Program: Art (BA)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Wed Nov 25, 2020 - 1:15:27 pm
1) Program Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Institutional Learning Objectives (ILOs)
1. BA-Studio: Demonstrate grasp of fundamental skills and concepts relative to the practice of the visual arts, and basic skills and knowledge of several speci?c art media
(2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth)
2. BA-Studio: Demonstrate some creative originality in visual communication and self expression.
(2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth)
3. BA-Studio: Demonstrate a basic understanding and appreciation of the art-historical contexts which formed our present approach to the visual arts.
(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth, 3b. Respect for people and cultures, in particular Hawaiian culture)
4. BA-Studio: Demonstrate a basic ability to analyze the merits of art works and establish an individual sense of aesthetic judgment and standards applicable to the broad range of art.
(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth)
5. BA-Studio: Demonstrate basic abilities in self-presentation and critique.
(2c. Communicate and report, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth, 3d. Civic participation)
6. BA-Art History: Demonstrate a basic grasp of the process of doing research or curatorial work with original artworks in museum and gallery collections.
(2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research)
7. BA-Art History: Demonstrate the ability to research and construct a basic but original art-historical argument.
(2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth)
8. BA-Art History: Demonstrate a broad grasp of the history of art within cultural contexts and a more specialized knowledge of certain periods, cultures, and issues
(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 3b. Respect for people and cultures, in particular Hawaiian culture)
9. BA-Art History: Demonstrate an understanding of basic art historical and critical issues, methods, and theories, and the ability to use them in written work.
(1b. Specialized study in an academic field)
10. BA-Art History: Demonstrate an ability to write in the basic forms of art-historical research, including the formal analysis, the research report, and the critical or analytic argument.
(2b. Conduct research, 2c. Communicate and report, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth, 3d. Civic participation)
11. BFA: Demonstrate command of fundamental skills and concepts relative to the practice of the visual arts, and intermediate to advanced skills and knowledge of a particular art medium or media.
(2b. Conduct research)
12. BFA: Demonstrate some development of individual approaches to and philosophies of art as well as the understanding of traditional modes and paradigms.
(2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth)
13. BFA: Demonstrate an intermediate to advanced understanding and appreciation of the art-historical contexts which formed our present approach to the visual arts.
(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 3b. Respect for people and cultures, in particular Hawaiian culture)
14. BFA: Demonstrate an intermediate to advanced ability to analyze the merits of art works and establish an individual sense of aesthetic judgment and standards applicable to the broad range of art.
(1b. Specialized study in an academic field)
15. BFA: Demonstrate mastery of the professional practices of artists, especially portfolio presentation, exhibition, and the writing of artist's statements; participate in and help organize BFA exhibition.
(2c. Communicate and report, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth, 3d. Civic participation)
2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online:
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online: NA
Other:
3) Please review, add, replace, or delete the existing curriculum map.
- File (09/16/2020)
4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%
5) Does the program have learning achievement results for its program SLOs? (Example of achievement results: "80% of students met expectations on SLO 1.")(check one):
Yes, on some(1-50%) of the program SLOs
Yes, on most(51-99%) of the program SLOs
Yes, on all(100%) of the program SLOs
6) Did your program engage in any program learning assessment activities between November 1, 2018 and October 31, 2020?
No (skip to question 17)
7) What best describes the program-level learning assessment activities that took place for the period November 1, 2018 and October 31, 2020? (Check all that apply.)
Collect/evaluate student work/performance to determine SLO achievement
Collect/analyze student self-reports of SLO achievement via surveys, interviews, or focus groups
Use assessment results to make programmatic decisions (e.g., change course content or pedagogy, design new course, hiring)
Investigate other pressing issue related to student learning achievement for the program (explain in question 8)
Other:
8) Briefly explain the assessment activities that took place since November 2018.
The Assessment Committee, made up of three full time faculty, reviewed a selection of exit portfolios representing the range of media areas in the department.
9) What types of evidence did the program use as part of the assessment activities checked in question 7? (Check all that apply.)
Assignment/exam/paper completed as part of regular coursework and used for program-level assessment
Capstone work product (e.g., written project or non-thesis paper)
Exam created by an external organization (e.g., professional association for licensure)
Exit exam created by the program
IRB approval of research
Oral performance (oral defense, oral presentation, conference presentation)
Portfolio of student work
Publication or grant proposal
Qualifying exam or comprehensive exam for program-level assessment in addition to individual student evaluation (graduate level only)
Supervisor or employer evaluation of student performance outside the classroom (internship, clinical, practicum)
Thesis or dissertation used for program-level assessment in addition to individual student evaluation
Alumni survey that contains self-reports of SLO achievement
Employer meetings/discussions/survey/interview of student SLO achievement
Interviews or focus groups that contain self-reports of SLO achievement
Student reflective writing assignment (essay, journal entry, self-assessment) on their SLO achievement.
Student surveys that contain self-reports of SLO achievement
Assessment-related such as assessment plan, SLOs, curriculum map, etc.
Program or course materials (syllabi, assignments, requirements, etc.)
Other 1:
Other 2:
10) State the number of students (or persons) who submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.
We collected exit portfolios from all graduating BA students via the course "ART 409", a zero credit graduation portfolio submission course. The committee chose ten portfolios, representing the range of areas in the department, taken from both Spring 2018 and Fall 2018.
11) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)
Faculty committee
Ad hoc faculty group
Department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Faculty advisor
Advisors (in student support services)
Students (graduate or undergraduate)
Dean/Director
Other:
12) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
Compiled survey results
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., external organization administered and scored the nursing licensing exam)
Other:
13) Summarize the results from the evaluation, analysis, interpretation of evidence (checked in question 12). For example, report the percentage of students who achieved each SLO.
Students received scores based on a 1-4 point scale rubric. 1 = below average, 2 = average, 3 = good, 4 = excellent. Averages are as follows:
Technique/practice: 3.36
Creativity/originality: 3.25
Knowledge/history: 3.45
Communication/analysis/critique: NA
Professional skills: 3.76
|
BA-Studio |
BA-Art History |
BFA |
MA |
MFA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Technique/ Practice |
Demonstrate grasp of fundamental skills and concepts relative to the practice of the visual arts, and basic skills and knowledge of several specific art media. |
Demonstrate a basic grasp of the process of doing research or curatorial work with original artworks in museum and gallery collections. |
Demonstrate command of fundamental skills and concepts relative to the practice of the visual arts, and intermediate to advanced skills and knowledge of a particular art medium or media. |
Demonstrate an advanced ability to do research or curatorial work with original artworks in museum and gallery collections. |
Demonstrate mastery of advanced skills and knowledge of an art medium or media. |
2 Creativity/Originality |
Demonstrate some creative originality in visual communication and self expression. |
Demonstrate the ability to research and construct a basic but original art-historical argument. |
Demonstrate some development of individual approaches to and philosophies of art as well as the understanding of traditional modes and paradigms. |
Demonstrate the ability to do primary source research and construct an advanced, original art-historical argument. |
Demonstrate the mastery of an original, individual approach to and philosophy of art. |
3 Knowledge/ History |
Demonstrate a basic understanding and appreciation of the art-historical contexts which formed our present approach to the visual arts. |
Demonstrate a broad grasp of the history of art within cultural contexts and a more specialized knowledge of certain periods, cultures, and issues. |
Demonstrate an intermediate to advanced understanding and appreciation of the art-historical contexts which formed our present approach to the visual arts. |
Demonstrate a broad grasp of the history of art within Asian-Pacific cultural contexts and an advanced specialist knowledge of a particular period, culture, and set of related issues. |
Demonstrate an advanced understanding and appreciation of the art-historical contexts which formed our present approach to the visual arts. |
4 Communication/ Analysis/ Critique |
Demonstrate a basic ability to analyze the merits of art works and establish an individual sense of aesthetic judgment and standards applicable to the broad range of art. |
Demonstrate an understanding of basic art historical and critical issues, methods, and theories, and the ability to use them in written work. |
Demonstrate an intermediate to advanced ability to analyze the merits of art works and establish an individual sense of aesthetic judgment and standards applicable to the broad range of art. |
Demonstrate an advanced understanding of art historical and critical issues, methods, and theories, and the ability to apply them in sophisticated ways in written work. |
Demonstrate an advanced ability to analyze the merits of art works and establish an individual sense of aesthetic judgment and standards, and show the ability to position one’s own creative process within the history of art. |
5 Professional Skills |
Demonstrate basic abilities in self-presentation and critique. |
Demonstrate an ability to write in the basic forms of art-historical research, including the formal analysis, the research report, and the critical or analytic argument. |
Demonstrate mastery of the professional practices of artists, especially portfolio presentation, exhibition, and the writing of artist’s statements; participate in and help organize BFA exhibition. |
Write and successfully defend a masters’ thesis in which original primary research forms the foundation for an original argument about art in the student’s area of specialization. |
Organize and hold a successful solo exhibition of original work, conduct a successful oral defense of the exhibition, and write a thesis paper analyzing and supporting the exhibition. |
14) What best describes how the program used the results? (Check all that apply.)
Course changes (course content, pedagogy, courses offered, new course, pre-requisites, requirements)
Personnel or resource allocation changes
Program policy changes (e.g., admissions requirements, student probation policies, common course evaluation form)
Students' out-of-course experience changes (advising, co-curricular experiences, program website, program handbook, brown-bag lunches, workshops)
Celebration of student success!
Results indicated no action needed because students met expectations
Use is pending (typical reasons: insufficient number of students in population, evidence not evaluated or interpreted yet, faculty discussions continue)
Other: Evidence collection has improved, students are given more assistance in documenting their work and formatting their submissions.
15) Please briefly describe how the program used its findings/results.
In an effort to improve the department's ability to assess PLO #4, Communication/analysis/critique, an instructor who is teaching an Oral Communication Focus course in Spring 2021 has agreed to supply the department's Assessment Coordinator with a written assessment of PLO #4 at the end of Spring 2021.
16) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries? This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, and great achievements regarding program assessment in this reporting period.
Students are meeting expectations.