Unit: Financial Economics & Institutions
Program: Finance (BBA)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Thu Oct 10, 2013 - 1:42:37 pm

1) Below are your program's student learning outcomes (SLOs). Please update as needed.

Assess in FIN 341 BBA Goal 5: Effectively apply skills in a functional specialization Entrepreneurship Major Objective 2: Apply relevant financial principles and use the tools necessary to assess start-up needs and viability [Assessed in Fin 341] Trait Rubrics Assessing Financial Needs 0 = Unable to identify the correct approaches to use or unable to effectively apply them if known 1 = Able to identify correct approaches and generally able to apply them. 2 = Able to identity correct analytic approaches, and correctly use them in ways that directly link the financial analysis to the financial needs of a new business. Valuation 0 = Unable to identify the correct valuation approach to use or to correctly calculate a valuation 1 = Able to identify the correct approach and generally able to arrive at appropriate valuations 2 = Able to identify the correct approach from the perspectives of different parties and to correctly calculation evaluations using different approaches.

2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL:
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online:
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online: NA
Other: will be posted on the Shidler College web site during the 2013-2014 academic year
Other:

3) Select one option:

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2013:

4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.

0%
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%

5) Did your program engage in any program assessment activities between June 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013? (e.g., establishing/revising outcomes, aligning the curriculum to outcomes, collecting evidence, interpreting evidence, using results, revising the assessment plan, creating surveys or tests, etc.)

Yes
No (skip to question 14)

6) For the period June 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the SLOs that were targeted, if applicable.

Assess in FIN 341 BBA Goal 5: Effectively apply skills in a functional specialization Entrepreneurship Major Objective 2: Apply relevant financial principles and use the tools necessary to assess start-up needs and viability [Assessed in Fin 341] Trait Rubrics Assessing Financial Needs 0 = Unable to identify the correct approaches to use or unable to effectively apply them if known 1 = Able to identify correct approaches and generally able to apply them. 2 = Able to identity correct analytic approaches, and correctly use them in ways that directly link the financial analysis to the financial needs of a new business. Valuation 0 = Unable to identify the correct valuation approach to use or to correctly calculate a valuation 1 = Able to identify the correct approach and generally able to arrive at appropriate valuations 2 = Able to identify the correct approach from the perspectives of different parties and to correctly calculation evaluations using different approaches.

7) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question #6.

Instructor determined, student by student met or exceeded learning objective expectations

8) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

2. random selection of students

9) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)

Course instructor(s)
Faculty committee
Ad hoc faculty group
Department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Faculty advisor
Advisors (in student support services)
Students (graduate or undergraduate)
Dean/Director
Other:

10) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)

Used a rubric or scoring guide
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
Compiled survey results
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., external organization administered and scored the nursing licensing exam)
Other:

11) For the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goal(s) stated in Question #6:
Summarize the actual results.

out of 172 students, 81% met or exceeded learning objectives.

12) State how the program used the results or plans to use the results. Please be specific.

Results are disseminated to faculty. We will hold an assessment committee meeting to discuss how to drive improvement from the results

13) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries?
This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, program aspects and so on.

as our accrediting body, the AACSB is refining and re-introducing its standards, they are looking for a more dynamic assessment program, including indirect measures and more evidence of using the results to drive continuance improvement. To achieve this, more involvement from career services and faculty will be required.

14) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.
Or, if the program did engage in assessment activities, please add any other important information here.