Unit: Theatre & Dance
Program: Dance (BA), Dance Theatre (BFA)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Mon Nov 22, 2010 - 2:06:11 pm

1) Below are the program student learning outcomes submitted last year. Please add/delete/modify as needed.

BA DANCE -Student Learning Outcomes:

Upon completion of the BFA degree students should have gained, developed and refined essential knowledge, skills and experiences necessary to successfully reach the following learning outcomes

Dance Technique

SLO 1: kinesthetic proficiency and conceptual understanding of various kinds of dance from diverse geographic regions

Performance

SLO 2: ability to effectively engage in the rehearsal process and demonstrate intended stylistic nuances, technically accuracy, musicality and creative intent in dance performance.

Kinesiology / Laban

SLO 3: ability to understand, embody, analyze and communicate structural details of movement

History / Distinction in World Cultures

SLO 4: understanding theoretical, conceptual and or historical aspects of dance

Literacy

SLO 5: Effective oral and written communication skills that demonstrate critical thinking ability and understanding of dance concepts and related topics.

BFA DANCE -Student Learning Outcomes:

Upon completion of the BFA degree students should have gained, developed and refined essential knowledge, skills and experiences necessary to successfully reach the following learning outcomes.

Technique

SLO 1: kinesthetic proficiency and conceptual understanding of various kinds of dance from diverse geographic regions

Performance

SLO 2: ability to effectively engage in the rehearsal process and demonstrate intended stylistic nuances, technical accuracy, musicality and creative intent of dance performance pieces    

Choreography

SLO 3: ability to create original work that effectively communicates creative intent and demonstrates clear understanding of choreographic tools and production elements  

Kinesiology / Laban

SLO 4: ability to understand, embody, analyze and communicate structural details of movement

History

SLO 5: understanding theoretical, conceptual and or historical aspects of dance

Literacy

SLO 6: Effective oral and written communication skills that demonstrate critical thinking ability and understanding of dance concepts and related topics.

2) As of last year, your program's SLOs were published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~uhmdance/
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online:
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online: NA
Other: Final Senior Portfolio Requirements
Other:

3) Below is the link to your program's curriculum map (if submitted in 2009). If it has changed or if we do not have your program's curriculum map, please upload it as a PDF.

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2010:

4) The percentage of courses in 2009 that had course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is indicated below. Please update as needed.

0%
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%

5) State the assessment question(s) and/or goals of the assessment activity. Include the SLOs that were targeted, if applicable.

1. How can the final degree portfolio requirements better align with degree SLOs? (BA, BFA) 

SLO 5: Effective oral and written communication skills that demonstrate critical thinking ability and understanding of dance concepts and related topics.

2. How can students be better prepared for their Senior Projects? (BFA) 

SLO 3: ability to create original work that effectively communicates creative intent and demonstrates clear understanding of choreographic tools and production elements  

3. How can student proficiency in lower level technique classes be best supported? (BA) 

SLO 1: kinesthetic proficiency and conceptual understanding of various kinds of dance from diverse geographic regions

6) State the type(s) of evidence gathered.

1. The portfolio requirements were formally revised. A Faculty member was assigned to 

7) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected?

Course instructor(s)
Faculty committee
Ad hoc faculty group
Department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Faculty advisor
Advisors (in student support services)
Students (graduate or undergraduate)
Dean/Director
Other:

8) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence?

Used a rubric or scoring guide
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
Compiled survey results
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., external organization administered and scored the nursing licensing exam)
Other:

9) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated.
If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

10) Summarize the actual results.

11) How did your program use the results? --or-- Explain planned use of results.
Please be specific.

12) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries? This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, program aspects and so on.

13) Other important information: