Unit: BBA
Program: BBA (Acc, Entr, Fin, Gen, Hum Res, Intl Bus, Mgt, MIS, Mkt)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Fri Oct 19, 2012 - 3:05:07 pm

1) Below are your program's student learning outcomes (SLOs). Please update as needed.

1.  Communicate effectively in writing and oral presentations

Objectives:

1 Students will give an effective oral presentation [Assessed in BUS345]

2. Students will write an effective report [Assessed in BUS345]

2. Manage and use technology in a business setting

Objectives:           

1.  Students will explain information technology usage across different business processes and functions. [Assessed in BUS311]

2.  Students will be able to evaluate the costs/benefits of applying technology in business. [Assessed in BUS311]

3.  Students will be able to identify IT/data security and integrity issues. [Assessed in BUS311]

4.  Students will be able to use IT to conduct quantitative data analysis [Assessed in BUS310]

3. Demonstrate an understanding of global business with an emphasis on the Asia Pacific region

Objectives:

1. Students will describe the common principals that characterize global business.  [Assessed in BUS313]

2. Students will identify and describe various comparative national risks within the context of analysis of Asia-Pacific settings. [Assessed in BUS313]

3. Student demonstrates a knowledge of the Asia-Pacific region [Assessed in BUS313]

4.  Students will describe how national cultures influence business practices and relationships  [Assessed in BUS 345]

4. Identify and analyze ethical issues.

Objectives:

1. Identify different ethical frameworks that can be applied to business situations. [Assessed in BUS 315]

2. Apply ethical frameworks to a business situation. [Assessed in BUS 315]

3. Describe how culture influences ethical perspectives. [Assessed in BUS 315]

4.  Explain the boundaries and overlaps between ethics and law. [Assessed in BUS 315]

5. Discuss the consequences of ethical choices. [Assessed in BUS 315]

5. Effectively apply skills in a functional specialization

Objectives vary by major 

2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL: http://www.shidler.hawaii.edu/Default.aspx?tabid=168&utm_source=Homepage&utm_medium=Homepage%2BPromo%20Links&utm_campaign=Undergraduate%2BPrograms
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online:
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online:
Other:
Other:

3) Select one option:

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2012:

4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.

0%
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%

5) Did your program engage in any program assessment activities between June 1, 2011 and September 30, 2012? (e.g., establishing/revising outcomes, aligning the curriculum to outcomes, collecting evidence, interpreting evidence, using results, revising the assessment plan, creating surveys or tests, etc.)

Yes
No (skip to question 14)

6) For the period June 1, 2011 to September 30, 2012: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the SLOs that were targeted, if applicable.

See the objectives listed in #1

7) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question #6.

professors randomly selected students to measure on their achievement of learning objectives.

8) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

26 professors

9) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)

Course instructor(s)
Faculty committee
Ad hoc faculty group
Department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Faculty advisor
Advisors (in student support services)
Students (graduate or undergraduate)
Dean/Director
Other:

10) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)

Used a rubric or scoring guide
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
Compiled survey results
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., external organization administered and scored the nursing licensing exam)
Other:

11) For the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goal(s) stated in Question #6:
Summarize the actual results.

a very high percentage were judged to have met the learning objectives. I attribute this to a couple of reasons:

--the students at Shidler are taking classes they have interest in and have been academically screened for entrance.

--the set up we have where the faculty report on the learning objectives of the class they teach could lend itself to biased reporting. a more objective method may provide more actionable results

12) State how the program used the results or plans to use the results. Please be specific.

the results will be used in discussion with the faculty assessment committee, in our accreditation documentation, and in bettering our assessment capability

13) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries?
This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, program aspects and so on.

14) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.
Or, if the program did engage in assessment activities, please add any other important information here.

I expect a more robust program for Spring 2013