Unit: Information & Computer Science
Program: Info & Comp Sci (BA)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Tue Oct 03, 2017 - 9:06:49 am

1) Institutional Learning Objectives (ILOs) and Program Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)

1. Students can apply knowledge of computing and mathematics appropriate to the discipline

(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field)

2. Students can analyze a problem, and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate to its solution

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively)

3. Students can design, implement, and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component, or program to meet desired needs

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research, 2c. Communicate and report)

4. Students can function effectively on teams to accomplish a common goal

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth, 3d. Civic participation)

5. Students have an understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities

(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 3b. Respect for people and cultures, in particular Hawaiian culture)

6. Students can communicate effectively with a range of audiences

(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2c. Communicate and report)

7. Students can analyze the local and global impact of computing on individuals, organizations, and society

(1a. General education, 1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 3b. Respect for people and cultures, in particular Hawaiian culture)

8. Students can recognize the need for and an ability to engage in continuing professional development

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 3a. Continuous learning and personal growth)

9. Students can use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practice.

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively)

10. An ability to use and apply current technical concepts and practices in the core informationtechnologies. [BA IT only]

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively)

11. An ability to identify and analyze user needs and take them into account in the selection,creation, evaluation and administration of computer-based systems. [BA IT only]

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research)

12. An ability to effectively integrate IT-based solutions into the user environment. [BA IT only]

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively, 2b. Conduct research)

13. An understanding of best practices and standards and their application. [BA IT only]

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively)

14. An ability to assist in the creation of an effective project plan. [BA IT only]

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2c. Communicate and report)

2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL: http://www.ics.hawaii.edu/academics/undergraduate-degree-programs/student-learning-outcomes-undergraduate/
Student Handbook. URL, if available online: http://www.ics.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ics-academic-plan-2015.pdf
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online: http://www.ics.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ics-academic-plan-2015.pdf
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online: http://courses.ics.hawaii.edu/syllabuses/
Other:
Other:

3) Please review, add, replace, or delete the existing curriculum map.

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2017:

4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.

0%
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%

5) Did your program engage in any program learning assessment activities between June 1, 2015 and October 31, 2017?

Yes
No (skip to question 16)

6) What best describes the program-level learning assessment activities that took place for the period June 1, 2015 to October 31, 2017? (Check all that apply.)

Create/modify/discuss program learning assessment procedures (e.g., SLOs, curriculum map, mechanism to collect student work, rubric, survey)
Collect/evaluate student work/performance to determine SLO achievement
Collect/analyze student self-reports of SLO achievement via surveys, interviews, or focus groups
Use assessment results to make programmatic decisions (e.g., change course content or pedagogy, design new course, hiring)
Investigate curriculum coherence. This includes investigating how well courses address the SLOs, course sequencing and adequacy, the effect of pre-requisites on learning achievement.
Investigate other pressing issue related to student learning achievement for the program (explain in question 7)
Other:

7) Briefly explain the assessment activities that took place in the last 28 months.

8) What types of evidence did the program use as part of the assessment activities checked in question 6? (Check all that apply.)

Artistic exhibition/performance
Assignment/exam/paper completed as part of regular coursework and used for program-level assessment
Capstone work product (e.g., written project or non-thesis paper)
Exam created by an external organization (e.g., professional association for licensure)
Exit exam created by the program
IRB approval of research
Oral performance (oral defense, oral presentation, conference presentation)
Portfolio of student work
Publication or grant proposal
Qualifying exam or comprehensive exam for program-level assessment in addition to individual student evaluation (graduate level only)
Supervisor or employer evaluation of student performance outside the classroom (internship, clinical, practicum)
Thesis or dissertation used for program-level assessment in addition to individual student evaluation
Alumni survey that contains self-reports of SLO achievement
Employer meetings/discussions/survey/interview of student SLO achievement
Interviews or focus groups that contain self-reports of SLO achievement
Student reflective writing assignment (essay, journal entry, self-assessment) on their SLO achievement.
Student surveys that contain self-reports of SLO achievement
Assessment-related such as assessment plan, SLOs, curriculum map, etc.
Program or course materials (syllabi, assignments, requirements, etc.)
Other 1:
Other 2:

9) State the number of students (or persons) who submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

10) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)

Course instructor(s)
Faculty committee
Ad hoc faculty group
Department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Faculty advisor
Advisors (in student support services)
Students (graduate or undergraduate)
Dean/Director
Other:

11) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)

Used a rubric or scoring guide
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
Compiled survey results
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., external organization administered and scored the nursing licensing exam)
Other:

12) Summarize the results of the assessment activities checked in question 6. For example, report the percent of students who achieved each SLO.

13) What best describes how the program used the results? (Check all that apply.)

Assessment procedure changes (SLOs, curriculum map, rubrics, evidence collected, sampling, communications with faculty, etc.)
Course changes (course content, pedagogy, courses offered, new course, pre-requisites, requirements)
Personnel or resource allocation changes
Program policy changes (e.g., admissions requirements, student probation policies, common course evaluation form)
Students' out-of-course experience changes (advising, co-curricular experiences, program website, program handbook, brown-bag lunches, workshops)
Celebration of student success!
Results indicated no action needed because students met expectations
Use is pending (typical reasons: insufficient number of students in population, evidence not evaluated or interpreted yet, faculty discussions continue)
Other:

14) Please briefly describe how the program used the results.

15) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries? This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, and great achievements regarding program assessment in this reporting period.

16) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.