Technical Report #170. Ragone, D. and L.H. Lorence. November 2006. Botanical and ethnobotanical inventories of the National Park of American Samoa

18 MB

In order to view these files properly you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher.  Click on the Adobe icon to download

 

ABSTRACT:
The establishment of the National Park of American Samoa (NPSA) was authorized by an Act of Congress in 1988 to “preserve and protect the tropical forest and archaeological and cultural resources of American Samoa, and of associated coral reefs, to maintain the habitat of flying foxes, preserve the ecological balance of the Samoan tropical forest, and consistent with the preservation of these resources, to provide for the enjoyment of the unique resources of the tropical Samoa forest by visitors from around the world.”

The National Park Service (NPS) was also directed to maintain traditional Samoan customs within the Park and to permit traditional subsistence uses in the Park, with certain conditions (NPS 1997). Agriculture, gathering, or fishing within the Park are restricted to native American Samoans and are limited in scope and location. They must be carried out in areas customarily used for these purposes, employing traditional tools and methods.

The concept of fa’asamoa is integral to managing the Park’s natural and cultural resources. Fa’asamoa means the traditional Samoan way of life: respecting and adhering to the traditions and customs of the Samoan culture. The matai system of lawful, chiefly authority is one of the most important components of fa’asamoa.

The vegetation of the islands of American Samoa has been extensively studied (Setchell 1924; Christophersen 1935, 1938; Amerson et al. 1982; Cole et al. 1988; Whistler 1980, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1998). Several of these studies (Whistler 1980, 1995;Amerson et al. 1982) have included the collection of quantitative data in various vegetation communities, including some areas now within the boundaries of the Park. Whistler (1980) and Amerson et al. (1982) established linear survey routes and/or inventoried 41 study sites, including 20 on Tutuila, 10 on Ta’u, four on Olosega, and two on Ofu. Due to time limitations, 13 of the 41 sites were not sampled with plots; instead, diameter at breast height (dbh) was estimated for a random number of trees with no actual measurements taken. The major emphasis of the study was on trees, but information on ground covers and epiphytes was also recorded.

Title page, table of contents

 780 KB

Introduction

297 KB

Methods, results, summary, acknowledgements

7.5 MB

References cited

202 KB

Appendices

 10 MB

You are visitor number  free website stats program