Unit: Office of the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs
Program: Honors
Date: Thu Sep 22, 2011 - 12:44:03 pm
Program: Honors
Date: Thu Sep 22, 2011 - 12:44:03 pm
1) List your program's student outcomes.
Selected Studies Student Learning Outcomes
The Honors Program has identified a set of specific outcomes for students who complete the Selected Studies program. Students who earn Sophomore Honors will be able to:
- Show an understanding of the diverse nature of scholarship in the university;
- Articulate clearly a sound argument in written and oral form;
- Synthesize and analyze information from a variety of sources;
- Conduct basic bibliographical, historical and geographical research;
- Engage purposefully in leadership/service, mentorship and/or multi-cultural/intercultural activities.
Upper Division Honors Program Student Learning Outcomes
The Honors Program has identified a set of specific outcomes for students who complete the upper division component of the Honors Program. Honors degree candidates will be able to:
- Write and publicly defend a proposal for the Senior Honors Project;
- Conduct independent scholarly work of professional or near professional quality in their field;
- Report research in oral and poster presentations in the format expected at professional academic conferences;
- Engage purposefully in scholarship, leadership/service, and/or multi-cultural/intercultural activities outside of the classroom.
2) Where are your program's student outcomes published? Mark all that apply and include URLs when appropriate.
Program's Website. URL: http://www.honors.hawaii.edu/programs/standards/slo.html
Student Handbook. URL, if available online: Information Sheet, Flyer, or Brochure. URL, if available online: UHM Catalog. Page Number: Other: Honors course syllabi Other: 3) Provide the program's activity map or other graphic that illustrates how program activities/services align with program student outcomes. Please upload it as a PDF.
Activity Map File(s) from 2011:
- File (09/22/2011)
4) For the period June 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011: State the assessment question(s) and/or assessment goals. Include the student outcomes that were targeted, if applicable.
5) State the type(s) of evidence gathered to answer the assessment question and/or meet the assessment goals that were given in Question 4.
6) State how many persons submitted evidence that was evaluated. If applicable, please include the sampling technique used.
7) Who interpreted or analyzed the evidence that was collected. Check all that apply.
Program faculty/staff Faculty/staff committee Ad hoc faculty/staff group Director or department chairperson Persons or organization outside the university Students (graduate or undergraduate) Dean Other 8) How did he/she/they evaluate, analyze, or interpret the evidence? Check all that apply.
Compiled survey results Used qualitative methods on interview, focus group, open-ended response data Scored exams/tests/quizzes Used a rubric or scoring guide Used professional judgment (no rubric or scoring guide used) External organization/person analyzed data (e.g., Social Science Research Institute) Other: