Unit: Management & Industrial Relations
Program: International Business (BBA)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Thu Oct 10, 2013 - 1:48:49 pm

1) Below are your program's student learning outcomes (SLOs). Please update as needed.

Assess in Undergraduate Management Courses BBA Learning Goal #5: Effectively apply skills in a functional specialization Assess in MGT 343 International Business Major Objective 1:Students can describe environmental differences between business within domestic and international contexts. Rubrics: 0 = Does not describe environmental differences. 1 = Describes major impact environmental differences accurately. 2 = Describes the impact of environmental differences comprehensively. International Business Major Objective 2: Students are able to analyze multinational companies’ operations in depth, drawing from concepts in these areas: cross-cultural management, international marketing, and international finance. Rubrics: 0 = Insufficient use of different functions and concepts. 1 = Use all different functions and concepts. 2 = Integrate all different functions and concepts accurately. Assess in MGT 342 International Business Objective 3: Students are able to communicate their understanding that international business requires management of complex organization. [Assessed in MGT 342] Rubrics: 0 = Failed to communicate the complexity. 1 = Communicated the complexity accurately. 2 = Communicated the complexity comprehensively. International Business Objective 4: Students are able to describe the impact of global environment on multinational companies in both domestic and foreign markets. [Assessed in MGT342] Rubrics: 0 = Not able to describe the impact. 1 = Describe the impact accurately. 2 = Describe the impact comprehensively.

2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL:
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online:
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online: NA
Other: These will be listed on the Shidler College web site, by the end of the Fall 13 Semester

3) Select one option:

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2013:

4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.


5) Did your program engage in any program assessment activities between June 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013? (e.g., establishing/revising outcomes, aligning the curriculum to outcomes, collecting evidence, interpreting evidence, using results, revising the assessment plan, creating surveys or tests, etc.)

No (skip to question 14)

6) For the period June 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the SLOs that were targeted, if applicable.


7) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question #6.

8) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

9) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)

Course instructor(s)
Faculty committee
Ad hoc faculty group
Department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Faculty advisor
Advisors (in student support services)
Students (graduate or undergraduate)

10) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)

Used a rubric or scoring guide
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
Compiled survey results
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., external organization administered and scored the nursing licensing exam)

11) For the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goal(s) stated in Question #6:
Summarize the actual results.

12) State how the program used the results or plans to use the results. Please be specific.

13) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries?
This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, program aspects and so on.

14) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.
Or, if the program did engage in assessment activities, please add any other important information here.

results not separated from overall BBA