Program: Ocean & Resources Engineering (MS)
Degree: Master's
Date: Tue Oct 09, 2012 - 3:11:48 pm
1) Below are your program's student learning outcomes (SLOs). Please update as needed.
The graduate program in Ocean and Resources Engineering channels the students’ previous education and work experience to ocean-related engineering careers. Students upon graduating from the program will have:
1. A broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context;
2. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and basic engineering topics that include statics, dynamics, fluid mechanics, solid mechanics, and probability and statistics;
3. Proficiency in the core program that comprises hydrostatics, oceanography, water waves, fluid-structure interaction, underwater acoustics, laboratory and at-sea experience;
4. Working knowledge of at least one of the three option areas that include coastal, offshore, and ocean resources engineering;
5. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and latest engineering tools necessary for ocean and resources engineering practice;
6. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve ocean and resources engineering problems;
7. An ability to design and optimize engineering systems to meet the needs of the marine community;
8. An ability to work independently and function on multi-disciplinary teams;
9. An appreciation of professional and ethical responsibilities;
10. An ability to communicate effectively to technical and non-technical audiences;
11. An awareness of the latest research and contemporary issues in and beyond the marine community, and;
12. Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning and continuing professional development.
2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.







3) Select one option:
- File (03/16/2020)
4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.





5) Did your program engage in any program assessment activities between June 1, 2011 and September 30, 2012? (e.g., establishing/revising outcomes, aligning the curriculum to outcomes, collecting evidence, interpreting evidence, using results, revising the assessment plan, creating surveys or tests, etc.)


6) For the period June 1, 2011 to September 30, 2012: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the SLOs that were targeted, if applicable.
Goal: to complete ongoing ABET requirements for the next 6 year review cycle.
7) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question #6.
ongoing assesment or placement of graduates in engineering related positions or continuation on to PhD level work
8) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.
all graduates of the program unwent an exit interview. Data were collected for 100% of the graduating class
9) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)










10) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)







11) For the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goal(s) stated in Question #6:
Summarize the actual results.
all of the graduate of the program either got jobs in engineering/academic related fields or went on to a higher degree program
12) State how the program used the results or plans to use the results. Please be specific.
The results of our ongoing assessment will be used in the next ABET evaluation and will be posted on the website as was the last 250 page ABET report. The department got the best ranking of the 5 engineering departments at UH ungoing the last round of ABET reviews and is fully accredited until 2016
13) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries?
This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, program aspects and so on.
The department has greatly improved according to ABET . All weaknesses and deficiciencies have been addressed and removed. The department is fully accredited. Further, the deparmtent is addressing a major State need by training about half the annual demand for ocean engineers in Hawaii ( the other half coming from mainland universities)
14) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.
Or, if the program did engage in assessment activities, please add any other important information here.
The program works very hard at continual asessment