UROP Presentation Rubric

All UROP Presentation applications are reviewed by members of the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Council (UROC) and/or ad hoc faculty reviewers from UHM based on the criteria shown in the UROP Presentation Rubric below. Once the application evaluation and scoring are complete, the sum of all scores will be divided by 6 (the total number of criteria) to create a score on a 4.0 scale. All required components must be included for application funding consideration.

Criterion/Score

4

3

2

1

0

Abstract / Significance

The abstract is clear and understandable to those outside the field

The abstract is sufficiently clear and understandable to those outside the field

The abstract is somewhat clear and understandable to those outside the field

The abstract is not clear and understandable to those outside the field

No Abstract / Significance

Rationale for Conference/Event/etc.

 

Rationale for the value of participation is clear

Rationale for the value of participation is sufficient

Rationale for the value of participation is insufficient

Rationale for the value of participation is poor

No Rationale for conference / event / etc.

Applicant’s Role

Applicant’s role will clearly facilitate a positive learning outcome

Applicant’s role will sufficiently facilitate  a positive learning outcome

Applicant’s role will somewhat facilitate a positive learning outcome

Applicant’s role will not facilitate a positive learning outcome

No Applicant’s Role

Budget

Projected items and expenses are clearly justified

Projected items and expenses are sufficiently justified

Projected items and expenses are somewhat justified

Projected items and expenses are not justified

No Budget

Presentation Recommendation Form

Evaluations clearly show mentor’s support of the student and reflect high quality of the proposed presentation

Evaluations sufficiently show mentor’s support of the student and reflect good quality of the proposed presentation

Evaluations somewhat show mentor’s support of the student and reflect moderate quality of the proposed presentation

Evaluations do not show mentor’s support of the student and reflect poor quality of the proposed presentation

No Presentation Evaluation

GPA

The scoring for grade-point average utilizes the 4.0 scale for the applicant’s cumulative academic record, including all transfer credits.

Back To Top
X