Unit: Information Technology Management
Program: Management Information Sys (BBA)
Degree: Bachelor's
Date: Wed Sep 24, 2014 - 4:59:44 pm

1) Institutional Learning Objectives (ILOs) and Program Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs)

1. Objective 1: Students can write programs that involve use of variables, expressions, branching, loops, arrays, and functions

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field)

2. Objective 2: Students can conceptualize, plan, design, and implement a basic application from basic requirements

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively)

3. Objective 3:  Students can describe the major activities of software project management, including techniques for managing and documenting these activities.

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field)

4. Objective 4: Students can properly determine what kind of database architecture to use for a given problem, considering costs and benefits.

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively)

5. Objective 5:  A student can properly determine what kind of network design/architecture to use for a given problem, considering costs and benefits.

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2a. Think critically and creatively)

6. Objective 6: Students can properly describe key characteristics of IT management functions in businesses and firms.

(1b. Specialized study in an academic field, 2c. Communicate and report)

2) Your program's SLOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.

Department Website URL:
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure URL, if available online:
UHM Catalog. Page Number:
Course Syllabi. URL, if available online: NA
Other:
Other:

3) Select one option:

Curriculum Map File(s) from 2014:

4) For your program, the percentage of courses that have course SLOs explicitly stated on the syllabus, a website, or other publicly available document is as follows. Please update as needed.

0%
1-50%
51-80%
81-99%
100%

5) Did your program engage in any program assessment activities between June 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014? (e.g., establishing/revising outcomes, aligning the curriculum to outcomes, collecting evidence, interpreting evidence, using results, revising the assessment plan, creating surveys or tests, etc.)

Yes
No (skip to question 14)

6) For the period between June 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the SLOs that were targeted, if applicable.

Students can write programs that involve use of variables, expressions, branching, loops, arrays, and functions 

Students can conceptualize, plan, design, and implement a basic application from basic requirements 

Students can describe the major activities of software project management, including techniques for managing and documenting these activities.

Students can properly determine what kind of database architecture to use for a given problem, considering costs and benefits.

A student can properly determine what kind of network design/architecture to use for a given problem, considering costs and benefits.

Students can properly describe key characteristics of IT management functions in businesses and firms.

7) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question #6.

departmental compliance on assessment collection was not optimum as some of the courses used were not offered this year.  a random selection of students was assessed on objectives 1-3

8) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.

2 professors submitted assessment of 11 students

9) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? (Check all that apply.)

Course instructor(s)
Faculty committee
Ad hoc faculty group
Department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Faculty advisor
Advisors (in student support services)
Students (graduate or undergraduate)
Dean/Director
Other:

10) How did they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? (Check all that apply.)

Used a rubric or scoring guide
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
Compiled survey results
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., external organization administered and scored the nursing licensing exam)
Other:

11) For the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goal(s) stated in Question #6:
Summarize the actual results.

all measured goals were met

12) State how the program used the results or plans to use the results. Please be specific.

they will be discussed in a departmental meeting.

13) Beyond the results, were there additional conclusions or discoveries?
This can include insights about assessment procedures, teaching and learning, program aspects and so on.

it was discussed that 6 objectives for this major is cumbersome and perhaps needs simplification

14) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.
Or, if the program did engage in assessment activities, please add any other important information here.

n/a