Unit: Kinesiology & Rehabilitation Science
Program: Kinesiology & Rehab Sci (BS)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Fri Oct 10, 2014 - 12:39:59 pm

1) Institutional Learning Objectives (ILOs) and Program Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)

1. Students will demonstrate knowledge of anatomical, physiological, biomechanical, and psychological principles of how the body moves in relation to space, time, and distance.

(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field)

2. Students will demonstrate knowledge in the application of movement principles and concepts related to movement.

(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth)

3. Students will demonstrate and communicate the ability to coordinate, plan, manage, and facilitate exercise prescription and information

(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research, 2c. Communicate and report, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth)

4. Students will demonstrate application of programming for healthy lifestyles through application and research venues.

(1a. General education, 2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research, 2c. Communicate and report)

5. Students will demonstrate civic responsibility through a service learning project [capstone experience]

(3d. Civic participation)

6. Students will demonstrate pro-social skills and professional dispositions in human interaction especially for persons of color and Native Hawaiians.

(1c. Understand Hawaiian culture and history, 3b. Respect for people and cultures, in particular Hawaiian culture, 3c. Stewardship of the natural environment)

7. Students will be able to demonstrate culturally responsive teaching and interaction with persons of color and Native Hawaiians.

(1c. Understand Hawaiian culture and history, 3b. Respect for people and cultures, in particular Hawaiian culture)

2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL: https://coe.hawaii.edu/academics/kinesiology-rehabilitation-science/bs-program
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online:
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online:
Other: Departmental brochure
Other:

3) Select one option:

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2014:

4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.

0%
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%

5) Did your program engage in any program assessment activities between June 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014? (e.g., establishing/revising outcomes, aligning the curriculum to outcomes, collecting evidence, interpreting evidence, using results, revising the assessment plan, creating surveys or tests, etc.)

Yes
No (skip to question 14)

6) For the period between June 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the SLOs that were targeted, if applicable.

    

The assessment system for the Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Science (BS) program is aligned to the College of Education's goals to prepare educators who are knowledgeable, effective, and caring professionals. We are able to collect evidence of our students' knowledge, skills, and dispositions by aligning program standards to key assessments identified in various classes throughout the program.

     The assessment questions for the Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Science (BS) program are as follows:

  1. Knowledge- What should the students know and be able to do by the completion of the program?
  2. Skills- What skills should the students be able to demonstrate and apply to a real world setting?
  3. Dispositions- How well do our students demonstrate professional dispositions?

Alignment of assessment questions and direct evidence to SLOs and ILOs are as follows:

Assessment Questions and ILOs

Alignment of Student Learning Objectives

Assessment Question # 1- Knowledge- What should the students know and be able to do by the completion of the program?                                                                                                      Direct Evidence: KRS 353- Structural Anatomy Rubric; KRS 354L Rubric; KRS 463- Biomechanics Rubric

ILO # 1- Know- Breadth and Depth of Knowledge

 

   1a. General Education

1a1; 1a2; 1a3

   1b. Specialized Study in an Academic Field

1b1;1b2; 1b3

   1c. Understand Hawaiian Culture and History

1c6; 1c7

Assessment Question # 2- Skills- What skills should the students be able to demonstrate and apply to a real world setting?                                                                                                    Direct Evidence: Entry Level Volunteer Evaluation Rubric

ILO # 2- Do- Intellectual and Practical Skills

  

   2a. Think Critically and Creatively

2a2; 2a3; 2a4

   2b. Conduct Research

2b3; 2b4

   2c. Communicate and Report

2c3; 2c4

Assessment Question # 3- Dispositions- How well do our students demonstrate professional dispositions?                                                                                                                             Direct Evidence: KRS 488- Practicum Evaluation Form; KRS 488-Professional Dispositions Rubric

ILO # 3- Value- Personal and Social Responsibility

 

    3a. Continuous Learning and Personal Growth

3a2; 3a3

    3b. Respect for People and Cultures, in Particular Hawaiian Culture

3b6; 3b7

    3c. Stewardship of the Natural Environment

3c6

    3d. Civic Participation in Their Communities

3d5

 

7) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question #6.

Assessment questions have been presented, evidence for each, along with a description of each direct evidence.

Assessment Question # 1- Knowledge- What should the students know and be able to do by the completion of the program?  

1.KRS 353- Structural Anatomy Rubric- Students must demonstrate knowledge of structural anatomy and are rated on their overall knowledge of gross anatomy through major exams and quizzes and on their anatomical knowledge for structural anatomy through identification of anatomical structures. Students receive a cumulative score for all exams and quizzes and are rated unacceptable, acceptable, or target on the following elements: knowledge of gross human anatomy; ability to identify anatomical structures; and ability to apply knowledge.  For structural anatomy, students are asked to identify anatomical structures and are rated on the following scale: 1 = unacceptable; 2 = acceptable; and 3 = Target.   

2.KRS 354L Rubric- Students must demonstrate knowledge of measurement techniques for the following: cardiovascular responses to graded exercise; skeletal muscle motor recruitment and responses to load and fatigue; relationship between static and dynamic strength, absolute and relative strength; metabolic pathways used to develop anaerobic power and blood lactate; metabolic pathways used to develop energy aerobically; and understanding of body composition. Students are rated on the following scale: 1 = unacceptable; 2 = acceptable; and 3 = Target.   

3.KRS 463- Biomechanics Rubric- Students must demonstrate knowledge of biomechanics and are rated on their overall knowledge of biomechanics through major exams and quizzes and on their direct application of biomechanical knowledge. Students receive a cumulative score for all exams and quizzes and are rated unacceptable, acceptable, or target on the following elements: combination of human anatomy and physics; application of mathematical skills to motor activity; and association of biomechanical principles along with analysis of fundamental activities. For application of biomechanical knowledge, students are asked to directly apply biomechanical principles to sporting activities and are rated on the following scale: 1 = unacceptable; 2 = acceptable; and 3 = Target.   

Indirect Evidence includes the collection of program completer surveys that are distributed by the Dean’s Office to candidates in their final semester. These data are published in reports aggregated by program in the College of Education Intranet and are also reported on the College of Education website “Measuring our Success.”

Data are reported for AY2013/2014 (Fall 2013, Spring 2014, Summer 2014) in Question # 11.

Assessment Question # 2- Skills- What skills should the students be able to demonstrate and apply to a real world setting?      

1.Entry Level Volunteer Evaluation Rubric- Students in the program are required to complete 40 hours of volunteer work. The evaluation is one part of the application process. Students are rated at an “Unacceptable,” “Acceptable,” or “Target” level. Students are assessed on the following criteria: Punctuality and Dependability; Attire and Dress; Interpersonal and Communication Skills; Motivation; and Rapport with Staff and Supervisor.

Data are reported for AY2013/2014 (Fall 2013, Spring 2014, Summer 2014) in Question # 11.

Assessment Question # 3- Dispositions- How well do our students demonstrate professional dispositions?     

1.KRS 488- Practicum Evaluation Form- Students enrolled in the program are required to complete a practicum experience. They are assessed on professional dispositions and must achieve at least a “Good” level. Students are assessed in the following three areas: General evaluation; Specific skills; and Strengths and weaknesses. Levels include: Exceptional; Good; Fair; Poor; and No Basis for Evaluation.

2.KRS 488- Professional Dispositions Rubric – Students in the program are assessed on professional dispositions and are assessed in the following areas: Character; Respect; Work ethic; Effective Communication; and Collaboration. Students must achieve an “Acceptable” level. Levels include: Unacceptable; Acceptable; and Target.

Data are reported for AY2013/2014 (Fall 2013, Spring 2014, Summer 2014) in Question # 11.

8) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

Below is a table indicating: assessment question; direct evidence used for each assessment question, and number of students who submitted direct evidence that were evaluated. A convenience sample was used for all direct evidence.

Direct Evidence

N = 763

 

Fall 2013

Spring 2014

Summer 2014

Assessment Question # 1- Knowledge- What should the students know and be able to do by the completion of the program?  

 

1.KRS 353 – Structural Anatomy Rubric

n = 38

n = 18/17/18

n =  35

2.KRS 354L Rubric

n = 35/32

n = 14/15/17

n = 39

3.KRS 463 Biomechanics Rubric

n = 33

n = 13

n = 19

Assessment Question # 2- Skills- What skills should the students be able to demonstrate and apply to a real world setting?      

 

1.Entry Level Volunteer Evaluation Rubric  

n = 35

n = 39

n = 19

Assessment Question # 3- Dispositions- How well do our students demonstrate professional dispositions?     

 

1.KRS 488- Practicum Evaluation Form 

n = 20

n = 20

n = 17/16

2.KRS- 488- Professional Dispositions Rubric                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

n = 20

n = 20

n = 17/16

 

9) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)

Course instructor(s)
Faculty committee
Ad hoc faculty group
Department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Faculty advisor
Advisors (in student support services)
Students (graduate or undergraduate)
Dean/Director
Other:

10) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)

Used a rubric or scoring guide
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
Compiled survey results
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., external organization administered and scored the nursing licensing exam)
Other:

11) For the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goal(s) stated in Question #6:
Summarize the actual results.

Data Table

AY 2013-2014

Scoring rubrics for direct evidence in the identified classes have been aggregated and presented below.

Assessment Questions, ILOs and SLOs

Fall 2013

Spring 2014

Summer 2014

Assessment Question # 1

N = 138

N = 112

N = 93

Direct Evidence: KRS 353- Structural Anatomy Rubric; KRS 354L Rubric; KRS 463- Biomechanics Rubric

U

A

T

U

A

T

U

A

T

%

5.80%

90.58%

3.62%

17.86%

79.46%

2.68%

1.08%

94.62%

4.30%

ILO # 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   1a. General Education

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1a1

8

125

5

20

89

3

1

88

4

1a2

8

125

5

20

89

3

1

88

4

1a3

8

125

5

20

89

3

1

88

4

   1b. Specialized Study in an Academic Field

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1b1

8

125

5

20

89

3

1

88

4

1b2

8

125

5

20

89

3

1

88

4

1b2

8

125

5

20

89

3

1

88

4

   1c. Understand Hawaiian Culture and History

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1c6

8

125

5

20

89

3

1

88

4

1c7

8

125

5

20

89

3

1

88

4

Assessment Question # 2

N = 35

N = 39

N = 19

Direct Evidence: Entry Level Volunteer Evaluation Rubric

U

A

T

U

A

T

U

A

T

%

 

94.29%

5.71%

2.56%

89.74%

7.69%

 

89.47%

10.53%

ILO # 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   2a. Think Critically and Creatively

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2a2

0

33

2

1

35

3

0

17

2

2a3

0

33

2

1

35

3

0

17

2

2a4

0

33

2

1

35

3

0

17

2

   2b. Conduct Research

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2b3

0

33

2

1

35

3

0

17

2

2b4

0

33

2

1

35

3

0

17

 

   2c. Communicate and Report

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2c3

0

33

2

1

35

3

0

17

2

2c4

0

33

2

1

35

3

0

17

2

Assessment Question # 3

N = 20

N = 20

N = 33

Direct Evidence: KRS 488- Practicum Evaluation Form; Professional Dispositions Rubric

U

A

T

U

A

T

U

A

T

%

 

90%

10%

20%

80%

 

3.03%

87.88%

90.09%

ILO # 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    3a. Continuous Learning and Personal Growth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3a2

0

18

2

4

16

0

1

29

3

3a3

0

18

2

4

16

0

1

29

3

    3b. Respect for People and Cultures, in Particular Hawaiian Culture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3b6

0

18

2

4

16

0

1

29

3

3b7

0

18

2

4

16

0

1

29

3

    3c. Stewardship of the Natural Environment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3c6

0

18

2

4

16

0

1

29

3

    3d. Civic Participation in Their Communities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

3d5

0

18

2

4

16

0

1

29

3

     U = Unacceptable; A = Acceptable; T = Target; The N represents the total number of students enrolled in the identified classes that the direct evidence was administered and collected in.

12) State how the program used the results or plans to use the results. Please be specific.

Faculty in the program consistently use results of direct evidence to make improvements to individual classes and to enhance learning experiences of students.

Given the total number of students, the amount of students achieving an “unacceptable” level is within a bell curve. However, direct evidence has been looked at carefully to see whether it was directly related to performance of students or how content was administered in the class.

In several classes  (KRS 488- Spring and Summer) students achieving an unacceptable level, were those who received” Incompletes” for a course grade and did not complete the course requirements for the “Incomplete grade” by the due date. When course requirements are not completed by due dates “Incomplete” grades automatically revert to a failing grade.

Additional changes include the following:

1.Assignments have been revised to make rubrics more clear

2.Examples of assignment are posted as a visual for students to follow along with guidelines

3.Course syllabi are reviewed twice

4.Syllabus quiz is given to reinforce guidelines

5.Additional time to review assignment guidelines have been implemented into class time

6.Mandatory drafts of assignments that are graded have been added to courses to allow students additional time to work on and apply material. All drafts are graded.

13) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries?
This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, program aspects and so on.

Insights gained were that options for additional review along with examples are more helpful for students. Also giving class time for students to work on assignments is beneficial. Students are more likely to work on the assignments and ask the course instructor questions if class time is given and are less inclined to seek outside help during office hours.

14) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.
Or, if the program did engage in assessment activities, please add any other important information here.

N/A