a separate file as 300 dpi (or higher) tiff files with captions. Please indicate placement of images in the text. This CFP stems from a call for papers originally posted for the 2020 Modern Language Association convention. Helga Lénárt-Cheng is Associate Professor in World Languages and Cultures and Global and Regional Studies at Saint Mary’s College of California. She is co-author of a book on Alexander Lenard (Wanderer of Worlds, 2016) and of numerous articles. Her research focuses on autobiography, immigration, digital trends in life writing, and theories of subjectivity and community. Megan Brown is Professor of English at Drake University and the author of two books: American Autobiography After 9/11 (University of Wisconsin Press, 2017) and The Cultural Work of Corporations (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009). Her work has also appeared in Biography, Assay, Women’s Studies Quarterly, College Literature, South Atlantic Quarterly, and Cultural Studies. She teaches courses in memoir and autobiography, personal essay, and American literature.
Deadline for Submissions 27 January 2020
GSA Seminar 2020 “The Nazi Legacy: Reconstruction Efforts and Memory Projects since 1945” (1/27/2020; 10/1-4/2020) Washington D.C.
The conveners of “The Nazi Legacy: Reconstruction Efforts and Memory Projects since 1945” invite applicants to apply to enroll in our seminar at the German Studies Association Conference from October 1-4, 2020 in Washington DC. Abstract: Over the last several decades, colleagues in Europe, the UK, and North America have produced a rich and varied body of scholarship concerning recovery and remembering after Nazism. Their approaches have included studies on judicial-administrative dimensions of denazification and (re)establishment of democratic institutions, the experience of POWs, tensions between traditional gender roles and new possibilities for women, immigration and ethnicity, cultural critique, innovation in the arts, the evolution of memory culture across generations, and examination of different aspects of everyday life. This trans-disciplinary seminar provides a setting in which to build on these themes, and to interrogate the spaces in between them. We welcome scholars at all professional levels and in all disciplines working on recovery, reorientation, and memory in Germany, Austria, or Nazi-occupied areas after 1945. Of particular interest are projects that use multidisciplinary approaches and challenge traditional interpretations. Seminar discussion will revolve around three common themes: “political cleansing”; “reshaping society after fascism”; and “memory and forgetting.” Through shared readings and discussion of ongoing or newly initiated projects, seminar participants will explore the complex, often fraught relationship between punitive vs rehabilitative actions, collective vs individual accountability, and private vs. public expression or concealment. We will also consider political, economic, social, cultural, and emotional perspectives on legacies of Nazi dictatorship and wartime occupation. Possible topics include the function/effects of denazification; law and justice; reeducation; guilt/accountability; economic development; cultural forms; memory culture; race; gender and sexuality. Format The seminar will employ discrete daily themes—“political cleansing”; “reshaping society after fascism”; “memory/forgetting”—to explore a common reading, assigned beforehand, followed by short work-in-progress presentations by participants. Sessions will conclude with feedback on methods and sources.
Contact Info:
Matthew Berg, John Carroll University, Department of History, mberg@jcu.edu Mikkel Dack, Rowan University, Department of History, dack@rowan.edu
Contact Email:
Deadline for Submissions 27 January 2020 CFP: GSA seminar “Genealogies of Self-Reflection: Writing in the Wake of Trauma” (1/27/2020; 10/1-4/2020) Washington D.C. USA
Call for Papers for 2020 German Studies Association Seminar  Genealogies of Self-Reflection: Writing in the Wake of Trauma
Building on the “Private Matters: Writing Outside the Margins of the Lebenslauf” seminar (GSA 2018) on memoire and academic writing, this seminar explores forms of critical reflection practiced by colleagues whose family genealogies, sites of origin, and identities have laid the groundwork for their scholarly writing on trauma. We will frame the seminar based on the concept of the “wake” as described in Christina Sharpe’s In the Wake: On Blackness and Being in contrast to Angelika Bammer’s notion of reckoning as enacted in Born After: Reckoning with the German Past (2019).  Bammer recalls how she overcame the “reckoning with her German past,” by taking Adorno’s advice to heart that only “critical reflection” provides a path through the impasse of weighted history and memory. A tour de force of self-reflection and rigorous readings of cultural production, this book offers a point of departure for exploring the trope of critical self-reflection in German studies in order to acknowledge the hidden genealogies that haunt our scholarly texts. Building on pre-submitted writing samples by participants, who are engaged in work that crosses the boundaries of academic and narrative prose, this seminar will be a writing workshop, in which participants respond to one another’s papers. Having prepared for the seminar by reading the books by Sharpe and Bammer, participants will structure their writing samples around the following guiding questions: What are the forms critical self-reflection might take when one interweaves family histories into one’s academic writing? What form might prose take when collective histories and subjective memories merge? What forms of writing emerge in the wake of discrimination, classification, and exclusion, experienced by colleagues, whose life trajectories are deemed or felt to be non-normative? This seminar will provide a forum for a diverse range of participants whose “reckoning” with their pasts may be quite distinct from the usual paradigms of transgenerational transmission within “German” pasts and instead encompass multiple genealogies of (family) identities, heritages, and indigeneities. The seminar will require participants to submit 12-15-page writing excerpts in advance and will focus on workshopping these pieces within the framework of the guiding questions listed in the seminar goals. We welcome participants who would like to share their work at all stages of the writing process. Please apply by JANUARY 27 on the GSA portal https://www.xcdsystem.com/gsa/member/index.cfm Conveners: Leslie Morris (University of Minnesota) morri074@umn.edu Karen Remmler (My Holyoke College) kremmler@mtholyoke.edu
Contact Info:
Leslie Morris
Contact Email:
*
Deadline for Submissions January 24, 2020 Experiencing Prison 7th Global Inclusive Interdisciplinary Conference Friday 3rd July to Saturday 4th July 2020 Bratislava, Slovakia
Prison is used world-wide as a form of punishment or detention for men, women and children, within a functioning criminal justice system, and its use can be traced back to the rise of the earliest forms of state or social organisation in which humans have lived. Prisons are variously known as jails, gaols, penitentiaries, detention centres, correctional centres, and remand centres. They can be used as a tool of political repression, or a means of detaining large groups of civilians during times of war. Incarceration has a long history, and despite its core commonality, as an experience it has varied historically, and continues to vary, in different societies all over the world. Although imprisonment is most commonly in a building, often purpose-built, it has variously taken place on ships, in camps, on islands, and in castles, fortresses, penal colonies, quarries, sewers, cages and dungeons. Imprisonment has become the dominant form of punishment in most societies across the world, and may occur prior to trial or as a result of sentencing by a properly constituted court. Imprisonment without trial or due process occurs in various forms in most societies across the world, mostly sanctioned by the state itself, sometimes used as a political strategy by military, ideological, political or religious groups within a state, or by groups desirous of becoming a state. The prison has become a formidable employer, sometimes the dominant employer in neighbourhoods or towns. Over time, it has also been the site of creativity: prison labour, prison art and prison literature (including poetry, drama and autobiography) have contributed hugely to our understanding both of the phenomenon of imprisonment and of the impact it has on lives. It can therefore be approached from a variety of experiential perspectives – that of prisoner, visitor, employee, volunteer, writer, artist, analyst or researcher. The prison is a powerful metaphor as well, with the capacity to describe a challenging or difficult situation for an individual, a family or a community that seemingly presents no way out, and which presses down upon the human psyche in often unbearable ways. It has been an effective trope within literature, art, poetry and drama.
Key Topics We welcome contributions about the prison from a wide range of perspectives, including legal, architectural, criminological, historical, geographical, fictional, psychotherapeutic, artistic, phenomenological, biographical and autobiographical points of view. Contributions are particularly welcomed from former prisoners, detainees, incarcerated asylum seekers, former prisoners of war, political prisoners or those detained because of nationalist, religious or other convictions, those who have been to prison and have written about the experience; those who have fictionalised the prison experience in art and literature; those who have done paid or voluntary work in prison; and those who have researched the prison of the past and of the present. Additionally, we hope to hear from those involved with the architecture and design of prisons, those who are directly or indirectly involved with the delivery of incarceration,and those involved with any prisoners’ rights groups or with those who seek to ameliorate incarceration by providing therapeutic drama, literacy, education, counselling, religious support, death row support, and other services. All genres and media will be considered, in order to examine the widest possible range of representations, past and contemporary, which inform us about the strange phenomenon of the prison with a view to forming a selective innovative interdisciplinary publication to engender further research and collaboration. We particularly welcome creative responses to the subject, such as poetry/prose, short film screenings/original drama, installations, and alternative presentation styles that engage the audience and foster debate. Topics for discussion include, but are not restricted to: Prisoners and the Prison Experience
  • ~ Types of Prisoners: political dissidents, prisoners of war, violent offenders, non-violent offenders, white collar criminals, innocent/wrongly accused, asylum seekers
  • ~ The female experience in prison
  • ~ Transgendered people in prison
  • ~ Relationships in prison: motherhood, sex, friendship and bonding, relationships with people ‘outside’
  • ~ Rape, assault and other acts of violence
  • ~ Torture in prison
  • ~ Death and dying in prison
  • ~ Social structures within the prison environment
  • ~ Prisoner interactions with guards and administrators
  • ~ Historical perspectives on the prison experience
  • ~ Race, racism and prison
  • ~ Poverty, class and prison
  • ~ Writing, art and other creative practices in prison
  • ~ Representing the prison experience in literature, theatre, TV, film, video games, music and art
  • ~ mental health in prison
  • ~ addictions, self-harm and suicide
  • ~ medical ethics and care in prison
Life After Prison
  • ~ Challenges of reintegration
  • ~ Rehabilitation and education
  • ~ Discrimination against former inmates
  • ~ Family and friends coping with the release of loved ones
  • ~ Community service and volunteerism
Prison As Institution
  • ~Prison as workplace: experiences of guards, administrators and institutional officials
  • ~ Prison spaces: architectural design in theory and practice, boot camps, work camps, open air prisons, etc.
  • ~ Technologies of incarceration
  • ~ Teaching and learning in prison
  • ~ Spirituality and religion in prison
  • ~ Counselling and other clinical experiences with prisoners
  • ~ (In)Famous prisons and their legacy (Auschwitz, Guantanamo Bay, Alcatraz, Newgate Gaol, etc.)
  • ~ Prisons and dark tourism
  • ~ Prison conditions around the globe
  • ~ Economics of incarceration: politics of awarding contracts, private vs public management, impact of prison location on local communities, etc.
Prisons in Law and Policy
  • ~ Theories and practices in rehabilitation and humane containment
  • ~ Balancing punishment and human rights
  • ~ Prison reform initiatives
  • ~ Innovative approaches to incarceration
  • ~ Relationship between justice system and corrections system
  • ~ Race, class, sex and other forms of discrimination in sentencing
  • ~ Correctional services as public policy: governmental/civil service perspectives
  • ~ National and international legal provisions around prison conditions and prisoners’ rights
  • ~ NGOs and charities working in the area of prison reform
  • ~ Social attitudes toward prison and prisoners

What To Send The aim of this inclusive interdisciplinary conference and collaborative networking event is to bring people together and encourage creative conversations in the context of a variety of formats: papers, seminars, workshops, storytelling, performances, poster presentations, problem-solving sessions, case studies, panels, q&a’s, round-tables etc. Creative responses to the subject, such as poetry/prose, short film screenings/original drama, installations and alternative presentation styles that engage the audience and foster debate are particularly encouraged. Please feel free to put forward proposals that you think will get the message across, in whatever form. At the end of the conference we will be exploring ways in which we can develop the discussions and dialogues in new and sustainable inclusive interdisciplinary directions, including research, workshops, publications, public interest days, associations, developing courses etc which will help us make sense of the topics discussed during the meeting. There is an intention, subject to the discussions which emerge during the course of the meeting, to form a selective innovative interdisciplinary publication to engender further research and collaboration. 300 word proposals, presentations, abstracts and other forms of contribution and participation should be submitted by Friday 10th January 2020. Other forms of participation should be discussed in advance with the Organising Chairs. All submissions will be at least double reviewed, under anonymous (blind) conditions, by a global panel drawn from members of the Project Team, The Development Team and the Advisory Board. In practice our procedures usually entail that by the time a proposal is accepted, it will have been triple and quadruple reviewed. You will be notified of the panel’s decision by Friday 24th January 2020. If your submission is accepted for the conference, a full draft of your contribution should be submitted by Friday 1st May 2020. Abstracts and proposals may be in Word, RTF or Notepad formats with the following information and in this order: a) author(s), b) affiliation as you would like it to appear in the programme, c) email address, d) title of proposal, e) type of proposal e.g. paper presentation, workshop, panel, film, performance, etc, f) body of proposal, g) up to 10 keywords. E-mails should be entitled: Experiencing Prison Submission
Where To Send Abstracts should be submitted simultaneously to the Organising Chairs and the Project Administrator: Diana Medlicott: diana@progressiveconnexions.net Len Capuli (Project Administrator): bratislavaprison@progressiveconnexions.net Please direct all enquiries to: bratislavaprison@progressiveconnexions.net For further details and information please visit the conference web page: http://www.progressiveconnexions.net/interdisciplinary-projects/human-rights/experiencing-prison/conferences/
Contact Info:
Diana Medlicott: diana@progressiveconnexions.net Len Capuli (Project Administrator): bratislavaprison@progressiveconnexions.net

Deadline for Submissions January 20, 2020
24, 25 & 26 June 2020 (Le Mans University, France) WAR MEMORIES (2020) Sharing War Memories – From the Military to the Civilian International Conference initiated by  Professor Renée Dickason (Université Rennes 2), Professor  Stéphanie Bélanger (Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario) and Professor Delphine Letort (Le Mans Université) https://warmem2020.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/CFP_warmem_2020_EN.pdf War narratives are subject to emphases, orientations and points of view that give a particular flavour to wars fought by populations (anonymously, individually and/or hidden in an organisation, secret or not)  and by the military (from high command to the ‘unknown soldier’). Such accounts evolve with the benefit of hindsight, the writing of history textbooks and the constant (re)interpretations of archives (new or not) and the official version a country wishes to put forward according to its political agendas and visions of patriotism, citizenship and human rights, or its diplomatic or international policy objectives. The narratives of wars vary with the context and the need for men and women to express their inner feelings when faced with the torments and human atrocities of war; they also reflect the place of individuals within a group and the implications of group cohesion within the larger community. Civilians’ knowledge of the war effort and the involvement of the military is informed by two types of documents: primary sources (letters, emails, photographs, videos, testimonies, trench gazettes, blogs, etc.) provide direct information about the war experienced at an individual level, whereas secondary sources mediate these artefacts by incorporating them into another narrative. The artefacts of war become the original materials which museums and memorials turn into places of memory, while feature films provide a less direct approach as they often (re)mediate the original accounts of first-hand witnesses through documentary, ethno-fiction, docudrama or more generally through fiction. These documents show a possible encounter between the military and civilian spheres, especially when the two are separated either in time or space. Civilians learn about past and distant wars through the narratives built on them and through the images produced either by the military themselves, by news reporters embedded with them or following in their footsteps, or by historians. Journalistic records often frame the understanding of war by shining light on events hidden from the public gaze, by illuminating the conflicts or the complicity between civilian witnesses and members of the military. Whether intended to win the ‘hearts and minds’ of the indigenous populations or to denigrate the enemy by reductive stereotyping, military strategies condition how armed forces regard the ‘Other’. Humanitarian groups approach war with a different goal in mind; their representations of war emphasize the dangers for civilian populations trapped by an ongoing conflict and reintroduce human concerns where war technology erases them. The case of civilian hostages is of particular relevance in this context. This conference aims to explore zones of contact between the military and the civilian worlds – be they real or virtual. Zones of contact extend beyond the battlefields to civilian areas, where the enemy is sometimes conflated with undeclared combatants (especially in the age of terrorism). Soldiers may also find respite in the civilian life that wars disrupt but cannot completely annihilate. The contacts between the military and the civilians are often channeled by professional relationships. Doctors, nurses, drivers, journalists, artists… provide a link between two worlds that outsourcing has brought closer together in the contemporary era. Both volunteers and conscripts undergo a change of status when they join the armed forces. The transition from the civilian to the military world may be a life-changing event, but it may also become part and parcel of one’s daily rhythm as war can increasingly be pursued without even leaving the home country (for example, with the development of drone technology). How do the military manage to attract civilians into donning the uniform? How do the veterans reintegrate into civilian life and overcome the trauma of waging war, especially when serious injury makes them unfit for further service. The study of the relationships between the civilian and the military implies research into the artefacts of war, conveying the perception of combat by the military themselves or by the civilians observing them. This relationship is founded on a variety of objects aiming at boosting admiration for war heroes or condemnation of war criminals. Reality turns into fiction as it becomes a political or romanticized narrative in film and on television, in literature and in the arts – and this transformation illuminates the civilians’ perception of war as well as soldiers’ perception of themselves. In 2020, to mark the tenth year anniversary of the active and fruitful collaboration on the theme of war memories, our research groups – ACE (Rennes), the Royal Military College of Canada (Kingston, Ontario) and 3L.AM (Le Mans) – would like to offer researchers and members of civil society the opportunity to participate in workshop discussions on the subject of sexual violence and abuse perpetuated as a weapon of war, and on the fate of children in wartime, in addition to the themes in the non-exhaustive list given below. Other possible workshops: –  Remembering, transmitting war (commemorations, textbooks (paper or e-learning), museums…) and narrating war (children’s literature, graphic novels, essays, short stories, drama, poetry…) – Drawing, photographing or filming war (documentaries, docu-fictions, ethno-fiction) – Medialization of war (news bulletins, news reports, blogs, social media, websites…) – War and the human dimension: testimonies of trauma and the management of emotions (from military to civilian points of view) –  Childhood in wartime: mobilization of children in armed conflicts; staging children characters in, fictional and non-fictional, war narratives; writing or representing war for a young public – Women civilians and the military in war; women as war weapons and victims A vibrant homage will be delivered to Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Dr. Denis Mukewege and his fights in Democratic Republic of the Congo With keynote speeches by: Jonathan Bignell (Professor of Television and Film, Reading University, United Kingdom) Keynote provisional  title: Television and Ephemerality: Remembering and Forgetting War Daniel Palmieri (Historian, International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland) Keynote provisional title: “Now, the World without me”. Humanitarians and Sexual Violence in Time of War Stéphanie Bélanger (Professor, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario) Keynote provisional title: Voice or Loyalty? Dealing with Memories in the Armed Forces SUBMISSION DEADLINE : 20th JANUARY 2020 All submissions will be considered after the deadline of 20th January 2020. Please send your abstract (350 words) and biography (200 words) directly to the conference website. You will need to create an account in the Submission section before filling up the fields required and uploading your document (see information on the conference website). We will not be able to give you any news concerning the acceptance of your work before 20th January 2020.
Submissions Deadline: January 15, 2020 Call for Papers: “Mapping Black Women’s Lives” Special Issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 36.2 Spring 2021 www.tandfonline.com/raut For this special issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, we seek papers that employ diverse and/or interdisciplinary methodologies to recover and situate (geographically and theoretically) Black female lives throughout the African diaspora. How do we write with and against archival silences and violences? What role does digitization play in making visible or further marginalizing Black women’s life writing? We are particularly interested in scholarly efforts that redefine, transform, or reform the spaces and places in which Black women’s cultural contributions were recorded (or not). Where and how do we map the lives of Black women? Topics include but are not limited to the following: ·         Cartography, maps, mapping, and journeys in Black women’s life narrative ·         Forced displacements ·         Dangerous moves ·         Middle passages as trans-historical consciousness ·         Relationships between faith systems, movement and racialized geographies ·         Examining Diaspora through Life Writing ·         Travel to and through archives ·         How geography shapes who and what we recover ·         Global perspectives on mapping Black women’s lives ·         Methodologies for locating and mapping Black women’s lives ·         Pedagogical approaches to mapping Black women’s lives and/or reading journeys in Black women’s life narratives ·         Autotheoretical approaches to mapping and/or studying Black women’s lives in transit Send original articles of 6000-7000 words (including works cited and notes), including keywords, an abstract, and a brief biographical statement to Kimberly Blockett (kdb13@psu.edu). We welcome essays that include images and are able to print in color without author fees. a/b also publishes ancillary digital and multimedia texts on the journal’s Routledge website. Inquiries welcome. All essays must follow the format of Chicago Manuel of Style (17th edition). Essays submitted for the special issue, but not selected, may be considered general submissions and may be selected for publication. In order to ensure a confidential peer review, remove any identifying information, including citations that refer to you as the author in the first person. Cite previous publications, etc. with your last name to preserve your anonymity in the reading process. Include your name, address, email, the title of your essay, and your affiliation in a cover letter or cover sheet for your essay. It is the author’s responsibility to secure any necessary copyright permissions and essays may not progress into the publication stage without written proof of right to reprint. Images with captions must be submitted in a separate file as 300 dpi (or higher) tiff files with captions. Please indicate placement of images in the text. Guest Editor, Kimberly Blockett, Associate Professor of English at Penn State Brandywine, is a C19 literary historian. She uses archives and cultural geography to examine black female movement and subjectivity. Blockett’s publications include MELUS, Legacy, MLA Approaches to Teaching Hurston, and the Cambridge History of African American Literature. The archival work for her forthcoming monograph and annotated edition of Zilpha Elaw’s Memoirs was funded by fellowships from the Ford Foundation, Smithsonian, NEH, and Harvard Divinity School. *
CALL FOR PAPERSDeadline, January 15, 2020 Society for the Study of American Travel Writing American Literature Association 31st Annual Conference May 21-24, 2020 Manchester Grand Hyatt, San Diego, CA The SSATW (https://www.facebook.com/americantravelwriting/) invites abstracts of 250-300 words for presentations at the annual conference of the American Literature Association (http://americanliteratureassociation.org/).  The society will be hosting two thematically linked panels. Ethical Encounters From Twain’s ugly innocents abroad to Kinkaid’s warning that “the tourist is an ugly human being,” for over a century those who write about American travel and travelers have raised concerns about the potential impacts of travelers on communities, cultures, and ecosystems. The power dynamics of travel are complex, as are the ethical challenges of meaningfully and responsibly representing peoples, cultures, places, and even the self. We invite papers that examine any aspect of ethics in relation to travel and travel writing. Time period and geographic region are open. What is travel writing? We often focus on questions of borders and border crossing in travel writing, but what delimits the borders of the genre itself? What makes a something “travel writing?” In the Best American Travel Writing 2017 Lauren Collins suggests that we might now understand travel writing “simply as writing about space and time,” conceiving of the genre in what are perhaps the broadest possible terms.  Questions abound. Must travel writing be “true” and what does this mean? Must it be primarily concerned with place? With movement? Arguably refugee resettlement narratives, voluntourism blogs, and memoirs of the Pacific Coast Trail all fit somewhere in the genre, but what doesn’t?  Where are the lines between advocacy, reporting, and travel writing? Between memoir and travel writing? We invite papers that delve directly into these questions as well as those that implicitly trouble the boundaries of the genre of “travel writing” itself, delving into questions of space, time, mobility, emplacement and beyond. Please send abstracts to Shealeen Meaney (meanes@sage.edu) by Wednesday, January 15, 2020.  Early submissions are welcome.
* Deadline for Submissions: January 15, 2020
Call for papers: Autofiction in the Age of the Self(ie) Special Issue of English Studies in Canada Deadline for abstracts: January 15, 2020 Deadline for final essays (6000-9000 words): August 15, 2020 Submit to: mbloom@glendon.yorku.ca If the late nineties and early oughts witnessed what Leigh Gilmore has termed a ‘memoir boom’, the intervening years have seen the rise of a new genre: autofiction. Coined by Serge Doubrovsky in 1977 and initially associated with French writers, the term—and the self-fictionalizing practices it designates—have exploded into the international mainstream. Although there is no critical consensus about what constitutes this genre–or whether it should even be considered a distinct genre–examples of works that blur the line between autobiography and fiction have increased wildly over the past several decades in the US, Canada, Scandinavia, Germany, and elsewhere. Both the corpus and the conversation are broadening to encompass a range of texts and approaches by writers whose work falls between and beyond traditional publishing industry categories such as autobiography, memoir, confession, essay, and fiction.  Some scholars are using this lens to trace lineages with earlier writers and genres such as the roman-à-clef. Autofiction has been touted by some as a productive response to the commodification, digitization, and proliferation of the self in a contemporary culture that has called the very nature of ‘truth’ and ‘fact’ into question. Others – particularly racialized writers and women—have rejected the label, arguing that it overvalues or mischaracterizes the autobiographical dimension of their writing, further entrenching pernicious stereotypes. Is autofiction a reaction against the selfie, or simply another manifestation? Does the label refer to a new form of writing, or is it just a new way of describing metafictional techniques that have appeared in literature since The Canterbury Tales? This special issue invites papers that consider these questions or any aspect of autofiction and its associated genres (autotheory, biofiction, creative nonfiction, etc.). Authors are welcome to discuss works that have been translated into English, and are particularly encouraged to focus on women, LGBTQ+, BIPOC, disabled, and otherwise marginalized writers. Please submit abstracts of 500 words to Dr. Myra Bloom mbloom@glendon.yorku.ca by January 15, 2020. Final essays (6,000-9,000 words) are due August 15, 2020. — Myra Bloom Assistant Professor Department of English Glendon College, York University 2275 Bayview Avenue Toronto,  ON M4N 3M6 Tel: 416-736-2100 (x88597)
Deadline for Submissions January 15, 2020
CALL FOR PAPERS Conference: Comics, Migration, MinoritiesDATE: June 3–5, 2020 VENUE: School of History, Culture and Arts Studies at the University of Turku, Finland SUBMISSIONS close by January 15, 2020; presenters will be notified by January 31, 2020The Comics, Migration, Minorities conference welcomes comics scholars, comics artists, educators, cultural workers, teachers, activists and other representatives of the comics field interested in the different ways in which comics, migration and minorities intermingle. There is currently an international boom in migration-themed comics, but migratory movement has had an effect on comics throughout the art form’s history. In the last decade, comics have become an important forum for the depiction and discussion of various aspects of migration. Comics depict forced displacement, seeking refuge, asylum-seeking processes, detention policies, border control and violence, labor migration, international adoption, and studying abroad. Through their stories they explore and reflect diasporic and minority identities, the differences between immigrant generations, family histories, memories of former homelands, and the different experiences and emotional aspects of involuntary and voluntary migration. Migration has become a prominent issue in comics of a whole range of genres, including both fictional and documentary comics. Comics autobiographies and biographies, journalism and historical narratives have recorded migration in different parts of the world and displayed personal histories and social analyses. Fictional stories for adults, young adults and children have highlighted the predicaments of refugees and others on the move. Comics are also an activist and educational medium in the fight for immigrant rights and against xenophobic and racist policies and sentiments. Whose stories are told in comics, whose voices are heard in them, and who gets to tell graphic narratives are central questions when considering the narration of migration, as well as regarding the relationship between hegemonic majority groups and minority groups in societies at large and in comics fields in particular. Cross-border migration and the formation of immigrant communities are shaped by historical and current power relations and processes of colonialism and slavery, white supremacy, growing global neo-fascism and racialization, as well as formations such as Fortress Europe and border policing. Questions concerning representation and diversity in comics and the field of comics are not delimited to issues of migration, however. While the focus of the conference is on migration and comics, a broader discussion on diversity and the similarities and intersections of minority positions is encouraged. We welcome proposals for individual presentations in the traditional academic format (20-minute presentations with a 10-minute discussion), but we also encourage proposals of alternative presentation forms (e.g., roundtables and workshops) on topics related, but not limited, to the following:
  • Migration and minorities in various comics genres
  • The representation of migrants and other minorities in comics
  • Displacement and seeking refuge in comics
  • Ethics of narrative and representation
  • Histories and memories of migration
  • Labor migration, studies abroad and international adoption in comics
  • Asylum-seeking processes, detention policies, and border control and violence in comics
  • Racism, xenophobia and stereotypes in comics
  • Activism and social justice initiatives
  • Comics and political discourses about migration and minorities
  • Comics as a tool for integration
  • Comics as a tool for education about migration and minorities
  • Comics in language education for migrant groups
  • Diversity in the comics field
  • Comics by migrant and minority creators and in minority languages
The conference’s invited plenary speakers are: Please submit an abstract of your proposed presentation in English by January 15, 2020, as an attachment to the email address comics@utu.fi. The abstract should be no longer than 200 words. Please include your name, affiliation and contact information in the abstract document. Authors of submissions will be notified by January 31, 2020. For further information, please contact comics@utu.fi. In due time, information concerning the conference will be found on the conference web page at http://conference.migrationcomics.fi. Should you be interested in combining attendance at the Comics, Migration, Minorities conference with another conference, the call for papers for the IABA World Turku 2020 – Life-Writing: Imagining the Past, Present and Future conference (to be held in Turku, Finland, June 9–12, 2020) is open until October 15, 2019. More information can be found at the conference website: https://iabaturku2020.net/call-for-papers/. The Comics, Migration, Minorities conference is organized by: *
* Deadline for Submissions January 13, 2020

Call for papers : Identities: Understanding of Oneself, Others and the World

March 18, 2020 to March 20, 2020
Identities and discourses of alterity are, at all times and in all societies, an integral part of social, political, economic, cultural and territorial interactions. Our views of ourselves and others tend to be influenced by multiple factors, including discourses on individuals, groups and their environment, as well as various performances and materialities. The historiography of identities and alterities is now divided into several subfields. Concepts of plurality and the multitude are hence at the core of our understandings of self, others and the environment. In view of this, the organizing committee is pleased to offer a platform for exchanges and reflections on the use and conceptualization of identities and alterities as well as their relations with the environment in which they exist and evolve. In what ways do they vary in time and space? How are they shaped? How are they institutionalized? How do alterities act as factors in identity construction? How do they confront and/or comfort each other? In what ways are they influenced by internal or external ideologies? By what means are they disseminated and shared? By what mechanisms are they made invisible? How do identity groups represent themselves, others and their backgrounds? Who is marginalized by these identities and what is their agency? What mechanisms explain these rejections and what are their consequences? Finally, in the context of scholarship, how do these concepts influence the work of researchers? The committee seeks proposals for presentations of 15 to 20 minutes addressing, but not limited to, the following themes: • Movements related to identities and otherness or representations of others (concepts of race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, language, religion, etc.) • Representations related to the understanding of self, others or the comprehension of the world on a social, cultural, political, economic and geographical level. • Issues related more broadly to identities (national, religious, gendered, sexual, linguistic, territorial, etc.) Graduate students from any field of study whose work focuses on these themes are invited to participate in the XXVII International Interdisciplinary Colloquium of Graduate Students’ Association of the Department of History of the University of Montreal. Participation in this colloquium is an excellent opportunity to present your research, interact with fellow students and professors, and eventually publish your findings.
Contact Info:
Please submit your proposal in either English or French (250 words maximum) before January 13, 2020, at 6 p.m., to xxviicolloqueaeddhum@gmail.com with a copy to marly.tiburcio-carneiro@umontreal.ca. Applicants must also provide their first and last name, institutional affiliation and an estimate of travel costs if financial assistance is required.
* MLA Genre Studies Forum in Life Writing Annual Cocktail Party Saturday, January 11, 2020 The Fairmont Olympic Hotel 8:30-10:30 pm [Room # TBA on the a/b: Auto/Biography Studies  Facebook page] ALL ARE WELCOME!
Deadline for Submissions January 10, 2020
Call for Papers: Epistolary Forms in Film, Media and Visual Culture Edited by Catherine Fowler and Teri Higgins “We are living in a great epistolary age, even if no one much acknowledges it. Our phones, by obviating phoning, have reestablished the omnipresence of text. Think of the sheer profusion of messages … that we now send. “(Sally Rooney, 2019) As Irish novelist Sally Rooney observes, despite the frequent assumption that technological advances provide constantly new forms of communication, these new forms: the email, the blog, the text message, the tweet, the update are actually haunted by old ‘epistolary’ forms: the letter and the diary. Both the letter and the diary have strong historical relationships to privacy, secrecy and intimacy, as well as to anonymity masquerade and deception, all notions that are both prevalent and highly contested in our current age. By focusing on the connection between a wide-range of media and these epistolary forms our aim is to consider their continuing significance for the mediation of self-expression and the building of relationships. On the one hand, in mainstream cinema epistolary forms appear to produce storytelling that focuses on emotion rather than action, as such, they challenge the superficiality of post-feminist narratives centered on consumption and continue the melodramatic tradition, specifically the protagonist’s “desire to express all… [and] give voice to their deepest feelings” (Brooks, 1991) (See You’ve Got Mail [1998], Bridget Jones’s Diary [2001], Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants [2005], The Lake House [2006] P.S I Love You [2007], The Young Victoria [2009], Julie and Julia [2009], and most recently, I Love Dick [2016], Love, Simon [2018], and To All The Boys I’ve Loved Before [2018]). Several films also ask us to consider emotional masculinity; specifically the relationship between men, vulnerability, and letter writing ([Dear, John (2010], and Love, Simon 2018], and Charlie in The Perks of Being a Wallflower 2012]). On the other hand, we find masquerade and deceit as the counter to intimacy and emotional expression. These themes are increasingly prevalent as epistolary forms move online (A Cinderella Story [ 2004] as a digital take on a classic, Sierra Burgess Is a Big Loser, [2018], as the most recent re-telling of Cyrano de Bergerac, and in the omniscient narration of Gossip Girl [2007-2012]). In less mainstream film and media letters, diaries, emails, and blogs have provided ways to play with the space of the personal and auto-biographical, providing intersections with the Essay Film genre. In this space epistolary forms offer genres of self-expression that adopt intimate, emotional, confessional tones; in contrast to the essayistic they are often characterised by a lack of reflection, as writers are too close to experiences, unable to make sense of them, writing them in the moment and/or caught up in the quotidian detail. Hamid Naficy finds epistolary forms particularly prevalent for expressions of exile ‘driven by distance, separation, absence and loss’ (Naficy, 1992: 101), (for example, Mona Hatoum’s Measures of Distance [1988] and Fernando Solanos Tangos: Exile of Gardel [1985]). Naficy’s words fit Indigenous collectives: the Chiapas media project (for Zapista communities in Mexico) who have created politicised videos that use ‘letters, interviews and testimonials’ (Davis et al, 2015: 54) and independents from Chantal Akerman and Jonas Mekas to Abbas Kiarostami (with Victor Erice). Beyond cinema, in the art world and on other media, it is the themes of intimacy, privacy self-expression and masquerade raised by letters and diaries that we find most frequently addressed. Artist Hito Steyerl, writing about online scamming letters, has gone so far as to argue that: ‘[t]he strongest affective address of the digital happens in the epistolary mode. As a brush with words divorced from actual bodies.’(58) Meanwhile visual artists including Sophie Calle and Miranda July have created subversive melodramas from their use of letters and diaries. The goal of this proposed collection is to embark on a deep engagement with epistolary forms and their presence in culture and on screen. We look forward to hearing from contributors working on all aspects of film, media and visual studies who share an interest in the many connections between the audio-visual and epistolary forms. Contributors may choose to focus on a specific film or media text or pursue an analysis that draws from a range of examples. As ‘epistolary forms’ we include letters, diaries, emails, blogs, texts, tweets and online social media. Proposals may consider (but should not be limited to) the following themes and issues:
  • Histories of epistolary forms in film and media
  • Re-defining self-expression on screen
  • Implications for contemporary representations of intimacy
  • Relationships with gender & sexuality, especially masculinity
  • Intersectionality and epistolary forms
  • Centrality to cultures of confession,
  • Re-inventions of emotionality
  • Extending notions of masquerade
  • Relationships with genres (melodrama, romantic comedy, exile cinema, essay film)
  • World Cinema/race, ethnicity, the inter-cultural
  • Relation to other media forms (television; video games; social media)
  • The letter in the digital age (social media; scams)
  • Instagram and other social media platforms as diaristic forms
Proposals of up to 350 words, along with a short bio should be sent to the editors: Catherine.fowler@otago.ac.nz and theterihiggins@gmail.com by January 10th 2020. Final chapters will be due January 2021. Details regarding publication (publisher and timeline) will be sent when proposals are accepted. References Brooks, Peter. “The Melodramatic Imagination.” Imitations of Life: A Reader on Film and  Television Melodrama. Ed. Marcia Landy. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1991.  50-68. Davis, Glyn, Kay Dickinson, Lisa Patti and Amy Villarejo. Film Studies – A Global Introduction. London and New York: Routledge, 2015. Naficy, Hamid. An Accented Cinema: Exilic and Diasporic Filmmaking. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/01/07/sally-rooney-gets-in-your-head Steyerl, Hito. “Epistolary Affect and Romance Scams: Letter from an Unknown Woman.” October, Vol. 138, (Fall 2011), pp. 57-69.
Contact Info:
Associate Professor Catherine Fowler, University of Otago and Dr Teri Higgins, Independent Researcher, Montreal.
Posted January 4, 2020
That was is a beautiful tribute to Kay by Sid Smith. I remember Kay as a generous and enthusiastic life writing colleague, whose work on human rights in particular is still shaping the work of the next generation of scholars. When we ran the IABA Conference in Canada, Kay wrote to me frequently as she planned an epic car trip across the Canadian West to get to the conference. That’s what I remember about Kay–she was always up for an adventure. Rest in power. Regards, Julie Rak University of Alberta, Canada
POSTED JANUARY 3, 2020
Kay Schaffer 1945-2019 Many in the lifewriting community are saddened by the loss of Kay Schaffer, Professor Emerita in Gender Studies and Social Inquiry at the University of Adelaide. For more detailed information about her distinguished and influential career, go to https://www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/kay.schaffer# Sidonie Smith has also written a remembrance and a tribute to Kay that I’m posting below for the many people in our field who knew her, and who have benefited from her scholarship and enjoyed her company back to the very first IABA conference in Beijing in 1999.
Kay was a pioneering scholar of Australian women’s writing, post/colonial literary cultures, and life writing studies. Fearless feminist theorist. Tireless advocate of women’s studies curricula and programs. Educator of sometimes hostile colleagues. Dedicated mentor to young scholars and graduate students. Inspiring professor in the classroom. These were the roles Kay superbly inhabited throughout her career, and her enduring legacies. Brilliance, ambition, and confidence were her defining scholarly attributes. Sparkling beauty, warmth, and generosity were the animating features of her very being. I was the beneficiary of Kay’s desire to share remarkable book projects, especially our 2004 book Human Rights and Narrated Lives: The Ethics of Recognition. She shared with me her family and her community of friends; her love of travel, especially to the IABA-World conferences; and her love of pleasure in living and in living well and fully. The memory of Kay’s voice, of her embodied habits, of her tensile energy, of her indomitable spirit, of her openness to grace, fills the hearts of those who knew her.  Vale Kay. Sidonie Smith
Deadline for Submissions January 1, 2020

Storytelling and Identity through Digital Media

deadline for submissions: 
January 1, 2020
Storytelling, Self, Society
contact email: 
Digital media has drastically altered the way ordinary folk and professional users develop, tell, and share stories of culture. It challenges notions of authenticity and truth and the ethics of who has the privilege to tell a story. This special issue of Storytelling, Self, Society will investigate the way digital media has specifically altered practices such as narrative, character/identity, culture, story creation, and dissemination. Research questions might include: How do public and private users develop cultural media? What are the effects of insider and outside digital storytelling practices on identity formation? What constitutes authenticity and truthfulness in digital storytelling practices? Who has the right to tell a story online and from which perspectives? How can digital storytelling practices reframe identity and culture narratives for ordinary folk? How do people work within the limits of the media to tell narratives of identity and culture? What is the futurity of cultural digital media narrative artifacts? What is the impact of cultural digital narratives on travel and tourism? Are there differences between digital narratives and those told in person? What creative digital media projects are currently being employed to discuss narratives of identity and culture? What dissemination practices reach audiences most effectively? How do diverse audiences respond to or reflect the impact of digital stories of identity and narrative? List of potential topics: ● Authenticity and truthfulness ● Ethics of identity shaping ● Social media ● Augmented/Virtual Reality ● Video games ● Video storytelling and Vlogs ● Character creation ● Gamer identity ● Identity groups (ex. LGBTQ+, Latinx) ● Avatars ● Public vs. personal identities ● Public History *
2020 New England Graphic Medicine Conference
Call for Papers  MARCH 26-28, 2020 [Deadline: January 10, 2020] Graphic Medicine is a genre, a field, a tool, a community, and a cause. It is large enough to accommodate all health and medical experiences, from that of the doctor to that of the patient – from that of a microbe to that of a planet. Following the inaugural 2019 event organized by the National Network of Libraries of Medicine New England Region (NNLM NER), we are delighted to announce the 2020 New England Graphic Medicine Conference on the MCPHS University Boston campus. Paper, presentation, and panel proposals on Graphic Medicine in terms of the following topics are now being requested:
  • Artist health
  • Canonization
  • Climate crisis
  • Comics journalism
  • Data collection and privacy
  • Disability in the superhero genre
  • Healthcare business
  • Librarianship
  • Narratology and literary theory
  • Posthumanism
  • Religion and faith
  • Colorectal Cancer (March is Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month)
  • Epilepsy (March 26th is #PurpleDay for Epilepsy Awareness)
  • Historical illnesses (e.g. smallpox, malaria, Great Plague of London)
  • The Nib, The Annals of Graphic Medicine, and other online GM sources
Additional topics will also be considered. Proposals of no more than 200 words should be submitted as Word documents to a.lewis@mcphs.edu with the Subject line New England Graphic Medicine. Please also include a relevant 1-2 page CV for each potential speaker. Specify whether the proposal is part of a planned panel or is being offered for placement at the organizers’ discretion. Time blocks of 75 minutes (for full panels), 20 minutes (for individual papers), or 5 minutes (for “lightning talks”) will all be considered and should be noted in the proposal. Creative workshops will be considered as well, and interested artists should submit portfolio links along with the other materials listed above. Exhibitor opportunities may be available: contact a.lewis@mcphs.edu for potential details. Organized by the MCPHS Center of Health Humanities, the 2020 New England Graphic Medicine Conference is also supported by the MCPHS University Libraries, the School of Healthcare Business, and the School of Professional Studies. Additional guidance and resources are provided by the NNLM NER.
*
Deadline for Submissions January 1, 2020 Call for Papers for an Edited Book on The Future of Holocaust Testimonies: Preserving, Researching, and Re-Presenting Survivor’s Voices Boaz Cohen (WGC), Wolf Gruner (USC), Miriam Offer (WGC), and Thomas Pegelow Kaplan (ASU) Survivors and their testimonies have been central to Holocaust research and memorial culture. Even before the end of the Shoah, survivor historians in parts of Eastern Europe liberated from Nazi occupation collected testimonies and conducted interviews with fellow survivors. These practices constituted an integral part in rebuilding lives, coping with trauma, and shaping collective memories (Laura Jockusch). The 1960s trials of Nazi perpetrators, which were increasingly driven by Holocaust survivor-witnesses, laid the groundwork for the transformation of survivors into “survivors” in courtrooms from Jerusalem to Frankfurt/Main (Carolyn J. Dean). By the late 1970s and early 1980s, the beginning “era of the witness” (Annette Wieviorka), survivors and their testimonies were subject to further changes in increasingly transnational Holocaust memory cultures. Accompanying the rise of Holocaust Studies in North America and parts of Europe, survivors assumed often prominent positions in public discourse, frequently spoke in communities, schools, and universities, and—imbued with moral authority—conveyed a range of lessons about past and future genocides. During the 1990s, audio-visual projects, most noteworthy by the Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation (now USC Shoah Foundation), recorded Holocaust survivor voices around the globe in unprecedented numbers, further elevating their standing and significance. At the same time, international Holocaust scholarship shifted from a preoccupation with perpetrator records to the voices and agency of persecuted Jewish populations that had already been at the center of the work of many Israeli scholars for decades. At the end of the twenty-first century’s second decade, most adult survivors of the Holocaust are no longer with us and more and more child survivors – brought into sharp focus by the recent death of prominent survivor-activists like Eva Kor – are passing away. In the U.S. today, the number of survivors has shrunk by about half to under 70,000 in the span of the last decade. In Israel, the survivor population had fallen to less than 150,000 by 2015. Estimates for 2025 put this figure closer to 45,000. In response, various organizations have stepped up their efforts to record accounts from remaining survivors. The USC Shoah Foundation has introduced its “New Dimensions in Testimony” project that records three-dimensional, interactive testimonies of Holocaust survivors, which it is making available at museums throughout the United States. With fewer and fewer survivors remaining among us, educators and researchers need to reconsider how and in what forms Holocaust scholarship and the memory of the Holocaust will continue. The main focus will certainly be the legacy that survivors leave behind in the forms of written, audio, and video testimonies. Holocaust testimonies have been studied in a myriad of ways. Many scholars have analyzed the devastating impact of the genocide on the survivors. They have focused on a range of factors from trauma to identity formation. Others have examined the transmission of survivor testimony to their children and grandchildren, who have their own stories to tell and are profoundly shaped by what some have conceptualized as “postmemory” (Marianne Hirsch). A different body of scholarship has shed light on survivors and their testimony in the broader societal contexts of Holocaust consciousness and memory. Still others, especially some cohorts of historians, have shifted the focus back to what these testimonies reveal about the actual events of the Shoah. A number of historians have proposed to take these sources at face value and dismissed approaching them with “cautious skepticism” (Jan Gross). Still others have compared larger bodies of testimonies, constructed “collected” and “core” memories (Christopher R. Browning), and used them as the main sources for monograph-length studies of the Shoah. This edited volume sets out to reevaluate the study and role of Holocaust testimonies in the twenty-first century. The prospect of a world without Holocaust survivors poses profound challenges, precisely because their testimony has become so central to Holocaust memory, education, and research since the 1980s. Scholarly work on survivor testimony is done today in many academic disciplines. The rich and varied corpus of testimonies requires the collaborative efforts of researchers across disciplines to enable us to hear the voices of survivors articulated through their testimonies. This volume takes stock of the extensive work that has been accomplished, discusses the challenges, and explores new ways of preserving, analyzing, and re-presenting Holocaust survivor testimonies at this critical time. In light of these objectives, we are welcoming contributions by scholars from a wide variety of disciplines, ranging from history and literary analysis to linguistics and genocide studies as well as from psychology and neuroscience to anthropology and memory studies. The editors encourage a broad variety of approaches from empirically oriented case studies to theoretical and methodological reflections. We also invite comparative work, contrasting testimony by Holocaust survivors with survivors of other genocides, and cross- and transnational studies. Lastly, we only accept work that has not already been published elsewhere. The essays should address some of the following questions without being limited by them:
  • What are the meanings and conceptualizations of “Holocaust testimony”?
  • What are the key methodological and theoretical approaches in the study of Holocaust testimonies? What are these approaches’ accomplishments and shortcomings and how can we sharpen our readings of these invaluable sources?
  • How should Holocaust testimonies be classified and categorized?
  • What role do gender, occupation, age, place, and/or time play?
  • What are the insights and challenges of analyzing multiple testimonies given by the same survivors at different times after 1945?
  • How does video testimony differ from other forms of testimony (written, audio and the like)? What specific approaches does the study of these testimonies require?
  • How do the changing contexts (oral history, courtroom testimony, public presentation, conversation among survivors and the like) in which testimonies are given impact their form and outcome?
  • How have Holocaust testimonies shaped the construction of history and memory cultures? To what extent did the increasing significance of testimonies and their collection since the 1990s reflect a crisis in confidence in academic history and the work of professional historians and scholars of related disciplines? How do testimonies affect and/or change historical understanding and memorialization?
  • What insights do early Holocaust testimonies (of the 1940s and 1950s) convey? How do they differ from later testimonies (since the 1980s)? Is there a need for re-reading and re-interpretation and what forms would it take?
  • What are the challenges of a time in the not too distant future, when there will be no more Holocaust survivors to give testimony?
  • What is the role of second- and third-generation Holocaust testimony? What are the prospects and limits of concepts such as postmemory? What can we learn from studies of intergenerational transmission of trauma and resilience?
  • What are the prospects and limitations in the use of three-dimensional, interactive testimonies of Holocaust survivors such as the USC Shoah Foundation’s “New Dimensions in Testimony” project for Holocaust education, memory, and research?
  • What strategies have Holocaust deniers employed to undermine Holocaust testimonies? What is the role of survivor-witnesses and their testimonies in combatting Holocaust denial?
Please submit an abstract of up to 400 words (including title) and a 100-word bio to Boaz Cohen (BoazC@wgalil.ac.il), Wolf Gruner (gruner@dornsife.usc.edu), Miriam Offer (miriamoffer@gmail.com), and Thomas Pegelow Kaplan (thomaspegelowkaplan@appstate.edu) by Jan. 1, 2020.
Contact Info:
Dr. Boaz Cohen Chair Holocaust Studies Program Western Galilee College, Akko Western Galilee College P.O. Box 2125 Akko  24121 Israel Dr. Wolf Gruner Shapell-Guerin Chair in Jewish Studies Shapell-Guerin Chair in Jewish Studies Founding Director of the USC Shoah Foundation Center for Advanced Genocide Research University of Southern California Department of History 3502 Trousdale Parkway Social Sciences Building (SOS) 262 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0034 USA Dr. Miriam Offer Holocaust Studies Program Western Galilee College, Akko Western Galilee College P.O. Box 2125 Akko  24121 Israel Dr. Thomas Pegelow Kaplan Leon Levine Distinguished Professor of Judaic, Holocaust, and Peace Studies Director, Center for Judaic, Holocaust, and Peace Studies Professor of History Appalachian State University P.O. Box 32146 Edwin Duncan Hall, Room 102B Boone, NC 28608 USA
As 2019 draws to a close, here is a brief summary of the life-writing events coming up next term. We have a programme packed with the usual lectures and discussions, as well as the launch of our book, Lives of Houses, a new seminar series on Ancient Lives, and an exciting opportunity to study with us…
Study for a doctorate at OCLW
In 2020 we, in collaboration with the Department of Education and Human Story Theatre, will be awarding the first Derrill Allatt doctoral studentship.Our student will make use of a range of participatory arts-based methods to study the lives of homeless women, exploring the relationship between their experiences in education, broadly defined, and their lives today.More details, including how to apply, can be found here. The deadline is midday, on 24 January 2020.
Launching Lives of Houses
What can a house tell us about the person who lives there? Do we shape the buildings we live in, or are we formed by the places we call home? And why are we especially fascinated by the houses of the famous and often long-dead?In Lives of Houses, edited by Kate Kennedy and Hermione Lee, a group of notable biographers, historians, critics, and poets explores these questions and more through fascinating essays on the houses of great writers, artists, composers, and politicians of the past.During Hilary Term we will celebrate the publication of Lives of Houses with Princeton University Press on several occasions. The dates for your diary are 9 March in London, and 28 March at the Oxford Literary Festival.
Life-writing lectures and discussions
During the term we will welcome Zachary Leader on Ellmann’s Joyce; Benjamin Zephaniah in conversation with Elleke Boehmer and Malachi McIntosh; and Warhol biographer Blake Gopnik.There will be discussion panels on royal biography and maternity, life-writing, and fiction, as well as colloquiums on writing queer lives, authorship and celebrity, and the work of Jenny Diski.All the details are in our Hilary Term Card, and we will send out fortnightly notifications next term.
Life-Writing Research Forums
As always, please do join us in Seminar Room 2 from 1:15 – 2:30 every Tuesday in term for a programme of talks and workshops on life-writing. Topics for Hilary Term include biographical fiction, opera and life-writing, lives of orchestras, and trauma in life-writing. All the details are in our Hilary Term Card.
New Seminar Series on Ancient Lives
We’re delighted to launch a new seminar series on ancient lives, a collaboration between OCLW and the Ancient World Research Cluster at Wolfson College. These seminars will take place in the Leonard Wolfson Auditorium every other Wednesday at 5-30pm, starting on 29 January with a talk on life-writing in an ancient desert. Once again, full details are in the term card and will be in next term’s regular newsletters.We wish you an enjoyable Christmas break, and look forward to seeing you at some of our many events next term.
Deadline for Submissions December 31, 2019
Self-Promotion and Self-Aggrandizement: Accelerating Literary Legacy through Nonfiction South Central Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies February 7-8, 2020, Embassy Suites Hotel, St. Augustine, Florida
This year, Martin Scorsese started a debate about “good cinema” when he boldly asserted that all movies in the Marvel universe were not cinema because “cinema is an art form that brings the unexpected,” where superhero movies are formulaic, and nothing is at stake (New York Times 2019). Scorsese’s opinion piece inspired multiples of movie critics, other directors, actors, and moviegoers to respond, either agreeing or disagreeing with him. This debate also motivated questions about the definition of an “art form” and who is qualified to define that term. Specifically, a lot of people criticized the obvious self-serving nature of a film director (who had a movie coming out) attempting to define himself as a creator of an art form and his movies as “art.” Likewise, in the eighteenth-century, writers constantly tried to define what “good literature” was in a way that included their own works or those of their friends and mentors. Beginning in the Restoration, long eighteenth-century writers engaged in pamphlet wars and wrote encomiums and invectives to one another through play dedications and satires—including mock epics and imitations. Writers also composed nonfiction genres such as literary criticism, biographies, collections of letters, and literary histories, wherein their attempted to situate themselves or their friends in a “Literary” framework (and by contrast, they attempted to situate their literary enemies outside this framework). We can trace a kind of adjudication of “Literature” through these genres in the eighteenth century. This is a panel at the 2020 SCSECS Conference in St. Augustine, FL and is interested in the ways writers of the long eighteenth-century (American, British, or otherwise) used nonfiction genres such as life writing, literary criticism, literary history, pamphlets, author’s notes, etc. to create a literary legacy for themselves or members of their literary coterie. You may also discuss how writers of this period used these types of writings to create negative literary legacies for their competitors and enemies. Please submit a brief paper proposal to Dr. Lindsay Emory Moore at LEMoore@collin.edu by December 31, 2019. Lindsay Emory Moore is a Professor of English at the Spring Creek campus of Collin College in Plano, TX.
For more information http://scsecs.net/scsecs/2020/2020_panels.html * Deadline for Submissions, December 31, 2019 INDIGENOUS MOBILITIES Travelers through the Heart(s) of Empire Wednesday 17th – Friday 19th June 2020 Reid Hall, Paris KEYNOTE SPEAKERS –     David A. Chang (University of Minnesota) –     Nika Collison (Haida Gwaii Museum) –     Michael H. Crowe (Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians) In 2006, Anishinaabe artist Robert Houle (Sandy Bay First Nation) conceived Paris/Ojibwa during his residency at La Cité des Arts in Paris. Partly a commemoration of the 1845 visit of Maungwudaus and his troupe of performers, and partly a “reply” to the contemporary responses of French writers and artists the work reflects on the history and politics of encounter, and on disappearance. The piece recalls Indigenous ties to the land, while also alluding to the untimely deaths of members of Maungwudaus’s troupe and family while on tour. The resulting installation invited renewed encounter between Parisian publics and that Anishinaabe history, through a contemporary Anishinaabe presence in the city. This conference, drawing on the work of the “Beyond the Spectacle: Native North American Presence in Britain” project, seeks to build on the growing body of work examining Indigenous travel across the Atlantic, broadening the scope of our present project from Britain to Europe more broadly, and from North American/transatlantic to global concerns. If Houle’s project is one example of the ways travel both creates and illuminates historical memory, while also offering the opportunity to examine and enliven ongoing connections between Indigenous and European spaces and communities, how else do these legacies of colonialism manifest on European soil? How do they critique and commemorate that past? How do/can they transcend the colonial context? And what do they mean to contemporary communities, whether Indigenous or European? Maungwudaus and others left accounts of their experiences in Europe; what do those accounts, and contemporary reverberations such as Houle’s artwork, do to their public audiences’ understanding of the spaces they travelled through, as well as the places they came from? How do they inflect an Indigenous-centred understanding of the transnational turn; deflect or otherwise destroy the binary of Indigenous (local/static) and modern (global/mobile); or contribute to the exigencies of post-Imperial history and its implications in other fields? And finally, what practical, material change can the examination of these moments and modes of encounter, in spaces that invite collaboration between Indigenous and European participants, bring about for current practice in academia, museum studies, and the culture industry more broadly, particularly in regard to the relationships between institutional practitioners and communities? We welcome the full range of traditional approaches—20 minute papers, panels, roundtables—and are very open to more innovative responses to subject matter—poster presentations, video presentations, performances, collaborative/interactive sessions, as well as to non-academic proposers. Topics that may be covered include, but are not limited to: –       Historic and contemporary journeys by both individuals and groups—their root causes and impacts, e.g.: Sport, military (esp. the First and Second World Wars), activism, commerce, diplomacy, captivity, and performance –       Commemorations /reverberations of historical journeys –       The legacies of travel to home communities (incl. artistic and literary responses) –       The ‘residues’ of travel in destination communities (incl. artistic and literary responses) –       ‘encounter’ between different groups of non-European travellers –       How to make European archives more accessible to Indigenous scholars and communities –       Decolonizing European archives and institutions –       Fostering Indigenous-centred Indigenous Studies in Europe –       What it means to be gathering in Paris (or any other major city of a colonising power) –       Fostering mutual, ethical relations between IS practitioners in Europe and Indigenous communities –       Reframing Centre and Periphery –       Confronting/transcending the spectacle Papers: please send 250 word abstracts and a short bio. Panels: panel proposals of no more than 3 speakers should include a 100 word summary of the overall theme, plus 250 word abstracts per speaker. Please include short bios for all contributors, including chairs/respondents. Roundtables: please outline the proposed discussion in roughly 250-300 words and include bios of all intended participants that make clear how they will contribute to the discussion. All Other Formats: please describe the intended contribution in 250 words or so, include a brief bio, and a full list of any facilities (space dimensions, audio-visual, etc.) that would be required so that we can understand feasibility. Please send all proposals to: beyondthespectacle@kent.ac.uk by 31 December 2019.
Deadline for Submissions December 30, 1019
Call for Papers Life Writing in Translation (Conference) King’s College London / Centre for Life-Writing Research / 27 May 2020 The Centre for Life-Writing Research is a pioneering group producing some of the most innovative work in the field. Established in 2007, and now part of the Arts & Humanities Research Institute, it enables experts and students to share, research and exchange ideas with a wider audience. We work on all sorts of topics and periods covering a wide range of genres – biography, autobiography, autofiction, diaries and letters, memoirs, digital life writing including social media, blogs, audio and video, the visual arts (especially portraiture), poetry, and medical narratives. What connects us is an interest in the theory, history and practice of life writing. It’s more that when it comes to writing and reading translations the question of what is wholly normal or truly plausible, of what was really said or written, gets suspended, slightly. The translator asks me to agree to its suspension. To suspend, or to suspend even further, my disbelief. /…/ Which is to say: before we’re even in the position to critique or worry over the decisions made by the translator, some provisional agreement has already been made. We have accepted the book in English. We have accepted that the book is now written in what appears to be English. (Kate Briggs, This Little Art) As a one-day conference, Life Writing in Translation proposes to address such topics as:
  • Stylistic approaches to translating life writing: using style to translate mind, foregrounding, ambiguous translation, belle infidèle, the implied translatorA reader of translation will receive a sort of split message coming from two different addressers, both original although in two different senses: one originating from the author which is elaborated and mediated by the translator, and one (the language of the translation itself) originating directly from the translator. (Schiavi 1996)
  • Translating as re-writing: reconstructing the author’s image and lived experience, the translator’s impact, re-translationIn the case of translated autobiography, subtle variations of style may give rise to significant shifts in point of view that constructs a different persona of the autobiographer. (Xu Yun 2017)
  • Cross-cultural translation of life writing: translator as the producer of relations – is the I international?We receive these books newly made by the hands of translators, and the small contracts that those hands make, between translator and writer, reader and translator, language and language,
culture and culture, experience and experience are, as Edith Grossman puts it, as vital to our continued reading and writing, to the vitality of our language, our cultures and experiences as the books themselves. (Kate Briggs, This Little Art)
  • Becoming one: the translator’s melding with the author and its curious consequencesLike the ghostwriter, the translator must slip on a second skin. Sometimes this transition is gentle, unobtrusive, without violence. But sometimes the settling in is abrupt, loud, and even disagreeable. For me, “plunge deep” tactics that go beyond the mechanics of translation help: coaxing out references to reconstruct the author’s cultural touchstones (books, film, music); reading passages aloud, first in the original and then in translation, until hoarseness sets in; animating the author’s story through my senses, using my nose, my ears, my eyes, and my fingers; devouring every clue to imprint the range of the author’s voice (humor, anger, grief, detachment) on my translation. (Lara Vergnaud, The Paris Review)
  • The translator-reader contract: the tole of the ‘active’ readerI think of Renee Gladman, poet, novelist and translator, asking her interviewer in an interview: ‘When you’re reading translations, don’t you sometimes feel the racing heartbeat of the translator trying to get shit right?’ /…/ And the question is: Well, do you? Do I? Reading translations, is this the kind heat that you or indeed I want to feel? Or no, not really, not al all? (Kate Briggs, This Little Art)
  • Publishing perspectives: how publishers and booksellers tackle life writing in translation – the ‘three percent problem’We welcome academics, translators, poets, writers, booksellers and publishers and invite proposals for individual papers, dialogues/interviews, panels, round tables and creative or reflective submissions. Please send your proposals via email to pia.prezelj@kcl.ac.uk.Conference language: English Suggested formats:
  • −  Individual paper (15 minutes slot, abstract max. 300 words)
  • −  Dialogue/Interview (30 minutes slot, 2 participants, abstract max. 300 words)
  • −  Panel (60 minutes slot, 3 participants including chair, abstract max. 600 words)
  • −  Round Table (45 minutes slot, 3/4 participants, abstract max. 600 words)
  • −  Creative/Reflective Submission (15 minutes slot, fiction and non-fiction, proposal max. 300 words)
  • Deadline for proposals: 23 December 2019 Notification of acceptance: 27 January 2020
 *
Deadline for Submissions December 30, 1019
Special Issue on Post-millennial Indian Graphic Narratives (12/30/2019) Guest Editors: E. Dawson Varughese, Sakshi Wason and Varsha Singh The post-millennial years have witnessed significant developments in the field of popular visuality in South Asia and for India at least, a liberalised economy, advancements in digital technology, satellite television, urban beautification projects and a publishing boom have all shaped what we see, how we see it and why we see it. Within this post-millennial, economic, socio-cultural context Indian graphic narratives have taken their place and now, nearly twenty years into a sustained and successful period of their production, there is need to take stock of the field, reflecting on their creation, circulation, on artistic practice as well as domestic and global reception. Although the early years of the 2000s saw steady production and (in particular, domestic) circulation of Indian graphic narratives, research and scholarship has taken a little time to gain similar momentum but as the canon of creative work has grown, scholarship, particularly in the last seven to ten years has proved to be more sustained, more global and wider in its scope of enquiry. The field now enjoys some key academic texts in addition to many chapters and academic papers. The aim of this Special Issue is to publish a selection of academic papers that take stock of the field, reflecting on, exploring and presenting key themes, tropes and directions that the Indian graphic narratives scene has known over the last 15-20 years. Several invited, creative pieces will also appear in the Special Issue. As editors, we are interested in examining the last twenty years of Indian graphic narratives production through the following (and other related) topics, keeping in mind the over-arching theme of ‘reflection’ and ‘taking stock’:
  • The post-millennial Indian publishing scene and Indian graphic narratives (global corporates, domestic, independent presses and story houses)
  • Theoretical approaches to post-millennial Indian graphic narratives (‘West and East’ notions of visuality, ‘reading’ graphic narratives and production as possible topics)
  • Graphic narratives of the early post-millennial years – Sarnath Banerjee, Orijit Sen, Vishwajyoti Ghosh as examples
  • Comics collectives in India and co-created/curated anthologies of graphic narrative work
  • Hindu epics, mythology, the dystopian in Indian graphic narratives (such as the works of Appupen, Amruta Patil as examples)
  • Biography-based Indian graphic narratives
  • Socially-engaged Indian graphic narratives
  • Graphic non-fiction (such as the First Hand volumes of work)
  • Indian graphic narrative artistic production and research (practice-based research papers are welcome)
We invite academic papers of around 5000-7000 words formatted according to T&F’s Reference Style of Chicago Author-Date [For full information on this style, see The Chicago Manual of Style (16th edn) or http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html (click on the tab marked author-date to ensure you are using the right style)] Timeline CfP in circulation: July to December 2019 Deadline for full papers: 30th December 2019 Decisions on papers between 31st January – 29th February 2020 Revisions on papers to be completed during March – May 2020 Preparation for Publication June 2020 – December 2020 Publication of Special Issue in 2021 For initial queries please email Dr E. Dawson Varughese: edawsonvarughese@gmail.com
Contact Info:
Primary Respondent: Emma Dawson Varughese, Independent Scholar UK and Snr Fellow at Manipal Centre for Humanities, Manipal, India Fellow Respondents: Sakshi Wason, the University of Delhi, India, Varsha Singh, IIT Jammu, India
*
*
Deadline for Submissions December 23, 2019
Desired Identities New Technology-based Metamorphosis in Japan
April 29-30, 2020
Paris, France
This conference is organized by the ERC-funded research project ‘Emotional Machines: The Technological Transformation of Intimacy in Japan’ (EMTECH), in partnership with the Department of Research and Higher Education of the quai Branly museum – Jacques Chirac.
Description
In 2019, the population of Japan is at 124.9 million, but what if we include ‘character residents?’ As if to compensate for the declining birth-rate, characters proliferate. They welcome you in front of restaurants. They invite you for countryside tours. They smile on key holders, transportation cards, bags, screens and panels. Acting as interfaces between people, objects and spaces, they now invade social networks up to the point where a whole industry of character-camouflage is now prompting web users to merge with videogame-like creatures. How can we understand this phenomenon? What social changes does it contribute to shape and to mirror?In the course of an international conference, researchers from various disciplines are invited to share their experiences and outcomes concerning this phenomenon, in Japan (as well as in Korea or in similar research fields). This phenomenon has been termed
kyara-ka, ‘transforming into a character’ (Aihara Hiroyuki, 2007) and it is now giving birth to what Nozawa Shunsuke (2013) calls ‘an emerging art of self–fashioning.’ Based on elaborate disguise techniques, the kyara-ka phenomenon covers a variety of communication strategies and practices. The most famous is of course cosplay, which enables men and women to conceal their identity and to act as a character. Kigurumi, the radical version of cosplay, implies the making of a second skin, a helmet like head and, recently, a vocoder. As a matter of fact, kyara-ka has also generated a movement of people who record their voices using synthetic voice technology, in order to become what they call an utaloid (artificial singer). The phenomenon is also accountable for huge trends such as the use of image filters to upload TikTok viral videos, or the development of software applications that turn humans into animated avatars. Virtual-Tubers, who are real people with a digital manga-style appearance, are now becoming celebrities on YouTube. The most famous pretend to be Artificial Intelligences. Some of them may indeed be the equivalent of Virtual Idols (i.e. products designed by talent agencies) and their popularity is so high that they now become characters in Love Simulation Games. As nobody knows their real face, they may as well be purely fictitious persons.
Exploring all the aspects of this ‘thingification of humans’, the conference will reflect on how and why a growing number of people market themselves as characters. In contemporary societies, where individuals must compete (Pierre Bourdieu, 1979), the need to differentiate paradoxically results in the adoption of customized identities and normative e-bodies shared by media culture consumers. It would be easy of course to denounce this ‘Society of the Spectacle’ (Guy Debord, 1967) where branding yourself is a form of salvation, but such analysis would fail to acknowledge the specificity of these auto-commodification acts. The singular dimension of the kyara-ka phenomenon is the desire to be erased as a mortal being and to be reborn as a member of a collective fantasy. It is not only about role-playing or promoting your self, it is about seeing the world from a floating or spectral point of view, the point of view of someone (something?) which is inside the character shell. To what extent can we consider kyara-ka as part of the real digital revolution that Dominique Boullier (2016) describes in terms of an ‘immersive framework of thinking?’
The conference goal is to address the complexity of issues raised by these voluntary and, perhaps, ironical acts of obliteration. What is the profile of men and women who transform themselves into computer-graphic creatures? How do they deal with being loved only through their digital alter ego? How do they cope when the alter ego is not of the same gender? What image/voice-processing filters do they use, and in which contexts? What little or grand narratives are being produced alongside? Can we still deal with the phenomenon in terms of authenticity (original) versus artificiality (copy)? How does such a phenomenon affect networked sociability? What negotiations or refusals underly the use of characters as social masks?
For Social and Human Sciences, this rising phenomenon constitutes a strategic research object as it offers a particularly interesting vantage point on social phenomena such as the Construction of Digital Identities and the Business of Gamification.
Submission guidelines
Abstracts must be submitted BEFORE DECEMBER 23 2019, in English and sent by email to agnes.giard@fu-berlin.de in PDF format. The submissions (between two and three pages) must include a title, an abstract and a short biography of the author (including name and affiliation).
You can find the details in the attached file or on the following link.
Thank you for helping me disseminate this Call.
I am gladly waiting for  your proposals,
Agnès Giard
Contact Info:
Agnès GIARD
Postdoctoral researcher at Freie Universität Berlin (European research Project “Emotional Machines: The Technological Transformation of Intimacy in Japan”)
Associate researcher University of Paris Nanterre (Sophiapol laboratory)
Contact Email:
* Deadline for Submissions December 23, 2019

Life Writing in Translation (12/23/2019; 5/27/2020) King’s College London / Centre for Life-Writing Research

As a one-day conference, Life Writing in Translation proposes to address such topics as: • Stylistic approaches to translating life writing: using style to translate mind, foregrounding, ambiguous translation, belle infidèle, the implied translator A reader of translation will receive a sort of split message coming from two different addressers, both original although in two different senses: one originating from the author which is elaborated and mediated by the translator, and one (the language of the translation itself) originating directly from the translator. (Schiavi 1996) • Translating as re-writing: reconstructing the author’s image and lived experience, the translator’s impact, re-translation In the case of translated autobiography, subtle variations of style may give rise to significant shifts in point of view that constructs a different persona of the autobiographer. (Xu Yun 2017) • Cross-cultural translation of life writing: translator as the producer of relations – is the I international? We receive these books newly made by the hands of translators, and the small contracts that those hands make, between translator and writer, reader and translator, language and language, culture and culture, experience and experience are, as Edith Grossman puts it, as vital to our continued reading and writing, to the vitality of our language, our cultures and experiences as the books themselves. (Kate Briggs, This Little Art) • Becoming one: the translator’s melding with the author and its curious consequences Like the ghostwriter, the translator must slip on a second skin. Sometimes this transition is gentle, unobtrusive, without violence. But sometimes the settling in is abrupt, loud, and even disagreeable. For me, “plunge deep” tactics that go beyond the mechanics of translation help: coaxing out references to reconstruct the author’s cultural touchstones (books, film, music); reading passages aloud, first in the original and then in translation, until hoarseness sets in; animating the author’s story through my senses, using my nose, my ears, my eyes, and my fingers; devouring every clue to imprint the range of the author’s voice (humor, anger, grief, detachment) on my translation. (Lara Vergnaud, The Paris Review) • The translator-reader contract: the tole of the ‘active’ reader I think of Renee Gladman, poet, novelist and translator, asking her interviewer in an interview: ‘When you’re reading translations, don’t you sometimes feel the racing heartbeat of the translator trying to get shit right?’ /…/ And the question is: Well, do you? Do I? Reading translations, is this the kind heat that you – or indeed I – want to feel? Or no, not really, not al all? (Kate Briggs, This Little Art) • Publishing perspectives: how publishers and booksellers tackle life writing in translation – the ‘three percent problem’ We welcome academics, translators, poets, writers, booksellers and publishers and invite proposals for individual papers, dialogues/interviews, panels, round tables and creative or reflective submissions. Please send your proposals via email to pia.prezelj@kcl.ac.uk. Conference language: English Suggested formats: − Individual paper (15 minutes slot, abstract max. 300 words) − Dialogue/Interview (30 minutes slot, 2 participants, abstract max. 300 words) − Panel (60 minutes slot, 3 participants including chair, abstract max. 600 words) − Round Table (45 minutes slot, 3/4 participants, abstract max. 600 words) − Creative/Reflective Submission (15 minutes slot, fiction and non-fiction, proposal max. 300 words) Deadline for proposals: 23 December 2019 Notification of acceptance: 27 January 2020

Deadline for Submissions 12/20/2019 Oral History and the Media OHS Annual Conference 2020 Bournemouth University July 2020th and Saturday 4rdFriday 3 Oral history and the media have an important but complex relationship. The media has long been a significant producer of, and outlet for, oral history.  Classic radio and television productions like The Radio Ballads (1958-1964), Yesterday’s Witness (1969-1981), and The World at War (1973-4) pioneered the use of oral history in the media, giving voice to those who would otherwise have been excluded from both the media and the historical record. Since the 1980s, there has been growing use of oral history in TV and radio documentaries and storytelling, with oral histories now forming an important and popular dimension of history and factual programming and broadcasting. However, the methodological, aesthetic, narrative, and ethical decisions behind these productions – such as who to interview, what questions to ask, and what parts of the interviews end up on the “cutting room floor” – often remain hidden. The relationship between oral history and the media can also be seen in how oral history has been used to explore the histories and experiences of the media itself, with oral history projects charting the development of media companies and organisation. This has coincided with an upsurge of interest in memory and nostalgia related to the experiences of media, such as memories of cinema, books and music. Elsewhere, the advent of new media and social media has fuelled the growth of digital storytelling, interactive documentaries, as well as serialised audio podcasts which draw heavily on oral history testimony. Whilst these new technologies, formats and channels offer new ways of creating, disseminating and consuming oral history, they also raise vital questions about ethics, participation, expertise, audiences, and formats in oral history practice. This conference aims to consider the relationship between oral history and the media, both historically and today, by exploring similarities, differences, opportunities and challenges between media practices and oral history practices, from interviewing to editing, audiences to ethics, covering topics such as:
  • The Use and Misuse of Oral History in the Media
  • Memories of (the) Media: Film, Books, TV, Radio, Theatre, Music.
  • The Influence of the Media on Memory: Mediated Memory and Prosthetic Memory
  • Oral History, Media and Editing: Soundbites, Vox-Pops and the ‘Cutting-Room Floor’
  • Oral History, Media and Interviewing: Intersubjectivity, Questions, and Emotion
  • Journalism, Crisis Oral History and Historical Distance
  • Oral Histories of the Media (professions, organisations and companies)
  • New Media, Social Media and Oral History
  • Changing Media and Formats and its implications for Oral History
  • Archiving, Preservation and Re-use of Oral Histories in the Media
PROPOSALS The deadline for submission of proposals is 20th December 2019. Each proposal should include: a title, an abstract of between 250-300 words, your name (and the names of any copresenters, panellists, etc), your institution or organisation, your email address, and a note of any particular requirements. Most importantly your abstract should demonstrate the use of oral history or personal testimony and be directly related to the conference theme. Proposals that include audio playback are strongly encouraged. Proposals should be emailed to the ORAL HISTORY AND THE MEDIA Conference Manager, Polly Owen, at polly.owen@ohs.org.uk . They will be assessed anonymously by the conference organisers, and presenters will be contacted in January/February 2020 www.ohs.org.uk/conferences/conference-2020/
Date for Conference December 16-17, 2019

Herstory Re-Imagined

A Conference on Women’s Lives in Biographical Fiction and Film

16-17 December 2019 Centre for Life-Writing Research, King’s College London Convenors: Julia Lajta-Novak (Vienna) and Caitríona Ní Dhúill (Durham) How do the lives of historical women become the raw material of novelists and filmmakers? This conference addresses the current boom in biographical novels and biopics about women’s lives, encompassing a broad conception of ‘woman’ that includes queer and trans life narratives. Figures as diverse as Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine, poet Sylvia Plath, surgeon James Miranda Barry, painter Artemisia Gentileschi, and actress Jiang Qing are the subjects of fictions in various formats and degrees of literary ambition, while pilot Amelia Earhart, stateswoman Margaret Thatcher, blues singer Bessie Smith, and first lady Jackie Kennedy – to name just a very few – have been prominently re-imagined on the silver screen. This conference aims to bring studies of biofiction and biopics into close dialogue with gender-sensitive approaches to biography, so as to shed light on the interactions between life writing, fiction, and dynamics of gender. Programme: https://herstory-reimagined.net/programme/ Registration: https://estore.kcl.ac.uk/conferences-and-events/academic-faculties/faculty-of-arts-humanities/arts-humanities-research-institute/herstory-reimagined-womens-lives-in-biographical-fiction-and-film
*
*
Deadline for Submissions December 15, 2019
Deadline for Submissions, December 15, 2019 Call for Book Proposals for the Real Lives in Global Perspective Series
Call for book proposals for the series, Real Lives in Global Perspective. Published by Routledge, the purpose of this series is to teach key social, economic, political, and cultural developments in world history to first year university students using parallel biographies as a framework. The books will juxtapose figures facing similar situations in different geographical regions, with one book for each century, each containing four pairs of biographies. The authors should be experts in the appropriate time period willing to research a variety of geographic areas. Deadline: December 15
Contact Info:
Rebecca Boone Lamar University
Contact Email:
*
Fourth Annual Symposium Unhinging the National Framework: Transnational Life Writing Friday, 6 December, 2019 Atrium, Medical Faculty Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 BT Amsterdam 09.30 – 10.00       Welcome with coffee and tea 10.00 – 11.00       Opening Keynote Address + discussion Prof. dr. Sonja Boon, author of What the Oceans Remember: Searching for Belonging and Home (2019), Department of Gender Studies, Memorial University, Newfoundland, Canada Speculative Lives: Haunted Yearnings for Impossible Pasts 10.45 – 11.30       Dr. Esther Captain (KITLV) and Dr. Guno Jones (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) Postcolonial Transnational (Family) Histories 11.30 – 12.00       Coffee break 12.00 – 12.30       Dr. Karin Willemse, Department of History, Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication, Rotterdam Re-membering Those Who Left: Abandoned Houses as Archives of (In)Tangible Nubian Heritage 12.30 – 13.00       Interview with Dr. Lizzy van Leeuwen, independent scholar and biographer, by Yvette Kopijn (University of Amsterdam) 13.00 – 13.15       Discussion 13.15 – 14.00       Lunch 14.00 – 14.15       Research pitches Unhinging the National Framework 14.15 – 15.15       Keynote Address + discussion Prof. dr. Elleke Boehmer, Professor of World Literature in English, University of Oxford, England, biographer and author of fiction Unhinging the National Framework through Curricular Change 15.15 – 15.45       Coffee break 15.45 – 16.30       Dik van der Meulen, biographer King William III. A Boundless Royal Dr. Monica Soeting, European Journal of Life Writing Queen Emma, the Sweetest Grandmother of Europe 16.30 – 17.00       Interview with Dr. Frank Dragtenstein, historian and Surinamist, by Prof.dr. Susan Legêne (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) Dr. Babs Boter Lecturer in American and English Literature , Department of Language, Literature, and Communication Faculty of Humanities T +31 20 59 82814 | b.boter@vu.nl | WORKING DAYS: Mo, We, Th, Fr MAILING AND VISITING ADDRESS: De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam Disclaimer Twitter: @VUamsterdam
*
Deadline for Submissions December 2, 2019
Postdoctoral Fellowships at the University of Alberta tied to Life Writing Projects (12/2/2019) Hello Life Writing People, My institution has two types of postdoctoral fellowships available–both are open to Canadians and non-Canadian recent PhD graduates. I can sponsor one person each if you want to study a life writing topic in the Department of English and Film Studies. The University of Alberta is a large state-sponsored research-intensive university. We’ve got the second-best academic library in Canada. Edmonton is a liveable city (we’re far north, but not that expensive). If you come here, you can be part of two life writing projects: the Stories of Change research group (humanists and social scientists working together about stories and social change in music, visual art, sociology, cultural studies and literature studies) and the Life Writing Virtual Network and Virtual Conference that I’m building as part of my Tory Chair. Deadline for all documents is December 2, 2019. If you are interested (or you know a PhD graduate who is), read the links below and contact me–I can sponsor one postdoc each–so I’ll be sponsoring first-come first served. Winning isn’t guaranteed, but there’s a reasonable chance of success right now, so think about it! https://www.ualberta.ca/research/support/post-doctoral-office/awards-funding/u-of-a-fellowships https://www.ualberta.ca/english-film-studies Julie Rak Henry Marshall Tory Chair Department of English and Film Studies University of Alberta Humanities Centre 3-5 Edmonton, AB T6G 2E6, Canada
*
Deadline for Submissions, December 1, 2019
Call for Abstracts: Refugee, Migrant, and Displaced Motherhood in America (12/1/2019) Contributions are invited for a scholarly edited collection that aims to explore literary accounts of migrant, refugee, and displaced motherhood in America. Refugees and migrants are often unseen, or worse seen as an inconvenience or imposition.  Migrant mothers in particular are often overlooked, with their experiences, their needs, and their lives nearly erased. Vu Tran says that “for those who can never quite accept her, a refugee is like a ghost” (p. 154).  This book seeks to examine writings by and about the displaced mother that make her part of a collective imagination, memory, and mythology of the American conscience. Just as we see today in stories from the US/Mexican border, America is a nation of immigrants that continues to see complicated migration and immigration.  Indigenous mothers traverse complex paths at our Northern borders, and refugee mothers seek to resettle their families from wars and other dangers. This book will look primarily at contemporary writings about migrant and refugee mothers in America. This collection is particularly interested in analysis of first-hand accounts of migrant motherhood, while also recognizing that the migrant mother is often silent. Therefore, analysis of both fictional and non-fiction accounts may be of importance as the collection pieces together the fragmented lives of migrant mothers. Dina Nayeri has examined the refugee experience in both her fictional and non-fiction works, Refuge and The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You. In the latter, her non-fiction account, Nayeri talks about how her own mother made the brave decision to take her small children and leave home to ultimately settle in America.  Nayeri says of the refugee, “A tortured mind, terror of a wasted future, is what enables you to abandon home; it’s a prerequisite for stepping into a dingy, for braving militarized mountains” (p. 8). The journey of the migrant woman is made evermore complex by her status as a mother, a child-bearer, and a woman at-risk. The borders of motherhood to be examined in this collection can be linguistic, political, and geographical, along with the complex physicality of moving through liminal and transitory spaces. Chapters may explore a range of topics from the mother figure in refugee children’s literature to ethnographic studies of migrant mothers in detention facilities. I am in talks with several highly reputable academic publishers, including Bloomsbury, that are interested in the collection. Possible topics might look critically at (but not limited to):
  • Narratives about or by migrant or refugee mothers
  • Fictionalized accounts of migrant motherhood
  • Reproduction and migration
  • Rhetoric of migrant motherhood
  • Family separation
  • Family resettlement
  • Research and qualitative studies on women’s experiences as migrant or refugee mothers
  • Refugee children’s literature and the mother figure
References Tran, Vu. “A Refugee Again” In The Displaced: Refugee Writers on Refugee Lives, Edited by Viet Thanh Nguyen, Abrams, NY, NY, 2018 Nayeri, Dina. The Ungrateful Refugee: What Immigrants Never Tell You. Catapult, NY, 2019. Refuge, Riverhead, NY, 2017. Timeline 1 December 2019: Deadline for submitting 250-400 word abstract of your chapter and a 50-word bio. 1 April 2019: Accepted and complete chapters due (6,000 words maximum with MLA format and references) Submissions and questions should be sent to maria.lombard@northwestern.edu * Deadline for Submissions December 1, 2019

“I HAVE BEEN HER KIND.” HOW TO WRITE A WOMAN’S LIFE. THE ITALIAN PERSPECTIVE (12/1/2019; 3/26-28/2020) American Association for Italian Studies 2020, Tucson, Arizona

Carolyn Heilbrun thought there are four ways to write a woman’s life: the woman may do it as autobiography or as fiction; a biographer may tell her story or she may write her own life “in advance of living it, unconsciously, and without recognizing or naming the process.” This panel examines strategies of self-representation in (auto)biographies and novels by Italian women authors from the XX century to the present. We are particularly interested in the relationship between first and third person perspectives: What does it mean for a woman to write the life of another woman? We welcome papers that engage with literary theory (contemporary Italian feminism and queer studies, psychoanalysis) and comparative perspectives. Please send a 150-200 word abstract and brief bio to the session organizer by December 1, 2019. Organizer: Mattia Mossali, The Graduate Center – City University of New York, mmossali1@gradcenter.cuny.edu * Deadline for Submissions December 1, 2019
Call for Papers: “Mapping Black Women’s Lives” Special Issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies 36.2 Spring 2021 www.tandfonline.com/rautSubmissions Deadline: December 1, 2019 For this special issue of a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, we seek papers that employ diverse and/or interdisciplinary methodologies to recover and situate (geographically and theoretically) Black female lives throughout the African diaspora. How do we write with and against archival silences and violences? What role does digitization play in making visible or further marginalizing Black women’s life writing? We are particularly interested in scholarly efforts that redefine, transform, or reform the spaces and places in which Black women’s cultural contributions were recorded (or not). Where and how do we map the lives of Black women? Topics include but are not limited to the following:
  • Cartography, maps, mapping, and journeys in Black women’s life narrative
  • Forced displacements
  • Dangerous moves
  • Middle passages as trans-historical consciousness
  • Relationships between faith systems, movement and racialized geographies
  • Examining Diaspora through Life Writing
  • Travel to and through archives
  • How geography shapes who and what we recover
  • Global perspectives on mapping Black women’s lives
  • Methodologies for locating and mapping Black women’s lives
  • Pedagogical approaches to mapping Black women’s lives and/or reading journeys in Black women’s life narratives
  • Autotheoretical approaches to mapping and/or studying Black women’s lives in transit
Send original articles of 6000-7000 words (including works cited and notes), including keywords, an abstract, and a brief biographical statement to Kimberly Blockett (kdb13@psu.edu). We welcome essays that include images and are able to print in color without author fees. a/b also publishes ancillary digital and multimedia texts on the journal’s Routledge website. Inquiries welcome. All essays must follow the format of Chicago Manuel of Style (17th edition). Essays submitted for the special issue, but not selected, may be considered general submissions and may be selected for publication. In order to ensure a confidential peer review, remove any identifying information, including citations that refer to you as the author in the first person. Cite previous publications, etc. with your last name to preserve your anonymity in the reading process. Include your name, address, email, the title of your essay, and your affiliation in a cover letter or cover sheet for your essay. It is the author’s responsibility to secure any necessary copyright permissions and essays may not progress into the publication stage without written proof of right to reprint. Images with captions must be submitted in a separate file as 300 dpi (or higher) tiff files with captions. Please indicate placement of images in the text. Guest Editor, Kimberly Blockett, Associate Professor of English at Penn State Brandywine, is a C19 literary historian. She uses archives and cultural geography to examine black female movement and subjectivity. Blockett’s publications include MELUS, Legacy, MLA Approaches to Teaching Hurston, and the Cambridge History of African American Literature. The archival work for her forthcoming monograph and annotated edition of Zilpha Elaw’s Memoirs was funded by fellowships from the Ford Foundation, Smithsonian, NEH, and Harvard Divinity School.
*
Deadline for Submissions, November 30, 2019 Conference on “Restoration Epistolarity” Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen, 27-28 March 2020 The changing media environment of the English Restoration brought forth a sizeable increase in various forms of literary culture, including the birth of large-scale periodical publishing and the ready availability of the letter resulting from the establishment of the Penny Post. Contrary to the widely held consensus that the letter promoted reliability, recent scholarship has stressed the form’s deconstructive potential, allowing both readers and writers to reflect on the mediated nature of writing and the tenuous relationship between sign and reality. At this conference, we will therefore discuss Restoration epistolary culture as intimately tied to media criticism, new forms of corporeality, and changing literary values. Papers on these and related aspects of seventeenth and early eighteenth-century forms of epistolarity are welcome! Confirmed speakers: Prof. Dr. Thomas Beebee (Penn State) Prof. Dr. Helen Berry (Newcastle) Prof. Dr. Markman Ellis (Queen Mary, U London) Prof. Dr. Joe Bray (Sheffield) Please send a 300-word proposal for a 30-minute presentation to both organizers, Jaroslaw Jasenowski (jaroslaw.jasenowski@fau.de) and Gerd Bayer (gerd.bayer@fau.de), by 30 November 2019.
*
Deadline for Submissions, November 30, 2019
Deadline for Submissions, November 29, 2019
Art and Action: Literary Authorship, Politics, and Celebrity Culture (11/29/2019; 3/20-21/2020) Oxford UK
The Oxford Research Centre in the Humanities (TORCH)
Radcliffe Humanities, Woodstock Road, Oxford
Writers and writers’ organisations have a long history of using their public standing and cultural capital to promote causes that transcend the literary sphere, from abolition and gender equality to free expression, anti-war agitation, and environmental issues. This two-day conference explores the intersections of authorship, politics, activism, and literary celebrity across historical periods, literatures, and media. It examines the forms and impact of authorial field migrations between literature and politics and the ways in which they are situated within, and shaped by, structural frameworks that include academic institutions, prize-giving bodies, publishing industries, and literary celebrity culture. Authors have at all times been fiercely outspoken campaigners for a wide range of socio-political causes. At the same time, debates have long revolved around literature as a form of political intervention in its own right, thus undermining the seemingly clear-cut distinction between politics and poetics. This conference hopes to foster such debates and address a wide range of questions: What are the strategies employed by writers in the construction and performance of their public personae as political office-holders, activists, and cultural critics? How do they negotiate the tension between ethics and aesthetics in their public interventions, the potential conflict between authorial and activist selves? How have writers’ literary/political border-crossings been perceived by their audiences and to what extent have they affected their (posthumous) reputations? What are the risks faced by the politically engaged and outspoken writer? Interrogating the ideological dimension of literary celebrity and highlighting the fault-lines between public and private authorial selves, ‘pure’ art, political commitment, and marketplace imperatives, this conference joins current debates on authorship and literary value. It brings together writers, academics, literary activists, and industry stakeholders to explore the wider implications of authors’ political responsibilities and cultural authority in today’s heavily commodified literary marketplace and age of celebrity activism.
Topics may include, but are not limited to: ·       Authors as political office-holders / activists / public intellectuals: forms, manifestations, agendas, challenges of, and responses to, literary/political ‘double acts’ across historical periods, literatures, and cultural contexts ·       Literary celebrity and identity politics: how are the intersections of literary celebrity and politics inflected by categories such as gender, class, and ethnicity? To what extent do they map onto different national and cultural spaces? ·      Writers’ organisations, cultural institutions, and their political agendas: how do writers’ organisations capitalise on the celebrity status of particular writers and what are the potential pitfalls of this practice? What is the relationship between individual and collective agency? ·     The politics of market activism: what is the role of industry stakeholders (e.g. publishers, agents, translators, literary festivals, etc.) in enabling or inhibiting authorial migrations between literature and politics? ·      Literary prizes and politics: literary prizes as cultural consecrating agencies; literary award ceremonies as platforms for political intervention; (celebrity) prize judges as gatekeepers; the impact of literary awards on the cultural capital of winning and shortlisted authors ·   Authors’ political interventions and the media: the impact of transformations in media cultures, industries, and technologies (e.g. digital media) on the articulation and dissemination of critical stances and ideas within the public sphere ·      Literary celebrity, politics, and life-writing: How is the interplay of literary celebrity and politics negotiated and articulated across different life-writing genres? In which ways does the genre (e.g. memoirs, lectures, interviews, broadcasts, social media posts) shape these interrelations and the construction of authorial personae? ·    Authorship and political responsibility: What is the author’s political responsibility and cultural authority in today’s celebrity-driven media society? Is there a need for writers to step outside the literary medium? How do they reconcile their activities with a view of literature as political intervention in its own right? Keynote contributions: –        Benjamin Zephaniah (performance poet, activist, Professor of Poetry and Creative Writing, Brunel University London) –        Antjie Krog (writer and scholar activist, TORCH International Fellow) –    PEN roundtable discussion with Jennifer Clement (PEN International President), Carles Torner (PEN International Executive Director), Margie Orford (former South African PEN President), Rachel Potter (University of East Anglia), Peter McDonald (University of Oxford) Please send your proposal (no more than 250 words) for 20-minute papers along with a short biographical note to sandra.mayer@univie.ac.at by 29 November 2019; applicants will be notified by 20 December 2019. Selected contributions will be considered for inclusion in a peer-reviewed collection or special journal issue. For more information, and to register, please follow this link: https://www.torch.ox.ac.uk/article/call-for-papers-art-and-action-literary-authorship-politics-and-celebrity-culture This conference is convened by Sandra Mayer (University of Vienna / Oxford Centre for Life-Writing) and Ruth Scobie (Mansfield College, Oxford) and supported by The Oxford Research Centre in the Humanities and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) in collaboration with the Oxford Centre for Life-Writing (OCLW).
*
Deadline for Submissions November 25, 2019
European Society for Research on the Education of Adults – Life History and Biography Network Conference 2020 Activism in a troubled world:  auto/biographical and narrative perspectives on struggles for the good and beautiful. Canterbury Cathedral Lodge Thursday 27 February to Sunday 1 March We are pleased to confirm a Second Call for Papers  and the deadline for submission of abstracts for papers and proposals for symposia/workshops is now Monday 25th November. Details of the call and how to submit a proposal can be found at … https://www.canterbury.ac.uk/education/conferences-events/2020/esrea-conference-2020.aspx Very best wishes Alan, Linden and Laura Dr Alan Bainbridge CPsychol SFHEA Senior Lecturer Faculty of Education Canterbury Christ Church University North Holmes Road Canterbury Kent, CT1 1QU UK e-mail: a.bainbridge@canterbury.ac.uk Telephone: 01227 782452 Twitter: @bainbridge­­_edu

The Journal of Epistolary Studies has just published its first issue. I invite you to visit the website at https://journals.tdl.org/jes/index.php/jes to view it. I hope everyone will also consider contributing to a future issue! Best, Gary Schneider, Editor Editor, JES *
Dear IABA List Members This is obviously not a notice for an upcoming conference, or a publishing opportunity. But I thought that list members would be interested to know that Sidonie Smith is being honored on the eve of her retirement from University of Michigan by her colleagues and former and current students. And of course, despite all her contributions to the field over her remarkable career, all involved knew that the best way to acknowledge her continuing influence is to focus the discussion and celebration on the future. Congratulations! * The Future of Life Narrative Studies: A Celebration of the Distinguished Career of Sidonie Smith, the Lorna G. Goodison Distinguished University Professor of English and Women’s Studies. Friday, November 22, 2019, 3222 Angell Hall, University of Michigan.
  • 1:00- 1:45 PM:
    • Welcome and Introduction: June Howard (University of Michigan) and Valerie Traub (University of Michigan)
    • Talk: “Between Auto-Fiction and Counter-Fiction: Writing, Denouncing, Healing”
      • Presenter: Françoise Lionnet (Harvard University)
  • 1:45-2:45 PM:
    • Panel: “Current Research on Autobiographical Acts and Practices”
      • Panelists from the University of Michigan: Sofia Bento, Elise Nagy, Mallory Whiteduck, Rachel Wilson, Sunhay You
      • Moderator: Meg Sweeney (University of Michigan)
  • 2:45-3:00 PM: Break
  • 3:00-4:00 PM:
    • Round Table on the Future of Life Narrative Studies
      • Panelists: Keith Green (Rutgers University- Camden), Jina Kim (Smith College), Liz Rodrigues (Grinnell College)
      • Moderator: Yopie Prins (University of Michigan)
  • 4:00-4:45 PM:
    • Talk: “Collaborators or Co-conspirators? Three+  Decades in Autobiography Studies and the View from Here”
      • Presenter: Julia Watson (The Ohio State University)
      • Moderator: Peggy McCracken (University of Michigan)
  • 4:45-5:15 PM:
    • “Speaking of Sid…”
      • Anne Curzan (Michigan), Jane Johnson (Michigan), Susan Najita (Michigan), David Porter (Michigan), Sheri Sytsema-Geiger (Michigan)
  • 5:15-6:30 PM:
    • Reception in 3241 Haven Hall
Deadline for Submissions, November 15, 2019
EACLALS Triennial Conference 2020: Transcultural Mo(ve)ments: Memories, Writings, Embodiments Date: May 18-22, 2020 Venue: Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales Call for Papers The influence of postcolonial thought has made it a commonplace to acknowledge the coexistence of multiple and plural forms of modernities that have led to great cultural, political, economic and technological shifts in the twentieth and twenty first centuries. In the contemporary globalised world, patterns of migration are aided by technology so that movements and mobility are both physical and virtual: ‘hyper-mobility’ and ‘instantaneous communication’, the effects of which can be seen in the exchange of ideas, languages, and cultural and social forms. The influence of “post-national” transnationalism, characterised by a decentring and deterritorialization, can be seen not only in fully braided economies (EU), the internationalisation of wars (NATO), and global collective identities (ISIS) but is also visible in creative forms within circuits of exchange that reveal the blurring of national boundaries, the mixing of traditions, and the transformation of communities and aesthetics. Transcultural Mo(ve)ments then includes issues of, and tracks shifts among borders, refugees, languages, genders, genres, cultures, and between all sorts of mobilities and interdisciplinarity, among many, many other possibilities. Since the transcultural is often associated with a post-national age, can we still talk of distinct cultures? How do we think of identity without collapsing it into an indistinct homogeny? This call for papers invites responses that examine how these mo(ve)ments have emerged in postcolonial literary works: how are modes of narration influenced by these transcultural movements? As the very notion of transcultural presumes a decentring of national canons how do transnational narrative forms permeate, blend and destabilise origins? How do they forge new languages and create new forms of representation? Do they formulate a new ethics in a new heterogenous world? What is their relationship to those postcolonial works of literature or narratives that focus on binarities? How have transcultural narratives of migration blurred genres and identities in the postcolonial? What are the expressions of these mo(ve)ments that promote wider planetary approaches? How does the term “transcultural” reverberate in postcolonial Wales? This conference invites papers that rethink, rejuvenate and regroup postcolonial studies from within a wide array of transcultural frames and do so from a variety of disciplinary approaches, theoretical perspectives, creative and ARTivist expressions. Papers are invited on topics under the following headings:
  • Transcultural mo(ve)ments and expressions of the present, the patterns, migrations, subjectivities and imaginaries.
  • The production and reception of narrative forms in these transcultural mo(ve)ments.
  • The expressions of ethical lives in transcultural narratives.
  • Canonicity and transcultural literatures.
  • Transcultural and postcolonial.
  • Narrative modes and genres in transcultural literatures.
  • The linguistic turn in transcultural narratives.
  • Transcultural interventions in the postcolonial.
  • Postcolonial transcultural mo(ve)ments from Indigenous perspectives.
  • Transcultural mo(ve)ments of absence into presence.
  • Transcultural and gender.
  • Transcultural and embodiment.
  • Queer, transcultural and the postcolonial.
  • Transcultural and globalisation.
  • Postcolonial ARTivism within the transcultural mo(ve)ments.
  • ‘Hyper-mobility’ and ‘instantaneous communication’.
  • Transcultural memory.
  • Transcultural mo(ve)ments in postcolonial translation.
  • Transcultural and postcolonial cinema and/or the visual arts.
  • Transcultural and mobility.
  • Transcultural and postcolonial engagements.
  Proposals Deadline Extended: November 15th Notification of acceptance by December 6th We invite contributions for 20-minute papers or 90-minute panels addressing the conference topic. Please send a 300-word abstract for individual papers or 450-word abstract for panels, accompanied by a short bionote of all speakers (100-150 words) and 5-6 keywords, to: eaclals2020@cardiff.ac.uk For more information please do not hesitate to contact the conveners of the conference: Radhika Mohanram  mohanramr1@cardiff.ac.uk  and Luisa Pèrcopo percopol1@cardiff.ac.uk
* Deadline for Submissions, November 15, 2019
Stories We Live By: Narrative and Identity. (11/15/2019; 1/20-24/2020) University of Groningen, Netherlands Dear friends and colleagues, I would like to draw your attention to an upcoming Winter School, titled Stories to Live By: Narrative and Identity, organized at the University of Groningen. This Winter School should be of interest to graduate students (MA & PhD) and early career researchers with an interest in narrative, as well as artists, professionals, and teachers. What: A week-long programme on narrative and identity in journalism, sociology, theology, literature, art and other fields and media. Confirmed speakers: Alberto Godioli, Marina Grishakova, Barend van Heusden, Goffe Jensma, Warda el Kaddouri, Stefan Kjerkegaard, Liesbeth Korthals Altes, Tilman Lanz, Sjoerd-Jeroen Moenandar, Ronald Nikolsky, Rick Peters, Anneke Sools and Margaret Tali. Where: University of Groningen, the Netherlands (2 hours by train from Amsterdam Airport) When: 20-24 January 2020 Costs: €375 with or €325 without accomodation DeadlineBefore or on 15 November 2019 Applications: You can apply here More information: see the flyer and programme attached, or visit our website May I ask you to share this message with anyone you think might be interested in applying for the winter school? Kind regards, Sjoerd-Jeroen Moenanda Deadline for Submissions, November 15, 2019
*
Deadline for Submissions, November 15, 2019
CALL FOR PAPERS After(Life) Narratives of #MeToo A Special Issue of Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Guest Editors: Rebecca Wanzo (Washington University in St. Louis) and Carol Stabile (University of Oregon) Submit: Abstracts of 300–500 words in length by November 15, 2019 to metoolifenarratives@gmail.com. Stories of sexual violence are shaped and constrained both by the unrepresentable nature of trauma and conventions of medium and genre (Judith Herman 1992; Leigh Gilmore 2001; Saidiya Hartman 2007; Ariella Azoulay 2008). Fictive and real accounts of sexual violence across time and media can also sometimes absorb discourses that decenter or undermine support for survivors and affirm identity-based, nationalist, and conservative discourses (Ida B. Wells 1892; Birth of a Nation; Central Park Five; Sarah Projansky 2001). While personally and politically vital, the politics of recognition that narrating stories of sexual violence enact are complicated by the ways they move across various political projects, locations, and media (S. Smith and K. Schaffer). The #MeToo movement invites us to rethink the constraints of medium and genre in relationship to disclosures. #MeToo has sought to provide a platform for sharing survivor stories, using the quotidian nature of experiences of sexual violence (from harassment to rape) to force assailants and institutions to reckon with the impact of sexual violence. With limited characters, and in a medium notorious for an alleged lack of nuance, the stories of #MeToo gathered into a powerful collective story that moved beyond the platform, creating perhaps the most massive moment of feminist consciousness-raising since Anita Hill. This special issue of Biography explores storytelling practices emerging after the the 2017 celebrity re-launch of Tarana Burke’s hashtag #MeToo in 2006, narratives shaped by constraints, but also hinting at possible new genres and disruptions: the elliptical disclosure; the power of the celebrity story and its erasures around race, class, and disability, and other identity categories; the tensions between queer and heteronormative narratives; and the difference national context makes. Most of all, we are interested in contributions that invite us to think about how the medium interacts with these disruptions and the extent to which medium may transform storytelling practices and ways of thinking about sexual violence. We welcome pieces that engage questions such as:
  • How do fragmented narratives, solidarity narrative practices, generic conventions governed by social movements, legal concerns, silences that have historically been integral to disclosure, and shifts in listening practices change the nature of the story?
  • How do contemporary movements against sexual violence engage with previous traditions of nonfictional representations of sexual violence?
  • What difference do media—and mediation—make in telling and listening to stories of sexual violence—and to who gets to speak and who is heard?
  • Do projects like Aishah Shahidah Simmons’ #loveWITHaccountability challenge conventional wisdom about whose stories about sexual violence can be told alongside each other—both the injured and people who were silent in the face of the injury? How might restorative justice approaches be folded into media storytelling practices?
  • What roles do identities play in the presentation and reception of #MeToo? For example, how have the conventions of queer life narrative storytelling interacted with stories of sexual injury within the community? How have working-class women, like those at the Ford Motor plants in Chicago, been able to share their stories? How should we think about the difference between the kind of #MeToo story invited by Tarana Burke and the stories from predominately white women celebrities that made international headlines?
  • Do narratives of sexual violence linked across people, media, and time disrupt our understanding of single stories of individual injury?
  • How do we map the differences in transnational #MeToo storytelling, with convergences and divergences in #IAmNotAfraidtoSpeak, #BalanceTonPorc, #Cuentalo, #AnaKaman, #YoTambien, #Losha, #MosqueMeToo, or #QuellaVolteChe? Where do we begin to write the history of women’s struggles to form solidarity over histories of sexual violence? What are the challenges and obstacles women face in forging solidarities?
  • How might we historicize this kind of storytelling in relationship to work done either before #MeToo (#MeuAmigoSecreto, #WhyLoiter, et al.) or in the years before Twitter existed, when women used latrinalia and other forms of cultural expression to share the names of rapists and harassers among themselves? How do we place memoirs discussing sexual violence in conversation with these contemporary storytelling practices of disclosure?
We also welcome papers that use multiple media or modes of storytelling to generate new ways of thinking about global movements against sexual violence and their histories of solidarity and resistance. Multi-authored work, interviews, and collaborative projects are welcome. Please submit 350–500-word abstracts to Rebecca Wanzo and Carol Stabile by November 15, 2019 to metoolifenarratives@gmail.com. Notifications will be sent on December 16, 2019. Articles of up to 10,000 words will be due on June 1, 2020. Biography will arrange for contributors to present papers in workshop format at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa in Honolulu in August 2020.
* * Deadline for Submissions, November 8, 2019
* Posted November 2, 2019
Hello all Does anyone on the list know of work on the relationship between autobiography and periodicals in the nineteenth century? All suggestions gratefully received. Please answer directly, to trev.broughton@york.ac.uk
Trev
Dr Trev Broughton
Reader in English and Related Literature,
Associate, Centre for Women’s Studies
University of York
Part-time (Mondays — Wednesdays)
Office:  Derwent  J 215 b
Co-editor, Journal of Victorian Culture https://academic.oup.com/jvc/pages/Editorial_Board

* Deadline for Submissions, November 4, 2019
Dear IABA List Members, We are working on our annual annotated bibliography of critical and theoretical work on Life Writing, and before finalizing it, we want to make sure it is as timely, inclusive, and extensive as possible. So if during the last year (from November 2018 to December 2019) you have published, edited, or co-edited a book, written an article for a journal or an essay for an edited collection, or completed your doctoral dissertation, we would appreciate having that information, so that we can incorporate it into the list. (There is of course a very good chance that we have already included it—we work on this all year!—but this will make sure your work is noted.) We would request the following information: ·      Full bibliographic information for each text, formatted as per MLA 8 ·      A one-sentence annotation per text We are especially committed to noting publications in languages other than English. If you could provide a translation of the annotation, however, that would be helpful. We would appreciate getting the information by Monday, November 4. Please send your information to Janet Graham (gabiog@hawaii.edu). Thanks in advance. This bibliography usually has between 1,400 and 1,500 entries, and represents the most extensive annual critical survey of the field. We want to make sure your work appears within it!
Paige Rasmussen
Managing Editor
The Center for Biographical Research
Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly
1960 East-West Road Biomed B104
Honolulu, HI 96822
Tel: (808) 956-3774
Find us on Facebook and Twitter!
*
Deadline for Submissions, November 4, 2019

VETERAN IDENTITY, ADVOCACY, AND REPRESENTATION 5th Veterans in Society Conference: (11/4/2019; 3/22-24/20120) St. Louis, USA

contact email:
We invite scholars at all levels—including students and those out of academia—to cross national, cultural, historical, and disciplinary boundaries to reflect on the theme of “Veteran Identity, Advocacy, and Representation.” We encourage and are open to a variety of presentation styles, including but not limited to:
  • Individual Presentations: 75- to 100-word abstract, 250-word proposal
  • Panel Presentation, with 3 to 4 presenters: 150- to 200-word abstract, 750-word 
proposal including potential panelists
  • Poster Presentations, by individual or collaborative presenters (1 poster per 
submission): 150- to 200-word abstract
  • Roundtable Discussion, with 4 or more presenters: 150- to 200-word abstract, 500- 
word proposal
  • Works-in-Progress: back by popular demand, we have scheduled a workshop session specifically for sharing and refining early-stage research and/or engagement projects with kindred scholars and potential collaborators: 500-word proposal (works-in-progress submissions will not undergo peer review)
All submissions should conform to a widely accepted citation style that will be intelligible to an interdisciplinary audience (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago). Unless otherwise noted (under session type), email proposals must include:
  1. a cover letter providing contact information for the author(s), title, and format of the proposed work,
  2. an abstract attached in a separate file (or sheet of paper).Please respect word counts for abstracts by desired session type. Abstracts must be formatted for blind review: no author names, affiliations, or other personally identifiable information.
  3. Email proposals to vis20@umsl.edu
Visit www.veteranology.org for more details about the conference and the Veterans Studies Association.
The  French Directors Project ‘Portraits de cinéastes’  is currently seeking scholars willing to offer biographical entries both literary and personal on  major French directors (1000 words maximum) for the remaining entries of our publication (see below).  If you are interested in contributing please email: frenchdirectorsproject@gmail.com We look forward to hearing from you, Dr Michael Abecassis University of Oxford Language Centre, 12 Woodstock Road Oxford OX2 6HT England Marcel Achard Jean-Jacques Annaud Jacqueline Audry Jacques Becker Claude Berri Guillaume Canet Etienne Chatilliez Patrice Chéreau Eli Chouraqui René Clément Alain Corneau Louis Delluc Raymond Depardon Bruno Dumont Louis Feuillade Francis Girod Jean Grémillon Robert Guédiguian André Hunebelle Benoît Jacquot Christian-Jaque Claude Lelouch Marcel L’Herbier Tonie Marshall Claude Miller Edouard Molinaro Gérard Oury Jean-Marie Poiré Yves Robert Georges Rouquier Francis Veber Ariel Zeitoun Claude Zidi
Contact Info:
Dr Michael Abecassis University of Oxford Language Centre, 12 Woodstock Road Oxford OX2 6HT England frenchdirectorsproject@gmail.commichael.abecassis@mod-langs.ox.ac.uk

Deadline for Submissions November 1, 2019
 

American Elegy, Now

deadline for submissions:
November 1, 2019
full name / name of organization:
ALA American Poetry Symposium (Washington DC, February 20-22, 2020)
contact email:

Call for Papers:

If the English elegy consoles through aesthetic substitution (Sacks), and the modern elegy resists consolation and persists in melancholy or rage (Ramazani), then what forms of memory and mourning avail contemporary American elegists? In this moment of heightened division, instability, and violence, how might elegy answer—or fail—the exigencies of life and death in contemporary America? We invite short talks on the poetry and poetics of mourning for a roundtable discussion, “American Elegy, Now,” at the 2020 ALA American Poetry Symposium. We encourage intersectional approaches, and we especially welcome talks that read American elegy in light of any of the following topics:
  • Environment: climate change; indigenous land rights; water and food chain contamination; anthropocentrism & animal studies

  • Race & Ethnicity: Native sovereignty & tribal recognition; structural racism; the New Jim Crow & the carceral state; public monuments and memorials

  • Gender & Sexuality: trans-, cis-gender, and non-binary women’s elegies; LGBTQIA+ approaches to elegy; disease, illness, mortality, and sex;  responses to the AIDS crisis

  • Disability Studies: mobility impairment; sensory impairment; chronic pain and/or illness; neurodiversity; posthumanism

  • Digital Media: memory and mourning through digital archives, social media, apps, and digital media and online fora

  • Visual Arts: painting, drawing, photography, sculpture, book art; hybrid materials and forms

  • Performance: music, dance, film, performance art

  • Architecture: public and private memorials; funerary statues

  • Fashion: customs of dress; sentimental & mourning jewelry

  • Food: industrial agriculture;  food insecurity

Guidelines:

Please send a 300-word abstract, a 100-word bio, curriculum vitae, and current contact information to Drs. Julie Phillips Brown (brownjp@vmi.edu) and Giffen Mare Maupin (maupin@hendrix.edu) no later than 1 November 2019. Accepted participants must submit complete talks (approximately 1500 words in length) by the end of January, 2020.

About the 2020 ALA Symposium on American Poetry: The Symposium will take place in Washington, DC, from February 20-22, 2020. Please note that the conference registration fee is $175 (the conference fee covers the costs of the conference, including one meal and three receptions). While ALA membership is not required to participate, all participants must register by February 2, 2020.

For more details on the Symposium, please visit:

https://americanliteratureassociation.org/ala-conferences/ala-symposia/american-poetry/

*
Deadline for Submissions November 1, 2019
Call for Papers: 2020 Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association Annual Conference—Biographies Area: Philadelphia, PA (April 15-18, 2020) The Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association annual conference will be held on Wednesday April 15 through Saturday April 18, 2020 at the Downtown Marriott Hotel on Market Street in Philadelphia, PA. Scholars from a wide variety of disciplines will meet to share their Popular Culture research and interests. The Biographies Area is soliciting papers that examine the connections between biography and popular culture. Papers and full panel presentations regarding any aspect of popular culture and biography are encouraged. Potential topics might include: – Biography and entertainment, art, music, theater – Biography and film – Biography and criminal justice – Television programs about biography – Biography and urban legends – Biography and folklore – Biography and literature – Scholarly Biography – Controversial Biography – Psychoanalysis and Biography – Historical Biography – Political Biography – Autobiography Sessions are scheduled in 1½ hour slots, typically with four papers or speakers per standard session.  Presentations should not exceed 20 minutes. The deadline is November 1, 2019. Proposals must be submitted on the conference website. Thank you for your interest! Please direct any queries to the Biographies Area chair: Susie Skarl Associate Professor/Urban Affairs Librarian UNLV Libraries Las Vegas, NV 89154 702.895.2141 susie.skarl@unlv.edu OR susieskarl@gmail.com
*
Deadline for Submissions Nov. 1, 2019
Call for submissions–MLA Approaches to Teaching Volume on Harriet Jacobs’ Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl (11/1/2019)
Harriet Jacobs’ Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl is one of the most frequently taught texts—it appears on syllabi for American literature, African American literature, American history, life writing, and gender or women’s studies courses. It is taught in high schools as well as in colleges and universities. Yet, very few resources are currently available for instructors. Submission are invited, therefore, for a new volume in the MLA’s Approaches to Teaching series on Harriet Jacobs’ Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. Proposed contributions should incorporate a clear pedagogical focus. Possible themes could include the literary, social, historical, political, ideological, and cultural contexts of the narrative, comparisons between Incidents and other texts, the reception and publication history of the narrative, the genre of slave narratives, violence and the threat of violence, editorial collaboration, and many others.Interested contributors should first complete the survey available on the MLA’s website:https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HLVKXJV .Then submit a 500-word abstract as well as a brief c.v. to the editor, Lynn Domina, at ldomina@nmu.edu.Deadline for survey and abstracts: November 1, 2019.
*

Deadline for Submissions October 31, 2019

AUTOETHNOGRAPHY AND SELF-STUDY AS EDUCATION RESEARCH METHODS: CONTINUING DEBATES AND CONTEMPORARY AP

AUTOETHNOGRAPHY AND SELF-STUDY AS EDUCATION RESEARCH METHODS:

CONTINUING DEBATES AND CONTEMPORARY APPLICATIONS

 Edited by

Deborah L. Mulligan*, Emilio A. Anteliz# and Patrick Alan Danaher*,+,^

*University of Southern Queensland, Australia

#Central University of Venezuela, Venezuela

+Central Queensland University, Australia

^University of Helsinki, Finland

FOCUS AND RATIONALE There is recurring and increasing scholarly interest in the ethical and methodological possibilities of autoethnography and self-study as research methods in education (understood broadly and inclusively as encompassing learning and/or teaching in diverse forms and ranging from formal and structured on the one hand to informal and incidental on the other hand). Against the backdrop of that scholarly interest, this proposed edited research book is centred on continuing debates and contemporary applications related to autoethnography and self-study. These continuing debates include the perceived legitimacy and rigour of focusing on the researcher as self, the relationship between that focus and wider conceptualisations of the self and possible opportunities for engaging productively with multiple manifestations of the other and of otherness. These contemporary applications encompass innovative strategies for building on the undoubted affordances of autoethnography and self-study while also addressing their perceived limitations, traversing different disciplines and paradigms, and mobilising inter- and trans-disciplinary and -paradigmatic approaches. ORGANISING QUESTIONS Across the range of issues traversed in the book, it is planned that the following organising questions will be addressed:
  1. What are the genealogical origins and the defining characteristics of autoethnography and self-study?
  2. What are the strengths and limitations of autoethnography and self-study as education research methods?
  3. What are innovative and novel strategies for maximising the strengths and minimising the limitations of autoethnography and self-study?
  4. How do debates about and applications of autoethnography and self-study generate new insights into the character and significance of education research methods?
  5. How do autoethnography and self-study resonate with broader advances in theorising and understanding contemporary life and society?
  6. How can autoethnography and self-study contribute to reconceptualising and reimagining the work and identities of current and future researchers?
CALL FOR CHAPTER ABSTRACTS Abstracts of no more than 250 words are cordially invited as potential chapters for this proposed edited research book. The editors seek submissions that represent a diversity of geographical location, disciplinary focus, and theoretical and methodological approaches, united by a shared focus on the affordances, limitations and possibilities of autoethnography and self-study as productive and potentially transformative education research methods. Please email your abstract and a bionote of no more than 125 words for each chapter author to Deborah.Mulligan@usq.edu.au, emilio.anteliz@gmail.com or Patrick.Danaher@usq.edu.au Feel free to contact by email with the book editors with any questions regarding the formation of your abstract. Abstract deadline: 31 October 2019 EDITOR BIONOTES
  1. Deborah L. Mulligan has spoken at a number of academic symposiums in South East Queensland and has presented in state-wide webinars. Her primary research interest resides in the field of gerontology. Her PhD investigated the role of contributive needs when addressing older men and suicide ideation. Deborah has a strong interest in community capacity building as a means of transforming the lives of older adults and combating the negative stereotypes surrounding this demographic. She is also interested in the long-term effects of research on the participants and the ethical implications of investigating marginalised groups. Email: deborah.mulligan@usq.edu.au
  2. Emilio A. Anteliz is a hydrometeorological engineer who for many years coordinated the provision of learning extension programs, projects and courses by the Faculty of Engineering at the Central University of Venezuela in Caracas, Venezuela to professional engineers and related fields. His research interests include environmental movements, engineering education, informal and lifelong learning, and professional ethics. Email: emilio.anteliz@gmail.com
  3. Patrick Alan Danaher is Professor of Educational Research in the School of Education at the Toowoomba campus of the University of Southern Queensland, Australia. He is also currently an Adjunct Professor in the School of Education and the Arts at Central Queensland University, Australia; and Docent in Social Justice and Education at the University of Helsinki, Finland. His research interests include the education of occupationally mobile communities; education research ethics, methods, politics and theories; and academics’, educators’ and researchers’ work and identities. Email: patrick.danaher@usq.edu.au https://staffprofile.usq.edu.au/profile/patrick-danaher
*
Deadline for Submissions October 31, 2019
Deadline for Submissions October 31, 2019

Call for Chapters: From Self-Portrait to Selfie: Contemporary Art and Self-Representation in the Social Media Age (10/31/2019)

Website: https://www.mdpi.com/books/pdfview/edition/1083 MDPI Books is currently running an edition entitled “From Self-Portrait to Selfie: Contemporary Art and Self-Representation in the Social Media Age”.  Defined as a self-image made with a hand-held mobile device and shared via social media platforms, the selfie has facilitated self-imaging becoming a ubiquitous part of globally networked contemporary life. Beyond this selfies have facilitated a diversity of image making practices and enabled otherwise representationally marginalized constituencies to insert self-representations into visual culture. In the Western European and North American art-historical context, self-portraiture has been somewhat rigidly albeit obliquely defined, and selfies have facilitated a shift regarding who literally holds the power to self-image. Like self-portraits, not all selfies are inherently aesthetically or conceptually rigorous or avant-guard. But, –as this project aims to do address via a variety of interdisciplinary approaches– selfies have irreversibly impacted visual culture, contemporary art, and portraiture in particular. Selfies propose new modes of self-imaging, forward emerging aesthetics and challenge established methods, they prove that as scholars and image-makers it is necessary to adapt and innovate in order to contend with the most current form of self-representation to date. The essays gathered herein will reveal that in our current moment it is necessary and advantageous to consider the merits and interventions of selfies and self-portraiture in an expanded field of self-representations. We invite authors to take interdisciplinary global perspectives, to investigate various sub-genres, aesthetic practices, and lineages in which selfies intervene to enrich the discourse on self-representation in the expanded field today. Ace Lehner, University of California – Santa Cruz (USA) Editor The submission deadline is 31.10.2019. You may send your manuscript now or up until the deadline. Submitted papers should not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Their acceptance will be subject to our regular peer review processes. To check suitability, we encourage authors to send a short abstract or tentative title in advance to the Editorial Office (booksubmission@mdpi.com). MDPI Books is fully open access. Open access (unlimited and free access by readers) increases publicity and promotes more frequent citations, as indicated by several studies. Open access is supported by the authors and their institutes. No Article Processing Charges (APC) apply for well-prepared manuscripts. For further details on the submission process, please see the instructions for authors at our website (https://www.mdpi.com/books/publish_with_us).
Contact Email:
Deadline for Submissions, October 31, 2019

Travel in Arab Women’s Writings and/or Arab Women’s Travel Writings

I am editing a journal volume, of about six articles, on Arab Women’s Travel Writings, or Travel Writings by Arab Women. I am seeking original  scholarly papers, not previously published, about travel writings by Arab women. I will also consider scholarly papers about travel, or the theme of travel, in Arab Women’s writings. Please write to me if you have an idea for a paper on this topic. Thank you.
Contact Info:
Dr. Nawar Al-Hassan Golley Professor in Literary Theory and Gender and Women’s Studies American University of Sharjah
Contact Email:
Deadline–10/31/2019
Deadline for Submissions October 15, 2019 M/C Media/Culture Journal Call for Abstracts – ‘violence’ (15/10/2019) ‘violence’ We often think of violence in its most manifest forms: war, terrorism or massacres at schools. But violence also operates in more subtle forms. Some forms of violence are easily recognised, but others are decontextualised and depoliticised through complex cultural processes of normalisation and denial (Brison). Violence can become a spectacle, an aestheticised representation, or it can be reduced to banality when its horror and trauma is refracted through everyday lives and spaces which are shaped by violent systems and ideologies (Arendt). Notions of trauma, spectatorship, testimony, and witnessing circulate through narratives of violence. Ideas of “civilisation” implicitly and explicitly reference competing discourses of violence and put them to work in damaging ways, often in service of ideals (e.g. liberalism) that mask the very violence that support them. Even for those of us who feel generally safe, violence is all around us, shaping how we live, work, think, feel, and act. However, violence is not equally inflicted or experienced throughout the world. Ultimately, feeling safe is often a marker of privilege and this safety often comes at the price of violence enacted upon others. This issue invites responses to the theme of “violence,” understood broadly, as it operates through various social, cultural, institutional, and affective domains. Possible considerations include (but are by no means limited to):
  • Symbolic violence and the discursive, political and social domination that shapes contemporary or historical realities.
  • Pedagogical violence and the operation of power and control over the means of intellectual, social and cultural production in spaces of learning.
  • Physical violence and the attendant damages that this entails.
  • “Cartographies of violence” (Oikawa) and the production of subjectivities, histories and realities through spatial imaginaries (and regulation).
  • The intersections of (racial, colonial, gendered, sexed, ableist) violence and the exclusions that this produces, depends on, and reifies.
  • Political violence in the wake of polarisation.
  • Technological violence and the ways in which media technologies facilitate or resist violence.
  • Violence as a subject of public interest in forms including news media, true crime, and entertainment.
Prospective contributors should email an abstract of 100-250 words and a brief biography to the issue editors. Abstracts should include the article title and should describe your research question, approach, and argument. Biographies should be about three sentences (maximum 75 words) and should include your institutional affiliation and research interests. Articles should be 3000 words (plus bibliography). All articles will be double-blind refereed and must adhere to MLA style (6th edition). Details
  • Release date: 22 Apr. 2020
  • Editors: Janine Gertz, Emma Maguire, Theresa Petray, and Bryan Smith
  • Send us your 150 word abstract proposals as soon as possible, and preferably by 15 October 2019. Full essay deadline to be negotiated with editors but likely by 1 December.
Please submit articles through this Website. Send any enquiries to violence@journal.media-culture.org.au. For Author Guidelines see here: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/about/submissions#authorGuidelines Janine Gertz, Emma Maguire, Theresa Petray & Bryan Smith James Cook University Deadline for Submissions October 15, 2019
IABA World Turku 2020 Life-Writing: Imagining the Past, Present and Future 9–12 June 2020 Turku, Finland SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory warmly welcomes proposals to the 12th IABA World Conference, which will be held at the University of Turku (Finland), June 9-12, 2020. Through the theme of Life-Writing: Imagining the Past, Present and Future, IABA World 2020 will explore the multiple temporalities shaping the dimensions of life storying and life writing research. Temporality impacts the writing and shaping of life narratives, as well as the ways in which we analyze life narrative documents. The temporal is at the core of how we understand the centuries-long histories of how the self is written about and the genealogy of life writing research. Temporality, however, does not mean only gazing to the past, but also understanding how the present moment and orientation to the future are visible in life writing and/or how history makes its presence known in different moments and spaces. The temporal approach also invites us to explore how the future is imagined in life narratives and to discuss our visions for the future of life writing studies. This interdisciplinary conference encourages dialogues across boundaries of theory, methodology, genre, place, and time. The Conference invites not only traditional conference papers and panels, but also unconventional presentation formats, creative sessions, as well as artistic performances. We encourage cross-disciplinary and transnational contributions. Proposed works may consider life storying through themes including for example:
  • Narrating and imagining life courses (for example childhood, youth, and aging in life writing)
  • Ethics of storytelling
  • Cultural memory and societal change
  • Non-human life storying / Life writing in posthumanism
  • Autobiography, diary, letters, and life writing in historical research
  • The histories and futures of different genres of life writing
  • Digital history and the future of biographical and prosopographical research
  • Sensory and/or Emotive narratives
  • Life storying in popular culture (music, film, theatre, games)
  • Visual life narratives (photography, graphics, visual arts etc.)
  • Hidden/forgotten lives vs. Public/celebrated lives
  • Interrelations: Family and life writing
  • Life storying migrations, displacements, and belongings
  • Life writing illness and wellness / disability and ability
  • Imagining futures in life narratives
  • Life writing and artistic research
  • The histories and futures of life writing studies across disciplinary boundaries
  • Methods, genres, and definitions in life-writing/autobiographical/life story/ego-document research
Submissions: We invite both 20 minute individual presentations and 90 minute full panel, roundtable, or workshop sessions. We encourage proposed full sessions to be interdisciplinary and international. Creative sessions and performances can also be proposed and if you are uncertain about how to submit these, please contact the organizers: iabaturku2020@utu.fi The conference language is English. All presenters must submit a max. 300 word abstract and a 150 word bio. Please note: when you propose a full session all the presenters must submit their own abstract to the system and mention that it is part of XXX session. Link to abstract submission: https://app.oxfordabstracts.com/stages/1230/submission Abstract submission guidelines:
  • Register to Oxford Abstracts to submit
  • You may amend your submission until the final submission deadline. Please note that uncompleted abstracts will not be reviewed.
  • Remember to complete the abstract and answer all the required questions before the deadline.
  • If you have any questions regarding the submission process, please contact info@aboaservices.fi
Practicalities and schedule: Deadline for proposals 15.10.2019 Notification of acceptance: 1.12.2019 Registration opens: 1.12.2019 / Early bird fee until: 29.2.2020 / Final registration by: 15.4.2020 The Conference Fee will be ca. 200/150 EUR (early bird), 250/200 EUR (the exact amount will be notified when the registration opens) Information about publication plans: The conference team will publish a special issue of Biography in conjunction with the 2020 IABA Turku. Information will be available on the conference website by August. Conference organizer:SELMA: Centre for the Study of Storytelling, Experientiality and Memory, University of Turku Conference co-organizers:  Åbo Akademi University, the City of Turku, International Institute for Popular Culture, and the Finnish Literature Society FAQ: Individual proposal + panel: traditional academic session with 3–4 participants, 20 min presentation + 10 minutes discussion. In full panel, we propose that the chair is one of the presenters. Roundtable: 4–6 participants, with short presentations and then questions from the round-table organizers, dialogue between participants and then open discussion from the floor Workshops, creative sessions, performances:  we are open for suggestions! Deadline for Submissions October 15, 2019

Special Issue of [Inter]sections onWar and Conflict in North American Autobiographical and Documentary Narratives

Our age is one of refugee crises, of wars where the civilian population is more exposed than ever before, and of terrorist attacks that can produce more victims than organized combat. Today, information about all of these events circulates faster than ever, particularly outside of traditional media outlets.  Witnessing and reporting about destruction has never been easier, and cultural memory and social responsibility are more mobile and more complicated as a consequence. Similarly, at this time, our understanding of categories such as “victim” and “perpetrator” are unsettled by terrorism and the refugee crisis, news stories about American veterans who return home to perpetrate mass violence, as well as revelations about the treatment of war prisoners by the American military, and other human rights abuses within the military itself. In addition to this, memory and representation now circulate not only among cultural and national groups, but also among genres and media, in a constantly shifting hierarchy that is only partly reflected by traditional media. The mobility of memory and the recent growth of its transcultural dimension should have, it seems, worked towards increasing a sense of responsibility towards the fate of the more vulnerable, those who live in warzones or are fleeing conflict areas, but instead the effect seems to be much more ambiguous, as recent political and social developments indicate. We welcome submissions that examine narratives that memorialize participation in war and conflict in a variety of North American auto/biographical and documentary genres (diary, memoir, autobiography, reportage, documentary film, oral testimony etc.) and media (traditional writing and reporting, but also multimodal media such as comics, video, and digital media etc.) in order to explore the complicated mobility of individual and group memory, as well as the complexities of witnessing, recording, and reacting to one another’s suffering. In a world where the United States is still perceived as one of the main players on the political, military, and cultural scene, as well as an increasingly selective refuge for those fleeing war and conflict across the globe, an analysis of American autobiographical and documentary narratives that bear witness to conflict and destruction (from both within and without US borders) is essential for the understanding of transcultural identity and memory, as well as the narrative patterns through which they are expressed. This special issue asks questions such as: in the process of memorialization, how are concepts such as grief, trauma, and survival translated across cultures? How can the classification of participants in war and conflict into “victims,” “perpetrators,” “bystanders,” as well as “soldiers” and “civilians” be refined so that it contributes to a better understanding of what makes ordinary people commit evil deeds (Waller 2002)? How do mainstream definitions of concepts such as “genocide,” “heroism,” or “war crime” influence the way people experience and remember war and conflict? What counter memories are produced as a consequence? How do Western tropes of storytelling, suffering, and healing influence the narratives of both American and non-American stories? How do the requirements of a particular genre (such as memoir or documentary film) influence the way certain events are memorialized? What blind spots exist in the memorialization of war and conflict? How does suffering become sellable? Last, but not least, how do gender and sexuality play out in the context of war and conflict? This special issue is co-edited by Dragos Manea and Mihaela Precup. Please submit all inquiries, as well as full articles to mihaela.precup@lls.unibuc.ro and dragos.manea@lls.unibuc.ro. — [Inter]sections is a double-blind peer reviewed open access journal of American Studies indexed in the MLA Directory of Periodicals, Ulrichsweb, DOAJ, CEEOL, and EBSCO. For more information about us, see www.intersections-journal.com. We publish academic papers, as well as relevant reviews and interviews. The language of the journal is English (US), so please edit your submission accordingly. Papers should be between 3,000 and 8,000 words (for book reviews, the suggested length is between 1,000 and 3,000 words), and written in accordance with the 7th edition of the MLA citation style. All submissions should also include an abstract, a list of 5-7 keywords, and a short bio. *
Deadline for Submissions October 15, 2019 Call for Papers Conference Auto/Biography and Reputation Politics February 6 and 7, 2020 at the University of Vienna Collaboration of Character Assassination and Reputation Politics (CARP) Research Laboratory, George Mason University, Viriginia, and Department of English and American Studies, University of Vienna In the earliest documents of the genre transmitted from antiquity, biography and its reception are already associated with the creation of positive or negative personal reputations of politicians, artists, scientists or military leaders. Autobiography, in turn, whetherspiritual since late antiquity or generally secular since the Enlightenment, has also been used to publicly create and negotiate reputations of its narrators and protagonists. The relation of such reputations created in biography and autobiography to the author figures and historical persons has produced long-standing scholarly and popular debates in terms of fictionality or nonfictionality, semiotic constructedness, and reliability. In the past decades, however, life writings – including biography and autobiography as much as diaries or letters and, more contemporarily, life narratives and egodocuments in media such as painting, cinema, graphic novels, digital formats andphotography, for example – have been critically discussed in terms of cultural and national significations, affective patterns, psychologically and legally coded constructions – relating to trauma studies, witnessing and testimonials – or narratological conventions including perspectives, temporalities or individual and collective memory. The discussion of life narratives and their genre conventions, patterns and protocols as established means of creating and destroying reputations appears to have met with only minor interest in the field. At this juncture, Auto/Biography Studies and Reputation Politics Studies might benefit mutually and strongly from an interdisciplinary collaboration. For a range of studies of reputation politics and reputation management in psychology, communication studies, political sciences and historical science, contemporary methodologies and theories of life writing and life narrative in literary, cultural and media studies provide refined terminologies and tested approaches in respect of the determining effects of generic and narrative conventions, semiotic materiality and medial intransparency, as well as questions of agency, relationality and network structures; and, reversely, for the study of auto/biography, the recently developed categories and critical methods in the study of reputation politics provide new ways for ethical consideration of life narratives by addressing the creation or destruction of life stories in public. Through reputation politics studies, as an emerging field that is revitalizing interests of rhetorical studies and political sciences since antiquity, human-rights approaches or memory studies in life writing research, for example, may be further detailed by address to the evaluative strategies behind the creation of specific structures of personalities and narrated characters and lives and, for example, the seemingly returning attraction in these days of isolating identity images and discourses long considered defunct. The critical discussion of the textually produced relations between the individual and the communal or collective in the age of populist revival and resurging nationalism benefits from the joint address to life narratives and reputation politics. Conceivable for discussion, among others, are the following questions: • Has the term reputation lost relevance in the contemporary age of intense and deep mediatization and rapid globalization of life stories and their ever-changing, elusive evaluative reception? • If processuality and relationality of agencies in production and reception of works of culture as well as the intransparency of the medium have become of guiding interest in contemporary auto/biography studies, how might the medial production of a reputation be systematically considered in processual terms? • What is the benefit of the continuing address to the ancient category of character in discussions of ‘character assassination’? Who or what is a character in relation to personality, self, individual, protagonist, narrator, author? • Has the term reputation become part of an elitist discourse that collides with precepts of the race-class-gender and further categories of cultural-studies critiques? If there is an intersectionality of reputation, is there a transversality, as well? • When politicians write autobiographies, how do the self-images created in these autobiographies relate to historiography and biography? • How are fiction and non-fiction in auto/biography and autofiction as well as their discussion related to reputation constructions and their criticism? • What are the relations of private and public practices of life writing with reputation building? • How is the discussion of the mediality of works of auto/biography freshly challenged by consideration of the multimodality of the medial channels and materialities through which reputations are generated and put to political use? • How does historiography as a genre that is still often determined by descriptions of individual lives and personalities rather than relational perspectives, and as such still committed to its derivation from protocols of biography in antiquity, benefit from the critical combination of methods and theories of Auto/Biography and Reputation Politics Studies? For a principal orientation regarding the two fields, respectively, and as a common ground for initiation of methodological discussion, we suggest Routledge Handbook of Character Assassination and Reputation Management, ed. Sergei Samoilenko, Martijn Icks, Jennifer Keohane and Eric Shiraev (Routledge, in print, fall 2019), or Samoilenko, Shiraev, Keohane and Icks, “Character Assassination (general)” in The Global Encyclopedia of Informality, ed. Alena Ledeneva (UCL Press 2018) 441–445, and Handbook of Autobiography/Autofiction, ed. Martina Wagner-Egelhaaf (De Gruyter 2019). Please also see the websites of IABA, the International Auto/Biography Association, and of CARP Research Lab, https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/iaba/home and https://carplab.wordpress.com. We welcome interdisciplinary and methodologically explicit papers that address critical questions across an international variety of works, genres, media and practices, with attention to theoretical premises of both Auto/Biography Studies and Reputation Politics Studies. Conference language will be English. Several publishers, including Macmillan, Sage, Routledge, and Taylor & Francis, have expressed interest in the publication of a volume comprising the results of the conference. Please send proposals (600 words maximum exclusive of references) plus a short academic biography to nadja.gernalzick@univie.ac.at and eshiraev@gmu.edu by October 15, 2019. Notice of acceptance will be given by October 30, 2019. The conference is co-organized by Nadja Gernalzick, Department of English and American Studies, Faculty of Philological and Cultural Studies, University of Vienna, and Eric Shiraev, George Mason University, Arlington, Virginia, U.S.A, with the assistance of Edwina Hagen, University of Amsterdam; Martijn Icks, University of Amsterdam; Jennifer Keohane, University of Baltimore, and Sergei Samoilenko, George Mason University. _____________________ Univ.-Prof. Dr. Nadja Gernalzick Visiting Professor Department of English and American Studies Faculty of Philological and Cultural Studies University of Vienna Campus, Hof 8.3 Spitalgasse 2-4 1090 Wien Austria Campus, Hof 8.3, Room 3E-02-08A nadja.gernalzick@univie.ac.at * Deadline for Submissions October 15, 2019
International Conference on Oral History 8-9 February 2020 – London, UK
organised by

London Centre for Interdisciplinary Research

For decades, oral history was considered less than scholarly, leading to its exclusion from several history books; thus valuable first-hand experiences and information that could alter historical truth were neglected and ultimately lost to oblivion. Our conference wishes to challenge the pervading view that oral testimony can lead to false representation of historical events and underline the significant support it can provide to historical research, especially in lieu of written documentation. The journey of a memory through time may change, transform or even become distorted from its primary form. Oral testimony requires a multilevel examination and verification so it can be considered legitimate and useful as historical information, but despite these difficulties, oral tradition can have the power to present an entirely new perspective on an event, future generations can then interpret it freely. The conference will focus on the connections between oral history, collective memory, and individual memory. Whether from a historical, social, or even psychological perspective, we wish to engage scholars in a multidimensional and interdisciplinary approach in order to deeply explore all aspects of this valuable and fascinating area. We are committed to creating a welcoming space for discussion, collaboration, and exploration of oral history’s potential as a tool for local, national and international projects that would enrich and even revise chapters of history. Conference presentations will be related, but not limited, to:
  • Oral history throughout history
  • Oral historian: a public historian? Oral history as a form of social and communal activity; Promoting oral history and engaging public awareness
  • Conducting oral history research; advantages and disadvantages; limitations and ways to overcome them
  • Archiving oral testimony; examples and presentation of valuable archives
  • Methodologies, techniques and methods in conducting and writing oral history
  • Theories of oral history
  • Re-examining and re-writing history through the lens of oral history; Oral history in the global historical arena
  • The absence of historical facts and the role of testimonies
  • Epistemological and ethical dilemmas in oral history
  • Use and abuse of oral history on the Internet
  • Oral history and the law
  • Cases in which oral testimony changed historical truth
  • Oral history as a form of therapy
  • Collective memory and oral tradition
  • The role of individual memory in oral history
  • Oral history as a revealing or misleading tool
  • Manipulation of memory and the role of oral history
  • Oral history and trauma
  • Oral history in war
  • Oral history in the hands of social scientists
  • Oral history as a tool of revealing/reliving a dictatorship/suppressing regime
  • Altering, exaggerating or forgetting memories; the psychology of a survivor
  • Can individual and collective memory be manipulated in order to present a particular side of an incident?
  • Iconic cases of oral history
  • Why is the oral history project needed? Goals, steps and priorities
  • Oral history in teaching and teaching oral history
The conference will bring together scholars from different fields including history, philosophy, religion, sociology, international relations, literature, art, space studies, peace studies, cultural studies, minority studies, war and/or genocide studies, journalism, immigration studies, psychology and psychiatry, political and social studies, and those working in archives, museums and NGOs. We are particularly interested in inviting those with first-hand experiences, amateur archivists and memory collectors to participate in our newly established session “Share your memories and change history.” Submissions may propose various formats, including: *Individually submitted papers (organised into panels by the committee) * Panels (3-4 individual papers) * Roundtable discussions (led by one of the presenters) * Posters Paper proposals up to 250 words and a brief biographical note should be sent by 15 October 2019  For fees and submission information please follow the link: https://oralhistory.lcir.co.uk Provisional conference venue: Birkbeck, University of London, Bloomsbury, Malet Street, London WC1E 7H
Contact Email:
Deadline for Submissions October 15, 2019 Call for Contributions Semiotics in Cultural Studies/Semiotiken in den Kulturwissenschaften The collection Semiotiken in den Kulturwissenschaften/Semiotics in Cultural Studies opens a comparative and transdisciplinary discussion on the uses and critical methodology of semiotics in cultural studies. Histories of cultural studies (Assmann 2017 [2006]; Bachmann-Medick 2016 [2006]; During 2005; During ed. 2001 [1993];  Fauser 2011 [2003]; Marchart 2018 [2008]; Musner ed. 2001; Nünning and Nünning eds. 2008 [2003]; Takahashi 2004; Kittler 2000; and many others) have usually not addressed the provenances of the semiotics employed in diverse cultural-studies approaches or have done so peripherally only. While poststructuralist influences are frequent and noted in cultural studies and imply a recourse to the history of structuralist semiotics of some kind, for example, the semiotic theories and models informing various schools and traditions of cultural studies are hardly critically discussed in terms of the role semiotics take in informing and shaping cultural studies methodologies. When cultural studies are understood as media studies, as they must be from a contemporary semiotic perspective, the need for coherent explications of semiotic assumptions and methodologies in diverse scholarly approaches to cultural products becomes even more felt. While histories and systematics of semiotics  address areas of cultural-studies interest (Posner/Robering/Sebeok 1997–2004), a comprehensive cultural-studies review of semiotics has not yet been developed. This collection is meant to offer a first stepping stone towards a systematic and critically methodological comparison of the diversity of applications of semiotics in cultural studies by providing, as incentives for a wider discussion, treatments of individual traditions and problematics of semiotics in cultural studies. Including the semiotics of Charles Sanders Peirce, there have been and are a variety of explicitly semiotic approaches in cultural studies since the late nineteenth century, for example from Ferdinand de Saussure and structuralism to semiotics of culture by Roland Barthes, or from poststructuralism to representationalism (Birmingham School) and the plurality of methods in so-called cultural semiotics (www.kultursemiotik.com). The investigation of visual signs after early iconology (Aby Warburg, Erwin Panofsky) or the diagrams and orders of signs developed for the notation of phenomena in myth studies and early anthropology (George Frazer) also employ diverse semiotic conceptions and methods that have been extended to and are referenced in these days. How do tenets of Saussurian semiology inform structural anthropology? When such methods are critically and comparatively studied, the position of discourse analysis after Michel Foucault on the spectrum also has to be investigated: what is historical semantics (Dietrich Busse) in relation to discourse analysis and cultural semiotics? How is the agency of actors, for example after actor network theory (Bruno Latour), integrated in models of signification and what is the semiotics of actor network theory? The models of signification and of actants are as diverse as are the semiotics and semiologies, even if individual areas of application of semiotics prefer specific models like the notorious use of the differentiation of icon, index and symbol after Peirce in theories of documentary film and photography. Contemporarily and continuingly, materiality and deixis appear to be important concepts in theories of signs, and the relation of semiotics and media studies is of particular interest in times of a phenomenologization of media studies as in approaches to a “semiotic phenomenology” (Malin Wahlberg) in film studies as well as in new materialism or posthumanism. Elaborations of deconstruction and grammatology, for example in image studies (Sigrid Weigel), call for conceptualizations of principal relationality and differantiality beyond identificatory reductions of signs to referents. Where is the connection of a materialist semiotics in diagrammatics (Matthias Bauer und Christoph Ernst), intermateriality (Andrea Seier) and the materialism of posthumanism (Cary Wolfe)? We welcome comparative methodological, theoretical and historical discussions of semiotics, investigations of specific problems in semiotics of cultural studies as well as sample applications of methodologically reflected semiotic approaches in cultural studies. Possible contributions may address or include, among others, the fields of semiotics and cultural studies, approaches and examples since the 1880s: anthropology from James Frazer to Bronislaw Malinowski and Claude Lévi-Strauss; iconology and its extension to image studies, visual culture studies and semiotics of the image; semiotics after Charles Sanders Peirce: pragmatism; semiology after Ferdinand de Saussure: structuralism; … semiotics and cultural studies, approaches and examples since the 1950s: discourse analysis and dispositives after Michel Foucault, historical epistemology, cultures of knowledge; semiotics of culture after RolandBarthes; grammatology after Jacques Derrida; … schools and methods of cultural studies and their semiotics: Frankfurt school (is there a semiotics of the Frankfurt School?); Birmingham school; postcolonialism; pragmatism; mixed methods and grounded theory; cultural concepts of the body; cultural memory, memory studies; trauma studies; Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis; actor network theory; posthumanism; relationalism; Linienwissen, Liniendenken; diagrammatics; new materialism; posthermeneutics; … transdisciplinary semiotics in cultural studies: history and theory of art and architecture; media theory, media philosophy, media ecology; design theory; aesthetics of reception; neurobiology and cognitive science; neuronal networks and artificial intelligence; theater studies, theories of ritual and performance studies; film studies; queer theory; comparative literature; narratology, narrative environments; translation studies; archaeology; historiography; auto/biography and automediality studies; social semiotics; approaches to multimodality; communication studies; numerology; sound studies; media archaeologies; theory of technics and technology; … The collection is intended as a bilingual volume, and we accept original contributions in English or German. The collection is scheduled to appear with transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, Germany, in a new series on cultural studies under the general editorship of Kulturwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft (KWG). Please send proposals (about 400 words) in English or German plus a short academic biography to the volume editors by October 15, 2019: nadja.gernalzick@univie.ac.at and thomasmetten@me.com. Prof. Dr. Nadja Gernalzick Department of English and American Studies Faculty of Philological and Cultural Studies University of Vienna Austria Dr. Thomas Metten Transfer Center University of Passau Germany with the assistance of Nora Benterbusch M.A. Art History and Cultural Studies European Comparative Media Studies Saarland University Germany Dipl.-Biol. Filip Niemann Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III Section Neuropsychology and Functional Imaging University Hospital Ulm Germany
New Series (Bordeaux University Press): Contemporary Autobiographical Practices This new collection publishes original manuscripts (monographs and collective volumes in French or English) that examine :
  • Self-referential narratives, and the way they are published and read (and the increasing role of new technology, more particularly phenomena like blogs or social networks, but also the resurgence of more ancient forms such as diaries)
  • The ontological and psychological dispositions that lead us to tell about ourselves and our lives to others—and the communicational structures entailed­—and their possible pathological or curative dimension.
  • Outstanding contemporary autobiographical ventures (mostly from the anglophone world—Henry Roth, Edward St. Aubyn, Rachel Cusk, Maggie Nelson…—but they can be compared to similar works from other linguistic areas such as Elena Ferrante or Karl Ove Knausgaard) and what they reveal about current publishing policies, formal and aesthetic evolutions and reader responses.
  • Self-representation for commercial purposes (from an author’s picture on a dust cover to authors’ personal websites) or political ones.
  • Self-representation in visual arts (painting, photography, cinema and graphic memoirs).
  • And more generally theoretical approaches to the issue of the fact/fiction border and the line separating self-portrait and self-reinvention.
Our aim is to publish texts by authors who have a good knowledge of contemporary stakes and concepts linked to self-narration, and whose approach is not limited to literature but branches out into other fields (sociology, cognitive sciences, psychoanalysis…) in order to better understand a will, a need—to narrate oneself, to narrate one’s self—intrinsic to human beings. Edited by Arnaud Schmitt (arnaud.schmitt@u-bordeaux.fr) and Stéphanie Ravez (stephanie.ravez@u-bordeaux-montaigne.fr)
*
Deadline for Proposals October 13, 2019
10 PhD fellowships in Life Sciences – Life Writing at Johannes Gutenberg University / University Medical Center Mainz
Starting April 2020, we are offering 10 fully funded PhD fellowships at our interdisciplinary DFG research training group „Life Sciences – Life Writing: Experiences at the Boundaries of Human Life between Biomedical Explanation and Lived Experience“ in Mainz.
Graduates from life sciences and the humanities as well as medicine students are welcome to apply!
Come and join our vivid and interdisciplinary research training group!
Applications are welcome both in German and English.
Application deadline: October 13, 2019
Interviews will take place in calendar week 47 in Mainz.

Prof. Dr. Alfred Hornung
Speaker, Obama Institute
Chair, American Studies Department of English & Linguistics Johannes Gutenberg University
Jakob-Welder Weg 20
D-55099 Mainz, Germany +49-6131-3923535 www.obama-institute.com/hornung/
Academia Europaea
Deadline for Proposals October 5, 2019
Call for Papers: Nonfiction Neonarrative: Pushing the Boundaries of the Narratable (10/5/2019; 3/5-8/2020) New Orleans, USA
by Daniel Aureliano Newman, University of Toronto International Society for the Study of Narrative in New Orleans, USA, March 5–8, 2020 Neonarrative is a term coined by Robyn Warhol (2005) to describe the emerging narratability of socio-cultural processes or events that were formerly unspeakable, unacknowledged or unintelligible—in short, it is the process by which the “narratable” emerges from the “unnarratable” (a term Warhol borrows from Gerald Prince 1988). H. Porter Abbott likewise adopts, in a distinct but not unrelated sense, the term “unnarratable” to describe processes so complex that they “resist representation in narrative form” (Abbott 2009); unnarratable processes include the behaviour of stock markets and subatomic particles, evolution by natural selection, and various statistical or emergent phenomena (Abbott 2008). Though such processes are arguably more resistant to narrative than sociocultural processes, they too may eventually become more narratable, over time, growing familiarity, and the efforts of cultural interpreters (among others, journalists, science popularizers, historians, psychologists, explorers of various kinds). Neonarrative thus extends beyond reversals of the hitherto-unspeakable, into the realm of what once eschewed narrative comprehension altogether. To cite just one example: Richard Dawkins’s figure (or character, if you like) of the “selfish gene” gave significant narrative shape to the processes of Darwinian evolution, which Abbott considers the non plus ultra of the unnarratable (2003). This panel focuses on how nonfiction might contribute to neonarrative’s replacement or displacement of the formerly unnarratable. Fictive narratives certainly participate in this expansion of the narratable; but nonfiction arguably raises the stakes because its truth-telling imperative clashes to a lesser or greater extent with the counterintuitive, experimental, defamiliarizing (Iversen 2019), strange (Caracciolo 2016) or unnatural (Richardson 2015) techniques required to tell a story that couldn’t be told before. Furthermore, understanding the potential narratability of very complex real-life processes might serve to better counter the simple but powerful narratives that play such insidious roles in public misinformation, propaganda, anti-intellectualism. The ideal composition of the panel will be three or four papers featuring different forms of nonfiction neonarrative (for example, government reports, history, journalism, medicine, narrative essays, science, thought experiments, travel writing…). I am especially interested in papers that focus on a single narrative device (or a cluster of interrelated devices) and its function, formal and rhetorical effects, and relations to neonarrative. The selected papers will be gathered as a panel proposal for the upcoming conference of the International Society for the Study of Narrative in New Orleans (March 5–8, 2020). To be considered for the panel, please submit a proposal outlining your paper (max. 200 words) and short biographical note to Daniel Aureliano Newman (University of Toronto, daniel.newman@utoronto.ca) by October 5, 2019. Panel organizer’s bio: Daniel A. Newman is Assistant Professor (Teaching Stream) in the Faculty of Arts & Science at the University of Toronto. His book, Modernist Life Histories: Biological Theory and the Experimental Bildungsroman, was publishedin 2019 by Edinburgh University Press, and his articles have appeared in journals such as Style, Twentieth-Century Literature, Journal of Narrative Theory, and Frontiers of Narrative Studies.
Dear all, I am interested in organizing a panel, roundtable, or workshop proposal for IABA Finland, June 2020, on digital methods in life writing studies. I would imagine the digital to be broadly defined, open to any kind of method that it is attempting to think through the affordances and limitations of digital tools for scholarship on life writing, whether that be through the creation of digital collections or archives, computational analysis, mapping, data collection and coding, or some other method. My own contribution would be on work to develop and analyze a textual corpus for early twentieth century US immigrant life narrative. My hope would be for the session to offer examples, in early or more finished stages, alongside critical reflections upon the choice to engage these methods. Please contact me with interest or questions at rodrigue8@grinnell.edu by September 15. We can decide on what format (panel, roundtable, workshop) would make the most sense based on interest.
Elizabeth Rodrigues, PhD
Assistant Professor, Humanities & Digital Scholarship Librarian Grinnell College rodrigue8@grinnell.edu
Deadline for Submissions September 15, 2019 CALL FOR PAPERS Graphic Medicine A Special Issue of Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Guest Editors: Erin La Cour (Free University of Amsterdam) and Anna Poletti (Utrecht University) Submit: Abstracts of 300–500 words in length by September 15, 2019 to biographygraphicmedicine@gmail.com. In recent years, Graphic Medicine has emerged as an important movement in changing attitudes to patient experience within the practice of Western medicine. Combining insights from life writing and comics studies, Graphic Medicine texts and scholarship evidence the efficacy of life narrative in the medium of comics for opening up new channels of communication between medical staff, patients, their loved ones, and the community; providing alternative sites for community building among patients and their loved ones in regards to specific conditions and their related treatments; and for educating medical practitioners about patient experiences within healthcare systems. Graphic Medicine also provides new opportunities for life narratives to be coaxed, collected, and published for the benefit of the wider community and for the education of medical professionals. This special issue of Biography will bring comics practitioners and other artists who work within the field of graphic medicine and/or life writing together with scholars of graphic medicine, life writing, and comics to examine the rise of Graphic Medicine as a discourse and practice, and to consider its possible futures, limits, sites of expansion, and the challenges it may face in offering alternative perspectives on the lived experience of health, illness, and healthcare systems, and their attendant discourses. The guest editors welcome proposals for scholarly articles and comics on any of the following topics: The graphic in Graphic Medicine: Can Graphic Medicine help overcome stigmas regarding the body, affective states, and psychological responses associated with different forms of illness and disability? What are the possible limit cases for telling personal stories of illness, health, and death in Graphic Medicine? What role do images play when Graphic Medicine texts attempt to narrate experiences associated with healthcare—such as specific procedures, side effects, or elements of recovery—that may go against social and cultural norms of “good taste”? Ethics: What ethical questions are raised when artists tell the stories of others in Graphic Medicine? What questions emerge when a patient’s illness story necessarily involves telling the stories of others? Fictionality: Is there a role in Graphic Medicine for fictive stories of patient experience? Why might practitioners turn to invention and fictionality to tell true stories of health and illness? Does fictionality open up different avenues of critique of medical discourses and practices? Mediality and terminology: Must the term “Graphic Medicine” only apply to life narratives about health and illness told in comics? Can personal zines, visual artworks, documentaries, live performances, site-specific installations, blogs, Twitter, and other forms of multimodal or intermedial life writing also be included under the banner of “Graphic Medicine”? How might current theorizing about what Graphic Medicine is and does change if other cultural forms were included in its rubric? Graphic Medicine and disability studies: How do the principles, ideas, and practices of Graphic Medicine intersect with the field of critical disability studies? Graphic Medicine and diversity: Can the focus on the experiences and expectations patients have when interacting with institutions and procedures in Graphic Medicine expand the recognition of and respect for bodily and psychological difference and neurodiversity within the medical establishment? Does this potential for increased recognition of diversity create a tension with the medical discourses that underpin the provision of healthcare and treatment? Graphic Medicine and epistemology: What alternative forms of care and healing does Graphic Medicine need to address? Does it offer a means for communicating the importance and efficacy of non-Western and Indigenous practices? Graphic Medicine and intersectionality: Can Graphic Medicine offer new insights into effects of race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, class, and age in informing access to the provision of healthcare? How might Graphic Medicine address the discourses that structure the scene of encounter between patient and medical staff and shape how patients’ experiences are interpreted? We are interested in papers and articles that explore Graphic Medicine from creative practitioner and scholarly perspectives, and which may take the form of original artwork in comics or other text-image combinations, as well as more traditional scholarly formats. Please submit 350–500-word abstracts or proposals for creative works to Erin La Cour and Anna Poletti by September 15, 2019 to biographygraphicmedicine@gmail.com. Notifications will be sent by November 15, 2019. Articles of up to 10,000 words or creative works of up to 10 pages in draft form will be due March 1, 2020, and will be workshopped prior to the International AutoBiography Association (IABA) world conference in Turku, Finland, June 9–12, 2020. Biography will reimburse workshop participants for accommodations. *
Deadline for Submissions September 10, 2019

Performing Joan: Interpreting the Maid on Screen, on Stage, and in the Streets (9/10/2019; 5/7-9/2020) Michigan USA

Call for Papers sponsored by The International Joan of Arc Society/Société Internationale de l’étude de Jeanne d’Arc International Congress on Medieval Studies (ICMS 2020) May 7 to 10, 2020 Western Michigan University Joan of Arc continues to captivate filmmakers, most recently Bruno Dumont, whose headbanging heroine mixes medieval and metal in Jeannette: The Childhood of Joan of Arc (2017) and Joan of Arc (2019). Joan has also made a Broadway comeback via three recent productions: David Byrne’s rock musical Joan of Arc: Into the Fire (2017) the 2018 revival ofShaw’s Saint Joan, and Jane Anderson’s Mother of the Maid(2018)Participatory street theater such as Orléans’ yearly Fêtes de Jeanne d’Arc or the procession’s campier New World cousin, a Joan-themed carnival parade in New Orleans, also shape the Maid’s evolving legacy. This panel seeks papers that explore the origins, processes, and reception of Joan in performance. What performative aspects characterize the primary documents that inspired subsequent retellings of Joan’s story? Why do certain patterns emerge in Joan’s onstage and onscreen afterlives? And how do different authors and actors approach the creative task of communicating Joan’s relevance to new audiences? What purposes do these performances serve for those who conceive of or take part in them? Finally, how are the productions that Joan inspires received? Please submit a 250-word proposal for a 15-minute presentation. Proposals should have an abstract format written in Word doc and be accompanied by a brief academic bio (or a CV), including email address, current affiliation, and title/name. Please submit all relevant documents by September 10, 2019 to Scott Manning (scottmanning13@gmail.com) and Tara Beth Smithson (tbsmithson@manchester.edu). Preliminary inquiries and expressions of interest are more than welcome. *
Deadline for Submissions September 1, 2019

Departures and Arrivals: Women, Mobility and Travel Writing (9/1/2019) Special Issue–Feminismo/s

Feminismo/s, from the Institute of Research in Gender Studies from the University of Alicante, is currently accepting submissions for its 36 issue, entitled “Departures and Arrivals: Women, Mobility and Travel Writing”. This issue seeks to approach women travel writing from a transhistorical and transnational perspective. Thus, we encourage submissions that deal with travelling and mobility in women’s writing from different cultural and national backgrounds and periods. We are particularly interested in contributions that explore the intersections between gender, mobility and identity, including, but not restricted to the following aspects: –       Religious or spiritual pilgrimages. –       Transatlantic and transnational experiences. –       Exploratory journeys and pioneering experiences. –       Sea narratives, air narratives, railway experiences and road trip experiences. –       Travelling in/to/from war zones. –       Diasporic experiences. –       Enforced migration and refugee experiences. –       Uprootedness and in-between identities. –       Ecocritical approaches to travelling. –       Tourism and neo-colonial experiences of travelling. –       Travelling and the cyber-world. –       Mobility and ableism. Submitted abstracts should be between 300 and 500 words in length, and should be sent to the issue co-editors by no later than 1 September 2019. Please also include an additional biographical statement, of no more than 100 words, that lists your educational level, current academic affiliation, previous publications and any other details you may feel are pertinent. Applicants can expect to hear back about their proposals by 1 October 2019. Full articles (9,000 words) will be due by 1 February 2020. Notifications about acceptance or required changes will be provided in July 2020, and final articles will be required on 1 September 2020. Contributors must follow the journal’s editorial guidelines and style. Should you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact the issue co-editors, Sara Prieto (sara.prieto@ua.es) and Raquel García-Cuevas (r.c.garcia@kent.ac.uk). Feminismo/sis an Open Acces Journal and is indexed in the following databases: Proquest (Gender Watch), DOAJ, REDIB, InDICEs-CSIC, ERIH PLUS, MLA, CIRC, MlAR, Latindex, Dialnet, Ulrich’s, Dulcinea, Google Scholar, SHERPA/RoMEO, RUA, DICE, REBIUN, RESH, OCLC WorldCat, Copac, SUDOC and ZDB/EZB. Deadline for Submissions September 1, 2019
Jenny Diski: A Celebration A Symposium, University of Oxford, 7th April 2020 Keynote Speaker: Blake Morrison Jenny Diski sadly died in 2016, and the time is right for a celebration of her work. Diski wrote in many genres, from novels and short stories, to memoirs, travel narratives, and books on human-animal relationships and the 1960s. She was also a prolific reviewer, who contributed regularly to the London Review of Books. Diski herself, though, refused to classify her writings: ‘Something about the distinction between being a fiction and a non-fiction writer distresses me’, she declared, ‘So I think of myself as a writer. Period’. And it is as a writer, first and foremost, that Diski is appreciated by her many admirers. No reader of hers can fail to be dazzled by her style, or struck by her formal playfulness and innovation. Yet, perhaps owing to her refusal to be confined by boundaries, Diski has tended to slip under the radar, or between the gaps, in academic discussions. This symposium seeks to bring her to the fore by recognising that it is precisely her difference from what we might expect that makes her so exciting, and by drawing together the many aspects of her work. How, for instance, does Diski extend our understanding of life writing, autofiction, and travel literature? How does she explore the individual mind and social institutions? Is it right to think of her as a Jewish writer, and how does Jewishness figure in her work? What do we make of her provocative interrogations of gender and sexuality? It is hoped that by addressing questions such as these, with a close attention to literary form, this celebration of her work will help to place Diski where she belongs: as one of the most important writers of our time. Period. We welcome papers on topics including, but by no means restricted to:
  • Diski as a life writer: autofiction, memoir, autobiography.
  • Diski as a Jewish writer.
  • Illness narratives and the cancer diary.
  • Family relationships.
  • Feminism and women’s writing.
  • Travel and travel literature.
  • London.
  • Formal innovation.
  • Humour.
  • Sexuality and the erotic.
  • Diski as a literary critic and a film critic.
  • Journalism.
  • Diski’s significance as a public intellectual.
  • Psychoanalysis and psychiatry.
  • Human-animal relationships.
  • Diski and her times.
  • Diski’s politics.
  • Diski and postmodernism.
Please submit a short abstract (200-300 words) for a 20 minute paper to Dr Ben Grant (benjamin.grant@conted.ox.ac.uk) by 1st September 2019.
Contact Info:
Dr Ben Grant (University of Oxford)

*

Deadline for Submissions August 23, 2019
The ACLA 2020 conference will take place at the Sheraton Grand Hotel in Chicago on March 19-22.
The Panel titled ” 27 Rue de Fleurus.”
Individuals interested in participating in a particular seminar are encouraged to be in touch with the organizers over the summer; paper submissions through the portal will open August 31 and close September 23.

Organizer: Yu Min Claire Chen

yuminclaire@gmail.com
” Paris was the place that suited us who were to create the twentieth-century art and literature. Picasso once remarked I do not care who it is that has or does influence me as long as it is not myself.” (Gertrude Stein) The post-war generation has been depicted as the lost generation, but it was also a time of vibrant cultural exchange between the US and Europe. Walking into the 27 rue de fleurus in the 1920s, you would see Gertrude Stein’s Saturday evening salon, where the most prominent modernist writers and artists met. Among them included Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ezra Pound, Guillaume Apollinaire, Sinclair Lewis, James Joyce, Juan Gris, Sherwood Anderson, Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, and many others. In 1933, Gertrude Stein published her autobiography, The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas, writing about her years in Paris, Ernest Hemingway also wrote A Moveable Feast, and Woody Allen directed a film Midnight in Paris about life around the Salon. The panel solicits papers that delve into the richness of cultures, arts, music, and literature of this period and probe into cross-cultural influences of writers and artists’ works. Topics include but are not limited to the following: · * Autobiography and memoir studies · * Arts and Literature · * Expatriates · * The Lost generation · * The Jazz Age · * Avant-Garde

Further Update on IABA Website, from Julie Rak

Hello Everyone,

Sorry, posted the wrong link for the 2020 CFP. Here is the one that works: https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/iaba/calls-for-papers?authuser=0 Thanks all! Take care, Julie Rak — Julie Rak Professor, Department of English and Film Studies University of Alberta Humanities Centre 3-5 Edmonton, AB T6G 2E6, Canada ᐊᒥᐢᑿᒌᐚᐢᑲᐦᐃᑲᐣ (Amiskwacîwâskahikan), Treaty 6/Métis Territory Website: https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/julie-rak/home

Update on IABA Website, from Julie Rak

Hello IABA friends and fans,

Thanks to all organizers for the IABA Europe and IABA Americas sections for excellent conferences. I’m writing to let you all know that the Call for Papers for the 2020 IABA World conference to be held in Finland is now on the IABA web site. Please have a look, and share it widely with your colleagues beyond life writing studies. The Conferences section of the site is now updated–we can look forward to an IABA Asia-Pacific CFP soon, I hope! https://sites.google.com/s/0B3LGuUnUnOHfR1VuSG5VNWx3VWc/p/0B3LGuUnUnOHfSF9HT0dBdVlaYUk/edit Take care, Julie Rak — Julie Rak Professor, Department of English and Film Studies University of Alberta Humanities Centre 3-5 Edmonton, AB T6G 2E6, Canada ᐊᒥᐢᑿᒌᐚᐢᑲᐦᐃᑲᐣ (Amiskwacîwâskahikan), Treaty 6/Métis Territory Website: https://sites.google.com/ualberta.ca/julie-rak/home

*

Newsletter Biography Institute August 2019 (PDF-version) Richard Hoving will defend his thesis on Josef Kotalla October 24, 14.30 hrs., Richard Hoving will defend his biography of Josef Kotalla in the aula of Groningen University. During the Second World War, Kotalla was an executioner at Amersfoort prison camp. De Beul van Amersfoort. De biografie van Josef Kotalla will be published by Prometheus publishers. The project was supervised by prof. Hans Renders and dr. Hinke Piersma. Biography Institute hosts research seminar Biography & History The course will be given by members of the Biography Institute during the first semester of the next academic year. For more information about enrollment (also for contract students) and the content of the seminar, see the flyer and the section Courses on the website of the Biography Institute.John A. Farrell writes biography Edward Kennedy Edward Moore Kennedy (1932-2009) was the youngest of three brothers who played instrumental roles in the landmark movements for social justice and the struggle for progressive, active government which transfused American politics in the 20th century. Farrell has written biographies of House Speaker Thomas ‘Tip’ O’Neill and U.S. President Richard Nixon. The project will be supervised by prof. Hans Renders and prof. Doeko Bosscher. Frisian Biography Institute There will be a Frisian Biography Institute. The aim of this initiative is to forge a cooperation, under the auspices of the Biography Institute of the University of Groningen, between different Frisian organizations, that should lead to an independent Frisian Biography Institute. With this initiative, boardmembers Bert Looper (Tresoar), Hans Renders (Biography Institute RUG), Steven Sterk (Bornmeer|Noordboek) and Geart de Vries (Historisch Centrum Leeuwarden) hope to mobilize other cultural organizations in Friesland to establish a widely supported institute, providing supervision of biographies of Frisian people. Follow this link for more information. More information can be found on the website www.biografieinstituut.nl. For subscribing to and unsubscribing from this newsletter, please email biografie.instituut@rug.nl
Deadline for Submissions August 18, 2019

Dying and Death in 18th-21st Century Europe, International Conference (ABDD11)

On behalf of the Scientific and Organizing Committee, we are very pleased to invite you to attend the eleventh edition of “Dying and Death in 18th-21st Century Europe, International Conference” (ABDD11), which will take place, as always, at the “1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, Romania, between 26th and 28th September 2019. With its unique friendly atmosphere, our interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary conference offers an excellent opportunity for academics, experts and practitioners from diverse fields such as history, sociology, anthropology, psychology, medicine, literary studies, theology, or architecture to network and to share knowledge, experiences and research findings on a variety of themes concerning death and dying, such as the followings:
  • challenges of grieving in a digital age
  • old and contemporary meanings of the ‘good’ death
  • ageing well, dying well and their reverses
  • death, dying and the postmodern search for meaning
  • the great equaliser and the socioeconomic inequalities in dying
  • death and dying within the entertainment industry
  • dreaming, theorising and designing immortality today
  • the rise of the undead in movies and game industry
  • the art and rituals of photographing the dead nowadays
  • (not so) changing attitudes towards death
  • new theories and ideologies of death
  • cultural memory and the landscapes of death
  • death anxiety and the promises of new age movement
  • the dying brain: mind, identity, agency
  • medicalization and de-medicalization of death
  • suicide and capital punishment in times of ‘happiology’
  • enduring ethical challenges of organ donation
  • personal narratives of death and dying
Those interested are invited to submit a proposal of roughly 250-300 words, followed by 3-5 key-words, no later than August 18, 2019 to both mrotar2000@yahoo.com and adriana.teodorescu@gmail.com. Please include also a short bio of yourself, indicating your academic title/affiliation, research interests, significant publications etc. Authors will be notified of the abstract acceptance by August 25, 2019. Selected papers could be considered for publication in a collective volume or in an international journal. As our tradition demands, the karaoke show will be part of this edition too. You will find more details here: http://death-studies.ro/abdd11/.
Contact Info:
Adriana Teodorescu Associate Lecturer Babeș-Bolyai University

Deadline for Submissions August 15, 2019

HISTORIES OF DEATH AN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM University of Turku, Finland February 19–21, 2020 CALL FOR PAPERS Our understandings of death come with long and complex histories, shaped by culture, place, time, power, and identities. Historical analysis allows us to better understand the paths that have led to the recent move toward “death positivity,” and the popularity of death doulas, “death cafes,” alternative and ecological burial solutions, and new understandings of grief. The interdisciplinary and rapidly growing field of Death Studies raises awareness about how we die and mourn, and the ways social factors – class, migrant background, and gender, among them – can result in unequal access to “good death” in many countries and communities today. This International Symposium seeks to delve into the many varied and interwoven Histories of Death to further explore the traditions, ideologies, and institutions that shape our experiences with death. Death sets people into action, caring for the dying, the deceased, and the grieving in ways that range from the intimate to the professional. The Histories of Death Symposium invites researchers to share their work and engage in dialogue about the different ways people have approached dying, death, and mourning from everyday, cultural, and structural perspectives. The symposium calls for papers, posters, and creative works that may analyze:
  • the social and everyday histories of death
  • histories of death in the context of migration(s)
  • narratives and/or life writing of death and mourning
  • histories of emotion and mourning
  • sensory and corporeal histories of death and mourning
  • childhood and family histories of death
  • health, gerontological, and palliative care histories
  • art and craftwork in histories of death
  • methods and ethics for the study of death in history.
Proposals across times and places are welcome. Though the focus is on death and mourning in historical contexts, the symposium is particularly interested in exploring inter/transdisciplinary approaches, and scholars from all backgrounds are welcome to participate. Please email abstracts of 250 words, indicating whether you are proposing a paper presentation, poster presentations, or creative work, together with a max. 150-word bio, including name, institutional affiliation and position, and email address, to historiesofdeath@gmail.com by August 15, 2019. Information about registration, featured speakers, travel, and accommodation will be posted shortly on the Symposium website. The Symposium is hosted by the John Morton Center for North American Studies at the University of Turku’s Department of Philosophy, Political Science, and Contemporary History. The Symposium in funded by the Academy of Finland.

Call for Book Proposals: Practicing Oral History

The Routledge book series Practicing Oral History is accepting proposals for new titles on applied oral history. Series editor Nancy MacKay will be at the Archives* Records conference in Austin, Texas, August 1-7 and happy to meet in person to discuss your book idea. Contact Nancy at nancymackay@gmail.com for a detailed prospectus or to discuss your project. The series is devoted to applied oral history. Books should address one of three approaches to oral history: best practices for a specific stage or skill within the oral history life cycle, oral history adapted to a specific professional community, or using oral history to achieve a specific goal.
Contact Info:
Nancy MacKay Series Editor, Practicing Oral History (Routledge)
Contact Email:
Deadline for Submissions August 1, 2019

Dying and Death in 18th-21st Century Europe, International Conference (ABDD11) (8/1/2019; 9/26-28/2019) Romania

On behalf of the Scientific and Organizing Committee, we are very pleased to invite you to attend the eleventh edition of “Dying and Death in 18th-21st Century Europe, International Conference” (ABDD11), which will take place, as always, at the “1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, Romania, between 26th and 28th September 2019. With its unique friendly atmosphere, our interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary conference offers an excellent opportunity for academics, experts and practitioners from diverse fields such as history, sociology, anthropology, psychology, medicine, literary studies, theology, or architecture to network and to share knowledge, experiences and research findings on a variety of themes concerning death and dying, such as the followings:
  • challenges of grieving in a digital age
  • old and contemporary meanings of the ‘good’ death
  • ageing well, dying well and their reverses
  • death, dying and the postmodern search for meaning
  • the great equaliser and the socioeconomic inequalities in dying
  • death and dying within the entertainment industry
  • dreaming, theorising and designing immortality today
  • the rise of the undead in movies and game industry
  • the art and rituals of photographing the dead nowadays
  • (not so) changing attitudes towards death
  • new theories and ideologies of death
  • cultural memory and the landscapes of death
  • death anxiety and the promises of new age movement
  • the dying brain: mind, identity, agency
  • medicalization and de-medicalization of death
  • suicide and capital punishment in times of ‘happiology’
  • enduring ethical challenges of organ donation
  • personal narratives of death and dying
Those interested are invited to submit a proposal of roughly 250-300 words, followed by 3-5 key-words, no later than August 1, 2019 to both mrotar2000@yahoo.com and adriana.teodorescu@gmail.com. Please include also a short bio of yourself, indicating your academic title/affiliation, research interests, significant publications etc. Authors will be notified of the abstract acceptance by August 10, 2019. Selected papers could be considered for publication in a collective volume or in an international journal. As our tradition demands, the karaoke show will be part of this edition too. You will find more details here: http://death-studies.ro/abdd11/.
Contact Info:
Adriana Teodorescu Associate Lecturer Babeș-Bolyai University
* Dear Reader, On behalf of the editorial board of the European Journal of Life Writing, we are very happy to announce that the EJLW has published the first 28 articles of its eighth volume, which is now available at https://ejlw.eu/index Since the end of 2018, the European Journal of Life Writing is no longer published by the University Library of the VU Free University in Amsterdam, but by the University of Groningen Press. We are very grateful to the people of the Library of the VU Free University, who have very skilfully and kindly helped and guided us when we first started our Journal. At the same time we are very happy to join the collection of interesting scholarly journals published by the no less skilful, helpful and kind staff of the University of Groningen Press at Groningen University, who have expertly remodelled the lay-out of the EJLW and introduced a new version of OJS (Open Journal System). Please note that the European Journal of Life Writing is an open-access, scholarly e-journal, which is not funded by any governmental or other organisations. To support the ongoing work of the Journal, please visit https://ejlw.eu/donations. We are most grateful for any kind of financial support. Another possibility to support the Journal is by purchasing a hard copy of the Festschrift we made for Philip Lejeune on the occasion of his 80th birthday. A copy can be bought for € 30 (Libraries: € 50).If you have any questions about submitting an article or about donating money to the Journal, or if you would like  buy a copy of the Festschrfit, please contact the journal managers Monica Soeting (m.soeting@xs4all.nl) or Petra van Langen (ptvanlangen@gmail.com).Thank you very much for your support! On behalf of all the editors of the European Journal of Life Writing, Petra van Langen and Monica Soeting *
Dear all,

I am interested in organizing or joining a panel proposal for IABA Finland, June 2020. For my own paper, I plan to present research on how the future (near, distant, and unknown) is imagined in diaries and letters written by Jews in France during the Second World War. I envision a panel on the future in diaries and letters – genres generally seen as positioned in the present. Alternatively, the panel could explore different temporalities in diaries and letters written in extreme circumstances (i.e. war and genocide). Please contact me at roseau_ka@mercer.edu.

Katherine Roseau, PhD Assistant Professor of French Mercer University
Deadline for Submissions July 31, 2019

Call for Applications: How to Approach Biographical Research? – Workshop for Young Scholars (7/31/ 2019; 11/30/2019) Warsaw, Poland

The days when historical biographies had been reserved for life pictures of “great men” and – to a lesser degree – “great women” have long passed. Since then, many outstanding studies have demonstrated the enormous potential of either individual or group biographies, or biographical approach for historical research.
Biographical approach can provide insight into the way people thought and felt in the past, make us aware of the complexity of political and personal decisions and also of the scope for action of individuals in historical situations. It has a special place in the Jewish studies, since it allows to research and analyse complex identity choices. Similar processes also affect other ethnic and/or religious. However, it is also useful to scholars dealing with migration studies, social history and history of ideas. In order to assist young scholars with biographical research projects and to provide them with a friendly space to discuss research questions and problems, the POLIN Museum invites early career scholars and especially PhD students to participate in a one-day workshop on 30 November 2019 in Warsaw. The workshop precedes the conference “Biographies and Politics. The Involvement of Jews and People of Jewish Origin in Leftist Movements in 19th and 20th Century Poland” (1-2 December 2019), jointly organized by the POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews, the Aleksander Brückner Center for Polish Studies, the Center for Hebrew and Jewish Studies, University of Oxford and the UCL. The participants of the workshop are expected to also attend the conference. Interested early career scholars and PhD students are invited to submit the completed application form to: geopconference@polin.pl. The working language of the workshop will be English. Additional reading skills in Polish, Yiddish or German will be a plus. Participation in the workshop is free of charge. The POLIN Museum will cover the costs of accommodation and meals during the Workshop and the subsequent conference. Participants without institutional funding may apply for a travel grant. Deadline for application: 31 July 2019. The workshop is organized within the Global Education Outreach Program. The workshop was made possible thanks to the support of Taube Philanthropies, the William K. Bowes, Jr. Foundation, and the Association of the Jewish Historical Institute of Poland.  The workshop was made possible thanks to the support of the European Association for Jewish Studies.
Contact Info:
Contact Email:
Deadline for Submissions July 21, 2019

Call for Abstracts–Workshop “Non-Sites of Memory and Their Witnesses: The Testimonies of the Holocaust by Bullets”(7/21/2019; 9/23/2019) Krakow, Poland

The Research Center for Memory Cultures at the Faculty of Polish Studies of the Jagiellonian University and the Yahad – In Unum association kindly invite you to the workshop Non-Sites of Memory and Their Witnesses: The Testimonies of the Holocaust by Bullets 23 September 2019, Krakow, Faculty of Polish Studies at the Jagiellonian University More than 2 million Jews and tens of thousands of Roma were killed by German units in the occupied territories of Soviet Union and Poland between 1941 and 1944, in numerous executions across hundreds of villages and towns. This method of murder by special firing squads has come to be known as the “Holocaust by bullets”. The executions took place on the outskirts of human settlements, in fields, woods or swamps, in the view of neighbors, and sometimes with their complicity. Now, most these killing sites are invisible: unmarked and unmemorialized, overgrown and littered, repainted, demolished and repopulated. They are specific non-sites of memory: non-remembered but also unforgotten by the local communities, characterized by an ambiguous, unsettling status. In order to locate and recognize these sites, we need memory of eyewitnesses to the events that happened there. These witnesses, who are becoming harder and harder to find, have in most cases spent their entire lives next to the killing sites, yet nobody asked them to tell their story. They are our last link to the difficult heritage of the dispersed Shoah. The Research Center for Memory Cultures at the Faculty of Polish Studies of the Jagiellonian University and the Yahad – In Unum association kindly invite students enrolled in master’s and doctoral programs as well as early career researchers to the one-day workshop dedicated to the non-sites of memory and their witnesses. The French organization Yahad – In Unum, founded in 2004 in Paris by Father Patrick Desbois, researches the “Holocaust by bullets” in Central and Eastern Europe by collecting video testimonies of the eyewitnesses to the Shoah and identifying the killing sites. Until today, Yahad – In Unum has gathered almost 6,500 accounts and created the biggest collection of Holocaust bystanders’ testimonies. The Research Center for Memory Cultures – within the research project dedicated to the unmemorialized sites of genocide (supported by the National Program for the Development of Humanities), led by Prof. Roma Sendyka – has researched on sites of this kind and their impact on local communities for three years. The workshop (held in English) will have an open, seminar-like structure and will engage its participants in work with both archival documents and video testimonies related to killing sites. It will take a multidisciplinary approach to the sites of the dispersed Shoah and the testimonies of the eyewitnesses to the genocide. We will discuss the following issues: How to locate and identify a killing site; How to interpret archival documents related to them; How to find eyewitnesses and interview them; What is the relevance of space where an act of witnessing takes place as well as the language and gestures of a witness; How do the bystanders’ testimonies differ from the survivors’ accounts; Can only humans be witnesses; How to use eyewitnesses’ testimonies in transmitting the knowledge about the Shoah to the next generations; How do history (and oral history), sociology, as well as memory, cultural and performative studies help us understand video testimony; How was the Holocaust by bullets possible? After the workshop, the participants are invited to a lecture by Father Patrick Desbois, the founder of the Yahad – In Unum. The lecture will open the two-day international conference (24–25 September) “Sites of Violence and Their Communities: Critical Memory Studies in the Era of the Post-Human”, featuring, among other guests, Prof. Ewa Domańska, Prof. Caroline Sturdy Colls, Prof. Erica Lehrer and Dr. Bryce Lease. Applications, consisting of a 1-page CV and a short description (no more than 500 words) of the applicant’s research relevant to the topic of the workshop, should be submitted before 21 July 2019 to the address memorycultures@gmail.com. Notifications will be sent via email by 31 July 2019. Any questions regarding the workshop should be directed to the aforementioned email address. The organizers will provide catering during the workshop as well as accommodation for the night of 23/24 September. The organizing team are Dr. hab. Roma Sendyka, Aleksandra Szczepan, Dr. Kinga Siewior and Dr. Karina Jarzyńska from the Research Center for Memory Cultures, Patrice Bensimon and Michał Chojak from Yahad – In Unum and Dr. Stanley Bill from the Faculty of Modern & Medieval Languages of the University of Cambridge.
Contact Email:
Deadline for Submissions July 15, 2019 The Research Center for Memory Cultures at the Faculty of Polish Studies of the Jagiellonian University and the Yahad – In Unum association kindly invite you to the workshop Non-Sites of Memory and Their Witnesses: The Testimonies of the Holocaust by Bullets 23 September 2019, Kraków, Faculty of Polish Studies at the Jagiellonian University More than 2 million Jews and tens of thousands of Roma were killed by German units in the occupied territories of Soviet Union and Poland between 1941 and 1944, in numerous executions across hundreds of villages and towns. This method of murder by special firing squads has come to be known as the “Holocaust by bullets”. The executions took place on the outskirts of human settlements, in fields, woods or swamps, in the view of neighbors, and sometimes with their complicity. Now, most these killing sites are invisible: unmarked and unmemorialized, overgrown and littered, repainted, demolished and repopulated. They are specific non-sites of memory: non-remembered but also unforgotten by the local communities, characterized by an ambiguous, unsettling status. In order to locate and recognize these sites, we need memory of eyewitnesses to the events that happened there. These witnesses, who are becoming harder and harder to find, have in most cases spent their entire lives next to the killing sites, yet nobody asked them to tell their story. They are our last link to the difficult heritage of the dispersed Shoah. The Research Center for Memory Cultures at the Faculty of Polish Studies of the Jagiellonian University and the Yahad – In Unum association kindly invite students enrolled in master’s and doctoral programs to the one-day workshop dedicated to the non-sites of memory and their witnesses. The French organization Yahad – In Unum, founded in 2004 in Paris by Father Patrick Desbois, researches the “Holocaust by bullets” in Central and Eastern Europe by collecting video testimonies of the eyewitnesses to the Shoah and identifying the killing sites. Until today, Yahad – In Unum has gathered almost 6,500 accounts and created the biggest collection of Holocaust bystanders’ testimonies. The Research Center for Memory Cultures – within the research project dedicated to the unmemorialized sites of genocide (supported by the National Program for the Development of Humanities), led by Prof. Roma Sendyka – has researched on sites of this kind and their impact on local communities for three years. The workshop (held in English) will have an open, seminar-like structure and will engage its participants in work with both archival documents and video testimonies related to killing sites. It will take a multidisciplinary approach to the sites of the dispersed Shoah and the testimonies of the eyewitnesses to genocide. How to locate and identify a killing site; How to interpret archival documents related to them; How to find eyewitnesses and interview them; What is the relevance of space where an act of witnessing takes place as well as the language and gestures of a witness; How do the bystanders’ testimonies differ from the survivors’ accounts; Can only humans be witnesses; How to use eyewitnesses’ testimonies in transmitting the knowledge about the Shoah to the next generations; How do history (and oral history), sociology, as well as memory, cultural and performative studies help us understand video testimony; How was the Holocaust by bullets possible? After the workshop, the participants are invited to a lecture by Father Patrick Desbois, the founder of the Yahad – In Unum. The lecture will open the two-day international conference (24–25 September) “Sites of Violence and Their Communities: Critical Memory Studies in the Era of the Post-Human”, featuring, among other guests, Prof. Ewa Domańska, Prof. Caroline Sturdy Colls, Prof. Erica Lehrer and Dr. Bryce Lease. Applications, consisting of a 1-page CV and a short description (no more than 500 words) of the applicant’s research relevant to the topic of the workshop, should be submitted no later than 15 July 2019 to the address memorycultures@gmail.com. Notifications will be sent via email by 31 July 2019. Any questions regarding the workshop should be directed to the aforementioned email address. Organizers will provide catering during the workshop as well as accommodation for the night of 23/24 September. In some cases, travel grants may also be secured for the workshop’s participants. The organizing team are Dr. hab. Roma Sendyka, Aleksandra Szczepan, Dr. Kinga Siewior and Dr. Karina Jarzyńska from the Research Center for Memory Cultures, Michał Chojak from Yahad – In Unum and Dr. Stanley Bill from the Faculty of Modern & Medieval Languages of the University of Cambridge. *

Life Writing, Volume 16, Issue 3, September 2019 is now available online onTaylor & Francis Online.

This new issue contains the following articles:is now available online onTaylor & Francis Online. This new issue contains the following articles: Articles
The Personal is Political. Self-enunciation Strategies in Italian Second-wave Feminism Walter Stefano Baroni Pages: 329-344 | DOI: 10.1080/14484528.2018.1469615
Reading Phoebe Gloeckner’s A Child’s Life and Other Stories at the Time of #MeToo Olga Michael Pages: 345-367 | DOI: 10.1080/14484528.2018.1507416
Sites of Servant Memory in the English Country House: Frederick Gorst and the Gladstone Vase Ellen O’Brien Pages: 369-384 | DOI: 10.1080/14484528.2018.1564216
Orality, Text and Witness in the Early Work of Tony Parker Simon Featherstone Pages: 385-396 | DOI: 10.1080/14484528.2018.1522494
Essays
Writing an Illness Narrative and Negotiating Identity: A Kuwaiti Academic/Author’s Journey Shahd Alshammari Pages: 431-438 | DOI: 10.1080/14484528.2018.1514240
Evoking the Female ‘Asexual’: Narrating the Silenced Self Aoife Sadlier Pages: 439-461 | DOI: 10.1080/14484528.2018.1510288
Hawai‘i Jungle Writing: Where There is the Most Life Stewart Manley Pages: 463-475 | DOI: 10.1080/14484528.2018.1470444
Reviews
Memory Work: The Second Generation by Nina Fischer, London, Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies, 2015, 262 pp., ISBN: 978-1-137-55761-2 Marta Bladek Pages: 479-482 | DOI: 10.1080/14484528.2017.1361781
<a href=”https://hawaii.us14.list-manage.com/track/click?u=