Unit: Management & Industrial Relations
Program: Management (BBA)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Thu Oct 10, 2013 - 2:01:39 pm

1) Below are your program's student learning outcomes (SLOs). Please update as needed.

Goals 1 through 4 are the same for ALL BBA students. 

Objectives listed under Goal 5 vary by major. 

Objectives for Management Majors are Listed below  

MANAGEMENT Objective 1: Students are able to explain the four functions of management: planning, organizing, leading, controlling [Assessed in BUS 315]

Rubrics:                  0= Not able to explain all four functions

                                    1= Accurately explains all four functions

                                    2= Accurately analyzes a business using all four functions

MANAGEMENT Objective 2: Students are able to analyze and apply results on a personality/ self assessment instrument to future career options [Assessed in BUS 315]

Rubrics:                  0=Not able to analyze results

1= Accurately analyzes results and explain how result might be utilized

2 = Accurately analyzes results and utilizes them to analyze career options

MANAGEMENT Objective 3: Students are able to analyze a company using concepts from: management, marketing, finance, accounting and information technology [Assessed in BUS 345]

Rubrics:                  0=Not able to use concepts from each area in analysis

                                    1=Able to use concepts from each area in analysis

                                    2-Able to integrate concepts from all areas in analysis

MANAGEMENT Objective 4:  Students are able to make recommendations for improving a company’s performance, based on analysis [Assessed in BUS 345]

Rubrics:                  0= Not able to make recommendations that are supported by analysis

                                    1=Accurate analysis supporting recommendations

                                    2=Comprehensive and insightful analysis and recommendations

2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL:
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online:
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online: NA
Other: These will be listed on the Shidler College web site, by the end of the Fall 13 Semester
Other:

3) Select one option:

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2013:

4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.

0%
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%

5) Did your program engage in any program assessment activities between June 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013? (e.g., establishing/revising outcomes, aligning the curriculum to outcomes, collecting evidence, interpreting evidence, using results, revising the assessment plan, creating surveys or tests, etc.)

Yes
No (skip to question 14)

6) For the period June 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the SLOs that were targeted, if applicable.

BBA Goal 5: Management Majors MGT Objective 1: Students are able to explain the four functions of management: planning, organizing, leading, controlling [Assessed in BUS 315] Rubrics: 0= Not able to explain all four functions 1= Accurately explains all four functions 2= Accurately analyzes a business using all four functions MGT Objective 2: Students are able to analyze and apply results on a personality/ self assessment instrument to future career options [Assessed in BUS 315] Rubrics: 0=Not able to analyze results 1= Accurately analyzes results and explain how result might be utilized 2 = Accurately analyzes results and utilizes them to analyze career options MGT Objective 3: Students are able to analyze a company using concepts from: management, marketing, finance, accounting and information technology [Assessed in BUS 345] Rubrics: 0=Not able to use concepts from each area in analysis 1=Able to use concepts from each area in analysis 2-Able to integrate concepts from all areas in analysis MGT Objective 4: Students are able to make recommendations for improving a company’s performance, based on analysis [Assessed in BUS 345] Rubrics: 0= Not able to make recommendations that are supported by analysis 1=Accurate analysis supporting recommendations 2=Comprehensive and insightful analysis and recommendations

7) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question #6.

instructors turned in spreadsheets that indicated whether or not students met learning objectives

8) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

6

9) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)

Course instructor(s)
Faculty committee
Ad hoc faculty group
Department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Faculty advisor
Advisors (in student support services)
Students (graduate or undergraduate)
Dean/Director
Other:

10) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)

Used a rubric or scoring guide
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
Compiled survey results
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., external organization administered and scored the nursing licensing exam)
Other:

11) For the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goal(s) stated in Question #6:
Summarize the actual results.

75% of students met the specific management objectives

12) State how the program used the results or plans to use the results. Please be specific.

Results are disseminated to faculty. We will hold an assessment committee meeting to discuss how to drive improvement from the results

13) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries?
This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, program aspects and so on.

as our accrediting body, the AACSB is refining and re-introducing its standards, they are looking for a more dynamic assessment program, including indirect measures and more evidence of using the results to drive continuance improvement. To achieve this, more involvement from career services and faculty will be required.

14) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.
Or, if the program did engage in assessment activities, please add any other important information here.