Unit: Atmospheric Sciences
Program: Atmospheric Sciences (PhD)
Degree: Doctorate
Date: Thu Nov 19, 2020 - 4:02:14 pm

1) Program Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Institutional Learning Objectives (ILOs)

1. Design and execute a path of study resulting in the publication of original work that contributes to a sub-discipline in the atmospheric sciences.

(1. Demonstrate comprehensive knowledge in one or more general subject areas related to, but not confined to, a specific area of interest., 2. Demonstrate understanding of research methodology and techniques specific to one’s field of study., 3. Apply research methodology and/or scholarly inquiry techniques specific to one’s field of study., 4. Critically analyze, synthesize, and utilize information and data related to one’s field of study., 5. Proficiently communicate and disseminate information in a manner relevant to the field and intended audience., 6. Conduct research or projects as a responsible and ethical professional, including consideration of and respect for other cultural perspectives.)

2. Explain fundamental concepts to both undergraduate and graduate students.

(1. Demonstrate comprehensive knowledge in one or more general subject areas related to, but not confined to, a specific area of interest., 5. Proficiently communicate and disseminate information in a manner relevant to the field and intended audience., 7. Interact professionally with others.)

3. Write clear, concise reports and a dissertation.

(1. Demonstrate comprehensive knowledge in one or more general subject areas related to, but not confined to, a specific area of interest., 2. Demonstrate understanding of research methodology and techniques specific to one’s field of study., 3. Apply research methodology and/or scholarly inquiry techniques specific to one’s field of study., 4. Critically analyze, synthesize, and utilize information and data related to one’s field of study., 5. Proficiently communicate and disseminate information in a manner relevant to the field and intended audience.)

4. Become a viable candidate for employment at major operational centers, research laboratories and universities world-wide.

(6. Conduct research or projects as a responsible and ethical professional, including consideration of and respect for other cultural perspectives., 7. Interact professionally with others.)

2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL: http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/met/
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online: http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/atmo/index.php/information-for-prospective-graduate-students/
UHM Catalog. Page Number: https://manoa.hawaii.edu/catalog/schools-colleges/soest/atmo/
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online: www.soest.hawaii.edu/met/met_syllabi.shtml
Other: Syllabi handed out to students in enrolled class

3) Please review, add, replace, or delete the existing curriculum map.

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2020:

4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.

0%
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%

5) Does the program have learning achievement results for its program SLOs? (Example of achievement results: "80% of students met expectations on SLO 1.")(check one):

No
Yes, on some(1-50%) of the program SLOs
Yes, on most(51-99%) of the program SLOs
Yes, on all(100%) of the program SLOs

6) Did your program engage in any program learning assessment activities between November 1, 2018 and October 31, 2020?

Yes
No (skip to question 17)

7) What best describes the program-level learning assessment activities that took place for the period November 1, 2018 and October 31, 2020? (Check all that apply.)

SKIP

8) Briefly explain the assessment activities that took place since November 2018.

SKIP

9) What types of evidence did the program use as part of the assessment activities checked in question 7? (Check all that apply.)

SKIP

10) State the number of students (or persons) who submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

SKIP

11) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)

SKIP

12) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)

SKIP

13) Summarize the results from the evaluation, analysis, interpretation of evidence (checked in question 12). For example, report the percentage of students who achieved each SLO.

SKIP

14) What best describes how the program used the results? (Check all that apply.)

SKIP

15) Please briefly describe how the program used its findings/results.

SKIP

16) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries? This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, and great achievements regarding program assessment in this reporting period.

SKIP

17) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please justify.

Our Ph.D. students uniformly met or exceeded the student learning objectives.  Their performance and grades were excellent on the whole.