Unit: Information Technology Management
Program: Management Information Sys (BBA)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Thu Oct 10, 2013 - 3:51:15 pm

1) Below are your program's student learning outcomes (SLOs). Please update as needed.

Goals 1 through 4 are the same for ALL BBA students. 

Objectives listed under Goal 5 vary by major. 

Objectives for MIS are Listed below 

MIS Objective 1: Students can write programs that involve use of variables, expressions, branching, loops, arrays, and functions [Assessed in ITM 352]

Rubrics:              0 = Can not write a functional program involving, expressions, branching, loops

                        1 = Can write functional programs involving specific examples of expressions, branching, loops, arrays, and functions in a directed setting.

2 =  Can creatively apply and combine basic programming techniques to address a variety of programming problems.

MIS Objective 2: Students can conceptualize, plan, design, and implement a basic application from basic requirements [Assessed in ITM 353]

Rubrics            0 = Can not build basic application

1 = Can build e-service application involving user registration, login, formatted display of products/services/activities, user interaction (e.g. selection of products), processing of user input (e.g. data validation)

2 = Can build e-service application with sophisticated features such as shopping carts, security, concurrent users that share data, and data persistence

MIS Objective 3:  Students can describe the major activities of software project management, including techniques for managing and documenting these activities. [Assessed in MGT 353]

Rubrics            0 = Not met: Can not describe the major activities of software project management.

                        1 = Can describe the major activities of software project management and can give simple examples of how to manage and document project activities.

                        2 = Demonstrates a thorough understanding of a wide range of techniques for project management.

MIS Objective 4: Students can properly determine what kind of database architecture to use for a given problem, considering costs and benefits. [Assessed in ITM 354]

Rubrics            0 =  Can not choose an appropriate database architecture.

                        1 =  Can choose an appropriate database architecture given a well-defined, modest sized problem.

                        2 =  Can analyze a complex problem, evaluate alternative architectures, and justify the choice of one architecture.

MIS Objective 5:  A student can properly determine what kind of network design/architecture to use for a given problem, considering costs and benefits. [Assessed in ITM 431]

Rubrics            0 = Cannot choose an appropriate network design/architecture

1 = Can choose an appropriate network design/architecture given a well-defined, modest sized problem.

2 = Can analyze a complex problem, evaluate alternative architectures, and justify the choice of one architecture.

MIS Objective 6: Students can properly describe key characteristics of IT management functions in businesses and firms. [Assessed in ITM 366]

Rubrics            0 = Cannot describe key characteristics.

                        1 = Can describe several key characteristics.

                        2 = Can describe most important characteristics of the IT management function

2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL:
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online:
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online: NA
Other: These will be listed on the Shidler College web site, by the end of the Fall 13 Semester
Other:

3) Select one option:

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2013:

4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.

0%
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%

5) Did your program engage in any program assessment activities between June 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013? (e.g., establishing/revising outcomes, aligning the curriculum to outcomes, collecting evidence, interpreting evidence, using results, revising the assessment plan, creating surveys or tests, etc.)

Yes
No (skip to question 14)

6) For the period June 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the SLOs that were targeted, if applicable.

SKIP

7) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question #6.

SKIP

8) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

SKIP

9) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)

SKIP

10) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)

SKIP

11) For the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goal(s) stated in Question #6:
Summarize the actual results.

SKIP

12) State how the program used the results or plans to use the results. Please be specific.

SKIP

13) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries?
This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, program aspects and so on.

SKIP

14) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.
Or, if the program did engage in assessment activities, please add any other important information here.

received no data on the separate ITM goal. Included in the overall BBA information