Program: Student Services
Date: Fri Sep 27, 2013 - 10:36:10 am
1) Below are your program's student outcomes (SOs). Please add or update as needed.
A. Use MYUH, STAR, Catalog, Schedule of Classes, and/or program sheets to identify and understand program requirements.
B. Design a reasonable and timely academic plan that leads to a Bachelor degree in a desired field.
C. Identify academic, career, and life goals that incorporate his/her personal values, interests, and aptitudes, and skills.
D. Come to academic advising sessions prepared with questions, an academic plan, and/or other relevant materials.
E. Locate and effectively use information and resources to help them achieve their educational goals.
2) Your program's SOs are published as follows. Please update as needed.
Student Handbook. URL, if available online:
Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure. URL, if available online: /www.soest.hawaii.edu/soest_web/education_docs/Advising_Sheets/advising_syllabus_Fall_2013.pdf
UHM Catalog. Page Number: 287
Other:
Other:
3) Provide the program's activity map or other graphic that illustrates how program activities/services align with program student outcomes. Please upload it as a PDF.
- File (09/27/2013)
4) Did your program engage in any program assessment activities between June 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013? (e.g., establishing/revising outcomes, aligning activities to outcomes, collecting evidence, interpreting evidence, using results, revising the assessment plan, creating surveys, etc.)
No (skip to question 14)
5) For the period June 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the student outcomes that were targeted, if applicable.
6) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question #5.
7) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.
8) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected? Check all that apply.
Faculty/staff committee
Ad hoc faculty/staff group
Director or department chairperson
Persons or organization outside the university
Students (graduate or undergraduate)
Dean or Associate Dean
Advisory Board
Other:
9) How did he/she/they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? Check all that apply.
Used quantitative methods on student data (e.g., grades, participation rates) or other numeric data
Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, or other open-ended response data
Scored exams/tests/quizzes
Used a rubric or scoring guide
Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used)
External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., Social Science Research Institute)
Other:
10) For the assessment questions/goals stated in Question #5, summarize the actual results.
11) What was learned from the results?
12) State how the program used the results or plans to use the results. Please be specific.
13) Reflect on the assessment process. Is there anything related to assessment procedures your program would do differently next time? What went well?
14) If the program did not engage in assessment activities, please explain.
Or, if the program did engage in assessment activities, please add any other important information here.
The program was part of a school-wide review conducted by a team of external reviewers between April 15 and April 19. The full report is available at: http://manoa.hawaii.edu/ovcaa/program_review/pdf/SOEST_Final%20Report.pdf